10-K405 1 j3061_10k405.htm 10-K405 UNITED STATES

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 


FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2001

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                to               .

 

Commission File No. 1-12714

 

 

OSMONICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Minnesota

 

41-0955959

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

5951 Clearwater Drive, Minnetonka, Minnesota

 

55343

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

 

 

(952) 933-2277

(Registrant’s telephone number)

 

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

 

 

Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share

 

 

 

New York Stock Exchange

 

(Title of each class)

 

(Name of each exchange on which registered)

 

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes  ý                                      No  o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K.  ý.

 


 

As of March 20, 2002, 14,538,884 Common Shares were outstanding.  The aggregate market value of the Common Shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on such date (based upon the closing price of such shares on the New York Stock Exchange on March 20, 2002) was $209,359,930.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (the “Annual Report to Shareholders”), are incorporated by reference into Parts II and IV.  Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 8, 2002 (the “Proxy Statement”), and to be filed within 120 days after the Registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, are incorporated by reference into Part III.

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

 

The following discussion contains certain information and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  The actual results of Osmonics could differ materially from the Company’s historical results of operations and those discussed in the forward-looking statements.  See “Certain Factors” and other portions of this Form 10-K for discussion of some of these risks and uncertainties.

 

Osmonics, Inc., founded in 1969, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) design, manufacture and market a wide range of products used in the filtration, separation and processing of fluids ranging from complete fluid processing systems to replaceable components used in purification, filtration, and separation equipment.  The Company classifies its products into three segments, namely Filtration and Separations, Process Water and Household Water.

 

Development of Business

 

In addition to developing the Company’s product line through internal research and development, the Company has expanded its business through a series of acquisitions.  Recent major acquisitions in the last five years include:

 

                  AquaMatic - In February 1997, the Company acquired AquaMatic, Inc., a Rockford, Illinois-based company offering a line of specialty valves and controllers for the water conditioning market, which are sold through the Company’s existing distribution channels.

 

                  Micron Separations, Inc. - In February 1998, the Company acquired Micron Separations, Inc. (“MSI”), a Westborough, Massachusetts-based developer and manufacturer of microfilter membrane and membrane products for diagnostic, laboratory and industrial use. These products expand the Company’s range of nylon and cellulosic membrane applications.  The products are sold through the Company’s existing distribution channels.

 

2



 

                  Membrex Corp. - In April 1998, the Company acquired Membrex Corp. of Fairfield, New Jersey.  The acquisition gives the Company the most hydrophilic UF membrane in the market.  This patented membrane is primarily used to separate oil from water and is also used in a variety of applications in biotechnology, laboratory and petrochemical processes. Membrex also has a patented machine using its UF membrane, which separates oil from aqueous chemical cleaners, used in parts cleaning and other industrial and commercial applications.  Some Membrex products are sold through an exclusive agreement with Safety-Kleen Corp. and the remainder through the Company’s existing distribution channels.  In December 2001, the Company signed a new agreement with Safety-Kleen Corp., which continues the business relationship on a non-exclusive basis.

 

                  ZyzaTech Water Systems, Inc. - In July 1999, the Company acquired ZyzaTech Water Systems, Inc. (ZyzaTech), a Seattle, Washington-based manufacturer of medical and pharmaceutical water purification and fluid handling products.  ZyzaTech products are being sold through their existing distribution channels, offering a broadened line of hemodialysis products.

 

Business Segments

 

The Company’s products are divided into three primary business segments, namely, Filtration and Separations, Process Water and Household Water.

 

Filtration and Separations:

 

The Company’s Filtration and Separations group consist primarily of membranes, filter media, membrane elements and filter cartridges.  The filtration media and membrane are produced primarily from polymers or polymer-based compounds.

 

Membranes are generally sheets of material that, due to their unique characteristics, can separate various materials from a fluid.  Membrane elements are the combination of membrane, support materials and connections, which allows the membrane to be broadly utilized.

 

Membrane elements are typically replaced every 6 to 60 months, depending upon the severity of the application.  The Company manufactures most of the membrane material and membrane elements used in its own systems, and also manufactures membrane and membrane elements for other original equipment manufacturers (OEM’s) who include them as component parts in their products.

 

3



 

The Company’s crossflow membranes are used in many bioengineering processes such as the production of high fructose corn sugar, enzyme purification, and purification of pharmaceuticals produced by biological processes.  Other uses include water purification applications in hemodialysis, semiconductor manufacturing, production of pure water for beverages, production of ultrapure pharmaceutical and boiler feed water, industrial water purification, oil/water separation and waste removal for pollution control compliance.

 

The Company is registered with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the manufacture and sale of certain membrane elements used in biological preparations.

 

The Company markets its microfiltration normal flow membrane for use in a variety of laboratory and medical diagnostic applications.  Numerous applications exist for the Company’s microfilters because of unique features, including use in diagnostics, air monitoring and in laboratory procedures for cancer and other research.

 

The Company markets several types of replaceable cartridge filters. Cartridge filters consist of the various membranes and filtration media manufactured by the Company and third parties together with various end caps and other parts that allow them to be used and replaced in filtration equipment and systems.  These cartridge filters include depth cartridge filters, pleated cartridge filters, and rolled cartridge filters.

 

Cartridge filters are manufactured in a range of pore sizes and particulate retention ratings.  Cartridge filters are designed to retain particles in the filters.  As a result, cartridge filters are typically replaced at intervals of eight hours to four weeks, depending on the particular application.

 

Process Water:

 

The Company’s Process Water group manufactures and sells a broad range of equipment products ranging from large independent fluid treatment systems custom designed for a particular customer and its related filtration requirements to instruments used to determine the amount of a particular substance in a fluid.  The Company’s filtration equipment utilizes a wide range of filtration techniques including: crossflow filtration (which includes reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, ultrafiltration and microfiltration), normal filtration (which includes microfiltration and particle filtration), coalescing filtration, ion exchange, clarification, chromatography, ozonation and distillation.  As a result, the Company’s equipment is used in a broad range of applications from complete fluid processing systems used in beverage production to water for high performance boilers used in power generation.  The Company’s equipment products are manufactured in two locations in the United States.

 

The Company manufacturers and sells crossflow and normal filtration machines.  Such machines are comprised of one or more membrane elements, cartridge filters, pumps, valves, controls, transformers, heat exchangers, pipes and a steel frame on which the components are mounted.  The size and number of membrane elements and filters can vary greatly.  Pumps, pipes and frames of various sizes can be combined and configured to accommodate the membrane elements or filters required for various fluid handling or separation tasks.

 

4



 

The systems sold by the Company are comprised of one or more machines or pieces of equipment designed and manufactured by the Company as well as ancillary equipment, such as additional pumps, heat exchangers and holding tanks.  The type, size and number of machines and the ancillary equipment included in a system will vary with the nature and size of the fluid separation task.

 

The Company is a major manufacturer and marketer of machines and systems used for the production of pure water for artificial kidney dialysis and is registered with the FDA for the manufacture of Class II medical devices used to purify and process water for hemodialysis.

 

The Company manufactures and sells a line of multi-stage centrifugal pumps.  These pumps were developed by the Company to meet the need for dependable high pressure pumps and are available in 60 standard sizes with flows ranging from 3 gallons per minute to 500 gallons per minute and pressure capabilities from 25 pounds per square inch (psi) to 500 psi.  The pumps are capable of operating in series to obtain 1000 psi for seawater desalting and other high pressure applications.  The Company recently developed an energy recovery turbine that complements its centrifugal pumps primarily for use in desalting seawater with reverse osmosis.

 

The Company manufactures and markets equipment to generate ozone from electricity using corona discharge.  Ozone is becoming increasingly important as a bactericide and water purifier because it kills bacteria, virus and giardia cysts 10 to 300 times faster than chlorine.  Ozone is also effective in oxidizing trace organic materials in water which are precursors of the carcinogenic trihalomethanes.  Ozone can also be used to purify solvent-contaminated groundwater and is often used to de-color water and wastewater.

 

The Company also manufactures and markets electronic controllers to operate precision valves for water conditioning; flow control and measuring devices and instrumentation; housings and specialty holders and devices for containing and retaining various membranes and filters; analog and digital products for chemical water treatment and monitoring; and instruments used to measure and control conductivity, pH, ORP, chlorine and specific ions.  The instruments are capable of being used in local operating network (LON) communications and data acquisition.

 

Household Water:

 

The Company is a leader in the manufacture of the controllers and valves used to effect ion exchange technology.  The most commonly used ion exchange process is for water softening where the ions of calcium and magnesium are replaced with sodium to reduce soap usage, improve boiler operation and improve cleaning.  Ion exchange technology is also used to polish ultrapure water for electronics manufacture and high-pressure boiler feed.

 

The Company also manufactures and sells automated chlorination units for residential and farm water system disinfection.

 

In addition, the Company manufactures and sells home reverse osmosis (HRO) membrane elements and cartridge filters to OEM’s who package them into systems for use in homes, offices and retail vending establishments to produce purified drinking water.

 

5



 

Segment Sales

 

For the twelve months of 2001, Filtration and Separations was 40% of total sales, Process Water was 42% of total sales and Household Water made up 18% of total sales.  For the twelve months of 2000, Filtration and Separations was 40% of total sales, Process Water was 40% of total sales and Household Water made up 20% of total sales.  For the twelve months of 1999, Filtration and Separations was 42% of total sales, Process Water was 38% of total sales and Household Water made up 20% of total sales.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

The Company’s broad range of products are used in the purification of water and industrial solutions, dewatering and recycling of commercial and industrial fluids, pollution control and seawater desalting.  The Company’s principal domestic and international markets, from which it derives more than 50% of its sales, include healthcare, household, food and beverage, municipal, power and industrial, and microelectronics.

 

The Company focuses the marketing of its products through targeted selling efforts in four main regions of the world:

 

1.  USA and Canada

 

2.  Mexico, Central and South America

 

3.  Euro/Africa

 

4.  Asia/Pacific

 

These sales efforts are supported by application engineers and customer service personnel.

 

Filtration and Separations products are sold through a worldwide network of independent distributors and OEM’s.  Some sales are made directly to certain of the Company’s largest customers and to other manufacturers of filtration equipment and systems.  The Company markets its engineered systems and equipment through its direct sales force and third-party integrators.  The Company’s other equipment products in the Process Water and Household Water products are marketed to a network of independent distributors and value-added resellers with the help of Company district managers.  These value-added resellers provide worldwide installation service and stocking of a wide range of the Company’s equipment.

 

The Company’s marketing activities include appearances at trade shows, direct marketing campaigns, advertisements in professional and trade journals and appearances before professional organizations.  The Company participates with its customers in planning the systems in which its products are to be used, particularly if new applications are involved.  In some cases, the sale of a system designed for a particular customer may result from an engineering and service relationship which has extended over several years.

 

6



 

Research and Development

 

Research and development activities emphasize product development and applied research, with the goal of developing proprietary products.  Such expenditures totaled $7,743,000 in 2001, $7,886,000 in 2000, and $7,694,000 in 1999.

 

Patents and Trademarks

 

The Company has been granted domestic and certain foreign trademarks on numerous product names, and on its logotypes.  The Company holds domestic and foreign patents on certain of its filter media, membranes, filters, controlling valves, machine designs and other products.  The Company has also from time to time acquired businesses that own patents and trademarks.  Although the Company believes that its patents have value, the Company’s business as a whole is not dependent on any patent or group of related patents because the Company considers its technological position to be based primarily on its proprietary manufacturing methods, innovative engineering and marketing expertise.  However, the loss of patents relating to certain specialized membranes and related products could have a significant effect on the Company’s future revenues.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2001, the Company employed 1,318 persons, including 191 employees who hold engineering or technical degrees.

