XML 19 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Business Description and Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Business Description and Significant Accounting Policies
Business Description and Significant Accounting Policies

Business Description
    
Glowpoint, Inc. (“Glowpoint” or “we” or “us” or the “Company”) is a managed service provider of video collaboration and network applications. Our services are designed to provide a comprehensive suite of automated and concierge applications to simplify the user experience and expedite the adoption of video as the primary means of collaboration. Our customers include Fortune 1000 companies, along with small and medium enterprises in a variety of industries. We market our services globally through a multi-channel sales approach that includes direct sales and channel partners. The Company was formed as a Delaware corporation in May 2000. The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
On October 24, 2018, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent with SharedLabs, Inc. (“SharedLabs”), a privately held global software and technology services company located in Jacksonville, Florida, with respect to the proposed acquisition by us of 100% of the issued and outstanding equity securities of SharedLabs in exchange for shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”). On December 20, 2018, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Glowpoint Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Glowpoint (the “Merger Sub”), and SharedLabs. The Merger Agreement provides that, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, (i) Glowpoint will effect a reverse stock split of its shares of Common Stock, at a ratio to be approved by Glowpoint’s stockholders and board of directors, and which ratio, as set forth in the Merger Agreement, will not be greater than 1-for-30 without SharedLabs’ approval; (ii) the Merger Sub will merge with and into SharedLabs (the “Merger”), with SharedLabs surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Glowpoint; and (iii) in connection therewith, each share of capital stock of SharedLabs issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement) of the Merger (other than Excluded Shares (as defined in the Merger Agreement)) will be converted into the right to receive shares of Glowpoint’s Common Stock (the “Merger Consideration”).
The completion of the Merger is subject to satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, including obtaining shareholder approval. As of the date of this Report, we believe that SharedLabs is working to prepare its 2018 year-end financial statements, and working with is independent auditors to complete the audit thereof, for inclusion in the Form S-4. When SharedLabs’ 2018 audited financial statements are available, we and SharedLabs will work to prepare the Form S-4 for filing with the SEC. However, there can be no assurances regarding SharedLabs’ ability to prepare such financial statements and finalize an audit. As a result, there can be no assurance that the parties will be able to file the Form S-4, including SharedLabs’ audited financial statements, on a timely basis. In addition, there can be no assurance that the business combination will be completed on the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement or at all. In the event that the business combination is consummated, there can be no assurance that it will ultimately prove to be beneficial to our stockholders. If the Merger transaction is not completed for any reason, our business and operations, as well as the market price of our stock, may be adversely affected.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Glowpoint and our 100%-owned subsidiary, GP Communications, LLC, whose business function is to provide interstate telecommunications services for regulatory purposes. All material inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from the estimates made. We continually evaluate estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for reasonableness. Appropriate adjustments, if any, to the estimates used are made prospectively based upon such periodic evaluation. The significant areas of estimation include determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred tax valuation allowance, accrued sales taxes and regulatory fees, stock-based compensation, the valuation of goodwill, the valuation of intangible assets and their estimated lives, and the estimated lives and recoverability of property and equipment.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers. We record an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts that are believed to be uncollectible. We also record additional allowances based on our aged receivables, which are determined based on historical experience and an assessment of the general financial conditions affecting our customer base. If our actual collections experience changes, revisions to our allowance may be required. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. We do not obtain collateral from our customers to secure accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $8,000 and $3,000 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company considers its cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and former debt obligations to meet the definition of financial instruments. The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their fair value due to the short maturities of these instruments. The carrying amounts of our former debt obligations (see Note 8) approximate their fair values, which are based on borrowing rates that are available to the Company for loans with similar terms, collateral, and maturity.

The Company measures fair value as required by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC Topic 820”).  ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, there exists a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 - unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.
Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability only used when there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.  The fair value of the Super G warrant liability as of December 31, 2017 (see Note 7 and Note 8) was considered to be Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and was estimated using an option pricing model.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2014-09 (Topic 606) “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition” (Topic 605), and requires entities to recognize revenue when control of promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The Company recognizes revenue using the five-step model as prescribed by Topic 606:
Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer;
Identification of the performance obligations in the contract;
Determination of the transaction price;
Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
Recognition of revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation.
Our managed videoconferencing services are offered to our customers on either a usage basis or on a monthly subscription. Our network services are offered to our customers on a monthly subscription basis. Revenue for these services is generally recognized on a monthly basis as services are performed. Revenue related to professional services is recognized at the time the services are performed. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605. We did not record an adjustment to opening accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018 as the cumulative impact of adopting Topic 606 was not material. The costs associated with obtaining a customer contract were previously expensed in the period they were incurred. Under Topic 606, these payments are deferred on our consolidated balance sheet and amortized over the expected life of the customer contract. The impact to sales and marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 was not material as a result of applying Topic 606. Deferred revenue as of December 31, 2018 totaled $43,000 as certain performance obligations were not satisfied as of this date. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $350,000 of revenue that was included in deferred revenue as of December 31, 2017. The Company disaggregates its revenue by geographic region. See Note 15 for more information.
Taxes Billed to Customers and Remitted to Taxing Authorities

