UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM SD
SPECIALIZED DISCLOSURE REPORT
Magna International Inc.
Ontario, Canada |
|
001-11444 |
|
98-0037983 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(commission file number) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
337 Magna Drive, Aurora, Ontario, Canada L4G 7K1
(Address of principal executive offices)
Bassem A. Shakeel
Corporate Secretary
(905) 726-2462
(Name and telephone number, including area code,
of the person to contact in connection with this report)
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
x Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2017.
SECTION 1 - CONFLICT MINERALS DISCLOSURE
Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report
A copy of Magna International Inc.s Conflict Minerals Report which covers the reporting period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 is provided as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD and is also publicly available on Magnas corporate website at: http://www.magna.com/investors/financial-reports-public-filings/?rpt=tax under the heading Form SD and Exhibit 1.01 (Conflict Minerals Report dated May 31, 2018). The website and information accessible through it are not incorporated into this document.
ITEM 1.02 Exhibit
See item 2.01 of this Form SD.
SECTION 2 - EXHIBITS
Item 2.01 Exhibits
The following exhibit is filed as part of this Form SD.
Exhibit 1.01 Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form.
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
Date: May 31, 2018
|
Magna International Inc. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
/s/ Michael Sinneave |
|
By: |
Michael G.R. Sinnaeve |
|
|
Vice-President, Operational |
|
|
Improvement & Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bassem Shakeel |
|
By: |
Bassem A. Shakeel |
|
|
Vice-President and |
|
|
Corporate Secretary |
|
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONFLICT MINERALS REPORT
(For the reporting period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017)
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
A. Background
(a) The Conflict Minerals Rule
This Conflict Minerals Report (the Report) of Magna International Inc. (referred to as Magna, we, us or our in this Report) has been prepared in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Rule 13p-1 (17 CFR 240.13p-1) (the Rule) adopted under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.The Rule requires SEC registrant companies to disclose the use of Conflict Minerals in their products, where such use is necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by that company. The Rule defines Conflict Minerals as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, wolframite, gold, and their derivatives, tin, tantalum, tungsten as well as gold (collectively, 3TG minerals or 3TG) that originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country specified in the Rule (collectively, the Covered Countries).
As a registrant with 3TG minerals present in certain of our manufactured products, Magna is required to comply with the Rule, including performing a reasonable country of origin inquiry (RCOI) into the sources of the 3TG minerals to determine whether any such minerals in our products originated in a Covered Country. The results of our RCOI are detailed in Section 2 of this Report.
(b) Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains forward-looking statements relating to actions that we may take in the future with respect to our conflict minerals compliance program (the Program). Such statements are based on the current expectations of our management and are not promises or guarantees of future performance of such actions. The forward-looking statements represent managements expectations as of the date of this Report. Subsequent events and developments may cause managements views to change.
(c) Documents Incorporated by Reference
Unless expressly incorporated by reference in this Report, any documents, third-party materials or references to websites (including Magnas website) are not incorporated by reference in, or considered a part of, this Report.
B. Company Overview
(a) Our Company
We are a mobility technology company and one of the worlds largest suppliers to the automotive industry with 340 manufacturing operations and 93 product development, engineering and sales centres in 28 countries. We have more than 172,000 entrepreneurial-minded employees dedicated to delivering mobility solutions. These figures include manufacturing operations, product development, engineering and sales centres and employees in certain equity-accounted operations.
(b) Our Products
Our products are designed to meet the requirements and specifications of our automotive customers. Certain of these requirements and specifications entail the use of 3TG minerals. In addition to complete vehicle engineering and contract manufacturing expertise, our product capabilities include producing body, chassis, exterior, roof, powertrain, electronics, mirrors and lighting, mechatronics, and seating systems. A more detailed description of our products can be found on pages 20-25 of our Annual Information Form, which is available on Magnas corporate website at: http://www.magna.com/investors/financial-reports-public-filings?rpt=annualinfo
(c) Reliance on Supply Chain & Industry-Driven Initiatives
Due to the number and complexity of the products we manufacture, our supply chain consists of a substantial number of suppliers globally, the composition of which changes within each calendar year and from year to year. Moreover, we are generally many tiers removed from the smelters or refiners (SORs) of 3TG minerals in our supply chain. We do not, to the best of our knowledge, directly purchase 3TG minerals from any of the Covered Countries. As a downstream consumer of 3TG minerals, Magna must rely on its direct suppliers to gather and report to us information about SORs in the supply chain. Our direct suppliers are similarly reliant upon information provided to them by their own suppliers.
