XML 80 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Accounts and Notes Receivable and Credit Quality of Notes Receivable
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Receivables [Abstract]  
Accounts and Notes Receivable and Credit Quality of Notes Receivable
Accounts and Notes Receivable and Credit Quality of Notes Receivable
Accounts and Notes Receivable
The following summarizes the components of current and long-term accounts and notes receivable, net:
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Current:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
$
478.9

 
$
479.5

Notes receivable
174.5

 
194.6

Allowance for doubtful accounts
(19.7
)
 
(17.0
)
Current accounts and notes receivable, net
$
633.7

 
$
657.1

Long-term:
 
 
 
Notes receivable
57.6

 
87.5

  Total accounts and notes receivable, net
$
691.3

 
$
744.6


Credit Quality of Notes Receivable
The Company includes in its notes receivable amounts due in installment payments and any amounts due for development financing provided to certain customers. We carry our notes receivable at face amount less an allowance for doubtful accounts and imputed interest, if any. Interest income is recognized ratably over the life of the note receivable and any related fees or costs to establish the notes are expensed as incurred, as they are considered insignificant. Actual or imputed interest, if any, is determined based on stated rates or current market rates at the time the note originated and is recorded as interest income in other income (expense), net, ratably over the payment period. We generally impute interest income on notes receivable with terms greater than one year that do not contain a stated interest rate. The interest rates on our outstanding notes receivable ranged from 3.25% to 10.4% at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Our policy is to generally recognize interest on our notes receivable until the note receivable is deemed non-performing, which we define as a note on which payments are over 180 days past due. The amount of our non-performing notes was immaterial at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
We monitor the credit quality of our accounts receivable by reviewing an aging of customer invoices. Invoices are considered past due if a scheduled payment is not received within agreed-upon terms. Our notes receivable are reviewed for impairment at least quarterly. We also review a variety of other relevant qualitative information such as collection experience, economic conditions and customer-specific financial conditions to evaluate credit risk in recording the allowance for doubtful accounts or as an indicator of an impaired loan. For notes receivable from customers in the U.S. with payment terms over 90 days, we generally file a UCC-1 form to retain a security interest in the gaming machines until we are fully paid. For notes receivable from international customers, where possible, we seek payment deposits, collateral, pledge agreements, bills of exchange, foreign bank letters of credit, post-dated checks or personal guarantees from such customers. However, the majority of our notes receivable from international customers do not have these features. Currently, we have not sold our notes receivable to third parties.
The government authorities in Argentina limit the exchange of pesos into U.S. dollars and the transfer of funds from Argentina. Our accounts and notes receivable, net, from customers in Argentina at September 30, 2015 were $19.1 million, which is denominated in U.S. dollars, although, under the terms of our arrangements with our customers in Argentina, they are required to pay us in pesos at the spot exchange rate between the peso and the U.S. dollar on the date of payment. In evaluating the collectability of customer receivables in Argentina at September 30, 2015, we specifically evaluated recent payments, receivables aging, any additional security or collateral we had (bills of exchange, pledge agreements, etc.) and other facts and circumstances relevant to our customers’ ability to pay. Our customers in Argentina have continued to pay us in pesos based on the spot exchange rate between the peso and the U.S. dollar on the payment date. We collected $23.6 million of outstanding receivables from customers in Argentina during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. In late November 2015, Argentinians will elect a new president and we cannot predict what the impact of this change in leadership may have on our operations, customer payments or our ability to transfer funds from Argentina.
Recent government actions and challenges affecting the gaming industry in Mexico have increased the credit quality risk with respect to certain of our current Mexico customers. In evaluating the collectability of customer receivables in Mexico at September 30, 2015, we specifically evaluated recent payments, receivable aging, any additional security or collateral we had (bills of exchange, pledge agreements, etc.) and other facts and circumstances relevant to our customers’ ability to pay. Our accounts and notes receivable, net, from all customers in Mexico was $42.1 million at September 30, 2015. We collected $23.7 million of outstanding receivables from customers during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
The following summarizes the components of total notes receivable, net:
 
September 30, 2015
 
Balances over 90 days past due
 
December 31, 2014
 
Balances over 90 days past due
Notes receivable:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
$
63.1

 
$
2.6

 
$
95.3

 
$
7.9

International
169.0

 
20.3

 
186.8

 
12.0

     Total notes receivable
232.1

 
22.9

 
282.1

 
19.9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes receivable allowance for doubtful accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
(2.9
)
 
(1.5
)
 

 

International
(8.5
)

(4.4
)
 
(5.9
)
 
(3.5
)
     Total notes receivable allowance for doubtful accounts
(11.4
)
 
(5.9
)
 
(5.9
)
 
(3.5
)
Note receivable, net
$
220.7

 
$
17.0

 
$
276.2

 
$
16.4


At September 30, 2015, 7.7% of our total notes receivable, net, was past due by over 90 days compared to 5.9% at December 31, 2014.
    


