10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2013

or

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period from ____ to  ____

Commission File No. 0-13150

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	04-2735766
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4375 River Green Parkway, Suite 100, Duluth, GA  30096

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Telephone: (678) 258-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).         Yes   x No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨	Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨    No   x

Number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of October 24, 2013 was 9,233,043.

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Form 10-Q

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

Table of Contents

		Page
	Part I – Financial Information
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24
	Part II – Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	26
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	26
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	26
Item 5.	Other Information	26
Item 6.	Exhibits	26

1

Part I Financial Information

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data,)

	September 30,			June 30,
	2013			2013
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,533		$	27,927
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 at September 30, 2013 and $70 at June 30, 2013		9,645			10,701
Inventories		3,009			2,844
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,560			2,324
Total current assets		39,747			43,796
Property, plant and equipment, net		3,178			3,102
Intangible assets, net		617			834
Other long-term assets, net		911			737
Total assets	$	44,453		$	48,469
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	5,019		$	7,671
Deferred revenue		7,515			8,383
Total current liabilities		12,534			16,054
Non-current liabilities:
Deferred revenue		1,529			1,924
Pension liability		3,027			2,901
Other		1,686			1,805
Total liabilities		18,776			22,684
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders' equity:
Shares of common stock, par value $.01; 14,000,000 authorized; 8,937,410 and 8,807,766 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively		89			88
Capital in excess of par value		208,975			208,677
Accumulated deficit		(183,444	)		(183,085	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 37,788 at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013		(255	)		(255	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		312			360
Total stockholders' equity		25,677			25,785
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	44,453		$	48,469

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

 Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

	Three Months Ended
	September
	2013			2012
Revenues:
Product	$	11,446		$	8,964
Service		5,752			6,040
Total revenues		17,198			15,004
Cost of sales:
Product		4,984			3,553
Service		2,712			2,639
Total cost of sales		7,696			6,192
Gross margin		9,502			8,812
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		3,482			3,638
Research and development		3,173			2,847
General and administrative		2,047			1,914
Total operating expenses		8,702			8,399
Operating income		800			413
Interest income		14			17
Interest expense		(16	)		(18	)
Other (expense) income, net		(25	)		20
Income before income taxes		773			432
Provision for income taxes		39			107
Net income	$	734		$	325
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.08		$	0.04
Diluted	$	0.08		$	0.04
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		8,813			8,683
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted		9,049			8,801
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.12		$	0.12

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)

(In Thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Net income	$	734		$	325
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(53	)		(47	)
Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of tax		5			2
Other comprehensive loss		(48	)		(45	)
Comprehensive income	$	686		$	280

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’

Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Dollars In thousands)

For the three month period ended September 30, 2013

	Common Stock															Treasury Stock
	Shares			Par Value			Capital in Excess of Par Value			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comp. Income			Shares			Cost			Total
Balance at June 30, 2013		8,807,766		$	88		$	208,677		$	(183,085	)	$	360			(37,788	)	$	(255	)	$	25,785
Comprehensive Income:
Net income											734												734
Foreign currency translation adj.														(53	)								(53	)
Pension plan														5									5
Total Comprehensive income																							686
Dividends declared											(1,108	)											(1,108	)
Dividends forfeited with restricted stock forfeitures											57												57
Restricted stock compensation expensed								391															391
Lapse of restriction on restricted stock		146,471			1			(1	)														-
Repurchase and retirement of shares		(16,827	)		(0	)		(92	)		(42	)											(134	)
Balance at September 30, 2013		8,937,410		$	89		$	208,975		$	(183,444	)	$	312			(37,788	)	$	(255	)	$	25,677

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In Thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	734		$	325
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		727			856
Share-based compensation		391			168
Other non-cash expenses		(168	)		33
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,056			(792	)
Inventories		(190	)		850
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		775			(53	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,684	)		(507	)
Other long-term assets		(15	)		39
Deferred revenue		(1,263	)		(458	)
Other long-term liabilities		38			63
Total adjustments to net income		(1,333	)		199
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(599	)		524
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment		(538	)		(199	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(538	)		(199	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Dividends paid		(1,190	)		(1,042	)
Repurchase of shares to satisfy employee tax withholdings		(134	)		-
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,324	)		(1,042	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		67			44
Change in cash and cash equivalents		(2,394	)		(673	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		27,927			29,613
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	25,533		$	28,940
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	6		$	7
Income taxes (net of refunds)	$	54		$	446

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements

6

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation

We provide software, hardware and professional services for the video market and the high-performance, real-time market.  Our business is comprised of two segments for financial reporting purposes, products and services, which we provide for each of these markets.

Our video solutions consist of software, hardware, and services for intelligently streaming video and collecting and analyzing media data.  Our video solutions and services are deployed by video service providers for distribution of video to consumers and collection of media data intelligence to manage their video business and operations.

Our real-time products consist of real-time Linux operating systems, development tools and other system software combined, in most cases, with computer platforms and services.  These products are sold to a wide variety of companies seeking high-performance, real-time computer solutions in the military, aerospace, financial and automotive markets around the world.

Our condensed consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.

There have been no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies as disclosed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.  The results reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2013, we had U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $97,200,000 for income tax purposes which will expire at various dates through 2032.  We completed an evaluation of the potential effect of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) on our ability to utilize these net operating losses.  The study concluded that we have not had an ownership change for the period from July 22, 1993 to June 30, 2012.  Therefore, we do not expect the U.S. Federal net operating losses to be subject to limitation under Section 382, unless there are additional material ownership changes in the future.

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily on the generation of future taxable income. In considering the need for a valuation allowance we consider our historical results, future projected taxable income, and other positive and negative evidence.  This analysis is required on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. The following summarizes our conclusions on the need for a valuation allowance in each jurisdiction as of September 30, 2013:

U.S.:  As of September 30, 2013, we have realized a three-year cumulative accounting profit in the U.S. While the negative evidence of cumulative losses in recent years is not present at September 30, 2013, we believe that significant uncertainty continues to exist in our domestic operations as our recent improved financial performance in the U.S. has been for a limited time period.  We believe that our history of expired net operating losses, our inability to carryback any net operating losses or credits, a history of inconsistent earnings and the absence of currently available tax strategies provide negative evidence about the ability to realize our deferred tax assets at the present time.   We believe that the negative evidence outweighs the positive evidence on the realizability of the domestic deferred tax assets.  As such, at this time we believe it is premature to assert that it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize all net deferred tax assets and release some or all of the domestic valuation allowance.  We will continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on our domestic deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2013.

7

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

United Kingdom (“U.K.”):  During the first quarter of our fiscal year 2014, a change in U.K. tax law relative to treatment of research and development expenses allowed us to release $197,000 of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets that we believe are now realizable as a result of the current period tax law change.  We believe that in light of this law change, we will now generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize our net deferred tax assets in the U.K.

Japan:  Japan has a long history of profitable operations, and we continue to project profitability in Japan for the foreseeable future.  Therefore, we continue to believe that we will fully realize the net deferred tax assets in Japan, and no valuation allowance is needed.

Other Foreign Jurisdictions:  We also evaluated the need for a continued full valuation allowance against our foreign deferred tax assets in other jurisdictions.  We concluded that a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets for other foreign jurisdictions, was warranted due to, among other reasons, (i) the realized cumulative accounting losses, (ii) our long history of taxable losses, and (iii) our uncertainty with respect to generating future taxable income in the near term given our recently completed projections and other inherent uncertainties in our business.

Each quarter, we assess the total weight of positive and negative evidence and evaluate whether release of all or any portion of the valuation allowance is appropriate. Should we come to the conclusion that a release of our valuation allowances is required, there would be a significant increase in net income and earnings per share due to the impact on the tax rate.

We recorded $39,000 of income tax provision during the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to taxable income earned by our Japan subsidiary and an expected alternative minimum tax liability in the U.S., both of which were mostly offset by the aforementioned release of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in the U.K.  We recorded $107,000 of income tax provision during the three months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to taxable income earned by our Japan subsidiary.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-2, Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, providing on disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).  This new guidance requires entities to present (either on the face of the income statement or in the notes) the effects on the line items of the income statement for amounts reclassified out of AOCI. The new guidance was effective for us beginning July 1, 2013 and did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

To Be Adopted

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) which provides guidance on a parent’s accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment upon derecognition of a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. This new guidance requires that the parent release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. The new guidance will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2014. We do not anticipate any material impact on our financial statements upon adoption.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This amendment requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward, unless certain conditions exist. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods (and the interim periods within) beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. We expect to adopt this guidance effective July 1 2014.  We expect adoption will not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

8

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition Policy

We generate revenue from the sale of products and services. We commence revenue recognition when all of the following conditions are met:

· persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,

· the system has been delivered or the services have been performed,

· the fee is fixed or determinable, and

· collectability of the fee is probable.

Our standard multiple-element contractual arrangements with our customers generally include the delivery of systems with multiple components of hardware and software, certain professional services that typically involve installation and consulting, and ongoing software and hardware maintenance.  Product revenue is generally recognized when the product is delivered.  Professional services that are of a consultative nature may take place before, or after, delivery of the system, and installation services typically occur within 90 days after delivery of the system.  Professional services revenue is typically recognized as the services are performed.  Initial maintenance begins after delivery of the system and typically is provided for one to three years after delivery. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Our product sales are predominantly system sales whereby software and hardware function together to deliver the essential functionality of the combined product.  Upon our adoption of ASU 2009-14 on July 1, 2010, sales of these systems were determined to typically be outside of the scope of the software revenue guidance in Topic 985 (previously included in SOP 97-2) and are accounted for under ASU 2009-13.

Our sales model for media data intelligence (“MDI”) products includes the option for customers to purchase: (1) a perpetual license with maintenance; (2) a term license with maintenance and managed services; (3) software as a service; or (4) perpetual license with maintenance and managed services.  We expect that revenue from these sales generally will be recognized over the term of the various customer contracts.  Professional services attributable to implementation of our MDI products or managed services are essential to the customers’ use of these products and services.  We defer commencement of revenue recognition for the entire arrangement until we have delivered the essential professional services or have made a determination that the remaining professional services are no longer essential to the customer.  We recognize revenue for managed services and software-as-a-service arrangements once we commence providing the managed or software services and recognize the service revenue ratably over the term of the various customer contracts.  In circumstances whereby we sell a term or perpetual license and managed services, we commence revenue recognition after both the software and service are made available to the customer and recognize the revenue from the entire arrangement ratably over the longer of the term license or managed service period, because we believe the managed services to be essential to the functionality of the term or perpetual license.

We evaluate each element in a multiple-element arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting.  An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has standalone value and delivery of the undelivered element is probable and within our control.  Our various systems have standalone value because we have either routinely sold them on a standalone basis or we believe that our customers could resell the delivered system on a standalone basis.  Professional services have standalone value because we have routinely sold them on a standalone basis, there are similar third party vendors that routinely provide similar professional services, and certain customers perform the installation themselves.  Our maintenance has standalone value because we have routinely sold maintenance separately.

As a result of the adoption of ASU 2009-13, we allocate revenue to each element in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, third party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. We have typically been able to establish VSOE of fair value for our maintenance and services. We determine VSOE of fair value for professional services and maintenance by examining the population of selling prices for the same or similar services when sold separately, and determining that the pricing population for each VSOE classification is within a very narrow range of the median selling price.  For each element, we evaluate at least annually whether or not we have maintained VSOE of fair value based on our review of the actual selling price of each element over the previous 12 month period.

9

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

Our product deliverables are typically complete systems comprised of numerous hardware and software components that operate together to provide essential functionality, and we are typically unable to establish VSOE or TPE of fair value for our products.  Due to the custom nature of our products, we must determine ESP at the individual component level whereby our ESP for the total system is determined based on the sum of the individual components.  ESP for components of our real-time products is typically based upon list price, which is representative of our actual selling price.  ESP for components of our video products is based upon our most frequent selling price (“mode”) of standalone and bundled sales, based upon a 12 month historical analysis.  If a mode selling price is not available, then ESP will be the median selling price of all such component sales based upon a 12 month historical analysis, unless facts and circumstances indicate that another selling price, other than the mode or median selling price, is more representative of our ESP.  Our methodology for determining ESP requires judgment, and any changes to pricing practices, the costs incurred to integrate products, the nature of our relationships with our customers, and market trends could cause variability in our ESP or cause us to re-evaluate our methodology for determining ESP.  We will update our analysis of mode and median selling price at least annually, unless facts and circumstances indicate that more frequent analysis is required.

