XML 86 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
NOTE 7 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis, which is performed by the Company as of September 30, 2014, or as events occur or circumstances change that (i) would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, or (ii) indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative. The fair value of a reporting unit is determined by using discounted cash flow analyses and, when applicable, guideline company information. The carrying value of a reporting unit is determined using an equity allocation methodology that allocates the total equity of the Company to each of its reporting units considering both regulatory risk-based capital and tangible assets relative to tangible equity. See Note 1, "Significant Accounting Policies" in the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the Company's goodwill accounting policy. The Company performed a goodwill impairment analysis for all of its reporting units with goodwill balances at September 30, 2014 and determined that the fair values were in excess of the respective carrying values by the following percentages:

Consumer Banking and Private Wealth Management        68%
Wholesale Banking                    13%
As discussed in Note 2, "Acquisitions/Dispositions," the Company completed the sale of its asset management subsidiary, RidgeWorth, during the second quarter of 2014. Also, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, branch-managed business banking clients were transferred from Wholesale Banking to Consumer Banking and Private Wealth Management, resulting in the reallocation of $300 million in goodwill. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30 are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)
Consumer Banking and Private Wealth Management
 
Wholesale Banking
 
Total
Balance, January 1, 2014

$4,262

 

$2,107

 

$6,369

Acquisition of Lantana Oil and Gas Partners, Inc.

 
8

 
8

Sale of RidgeWorth

 
(40
)
 
(40
)
Balance, September 30, 2014

$4,262

 

$2,075

 

$6,337

Balance, January 1, 2013

$3,962

 

$2,407

 

$6,369

Intersegment transfers
300

 
(300
)
 

Balance, September 30, 2013

$4,262

 

$2,107

 

$6,369




Other Intangible Assets
Changes in the carrying amounts of other intangible assets for the nine months ended September 30 are as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Core Deposit
Intangibles
 
 MSRs -
Fair Value
 
Other
 
Total
Balance, January 1, 2014

$4

 

$1,300

 

$30

 

$1,334

Amortization
(4
)
 

 
(6
)
 
(10
)
MSRs originated

 
137

 

 
137

MSRs purchased

 
109

 

 
109

Changes in fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due to changes in inputs and assumptions 1

 
(117
)
 

 
(117
)
Other changes in fair value 2

 
(123
)
 

 
(123
)
Sale of MSRs

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
Sale of RidgeWorth

 

 
(9
)
 
(9
)
Balance, September 30, 2014

$—

 

$1,305

 

$15

 

$1,320

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, January 1, 2013

$17

 

$899

 

$40

 

$956

Amortization
(10
)
 

 
(8
)
 
(18
)
MSRs originated

 
302

 

 
302

Changes in fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due to changes in inputs and assumptions 1

 
260

 

 
260

Other changes in fair value 2

 
(212
)
 

 
(212
)
Sale of MSRs

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
Balance, September 30, 2013

$7

 

$1,248

 

$32

 

$1,287

1 Primarily reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, due to changes in interest rates.
2 Represents changes due to the collection of expected cash flows, net of accretion, due to the passage of time.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company retains MSRs from certain of its sales or securitizations of residential mortgage loans. MSRs on residential mortgage loans are the only servicing assets capitalized by the Company and are classified within intangible assets on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Income earned by the Company on its MSRs is derived primarily from contractually specified mortgage servicing fees and late fees, net of curtailment costs. Such income earned for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $81 million and $241 million, respectively, and $79 million and $232 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. These amounts are reported in mortgage servicing related income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the total UPB of mortgage loans serviced was $135.8 billion and $136.7 billion, respectively. Included in these amounts were $109.1 billion and $106.8 billion at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, of loans serviced for third parties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company sold MSRs, at a price approximating their fair value, on residential loans with a UPB of $612 million and $2.1 billion, respectively. The Company purchased MSRs on residential loans with a UPB of $9.0 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2014; however, only $3.0 billion of these loans are reflected in the UPB amounts above as the transfer of servicing for the remainder is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2014. No MSRs were purchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
The Company determines the fair value of the MSRs using a valuation model that calculates the present value of the estimated future net servicing income. The model incorporates a number of assumptions as MSRs do not trade in an active and open market with readily observable prices. The Company determines fair value using prepayment projections, spreads, and other assumptions that are compared to various sources of market data including independent third party valuations and industry surveys. Senior management and the STM Valuation Committee review all significant assumptions at least quarterly, since many factors can affect the fair value of MSRs. Changes to the valuation model inputs and assumptions are reflected in the periods' results.

A summary of the key characteristics, inputs, and economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s MSRs at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the sensitivity of the fair values to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions are shown in the table below.
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Fair value of retained MSRs

$1,305

 

$1,300

Prepayment rate assumption (annual)
9
%
 
8
%
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

$45

 

$38

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change
87

 
74

Option adjusted spread/discount rate (annual) 1
10
%
 
12
%
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

$64

 

$66

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change
123

 
126

Weighted-average life (in years)
7.1

 
7.7

Weighted-average coupon
4.2
%
 
4.4
%

1 Option adjusted spread was a key assumption used to estimate the fair value of the Company's MSRs at September 30, 2014. For periods prior to September 30, 2014, a discount rate was used.
The above sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the amounts indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Additionally, the sensitivities above do not include the effect of hedging activity undertaken by the Company to offset changes in the fair value of MSRs. See Note 12, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” for further information regarding these hedging activities.