20-F

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

o REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

o SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to ________

Commission File No. 0 13012

I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter and translation of Registrant's name into English)

ISRAEL
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

33 Jabotinsky Street, Ramat Gan, Israel
(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

None

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

Ordinary Shares, NIS 0.003 par value per share

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: As of January 2, 2008, the Registrant had 23,128,768 Ordinary Shares, NIS 0.003 par value per share, outstanding (“Ordinary Shares”).

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

o   Yes      x   No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

o   Yes      x   No

Note-Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x   Yes     o   No

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x

        Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements including in this filing:

U.S. GAAP     x International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board o Other      o

        If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

o   Item 17     x   Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o   Yes     x   No

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

o   Yes     x   No

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 3. KEY INFORMATION	3
Item 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	13
Item 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	25
Item 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	34
Item 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	46
Item 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	49
Item 9. THE OFFER AND THE LISTING	50
Item 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	51
Item 11. QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	71
Item 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	71
Item 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES	71
Item 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS	71
Item 15T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	71
Item 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT	72
Item 16B. CODE OF ETHICS	72
Item 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	72
Item 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES	73
Item 16E. PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS	73
Item 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	73
Item 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	74
Item 19. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS	74

i

This Annual Report contains historical information and forward-looking statements. Statements looking forward in time are included in this Form 20-F pursuant to the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. They involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited (the “Company”, “us” or “IIS”) in future periods to be materially different from any future performance suggested herein. Further, the Company operates in an industry sector where securities values may be volatile and may be influenced by economic and other factors beyond the Company’s control. In the context of the forward-looking information provided in this Form 20-F and in other reports, please refer to the discussions of risk factors detailed in, as well as the other information contained in, this Annual Report and the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the past 12 months.

ii

PART I

Item 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. Selected Financial Data

        The following selected financial data of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, are derived from the Company’s audited financial statements are also included elsewhere in this Annual Report and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The selected financial data of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 have been derived from audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report and have also been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The following selected financial data for Witech Communications Ltd., an Israeli company (“Witech”) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are derived from Witech’s audited financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Selected Financial Data set forth below should be read in conjunction with and are qualified by reference to Item 5 (Operating and Financial Review and Prospects), and the Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual.

        As a result of the decrease of the Company’s interest in StoreAge Networking Technologies Ltd. (“StoreAge”) to below 50%, after December 2000, the Company and StoreAge ceased reporting their operations on a consolidated basis and the Company’s investment in StoreAge was accounted for instead, in accordance with the hypothetical liquidation method. Investments in affiliates are investments in companies which are not subsidiaries, but are rather investments in companies where the investor holds more than 20% of the outstanding stock and can thereby exercise significant influence over operating and financial policy. As the Company had not guaranteed obligations and was not otherwise committed to provide further financial support for any of the associated companies, the Company discontinued applying the equity method when the investment account was reduced to zero.

Statement of Operations Data (in thousands, except per share data) of IIS:

	Year Ended December 31,
	Audited
	2007			2006		2005			2004			2003
Income from management fee	$	55
General and administrative expenses		607		$	91	$	103		$	200			441
Financial income (expenses) - net		453			17		(3	)		(4	)		(3	)
Capital gain from disposal of investment					4,713
Income (loss) before tax on income		(99	)		4,639		(106	)		(204	)		(444	)
Tax on income		4											330
Equity in losses of associated company													(20	)
Net income (loss)	$	(103	)	$	4,639	$	(106	)	$	(204	)	$	(134	)
Earnings (loss) per share - basic and
diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	0.40	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average number of shares (in
thousands) - basic and diluted		11,577			11,577		11,577			11,577			11,577

3

Balance Sheet Data (in thousands) of IIS:

	At December 31,
	Audited
	2007		2006		2005			2004			2003
Working capital	$	89	$	4,449	$	(191	)	$	(86	)	$	113
Cash and cash equivalents		463		4,705		41			93		$	133
Total assets		5,664		4,713		43			105		$	335
Shareholders' equity (capital deficiency)	$	4,401	$	4,447	$	(192	)	$	(86	)	$	118

Statement of Operations Data (in thousands, except per share data) of Witech :

	Year Ended December 31,
	Audited
	2007			2006			2005
Revenues	$	1,524		$	272		$	25
Cost of revenues		2,681			740			57
Gross loss		(1,157	)		(468	)		(32	)
Research and development costs, net		258			407			200
Selling, general and administrative		2,990			820			208
Operating loss		(4,405	)		(1,695	)		(440	)
Financial expenses- net		(852	)		(316	)		14
Loss before taxes on income		(5,257	)		(2,011	)	$	(454	)
Taxes on income		102			5
Net loss	$	(5,359	)	$	(2,016	)	$	(454	)
Loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(213.7	)	$	(105.4	)	$	(29.4	)
Weighted average number of shares (in
thousands) - basic and diluted		25.1			19.1			15.4

Balance Sheet Data (in thousands) of Witech:

	At December 31,
	Audited
	2007			2006			2005
Working capital	$	(6,611	)	$	(897	)	$	30
Cash and cash equivalents		53			31			20
Total assets		2,487			963			288
Short-term credits and loans from banks and
others		5,862			253			21
Shareholders' equity (capital deficiency)	$	(5,656	)	$	(1,209	)	$	70

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

        Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds.

        Not applicable.

4

D. Risk Factors

        The following risk factors, among others, could in the future affect our actual results of operations and could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by us. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and we assume no obligation to update this information. Before you decide to buy, hold, or sell our Ordinary Shares, you should carefully consider the risks described below, in addition to the other information contained elsewhere in this annual report. The following risk factors are not the only risk factors facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. Our business, financial condition and results of operation could be seriously harmed if any of the events underlying any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs. In that event, the market price for our Ordinary Shares could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

        Substantially all of our assets and those of Witech are encumbered to secure loans. We have agreed to pledge the bank account of CDRide Corp., the subsidiary of Witech through which substantially all of the revenues from amusement parks in the United States are deposited, as security for a short-term loan received by CDRide which is also guaranteed by us and Witech. The loan is due and payable on June 30, 2008 but the lender has indicated its agreement to extend the repayment date to allow us to raise additional financing. Although we are in advanced negotiations with investors to raise financing to repay this loan there can be no assurance that we will succeed in raising the required financing and the inability to repay, refinance or further extend the loan could result in the loss of substantially all of our revenues and elimination of all shareholder value or prospects. In addition, our inability to repay this loan may lead to acceleration of convertible loans received by us in November 2007 and January 2008 (which are not due until November 2010 and January 2011, respectively) which are secured by a floating charge on all our assets.

        Our acquisition of Witech Communications Ltd contains various risks. On January 2, 2008 we acquired all the outstanding shares of Witech, which is engaged in the development, sale, operation and support of wireless video transmission systems for use on roller coasters and thrill rides in amusement parks as well as other moving attractions. The acquisition resulted in the dilution of our existing shareholders as the shareholders of Witech received approximately 50% of our issued and outstanding shares following the transaction. Witech’s business is subject to various risks such as rapid changes in technology, competition, need for substantial working capital, dependence on amusement park seasonality, risks relating to expansion of its business and international operations, risk of lawsuits and liability and dependence on relationships with a relatively small number of companies who own and operate amusement parks worldwide.

        Witech and IIS have a history of substantial recurring operating losses and we depend on Witech’s future success for any future income; there is doubt as to Witech’s ability to continue as a going concern. IIS lost $103,000 during the year ended December 31, 2007. During the year ended December 31, 2006 we had an operating loss of $74,000, but showed a net income of $4,639,000 due to the sale of our holdings in StoreAge. Our operating costs have increased in 2007 due to the termination of our voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007 and these costs have further increased significantly due to the Witech transaction. We currently have no material assets other than a limited amount of cash, the loans granted to Witech and the shares of Witech. Our ability to achieve any future revenues and to generate profits or gains depends entirely on Witech’s revenues and profitability. We cannot assure you that Witech will prove commercially successful, or that our investment in Witech will be profitable.

        Witech’s net sales revenues in the years that ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $25,000, $272,000 and $1,524,000, respectively. However, Witech’s net losses for the years that ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $454,000, $2,016,000 and $5,359,000, respectively. Witech has accumulated net losses for the period from inception (February 1, 2004) through December 31, 2007 of $8,105 thousands. Currently, Witech does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its requirements in the twelve months following January 1, 2008. These factors raise substantial doubt about Witech’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is in the process of evaluating various financing alternatives.

5

        Witech’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should Witech be unable to continue as a going concern. Witech’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability.

        We have very limited cash resources and any additional raising of capital may lead to significant dilution; Witech may have to cease operations if it does not receive additional funding. We anticipate that we will have to raise at least $2,500,000 of additional financing (net of expenses) to meet Witech’s operational requirements until December 31, 2008; however, we intend to raise up to $4,000,000 of additional financing in order to finance and grow Witech’s business. There can be no assurance that this financing will be available at acceptable terms or at all and in any case it will result in the dilution of existing shareholders.

        Since Witech has a limited number of customers, loss of any one customer in the future as they build their customer base could hurt its business. Approximately 67% of revenues of Witech in 2007 were derived from two amusement park chains operating 11 amusement parks. Although Witech generally enters into long-term contracts with most of its customers, loss of one or more of these principal chains or a material decrease in orders could materially and adversely affect its business, financial position and results of operations.

        Our future growth will depend upon market acceptance of Witech and the development of the market for its products. Witech’s success depends on the acceptance of its products and technologies, development of new products and features and the development of the targeted markets. In 2005, Witech launched its on-ride video system, which we believe to be one of the first and leading on-ride technologies. During 2005, 2006 and 2007 Witech invested, and we expect to continue to invest in 2008, in developing Witech’s on-ride video system and in creating and increasing its market acceptance. There is no assurance that the market or demand for on-ride technologies, such as Witech’s on-ride video system, will develop as rapidly as we expect or at all, or even if such market develops, that we will be successful in marketing and selling Witech’s on-ride video system and growing revenues to justify our investments. In particular, we believe that successful positioning of Witech’s on-ride video system is a critical factor in its ability to achieve growth.

        Our results may be adversely affected by competition. The market for our products is fragmented and intensely competitive. Competition in the industry is generally based on product performance, technical support and price. We compete with international providers, many of whom have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. We anticipate continued growth and competition in the on-ride technology market and, consequently, the entrance of new competitors into the market. Our existing and potential competitors, such as Ridercam GmbH and Socrates Digital Video B.V. who compete with our on-ride video system and Yourday and Colorvison who have off-ride video systems who also compete with our on-ride video system, may be able to develop software products and services that are as effective as, or more effective or easier to use than those offered by us. Such existing and potential competitors may also enjoy substantial advantages over us in terms of research and development expertise, manufacturing efficiency, name recognition, sales and marketing expertise and distribution channels. In addition, three of the largest ride photo companies, Kodak, Colorvision and Picsolve, currently have corporate sponsorship agreements with a number of large park chains. These sponsorship agreements often give the sponsor exclusive rights for all digital media services in the parks. When supplying systems to parks with sponsorship agreements, we may have to split part of the revenues with the sponsor. These agreements may limit Witech’s potential growth into new park chains. We anticipate the need of Witech to enter into its own sponsorship agreements in the future, but it may need to wait for the current agreements to expire. Although these agreements are typically for three years, there is no assurance that the agreements will not be renewed with the current sponsors. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our future revenues and, consequently, on our business, operating results and financial condition.

        Our operating results may vary quarterly and seasonally. Witech recognizes a substantial portion of its revenues in the months of June through September.  Our operating results reflect seasonal trends and we expect to continue to be affected by such trends in the future, primarily in the first and fourth quarters, when we expect to continue to experience relatively lower sales as a result of reduced sales activity in North America during the winter months. Due to the foregoing factors, in some future quarters our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In such event, it is likely that the price of our Ordinary Shares would be materially adversely affected.

6

        Our operating results fluctuate significantly.  Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past and are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future. Our future operating results will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

— the size and timing of significant orders and their fulfillment;

— demand for our products;

— changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;

— the number, timing and significance of product enhancements;

— new product announcements by us and our competitors;

— our ability to successfully market newly acquired products and technologies;

— our ability to develop, introduce and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;

— changes in the level of our operating expenses;

— budgeting cycles of our customers;

— customer order deferrals in anticipation of enhancements or new products that we or our competitors offer;

— product life cycles;

— software bugs and other product quality problems;

— personnel changes;

— changes in our strategy;

— seasonal trends and general domestic and international economic and political conditions, among others;

— currency exchange rate fluctuations and economic conditions in the geographic areas where we operate; and

— the inherent uncertainty in marketing new products or technologies.

        Due to the foregoing factors, quarterly revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast, and it is likely that these or other factors will adversely affect our future operating results.

        Revenues are also difficult to forecast because our sales cycle varies from customer to customer. In light of the foregoing, we cannot predict revenues for any future quarter with any significant degree of accuracy. Accordingly, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful and you should not rely upon them as indications of future performance. Although we have experienced revenue growth in the past, we may not be able to sustain this growth rate, and you should not consider such past growth indicative of future revenue growth, or of future operating results.

        We are subject to risks associated with international operations. Witech and IIS are based in Israel, but Witech generates almost all its revenues from North America. We intend to increase Witech’s marketing and sales efforts in Europe and the Far East in order to sign agreements with customers in these areas. Although we commit significant management time and financial resources to developing direct and indirect international sales and support channels, we cannot be certain that we will be able to generate or maintain international market demand for our products. To the extent that we cannot do so in a timely manner, our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.

        As we conduct business globally, our future results could also be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors and inherent risks, including the following:

— the impact of possible recessionary environments in multiple foreign markets;

— unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

— difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations;

— reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;

— potentially adverse tax consequences; and

— political and economic instability.

7

            We cannot be certain that we will be able to sustain or increase revenues from international operations or that the foregoing factors will not have a material adverse effect on our future revenues and, as a result, on our business, operating results and financial condition.

        The loss of the services of our key personnel may negatively affect our business. Our future success depends to a large extent on the continued services of our senior management and key personnel, including, in particular, Charles Moss, David Elooz, Eliyahu Cohen and Ronen Segal. Any loss of the services of members of our senior management or other key personnel, and especially those of Messrs. Moss, Elooz, Cohen and Segal, particularly to a competitor, may adversely affect our business.

        Witech is subject to risks relating to proprietary rights and risks of infringement. Witech has limited patent protection. It is dependent upon its proprietary software technology and Witech relies primarily on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect its proprietary rights. Except for Witech’s pending patent applications for a system and method for filming and recording attractions in the United States, Europe and Japan, it does not have any trademark, patent or copyright registrations. To protect Witech’s software, documentation and other written materials, it relies on trade secret and copyright laws, which afford only limited protection. It is possible that others will develop technologies that are similar or superior to Witech’s technology. Despite its efforts to protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of Witech’s products or to obtain and use information that Witech regards as proprietary. It is difficult to police the unauthorized use of products in our field, and Witech expects software piracy to be a persistent problem, although it is unable to determine the extent to which piracy of its software products exists. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect Witech’s proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States. Witech cannot be certain that its means of protecting its proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate or that its competition will not independently develop similar technology.

        Witech is not aware if it has infringed any proprietary rights of third parties. It is possible, however, that third parties will claim that Witech has infringed upon their intellectual property rights. Witech believes that software product developers will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in its industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. It would be time consuming for Witech to defend any such claims, with or without merit, and any such claims could:

— result in costly litigation;

— divert management's attention and resources;

— cause product shipment delays; and

— require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

        If there is a successful claim of infringement against us and we are not able to license the infringed or similar technology or other intellectual property, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

        Technological changes may adversely affect the market acceptance of our products and services. We compete in a market that is characterized by technological changes and improvements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. The introduction of new technologies and products could render existing products and services obsolete and unmarketable and could exert price pressures on our products and services. Any future success will depend upon our ability to address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers by, among others:

— supporting existing and emerging hardware, software, databases and networking platforms; and

— developing and introducing new and enhanced applications that keep pace with such technological developments, emerging new markets and changing customer requirements.

8

        Witech’s products may contain defects that may be costly to correct, delay market acceptance of its products, harm our reputation and expose us to litigation. Despite testing by Witech, errors may be found in its software products. If defects are discovered, Witech may not be able to successfully correct them in a timely manner, or at all. Defects and failures in its products could result in a loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of Witech’s products and could damage its reputation. Although Witech’s standard license agreement with its customers contains provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential product liability claims, it is possible that these provisions may not be effective or enforceable under the laws of some jurisdictions, and Witech could fail to realize revenues and suffer damage to its reputation as a result of, or in defense of, a substantial claim.

        Our efforts to increase our presence in North America, Europe and Asia may not be profitable. Our success in becoming a stronger competitor in the sale of our on-ride technology is dependent upon our ability to increase our sales in North America, Europe and Asia. Our efforts to increase our presence in these markets are subject to risks inherent to such markets, including the high cost of doing business in such locations.

        We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our Ordinary Shares in the foreseeable future. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Ordinary Shares in the foreseeable future under our current financial condition. Future dividend distributions are subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on various factors, including our operating results, future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, tax implications of dividend distributions on our income, future prospects and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. The distribution of dividends also may be limited by Israeli law, which permits the distribution of dividends only out of profits (as defined by Israeli law) or otherwise upon the permission of the court. You should not rely on an investment in our company if you require dividend income from your investment. The success of your investment will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation of the market price of our Ordinary Shares, which is uncertain and unpredictable. There is no guarantee that our Ordinary Shares will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased your Ordinary Shares.

        A substantial number of our shares can be sold in the future under Rule 144, which could lower the price of our shares. Existing shareholders may sell Ordinary Shares pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise. Such sales could adversely affect the price of the Ordinary Shares. We cannot predict the effect that future sales of the Ordinary Shares, or the availability of the Ordinary Shares for future sales, will have on the market price of the Ordinary Shares. Prevailing market prices for the Ordinary Shares could drop if substantial amounts of the Ordinary Shares are sold, or if others perceive that such sales could occur.

        The delisting of our Ordinary Shares from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market has decreased the liquidity and increased the volatility of our Ordinary Shares. Our Ordinary Shares were delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market effective January 23, 2003. In addition, after being traded on the OTC Bulletin Board from January 23, 2003 until August 23, 2004, the Company’s Ordinary Shares were delisted from the OTC Bulletin Board and until relisting in April 2008 were traded on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service. The delisting of the Company’s Ordinary Shares from The Nasdaq SmallCap Market and the OTC Bulletin Board has materially and adversely decreased the liquidity and market price of the Ordinary Shares, and may increase both volatility and the “spread” between bid and asked prices of the shares.

        Our share price may be volatile. The market price of our Ordinary Shares may fluctuate following the announcement of financial results or new product introductions by Witech or its competitors or other matters such as military, political or economic developments in the Middle East and the market for technology stocks generally.

9

        Our financial results may be adversely affected by inflation and currency fluctuations. Since our functional currency is the U.S dollar and we report our financial results in dollars, fluctuations in rates of exchange between the dollar and non-dollar currencies (including the NIS) may have a material adverse affect on our results of operations. We are exposed to the risk of fluctuation in the U.S. dollar/shekel exchange rate. In 2007, we derived almost all of our revenues in U.S. dollars, however, a material portion of our expenses were denominated in shekels. Our NIS-denominated expenses consist principally of salaries and related personnel expenses. We anticipate that a material portion of our expenses will continue to be denominated in shekels. If the U.S. dollar depreciates against the NIS, this will adversely effect our profit margins. We do not currently engage in any currency hedging transactions intended to reduce the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on our results of operations. We cannot guarantee that we will not enter into such transactions in the future or that such measures will adequately protect us from serious harm due to the impact of inflation in Israel or the United States.

        The future issuance of warrants to certain IIS shareholders will dilute other shareholders. As previously determined by our Board of Directors and publicly announced, subject to and following compliance with applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations, we intend to issue, for no additional consideration, to all shareholders of IIS of record as of November 9, 2007, warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,600,000 of our Ordinary Shares, on a pro-rata basis according to the percentage holding of each such shareholder in the issued and outstanding share capital of IIS on such date. These warrants will be exercisable at the price of $0.44 per share. These warrants, when issued, will dilute all our shareholders who are not entitled to such warrants.

Risk Factors Relating to Our Operations in Israel

        Conducting business in Israel entails special risks. We are incorporated under the laws of, and our executive offices and research and development facilities, and those of Witech are located in the State of Israel. Although most of Witech’s sales are made to customers outside of Israel, it is nonetheless directly affected by the political, economic and military conditions affecting Israel. Any of Witech’s manufacturing operations would be heavily dependent upon components imported from outside of Israel. Any major hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors, as well as incidents of civil unrest. During the summer of 2006, Israel was engaged in an armed conflict with Hezbollah, a Lebanese Islamist Shiite militia group and political party. This conflict involved missile strikes against civilian targets in northern Israel that resulted in economic losses. In 2007 and 2008, the region in Israel in proximity to the Gaza Strip has suffered ongoing rocket attacks originating from the Gaza Strip. Furthermore, several countries still restrict trade with Israeli companies and additional countries may impose such restrictions as a result of changes in the military and/or political conditions in Israel, which may limit our ability to make sales in, or purchase components from, those countries. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could adversely affect our operations. Since September 2000, terrorist violence in Israel has increased significantly and negotiations between Israel and Palestinian representatives have effectively ceased. Although Israel has entered into various agreements with its Arab neighbors and the Palestinian Authority, there has been an increase in unrest and terrorist activity in Israel, in varying levels of severity, since September 2000 through 2008. The establishment of a government in the Palestinian Authority in early 2006 by representatives of the Hamas militant group has created additional unrest and uncertainty in the region. In June 2008, an informal cease fire was reached between Israel and the Palestinian factions in the Gaza Strip but there was be no assurance that hostilities will not escalate again. We can give no assurance that security and political conditions will not have an impact on our business in the future. Hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could adversely affect our operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

10

        Our results of operations may be negatively affected by the obligation of our personnel to perform military service. Many of our executive officers and employees in Israel are obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israeli Defense Forces and may be called for active duty under emergency circumstances at any time. If a military conflict or war arises, these individuals could be required to serve in the military for extended periods of time. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence for a significant period of one or more of our executive officers or key employees or a significant number of other employees due to military service. Any disruption in our operations could adversely affect our business.

        Because Witech received grants from the Israeli Office of the Chief Scientist, it is subject to ongoing restrictions. Witech received royalty-bearing grants from the Office of the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor for research and development programs that meet specified criteria. Witech is obligated to pay royalties with respect to the grants received. In addition, the terms of the Chief Scientist grants limit its ability to manufacture products or transfer technologies outside of Israel if such products or technologies were developed using know-how developed with or based upon Chief Scientist grants. Any non-Israeli who becomes a holder of 5% or more of Witech’s share capital is generally required to notify the Chief Scientist and to undertake to observe the law governing the grant programs of the Chief Scientist, the principal restrictions of which are the transferability limits described above.

        Under current Israeli law, we may not be able to enforce covenants not to compete and therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of some of its former employees. Witech has entered into non-competition agreements with substantially all of its employees. These agreements prohibit our employees, for a limited period after they cease working for Witech, from competing directly with Witech or working for our competitors. Under current Israeli law, Witech may be unable to enforce these agreements, and it may be difficult for Witech to restrict its competitors from gaining access to the expertise its former employees gained while working for Witech. For example, Israeli courts have concluded that an employer seeking to enforce a non-competition agreement of a former employee must demonstrate that the competitive activities of the former employee will harm one of a limited number of material interests of the employer which have been recognized by the courts, such as the secrecy of a company’s confidential commercial information or its intellectual property. If Witech cannot demonstrate that such harm would result, Witech may be unable to prevent its competitors from benefiting from the expertise of its former employees.

        We may be adversely affected if the rate of inflation in Israel exceeds the rate of devaluation of the new Israeli shekel against the U.S. dollar. A portion of our expenses, primarily labor expenses, is incurred in NIS. As a result, we are exposed to the risk that the rate of inflation in Israel will exceed the rate of devaluation of the NIS in relation to the U.S. dollar or that the timing of this devaluation lags behind inflation in Israel. In 2004, 2006 and 2007 the U.S. dollar devaluated against the NIS by 1.6%, 8.2% and 8.97%, respectively, while in 2005, the U.S. dollar appreciated against the NIS by 6.8%. We may be materially and adversely affected in the future if the rate of inflation in Israel exceeds the devaluation of the NIS against the U.S. dollar or if the timing of this devaluation lags behind increases in inflation in Israel.

        Anti takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders. Some of the provisions of Israeli law could:

— discourage potential acquisition proposals;

— delay or prevent a change in control over us; and

— limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for our Ordinary Shares.

11

Generally, under Israeli corporate law, the board of directors and the shareholders of each of the merging companies must approve a merger. If the share capital of the non-surviving company consisted of more than one class of shares, the approval of each class is also required. In certain cases, court approval is also required. Under the Companies Law, a merger may be completed only after 50 days have elapsed from the date all the necessary approvals and the merger proposals have been submitted to the Israeli Companies Registrar and at least 30 days have passed from the shareholders approval of each of the merging companies. The Companies Law also provides that an acquisition of shares of a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if, as a result of such acquisition, the purchaser would become a 25% or more shareholder of the company. This rule does not apply if there is already another 25% shareholder of the company. Similarly, the Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of tender offer if, as a result of the acquisition, the purchaser would become a 45% shareholder of the company, unless someone else already holds a majority of the voting power of the company. These rules may not apply if the acquisition is made by way of a merger. The requirements of Israeli corporate law generally make these forms of acquisition significantly more difficult than under United States corporate laws. Other potential means of acquiring a public Israeli company might involve significant obstacles, such as a requirement for court approval for the acquisition. In addition, a significant body of case law has not yet developed with respect to many aspects of the new Companies Law. Until this happens, uncertainties will exist regarding its interpretation.

        Service and enforcement of legal process on us and our directors and officers may be difficult to obtain. Service of process upon our directors and officers and the Israeli experts named herein, all of whom reside outside the United States, may be difficult to obtain within the United States. Furthermore, all of our assets, and all of our directors and the Israeli experts named in this annual report are located outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against us or these individuals or entities may not be collectible within the United States. There is doubt as to the enforceability of civil liabilities under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act in original actions instituted in Israel. However, subject to certain time limitations and other conditions, Israeli courts may enforce final judgments of U.S. courts for liquidated amounts in civil matters, including judgments based upon the civil liability provisions of those acts. If a foreign judgment is enforced by an Israeli court, it generally will be payable in Israeli currency. Judgment creditors must bear the risk of unfavorable exchange rates.

        Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli Law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law. We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of holders of our Ordinary Shares are governed by our memorandum of association, articles of association and by Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith in exercising his or her rights and fulfilling his or her obligations toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on certain matters. Israeli law provides that these duties are applicable in shareholder votes at the general meeting with respect to, among other things, amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and actions and transactions involving interests of officers, directors or other interested parties which require the shareholders’ general meeting’s approval. In addition, a controlling shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who knows that he or she possesses the power to determine the outcome of a vote at a meeting of our shareholders, or who has, by virtue of the company’s articles of association, the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder in the company, or any other power with respect to the company, has a duty of fairness toward the company. The Israeli Companies Law does not establish criteria for determining whether or not a shareholder has acted in good faith. Moreover, the law is relatively new and there is no case law available on the duty of a non-controlling shareholder to act in good faith.

        As a foreign private issuer, we may follow certain home country corporate governance practices. As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain requirements applicable to domestic private issuers. As a foreign private issuer, we may follow home country practice with regard to, among other things, composition of the board of directors, director nomination procedure, compensation of officers, quorum at shareholders’ meetings and contents of proxy statements. In addition, we may follow our home country law, which requires that we obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as for the establishment or amendment of certain equity based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company.

12

Item 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. Share Exchange Agreement with Witech

        The following description describes certain of the material terms of the Share Exchange Agreement between the Company, Witech and the shareholders of Witech dated November 5, 2007, as amended on January 2, 2008 (the “Exchange Agreement”). This description of the Exchange Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Exchange Agreement, which is attached as an Exhibit to our Shell Company Report on Form 20-F dated January 8, 2008.

        The Exchange of Shares

        Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, we acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of Witech, in consideration for the issuance of 11,552,229 of our Ordinary Shares, with NIS 0.003 nominal value each (“Ordinary Shares” and the “Exchange Shares”, respectively) to the shareholders of Witech (the “Witech Shareholders”) and Witech became our wholly owned subsidiary. The Exchange Shares constitute approximately 50% of our total issued and outstanding share capital and approximately 34.07% of the outstanding share capital, on a fully-diluted basis, including the reservation of 3,300,000 Ordinary Shares under our 2007 Israeli Share Option Plan, the contemplated issuance of warrants to purchase 4,600,000 Ordinary Shares to all our shareholders of record on November 9, 2007 and the convertible notes and related warrants issued by us in November 2007. See “Item 10. Addition Information – C. Material Contracts”.

        Termination of Witech Options

        Each of the options, warrants and other rights to purchase Witech Shares or other non-cash compensation to the Witech Shareholders or the employees of Witech (which included all outstanding options granted under Witech’s stock option plans and Witech’s stock option agreements) that were outstanding at the closing were terminated without any liability or obligation on the part of Witech or to us.

        Limitation of Assumed Liabilities

        At the date of signing the Exchange Agreement and except as agreed in writing by IIS, the aggregate total liabilities (of any kind or nature whatsoever) of Witech (on a consolidated basis), including any of the Witech Shareholders or any of their affiliates, on a consolidated basis (including interest calculated up to the scheduled repayment date) were not to exceed $2,357,815 according to the breakdown approved by IIS. At the closing of the Exchange Agreement, we agreed to accept total liabilities of Witech in the aggregate amount of $2,443,782 out of which liabilities in the aggregate amount of approximately $630,000 are only to be paid after the Company raised at least $6,000,000 in equity or convertible debt financing ($1,655,000 of this amount have already been invested). All shareholders and all holders of any other rights to shares of Witech signed waivers and releases in favor of Witech and IIS, except with respect to the liabilities agreed by IIS.

        Representations and Warranties

        The Exchange Agreement contains certain representations and warranties by IIS relating to, among other things: organization and qualifications of IIS; approvals; capitalization; liabilities; intellectual property; legal proceedings; changes of operations of IIS; compliance with Laws; material contracts; assets; loans and encumbrances; employment matters; finder’s fee; tax returns filed and taxes paid; tax claims and liens.

13

        The Exchange Agreement contains representations and warranties by Witech and certain Witech Shareholders relating to, among other things: organization and standing; authorization and enforceability; approvals; no violation; capitalization; subsidiaries; financial statements; liabilities; employee compensation plans; compensation; employee agreements; guarantees; contracts; financial change; property damage; dividends; labor disputes; employee arrangement; securities; amendments to charter documents; taxes; change of accounting method; intellectual property; personnel; software performance; software contracts; marketing agreements; third-party rights; other agreements; title to properties; litigation; environmental compliance; finder’s fee; employment matters; product warranty; customers and suppliers; relationships with related persons; restrictions on business activities; grant incentives and subsidies.

        Indemnification

        The Witech Shareholders, severally and jointly, have agreed to indemnify and hold us and our shareholders, officers, directors, representatives, agents, successors and assigns harmless from and against any of the liabilities and obligations in excess of the amounts specified in the agreement or that are not assumed by us (collectively, the “Excluded Liabilities”), provided however that the sole source of such indemnification shall be the proceeds from the sale of twenty five percent (25%) of the Exchange Shares (the “Escrow Shares”) except in the case of fraud and breaches of the capitalization and ownership of shares for which the remedy would not exceed the aggregate monetary value of the representations regarding Exchange Shares at the closing and for which claims could be made until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. The Escrow Shares shall be placed in escrow during the Restrictive Period (as defined below) and will be used as collateral to satisfy any claims, demands or actions related to the Excluded Liabilities and/or liabilities, costs and expenses relating to any breach of the representations, warranties and covenants of Witech and the Shareholders (collectively, “Claims”). In the event of any Claims, the escrow agent may sell the Escrow Shares to satisfy the Claims.

        Witech Shareholder Non Compete

        All the shareholders of Witech who are employees or consultants of Witech or its subsidiary (directly or through affiliates), as well as certain officers and directors of Witech undertook not to compete, directly or indirectly, with respect to Witech’s business until December 31, 2009. This will not derogate from any non-compete undertakings that will be included in employment agreements between any such persons and IIS.

        Restriction on resale of Exchange Shares

        According to an amendment to the Exchange Agreement dated January 2, 2008, the parties decided that the share exchange will not be a tax-free exchange requiring an Israeli tax ruling that would restrict sales of the Exchange Shares and all our shares held by our other shareholders holding 5% or more of the issued and outstanding shares of IIS immediately following the closing of the Exchange Agreement for a period of 24 months following the closing of the Exchange Agreement. However, former Witech shareholders holding 7,341,470 of the Exchange Shares, except for an amount of Exchange Shares not exceeding 250,000 as shall be specified in writing in a notice from the shareholders’ representative on behalf of such shareholders to IIS and except as may otherwise be agreed in writing by IIS, such shareholders shall not directly or indirectly (1) offer for sale, sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of (or enter into any transaction or device that is designed to, or could be expected to, result in the disposition by any person at any time in the future of), or (2) enter into any swap or other derivatives transaction that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic benefits or risks of ownership of, the Exchange Shares, or (3) publicly disclose the intention to do any of the foregoing, for a period commencing on the date of the Closing and the ending twelve (12) months following the closing. In order to ensure compliance with this restriction, all the Exchange Shares subject to this restriction are being held in escrow during the relevant 12-month period.

B. History and Development of the Company

        We were incorporated in Israel on January 28, 1980. Our legal and commercial name is I.I.S. Intelligence Information System Limited.

14

        Until early 1999, we were engaged in the development, manufacture, marketing and service of data communication and intelligent peripheral products targeted at the International Business Machines (“IBM”) midrange, IBM mainframe and open systems computing environments. In late 1998, the Company implemented a restructuring plan (the “Restructuring”) which resulted in the disposition of most of the assets of the Company, substantial changes in the Company’s structure and a focus exclusively on storage area networking (“SAN”). For information regarding our products prior to completion (in early 1999) of the Restructuring, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.

–        For information regarding our operations and various corporate disposition transactions in which we engaged from 1999 through 2003, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

–        As of December 31, 2003 we were no longer engaged in any operational business activity other than managing our minority holdings in StoreAge and Enargis. See Item 4. “C. Business Overview – Sale of StoreAge and Sale of Enargis”. On July 29, 2004 approximately 96% of our shareholders present and voting at a general meeting of shareholders, approved our voluntary liquidation and the appointment of Messrs. Robi Hartman and Aharon Jacobowitz as our joint liquidators.

–        From 2005 through 2007 we engaged in the following transactions:

–        In February 2005, StoreAge raised $5,900,000 in convertible bridge loan financing from its shareholders. We did not participate in that financing.

–        In October 2005, in contemplation of an initial public offering of StoreAge on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange, all classes of preferred shares of StoreAge and outstanding bridge loans were converted into ordinary shares of StoreAge based on the amount actually invested in StoreAge and all preferential shareholder rights were cancelled. Following this conversion we held 13% of the issued and outstanding share capital of StoreAge (11.74% on a fully diluted basis). The proposed initial public offering of StoreAge was aborted in November 2005 due to the inability of StoreAge to meet its sales forecast and decreased expected sales forecast.

–        On March 26, 2006, StoreAge received a loan in the amount of $4,000,000 from an Israeli venture lending fund. The loan principal was to be repaid in 24 equal monthly installments, beginning 12 months from the closing date. The loan bore annual interest of LIBOR +5%, to be repaid on a quarterly basis. In consideration, the lender received warrants to purchase shares of the StoreAge equal to 2.6% of its outstanding fully diluted share capital. A first-ranking floating charge and specific charge on the assets of StoreAge was registered on behalf of the lender to secure the loan.

–        In October 2006, all shareholders of StoreAge, including us, signed a share purchase agreement with LSI Logic Corporation (“LSI”) for the sale of all issued and outstanding shares of StoreAge to LSI. In November 2006, the sale was closed and LSI paid us gross proceeds of $5,416,692 for all our shares, out of which $703,793 is held in escrow to satisfy certain possible future claims for a period of 18 months following the closing. No claims were made against the escrow and these funds were released to us in May 2008. At the time of this closing, we held 12.68% of the issued and outstanding share capital of StoreAge (10.89% on a fully diluted basis). This additional dilution resulted from the issuance of shares, the issuance of warrants to an Israeli venture lending fund that provided the $4,000,000 to StoreAge in March 2006 (that was repaid by LSI) and the increase of shares reserved for options pursuant to StoreAge’s incentive share option plans. For a discussion of the agreement with LSI, see Item 4. “Information on the Company – Sale of StoreAge”.

–        In February 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with Witech and its shareholders for the merger of Witech into IIS in consideration for the issuance of 50% of our issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares. This MOA was contingent on termination of our voluntary liquidation.

15

–        On April 17, 2007, at our general meeting of shareholders, the termination of our voluntary liquidation was approved by an almost unanimous vote of a majority of the shareholders present and voting at the meeting.

–        From April 23, 2007 through December 31, 2007, we provided various loans to Witech in the aggregate amount of $4,590,000.

–        On May 15, 2007, the board of directors approved the future distribution of five-year warrants for no consideration on a pro-rata basis to all shareholders of the Company who were holders of record at the record date for the purpose of voting at the general shareholders meeting of the Company for the purpose of approving the Exchange Agreement, to purchase an aggregate of 2,300,000 of our shares, at an exercise price equal to the average closing price of our shares 20 days prior to the date of closing of the Witech acquisition. These warrants will be issued following the closing date of the acquisition and will be non-transferable and non-exercisable until a registration statement covering their resale and exercise is filed and declared effective by the SEC.

–        On May 23, 2007, we, together with all the other shareholders of Enargis, transferred all our shares in Enargis to West End Technology Investments Ltd. (an affiliate of our chief executive officer and principal shareholder) for no consideration other than the assumption by West End of all Enargis’ liabilities, see Item 4. “C. Business Overview – Sale of Enargis”.

–        On November 5, 2007, our Board of Directors approved, subject to and following compliance with applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations, the issuance, for no additional consideration, to all our shareholders at the record date determined for the purpose of the shareholders’ meeting convened to approve the Exchange Agreement (November 9, 2007), and the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,600,000 of our Ordinary Shares, on a pro-rata basis according to the percentage holding of each such shareholder in our issued and outstanding share capital on such record date. This includes the warrants to purchase 2,300,000 Ordinary Shares previously authorized in May 2007. The exercise price of each warrant is $0.44 (the average trading price per share of our Ordinary Shares during the twenty trading days prior to the closing of the Exchange Agreement). The warrants will be exercisable for cash or on a cash-less exercise basis. These warrants will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction. A “Transaction” shall mean either (i) the merger of the Company into another company in which the Company is not the surviving entity, or (ii) the purchase of all or substantially all of our shares. These warrants will be non-transferable and non-exercisable until all applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations have been complied with in connection with the warrants and the underlying shares, including without limitation, that a registration statement covering the issuance of the underlying shares is declared effective by the SEC.

–        On November 5, 2007, we signed the Exchange Agreement with Witech and its shareholders. On December 20, 2007, our stockholders approved the Exchange Agreement and all transactions contemplated therein. On January 2, 2008, pursuant to this agreement, we acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of Witech, in consideration for the issuance of approximately 50% of our issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares to the shareholders of Witech and Witech became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

–        On November 15, 2007, we signed definitive agreements with private investors for the issuance of convertible notes in the principal amount of $1,655,000, out of which $827,500 was invested on November 2007 and the remaining 50% was invested at the beginning of January 2008 following the closing of the Exchange Agreement. We issued warrants to purchase 331,000 of our Ordinary Shares to the purchasers of the notes at an exercise price of $0.44 per share. For a detailed description of the terms of the notes and warrants, see “Item 4. Additional Information – C. Material Contracts”.

16

–        In February 2008, the Nimrod Fund, one of our shareholders who holds approximately 7% of our issued and outstanding share capital, provided a loan to Witech in the amount of $400,000 which is to be repaid on July 1, 2008, with interest of 0.917% per month (the total amount to be repaid is $414,672). The loan is unsecured. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 160,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to $0.44 per share.

–        In April 2008 our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, CDRide Corp., received a short-term bridge loan in the amount of up to $1,400,000 repayable on June 30, 2008. The loan bears interest at the rate of 0.8% per month. An amount of $850,000 was disbursed in April 2008 and an additional $300,000 was disbursed in June, 2008. The remaining $250,000 will be disbursed at the discretion of the lender if required to repay bank financing. The loan is secured by a pledge on future income of CDRide Corp. as well as a guaranty by us and Witech. The loan is not convertible into equity. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 560,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to the lower of $0.44 per share and the lowest price at which we raised equity or convertible debt financing in the next 12 months. The lender is a company related to CDC Holdings Ltd., who holds approximately 5.4% of our issued and outstanding shares and who is associated with Alon Wulkan and Iris Weller-Weiss, two of our directors.

        Our executive offices are located at 33 Jabotinsky Street, Ramat Gan, Israel, our telephone number is (+972) 3-751-0007 and our facsimile number is (+972) 3-575-0595. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP located at 875 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

C. Business Overview

        Prior to January 2, 2008, we had no operating business other than providing management services to Witech. All business activities are currently conducted through Witech, which became our wholly-owned subsidiary as of January 2, 2008. We have another wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary, IIS Manufacturing Ltd., which has no assets and has been inactive since 1999.

        Sale of StoreAge

        In order to enable total focus on the new fast growing, large storage area networks (“SANs”) and fibre channel market, in January 1999, we formed StoreAge, a separate entity whose sole purpose was to concentrate on storage networking development, production and marketing activities.

        StoreAge was engaged in the development, marketing, sale and support of products and services in areas such as (i) virtualization of storage networks for Open Systems (including Windows 2000, NT, Linux and UNIX), (ii) storage networking middleware (distributed RAID, volume management), (iii) storage management software, and (iv) storage related applications including disaster recovery and backup solutions, such as snapshot, remote mirroring and others.

        In February 2005, StoreAge raised $5,900,000 in convertible bridge loan financing from its shareholders. We did not participate in that financing.

        In October 2005, in contemplation of an initial public offering of StoreAge on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange, all classes of preferred shares of StoreAge and outstanding bridge loans were converted into ordinary shares of StoreAge based on the amount actually invested in StoreAge and all preferential shareholder rights were cancelled. Following this conversion we held 13% of the issued and outstanding share capital of StoreAge (11.74% on a fully diluted basis). The proposed initial public offering of StoreAge was aborted in November 2005 due to the inability of StoreAge to meet its sales forecast and decreased expected sales forecasts.

17

        In October 2006, all shareholders of StoreAge, including us, signed a share purchase agreement with LSI Logic Corporation (“LSI”) for the sale of all issued and outstanding shares of StoreAge to LSI. In November 2006, the sale was closed and LSI paid us gross proceeds of $5,416,692 for all our shares, out of which $703,793 is being held in escrow to satisfy certain possible future claims until May 2008. No claims were made against the escrow and these funds were released to us in May 2008. At the time of this closing, we held 12.68% of the issued and outstanding share capital of StoreAge (10.89% on a fully diluted basis). This additional dilution resulted from the issuance of shares, the issuance of warrants to the Israeli venture lending fund that provided a $4,000,000 loan to StoreAge in March 2006 (that was repaid by LSI) and the increase of shares reserved for options pursuant to StoreAge’s incentive share option plans.

        Sale of Enargis

        On May 23, 2007, considering the bleak business prospects of Enargis and the costs involved of maintaining our shareholding in Enargis, we, together with all the other shareholders of Enargis, transferred all our shares in Enargis to West End Technology Investments Ltd., a company owned and controlled by Robi Hartman, for no consideration other than the assumption by West End of all Enargis liabilities. (For a further discussion of Enargis and our disposition of shares in Enargis, please refer to our Annual Report on form 20-F for year ended December 31, 2006).

        Witech

a. Witech’s Business Overview

        Witech is an Israeli company that was incorporated in February 2004. Together with its wholly owned Delaware subsidiary, CDRide Corp., Witech is engaged in the field of video transmission using wireless communications. Witech develops, manufactures, installs, operates and supports on-ride video systems for use on thrill rides and other attractions in amusement parks. Witech’s current product is a proprietary wireless video transmission system for use on various moving attractions. It is a small video camera and a wireless transmitter that is attached to each car of a roller coaster. The camera films the riders during the ride and transmits the video data to a wireless receiver and a computer. The video file is then edited and can be burned to a DVD for purchase. In addition to a DVD, the rider is also given the opportunity to purchase a set of four to sixteen printed pictures captured from various video frames during the ride.

        Generally, Witech installs the relevant equipment such as the computer server, wireless infrastructure, plasma screens and a point-of-sale area in return for compensation that is derived from a percentage of the revenues received by the amusement park operator or from the sale of the DVDs. However, Witech also has the ability to sell the complete on-ride photographic system and provide support services. As of June 30, 2008, Witech had systems installed and operating on twenty seven rides in most of the major amusement park chains in the United States (excluding Disney where we plan to have a live demo at the end of 2008) and Canada including Cedar Fair, Six Flags, Busch Entertainment and MGM Grand. Witech also has 3 systems operating in Europe (2 in the U.K. and 1 in Germany).

b. Industry Background

        Today there are approximately 2,100 roller coasters worldwide. There are three main types of roller coasters: thrill rides, family rides and kiddy rides. Thrill rides are the most prevalent type of roller coaster. These are the famous roller coasters that are usually the flagship rides in most parks. They tend to be large and have annual capacities in the ranges of 1,000,000 – 2,000,000 riders per year. Family coasters tend to be smaller than large thrill rides. Family coasters will have annual capacities of 1,000,000 riders or less. Kiddy coasters tend to be the smallest and have riders that are between 3-13 years old. Kiddy coasters generally have annual capacities of 200,000 to 700,000 riders per year. In addition to these roller coasters there are more than 1,000 log-flumes (water coasters) and another 1,000 active attractions that can use on-ride photographic systems. Although accurate figures are unavailable, it is estimated that a significant and growing proportion of all roller coasters utilize a photographic system. Ride photographic systems first appeared in the industry almost twenty years ago and have been growing in popularity with time. The current standard is a fixed system whereby the camera is in a static position and takes photographs of the roller coaster as the roller coaster passes the position of the camera. There are limitations to photographic systems. Since the camera is fixed, it is only able to capture the riders once during the ride. As the coaster passes the camera the rider may not be in the optimum position or have the preferred facial expression and as a result the opportunity to capture such an experience is lost. Additionally, since only one picture is taken, the rider is unable to fully capture his/her experience from a still photograph of only a small portion of the ride. Difficulties have also arisen in hanging or inverted roller coasters, as picture quality is often poor due to the inability to have the proper camera locations and angles.

18

c. Witech’s Solution

        As an alternative to a fixed photographic system, Witech offers an exciting next-generation product that is already filling a natural slot among today’s young, hi-tech riders. With Witech’s product, customers can purchase both DVDs and pictures. It is Witech’s assumption that riders will prefer to purchase a DVD of the ride (or a DVD and a set of photographs) rather than just one photograph.

        Unlike fixed photographic systems that can only offer one photograph at fixed locations, multiple action photographs can be provided by Witech’s system, thus giving the rider a better selection of possible positions and facial expressions. Additionally, a DVD as opposed to a single photograph, captures the whole ride and enables the viewer to relive the entire experience instead of only one particular moment. A DVD also has a high-tech appeal and riders will be attracted by the ease with which they can share the movie of their ride with their friends.

        Another benefit of the Witech system over the single photograph static systems is that the DVD is interspersed with other scenes from the roller coaster and the park, providing much more of the day’s experience. Further, movies from other rides can also be stored on the same DVD giving a virtual “album” of a whole day at the park.

        Since Witech’s system is installed on the cars of the roller coaster it also does not suffer from the same limitations of fixed photographic systems. The Witech system can be attached to inverted or hanging roller coasters and provide the proper angles and clarity for the images.

        An additional benefit of the Witech System is that the DVD video can provide advertisement clips for the park or its affiliates.

d. Witech’s Strategy

        It is Witech’s goal to firmly establish itself as the market leader for on-ride video systems. Witech’s strategy for achieving this objective includes the following elements:

– Capitalize on Viral Video Growth. An increasing number of people are uploading their personal experiences on websites such as Youtube, Metacafe and Myspace. Witech intends to capitalize on this growth opportunity through Witech’s ability to provide riders with videos that can be posted on the Internet. Witech is also looking to develop a number of new technologies that are designed to further enable riders to download or upload their video in a simpler manner.

– Expand Distribution, Consulting and Implementation Through Strategic Alliances. Witech intends to seek strategic alliances with leading camera companies and to increase its market penetration. An alliance with a major camera company, if consummated, would be expected to provide qualified customer introductions and enhance the generation of license revenues.

19

– Enhance Presence in Targeted Vertical Markets. Witech’s product is designed to be easily adaptable to different vertical markets, and Witech’s products can be adopted by customers across a broad range of industry segments, including video games, racecars as well as in helicopter and plane rides. Witech intends to penetrate vertical markets that it believes represent significant revenue opportunities. Witech intends to dedicate sales and marketing resources targeted at specific vertical markets.

– Build Upon Witech Awareness. Witech intends to leverage its installed base of customers and to make substantial investments in sales and marketing to increase its visibility and market share. Witech will focus on increasing its sales to existing customers and new customers. Witech also intends to expand its geographic coverage by increasing its presence, including in Europe, the Middle East and the Pacific Rim.

– Maintain Technological Leadership. Witech believes that it is a leader in on-ride videos and it intends to continue its leadership in this area. The second generation of its core product will be produced at a lower cost allowing it to be installed on many rides that are currently not fiscally viable for its current product. Witech will continue to invest in its products to enhance their quality and profitability. Witech intends to incorporate new technologies for providing the riders with on-ride videos of their experiences.

e. Products

        Witech’s current system is based on a video camera, a small digital video processor and a wireless transmitter unit that is installed on each car of a roller coaster or other ride. Once the ride starts, the camera starts filming the riders (typically 2 riders per camera). The recorded footage is stored on the on-board processor. The video file is processed in real-time and transmitted wirelessly to the “base station” when the car returns to the starting point.

        The video file is processed and interleaved with pre-filmed video clips of the roller coaster ride taken from different vantage points. Thereafter, a short preview with a video clip of each rider is displayed on a bank of video monitors located in the sales booth at the exit ramp of the ride. As the riders disembark from the ride, they walk past the sales booth and each rider is able to choose his video clip on a numbered screen, in the same manner that still photographs are displayed today. When a rider places an order, the sales attendant will copy the processed file onto a DVD and give it to the customer. The video editing/copying are all part of Witech’s proprietary software. The DVD format will enable playback either on a personal computer or on a standard home DVD player.

        Witech’s additional products include four to six passport-size photographs taken from different locations on the ride and a movie down-loaded onto a Disc-on-Key (“DOK”).

f. Professional Services

        Witech’s customers do not typically purchase consulting services, as Witech is usually responsible for the Witech system. Although Witech offers professional services with the initial deployment of its product, as well as on an ongoing basis to address the continuing needs of its customers these services are regarded as part of the overall product. Witech does however provide yearly service contracts to parks that purchase systems. As of December 31, 2007, Witech’s professional services organization consisted of six experienced professionals. Many of its service professionals have advanced degrees or considerable experience in digital video processing and wireless communications. Witech has at least another 10 technicians in the support team during the high season. Witech expects that the number of service professionals and the scope of the services that it offers will increase as Witech continues to address the expanding enterprise infrastructure needs of large amusement parks.

20

g. Amusement Parks Chains

        More than 20 amusement parks are currently using Witech’s systems including but not limited to Six Flags, Cedar Fair, MGM Grand, Adventuredome and Sesame Place. In 2007, 3 amusement parks accounted for more than 55% of Witech’s revenues. Approximately 70% of revenues of Witech in 2007 were derived from two amusement parks chains operating 11 amusement parks. Revenues from the sale of Witech’s products and services in North America accounted for $262,000, or 96% of Witech’s total revenues in 2006 and approximately 100% of Witech’s total revenues in 2007. The Israeli market is negligible and Witech believes that revenues from sales outside Israel will continue to account for the predominant portion of its total revenues for the foreseeable future.

        As of June 30, 2008, Witech has installed 27 video/photo on-ride systems (video and still pictures).

h. Sales and Marketing

        Witech offers its products and services primarily through a direct sales force in the United States and Israel. Its sales efforts in North America are conducted from its office in Atlanta, GA. Witech conducts comprehensive marketing programs that include advertising, direct mail, public relations, trade shows and customer relations from its headquarters in Or Yehuda, Israel. Witech’s sales and marketing organization consists of 5 employees as of December 31, 2007.

        Witech is working with Kodak to develop a joint video/photo system combining the technologies of both Witech and Kodak. The system will have one interface and when installed on a ride, the customer will be able to choose to buy a CDRide video, a Kodak photo or both. These systems are due to the installed in certain parks during 2008. In addition, we have subcontracted with Kodak to provide operation services for us in those parks where we have a contract to staff the sales booths. Kodak personnel will run the point of sales for us in 6 parks

        Witech believes that its continued growth and profitability will require it to expand its existing international operations and enter new international markets. Witech’s strategy is to substantially expand its network of salespeople to provide a worldwide sales and marketing presence for its products. In particular, Witech intends to expand its distribution capabilities in the Asian and European markets.

i. Product Development

        It is anticipated that in the future Witech will adapt its on-ride system to many other rides and attractions such as helicopters, airplanes, arcade games, go-karts, race cars, water slides, log flumes and climbing walls.