Occasionally, we sell software under multiple element arrangements that do not include hardware. Under these software arrangements, we allocate revenue to the various elements based on VSOE of fair value.  Our VSOE of fair value is determined based on the price charged when the same element is sold separately.  If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, but does exist for undelivered elements, we recognize revenue using the residual method.  Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement is recognized as revenue.  Where fair value of undelivered elements has not been established, the total arrangement is recognized over the period during which the services are performed.

Fair Value Measurements

The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) requires certain disclosures around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs.  The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.  Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  These levels are:

● Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

● Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

● Level 3 Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates.

We have money market funds that are highly liquid and have a maturity of three months or less, and as such are considered cash equivalents.

As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, we did not have an outstanding balance on our bank line of credit.  We did not have an average outstanding balance on our bank line of credit for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

10

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	Sept. 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	15,499	$	15,499	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,034		10,034		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,533	$	25,533	$	-	$	-

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	June 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	17,895	$	17,895	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,032		10,032		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,927	$	27,927	$	-	$	-

3. Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares including dilutive common share equivalents.  Under the treasury stock method, incremental shares representing the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued are included in the computation.  Diluted earnings per common share assumes exercise of outstanding stock options and vesting of restricted stock when the effects of such assumptions are dilutive.  Common share equivalents of 121,000 and 290,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were excluded from the calculation as their effect was antidilutive.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods indicated (dollars and share data in thousands, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012
Basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) calculation:
Net income	$	734	$	325
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		8,813		8,683
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock		223		118
Stock options		13		-
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		9,049		8,801
Basic EPS	$	0.08	$	0.04
Diluted EPS	$	0.08	$	0.04

11

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

4. Share-Based Compensation

As of September 30, 2013, we had share-based compensation plans which are described in Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.  We recognize stock compensation expense over the requisite service period of the individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period.  As of September 30, 2013, we had 197,239 stock options outstanding and 333,421 restricted shares outstanding.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we awarded 90,000 shares of restricted stock.   These restricted stock awards consisted of 50,000 restricted shares granted to employee participants that vest ratably over a four year service period, as long as the participant remains employed with Concurrent.  The award of restricted shares also included 40,000 performance-based restricted shares granted to senior management during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that vest based upon meeting specified company financial performance criteria over the next three years.  A summary of the activity of our time-based, service condition restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013, is presented below:

				Weighted Average
				Grant Date
Restricted Stock Awards	Shares			Fair Value
Unvested at July 1, 2013		225,064		$	4.91
Awarded		50,000			7.86
Released		(54,305	)		5.07
Forfeited		(3,250	)		4.57
Unvested at September 30, 2013		217,509		$	5.55

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we released restrictions on 92,166 previously granted performance based restricted shares, based upon achievement of performance goals attributable to our fiscal year 2013.  We cancelled 62,934 performance-based restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that had been granted to senior management and were forfeited during the period because neither the full performance criteria for our fiscal year 2011, 2012, and 2013 financial results, nor the market condition (achievement of a certain share price) were met.  A summary of the activity of our performance based restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013, is presented below:

				Weighted Average
				Grant Date
Performance Stock Awards	Shares			Fair Value
Unvested at July 1, 2013		231,012		$	3.66
Awarded		40,000			7.86
Released		(92,166	)		3.52
Forfeited		(62,934	)		2.90
Unvested at September 30, 2013		115,912		$	5.59

12

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

We recorded share-based compensation related to the issuance of stock options and restricted stock to employees and board members as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Share-based compensation expense included in the Statements of Operations:
Cost of sales		$	14		$	13
Sales and marketing			47			27
Research and development			35			26
General and administrative			295			102
Total			391			168
Tax benefit			-			-
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes		$	391		$	168

5. Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined by using the first-in, first-out method.  We reduce our excess and obsolete inventory to market value, if below cost, based upon historical and anticipated usage.  The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		June 30,
	2013		2013
Raw materials	$	1,557	$	1,091
Work-in-process		267		298
Finished goods		1,185		1,455
Total inventory	$	3,009	$	2,844

6. Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,			June 30,
	2013			2013
Cost of amortizable intangibles:
Purchased technology	$	7,700		$	7,700
Customer relationships		1,900			1,900
Patents		87			78
Total cost of intangibles		9,687			9,678
Less accumulated amortization:
Purchased technology		(7,679	)		(7,497	)
Customer relationships		(1,377	)		(1,334	)
Patents		(14	)		(13	)
Total accumulated amortization		(9,070	)		(8,844	)
Total intangible assets, net	$	617		$	834

Amortization expense was $226,000 for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

13

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

7.Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

The components of accounts payable and accrued expenses are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		June 30,
	2013		2013
Accounts payable, trade	$	1,440	$	2,075
Accrued payroll, vacation, severance  and other employee expenses		2,359		4,298
Accrued income taxes		27		130
Dividend payable		99		94
Other accrued expenses		1,094		1,074
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	5,019	$	7,671

8.Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information

We operate in two segments, products and services, as disclosed within our condensed consolidated Statements of Operations.  We evaluate segment results using revenues and gross margin as the performance measures.  Such information is shown on the face of the accompanying statements of operations.  We do not identify assets on a segment basis.  We attribute revenues to individual countries and geographic areas based upon location of our customers.  A summary of our revenues by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013		2012
United States	$	12,202	$	10,001
Canada		245		562
Total North America		12,447		10,563
Japan		2,980		3,168
Other Asia Pacific countries		821		112
Total Asia Pacific		3,801		3,280
Europe		950		1,159
South America		-		2
Total revenue	$	17,198	$	15,004

In addition, the following summarizes revenues by significant customer where such revenue accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013	2012
Customer A	31%	<10%
Customer B	<10%	20%

We assess credit risk through ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition, and collateral is generally not required.  The following summarizes accounts receivable by significant customer for whom

14

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

accounts receivable were 10% or more of total accounts receivables for any one of the indicated periods:

	September 30,	June 30,
	2013	2013
Customer A	24%	19%
Customer C	11%	<10%

There were no other customers representing 10% or more of our trade receivables at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.

The following summarizes purchases from significant vendors where such purchases accounted for 10% or more of total purchases for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Vendor A		22	%		14	%
Vendor B		18	%		13	%
Vendor C		13	%	<10		%
Vendor D	<10		%		11	%

9. Revolving Credit Facility

We have a $10,000,000 credit line (the “Revolver”) with Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) that matures on December 31, 2013.  Advances against the Revolver bear interest on the outstanding principal at a rate per annum equal to the greater of 4.0% or either: (1) the prime rate, or (2) the LIBOR rate plus a LIBOR rate margin of 2.75%.  We have borrowing availability of up to $10,000,000 under this Revolver as long as we maintain cash at or through the Bank of $15,000,000 or more.  At all times that we maintain cash at or through the Bank of less than $15,000,000, the amount available for advance under the Revolver is calculated from a formula that is primarily based upon a percentage of eligible accounts receivable, which may result in less than, but no more than, $10,000,000 of availability.

The interest rate on the Revolver was 4.0% as of September 30, 2013. The outstanding principal amount plus all accrued but unpaid interest is payable in full at the expiration of the credit facility on December 31, 2013.  Based on our cash balance at the Bank as of September 30, 2013, $10,000,000 was available to us under the Revolver.  As of September 30, 2013, no amount is drawn under the Revolver, and we did not draw against the Revolver at any time during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Under the Revolver, we are obligated to maintain a consolidated tangible net worth (total assets minus total liabilities and intangible assets)of at least $17,512,000 as of the last day of each quarter, increasing by 100% of quarterly net income and 100% of issuances of equity, net of issuance costs, and a consolidated adjusted quick ratio of at least 1.25 to 1.00 (cash, short-term investments and accounts receivable divided by current liabilities, excluding deferred revenue).  Additionally, we are subject to certain negative covenants whereby we must first receive the banks written consent prior to any dispositions, changes in business, management, or business locations, mergers or acquisitions, indebtedness, encumbrances, maintenance of collateral accounts, investments or subordinated debt.  As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with these covenants as our consolidated adjusted quick ratio was 7.01 to 1.00 and our tangible net worth was $25,060,000.  The Revolver is secured by substantially all of the assets of the company.

On July 30, 2012, we entered into a Waiver and Second Modification (the “Modification”) to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank governing the Revolver.  The Modification permits us to make payments of quarterly cash dividends.  We may pay quarterly cash dividends, as approved by our board of directors from time to time, so long as an Event of Default (as defined in the Credit Agreement) does not exist at the time of declaration or payment of any such cash dividend and would not exist after giving effect to such cash dividend, and provided such cash dividends do not exceed an aggregate of $3,000,000 per fiscal year.

15

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

10. Retirement Plans

The following table provides detail of the components of net periodic benefit cost of our German subsidiary’s defined benefit pension plan for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Service cost	$	-		$	1
Interest cost		42			46
Expected return on plan assets		(15	)		(18	)
Amortization of net loss		5			2
Net periodic benefit cost	$	32		$	31

We contributed $7,000 and $8,000 to our German subsidiary’s defined benefit pension plan during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and expect to make additional, similar, quarterly contributions during the remaining quarters of our fiscal year 2014.

We maintain a U.S. employee retirement savings plan that qualifies as a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Code.  We matched 25% of the first 5% of the employee’s annual salary invested by the employee in the 401(k) plan during fiscal year 2013.  In August 2013, we increased our match to 50% of the first 5% of the employee’s annual salary invested by the employee in the 401(k) plan.  During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we contributed $98,000 and $43,000 in matching funds to the 401(k) plan, respectively.

We also maintain a defined contribution plan (the “Stakeholder Plan”) for our U.K. based employees.  For our U.K. based employees who contribute 4% or more of their salary to the Stakeholder Plan, we match 100% of employee contributions, up to 7% of their salary.  During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we contributed $17,000 and $14,000 to the Stakeholder Plan, respectively.

11. Dividends

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we declared and paid one quarterly cash dividend. The following summarizes our dividend activity during the three months ended September 30, 2013:

			Dividend
Record Date	Payment Date	Type	Per Share		Total
September 16, 2013	September 30, 2013	Quarterly	$	0.12	$	1,108,000

As of September 30, 2013, we have recorded $237,000 of dividends payable to holders of restricted common stock who held restricted shares at the time of dividend record dates and still hold those restricted shares as of September 30, 2013.  Such dividends will be paid when the restrictions on a holder’s restricted common shares lapse.  This dividend payable is divided between current payable and non-current payable in the amounts of $99,000 and $138,000, respectively, based upon the expected vest date of the underlying shares. These holders of restricted common stock will receive the dividend payments as long as they remain eligible at the vest date of the shares. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, $57,000 of dividends payable were forfeited and returned to capital for restricted shares that were forfeited prior to meeting vesting requirements.  Because the participants are not entitled to these dividends unless they complete the requisite service period for the shares to vest, they are not participating dividends as defined under ASC 260-10.

16

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - continued

12. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business.  We believe that such pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

We enter into agreements in the ordinary course of business with customers that often require us to defend and/or indemnify the customer against intellectual property infringement claims brought by a third party with respect to our products.  For example, we were notified that certain of our customers have settled with or been sued by the following companies, in the noted jurisdictions, regarding the listed patents:

Asserting Party	Jurisdiction	Patents at Issue
Trans Video Electronics Ltd.	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,594,936 and 5,991,801
Olympic Developments AG, LLC	U.S. District Court Central	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,475,585 and
	District of California	6,246,400
InterAd Technologies	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S. Patent No. 5,438,353
LVL Patent Group	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S Patent No. 6,044,382
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania	U.S. Patent Nos. 6,754,907 and 6,757,907
FutureVision.com LLC	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas	U.S. Patent No. 5,877,755

We continue to review our potential obligations under our indemnification agreements with these customers and the indemnity obligations to these customers from other vendors that also provided systems and services to these customers.  From time to time, we also indemnify customers and business partners for damages, losses and liabilities they may suffer or incur relating to personal injury, personal property damage, product liability, and environmental claims relating to the use of our products and services or resulting from our acts or omissions, our employees, authorized agents or subcontractors.  We have not accrued any material liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial statements and do not expect any other material costs as a result of such obligations.  The maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make is unlimited, and we are unable to estimate any possible loss or range of possible loss.