We recognize taxes billed to customers in revenue and taxes remitted to taxing authorities in our cost of revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we included taxes of $440,000 and $546,000, respectively, in revenue and we included taxes of $447,000 and $542,000, respectively, in cost of revenue.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets

The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets used in operations, primarily fixed assets and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets might not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of fixed assets, the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are compared to the carrying amounts of those assets. If and when the carrying values of the assets exceed their fair values, then the related assets will be written down to fair value. Fair value of our intangible assets is determined using the relief from royalty methodology. This approach involves two steps: (a) estimating reasonable royalty rates for each intangible asset and (b) applying these royalty rates to a net revenue stream and discounting the resulting cash flows to determine fair value. This fair value is then compared with the carrying value of each intangible asset. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset is greater than its implied fair value, an impairment in the amount of the excess is recognized and charged to operations. It was determined at both December 31, 2018 and 2017 that the fair value of the Company’s fixed assets exceeded their carrying amounts, and, therefore, no related impairments were required.

The determination of related estimated useful lives and whether or not these assets are impaired involves significant judgments, related primarily to the future profitability and/or future value of the assets. Changes in the Company’s strategic plan and/or other-than-temporary changes in market conditions could significantly impact these judgments and could require adjustments to recorded asset balances. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment at least annually, as well as whenever an event or change in circumstances has occurred that could have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of long-lived assets (see Notes 5 and 6).

Capitalized Software Costs

The Company capitalizes certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal-use software. All software development costs have been appropriately accounted for as required by ASC Topic 350-40 “Intangible – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software”. Capitalized software costs are included in “Property and equipment” on our consolidated balance sheets and are amortized over three to four years. Software costs that do not meet capitalization criteria are expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we capitalized internal-use software costs of $265,000 and we amortized $372,000 of these costs. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we capitalized internal-use software costs of $126,000 and we amortized $625,000 of these costs. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we recorded impairment losses of $138,000 and $232,000, respectively, for certain discrete projects that were abandoned. These charges are recognized as “Impairment Charges” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs relate to fees and expenses incurred in connection with entering into our debt agreements (see Note 8) and are amortized as interest expense over the contractual lives of the related credit facilities. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, unamortized deferred financing costs of $0 and $138,000, respectively, are included as a direct reduction of the carrying amount of our debt.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, and trade accounts receivable. We place our cash primarily in commercial checking accounts. Commercial bank balances may from time to time exceed federal insurance limits.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of either the asset’s useful life or the related lease term. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes.

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method to determine our income tax expense or benefit. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Any resulting net deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability and, accordingly, a valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based awards have been accounted for as required by ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC Topic 718”). Under ASC Topic 718 stock-based awards are valued at fair value on the date of grant, and that fair value is recognized over the requisite service period.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses include internal and external costs related to developing new service offerings and features and enhancements to our existing services.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” as amended. The guidance introduces a lessee model that results in most leases impacting the balance sheet. The ASU addresses other concerns related to the current leases model.  Under Topic 842, lessees will be required to recognize for all leases with terms longer than 12 months, at the commencement date of the lease, a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease measured on a discounted basis, and a right-to-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use or control the use of a specified asset for the lease term.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition.  The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Our operating lease for our office space in California, as disclosed in Note 13, will be recognized as a right-of-use asset and operating lease liability on our balance sheet upon adoption on January 1, 2019, which will increase our total assets and liabilities by approximately $100,000, respectively.

In June 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326).” The amendments introduce an impairment model that is based on expected credit losses, rather than incurred losses, to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments (e.g., loans and held-to-maturity securities), including certain off-balance sheet financial instruments (e.g., loan commitments). The expected credit losses should consider historical information, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including estimates of prepayments, over the contractual term. Financial instruments with similar risk characteristics may be grouped together when estimating expected credit losses. In addition, the amendments provide for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since their origination. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We believe the effect of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures will not be material.

In June 2018 the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” The guidance simplifies the accounting for share-based payments to nonemployees by aligning it with the accounting for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions. The new guidance expands the scope to include share-based payments granted to nonemployees in exchange for goods or services used or consumed in an entity’s own operations and supersedes the guidance in ASC 505-50. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and should apply to all new awards granted after the date of adoption. We believe the effect of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures will not be material.