XML 33 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill
Goodwill

The changes in goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 for each reporting unit are shown in the table below:
  
Banking
 
Financial Services
 
Total
December 31, 2013:


 


 


Goodwill
$
40,902

 
$
7,474

 
$
48,376

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(3,570
)
 
(3,570
)
Reported goodwill
40,902

 
3,904

 
44,806

2014 activity

 

 

December 31, 2014:
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
40,902

 
7,474

 
48,376

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(3,570
)
 
(3,570
)
Reported goodwill
40,902

 
3,904

 
44,806

2015 activity(1)
50,851

 

 
50,851

December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
91,753

 
7,474

 
99,227

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(3,570
)
 
(3,570
)
Reported goodwill
$
91,753

 
$
3,904

 
$
95,657


(1)
On October 16, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of SBM and goodwill of $50.9 million was generated. Refer to Note 2 for additional details and discussion.

The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment assessment as of November 30th, and at interim periods if indicators of potential impairment exist. The Company's annual goodwill impairment assessment as of November 30, 2015 included the goodwill generated from the SBM acquisition of $50.9 million for the banking reporting unit. The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of November 30, 2015 and 2014 for each reporting unit and passed step one. As such, step two of the goodwill impairment test was not performed and no goodwill impairment was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2015 or 2014.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $2.8 million associated with its financial services reporting unit. The Company engaged an independent valuation firm to assist with its November 30, 2013 goodwill impairment assessment for the financial services reporting unit as qualitative factors suggested that it was more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. These qualitative factors included a decline in the revenue base as the result of (i) a decision to focus on the Company’s core business of managing assets and administering trusts for families and local nonprofit organizations resulting in a lower revenue base by increasing account minimums and transferring smaller relationships to affiliates; and (ii) divesting the employee benefits product line. Also in the fourth quarter of 2013, new information became available resulting in the Company refining its approach of who represents a market participant for the financial services reporting unit and reassessing the valuation implications imposed by the required regulatory capital requirements.

The Company performed the two-step goodwill impairment test in accordance with GAAP. In performing step one, two separate valuation methodologies were used to determine the fair value of the financial services reporting unit: (i) a discounted cash flow valuation technique (income approach); and (ii) a comparison of the price to revenue and assets under management of comparable market participant transactions (market approach). Both methods indicated the fair value of the financial services reporting unit was less than its carrying value. Step two of the analysis was then performed, and the results indicated the financial services reporting unit goodwill was impaired as the implied fair value of goodwill was less than its carrying value. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $2.8 million related to the financial services reporting unit included within non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2013. The impairment was caused by lower forecasted revenue, an increase in the discount rate, the anticipated market participants and increased regulatory driven operating costs and capital levels required by potential market participants which impacts the valuation metrics.
7. Other Intangible Assets

The changes in core deposit intangible and trust relationship intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are shown in the table below:
 
 
Core Deposit Intangible
 
Trust Relationship Intangible
  
 
Total
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Total
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
Balance at December 31, 2013
 
$
17,300

 
$
(13,088
)
 
$
4,212

 
$
753

 
$
(452
)
 
$
301

2014 activity
 

 
(1,073
)
 
(1,073
)
 

 
(75
)
 
(75
)
Balance at December 31, 2014
 
17,300

 
(14,161
)
 
3,139

 
753

 
(527
)
 
226

2015 activity
 
6,608

 
(1,231
)
 
5,377

 

 
(75
)
 
(75
)
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
23,908

 
$
(15,392
)
 
$
8,516

 
$
753

 
$
(602
)
 
$
151

Total carrying value of other intangible assets at December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,365

Total carrying value of other intangible assets at December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
8,667



On October 16, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of SBM and, in doing so, recorded core deposit intangible assets of $6.6 million. The core deposit intangible assets will amortize over a 10 year period using an accelerated depreciation method that aligns with the estimated economic benefit of the asset. The weighted-average amortization period for these intangible assets was 4.9 years.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded amortization expense of $1.3 million, $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

The following table reflects the expected amortization schedule for intangible assets over the period of estimated economic benefit (assuming no additional intangible assets are created or impaired):
 
Core Deposit
Intangible
 
Trust Relationship
Intangible
 
Total
2016
$
1,828

 
$
75

 
$
1,903

2017
1,735

 
76

 
1,811

2018
725

 

 
725

2019
705

 

 
705

2020
682

 

 
682

Thereafter
2,841

 

 
2,841

Total
8,516

 
151

 
8,667