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements with our executive officers and certain other employees, employment may be terminated by either the respective executive officer or us at any time.  In the event the employee voluntarily resigns (except as described below) or is terminated for cause, compensation under the employment agreement will end.  In the event an agreement is terminated by us without cause or in certain circumstances constructively by us, the terminated employee will receive severance compensation for a period from 6 to 12 months, depending on the officer, in an annualized amount equal to the respective employee's base salary then in effect.  In the event our CEO resigns within three months of a change in control or the CEO’s agreement is terminated by us within one year of a change of control other than for due cause, disability or non-renewal by our CEO, our CEO will be entitled to severance compensation multiplied by two.  Additionally, if terminated, our CEO and CFO may be entitled to bonuses during the severance period.  At September 30, 2013, the maximum contingent liability under these agreements is $2,461,000.  Our employment agreements with certain of our employees contain certain offset provisions, as defined in their respective agreements.

17

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto which appear elsewhere herein.  Except for the historical financial information, many of the matters discussed in this Item 2 may be considered “forward-looking” statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs.  Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” elsewhere herein and in other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.  References herein to “Concurrent”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us” refer to Concurrent Computer Corporation and its subsidiaries.

Overview

We provide software, hardware and professional services for the video market and the high-performance, real-time market.  Our business is comprised of two operating segments for financial reporting purposes, products and services, which we provide for each of these markets.

Our video solutions consist of software, hardware, and services for intelligently streaming video and collecting and analyzing media data.  Our video solutions and services are deployed by video service providers for distribution of video to consumers and collection of media data intelligence to manage their video business and operations.

Our real-time products consist of real-time Linux operating systems, development tools and other system software combined, in most cases, with computer platforms and services.  These products are sold to a wide variety of companies seeking high-performance, real-time computer solutions in the military, aerospace, financial and automotive markets around the world.

Application of Critical Accounting Estimates

The SEC defines “critical accounting estimates” as those that require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.  For a complete description of our critical accounting policies, please refer to the “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013 filed with the SEC on September 17, 2013.

18

Results of Operations

The three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Product revenue	$	11,446		$	8,964		$	2,482			27.7	%
Service revenue		5,752			6,040			(288	)		(4.8	%)
Total revenue		17,198			15,004			2,194			14.6	%
Product cost of sales		4,984			3,553			1,431			40.3	%
Service cost of sales		2,712			2,639			73			2.8	%
Total cost of sales		7,696			6,192			1,504			24.3	%
Product gross margin		6,462			5,411			1,051			19.4	%
Service gross margin		3,040			3,401			(361	)		(10.6	%)
Total gross margin		9,502			8,812			690			7.8	%
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		3,482			3,638			(156	)		(4.3	%)
Research and development		3,173			2,847			326			11.5	%
General and administrative		2,047			1,914			133			6.9	%
Total operating expenses		8,702			8,399			303			3.6	%
Operating income		800			413			387			93.7	%
Interest expense - net		(2	)		(1	)		(1	)		100.0	%
Other (expense) income - net		(25	)		20			(45	)	NM (1)
Income before income taxes		773			432			341			78.9	%
Provision for income taxes		39			107			(68	)		(63.6	%)
Net income	$	734		$	325		$	409			125.8	%

(1) NM denotes percentage is not meaningful

Product Revenue.  Total product revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $11.4 million, an increase of approximately $2.4 million, or 27.7%, from $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  The increase in product revenue resulted from the $1.5 million, or 30.1%, increase in video product revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year.  The period over period increase in video product revenue resulted from an increase in video system sales volume to a North American cable service provider during the current year period.  The increase in sales volume was primarily due to a period over period increase in video system and storage sales to customers in the United States that expanded and, in some cases, replaced existing video systems.  Fluctuation in video product revenue is often due to the fact that we have a small number of customers making periodic large purchases that account for a significant percentage of revenue.

The increase in product revenue also resulted from the $0.9 million, or 24.6%, increase in real-time product revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in the prior year. The period over period increase in real-time product revenue resulted from our increasing volume of iHawk system sales to United States defense contractors and the United States government during the current year period.  Real-time product orders from defense contractors and the government tend to vary by quarter and year, and are dependent upon government initiatives and funding availability.

19

Service Revenue.   Total service revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was approximately $5.7 million, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 4.8%, from $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  We experienced a period over period decrease in service revenue due to the $0.3 million, or 6.6%, decrease in video service revenue.  The period over period decrease in video service revenue is primarily attributable to a decline in media data intelligence maintenance and managed services revenue, as certain customer contracts have been fulfilled and not renewed, and other renewals during the period have been deferred due to software revenue recognition accounting constraints when undelivered elements of the software arrangement exist.

Product Gross Margin.  Product gross margin was $6.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of approximately $1.1 million, or 19.4%, from $5.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.    Product gross margin as a percentage of product revenue decreased to 56.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from 60.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2012.   Product margins increased in terms of dollars due to the period over period increase in revenue.  Product margins decreased as a percentage of revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the mix of products sold.

Service Gross Margin.  Service gross margin was $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of approximately $0.4 million, or 10.6%, from $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  Gross margin on service revenue decreased to 52.9% of service revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from 56.3% of service revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  The decrease in service margin as a percentage of service revenue was primarily due to the $0.3 million, or 4.8% decrease in service revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, while incurring a similar level of service cost of sales, which remain relatively fixed regardless of revenue levels, during the period.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses decreased approximately $0.1 million, or 4.3% to $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $3.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  Sales and marketing expenses decreased due to a $0.1 million reduction in personnel costs resulting from a year over year reductions in our international sales support personnel.

Research and Development.  Research and development expenses increased approximately $0.3 million, or 11.5%, to approximately $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  This increase was due to a $0.3 million increase in personnel costs during the three months ended September 30, 2013 resulting from recent salary increases for our research and development group.

General and Administrative.  General and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.1 million, or 6.9%, to $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $1.9 million for the three months ended September 20, 2012.  We incurred an additional $0.2 million of share-based compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to (1) achievement of certain performance criteria during the period, and (2) new restricted stock grants during the period.  Partially offsetting the increase in share-based compensation, we incurred $0.1 million less in salaries, wages and benefits due to a period over period decrease in general and administrative personnel.

Provision for Income Taxes.  We recorded a $39 thousand income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and a $107 thousand income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  Our tax provision recorded during both periods was primarily attributable to the income tax provision recorded by our subsidiary in Japan as a result of its pretax income earned in the period.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, most of the $0.2 income tax provision recorded in Japan was offset on a consolidated basis by the release of all valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets in the U.K..  During the first quarter of our fiscal year 2014, a change in U.K. tax law relative to treatment of research and development tax credits allowed us to release valuation allowances against approximately $0.2 million of deferred tax assets that we believe are now realizable as a result of the current period tax law change.

In all other jurisdictions, we either generate net operating losses or occasionally utilize some of the net operating loss carryforward amounts.  However, because of the cumulative accounting losses in those jurisdictions, we maintain a full valuation allowance on those losses as discussed below.  This results in no net income tax provision impact in those jurisdictions as of September 30, 2013.

20

Net Income.  Our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $0.7 million or $0.08 per basic and diluted share, compared to net income for the three months ended September 30, 2012 of $0.3 million, or $0.04 per basic and diluted share.

Deferred Tax Assets and Related Valuation Allowances

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily on the generation of future taxable income. In considering the need for a valuation allowance we consider our historical results, future projected taxable income, and other positive and negative evidence.  This analysis is required on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. The following summarizes our conclusions on the need for a valuation allowance in each jurisdiction as of September 30, 2013:

U.S.:  As of September 30, 2013, we have realized a three-year cumulative accounting profit in the U.S. While the negative evidence of cumulative losses in recent years is not present at September 30, 2013, we believe that significant uncertainty continues to exist in our domestic operations as our recent improved financial performance in the U.S. has been for a limited time period.  We believe that our history of expired net operating losses, our inability to carryback any net operating losses or credits, a history of inconsistent earnings and the absence of currently available tax strategies provide negative evidence about the ability to realize our deferred tax assets at the present time.  We believe that the negative evidence outweighs the positive evidence on the realizability of the domestic deferred tax assets.  As such, at this time we believe it is premature to assert that it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize all net deferred tax assets and release some or all of the domestic valuation allowance.  We will continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on our domestic deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2013.

U.K. - During the first quarter of our fiscal year 2014, a change in U.K. tax law relative to treatment of research and development expenses allowed us to release $0.2 million of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets that we believe are now realizable as a result of the current period tax law change.  We believe that in light of this law change, we will now generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize our net deferred tax assets in the U.K.

Japan - Japan has a long history of profitable operations, and we continue to project profitability in Japan for the foreseeable future.  Therefore, we continue to believe that we will fully realize the net deferred tax assets in Japan, and no valuation allowance is needed.

Other Foreign Jurisdictions - We also evaluated the need for a continued full valuation allowance against our foreign deferred tax assets in other jurisdictions.  We concluded that a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets for other foreign jurisdictions, was warranted due to, among other reasons, (i) the realized cumulative accounting losses, (ii) our long history of taxable losses and (iii) our uncertainty with respect to generating future taxable income in the near term given our recently completed projections and other inherent uncertainties in our business.

Each quarter, we assess the total weight of positive and negative evidence and evaluate whether release of all or any portion of the valuation allowance is appropriate. Should we come to the conclusion that a release of our valuation allowances is required, there would be a significant increase in net income and earnings per share due to the impact on the tax rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity is dependent upon many factors, including sales volume, product and service costs, operating results and the efficiency of asset use and turnover.  Our future liquidity will be affected by, among other things:

· our reliance on a small customer base, typically represented by a small number of large, concentrated orders (three customers accounted for 46% of our revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and three customers accounted for 40% of our revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2012);

21

· the rate of growth or decline or change in market, if any, of video solutions market expansions and the pace that video service companies implement, upgrade or replace video solutions technology;

· the impact of the global economic conditions on our business and our customers, including European Union austerity measures;

· the impact U.S. government sequestration on our business and our customers;

· the impact of a prolonged shutdown or prolonged operation under a continuing resolution by the U.S. government may result in delayed orders, delayed payments, declines in revenues, profitability and cash flows;

· the rate of growth or decline, if any, of deployment of our real-time products;

· the actual versus anticipated decline in revenue from maintenance and product sales of real-time proprietary systems;

· our ability to manage expenses consistent with the rate of growth or decline in our markets;

· ongoing cost control actions and expenses, including capital expenditures;

· the margins on our product and service sales;

· timing of product shipments, which typically occur during the last month of the quarter;

· the percentage of sales derived from outside the United States where there are generally longer accounts receivable collection cycles;

· the number of countries in which we operate, which may require maintenance of minimum cash levels in each country and, in certain cases, may restrict the repatriation of cash, by requiring us to maintain levels of capital;

· the rate of growth or decline, if any, of sales to the government and government related entities; and

· the use of cash to pay quarterly and special dividends.

Uses and Sources of Cash

We used $0.6 million of cash from operating activities during the three months ended September 30, 2013 whereas we generated $0.5 million of cash from operating activities during the three months ended September 30, 2012.  Operating cash outflows during the three months ended September 30, 2013 primarily resulted from payment of prior period accruals and payables.  Operating cash flow during the three months ended September 30, 2012 was generated by operating profits during the quarter.

We invested $0.5 million and $0.2 million in property, plant and equipment during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Capital additions during each of these periods were primarily related to development and test equipment and demonstration systems used by our sales and marketing group.  We expect capital additions to continue at a similar quarterly rate, which is comparable to our prior year’s quarterly levels, during the remainder of our fiscal year.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share.  The dividend was paid on September 30, 2013 to all stockholders of record as of September 16, 2013, aggregating $1.1 million.  We also paid an additional $0.1 million of dividends that had been held as dividends payable from previous declarations to restricted shareholders for whom restrictions lapsed during the three months ended September 30, 2013.  During the three months ended September 30, 2012, our Board of Directors approved two cash dividends each for $0.06 per share.  We intend to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common shares subject to, among other things, our results of operations, cash balances, future cash requirements, financial condition, statutory requirements of Delaware law, and other factors that the Board of Directors may deem relevant.