        Witech expects to record 20,000,000 personal videos in 2008. As such, Witech is currently exploring ways of using this video content to increase revenues. Web-based commerce and video and picture storage are some of the ideas Witech is investigating. Partnering with the parks on interactive web sites based on the park visitors’ videos and photos is another possibility.

        Witech has identified the need to design and operate web-based storage of the movies recorded. It is anticipated that the web will allow riders to purchase movies of their ride using the Internet, but Witech is still developing its business model for this service. Witech is also contemplating the development of an interactive web site that would host the photos and videos of the rides at different parks.

21

        In additional, Witech is currently testing a feature which would allow us to down-load the DVD of the ride to the customer’s cell phone. We hope to make this feature available in 2009. We can also download the full DVD to customer’s MP4 players. For this option, the customer would have to pay at the booth.

Grants from the Office of the Chief Scientist

        Under the Law for the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development, 1984 (the “Research Law”), research and development programs approved by a research committee of the Office of the Chief Scientist (“OCS”) of Israel’s Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor, are eligible for grants in exchange for payment to the Government of royalties from the sale of products developed in accordance with the Program. In order to be eligible, the applicant must be an Israeli company that proposes to invest in the development of industrial know-how, the development of new products, the development of new processing or manufacturing procedures or the development of significant improvements to an existing process or product. A committee of the OCS reviews the applications, evaluates the feasibility of the proposal, determines whether or not to approve a grant, and also determines the extent of Chief Scientist funding (within a range specified by the law) for approved projects. Depending on the nature of the project, the OCS grants generally amount to up to 50% of the approved research expenses.

        Under the terms of the grants we received from the OCS we are obligated to pay royalties of 3-5% on sales of products incorporating know-how developed within the framework of each funded program or derived therefrom (including ancillary services in connection therewith), up to an aggregate of 100% of the dollar-linked value of the total grants received. Royalties payable with respect to grants received under programs approved by the OCS after January 1, 1999, are subject to interest on the U.S. dollar-linked value of the total grants received at the annual rate of LIBOR applicable to U.S. dollar deposits at the date the grants are received.

        The Research Law requires that the manufacture of any product developed as a result of research and development funded by the Israeli Government take place in Israel. If any of the manufacturing is performed outside of Israel, the company would ordinarily be required to pay royalties at an increased rate and to increase the aggregate repayment amount to between 120% and 300% of the grant amount, depending on the manufacturing volume that is performed outside Israel, except in special cases that receive the prior approval of the research committee, and subject to certain payments to be made to the Israeli Government (generally an amount no less that the aggregate grants plus interest less royalties paid).

        The Research Law also provides that know-how from the research may not be transferred to third parties in Israel without prior approval of the research committee. This approval, however, is not required for the sale or export of any products resulting from such research and development. Approval of such transfer of know-how may be granted in specific circumstances, only if the recipient abides by the provisions of the Research Law and related regulations, including the restrictions on the transfer of know-how and the obligation to pay royalties in an amount that may be increased. The Research Law further provides that the know-how developed under an approved research and development program may not be transferred to any third parties outside Israel.

        The Research Law imposes reporting requirements with respect to certain changes in the ownership of a grant recipient. The law requires the grant recipient and its controlling shareholders and interested parties to notify the OCS of any change in control of the recipient or a change in the holdings of the significant stockholders of the recipient that results in a non-Israeli becoming an interested party directly in the recipient and requires the new interested party to undertake to the OCS to comply with the Research Law. In addition, the rules of the OCS may require prior approval of the OCS or additional information or representations in respect of certain of such events.

22

        The funds available for OCS grants out of the annual budget of the State of Israel have been reduced, and the Israeli authorities have indicated that the government may further reduce OCS grants in the future.

        In 2005 and 2006 Witech received grants from the Chief Scientist aggregating $128,912 for a certain research and development project. As of December 31, 2007, Witech has outstanding contingent obligations to pay royalties in amount of $91,000 in respect of future sales of products derived from such research and development. Witech did not receive any grants in 2007.

j. Customer Service and Support

        Witech’s support centers are located in Israel and the United States. Its customer service group handles incoming calls, shipping requests, call logging, maintaining customer information and responding to basic product questions. Witech’s technical support engineering group is responsible for all technical cases. Witech’s technical support engineering group interfaces with its research and development group for product maintenance and bug fixing. As of December 31, 2007, Witech’s support organization consisted of 6 employees.

k. Competition

        The markets for on-ride video systems are intensely competitive and are characterized by rapid technological advances, frequent new product introductions, evolving industry standards and price erosion.

        We believe that the principal competitive factors in our market include:

— high-quality performance of products;

— ease of use;

— level of integration with existing equipment;

— cost of products;

— effective sales, marketing and distribution;

— brand awareness;

— training, service and support; and

— intellectual property leadership and superiority.

        We consider our primary competition in on-ride video systems to be existing ride photography in which a photograph is taken of riders at some point on the ride and offered to every rider for sale at the disembarkation point. Witech’s alternative to the fixed photographic system is its on-ride video product that enables customers to purchase both DVDs and pictures.

        Unlike fixed photographic systems that can only offer one photograph at a fixed location, multiple action photographs can be provided by Witech’s system, thus giving the rider a better selection of possible positions and facial expressions. Additionally, a DVD, as opposed to a single photograph, captures the whole ride and enables the viewer to relive the entire experience instead of only one particular moment. Witech offers an exciting next-generation product without the need for extensive “market education”. With the Witech product, customers can purchase both DVD’s and pictures. Other companies are reported to be developing on-ride video products, but Witech has a significant lead with 36 systems which are intended to be operating in the 2008 park season.

23

        Another benefit of the Witech system over the single photograph static systems is that the DVD is interspersed with other scenes from the roller coaster and the park, providing much more of the day’s experience. Further, movies form other rides can also be stored on the same DVD giving a virtual “album” of a whole day at the park. However, regardless of Witech’s product’s perceived benefits, our success depends in part on convincing amusement parks to convert from existing static photographic systems to our on-ride video system.

        Moreover, despite Witech’s competitive edge over still photographs, other companies such as Ridercam GmbH and Socrates Digital Video B.V. are developing on-ride video products and as far as we know have installed systems in one park each. As far as we know these systems are still in the evaluation stage. Also, as far as Witech is aware, two companies- Yourday (in the UK) and Colorvison (in Florida)- have installed a small number off-ride video systems that film the riders at different points of the ride from cameras installed close to where the ride passes and produce a slow motion video of the recordings. We believe that Witech’s on-ride system is in a significantly more advanced stage of development relative to its competitors and provides a superior technical solution and record of the riders’ experience. Furthermore, Witech has a much larger installed base of systems and greater operating experience than its competitors. In addition, Witech has sophisticated on-the-fly video editing technology which we believe that our competitors lack.

        In addition, three of the largest ride photo companies, Kodak, Colorvision and Picsolve, currently have corporate sponsorship agreements with a number of large park chains. These sponsorship agreements often give the sponsor exclusive rights for all digital media services in the parks. When supplying systems to parks with sponsorship agreements, we may have to split part of the revenues with the sponsor. These agreements may limit Witech’s potential growth into new park chains. We anticipate the need of Witech to enter into its own sponsorship agreements in the future, but it may need to wait for the current agreements to expire. Although these agreements are typically for three years, there is no assurance that the agreements will not be renewed with the current sponsors.

        Furthermore, we may face direct and indirect competition from a number of competitors that have significantly greater financial and human resources than we do and have established relationships with amusement parks worldwide. Many of these competitors may also have established distributor networks, greater resources for product development, and sales and marketing capabilities than we do.

l. Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights and Licenses

        Witech’s success is dependent upon the technological and creative skills of its personnel in developing and enhancing its software products, as well as its ability to protect the related proprietary technology and intellectual proprietary rights. Witech relies primarily on a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures, trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws to accomplish these goals. Witech does not currently hold any patents. Witech has filed patent applications in the United States, Europe and Japan and may file additional patent applications in the future. We cannot assure you that a patent will be issued from any patent application Witech submits. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will develop proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that any patent issued to us will provide us with any competitive advantages, or that the patents of others will not seriously harm our ability to do business.

        Witech licenses its products pursuant to license agreements that prohibit reverse engineering or decompilation of its software, impose restrictions on the licensee’s ability to utilize the software and provide for specific remedies in the event of a breach of these restrictions. In addition, Witech takes measures to avoid disclosure of its trade secrets, including but not limited to requiring employees, customers and others with access to its proprietary information to execute confidentiality agreements with Witech which define the unauthorized uses and disclosures of its trade secrets and other proprietary materials and information. Additionally, it restricts access to its source code.

24

        Witech asserts copyright in software, documentation and other works of authorship. Witech asserts trademark rights in and to its name, product names, logos and other markings that are designed to permit consumers to identify its goods and services.

m. Government Regulations

        The installation of Witech’s systems on rides generally requires regulatory approvals at the state or county level in the United States. To date neither Witech nor the amusement parks have experienced any significant difficulties in obtaining the required approvals.

        Israel has the benefit of a free trade agreement with the United States, which, generally, permits tariff-free access into the United States for products produced by us in Israel. In addition, as a result of an agreement entered into by Israel with the European Union, or the EU, and countries remaining in the European Free Trade Association, or EFTA, the EU and EFTA have abolished customs duties on Israeli industrial products. However, there can be no assurance that these agreements will not be terminated, changed, amended or otherwise declared non-applicable to all or some of our Israeli operations, thereby materially harming our and their businesses.

D. Properties, Plants and Facilities

        The Company is headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel, where it leases an aggregate of 85 square meters of space at an annual rent of $17,340 (see Item 7. “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions – B. Related Party Transactions”). On June 29, 2008, the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved the extension of the agreement until December 31, 2008. The extension is subject to additional funds raised of at least $2,500,000 after this approval. Witech leases an aggregate of approximately 630 square meters of space in Or Yehuda, Israel for general management, product development and support operations at an annual rent of approximately $94,000. This lease expires at December 31, 2008 without an option for renewal. In addition, Witech’s subsidiary, CDRide leases premises in five locations in North America (in Sandusky, Ohio, Glenview, Illinois, Atlanta, Georgia, Buena Park, California and Canada) at an aggregate annual rent of $78,000.

Item 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

Forward-Looking Statements

        Some of the information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate” and similar words. Statements that we make in this section that are not statements of historical fact also may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. There may be events in the future that we are not accurately able to predict, or over which we have no control. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We do not promise to notify you if we learn that our assumptions or projections are wrong for any reason. We disclaim any obligation to update our forward-looking statements. See “Risk Factors” for more information.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Under different assumptions or conditions, actual results may differ from these estimates.

25

IIS

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes

        Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FAS 109", which was issued in June 2006. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company’s accounting policy, pursuant to the adoption of FIN 48, is to classify interest and penalties recognized in the financial statements relating to uncertain tax positions, under provision for income taxes. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a non-material cumulative impact to financial statements.

Witech

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes

        Effective January 1, 2007, Witech and its subsidiary, CDRide (the “Group”) adopted FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FAS 109", which was issued in June 2006. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Group’s accounting policy, pursuant to the adoption of FIN 48, is to classify interest and penalties recognized in the financial statements relating to uncertain tax positions, under provision for income taxes. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a non-material cumulative impact to financial statements.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

        On December 31, 2002, all goodwill was impaired by the cessation of IIS’s business activity. Thus during the years 2003 through 2007 we had no goodwill or intangible asset impairment.

        Witech did not record intangible assets or goodwill in its financial statements.

        For information on intangible assets and goodwill that arose as a result of the allocation of the purchase price according to the Exchange Agreement, see the Company’s audited financial statements, which are included in this Annual Report and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Investment in StoreAge and Enargis

        During 2002, our investment in StoreAge was reduced to zero and in 2003 the Company’s investment in Enargis was also reduced to zero. The Company has not guaranteed the obligations of StoreAge and/or Enargis and is not otherwise committed to provide further financial support to either of these companies. See Notes 2.a and 2.b to the Company’s Financial Statements included herewith.

Deferred Taxes

        Valuation allowance in respect of the deferred tax assets is provided when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The Group has provided a full valuation allowance with respect to its deferred tax assets as it expects that it is more likely than not that it will not have taxable income in the foreseeable future. While the Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made.

26

A. Operating Results

General

        As of December 31, 2003, we were no longer engaged in any operating business activity other than managing the minority holdings in StoreAge and Enargis until we disposed of our holdings in these companies and since April 2007, also providing certain management services to Witech.

        The functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries is the U.S dollar, as the U.S. dollar is the primary currency of the economic environment in which the Company and its subsidiaries have operated and expect to continue to operate in the foreseeable future. The majority of the Company’s operations are currently conducted in Israel and most of the Israeli expenses are currently paid in new Israeli shekels (“NIS”); however, most of the expenses are denominated and determined in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, monetary accounts maintained in currencies other than the dollar are remeasured into dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation” (“SFAS No. 52”). All transaction gains and losses of the remeasurement of monetary balance sheet items are reflected in the statement of operations as financial income or expenses, as appropriate.

Results of Operations

Witech Historical

Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

        Revenues. Our revenues are derived primarily from participation in revenues from sales of DVDs and other media products that were filmed by the systems of Witech installed on rides at amusement parks.

        Total revenues increased by approximately 460% to $1,524,000 during 2007 from $272,000 during 2006. This increase is mainly attributable to the increase of systems that Witech installed during this period from 12 to 31, including 3 photo systems, as well as increased revenues from systems installed in 2005 and 2006, and from the sale of one system to an amusement park in 2007.

         Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consist primarily of technical support, second installations and systems dismantles, operational costs and depreciation of on-ride installed systems.   Our cost of revenues increased by approximately 262% to $2,681,000 in 2007 from $740,000 in 2006. This increase was driven primarily by the increase in deployment force, increase in depreciation of installed systems and an impairment charge of $478,000 of certain installed systems. The test of the book value of long-lived assets was a result of the change in management expectations relating to the economic environment in the United States that caused a decrease in the forecasted revenues generated from certain installed systems.

        Gross Loss. Gross loss increased by 147% to $1,157,000 in 2007 from $468,000 in 2006. The increase in gross loss was mainly due to the increase in the number of systems installed and the impairment charge in 2007. The Company expects to decrease gross loss in the future as a result of the increase in the numbers of systems installed, increase in the number of the systems sold and its management’s decision to focus on more profitable rides.

27

        Research and Development, Net. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries of employees engaged in on-going research and development activities and other related costs.   Total research and development costs decreased by approximately 37% to $258,000 in 2007 from $407,000 in 2006 primarily due to a one time charge at the amount of $233,000 of stock based compensation costs accrued at September 2006. The one time charge effect was partly offset by an increase in payroll costs derived by an increase in the number of employees. Witech’s management expects that our expenditures for research and development will increase in 2008 for the development of our next generation camera/computer module.

        Marketing, General and Administrative. Marketing, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs relating to sales and marketing compensation, marketing and business development efforts, travel and related expenses, overhead, and administrative costs, including professional fees, communication and IT costs, and other general expenses. Marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by 265% to $2,990,000 in 2007 from $820,000 in 2006. This increase was due to an overall increase in Witech’s activity, including a rise in direct sales personnel, travel expenses, management payroll expenses and professional fees. Witech’s management expects that Marketing, general and administrative expenses will increase in 2008 as a result of the decision to increase marketing expenses as part of a plan to increase the installation of systems and to penetrate the European and Asian markets.

        Operating Income (Loss). Based on the foregoing, the operating loss increased by approximately 160% to $4,405,000 for this period in 2007 from $1,695,000 in 2006.

        Financial expenses, net. For 2007, Witech had net financial expenses increase by approximately 170% to $852,000 as compared to net financial expenses of $316,000 in 2006. This increase in financial expenses is attributable primarily to an increase in debts due to the receipt of loans from IIS in an amount of $4,590,000.

        Taxes on income. Taxes on income increased by 1940% in 2007 to $102,000 from $5,000 in 2006 mainly due to the first implementation of FIN 48“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FAS 109", which was issued in June 2006.

Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

        Revenues. Total revenues increased approximately 988% to $272,000 in 2006 from $25,000 for 2005. This increase is mainly attributable to the increase in systems installed by Witech during this period from 3 to 12 as well as increased revenues from systems installed in 2005.

        Cost of Revenues. Our cost of revenues increased approximately 1200% to $740,000 in 2006 from $57,000 in 2005 primarily due to the increase in the number of systems installed and operated during this period resulting in an increase in technical support, second installations, systems dismantles, operational costs and depreciation of on-ride installed systems.

        Gross Loss. Gross loss increased by 1,362% to $468,000 in 2006 from $32,000 in 2005. The gross losses in these periods were due to Witech’s management’s strategic decision to install a large number of systems, regardless of profitability. The Company expects to increase its gross income in the future as a result of its management’s decision to focus on more profitable rides.

        Research and Development, Net. Total research and development costs increased by 104% to $407,000 during 2006 from $200,000 during 2005 mainly due to a one time charge at the amount of $233,000 of stock based compensation costs at September 2006 and as a result of the end of financial support received from the Government of Israel.

28

        Marketing, General and Administrative. Marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately 294% to $820,000 during 2006 from $208,000 during 2005. This increase is due to the hire of additional people in the direct sales department as well as higher marketing costs.

        Operating Loss. Based on the foregoing, the operating loss increased by approximately 285% to $1,695,000 for 2006 from $440,000 in 2005.

        Financial Income (Expenses), Net. For 2006, net financial expenses increased to $316,000 as compared to net financial expenses of $14,000 for 2005. This increase in financial expenses is attributable primarily to an increase in debts due to receipt of loans from a bank and others.

        Loss. For 2006 our losses increased by approximately 344% to $2,016,000 compared to the loss of $454,000 for 2005, primarily due to the increase in cost of revenues, general and administrative expenses and financial expenses as specified above that was not offset by income.

IIS Historical

Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

        Revenues. We had $55,000 in revenues during 2007 from management fees primarily due to our management agreement with Witech, effective April 17, 2007 compared to no revenues during 2006.

         General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of professional fees, rent, office maintenance, payroll related expenses and liquidators’ and directors’ fees. General and administrative expenses increased by 567% to $607,000 in 2007 from $91,000 in 2006. The increase is attributable mainly to an increase in legal and accounting fees due to the filing of delinquent annual reports with the SEC and professional fees relating to the transaction with Witech as well as payments of fees to directors, the Chairman of the Board and the CEO and for directors’ and officers’ insurance.       

          Financial Income, Net. In 2007, our financial income increased to $453,000 as compared to financial income of $17,000 in 2006. This increase in financial income is attributable to financial income earned from bank deposits of funds received in November 2006 from the sale of our holdings in StoreAge and primarily from the interest accrued on the loans to Witech.

        Taxes on income. In 2007 we recognized tax expenses of $4,000 as a result of the implementation of FIN 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FAS 109", which was issued in June 2006.

        Loss. In 2007 losses were $103,000 compared to net income of $4,639,000 in 2006, primarily due to the increase in general and administrative expenses as specified above that was offset by a capital gain of $4,713 from the sale of StoreAge.

Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004

        The Company had no revenues in each of the years 2004, 2005 and 2006.

        In 2005 we incurred general and administrative expenses of $103,000 compared to $200,000 in 2004. This reduction was due to a reduction in all expenses, due to cessation of our operating activities during 2003 and our entry into voluntary liquidation at the end of July 2004. The main reductions were in the directors’ fees, insurance expenses and professional fees. During 2005 and 2006 the general and administrative expenses were $103,000 and $91,000, respectively, consisting mainly of liquidators’ and professional fees, rent and office maintenance as well as payroll related expenses. The expenses for 2006 also included approximately $13,000 paid to the Israeli tax authorities as a result of a VAT audit and related settlement.

29

        Our net financial expenses in 2004 and 2005 were $4,000 and $3,000, primarily due to exchange rate conversions and open bank balances. In 2006 we had financial income of $17,000 due to the interest received on the proceeds of the sale of our holdings in StoreAge in November 2006.

        We incurred non-recurring income of $4,713,000 in 2006, from the sale of all our holdings in StoreAge in November 2006 and an additional amount of $703,793 held in escrow to satisfy certain possible future claims for a period of 18 months following the closing. No claims were made against the escrow and these funds were released to us in May 2008.

        In 2004, we recorded a loss of approximately $204,000 and in 2005 a loss of approximately $106,000 was realized due to no income and a continued reduction in expenses due to voluntary liquidation.

        The $4,639,000 profit for 2006 primarily reflects the proceeds from the sale of our holdings in StoreAge in November 2006 and a continued reduction in general and administrative expenses due to our being in voluntary liquidation.

        We do not expect that Witech will be profitable in the next twelve months.

Impact of Inflation and Exchange Rates

        The dollar cost of the Company’s operations in Israel is related to the extent to which the rate of inflation in Israel is offset by the devaluation of Israeli currency in relation to the dollar without significant timing delays. The Company’s dollar costs in Israel will increase if devaluation fails to keep pace with the rate of inflation. Conversely, those costs will decrease if the rate at which Israeli currency devalues against the dollar exceeds the rate of inflation in Israel on a relatively even basis.

        During 2005, 2006 and 2007 (until April 30 when the Bank of Israel ceased to publish this data), the NIS was devalued (appreciated) approximately 1.66%, 8.21% and 3.927%, respectively, against the currency basket, and approximately (6.85%-revaluated at 2005), 5.18% and 8.97%, respectively, against the U.S. dollar. Our operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to guard against currency fluctuations in the future. We do not currently engage in any currency hedging transactions intended to reduce the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on our results of operations. We cannot guarantee that we will not enter into such transactions in the future or that such measures will adequately protect us from serious harm due to the impact of inflation in Israel.

        The relationship between the Company’s assets and liabilities in Israeli currency and whether they are linked to a foreign currency or price index also affects the Company’s financial results. In the past IIS has managed its exposure in Israeli currency so that unlinked liabilities generally exceeded unlinked monetary assets in Israeli currency. The Company cannot predict whether it will be able to continue to manage its assets and liabilities in this manner in the future.

Effective Corporate Tax Rate

        The income tax obligations of IIS and Witech in Israel are based upon earnings determined for Israeli statutory purposes and not as determined from the amounts reported in dollars. Pursuant to an amendment to the income Tax Ordinance, approved by the Israeli parliament on July 25, 2005, Israeli companies are generally subject to income tax on their taxable income at the rate of 31% for the year 2006, 29% for 2007, 27% for 2008, 26% for 2009 and 25% for year 2010 and thereafter.

        The subsidiary is incorporated outside of Israel is assessed for tax under the tax laws in the U.S. The applicable corporate tax rate for the subsidiary is up to 40%.

30

        As of December 31, 2007, the Company has carryforward tax losses in the amount of approximately $ 47 million (and approximately $41 at December 31, 2006), which may be carried forward and offset against taxable income in the future for an indefinite period. In addition, as of December 31, 2007, the Company has accumulated capital losses for tax purposes carryforward in a total amount of $43 million (and approximately $38 at December 31, 2006), which may offset against future capital gains for tax purposes for an indefinite period. These losses have not been audited and approved by the relevant tax authorities.

        As of December 31, 2007, Witech has carryforward tax losses in the amount of approximately $7.3 million (and approximately $2.2 million, at December 31, 2006), which may be carried forward and offset against taxable income in the future for an indefinite period.

Governmental, Economic, Fiscal, Monetary or Political Factors

        Our principal offices and our principal facilities and those of Witech are located in Israel, and each of us is directly affected by the political, economic and military conditions to which that country is subject. Any of Witech’s manufacturing operations would be heavily dependent upon components imported from outside of Israel. Almost all of Witech’s sales will be made outside of Israel. Accordingly, our operations and those of Witech could be materially adversely affected if major hostilities involving Israel should occur or if trade between Israel and its present trading partners were interrupted or curtailed. In addition, termination or reduction of certain governmental grants, programs and tax benefits could have a material adverse effect on Witech and us.

Political Conditions

        Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a state of hostility has existed, varying in degree and intensity, between Israel and the Arab countries. While Israel has entered into peace agreements with both Egypt and Jordan and several other countries have announced their intentions to establish trade and other relations with Israel, Israel has not entered into any peace arrangement with Syria or Lebanon. During the summer of 2006, Israel was engaged in an armed conflict with Hezbollah, a Lebanese Islamist Shiite militia group and political party. This conflict involved missile strikes against civilian targets in northern Israel that resulted in economic losses. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could adversely affect our operations. Since September 2000, terrorist violence in Israel has increased significantly and negotiations between Israel and Palestinian representatives have effectively ceased. The establishment of a government in the Palestinian Authority in early 2006 by representatives of the Hamas militant group has created additional unrest and uncertainty in the region. We can give no assurance that security and political conditions will not have an impact on our business in the future. Hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could adversely affect our operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

        Despite the peace between Israel and Egypt and Jordan, some countries, companies and organizations continue to participate in a boycott of Israeli firms and others doing business with Israel or with Israeli companies. Although we are precluded from marketing our products to such countries, we believe that in the past the boycott has not had a material adverse effect on us.

        All male adult citizens and permanent residents of Israel under the age of 48 are, unless exempt, obligated to perform up to 30 days of military reserve duty annually. Additionally, all such residents are subject to being called to active duty at any time under emergency circumstances. Many of our officers and employees and those of Witech are currently obligated to perform annual reserve duty. While we have operated effectively under these requirements since we began operations, we cannot assess the full impact of such requirements on our workforce or business if conditions should change, and we cannot predict the effect on us of any expansion or reduction of such obligations.

31

Economic Conditions

        Israel’s economy has been subject to numerous destabilizing factors, including a period of rampant inflation in the early to mid-1980s, low foreign exchange reserves, fluctuations in world commodity prices, military conflicts and civil unrest. The Israeli government has, for these and other reasons, intervened in various sectors of the economy, by utilizing, among other means, fiscal and monetary policies, import duties, foreign currency restrictions and control of wages, prices and foreign currency exchange rates. In 1998, the Israeli currency control regulations were liberalized significantly and as a result Israeli residents were permitted to deal in foreign currency and non-residents of Israel were permitted to purchase and sell Israeli currency and assets. The Israeli government has periodically changed its policies in these areas. There are currently no Israeli currency control restrictions on remittances of dividends on ordinary shares or the proceeds from the sale of shares; however, legislation remains in effect pursuant to which currency controls can be imposed by administrative action at any time. In addition, Israeli residents are required to file reports pertaining to specific types of actions or transactions.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The Company had current assets of approximately $562,000 on December 31, 2007, $4,710,000 on December 31, 2006 and $41,000 on December 31, 2005. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 1.19 on December 31, 2007, 18.046 on December 31, 2006 and 0.177 on December 31, 2005. The decrease in the current ratio as of December 31, 2007 was primarily due to a reduction in our cash on hand and an increase in our accounts payable and accruals due to ongoing operational expenses. The increase in the current ratio in 2006 was primarily due to the receipt of $4,713,000 from the sale of our shares in StoreAge. The decrease in the current ratio in 2005 was mainly a result of a reduction in cash due to operating activities and the accumulation of the Liquidators’ and directors’ fees payable.

