Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Jun. 29, 2013

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The FASB established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

The Company's Level 1 assets consist of money market funds.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

The Company's Level 2 assets and liabilities consist of certificates of deposit, government agency securities and foreign currency forward contracts.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company's Level 3 liabilities consist of contingent consideration related to certain acquisitions. For details on inputs used in measuring fair value, please refer to Note 9: "Acquisitions" of these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:



	As of June 29, 2013								As of June 30, 2012
	Fair Value								Fair Value
	Measurements Using						Total		Measurements Using						Total
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Balance		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Balance
	(in thousands)
Assets
Money market funds (1)	$	402,513	$	—	$	—	$	402,513	$	602,462	$	—	$	—	$	602,462
Certificates of deposit (1)	—		77		—		77		—		6,182		—		6,182
Government agency securities (2)	—		25,060		—		25,060		—		75,326		—		75,326
Foreign currency forward contracts (3)	—		187		—		187		—		642		—		642
Total Assets	$	402,513	$	25,324	$	—	$	427,837	$	602,462	$	82,150	$	—	$	684,612

Liabilities
Foreign currency forward contracts (4)	$	—	$	1,419	$	—	$	1,419	$	—	$	507	$	—	$	507
Contingent Consideration (4)	—		—		8,577		8,577		—		—		17,737		17,737
Total Liabilities	$	—	$	1,419	$	8,577	$	9,996	$	—	$	507	$	17,737	$	18,244

(1) Included in Cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2) Included in Short-term investments in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(3) Included in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(4) Included in Accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The tables below present reconciliations for liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended June 29, 2013 and for the year ended June 30, 2012:



Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

	June 29, 2013			June 30, 2012
Contingent consideration	(in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	17,737		$	8,800
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized):
Included in earnings	4,621			1,670
Additions	—			11,354
Payments	(13,781		)	(4,087		)
Ending balance	$	8,577		$	17,737

Changes in unrealized losses or (gains) included in earnings related to liabilities still held as of period end	$	4,621		$	1,670

The valuation of contingent consideration is based on a probability weighted earnout model which relies primarily on estimates of milestone achievements and discount rates applicable for the period expected payout. The most significant unobservable input used in the determination of estimated fair value of contingent consideration is the estimates on the likelihood of milestone achievements, which directly correlates to the fair value recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of this liability is estimated quarterly by management based on inputs received from the Company's engineering and finance personnel. The determination of the milestone achievement is performed by the Company's business units and reviewed by the accounting department. Potential valuation adjustments are made as the progress toward achieving milestones becomes determinable, with the impact of such adjustments being recorded through Other operating expenses (income), net.

During the years ended June 29, 2013 and June 30, 2012, there were no transfers between different levels in the fair value hierarchy.

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were as follows:

As of June 29, 2013, none of the Company's assets and liabilities were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

As of June 30, 2012, long-lived assets comprised of buildings held for sale were written down to their fair value, less cost to sell, of $19.7 million, resulting in an impairment loss of $22.4 million which was included in earnings for the period. The impairment charge was measured using Level 3 inputs. The Company reached its conclusion regarding the asset impairment after conducting an evaluation of assets fair values. The fair value of the land and buildings was determined mainly after consideration of evidence such as appraisals and offers received. Please refer to Note 10: "Impairment of long-lived assets" of these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References+ Details