 

Competition

 

The Company experiences competition from a variety of sources with respect to virtually all of its products, although the Company knows of no single entity that competes with it across the full range of its products and systems.  Competition in the markets served by the Company is based on a number of factors, which may include price, technology, applications experience, know-how, availability of financing, reputation, product warranties, reliability, service and distribution.

 

With respect to the Company’s membrane and related water treatment equipment business activity, there are a number of companies, including several sizable chemical companies that manufacture membranes, but not equipment.  There are numerous smaller companies, primarily fabricators, that build water treatment and desalination equipment, but which generally do not have their own proprietary membrane technology.  A limited number of companies manufacture both membranes and equipment.  In ozone equipment, there are both large and small competitors with no single dominant competitor.  In water softener controls and valves, the Company has three primary and numerous secondary competitors.  Some competitors sell only controller valves and some sell complete softeners.  The Company has numerous competitors in its conventional water treatment and filtration product business activities.

 

With respect to the Company’s disposable filter and lab products, two larger companies dominate the industry with several smaller companies competing in selected product lines.

 

7



 

With respect to the Company’s pump and fluid handling products, there are numerous competitors of larger size and with greater resources than the Company.  Some competitors have significantly broader product lines than the Company.

 

The Company is unable to state with certainty its relative market position in all aspects of its business.  Many of its competitors have financial and other resources greater than those of the Company.

 

Raw Materials

 

The principal raw materials used by the Company are various plastic materials including polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, Noryl PPO, Nylon, cellulose acetate, polycarbonate, polyester, polysulfone, polyacrylonitrile; stainless steel, steel, brass, copper, and various other synthetic materials, all of which are normally available from sources within the continental United States.  Most raw materials used by the Company are available from multiple sources of supply.  A limited number of materials are proprietary products of major companies which, if not available, would have a material effect on the Company’s sales and profits.  The Company believes it could find substitutes for these materials if they should become unavailable, but has no assurance that the substitute would perform as well or be priced as favorably.

 

In 2001 and 2000, the Company experienced no difficulty in securing any of its needed raw materials and components.

 

Customers

 

No one customer accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company’s consolidated revenue in 2001, 2000, or 1999.

 

Backlog

 

The dollar amount of the Company’s backlog of orders considered to be firm at December 31, 2001, was $21.1 million.  The comparable backlog at December 31, 2000, was $26.6 million.  The Company expects that nearly all orders included in the backlog at December 31, 2001 will be filled during the 2002 fiscal year.  The Company does not believe that its backlog at any time is necessarily indicative of annual sales.  The business of the Company is not subject to significant seasonal variations.

 

Governmental Regulation

 

Certain applications of the Company’s reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration products and fluid handling equipment are subject to governmental regulation.  Products used for fractionation of cheese whey for human consumption are subject to regulation by the United States Department of Agriculture.  Reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration and fluid handling systems used in medical applications, particularly the systems used in artificial kidney dialysis equipment and pharmaceutical water for injection, are subject to regulation by the FDA.  Ultrafiltration and microfiltration products used for biological separations are subject to regulation by the FDA.

 

8



 

Foreign Operations

 

Substantially all of the Company’s operations and assets are located in the United States.  The Company has sales offices and distribution facilities in France, Thailand, Switzerland, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and China.  Limited assembly is conducted in Europe and Asia.  The profitability of domestic and foreign sales is substantially equal.  Sales to Canada are made on the same trade terms as are available to customers in the United States.

 

The Company transacts business with certain international customers under defined credit terms and in U.S. dollars.  Large export equipment and system sales are primarily made on the basis of confirmed irrevocable letters of credit or time drafts to selected customers in U.S. dollars.  The Company believes that currency fluctuation related to these sales do not constitute substantial risks.

 

The Company’s operation in France sells to foreign customers primarily in euros.   The Company also has certain raw material sourcing arrangements transacted in foreign currencies. In 2001, the Company entered into a hedge contract to help offset foreign currency risk related to its European foreign subsidiary.  The instrument hedges certain levels of the subsidiary’s local euro currency exposure to the U.S. dollar and expires in June 2002. The Company believes these transactions do constitute some level of risk and adverse currency fluctuations may occur.  See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of the Company’s foreign operations and export sales by geographic area.

 

Certain Factors

 

In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders or this Form 10-K, such as intellectual property and other technological risks, regulatory risks, and environmental risks, the following are some important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.

 

9



 

EARNINGS VARIATIONS

 

The sale of capital equipment within the water purification and fluid filtration industry is cyclical and influenced by various economic factors including interest rates and general fluctuations of the business cycle.  A significant portion of the Company’s revenues is derived from capital equipment sales.  While the Company sells capital equipment to customers in diverse industries and in global markets, cyclicality of capital equipment sales and instability of general economic conditions, including those in the United States, Europe, Asia, Latin America and certain other markets, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues and profitability.

 

Operating results from the sale of water purification and fluid filtration systems also can be expected to fluctuate significantly as a result of the limited pool of existing and potential customers for these systems, the timing of new contracts, possible deferrals or cancellations of existing contracts and the evolving and unpredictable nature of the markets for water purification systems.  As a result of these and other factors, the Company’s operating results may be subject to quarterly or annual fluctuations.  There can be no assurance that at any given time the Company’s operating results will meet or exceed stock market analysts’ expectations.

 

COMPETITION

 

All of the markets in which the Company competes are highly competitive, and most are fragmented, with numerous regional and local participants.  There are competitors of the Company in certain markets that are divisions or subsidiaries of companies that have significantly greater resources than the Company.  Competitive factors include price, technical expertise, product quality and responsiveness to customer needs, including service and technical support.  The Company competes not only with a large number of independent wholesalers and with other distribution chains similar to the Company, but also with manufacturers who sell directly to customers.  The Company’s HRO business also competes with companies with national distribution networks, businesses with regional scope, and local product assemblers or service companies, as well as retail outlets.  The Company believes that there are thousands of participants in the residential water business.  The HRO business competes principally on the basis of price, product quality and “taste,” service, distribution capabilities, geographic presence and reputation.  Competitive pressures, including those described above, and other factors could cause the Company to lose market share or could result in significant price erosion, either of which could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

 

INTEREST RATE RISK

 

The Company has interest rate risk associated with its debt instruments.  These debt instruments are both fixed and variable in nature.  Also, the Company has some debt instruments denominated in currency other than the U.S. dollar.  See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of the Company’s debt instruments.  The following is a future maturity schedule by debt instrument category which can be used to assess the Company’s level of interest rate exposure as of December 31, 2001:

 

10



 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Future Maturities

 

 

Interest

 

Balance

 

 

2006 and

 

 

Rate

 

12/31/01

 

2002

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

Beyond

 

Variable Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. dollar-based

 

4.5

%

27,150

 

11,864

 

2,365

 

2,365

 

2,365

 

2,365

 

5,826

 

Euro-based

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

27,150

 

11,864

 

2,365

 

2,365

 

2,365

 

2,365

 

5,826

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. dollar-based

 

7.1

%

5,845

 

1,437

 

1,212

 

591

 

580

 

574

 

1,451

 

Euro-based

 

4.5

%

1,073

 

318

 

237

 

248

 

259

 

11

 

 

Total

 

 

 

6,918

 

1,755

 

1,449

 

839

 

839

 

585

 

1,451

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Debt

 

4.9

%

34,068

 

13,619

 

3,814

 

3,204

 

3,204

 

2,950

 

7,277

 

 

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

 

The Company in the ordinary course of business enters into sales and purchase activity at the Corporate and Subsidiary level in currency other than the functional currency of the reporting entity (U.S. dollar) and such activity exposes the Company to foreign exchange rate risk.  In the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company transacted sales and purchase transactions in a currency other than U.S. dollars of approximately $16,200,000 and $7,200,000, respectively.

 

RISKS RELATED TO ACQUISITIONS

 

The Company has acquired a number of United States-based companies and product lines.  The Company plans to continue to consider and potentially pursue acquisitions that expand the segments of the water, wastewater treatment and water-related industries in which it participates; complement its technologies, products or services; broaden its customer base and geographic areas served; expand its global distribution network; and provide opportunities. The Company’s acquisition strategy entails the potential risks inherent in assessing the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent or other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition candidates and in integrating the operations of acquired companies.  Although the Company believes that it has generally been successful in pursuing acquisitions, there can be no assurance that acquisition opportunities will continue to be available, that the Company will have access to the capital required to finance potential acquisitions, that the Company will continue to acquire businesses or that any business acquired will be integrated successfully or prove profitable.

 

PROFIT UNCERTAINTY IN FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS

 

A significant portion of the Company’s revenues is generated under fixed price contracts.  To the extent that original cost estimates are inaccurate, scheduled deliveries are delayed or progress under a contract is otherwise impeded, revenue recognition and profitability from a particular contract may be adversely affected.

 

11



 

RISKS OF DOING BUSINESS IN OTHER COUNTRIES

 

The Company sells a significant amount of its product in markets outside the United States.  While these activities provide important opportunities for the Company to offer its products and services internationally, they also entail the risks associated with conducting business internationally, including the risk of currency fluctuations, slower payment of invoices, the lack in some jurisdictions of well-developed legal systems, nationalization and possible social, political and economic instability.

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

 

The executive offices and principal manufacturing facilities of the Company are located in Minnetonka, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis.

 

A summary of the Company’s main operating facilities is as follows:

 

Location

 

Status

 

Size

 

Function

Minnetonka, MN

 

Owned

 

309,600 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vista, CA

 

Owned

 

110,000 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Milwaukee, WI

 

Owned

 

103,700 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rockford, IL

 

Owned

 

58,400 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Westborough, MA

 

Leased

 

44,000 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kent, WA

 

Leased

 

50,000 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Syracuse, NY

 

Owned

 

48,500 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Le Mée, France

 

Owned

 

36,900 sq ft

 

Sales, Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar Grove, NJ

 

Leased

 

4,000 sq ft

 

Research & Development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Escondido, CA

 

Leased

 

12,700 sq ft

 

Manufacturing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Emmetsburg, IA

 

Leased

 

8,800 sq ft

 

Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bryan, TX

 

Owned

 

2,500 sq ft

 

Manufacturing, Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Owned

 

 

 

669,600 sq ft

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Leased

 

 

 

119,500 sq ft

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Owned and Leased

 

 

 

789,100 sq ft

 

 

 

Certain borrowings of the Company are collateralized by real property of the Company.

 

The current manufacturing facilities are adequate for intermediate-term operations.  In addition, the Company leases space in Thailand, China, Germany, Japan, Hong Kong, Switzerland and Singapore that is used primarily for sales activities.

 

12



 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

The Company is currently involved in several lawsuits incidental to its business. Management does not believe that any of the lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

No matter was submitted to a vote of the Company’s security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year that ended December 31, 2001.

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

Name and Age

 

Position with Company

 

Officer
Since

D. Dean Spatz (57)

 

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

 

1969

 

 

 

 

 

Ruth Carol Spatz (57)

 

Secretary

 

1969

 

 

 

 

 

Roger S. Miller (43)

 

Sr. Vice President

 

1998

 

 

 

 

 

Phillip M. Rolchigo (40)

 

Chief Technology Officer

 

1998

 

 

 

 

 

Edward J. Fierko (60)

 

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

1999

 

 

 

 

 

Keith B. Robinson (47)

 

Chief Financial Officer and Sr. Vice President Administration

 

1999

 

All of the executive officers have been officers of the Company for more than five years except the following:

 

Mr. Miller joined Osmonics in 1993 as a product manager for pumps.  Previously, Mr. Miller managed sales and marketing for Kurt Manufacturing, a machine tool manufacturer, and was a general manager for a capital equipment manufacturer in the water treatment industry.

 

Dr. Rolchigo came to Osmonics from Membrex Corp., which Osmonics acquired in 1998.  Dr. Rolchigo is the principal inventor of advanced vortex flow filtration technology.  His technical expertise spans diverse industries from environmental waste to pharmaceutical processing.  He has served as a research affiliate in chemical engineering for MIT, and belongs to numerous industry organizations.