We paid $0.1 million for the repurchase of shares to settle minimum tax withholdings for employees whose restricted stock awards released during the three months ended September 30, 2013.  This payment represents the shares withheld from the release to those employees to satisfy minimum tax withholdings.  Because the availability of this tax settlement method  has been limited, we do not anticipate any additional material repurchases of stock for this purpose.

22

We have a $10.0 million credit line (the “Revolver”) with Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) that matures on December 31, 2013.  Advances against the Revolver bear interest on the outstanding principal at a rate per annum equal to the greater of 4.0% or either: (1) the prime rate, or (2) the LIBOR rate plus a LIBOR rate margin of 2.75%.  We have borrowing availability of up to $10.0 million under this Revolver as long as we maintain cash at or through the Bank of $15.0 million or more.  At all times that we maintain cash at or through the Bank of less than $15.0 million, the amount available for advance under the Revolver is calculated from a formula that is primarily based upon a percentage of eligible accounts receivable, which may result in less than, but no more than $10.0 million of availability.  Our Revolver matures in December 2013 and we are currently evaluating whether we should renew or replace the Revolver, or let it expire.

The interest rate on the Revolver was 4.0% as of September 30, 2013. The outstanding principal amount plus all accrued but unpaid interest is payable in full at the expiration of the credit facility on December 31, 2013.  Based on our cash balance at the Bank as of September 30, 2013, $10.0 million was available to us under the Revolver.  As of September 30, 2013, no amount was drawn under the Revolver, and we did not draw against the Revolver at any time during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Under the Revolver, we are obligated to maintain a consolidated tangible net worth of at least $17.5 million as of the last day of each quarter, increasing by 100% of quarterly net income and 100% of issuances of equity, net of issuance costs, and a consolidated adjusted quick ratio of at least 1.25 to 1.00.  As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with these covenants as our tangible net worth (total assets minus total liabilities and intangible assets) was $25.1 million and our consolidated adjusted quick ratio (cash, short-term investments and accounts receivable divided by current liabilities, excluding deferred revenue) was 7.01 to 1.00.  The Revolver is secured by substantially all of the assets of Concurrent.

On July 30, 2012, we entered into a Waiver and Second Modification (the “Modification”) to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank governing the Revolver.  The Modification permits us to make payments of quarterly cash dividends.  We may pay quarterly cash dividends, as approved by our board of directors from time to time, so long as an Event of Default (as defined in the Credit Agreement) does not exist at the time of declaration or payment of any such cash dividend and would not exist after giving effect to such cash dividend, and provided such cash dividends do not exceed an aggregate of $3,000,000 per fiscal year.

At September 30, 2013, we had working capital (current assets less current liabilities) of $27.2 million, including cash and cash equivalents of approximately $25.5 million, and had no material commitments for capital expenditures.  At June 30, 2013, we had working capital of $27.7 million, including cash and cash equivalents of approximately $27.9 million.  Based upon our existing cash balances, historical cash usage, and anticipated operating cash flow in the near term, we believe that existing cash balances will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital, capital expenditure requirements and any dividend payments for at least the next twelve months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We provide indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products and certain other matters. In evaluating estimated losses on these indemnifications, we consider factors such as the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and our ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. These obligations did not have a material impact on our financial statements during the periods presented.  See footnote 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the additional disclosures regarding indemnification.

23

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this quarterly report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws.  When used or incorporated by reference in this report, the words “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  Statements regarding future events and developments, our future performance, market share, new market growth, payment of dividends, and availability of earnings and profits with respect to dividend income, as well as our expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, or projections relating to the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws.  Examples of our forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, the impact of our video solutions strategy on our business, anticipated managed service revenue and cost of sales from our MDI sales, expected level of capital additions, the expected impact of reductions in force on our results of operations, downturn, the expected timing of revenue recognition for MDI sales, our expected cash position, the impact of interest rate changes and fluctuation in currency exchange rates, our sufficiency of cash,  the impact of litigation and the payment of dividends.  These statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of our management, which are based on currently available information.  All forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ materially from those projected.  The risks and uncertainties which could affect our financial condition or results of operations include, without limitation: United States government sequestration; European austerity measures; delays or cancellations of customer orders; changes in product demand; economic conditions; various inventory risks due to changes in market conditions; margins of video business to capture new business; fluctuations and timing of large video orders; doing business in the People’s Republic of China; uncertainties relating to the development and ownership of intellectual property; uncertainties relating to our ability and the ability of other companies to enforce their intellectual property rights; the pricing and availability of equipment, materials and inventories; the concentration of our customers; failure to effectively manage change; delays in testing and introductions of new products;  the impact of reductions in force on our operations; rapid technology changes; system errors or failures; reliance on a limited number of suppliers and failure of components provided by those suppliers; uncertainties associated with international business activities, including foreign regulations, trade controls, taxes, and currency fluctuations; the impact of competition on the pricing of video solutions products; our ability to satisfy the financial covenants in the Revolver; failure to effectively service the installed base; the entry of new well-capitalized competitors into our markets; the success of new video solutions; the success of our relationships with technology and channel partners; capital spending patterns by a limited customer base; the current challenging macro-economic environment; continuing unevenness of the global economic recovery; privacy concerns over data collection; earthquakes, tsunamis, floods and other natural disasters in areas in which our customers and suppliers operate; and the availability of debt or equity financing to support our liquidity needs.

Other important risk factors are discussed in Part 2, Item 1A. of this Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

Our forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.  We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on our short-term cash investments.  We conduct business in the United States and around the world.  Our most significant foreign currency transaction exposure relates to the United Kingdom, certain European countries that use the euro as a common currency, and Japan.  We do not hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures; Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2013. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Currently, management has concluded that the design of the controls to remediate the material weakness identified as of June 30, 2013 is appropriate as of September 30, 2013.  However, full remediation of the previous material weakness cannot be determined as of September 30, 2013 as implementation and operating effectiveness of the redesigned controls cannot be evaluated and tested until the end of the fiscal year due to the annual nature of these controls.

24

Previously Reported Material Weakness

Our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of June 30, 2013 because a material weakness existed in our internal control over financial reporting related to the preparation and review of our consolidated statements of cash flows.  Specifically, we initially had an error related to our determination of the cash flow classification of the proceeds from the one-time intellectual property sale that occurred in June 2013.  As the error was corrected prior to any public disclosure or filing of our results for the year ended June 30, 2013, there was no misstatement in our financial statements that were included in our previously filed Form 10-K.  In response to the material weakness in internal controls described above, during the three months ended September 30, 2013, we began to include as part of our financial reporting review process, a thorough examination of the financial reporting impact of new and unusual transactions or accounting issues on all of our financial statements, as well as implementing additional review procedures over our statements of cash flows.  Though management is still evaluating the design of these new procedures, we believe that our improved processes and procedures will assist in the remediation of the material weakness. Once placed in operation for a sufficient period of time, we will subject these procedures to appropriate tests, in order to determine whether they are operating effectively.

Changes in Internal Controls

Except for the changes in internal controls to remediate the material weakness noted above, there were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Part II Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are not presently involved in any material litigation.  However, we are, from time to time, party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of our business.  See footnote 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

If the U.S. government budget process results in a prolonged shutdown or prolonged operation under a continuing resolution, we may experience further delayed orders, delayed payments, declines in revenues, profitability and cash flows.

Sales to the U.S. government, prime contractors and agencies of the U.S. government represented between 13% and 18% of our total revenues in each of the past 3 fiscal years and our expected revenue for fiscal year 2014 and beyond depends, in part, on receiving a similar level of new orders from the U.S. government, which is currently under extreme budget pressures.  The U.S. government may be unable to timely complete its budget process or fully agree upon spending priorities. If the U.S. government budget process results in a prolonged shutdown or prolonged operation under a continuing resolution, we may experience further delayed orders, delayed payments, declines in revenues, profitability and cash flows. All of the aforementioned conditions could have a material adverse effect on our fiscal year 2014 business and financial outlook, our operating results and our financial condition.

Additional risk factors are discussed in Part I, Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.  There have been no other material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed.

25

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We do not have a formal stock purchase plan in place and are not actively repurchasing shares under any plan or program.  A provision exists in our stock plan that allows for the repurchase of shares to settle the minimum tax withholding liability due from restricted stock participants upon release of restrictions on their stock.  During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we paid $0.1 million for these repurchases of shares.  Because the availability of this tax settlement method has been limited, we do not anticipate any additional material repurchases of stock for this purpose.  The table below sets forth the purchases of our common stock for the quarter ended September 30, 2013:

					Total Number
	Total Number				of Shares		Approximate Dollar Value
	of Shares		Average		Purchased as Part		of Shares That May
	Purchased		Price Paid		of Publicly Announced		Yet Be Purchased Under
Period		(1)	Per Share		Plans or Programs		the Plans or Programs
August 2013		4,083	$	8.61		-	$	-
September 2013		12,744	$	7.70		-	$	-

(1) Shares were repurchased to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose on the release of restriction on restricted stock.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 33-62440)).

3.2 Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy on Form DEFR14A filed on June 2, 2008).

3.3 Certificate of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2011).

3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2011).

3.5 Certificate of Correction to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002).

3.6 Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

26

3.7 Amendment to Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003).

4.2 Form of Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

4.3 Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of August 7, 2002 between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

11.1* Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings.

31.1** Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2** Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1** Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2** Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Data required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” is provided in the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this report.

** Filed herewith.

27

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  October 29, 2013		CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
	By:	/s/  Emory O. Berry
		Emory O. Berry
		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Operations
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

28

Exhibit Index

3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 33-62440)).

3.2 Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy on Form DEFR14A filed on June 2, 2008).

3.3 Certificate of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2011).

3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2011).

3.5 Certificate of Correction to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002).

3.6 Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

3.7 Amendment to Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003).

4.2 Form of Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

4.3 Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of August 7, 2002 between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

11.1* Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings.

31.1** Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2** Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1** Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2** Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Data required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” is provided in the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this report.

** Filed herewith.

29

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Mondor, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 29, 2013
	By:	/s/  Dan Mondor
		Dan Mondor
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emory O. Berry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 29, 2013
	By:	/s/  Emory O. Berry
		Emory O. Berry
		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Operations
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: October 29, 2013
	By:	/s/ Dan Mondor
		Dan Mondor
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: October 29, 2013
	By:	/s/ Emory O. Berry
		Emory O. Berry
		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Operations
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

XML

Retirement Plans

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Retirement Plans [Abstract]

Retirement Plans

10. Retirement Plans

The following table provides detail of the components of net periodic benefit cost of our German subsidiary’s defined benefit pension plan for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Service cost	$	-		$	1
Interest cost		42			46
Expected return on plan assets		(15	)		(18	)
Amortization of net loss		5			2
Net periodic benefit cost	$	32		$	31

We contributed $7,000 and $8,000 to our German subsidiary’s defined benefit pension plan during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and expect to make additional, similar, quarterly contributions during the remaining quarters of our fiscal year 2014.

We maintain a U.S. employee retirement savings plan that qualifies as a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Code.  We matched 25% of the first 5% of the employee’s annual salary invested by the employee in the 401(k) plan during fiscal year 2013.  In August 2013, we increased our match to 50% of the first 5% of the employee’s annual salary invested by the employee in the 401(k) plan.  During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we contributed $98,000 and $43,000 in matching funds to the 401(k) plan, respectively.