The structure, size and breadth of our supply chain, as well as the fact that a substantial portion of the suppliers in our supply chain are not obligated to file reports with the SEC (including reports under the Rule), makes gathering of complete and accurate conflict minerals information a lengthy and challenging process. In most cases, we do not have meaningful leverage over upstream suppliers or other actors in the supply chain. As a result of these challenges, in addition to our ongoing engagement with our direct production suppliers as part of our Program, we participate in several industry-driven initiatives aimed at increasing awareness of, and participation in, conflict minerals reporting by suppliers.
SECTION 2: REASONABLE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INQUIRY & CONCLUSION
Magna conducted the following RCOI for the 2017 reporting year:
A. Risk Assessment of Direct Production Suppliers
We conducted a good faith, risk-based assessment (the Risk Assessment) of our 7,726 direct production suppliers in 2017 (the 2017 Suppliers), to identify those suppliers that were reasonably believed to represent the highest risk of supplying products or components to Magna during 2017 that do or may contain 3TG minerals from one or more of the Covered Countries.
The Risk Assessment included: internal assessments by Magna purchasing personnel, engineering personnel and/or materials specialists regarding the likelihood of 3TG minerals content in supplied materials based on the nature of the product itself and information available to Magna in its existing databases, including the International Material Data System (IMDS). Responses received from suppliers in previous reporting years were also considered, but were not necessarily determinative.
Based on the Risk Assessment the 2017 Suppliers were categorized based on the risk that their products supplied to Magna in 2017 contained 3TG minerals, as follows:
· 4% categorized as uncertain/undeterminable risk;
· 7% categorized as highrisk, and together with the uncertain/undeterminable category considered in-scope for 2017 reporting (the In-Scope Suppliers); and
· 89% of 2017 Suppliers were categorized as low/no risk , and therefore considered out-of-scope for 2017 reporting (the Out-of-Scope Suppliers).
B. Conclusion based on RCOI
Based on the RCOI conducted, we concluded in good faith that during the 2017 calendar year Magna:
i. manufactured and/or contracted to manufacture products containing 3TG minerals and determined that the use of such minerals was necessary to the functionality or production of these products; and
ii. could not exclude the possibility that a portion of the 3TG minerals in the Companys products originated in one or more Covered Countries (and were not from recycled or scrap sources).
As a result of this conclusion, Magna conducted due diligence activities on the source and chain of custody of these necessary conflict minerals as described in Section 3 of this Report.
SECTION 3: DUE DILIGENCE PROCESS
A. Design of Due Diligence Framework
On the basis of the information obtained as part of our RCOI, we conducted due diligence regarding the source and chain of custody of the 3TG minerals contained in our products. Magna designed its due diligence measures to be in conformity, in all material respects, with the internationally recognized due diligence framework as set forth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD, 2013) and related supplements for gold and for tin, tantalum and tungsten (collectively, the OECD
Guidance). The OECD Guidance specifies a five-step framework for risk-based due diligence for responsible supply chains of minerals sourced from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, which are described below in connection with our Program.
B. Due Diligence Measures Performed
Magnas due diligence measures for the 2017 reporting year included the following:
a. Establish Strong Company Management Systems
We previously established and maintain company management systems with regard to conflict minerals reporting, the main elements of which are described below:
i. Conflict Minerals Compliance Team & Program
We maintain a cross-functional conflict minerals compliance team (the CM Compliance Team), comprised of representatives from Magnas legal and purchasing departments that is tasked with managing and directing the day-to-day activities of the Program, including monitoring the execution and effectiveness of the Program; overseeing the activities of our Program team members in each region in which we operate; monitoring conflict minerals regulatory developments and evolving industry best practices; and conflict minerals reporting to our automotive customers. The Program, which includes a supply chain system of controls and transparency through the adoption and use of the CMRT (defined in Subsection 3(b) (ii) below), facilitates the transfer of information through the supply chain regarding, among other things: (i) mineral country of origin; (ii) SORs being utilized; and (iii) the identity of new SORs to potentially undergo an audit through the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP) (formerly the Conflict-Free Smelter Program) described below.