 

Mr. Fierko joined Osmonics in 1998 as a Vice President and General Manager of two Global Business Units.  Previously, Mr. Fierko served as President and CEO of EcoWater

 

13



 

International, Inc.  Before that, he served as President of EcoWater Systems and was with General Electric Company for 23 years prior to joining EcoWater in 1987.

 

Mr. Robinson joined Osmonics in 1999 as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President Administration.  Previously, Mr. Robinson served as Senior Director of Planning and Finance at West Group.  Before that, he served as Chief Financial Officer of The Thompson Corporation.

 

All executive officers are elected annually by, and serve at the direction of, the Board of Directors.  D. Dean Spatz and Ruth Carol Spatz are husband and wife.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

 

“Common Stock Data,” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” pages 25-33 of the Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated herein by reference.  As of March 20, 2002 there were 1,821 shareholders of record.

 

The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common shares.  The Board of Directors currently intends to retain its earnings for the expansion of the Company’s business. The Company has issued promissory notes that contain a covenant limiting the payment of dividends to shareholders.  At December 31, 2001, approximately $13,632,000 of retained earnings was eligible for dividend distribution under this covenant.

 

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

“Selected Financial Data,” pages 40-41 of the Annual Report to Shareholders, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” pages 34-39 of the Annual Report to Shareholders, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Information required by this Item is under the heading Foreign Operations, Interest Rate Risk and Foreign Currency Risk of Item 1 of this Form 10-K.

 

14



 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The following consolidated financial information of the Registrant and its subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report to Shareholders, is incorporated herein by reference:

 

Independent Auditors’ Report

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Quarterly Financial Data

 

ITEM 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

 

Not Applicable.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS

 

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and forwarded to shareholders prior to the Company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2002 Proxy Statement”).

 

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2002 Proxy Statement.

 

ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2002 Proxy Statement.

 

15



 

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2002 Proxy Statement.

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 14.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

(a) (1)           Financial Statements

 

The consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated by reference in Item 8, and are also incorporated herein by reference.

 

(a) (2)           Financial Statement Schedule

 

Reports of Independent Public Accountants on Supplemental Schedule to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Valuation and qualifying accounts.

 

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are either not applicable, not material or the required information has been given in the financial statements or in the notes to the financial statements.

 

  (2)                                     Agreement and Plan of Merger among Desalination Systems, Inc., Osmonics, Inc. and DSI Acquisition Corp. dated May 17, 1996.  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 33-05029.)

 

(3)A.

Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended.  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-2, File No. 33-336.)  Certificate of Amendment.  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3)A on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1987, File No. 0–8282.)

 

 

  B.

By-Laws of the Registrant.  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-2, File No. 33-336.)

 

 

(4)A.

Note Purchase Agreement dated July 12, 1991.  (Incorporated herein by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1991.)

 

16



 

(10)A.*

1993 Stock Option Plan and related form of stock option agreement.  (Incorporated herein by reference to Annex C of the Registrant’s Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated September 10, 1993.)

 

 

  B.

Stock Option Agreement with Michael L. Snow, Director.  (Incorporated herein by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.)

 

 

  D.

1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  (Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated March 27, 1995.)

 

 

 E.*

1995 Director Stock Option Plan.  (Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated March 27, 1995.)

 

 

 

* Denotes Executive Compensation Plan.

 

 

(10)

(a)

Letter Agreement dated as of May 15, 2001 by and between MLS and the Corporation (terminated August 13, 2002)(rescinded April 1, 2002)(portions of this exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to an application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)

 

 

 

(b)

Stock Option Agreement with Michael L. Snow, Director.

 

 

 

(c)

Change of Control Agreement dated April 26, 2001 with D. Dean Spatz (schedule attached listing executives / officers with substantially identical change in control agreements).

 

 

 

(d)

Non-compete Agreement with Phil M. Rolchigo dated October 5, 2001.

 

 

 

 

(e)

Letter agreement of April 1, 2002 by and between MLS and the Company rescinding Letter Agreement dated May 15, 2001.

 

 

 

2001 Annual Report to Shareholders.  (Only those portions incorporated herein by reference shall be deemed filed with the Commission.)

(13)

 

 

(21)

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

 

 

(23)

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

 

17



 

(b)                Reports on Form 8-K

 

No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 31, 2001.

 

18



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

OSMONICS, INC.

 

 

By

/s/ D. Dean Spatz

 

 

D. Dean Spatz, CEO

 

Dated:  April 1, 2002

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

 

Signatures

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

/s/

Keith B. Robinson

 

Chief Financial Officer

April 1, 2002

 

Keith B. Robinson

(Principal Finance and Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

/s/

Ruth Carol Spatz

 

Director

April 1, 2002

 

Ruth Carol Spatz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director

April 1, 2002

 

Michael L. Snow

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/

Ralph E. Crump

 

Director

April 1, 2002

 

Ralph E. Crump

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/

Charles W. Palmer

 

Director

April 1, 2002

 

Charles W. Palmer

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/

William Eykamp

 

Director

April 1, 2002

 

William Eykamp

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/

Charles M. Brennan

 

Director

April 1, 2002

 

Charles M. Brennan

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/

D. Dean Spatz

 

CEO, Chairman of the Board and Director

April 1, 2002

 

D. Dean Spatz

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

19



 

OSMONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Sales

 

$

207,439

 

$

200,139

 

$

187,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

 

141,896

 

139,733

 

128,608

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

65,543

 

60,406

 

58,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

44,806

 

44,195

 

43,720

 

Research, development and engineering

 

7,743

 

7,886

 

7,694

 

Special charges

 

1,700

 

250

 

2,575

 

 

 

54,249

 

52,331

 

53,989

 

Income from operations

 

11,294

 

8,075

 

4,431

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense), net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

116

 

397

 

612

 

Interest expense

 

(2,555

)

(4,337

)

(4,053

)

Other

 

507

 

3,947

 

2,058

 

 

 

(1,932

)

7

 

(1,383

)

Income before income taxes

 

9,362

 

8,082

 

3,048

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes (Note 10)

 

3,183

 

2,663

 

2,084

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

6,179

 

$

5,419

 

$

964

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic (Note 15)

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – assuming dilution
(Note 15)

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

20



 

OSMONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

(In thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 

$

21

 

Marketable securities (Note 3)

 

52

 

1,889

 

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $963 in 2001 and $1,008 in 2000

 

34,890

 

36,765

 

Inventories (Note 4)

 

32,094

 

32,758

 

Deferred tax assets (Note 11)

 

4,867

 

4,314

 

Other current assets

 

2,041

 

2,487

 

Total current assets

 

73,944

 

78,234

 

Property and equipment, at cost:

 

 

 

 

 

Land and land improvements

 

5,366

 

5,056

 

Buildings

 

30,830

 

30,283

 

Machinery and equipment

 

76,282

 

76,943

 

 

 

112,478

 

112,282

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(53,314

)

(55,381

)

 

 

59,164

 

56,901

 

Cash restricted for purchase and construction of equipment (Note 5)

 

325

 

325

 

Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $8,340 in 2001 and $6,478 in 2000

 

44,295

 

46,310

 

Long-term investments

 

2,617

 

2,688

 

Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of intangible assets of $1,910 in 2001 and $1,428 in 2000

 

4,453

 

4,234

 

Total assets

 

$

184,798

 

$

188,692

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

11,860

 

$

15,262

 

Line of credit advances (Note 6)

 

9,500

 

15,000

 

Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt (Note 8)

 

4,119

 

4,759

 

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

 

4,282

 

3,391

 

Other accrued liabilities (Note 7)

 

12,428

 

10,393

 

Total current liabilities

 

42,189

 

48,805

 

Long-term debt (Note 8)

 

20,449

 

24,603

 

Deferred income taxes (Note 11)

 

6,763

 

6,335

 

Other liabilities

 

 

4

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity (Note 9):

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized – 50,000,000 shares

 

 

 

 

 

Issued – 2001:  14,523,579 and 2000:  14,408,634 shares

 

145

 

144

 

Preferred stock:  Authorized - 500,000 shares; outstanding – none

 

 

 

Capital in excess of par value

 

24,701

 

23,818

 

Retained earnings

 

91,637

 

85,458

 

Total other comprehensive loss

 

(1,086

)

(475

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

115,397

 

108,945

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

184,798

 

$

188,692

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

21



 

OSMONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Cash flows from operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

6,179

 

$

5,419

 

$

964

 

Non-cash items included in net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,340

 

10,139

 

8,772

 

Deferred income taxes

 

93

 

1,609

 

3,227

 

Gain on sale of land and investments

 

(972

)

(3,788

)

(2,625

)

Loss on sale of property and equipment

 

35

 

 

 

Special charges

 

1,574

 

 

3,610

 

Changes in assets and liabilities (net of business acquisitions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

2,133

 

(1,205

)

(357

)

Inventories

 

664

 

(8,158

)

5,372

 

Other current assets

 

446

 

(366

)

2,464

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

(2,054

)

(1,255

)

(1,338

)

Net cash provided by operations

 

18,438

 

2,395

 

20,089

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired)

 

 

 

(6,846

)

Purchase of investments

 

 

(1,178

)

(3,603

)

Maturities and sales of investments

 

2,188

 

14,029

 

6,409

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(10,430

)

(7,058

)

(8,323

)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

575

 

367

 

747

 

Other

 

(1,174

)

(1,322

)

(728

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(8,841

)

4,838

 

(12,344

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Payments) proceeds from notes payable and current debt

 

(6,140

)

(1,553

)

9,000

 

Reduction of long-term debt

 

(4,154

)

(8,434

)

(17,061

)

Cash restricted for purchase and construction of equipment

 

 

 

235

 

Issuance of common stock

 

884

 

1,207

 

1,882

 

Net cash (used in) financing activities

 

(9,410

)

(8,780

)

(5,944

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(208

)

(239

)

(570

)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(21

)

(1,786

)

1,231

 

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year

 

21

 

1,807

 

576

 

Cash and cash equivalents - end of year

 

$

 

$

21

 

$

1,807

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

22



 

OSMONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Capital

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

in Excess of

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Shareholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Par Value

 

Earnings

 

Income(2)

 

Equity

 

Balance – January 1, 1999

 

13,991,291

 

140

 

20,733

 

79,075

 

2,207

 

102,155

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

964

 

 

964

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

(570

)

(570

)

Marketable securities adjustment (3)

 

 

 

 

 

111

 

111

 

Other comprehensive (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

(459

)

(459

)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

505

 

Employee stock purchase plans

 

69,209

 

1

 

555

 

 

 

556

 

401(k) stock match

 

51,078

 

1

 

483

 

 

 

484

 

Stock options exercised

 

150,552

 

1

 

841

 

 

 

842

 

Balance - December 31, 1999

 

14,262,130

 

143

 

22,612

 

80,039

 

1,748

 

104,542

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

5,419

 

 

5,419

 

Other comprehensive (loss) (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

(239

)

(239

)

Marketable securities
adjustment (3)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,984

)

(1,984

)

Other comprehensive (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,223

)

(2,223

)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,196

 

Employee stock purchase plans

 

74,017

 

1

 

522

 

 

 

523

 

401(k) stock match

 

59,748

 

 

498

 

 

 

498

 

Other

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

136

 

Stock options exercised

 

12,739

 

 

50

 

 

 

50

 

Balance - December 31, 2000

 

14,408,634

 

$

144

 

$

23,818

 

$

85,458

 

$

(475

)

$

108,945

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

6,179

 

 

6,179

 

Other comprehensive (loss) (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

(208

)

(208

)

Marketable securities
adjustment (3)

 

 

 

 

 

(403

)

(403

)

