UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly periods ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2006

OR

 [  ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number 814-00175

BROADLEAF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	88-0490034
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)
3887 Pacific Street
Las Vegas, Nevada	89121
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(702) 650-3000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes No    X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes X No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  o	Accelerated filer  o
Non-accelerated filer    x	Smaller reporting company  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes No X

As of August 29, 2011 the registrant had 144,419,925 shares of common stock outstanding.

-1-

Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2006 (unaudited), June 30, 2006 (unaudited),
	September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005 (audited)	4
	Consolidated Schedule of Investments at March 31, 2006 (unaudited), June 30, 2006 (unaudited),
	September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005 (audited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the  Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
	and 2005 (unaudited), and the Nine Months ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited)	6
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended  March 31, 2006
	(unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited), for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited), for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited)	7
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
	(unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited), for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited), and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited)	8
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
	and Results of Operations	24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	29
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	29

-2-

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	30
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 6.	Exhibits	33
SIGNATURES		34

-3-

BROADLEAF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
ASSETS
	9/30/2006			6/30/2006			3/31/2006			12/31/2005
	Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Audited
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	763		$	2,850		$	2,496		$	1,600
Total Current Assets		763			2,850			2,496			1,600
FIXED ASSETS, NET (Note2, 5)		0			0			0			0
OTHER ASSETS - Investments in limited partnerships -		162,155			162,155			162,155			162,155
(Note 2,4,8,9)
TOTAL ASSETS	$	162,918		$	165,005		$	164,651		$	163,755
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	324,420		$	324,420		$	324,420		$	324,420
Accrued Expenses		169,608			169,608			169,608			169,608
Accrued interest		66,763			60,299			53,835			47,371
Judgments payable		78,882			78,882			78,882			78,882
Notes payable - current portion (Note 7)		1,292,308			1,292,308			1,292,308			1,292,308
Total Current Liabilities		1,931,981			1,925,517			1,919,053			1,912,589
LONG-TERM DEBT - Notes payable - long term (Note 7)		0			0			0			0
Total Liabilities		1,931,981			1,925,517			1,919,053			1,912,589
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock authorized at $0.001 par value;
shares issued and outstanding 40,473,605
Total Common Shares issued and outstanding, respectively		140,474			140,474			140,474			140,474
Additional paid-in capital		13,875,209			13,875,209			13,875,209			13,875,209
Stock Subscriptions		(10,304	)		(10,304	)		(10,304	)		(10,304	)
Accumulated deficit		(15,774,442	)		(15,765,891	)		(15,759,781	)		(15,754,213	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(1,769,063	)		(1,760,512	)		(1,754,402	)		(1,748,834	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES,  AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	162,918		$	165,005		$	164,651		$	163,755
"The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements."

-4-

BROADLEAF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
		Number
		Shares Owned			Original
Company	Business	or %			Cost			9/30/2005		6/30/2005		3/31/2005		12/31/2004
								Unaudited		Unaudited		Unaudited		Audited
Canyon Shadows	Real Estate		1	%	$	1,131,961	(a)	$	781,655	$	781,655	$	781,655	$	781,655
TOTAL INVESTMENTS								$	781,655	$	781,655	$	781,655	$	781,655
Schedule of Investments - Descriptions
a) The Company's Investment Committee has valued this investment at cost,
less cash distributions to the Company from Canyon Shadows.

-5-

BROADLEAF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
	For the Nine Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	9/30/2006			9/30/2005			6/30/2006			6/30/2005
	Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited
REVENUES	$	5,697		$	134,711		$	3,798		$	134,078
EXPENSES
General and administrative		6,534			218,384			2,548			190,102
Depreciation (Note 5)		0			0			0			0
Total Expenses		6,534			218,384			2,548			190,102
NET INVESTMENT INCOME(LOSS)		(837	)		(83,673	)		1,250			(56,024	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest expense		(19,392	)		(19,392	)		(12,928	)		(12,928	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(19,392	)		(19,392	)		(12,928	)		(12,928	)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERARION BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(20,229	)		(103,065	)		(11,678	)		(68,952	)
Income taxes (Note 2)		0			0			0			0
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(20,229	)		(103,065	)		(11,678	)		(68,952	)
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic Income (Loss) Per Share (Note 2)		(0.000	)		(0.001	)		(0.000	)		(0.001	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
SHARES OUTSTANDING		140,473,605			138,845,115			140,473,605			135,030,871
"The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements."

-6-

BROADLEAF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
				For the Three Months Ended,
	9/30/2006			9/30/2005			6/30/2006			6/30/2005			3/31/2006			3/31/2005
	Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited
REVENUES	$	1,899		$	633		$	1,899		$	87,110		$	1,899		$	46,968
EXPENSES
General and administrative		3,986			28,282			1,545			81,062			1,003			109,040
Total Expenses		3,986			28,282			1,545			81,062			1,003			109,040
NET INVESTMENT INCOME(LOSS)		(2,087	)		(27,649	)		354			6,048			896			(62,072	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest expense		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERARION BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(8,551	)		(34,113	)		(6,110	)		(416	)		(5,568	)		(68,536	)
Income taxes (Note 2)		0			0			0			0			0			0
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(8,551	)		(34,113	)		(6,110	)		(416	)		(5,568	)		(68,536	)
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic Income (Loss) Per Share (Note 2)		(0.000	)		(0.000	)		(0.000	)		(0.000	)		(0.000	)		(0.001	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
SHARES OUTSTANDING		140,473,605			140,473,605			140,473,605			140,473,605			140,473,605			129,588,136
"The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements."

-7-

BROADLEAF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
				For the Nine, Six, and Three Months Ended,
	9/30/2006			9/30/2005			6/30/2006			6/30/2005			3/31/2006			3/31/2005
	Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(20,229	)	$	(103,065	)	$	(11,678	)	$	(68,952	)	$	(5,568	)	$	(68,536	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used by operating activities:
Common stock issued for services		0			0			0			0			0			0
(Increase) decrease in other assets		0			0			0			0			0			0
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		0			0			0			0			0			0
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		0			(29,712	)		0			(29,712	)		0			0
Increase (decrease) in Acrued Expenses		19,392			19,392			12,928			12,928			6,464			6,464
Increase (decrease) in Judgements Payable		0			0			0			0			0			0
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(837	)		(113,385	)		1,250			(85,736	)		896			(62,072	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Funds received from common stock
investments and note conversions to stock		0			68,131			0			68,131			0			37,395
Net Cash Provided (Used) in Investing Activities		0			68,131			0			68,131			0			37,395
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repayment of notes payable		0			(9,500	)		0			(9,500	)		0			0
Net Proceeds from borrowings		0			62,871			0			62,871			0			53,371
Proceeds from subscriptions payable		0			(27,804	)		0			(27,804	)		0			(27,804	)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	$	0		$	25,567		$	0		$	25,567		$	0		$	25,567
NET DECREASE IN CASH	$	(837	)	$	(19,687	)	$	1,250		$	7,962		$	896		$	890
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		1,600			3,957			1,600			3,957			1,600			3,957
CASH, END OF PERIOD
	$	763		$	(15,730	)	$	2,850		$	11,919		$	2,496		$	4,847
"The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements."

-8-

BROADLEAF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
For the Nine, Six, and Three Months Ended,
	9/30/2006		9/30/2005		6/30/2006		6/30/2005		3/31/2006		3/31/2005
	Unaudited		Unaudited		Unaudited		Unaudited		Unaudited		Unaudited
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH
FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Income taxes paid	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF
NON-CASH ACTIVITIES
Common stock issued in conversion
of debts and interest	$	0	$	32,179	$	0	$	32,179	$	0	$	32,179
Common stock issued for services	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Common Stock Issued on debt conversions
Common stock issued for subscriptions	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Common stock issued for settlements	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
"The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements."

