Note 12 - Fair Value Election and Measurement

The Company carries certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis and appropriately classifies them as level 1, 2, or 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s recurring fair value measurements are based on a requirement to carry such assets and liabilities at fair value or the Company’s election to carry certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Assets and liabilities that are required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis include trading securities, securities AFS, and derivative financial instruments. Assets and liabilities that the Company has elected to carry at fair value on a recurring basis include certain LHFI and LHFS, MSRs, certain brokered deposits, and certain issuances of fixed rate debt.

In certain circumstances, fair value enables a company to more accurately align its financial performance with the economic value of actively traded or hedged assets or liabilities. Fair value also enables a company to mitigate the non-economic earnings volatility caused from financial assets and financial liabilities being carried at different bases of accounting, as well as to more accurately portray the active and dynamic management of a company’s balance sheet.

The classification of an instrument as level 3 versus 2 involves judgment and is based on a variety of subjective factors in order to assess whether a market is inactive, resulting in the application of significant unobservable assumptions to value a financial instrument. A market is considered inactive if significant decreases in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have been observed. In determining whether a market is inactive, the Company evaluates such factors as the number of recent transactions in either the primary or secondary markets, whether price quotations are current, the nature of the market participants, the variability of price quotations, the significance of bid/ask spreads, declines in (or the absence of) new issuances and the availability of public information. Inactive markets necessitate the use of additional judgment when valuing financial instruments, such as pricing matrices, cash flow modeling, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. The assumptions used to estimate the value of an instrument where the market was inactive are based on the Company’s assessment of the assumptions a market participant would use to value the instrument in an orderly transaction and include considerations of illiquidity in the current market environment.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present certain information regarding assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the changes in fair value for those specific financial instruments in which fair value has been elected.


			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011 Using
(Dollars in millions)	Assets/Liabilities		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Trading assets
U.S. Treasury securities		$127		$127		$-		$-
Federal agency securities		504		-		504		-
U.S. states and political subdivisions		42		-		42		-
MBS - agency		271		-		271		-
MBS - private		2		-		-		2
CDO securities		44		-		2		42
ABS		37		-		32		5
Corporate and other debt securities		806		-		806		-
CP		129		-		129		-
Equity securities		91		-		78		13
Derivative contracts		2,952		212		2,740		-
Trading loans		1,581		-		1,581		-

Total trading assets		6,586		339		6,185		62


Securities AFS
U.S. Treasury securities		726		726		-		-
Federal agency securities		2,566		-		2,566		-
U.S. states and political subdivisions		516		-		448		68
MBS - agency		19,331		-		19,331		-
MBS - private		311		-		-		311
CDO securities		337		-		337		-
ABS		625		-		606		19
Corporate and other debt securities		56		-		51		5
Coke common stock		2,019		2,019		-		-
Other equity securities ²		729		-		132		597

Total securities AFS		27,216		2,745		23,471		1,000

LHFS
Residential loans		1,596		-		1,593		3
Corporate and other loans		329		-		329		-

Total LHFS		1,925		-		1,922		3

LHFI		449		-		-		449
MSRs		1,423		-		-		1,423
Other assets ¹		198		1		167		30

Liabilities
Trading liabilities
U.S. Treasury securities		509		509		-		-
Federal agency securities		1		-		1		-
Corporate and other debt securities		359		-		359		-
Equity securities		14		14		-		-
Derivative contracts		2,143		149		1,840		154

Total trading liabilities		3,026		672		2,200		154


Brokered deposits		1,140		-		1,140		-
Long-term debt		2,022		-		2,022		-
Other liabilities ¹		42		-		24		18

¹	These amounts include IRLCs and derivative financial instruments entered into by the Mortgage line of business to hedge its interest rate risk along with a derivative associated with the Company’s sale of Visa shares during the year ended December 31, 2009.

²	Includes $205 million of FHLB of Atlanta stock stated at par value and $391 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock stated at par value.

		00000000000000000		00000000000000000		00000000000000000		00000000000000000
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using
(Dollars in millions)	Assets/Liabilities		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Trading assets
U.S. Treasury securities		$187		$187		$-		$-
Federal agency securities		361		-		361		-
U.S. states and political subdivisions		123		-		123		-
MBS - agency		301		-		301		-
MBS - private		15		-		9		6
CDO securities		55		-		2		53
ABS		59		-		32		27
Corporate and other debt securities		743		-		743		-
CP		14		-		14		-
Equity securities		221		-		98		123
Derivative contracts		2,743		166		2,577		-
Trading loans		1,353		-		1,353		-

Total trading assets		6,175		353		5,613		209


Securities AFS
U.S. Treasury securities		5,516		5,516		-		-
Federal agency securities		1,895		-		1,895		-
U.S. states and political subdivisions		579		-		505		74
MBS - agency		14,358		-		14,358		-
MBS - private		347		-		-		347
CDO securities		50		-		50		-
ABS		808		-		788		20
Corporate and other debt securities		482		-		477		5
Coke common stock		1,973		1,973		-		-
Other equity securities ²		887		-		197		690

Total securities AFS		26,895		7,489		18,270		1,136

LHFS
Residential loans		2,847		-		2,845		2
Corporate and other loans		321		-		316		5

Total LHFS		3,168		-		3,161		7

LHFI		492		-		-		492
MSRs		1,439		-		-		1,439
Other assets ¹		241		-		223		18

Liabilities
Trading liabilities
U.S. Treasury securities		439		439		-		-
Corporate and other debt securities		398		-		398		-
Derivative contracts		1,841		120		1,576		145

Total trading liabilities		2,678		559		1,974		145


Brokered deposits		1,213		-		1,213		-
Long-term debt		2,837		-		2,837		-
Other liabilities ¹		114		-		72		42

These amounts include IRLCs and derivative financial instruments entered into by the Mortgage line of business to hedge its interest rate risk along with a derivative associated with the Company’s sale of Visa shares during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Includes $298 million of FHLB of Atlanta stock stated at par value and $391 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock stated at par value.

The following tables present the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of trading assets, LHFI, LHFS, brokered deposits, and long-term debt instruments for which the FVO has been elected. For LHFI and LHFS for which the FVO has been elected, the tables also include the difference between aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans that are 90 days or more past due, as well as loans in nonaccrual status.