Other comprehensive (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

(611

)

(611

)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,568

 

Employee stock purchase plans

 

52,300

 

1

 

432

 

 

 

 

433

 

401(k) stock match

 

45,447

 

 

472

 

 

 

472

 

Other

 

 

 

(136

)

 

 

(136

)

Stock options exercised

 

17,198

 

 

115

 

 

 

115

 

Balance - December 31, 2001

 

14,523,579

 

$

145

 

$

24,701

 

$

91,637

 

$

(1,086

)

$

115,397

 

 


(1)             All items included in other comprehensive income (loss) are shown net of taxes.  The tax effect for the marketable securities adjustment was $(134), $(1,051) and $43 for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

(2)             Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of accumulated currency translation of $(1,045), $(837) and $(598) and marketable securities adjustment of $(32), $362 and $2,346 at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

(3)             Marketable securities reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income (net of tax) was $642, $2,542 and $1,617 for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

23



 

FIVE-YEAR RESULTS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

INCOME DATA:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

1998

 

1997

 

Sales

 

$

207,439

 

$

200,139

 

$

187,028

 

$

179,742

 

$

164,905

(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

6,179

 

5,419

 

964

 

(1,053

)

8,643

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

6,179

 

5,419

 

964

 

(1,053

)

9,793

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share – basic (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

$

(0.08

)

$

0.60

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

$

(0.08

)

$

0.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share – assuming dilution (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

$

(0.08

)

$

0.59

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

$

(0.08

)

$

0.68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

14,464

 

14,329

 

14,162

 

13,976

 

14,031

 

Assuming dilution

 

14,686

 

14,404

 

14,252

 

13,976

 

14,313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

184,798

 

$

188,692

 

$

194,366

 

$

194,049

 

$

164,483

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

20,449

 

24,603

 

32,201

 

31,665

 

13,792

 

 


(a) Excludes impact of EITF 00-10 discussed in Note 1.

 

TWELVE-YEAR RESULTS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

These schedules present the prior twelve-year results of the Company as originally reported, before restatement of prior period data for those acquisitions accounted for as poolings-of-interests, to show the effect of the Company’s acquisition activity.

 

INCOME DATA:  (As originally reported)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

1998

 

1997

 

1996

 

1995

 

1994

 

1993

 

1992

 

1991

 

1990

 

Sales

 

$

207,439

 

$

200,139

 

$

187,028

 

$

179,742

 

$

164,905

(e)

$

155,946

(e)

$

111,610

(e)

$

96,180

(e)

$

89,043

(e)

$

50,541

(e)

$

46,738

(e)

$

43,553

(e)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

7,301

(f)

5,419

 

4,533

(d)

6,516

(c)

9,452

(b)

13,467

 

11,212

 

9,955

 

7,895

 

4,528

(a)

3,902

 

3,714

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:  (As originally reported)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

184,798

 

$

188,692

 

$

194,366

 

$

194,049

 

$

164,483

 

$

152,176

 

$

125,058

 

$

102,035

 

$

88,826

 

$

60,300

 

$

54,931

 

$

54,370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

31,755

 

29,429

 

32,161

 

33,976

 

45,273

 

54,006

 

54,224

 

55,995

 

45,281

 

29,471

 

25,955

 

21,692

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

20,449

 

24,603

 

32,201

 

31,665

 

13,792

 

15,900

 

12,441

 

14,050

 

13,913

 

13,221

 

13,697

 

13,761

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

equity

 

115,397

 

108,945

 

104,542

 

102,155

 

102,375

 

97,943

 

78,471

 

63,751

 

52,070

 

33,793

 

28,891

 

24,720

 

 


(a)             Includes an increase in earnings of $420 ($0.05 per share) as a result of adopting the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”

(b)            Excludes impact of December 1997 special charge of $1,448 and 1997 recovery on discontinued operations of $1,330 net of taxes.

(c)             Excludes impact of June 1998 special charge of $9,988.

(d)            Excludes impact of September and December 1999 special charge of $3,610.

(e)             Excludes impact of EITF 00-10 discussed in Note 1.

(f)               Excludes impact of December 2001 special charge of $1,700.

 

24



 

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Quarterly Financial Data - 2001

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

March 31

 

June 30

 

September 30

 

December 31(a)

 

Sales

 

$

53,302

 

$

51,721

 

$

48,372

 

$

54,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

17,698

 

16,244

 

13,911

 

17,690

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

2,731

 

1,161

 

1,139

 

1,148

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – basic

 

0.19

 

0.08

 

0.08

 

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – assuming dilution

 

$

0.19

 

$

0.08

 

$

0.07

 

$

0.08

 

 


(a)             Special charges of $1,700 ($0.08 per share after taxes assuming dilution) were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2001.

 

Quarterly Financial Data - 2000

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

March 31

 

June 30

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

Sales

 

$

51,095

 

$

50,110

 

$

48,463

 

$

50,471

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

16,284

 

15,888

 

14,100

 

14,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

1,592

 

1,848

 

1,019

 

960

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – basic

 

0.11

 

0.13

 

0.07

 

0.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – assuming dilution

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.13

 

$

0.07

 

$

0.07

 

 

25



 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

1.             Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Osmonics, Inc. is a manufacturer and marketer of high technology water purification, fluid filtration, fluid separation, and fluid transfer equipment and instruments, as well as the replaceable components used in purification, filtration and separation equipment.  These products are used by a broad range of industrial, commercial, consumer and institutional customers.

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Osmonics, Inc. and its wholly and majority owned subsidiaries (the Company).  Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Beginning in 2001, sales under long-term contracts for which the Company acts as the general contractor for the installation, are recorded on a percentage-of-completion method measured on the cost-to-cost basis for contracts.  Provisions for anticipated losses on such long-term contracts are recorded in full when such losses become evident.

 

All of the Company’s other product and service sales are recognized when an agreement of sales exists, product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.  Sales revenue associated with the initial start-up or installation of the equipment is deferred until the service has been completed and the associate costs incurred.

 

The estimated cost of warranty obligations is accrued at the time revenue is recognized.

 

The estimated fair value for notes payable and long-term debt approximates carrying value due to the relatively short-term nature of the instruments and/or due to the short-term floating interest rates on the borrowing.  The estimated fair value of notes receivable approximates the net carrying value, as management believes the respective interest rates are commensurate with the credit, interest rate and repayment risks involved.

 

The Company considers highly liquid debt instruments purchased with maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Inventories are stated at lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market for all operations except for two plants, which are valued using the last-in, first-out method.

 

26



 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation.  For financial reporting, the straight-line method of depreciation is used over the estimated useful lives of 10 to 40 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment.

 

Deferred income taxes have been provided for income and expenses which are recognized in different accounting periods for financial reporting purposes rather than for income tax purposes.

 

Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date.  Results of operations are translated using the average exchange rates throughout the period.

 

The excess of cost over the fair market value of assets acquired in acquisitions is amortized over not more than 40 years, with the majority at 30 years.  Other intangibles are carried at cost and amortized using the straight–line method over their estimated lives of 5 to 20 years.  In 1999, the estimated life of 40 years for the recorded AquaMatic goodwill was reduced to 10 years based on the maturity of the product line and continued softness of the Asia/Pacific market.  In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121 on impairment of long-lived assets, the carrying values of these intangibles are reviewed quarterly for impairment using discounted cash flows when events or circumstances warrant such a review (see Note 16).

 

On October 3, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved its proposed FAS No. 144 (FAS 144), “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”  FAS 144 prescribes a consistent accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by other than a sale, regardless of whether the asset was previously held and used or newly acquired.  The provisions of FAS 144 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this Standard and has not yet determined the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations.

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143 (FAS 143), “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.”  FAS 143 requires entities to recognize the fair value of a liability for tangible long-lived asset retirement obligations in the period incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.  The provisions of FAS 143 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard and has not yet determined the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations.

 

On June 29, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved its proposed Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (FAS 141), “Business Combinations,” and No. 142 (FAS 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”  FAS 141 requires that all business combinations subsequent to June 30, 2001 be

 

27



 

accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.  FAS 142 requires cessation of goodwill amortization and periodic evaluation of the goodwill carrying value.  The provisions of FAS 142 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of these standards and has not yet determined the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations.

 

On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities.”  SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities.  It requires that all derivatives, including those embedded in other contracts, be recognized as either assets or liabilities and that those financial instruments be measured at fair value.  The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on their intended use and designation.  Management has reviewed the requirements of SFAS No. 133 and has determined that they have no embedded derivatives.  All contracts that contain provisions meeting the definition of a derivative, except for one described below, also meet the requirements of, and have been designated as, normal purchases or sales.  The Company’s general policy is to not enter into contracts containing derivatives with terms that cannot be designated as normal purchases or sales.

 

In 2001, the Company entered into a hedge contract to help offset foreign currency risk related to its European foreign subsidiary.  The instrument hedges certain levels of the subsidiary’s local euro currency exposure to the U.S. dollar and expires in June 2002.  The Company has chosen, as permitted by FAS 133, to record the changes in the fair value of the instrument in other income (expense) in the period of change.

 

In May 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force in EITF 00-10 reached a consensus on the issue of “How a seller of goods should classify in the income statement amounts billed to a customer for shipping and handling.”  The consensus was that all amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related to shipping and handling, if any, represent revenues earned for the goods provided and should be classified as revenue.  The Company adopted EITF 00-10 in the fourth quarter 2000.  Comparative financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to comply with the classification guidelines of this issue.  Freight revenue added to sales and cost of goods sold were $3,586, $3,104 and $2,357 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

28



 

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform with current year presentations.

 

2.             Business Acquisitions

 

On July 1, 1999, the Company acquired all of the equity interest of ZyzaTech Water Systems, Inc. (ZyzaTech) of Seattle, Washington.  The purchase price was approximately $10,000 and included $8,600 of goodwill, which is being amortized on the straight-line method over 20 years.  ZyzaTech products are being sold through their existing distribution channels, offering a broadened line of hemodialysis products. The acquisition, included in the Process Water segment, was recorded under the purchase method of accounting.

 

The results of operations of ZyzaTech are included in the consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition.

 

Pro forma 1999 combined financial results of Osmonics, Inc. and ZyzaTech would be as follows:

 

1999

 

Osmonics

 

ZyzaTech

 

Combined

 

Sales

 

$

187,028

 

$

5,826

 

$

192,854

 

Income from operations

 

4,431

 

397

 

4,828

 

Acquisition interest expense

 

320

 

320

 

640

 

Net income

 

964

 

57

 

1,021

 

Net income per share - assuming dilution

 

$

0.07

 

 

 

$

0.07

 

 

The Company has $13,700 of goodwill recorded as of December 31, 2001 associated with the 1998 acquisition of Membrex Corp. (Membrex).  Safety Kleen (SK), the principal customer for the Membrex products, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in June 2000.  As a result, 2001 sales to SK of $1,878 were $1,909 below same period 2000 sales of $3,787.  SK has continued to order product and parts at reduced levels to support its installed base.  Future sales levels are uncertain and could be minimal.

 

On December 21, 2001, the Company signed a new agreement with SK, which continues the business relationship on a non-exclusive basis.  This new agreement enables the Company to actively market its product through other sales channels.  The Company has developed a business plan and hired a sales and technical support staff dedicated to pursuing sales in such channels in 2002 and beyond.

 

In February 2002, it was announced that Clean Harbors, Inc. (Nasdaq: CLHB), an industry-leading environmental services provider, has entered a definitive agreement to acquire Safety-Kleen’s Chemical Service Division, subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court and various regulatory agencies.  At this point, Management is unable to determine the financial impact of such a transaction to the Company.

 

29



 

The Company is monitoring the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings to determine any further financial impact to the Company.