-9-

NOTE 1 -COMPANY BACKGROUND

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  those  of  Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc., a Nevada company, (Broadleaf), and its  wholly owned   subsidiaries,   Peacock  Real  Estate  Development  Corporation (PREDC), Peacock International  Corporation (PIC), DotCom Ventures, LLC (DotCom), Peacock Sports, Inc. (PSI), Broadleaf Asset Management (BAM), Broadleaf Financial Services (BFS), Silverleaf Venture Fund, LLC (SVF) and Brand Asset Management (Brand). The consolidated financial statements  also  include its majority-owned subsidiaries, Bay Area Soccer Development Corporation (Bay Area) (70%), Orange County Soccer Development Corporation (Orange)  (70%), Riverside County   Soccer   Development   Corporation   (Riverside)  (53%),   and iNetPartners, Inc. (iNet) (51%). Collectively,  they  are  referred  to herein as "the Company".

PREDC,  a  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  was originally formed on July 29, 1993. On October 22, 1999, the name was  changed from Peacock Financial Corporation   (California)   to   Peacock   Real   Estate   Development Corporation. PREDC has had no significant operations since inception.

PIC, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed on December  8, 1997. It has had  no  operations  to  date,  but  was formed to invest and trade  in securities on an international basis.

DotCom was organized on July 23, 1999. Peacock acquired its initial 50% ownership with an initial investment of  $112,203.  On January 5, 2000, the Company acquired the remaining 50% ownership by granting options to acquire a total of 500,000 restricted common shares of  the  Company at $0.10 per share. DotCom was organized for the purposes of conducting an internet production company and to consult start-up and emerging growth companies  with  their  internet  strategies.  DotCom  had  no  operations since 2003.

PSI was incorporated  in January 2000 to hold and manage investments in professional sports. During  the  years  ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, PSI had no significant operations.

In  January 2000, the Company acquired an 85%  ownership  interest  for $50,000  cash in Orange County Soccer Development Corporation (Orange). The  investment  was  recorded  as  a  purchase.   Orange  discontinued operations effective December 31, 2000.

In February  2000,  the  Company acquired an 85% ownership interest for $100,000 cash in Bay Area  Soccer  Development  Corporation (Bay Area). The investment was recorded as a purchase. Effective December 31, 2000, Bay Area discontinued its operations.

In  February  2000,  the Company acquired a 53% ownership  interest  in Riverside County Soccer Development Corporation (Riverside) for $6,000. The investment was recorded as a purchase. Effective December 31, 2000, Riverside discontinued its operations.

Broadleaf holds a 51%  interest  in  iNet as of December 31, 2001. iNet was organized under the laws of the State of California on December 15, 1999 with the intent to develop Internet  e-commerce  applications  for both  the new and used automotive markets. Effective December 31, 2000, iNet had no significant operations.

On May 23, 2002 Storage Suites America was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary to take advantage of the growing self storage trend. During 2002 it was decided Broadleaf could not provide the capital and management support needed by Storage Suites America to implement their business plan. During March 2003 the Storage Suites America entity was sold by Broadleaf.

Silverleaf Venture Fund, LLC was formed on July 29, 2003 as a wholly owned subsidiary. The company had a limited history and briefly acquired shares in small micro cap companies during 2003 and 2004. However, due the lack of liquidity and markets available willing to buy these investments, they were written down to zero market value based on management recommendations and has had no significant operations since 2004.

Broadleaf’s remaining subsidiaries,  BAM,  BFS,  and  Brand, were all incorporated  in  2001.  These subsidiaries have had no operations  to date, and management is currently evaluating its alternatives for these companies.

-10-

NOTE 1 - COMPANY BACKGROUND (Continued)

On  September  15,  1998,  the  Company  filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  to become a Business Development  Corporation  as defined under the Investment  Act  of 1940. Simultaneously, the Company registered an offering circular with  the  SEC for 13,000,000 shares of common stock under Regulation E of the Investment  Act to raise capital and  to  make  investments  in  real  estate and in eligible  portfolio companies. The Company participates in  the  formation  of, and invests in, emerging or early-stage companies in various fields of  business by arranging   for  and  contributing  capital  and  providing  management assistance. During 2004 the Company had failed to comply with Business Development Company requirements while trying to maintain business operations and the Business Development License has been rescinded by the SEC.

From December 2000 through 2006 the Company did not have a permanent President but was run by interim President Robert A. Braner who was also Chairman of the Board during the same time. The Company has since hired a permanent President and restored its normal management structure.

The Company currently continues operations of its active holdings, all in the parent Company structure and not its subsidiaries which are currently inactive and being held for future ventures. Also, the Company is actively looking for opportunities to utilize its tax assets.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation.

Broadleaf  Capital  Partners,   Inc.  (the  Company)  is  a  closed-end management investment company organized  as  a  Nevada corporation.  Although  these types of company’s should prepare their financial statements  in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United  States of America, and are subject to audit as are other investment companies,  the statement presentation of some companies may need  to  be tailored to present  the  information  in  a  manner  most meaningful  to  their  particular  group  of investors. Since debt is a significant item, the Company concluded that  a  balance sheet would be more  appropriate  than  a statement of net assets. Also,  the  Company believes Article 5 of Regulation S-X applies.

FASB Codification:

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (“Codification”) effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement establishes the Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles used in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Codification does not replace or affect guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. As a result of the Codification, the references to authoritative accounting pronouncements included herein in this Annual Report now refer to the Codification topic section rather than a specific accounting rule as was past practice.

Principles of Consolidation: 

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  those  of  Broadleaf Capital  Partners,  Inc.,  a  Nevada corporation, and its  wholly-owned subsidiaries, Peacock Real Estate  Development Corporation (California) (PREDC),  Peacock  International Corporation  (Bahamas)  (PIC),  DotCom Ventures, LLC (DotCom),  Peacock  Sports,  Inc.  (PSI), Silverleaf Venture Fund. LLC (SVF), Broadleaf Asset Management (BAM), Broadleaf Financial Services (BFS),  and  Brand Asset Management  (Brand). They also include the majority owned subsidiaries, Bay Area Soccer Development Corporation (Bay Area) (80%), Orange County Soccer Development  Corporation (Orange) (85%), Riverside County Soccer Development Corporation  (Riverside)  (53%),  and  iNet  Partners, Inc. (iNet)  (51%).  All  significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

-11-

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Risk and Uncertainties:

Our future results of operations and financial condition will be impacted by the following factors, among others: our lack of capital resources, dependence on third-party management to operate the companies in which we invest and dependence on the successful development and marketing of any new products in new and existing markets. Generally, we are unable to predict the future status of these areas of risk and uncertainty. However, negative trends or conditions in these areas could have an adverse affect on our business.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

For financial statement presentation purposes, short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash accounts at all times at levels that do not exceed the insurable FDIC limit, but management believes that there is little risk of loss.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced a framework for

measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities.  The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ” (ASC 820) defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

● Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for  identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

● Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability; either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g. interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

● Level 3—Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.  These financial instruments include investments in available-for-sale securities and accounts payable and accrued expenses.    The Company has also applied ASC 820 for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The adoption of ASC 820 for non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

-12-

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Investments:

The Company's loans, net of participations  and  any unearned discount, are considered investments under the 1940 Act and  are recorded at fair value. Since no ready market exists for these loans,  the fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. In  determining the fair value, the Company and Board of Directors consider factors such as the financial condition of the borrower, the adequacy of the collateral and individual credit risks.