(Dollars in millions)	Aggregate Fair Value June 30, 2011		Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance under FVO June 30, 2011		Fair Value Over/(Under) Unpaid Principal

Trading loans		$1,581		$1,558		$23
LHFS		1,917		1,886		31
Past due loans of 90 days or more		7		7		-
Nonaccrual loans		1		8		(7)
LHFI		419		470		(51)
Past due loans of 90 days or more		3		5		(2)
Nonaccrual loans		27		48		(21)
Brokered deposits		1,140		1,107		33
Long-term debt		2,022		1,901		121

(Dollars in millions)	Aggregate Fair Value December 31, 2010		Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance under FVO December 31, 2010		Fair Value Over/(Under) Unpaid Principal

Trading loans		$1,353		$1,320		$33
LHFS		3,160		3,155		5
Past due loans of 90 days or more		2		2		-
Nonaccrual loans		6		25		(19)
LHFI		462		517		(55)
Past due loans of 90 days or more		2		4		(2)
Nonaccrual loans		28		54		(26)
Brokered deposits		1,213		1,188		25
Long-term debt		2,837		2,753		84

The following tables present the change in fair value during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 of financial instruments for which the FVO has been elected, as well as MSRs that are accounted for at fair value in accordance with applicable fair value accounting guidance. The tables do not reflect the change in fair value attributable to the related economic hedges the Company used to mitigate the market-related risks associated with the financial instruments. The changes in the fair value of economic hedges are also recognized in trading account profits and commissions, mortgage production related income/(loss), or mortgage servicing related income, as appropriate, and are designed to partially offset the change in fair value of the financial instruments referenced in the tables below. The Company’s economic hedging activities are deployed at both the instrument and portfolio level.


	Fair Value Gain/(Loss) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011, for Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to Election of the FVO								Fair Value Gain/(Loss) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 for Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to Election of the FVO
(Dollars in millions)	Trading Account Profits/(Losses) and Commissions		Mortgage Production Related Income ²		Mortgage Servicing Related Income		Total Changes in Fair Values Included in Current- Period Earnings¹		Trading Account Profits/(Losses) and Commissions		Mortgage Production Related Income ²		Mortgage Servicing Related Income		Total Changes in Fair Values Included in Current Period Earnings¹

Assets
Trading assets		$5		$-		$-		$5		$12		$-		$-		$12
LHFS		(4)		119		-		115		(2)		149		-		147
LHFI		-		-		-		-		3		(4)		-		(1)
MSRs		-		2		(162)		(160)		-		4		(145)		(141)
Liabilities
Brokered deposits		8		-		-		8		(3)		-		-		(3)
Long-term debt		(21)		-		-		(21)		(38)		-		-		(38)

¹Changes in fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, exclude accrued interest for the periods then ended. Interest income or interest expense on trading assets, LHFS, LHFI, brokered deposits and long-term debt that have been elected to be carried at fair value are recorded in interest income or interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) based on their contractual coupons. Certain trading assets do not have a contractually stated coupon and, for these securities, the Company records interest income based on the effective yield calculated upon acquisition of the securities.

²For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, income related to LHFS includes $46 million and $132 million, respectively, related to MSRs recognized upon the sale of loans reported at fair value. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, income related to MSRs includes $2 million and $4 million, respectively, of MSRs recognized upon the sale of loans reported at LOCOM. These MSRs are included in the table since the Company elected to report MSRs recognized in 2009 using the fair value method. Previously, MSRs were reported under the amortized cost method.


	Fair Value Gain/(Loss) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010, for Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to Election of the FVO								Fair Value Gain/(Loss) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010, for Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to Election of the FVO
(Dollars in millions)	Trading Account Profits/(Losses) and Commissions		Mortgage Production Related Income/(Loss)²		Mortgage Servicing Related Income		Total Changes in Fair Values Included in Current Period Earnings¹		Trading Account Profits/(Losses) and Commissions		Mortgage Production Related Income/(Loss)²		Mortgage Servicing Related Income		Total Changes in Fair Values Included in Current Period Earnings¹

Assets
Trading assets		($4)		$-		$-		($4)		($3)		$-		$-		($3)
LHFS		(4)		200		-		196		7		292		-		299
LHFI		(2)		8		-		6		(2)		8		-		6
MSRs		-		2		(411)		(409)		-		6		(520)		(514)
Liabilities
Brokered deposits		23		-		-		23		(8)		-		-		(8)
Long-term debt		(39)		-		-		(39)		(125)		-		-		(125)

¹Changes in fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, exclude accrued interest for the periods then ended. Interest income or interest expense on trading assets, LHFS, LHFI, brokered deposits and long-term debt that have been elected to be carried at fair value are recorded in interest income or interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) based on their contractual coupons. Certain trading assets do not have a contractually stated coupon and, for these securities, the Company records interest income based on the effective yield calculated upon acquisition of those securities.

²For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, income related to LHFS, includes $65 million and $128 million, respectively, related to MSRs recognized upon the sale of loans reported at fair value. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, income related to MSRs includes $3 million and $6 million, respectively, of MSRs recognized upon the sale of loans reported at LOCOM. These MSRs are included in the table since the Company elected to report MSRs recognized in 2009 using the fair value method. Previously, MSRs were reported under the amortized cost method.

The following is a discussion of the valuation techniques and inputs used in developing fair value measurements for assets and liabilities classified as level 2 or 3 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, based on the class as determined by the nature and risks of the instrument.

Trading Assets and Securities Available for Sale

Unless otherwise indicated, trading assets are priced by the trading desk and independently validated against pricing received from third party pricing sources; securities AFS are valued by an independent third party pricing service that is widely used by market participants. The Company classifies instruments as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy when it is able to determine that external pricing sources are using similar instruments trading in the markets as the basis for estimating fair value.

Federal agency securities

The Company includes in this classification securities issued by federal agencies and GSEs. For SBA instruments, the Company estimated fair value based on pricing from observable trading activity for similar securities or obtained fair values from a third party pricing service; accordingly, the Company has classified these instruments as level 2.

U.S. states and political subdivisions

The Company’s investments in U.S. states and political subdivisions (collectively “municipals”) include obligations of county and municipal authorities and agency bonds, which are general obligations of the municipality or are supported by a specified revenue source. Holdings were geographically dispersed, with no significant concentrations in any one state or municipality. Additionally, all but an insignificant amount of AFS municipal obligations classified as level 2 are highly rated or are otherwise collateralized by securities backed by the full faith and credit of the federal government.