 

The Company has determined that two-thirds ($9,100) of the Membrex goodwill is associated with these products.  The Company has concluded there was no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2001.  In its analysis, management used a discounted cash flow model in accordance with current accounting guidelines.  This analysis includes a detailed sales plan with sales of product through new sales channels and anticipates an ongoing business relationship with SK while it proceeds through and comes out of bankruptcy.  The ongoing business relationship assumes that SK will continue to purchase replacement membrane for existing product installations.

 

Management believes it will be capable of selling and marketing these products through other sales channels in a manner that will support the goodwill value.  The Company is continuing to investigate new applications for the technology acquired from Membrex.  The Company believes the patented technology associated with Membrex brings a cost-effective solution to hazardous waste disposal, which could become a required environmental standard.

 

3.             Marketable Securities

 

The Company considers all of its marketable securities available-for-sale.

 

Marketable securities at December 31, 2001 consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Unrealized
Gains

 

Unrealized
(Losses)

 

Fair
Value

 

Corporate debt securities and other 0-5 year maturity

 

100

 

 

(48

)

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total before-tax effect

 

$

100

 

 

(48

)

$

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax effect of unrealized (gains) losses

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities

 

 

 

$

 

$

(32

)

 

 

 

30



 

Marketable securities at December 31, 2000 consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Unrealized
Gains

 

Unrealized
(Losses)

 

Fair
Value

 

Municipal bonds 0-5 year maturity

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities and other 0-5 year maturity

 

100

 

 

(1

)

99

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity securities

 

919

 

815

 

(44

)

1,690

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total before-tax effect

 

$

1,119

 

815

 

(45

)

$

1,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax effect of unrealized (gains) losses

 

 

 

(432

)

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities

 

 

 

$

383

 

$

(21

)

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 were $2,188, $13,740 and $6,409, respectively.  The gains and losses on these sales, determined on the specific identification method, were $972 and $0 in 2001, $4,102 and $314 in 2000, and $2,813 and $442 in 1999 and are included in Other Income.

 

Market values are based on quoted market prices.

 

4.                             Inventories

 

Inventories consist of the following:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

Finished goods

 

$

9,353

 

$

8,013

 

Work in process

 

9,415

 

8,775

 

Raw materials

 

14,958

 

17,695

 

 

 

33,726

 

34,483

 

Adjustment to reduce inventories of $9,487 and $11,643 to the last-in, first-out method (see Note 1)

 

(1,632

)

(1,725

)

 

 

$

32,094

 

$

32,758

 

 

Pretax income (expense) realized from changes in LIFO inventory valuations for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 were $84, ($206) and $449, respectively. 

 

31



 

5.          Restricted Cash

 

Cash restricted for purchase and construction of equipment at December 31, 2001 and 2000 represents proceeds received from the issuer of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (see Note 8) restricted to the purchase and construction of property and equipment used in one of the Company’s operations.

 

6.          Line of Credit

 

The Company, at December 31, 2001, had an unsecured revolving line of credit of $24,000.  The revolving line of credit matures on March 31, 2003, and borrowings bear a variable interest rate related to LIBOR (London Interbank Offer Rate) or prime.  The terms of the credit agreement contain certain restrictions related to financial ratios, indebtedness, tangible net worth and capital expenditures.  As of December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.  As of December 31, 2001, the Company had borrowings outstanding under the line of $9,500 and the interest rate was 3.03%.  At December 31, 2000, the Company had borrowings outstanding under the line of $15,000 and the interest rate was 8.25%.

 

7.                             Other Accrued Liabilities

 

Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

2001

 

2000

 

Warranty and start-up

 

$

2,196

 

$

2,222

 

Professional fees and other accruals

 

3,556

 

3,249

 

Taxes

 

2,038

 

1,428

 

Deferred acquisition-related payments

 

 

53

 

Corporate restructuring

 

1,389

 

160

 

Customer deposits

 

3,249

 

3,281

 

 

 

$

12,428

 

$

10,393

 

 

32



 

8.                             Debt

 

Long-term debt is as follows:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

Promissory notes; interest payable quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 125 b.p.; due through 2001.  The interest rate on December 31, 2000 was 7.91%.

 

$

 

$

2,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Industrial development revenue bonds (IDRBs), principal due in varying annual payments through 2007; interest payable monthly at a variable rate determined periodically by the bond remarketing agent (6.45% at December 31, 2001).

 

5,650

 

6,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Promissory notes; interest payable quarterly at fixed rate of 6.72%; due through 2008.

 

4,000

 

4,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Promissory notes; interest payable quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 75 b.p.; due through 2008.  The interest rate on December 31, 2001 was 3.40%.

 

12,000

 

12,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable to two French banks; interest payable monthly at PIBOR (Paris Interbank Offer Rate) plus 40 b.p.; due through 2001.  The interest rate on December 31, 2000 was 5.34%.

 

 

108

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable to two French banks; interest payable monthly at fixed rate of 4.45%; due through 2006.

 

1,073

 

1,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Promissory notes; interest payable annually at fixed rate of 8.00%; due through 2003.

 

966

 

1,583

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other notes

 

879

 

1,123

 

 

 

24,568

 

29,362

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion

 

(4,119

)

(4,759

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

20,449

 

$

24,603

 

 

33



 

The IDRB debt and the mortgage notes payable to French banks are collateralized by real and personal property of the Company.

 

Aggregate maturities of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2001 are:

 

2002 - $3,832; 2003 - $3,680; 2004 - $3,186; 2005 - $3,197; 2006 - $2,949; beyond 2006 - $7,276.

 

Capital Leases – The Company leases its vehicles under noncancelable capital leases expiring in 2004.  The total leased assets were $1,361, and related accumulated amortization was $834 as of December 31, 2001.  Depreciation charged on assets under capital lease during 2001 was $282.  These amounts are included in the Company’s operating expenses.  Minimum future lease obligations under the capital lease for the Company’s vehicles as of December 31, 2001 are as follows:

 

Year ending December 31:

 

 

 

2002

 

$

316

 

2003

 

140

 

2004

 

14

 

2005

 

2

 

2006

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

472

 

Less amount representing interest

 

24

 

Present value of minimum lease payments

 

448

 

Less current portion

 

287

 

Long-term portion

 

$

161

 

 

The Company’s promissory notes contain a covenant, which limits the payment of dividends to shareholders.  At December 31, 2001 approximately $13,632 of retained earnings was eligible for dividend distribution under this covenant.  The Company’s various debt agreements contain certain restrictions related to financial ratios, indebtedness, tangible net worth and capital expenditures.  As of December 31, 2001 the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. 

 

The Company also has an unsecured standby letter of credit of $5 million with a large financial institution.  As of December 31, 2001 no amount was outstanding.

 

Cash payments for interest related to all debts of the Company were $2,695, $4,169 and $4,086 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

 

9.                             Stock Options

 

The Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan, with 950,000 reserved common shares, is intended to facilitate ownership and increase the interest of key employees in the growth and performance of the Company, thus enhancing the value of the Company for the benefit of the shareholders.  Options are granted at a price not less than fair

 

34



 

market value on the date of the grant and become exercisable over a period of up to ten years, after which they expire.  The 1993 Stock Option Plan terminates on September 1, 2003.

 

The Company’s 1995 Director Stock Option Plan, with 250,000 reserved common shares, provides that each director of the Company shall automatically receive, as of the date of each Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a non-qualified option to purchase 3,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The options have a ten-year term and are exercisable one year after the grant date at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares on the grant date.  The 1995 Director Stock Option Plan terminates on May 17, 2005.

 

Shares reserved for future issuance under all of the Company’s plans totaled approximately 1.899 million at December 31, 2001.

 

The Company applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations in accounting for its plans.  No compensation cost has been recognized for its stock-based compensation plans as the exercise price of the stock option grants was equal to the fair market value of the shares on the grant date.  Had compensation costs been determined based on the fair value of the 2001, 2000 and 1999 stock option grants consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” net income and earnings per share would have been reported as the following pro forma amounts: 

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

6,179

 

$

5,419

 

$

964

 

Pro forma

 

5,979

 

5,200

 

738

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – assuming dilution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

Pro forma

 

$

0.41

 

$

0.36

 

$

0.05

 

 

The fair value of the stock options used to calculate the pro forma net income and earnings per share amounts above is estimated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

35



 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Dividend yield

 

0

%

0

%

0

%

Expected volatility

 

55.1

%

30.0

%

46.9

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

5.5

%

7.0

%

6.5

%

Expected life

 

5.0

 

5.0

 

5.0

 

 

Information related to stock options at December 31 under the aforementioned stock option plans is as follows:

 

Stock Options

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

 

Shares
(000)

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares
(000)

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares
(000)

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

1,212

 

$

9.85

 

1,025

 

$

10.76

 

947

 

$

10.21

 

Granted

 

213

 

11.32

 

353

 

7.77

 

255

 

8.93

 

Exercised

 

(17

)

6.66

 

(13

)

3.92

 

(151

)

3.76

 

Forfeited

 

(77

)

9.86

 

(153

)

11.66

 

(26

)

12.71

 

Outstanding at end of year

 

1,331

 

10.12

 

1,212

 

9.85

 

1,025

 

10.76

 

Options exercisable at year-end

 

754

 

10.50

 

592

 

10.75

 

487

 

10.64

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year

 

$

6.55

 

 

 

$

3.11

 

 

 

$

4.44

 

 

 

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2001:

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of
Exercise
Prices

 

Shares
Outstanding
at 12/31/01
(000)

 

Remaining
Contractual
Life

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares
Exercisable
at 12/31/01
(000)

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

$

5.86

- 6.72

 

202

 

2.1 yrs

 

$

5.95

 

202

 

$

5.95

 

6.73

- 8.95

 

512

 

8.1 yrs

 

7.96

 

159

 

8.02

 

8.96

- 13.42

 

392

 

7.4 yrs

 

11.32

 

190

 

10.67

 

13.43

- 17.90

 

194

 

5.6 yrs

 

16.24

 

172

 

16.28

 

17.91

- 22.38

 

31

 

4.5 yrs

 

19.57

 

31

 

19.57

 

 

In 1998, the Company adopted a Stock Match Plan under which the Company matches, in the form of company common stock, certain eligible U.S. employee

 

36



 

savings plan contributions.  Employees are vested in the shares immediately.  Shares issued under the Stock Match Plan were 45,447, 59,748 and 51,078 shares at a cost of approximately $472,000, $498,000 and $483,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.  At December 31, 2001, there were approximately 220,260 shares reserved for future issuance.

 

The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan which allows eligible employees to purchase common shares of the Company at 85% of market price.  During 2001, 52,300 shares were issued at prices ranging from $6.21 to $11.90 per share.  During 2000, 74,017 shares were issued at prices ranging from $5.84 to $7.86 per share.  During 1999, 69,209 shares were issued at prices ranging from $6.80 to $9.99 per share.  At December 31, 2001, there were approximately 417,600 shares reserved for future issuance.

 

The Company had 500,000 authorized and unissued shares of preferred stock at December 31, 2001 and 2000.

 

10.        Income Taxes

 

Income tax expense (benefit) consists of:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

2,637

 

$

1,339

 

$

300

 

State

 

81

 

133

 

(213

)

Foreign

 

(38

)

61

 

162

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses and credits not usable in current year, carried forward to future years

 

(110

)

(29

)

(1,319

)

Depreciation

 

69

 

89

 

(26

)

Amortization of intangibles

 

262

 

298

 

1,635

 

Net operating loss usage

 

695

 

712

 

512

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts, start-up, warranty, inventory and other accruals

 

(729

)

520

 

424

 

Deduction for unqualified option exercise

 

 

 

251

 

Other

 

316

 

(460

)

358

 

Total provision

 

$

3,183

 

$

2,663

 

$

2,084

 

 

Other deferred income tax expense (benefit) includes multiple items with no one item exceeding 5% of income before income taxes.