Investments   in   equity   securities  are  recorded  at  fair  value, represented  as  cost,  plus  or   minus   unrealized  appreciation  or depreciation,  respectively. The carrying values  of  investments  that have no readily-determinable  market values are determined by the Board of Directors, based upon its analysis of the assets and revenues of the underlying invested companies.

Because  of  the  inherent uncertainty  of  valuations,  the  Board  of Directors' estimates  of  the  values  of  the  investments  may differ significantly  from  the  values that would have been used had a  ready market  for  the investments  existed  and  the  differences  could  be material.

Comprehensive Income:

ASC Topic 220 (SFAS No. 130) establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events from non-owner sources.  Per the consolidated financial statements, the Company has purchased available-for-sale securities that are subject to this reporting.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment:

All of our non-marketable and other investments are subject to a periodic impairment review. Investments are considered to be impaired when a decline in fair value is judged to be other-than-temporary. The indicators that we use to identify those events and circumstances include:

·the investee’s revenue and earnings trends relative to predefined milestones and overall business prospects;

·When events or changes in circumstances indicate that long-lived assets other than goodwill may be impaired, an evaluation is performed to determine if a write-down to fair value is required. When an asset is classified as held for sale, the asset's book value is evaluated and adjusted to the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. In addition, depreciation and amortization ceases while it is classified as held for sale.

·the general market conditions in the investee’s industry or geographic area, including regulatory or economic changes;

·factors related to the investee’s ability to remain in business, such as the investee’s liquidity, debt ratios, and the rate at which the investee is using its cash; and

·the investee’s receipt of additional funding at a lower valuation. If an investee obtains additional funding at a valuation lower than our carrying amount or a new round of equity funding is required for the investee to remain in business, and the new round of equity does not appear imminent, it is presumed that the investment is other than temporarily impaired, unless specific facts and circumstances indicate otherwise.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165” or ASC 855).  SFAS 165 (ASC 855) establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.  SFAS 165 (ASC 855) sets forth (1) The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) The circumstances nder which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 (ASC 855) was effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009.

-13-

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS 168” or ASC 105-10).  The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) will be the single source of authoritative

Non-governmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  SFAS 168 (ASC 105-10) was effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  All existing accounting standards are superseded as described in SFAS 168.  All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is non-authoritative. Existing GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the Codification, and accordingly the change did not impact our financial statements. The ASC does change the way the guidance is organized and presented.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (“ASU 2009-13. This standard updates FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”). The amendments to ASC 605 requires entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. These amendments to ASC 605 should be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted these amendments on January 1, 2010.  Management does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have any impact on the Company’s financial statements. 

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASU 2010-06”).  This standard updates FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”). ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of desegregations and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 on January 1, 2010, which had no material impact on the financial statements. Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its EITF), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

Revenue and Cost Recognition:

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company also receives shares in certain  companies for providing capital and  investment  services.  Therefore when this type of income is recognized, the Company records  it as management  consulting income based on the fair value of the shares received.

Fixed Assets:

Fixed assets are recorded  at cost. Major additions and improvement are capitalized. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of equipment retired or sold are removed  from  the  accounts  and  any  differences between  the  undepreciated  amount and the proceeds from the sale  are recorded as gain or loss on sale  of  assets.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets as follows:

Description     Estimated Useful Life

        Furniture and fixtures          5 to 7 years

        Computers and software          5 years

        Automobiles                            5 years

-14-

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Most of the fixed assets of the company have been retired during the 2005 fiscal year and, the related costs and accumulated depreciation have been removed from the accounts and any gain or loss was recognized during that period.

Reclassifications:

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform to the current year presentation.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share:

In addition to Net Asset Values the Company reports basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) according to the provisions of ASC Topic 260, which requires the presentation of basic EPS and, for companies with complex capital structures, diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders, adjusted by other changes in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion of those potential common shares, by the weighted number of common shares and common share equivalents (unless their effect is antidilutive) outstanding. Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be antidilutive. Thus, these equivalents are not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share, resulting in basic and diluted loss per share being equal. The following is a reconciliation of the computation for basic and diluted EPS for the quarters ended September 30, 2006 through March 31, 2006:

	9/30/2006			6/30/2006			3/31/2006
Net Income (Loss)	$	(20,229	)	$	(11,678	)	$	(5,568	)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  basic:
Weighted-average common stock		140,473,605			140,473,605			140,473,605
Equivalents
Stock options		-			-			-
Warrants		-			-			-
Convertible Notes		-			-			-
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding- diluted		140,473,605			140,473,605			140,473,605

-15-

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Income Taxes:

The Company, a C-corporation, accounts for income taxes under ASC Topic 740 (SFAS No. 109) Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 “ Uncertainty in Income Taxes ” (ASC 740-10), on January 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10.  If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Currently the Company has projected $14,383,956 as of December 31, 2005 in Net Loss Operating Loss carryforwards available. The benefits of the potential tax savings will be recognized in the financial statements upon the acquisition or development of revenue source to apply against these losses. The company recognizes that the Internal Revenue Service has the final determination of the NOL available going forward and that amount may be significantly different from that recorded to date.

The  net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes will expire between 2010 and 2019.  Generally, these can be carried forward and applied against future taxable income at the tax rate applicable at that time. We are currently using a 35% effective tax rate for our projected available net operating loss carryforward. However, as a result of potential stock offerings and stock issuance in connection with potential acquisitions, as well as the possibility of the Company not realizing it’s business plan objectives and having future taxable income to offset, the Company’s use of these NOLs may be limited under the provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the implications of Section 382 on its ability to utilize some or all of its NOLs.

Components of Net Operating Loss and Valuation allowance are as follows:

Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of
	9/30/2006			6/30/2006			3/31/2006
Deferred tax assets:
Beginning  NOL Carryover		14,366,710			14,378,388			14,383,956
Adjusted Taxable Income		(20,229	)		(11,678	)		(5,568	)
Valuation allowance		0			0			0
Ending  NOL Carryover		14,346,481			14,366,710			14,378,388
Tax Benefit Carryforward		5,021,268			5,028,349			5,032,436
Valuation allowance		(5,021,268	)		(5,028,349	)		(5,032,436	)
Net deferred tax asset		0			0			0
Net Allowance		5,021,268			5,028,349			5,032,436

-16-

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

In accordance with FASB ASC 740 “Income Taxes”, valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets, if based on the weight of available evidence, some or all of the deferred tax assets may or will not be realized. The Company has evaluated its ability to realize some or all of the deferred tax assets on its balance sheet and has established a valuation allowance in the amount of $5,034,385 at December 31, 2005 and estimated changes to the valuation allowance by the projected profit of loss for each period included in these financial statements in the table above. The allowance is calculated for each period as equal to the full potential tax benefits of the any NOL tax carryforwards.

NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN

As reported in  the  consolidated financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficits  of  $15,774,442  as of September 31, 2006, $15,765,891 as of June 30, 2006, and $15,759,781 as of March 31, 2006. The Company also has certain debts that  have been  in default during these periods although the creditors have not pursued collection proceedings. The Company's stockholders' deficit at September  30,  2006  was $1,769,063, at June 30, 2006 was $1,760,512, at March 31, 2006 was $1,754,402 and its current liabilities  exceeded  its current assets by $1,931,218 on September 30, 2006 and by $1,922,667 on June 30, 2006 and by $1,916,557, on March 31, 2006. These trends have been consistent right up through the most current 10K filed for the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

These  factors  create  uncertainty  about  the  Company's  ability  to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue  as a  going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable  to  obtain  adequate  capital  it  could  be  forced  to  cease operations.