Level 3 municipal securities includes ARS purchased since the auction rate market began failing in February 2008 and have been considered level 3 securities due to the significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in these markets, which has necessitated the use of significant unobservable inputs into the Company’s valuations. Municipal ARS are classified as securities AFS. These securities were valued using comparisons to similar ARS for which auctions are currently successful and/or to longer term, non-ARS issued by similar municipalities. The Company also looked at the relative strength of the municipality and made appropriate downward adjustments in price based on the credit rating of the municipality as well as the relative financial strength of the insurer on those bonds. Although auctions for several municipal ARS have been operating successfully, ARS owned by the Company at June 30, 2011 continued to be classified as level 3 as they are those ARS for which the auctions continued to fail; accordingly, due to the uncertainty around the success rates for auctions and the absence of any successful auctions for these identical securities, the Company continued to price the ARS below par.

Level 3 AFS municipal bond securities also include bonds that are only redeemable with the issuer at par and cannot be traded in the market. As such, no significant observable market data for these instruments is available. In order to estimate pricing on these securities, the Company utilized a third party municipal bond yield curve for the lowest investment grade bonds (BBB rated) and priced each bond based on the yield associated with that maturity.

MBS – agency

MBS – agency includes pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by GSEs and U.S. government agencies, such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. Each security contains a guarantee by the issuing GSE or agency. For agency MBS, the Company estimated fair value based on pricing from observable trading activity for similar securities or obtained fair values from a third party pricing service; accordingly, the Company has classified these instruments as level 2.

MBS – private

Private-label MBS includes purchased interests in third party securitizations as well as retained interests in Company-sponsored securitizations of residential mortgages. Generally, the Company attempts to obtain pricing for its securities from an independent pricing service or third party brokers who have experience in valuing certain investments. This pricing may be used as either direct support for the Company’s valuations or used to validate outputs from its own proprietary models. The Company evaluates third party pricing to determine the reasonableness of the information relative to changes in market data, such as any recent trades, market information received from outside market participants and analysts, and/or changes in the underlying collateral performance. When actual trades are not available to corroborate pricing information received, the Company uses industry-standard or proprietary models to estimate fair value and considers assumptions that are generally not observable in the current markets or that are not specific to the securities that the Company owns, such as relevant market indices that correlate to the underlying collateral, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates and discount rates. As liquidity returns to these markets, we have seen more pricing information from third parties and a reduction in the need to use internal pricing models to estimate fair value. Even though limited third party pricing has been available, the Company continued to classify private-label MBS as level 3, as the Company believes that this third party pricing relied on a significant amount of unobservable assumptions, as evidenced by a persistently wide bid-ask price range, particularly for the vintage and exposures held by the Company.

Securities that are classified as AFS and are in an unrealized loss position are included as part of our quarterly OTTI evaluation process. See Note 2, “Securities Available for Sale,” for details regarding assumptions used to assess impairment and impairment amounts recognized through earnings on private-label MBS during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

CDO Securities

Level 2 securities AFS consists of senior interests in third party CLOs for which independent broker pricing based on market trades and/or from new issuance of similar assets is readily available. At June 30, 2011, the Company’s investments in level 3 trading CDOs consisted of senior ARS interests in Company-sponsored securitizations of trust preferred collateral totaling $42 million. In the first quarter of 2011, the Company sold the remaining securities within trading assets that were received upon the liquidation of one of the Company’s SIV investments, which included $21 million of CDO securities. In addition, the Company’s $20 million retained interest in a structured participation of commercial loans was liquidated through the exercise of the Company’s clean up call. For the remaining CDOs classified as level 3 trading assets, increases in the value of these interests during the six months ending June 30, 2011 was due primarily to a steady recovery in the broader CDO market. For the ARS CDO interests, although market conditions have improved, the auctions continued to fail and the Company continues to make significant adjustments to valuation assumptions available from observable secondary market trading of similar term securities; therefore, the Company continued to classify these as level 3 investments.

Asset-backed securities

Level 2 ABS classified as securities AFS are primarily interests collateralized by third party securitizations of 2009 through 2011 vintage auto loans. These ABS are either publicly traded or are 144A privately placed bonds. The Company utilizes an independent pricing service to obtain fair values for publicly traded securities and similar securities for estimating the fair value of the privately placed bonds. No significant unobservable assumptions were used in pricing the auto loan ABS; therefore, the Company classified these bonds as level 2. Additionally, the Company classified $32 million of trading ARS and $74 million of AFS ARS collateralized by government guaranteed student loans as level 2 due to observable market trades and bids for similar senior securities. Student loan ABS held by the Company are generally collateralized by Federal Family Education Loan Program student loans, the majority of which benefit from a 97% (or higher) government guarantee of principal and interest. For subordinate securities in the same structure, the Company adjusts valuations on the senior securities based on the likelihood that the issuer will refinance in the near term, a security’s level of subordination in the structure, and/or the perceived risk of the issuer as determined by credit ratings or total leverage of the trust. These adjustments may be significant; therefore, the subordinate student loan ARS held as trading assets continue to be classified as level 3.

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company sold the remaining ABS related to the assets acquired in 2007, including those received in the SIV liquidation that occurred in December 2010. This included $31 million of level 3 trading ABS collateralized by auto loans and home equity lines of credit.

Corporate and other debt securities

Corporate debt securities are predominantly comprised of senior and subordinate debt obligations of domestic corporations. Other debt securities in level 3 include bonds that are redeemable with the issuer at par and cannot be traded in the market; as such, no significant observable market data for these instruments is available.

Commercial paper

From time to time, the Company trades third party CP that is generally short-term in nature (less than 30 days) and highly rated. The Company estimates the fair value of the CP that it trades based on observable pricing from executed trades of similar instruments.

Equity securities

Level 2 equity securities, both trading and AFS, consist primarily of money market mutual funds that trade at a $1 net asset value, which is considered the fair market value of those fund shares.