        For a discussion of the primary currency in which the operations of the Company and Witech are conducted see Item 5.A., “Operating Results,” above.

        In 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company recorded a net negative cash flow from operations of approximately $52,000, $49,000 and $289,000, respectively.

        The Company currently has no available lines of credit or other unused credit facilities.

        In February 2008, the Nimrod Fund, one of our shareholders who holds approximately 7% of our issued and outstanding share capital, provided a loan to Witech in the amount of $400,000 which is to be repaid on July 1, 2008, with interest of 0.917% per month (the total amount to be repaid is $414,672). The loan is unsecured. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 160,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to $0.44 per share.

        In April 2008 our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, CDRide Corp., received a short-term bridge loan in the amount of up to $1,400,000 repayable on June 30, 2008. The loan bears interest at the rate of 0.8% per month. An amount of $850,000 was disbursed in April 2008 and an additional $300,000 was disbursed in June 2008. The remaining $250,000 will be disbursed at the discretion of the lender if required to repay bank financing. The loan is secured by a pledge on future income of CDRide Corp. as well as a guaranty by us and Witech. The loan is not convertible into equity. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 560,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to the lower of $0.44 per share and the lowest price at which we raised equity or convertible debt financing in the next 12 months. The lender is a company related to CDC Holdings Ltd., who holds approximately 5.4% of our issued and outstanding shares and who is associated with Alon Wulkan and Iris Weller-Weiss, two of our directors. The lender has agreed to postpone repayment of the loan until we raise additional financing, but not later than July 31, 2008.

        We anticipate that our existing cash on hand, along with the escrow funds received in May 2008, will be sufficient, at the business levels presently projected, to meet our working capital requirements, including normal capital expenditures, at least until December 31, 2008. However, Witech is dependent on receipt of financing from IIS for its future operations. We need to raise immediately additional financing to maintain and expand Witech’s operations.

32

        Witech currently does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its requirements in the twelve months period following January 1, 2008, and without additional financing there is substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern. Any additional financing may not be available when required or at acceptable terms and may result in significant dilution to our shareholders. If financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, Witech’s business will suffer, it will need to scale back its activities and may need to cease its operations.

C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc

        Since December 31, 2002 we have not carried out any research and/or development activities. We currently hold no patents, licenses or other intellectual property assets. Witech has a patent pending in the United States, EU and Japan for a system and method for filming and recording attractions. Witech does not license its software to third parties.

D. Trend Information

        As of December 31, 2006, we were no longer engaged in any operational business activity other than managing our minority holding in Enargis, which was disposed of in May 2007. We consummated the share exchange transaction with Witech on January 2, 2008.

        Witech and the industry to which it relates are witnessing an increased interest in video products for rides at amusement parks as well as an upward trend in customers’ preferences for DVDs over still photographs. However, three of the largest ride photo companies, Kodak, Colorvision and Picsolve, currently have corporate sponsorship agreements with a number of large park chains. These sponsorship agreements often give the sponsor exclusive rights for all digital media services in the parks. When supplying systems to parks with sponsorship agreements, we may have to split part of the revenues with the sponsor. These agreements may limit Witech’s potential growth into new park chains. We anticipate the need of Witech to enter into its own sponsorship agreements in the future, but it may need to wait for the current agreements to expire. Although these agreements are typically for three years, there is no assurance that the agreements will not be renewed with the current sponsors. Other than the above, we do not expect any material variation in revenue sharing arrangements with potential future customers relative to the arrangements we have with existing customers.

        Although the gross margins for Witech’s sales in 2007, 2006 and 2005 were negative, this was based on a strategic decision to install a large number of systems regardless of expected profitability. Installation of a large amount of systems gave Witech the opportunity to prove that their systems would operate smoothly and out sell single photograph static systems. It also provided Witech with an understanding regarding installation, operation support and profitability. As a result of this decision, Witech gained credibility and increased its market presence. With the approval of the parks, Witech is ceasing operations of systems on rides that were not profitable in 2007 and in 2008 intends to install only systems that it believes will be profitable. Based on Witech’s experiences, Witech intends to focus its efforts on parks that have a high percentage of tourist visitors as opposed to locals as this dramatically increases the revenues from Witech’s system per ride. In addition based on its experiences, Witech is moving to regional maintenance centers in the U.S. with an aim to significantly reduce its operations costs.

        For additional information please see the “Risk Factors” listed in Item 3 above and the description of Witech’s Business in Item 4 “Information on the Company C. Witech”.

E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        Neither IIS nor Witech have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

33

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

        The following table of our material contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007, summarizes the aggregate effect that these obligations are expected to have on our cash flows in the periods indicated:

	Payment due by period (in thousands of dollars)
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years
IIS
Long-term loans from others	$	782			$	336	$	446
Accrued severance pay		4		4
Uncertain tax positions		4						4
Total	$	790	$	4	$	336	$	450
Witech
Long-term bank loans	$	450	$	308	$	142
Long-term loans from others		897		594		303
Warrants issued to a bank		203		203
Uncertain tax positions		89						89
Accrued severance pay		178						178
Finder's fee		110		110
Operating lease - cars		207		95		112
Purchase obligation for fixed assets		389		389
Facilities lease		186		168		18
Total	$	2,709	$	1,867	$	575	$	267

Item 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A. Directors and Senior Management

        The Company’s executive officers and directors and their share ownership as of June 30, 2008 are as follows:

Name	Age		Expiration of office		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
Charles Moss - Chairman of the Board of
the Company and Chief Executive Officer
of Witech		53		2008		1,012,141	(1)
Robi Hartman - Director and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and
Acting Chief Financial Officer		47		2008		2,748,901
Aharon Jacobowitz -Director		59		2008		0
Alon Wulkan -Director		38		2008		0
Iris Weller-Weiss - External Director		33		2010		0
Adrian Auman(2)-External Director		53		2010		0
David Elooz - Director and Chief
Operations Officer of Witech		35		2008		1,094,097
Eliyahu Cohen - Director and Chief
Technology Officer of Witech		35		2008		1,010,521
Ronen Segal - Vice President Sales of
Witech		35		-		1,010,521
Yifat Zommer - CFO of the Company and
Witech		34		-		18,995

(1) Including shares of Opcom Ltd.; a company controlled by Mr. Moss.

(2) Mr. Auman replaced Mr. Phillip Stein who resigned on December 20, 2007.

34

        Charles Moss has acted as a director of the Company since January 2, 2008 and as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Witech since its formation in February 2004. He is also the founder and owner of Opcom Ltd., an Israeli fiber optic company developing custom test solutions and served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of this company from 1986 until February 2004. He also served on the board of directors of MaxBill during 2006. Mr. Moss holds a Bachelors of Science and Masters of Science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science.

        Robi Hartman has 25 years of experience as an entrepreneur in the field of technology and as an executive for leading technology companies, with wide experience in public markets, finance and accounting. He has been the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since the Company terminated its voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007 and fulfilled these duties until January 2, 2008 where at such time he began acting as the Chief Executive Officer, a Director as well as Chairman of the Board of Witech. He served as a Director of the Company from September 1998 until its entry into voluntary liquidation in July 2004, Vice Chairman of the Board from October 1998 to March 2000, Acting Chief Financial Officer from December 1998 until July 2004, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from March 2000 until July 2004, and joint liquidator of the Company from July 2004 until April 2007. He has also served as the Vice Chairman of the Board of Teledata Networks since the management buyout from ADC Telecommunications in February 2004 and was Chairman of StoreAge Networking Technologies from its inception in 1999 until 2006.  Before joining the Company, from 1987 to 1996, Mr. Hartman was the manager of Teledata Communications Ltd., a leading supplier of advanced access solutions, beginning as a manager and advancing to the Chief Financial Officer and finally as Chief Executive Officer and President.  From 1996 to 1997, Mr. Hartman was the President of VCON Telecommunications, a pioneer in PC based teleconferencing.  Since 1997 he owns and manages West End Technology Investments Ltd. Mr. Hartman received his B.A. in Political Science and Economics from Bar Ilan University and his Masters in Business Administration (MBA) from Bentley College.

        Aharon Jacobowitz has served as a director of the Company since the Company terminated its voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007. He served as a director of the Company from May 1995 until its entry into voluntary liquidation in July 2004 and as a joint-liquidator of the Company from July 2004 until April 2007.  Since 1989, Mr. Jacobowitz has been a management consultant to large organizations on data processing and management issues.  In addition to his consultancy business, Mr. Jacobowitz served three periods as general manager of two high-tech start up companies and the Israeli branch of Coopers and Lybrand consultancy firm. Prior to 1989, Mr. Jacobowitz was employed for 14 years in various capacities in the marketing division of IBM Israel Ltd.  His main specialties are networking, midrange systems and project management. He holds a BSc in Mathematics and Physics and an MSc in computer sciences (with distinction) both from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

35

        Alon Wulkan has served as a director of the Company since the Company terminated its voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007. During the last five years he has served in various positions in Kardan Israel Ltd. and its subsidiaries, including Vice President of Finance, economist and economic advisor and acts as a director of Kardan Trade and Retail Ltd., Tuxedo Holdings (1999) Ltd.; Kardan Securities Ltd. and Kardan Financial Holdings Ltd. Mr. Wulkan is the son-in-law of Mr. Schnur who is one of the beneficiaries of a trust that holds the shares of CDC Holdings Ltd. (the holder of approximately 5.44% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company). Mr. Wulkan holds a BA in Social Sciences and Economics from the Open University in Israel and a Masters in Business Administration (MBA) from Tel Aviv University.

        Iris Weller-Weiss has served as a director of the Company since the Company terminated its voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007. She has been acting since January 2006 as the Legal Consultant & Personal Assistant to Mr. Avner Schnur. Mr. Schnur is one of the beneficiaries of a trust that holds the shares of CDC Holdings Ltd. (the holder of approximately 5.44% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company) and a principal shareholder and director of Kardan NV, a company traded on the Amsterdam Euronext and Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. Kardan NV is actively involved in real estate, financial services, infrastructure, communications & technologies, and the automotive industry. From 2003-2006, Mrs. Weller was a prosecutor with the District Attorney’s Office. Between the years 1999-2002, Mrs. Weller managed the Los Angeles branch of Kelly Law Registry, a leading American legal consulting and placement firm. Mrs. Weller received her LLB degree from Haifa University School of Law and her LLM degree from UCLA School of Law. She is a member of both the Israeli Bar Association and the State Bar of California.

        Adrian Auman has acted as an External Director of the Company since December 20, 2007. Mr. Auman has been Corporate Vice President for Finance and Investor Relations of Orbotech (NASDAQ:ORBK) since May 2006, prior to which he had served, since January 2000, as Director of Finance and Investor Relations and, from July 1997, has been Director of Finance. He was financial controller of the Company from October 1992 to July 1997 and was the financial controller of Orbot from 1988 until the Merger. Prior to joining Orbot, he was an audit supervisor at Kesselman & Kesselman, independent registered public accountants in Israel, from 1986 to 1988 and a tax manager at Goldstein, Golub, Kessler & Co., certified public accountants, from 1979 to 1985. Mr. Auman serves on the Board of Directors of Coreflow Ltd, which develops and sells aerochemical products and subsystems. Mr. Auman was among the founders and a member of the Board of Directors of Terem Emergency Medical Center Israel Ltd. which owns and runs 5 urgent care clinics throughout the Jerusalem region. He is a certified public accountant both in Israel and the United States and has a master’s of science degree from Pace University in New York.

        David Elooz has acted as a director of the Company since January 2, 2008 and as Chief Operations Officer of Witech since February 2007. Mr. Elooz served from 2001 until 2003 as Optical Engineering Manager and Senior Systems Engineer in Chiaro Networks Ltd., an Israeli company developing and managing optical design and production of fiberoptic switches. He also served from 2003 until 2006, as Team Leader and Project Manager for Applied Materials Ltd. (a subsidiary of Applied Materials Inc.), developing new inspection tools. Mr. Elooz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from the Jerusalem College of Technology.

        Eliyahu Cohen has acted as a director of the Company since January 2, 2008 and as Chief Technology Officer of Witech since its formation in February 2004. Mr. Cohen served from 2002 until joining Witech, as Projects Manager and Vice President R&D in ODF Optronics, an Israeli company developing visioning systems for the military and defense market. Mr. Cohen holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the Jerusalem College of Technology, and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from Bar Ilan University.

        Ronen Segal has acted as the Vice President of Sales for Witech since its formation in February 2004. From 1994 to 1998 he worked for the Israeli Ministry of Defense, Advanced Technology Unit, where he was responsible for the development and integration of a data communications link with a radar system. From 1998 to October 2000 he also worked for the Israeli Navy on the integration of submarine communication systems. From November 2000 until January 2004, he was the project leader for OpTun Inc. with responsibility for development of test systems for optical components. Mr. Segal has a Bachelors of Science degree in Electro-Optical Engineering and Applied Physics, from the Jerusalem Technology College and is also a certified WiFi system engineer.

36

        Yifat Zommer has acted as Chief Financial Officer of the Company since June 2008 and served as Chief Financial Officer of Witech since April 2007. Before she joined Witech, Mrs. Zommer served as Chief Financial Officer of CTWARE Ltd., a high-tech start-up in the field of telecommunications. Prior to that she was an audit manager in PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), where she served for 5 years. Mrs. Zommer holds a Bachelor of Accounting and Economics degree from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Masters in Business Administration (MBA) from Tel-Aviv University.

        There is no family relationship between any of the persons named above.

        There are no arrangements or understandings with any of the major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member of senior management.

B. Compensation

        At our general meeting of the shareholders held in July 2004, Messrs. Hartman and Jacobowitz were appointed as joint liquidators with a shareholders’ approved fee of $1,000 per month (plus VAT, if applicable), to each commencing from the appointment of the liquidation and continuing until distribution of all proceeds of the liquidation to our shareholders. These fees in the aggregate amount of $58,000 were paid in May 2007. The deferral of these fees represented a significant savings in cash expenses for the Company during 2004, 2005 and 2006. In addition, our shareholders in July 2004 approved a bonus to Messrs. Hartman and Jacobowitz as liquidators depending on the per share amount distributed to our shareholders, however since the liquidation proceedings were terminated, the bonus was not payable. Our shareholders further approved that (i) we would indemnify the liquidators for any liability, costs and expenses (including legal costs and expenses) relating to claims or demands against them in their capacity as liquidators to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law and subject to the same restrictions and qualifications as currently applicable to indemnification of our directors and officers, and (ii) we would waive any liabilities, claims, demands and causes of action against the liquidators in their capacity as liquidators to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, with the exception of actions constituting gross negligence or willful misconduct.

        Effective as of April 1, 2003, all of the directors of the Company agreed to suspend their compensation until the Company either received a settlement from an ongoing lawsuit which at that time was in mediation or received proceeds from the sale/exit of StoreAge or Enargis or the raising of additional financial resources. Following settlement of this lawsuit, the directors of the Company did not take their compensation and agreed that compensation would be paid only from receipt of the proceeds from the sale/exit of our holdings in StoreAge or Enargis or the raising of additional financial resources. The amount of compensation due but unpaid to our officers and directors as of December 31, 2006 according to this arrangement was approximately $172,000 (these amounts were paid in May 2007). In addition until January 2006, Mr. Hartman received compensation from StoreAge for services he performed as Chairman of the Board of StoreAge in the amounts equal to approximately $60,000, $57,000, and $4,800 for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Mr. Hartman did not receive any compensation from Enargis.

        No options were granted to officers or directors during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and all options issued prior to such time have expired. We have issued 2,435,000 options pursuant to our 2007 Israeli Stock Option Plan. For information on the Company’s 2007 stock option plan, see “Stock Option Plans” below.

37

        Effective as of April 1, 1999, StoreAge granted to Mr. Hartman in his capacity as Chairman of the Board, acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of StoreAge the option to purchase 310,000 non-voting ordinary shares of StoreAge at an exercise price of $0.1 per share. Effective as of January, 2006, Mr. Hartman received additional options to purchase 91,539 non-voting ordinary shares of StoreAge at an exercise price of $0.25 per share bringing the amount of his options in StoreAge to a total of 401,359 shares, constituting approximately 0.69% of the fully-diluted shares of StoreAge at the time of its sale to LSI. The net (pre tax) proceeds received by Mr. Hartman from the LSI transaction as a result of the exercise of these options was approximately $314,000.

        On April 17, 2007, our shareholders approved (i) a proposal that the compensation to our external directors, Mr. Philip Stein and Ms. Iris Weller, shall be the greater of $12,000 per annum or the lowest cash compensation paid to any other of our directors of who receives cash and who is not an employee, consultant, service provider or controlling shareholder (or office holder of such controlling shareholder) of our company (the “Other Directors”), but in any case, their compensation shall not exceed the average cash compensation paid to the Other Directors, and (ii) the proposal to grant to each such external director options to purchase 45,000 of our Ordinary Shares, as part of an incentive option plan to be adopted for all directors who are not external directors and other officers of our company, or, if greater, the lowest option compensation granted to Other Directors who receive options from our company, but in any case, not to exceed the average option compensation granted to the Other Directors, all as determined in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and regulations. The options shall vest annually in equal shares over three years following the grant date, and the exercise price shall be equal to the exercise price of the options first granted after April 17, 2007 to any Other Director, all as may be adjusted in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and regulations.

        Mr. Stein resigned and Mr. Adrian Auman was appointed as an external director, both effective as of December 20, 2007. Mr. Auman’s compensation as approved by our shareholders on December 20, 2007 is the same as specified above. The exercise price of the options to our external directors is $0.44 per share (the same price at which options were granted to our Other Directors).

        On May 15, 2007 and November 5, 2007, our board of directors and audit committee approved, subject to the shareholders approval that was given on December 20, 2007, the monthly compensation to West End Technology Investments Ltd. for the services of Mr. Hartman as our CEO in the amount (total cost to the Company) of NIS 60,000 plus VAT. In addition, in the event that the Company terminates the Agreement after April 16, 2011 (but not prior to this date), except in the case of a substantial breach, West End Technology Investments Ltd. will be paid a one-time payment equal to an additional 400% of the monthly fee. The Agreement includes confidentiality undertakings and a 12-month non-competition and non-solicitation undertaking by Mr. Hartman and West End Technology Investments Ltd. The Agreement commenced on April 17, 2007 and continues until either party terminates the Agreement at any time, at its sole discretion, by giving the other party at least 180-days advance written notice. In addition, on November 5, 2007, our board of directors and audit committee approved, subject to the shareholders approval that was provided on December 20, 2007, the grant of options to purchase 15,000 Ordinary Shares of the Company to Mr. Hartman for each year in which Mr. Hartman serves as a director of the Company, commencing April 17, 2007. The exercise price of such options shall be $ 0.44 (the average closing price of the Company’s shares (as quoted by Yahoo Financial or other similar service) on the last 20 trading days, prior to the date of the shareholder resolution).

        Since our general meeting of the shareholders resolved at its meeting held on April 17, 2007 to terminate the voluntary liquidation proceedings, no bonus was payable to the liquidators according to the shareholder resolution of July 2004. As such, on June 17, 2007 our Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved and on December 20, 2007, our general meeting of shareholders approved, that (i) we pay Aharon Jacobowitz a cash bonus as follows: $25,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS (as defined below) is above $0.50 per share, $50,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS is above $1.00 per share and $75,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS is above $1.30 per share, and (ii) we pay Robi Hartman a cash bonus of $100,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS is above $1.30 per share. For the purposes of this resolution “PPS” means the average closing price of our shares on the “Pink Sheets” (as quoted by Yahoo Financial or other similar service) during the twenty (20) trading days following the approval of this resolution by our general meeting of shareholders which was provided on December 20, 2007. Since the PPS was below the relevant price, no bonus was or will be paid to the liquidators.

38

        The following table summarizes the terms of employment of Charles Moss, David Elooz and Eliyahu Cohen that were approved by our shareholders on December 20, 2007:

Name	Initial Term*	Job description**	Basic Salary per month in 2007 and 2008***	Basic Salary per month in 2009****	Benefits	Bonus ($)
						Profit after tax	Bonus
Charles Moss	January 1, 2008-	CEO of Witech	NIS 42,000 or	NIS 44,000 or	- Managers Insurance equal to 15.83% of the Salary	$500,000-$1,000,000	$15,000
	January 31, 2011.		$ 10,475	$ 11,000	- Education Fund equal to 7.5% of the Salary	$1,000,000-$1,500,000	$37,500
					- Cellular Phone	$1,500,000-$2,000,000	$45,000
	Automatically				- Company car up to Category 5, provided that the cost	$2,000,000-$3,000,000	$50,000
	renewed if not				of such car will not exceed NIS 4,200 per month	$3,000,000-$5,000,000	$100,000
	terminated earlier.				- 4 months salary ("adjustment pay")	$5,000,000-$8,000,000	$100,000
					after February 1, 2011 in addition	$8,000,000-$10,000,000	$200,000
	Termination Notice				to any statutory severance pay	>$10,000,000	$250,000
	period of at least				-Vacation of 20 days per each 12-month period
	120 days.
David Elooz	January 1, 2008-	COO of Witech	NIS 42,000 or	NIS 44,000 or	- Managers Insurance equal to 15.83% of the Salary	$500,000-$1,000,000	$15,000
	January 31, 2011		$ 10,475	$ 11,000	- Education Fund equal to 7.5% of the Salary	$1,000,000-$1,500,000	$37,500
					- Cellular Phone	$1,500,000-$2,000,000	$45,000
	Automatically				- Company car up to Category 5,	$2,000,000-$3,000,000	$50,000
	renewed if not				provided that the cost of such car	$3,000,000-$5,000,000	$100,000
	terminated earlier.				will not exceed NIS 4,200 per month	$5,000,000-$8,000,000	$100,000
					- 4 months salary ("adjustment pay")	$8,000,000-$10,000,000	$200,000
	Termination Notice				after February 1, 2011 in addition	>$10,000,000	$250,000
	period of at least				to any statutory severance pay
	120 days.				- Vacation of 20 days per each
					12-month period
Eliyahu Cohen	January 1,	CTO of Witech	NIS 42,000 or	NIS 44,000 or	- Managers Insurance equal to 15.83%	$500,000-$1,000,000	$15,000
	2008-January 31,		$ 10,475	$ 11,000	of the Salary	$1,000,000-$1,500,000	$37,500
	2011.				- Education Fund equal to 7.5% of	$1,500,000-$2,000,000	$45,000
					the Salary	$2,000,000-$3,000,000	$50,000
	Automatically				- Cellular Phone	$3,000,000-$5,000,000	$100,000
	renewed if not				Company car up to Category 5,	$5,000,000-$8,000,000	$100,000
	terminated earlier.				provided that the cost of such car	$8,000,000-$10,000,000	$200,000
					will not exceed NIS 4,200 per month	>$10,000,000	$250,000
	Termination Notice				- 4 months salary ("adjustment pay")
	period of at least				after February 1, 2011 in addition
	120 days.				to any statutory severance pay]
					- Vacation of 20 days per each
					12-month period

*     If the total sales or profit for the previous year were less than 60% of the budget approved by the board of directors of Witech, with no obligation to pay the remaining value of the contract until the end of the initial term. Witech may terminate the employment agreement at its discretion at any time after February 1, 2008. Unless Witech exercises its right to terminate the contract under such condition, the contract shall automatically renew until terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 of the employment agreement.

**     The agreement with the employee includes a Confidentiality and a 2-year Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation undertaking.

***     This will be the basic salary until February 1, 2009; provided that, until additional equity or convertible debt financing is raised, the basic salary shall be reduced by 25% (and will not be increased retroactively following such financing).

****     The salary from February 1, 2010 until January 31, 2011 will increase by 10% if the profit after tax in 2009 is at least $1,000,000.

39

        On May 15, 2008, we resolved (with the agreement of the relevant people) to postpone payment to Charles Moss and David Elooz, of NIS 1,400 of their monthly salary, to Eliyahu Cohen and Ronen Segal of NIS 1,500 of their monthly salary, to West End Technology Investments Ltd. (for the services of Robi Hartman) of NIS 18,000 of its monthly fee and from the other directors a monthly fee of $1,000. The accumulated sums that have been postponed will be paid when we raise additional financing.

        In May 2008, we resolved to reduce the salaries of a number of Witech’s key employees by 10% until we raise additional financing. In addition, two members of our Board of Directors who are not employees or consultants of the Company agreed to defer receipt of their cash compensation until we raise additional financing.

        In addition, on January 2, 2008, we granted stock options to Charles Moss, David Elooz, Eliayu Cohen and Ronen Segal, to purchase 527,330 each of our Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to $0.44, which was the average trading price per share of the Exchange Shares during the twenty (20) trading days prior to the closing of the Exchange Agreement, vesting in eight (8) semi- annual installments as long as each such executive continues to be employed by us. These options were issued according to the capital gains route under Section 102 of the Israeli Income Ordinance or in accordance with Section 3(i) of the Israeli Income Ordinance, as applicable.

C. Board Practices

        In August 1993 our articles of association were amended to provide, among other matters, for a classified board of directors. These provisions were retained with minor amendments, in the new articles of association of the Company approved on November 19, 2000 (the “Articles of Association”). Effective as of January 2, 2008, the “classified board’ provisions of our Articles of Association were repealed and currently all directors (except for “External Directors” elected in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law) are elected at a general or special meeting of shareholders and hold office until the end of the next annual meeting or until they cease to hold office pursuant to the provisions of the Articles of Association.

        During our voluntary liquidation proceedings, from July 2004 until April 2007, our board ceased to function and was replaced by the liquidators and all powers of the board of directors were exercised by the liquidators in accordance with Israeli law. In April 2007, Messrs. Hartman, Jacobowitz and Wulkan were elected as directors and, on January 2, 2008 Messrs. Moss, Elooz and Cohen were elected as additional directors. These directors will hold office until the later of the 2008 annual general meeting of shareholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Mrs. Weller-Weiss and Mr. Auman have been elected as external directors (as defined below) pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the initial term of an external director is three years and may be extended for an additional three years.

40

        Officers serve at the discretion of the board of directors, subject to the terms of any agreement between them and the Company.

        There are no service contracts between the Company and any of its directors providing for benefits upon termination of engagement as directors.

External and Independent Directors

        Under the Israeli Companies Law, Israeli companies whose shares have been offered to the public in or outside of Israel are required to appoint two people to serve as external directors on the board of directors of a company.

Under the Companies Law:

— An external director must either be professionally eligible or have relevant accounting and financial expertise, but at least one of the external directors must have relevant accounting and financial expertise.

— A director with accounting and financial expertise is a director who, due to his education, experience and skills, possesses capabilities relating to and understandings of, business and accounting matters and financial statements, which enable him to understand in depth the company’s financial statements and to initiate a debate regarding the manner in which the company’s financial information is presented.