In  order to continue as a going concern, develop and generate revenues and achieve  a  profitable  level of operations, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plans to obtain such resources for the  Company  include  (1) raising additional capital through sales of common stock, (2) converting  promissory notes into  common  stock  and (3) entering into acquisition agreements  with profitable  entities  with   significant   operations.   In   addition, management  is  continually  seeking  to streamline its operations  and expand  the business through a variety of  industries,  including  real estate and financial management. However, management cannot provide any assurances  that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of  the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability  to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph  and  eventually  secure other sources of financing and   attain  profitable  operations.  The accompanying   consolidated financial  statements  do  not  include  any  adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4 - INVESTMENTS IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

During 1995,  the  Company received a $975,000 loan that converted to a grant from the City of Riverside to acquire and rehabilitate a 120-unit apartment complex (see  Note  9).  During April  1996, the Company was awarded  $2,400,000 in Federal tax credits relating  to  this  project. During December  1996,  the Company sold the completed project to a tax credit partnership named  Canyon Shadows, L.P., retaining a 1% interest as general partner, and receiving  a  $905,000  capital  account in the partnership.  During  1999,  a  $70,000  note  held by the Company  was transferred to Canyon Shadows, L.P., which was recorded  as  a  capital distribution  to  the  Company  (see  Note  9).  Additional  costs were incurred  by  the Company on behalf of the partnership resulting  in  a total investment  in Canyon Shadows, L.P. of $1,131,961 at December 31, 2000. The Company's  Board  of  Directors  determined that the value of this investment approximated the current interest  in  the partnership. The  valuation  was  based  upon  projected  future  occupancy  of  the apartment  unit.  In 2002, Canyon Shadows distributed $101,422  to  the Company, leaving a  balance  of  $937,424 at December 31, 2002.  During the  year  ended  December  31, 2003,  Canyon  Shadows  distributed  an additional  $134,176 to the Company,  while  the  Company  invested  an additional $12,734 into the Investment.

-17-

NOTE 4 - INVESTMENTS IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (Continued)

On May 26, 2003  the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with an individual  whereby the Company is to organize a subsidiary and sell a 21% interest in  the  subsidiary to the individual for $200,000. Immediately thereafter, the Company would transfer the control of the Canyon Shadows LP to the new subsidiary.  Thereafter, the individual is to  be  entitled  to  21%  of the quarterly distributions  from  Canyon  Shadows LP or $5,000 whichever  is  greater.   As of December 31, 2004, the individual had their investment reclassified as a note payable secured against the property with the same income provisions.  The Company has been accruing payments to the individual totaling 21% of the Company's monthly distribution from the Canyon Shadows investment.

NOTE 5 - FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consist of the following:
For the Periods Ended,	9/30/2006		6/30/2006		3/31/2006
Furniture and fixtures	$	0	$	0	$	0
Computers and software		3,500		3,500		3,500
Other equipment		400		400		400
		3,900		3,900		3,900
Accumulated depreciation		3,900		3,900		3,900
Current depreciation expense		0		0		0
		3,900		3,900		3,900
Net fixed assets	$	0	$	0	$	0
Most Fixed Assets were retired during the reduction of operations in 2005

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company is a partner in several limited partnerships (Note 4). The Company occasionally pays for operating expenses of the partnerships and is reimbursed as funds become available to the partnerships.  The Company received a $30,000 loan from director Donna Steward in 2004 as stated in note 7.  Additionally, the Company uses 500 square feet of office space from its Interim President rent free. There are no commitments attached to this space.

-18-

NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable consist of the following for the periods ended;	9/30/2006		6/30/2006		3/31/2006		12/31/2005
Note payable at 5%, secured
by an assignment of
partnership cash, interest
payable quarterly, principal due
January 1, 2007, convertible to
common stock. Resettled as part
of the Peacock Note in 2008.	$	500,000	$	500,000	$	500,000	$	500,000
Note payable at variable rate
(18.0% at December 31, 2000)
collateralized by deed of trust on
real property. Lump sum payment
was due May 21, 1999, currently
in default. Both general partners since
deceased. Note written off in 2006		86,854		86,854		86,854		86,854
Note payable at 10%, secured by
deed of trust, due March 31, 1996,
currently in default. Developer of project
investor since retired. Note written off in 2006		65,000		65,000		65,000		65,000
Debentures at 10%, unsecured, were to be
convertible into common shares at the
option of the holder, all debentures
were resettled as part of the Peacock note in 2008.		139,583		139,583		139,583		139,583
Debentures at 10%, unsecured, were to be
convertible into common shares at the
option of the holder, all debentures
are currently in default.		10,383		10,383		10,383		10,383
Peacock Family Trust debentures issued during 2004
with a stated interest rate of 10% per annum.
all debentures were resettled as part of
the Peacock note in 2008.		125,000		125,000		125,000		125,000
Convertible note from a related party dated June 28,
2004 with a stated rate of 10% per annum payable
quarterly. The holder has the right to convert upon
written request at 80% of market of the five
previous trading days of the conversion request.		30,000		30,000		30,000		30,000
Convertible note payable, accrues with an
interest at a Rate of 6.0% per annum,
two-year term. Currently in default.		0		0		0		0
Convertible note payable, accrues with an
interest at a Rate of 6.0% per annum,
two-year term. Currently in default.		42,988		42,988		42,988		42,988
of the company to repay or settle the debts.		92,500		92,500		92,500		92,500
Virginia Roberts investment was originally stated
as Minority Interest investment in 2003 financials,
was reclassed in 2004 to secured demand note against
Canyon Shadows Investment and entitled note
holder to 21% if Investment distributions at no
less than $5,000 per quarter.		200,000		200,000		200,000		200,000
Total Notes Payable		1,292,308		1,292,308		1,292,308		1,292,308
Less Current Portion		1,292,308		1,292,308		1,292,308		1,292,308
Long Term Notes Payable	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
The aggregate principal maturities of notes payable are as follows:
All are classified as short term by the Company.
During these periods,  the  Company  was in default on two notes
payable.  The note holders have not taken any legal action against the
Company as permitted by the agreements.   Accrued  interest  on
these notes totaled:	$	66,763	$	60,299	$	53,855	$	47,371

-19-

NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

a. General Partner Obligations

The  Company  serves  as  general   partner  in  several  real  estate development partnerships until 2005 when they reduced their position to one partnership (Canyon Shadows) of which they became a limited partner during the 2005 refinance of the project . The Company  may  still be held liable for certain liabilities, although because the amounts are minimal and the entities are limited liability companies, management does  not  feel  that  the potential liabilities will have a material impact on the Company.

b. Housing Grant

In April 1995, the Company acquired a 120-unit apartment complex using a  $975,000  loan  that  was  converted  to  a  grant from the City of Riverside, California. The loan was a non-recourse and was  secured  by a second  trust  deed  on  the  property.  After  the Company met certain requirements pertaining to the complex, which  have been stipulated by the city, the loan was forgiven by the City of Riverside on January 31, 2005 before the refinance of the Canyon Shadows project.

a. Stock Escrow and Security Agreement

In 2004 and 2005, the Company entered into a Stock  Escrow and Security Agreement  with  Angus  Holdings,  LLC ("Angus") and Douglas Morgan whereby  the  Company borrowed funds under the terms of a convertible promissory note.  The Company still has $53,371 outstanding on its books as of December 31, 2009. Although the Company has not had request to convert these loans in many years and feels the statute of limitations has passed, they have kept the liabilities open in the event some settlement is eventually reached. Currently, there is no stock being held in escrow.