 

Cash payments for income taxes were $2,460, $1,344 and $1,155 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

 

37



 

When Osmonics, Inc. acquired MSI, on February 17, 1998, MSI had incurred $11,827 of tax losses, which had not yet been offset against previous or subsequent years’ taxable income of MSI.  In 1999, MSI filed a refund request that offset $8,684 of these losses against income of MSI for the years from 1988 to 1995, under the “Claim of Right” rule.  All of the taxes claimed in this refund request were received in 1999.  The remaining losses of $3,143 were carried forward, for offset against MSI income in years after the acquisition.  $1,989, $0 and $1,154 of these losses were offset against MSI income for the years of 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.  After the 2000 offset, there were no more remaining losses available for carryforward. 

 

Osmonics generated a net operating loss (NOL) of $1,639 in 1999.  The entire loss was used as an offset against income generated in 1997, which resulted in a refund of $556 received in 2000. The net operating loss and credit carryforwards that remain have expiration dates will expire in years ranging from the year 2003 to the year 2020.

 

The tax effects of the distributing of the foreign subsidiaries’ accumulated earnings to the United States parent are not reflected on the financial statements.  This has not been included because it is the intent of the Company to reinvest all foreign subsidiaries’ earnings outside the United States.  The cumulative total of undistributed earnings for which deferred tax has not been included are $1,981.

 

A reconciliation of the income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate to the Company’s income tax expense is as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Taxes at federal rate (35%)

 

$

3,276

 

$

2,829

 

$

1,067

 

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State taxes, net of federal tax benefit

 

(111

)

217

 

6

 

Foreign Sales Corp. benefit

 

(746

)

(571

)

(615

)

Tax credits

 

(109

)

(109

)

(227

)

Tax-exempt interest/dividend deduction

 

 

(55

)

(100

)

Effect of foreign affiliates with different tax rates or net losses

 

(109

)

119

 

15

 

Nondeductibility of intangible write-offs and amortization

 

464

 

469

 

1,547

 

Other

 

518

 

(236

)

391

 

Total provision

 

$

3,183

 

$

2,663

 

$

2,084

 

 

Other adjustments increase (decrease) includes multiple items with no one item exceeding 5% of income before income taxes. 

 

38



 

11.                       Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

 

Temporary differences which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows as of December 31:

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts, start-up, warranty and other accruals

 

$

3,960

 

$

3,192

 

Unrealized gain on marketable securities

 

7

 

(408

)

Inventory costs capitalized for tax

 

39

 

66

 

Net operating losses available for carryback or carryforward

 

928

 

1,400

 

Other

 

(67

)

64

 

Total current deferred assets

 

$

4,867

 

$

4,314

 

Noncurrent liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

$

4,033

 

$

3,932

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

2,350

 

2,165

 

Other

 

380

 

238

 

Total noncurrent deferred tax liabilities

 

$

6,763

 

$

6,335

 

 

12.                       Sales and Segment Information

 

The Company designs, manufactures and markets equipment, systems and components used in the processing and handling of fluids.  In 2000, the Company changed the focus of its reporting structure from a two-segment, product-focused structure to a three-segment, market-focused structure.

 

The three-market-segment structure was established to provide strategic leadership within the three major market segments in which the Company conducts business.  The new structure was implemented on January 1, 2000.  Restatement of 1999 financial results under this method of reporting has been completed and is disclosed comparatively in financial reports.

 

The Filtration and Separations segment includes products such as filter cartridges, membrane elements, membranes, instruments and laboratory products.  The Process Water segment includes products such as pumps, housings, valves, controls, reverse osmosis/ultrafiltration (RO/UF) machines, ozonators and water treatment systems used for industrial, commercial and municipal applications.  The Household Water segment includes products such as valves, controls and home reverse osmosis membranes and filters used for the residential water purification and water softening markets.  Each segment is currently supported by several manufacturing facilities, a sales force and various corporate functions.  The segments do not have separate accounting, administration or research and development functions.

 

The reportable segment information for 2001, 2000 and 1999 is as follows (all segment information excludes the impact of special charges):

 

39



 

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filtration and Separations

 

$

83,208

 

$

79,977

 

$

78,640

 

Process Water

 

87,152

 

80,647

 

71,306

 

Household Water

 

37,079

 

39,515

 

37,082

 

Net Sales

 

207,439

 

200,139

 

187,028

 

Gross Profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filtration and Separations

 

30,447

 

27,526

 

30,315

 

Process Water

 

23,504

 

20,141

 

17,078

 

Household Water

 

11,592

 

12,489

 

12,062

 

Gross Profit

 

65,543

 

60,156

 

59,455

 

Operating Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filtration and Separations

 

7,518

 

4,986

 

7,159

 

Process Water

 

3,485

 

(191

)

(1,299

)

Household Water

 

1,991

 

3,280

 

2,181

 

Operating Income

 

$

12,994

 

$

8,075

 

$

8,041

 

 

Management does not report the balance sheet or any cash-generating measurements by such segments.

 

All operations for which geographic data is presented below are in one principal industry (design, manufacture and marketing of machines, systems, instruments and components used in the processing of fluids).

 

40



 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Sales to unaffiliated customers from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

189,854

 

$

182,324

 

$

172,194

 

Foreign operations

 

17,585

 

17,815

 

14,834

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers from (to) geographic areas:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

12,334

 

15,253

 

10,142

 

Foreign operations

 

(12,234

)

(15,253

)

(10,142

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

207,439

 

$

200,139

 

$

187,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

9,526

 

$

7,952

 

$

2,681

 

Foreign operations

 

(164

)

130

 

367

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

9,362

 

$

8,082

 

$

3,048

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

129,868

 

$

130,445

 

$

135,138

 

Foreign operations

 

8,462

 

9,872

 

9,028

 

 

 

$

138,330

 

$

140,317

 

$

144,166

 

 

NOTE:  Transfers are made at fair market value.

 

Sales by United States operations to unaffiliated customers in foreign geographic areas are as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Asia/Pacific

 

$

21,509

 

$

22,653

 

$

17,953

 

Euro/Africa

 

16,761

 

14,771

 

18,437

 

Americas

 

14,538

 

15,297

 

10,491

 

 

 

$

52,808

 

$

52,721

 

$

46,881

 

 

41



 

Sales to unaffiliated customers in foreign geographic areas are as follows:

 

 

 

2001

 

% of
Total
Sales

 

2000

 

% of
Total
Sales

 

1999

 

% of
Total
Sales

 

Asia/Pacific

 

$

21,509

 

10.4

 

$

22,653

 

11.3

 

$

17,953

 

9.6

 

Euro/Africa

 

34,346

 

16.5

 

32,586

 

16.3

 

33,271

 

17.8

 

Americas

 

14,538

 

7.0

 

15,297

 

7.6

 

10,491

 

5.6

 

Total Sales

 

$

70,393

 

33.9

 

$

70,536

 

35.2

 

$

61,715

 

33.0

 

 

13.        Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases - The Company leases facilities for sales, service, or manufacturing purposes in Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington and Wisconsin in the United States, as well as in China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland and Thailand. 

 

Future minimum lease payments on all operating leases of $2,892 are payable as follows:  2002 - $1,251; 2003 - $891; 2004 - $365; 2005 - $243 and 2006 - $142.  Rent expense for the three years ended December 31 was:  2001 - $1,871; 2000 - $1,942; and 1999 - $2,316.

 

The Company’s aggregate outstanding capital expenditure commitments were less than $1,00 as of December 31, 2001.

 

The Company is involved in certain legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, based on the advice of legal counsel, such litigation and claims will be resolved without a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. 

 

14.                       Employee Benefit Plan

 

The Company has a noncontributory discretionary profit sharing plan covering certain employees meeting age and length of service requirements.  The Company contributes annually to the plan an amount established at the discretion of the Board of Directors. 

 

Total expense recognized by the Company under this plan amounted to $360, $300 and $284 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

 

42



 

15.        Earnings Per Share

 

The following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share from operations. 

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

Earnings per share - basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations available to common stockholders

 

$

6,179

 

$

5,419

 

$

964

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

14,464

 

14,329

 

14,162

 

Income from operations per share – basic

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

Earnings per share – assuming dilution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations available to common stockholders

 

$

6,179

 

$

5,419

 

$

964

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

14,464

 

14,329

 

14,162

 

Dilutive impact of stock options outstanding

 

222

 

75

 

90

 

Weighted average shares and potential dilutive shares outstanding

 

14,686

 

14,404

 

14,252

 

Income from operations per share – assuming dilution

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.07

 

 

Additionally, options to purchase 594,000 shares of common stock at a range of $11.62 to $19.88 were outstanding during 2001 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common share.

 

16.        Special Charges

 

Special charges in 2001 included $1,100 related to the closure of the Company’s Syracuse, New York manufacturing facility and $600 in corporate restructuring.  Closure costs include asset write-downs, workforce reduction severance, and facility closing/consolidation costs.  Certain manufacturing efforts will be relocated to another existing location while others will be exited as a result of the facility closure.  Discontinuance and relocation of such manufacturing has risks associated with potential production interruptions; however, management’s current assessment is that these risks can be effectively managed to minimize impact to sales.  Corporate restructuring costs include workforce reduction severance and asset write-downs costs.

 

43



 

 

Workforce reductions of 50 employees with expected severance/outplacement costs of $235 related to the Company’s Syracuse, New York facility were included in the 2001 special charge.  Workforce reductions of 34 employees with expected severance/outplacement costs of $405 related to the corporate restructurings were included in the 2001 special charge.

 

Special charge expenditures in 2001 were $126 for workforce reductions and $185 for corporate restructuring asset write-downs.

 

In 2000, the Company recorded a $250 recovery of 1999 special charge inventory accruals primarily due to gains recognized on the sale of inventory at the Company’s Rockland, Massachusetts manufacturing facility, which reduced cost of goods sold.  The special charge of $250 related to workforce reduction severance costs.  Workforce reductions of 75 employees with expected severance/outplacement costs of $250 related to the first quarter 2000 restructuring of several corporate functions and the planned third quarter 2000 closure of the Company’s Phoenix, Arizona facility.

 

Special charge expenditures in 2000 were $329 for workforce reductions.  The remaining negative accrual balance of $79 was offset by a like amount of overage in the 1999 special charge accruals.

 

In 1999, the Company recorded net special charges of $3,610 ($3,569 net-of-tax or $0.25 per share assuming dilution).  Charges included a $3,500 asset impairment charge for non-deductible goodwill associated with the acquisition of AquaMatic, Inc. in 1997, a $1,035 charge to cost of sales for inventory related to plant closings and a $1,233 charge to operating expense for corporate restructuring and consolidation of operations.  Operating expense recoveries included a $1,943 gain on the sale of operations and $215 recovery on second quarter 1998 special charges.

 

Asset impairment charges of $3,500 in 1999 relate to the AquaMatic acquisition in 1997 by the Company (see Note 1).  The impairment charge was based on the 1999 operating results and the estimated discounted future cash flows of the products. 

 

Inventory charges of $1,035 in 1999 represent the net book value of inventory at two manufacturing locations that will not be utilized in ongoing production of the Company’s products or be recovered through other methods of disposal. 

 

44



 

Corporate restructuring and consolidation of operations costs of $1,233 in 1999 primarily include facility closing/consolidation, asset write-downs and workforce reduction severance costs.  Facility-related costs relate to closing two manufacturing facilities and relocating certain manufacturing-related activities to other existing locations.

 

Workforce reductions of 30 employees with expected severance/outplacement costs of $75 related to the December 31, 1999 closure of the Company’s Rockland, Massachusetts facility were included in the 1999 special charge.  Workforce reductions of 50 employees with expected severance/outplacement costs of $200 related to the planned third quarter 2000 closure of the Company’s Phoenix, Arizona facility were not included in the 1999 special charge since the plan was not announced to the employees at December 31, 1999.