— A director who meets certain professional qualifications is a director who satisfies one of the following requirements: (1) the director holds an academic degree in either economics, business administration, accounting, law or public administration, (2) the director either holds another academic degree or has obtained other high education in the company’s primary field of business or in an area that is relevant to his position, and (3) the director has at least five (5) years of experience serving in one of the following capacities or an aggregate of at least five (5) years of experience in two or more of the following capacities (a) a senior business management position of a company with a substantial scope of business, (b) a senior position in the primary field of business of the company or (c) a senior public administration position.

— The board of directors should determine the minimum number of directors having financial and accounting expertise, in addition to the external director, and in making the determination as to a director’s accounting and financial expertise, the board of directors is required to consider, among other things, the education, experience and knowledge of such person with respect to (1) accounting and internal control matters that are typical to the industry in which the company engages and to companies of similar size and complexity to those of the company, (2) the responsibilities of the company’s auditor and (3) the preparation and approval of financial statements under the Companies Law and the relevant Israeli securities law.

        The Companies Law provides that a person may not be appointed as an external director if the person or the person’s relative, partner, employer or any entity controlled by that person has at the date of appointment, or has had at any time during the two years preceding that date, any affiliation with the company, any entity controlling the company or any entity controlled by the company or by this controlling entity. The term “affiliation” includes:

— an employment relationship;

— business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis;

41

— control; or

— service as an officer.

        No person can serve as an external director if the person’s position or other business creates, or may create, conflict of interests with the person’s responsibilities as an external director or if such position or other business may impair such director’s ability to serve a director. No person who is a director in one company can serve as an external director in another company, if at that time a director of the other company serves as an external director in the first company. The Companies Law further provides that if, at the time of appointment of an external director, all members of the board of directors of the company are of one gender, then the external director appointed shall be of the other gender. From April 2003 until termination of the voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007, we did not comply with these requirements due to the resignation of certain directors and our inability to attract additional directors. During our voluntary liquidation proceedings, from July 2004 until April 2007, our board ceased to function and was replaced by the liquidators and all powers of the board of directors were exercised by the liquidators in accordance with Israeli law.

        External directors are appointed by a majority vote at a shareholders’ meeting, provided that either: (1) the majority of shares voted at the meeting, including at least one third of the shares of non-controlling shareholders voted at the meeting, vote in favor of appointment of the director or (2) the total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders voted against the election of the director does not exceed one percent of the aggregate voting rights in the company. The initial term of an external director will be three years and may be extended for an additional three-year period. Each committee of a company’s board of directors will be required to include at least one external director and all external directors must be members of the company’s audit committee.

        In addition, we are obligated under the Companies Law to establish an audit committee, at least a majority of whose members are independent of management. The audit committee should adopt a formal written audit committee charter to be reviewed annually.

        An external director is entitled to consideration and to the refund of expenses, as is provided in regulations adopted under the Companies Law only and is otherwise prohibited from receiving any other consideration, directly or indirectly, in connection with the services provided as an external director. Nevertheless, the grant of an exemption from liability for breach of fiduciary duty or duty of care, an undertaking to indemnify, indemnification or insurance under the provisions of the Companies Law shall not be deemed consideration. Under the Companies Law, an external director cannot be dismissed from the office unless:

— the board of directors determines that the external director no longer meets the requirements for holding such office, as set forth in the Companies Law or that the director is in breach of his or her fiduciary duties to the company and the shareholders of the company vote (by the same majority required for the appointment) to remove the external director after the external director has been given the opportunity to present his or her position;

— an Israeli court determines, upon a request of a director or a shareholder, that the director no longer meets the requirements for holding such office as set forth in the Companies Law or that the director is in breach of his or her fiduciary duties to the company; or

— the court determines, upon a request of the company or a director, shareholder or creditor of the company, that the external director is unable to fulfill his or her duty or has been convicted of certain crimes as specified in the Companies Law.

42

Audit Committee

        The Israeli Companies Law requires public companies to appoint an audit committee. The responsibilities of the audit committee include identifying irregularities in the management of the company’s business and approving related party transactions as required by law. An audit committee must consist of at least three directors, including every external director. The chairman of the board of directors, any director employed by or otherwise providing services to the company, and a controlling shareholder or any relative of a controlling shareholder, may not be a member of the audit committee. An audit committee may not approve an action or a transaction with a controlling shareholder, or with an office holder, unless at the time of approval two external directors are serving as members of the audit committee and at least one of the external directors was present at the meeting in which an approval was granted. Our audit committee consists of Aharon Jacobowitz, Alon Wulkan, Iris Weller-Weiss and Adrian Auman.

        The audit committee provides assistance to the board in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations with respect to matters involving the accounting, auditing, financial reporting and internal control functions of the Company. In carrying out these duties, the audit committee meets at least once every fiscal quarter with management at which time, among other things, it reviews, and either approves or disapproves, the financial statements of the Company for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter and conveys its conclusions in this regard to the board. The audit committee also monitors generally the services provided by the Company’s external auditors to ensure their independence, and reviews, and either approves or disapproves, all audit and non-audit services provided by them. The Company’s external and internal auditors also report regularly to the audit committee at its meetings, and the audit committee discusses with the Company’s external auditors the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the Company’s financial statements, as and when it deems it appropriate to do so.

        Under the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the audit committee will be responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the Company’s external auditors. However, under Israeli law, the appointment of external auditors and their compensation require the approval of the shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to Israeli law, the shareholders may delegate the authority to determine the compensation of the external auditors to the board of directors. The compensation of the external auditors will be required to be approved by the audit committee and recommended to the shareholders or, if so authorized by the shareholders, recommended by the board and ratified by the shareholders or simply ratified by the board, as the case may be. The Company does not have a separate compensation committee.

Internal Auditor

        Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors must appoint an internal auditor, nominated by the audit committee. The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other matters, whether the company’s actions comply with the law and orderly business procedure. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the internal auditor may be an employee of the Company but not an office holder, or an affiliate, or a relative of an office holder or affiliate, and he or she may not be the Company’s independent accountant or its representative. Our internal auditor was appointed during May 2007 and submitted an audit report in January 2008. There were no material findings.

D. Employees

        As of December 31, 2007, Witech had 31 permanent employees and 8 temporary employees. During the height of the 2007 season, Witech had a total of 145 employees. Most of these were hired for 3-4 months to work in the U.S. parks. None of Witech’s employees are represented by a labor union and Witech considers its relations with its employees to be good. Witech’s U.S. subsidiary, CDRide had 1 permanent employee and 20 temporary employees.

43

        Until March 2008 IIS employed one person on a part-time basis, in general management and administration. Robi Hartman, our CEO is engaged on the basis of a consulting agreement.

        For a description of the agreement with our CEO and Witech’s material employment agreements, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees – B. Compensation”.

E. Share Ownership

        The following chart sets forth director and senior management share ownership in the Company as of June 30, 2008. Each shareholder listed below enjoys the same voting rights with respect to each share.

Name	Title of Class		Number of Beneficially Owned (1)			Shares Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned (%)(2)			Options(3)			Warrants
Robi Hartman		Ordinary Shares		2,748,901			11.89	%		30,000	(5)		1,092,291	(7)
Aharon Jacobowitz		Ordinary Shares		0			0			30,000	(5)		0
Alon Wulkan		Ordinary Shares		0			0			30,000	(5)		0
Charles Moss		Ordinary Shares		1,012,141	(4)		4.38	%		527,330	(6)		795	(8)
David Elooz		Ordinary Shares		1,094,097			4.73	%		527,330	(6)		0
Eliyahu Cohen		Ordinary Shares		1,010,521			4.37	%		527,330	(6)		0
Iris Weller-Weiss		Ordinary Shares		0			0			45,000	(7)		0
Adrian Auman		Ordinary Shares		0			0			45,000	(7)		0
Ronen Segal		Ordinary Shares		1,010,521			4.37	%		527,330	(6)		0
Yifat Zommer		Ordinary Shares		18,995			0.08	%		90,000	(9)		0

(1) Beneficial ownership by a person assumes the exercise of all options and warrants held by such person that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of such date.

(2) Percentage ownership is based on 23,128,768 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2008.

(3) In the event of termination of optionee’s employment or services, with us or any of our affiliates, all options granted to such optionee that are at the time of termination non-vested will immediately expire. If termination is without cause, then any vested option still in force and un-expired may be exercised within a period of three months after the date of such termination.   If termination is the result of death, or disability of the optionee, then any vested option still in force and un-expired may be exercised within a period of twelve months after the date of such termination;

(4) Includes 151,958 Shares of Opcom Ltd., a company owned and controlled by Mr. Moss.

44

(5) 15,000 options were granted on April 17, 2007 and additional 15,000 were granted on April 17, 2008. Each of these directors will receive additional options to purchase 15,000 shares for each year in which they serve as a director of the Company, commencing April 17, 2007 and vesting of such options will occur at the end of each such year. The exercise price of all the above options is $0.44 which is the average closing price of the Company’s shares in the 20 trading days preceding the approval of these options by the general meeting of the shareholders of the Company.

(6) All these options were issued on January 2, 2008 at an exercise price equal to $0.44 which was the average trading price per share of the Exchange Shares during the 20 trading days prior to the closing of the Witech Exchange Agreement, vesting in eight (8) semi- annual installments as long as each such executive continues to be employed by us or Witech.

(7) All these options were granted in December 2007 and vest in three equal annual installments commencing in April 17, 2008 with respect to Mrs. Weller-Weiss and December 20, 2007 with respect to Mr. Auman. The exercise price of all the above options is $0.44 which is the average closing price of the Company’s shares in the 20 trading days preceding the approval of the options granted to Mr. Auman by the general meeting of the Shareholders of the Company.

(8) Part of the 4,600,000 warrants to be issued following compliance with applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations, we intend to issue, for no additional consideration, to all our shareholders at the record date determined for the purpose of the extraordinary general meeting held on December 20, 2007 (November 9, 2007), to the percentage holding of each such shareholder in our issued and outstanding share capital on such date. The exercises price of these warrants will be $0.44.

(9) All these options were granted on May 6, 2008, vesting in six (6) semi-annual installments at an exercise price of $ 0.44 per share.

Stock Option Plans

        In August 1993, the Company’s employee share incentive plan (the “1993 Plan”) was approved by the board of directors and later adopted by the Company’s shareholders. The 1993 Plan permitted the grant of options to purchase Ordinary Shares to officers, directors and key employees of, and consultants to, the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. The 1993 Plan and all outstanding options issued under the 1993 Plan expired in 2003 except that the options held by Mr. Robi Hartman and Mr. Aharon Jacobowitz expired in 2006.

        On November 5, 2007, our board of directors approved the Company’s 2007 Israeli Share Option Plan (the “Plan”) and resolved to reserve 3,300,000 Ordinary Shares for issuance pursuant to the Plan. The Plan was also approved by our general meeting of shareholders on December 20, 2007.

        The purpose of the Plan is to enable us to attract and retain qualified persons as employees, officers, directors, consultants, advisors and service providers and to motivate such persons by providing them with an equity participation in the Company. The Plan will expire 10 years after its adoption, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors.

        The Plan is administered by our board of directors or a committee of our board of directors which has broad discretion, subject to certain limitations, to determine the persons entitled to receive options.

        Under the Plan, the terms and conditions under which options are granted and the number of shares subject thereto shall be determined by our board of directors or a committee of our board of directors. The board of directors or such committee also has discretion to determine the nature of the consideration to be paid upon the exercise of an option under the Plan. Such consideration generally may consist of cash, but may at the discretion of our board of directors include cash and a recourse promissory note.

45

        The Ordinary Shares acquired upon exercise of an option are subject to certain restrictions on transfer, sale or hypothecation. Options are exercisable and restrictions on disposition of shares lapse pursuant to the terms of the individual agreements under which the options were granted or the shares were issued.

        Options granted under the Plan to our employees and to certain of our directors may be designated as 102 Options that afford qualified optionees certain tax benefits under the Israel Income Tax Ordinance (“102 Options”). We have elected that the benefits available under the “capital gains” alternative will apply to 102 Options. Pursuant to the election made by the Company, capital gains derived by optionees arising from the sale of shares derived from the exercise of options granted to them under Section 102, will be subject to a flat capital gains tax rate of 25% (instead of the gains being taxed as salary income at the employee’s marginal tax rate). However, as a result of this election, the Company will no longer be allowed to claim as an expense for tax purposes the amounts credited to such employees as a benefit when the related capital gains tax is payable by them, as the Company was previously entitled to do. The Company may change its election from time to time, as permitted by the Tax Ordinance. There are various conditions that must be met in order to qualify for these benefits, including registration of the options in the name of a trustee (the “Trustee”) for each of the employees who is granted options. Each option, and any ordinary shares acquired upon the exercise of the option, must be held by the Trustee for a period commencing on the date of grant and ending no earlier than 24 months after the date of grant.

        As of December 31, 2007 the Company issued stock options to purchase 135,000 of its Ordinary Shares at an exercise price of $0.44. On January 2, 2008 the Company issued stock options to purchase 2,300,000 of its Ordinary Shares at an exercise price of $0.44 and on May 6, 2008 options to purchase an additional 731,000 of its Ordinary Shares at an exercise price of $0.44.

Item 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A. Major Shareholders

        During the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2006, Mr. Hartman purchased an aggregate of 1,377,757 Ordinary Shares of the Company in open-market transactions.

        Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, on January 2, 2008, we issued 11,552,229 of our Ordinary Shares to the shareholders of Witech.

        The following table sets forth, as of May 30, 2008, the number of Ordinary Shares of the Company owned by all persons known to the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of the Company’s Ordinary Shares. The Company’s major shareholders do not have different voting rights.

Name and Address	Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned			Percentage of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
Nimrod Fund Ltd.
Sir Francis Drake Drive C725
Roadtown, Tortola,
British Virgin Islands		1,615,559	(2)		6.98	%
CDC Holdings Ltd.
c/o Fiduciaire Equity Trust A.G.
Address: 22 rue de Villereuse, P.O. Box
6135, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland		1,258,225	(3)		5.44	%
Robi Hartman
c/o I.I.S Intelligent Information Systems
Limited
33 Jabotinsky Street
Ramat Gan, Israel		2,748,901	(4)		11.89	%

46

(1) Percentage ownership is based on 23,128,768 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2008.

(2) Issued on January 2, 2008, at the closing of the Exchange Agreement in consideration for the transfer of shares in Witech to the Company. This does not include warrants issued in February 2008 to purchase 160,000 of our Ordinary Shares. (See “Item 4. Additional Information- C. Material Contracts).

(3) As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, dated January 14, 2002. This does not include warrants issued to an affiliated entity in April 2008 to purchase 560,000 of our Ordinary Shares (See “Item 4. Additional Information- C. Material Contracts”).

(4) As reported on Schedule 13D filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, dated January 24, 2007.

        As of December 31, 2007, approximately 90% of the outstanding Ordinary Shares of the Company were held of record by approximately 50 holders registered on the books of the Company’s United States transfer agent with addresses in the United States. The Company believes that a majority of its Ordinary Shares are beneficially owned by non-United States persons. To the extent known to the Company, the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person.

B. Related Party Transactions

        In February 2001, a portion of our office space located in Ramat Gan, Israel was leased from West End, a company that is owned by Robi Hartman, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. As of April 1, 2003, this lease was assumed by Enargis which sublet 35% of the premises to us at an annual cost of approximately $12,000 which was reduced by 50% to $6,000 per annum with effect from August 2004, following our entry into voluntary liquidation proceedings in July 2004. The other 50%, $6,000, was deferred until receipts of the proceeds from the sale of either StoreAge or Enargis. These deferred amounts were paid in May 2007 following termination of our voluntary liquidation proceedings. As of November 2005, we became a direct tenant of West End. Following termination of the Company’s voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007, the amount of office space used increased from 35% to 50% of the premises and the annual cost also increased to $1,450 per month due to the larger space (the cost per square meter remained the same according to the original agreement).

        On June 29, 2008, the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved the extension of the above agreement until December 31, 2008. The extension is subject to additional funds raised of at least $2,500,000 after this approval.

        Effective as of January 2006, Mr. Hartman received additional options to purchase 91,539 non-voting ordinary shares of StoreAge at an exercise price of $0.25 per share bringing the amount of his options in StoreAge to a total of 401,359 shares, constituting approximately 0.69% of the outstanding shares of StoreAge on a fully diluted basis. See: “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees. B. Compensation”. These options vested and were exercised at the time of the sale of StoreAge to LSI. For compensation due to the liquidators in the voluntary liquidation and our officers and directors, see “Item 6 – Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.

47

        On May 23, 2007, considering the bleak business prospects of Enargis and the costs involved in maintaining our shareholding in Enargis (particularly audit costs), we, together with all the other shareholders of Enargis, transferred all our shares in Enargis to West End Technology Investments Ltd. for no consideration other than the assumption by West End of all Enargis’ liabilities.

        On June 17, 2007, our Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved and on December 20, 2007, at a general meeting, our shareholders approved that (i) we will pay Mr. Aharon Jacobowitz a cash bonus according to the following: $25,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS (as defined below) is above $0.50 per share, $50,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS is above $1.00 per share and $75,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS is above $1.30 per share, and (ii) we will pay Robi Hartman a cash bonus of $100,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the PPS is above $1.30 per share. For the purposes of this resolution “PPS” shall mean the average closing price of our shares on the “Pink Sheets” (as quoted by Yahoo Financial or other similar service) during the twenty (20) trading days following the approval of the resolution by our general meeting of shareholders (which was given on December 20, 2007). Since the PPS was below the relevant price, no bonus was or will be paid to the liquidators.

        For a description of the agreements with our directors and our CEO see "Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees - B. Compensation".

        Out of the initial $1,500,000 loan provided by us to Witech, $200,000 was used to repay a loan provided in February 2007 by a company whose beneficial shareholders are affiliated with the beneficial shareholders of CDC Holdings Ltd., which holds 5.44% of our issued and outstanding share capital.

        Our Board of Directors decided in May 2007 in a resolution that was amended and supplemented in November 2007 that, subject to and following compliance with applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations, we intend to issue, for no additional consideration, to all our shareholders at the record date determined for the purpose of the extraordinary general meeting held on December 20, 2007 (November 9, 2007), warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,600,000 of our Ordinary Shares, on a pro-rata basis according to the percentage holding of each such shareholder in our issued and outstanding share capital on such record date. The exercise price of each warrant shall be $0.44 (the average trading price per share of our Ordinary Shares during the twenty trading days prior to the closing of the Witech Exchange Agreement). The warrants will be exercisable for cash or on a cash-less exercise basis. These warrants will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction. A “Transaction” shall mean either (i) the merger of our Company into another company in which our Company is not the surviving entity, or (ii) the purchase of all or substantially all of the shares of our Company. These warrants will be non-transferable and non-exercisable until all applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations have been complied with in connection with the warrants and the underlying shares, including without limitation, that a registration statement covering the issuance of the underlying shares is declared effective by the SEC.

        At an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders on December 20, 2007, the shareholders authorized the procurement of directors and officers liability coverage of up to $10 million per event and up to $10 million per annum, with an annual premium not to exceed $100,000. We procured an insurance policy, effective until December 2008 with the above coverage for an annual premium of $68,000.

        At an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders on December 20, 2007, the shareholders approved indemnification and exculpation agreements with our directors and office holders in a total amount for all directors and office holders (in excess of the insurance proceeds received) that shall not exceed to US$2,500,000, or such greater sum as shall, from time to time, be approved by our shareholders.

        In February 2008, the Nimrod Fund, one of our shareholders who holds approximately 7% of our issued and outstanding share capital, provided a loan to Witech in the amount of $400,000 which is to be repaid on July 1, 2008, with interest of 0.917% per month (the total amount to be repaid is $414,672). The loan is unsecured. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 160,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to $0.44 per share.

48

        On May 15, 2008, we resolved (with the agreement of the relevant people) to postpone payment to Charles Moss and David Elooz, of NIS 1,400 of their monthly salary, to Eliyahu Cohen and Ronen Segal of NIS 1,500 of their monthly salary, to West End Technology Investments Ltd (for the services of Robi Hartman) of NIS 18,000 of its monthly fee and from the other directors a monthly fee of $1,000. The accumulated sums that have been postponed will be paid when we raise additional financing will be raised.

        In April 2008 our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, CDRide Corp., received a short-term bridge loan in the amount of up to $1,400,000 repayable on June 30, 2008. The loan bears interest at the rate of 0.8% per month. An amount of $850,000 was disbursed in April 2008 and an additional $300,000 was disbursed in June 2008. The remaining $250,000 will be disbursed at the discretion of the lender if required to repay bank financing. The loan is secured by a pledge on future income of CDRide Corp. as well as a guaranty by us and Witech. The loan is not convertible into equity. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 560,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to the lower of $0.44 per share and the lowest price at which we raised equity or convertible debt financing in the next 12 months. The lender is a company related to CDC Holdings Ltd., who holds approximately 5.4% of our issued and outstanding shares and who is associated with Alon Wulkan and Iris Weller-Weiss, two of our directors. The lender has agreed to postpone repayment of the loan until we raise additional financing, but not later than July 31, 2008.

Item 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. Statements and Other Financial Information

        See pages F-1 – F-31 of the Company’s financial statements and pages W-1 – W-34 of Witech’s financial statements.

Legal Proceedings

        In June 2007, Witech entered into a lease for 960 square meters at an office complex in Israel at a monthly rental of $20,000 commencing from March 2008 for 121 months. In September 2007, due to a change in its staffing requirements in Israel, Witech notified the landlord of its intention not to occupy the premises. Witech has not made any payments under the lease and has not provided any guarantees to the lessor. Witech is currently seeking an alternative lessee for the premises and believes that the landlord is doing the same. Although the landlord has not instituted any legal proceeding against Witech, we believe that there may be potential exposure in this matter that could be material to Witech. Except for the above, neither Witech nor IIS is presently a party to any litigation that would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on Witech or IIS or their business, and they are not aware that any such litigation is threatened. However, litigation is common in the technology industry, and they may become involved in material litigation in the future.

Dividends

        The Company has not declared or paid dividends on its Ordinary Shares since 1989, and does not intend to declare or pay any dividends to their shareholders in the foreseeable future.

B. Significant Changes

        With the exception of the Exchange Agreement pursuant to which we acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of Witech, in consideration for the issuance of 11,552,229 of our ordinary shares on January 2, 2007 (see Item 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY – A. Share Exchange Agreement with Witech), there have been no material changes in our business or Witech’s business since December 31, 2007.

49

Item 9. THE OFFER AND THE LISTING

        The Ordinary Shares of the Company have been traded in the over-the-counter market in the United States since the Company’s initial public offering on November 8, 1984. The Ordinary Shares originally traded under the symbol IISLF and now trade under the symbol IISLF.PK. From January 22, 1985 to March 17, 1999, the Ordinary Shares traded on the Nasdaq National Market (“Nasdaq”). From March 18, 1999 until January 22, 2003, the Ordinary Shares traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. From January 23, 2003 until August 23, 2004, the Company’s Ordinary Shares traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. From August 24, 2004, until April 15, 2008 the Company’s Ordinary Shares have traded on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service (“Pink Sheets”). Since April 15, 2008, the Company’s Ordinary Shares were readmitted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.

        The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the annual high and low closing sales price quotes of the Ordinary Shares as reported by Nasdaq, by the OTC Bulletin Board or by the Pink Sheets from January 23, 2003 until May 31, 2008, for the five most recent full financial years and the quarterly high and low closing sales price quotes for the three most recent full financial years. The table also sets forth the high and low closing sales price quotes of the Ordinary Shares as reported by the Pink Sheets for the most recent six months.

	High		Low
Year ended December 31, 2003	$	0.92	$	0.31
Year ended December 31, 2004	$	0.73	$	0.09
Year ended December 31, 2005	$	0.15	$	0.09
Year ended December 31, 2006	$	0.36	$	0.09
Year ended December 31, 2007	$	0.85	$	0.30
2005
First Quarter	$	0.15	$	0.09
Second Quarter	$	0.12	$	0.09
Third Quarter	$	0.14	$	0.10
Fourth Quarter	$	0.13	$	0.10
2006
First Quarter	$	0.22	$	0.10
Second Quarter	$	0.12	$	0.9
Third Quarter	$	0.11	$	0.9
Fourth Quarter	$	0.36	$	0.10
2007
First Quarter	$	0.54	$	0.32
Second Quarter	$	0.85	$	0.51
Third Quarter	$	0.55	$	0.30
Fourth Quarter	$	0.64	$	0.32
Most Recent Six Months
December 2007	$	0.47	$	0.32
January 2008	$	0.45	$	0.30
February 2008	$	0.49	$	0.33
March 2008	$	0.50	$	0.35
April 2008	$	0.50	$	0.35
May 2008	$	0.47	$	0.30

        The foregoing prices reflect inter-dealer quotations without retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

50

Item 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. Share Capital

        Not Applicable

B. Memorandum and Articles of Association

Objects and Purposes in the Company’s Articles of Association

        The Company’s objects and purposes are specified in its Memorandum of Association filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement No. 33-62862 dated August 10, 1993 (the “Memorandum”).

Provisions Regarding Directors

        Pursuant to article 54(b) of our Articles of Association, a transaction entered into by the Company in which a director of the Company has a personal interest, directly or indirectly, will be valid in respect of the Company and the given director only if approved by the Company’s board of directors and, if such transactions are “irregular transactions” as defined in the Israeli Companies Law, approved in accordance with the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law.

        An “irregular transaction” pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law is defined as a transaction which is not in the ordinary course of business, a transaction which is not under ordinary market conditions or any transaction which might substantially affect the profitability of the Company, its assets and liabilities.

        The Israeli Companies Law provides that a director who has a personal interest in a given transaction of the Company, brought for approval of the board of directors, shall not be present and/or vote at that meeting. Article 55 of the Company’s Articles of Association provides that a director who has a personal interest in a matter which is brought for discussion before the board of directors may participate in said discussion, provided that he shall neither vote in nor attend discussions concerning the approval of the activities or the arrangements. If said director did vote or attend as aforesaid, the approval given to the aforesaid activity or arrangements shall be invalid.

        Pursuant to article 72 of the Company’s Articles of Association, at any meeting of the board of directors at which a quorum is present, the board will have the authority to exercise all or part of the authorities, power of attorney and discretion invested at such time in the directors or regularly exercised by them. With respect to legal quorum at our board meetings, the Israeli Companies Law provides that, unless determined otherwise by the Company, a legal quorum at the board meetings shall consist of the majority of the board members. We have not decided otherwise and therefore, the legal quorum at our board meeting will consist of the majority of the board members.

        Any transaction concerning compensation to a director requires the approval by the board of directors, the audit committee and the shareholders of the Company.

51

        The board of directors may from time to time, in its discretion, cause the Company to borrow or secure the payment of any sum or sums of money for the purpose of the Company. Additionally, the Company may secure or provide for the repayment of such sum or sums in such manner, at such times and upon such terms and conditions in all respects as it sees fit including but not limited to, by the issuance of bonds, perpetual or redeemable debentures, debenture stock, or any mortgages, charges or other securities on the undertaking, or the whole or any part of the property of the Company, both present and future, including units uncalled or called but unpaid capital for the time being.

