XML 81 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Reinsurance Arrangements and Guarantees
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Reinsurance Arrangements and Guarantees
NOTE 13 – REINSURANCE ARRANGEMENTS AND GUARANTEES
Reinsurance
The Company provides mortgage reinsurance on certain mortgage loans through contracts with several primary mortgage insurance companies. Under these contracts, the Company provides aggregate excess loss coverage in a mezzanine layer in exchange for a portion of the pool’s mortgage insurance premium. As of September 30, 2011, approximately $8.3 billion of mortgage loans were covered by such mortgage reinsurance contracts. The reinsurance contracts are intended to place limits on the Company’s maximum exposure to losses by defining the loss amounts ceded to the Company as well as by establishing trust accounts for each contract. The trust accounts, which are comprised of funds contributed by the Company plus premiums earned under the reinsurance contracts, are maintained to fund claims made under the reinsurance contracts. If claims exceed funds held in the trust accounts, the Company does not intend to make additional contributions beyond future premiums earned under the existing contracts.
At September 30, 2011, the total loss exposure ceded to the Company was approximately $320 million; however, the maximum amount of loss exposure based on funds held in each separate trust account, including net premiums due to the trust accounts, was limited to $50 million. Of this amount, $41 million of losses have been reserved for as of September 30, 2011, reducing the Company’s net remaining loss exposure to $9 million. The reinsurance reserve was $148 million as of December 31, 2010. The decrease in the reserve balance was due to claim payments made to the primary mortgage insurance companies since December 31, 2010, as well as the relinquishment of one trust during the second quarter of 2011. The Company’s evaluation of the required reserve amount includes an estimate of claims to be paid by the trust in relation to loans in default and an assessment of the sufficiency of future revenues, including premiums and investment income on funds held in the trusts, to cover future claims. Future reported losses may exceed $9 million, since future premium income will increase the amount of funds held in the trust; however, future cash losses, net of premium income, are not expected to exceed $9 million. The amount of future premium income is limited to the population of loans currently outstanding since additional loans are not being added to the reinsurance contracts; future premium income could be further curtailed to the extent the Company agrees to relinquish control of other individual trusts to the mortgage insurance companies. Premium income, which totaled $6 million and $20 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $10 million and $30 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, is reported as part of noninterest income. The related provision for losses, which totaled $5 million and $18 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively and $7 million and $25 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, is reported as part of other noninterest expense.

Guarantees
The Company has undertaken certain guarantee obligations in the ordinary course of business. The issuance of a guarantee imposes an obligation for the Company to stand ready to perform and should certain triggering events occur, it also imposes an obligation to make future payments. Payments may be in the form of cash, financial instruments, other assets, shares of stock, or provisions of the Company’s services. The following discussion appends and updates certain guarantees disclosed in Note 18, “Reinsurance Arrangements and Guarantees,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Additionally, the Company has entered into certain contracts that are similar to guarantees, but that are accounted for as derivatives (see Note 11, “Derivative Financial Instruments”).

Letters of Credit
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company generally to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party in borrowing arrangements, such as CP, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to clients and may be reduced by selling participations to third parties. The Company issues letters of credit that are classified as financial standby, performance standby, or commercial letters of credit.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the maximum potential amount of the Company’s obligation was $5.5 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively, for financial and performance standby letters of credit. The Company has recorded $106 million and $109 million in other liabilities for unearned fees related to these letters of credit as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company’s outstanding letters of credit generally have a term of less than one year but may extend longer. If a letter of credit is drawn upon, the Company may seek recourse through the client’s underlying obligation. If the client’s line of credit is also in default, the Company may take possession of the collateral securing the line of credit, where applicable. The Company monitors its credit exposure under standby letters of credit in the same manner as it monitors other extensions of credit in accordance with credit policies. Some standby letters of credit are designed to be drawn upon and others are drawn upon only under circumstances of dispute or default in the underlying transaction to which the Company is not a party. In all cases, the Company holds the right to reimbursement from the applicant and may or may not also hold collateral to secure that right. An internal assessment of the probability of default and loss severity in the event of default is assessed consistent with the methodologies used for all commercial borrowers. The management of credit risk regarding letters of credit leverages the risk rating process to focus higher visibility on the higher risk and higher dollar letters of credit. The associated reserve is a component of the unfunded commitment reserve recorded in other liabilities included in the allowance for credit losses as disclosed in Note 4, “Allowance for Credit Losses.”
Loan Sales
STM, a consolidated subsidiary of SunTrust, originates and purchases residential mortgage loans, a portion of which are sold to outside investors in the normal course of business, through a combination of whole loan sales to GSEs, Ginnie Mae, and non-agency investors, as well as a limited amount of Company sponsored securitizations. When mortgage loans are sold, representations and warranties regarding certain attributes of the loans sold are made to these third party purchasers. Subsequent to the sale, if a material underwriting deficiency or documentation defect is discovered, STM may be obligated to repurchase the mortgage loan or to reimburse the investor for losses incurred (make whole requests) if such deficiency or defect cannot be cured by STM within the specified period following discovery. These representations and warranties may extend through the life of the mortgage loan; however, most demands occur within the first years of origination. STM’s risk of loss under its representations and warranties is largely driven by borrower payment performance since investors will perform extensive reviews of delinquent loans as a means of mitigating losses.
Loan repurchase requests generally arise from loans sold during the period from January 1, 2005 to September 30, 2011, which totaled $239.8 billion at the time of sale, consisting of $184.5 billion and $30.3 billion of agency and non-agency loans, respectively, as well as $25.0 billion of loans sold to Ginnie Mae. The composition of the remaining outstanding balance by vintage and type of buyer as of September 30, 2011 is shown in the following table:
 