We also maintain a defined contribution plan (the “Stakeholder Plan”) for our U.K. based employees.  For our U.K. based employees who contribute 4% or more of their salary to the Stakeholder Plan, we match 100% of employee contributions, up to 7% of their salary.  During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we contributed $17,000 and $14,000 to the Stakeholder Plan, respectively.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Revenues:
Product	$ 11,446	$ 8,964
Service	5,752	6,040
Total revenues	17,198	15,004
Cost of sales:
Product	4,984	3,553
Service	2,712	2,639
Total cost of sales	7,696	6,192
Gross margin	9,502	8,812
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	3,482	3,638
Research and development	3,173	2,847
General and administrative	2,047	1,914
Total operating expenses	8,702	8,399
Operating income	800	413
Interest income	14	17
Interest expense	(16)	(18)
Other (expense) income, net	(25)	20
Income before income taxes	773	432
Provision for income taxes	39	107
Net income	$ 734	$ 325
Net income per share
Basic (in dollars per share)	$ 0.08	$ 0.04
Diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.08	$ 0.04
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic (in shares)	8,813	8,683
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted (in shares)	9,049	8,801
Cash dividends declared per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.12	$ 0.12

XML

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share

3. Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares including dilutive common share equivalents.  Under the treasury stock method, incremental shares representing the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued are included in the computation.  Diluted earnings per common share assumes exercise of outstanding stock options and vesting of restricted stock when the effects of such assumptions are dilutive.  Common share equivalents of 121,000 and 290,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were excluded from the calculation as their effect was antidilutive.

               The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods indicated (dollars and share data in thousands, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012
Basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) calculation:
Net income	$	734	$	325
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		8,813		8,683
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock		223		118
Stock options		13		-
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		9,049		8,801
Basic EPS	$	0.08	$	0.04
Diluted EPS	$	0.08	$	0.04

XML

Share-Based Compensation (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]

Summary of share based compensation expense allocation

We recorded share-based compensation related to the issuance of stock options and restricted stock to employees and board members as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013		2012
Share-based compensation expense
included in the Statements of Operations:
Cost of sales	$	14	$	13
Sales and marketing		47		27
Research and development		35		26
General and administrative		295		102
Total		391		168
Tax benefit		-		-
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes	$	391	$	168

Service-Based Restricted Shares [Member]

Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]

Summary of activity of restricted shares

 A summary of the activity of our time-based, service condition restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013, is presented below:

				Weighted Average
				Grant Date
Restricted Stock Awards	Shares			Fair Value
Unvested at July 1, 2013		225,064		$	4.91
Awarded		50,000			7.86
Released		(54,305	)		5.07
Forfeited		(3,250	)		4.57
Unvested at September 30, 2013		217,509		$	5.55

Performance-Based Restricted Shares [Member]

Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]

Summary of activity of restricted shares

A summary of the activity of our performance based restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013, is presented below:

				Weighted Average
				Grant Date
Performance Stock Awards	Shares			Fair Value
Unvested at July 1, 2013		231,012		$	3.66
Awarded		40,000			7.86
Released		(92,166	)		3.52
Forfeited		(62,934	)		2.90
Unvested at September 30, 2013		115,912		$	5.59

XML

Dividends

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Dividends [Abstract]

Dividends

11. Dividends

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we declared and paid one quarterly cash dividend. The following summarizes our dividend activity during the three months ended September 30, 2013:

			Dividend
Record Date	Payment Date	Type	Per Share		Total
September 16, 2013	September 30, 2013	Quarterly	$	0.12	$	1,108,000

As of September 30, 2013, we have recorded $237,000 of dividends payable to holders of restricted common stock who held restricted shares at the time of dividend record dates and still hold those restricted shares as of September 30, 2013.  Such dividends will be paid when the restrictions on a holder’s restricted common shares lapse.  This dividend payable is divided between current payable and non-current payable in the amounts of $99,000 and $138,000, respectively, based upon the expected vest date of the underlying shares. These holders of restricted common stock will receive the dividend payments as long as they remain eligible at the vest date of the shares. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, $57,000 of dividends payable were forfeited and returned to capital for restricted shares that were forfeited prior to meeting vesting requirements.  Because the participants are not entitled to these dividends unless they complete the requisite service period for the shares to vest, they are not participating dividends as defined under ASC 260-10.

XML

Inventories (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Inventories [Abstract]
Raw materials	$ 1,557	$ 1,091
Work-in-process	267	298
Finished goods	1,185	1,455
Total inventory	$ 3,009	$ 2,844

XML

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses [Abstract]

Components of accounts payable and accrued expenses

The components of accounts payable and accrued expenses are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		June 30,
	2013		2013
Accounts payable, trade	$	1,440	$	2,075
Accrued payroll, vacation, severance  and other employee expenses		2,359		4,298
Accrued income taxes		27		130
Dividend payable		99		94
Other accrued expenses		1,094		1,074
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	5,019	$	7,671

XML

Other Intangible Assets (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Schedule of intangible assets

Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,			June 30,
	2013			2013
Cost of amortizable intangibles:
Purchased technology	$	7,700		$	7,700
Customer relationships		1,900			1,900
Patents		87			78
Total cost of intangibles		9,687			9,678
Less accumulated amortization:
Purchased technology		(7,679	)		(7,497	)
Customer relationships		(1,377	)		(1,334	)
Patents		(14	)		(13	)
Total accumulated amortization		(9,070	)		(8,844	)
Total intangible assets, net	$	617		$	834

XML

Commitments and Contingencies, Litigation (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Trans Video Electronics Ltd. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Asserting Party	Trans Video Electronics Ltd.
Jurisdiction	U.S. District Court of Delaware
Patents at Issue	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,594,936 and 5,991,801
Olympic Developments AG, LLC [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Asserting Party	Olympic Developments AG, LLC
Jurisdiction	U.S. District Court Central
Patents at Issue	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,475,585
Olympic Developments AG, LLC [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Asserting Party	Olympic Developments AG, LLC
Jurisdiction	District of California
Patents at Issue	U.S. Patents Nos. 6,246,400
InterAd Technologies [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Asserting Party	InterAd Technologies
Jurisdiction	U.S. District Court of Delaware
Patents at Issue	U.S. Patent No. 5,438,353
LVL Patent Group [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Asserting Party	LVL Patent Group
Jurisdiction	U.S. District Court of Delaware
Patents at Issue	U.S Patent No. 6,044,382
Sprint Communications Company, L.P. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Asserting Party	Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Jurisdiction	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Patents at Issue	U.S. Patent Nos. 6,754,907 and 6,757,907
FutureVision.com LLC [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Asserting Party	FutureVision.com LLC
Jurisdiction	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas
Patents at Issue	U.S. Patent No. 5,877,755

XML

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share
Antidilutive securities excluded from earnings per share (in shares)	121,000	290,000
Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]
Net income	$ 734	$ 325
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding (in shares)	8,813,000	8,683,000
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding (in shares)	9,049,000	8,801,000
Basic EPS (in dollars per share)	$ 0.08	$ 0.04
Diluted EPS (in dollars per share)	$ 0.08	$ 0.04
Restricted Stock [Member]
Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]
Effect of dilutive securities (in shares)	223,000	118,000
Stock Options [Member]
Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]
Effect of dilutive securities (in shares)	13,000	0

XML

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses [Abstract]
Accounts payable, trade	$ 1,440	$ 2,075
Accrued payroll, vacation, and other employee expenses	2,359	4,298
Accrued income taxes	27	130
Dividends payable	99	94
Other accrued expenses	1,094	1,074
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$ 5,019	$ 7,671

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Customers sued by following companies

We enter into agreements in the ordinary course of business with customers that often require us to defend and/or indemnify the customer against intellectual property infringement claims brought by a third party with respect to our products.  For example, we were notified that certain of our customers have settled with or been sued by the following companies, in the noted jurisdictions, regarding the listed patents:

Asserting Party	Jurisdiction	Patents at Issue
Trans Video Electronics Ltd.	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,594,936 and 5,991,801
Olympic Developments AG, LLC	U.S. District Court Central	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,475,585 and
	District of California	6,246,400
InterAd Technologies	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S. Patent No. 5,438,353
LVL Patent Group	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S Patent No. 6,044,382
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania	U.S. Patent Nos. 6,754,907 and 6,757,907
FutureVision.com LLC	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas	U.S. Patent No. 5,877,755

XML

Retirement Plans (Details) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
Retirement Plans [Abstract]
Service cost		$ 0	$ 1,000
Interest cost		42,000	46,000
Expected return on plan assets		(15,000)	(18,000)
Amortization of net loss		5,000	2,000
Net periodic benefit cost		32,000	31,000
German Subsidiary Defined Benefit Plan [Member]
Deferred Compensation Arrangement With Individual Postretirement Benefits [Line Items]
Employer contributions		7,000	8,000
United States Defined Contribution Plan [Member]
Deferred Compensation Arrangement With Individual Postretirement Benefits [Line Items]
Employer contributions		43,000	98,000
Employer matching contribution (in hundredths)	50.00%			25.00%
Employee contribution subject to employer match (in hundredths)	5.00%			5.00%
United Kingdom Defined Contribution Plan [Member]
Deferred Compensation Arrangement With Individual Postretirement Benefits [Line Items]
Employer contributions		$ 17,000	$ 14,000
Minimum [Member] | United Kingdom Defined Contribution Plan [Member]
Deferred Compensation Arrangement With Individual Postretirement Benefits [Line Items]
Employer matching contribution (in hundredths)		4.00%
Maximum [Member] | United Kingdom Defined Contribution Plan [Member]
Deferred Compensation Arrangement With Individual Postretirement Benefits [Line Items]
Employer matching contribution (in hundredths)		7.00%

XML

Inventories (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Inventories [Abstract]

Components of inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined by using the first-in, first-out method.  We reduce our excess and obsolete inventory to market value, if below cost, based upon historical and anticipated usage.  The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		June 30,
	2013		2013
Raw materials	$	1,557	$	1,091
Work-in-process		267		298
Finished goods		1,185		1,455
Total inventory	$	3,009	$	2,844

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Common Stock [Member]	Capital In Excess Of Par Value [Member]	Accumulated Deficit [Member]	Accumulated Other Comp. Income [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Total
Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	$ 88	$ 208,677	$ (183,085)	$ 360	$ (255)	$ 25,785
Treasury Stock (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2013					(37,788)	(37,788)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2013	8,807,766					8,807,766
Comprehensive income:
Net income			734			734
Foreign currency translation adj				(53)		(53)
Pensions plan				5		5
Comprehensive income						686
Dividends declared			(1,108)			(1,108)
Dividends forfeited with restricted stock forfeitures			57			57
Restricted stock compensation expensed		391				391
Lapse of restriction on restricted stock	1	(1)				0
Lapse of restriction on restricted stock (in shares)	146,471
Repurchase of shares to satisfy minimum tax withholdings on restricted stock releases	0	(92)	(42)			(134)
Repurchase of shares to satisfy minimum tax withholdings on restricted stock releases (in shares)	(16,827)
Balance at Sep. 30, 2013	$ 89	$ 208,975	$ (183,444)	$ 312	$ (255)	$ 25,677
Treasury Stock (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2013					(37,788)	(37,788)
Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2013	8,937,410					8,937,410

XML

Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation

1. Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation

We provide software, hardware and professional services for the video market and the high-performance, real-time market.  Our business is comprised of two segments for financial reporting purposes, products and services, which we provide for each of these markets.

Our video solutions consist of software, hardware, and services for intelligently streaming video and collecting and analyzing media data.  Our video solutions and services are deployed by video service providers for distribution of video to consumers and collection of media data intelligence to manage their video business and operations.

Our real-time products consist of real-time Linux operating systems, development tools and other system software combined, in most cases, with computer platforms and services.  These products are sold to a wide variety of companies seeking high-performance, real-time computer solutions in the military, aerospace, financial and automotive markets around the world.

Our condensed consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.

There have been no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies as disclosed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.  The results reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2013, we had U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $97,200,000 for income tax purposes which will expire at various dates through 2032.  We completed an evaluation of the potential effect of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) on our ability to utilize these net operating losses.  The study concluded that we have not had an ownership change for the period from July 22, 1993 to June 30, 2012.  Therefore, we do not expect the U.S. Federal net operating losses to be subject to limitation under Section 382, unless there are additional material ownership changes in the future.