ii. Oversight
The CM Compliance Team periodically reports the status of the Program to designated senior management.
iii. Policy Statement & Grievance Mechanism
We are committed to working with our supply chain to ensure compliance with the Rule. We previously adopted a policy statement which addresses our commitment to comply with the Rule and the expectations we place on our suppliers with respect to engagement in due diligence of their supply chains, as well as, conflict minerals reporting to us. The policy statement is publicly available on our corporate website at: http://www.magna.com/docs/default-source/corporate-governance/conflict-minerals-policy-statement.pdf.
The policy statement includes a grievance mechanism to facilitate reporting of concerns relating to Magnas Program through Magnas confidential and anonymous whistle-blower hotline (the Hotline) (www.magnahotline.com). The Hotline is structured such that reports are received and tracked by an independent third-party provider, and communicated to members of the CM Compliance Team for review and appropriate action. To date, we have not received any Hotline reports regarding our Program.
iv. Records Retention
We have a policy to retain conflict minerals documentation for at least five (5) years from the date of creation.
v. Supply Chain Engagement
Our Supplier Code of Conduct and Ethics (Supplier Code), which outlines our expectations for every company that supplies goods and services to Magna, specifically addresses the reporting obligations of our suppliers to us with respect to conflict minerals. In addition, Magnas standard global contract terms and conditions, including our global standard supplier requirements manual, require suppliers to provide information or certification with respect to the origin of their products supplied to Magna. The requirements manual is incorporated by reference into our standard global contract terms and conditions. Purchase orders and other agreements in place with our direct suppliers are, however, typically in force for an extended period of time and we have limited ability to impose: (i) new contract terms, or (ii) other requirements that our suppliers must flow down to their own suppliers.
We also communicated with all direct production suppliers regarding our Program and maintain a dedicated email address (conflict.minerals@magna.com) to facilitate supplier communication with us regarding the Program, including requests for assistance in fulfilling their reporting obligations to Magna.
vi. Industry Participation & Collaboration
The OECD Guidance encourages participation in industry-driven programs to establish a system of controls over the mineral supply chain which includes either a chain of custody or traceability system.
With respect to initiatives aimed at improving SOR validation, we continue to support the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) (formerly the Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative) as a member, as well as through participation in CFSI plenary member conference calls and as a part of its Due Diligence Practice Team. The RMI has designed and manages the RMAP, a process designed to identify the SORs that process 3TG minerals and independently audit those smelters and refiners to validate those that source only conflict-free 3TG minerals. Through our membership, which we view as critical to our Program, we have benefited from access to RCOI and smelter validation data, information regarding sourcing initiatives and regulatory developments, and access to valuable tools and resources which we are able to use to enhance our Program. Through our membership in the RMI, we also support several complementary programs/organizations with which the RMI regularly collaborates to address conflict minerals issues from an industry perspective.
Throughout 2017 we also engaged with and actively participated as a member of several industry associations, particularly the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). The initiatives of the AIAG and its Conflict Minerals Working Group include: efforts to improve supply chain transparency and compliance with the conflict minerals reporting requirements; development of best practices for conducting due diligence, supply chain engagement and reporting; development of common standards and reporting tools; engagement
with SORs to promote conflict-free validation programs; and provision of training and awareness. We also provided opportunities for increased supply chain awareness of the conflict mineral reporting requirements and emerging best practices by sponsoring several AIAG industry events. Magna also actively participates in the Original Equipment Suppliers Association (OESA), including its activities relating to conflict minerals compliance.
b. Identification and assessment of risks in the supply chain
i. Identification of Risks
To identify risks in the supply chain, Magna undertook the following measures:
· Conducted the Risk Assessment described in Section 2.A. of this Report.
· Communicated at least once with all Out-of-Scope Suppliers advising of their low/no risk rating and directing them to contact us if they believed their rating to be incorrect.
· Communicated regularly with all In-Scope Suppliers (as described below).
· Ensured changes to our supplier list were captured in our Program.
· Reviewed and responded to red flags generated by supplier survey responses, including detailed communication to suppliers of our requirements for addressing the specific red flag(s) generated.