Level 3 equity securities classified as trading include nonmarketable preferred shares in municipal funds issued as ARS that the Company has purchased since the auction rate market began failing in February 2008. The fair value of ARS recorded in trading equity securities declined to $13 million as of June 30, 2011 compared to $123 million as of December 31, 2010 due to issuer redemptions. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized gains of $4 million and $12 million, respectively from redemptions of these ARS at par. These ARS have been considered level 3 securities due to the significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in these markets, which has necessitated the use of significant unobservable inputs into the Company’s valuations. Valuation of these shares is based on the level of issuer redemptions at par that have occurred as well as discussions with the dealer community.

Level 3 equity securities classified as securities AFS include, as of June 30, 2011, $597 million of FHLB stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock, which are redeemable with the issuer at par and cannot be traded in the market. As such, no significant observable market data for these instruments is available. The Company accounts for the stock based on the industry guidance that requires these investments be carried at cost and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recovery of par value. During the second quarter, the FHLB of Atlanta repurchased $93 million of its stock, which accounts for the decline in level 3 equity securities during the period.

Derivative contracts (trading assets or trading liabilities)

With the exception of one derivative contract discussed herein and certain instruments discussed under ‘other assets/liabilities, net’ that qualify as derivative instruments, the Company’s derivative instruments are level 1 or level 2 instruments. Level 1 derivative contracts generally include exchange-traded futures or option contracts for which pricing is readily available. See Note 11, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” for additional information on the Company’s derivative contracts.

The Company’s level 2 instruments are predominantly standard OTC swaps, options, and forwards, with underlying market variables of interest rates, foreign exchange, equity, and credit. Because fair values for OTC contracts are not readily available, the Company estimates fair values using internal, but standard, valuation models that incorporate market-observable inputs. The valuation model is driven by the type of contract: for option-based products, the Company uses an appropriate option pricing model, such as Black-Scholes; for forward-based products, the Company’s valuation methodology is generally a discounted cash flow approach. The primary drivers of the fair values of derivative instruments are the underlying variables, such as interest rates, exchange rates, equity, or credit. As such, the Company uses market-based assumptions for all of it significant inputs, such as interest rate yield curves, quoted exchange rates and spot prices, market implied volatilities and credit curves.

The Agreements the Company entered into related to its Coke common stock are level 3 instruments, due to the unobservability of a significant assumption used to value these instruments. Because the value is primarily driven by the embedded equity collars on the Coke shares, a Black-Scholes model is the appropriate valuation model. Most of the assumptions are directly observable from the market, such as the per share market price of Coke common stock, interest rates, and the dividend rate on the Coke common stock. Volatility is a significant assumption and is impacted both by the unusually large size of the trade and the long tenor until settlement. Because the derivatives carry scheduled terms of 6.5 years and 7 years from the effective date and are on a significant number of Coke shares, the observable and active options market on Coke does not provide for any identical or similar instruments. As such, the Company receives estimated market values from a market participant who is knowledgeable about Coke equity derivatives and is active in the market. Based on inquiries of the market participant as to their procedures, as well as the Company’s own valuation assessment procedures, the Company has satisfied itself that the market participant is using methodologies and assumptions that other market participants would use in estimating the fair value of The Agreements. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, The Agreements’ combined fair value was a liability of $154 million and $145 million, respectively.

Trading loans

The Company engages in certain businesses whereby the election to carry loans at fair value for financial reporting aligns with the underlying business purposes. Specifically, the loans that are included within this classification are: (i) loans made in connection with the Company’s TRS business (see Note 11, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” for further discussion of this business), (ii) loans backed by the SBA and (iii) the loan sales and trading business within the Company’s CIB line of business. All of these loans have been classified as level 2, due to the market data that the Company uses in its estimates of fair value.

The loans made in connection with the Company’s TRS business are short-term, demand loans, whereby the repayment is senior in priority and whose value is collateralized. While these loans do not trade in the market, the Company believes that the par amount of the loans approximates fair value and no unobservable assumptions are made by the Company to arrive at this conclusion. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding $1.1 billion and $972 million, respectively, of such short-term loans carried at fair value.

SBA loans are similar to SBA securities discussed herein under “Federal agency securities,” except for their legal form. In both cases, the Company trades instruments that are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government as to contractual principal and interest and has sufficient observable trading activity upon which to base its estimates of fair value.

The loans from the Company’s sales and trading business are commercial and corporate leveraged loans that are either traded in the market or for which similar loans trade. The Company elected to carry these loans at fair value in order to reflect the active management of these positions. The Company is able to obtain fair value estimates for substantially all of these loans using a third party valuation service that is broadly used by market participants. While most of the loans are traded in the markets, the Company does not believe that trading activity qualifies the loans as level 1 instruments, as the volume and level of trading activity is subject to variability and the loans are not exchange-traded, such that the Company believes that level 2 is a more appropriate presentation of the underlying market activity for the loans. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $415 million and $381 million, respectively, of loans related to the Company’s trading business were held in inventory.

Loans and Loans Held for Sale

Residential LHFS

The Company recognized at fair value certain newly-originated mortgage LHFS based upon defined product criteria. The Company chooses to fair value these mortgage LHFS in order to eliminate the complexities and inherent difficulties of achieving hedge accounting and to better align reported results with the underlying economic changes in value of the loans and related hedge instruments. This election impacts the timing and recognition of origination fees and costs, as well as servicing value. Specifically, origination fees and costs are recognized in earnings at the time of origination. The servicing value, which had been recorded as MSRs at the time the loan was sold, is included in the fair value of the loan and initially recognized at the time the Company enters into IRLCs with borrowers. The Company uses derivatives to economically hedge changes in servicing value as a result of including the servicing value in the fair value of the loan. The mark to market adjustments related to LHFS and the associated economic hedges are captured in mortgage production income.

Level 2 LHFS are primarily agency loans which trade in active secondary markets and are priced using current market pricing for similar securities adjusted for servicing and risk. Level 3 loans are primarily non-agency residential mortgages for which there is little to no observable trading activity of similar instruments in either the new issuance or secondary loan markets as either whole loans or as securities. Prior to the non-agency residential loan market disruption, which began during the third quarter of 2007 and continues, the Company was able to obtain certain observable pricing from either the new issuance or secondary loan market. However, as the markets deteriorated and certain loans were not actively trading as either whole loans or as securities, the Company began employing the same alternative valuation methodologies used to value level 3 residential MBS to fair value the loans.