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily on the generation of future taxable income. In considering the need for a valuation allowance we consider our historical results, future projected taxable income, and other positive and negative evidence.  This analysis is required on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. The following summarizes our conclusions on the need for a valuation allowance in each jurisdiction as of September 30, 2013:

U.S.:  As of September 30, 2013, we have realized a three-year cumulative accounting profit in the U.S. While the negative evidence of cumulative losses in recent years is not present at September 30, 2013, we believe that significant uncertainty continues to exist in our domestic operations as our recent improved financial performance in the U.S. has been for a limited time period.  We believe that our history of expired net operating losses, our inability to carryback any net operating losses or credits, a history of inconsistent earnings and the absence of currently available tax strategies provide negative evidence about the ability to realize our deferred tax assets at the present time.   We believe that the negative evidence outweighs the positive evidence on the realizability of the domestic deferred tax assets.  As such, at this time we believe it is premature to assert that it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize all net deferred tax assets and release some or all of the domestic valuation allowance.  We will continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on our domestic deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2013.

United Kingdom (“U.K.”):  During the first quarter of our fiscal year 2014, a change in U.K. tax law relative to treatment of research and development expenses allowed us to release $197,000 of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets that we believe are now realizable as a result of the current period tax law change.  We believe that in light of this law change, we will now generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize our net deferred tax assets in the U.K.

Japan:  Japan has a long history of profitable operations, and we continue to project profitability in Japan for the foreseeable future.  Therefore, we continue to believe that we will fully realize the net deferred tax assets in Japan, and no valuation allowance is needed.

Other Foreign Jurisdictions:  We also evaluated the need for a continued full valuation allowance against our foreign deferred tax assets in other jurisdictions.  We concluded that a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets for other foreign jurisdictions, was warranted due to, among other reasons, (i) the realized cumulative accounting losses, (ii) our long history of taxable losses, and (iii) our uncertainty with respect to generating future taxable income in the near term given our recently completed projections and other inherent uncertainties in our business.

Each quarter, we assess the total weight of positive and negative evidence and evaluate whether release of all or any portion of the valuation allowance is appropriate. Should we come to the conclusion that a release of our valuation allowances is required, there would be a significant increase in net income and earnings per share due to the impact on the tax rate.

We recorded $39,000 of income tax provision during the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to taxable income earned by our Japan subsidiary and an expected alternative minimum tax liability in the U.S., both of which were mostly offset by the aforementioned release of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in the U.K.  We recorded $107,000 of income tax provision during the three months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to taxable income earned by our Japan subsidiary.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-2, Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, providing on disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).  This new guidance requires entities to present (either on the face of the income statement or in the notes) the effects on the line items of the income statement for amounts reclassified out of AOCI. The new guidance was effective for us beginning July 1, 2013 and did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

To Be Adopted

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) which provides guidance on a parent’s accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment upon derecognition of a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. This new guidance requires that the parent release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. The new guidance will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2014. We do not anticipate any material impact on our financial statements upon adoption.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This amendment requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward, unless certain conditions exist. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods (and the interim periods within) beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. We expect to adopt this guidance effective July 1 2014.  We expect adoption will not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

XML

Share-Based Compensation

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Share-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Share-Based Compensation

4. Share-Based Compensation

As of September 30, 2013, we had share-based compensation plans which are described in Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013.  We recognize stock compensation expense over the requisite service period of the individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period.  As of September 30, 2013, we had 197,239 stock options outstanding and 333,421 restricted shares outstanding.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we awarded 90,000 shares of restricted stock.   These restricted stock awards consisted of 50,000 restricted shares granted to employee participants that vest ratably over a four year service period, as long as the participant remains employed with Concurrent.  The award of restricted shares also included 40,000 performance-based restricted shares granted to senior management during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that vest based upon meeting specified company financial performance criteria over the next three years.  A summary of the activity of our time-based, service condition restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013, is presented below:

				Weighted Average
				Grant Date
Restricted Stock Awards	Shares			Fair Value
Unvested at July 1, 2013		225,064		$	4.91
Awarded		50,000			7.86
Released		(54,305	)		5.07
Forfeited		(3,250	)		4.57
Unvested at September 30, 2013		217,509		$	5.55

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we released restrictions on 92,166 previously granted performance based restricted shares, based upon achievement of performance goals attributable to our fiscal year 2013.  We cancelled 62,934 performance-based restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that had been granted to senior management and were forfeited during the period because neither the full performance criteria for our fiscal year 2011, 2012, and 2013 financial results, nor the market condition (achievement of a certain share price) were met.  A summary of the activity of our performance based restricted shares during the three months ended September 30, 2013, is presented below:

				Weighted Average
				Grant Date
Performance Stock Awards	Shares			Fair Value
Unvested at July 1, 2013		231,012		$	3.66
Awarded		40,000			7.86
Released		(92,166	)		3.52
Forfeited		(62,934	)		2.90
Unvested at September 30, 2013		115,912		$	5.59

We recorded share-based compensation related to the issuance of stock options and restricted stock to employees and board members as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Share-based compensation expense included in the Statements of Operations:
Cost of sales		$	14		$	13
Sales and marketing			47			27
Research and development			35			26
General and administrative			295			102
Total			391			168
Tax benefit			-			-
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes		$	391		$	168

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition Policy

We generate revenue from the sale of products and services. We commence revenue recognition when all of the following conditions are met:

· persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,

· the system has been delivered or the services have been performed,

· the fee is fixed or determinable, and

· collectability of the fee is probable.

Our standard multiple-element contractual arrangements with our customers generally include the delivery of systems with multiple components of hardware and software, certain professional services that typically involve installation and consulting, and ongoing software and hardware maintenance.  Product revenue is generally recognized when the product is delivered.  Professional services that are of a consultative nature may take place before, or after, delivery of the system, and installation services typically occur within 90 days after delivery of the system.  Professional services revenue is typically recognized as the services are performed.  Initial maintenance begins after delivery of the system and typically is provided for one to three years after delivery. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Our product sales are predominantly system sales whereby software and hardware function together to deliver the essential functionality of the combined product.  Upon our adoption of ASU 2009-14 on July 1, 2010, sales of these systems were determined to typically be outside of the scope of the software revenue guidance in Topic 985 (previously included in SOP 97-2) and are accounted for under ASU 2009-13.

Our sales model for media data intelligence (“MDI”) products includes the option for customers to purchase: (1) a perpetual license with maintenance; (2) a term license with maintenance and managed services; (3) software as a service; or (4) perpetual license with maintenance and managed services.  We expect that revenue from these sales generally will be recognized over the term of the various customer contracts.  Professional services attributable to implementation of our MDI products or managed services are essential to the customers’ use of these products and services.  We defer commencement of revenue recognition for the entire arrangement until we have delivered the essential professional services or have made a determination that the remaining professional services are no longer essential to the customer.  We recognize revenue for managed services and software-as-a-service arrangements once we commence providing the managed or software services and recognize the service revenue ratably over the term of the various customer contracts.  In circumstances whereby we sell a term or perpetual license and managed services, we commence revenue recognition after both the software and service are made available to the customer and recognize the revenue from the entire arrangement ratably over the longer of the term license or managed service period, because we believe the managed services to be essential to the functionality of the term or perpetual license.

We evaluate each element in a multiple-element arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting.  An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has standalone value and delivery of the undelivered element is probable and within our control.  Our various systems have standalone value because we have either routinely sold them on a standalone basis or we believe that our customers could resell the delivered system on a standalone basis.  Professional services have standalone value because we have routinely sold them on a standalone basis, there are similar third party vendors that routinely provide similar professional services, and certain customers perform the installation themselves.  Our maintenance has standalone value because we have routinely sold maintenance separately.

As a result of the adoption of ASU 2009-13, we allocate revenue to each element in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, third party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. We have typically been able to establish VSOE of fair value for our maintenance and services. We determine VSOE of fair value for professional services and maintenance by examining the population of selling prices for the same or similar services when sold separately, and determining that the pricing population for each VSOE classification is within a very narrow range of the median selling price.  For each element, we evaluate at least annually whether or not we have maintained VSOE of fair value based on our review of the actual selling price of each element over the previous 12 month period.

Our product deliverables are typically complete systems comprised of numerous hardware and software components that operate together to provide essential functionality, and we are typically unable to establish VSOE or TPE of fair value for our products.  Due to the custom nature of our products, we must determine ESP at the individual component level whereby our ESP for the total system is determined based on the sum of the individual components.  ESP for components of our real-time products is typically based upon list price, which is representative of our actual selling price.  ESP for components of our video products is based upon our most frequent selling price (“mode”) of standalone and bundled sales, based upon a 12 month historical analysis.  If a mode selling price is not available, then ESP will be the median selling price of all such component sales based upon a 12 month historical analysis, unless facts and circumstances indicate that another selling price, other than the mode or median selling price, is more representative of our ESP.  Our methodology for determining ESP requires judgment, and any changes to pricing practices, the costs incurred to integrate products, the nature of our relationships with our customers, and market trends could cause variability in our ESP or cause us to re-evaluate our methodology for determining ESP.  We will update our analysis of mode and median selling price at least annually, unless facts and circumstances indicate that more frequent analysis is required.

Occasionally, we sell software under multiple element arrangements that do not include hardware. Under these software arrangements, we allocate revenue to the various elements based on VSOE of fair value.  Our VSOE of fair value is determined based on the price charged when the same element is sold separately.  If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, but does exist for undelivered elements, we recognize revenue using the residual method.  Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement is recognized as revenue.  Where fair value of undelivered elements has not been established, the total arrangement is recognized over the period during which the services are performed.

Fair Value Measurements

The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) requires certain disclosures around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs.  The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.  Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  These levels are:

● Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

● Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

● Level 3 Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates.

We have money market funds that are highly liquid and have a maturity of three months or less, and as such are considered cash equivalents.

As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, we did not have an outstanding balance on our bank line of credit.  We did not have an average outstanding balance on our bank line of credit for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	Sept. 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	15,499	$	15,499	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,034		10,034		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,533	$	25,533	$	-	$	-

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	June 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	17,895	$	17,895	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,032		10,032		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,927	$	27,927	$	-	$	-

XML

Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended																							12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013 Segment	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013 Customer A [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Customer A [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Customer B [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Customer B [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 United States [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 United States [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Canada [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Canada [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Total North America [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Total North America [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Japan [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Japan [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Other Asia Pacific Countries [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Other Asia Pacific Countries [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Total Asia Pacific [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Total Asia Pacific [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Europe [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Europe [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 South America [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 South America [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Accounts Receivable [Member] Customer A [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Accounts Receivable [Member] Customer A [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Accounts Receivable [Member] Customer C [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Accounts Receivable [Member] Customer C [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor A [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor A [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor B [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor B [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor C [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor C [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor D [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Cost of Goods, Total [Member] Vendor D [Member]
Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information [Abstract]
Number of operating segments	2
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Revenues	$ 17,198	$ 15,004					$ 12,202	$ 10,001	$ 245	$ 562	$ 12,447	$ 10,563	$ 2,980	$ 3,168	$ 821	$ 112	$ 3,801	$ 3,280	$ 950	$ 1,159	$ 0	$ 2
Concentration risk			31.00%	10.00%	10.00%	20.00%																	24.00%	19.00%	11.00%	10.00%	22.00%	14.00%	18.00%	13.00%	13.00%	10.00%	10.00%	11.00%

XML

Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information [Abstract]

Summary of revenues by geographic area

 A summary of our revenues by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013		2012
United States	$	12,202	$	10,001
Canada		245		562
Total North America		12,447		10,563
Japan		2,980		3,168
Other Asia Pacific countries		821		112
Total Asia Pacific		3,801		3,280
Europe		950		1,159
South America		-		2
Total revenue	$	17,198	$	15,004

Summary of revenues by significant customers

In addition, the following summarizes revenues by significant customer where such revenue accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013	2012
Customer A	31%	<10%
Customer B	<10%	20%

Summary of significant accounts receivable

The following summarizes accounts receivable by significant customer for whom accounts receivable were 10% or more of total accounts receivables for any one of the indicated periods:

	September 30,	June 30,
	2013	2013
Customer A	24%	19%
Customer C	11%	<10%

Summary of purchases by significant vendor

The following summarizes purchases from significant vendors where such purchases accounted for 10% or more of total purchases for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Vendor A		22	%		14	%
Vendor B		18	%		13	%
Vendor C		13	%	<10		%
Vendor D	<10		%		11	%

XML

Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013 Segment	Sep. 30, 2012
Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation [Abstract]
Number of reportable segments	2
Operating loss carryforwards	$ 97,200,000
Net operating loss carryforwards expiration year	Dec. 31, 2032
Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets	197,000
Income tax provision	$ 39,000	$ 107,000