· Validated the accuracy and completeness of the SORs identified by In-Scope Suppliers, including by reviewing the list of such SORs against the RMI (members-only access) list of processing facilities which have received a Conformant or other designation under the RMAP.
ii. In-Scope Supplier Due Diligence
Our due diligence efforts were focused primarily on communicating with the In-Scope Suppliers to obtain information with respect to the source and chain of custody of the necessary 3TG minerals in the products they supplied to us. All In-Scope Suppliers were sent an initial communication package requesting that they complete a survey based on the standardized template originally developed by the RMI known as the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template or CMRT. The CMRT was developed to facilitate disclosure and communication of information regarding SORs that provide materials in a companys supply chain and includes, among other things, questions regarding a suppliers conflict minerals policy, engagement with its own suppliers, origin of 3TG minerals in its products, and supplier due diligence.
The supplier communication package also included: step-by-step instructions on how to complete each CMRT question; recommendations with regard to implementing or enhancing a suppliers own conflict minerals program; and details regarding AIAG and other conflict minerals tools and resources available to improve supplier reporting. Our suppliers were requested to obtain completed
CMRTs from their own production suppliers, and encourage those suppliers to cascade the same requirement throughout their supply chain.
In-Scope Suppliers that provided responses in a format other than the CMRT were advised to resubmit their response in the requested format. In-Scope Suppliers that failed to respond at all to Magna were sent several reminders to submit a CMRT by a specified deadline.
iii. CMRT Review
Magna reviewed the CMRT responses received from In-Scope Suppliers for red flags that would identify inconsistent, incomplete, or inaccurate responses. Responses that triggered select red flags were targeted for priority follow up and those suppliers were sent a request to address and resolve the red flag(s). 59 In-Scope Suppliers were determined as low/no risk through this review process. No supplier indicated that they receive any 3TG minerals from sources that directly or indirectly financed or benefitted armed groups within the meaning of the Rule.
iv. Efforts to Determine Mine or Location of Origin
As a downstream company, the primary focus of our due diligence on the source and chain of custody of the 3TG minerals in our supply chain was the collection and analysis of the CMRT responses received from our direct production suppliers. As described in this report, we verify the SOR information in the CMRT responses with data obtained from the RMI. We believe this represents the most reasonable effort we can make to determine the mines or locations of origin of any 3TG minerals that may be used in our products, as discussed in Section 4 below.
c. Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks
Magna designed a risk management plan to identify, monitor and mitigate identified risks, the key elements of such plan being:
· Based on the red flag review, In-Scope Suppliers whose responses to select CMRT questions were identified as incomplete, inconsistent or inaccurate, were asked to address and resolve the red flag(s) and resubmit their CMRT.
· In-Scope Suppliers that did not respond to Magnas initial survey request were sent follow-up reminders, either directly or through periodic iPCMP system generated notices, requesting that they complete a CMRT.
· Suppliers who sent responses to Magna in a format other than the CMRT were asked to resubmit a response using the CMRT.
· The CM Compliance Team regularly reviewed a supplier response status dashboard and determined the timing and frequency of supplier follow-up communications.
· In order to increase supplier awareness and facilitate compliance with the conflict minerals reporting requirements, Magnas written communications directed suppliers to visit the RMI website (www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org) to take advantage of useful resources and tools, training information and guidance documents relating to the completion of the CMRT and conflict minerals reporting in general. In addition, Magna annually sponsors the AIAGs annual Conflict Minerals Industry Briefing, which is organized to provide an update on industry strategies regarding conflict minerals reporting and due diligence best practices, as well as SOR engagement activities.
d. Carry out independent third-party audit of SOR due diligence practices
Magna is a downstream consumer of necessary conflict minerals and is several supply chain tiers removed from smelters and refiners which provide minerals and ores. Therefore, Magna does not perform, or direct the performance of, audits of SORs within the supply chain. As outlined in the OECD Guidance upon which our Program is based, we support the RMIs cross-industry initiative that audits SORs to identify those facilities that have systems in place to assure sourcing of only conflict-free materials. The data on which we relied for certain statements in this Conflict Minerals Report (including in Appendix I) was obtained using the RCOI report we receive through our membership in the RMI (Unique RMI membership code: MAGN).
e. Report annually on supply chain due diligence
Magnas conflict minerals policy states that we will comply with the Rule, which includes filing our Specialized Disclosure Form (Form SD) and the associated Conflict Minerals Report with the SEC (www.edgar.com) and making both documents publicly available on our corporate website (www.magna.com).