As disclosed in the tabular level 3 rollforwards, transfers of certain mortgage LHFS into level 3 during 2011 were largely due to borrower defaults or the identification of other loan defects impacting the marketability of the loans.

For residential loans that the Company has elected to carry at fair value, the Company has considered the component of the fair value changes due to instrument-specific credit risk, which is intended to be an approximation of the fair value change attributable to changes in borrower-specific credit risk. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) of $4 million and $9 million, respectively, due to changes in fair value attributable to borrower-specific credit risk. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) of $8 million and $12 million, respectively, due to changes in fair value attributable to borrower-specific credit risk. In addition to borrower-specific credit risk, there are other, more significant, variables that drive changes in the fair values of the loans, including interest rates and general conditions in the principal markets for the loans.

Corporate and other LHFS

As discussed in Note 6, “Certain Transfers of Financial Assets and Variable Interest Entities,” the Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of a CLO vehicle, which resulted in the Company consolidating the loans of that vehicle. Because the CLO trades its loans from time to time and in order to fairly present the economics of the CLO, the Company elected to carry the loans of the CLO at fair value. The Company is able to obtain fair value estimates for substantially all of these loans using a third party valuation service that is broadly used by market participants. While most of the loans are traded in the markets, the Company does not believe the loans qualify as level 1 instruments, as the volume and level of trading activity is subject to variability and the loans are not exchange-traded, such that the Company believes that level 2 is more representative of the general market activity for the loans.

LHFI

Level 3 loans include $4 million of fair value loans that were acquired through the acquisition of GB&T. The loans the Company elected to account for at fair value are primarily nonperforming commercial real estate loans, which do not trade in an active secondary market. As these loans are classified as nonperforming, cash proceeds from the sale of the underlying collateral is the expected source of repayment for a majority of these loans. Accordingly, the fair value of these loans is derived from internal estimates, incorporating market data when available, of the value of the underlying collateral. Additionally, level 3 LHFI include $445 million of mortgage loans that have been deemed not marketable, largely due to borrower defaults or the identification of other loan defects. The Company values these loans using a discounted cash flow approach based on assumptions that are generally not observable in the current markets, such as prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates, and discount rates.

Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets that the Company records at fair value are the Company’s MSR assets. The fair values of MSRs are determined by projecting cash flows, which are then discounted to estimate an expected fair value. The fair values of MSRs are impacted by a variety of factors, including prepayment assumptions, discount rates, delinquency rates, contractually specified servicing fees, servicing costs, and underlying portfolio characteristics. The underlying assumptions and estimated values are corroborated by values received from independent third parties based on their review of the servicing portfolio. Because these inputs are not transparent in market trades, MSRs are considered to be level 3 assets.

Other Assets/Liabilities, net

The Company’s other assets/liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis include IRLCs that satisfy the criteria to be treated as derivative financial instruments, derivative financial instruments that are used by the Company to economically hedge certain loans and MSRs, and the derivative that the Company obtained as a result of its sale of Visa Class B shares.

The fair value of IRLCs on residential mortgage LHFS, while based on interest rates observable in the market, is highly dependent on the ultimate closing of the loans. These “pull-through” rates are based on the Company’s historical data and reflect the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood that a commitment will ultimately result in a closed loan. Servicing value is included in the fair value of IRLCs, and the fair value of servicing value is determined by projecting cash flows which are then discounted to estimate an expected fair value. The fair value of servicing value is impacted by a variety of factors, including prepayment assumptions, discount rates, delinquency rates, contractually specified servicing fees, servicing costs, and underlying portfolio characteristics. Because these inputs are not transparent in market trades, IRLCs are considered to be level 3 assets.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company transferred $40 million and $54 million, respectively, of IRLCs out of level 3 as the associated loans were closed, compared to $62 million and $129 million, during the same periods in 2010, respectively.

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk associated with MSRs, IRLCs, mortgage LHFS, and mortgage LHFI reported at fair value. The Company hedges these exposures with a combination of derivatives, including MBS forward and option contracts, interest rate swap and swaption contracts, futures contracts, and eurodollar options. The Company estimates the fair values of such derivative instruments consistent with the methodologies discussed herein under “Derivative contracts” and accordingly these derivatives are considered to be level 2 instruments.

During the second quarter of 2009, in connection with its sale of Visa Class B shares, the Company entered into a derivative contract whereby the ultimate cash payments received or paid, if any, under the contract are based on the ultimate resolution of litigation involving Visa. The value of the derivative was estimated based on the Company’s expectations regarding the ultimate resolution of that litigation, which involved a high degree of judgment and subjectivity. Accordingly, the value of the derivative liability was classified as a level 3 instrument.

Liabilities

Trading liabilities

Trading liabilities are primarily comprised of derivative contracts, but also include various contracts involving U.S. Treasury securities, Federal agency securities, and corporate debt securities that the Company uses in certain of its trading businesses. The Company employs the same valuation methodologies for these derivative contracts and securities as are discussed within the corresponding sections herein under “Trading Assets and Securities Available for Sale”.

Brokered deposits

The Company has elected to measure certain CDs at fair value. These debt instruments include embedded derivatives that are generally based on underlying equity securities or equity indices, but may be based on other underlyings that may or may not be clearly and closely related to the host debt instrument. The Company elected to carry these instruments at fair value in order to remove the mixed attribute accounting model for the single debt instrument or to better align the economics of the CDs with the Company’s risk management strategies. The Company evaluated, on an instrument by instrument basis, whether a new issuance would be carried at fair value.

The Company has classified these CDs as level 2 instruments due to the Company’s ability to reasonably measure all significant inputs based on observable market variables. The Company employs a discounted cash flow approach to the host debt component of the CD, based on observable market interest rates for the term of the CD and an estimate of the Bank’s credit risk. For the embedded derivative features, the Company uses the same valuation methodologies as if the derivative were a standalone derivative, as discussed herein under “Derivative contracts”.

For brokered deposits carried at fair value, the Company estimated credit spreads above LIBOR, based on credit spreads from actual or estimated trading levels of the debt or other relevant market data. The Company recognized gains of $1 million and losses of $13 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and gains of $22 million and $7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, due to changes in its own credit spread on its brokered deposits carried at fair value.