XML

Share-Based Compensation Summary Of Share Based Compensation Expense Allocation (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Share-based compensation expense	$ 391	$ 168
Tax benefit	0	0
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes	391	168
Cost of Sales [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Share-based compensation expense	14	13
Sales and Marketing [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Share-based compensation expense	47	27
Research and Development [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Share-based compensation expense	35	26
General and Administrative [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Share-based compensation expense	$ 295	$ 102

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Contingent liability under employment contract agreements	$ 2,461,000
Minimum [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Terminated employees severance compensation payment period	6 months
Maximum [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Terminated employees severance compensation payment period	12 months

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) [Abstract]
Accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 59	$ 70
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, authorized (in shares)	14,000,000	14,000,000
Common stock, issued (in shares)	8,937,410	8,807,766
Common stock, outstanding (in shares)	8,937,410	8,807,766
Treasury stock, at cost (in shares)	37,788	37,788

XML

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses [Abstract]

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

7.Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

The components of accounts payable and accrued expenses are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		June 30,
	2013		2013
Accounts payable, trade	$	1,440	$	2,075
Accrued payroll, vacation, severance  and other employee expenses		2,359		4,298
Accrued income taxes		27		130
Dividend payable		99		94
Other accrued expenses		1,094		1,074
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	5,019	$	7,671

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) [Abstract]
Net income	$ 734	$ 325
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(53)	(47)
Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of tax	5	2
Other comprehensive loss	(48)	(45)
Comprehensive income	$ 686	$ 280

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 25,533	$ 27,927
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 at September 30, 2013 and $70 at June 30, 2013	9,645	10,701
Inventories	3,009	2,844
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net	1,560	2,324
Total current assets	39,747	43,796
Property, plant and equipment, net	3,178	3,102
Intangible assets, net	617	834
Other long-term assets, net	911	737
Total assets	44,453	48,469
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	5,019	7,671
Deferred revenue	7,515	8,383
Total current liabilities	12,534	16,054
Non-current liabilities:
Deferred revenue	1,529	1,924
Pension liability	3,027	2,901
Other	1,686	1,805
Total liabilities	18,776	22,684
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders' equity:
Shares of common stock, par value $.01; 14,000,000 authorized; 8,937,410 and 8,807,766 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively	89	88
Capital in excess of par value	208,975	208,677
Accumulated deficit	(183,444)	(183,085)
Treasury stock, at cost; 37,788 at September 30, 2013and June 30, 2013	(255)	(255)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	312	360
Total stockholders' equity	25,677	25,785
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 44,453	$ 48,469

XML

Retirement Plans (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Retirement Plans [Abstract]

Schedule of components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income

The following table provides detail of the components of net periodic benefit cost of our German subsidiary’s defined benefit pension plan for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Service cost	$	-		$	1
Interest cost		42			46
Expected return on plan assets		(15	)		(18	)
Amortization of net loss		5			2
Net periodic benefit cost	$	32		$	31

XML

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share

Reconciliation of numerators and denominators of basic and diluted net loss per share

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods indicated (dollars and share data in thousands, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012
Basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) calculation:
Net income	$	734	$	325
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		8,813		8,683
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock		223		118
Stock options		13		-
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		9,049		8,801
Basic EPS	$	0.08	$	0.04
Diluted EPS	$	0.08	$	0.04

XML

Dividends (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
Dividends [Abstract]
Dividends Payable	$ 237,000
Current dividends payable	99,000		94,000
Noncurrent dividends payable	138,000
Dividends forfeited with restricted stock forfeitures	57,000
Record Date	Sep. 16, 2013
Payment Date	Sep. 30, 2013
Type	Quarterly
Dividend Per Share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.12	$ 0.12
Dividends	$ 1,108,000

XML

Other Intangible Assets (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Total cost of intangibles	$ 9,687,000		$ 9,678,000
Total accumulated amortization	(9,070,000)		(8,844,000)
Total intangible assets, net	617,000		834,000
Amortization expense	226,000	226,000
Purchased Technology [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Total cost of intangibles	7,700,000		7,700,000
Total accumulated amortization	(7,679,000)		(7,497,000)
Customer Relationships [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Total cost of intangibles	1,900,000		1,900,000
Total accumulated amortization	(1,377,000)		(1,334,000)
Patents [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Total cost of intangibles	87,000		78,000
Total accumulated amortization	$ (14,000)		$ (13,000)

XML

Share-Based Compensation (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Options outstanding (in shares)	197,239
Restricted shares outstanding (in shares)	333,421
Awarded, Shares (in shares)	90,000
Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	4 years
Performance-Based Restricted Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Awarded, Shares (in shares)	40,000
Vesting period	3 years
Service-Based Restricted Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Awarded, Shares (in shares)	50,000

XML

Share-Based Compensation Restricted Stock (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Awarded, Shares (in shares)	90,000
Service-Based Restricted Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unvested, Shares (in shares)	225,064
Awarded, Shares (in shares)	50,000
Released, Shares (in shares)	(54,305)
Forfeited, Shares (in shares)	(3,250)
Unvested, Shares (in shares)	217,509
Unvested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 4.91
Awarded, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 7.86
Released, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 5.07
Forfeited, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 4.57
Unvested at, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 5.55
Performance-Based Restricted Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unvested, Shares (in shares)	231,012
Awarded, Shares (in shares)	40,000
Released, Shares (in shares)	(92,166)
Forfeited, Shares (in shares)	(62,934)
Unvested, Shares (in shares)	115,912
Unvested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 3.66
Awarded, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 7.86
Released, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 3.52
Forfeited, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 2.90
Unvested at, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in dollars per share)	$ 5.59

XML

Other Intangible Assets

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Other Intangible Assets

6. Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,			June 30,
	2013			2013
Cost of amortizable intangibles:
Purchased technology	$	7,700		$	7,700
Customer relationships		1,900			1,900
Patents		87			78
Total cost of intangibles		9,687			9,678
Less accumulated amortization:
Purchased technology		(7,679	)		(7,497	)
Customer relationships		(1,377	)		(1,334	)
Patents		(14	)		(13	)
Total accumulated amortization		(9,070	)		(8,844	)
Total intangible assets, net	$	617		$	834

Amortization expense was $226,000 for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

XML

Dividends (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Dividends [Abstract]

Summary of dividend activity

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we declared and paid one quarterly cash dividend. The following summarizes our dividend activity during the three months ended September 30, 2013:

			Dividend
Record Date	Payment Date	Type	Per Share		Total
September 16, 2013	September 30, 2013	Quarterly	$	0.12	$	1,108,000

XML

Revolving Credit Facility (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Revolving credit facility, maximum borrowing capacity	$ 10,000,000
Revolving credit facility, expiration date	Dec. 31, 2013
Revolving credit facility, interest rate (in hundredths)	4.00%
Minimum cash required for covenant compliance	15,000,000
Revolving credit facility, current borrowing capacity	10,000,000
Revolving credit facility, amount outstanding	0	0
Consolidated tangible net worth required for covenant compliance	17,512,000
Percentage of quarterly net income cash covenant increases by (in hundredths)	100.00%
Percentage of equity issuances cash covenant increases by (in hundredths)	100.00%
Company's net worth	25,060,000
Maximum dividend per fiscal year	$ 3,000,000
Scenario One [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Revolving credit facility, interest rate (in hundredths)	4.00%
Scenario Two [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Revolving credit facility, interest rate percentage in addition to LIBOR (in hundredths)	2.75%
Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Quick ratio required for covenant compliance	1.00
Quick ratio of company	1.00
Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Quick ratio required for covenant compliance	7.01
Quick ratio of company	1.25

XML

Revolving Credit Facility

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract]

Revolving Credit Facility

9. Revolving Credit Facility

We have a $10,000,000 credit line (the “Revolver”) with Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) that matures on December 31, 2013.  Advances against the Revolver bear interest on the outstanding principal at a rate per annum equal to the greater of 4.0% or either: (1) the prime rate, or (2) the LIBOR rate plus a LIBOR rate margin of 2.75%.  We have borrowing availability of up to $10,000,000 under this Revolver as long as we maintain cash at or through the Bank of $15,000,000 or more.  At all times that we maintain cash at or through the Bank of less than $15,000,000, the amount available for advance under the Revolver is calculated from a formula that is primarily based upon a percentage of eligible accounts receivable, which may result in less than, but no more than, $10,000,000 of availability.

The interest rate on the Revolver was 4.0% as of September 30, 2013. The outstanding principal amount plus all accrued but unpaid interest is payable in full at the expiration of the credit facility on December 31, 2013.  Based on our cash balance at the Bank as of September 30, 2013, $10,000,000 was available to us under the Revolver.  As of September 30, 2013, no amount is drawn under the Revolver, and we did not draw against the Revolver at any time during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Under the Revolver, we are obligated to maintain a consolidated tangible net worth (total assets minus total liabilities and intangible assets)of at least $17,512,000 as of the last day of each quarter, increasing by 100% of quarterly net income and 100% of issuances of equity, net of issuance costs, and a consolidated adjusted quick ratio of at least 1.25 to 1.00 (cash, short-term investments and accounts receivable divided by current liabilities, excluding deferred revenue).  Additionally, we are subject to certain negative covenants whereby we must first receive the banks written consent prior to any dispositions, changes in business, management, or business locations, mergers or acquisitions, indebtedness, encumbrances, maintenance of collateral accounts, investments or subordinated debt.  As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with these covenants as our consolidated adjusted quick ratio was 7.01 to 1.00 and our tangible net worth was $25,060,000.  The Revolver is secured by substantially all of the assets of the company.

On July 30, 2012, we entered into a Waiver and Second Modification (the “Modification”) to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank governing the Revolver.  The Modification permits us to make payments of quarterly cash dividends.  We may pay quarterly cash dividends, as approved by our board of directors from time to time, so long as an Event of Default (as defined in the Credit Agreement) does not exist at the time of declaration or payment of any such cash dividend and would not exist after giving effect to such cash dividend, and provided such cash dividends do not exceed an aggregate of $3,000,000 per fiscal year.

XML

Inventories

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Inventories [Abstract]

Inventories

5. Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined by using the first-in, first-out method.  We reduce our excess and obsolete inventory to market value, if below cost, based upon historical and anticipated usage.  The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		June 30,
	2013		2013
Raw materials	$	1,557	$	1,091
Work-in-process		267		298
Finished goods		1,185		1,455
Total inventory	$	3,009	$	2,844

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 734	$ 325
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	727	856
Share-based compensation	391	168
Other non-cash expenses	(168)	33
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable	1,056	(792)
Inventories	(190)	850
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	775	(53)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(2,684)	(507)
Other long-term assets	(15)	39
Deferred revenue	(1,263)	(458)
Other long-term liabilities	38	63
Total adjustments to net income	(1,333)	199
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(599)	524
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment	(538)	(199)
Net cash used in investing activities	(538)	(199)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Dividends paid	(1,190)	(1,042)
Repurchase of shares to satisfy employee tax withholdings	(134)	0
Net cash used in financing activities	(1,324)	(1,042)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents	67	44
Change in cash and cash equivalents	(2,394)	(673)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year	27,927	29,613
Cash and cash equivalents - end of year	25,533	28,940
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	6	7
Income taxes (net of refunds)	$ 54	$ 446

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Number of days in delivery period following sale of system	90 days
Bank line of credit, amount outstanding	$ 0	$ 0
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	25,533,000	27,927,000
Cash [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	15,499,000	17,895,000
Money Market Funds [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	10,034,000	10,032,000
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	25,533,000	27,927,000
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) [Member] | Cash [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	15,499,000	17,895,000
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	10,034,000	10,032,000
Observable (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	0	0
Observable (Level 2) [Member] | Cash [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	0	0
Observable (Level 2) [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	0	0
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	0	0
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Cash [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	0	0
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]
Fair Value By Asset Class [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents at fair value	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

12. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business.  We believe that such pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

We enter into agreements in the ordinary course of business with customers that often require us to defend and/or indemnify the customer against intellectual property infringement claims brought by a third party with respect to our products.  For example, we were notified that certain of our customers have settled with or been sued by the following companies, in the noted jurisdictions, regarding the listed patents:

Asserting Party	Jurisdiction	Patents at Issue
Trans Video Electronics Ltd.	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,594,936 and 5,991,801
Olympic Developments AG, LLC	U.S. District Court Central	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,475,585 and
	District of California	6,246,400
InterAd Technologies	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S. Patent No. 5,438,353
LVL Patent Group	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S Patent No. 6,044,382
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania	U.S. Patent Nos. 6,754,907 and 6,757,907
FutureVision.com LLC	U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas	U.S. Patent No. 5,877,755

We continue to review our potential obligations under our indemnification agreements with these customers and the indemnity obligations to these customers from other vendors that also provided systems and services to these customers.  From time to time, we also indemnify customers and business partners for damages, losses and liabilities they may suffer or incur relating to personal injury, personal property damage, product liability, and environmental claims relating to the use of our products and services or resulting from our acts or omissions, our employees, authorized agents or subcontractors.  We have not accrued any material liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial statements and do not expect any other material costs as a result of such obligations.  The maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make is unlimited, and we are unable to estimate any possible loss or range of possible loss.