We also completed Conflict Minerals Reporting Templates for each of our customers who requested us to do so for the 2017 reporting year, in support of such customers reporting obligations under the Rule.
SECTION 4: DETERMINATION
Magna does not, to the best of its knowledge, directly purchase 3TG from any of the Covered Countries. As a downstream consumer of 3TG, Magna must rely on its direct production suppliers to gather information about smelters and refiners in the supply chain. Those direct production suppliers are similarly reliant upon information provided by their suppliers throughout the supply chain. There are generally multiple tiers of suppliers between 3TG SORs and Magna. We have determined that our efforts to seek information about the smelters and refiners in our supply chain through the submission of CMRTs from our suppliers, as well as efforts to determine and improve the accuracy and quality of such submissions, represents the most reasonable effort Magna can make to determine the mines or locations of origin of the necessary conflict minerals in our supply chain. However, most of the In-Scope Suppliers who responded to us did so at a company level and not a product level.
As a result, despite receiving CMRT responses from In-Scope Suppliers that included SOR names (See Appendix I to this Conflict Minerals Report), such suppliers were unable to accurately report with specificity those facilities that were part of the supply chain for the products or components that were sold to Magna in 2017. Based on the due diligence efforts described in this Report, we are unable to determine the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflict minerals in our products for the 2017 reporting year.
SECTION 5: CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS TO MITIGATE RISK
Magna continues to examine ways to improve the response rate and quality of relevant supplier responses in future reporting years and to attempt to mitigate the risk that necessary conflict minerals used in Magna products may benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries, including the following:
· Continuing to work with our suppliers to increase the completeness and accuracy of conflict minerals reporting.
· Assessing opportunities to provide additional awareness, training, best practices or other assistance to our suppliers with respect to conflict minerals reporting.
· Maintaining our support for industry initiatives aimed at improving supply chain transparency, including, through our membership and participation in the AIAG, OESA and other industry associations.
· Supporting ongoing SOR audit and validation initiatives, including through our membership and participation in the RMI.
· Annually evaluating opportunities to enhance our Program, including by monitoring best practices adopted by peer companies and automotive customers, and those developed by industry organizations.
· Continuing to monitor legislative developments regarding conflict-free minerals sourcing or reporting.
APPENDIX I
TO THE 2017 CONFLICT MINERALS REPORT OF
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.
PROCESSING FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN SUPPLIER CMRT RESPONSES
The following table lists the name and country of the processing facilities identified in supplier CMRT responses to Magna International Inc., as well as the validation status of each processing facility under the RMAP, based on the RMI Standard Smelter List as at May 26, 2018. Facilities included in supplier CMRT responses but identified as Not Applicable as a result of not being eligible for the RMAP in the RMI Standard Smelter List have been excluded.