Long-term debt

The Company has elected to carry at fair value certain fixed rate debt issuances of public debt which are valued by obtaining quotes from a third party pricing service and utilizing broker quotes to corroborate the reasonableness of those marks. In addition, information from market data of recent observable trades and indications from buy side investors, if available, are taken into consideration as additional support for the value. Due to the availability of this information, the Company determined that the appropriate classification for the debt was level 2. The election to fair value the debt was made in order to align the accounting for the debt with the accounting for the derivatives without having to account for the debt under hedge accounting, thus avoiding the complex and time consuming fair value hedge accounting requirements.

The Company’s public debt carried at fair value impacts earnings mainly through changes in the Company’s credit spreads as the Company has entered into derivative financial instruments that economically convert the interest rate on the debt from fixed to floating. The estimated earnings impact from changes in credit spreads above U.S. Treasury rates were gains of $5 million and losses of $15 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and gains of $61 million and losses of $17 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.

The Company also carries approximately $289 million of issued securities contained in a consolidated CLO at fair value in order to recognize the nonrecourse nature of these liabilities to the Company. Specifically, the holders of the liabilities are only paid interest and principal to the extent of the cash flows from the assets of the vehicle and the Company has no current or future obligations to fund any of the CLO vehicle’s liabilities. The Company has classified these securities as level 2, as the primary driver of their fair values are the loans owned by the CLO, which the Company has also elected to carry at fair value, as discussed herein under “Loans and Loans Held for Sale – Corporate and other LHFS”.

The following tables show a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair valued assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (other than MSRs which are disclosed in Note 5, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”). Transfers into and out of the fair value hierarchy levels are assumed to be as of the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred. None of the transfers into or out of level 3 have been the result of using alternative valuation approaches to estimate fair values.


	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in millions)	Beginning balance April 1, 2011		Included in earnings			OCI			Sales		Settlements		Transfers to/from other balance sheet line items		Transfers into Level 3		Transfers out of Level 3		Fair value June 30, 2011		Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2011 related to financial assets still held at June 30, 2011

Assets
Trading assets
MBS - private		$2		$-			$-			$-		$-		$-		$-		$-		$2		$-
CDO securities		42		-			-			-		-		-		-		-		42		-
ABS		5		-			-			-		-		-		-		-		5		-
Equity securities		56		4			-			-		(47)		-		-		-		13		-

Total trading assets		105		4	¹		-			-		(47)		-		-		-		62		-


Securities AFS
U.S. states and political subdivisions		73		-			-			-		(5)		-		-		-		68		-
MBS - private		338		(1)			(7)			-		(19)		-		-		-		311		1
ABS		20		-			-			-		(1)		-		-		-		19		-
Corporate and other debt securities		5		-			-			-		-		-		-		-		5		-
Other equity securities		690		-			-			-		(93)		-		-		-		597		-

Total securities AFS		1,126		(1	) ²		(7)			-		(118)		-		-		-		1,000		1	²

LHFS		17		1	³		-			(12)		-		(7)		5		(1)		3		-
LHFI		457		1	⁴		-			-		(11)		2		-		-		449		(1)	⁴
Other assets/(liabilities), net		(2)		48			-			-		6		(40)		-		-		12		-

Liabilities
Derivative contracts		(161)		1			6	⁵		-		-		-		-		-		(154)		-
(Dollars in millions)	Beginning balance January 1, 2011		Included in earnings			OCI			Sales		Settlements		Transfers to/from other balance sheet line items		Transfers into Level 3		Transfers out of Level 3		Fair value June 30, 2011		Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to financial assets still held at June 30, 2011

Assets
Trading assets
MBS - private		$6		$2			$-			($5)		($1)		$-		$-		$-		$2		$-
CDO securities		53		31			-			(21)		(1)		(20)		-		-		42		15
ABS		27		9			-			(31)		-		-		-		-		5		2
Equity securities		123		12			-			-		(122)		-		-		-		13		-

Total trading assets		209		54	¹		-			(57)		(124)		(20)		-		-		62		17	¹


Securities AFS
U.S. states and political subdivisions		74		1			-			-		(7)		-		-		-		68		-
MBS - private		347		(3)			9			-		(42)		-		-		-		311		(3)
ABS		20		-			1			-		(2)		-		-		-		19		-
Corporate and other debt securities		5		-			-			-		-		-		-		-		5		-
Other equity securities		690		-			-			-		(93)		-		-		-		597		-

Total securities AFS		1,136		(2)	²		10			-		(144)		-		-		-		1,000		(3)	²

LHFS
Residential loans		2		-			-			(14)		(1)		2		16		(2)		3		-
Corporate and other loans		5		(1)	⁶		-			-		-		(4)		-		-		-		-
LHFI		492		-			-			-		(34)		(9)		-		-		449		(3)	⁴
Other assets/(liabilities), net		(24)		84			-			-		6		(54)		-		-		12		-

Liabilities
Derivative contracts		(145)		1			(10)	⁵		-		-		-		-		-		(154)		-

¹ Amounts included in earnings are recorded in trading account profits and commissions.

² Amounts included in earnings are recorded in net securities gains.

³ Amounts included in earnings are net of issuances, fair value changes, and expirations and are recorded in mortgage production related income/(loss).

⁴ Amounts are generally included in mortgage production related income/(loss), however, the mark on certain fair value loans is included in trading account profits and commissions.

⁵ Amount recorded in OCI is the effective portion of the cash flow hedges related to the Company’s probable forecasted sale of its shares of Coke common stock as discussed in Note 11, “Derivative Financial Instruments.”

⁶ Amounts included in earnings are recorded in other noninterest income.


