XML 147 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
NOTE 9 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
As discussed in Note 20, "Business Segment Reporting," the Company reorganized its management reporting structure in the first quarter of 2012, including its segment reporting structure and goodwill reporting units. Goodwill was reassigned to the new reporting units using a relative fair value allocation. After the allocation, Consumer Banking and Private Wealth Management's goodwill balance was comprised of $3.6 billion and $335 million previously recorded within the Retail Banking and W&IM segments, respectively. Wholesale Banking's goodwill balance was comprised of $1.3 billion, $47 million, $928 million, and $180 million previously recorded within the Retail Banking, W&IM, Diversified Commercial Banking, and CIB segments, respectively.

Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis or as events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount or indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative. The Company performed a goodwill impairment analysis as of September 30, 2012 for Consumer Banking and Private Wealth Management, Wholesale Banking, GenSpring, and RidgeWorth Capital Management, which includes all its reporting units with goodwill balances as of September 30, 2012. The Company determined for the following reporting units that the fair value is in excess of the respective carrying value by the following percentages:

Consumer Banking and Private Wealth Management         21%
Wholesale Banking                     31%
RidgeWorth Capital Management                  147%


The fair value of the GenSpring reporting unit, however, was less than its carrying value. As a result, the Company performed the second step of the goodwill impairment evaluation, which involved calculating the implied fair value of the goodwill for the reporting unit. The implied fair value of the goodwill was less than its carrying value; therefore, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $7 million, which was the carrying value of goodwill for the reporting unit.
The Company monitored events and circumstances during the fourth quarter of 2012, and determined that there was no further goodwill impairment during the fourth quarter of 2012. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Retail
Banking
 
Diversified
Commercial
Banking
 
CIB
 
W&IM
 
Consumer Banking and Private Wealth Management
 
Wholesale Banking
 
Total
Balance, January 1, 2012

$4,854

 

$928

 

$180

 

$382

 

$—

 

$—

 

$6,344

Acquisition of assets of FirstAgain, LLC

 

 

 

 
32

 

 
32

Intersegment transfers
(4,854
)
 
(928
)
 
(180
)
 
(382
)
 
3,930

 
2,414

 

Impairment of GenSpring

 

 

 

 
(7
)
 

 
(7
)
Balance, December 31, 2012

$—

 

$—

 

$—

 

$—

 

$3,955

 

$2,414

 

$6,369

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, January 1, 2011

$4,854

 

$928

 

$180

 

$361

 

$—

 

$—

 

$6,323

Contingent consideration

 

 

 
1

 

 

 
1

Acquisition of certain additional
assets of CSI Capital Management

 

 

 
20

 

 

 
20

Balance, December 31, 2011

$4,854

 

$928

 

$180

 

$382

 

$—

 

$—

 

$6,344




Other Intangible Assets
Changes in the carrying amounts of other intangible assets for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
 
(Dollars in millions)
Core Deposit  
Intangibles
 
 MSRs -
Fair Value
 
Other
 
Total
Balance, January 1, 2012

$38

 

$921

 

$58

 

$1,017

Amortization
(21
)
 

 
(18
)
 
(39
)
MSRs originated

 
336

 

 
336

Changes in fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due to changes in inputs and assumptions 1

 
(112
)
 

 
(112
)
Other changes in fair value 2

 
(241
)
 

 
(241
)
Sale of MSRs

 
(5
)
 

 
(5
)
Balance, December 31, 2012

$17

 

$899

 

$40

 

$956

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, January 1, 2011

$67

 

$1,439

 

$65

 

$1,571

Amortization
(29
)
 

 
(14
)
 
(43
)
MSRs originated

 
224

 

 
224

Changes in fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due to changes in inputs and assumptions 1

 
(533
)
 

 
(533
)
Other changes in fair value 2

 
(200
)
 

 
(200
)
Sale of MSRs

 
(9
)
 

 
(9
)
Other

 

 
7

 
7

Balance, December 31, 2011

$38

 

$921

 

$58

 

$1,017

1 Primarily reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, due to changes in interest rates.
2 Represents changes due to the collection of expected cash flows, net of accretion, due to the passage of time.

The estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Core Deposit
Intangibles
 
Other
 
Total
2013

$13

 

$10

 

$23

2014
4

 
8

 
12

2015

 
7

 
7

2016

 
4

 
4

2017

 
4

 
4

Thereafter

 
7

 
7

Total

$17

 

$40

 

$57



Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company retains MSRs from certain of its sales or securitizations of residential mortgage loans. MSRs on residential mortgage loans are the only servicing assets capitalized by the Company and are classified within intangible assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Income earned by the Company on its MSRs is derived primarily from contractually specified mortgage servicing fees and late fees, net of curtailment costs. Such income earned for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, was $333 million, $364 million, and $399 million, respectively. These amounts are reported in mortgage servicing related income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the total unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans serviced was $144.9 billion and $157.8 billion, respectively. Included in these amounts were $113.2 billion and $124.1 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, of loans serviced for third parties. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company sold MSRs on residential loans with an unpaid principal balance of $2.1 billion.

At the end of each quarter, the Company determines the fair value of the MSRs using a valuation model that calculates the present value of the estimated future net servicing income. The model incorporates a number of assumptions as MSRs do not trade in an active and open market with readily observable prices. The Company determines fair value using market based prepayment rates, discount rates, and other assumptions that are compared to various sources of market data including independent third party valuations and industry surveys. Senior management and the valuation committee review all significant assumptions quarterly since many factors can affect the fair value of MSRs. Changes in the valuation model inputs and assumptions are reported in the periods' results.

A summary of the key characteristics, inputs, and economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s MSRs as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the sensitivity of the fair values to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions are shown in the table below. Substantially all of the decrease in fair value during the year ended December 31, 2012, was driven by a 9% decline in the principal balance of loans serviced for others and a decrease in prevailing interest rates during the year ended December 31, 2012.
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
Fair value of retained MSRs

$899

 

$921

Prepayment rate assumption (annual)
16
%
 
20
%
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

$50

 

$52

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change
95

 
98

Discount rate (annual)
11
%
 
11
%
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

$37

 

$33

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change
70

 
63

Weighted-average life (in years)
4.9

 
4.3

Weighted-average coupon
4.8
%
 
5.2
%


The above sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the amounts indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Additionally, the sensitivities above do not include the effect of hedging activity undertaken by the Company to offset changes in the fair value of MSRs. See Note 16, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” for further information regarding these hedging transactions.