The definition of each RMAP Status used in the tables below can be found at: http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/members/database-field-definitions/
GOLD
FACILITY NAME |
|
COUNTRY |
|
RMAP STATUS |
Abington Reldan Metals, LLC |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
NON-CONFORMANT |
Advanced Chemical Company |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Aida Chemical Industries Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Allgemeine Gold-und Silberscheideanstalt A.G. |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC) |
|
UZBEKISTAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
AngloGold Ashanti Córrego do Sítio Minerção |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Argor-Heraeus S.A. |
|
SWITZERLAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Asahi Pretec Corp. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Asahi Refining Canada Ltd. |
|
CANADA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Asahi Refining USA Inc. |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Asaka Riken Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Atasay Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. |
|
TURKEY |
|
DUE DILIGENCE VETTING PROCESS |
AU Traders and Refiners |
|
SOUTH AFRICA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Aurubis AG |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Bangalore Refinery |
|
INDIA |
|
ACTIVE |
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines) |
|
PHILLIPINES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Boliden AB |
|
SWEDEN |
|
CONFORMANT |
C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Caridad |
|
MEXICO |
|
COMMUNICATION SUSPENDED NOT INTERESTED |
CCR Refinery - Glencore Canada Corporation |
|
CANADA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Cendres + Metaux S.A. |
|
SWITZERLAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Chimet S.p.A. |
|
ITALY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Chugai Mining |
|
JAPAN |
|
IN COMMUNICATION |
Daejin Indus Co., Ltd |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Daye Non-Ferrous Metals Mining Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
IN COMMUNICATION |
Degussa Sonne / Mond Goldhandel GmbH |
|
GERMANY |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Dowa |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
DSC (Do Sung Corporation) |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Fidelity Printers and Refiners Ltd. |
|
ZIMBABWE |
|
DUE DILIGENCE VETTING PROCESS |
Geib Refining Corporation |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Gold Refinery of Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Great Wall Precious Metals Co., Ltd. of CBPM |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Guoda Safina High-Tech Environmental Refinery Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Guangdong Jinding Gold Limited |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Hangzhou Fuchunjiang Smelting Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
HeeSung Metal Ltd. |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Heimerle + Meule GmbH |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Heraeus Metals Hong Kong Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Hunan Chenzhou Mining Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
HwaSeong CJ CO., LTD. |
|
KOREA |
|
COMMUNICATION SUSPENDED NOT INTERESTED |
Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Istanbul Gold Refinery |
|
TURKEY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Italpreziosi |
|
ITALY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Japan Mint |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Copper Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
JSC Ekaterinburg Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
RMI DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW UNABLE TO PROCEED |
JSC Uralelectromed |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
JX Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Kaloti Precious Metals |
|
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES |
|
RMI DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW - UNABLE TO PROCEED |
Kazakhmys Smelting LLC |
|
KAZAKHSTAN |
|
IN COMMUNICATION |
Kazzinc |
|
KAZAKHSTAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Kennecott Utah Copper LLC |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
KGHM Polska Miedz Spolka Akcyjna |
|
POLAND |
|
ACTIVE |
Kojima Chemicals Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Korea Zinc Co., Ltd. |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Kyrgyzaltyn JSC |
|
KYRGYZSTAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Kyshtym Copper-Electrolytic Plant ZAO |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Lazurde Company For Jewelry |
|
SAUDI ARABIA |
|
RMI DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW UNABLE TO PROCEED |
LOrfebre S.A. |
|
ANDORRA |
|
ACTIVE |
Lingbao Gold Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Lingbao Jinyuan Tonghui Refinery Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
LS-NIKKO Copper Inc. |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Luoyang Zijin Yinhui Gold Refinery Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Marsam Metals |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Materion |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metalor Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metalor Technologies (Singapore) Pte., Ltd. |
|
SINGAPORE |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metalor Technologies (Suzhou) Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metalor Technologies S.A. |
|
SWITZERLAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metalor USA Refining Corporation |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metalurgica Met-Mex Penoles S.A. De C.V. |
|
MEXICO |
|
CONFORMANT |
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
MMTC-PAMP India Pvt., Ltd. |
|
INDIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Modeltech Sdn Bhd |
|
MALAYSIA |
|
ACTIVE |
Morris and Watson |
|
AUSTRALIA |
|
COMMUNICATION SUSPENDED NOT INTERESTED |
Morris and Watson Gold Coast |
|
AUSTRALIA |
|
COMMUNICATION SUSPENDED NOT INTERESTED |
Moscow Special Alloys Processing Plant |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.Ş. |
|
TURKEY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat |
|
UZBEKISTAN |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Nihon Material Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ogussa Osterreichische Gold- und Silber-Scheideanstalt GmbH |
|
AUSTRIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ohura Precious Metal Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
OJSC Novosibirsk Refinery |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
OJSC The Gulidov Krasnoyarsk Non-Ferrous Metals Plant (OJSC Krastsvetmet) |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
PAMP S.A. |
|
SWITZERLAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Pease & Curren |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Penglai Penggang Gold Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Planta Recuperadora de Metales SpA |
|
CHILE |
|
CONFORMANT |
Prioksky Plant of Non-Ferrous Metals |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PX Precinox S.A. |
|
SWITZERLAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Rand Refinery (Pty) Ltd. |
|
SOUTH AFRICA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Remondis Argentia B.V. |
|
NETHERLANDS |
|
ACTIVE |
Republic Metals Corporation |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Royal Canadian Mint |
|
CANADA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Rand Refinery (Pty) Ltd. |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
SAAMP |
|
FRANCE |
|
CONFORMANT |
Safimet S.p.A |
|
ITALY |
|
CONFORMANT |
SAFINA A.S. |
|
CZECH REPUBLIC |
|
CONFORMANT |
Sai Refinery |
|
INDIA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Samduck Precious Metals |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
SAXONIA Edelmetalle GmbH |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Sichuan Tianze Precious Metals Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Singway Technology Co., Ltd. |
|
TAIWAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
SOE Shyolkovsky Factory of Secondary Precious Metals |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp. |
|
TAIWAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
State Research Institute Center for Physical Sciences and Technology |
|
LITHUANIA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Sudan Gold Refinery |
|
SUDAN |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
T.C.A S.p.A |
|
ITALY |
|
CONFORMANT |
The Refinery of Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Tongling Nonferrous Metals Group Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Tony Goetz NV |
|
BELGIUM |
|
NON-CONFORMANT |
TOO Tau-Ken-Altyn |
|
KAZAKHSTAN |
|
IN COMMUNICATION |
Torecom |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Umicore Brasil Ltda. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Umicore Precious Metals Thailand |
|
THAILAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Umicore S.A. Business Unit Precious Metals Refining |
|
BELGIUM |
|
CONFORMANT |
United Precious Metal Refining, Inc. |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Universal Precious Metals Refining Zambia |
|
ZAMBIA |
|
COMMUNICATION SUSPENDED NOT INTERESTED |
Valcambi S.A. |
|
SWITZERLAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Western Australian Mint trading as The Perth Mint |
|
AUSTRALIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Yokohama Metal Co., Ltd |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Yunnan Copper Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
TANTALUM
FACILITY NAME |
|
COUNTRY |
|
RMAP STATUS |
Asaka Riken Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Changsha South Tantalum Niobium Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
D Block Metals, LLC |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Exotech Inc. |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
FIR Metals & Resource Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
F&X Electro-Materials Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Global Advanced Metals Aizu |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Global Advanced Metals Boyertown |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Guangdong Zhiyuan New Material Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Co., Ltd. |
|
THAILAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Tantalum and Niobium GmbH |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Hermsdorf GmbH |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Inc. |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co. KG |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Hengyang King Xing Lifeng New Materials Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Dinghai Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Tuohong New Raw Material |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
JiuJiang JinXin Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiujiang Tanbre Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiujiang Zhongao Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
KEMET Blue Metals |
|
MEXICO |
|
CONFORMANT |
KEMET Blue Powder |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
LSM Brasil S.A. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metallurgical Products India Pvt., Ltd. |
|
INDIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
NPM Silmet A.S. |
|
ESTONIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Power Resources Ltd. |
|
MACEDONIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Resind Industria e Comercio Ltda. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
QuantumClean |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Solikamsk Magnesium Works OAO |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
Taki Chemical Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Telex Metals |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC |
|
KAZAKHSTAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
XinXing HaoRong Electronic Material Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
TIN
FACILITY NAME |
|
COUNTRY |
|
RMAP STATUS |
Alpha |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
An Vinh Joint Stock Mineral Processing Company |
|
VIETNAM |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
China Tin Group Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Chenzhou Yunxiang Mining and Metallurgy Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
CNMC (Guangxi) PGMA Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
COMMUNICATION SUSPENDED TEMPORARILY CEASED OPERATIONS |
CV Ayi Jaya |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
CV Gita Pesona |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
CV United Smelting |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
CV Venus Inti Perkasa |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Dowa |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Electro-Mechanical Facility of the Cao Bang Minerals & Metallurgy Joint Stock Company |
|
VIETNAM |
|
NON-CONFORMANT |
EM Vinto |
|
BOLIVIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Estanho de Rondonia S.A. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Fenix Metals |
|
POLAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Gejiu Jinye Mineral Company |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Gejiu Kai Meng Industry and Trade LLC |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Gejiu Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Gejiu Yunxin Nonferrous Electrolysis Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Gejiu Zili Mining And Metallurgy Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
IN COMMUNICATION |