	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in millions)	Beginning balance April 1, 2010		Included in earnings			Other comprehensive income			Purchases, sales, issuances, settlements, maturities paydowns, net		Transfers to/from other balance sheet line items		Transfers into Level 3		Transfers out of Level 3		Fair value June 30, 2010		Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2010 related to financial assets still held at 2010
Assets
Trading assets
U.S. states and political subdivisions		$6		$-			$-			$3		$-		$-		$-		$9		$-
MBS - private		5		(1)			-			(1)		-		-		-		3		(1)
CDO securities		159		6			-			(48)		-		-		-		117		4
ABS		51		(1)			-			(2)		-		-		-		48		(1)
Equity securities		145		(2)			-			(23)		-		-		-		120		(4)
Derivative contracts		22		-			106	⁵		-		-		-		-		128		-

Total trading assets		388		2	¹		106			(71)		-		-		-		425		(2)	¹


Securities AFS
U.S. states and political subdivisions		131		-			(2)			(4)		-		-		-		125		-
MBS - private		369		(1)			17			(20)		-		-		-		365		(1)
ABS		108		-			1			(1)		-		-		-		108		-
Corporate and other debt securities		5		-			-			-		-		-		-		5		-
Other equity securities		705		-			-			-		-		-		-		705		-

Total securities AFS		1,318		(1)	²		16			(25)		-		-		-		1,308		(1)	²

LHFS
Residential loans		152		6	³		-			(51)		(6)		4		(1)		104		2	³
Corporate and other loans		9		(2)	⁶		-			(2)		-		-		-		5		(2)	⁶
LHFI		422		5	⁴		-			(12)		(4)		-		-		411		4	⁴
Other assets/(liabilities), net		(10)		119	³		-			6		(62)		-		-		53		-
(Dollars in millions)	Beginning balance January 1, 2010		Included in earnings			Other comprehensive income			Purchases, sales, issuances, settlements, maturities paydowns, net		Transfers to/ from other balance sheet line items		Transfers into Level 3		Transfers out of Level 3		Fair value June 30, 2010		Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to financial assets still held at June 30, 2010
Assets
Trading assets
U.S. states and political subdivisions		$7		$-			$-			$2		$-		$-		$-		$9		$-
MBS - private		6		(1)			-			(2)		-		-		-		3		(1)
CDO securities		175		17			-			(75)		-		-		-		117		11
ABS		51		3			-			(6)		-		-		-		48		1
Equity securities		151		4			-			(35)		-		-		-		120		-
Derivative contracts		-		7			121	⁵		-		-		-		-		128		-

Total trading assets		390		30	¹		121			(116)		-		-		-		425		11	¹


Securities AFS
U.S. states and political subdivisions		132		-			(2)			(5)		-		-		-		125		-
MBS - private		378		(2)			34			(45)		-		-		-		365		(2)
ABS		102		1			(7)			12		-		-		-		108		-
Corporate and other debt securities		5		-			-			-		-		-		-		5		-
Other equity securities		705		-			-			-		-		-		-		705		-

Total securities AFS		1,322		(1)	²		25			(38)		-		-		-		1,308		(2)	²

LHFS
Residential loans		142		5	³		-			(70)		4		24		(1)		104		(6)	³
Corporate and other loans		9		(2)	⁶		-			(2)		-		-		-		5		(2)	⁶
LHFI		449		5	⁴		-			(25)		(17)		-		(1)		411		6	⁴
Other assets/(liabilities), net		(35)		211	³		-			6		(129)		-		-		53		-

Liabilities
Derivative contracts		(46)		-			46	⁵		-		-		-		-		-		-

¹ Amounts included in earnings are recorded in trading account profits/(losses) and commissions.

² Amounts included in earnings are recorded in net securities gains/(losses).

³ Amounts included in earnings are net of issuances, fair value changes, and expirations and are recorded in mortgage production related income/(loss).

⁴ Amounts are generally included in mortgage production related income, however, the mark on certain fair value loans is included in trading account profits/(losses) and commissions.

⁵ Amount recorded in other comprehensive income is the effective portion of the cash flow hedges related to the Company’s probable forecasted sale of its shares of Coke stock as discussed in Note 10, “Derivative

Financial Instruments.”

⁶ Amounts included in earnings are recorded in other noninterest income.

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present the change in carrying value of those assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, for which impairment was recognized. The table does not reflect the change in fair value attributable to any related economic hedges the Company may have used to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with LHFS. The Company’s economic hedging activities for LHFS are deployed at the portfolio level.


			Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2011 Using
(Dollars in millions)	Net Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Valuation Allowance

LHFS		$128		$-		$61		$67		$-
LHFI		118		-		-		118		(45)
OREO		483		-		370		113		(120)
Other Assets		13		-		6		7		(10)

			Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2010, Using
(Dollars in millions)	Net Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Valuation Allowance

LHFS		$333		$-		$142		$191		$-
LHFI		85		-		-		85		(15)
OREO		596		-		553		43		(116)
Affordable Housing		357		-		-		357		-
Other Assets		130		-		90		40		(20)

The following is a discussion of the valuation techniques and inputs used in developing fair value measurements for assets classified as level 2 or level 3 that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, based on the class as determined by the nature and risks of the instrument.

Loans Held for Sale

Level 2 LHFS consist primarily of conforming, residential mortgage loans and corporate loans that are accounted for at LOCOM. Level 3 LHFS consist of non-agency residential mortgage LHFS for which there is little or no secondary market activity and leases held for sale. These loans are valued consistent with the methodology discussed in the Recurring Fair Value Measurement section of this footnote. Leases held for sale are valued using internal estimates which incorporate market data when available. Due to the lack of current market data for comparable leases, these assets are considered level 3.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company transferred $47 million in NPLs, net of a $10 million incremental charge-off, that were previously designated as LHFI to LHFS in conjunction with the Company’s election to actively market these loans for sale. These loans were predominantly reported at amortized cost prior to transferring to LHFS; however, a portion of the NPLs was carried at fair value. Of these transferred loans, $34 million were sold at approximately their carrying value during the second quarter; the remaining $13 million were returned to LHFI as they were no longer deemed marketable for sale. The Company executed a similar transfer of $160 million in NPLs during the six months ended June 30, 2010; these loans were subsequently sold at prices approximating fair value.

Loans Held for Investment

LHFI consist primarily of nonperforming commercial real estate loans for which specific reserves have been recorded. As these loans have been classified as nonperforming, cash proceeds from the sale of the underlying collateral is the expected source of repayment for a majority of these loans. Accordingly, the fair value of these loans is derived from internal estimates of the underlying collateral incorporating market data when available. Due to the lack of market data for similar assets, these loans are considered level 3.

OREO

OREO is measured at the lower of cost or its fair value less costs to sell. Level 2 OREO consists primarily of residential homes, commercial properties, and vacant lots and land for which current property-specific appraisals, broker pricing opinions, or other market information is available. Level 3 OREO consists of lots and land for which initial valuations are based on property-specific appraisals or internal valuations. Due to the lower dollar value per property and geographic dispersion of the portfolio, these properties are re-evaluated at least annually using a pooled approach, which applies geographic factors to adjust carrying values for estimated further declines in value.