The following tables detail our evaluation of notes receivable for impairment as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
September 30, 2015
 
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment
 
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
Notes receivable:
 
  
 
 
 
Domestic
$
63.1

 
$
32.4

 
$
30.7

International
169.0

 
112.3

 
56.7

Total notes receivable
$
232.1

  
$
144.7

  
$
87.4

 
December 31, 2014
 
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment
 
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
Notes receivable:
 
  
 
 
 
Domestic
$
95.3

  
$
36.1

  
$
59.2

International
186.8

  
121.0

  
65.8

Total notes receivable
$
282.1

  
$
157.1

  
$
125.0


The following table reconciles the allowance for doubtful notes receivable from December 31, 2014 to September 30, 2015:
 
Total
 
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment
 
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
Beginning balance at December 31, 2014
$
5.9

 
$
5.9

 
$

Charge-offs
(1.9
)
 
(1.9
)
 

Recoveries
(0.5
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.1
)
Provision
7.9

 
6.2

 
1.7

Ending balance at September 30, 2015
$
11.4

 
$
9.8

 
$
1.6


    
The following table reconciles the allowance for doubtful notes receivable from December 31, 2013 to September 30, 2014:
 
Total
 
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment
 
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
Beginning balance at December 31, 2013
$
5.6

 
$
5.6

 
$

Charge-offs
(0.1
)
 
(0.1
)
 

Recoveries

 

 

Provision
1.9

 
1.9

 

Ending balance at September 30, 2014
$
7.4

 
$
7.4

 
$


Modifications to original financing terms are exceptions to our cash collection process and are a function of collection activities with the customer. If a customer requests a modification of financing terms during the collection process, we evaluate the proposed modification in relation to the recovery of our gaming machines, generally seek additional security and recognize any additional interest income ratably over the remaining new financing term. Additionally, we often take the opportunity to simplify the customer's future payments by consolidating several notes (each typically representing an individual purchase transaction) into one note. In those instances, the aging of any outstanding receivable balance would be adjusted to reflect the new payment terms. Such modifications generally do not include a concession on the amount owed and typically result only in a delay of payments relative to the original terms.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we had no significant modifications to the original financing terms.
    
The following summarizes the notes receivable financing terms that were modified during the nine months ended September 30, 2014:
 
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
 
# of
 Customers
# of Notes
 
Pre-Modification
 Investment
 
Post-Modification
 Investment
Financing term modifications:
 
 
 
 
 
 
International (1)
9

28

 
$
12.8

 
$
12.8

Total financing term modifications
9

28

  
$
12.8

  
$
12.8

(1) The modifications are detailed below:
one customer for which 12 notes were consolidated into one note aggregating $4.0 million, with an average 28-month payment extension;
one customer for which three notes were consolidated into one note aggregating $3.1 million, with an average four-month payment extension;
one customer with a note for $2.3 million for which original payment terms were extended by nine months;
one customer for which four notes were consolidated into one note aggregating $1.4 million, with an average five-month extension, and another note for $0.2 million for which original payment terms were extended by seven months;
one customer for which two notes were consolidated into one note aggregating $0.7 million, with an average 15-month payment extension;
one customer with a note for $0.5 million for which original payment terms were extended by 21 months;
one customer with a note for $0.3 million for which original payment terms were extended by 27 months;
one customer for which two notes were consolidated into one note aggregating $0.2 million, with an average 14-month payment extension; and
one customer with a note for $0.1 million for which original payment terms were extended by 21 months.
In certain international jurisdictions, we offer extended financing terms to our customers. Such financing activities subject us to increased credit risk, which could be worsened by, among other things, unfavorable economic conditions or political or economic instability in those regions. Our notes receivable were concentrated in the following international gaming jurisdictions at September 30, 2015:
Mexico
19
%
Peru
17
%
Australia
8
%
Columbia
7
%
Argentina
7
%
Other (less than 5% individually)
15
%
Total international notes receivable as a percentage of total notes receivable
73
%