Guangdong Hanhe Non-Ferrous Metal Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Guanyang Guida Nonferrous Metal Smelting Plant |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
HuiChang Hill Tin Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Huichang Jinshunda Tin Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Ketai Advanced Material Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi New Nanshan Technology Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Magnus Minerais Metais e Ligas Ltda. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC) |
|
MALAYSIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Melt Metais e Ligas S.A. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Metallic Resources, Inc. |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Mineração Taboca S.A. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Minsur |
|
PERÚ |
|
CONFORMANT |
Modeltech Sdn Bhd |
|
MALAYSIA |
|
ACTIVE |
Nghe Tinh Non-Ferrous Metals Joint Stock Company |
|
VIETNAM |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
O.M. Manufacturing Philippines, Inc. |
|
PHILIPPINES |
|
CONFORMANT |
O.M. Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd. |
|
THAILAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Operaciones Metalurgical S.A. |
|
BOLIVIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Aries Kencana Sejahtera |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Artha Cipta Langgeng |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT ATD Makmur Mandiri Jaya |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Babel Inti Perkasa |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Bangka Prima Tin |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Bangka Tin Industry |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Belitung Industri Sejahtera |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Bukit Timah |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT DS Jaya Abadi |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Eunindo Usaha Mandiri |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Inti Stania Prima |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Karimun Mining |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Kijang Jaya Mandiri |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Lautan Harmonis Sejahtera |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Menara Cipta Mulia |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Mitra Stania Prima |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Panca Mega Persada |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Prima Timah Utama |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Rajehan Ariq |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Refined Bangka Tin |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Sukses Inti Makmur |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Sumber Jaya Indah |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Kundur |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Mentok |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Tinindo Inter Nusa |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
PT Tommy Utama |
|
INDONESIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Resind Industria e Comercio Ltda. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Rui Da Hung |
|
TAIWAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Soft Metais Ltda. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Super Ligas |
|
BRAZIL |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Thaisarco |
|
THAILAND |
|
CONFORMANT |
Tuyen Quang Non-Ferrous Metals Joint Stock Company |
|
VIETNAM |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
White Solder Metalurgia e Mineração Ltda. |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Yunnan Tin Company Limited |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
TUNGSTEN
FACILITY NAME |
|
COUNTRY |
|
RMAP STATUS |
A.L.M.T. Tungsten Corp. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
ACL Metais Eireli |
|
BRAZIL |
|
CONFORMANT |
Asia Tungsten Products Vietnam Ltd. |
|
VIETNAM |
|
CONFORMANT |
Chenzhou Diamond Tungsten Products Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Fujian Jinxin Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ganzhou Jiangwu Ferrotungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Ganzhou Yatai Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
NON-CONFORMANT |
Global Tungsten & Powders Corp. |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Guangdong Xianglu Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Tungsten GmbH |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co.KG |
|
GERMANY |
|
CONFORMANT |
Hunan Chuangda Vanadium Tungsten Co., Ltd. Wuji |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Hunan Chunchang Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Hunan Litian Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
NON-CONFORMANT |
Hydrometallurg, JSC |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
Japan New Metals Co., Ltd. |
|
JAPAN |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangwu H.C. Starck Tungsten Products Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Dayu Longxintai Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
OUTREACH REQUIRED |
Jiangxi Gan Bei Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Minmetals Gaoan Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
COMMUNICATION SUSPENDED NOT INTERESTED |
Jiangxi Tonggu Non-ferrous Metallurgical & Chemical Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Xinsheng Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Jiangxi Yaosheng Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Kennametal Fallon |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Kennametal Huntsville |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Malipo Haiyu Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Moliren Ltd. |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
Niagara Refining LLC |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
CONFORMANT |
Nui Phao H.C. Starck Tungsten Chemicals Manufacturing LLC |
|
VIETNAM |
|
CONFORMANT |
Philippine Chuangxin Industrial Co., Inc. |
|
PHILLIPINES |
|
CONFORMANT |
South-East Nonferrous Metal Company Limited of Hengyang City |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Tejing (Vietnam) Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
VIETNAM |
|
CONFORMANT |
Unecha Refractory metals plant |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
|
CONFORMANT |
Vietnam Youngsun Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd. |
|
VIETNAM |
|
CONFORMANT |
Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG |
|
AUSTRIA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Woltech Korea Co., Ltd. |
|
KOREA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Xinfeng Huarui Tungsten & Molybdenum New Material Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |
Xinhai Rendan Shaoguan Tungsten Co., Ltd. |
|
CHINA |
|
CONFORMANT |