 

Special charge expenditures in 1999 were $850 for inventory costs, $164 for workforce reductions and $830 for facility closing/consolidation costs in 2000.  In 2000, $79 of the 1999 special charge accrual was used to offset the 2000 special charges accrual shortfall.  The remaining accrual balance of $160 related to costs incurred in January 2001 to exit the Company’s Rockland, Massachusetts manufacturing facility. 

 

45



 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

 

Osmonics, Inc.

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Minnetonka, Minnesota

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Osmonics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ending December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 1, 2002

 

46



 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in this report.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth certain statements of operations data as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2001 vs.

 

2000 vs.

 

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

2000

 

1999

 

Net sales

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

3.6

%

7.0

%

Cost of goods sold

 

68.4

 

69.8

 

68.8

 

1.5

 

8.7

 

Gross profit

 

31.6

 

30.2

 

31.2

 

8.5

 

3.4

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

21.7

 

22.2

 

23.3

 

1.4

 

1.1

 

Research, development and engineering

 

3.7

 

3.9

 

4.1

 

(1.8

)

2.5

 

Special charges

 

0.8

 

0.1

 

1.4

 

580.0

 

(90.3

)

Operating profit

 

5.4

 

4.0

 

2.4

 

39.9

 

82.2

 

Other income (expense)

 

(0.9

)

 

(0.7

)

n/a

 

100.5

 

Income taxes

 

1.5

 

1.3

 

1.2

 

19.5

 

27.8

 

Net income (loss)

 

3.0

 

2.7

 

0.5

 

14.0

 

462.1

 

 

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000

 

Net Sales for 2001 increased $7,300 or 3.6% to $207,439 as compared to net sales of $200,139 for 2000.  The 2001 sales increase was the result of organic sales growth as there were no acquisitions in 2001.  Sales in 2001 increased in both the Filtration and Separations and Process Water segments while the Household Water segment sales decreased.  Segment results are discussed later in this section.  Overall, international sales decreased $143 (0.2%).  The deterioration of the euro in comparison to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted 2001 and 2000 sales by approximately $977 (0.5% of net sales) and $580 (0.3% of net sales), respectively.  2001 sales to customers in Euro/Africa improved $1,760 (5.4%) while sales to customers in Asia/Pacific and the Americas declined $1,144 (5.1%) and $759 (5.0%), respectively.

 

1



 

Gross Profit for 2001 increased $5,137 or 8.5% to $65,543 as compared to $60,406 in 2000.  As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased to 31.6% from 30.2% in 2000.  2000 gross profit includes $250 (0.1% of net sales) of a special inventory recovery related to a plant closing recorded in the first quarter 2000.  The increase in gross profit percentage is primarily due to higher sales volume, better utilization of factories, and tight cost control.

 

To further reduce manufacturing capacity and costs in order to improve gross margins, the Company announced in December 2001 the closure of the Syracuse, New York facility scheduled for mid 2002.  This is a continuation of a Company-wide restructuring plan initiated two years ago that has included the closure of one facility (Rockland, Massachusetts) on December 31, 1999, another (Denver, Colorado) in September 2000, and a third facility (Phoenix, Arizona) in October 2000.

 

2001 gross margins benefited from five relocations of certain production capabilities completed in 2000 related to efforts to focus its factories and eliminate duplicate capabilities and the associated cost and overhead structures.  One-time costs of physically moving the manufacturing efforts and near-term inefficiencies inherent with such changes negatively impacted margins of the Company during 2000.  In 2001, additional production capabilities were relocated with little impact to margins.  With the planned closure of the Syracuse facility in mid 2002, additional one-time costs of physically moving manufacturing efforts and near-term inefficiencies inherent with such changes are anticipated in 2002.

 

Through improvements made in certain manufacturing processes and a better understanding of various chemical processes, the Company was able to achieve certain scrap reduction targets in 2001.  In addition, many 2001 and planned 2002 capital expenditures are focused on membrane and filtration technology manufacturing equipment which should further reduce scrap.

 

Material and energy costs remained relatively flat in 2001 after notable increases experienced in 2000.  The largest raw material impacts in 2000 were improved in 2001 as surcharges on stainless steel were reduced and polypropylene costs returned to more historical levels.  Energy costs at the Company’s Vista, California facility approximated the increased levels experienced in the second half of 2000 when the state of California entered its energy crisis.  This resulted in increased 2001 utility costs of approximately $600 compared to those incurred in the first half of 2000.  The reduction of manufacturing scrap and the improvement in raw material sourcing continue to be Company priorities in Year 2002.

 

The deterioration of the euro in comparison to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted 2001 and 2000 gross margin by approximately $977 (0.5% of net sales) and $580 (0.3% of net sales), respectively.

 

2



 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses increased $611 or 1.4% to $44,806 in 2001 as compared to $44,195 in 2000.  As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased from 22.2% to 21.7% in 2001.  The 2001 increase is primarily attributed to increased general and administrative costs primarily associated with legal and professional fees.  The Company has attempted to manage expenses through various efforts to restructure the Company, improve the utilization of the Company’s ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system and focus the number of products sold and the markets served by the Company.  Also, the Company continues to centralize its sales efforts within business segments to focus responsibility for customer relationships.

 

Research, Development and Engineering Expenses decreased $143 or 1.8% to $7,743 in 2001, compared to $7,886 in 2000.  As a percentage of sales, the R&D expenses were 3.7% and 3.9% in 2001 and 2000, respectively.  The decrease as a percent of sales is the result of the Company continuing to focus its R&D efforts to eliminate duplication, to concentrate on new product development and improve timeliness to market.  The Company believes the current level of funding is adequate to support its product development priorities throughout 2002.

 

Special Charges of $1,700 ($1,122 net-of-tax or $0.08 per diluted share) were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001.  Charges included $1,100 related to the closure of the Company’s Syracuse, New York manufacturing facility and $600 related to corporate restructuring.  The special charges are summarized below:

 

Plant closure

 

$

1,100

 

Corporate restructuring

 

600

 

Special charges

 

$

1,700

 

 

Other Expense includes interest income, interest expense, gains on asset sales and other miscellaneous items.  This increased $1,939 to $1,932 in 2001, compared to income of $7 in 2000.  The 2001 change is primarily the result of $3,788 pretax gains ($0.18 per diluted share after tax) recognized on the sale of securities during 2000 compared to $972 pretax gains ($0.04 per diluted share after tax) in 2001.  Net interest expense decreased $1,501 to $2,439 in 2001 compared to $3,940 in 2000.  2001 interest expense decreased $1,782 as a result of lower overall debt levels and lower interest rates.  Also, 2001 interest income decreased $281 resulting from the liquidation of marketable securities in 2000 and 2001.

 

Income Taxes increased $520 to $3,183 in 2001 compared to $2,663 in 2000.  The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2001 was 34.0% compared to 32.9% for the same period in 2000.

 

3



 

Net Income increased $760 to $6,179 ($0.42 per diluted share) in 2001, compared to $5,419 ($0.38 per diluted share) in 2000.  Net income in 2001 was negatively impacted by special charges totaling $1,700 ($0.08 per diluted share).  Without the special charges, 2001 net income would have been $7,301 ($0.50 per diluted share).  There were no net special charges in 2000.

 

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999

 

Net Sales for 2000 increased $13,111 or 7.0% to $200,139 as compared to net sales of $187,028 for 1999.  The 2000 sales increase was primarily the result of renewed organic sales growth of 6%.  Sales in 2000 benefited from the full year impact of ZyzaTech ($6,500), acquired in third quarter 1999, and were negatively impacted by product lines that were exited as a result of closing certain manufacturing facilities ($4,900).  Sales in 2000 increased in all segments of the Company.  Overall, international sales increased $8,821 (14.3%).  The deterioration of the euro in comparison to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted Year 2000 sales by approximately $580 (0.3% of net sales).  2000 sales to customers in the Americas and Asia/Pacific improved $4,806 (45.8%) and $4,700 (26.2%), respectively, while sales to customers in Euro/Africa declined $685 (2.1%). 

 

Gross Profit for 2000 increased $1,986 or 3.4% to $60,406 as compared to $58,420 in 1999.  As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased to 30.2% from 31.2% in 1999.  2000 gross profit includes $250 (0.1% of net sales) of a special inventory recovery related to a plant closing recorded in the first quarter 2000.  1999 gross profit includes $1,035 (0.6% of net sales) of special inventory charges related to plant closings.  The decrease in gross profit percentage is primarily due to lower utilization and production issues at certain manufacturing facilities.  To reduce excess manufacturing capacity and costs in order to improve gross margins, one facility (Rockland, Massachusetts) was closed on December 31, 1999, another (Denver, Colorado) was closed in September 2000 and another facility (Phoenix, Arizona) was closed in October 2000.

 

The Company relocated certain production capabilities throughout the year as it continued its efforts to focus its factories and eliminate duplicate capabilities and the associated cost and overhead structures.  Five such relocations were completed during 2000.  One-time costs of physically moving the manufacturing efforts and near-term inefficiencies inherent with such changes negatively impacted margins of the Company during the year. 

 

In the process of relocating production capabilities, the Company was unable to achieve its expected scrap reduction targets.  The Company experienced increasing raw material and energy costs in 2000 and was unable to offset such costs with price increases.  Specifically, surcharges on stainless steel and increased polypropylene costs were the largest raw material impacts.  While energy costs increased throughout the Company, the increases were more substantial at the Company’s Vista, California facility.  Should the energy costs in 2001 remain at levels experienced in California during the second half of 2000, the Company anticipates approximately $600 of additional costs that it may not be

 

4



 

able to pass on to its customers.  The reduction of manufacturing scrap and the improvement in raw material sourcing remain continuing priorities in Year 2001.

 

The deterioration of the euro in comparison to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted Year 2000 gross margin by approximately $580 (0.3% of net sales). 

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses increased $475 or 1.1% to $44,195 in 2000 as compared to $43,720 in 1999.  As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased from 23.3% to 22.2% in 2000.  The 2000 increase is attributed to the acquisition of ZyzaTech Water Systems in July 1999 and offset by expense control efforts of the Company.

 

The Company continues to centralize its sales efforts within business segments to focus responsibility for customer relationships.  The Company has increased its efforts to better understand its customers’ requirements and believes it has made progress toward improving performance and service levels to meet those requirements.

 

Research, Development and Engineering Expenses increased $192 or 2.5% to $7,886 in 2000, compared to $7,694 in 1999.  As a percentage of sales, the R&D expenses were 3.9% and 4.1% in 2000 and 1999, respectively.  The Company believes the current level of funding is adequate to support its product development priorities.

 

Special Charges (Recovery) were recorded in the first quarter of 2000 that netted to zero.  Special charges included a $250 recovery of inventory accruals primarily due to gains recognized on the sale of inventory at the Company’s Rockland, Massachusetts manufacturing facility.  The special charges also included $250 of workforce reduction severance costs related to the first quarter 2000 restructuring of several corporate functions.  The special charges (recovery) are summarized below:

 

Corporate restructuring

 

$

250

 

Special inventory recovery related to plant closings

 

(250

)

Gross special charges (recovery)

 

$

 

Less special inventory recovery – in COS

 

(250

)

Special charge in Operating Expense

 

$

250

 

 

Other Expense decreased $1,390 to income of $7 in 2000, compared to expense of $1,383 in 1999.  The 2000 change is primarily the result of gains on the sale of investment securities of $3,788 in 2000 compared to $2,371 in 1999.  Net interest expense increased $499 to $3,940 in 2000 compared to $3,441 in 1999.  This resulted from a $215 decrease in interest income during 2000 resulting from the liquidation of marketable securities in 2000.  Also, 2000 interest expense increased $284 as interest rate increases negatively impacted the reduced average debt carrying balance of the Company.

