XML 55 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures”, (“ASC 820”). This topic defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

 

    Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

    Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

    Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities and our notes payable. The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents (which are composed primarily of deposit and overnight sweep accounts), accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of our notes payable approximates fair value due to the market rate of the stated interest rate.

The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis relate to the Company’s money market accounts. The Company’s liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis relate to contingent consideration resulting from the acquisition of Xoft and the Warrants issued in connection with the Deerfield Facility Agreement.

The Company’s money market funds are included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheets, and are considered a Level 1 investment as they are valued at quoted market prices in active markets.

 

The following table sets forth Company’s assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy.

 

Fair value measurements using: (000’s) as of December 31, 2013

 
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Assets

           

Money market accounts

   $ 7,572       $ —         $ —         $ 7,572   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 7,572       $ —         $ —         $ 7,572   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities

           

Warrants

     —           —         $ 3,986       $ 3,986   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

   $ —         $ —         $ 3,986       $ 3,986   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Fair value measurements using: (000’s) as of September 30, 2014

 
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Assets

           

Money market accounts

   $ 28,019       $ —         $ —         $ 28,019   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 28,019       $ —         $ —         $ 28,019   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As discussed in Note 4, the Company issued 450,000 immediately exercisable warrants to Deerfield in December 2011. On April 30, 2014, Deerfield exercised the Warrants, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,575,000, and the Company issued 450,000 shares of Common Stock. The Warrant obligation was fully satisfied following that exercise. The liability for the Warrants associated with the debt was valued using the binomial lattice-based valuation methodology because that model embodies all of the relevant assumptions that address the features underlying these instruments. The Warrant was valued at $2,151,000 as of April 30, 2014 immediately prior to exercise and the Company recorded a gain of $699,000. Significant assumptions in valuing the Warrant liability were as follows as of December 31, 2013 and April 30, 2014.

 

     April 30,
2014
    December 31,
2013
 

Warrants

    

Exercise price

   $ 3.50      $ 3.50   

Volatility

     40.8     56.2

Equivalent term (years)

     —          4.00   

Risk-free interest rate

     0.1     1.3

The volatility was determined based on the definition in the Warrants, and the risk-free interest rate was determined using the six year LIBOR as of the measurement date.

 

In addition the other significant assumptions include the probability of voluntary exercise versus a major transaction (as defined in the Warrants); and assuming a major transaction, the probability of cashless major exercise; and assuming a cashless major exercise, the annual probabilities for a major transaction.

The following sets forth a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of the Warrants payable during the period:

 

Warrants

   Amount  

Balance as of December 31, 2013

     3,986   

Gain from change in fair value of warrant

     (1,835

Warrant exercise

     (2,151
  

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2014

   $ —     
  

 

 

 

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets, including our goodwill, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be impaired. We did not consider any assets to be impaired during the three months ended September 30, 2014.