        There is no mandatory retirement age for the directors under our Articles of Association or the Companies Law.

        There is no requirement concerning the number of shares one individual must hold in order to qualify him or her as a director under our Articles of Association or the Israeli Companies law.

Dividends

        Subject to any preferential, deferred, qualified or other rights, privileges or conditions attached to any special class of shares with regard to dividends, the profits of the Company available for dividend and resolved to be distributed shall be applied in payment of dividends upon the shares of the Company in proportion to the amount paid up or credited as paid up per the nominal value thereon respectively. Unless not otherwise specified in the conditions of issuance of the shares, all dividends with respect to shares which were not fully paid up within a certain period, for which dividends were paid, shall be paid proportionally to the amounts paid or credited as paid on the nominal value of the shares during any portion of the above-mentioned period.

        The board of directors may declare a dividend to be paid to the shareholders according to their rights and interests in the profits, and may fix the record date for eligibility and the time for payment.

        The board of directors may from time to time pay to the shareholders on account of the next forthcoming dividend such interim dividends as, in their judgment, the position of the Company justifies.

        A transfer of shares shall not pass the right to any dividend declared thereon after such transfer and before the registration of the transfer.

        There is no time limit after which dividend entitlement lapses according to our Articles of Association or the Companies Law.

        The board of directors may determine that, a dividend may be paid, wholly or partially, by the distribution of specific assets of the Company or by distribution of paid up shares, debentures or debenture stock or any other securities of the Company or of any other companies or in any one or more of such ways in the manner and to the extent permitted by the Companies Law.

Terms of Directors

        Effective as of January 2, 2008, the “classified board” provisions of our Articles of Association were cancelled and currently all directors (except for “External Directors” elected in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law) are elected at a general or special meeting of shareholders and hold office until the end of the next annual meeting or until they cease to hold office pursuant to the provisions of the Articles. For a detailed description of the provisions relating to External Directors see “Item 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES – Board Practices”.

Votes of Shareholders

        Our shareholders have one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Except as otherwise provided in our Articles of Association, any resolution at a general meeting shall be deemed adopted if approved by the holders of a majority of the voting rights in the Company represented at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting thereon. In the case of an equality of votes, either on a show of hands or a poll, the chairman of the meeting shall not be entitled to a further or casting vote.

52

        At all general meetings, a resolution put to a vote at the meeting shall be decided on a show of hands unless, before or upon the declaration of the result of the show of hands, a poll in writing be demanded by the chairman (being a person entitled to vote), or by at least two shareholders present, in person or by proxy, holding at least 5% of the issued share capital of the Company and, unless a poll be so demanded, a declaration by the chairman of the meeting that a resolution has been carried, or has been carried unanimously or by a particular vote, or lost, or not carried by a particular vote, shall be conclusive, and an entry to that effect in the minute book of the Company shall be conclusive evidence thereof, without proof of the number or proportion of the votes recorded in favor of or against such resolution.

        If a poll be demanded in manner aforesaid, it shall be taken forthwith, and the result of the poll shall be deemed to be the resolution of the meeting at which the poll was demanded. The demand of a poll shall not prevent the continuance of a meeting for the transaction of any business other than the question on which a poll has been demanded.

        Any shareholder which is not a natural person may, by resolution of its directors or other governing body, authorize such person as it thinks fit to act as its representative at a general meeting, and the person so authorized to the satisfaction of the Company shall be entitled to exercise the same powers on behalf of such entity, which he represents as the entity could exercise if it were an individual shareholder.

        Subject to any rights or restrictions for the time being attached to any class or classes of shares, every shareholder shall have one vote for each share of which he is the holder, whether on a show of hands or on a poll. Our Articles of Association do not permit cumulative voting and it is not mandated by Israeli law. Votes may be given either personally or by proxy. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company. If any shareholder is a lunatic, idiot, or non compos mentis, he may vote by his committee, receiver, curator bonis or other legal curator, and such last mentioned persons may give their votes either personally or by proxy. If two or more persons are jointly entitled to a share then, in voting upon any question, the vote of the senior person who tenders a vote, whether in person or by proxy, shall be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other registered holders of the share and, for this purpose seniority shall be determined by the order in which the names stand in the shareholder register.

        The instrument appointing a proxy shall be in writing in the usual common form, or such form as may be approved by the board of directors, and shall be signed by the appointor or by his attorney duly authorized in writing or, if the appointor is a corporation, the corporation shall vote by its representative, appointed by an instrument duly signed by the corporation. The instrument appointing a proxy shall be deemed to include authorization to demand a poll or to vote on a poll on behalf of the appointor.

        A vote given in accordance with the terms of an instrument of proxy shall be valid notwithstanding the previous death or insanity of the principal, or revocation of the proxy, or transfer of the share in respect of which the vote is given, unless an intimation in writing of the death, revocation or transfer shall have been received at the office before the commencement of the meeting or adjourned meetings at which the proxy is used.

        The instrument appointing a proxy shall be deposited at the registered office of the Company or at such other place or places, whether in Israel or elsewhere, as the board of directors may from time to time, either generally or in a particular case or class of cases prescribe, at least forty eight (48) hours before the time appointed for holding the meeting or adjourned meeting at which the person named in such instrument proposes to vote. Otherwise, the person so named shall not be entitled to vote in respect thereof, but no instrument appointing a proxy shall be valid after the expiration of twelve months from the date of its execution.

        Subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, a resolution in writing (approved by letter, telex, facsimile or otherwise) by all the shareholders, in person or by proxy, for the time being entitled to vote at a general meeting of the Company, shall be as valid and as effectual as a resolution adopted by a general meeting duly convened, held and constituted for the purpose of passing such resolution.

53

        A shareholder will be entitled to vote at the meetings of the Company by several proxies appointed by him, provided that each proxy shall be appointed with respect to different shares held by the appointing shareholder. Every proxy so appointed on behalf of the same shareholder shall be entitled to vote as he sees fit.

Further Rights and Preferences of the Ordinary Shares

        In the event of sale or the undertaking of the Company, the board or the liquidator on a winding up, as the case may be, subject to the authorization by a majority vote at a meeting of shareholders, may distribute to our shareholders all assets remaining after payment of the Company’s liabilities.

        Our Articles of Association permit, subject to the Israeli Companies Law, the issue of redeemable shares and to redeem the same according to terms and conditions determined by the Company. Our Articles of Association do not include provisions related to sinking funds.

        According to our Articles of Association no person shall be entitled to vote at any general meeting (or be counted as a part of the quorum thereof) unless all calls then payable by him in respect of his shares in the Company shall have been paid. The Israeli Companies Law provides that a company is entitled to determine within its articles a provision allowing the board to place a call on the shares, in the event that the consideration for such shares, in full or in part, has not been paid on time and in accordance with the agreeable terms set out in the given agreement or the articles of association of the Company.

        According to our Articles of Association, there are no discriminating provisions against any existing or prospective holders of shares of the Company as a result of a shareholder holding a substantial number of shares.

Modification of Class Rights

        If, at any time, the share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issuance of the shares of that class) may be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of all the issued shares of that class, or with the sanction of a majority vote at a meeting of the shareholders passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of the class. The provisions of our Articles of Association relating to general meetings shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to every such separate general meeting. Any holder of shares of the class present in person or by proxy may demand a secret poll.

        Unless otherwise provided by the conditions of issuance, the enlargement of an existing class of shares, or the issuance of additional shares thereof, shall not be deemed to modify or abrogate the rights attached to the previously issued shares of such class or of any other class. These conditions provide for the minimum shareholder approvals permitted by the Israeli Companies Law.

General Meetings

        General meetings shall be held at least once in every calendar year at such time, not being more than fifteen months after the holding of the last preceding general meeting, and at such time and place as may be determined by the board of directors.

        The board of directors may, whenever it deems necessary, and shall upon such requisition in writing as is provided by Section 63(b) of the Companies Law, convene a general meeting. Any such request must state the purposes for which the meeting is to be called, be signed by the requesting shareholders, and must be deposited at the registered office of the Company. Such request may consist of several documents in like form, each signed by one or more requesting shareholder(s).

54

        Unless a longer period for notice is prescribed by the Companies Law, at least ten (10) days and not more than sixty (60) days notice of any general meeting shall be given, specifying the place, the day and the hour of the meeting and, in the case of special business, the nature of such business, shall be given in the manner hereinafter mentioned, to such shareholders as are under the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association, entitled to receive notices from the Company. Notices shall be given by mail or by personal delivery to every registered shareholder of the Company, to his address as described in the shareholders register of the Company or such other address as designated by him in writing for this purpose. The accidental omission to give such notice to, or the non receipt of such notice by, any such shareholder shall not invalidate any resolution passed or proceeding held at any such meeting and, with the unanimous consent of the shareholders entitled to receive notice of meetings, a meeting may be convened upon a shorter notice or without notice, and generally in such manner as such shareholders may approve. Such consent may be given at the meeting or retroactively after the meeting. If a shareholder has not provided the Company with an address for the delivery of notices, the shareholder shall be deemed to have waived his right to receive such notices.

        Only shareholders of record as reflected on the Company’s share register at the close of business on the date fixed by the board of directors as the record date determining the then shareholders who will be entitled to vote, shall be entitled to notice of, and to vote, in person or by proxy, at a general meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Quorum at General Meetings

        No business shall be transacted at any general meeting unless a quorum is present when the meeting proceeds to business. The quorum at any Meeting shall be two shareholders present in person or by proxy, holding or representing at least twenty five percent (25%) of the total voting rights in the Company. A company being a shareholder shall be deemed to be personally present for the purpose of the Company’s Articles of Association if represented by its representative duly authorized in accordance with Article 42 of the Company’s Articles of Association.

        If, within half an hour from the time appointed for the holding of a general meeting, a quorum is not present, the meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day in the next week at the same time and place, or any time and hour as the board of directors shall designate and state in a notice to the shareholders entitled to vote at the original meeting, and if, at such adjourned meeting, a quorum is not present within half an hour from the time appointed for holding the meeting any two shareholders present in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, if a general meeting was convened at the demand of shareholders as permitted by Section 63(b) of the Companies Law, then a quorum at such adjourned meeting shall be present only if one or more shareholders are present who hold in the aggregate at least 5% of the issued share capital of the Company and at least 1% of the voting rights in the Company or one or more shareholders who hold in the aggregate at least 5% of the voting rights in the Company.

Restrictions on Shareholders Rights to Own Securities

        The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company do not restrict in any way the ownership of Ordinary Shares by residents or nonresidents, except with respect to subjects of countries which are in a state of war with Israel, and neither the Memorandum and Articles of Association nor Israeli law restricts the voting rights of residents or nonresidents.

Potential Issues that Could Delay a Merger

        A merger of the Company requires the approval of the board of directors and the general meeting of shareholders, in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law. See also “Anti-Takeover Provisions; Merger and Acquisitions under Israeli Law”.

Requirement of Disclosure of Shareholder Ownership

        There are no provisions of our Memorandum or Articles of Association governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.

55

Approval of Related Party Transactions Under Israeli Law

        The Companies Law codifies the fiduciary duties that “office holders,” including directors and executive officers, owe to a company. An office holder’s fiduciary duties consist of a duty of care and a duty of loyalty. The duty of care requires an office holder to act at a level of care that a reasonable office holder in the same position would employ under the same circumstances. The duty of loyalty includes avoiding any conflict of interest between the office holder’s position in the company and his personal affairs, avoiding any competition with the company, avoiding exploiting any business opportunity of the company in order to receive personal gain for the office holder or others, and disclosing to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder has received due to his position as an office holder. Each person listed as a director or executive officer in the table under “Directors, Senior Management and Employees–Directors and Senior Management” above is an office holder. Under the Companies Law, all arrangements as to compensation of office holders who are not directors require approval of our board of directors, and the compensation of office holders who are directors must be approved by our audit committee, board of directors and shareholders.

        The Companies Law requires that an office holder promptly disclose any personal interest that he or she may have and all related material information known to him or her, in connection with any existing or proposed transaction by us. In addition, if the transaction is an extraordinary transaction, that is, a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business, other than on market terms, or likely to have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities, the office holder must also disclose any personal interest held by the office holder’s spouse, siblings, parents, grandparents, descendants, spouse’s descendants and the spouses of any of the foregoing, or by any corporation in which the office holder or a relative is a 5% or greater shareholder, director or general manager or in which he or she has the right to appoint at least one director or the general manager. Some transactions, actions and arrangements involving an office holder (or a third party in which an office holder has an interest) must be approved by the board of directors or as otherwise provided for in a company’s articles of association, as not being adverse to the company’s interest. In some cases, such a transaction must be approved by the audit committee and by the board of directors itself (with further shareholder approval required in the case of extraordinary transactions). An office holder who has a personal interest in a matter, which is considered at a meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee, may not be present during the board of directors or audit committee discussions and may not vote on this matter, unless the majority of the members of the board or the audit committee have a personal interest, as the case may be.

        The Companies Law also provides that some transactions between a public company and a controlling shareholder, or transactions in which a controlling shareholder of the company has a personal interest but which are between a public company and another entity, require the approval of the board of directors and of the shareholders.

        Once the officer or controlling shareholder complies with these disclosure requirements, the company may approve the transaction in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law and its articles of association. Generally, the approval of the majority of the disinterested members of the audit committee and the board of directors is required. If audit committee approval is required for a transaction with an interested party, an officer or a controlling shareholder, such approval may not be given unless, at the time the approval was granted two members of the audit committee were external directors and at least one of them was present at the meeting at which the audit committee decided to grant the approval. Shareholder approval may also be required if the transaction is an exceptional transaction. An exceptional transaction is a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business, otherwise than on market terms or that is likely to have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities. In such event, the principal terms of such transaction must be disclosed in a notice to the shareholders which will include all substantive documents relating to the transaction.

56

        Moreover, the audit committee, the board of directors and shareholders must approve an extraordinary transaction with a controlling shareholder or the terms of compensation of a controlling shareholder. The shareholder approval for an extraordinary transaction must include at least one-third of the shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are present at the meeting. Shareholders without this one-third approval can approve the transaction, if the total shareholdings of those shareholders who have no personal interest and voted against the transaction do not represent more than one percent of the voting rights in the company.

        If the transaction is with an officer or with a third party in which the officer or the controlling shareholder has a personal interest, the approval must confirm that the transaction is not adverse to the company’s interest. Shareholders must also approve all compensation paid to directors in whatever capacity, company’s undertaking to indemnify a director or indemnification under a permit to indemnify and any transaction in which a majority of the board members have a personal interest. An officer with a personal interest in any matter may not be present at any committee or board of directors meeting where such matter is being approved, and may not vote thereon, unless the majority of the members of the committee or of the board of directors have a personal interest in such approval.

        However, under the Companies Regulations (Relief From Related Party Transactions), 5760-2000, promulgated under the Companies Law and amended in January 2002, certain transactions between a company and its controlling shareholder(s) do not require shareholder approval. In addition, pursuant to the recent amendment to these regulations, certain directors’ compensation and employment arrangements do not require the approval of the shareholders if both the audit committee and the board of directors approve that such arrangements are for the benefit of the company.

        If the director or the office holder is a controlling shareholder of the company then the employment and compensation arrangement of such director or office holder does not require the approval of the shareholders if it meets certain criteria.

        The above relief shall not apply if one or more shareholders, holding at least 1% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the company’s voting rights objects to the grant of such relief, providing that such objection is submitted to the company in writing not later than seven (7) days from the date of the filing of a report regarding the adoption of such resolution by the company pursuant to the requirements of the Israeli Securities Law. If such objection is duly and timely submitted then the compensation arrangement of the directors will require shareholders’ approval as detailed above.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

        The Companies Law provides that an Israeli company cannot exculpate an office holder from liability with respect to a breach of his duty of loyalty, but may exculpate in advance an office holder from his liability to the company, in whole or in part, with respect to a breach of his duty of care. Our Articles of Association provide that, subject to any restrictions imposed by corporate law, we may enter into a contract for the insurance of the liability of any of our office holders with respect to:

— a breach of his duty of care to us or to another person;

— breach of his duty of loyalty to us, provided that the office holder acted in good faith and had reasonable cause to assume that his act would not prejudice our interests; or

— a financial liability imposed upon him in favor of another person in respect of an act performed by him in his capacity as an office holder.

57

In addition, we may indemnify an office holder against:

— a financial liability imposed on him in favor of another person by any judgment, including a settlement or an arbitrator’s award approved by a court in respect of an act performed in his capacity as an office holder; and

— reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, expended by such office holder or charged to him by a court, in proceedings we institute against him or instituted on our behalf or by another person, or in a criminal charge from which he was acquitted, all in respect of an act performed in his capacity as an office holder.

        These provisions are specifically limited in their scope by the Companies Law, which provides that a company may not indemnify an office holder, nor enter into an insurance contract which would provide coverage for any monetary liability incurred as a result of certain improper actions.

        Pursuant to the Companies Law, indemnification of, and procurement of insurance coverage for, our office holders must be approved by our audit committee and our board of directors and, in specified circumstances, by our shareholders.

        At an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders in December 2007, the shareholders authorized the procurement of directors and officers liability coverage of up to $10 million per event and up to $10 million per annum, with an annual premium not to exceed $100,000. We procured an insurance policy, effective until December 2008 with the above coverage for an annual premium of $68,000.

        At an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders in December 2007, the shareholders approved indemnification and exculpation agreements with our directors and office holders in a total amount for all directors and office holders (in excess of the insurance proceeds received) that shall not exceed US$2,500,000, or such greater sum as shall, from time to time, be approved by our shareholders.

Anti-Takeover Provisions; Mergers and Acquisitions under Israeli Law

        Pursuant to the Companies Law, if following any acquisition of shares of a public company or of a class of shares of a public company the acquiror will hold 90% or more of the company’s shares or 90% of any class of the company’s shares, respectively, then the acquiror must make a tender offer for all of the remaining shares or the particular class of shares of the company. In the event that 5% or more of the shareholders have not responded favorably to a tender offer, the offeror may not purchase more than 90% of that class of shares. Furthermore, the Companies Law provides that as long as a shareholder in a public company holds more than 90% of the company’s shares or of a class of shares, such shareholder shall be precluded from purchasing any additional shares of that type.

        The Companies Law further provides that if following the tender offer such acquiring shareholder holds more than 95% of the outstanding shares of any class, the holders of all the remaining shares will be obligated to transfer such shares to the acquiror at the tender offer price. This entails the possibility of additional delay and the imposition of further approval requirements at the court’s discretion. The Companies Law requires that each company that is party to a merger approve the transaction by a vote of the board of directors and by a vote of the majority of its outstanding shares, generally excluding shares voted by the other party to the merger or any person holding at least 25% of the other party to the merger, at a shareholders’ meeting called for this purpose. In addition, in certain cases court approval of a merger may be required. Upon the request of a creditor to either party to the proposed merger, the court may delay or prevent the merger if it concludes that there exists a reasonable concern that as a result of the merger, the surviving company will be unable to satisfy the obligations of any of the parties to the merger. In addition, a merger may not be completed unless at least 50 days have passed from the time that a proposal for approval of the merger has been filed with the Israeli Registrar of Companies, certain notification and information have been provided to debtors and at least 30 days have passed from the shareholders approval of the merging companies.

58

        The Companies Law also provides that an open market acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become a holder of 25% of the voting rights in the company. This rule does not apply if there already is another holder of 25% of the voting rights in the company. Similarly, the Companies Law provides that an open market acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become the holder of 45% of the voting rights in the company. This rule does not apply if another party already holds more than 45% of the voting rights in the company. Regulations promulgated under the Companies Law provide that these tender offer requirements do not apply to companies whose shares are listed for trading on a stock exchange outside of Israel only if, according to the laws in the country in which its shares are traded there is either a limitation on the acquisition of a specified percentage of control in the Company or the acquisition of a specified percentage of control requires the purchaser to also make a tender offer to the public.

        The Companies Law extends the disclosure requirements applicable to an officer of the Company to a shareholder that holds 25% or more of the voting rights in a public company, including an Israeli company that is publicly traded outside of Israel such as on the OTC Bulletin Board. Certain transactions between a public company and a 25% shareholder, or transactions in which a 25% shareholder of the company has a personal interest but which are between a public company and another entity, require the approval of the board of directors and of the shareholders. Moreover, an extraordinary transaction with a 25% shareholder or the terms of compensation of a 25% shareholder must be approved by the audit committee, the board of directors and shareholders. The shareholder approval for an extraordinary transaction must include at least one third of the shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are present at the meeting; the transaction can be approved by shareholders without this one third approval, if the total share holdings of those who vote against the transaction do not represent more than 1% of the voting rights in the company.

        The Israeli Companies Ordinance requires that certain transactions, actions and arrangements be approved as provided for in the Company’s Articles of Association, by the Company’s board of directors, by the audit committee and/or by the Company’s shareholders. The vote required by the audit committee and the board for approval of such matters, in each case, is a majority of the disinterested directors participating in a duly convened meeting.

Changes in Capital

        The Company’s Memorandum and Articles of Association do not impose any conditions governing changes in capital that are more stringent than required by the Israeli Companies Law.

C. Material Contracts

        Sale of shares in StoreAge

        In October 2006 all shareholders of StoreAge, including us, signed a share purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with LSI for the sale of all issued and outstanding shares of StoreAge to LSI. In November 2006, the sale was closed and LSI paid us gross proceeds of $5,416,692 ($0.862 per share) for all our shares, out of which 13%, $703,793 or $0.112 per share was held in escrow to satisfy certain possible future claims for a period of 18 months following the closing (see below in this Item). No claims were made against the escrow and these funds were released to us in May 2008. At the time of this closing, we held 12.68% of the issued and outstanding share capital of StoreAge (10.89% on a fully diluted basis). This additional dilution resulted from the issuance of warrants to the Israeli venture lending fund that provided a $4,000,000 loan to StoreAge in March 2006 (that was repaid by LSI) and the increase of shares reserved for options pursuant to StoreAge’s incentive share option plans. See “Item 4C. Business Overview – Sale of StoreAge”.

        In the framework of the SPA, we did not make any representations and warranties regarding StoreAge and its subsidiaries, these representation and warranties were made only by StoreAge. We were required to make certain representations and warranties regarding ourselves and the ownership of our shares. The representations and warranties of StoreAge and the sellers, including ourselves, contained in the SPA survived the closing for 18 months until May 21, 2008; provided, however, that (i) the representations and warranties made with respect to capitalization and ownership of shares shall survive indefinitely, and (ii) the representations and warranties with respect to tax liabilities shall survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.

59

        In the event of any breach of any representation, warranty or covenant by StoreAge or a seller, including ourselves, the liability of the sellers is limited to their pro-rata share of the funds in escrow; with the exception of representations and warranties regarding capitalization, taxation and due ownership of the shares in which case the total liability of each seller will not exceed the aggregate consideration received by such seller for such seller’s shares sold pursuant to the SPA.

        The SPA provides that the sellers, including ourselves, will have no liability for breaches of representations and warranties (until the aggregate amount of all losses to the purchaser as a result of such breaches equals or exceeds $500,000 (the “Threshold”)), whereupon LSI shall be entitled to indemnification with respect to all such losses including the amount of the Threshold; except that (i) the Threshold shall not apply with respect to losses arising or resulting from breaches of the representations and warranties regarding due ownership of the shares, and (ii) the threshold for tax liabilities is $50,000.

        There were no claims made against the funds in escrow and all funds were released in May 2008.

        Transfer of Shares in Enargis

        On May 23, 2007, considering the bleak business prospects of Enargis and the costs involved in maintaining our shareholding in Enargis, we, together with all the other shareholders of Enargis, transferred all our shares in Enargis to West End Technology Investments Ltd. for no consideration other than the assumption by West End of all Enargis’ liabilities (see Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions – B. Related Party Transactions).

        Intention to issue warrants

        On November 5, 2007 our Board of Directors approved, subject to and following compliance with applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations, its intention to issue, for no additional consideration, to all our shareholders at the record date determined for the purpose of the shareholders meeting convened to approved the Exchange Agreement (November 9, 2007), warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,600,000 of our Ordinary Shares, on a pro-rata basis according to the percentage holding of each such shareholder in our issued and outstanding share capital on such record date. This includes the warrants to purchase 2,300,000 Ordinary Shares that we decided to issue in May 2007. The exercise price of each warrant shall be $0.44 (the average trading price per share of our Ordinary Shares during the twenty trading days prior to the closing of the Exchange Agreement). The warrants will be exercisable for cash or on a cash-less exercise basis. These warrants will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction. A “Transaction” shall mean either (i) the merger of the Company into another company in which the Company is not the surviving entity, or (ii) the purchase of all or substantially all of our shares. These warrants will be non-transferable and non-exercisable until all applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations have been complied with in connection with the warrants and the underlying shares, including without limitation, that a registration statement covering the issuance of the underlying shares is declared effective by the SEC.

        Witech Exchange Agreement

        For a description of the Witech Exchange Agreement that was signed on November 5, 2007 and closed on January 2, 2008, see “Item 4. Information on the Company – A. Share Exchange Agreement”.

60

        Agreements with Directors and Officers

        For a description of the agreements with directors and officers of the Company see "Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees - B. Compensation".

        Convertible Note Financing

        In November 2007, we entered into definitive agreements with private investors for the issuance of convertible notes in the principal amount of $1,655,000, out of which $827,500 was invested in November 2007 and the remaining $827,500 was invested in January 2008 following the closing of the Witech Exchange Agreement. The principal amount of the notes will accrue interest at the rate of 8% compounded annually and principal and interest will be repaid in 12 equal quarterly installments commencing 36 months from issuance. Unpaid principal and interest may at the option of the purchasers be converted into our Ordinary Shares at a price of $0.65 per share, subject to a broad-based weighted average ratchet anti-dilution adjustment in the event of issuance of equity-related securities at a lower price, subject to certain exceptions. We shall have the right to redeem the principal amount and interest of the notes that have not been converted into shares, in whole or in part, between December 31 and January 31 of each year commencing December 31, 2008 or at the closing of a Transaction at a 20% premium per year, or a pro-rata portion of a year if redeemed in the event of a Transaction. The notes are secured by a floating charge on our assets, subordinated only to bank financing in an amount not to exceed $500,000.

        We also issued to the purchasers of the notes warrants exercisable for 331,000 Ordinary Shares at the price per share of $0.44 (equal to the average trading price per share of the shares of IIS during the 20 trading days prior to the closing of the Exchange Agreement), until the earlier of: (i) five years from issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction. The warrants will be exercisable for cash or on a cash-less exercise basis. In the event that within 6 months from the date of issuance of the notes, the Company raises financing from the issuance of convertible loans or notes or similar securities with terms more favorable to the purchasers thereof than those granted to the purchasers, the notes and warrants will be automatically amended to provide for such favorable terms. The anti-dilution protection has been extended for an additional 6 months following the Raithalon investment.