Affordable Housing

The Company evaluates its consolidated affordable housing partnership investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. An impairment is recorded when the carrying amount of the partnership exceeds its fair value. Fair value measurements for affordable housing investments are derived from internal models using market assumptions when available. Significant assumptions utilized in these models include cash flows, market capitalization rates, and tax credit market pricing. Due to the lack of comparable sales in the marketplace, these valuations are considered level 3. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, there were no impairments recognized; however, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded $5 million in impairment charges on its consolidated affordable housing partnership investments.

Other Assets

Other assets consist of private equity investments, structured leasing products, other repossessed assets, and assets under operating leases where the Company is the lessor.

Investments in private equity partnerships are valued based on the estimated expected remaining cash flows to be received from these assets discounted at a market rate that is commensurate with their risk profile. Based on the valuation methodology and the lack of observable inputs, these investments are considered level 3. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $2 million in impairment charges and no impairment charges, respectively, on its private equity partnership investments. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $4 million and $2 million, respectively, in impairment charges on its private equity partnership investments.

Structured leasing consists of assets held for sale under third party operating leases. These assets consist primarily of commercial buildings and are recognized at fair value less cost to sell. These assets are valued based on internal estimates which incorporate current market data for similar assets when available. Due to the lack of current market data for comparable assets, these assets are considered level 3. During both the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded no impairment charges on these assets. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded no impairment charges and $2 million in impairment charges, respectively, on these assets.

Other repossessed assets consist of repossessed personal property that is measured at fair value less cost to sell. These assets are considered level 2 as their fair value is determined based on market comparables and broker opinions. During both the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $1 million in impairment charges on these assets. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $1 million and $7 million, respectively, in impairment charges, on these assets.

The Company monitors the fair value of assets under operating leases, where the Company is the lessor, and records impairment to the extent the carrying value is not recoverable and the fair value is less than its carrying value. Fair value is determined using collateral specific pricing digests, external appraisals, and recent sales data from industry equipment dealers. As market data for similar assets is available and used in the valuation, these assets are considered level 2. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded no impairment charges and $2 million in impairment charges, respectively, attributable to the fair value of various personal property under operating leases. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $1 million and $11 million, respectively, in impairment charges attributable to the fair value of various personal property under operating leases.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

June 30, 2011

December 31, 2010

(Dollars in millions)

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$6,787

(a)

$5,378

(a)

Trading assets

6,586

(b)

6,175

(b)

Securities AFS

27,216

(b)

26,895

(b)

LHFS

2,052

2,053

(c)

3,501

(c)

LHFI

114,913

115,975

Interest/credit adjustment on LHFI

(2,744)

(3,109)

(2,974)

(3,823)

LHFI, as adjusted for interest/credit risk

112,169

111,804

(d)

113,001

112,152

(d)

Market risk/liquidity adjustment on LHFI

(4,303)

(3,962)

LHFI, fully adjusted

$112,169

$107,501

(d)

$113,001

$108,190

(d)

Financial liabilities

Consumer and commercial deposits

$121,671

$122,025

(e)

$120,025

$120,368

(e)

Brokered deposits

2,345

2,373

(f)

2,365

2,381

(f)

Foreign deposits

905

(f)

654

(f)

Short-term borrowings

5,983

5,979

(f)

5,821

5,815

(f)

Long-term debt

13,693

13,404

(f)

13,648

13,191

(f)

Trading liabilities

3,026

(b)

2,678

(b)

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of financial instruments:

(a)

Cash and cash equivalents are valued at their carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet, which are reasonable estimates of fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity of the instruments.

(b)

Securities AFS, trading assets, and trading liabilities that are classified as level 1 are valued based on quoted market prices. For those instruments classified as level 2 or level 3, refer to the respective valuation discussions within this footnote.

(c)

LHFS are generally valued based on observable current market prices or, if quoted market prices are not available, on quoted market prices of similar instruments. In instances when significant valuation assumptions are not readily observable in the market, instruments are valued based on the best available data in order to approximate fair value. This data may be internally-developed and considers risk premiums that a market participant would require under then-current market conditions. Refer to the LHFS section within this footnote for further discussion of the LHFS carried at fair value.

(d)

LHFI fair values are based on a hypothetical exit price, which does not represent the estimated intrinsic value of the loan if held for investment. The assumptions used are expected to approximate those that a market participant purchasing the loans would use to value the loans, including a market risk premium and liquidity discount. Estimating the fair value of the loan portfolio when loan sales and trading markets are illiquid, or for certain loan types, nonexistent, requires significant judgment. Therefore, the estimated fair value can vary significantly depending on a market participant’s ultimate considerations and assumptions. The final value yields a market participant’s expected return on investment that is indicative of the current market conditions, but it does not take into consideration the Company’s estimated value from continuing to hold these loans or its lack of willingness to transact at these estimated values.

The Company estimated fair value based on estimated future cash flows discounted, initially, at current origination rates for loans with similar terms and credit quality, which derived an estimated value of 100% and 99% on the loan portfolio’s net carrying value as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The value derived from origination rates likely does not represent an exit price; therefore, an incremental market risk and liquidity discount was subtracted from the initial value as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The discounted value is a function of a market participant’s required yield in the current environment and is not a reflection of the expected cumulative losses on the loans. Loan prepayments are used to adjust future cash flows based on historical experience and prepayment model forecasts. The value of related accrued interest on loans approximates fair value; however, it is not included in the carrying amount or fair value of loans. The value of long-term customer relationships is not permitted under current U.S. GAAP to be included in the estimated fair value.

(e)

Deposit liabilities with no defined maturity such as demand deposits, NOW/money market accounts, and savings accounts have a fair value equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to a schedule of aggregated expected maturities. The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis are expected to approximate those that market participants would use in valuing deposits. The value of long-term relationships with depositors is not taken into account in estimating fair values.

(f)

Fair values for foreign deposits, certain brokered deposits, short-term borrowings, and certain long-term debt are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments or estimated using discounted cash flow analysis and the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments. For brokered deposits and long-term debt that the Company carries at fair value, refer to the respective valuation sections within this footnote.