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements with our executive officers and certain other employees, employment may be terminated by either the respective executive officer or us at any time.  In the event the employee voluntarily resigns (except as described below) or is terminated for cause, compensation under the employment agreement will end.  In the event an agreement is terminated by us without cause or in certain circumstances constructively by us, the terminated employee will receive severance compensation for a period from 6 to 12 months, depending on the officer, in an annualized amount equal to the respective employee's base salary then in effect.  In the event our CEO resigns within three months of a change in control or the CEO’s agreement is terminated by us within one year of a change of control other than for due cause, disability or non-renewal by our CEO, our CEO will be entitled to severance compensation multiplied by two.  Additionally, if terminated, our CEO and CFO may be entitled to bonuses during the severance period.  At September 30, 2013, the maximum contingent liability under these agreements is $2,461,000.  Our employment agreements with certain of our employees contain certain offset provisions, as defined in their respective agreements.

XML

Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information [Abstract]

Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information

8.Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information

We operate in two segments, products and services, as disclosed within our condensed consolidated Statements of Operations.  We evaluate segment results using revenues and gross margin as the performance measures.  Such information is shown on the face of the accompanying statements of operations.  We do not identify assets on a segment basis.  We attribute revenues to individual countries and geographic areas based upon location of our customers.  A summary of our revenues by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013		2012
United States	$	12,202	$	10,001
Canada		245		562
Total North America		12,447		10,563
Japan		2,980		3,168
Other Asia Pacific countries		821		112
Total Asia Pacific		3,801		3,280
Europe		950		1,159
South America		-		2
Total revenue	$	17,198	$	15,004

In addition, the following summarizes revenues by significant customer where such revenue accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013	2012
Customer A	31%	<10%
Customer B	<10%	20%

We assess credit risk through ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition, and collateral is generally not required.  The following summarizes accounts receivable by significant customer for whom accounts receivable were 10% or more of total accounts receivables for any one of the indicated periods:

	September 30,	June 30,
	2013	2013
Customer A	24%	19%
Customer C	11%	<10%

There were no other customers representing 10% or more of our trade receivables at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.

The following summarizes purchases from significant vendors where such purchases accounted for 10% or more of total purchases for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Vendor A		22	%		14	%
Vendor B		18	%		13	%
Vendor C		13	%	<10		%
Vendor D	<10		%		11	%

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Financial assets measured on recurring basis

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	Sept. 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	15,499	$	15,499	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,034		10,034		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,533	$	25,533	$	-	$	-

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	June 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	17,895	$	17,895	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,032		10,032		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,927	$	27,927	$	-	$	-

XML

Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2013, we had U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $97,200,000 for income tax purposes which will expire at various dates through 2032.  We completed an evaluation of the potential effect of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) on our ability to utilize these net operating losses.  The study concluded that we have not had an ownership change for the period from July 22, 1993 to June 30, 2012.  Therefore, we do not expect the U.S. Federal net operating losses to be subject to limitation under Section 382, unless there are additional material ownership changes in the future.

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily on the generation of future taxable income. In considering the need for a valuation allowance we consider our historical results, future projected taxable income, and other positive and negative evidence.  This analysis is required on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. The following summarizes our conclusions on the need for a valuation allowance in each jurisdiction as of September 30, 2013:

U.S.:  As of September 30, 2013, we have realized a three-year cumulative accounting profit in the U.S. for the first time. While the negative evidence of cumulative losses in recent years is not present at September 30, 2013, we believe that significant uncertainty continues to exist in our domestic operations as our recent improved financial performance in the U.S. has been for a limited time period.  We believe that our history of expired net operating losses, our inability to carryback any net operating losses or credits, a history of inconsistent earnings and the absence of currently available tax strategies provide negative evidence about the ability to realize our deferred tax assets at the present time.   We believe that the negative evidence outweighs the positive evidence on the realizability of the domestic deferred tax assets.  As such, at this time we believe it is premature to assert that it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize all net deferred tax assets and release some or all of the domestic valuation allowance.  We will continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on our domestic deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2013.

United Kingdom (“U.K.”):  During the first quarter of our fiscal year 2014, a change in U.K. tax law relative to treatment of research and development expenses allowed us to release $197,000 of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets that we believe are now realizable as a result of the current period tax law change.  We believe that in light of this law change, we will now generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize our net deferred tax assets in the U.K.

Japan:  Japan has a long history of profitable operations, and we continue to project profitability in Japan for the foreseeable future.  Therefore, we continue to believe that we will fully realize the net deferred tax assets in Japan, and no valuation allowance is needed.

Other Foreign Jurisdictions:  We also evaluated the need for a continued full valuation allowance against our foreign deferred tax assets in other jurisdictions.  We concluded that a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets for other foreign jurisdictions, was warranted due to, among other reasons, (i) the realized cumulative accounting losses, (ii) our long history of taxable losses, and (iii) our uncertainty with respect to generating future taxable income in the near term given our recently completed projections and other inherent uncertainties in our business.

Each quarter, we assess the total weight of positive and negative evidence and evaluate whether release of all or any portion of the valuation allowance is appropriate. Should we come to the conclusion that a release of our valuation allowances is required, there would be a significant increase in net income and earnings per share due to the impact on the tax rate.

We recorded $39,000 of income tax provision during the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to taxable income earned by our Japan subsidiary and an expected alternative minimum tax liability in the U.S., both of which were offset by the aforementioned release of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in the U.K.  We recorded $107,000 of income tax provision during the three months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to taxable income earned by our Japan subsidiary.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-2, Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, providing on disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).  This new guidance requires entities to present (either on the face of the income statement or in the notes) the effects on the line items of the income statement for amounts reclassified out of AOCI. The new guidance was effective for us beginning July 1, 2013 and did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

To Be Adopted

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) which provides guidance on a parent’s accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment upon derecognition of a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. This new guidance requires that the parent release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. The new guidance will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2014. We do not anticipate any material impact on our financial statements upon adoption.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This amendment requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward, unless certain conditions exist. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods (and the interim periods within) beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. We expect to adopt this guidance effective July 1 2014.  We expect adoption will not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Oct. 24, 2013
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Entity Registrant Name	CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORP/DE
Entity Central Index Key	0000749038
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--06-30
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		9,233,043
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Revenue Recognition Policy

Revenue Recognition Policy

We generate revenue from the sale of products and services. We commence revenue recognition when all of the following conditions are met:

· persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,

· the system has been delivered or the services have been performed,

· the fee is fixed or determinable, and

· collectability of the fee is probable.

Our standard multiple-element contractual arrangements with our customers generally include the delivery of systems with multiple components of hardware and software, certain professional services that typically involve installation and consulting, and ongoing software and hardware maintenance.  Product revenue is generally recognized when the product is delivered.  Professional services that are of a consultative nature may take place before, or after, delivery of the system, and installation services typically occur within 90 days after delivery of the system.  Professional services revenue is typically recognized as the services are performed.  Initial maintenance begins after delivery of the system and typically is provided for one to three years after delivery. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Our product sales are predominantly system sales whereby software and hardware function together to deliver the essential functionality of the combined product.  Upon our adoption of ASU 2009-14 on July 1, 2010, sales of these systems were determined to typically be outside of the scope of the software revenue guidance in Topic 985 (previously included in SOP 97-2) and are accounted for under ASU 2009-13.

Our sales model for media data intelligence (“MDI”) products includes the option for customers to purchase: (1) a perpetual license with maintenance; (2) a term license with maintenance and managed services; (3) software as a service; or (4) perpetual license with maintenance and managed services.  We expect that revenue from these sales generally will be recognized over the term of the various customer contracts.  Professional services attributable to implementation of our MDI products or managed services are essential to the customers’ use of these products and services.  We defer commencement of revenue recognition for the entire arrangement until we have delivered the essential professional services or have made a determination that the remaining professional services are no longer essential to the customer.  We recognize revenue for managed services and software-as-a-service arrangements once we commence providing the managed or software services and recognize the service revenue ratably over the term of the various customer contracts.  In circumstances whereby we sell a term or perpetual license and managed services, we commence revenue recognition after both the software and service are made available to the customer and recognize the revenue from the entire arrangement ratably over the longer of the term license or managed service period, because we believe the managed services to be essential to the functionality of the term or perpetual license.

We evaluate each element in a multiple-element arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting.  An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has standalone value and delivery of the undelivered element is probable and within our control.  Our various systems have standalone value because we have either routinely sold them on a standalone basis or we believe that our customers could resell the delivered system on a standalone basis.  Professional services have standalone value because we have routinely sold them on a standalone basis, there are similar third party vendors that routinely provide similar professional services, and certain customers perform the installation themselves.  Our maintenance has standalone value because we have routinely sold maintenance separately.

As a result of the adoption of ASU 2009-13, we allocate revenue to each element in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, third party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. We have typically been able to establish VSOE of fair value for our maintenance and services. We determine VSOE of fair value for professional services and maintenance by examining the population of selling prices for the same or similar services when sold separately, and determining that the pricing population for each VSOE classification is within a very narrow range of the median selling price.  For each element, we evaluate at least annually whether or not we have maintained VSOE of fair value based on our review of the actual selling price of each element over the previous 12 month period.

Our product deliverables are typically complete systems comprised of numerous hardware and software components that operate together to provide essential functionality, and we are typically unable to establish VSOE or TPE of fair value for our products.  Due to the custom nature of our products, we must determine ESP at the individual component level whereby our ESP for the total system is determined based on the sum of the individual components.  ESP for components of our real-time products is typically based upon list price, which is representative of our actual selling price.  ESP for components of our video products is based upon our most frequent selling price (“mode”) of standalone and bundled sales, based upon a 12 month historical analysis.  If a mode selling price is not available, then ESP will be the median selling price of all such component sales based upon a 12 month historical analysis, unless facts and circumstances indicate that another selling price, other than the mode or median selling price, is more representative of our ESP.  Our methodology for determining ESP requires judgment, and any changes to pricing practices, the costs incurred to integrate products, the nature of our relationships with our customers, and market trends could cause variability in our ESP or cause us to re-evaluate our methodology for determining ESP.  We will update our analysis of mode and median selling price at least annually, unless facts and circumstances indicate that more frequent analysis is required.

Occasionally, we sell software under multiple element arrangements that do not include hardware. Under these software arrangements, we allocate revenue to the various elements based on VSOE of fair value.  Our VSOE of fair value is determined based on the price charged when the same element is sold separately.  If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, but does exist for undelivered elements, we recognize revenue using the residual method.  Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement is recognized as revenue.  Where fair value of undelivered elements has not been established, the total arrangement is recognized over the period during which the services are performed.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) requires certain disclosures around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs.  The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.  Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  These levels are:

● Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

● Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

● Level 3 Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates.

We have money market funds that are highly liquid and have a maturity of three months or less, and as such are considered cash equivalents.

As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, we did not have an outstanding balance on our bank line of credit.  We did not have an average outstanding balance on our bank line of credit for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	Sept. 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	15,499	$	15,499	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,034		10,034		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,533	$	25,533	$	-	$	-

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of		Quoted Prices in		Observable		Unobservable
	June 30, 2013		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash	$	17,895	$	17,895	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,032		10,032		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,927	$	27,927	$	-	$	-