        Nimrod Loan

        In February 2008, the Nimrod Fund, one of our shareholders who holds 6.9% of our issued and outstanding share capital, provided a loan to Witech in the amount of $400,000 which is to be repaid with interest of 0.917% per month (The total amount to be repaid is $414,672). The loan is unsecured. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 160,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to $0.44 per share.

        Reytalon Loan

        In April 2008 our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, CDRide Corp., received a short-term bridge loan in the amount of up to $1,400,000 repayable on June 30, 2008. The loan bears interest at the rate of 0.8% per month. An amount of $850,000 was disbursed in April 2008 and an additional $300,000 was disbursed in June 2008. The remaining $250,000 will be disbursed at the discretion of the lender if required to repay bank financing. The loan is secured by a pledge on future income of CDRide Corp. as well as a guaranty by us and Witech. The loan is not convertible into equity. As consideration for providing this loan, we issued to the lender five-year warrants to purchase 560,000 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price equal to the lower of $0.44 per share and the lowest price at which we raised equity or convertible debt financing in the next 12 months. The lender is a company related to CDC Holdings Ltd., who holds approximately 5.4% of our issued and outstanding shares and who is associated with Alon Wulkan and Iris Weller-Weiss, two of our directors. The lender has agreed to postpone repayment of the loan until we raise additional financing, but not later than July 31, 2008.

61

D. Exchange Controls

        The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company do not restrict in any way the ownership of Ordinary Shares by nonresidents, except with respect to subjects of countries which are in a state of war with Israel, and neither the Memorandum and Articles of Association nor Israeli law restricts the voting rights of nonresidents. The Israeli Currency Control Law, 1978 imposes certain limitations concerning foreign currency transactions and transactions between Israeli and non-Israeli residents, which limitations may be regulated or waived by the Controller of Foreign Exchange at the Bank of Israel, through “general” and “special” permits. In May 1998, a new “general permit” was issued pursuant to which substantially all transactions in foreign currency are permitted. Any dividends or other distributions paid in respect of Ordinary Shares and any amounts payable upon the dissolution, liquidation or winding up of the affairs of a company, as well as the proceeds of any sale in Israel of the company’s securities to an Israeli resident are freely repatriable into non-Israeli currencies (including U.S. dollars) at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of conversion, provided that any Israeli income tax owing has been paid on (or withheld from) such payments. Because exchange rates between the NIS and most foreign currencies fluctuate continuously, non-Israeli shareholders will be subject to any such currency fluctuation during the period from when such dividend is declared through the date payment is made in U.S. dollars.

E. Taxation

        The following is a summary of the current tax structure applicable to companies in Israel which may be relevant to our shareholders and us. To the extent that the summary is based on new tax legislation yet to be judicially or administratively interpreted, we cannot be sure that the views expressed will accord with any future interpretation by the Israeli tax authorities or courts.

        The discussion is not intended, and should not be taken, as legal or professional tax advice and is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations. Accordingly, you should consult your tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences of an investment in our Ordinary Shares.

General Corporate Tax Structure

        On July 24, 2002, the Israeli Knesset enacted income tax reform legislation, commonly referred to as the “2003 Tax Reform”. The 2003 Tax Reform has introduced fundamental and comprehensive changes into Israeli tax laws. Most of the legislative changes took effect on January 1, 2003. The 2003 Tax Reform has introduced a transition from a primarily territorial-based tax system to a personal-based system of taxation with respect to Israeli residents. The 2003 Tax Reform has also resulted in significant amendments to the international taxation provisions, and new provisions concerning the taxation of capital markets. Under the 2003 Tax Reform legislation the Ordinary Shares are no longer regarded and defined as “foreign traded securities” and thus certain associated Israeli tax aspects will accordingly be subject to change as discussed below.

        A relatively short time after the 2003 Tax Reform, the Knesset approved on July 25, 2005, the second and third readings of the Income Tax Ordinance Amendment (No. 147 and Ad Hoc Provision) Law, 2005 (hereafter – the 2005 Amendment). The 2005 amendment was an additional update of corporate tax rates that were previously determined in the 2003 Tax Reform, and determines that the rate of corporate tax will be reduced from January 1, 2006. Consequently income not eligible for “Approved Enterprise” benefits was taxed in 2006 at the regular corporate rate of 31% and in 2007 is taxed at a regular corporate tax rate of 29%. The tax rate will be reduced in subsequent tax years as follows: in 2008 27%, in 2009 26% and in 2010 and thereafter 25%.

        However, the effective tax rate payable by a company that derives income from an “Approved Enterprise” may be considerably less. We and Witech currently have no facilities which have received Approved Enterprise status.

62

        The tax reform also substantially changed the system of taxation of capital gains. Capital gains tax was reduced to 20%, (25% for 10% or more shareholders) except with respect to capital gains from marketable securities, with transitional provisions for assets acquired prior to January 1, 2003. For further discussion see below “Capital Gains Tax”.

Tax Benefits Under the Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969

        Pursuant to the Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969, also known as the Industry Encouragement Law, an Industrial Company is a company resident in Israel, if at least 90% of the income of which, in a given tax year, determined in Israeli currency (exclusive of income from some government loans, capital gains, interest and dividends), is derived from an Industrial Enterprise owned by it. An “Industrial Enterprise” is defined as an enterprise whose major activity in a given tax year is industrial production activity.

        Under the Industry Encouragement Law, Industrial Companies are entitled to the following preferential corporate tax benefits:

— amortization of purchases of know-how and patents over an eight-year period for tax purposes;

— the right to elect to file under specified conditions a consolidated tax return with additional related Israeli Industrial Companies; and

— accelerated depreciation rates on equipment and buildings.

        Eligibility for benefits under the Industry Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior approval from any governmental authority. We no longer qualify as an Industrial Company.

Taxation Under Inflationary Conditions

        The Income Tax Law (Inflationary Adjustments), 1985, generally referred to as the Inflationary Adjustments Law, represents an attempt to overcome the problems presented to a traditional tax system by an economy undergoing rapid inflation. The Inflationary Adjustments Law is highly complex. Its features which may be material to us can be summarized as follows:

— There is a special tax adjustment for the preservation of equity whereby corporate assets are classified broadly into fixed assets and non-fixed assets. Where a company’s equity, as defined in such law, exceeds the depreciated cost of fixed assets, a deduction from taxable income that takes into account the effect of the applicable annual rate of inflation on such excess is allowed up to a ceiling of 70% of taxable income in any single tax year, with the unused portion permitted to be carried forward on a linked basis. If the depreciated cost of fixed assets exceeds a company’s equity, then such excess multiplied by the applicable annual rate of inflation is added to taxable income.

— Subject to specific limitations, depreciation deductions on fixed assets and losses carried forward are adjusted for inflation based on the increase in the consumer price index (“CPI”).

— Where a company’s depreciated cost of fixed assets exceeds its equity, then the excess multiplied by the applicable annual rate of inflation is added to taxable income (hereinafter: “Inflation supplement”). Note, the Inflation Supplement will only be added to the corporate income but not to other incomes such as capital gains.

63

        The Minister of Finance may, with the approval of the Knesset Finance Committee, determine by decree, during a certain fiscal year (or until February 28^th of the following year) in which the rate of increase of the Israeli consumer price index would not exceed or did not exceed, as applicable, 3.0%, that some or all of the provisions of the Inflationary Adjustments Law shall not apply with respect to such fiscal year, or that the rate of increase of the Israeli consumer price index relating to such fiscal year shall be deemed to be 0%, and to make the adjustments required to be made as a result of such determination.

Capital Gains Tax

        Capital gains tax is imposed on the disposal of capital assets by an Israeli resident, and on the disposal of such assets by a non- Israel resident if those assets are: (i) located in Israel; (ii) are shares or a right to a share in an Israeli resident corporation; or (iii) rights in a foreign corporation, the majority of whose assets is directly or indirectly, rights to assets located in Israel (with respect to the applicable portion of the capital gain). The Israeli Tax Ordinance distinguishes between “Real Gain” and the “Inflationary Surplus”. Real Gain is the excess of the total capital gain over Inflationary Surplus computed generally on the basis of the increase in the Israeli CPI between the date of purchase and the date of disposal.

        The capital gain accrued by individuals on the sale of an asset purchased on or after January 1, 2003 will be taxed at the rate of up to 20%. However, if the individual shareholder is a “Controlling Shareholder” (i.e., a person who holds, directly or indirectly, alone or together with others, 10% or more of one of the Israeli resident company’s means of control at the time of sale or at any time during the preceding 12-month period) such gain will be taxed at the rate of 25%. In addition, capital gain derived by an individual claiming deduction of financing expenses in respect of such gain will be taxed at the rate of up to 25%. The real capital gain derived by corporation will be generally subject to tax at the rate of 25%. However, the real capital gain derived from the sale of securities, as defined in Section 6 of the Inflationary Adjustment Law, by a corporation, which was subject upon December 31, 2005 to the provisions of Section 6 of the Inflationary Adjustment Law, will be taxed at the corporate tax rate (29% in 2007).

        The capital gains accrued at the sale of an asset purchased prior to January 1, 2003 will be subject to tax at a blended rate. The marginal tax rate for individuals (up to 48% in 2007) and the regular corporate tax rate for corporations (29% in 2007) will be applied to the gain amount which bears the same ratio to the total gain realized as the ratio which the holding period commencing at the acquisition date and terminating on January 1, 2003 bears to the total holding period. The remainder of the gain realized will be subject to capital gains tax at the rates applicable to an asset purchased after January 1, 2003 (see aforementioned). With respect to traded securities detailed rules apply. Individual and corporate shareholders dealing in securities in Israel are taxed at the tax rates applicable to business income (in 2007 – 29% tax rate for a corporation and a marginal tax rate of up to 48% for an individual).

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the shareholder is a non-Israeli resident, then such taxation is subject to the provisions of any applicable double tax treaty. Moreover, capital gains derived from the sale of the Ordinary Shares by a non-Israeli shareholder may be exempt under the Israeli income tax ordinance from Israeli taxation provided the following cumulative conditions are met: (i) the Shares were purchased upon or after the registration of the Ordinary Shares at the stock exchange, (ii) the seller does not have a permanent establishment in Israel to which the derived capital gain is attributed, and (iii) if the seller is a corporation, less than 25% of its means of control are held by Israeli resident shareholders. In addition, the sale of the Shares may be exempt from Israeli capital gains tax under an applicable tax treaty. Thus, the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty (“the US Treaty”) exempts U.S. resident from Israeli capital gain tax in connection with such sale, provided that: (i) the U.S. resident controlled, either directly or indirectly, less than 10% of an Israeli resident company’s voting power at any time within the 12–month period preceding such sale; (ii) the seller, if being an individual, is present in Israel for a period or periods of less than 183 days during the taxable year; and (iii) the capital gain from the sale was not derived through a permanent establishment of the U.S. resident in Israel.

64

        Either the seller, the Israeli stockbrokers or financial institution through which the sold securities are held is obliged, subject to the above mentioned exemptions, to withhold tax upon the sale of securities from the real capital gain at the rate of 25% in respect of a corporation and 20% in respect of an individual

        Generally, a detailed return, including a computation of the tax due, should be submitted to the Israeli Tax Authority, within 30 days of the completion of a transaction and advanced payment amounting to the tax liability arising from the capital gain is due. At the sale of traded securities, detailed rules apply, by which, inter alia, the aforementioned detailed return, upon fulfillment of certain conditions, may not be submitted and the advanced payment should not be paid if all tax due was withheld at the source according to applicable provisions of the Israeli income tax ordinance and regulations promulgated thereunder. Capital gains are also reportable on the annual income tax return.

Dividends

        The following Israeli tax consequences shall apply in the event of actual payment of any dividends on ordinary shares.

        Income from dividends in 2007 and thereafter, other than bonus shares (stock dividends), to Israeli residents who purchased our Shares will generally be subject to an income tax rate of 20% for individuals, or 25% if the dividends recipient is a Controlling Shareholder (as defined above) and will be exempt from income tax for Israeli corporations (as long as the corporation did not generate income from an approved enterprise).

        Non-residents of Israel (both individuals and corporations) are subject to income tax on income accrued or derived from sources in Israel, including dividends from Israeli corporations. The distribution of dividends, other than bonus shares (stock dividends), sourced from non-Approved Enterprise income, to non-residents of Israel will generally be subject to income tax at a rate of 20% (or 25% for a shareholder that is considered a Controlling Shareholder (as described above) by way of a tax withholding, unless a lower rate is stipulated by a treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence.

        Generally, under the US Treaty the maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends paid to a shareholder who is a resident of the United States (as defined in the US Treaty) will be 25%. Due to the fact that a tax rate of 25% is higher than the maximum Israeli tax rate on dividends pursuant to the 2005 Amendment, the maximum tax rate should be 20%. However, when a U.S. tax resident corporation is the recipient of the dividend, the rate on a dividend out of regular (sourced from non-Approved Enterprise income) profits may be reduced to 12.5% under the treaty, where the following conditions are met:

(a) the recipient corporation owns at least 10% of the outstanding voting rights of the Company for all of the period preceding the dividend during the Company’s current and prior tax year; and

(b) generally not more than 25% of the gross income of the paying corporation for its prior tax year consists of certain interest and dividend income components.

        Otherwise, the usual rates as described above would apply.

        In addition, if an Individual shareholder is considered a Controlling Shareholder (as defined above) at any time during the 12-month period preceding such sale, the tax rate on the dividend (not source from Approved Enterprise income) will be 25%. The withholding tax by the Company on such dividend would remain 20%.

United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

        TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, WE INFORM YOU THAT ANY TAX STATEMENT HEREIN IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY ANY TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING ANY TAX-RELATED PENALTIES UNDER THE UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. ANY TAX STATEMENT HEREIN WAS WRITTEN IN CONNECTION WITH THE MARKETING OR PROMOTION OF THE TRANSACTIONS OR MATTERS TO WHICH THE STATEMENT RELATES. EACH TAXPAYER SHOULD SEEK ADVICE BASED ON THE TAXPAYER’S PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR.

65

        The following is a summary of selected material U.S. Federal income tax consequences that apply to U.S. Holders (as defined below) who hold Ordinary Shares as capital assets. This summary is based on the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, and the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change either prospectively or retroactively. This summary does not address all tax considerations that may be relevant with respect to an investment in Ordinary Shares. This summary does not account for the specific circumstances of any particular investor, such as:

— broker dealers,

— financial institutions,

— certain insurance companies,

— investors liable for alternative minimum tax,

— tax exempt organizations,

— non-resident aliens of the U.S. or taxpayers whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar,

— persons who hold the Ordinary Shares through partnerships or other pass-through entities,

— investors that actually or constructively own 10 percent or more of our voting shares,

— investors holding Ordinary Shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction, or other integrated investment; and

— regulated investment companies.

        This summary does not address the effect of any U.S. Federal taxation other than U.S. Federal income taxation. In addition, this summary does not include any discussion of state, local or foreign taxation.

        Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the foreign and United States Federal, state and local tax considerations of an investment in Ordinary Shares.

        For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a shareholder which is:

— an individual who is a citizen or, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, a resident of the United States;

— a corporation (including any entity treated as a corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;

— an estate whose income is subject to U.S. Federal income tax regardless of its source; or

66

— a trust if:

(a) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over administration of the trust;

(b) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust; or

(c) it has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

Taxation of Dividends

        The gross amount of any distributions received with respect to Ordinary Shares, including the amount of any Israeli taxes withheld therefrom, will constitute dividends under U.S. Federal income tax purposes, to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. Federal income tax principles. Shareholders will be required to include this amount of dividends in gross income as ordinary income. Subject to the discussion below under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Companies”, distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated as a non taxable return of capital to the extent of a shareholder’s tax basis in the Ordinary Shares and any amount in excess of such shareholder’s tax basis, will be treated as gain from the sale of Ordinary Shares. See “Disposition of Ordinary Shares” below for the discussion on the taxation of capital gains. Dividends will not qualify for the dividends received deduction generally available to corporations under Section 243 of the Code.

        Dividends that we pay in NIS, including the amount of any Israeli taxes withheld therefrom, will be included in a shareholder’s income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day such dividends are received. A U.S. Holder who receives payment in NIS and converts NIS into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate other than the rate in effect on such day may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the U.S. tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of NIS.

        Any Israeli withholding tax imposed on such dividends will be a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, subject to certain limitations set out in the Code (or, alternatively, for deduction against income in determining such tax liability). The limitations set out in the Code include computational rules under which foreign tax credits allowable with respect to specific classes of income cannot exceed the U.S. federal income taxes otherwise payable with respect to each such class of income. Dividends generally will be treated as foreign source passive income or financial services income for United States foreign tax credit purposes. Foreign income taxes exceeding the credit limitation for the year of payment or accrual may be carried back for two taxable years and forward for five taxable years in order to reduce U.S. federal income taxes, subject to the credit limitation applicable in each of such years. Other restrictions on the foreign tax credit include a prohibition on the use of the credit to reduce liability for the U.S. individual and corporation alternative minimum taxes by more than 90%. A U.S. Holder will be denied a foreign tax credit with respect to Israeli income tax withheld from dividends received on the Ordinary Shares to the extent such U.S. Holder has not held the Ordinary Shares for at least 16 days of the 30-day period beginning on the date which is 15 days before the ex dividend date or to the extent such U.S. Holder is under an obligation to make related payments with respect to substantially similar or related property. Any days during which a U.S. Holder has substantially diminished its risk of loss on the Ordinary Shares are not counted toward meeting the 16-day holding period required by the statute. The rules relating to the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex, and shareholders should consult with their personal tax advisors to determine whether and to what extent they would be entitled to this credit.

67

        Dividends received by an individual shareholder from U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations are taxed at the same rate applicable to net capital gain income. As such, the maximum rate applicable to dividend income received by an individual shareholder from a U.S. corporation and certain qualified foreign corporations has generally been reduced to 15%. However, an individual shareholder will not qualify for this lower rate if such shareholder does not hold a share of stock for more than 60 days during the 120 day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date. Additionally, the reduced rate is not available for dividends to the extent that the individual shareholder is obligated to make related payments (whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. Special rules will apply in determining an individual shareholder’s foreign tax credit limitation in the case of dividends which qualify for the lower rate.

        A foreign corporation is a “qualified foreign corporation” if it is not a foreign personal holding company, a foreign investment company or a passive foreign investment company for the taxable year of the corporation in which the dividend is paid, or the preceding taxable year and either (i) is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the United States Treasury Department determines is satisfactory for purposes of the new provision and which includes an exchange of information program, or (ii) the stock of the foreign corporation is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.

        The reduced rate applicable to dividend distributions shall not apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.

Dispositions of Ordinary Shares

        If a shareholder sells or otherwise disposes of Ordinary Shares, such shareholder will recognize gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or other disposition and the adjusted tax basis of such Ordinary Shares. Subject to the discussion below under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Companies,” such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long term capital gain or loss if a shareholder has held the Ordinary Shares for more than one year at the time of the sale or other disposition. In general, any gain that a shareholder recognizes on the sale or other disposition of Ordinary Shares will be U.S. source for purposes of the foreign tax credit limitation; losses, will generally be allocated against U.S. source income. Under the U.S.-Israel Treaty, gain on the disposition of Ordinary Shares may be treated as Israeli source, if the shareholder has held 10% or more of the voting power of the company at any time during the 12 months preceding the date of disposition. Deduction of capital losses is subject to certain limitations under the Code.

        In the case of a cash basis U.S. Holder who receives NIS in connection with the sale or disposition of Ordinary Shares, the amount realized will be based on the U.S. dollar value of the NIS received with respect to the Ordinary Shares as determined on the settlement date of such exchange. A U.S. Holder who receives payment in NIS and converts NIS into United States dollars at a conversion rate other than the rate in effect on the settlement date may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss.

        An accrual basis U.S. Holder may elect the same treatment required of cash basis taxpayers with respect to a sale or disposition of Ordinary Shares, provided that the election is applied consistently from year to year. Such election may not be changed without the consent of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). In the event that an accrual basis U.S. Holder does not elect to be treated as a cash basis taxpayer (pursuant to the Treasury regulations applicable to foreign currency transactions), such U.S. Holder may have a foreign currency gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes because of differences between the U.S. dollar value of the currency received prevailing on the trade date and the settlement date. Any such currency gain or loss would be treated as ordinary income or loss and would be in addition to gain or loss, if any, recognized by such U.S. Holder on the sale or disposition of such Ordinary Shares.

Passive Foreign Investment Companies

        For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, we will be considered a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for any taxable year in which either (i) 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of all of our assets for the taxable year produce or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, passive income includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities and the excess of gains over losses from the disposition of assets which produce passive income. If we were determined to be a PFIC for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, highly complex rules would apply to U.S. Holders owning Ordinary Shares. Accordingly, shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of such rules.

68

        Based on our current and projected income, assets and activities, we believe that we may be considered a PFIC for periods prior to the acquisition of Witech.

        If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, then, unless a shareholder elects either to treat such shareholder’s investment in Ordinary Shares as an investment in a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF election”) or to “mark to market” such shareholder’s Ordinary Shares, as described below:

— the shareholder would be required to allocate income recognized upon receiving certain dividends or gain recognized upon the disposition of Ordinary Shares ratably over the holding period for such Ordinary Shares;

— the amount allocated to each year during which we are considered a PFIC other than the year of the dividend payment or disposition would be subject to tax at the highest individual or corporate tax rate, as the case may be, and an interest charge would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax liability allocated to each such year;

— gain recognized upon the disposition of Ordinary Shares would be taxable as ordinary income; and

— the shareholder would be required to make an annual return on IRS Form 8621 regarding distributions received with respect to ordinary shares and any gain realized on such shareholder’s Ordinary Shares.

        If a shareholder makes either a timely QEF election or a timely mark to market election in respect of such shareholder’s Ordinary Shares, the shareholder would not be subject to the rules described above. If a shareholder makes a timely QEF election, the shareholder would be required to include in such shareholder’s income for each taxable year such shareholder’s pro rata share of our ordinary earnings as ordinary income and such shareholder’s pro rata share of our net capital gain as long term capital gain, whether or not such amounts are actually distributed to the shareholder. A shareholder would not be eligible to make a QEF election unless we comply with certain applicable information reporting requirements.

        Alternatively, if a shareholder elects to “mark to market” such shareholder’s Ordinary Shares, the shareholder will generally include in income any excess of the fair market value of the Ordinary Shares at the close of each tax year over such shareholder’s adjusted basis in the Ordinary Shares. If the fair market value of the Ordinary Shares had depreciated below the shareholder’s adjusted basis at the close of the tax year, the shareholder may generally deduct the excess of the adjusted basis of the Ordinary Shares over its fair market value at that time. However, such deductions generally would be limited to the net mark to market gains, if any, that the shareholder included in income with respect to such Ordinary Shares in prior years. Income recognized and deductions allowed under the mark to market provisions, as well as any gain or loss on the disposition of Ordinary Shares with respect to which the mark to market election is made, is treated as ordinary income or loss. For these purposes, stock will be treated as “marketable stock” for which a “mark-to-market” election can be made if (i) it is a class of stock which trades on a national securities exchange that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or on a national market system established pursuant to Section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) which is regularly traded on such exchanges or markets, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. However, it is unclear under current law whether shares being traded in the over-the-counter market qualify as “marketable stock” for these purposes. Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors concerning their ability to make a “mark-to-market” election.

69

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

        Payments in respect of Ordinary Shares may be subject to information reporting to the IRS and U.S. backup withholding tax. Under the backup withholding rules, a shareholder may be subject to backup withholding at the rate of 28%. Backup withholding will not apply, however, if a shareholder (i) is a corporation or falls within certain exempt categories, and demonstrates the fact when so required, or (ii) furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and makes any other required certification. Any amount withheld under these rules may be credited against a shareholder’s federal income tax liability.

        Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against a U.S. holder’s U.S. tax liability, and a U.S. Holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.

        Any U.S. holder who holds 10% or more in vote or value of our Ordinary Shares will be subject to certain additional United States information reporting requirements.

U.S. Gift and Estate Tax

        An individual U.S. holder of Ordinary Shares will be subject to U.S. gift and estate taxes with respect to Ordinary Shares in the same manner and to the same extent as with respect to other types of personal property.

F. Dividends and Paying Agents

        Not applicable.

G. Statements by Experts

        Not Applicable

H. Documents on Display

        The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and, accordingly, it files reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Individuals can inspect and copy those reports and other information at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F. Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the SEC’s regional offices. For more information on its public reference facilities, you can call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can obtain copies of such material at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Section of the SEC. Individuals can also obtain reports and other information from the Internet site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

        In addition, documents referred to in this Form 20-F filing are available, at no cost, upon request from Robi Hartman, Chief Executive Officer, I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited, 33 Jabotinsky Street, Ramat Gan, Israel (Tel. 972-3-751-0007).

I. Subsidiary Information

        Not applicable.

70

Item 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        In the normal course of business, the financial position of the Company is routinely subjected to a variety of risks, including market risk associated with interest rate movements and currency rate movements on non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities. The Company regularly assesses these risks and has established policies and business practices to protect against the adverse effects of these and other potential exposures. As a result, the Company does not anticipate material losses in these areas.

        For purposes of specific risk analysis, the Company uses sensitivity analysis to determine the impacts that market risk exposures may have on the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments. The financial instruments included in the sensitivity analysis consist of all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents.

        To perform sensitivity analysis, the Company assesses the risk of loss in fair values from the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates on market sensitive instruments. The market values for interest risk are computed based on the present value of future cash flows as impacted by the changes in rates attributable to the market risk being measured. The discount rates used for the present value computations were selected based on market interest rates in effect at December 31, 2007. The market values for foreign exchange risk are computed based on spot rates in effect at December 31, 2007. The market values that result from these computations are compared to the market values of these financial instruments at December 31, 2007. The differences in this comparison are the hypothetical gains or losses associated with each type of risk.

        The results of the sensitivity analysis are as follows:

        Interest Rate Risk: A 10% decrease or a 10% increase in the levels of interest rates with all other variables held constant would not materially affect the earnings, cash flow and fair value of the Company’s near-term financial condition or results of operations.

        Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk: A 10% movement in levels of foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar with all other variables held constant would not materially affect the earnings, cash flow and fair value of the Company’s near-term financial condition or results of operations.

Item 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

        Not applicable.

PART II

Item 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

        Not applicable.

Item 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

        Not applicable.

Item 15T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20F. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. The Company’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

        All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

        The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.

71

        Based on management’s assessment and the criteria set forth by COSO, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.

        This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

C. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        From July 2004 until April 2007, the Company was placed in voluntary liquidation and had no functioning board of directors or board-related committees as an outside liquidator managed all of the Company’s affairs. During this period, we ceased preparing audited financial statements which resulted in the Company being delinquent with respect to its annual report filing obligations with the SEC. Consequently, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions.