 
Remaining Outstanding Balance by Year of Sale
(Dollars in billions)
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
2011
 
Total    
GSE1

$4.8

 

$5.7

 

$11.0

 

$12.1

 

$27.3

 

$15.4

 

$11.5

 

$87.8

Ginnie Mae1
0.7

 
0.5

 
0.5

 
2.5

 
5.8

 
4.2

 
2.3

 
16.5

Non-agency
4.1

 
6.0

 
4.8

 

 

 

 

 
14.9

Total

$9.6

 

$12.2

 

$16.3

 

$14.6

 

$33.1

 

$19.6

 

$13.8

 

$119.2


1 Balances based on loans serviced by the Company.
Non-agency loan sales include whole loans and loans sold in private securitization transactions. While representation and warranties have been made related to these sales, they differ in many cases from those made in connection with loans sold to the GSEs in that non-agency loans may not be required to meet the same underwriting standards and, in addition to identifying a representation or warranty breach, non-agency investors are generally required to demonstrate that the breach was material and directly related to the cause of default. Loans sold to Ginnie Mae are insured by either the FHA or VA. As servicer, we may elect to repurchase delinquent loans in accordance with Ginnie Mae guidelines; however, the loans continue to be insured. Although we indemnify the FHA and VA for losses related to loans not originated in accordance with their guidelines, such occurrences are limited and no repurchase liability has been recorded for loans sold to Ginnie Mae.
Although the timing and volume has varied, repurchase and make whole requests have increased over the past several years and more recently during the current quarter. Repurchase request volume was $1.1 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $1.1 billion, $1.1 billion, and $557 million during the years ended 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, and on a cumulative basis since 2005 has been $4.6 billion. The majority of these requests are from GSEs, with a limited number of requests having been received related to non-agency investors; repurchase requests from non-agency investors were $47 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $55 million, $99 million, and $148 million during the years ended 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Additionally, repurchase requests related to loans originated in 2006 and 2007 have consistently comprised the vast majority of total repurchase requests during the past three years. The repurchase and make whole requests received have been primarily due to material breaches of representations related to compliance with the applicable underwriting standards, including borrower misrepresentation and appraisal issues. STM performs a loan by loan review of all requests, and demands have been contested to the extent they are not considered valid. At September 30, 2011, the unpaid principal balance of loans related to unresolved requests previously received from investors was $490 million, comprised of $462 million from the GSEs and $28 million from non-agency investors. Comparable amounts at December 31, 2010, were $293 million, comprised of $264 million from the GSEs and $29 million from non-agency investors.
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the liability for contingent losses related to loans sold totaled $282 million and $265 million, respectively. The liability is recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the related repurchase provision is recognized in mortgage production related income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. STM does not maintain any legal reserves with respect to mortgage repurchase activity because there is currently no litigation outstanding. The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s reserve for mortgage loan repurchase losses:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30
 
Nine Months Ended September 30
(Dollars in millions)
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Balance at beginning of period

$299

 

$256

 

$265

 

$200

Repurchase provision
117

 
95

 
287

 
371

Charge-offs
(134
)
 
(81
)
 