d. Litigation

At  December  31,  2009,  the  Company  was  party  to  certain  legal proceedings, resulting in judgments and settlements since the 2003 audited calendar year.  The following is a summary of those payables:

During  the  year of 2003, Bank of Hemet received a legal judgment against the Company  totaling   $932,006.   In  2000,  however,  the  Company  had negotiated a settlement in this case  for  $100,000,  and  booked this amount  as  a contingent liability at December 31, 2000. In 2001,  the Company defaulted  on  this  settlement. As a result, during 2001, the Company recorded the full amount  of  the judgment, less payments made by the Company to Bank of Hemet.  On November  20,  2002,  the Company negotiated  another  settlement  on  this  amount  totaling  $280,000, payable  from  proceeds  from  the  Canyon Shadows investment.  During 2002,  the  contingency  was recorded at  this  amount  plus  interest imputed at an annual rate of 8%.  At December 31, 2002, this liability is recorded at $269,535.   In  2003, this liability was transferred to an unrelated entity by the name of Jeager and Kodner, LP. ("JK").  The Company negotiated a new settlement with JK whereby JK became entitled to  the Company's cash receipts from  its  Canyon  Shadows  investment (less 21% - see Note 4), until JK is paid in full.  As of December 31, 2003, the Bank of Hemet/JK liability totaled $168,794. This liability was paid in full in cash during 2005 from the refinance of their Canyon Shadows Investment.

In 2000,  a  non-related  individual  filed  suit against the Company. Later  that  year,  management  negotiated  a  settlement   with  this individual  totaling  $250,000,  and  the  amount  was  recorded as  a contingent  liability  at  December  31,  2000.  In  2001  the Company defaulted  on the settlement agreement. As a result, during 2001,  the Company recorded the full amount of the alleged damages, less payments made by the  Company  to  the individual. On May 21, 2002, the Company negotiated another settlement  with  this individual totaling $125,000 payable in cash payments and a convertible  debenture.   Subsequent to May  2002, the Company defaulted on this settlement agreement.   As  a result,  in  the current year, the Company recorded the full amount of the  alleged damages,  less  payments  made  by  the  Company  to  the individual,  plus  interest  imputed  at  an  annual  rate  of 8%.  At December 31, 2002, this liability was recorded at $1,238,785.   During the year ended December 31, 2003, this amount was settled in full  for 20,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

-20-

NOTE 8  –  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

In 2001, 1st Miracle Group, Inc. received a legal judgment against the Company   totaling  $100,000.  Management  was  able  to  negotiate  a settlement  on  this  amount, totaling $20,000. At December 31, 2003, the liability is recorded at the settled amount, plus accrued interest imputed at 8% annually totaling $23,328. The balance has been eliminated from the books as of  December 31, 2007.

In 2001, AMG Consulting  brought  legal  action  against  the Company, seeking  damages of $21,012. During 2003, this amount was settled  in full for $6,000 in cash.

In 2002, a  former  employee  received  a  legal  judgment against the Company  totaling  $20,110.  At December 31, 2003, this  liability  is recorded at the settled  amount  plus  accrued  interest imputed at 8%

annually for a total liability of $23,021. This amount was adjusted for another judgment which was then being recorded  as accounts payable of  December 31, 2004.  During 2007, there was a partial payment of the settlement of the combined balance and $39,372 is still recorded as a judgment payable at December 31, 2009.

NOTE 9 -INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT VALUATION

On  September  15,  1998,  the  Company filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission to become a Business  Development  Corporation (BDC)  as defined  under  the  Investment Act of 1940 in order to invest in real estate and eligible portfolio  companies. This resulted in the Company becoming a specialized type of Investment Company. Due to the administrative burdens the Company rescinded its Business Development license during 2005 and for comparative purposes all information presented here including the year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is presented as an Investment company and not a BDC. adopted in 2008 FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ” (ASC 820) for valuation purposes. Previously, as required by ASR 118, the investment committee  of  the  company is required  to  assign a fair value to all investments.  To comply  with Section 2(a)(41) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 2a-4 under the Investment Company Act, it is incumbent upon the board of directors to satisfy themselves  that all appropriate factors relevant to the value of investments for which  market  quotations  are not readily available have been considered and to determine the method  of  arriving  at the fair value of each such security.  To the extent considered necessary, when determining fair value, the Company will consider whether factors exist that indicate a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability by comparing those levels to normal levels of market activity. Those factors may include, but are not limited to whether:

• There are few recent transactions.

• Price quotations are not based on current information.

• Price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets).

• Indexes that previously were highly correlated with the fair values of the asset or liability are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent indications of fair value for that asset or liability.

• There is a significant increase in implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or performance indicators (such as delinquency rates or loss

severities) for observed transactions or quoted prices when compared with the reporting fund’s estimate of expected cash flows, considering all available market data about credit and other nonperformance risk for the asset or liability.

• There is a wide bid-ask spread or significant increase in the bid-ask spread.

• There is a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuances (that is, a primary market) for the asset or liability or similar assets or liabilities.

• Little information is released publicly (for example, a principal to- principal market).

Significant judgment may be required from time to time to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability based on the weight of the evidence. When the market has become less active or is no longer active, there is an increased likelihood of distressed or forced transactions underlying market transactions. Therefore, quoted prices become less reliable indicators of fair value. In circumstances where there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or a

-21-

NOTE 9 -INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT VALUATION (Continued)

liability in relation to normal market activity, additional steps should be taken by the Company to determine whether other valuation techniques and inputs are needed to meet the objective of a fair value measurement. However, in many cases, our availability of relevant observable inputs to determine the fair value of a liability may be limited or unavailable. In such cases the Company will employ any valuation method which provides a suitable market value as determined by the Company which may include;

a.  Cost  -  The  cost  method  is  based  on the original cost to the Company,  adjusted for amortization of original  issue  discounts  and accrued  interest   for   certain   capitalized  expenditures  of  the corporation. Such method is to be applied in the early stages of an investee's development until significant positive or  adverse  events subsequent to  the date of the original investment require a change to another method.

b. Private market  - The private market method uses actual or proposed third party transactions  in  the investee's securities as a basis for valuation,  utilizing  actual  firm   offers  as  well  as  historical transactions, provided that any offer used is seriously considered and well documented by the investee.

b.  Appraisal  -  The  appraisal method is used to value an investment position after analysis  of  the  best  available  outside information where  there is no established public or private market  method  which have restrictions  as  to  their  resale as denoted in the schedule of investments are also considered to be restricted securities.

The Company feels all current investments that are not liquid are currently represented at values that are not materially different from fair market value.

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In August 2011 the company issued two forms 8K for events pertaining to the fiscal years included in these financial statements. They are referenced in this report. In addition the company is continuing to bring current all of its filing requirements required by SEC regulations and to reestablish its quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board. Currently all form 10K’s have since been filed through December 31, 2010.