 

Income Taxes increased $579 to $2,663 in 2000 compared to $2,084 in 1999.  The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2000 was 32.9% compared to 31.8% for the same period in 1999.  The 1999 effective tax rate was computed after excluding

 

5



 

the non-deductible $3,500 goodwill asset impairment special charge related to AquaMatic products.

 

Net Income increased $4,455 to $5,419 ($0.38 per diluted share) in 2000, compared to $964 ($0.07 per diluted share) in 1999.  Net income in 1999 was negatively impacted by special charges.  Without the special charges, 1999 net income would have been $4,533 ($0.32 per diluted share).

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

At December 31, 2001, the Company had cash and marketable securities of $52 as compared to $1,910 at December 31, 2000.  The decrease in cash and marketable securities was primarily the result of the Company liquidating $2,188 of its marketable securities portfolio during 2001.  This compares to $13,740 and $6,409 of marketable securities liquidated in 2000 and 1999, respectively.

 

Cash provided by operations was $18,438, $2,395 and $20,089 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.  The increase in cash provided by operating activities during 2001 was principally due to improved earnings and reductions in accounts receivable and inventory.  The reduction in cash provided by operating activities during 2000 was principally due to the Company’s decision to strategically build inventory levels of high volume items to better serve its customers.  The combination of Year 2000 inventory increase of $8,158 and a 1999 inventory decrease of $5,372 resulted in total cash flow from operations impact change of $13,530.

 

Capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 were $10,430, $7,058 and $8,323, respectively.  Depreciation for the same time periods was $7,557, $7,300 and $6,632, respectively.  The Company anticipates increasing its investment in capital assets in 2002.  At December 31, 2001, the Company’s aggregate commitments for capital expenditures were less than $1,000.

 

In the first quarter of 2000, the Company amended its loan agreement and reduced the Company’s unsecured revolving line of credit to $30,000 from $35,000.  In the second quarter 2000, the Company negotiated the release of collateral arrangements with its lenders associated with $10,000 of its marketable securities portfolio.  As a result, the Company liquidated that portion of its marketable securities portfolio and used the proceeds to reduce aggregate debt levels, fund current operations and enter into a loan agreement amendment that reduced the Company’s unsecured revolving line of credit to $24,000 from $30,000.  At December 31, 2001, the Company had $14,500 available under the revolving line of credit, compared to $9,000 as of December 31, 2000.

 

The Company’s operating cash requirements consist principally of working capital requirements, capital expenditures and scheduled payments of principal on outstanding indebtedness.  The Company believes that its cash and marketable securities, cash flow from operating activities and borrowings under its bank facility will be adequate to meet the Company’s liquidity and capital investment requirements in the foreseeable future.

 

6



 

New Accounting Standards

 

On October 3, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved its proposed FAS No. 144 (FAS 144), “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”  FAS 144 prescribes a consistent accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by other than a sale, regardless of whether the asset was previously held and used or newly acquired.  The provisions of FAS 144 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard and has not yet determined the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations. 

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143 (FAS 143), “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.”  FAS 143 requires entities to recognize the fair value of a liability for tangible long-lived asset retirement obligations in the period incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.  The provisions of FAS 143 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard and has not yet determined the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations.

 

On June 29, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved its proposed Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (FAS 141), “Business Combinations,” and No. 142 (FAS 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”  FAS 141 requires that all business combinations subsequent to June 30, 2001 be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.  FAS 142 requires cessation of goodwill amortization and periodic evaluation of the goodwill carrying value.  The provisions of FAS 142 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of these standards and has not yet determined the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations.

 

On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities.”  SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities.  It requires that all derivatives, including those embedded in other contracts, be recognized as either assets or liabilities and that those financial instruments be measured at fair value.  The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on their intended use and designation.  Management has reviewed the requirements of SFAS No. 133 and has determined that they have no embedded derivatives.  All contracts that contain provisions meeting the definition of a derivative, except for one described below, also meet the requirements of, and have been designated as, normal purchases or sales.  The Company’s general policy is to not enter into contracts containing derivatives with terms that cannot be designated as normal purchases or sales.

 

7



 

In 2001, the Company entered into a hedge contract to help offset foreign currency risk related to its European foreign subsidiary.  The instrument hedges certain levels of the subsidiary’s local euro currency exposure to the U.S. dollar and expires in June 2002.  The Company has chosen, as permitted by FAS 133, to record the changes in the fair value of the instrument in other income (expense) in the period of change.   

 

The Company adopted EITF 00-10 “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs” issued by the Emerging Issues Task Force in 2000.  Comparative financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to comply with the classification guidelines.  The freight amounts included in revenues were $3,586, $3,104 and $2,357 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

 

Review of Industry Segments

 

As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2000 the Company changed the focus of its reporting structure from a two-segment, product-focused structure to a three-segment, market-focused structure.  Certain financial results for the 12 months ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 are presented below as a percentage of net sales by segment (all segment information excludes the impact of special charges):

 

8



 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

1999

 

2001 vs.
2000

 

2000 vs.
1999

 

Filtration and Separations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

4.0

%

1.7

%

Gross Profit

 

36.6

 

34.4

 

38.5

 

10.6

 

(9.2

)

Operating Income

 

9.0

 

6.2

 

9.1

 

50.8

 

(30.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Process Water:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

8.1

%

13.1

%

Gross Profit

 

27.0

 

25.0

 

24.0

 

16.7

 

17.9

 

Operating Income (Loss)

 

4.0

 

(0.2

)

(1.8

)

n/a

 

(85.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Household Water:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

(6.2%

)

6.6

%

Gross Profit

 

31.3

 

31.6

 

32.5

 

(7.2

)

3.5

 

Operating Income

 

5.4

 

8.3

 

5.9

 

(39.3

)

50.4

 

 

Sales to unaffiliated customers in foreign geographic areas are as follows:

 

 

 

2001

 

% of
Total
Sales

 

2000

 

% of
Total
Sales

 

1999

 

% of
Total
Sales

 

Asia/Pacific

 

$

21,509

 

10.4

 

$

22,653

 

11.3

 

$

17,953

 

9.6

 

Euro/Africa

 

34,346

 

16.5

 

32,586

 

16.3

 

33,271

 

17.8

 

Americas

 

14,538

 

7.0

 

15,297

 

7.6

 

10,491

 

5.6

 

Total Sales

 

$

70,393

 

33.9

 

$

70,536

 

35.2

 

$

61,715

 

33.0

 

 

Filtration and Separations

 

Net sales in the Filtration and Separations segment increased 4.0% to $83,208 in 2001 compared to $79,977 in 2000.  The 2001 sales increase is primarily related to improved sales in membrane element products offset by some reduction in the Company’s filtration products.

 

Gross margin improved 10.6% to $30,447 (36.6% of net sales) in 2001 compared to $27,526 (34.4% of net sales) in 2000.  The improved gross margin is primarily the result of improved utilization of the Company’s membrane manufacturing facilities in 2001.  In addition, improvements in certain manufacturing processes and improved awareness of the chemical processes in membrane manufacturing contributed to the gross margin improvement in 2001.

 

The operating income improvement of $2,532 to $7,518 (9.0% of net sales) in 2001 compared to $4,986 (6.2% of net sales) in 2000 was primarily the result of improved

 

9



 

gross profits.  Operating expenses declined as a percent of net sales in 2001 as the Company continued to focus on expense control. 

 

Process Water

 

Net sales in the Process Water segment increased 8.1% to $87,152 in 2001 compared to $80,647 in 2000.  The 2001 sales increase is primarily related to improved sales on engineered systems and products.

 

Gross margin improved 16.7% to $23,504 (27.0% of net sales) in 2001 compared to $20,141 (25.0% of net sales) in 2000.  The improved gross margin is largely the result of improved utilization of capacity, standardization of product lines, new product releases, cost control, and focused factory initiatives.

 

The operating income improvement of $3,676 to $3,485 (4.0% of net sales) in 2001 compared to a loss of $191 (-0.2% of net sales) in 2000 was primarily the result of improved gross profits.  Operating expenses declined as a percent of net sales in 2001 as the Company continued to focus on expense control.

 

Household Water

 

Net sales in the Household Water segment decreased 6.2% to $37,079 in 2001 compared to $39,515 in 2000.  The 2001 sales decrease was primarily related to reduced demand for the Company’s residential valves and controls products.  This segment was negatively impacted by the general economic slowdown and customer inventory adjustments throughout 2001.

 

Gross margin declined 7.2% to $11,592 (31.3% of net sales) in 2001 compared to $12,489 (31.6% of net sales) in 2000.  The reduced gross margin is primarily the result of lower utilization of fixed manufacturing capacity driven by reduced sales.  Throughout 2001, management focused efforts on cost reductions to match the level of economic activity.

 

The operating income decline of $1,289 to $1,991 (5.4% of net sales) in 2001 compared to $3,280 (8.3% of net sales) in 2000 was primarily the result of reduced gross profits.  Operating expenses increased $392 and as a percent of net sales in 2001.  The segment incurred one-time separation charges of $250 in the second quarter of 2001 resulting from efforts to reduce staff and management levels to match the current and near-term anticipated business requirements.

 

Management does not report the balance sheet or any cash-generating measurements by such segments.

 

10



 

Bankruptcy of Major Customer

 

The Company has $13,700 of goodwill recorded as of December 31, 2001 associated with the second quarter 1998 acquisition of Membrex Corp. (Membrex).  Safety Kleen (SK), the principal customer for the Membrex products, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in June of 2000.  As a result, 2001 sales to SK of $1,878 were $1,909 below the same period 2000 sales of $3,787.  SK has continued to order product and parts at reduced levels to support its installed base.  Future sales levels are uncertain and could be minimal.  Inventory related to the Membrex products for SK was $1,600 while net receivables from SK were current at December 31, 2001. 

 

On December 21, 2001, the Company signed a new agreement with SK, which continues the business relationship on a non-exclusive basis.  This new agreement enables the Company to actively market its product through other available sales channels.  The Company has developed a business plan and hired a sales and technical support staff dedicated to pursuing sales in such channels in 2002 and beyond.

 

In February 2002, it was announced that Clean Harbors, Inc. (Nasdaq: CLHB), an industry-leading environmental services provider, has entered a definitive agreement to acquire Safety-Kleen’s Chemical Service Division, subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court and various regulatory agencies.  At this point, Management is unable to determine the financial impact of such a transaction to the Company.  The Company is monitoring the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings to determine any further financial impact to the Company.

 

The Company has determined that two-thirds ($9,100) of the Membrex goodwill is associated with these products.  The Company has concluded there was no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2001.  In its analysis, management used a discounted cash flow model in accordance with current accounting guidelines.  This analysis includes a detailed sales plan with sales of product through new sales channels and anticipates an ongoing business relationship with SK while it proceeds through and comes out of bankruptcy.  The ongoing business relationship assumes that SK will continue to purchase replacement membrane for existing product installations.

 

Management believes it will be capable of selling and marketing these products through other sales channels in a manner that will support the goodwill value.  The Company is continuing to investigate new applications for the technology acquired from Membrex.  The Company believes the patented technology associated with Membrex brings a cost-effective solution to hazardous waste disposal, which could become a required environmental standard.

 

11



 

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

 

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements.  Certain information included in this Annual Report and other materials filed or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as information included in statements made or to be made by the Company) contains statements that are forward-looking.  Such statements may relate to plans for future expansion and market penetration, sales, business development activities, capital expenditures and spending, financing, product reorganizations, plant rationalizations, scrap reductions, contract negotiations, the bankruptcy of SK or the effects of regulation, competition and foreign exchange.  Such information involves important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect results in the future.  Such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by the Company.  These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to product development, computer systems development, dependence on existing management, energy availability and costs, global economic and market conditions and changes in federal or state laws.

 

12