(270
)
 
(301
)
Balance at end of period

$282

 

$270

 

$282

 

$270



During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company repurchased or otherwise settled mortgages with unpaid principal balances of $488 million and $512 million, respectively, related to investor demands. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of outstanding repurchased mortgage loans, net of any allowance for loan losses, totaled $199 million and $153 million, respectively, of which $100 million and $86 million, respectively, were nonperforming.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company maintained a reserve for costs associated with foreclosure delays of loans serviced for GSEs. STM also maintains a liability for contingent losses related to MSR sales, which totaled $7 million and $6 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Contingent Consideration
The Company has contingent payment obligations related to certain business combination transactions. Payments are calculated using certain post-acquisition performance criteria. Arrangements entered into prior to January 1, 2009 are not recorded as liabilities until the contingency is resolved; whereas, arrangements entered into subsequent to that date are recorded as liabilities at the fair value of the contingent payment. The potential obligation associated with these arrangements was $11 million and $5 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of which $10 million and $3 million were recorded as a liability representing the fair value of the contingent payments as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. If required, these contingent payments will be payable at various times over the next three years.
Visa
The Company issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through Visa. The Company is a defendant, along with Visa U.S.A. Inc. and MasterCard International (the “Card Associations”), as well as several other banks, in one of several antitrust lawsuits challenging the practices of the Card Associations (the “Litigation”). The Company has entered into judgment and loss sharing agreements with Visa and certain other banks in order to apportion financial responsibilities arising from any potential adverse judgment or negotiated settlements related to the Litigation. Additionally, in connection with Visa’s restructuring in 2007, a provision of the original Visa By-Laws, Section 2.05j, was restated in Visa’s certificate of incorporation. Section 2.05j contains a general indemnification provision between a Visa member and Visa, and explicitly provides that after the closing of the restructuring, each member’s indemnification obligation is limited to losses arising from its own conduct and the specifically defined Litigation. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under this indemnification provision cannot be determined as there is no limitation provided under the By-Laws and the amount of exposure is dependent on the outcome of the Litigation. As of September 30, 2011, Visa had funded $6.5 billion into an escrow account, established for the purpose of funding judgments in, or settlements of, the Litigation. Agreements associated with Visa’s IPO have provisions that Visa will first use the funds in the escrow account to pay for future settlements of, or judgments in the Litigation. If the escrow account is insufficient to cover the Litigation losses, then Visa will issue additional Class A shares (“loss shares”). The proceeds from the sale of the loss shares would then be deposited in the escrow account. The issuance of the loss shares will cause a dilution of Visa’s Class B common stock as a result of an adjustment to lower the conversion factor of the Class B common stock to Class A common stock. Visa USA’s members are responsible for any portion of the settlement or loss on the Litigation after the escrow account is depleted and the value of the Class B shares is fully-diluted. In May 2009, the Company sold its 3.2 million shares of Class B Visa Inc. common stock to another financial institution (“the Counterparty”) and entered into a derivative with the Counterparty. The Company received $112 million and recognized a gain of $112 million in connection with these transactions. Under the derivative, the Counterparty will be compensated by the Company for any decline in the conversion factor as a result of the outcome of the Litigation. Conversely, the Company will be compensated by the Counterparty for any increase in the conversion factor. The amount of compensation is a function of the 3.2 million shares sold to the Counterparty, the change in conversion rate, and Visa’s share price. The Counterparty, as a result of its ownership of the Class B common stock, will be impacted by dilutive adjustments to the conversion factor of the Class B common stock caused by the Litigation losses. The conversion factor at the inception of the derivative in May 2009 was 0.6296 and as of September 30, 2011 the conversion factor had decreased to 0.4881 due to Visa’s funding of the litigation escrow account. The decreases in the conversion factor triggered payments by the Company to the Counterparty of $7 million, $17 million, and $10 million during 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. A high degree of subjectivity was used in estimating the fair value of the derivative liability, and the ultimate impact to the Company could be significantly higher or lower than the $16 million and $23 million recorded as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Other
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into indemnification agreements and provides standard representations and warranties in connection with numerous transactions. These transactions include those arising from securitization activities, underwriting agreements, merger and acquisition agreements, loan sales, contractual commitments, payment processing sponsorship agreements, and various other business transactions or arrangements. The extent of the Company’s obligations under these indemnification agreements depends upon the occurrence of future events; therefore, the Company’s potential future liability under these arrangements is not determinable.