5.	Income Taxes

Components of Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,				Six Months Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015

United States	$	(17)	$	(431)	$	(3,331)	$	2,323
Foreign		32		103		546		439
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	15	$	(328)	$	(2,785)	$	2,762

We recorded income tax expense for our domestic and foreign subsidiaries of $103 and an income tax benefit of $45 during the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and an income tax expense of $231 and an income tax benefit of $162 during the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,				Six Months Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015

United States	$	8	$	(159)	$	16	$	(410)
Foreign		95		114		215		248
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	103	$	(45)	$	231	$	(162)

For the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, the domestic tax expense is higher than the prior year due to the full valuation allowance that is now being applied to any tax benefit generated from operating losses. The domestic expense is primarily attributable to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions and minimum state taxes in a number of jurisdictions for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016. The foreign tax expense is lower than the prior year primarily due to a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Japan for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same periods from the prior year.

Net Operating Losses

As of June 30, 2016, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $89,937 for income tax purposes, of which none expire in fiscal year 2017, and the remainder expire at various dates through fiscal year 2035. We recently completed an evaluation of the potential effect of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) on our ability to utilize these net operating losses. The study concluded that we have not had an ownership change for the period from July 22, 1993 to June 30, 2016. If we experience an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Code, our ability to use these NOLs will be substantially limited, which could therefore significantly impair the value of that asset. On March 1, 2016, we adopted a Tax Asset Preservation Plan (“TAPP”) in order to protect the value of our NOLs. At our 2016 Annual Meeting held on October 26, 2016, our shareholders adopted a formal amendment to our certificate of incorporation with terms substantially similar to the TAPP. The TAPP terminated in accordance with its terms on November 3, 2016 concurrent with the effectiveness of the amendment to our certificate of incorporation.

As of June 30, 2016, we had state NOLs of $51,346 and foreign NOLs of $28,208. The state NOLs expire between fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2035. The foreign NOLs expire according to the rules of each country. Currently, none of the jurisdictions in which the Company has foreign NOLs are subject to expiration due to indefinite carryforward periods.

Valuation Allowance

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily on the generation of future taxable income. In reviewing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider our historical and future projected operations along with other positive and negative evidence in assessing if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets. The following summarizes our conclusions on the need for a valuation allowance in each jurisdiction as of December 31, 2016:

U.S. – As of June 30, 2016, we believed the weight of negative evidence was greater than the existing positive evidence and concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that we would be unable to realize our U.S. net deferred tax assets. As a result, a full valuation allowance was established on our U.S. net deferred tax assets which continue to remain in place as of December 31, 2016. For future periods in which we remain in a full valuation allowance position, we would expect our U.S. tax provision expense to be limited to the alternative minimum tax (if applicable) for federal tax purposes, which approximates 2% of earnings before income taxes, state taxes in various jurisdictions, and interest and penalties on our uncertain tax positions.

U.K. - During our fiscal year 2014, a change in U.K. tax law relative to treatment of research and development expenses allowed us to release $214 of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets that we believe are now realizable as a result of the current period tax law change. We believe that in light of this law change, we will now generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize our net deferred tax assets in the U.K.

Japan - Our subsidiary in Japan has a long history of profitable operations, and we continue to project profitability in Japan for the foreseeable future. Therefore, we continue to believe that we will fully realize the net deferred tax assets in Japan, and no valuation allowance is needed.

Other Foreign Jurisdictions - We also evaluated the need for a continued full valuation allowance against our foreign deferred tax assets in other jurisdictions. We concluded that a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets for other foreign jurisdictions was warranted due to, among other reasons, (i) the realized cumulative accounting losses, (ii) our long history of taxable losses and (iii) our uncertainty with respect to generating future taxable income in the near term given our recently completed projections and other inherent uncertainties in our business.

We are beginning to show greater profitability in our German operations. While we continue to have cumulative losses over a 12-quarter period, it is possible that we could become cumulatively profitable over a 12-quarter period in the next 12 to 24 months should profitable operations continue. We will continue to monitor results in Germany to determine if a change in our valuation allowance conclusion is needed.

Each quarter, we assess the total weight of positive and negative evidence and evaluate whether release of all or any portion of the valuation allowance is appropriate. Should we come to the conclusion that a release of our valuation allowances is required, or that additional valuation allowance is required, there could be a significant increase or decrease in net income and earnings per share in the period of release, or the additional valuation allowance, due to the impact on the tax rate.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company has evaluated its unrecognized tax benefits and determined that there has not been a material change in the amount of such benefits for the three or six months ended December 31, 2016.