-22-

NOTE 11 – FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following schedule presents financial highlights for a share of
the Fund outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
	9/30/2006			6/30/2006			3/31/2006
Net Income(Loss)	$	(20,229	)	$	(11,678	)	$	(5,568	)
Net Investment Value End of Period	$	(1,769,063	)	$	(1,760,512	)	$	(1,754,402	)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  basic:		140,473,605			140,473,605			140,473,605
Beginning of period Net Asset Value		(0.013	)		(0.013	)		(0.013	)
Income from Net Investment operations Income(Loss)
		(0.000	)		0.000			0.000
Net Losses Securities                        (realized & unrealized)		-			-			-
Total from investment operations		(0.000	)		0.000			0.000
Other Increases(Decreases)		(0.000	)		(0.000	)		(0.000	)
End of period Net Asset Value		(0.013	)		(0.013	)		(0.013	)

-23-

PART I

ITEM  2.    DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

Broadleaf  Capital  Partners,  Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation   (the   Company), incorporated  February  1984,  has  continued  with its restructuring and plans expansion  through  the ongoing development of its  available  operations,  and other business opportunities.  The Company is a publicly traded diversified investment   holding   company that currently maintains its interest in its sole investment, Canyon Shadows Apartments and continues to operate looking for new potential investments.

 BUSINESS STRATEGY

The Company continually seeks and evaluates investment opportunities that have the potential of earning reasonable returns. The Company has in the past, and may  again  in the future,  raise  capital  specifically  for  the  purpose  of permitting it  to  make  an investment that the company believes is attractive. Management has committed resources for the update of all financial reporting with the SEC. The services of Corporate Strategy Consultants have been retained as well, to aid the Board in development and implementation of growth prospects The Company's current investment focus is centered on real estate and finance and it has substantial net operating losses to possibly reduce the net tax effects of these potential investments. This is all with the aim of conservative growth during slow economic times - through slightly-levered transactions built on a strong equity base — to significantly improve sales and operating profits.

The Company continues to look to create shareholder value through joint-ventures with for one or more members of the Private Equity or Venture Capital Communities or a Merchant Bank. in the creation of liquid exit strategies for one or more of their portfolio interests. Identifying  and  developing  each  new business opportunity  may  require  the Company  to  dedicate  certain  amounts  of   financial  resources,  management attention, and personnel, with no assurance that  these  expenditures  will  be recouped.  Similarly,  the  selection  of  companies  and  the determination of whether  a company offers a viable business plan, an acceptable  likelihood  of success, and future profitability involves inherent risk and uncertainty.

INVESTMENT HISTORY

Canyon Shadows Apartments

The Company acquired a 120-unit apartment complex in April 1995 for $875,000. The Company received  a $975,000 loan that converted to a grant from the City of Riverside for the purpose  of  acquisition and rehabilitation and, in 1996, the Company was awarded $2,200,000 in  Federal  Tax  Credits  for  the  project. In December 1996, the project was sold to a tax credit partnership in which the Company retained a $905,000 capital account, as well as a 1% interest as a general partner for which it is entitled to receive a management fee and 75.9% of the project cash flow. During 2005 during a refinancing of the project the Company received distributions used to reduce debts and changed its interest from developer general partner to limited partner reducing both income and liability exposure.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

      CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following is a discussion of certain factors affecting Registrant's results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the Registrant's consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included herein under Item 7 below.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE    PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995.

The statements contained in the section captioned  Management's  Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations which are  historical are   "forward-looking  statements"  within  the meaning of Section 27A of  the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section  21E of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934,  as  amended.   These forward-looking statements represent the Registrant's present expectations or beliefs concerning future events. The Registrant  cautions  that  such  forward-looking statements involve known  and unknown risks, uncertainties and other  factors  which  may  cause  the  actual results,  performance  or  achievements  of  the  Registrant  to  be materially different  from  any  future results, performance or achievements expressed  or implied by such forward-looking  statements.  Such factors include, among other things,  the  uncertainty  as to the  Registrant's  future  profitability;  the uncertainty as to the demand  for Registrant's services; increasing competition in the markets that Registrant  conducts  business; the Registrant's ability to hire, train and retain sufficient qualified personnel; the Registrant's ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms to finance its growth strategy; and the Registrant's ability to develop and implement operational and financial systems to manage its growth.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-Q.

-24-

Results of Operations

The Company intends to operate its business primarily through its parent company, as described above, as well as entities that may be formed or acquired in the future.

							For the Three Months Ended
				9/30/2006			9/30/2005			6/30/2006			6/30/2005			3/31/2006			3/31/2005
		Revenues		$	1,899		$	633		$	1,899		$	87,110		$	1,899		$	46,968
1	)	Officer Wages			0			19,640			0			66,337			0			62,253
		Wages			0			0			0			0			0			0
		Rent			0			5,370			0			8,700			0			8,700
2	)	Professional Fees			0			633			0			1,676			0			33,653
3	)	Administrative			1,003			2,639			1,545			4,349			3,986			4,434
		Depreciation			0			0			0			0			0			0
																	0
4	)	Gain on forgiveness of debt			0			0			0			0			0			0
		Discontinued Operations			0			0			0			0			0			0
		Other Income(Expense)			0			0			0			0			0			0
		Interest expense			(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)		(6,464	)
5	)	Loss on investment			0			0			0			0			0			0
			NET INCOME	$	(5,568	)	$	(34,113	)	$	(6,110	)	$	(416	)	$	(8,551	)	$	(68,536	)
1	)	Salaries, Wages & Personnel Costs are for the principal executive officers as noted above.
2	)	Professional Fees include bookkeeping, accounting, auditing and legal fees incurred in conjunction with
		the Company’s public filings processes as well for occasional external help with day-to-day operations,
		as the Company has not hired its permanent accounting or legal staff.
3	)	All Other expenses include travel, entertainment, supplies, postage and other General &
		Administrative expenses incurred in the day to day operations of the Company.
4	)	Reversal of accounts and notes payable recorded as income by Company
5	)	Realized losses on investments
				For the Nine Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
				9/30/2006			9/30/2005			6/30/2006			6/30/2005
		Revenues		$	5,697		$	134,711		$	3,798		$	134,078
1	)	Officer Wages			0			148,230			0			128,590
		Wages			0			0			0			0
		Rent			0			22,770			0			17,400
2	)	Professional Fees			0			35,962			0			35,329
3	)	Administrative			6,534			11,422			2,548			8,783
		Depreciation			0			0			0			0
4	)	Gain on forgiveness of debt			0			0			0			0
		Discontinued Operations			0			0			0			0
		Other Income			0			0			0			0
		Interest expense			(19,392	)		(19,392	)		(12,928	)		(12,928	)
6	)	Loss on investment			0			0			0			0
			NET INCOME	$	(20,229	)	$	(103,065	)	$	(11,678	)	$	(68,952	)

-25-

 Results of Operations 2006-2005

Analysis of the calendar quarters ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, June 30, 2006 and 2005, and March 31, 2006 and 2005.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005;

           For  the  nine months ended September 30, 2006,  revenues  were  approximately $5,697 compared  to  $134,711  for  the nine months ended September 30, 2005, resulting in an increase of $134,711.  This reflected the Company’s management decreased role from general to limited partner and the resulting decreased distributions from its investment asset.

G&A expense decreased to $6,534 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from $218,384 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $211,850. The decrease in G&A was due to a reduction in Company activity down to basic core administrative cost after the 2005 fiscal year.

Other expenses remained the same at $19,392 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from $19,392 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, resulting from a consistent level of debt over the periods provided with the previous periods.

Net Losses decreased to $20,229 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from $103,065 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $82,836. The decrease reflected the overall cut back in Company expenses and interest expense due to debt restructuring as detailed by category above throughout the entire fiscal year.

For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005;

           For  the  six months ended June 30, 2006,  revenues  were  approximately $3,798 compared  to  $134,078  for  the six months ended June 30, 2004, resulting in a decrease of $130,280.  This reflected the Company’s management decreased role from general to limited partner and the resulting decreased distributions from its investment asset.

G&A expense decreased to $2,548 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $190,102 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $59,362. The decrease in G&A was due to a reduction in Company activity down to basic core administrative cost after the 2005 fiscal year.

Other expenses remained the same at $19,392 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $19,392 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, resulting from a consistent level of debt over the periods provided with the previous periods.

Net Losses decreased to $11,678 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $68,952 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $140,889. The decrease reflected the overall cut back in Company expenses and interest expense due to debt restructuring as detailed by category above throughout the entire fiscal year.

For the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005;

           For  the  calendar quarter ended September 30, 2006,  revenues  were  approximately $1,899 compared  to  $633  for  the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2005, resulting in an increase of $1,266.  This was the result of the Company’s management distributions from its investment asset.

G&A expense decreased to $3,986 for the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2006 from $28,282 for the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $24,296. The decrease in G&A was due to professional and administrative, and  wage and cost reductions as the Company downsized operations during 2005 to its core operations.

Other expenses remained the same at $6,464 for the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2006 from $6,464 for the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2005, resulting from a consistent level of debt over the periods provided with the previous periods.

-26-

Net Losses decreased to $8,551 for the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2006 from $34,113 for the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $25,562. The decrease reflected the overall cut back in Company expenses and interest expense due to debt restructuring as detailed by category above throughout the entire fiscal year.

For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005;

           For  the  calendar quarter ended June 30, 2006,  revenues  were  approximately $1,899 compared  to  $87,110  for  the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2005, resulting in a decrease of $85,211.  This reflected the Company’s management decreased role from general to limited partner and the resulting decreased distributions from its investment asset.

G&A expense decreased to $1,545 for the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $81,062 for the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $79,517. The decrease in G&A was due to professional and administrative wage and cost reductions as the Company downsized operations during 2005.

Other expenses remained the same at $6,464 for the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $6,464 for the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2005, resulting from a consistent level of debt over the periods provided with the previous periods.

Net Losses increased to $6,110 for the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $416 for the calendar quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $5,694. This was basically the result of our prior period in 2005 having management income to offset expenses of that quarter and our results in 2006 were essentially flat with accrued interest resulting in most of the net loss for the 2006 period.

For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005;

           For  the  calendar quarter ended March 31, 2006,  revenues  were  approximately $1,899 compared  to  $46,968  for  the calendar quarter ended March 31, 2005, resulting in a decrease of $46,968.  This reflected the Company’s management decreased role from general to limited partner and the resulting decreased distributions from its investment asset.

G&A expense decreased to $1,003 for the calendar quarter ended March 31, 2006 from $109,040 for the calendar quarter ended March 31, 2005, a decrease of $108,037. The decrease in G&A was due to professional and administrative wages and cost reductions as the Company downsized operations during 2005.

Other expenses remained the same at $6,464 for the calendar quarter ended March 31, 2006 from $6,464 for the calendar quarter ended March 31, 2005, resulting from a consistent level of debt over the periods provided with the previous periods.

Net Losses decreased to $5,568 for the calendar quarter ended March 31, 2006 from $68,536 for the calendar quarter ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $63,168. The decrease reflected the overall cut back in Company expenses and interest expense due to debt restructuring as detailed by category above throughout the entire fiscal year but without enough management income during the 2005 period to cover the operating expenses of the quarter.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On September 30, 2006 we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $763, on June 30, 2006 we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $2,850, and on March 31, 2006 we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $2,496. At these times, those balances were not sufficient to fund our operations.

During this period the cash used for operations was raised through the sale of common stock and debt conversions. This was done at a pace to match our cash outflows for the period. The company also used distributions from its main investment asset to restructure debt as the balance was continually restructured during the 2004 through 2010 time period. The subsequent operations of the Company today is now at a level that can be funded from its investment distributions.

We anticipate seeking additional opportunities through potential acquisitions or investments. Such acquisitions or investments may consume cash reserves or require additional cash or equity. Our working capital and additional funding requirements will depend upon numerous factors to be determined on a case by case basis as these opportunities arise.

-27-

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements. In preparing our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that, among other things, affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. These estimates are most significant in connection with our critical accounting policies, namely those of our accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. These judgments often result from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that the following represents our critical accounting policies:

· Going concern. Our recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and as a result, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in their report on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 with respect to this uncertainty. We have prepared our financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our carrying values of cash, marketable securities, accounts payable, accrued expenses and debt are a reasonable approximation of their fair value. The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined by us using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. We have not entered into and do not expect to enter into, financial instruments for trading or hedging purposes. We do not currently anticipate entering into interest rate swaps and/or similar instruments.

Our primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is to changes in interest rates, which would impact interest income earned on such instruments. We have no material currency exchange or interest rate risk exposure as of March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, and September 30, 2006. Therefore, there will be no ongoing exposure to a potential material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation for sensitivity to changes in interest rates or to changes in currency exchange rates.

ITEM 4  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, consisting of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006. Based upon this evaluation, the Interim President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, are timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported as required by the Exchange Act.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rue 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act).  Internal control over financial reporting is a process, including policies and procedures, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  Based on the results of this assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2006 based on such criteria.

-28-

Management did not use a formal framework to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or the Company’s internal control over financial reporting since, in the view of management, comparison with a formal framework was unwarranted because of (1) the small size of the Company’s current operations and (2) the Company’s executive management structure (consisting of only the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer) which enables management to be aware of all transactions.  The Company has limited resources and as a result, a material weakness in financial reporting currently exists, because of our limited resources and personnel, including those described below.

●The Company lacks personnel with the experience to properly analyze and record complex transactions in accordance with GAAP.

● The Company has in insufficient quantity of dedicated resources and experienced personnel involved in reviewing and designing internal controls.  As a result, a material misstatement of the interim and annual financial statements could occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

● The Company has not achieved the optimal level of segregation of duties relative to key financial reporting functions.

● The Company does not have an audit committee or an independent audit committee financial expert.  While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee or independent audit committee financial expert, it is the management’s view that to have an audit committee, comprised of independent board members, and an independent audit committee financial expert is an important entity-level control over the Company’s financial statements.

● The Company has not achieved an optimal segregation of duties for executive officers of the Company.

A material weakness is a deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) auditing standard 5) or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Management has determined that a material weakness exists due to the items stated above, resulting from the Company’s limited resources and personnel.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as described above, there has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation made by management required by paragraph (d) of Section 240.13a-15 or Section 240.15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

-29-

                                    PART II

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company currently has no open or pending legal proceedings. In addition management is unaware of any pending situations that could eventually lead to legal proceedings. All prior legal proceedings have been settled  and the Company currently still has two liabilities  outstanding with the total amounts due recorded as liabilities in the included financial statements.

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

An investment in our Common Stock is highly speculative, involves a high degree of risk and should be considered only by those persons who are able to afford a loss of their entire investment. In evaluating our business, prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS DURING SLOW ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

Our business environment including potential real estate projects are running at an extremely slow economic pace and may continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Our prospects must be considered within that framework and in light of the risks, expenses, delays, problems and difficulties frequently encountered in the re-establishment of a business. As such, we face risks and uncertainties relating to our ability to successfully implement our business plan.

WE HAVE AN ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND MAY CONTINUE TO HAVE LOSSES IN THE FUTURE, WHICH COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR OPERATIONS

Since inception, we have generated an accumulated deficit of $15,027,128 as of December 31, 2010. We are increasing development, growth and acquisition activity which will result in increased expenses which could result in additional losses in the next 12 months. These losses could continue until such time, as we are able to generate sufficient revenues to finance our operations and the costs of continuing expansion. As of December 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $41,480.

OUR AUDITORS ISSUED A GOING CONCERN OPINION WHICH MEANS WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ACHIEVE OUR OBJECTIVES AND MAY HAVE TO SUSPEND OR CEASE OPERATIONS.

Our auditors issued a going concern opinion for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business without additional financing and/or generating profits. If we cannot raise additional capital or generate sufficient revenues to operate profitably, we may have to suspend or cease operations. If that occurs, you will

lose your investment.

WE MAY NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS IN THE FUTURE FOR OUR OPERATIONS AND IF WE ARE UNABLE TO SECURE SUCH FINANCING, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUPPORT OPERATIONS.

Future events, including the problems, delays, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by growing companies, may lead to cost and expense increases that could make our revenues insufficient to support our operations and business plans. We may seek additional capital, including an offering of our equity securities, an offering of debt securities or obtaining financing through a bank or other entity. We have not established a limit as to the amount of debt we may incur nor have we adopted a ratio of our equity to a debt allowance. If we need to obtain additional financing, there is no assurance that financing will be available from any source, that it will be available on terms acceptable to us, or that any future offering of securities will be successful.

-30-

W e may seek additional financing which may result in the issuance of additional shares of our common stock and/or rights to acquire additional shares of our common stock. The issuance of our common stock in connection with such financing may result in substantial dilution to the existing holders of our common stock who do not have anti-dilution rights. Those additional issuances of our common stock would result in a reduction of an existing holder's percentage interest in Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc.. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer adverse consequences if we are unable to obtain additional capital when needed.

OUR COMMON STOCK MAY BE AFFECTED BY LIMITED TRADING VOLUME AND MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY.

There has been a limited public market for our common stock, and an active trading market for our common stock may not develop. As a result, this could reduce our shareholders' ability to sell our common stock in short time periods, or possibly at all. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations which could reduce the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially.

OUR COMMON STOCK IS DEEMED A "PENNY STOCK," WHICH MAY MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR INVESTORS TO RESELL THEIR SHARES DUE TO SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS.

The Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. The market price of our common stock on the Bulletin Board has been substantially less than $5.00 per share and therefore we are currently considered a “penny stock” according to SEC rules. This designation requires any broker-dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules limit the ability of broker-dealers to solicit purchases of our common stock and therefore reduce the liquidity of the public market for our shares.

NEVADA LAW AND OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION MAY PROTECT OUR DIRECTORS FROM CERTAIN TYPES OF LAWSUITS WHICH COULD RESULT IN LIABILITY FOR INFE AND NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR LIQUIDITY OR OPERATIONS.

Nevada law provides that our officers and directors will not be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for all but certain types of conduct as officers and directors. Our Bylaws permit us broad indemnification powers to all persons against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law. These exculpation provisions may have the effect of preventing stockholders from recovering damages against our officers and directors caused by their negligence, poor judgment or other circumstances. The indemnification provisions may require us to use our limited assets to defend our officers and directors against claims, including claims arising out of their negligence, poor judgment, or other circumstances.

SINCE WE HAVE NOT PAID ANY DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON STOCK AND DO NOT INTEND TO DO SO IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE, A PURCHASER OF OUR COMMON STOCK WILL ONLY REALIZE AN ECONOMIC GAIN ON HIS OR HER INVESTMENT FROM AN APPRECIATION, IF ANY, IN THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

We have never paid, and have no intentions in the foreseeable future to pay, any cash dividends on our common stock. Therefore an investor in our common stock, in all likelihood, will only realize a profit on his investment if the market price of our common stock increases in value.

IF WE FAIL TO MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROLS, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ACCURATELY REPORT OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS. AS A RESULT, CURRENT AND POTENTIAL STOCKHOLDERS COULD LOSE CONFIDENCE IN OUR FINANCIAL REPORTING, WHICH COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS AND THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

We are subject to reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The Securities and Exchange Commission as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring every public company to include a management report on such company’s internal controls over financial reporting in its annual report, which contains management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, an independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting. These requirements may first apply to our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002. Our management may conclude that our internal controls over our financial reporting are not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may still decline to attest to our management’s assessment or may issue a report that is qualified if they are not satisfied with our controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us.

-31-

Our reporting obligations as a public company will place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. If we fail to timely achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting at a reasonable assurance level. Moreover, effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent fraud. As a result, our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the trading price of our common stock. Furthermore, we anticipate that we will incur considerable costs and use significant management time and other resources in an effort to comply with Section 404 and other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As of the date of this prospectus we do not have an estimate of the costs to the company of compliance with the Act.

We are preparing for compliance with Section 404 by strengthening, assessing and testing our system of internal controls to provide the basis for our report. The process of strengthening our internal controls and complying with Section 404 is expensive and time consuming, and requires significant management attention. We cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that we will maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Furthermore, as we rapidly grow our business, our internal controls will become more complex and will require significantly more resources to ensure our internal controls overall remain effective. Failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we or our auditors discover a material weakness, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market's confidence in our financial statements and harm our stock price.

INVESTORS IN OUR SECURITIES MAY SUFFER DILUTION.

The issuance of shares of our common stock, or shares of our common stock underlying warrants, options or preferred stock will dilute the equity interest of existing stockholders who do not have anti-dilution rights and could have a significant adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. The sale of our common stock acquired at a discount could have a negative impact on the market price of our common stock and could increase the volatility in the market price of our common stock. We may seek additional financing which may result in the issuance of additional shares of our common stock and/or rights to acquire additional shares of our common stock. The issuance of our common stock in connection with such financing may result in substantial dilution to the existing holders of our common stock who do not have anti-dilution rights. Those additional issuances of our common stock would result in a reduction of an existing holder's percentage interest in Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc.. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer adverse consequences if we are unable to obtain additional capital when needed.

ITEM 2.  RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

There were no  unregistered securities sold by the Company from January 1, 2006 through December 31 2006 including  the  date  sold,  the  title  of  the securities, the amount  sold,  the  identity  of  the  person who purchased the securities, the price or other consideration paid for the  securities,  and the section  of  the  Securities  Act  of 1933 under which the sale was exempt from registration as well as the factual basis for claiming such exemption.

-32-

ITEM  6.   EXHIBITS, REPORTS ON FORM  8-K AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

      (a)   Exhibits

Exhibits required to be attached by Item 601 of Regulation S-B are listed in the Index to Exhibits and are incorporated herein by this reference.

      (b)   Reports on Form 8-K.

The following reports on Form 8-K were filed during the period covered by this

Form 10-KSB:

            July 22, 2011 Item 4. Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant

                                   Item 8. Other Items

                                   Item 9. Financial Statements and Exhibits

            August 4, 2011 Item 5. Terminations of Registrant's Directors

EXHIBIT

NO.               DESCRIPTION

                  ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS

3(i)        *     Articles of Incorporation as amended

3(vi)       *     Bylaws

                  CERTIFICATIONS

31.1              Rule 13a-14(a) Sarbanes-Oxley Sec. 302 certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

32.1             Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

*     Incorporated herein by reference from filings previously made by the

      Company

-33-

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused

this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly

authorized, this 15 day of September  2011.

                                           Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc.

                                           /s/  J. Michael King

                                          ----------------------------

                                          Interim President/CFO

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the

following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the

dates indicated.

Signature                           Title                    Date

/s/ J. Michael King          Interim President/ CFO,  September 15, 2011

---------------------

   J. Michael King

/s/Donna Steward              Director                      September 15, 2011

-----------------

   Donna Steward

/s/ Charles Snipes            Director                       September 15, 2011

-------------------

    Charles Snipes

/s/ Robert McCoy            Director                       September 15, 2011

-------------------

    Robert McCoy

-34-