        Following the cancellation of our voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007, we have taken certain actions to remediate our material weaknesses including:

— Re-establishing a board of directors including an audit committee; and

— Creating an internal audit function; and

— Hiring a professional services firm to perform accounting and financial reporting functions and as of the end of 2007, accounting is performed by qualified in-house professionals.

As a result of these and other measures we have taken to date, we believe all the material weaknesses were remediated by August 2007.

Item 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

        For the year 2004, as we entered voluntary liquidation in July 2004, we did not have a properly functioning audit committee. None of the members of our audit committee met the definition of an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 16A (a) of Form 20-F. This was due to our inability to attract a director with the requisite financial knowledge and experience.

        From July 2004 until April 2007 we were in involuntary liquidation and had no functioning board of directors or board of directors’ committees.

        Following the termination of our voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007 we have an Audit Committee consisting of Iris Weller-Weiss, Adrian Auman, Alon Wulkan and Rony Jacobowitz. Our Board has determined that each of Philip Stein as well as Adrian Auman, meets the definition of an independent audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 16A(a) of Form 20-F.

Item 16B. CODE OF ETHICS

        On December 27, 2007, the Company adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its management, employees, in-house contractors, and employees of subsidiaries or affiliates. In particular, all supervisory and management personnel, including all of our officers and directors, are expected to lead according to the standards in the Code, in both words and action. A copy of the code is posted on our website at (http://www.iislf.com) and may also be obtained, without charge, upon a written request addressed to the Company.

Item 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

        The following table sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the fees incurred in respect to services rendered by our independent public accountants.

Services Rendered	Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2006		2007
IIS
Audit Fees (1)	$	43,000	$	54,000	$	114,000
Audit-related Fees (2)			$	20,000
Tax Fees (3)	$	2,000	$	2,000	$	2,000
Total	$	45,000	$	76,000	$	116,000

72

(1) Audit fees consist of services that would normally be provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including services that generally only the independent accountant can reasonably provide.

(2) Audit-related fees relate to assurance and associated services that traditionally are performed by the independent accountant, including: attest services that are not required by statute or regulation; accounting consultation and audits in connection with mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; employee benefit plans audits; and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

(3) Tax fees relate to services performed by the tax division for tax compliance, planning, and advice.

        Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

        As of December 31, 2007 our board of directors had not adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent public accountants, Kesselman & Kesselman, a member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited. No issue regarding these services has arisen in the last two fiscal years. The board of directors will deliberate these matters as and when they arise, on a case-by-case basis. Commencing April 17, 2007, the Company’s audit committee charter provides that the audit committee shall approve in advance all audit services and all non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm based on a policy attached to the charter.

        Under the policy, proposed services either (i) may be pre-approved by the audit committee without consideration of specific case-by-case services as “general pre-approval”; or (ii) require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee as “specific pre-approval”. The appendices to the policy set out the audit, audit-related and tax services that have received the general pre-approval of the audit committee, including those described in the footnotes to the table, above. These services are subject to annual review by the audit committee.

        All other audit, audit-related, tax and other services not mentioned in the appendices to the charter must receive a specific pre-approval from the audit committee. Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the audit committee are submitted to the audit committee by the Chief Executive Officer.

Item 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

        Not applicable.

Item 16E. PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

        Not applicable.

PART III

Item 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        Not applicable.

73

Item 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        Attached see Item 19(a) and 19(b).

Item 19. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(a) Index to Financial Statements of the Company: Page

Report of Independent Auditors on Financial Statements of the Company	F-2
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2006	F-3
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	F-4
Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (capital deficiency) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	F-6
Notes to the Financial Statements	F-7 - F-31

(b) Index to Audited Financial Statements of Witech

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	W-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2006	W-3-W-4
Consolidated Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	W-5
Consolidated Statements of changes capital deficiency for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	W-6
Consolidated Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	W-7
Note to Consolidated Financial Statements	W-8-W-34

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

74

SIGNATURES

        The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION
SYSTEMS LIMITED
(Registrant)


By: /s/ Robi Hartman
——————————————
Robi Hartman, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ Yifat Zommer
——————————————
Yifat Zommer, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: June 30, 2008

75

Index to Exhibits:

Exhibit No.:

1.1 Memorandum of Association of the Company.*

1.2 Articles of Association of the Company, Amended and Restated as of November 19, 2000. **

2.1 Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and the Purchasers listed therein dated as of November 12, 2007. ****

4.1 Summary English Translation from the original Hebrew of a Lease Agreement entered into between the Company and West End Technology Investments Ltd., for office space located at 33 Jabotinsky Street, Ramat Gan, Israel, dated January 30, 2001. ***

4.2 Share Purchase Agreement between LSI Logic Corporation, StoreAge Networking Technologies Ltd. and the Purchasers listed therein dated as of October 25, 2006. ****

4.4 Share Exchange Agreement between the Company, Witech Communications Ltd., and the Shareholders of Witech Communications Ltd. dated November 5, 2007, and the amendment dated January 2, 2008. ****

4.5 Indemnification Agreement between the Company, Witech Communications Ltd., the Shareholders of Witech Communications Ltd. and Charles Moss as the Shareholder Representative dated November 5, 2007. ****

4.6 2007 Stock Option Plan.****

4.7 Form of Indemnification Agreement with directors and officers. ****

8.1 List of significant subsidiaries of the Company.

12.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

12.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-62862 dated August 10, 1993.

** Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2000.

*** Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001.

**** Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to the Company’s Shell Company Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on January 10, 2008.

76

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM	F-2
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Balance sheets	F-3
Statements of operations	F-4
Statements of changes in shareholders' equity (capital deficiency)	F-5
Statements of cash flows	F-6
Notes to financial statements	F-7-F-31

The amounts are stated in U.S. dollars ($).

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders of
I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED

We have audited the balance sheets of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity (capital deficiency) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s Board of Directors and management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Company’s Board of Directors and management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion the financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of its operations changes in shareholders’ equity (capital deficiency) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Tel-Aviv, Israel	Kesselman & Kesselman
June 30, 2008	Certified Public Accountant (Isr.)
	A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers
	International Limited

F - 2

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
BALANCE SHEETS
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

	December 31
	2007			2006
A s s e t s
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	463		$	4,705
Accounts receivable		99			5
T o t a l current assets		562			4,710
FIXED ASSETS, net		1
LONG-TERM ASSETS:
Loans granted (note 3)		4,908
Deferred acquisition costs (note 1a(2))		190
Funds in respect of employee rights upon retirement
(note 4)		3			3
		5,102			3
T o t a l  assets	$	5,664		$	4,713
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
CURRENT LIABILITIES -
Accounts payable and accruals	$	473		$	261
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Convertible loan (note 6)		782
Provision for uncertain tax position		4
Liability for employee rights upon retirement (note 4)		4			5
T o t a l  long-term liabilities		790			5
T o t a l  liabilities		1,263			266
COMMITMENTS, note 5
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.003 par value:
authorized - 50,000,000 and 16,666,667 shares in
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively;
issued and outstanding - 11,576,539 shares at
December 31, 2007 and 2006		55			55
Additional paid-in capital		41,474			41,417
Accumulated deficit		(37,128	)		(37,025	)
T o t a l  shareholders' equity		4,401			4,447
T o t a l  liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	5,664		$	4,713

/s/ Charles Moss
——————————————
Charles Moss
Chairman of the Board /s/ Robi Hartman
——————————————
Robi Hartman
Chief Executive Officer /s/ Yifat Zommer
——————————————
Yifat Zommer
Chief Financial Officer

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F - 3

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Year ended December 31
	2007			2006			2005
INCOME FROM MANAGEMENT FEE	$	55
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		(607	)		(91	)		(103	)
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES) - net		453			17			(3	)
CAPITAL GAIN FROM DISPOSAL OF INVESTMENT					4,713
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES ON INCOME		(99	)		4,639			(106	)
TAXES ON INCOME		4
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(103	)	$	4,639		$	(106	)
Net income (loss) per share of ordinary shares -
Basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	0.40		$	(0.01	)
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in
computing income (loss) per ordinary shares
(in thousands) -
Basic and diluted		11,577			11,577			11,577

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F - 4

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (CAPITAL DEFICIENCY)
(U.S dollars in thousands, except share data)

	Ordinary shares
	Number of shares		Amount		Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated deficit			Total shareholders' equity (capital deficiency)
BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005		11,576,539	$	55	$	41,417	$	(41,558	)	$	(86	)
CHANGE DURING 2005 -
net loss								(106	)		(106	)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005		11,576,539		55		41,417		(41,664	)		(192	)
CHANGE DURING 2006 -
net income								4,639			4,639
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006		11,576,539		55		41,417		(37,025	)		4,447
CHANGES DURING 2007:
Stock based compensation						1					1
Warrants granted (see note 6)						56					56
Net loss								(103	)		(103	)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007		11,576,539	$	55	$	41,474	$	(37,128	)	$	4,401

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F - 5

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(U.S dollars in thousands)

	Year ended December 31
	2007			2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(103	)	$	4,639		$	(106	)
Adjustments required to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
Changes in accrued liability for employee rights
upon retirement		(1	)		2			1
Gain on amounts funded in respect of employee
rights upon retirement					(1	)
Capital gain from disposal of investment					(4,713	)
Stock based compensation		1
Accrued interest in respect of loans received		10
Changes in provision for uncertain tax position		4
Accrued interest in respect of loans granted		(318	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable		(94	)		(5	)		10
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accruals		212			29			43
Net cash used in operating activities		(289	)		(49	)		(52	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Loans granted		(4,590	)
Proceeds from disposal of investment					4,713
Deferred acquisition costs		(190	)
Purchase of fixed assets		(1	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(4,781	)		4,713			-,-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Long term convertible loan received		772
Warrants issued		56
Net cash provided by financing activities		828			-,-			-,-
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(4,242	)		4,664			(52	)
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		4,705			41			93
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
AT END OF YEAR	$	463		$	4,705		$	41

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F - 6

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

a. General:

1) Operations

Through December 2002, I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited. (the “Company” or “IIS”) designed, developed and provided enterprise storage solutions for the Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (“iSCSI”). Due to the slow down associated with the iSCSI revenues resulting from the delays in the adoption of the iSCSI protocol, the Company decided to cease its iSCSI operations in December 2002.

On July 29, 2004, the Company’s shareholders resolved to place the Company in a voluntary liquidation.

On April 17, 2007, the Company’s general meeting of shareholders duly approved the termination of the Company’s voluntary liquidation.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company is no longer engaged in any operational business other than providing managing services to Witech Communications Ltd. (“Witech”) for a fixed monthly fee of $6,000.

2) Share exchange agreement

On February 20, 2007, the Company signed a memorandum of agreement (“MOA”) with Witech with respect to a contemplated merger between the Company and Witech, under which the Company is to acquire full control and ownership of Witech, in consideration of 50% of the Company’s shares.

Witech is an Israeli company, which is engaged in the development, sale, operation and support of wireless video transmission systems for use on roller coasters and thrill rides in amusement parks as well as other moving attractions.

F - 7

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

On November 5, 2007, the Company signed a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Witech and it’s shareholders which was approved on December 20, 2007 by the Company’s general shareholders meeting for the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of Witech in exchange for the issuance of 11,552,229 shares of the Company to the shareholders of Witech, representing 50% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company less those shares due to the Company by virtue of the loan agreement between the Company and Witech (see also note 3b). Following the transaction, Witech will become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. According to the agreement, the Company will grant stock options to the senior management and shareholders of Witech, in accordance with the 2007 options plan of the Company (see note 7c(2)), to purchase an aggregate of 2,300,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price equal to the average trading share price during the twenty (20) trading days prior to the Closing ($0.44), vesting in eight (8) semi- annual installments as long as each such executive continues to be employed by the Company. The fair value of the above options on the date of grant is $940,030 using the Black Scholes option-pricing model and was based on the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 141%; risk-free interest rates of 3.88%; and expected lives of 6.15 years.

In addition, according to the agreement , the Company will increase the shares reserved for issuance to directors, employees, consultants and service providers of the Company and its subsidiaries pursuant to its incentive stock option plans by an additional 1,000,000 shares so that the total amount of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to such plan will be 3,300,000.

In addition, the Company will issue to all registered shareholders of the Company as of November 9, 2007 (the “record date”) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,600,000 Ordinary Shares of the Company, on a pro-rata basis according to the percentage holding of each such shareholder in the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company on such record date. These warrants will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction. A “Transaction” means each of (i) merger, acquisition or reorganization of IIS with one or more other entities in which IIS is not the surviving entity, or (ii) a sale of all or substantially all of the assets or shares of IIS. The exercise price of each warrant shall be the average trading price per share of the Company’s Ordinary Shares during the twenty trading days prior to the Closing ($0.44). These warrants will be non-transferable and non-exercisable until all applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations have been complied with in connection with the warrants and the underlying shares, including without limitation, that a registration statement covering the underlying shares is declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As of the issuance date of these financial statements the grant of these warrants was not approved.

The closing of the Exchange Agreement was subject to certain closing conditions. The closing of the transaction was on January 2, 2008.

F - 8

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

The financial statements of Witech as of December 31, 2007 include an explanatory note in respect of the fact that Witech does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its requirements in the twelve months following January 1, 2008.

The acquisition is to be accounted for by the purchase method. The results of operations of Witech are to be included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company commencing January 1, 2008. The Company has not finalized the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets acquired in this acquisition. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with reference to Witech’s balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007:

	Unaudited
	U.S. dollars in thousands
Number of IIS shares issued to Witech's shareholders		11,552,229
Multiplied by IIS's average stock price for the period two business days before and
through the two business days after November 5,2007 Exchange Agreement date, net of the
estimated fair value of the warrants	$	0.48
			$	5,545
Estimated transactions costs				190
Estimated purchase price			$	5,735
The preliminary allocation of the estimated purchase price based on the estimated fair
values of Witech's assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition is as
follows:
Net tangible assets			$	(5,656	)
Identifiable intangible assets				5,776
In-process research and development				132
Goodwill				5,483
Total purchase price			$	5,735

F - 9

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

The amount allocated to research and development in-process represents an estimate of the fair value of purchased in-process technology for research projects that, as of the closing date of the exchange agreement, have not reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. The preliminary estimate of research and development in-process is subject to change and is to be finalized upon completion of an appraisal by management. The amount allocated to research and development in process is to be charged to operating expenses in the first quarter of 2008. The useful life of intangible assets estimated between 7 to 13 years.

3) Accounting principles

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

4) Functional currency

The currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates is the U.S. dollar (“dollar”; “$”). Most of the Company’s expenses are incurred in dollars. The Company’s deposits are mostly in dollars. Thus, the functional currency of the Company is the dollar.

Transactions and balances originally denominated in dollars are presented at their original amounts. Balances in non-dollar currencies are translated into dollars using historical and current exchange rates for non-monetary and monetary balances, respectively. Non-dollar transactions reflected in the statements of operations are translated into dollars using exchange rates at the transaction dates or average rates. Currency transaction gains or losses are carried to financial income or expenses, as appropriate.

5) Use of estimates in preparation of financial statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting policies (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

b. Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments, which are comprised of short-term bank deposits with an original maturity date of up to three months that are not restricted as to withdrawal or use, to be cash equivalents.

F - 10

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

c. Deferred income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Deferred taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability method, based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial accounting and tax bases of assets and liabilities under the applicable tax laws.

Deferred tax balances are computed using the tax rates expected to be in effect at time when these differences reverse.

Valuation allowances in respect of the deferred tax assets are provided when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized.

The Company has provided a full valuation allowance with respect to its deferred tax assets.

As of January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, ‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes–an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109’ (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 specifies how tax benefits for uncertain tax positions are to be recognized, measured, and derecognized in financial statements; requires certain disclosures of uncertain tax positions; specifies how reserves for uncertain tax positions should be classified on the balance sheet; and provides transition and interim-period guidance, among other provisions. The Group’s accounting policy, pursuant to the adoption of FIN 48, is to classify interest and penalties recognized in the financial statements relating to uncertain tax positions under the provision for income taxes. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a non-material cumulative impact to retained earnings. See also note 8g.

d. Investments in associated companies

Investments in associated companies are investments in companies held to the extent of 20% or more which the Company can exercise significant influence over operating and financial policy.

As the Company has not guaranteed obligations and not otherwise committed to provide further financial support for any of the associated companies, the Company discontinued applying the equity method when the investment account was reduced to zero (see also note 2).

F - 11

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

e. Net income (loss) per share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year.

Diluted net income (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, taking into account the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of options granted under employee stock option plans and warrants issued, using the treasury stock method and the potential dilution that could occur upon conversion of the convertible loan using the if converted method.

For the years ended December 2007, 2006 and 2005 all outstanding options, warrants and the convertible loan have been excluded from the calculation of the diluted loss per share since their effect was anti dilutive.

f. Accounting for stock based compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-based Payment” (“FAS 123(R)”). FAS 123(R) supersedes APB 25 and related interpretations and amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows” (“FAS 95”). FAS 123(R) requires awards classified as equity awards be accounted for using the grant-date fair value method. The fair value of share-based payment transactions is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company estimated forfeitures based on historical experience and anticipated future conditions. The Company elected to recognize stock based compensation cost using the straight-line method.

The Company did not disclose pro forma data in respect of the year ended December 31, 2005, as required by SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”(“SFAS 123”), as amended by FAS 148, assuming it had accounted for employee share option grants using the fair value-based method defined in SFAS 123, since the effect on net loss and net loss per share assuming it had applied the fair value recognition provisions is immaterial.

In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”). SAB 107 provides supplemental implementation guidance on FAS 123(R), including guidance on valuation methods, inventory capitalization of share-based compensation cost, income statement effects, disclosures and other issues. SAB 107 requires share-based payment to be classified in the same expense line items as cash compensation. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of FAS 123(R).

F - 12

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

g. Concentration of credit risks

Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and account receivables. These balances do no represent a substantial concentration of credit risks as of December 31, 2007. Also, the long term loans which were granted to Witech (see note 3) do no represent a substantial concentration of credit risks as of December 31, 2007 mainly because of the Exchange agreement (see note 1a (2)).

h. Fair value of financial instruments

In view of their nature, the fair value of the financial instruments included in the working capital of the Company is usually identical or close to their carrying value. The carrying amounts of the Company’s long-term assets, long-term loans payable, and other long-term liabilities approximate their fair value.

i. Newly issued accounting pronouncements:

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”(“SFAS 157”), which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 (January 1, 2008 for the Company), and interim periods within those fiscal years. Subsequent to the issuance of SFAS 157, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13”(“FSP 157-1”) and FSP No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-1 excludes, in certain circumstances, SFAS No. 13 “Accounting for Leases” and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under statement 13 from the provision of SFAS 157. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 for such instruments to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years (January 1, 2009, for the Company). The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

F - 13

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 is expected to expand the use of fair value accounting, but does not affect existing standards which require certain assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at its initial application or at other specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years (January 1, 2008, for the Company). Were the Company to elect the fair value option for its existing assets and liabilities, the effect as of the adoption date, shall be reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of comprehensive loss. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”) which replaces SFAS No 141. SFAS 141R changes the accounting for business combinations, including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance and income tax uncertainties. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years (January 1, 2009, for the Company). Early application is prohibited. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51" (“SFAS 160”).

SFAS 160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. An ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent should be presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. SFAS 160 requires that changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary should be accounted for similarly as equity transactions. When a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary should be initially measured at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.

F - 14

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interests.

SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The statement shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirement which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (“SAB 110”). SAB 110 amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14, Share-Based Payment, of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14 expresses the views of the staff regarding the use of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain vanilla” share options and allows usage of the “simplified” method for share option grants prior to December 31, 2007. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experience to provide a reasonable estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. The Company currently uses the “simplified” method to estimate the expected term for share option grants as the Company does not have enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate. The Company will continue to use the “simplified” method until we have enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate of expected term in accordance with SAB 110. SAB 110 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,”(SFAS “161”) as amended and interpreted, which requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of financial reporting. Disclosing the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format provides a more complete picture of the location in an entity’s financial statements of both the derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using derivatives during the reporting period. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November15, 2008. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any that FAS 161may have on its results of operations and financial position

F - 15

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162 “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“FAS 162”). FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. FAS 162 is effective sixty days following the SEC’s approval of PCAOB amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of ‘Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles’". The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any that FAS 162may have on its results of operations and financial position

F - 16

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 2 – SALE OF INVESTMENTS:

a. Sale of investment in Enargis

On March 31, 2003, the Company transferred iSCSI activities to a newly formed company –Enargis. Following such transfer, the Company held 25% in Enargis with the remaining shares held by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and then serving Chairman of the Board. The carrying amount of the investment in Enargis following the transaction amounted to approximately $20,000, equaling the carrying amount of assets transferred, and was subsequently reduced to zero during the year ended December 31, 2003 due to the Company’s share in Enargis’s losses.

On May 23, 2007, the Company, together with all the other shareholders of Enargis, of which the fair value was deemed negligible, transferred all of its 25% holdings in Enargis to West End Technology Investments Ltd. (a company controlled by the CEO and Chairman of the Board) for no consideration.

b. Sale of investment in StoreAge

As of January 1, 2004 and through October 2005, the Company held 38.9% of StoreAge. StoreAge is an Israeli company, which is engaged in the development and marketing of products based on its SAN Virtualization technology.

In October 2005, all classes of preferred shares of StoreAge and outstanding bridge loans were converted into ordinary shares of StoreAge. Following this conversion the Company held 13% of the issued and ordinary shares of StoreAge.

The carrying amount of the investment in StoreAge was reduced to zero during the year ended December 31, 2002 due to the Company’s share in StoreAge’s losses.

In March 2006, the Company’s holdings in Storage were diluted to 12.68% due to share issuance by StoreAge to a third party.

In October 2006 all the shareholders of StoreAge, including the Company, signed a share purchase agreement with LSI Logic Corporation (“LSI”) for the sale of all issued and outstanding shares of StoreAge to LSI. The Company’s share of the proceeds received upon the closing of the transaction in November 2006, was $5,416,692 of which $703,793 was held in escrow to satisfy certain possible future claims for a period of 18 months following the closing.

The Company recognized the cash portion received in the amount of $4,712,899 as a gain on the sale in 2006, while the amount of $703,793 was recognized in 2008 since it was received on May 2008.

F - 17

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 3 – LOANS GRANTED:

a. On April 23, 2007 and May 28, 2007, the Company signed loan agreements with Witech to grant an aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 to Witech. The loans bear an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 5%, whilst in the event that the Exchange Agreement with Witech is not consummated, the interest on the loan will be increased to LIBOR plus 10% retroactively to the date it was granted. The maturity date was determined as the earlier of (i) 90 days following the termination of the exchange agreement (ii) January 20, 2008.

In connection with these loans, Witech issued promissory notes to the Company. According to these promissory notes, the Company has the right at any time following an event of default, as defined in the agreement, or in the event that the exchange agreement is not consummated, to convert any unpaid amount into fully-paid up and duly issued shares of Witech at a pre-conversion fully-diluted valuation of $5,000,000.

The loan agreements include certain covenants. The Company satisfied the respective covenants as at December 31, 2007.

The interest accrued in respect of these loans is calculated base on LIBOR plus 10%.

On January 20, 2008 (after the closing of the exchange agreement – see note 1a(2)) the loans and the accrued interest up to that date were converted into capital notes denominated in NIS, bearing no interest and repayable at request, but not before the expiration of a period of 5 years. In occasion of liquidation of Witech, amounts to be paid in respect of these capital notes are subordinate to all other debts.

b. From August through November 2007, the Company granted Witech loans in an aggregate amount of $1,590,000. The loans bear an interest rate of 1.5% per month. According to the original agreements, the maturity date was December 16, 2007, whilst in December 2007 the maturity date was lengthened by additional three months on the same terms. In addition, for every month or part thereof that the principal amount for each loan (including interest) or part thereof shall be outstanding, the Company will be entitled to newly issued ordinary shares of Witech equal to 0.0259% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Witech, on a fully diluted basis. According to the alternative settlement of the above mentioned shares as stipulated in the loan agreements, due to the fact that the exchange agreement was closed prior to issuance of the shares, the amount of shares of the Company that the shareholders of Witech received in such exchange agreement has been reduced by 24,313 shares The loans are secured by a pledge over the shares of Witech held by certain shareholders.

Effective March 16, 2008 the loans and the accrued interest up to that date were converted into capital notes denominated in NIS, bearing no interest and repayable at request, but not before the expiration of a period of 5 years In occasion of liquidation of Witech, amounts to be paid in respect of these capital notes are subordinate to all other debts.

F - 18

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 4 – EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UPON RETIREMENT

Israeli law generally requires payment of severance pay and/or pensions upon dismissal of an employee or upon termination of employment in certain other circumstances. The severance pay liabilities are fully provided for in these financial statements, as if it was payable at each balance sheet date on an undiscounted basis, based upon the number of years of service and the most recent monthly salary of the Company’s employee.

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS:

a. Liquidators’compensation:

1) At the Company’s general meeting of shareholders held in July 2004, Messrs. Hartman (the CEO and then serving Chairman of the Board) and Jacobowitz (one of the directors) were appointed as joint liquidators and the shareholders approved a fee of $1,000 per month (plus VAT, if applicable), to each of them commencing from the appointment of the liquidation and until distribution of all proceeds of the liquidation to the Company’s shareholders. The amount of compensation due but unpaid to the Company’s liquidators as of December 31, 2006 according to this arrangement is approximately $58,000. This amount was accrued in the financial statement in “accounts payable and accruals” and was paid in May 2007.

2) In addition, the Company’s shareholders approved that (i) Mr. Jacobowitz will receive an additional bonus as follows: $25,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the gross proceeds received by the Company’s shareholders as a result of the liquidation of the net assets of the Company (hereinafter – the “Gross Proceeds”) are above $0.50 per share, $50,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the Gross Proceeds are above $1.00 per share and $75,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the Gross Proceeds are above $1.30 per share, and (ii) Mr. Hartman will receive an additional bonus of $100,000 (plus VAT, if applicable) if the Gross Proceeds are above $1.30 per share.

Since the Company terminated its voluntary liquidation, the Company’s audit committee and board of directors have approved on June 17, 2007, subject to shareholder approval, which was obtained on December 20, 2007, that these bonuses will be calculated and paid based on the average closing share price of the Company’s shares in the twenty trading days following December 20,2007.

The Company has not provided for the additional bonus to the liquidators in its financial statements as, at balance sheet date, the payment of the said bonus was contingent upon conditions as detailed above.

Based on the average closing share price of the Company’s shares in the twenty trading days following December 20, 2007 the liquidators were not entitled to the said bonus.

F - 19

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS (continued):

b. Directors’compensation:

1) Effective as of April 1, 2003, all of the directors of the Company agreed to suspend their compensation until the Company either received a settlement from an ongoing lawsuit which at that time was in mediation or received proceeds from the sale/exit of StoreAge or Enargis or the raising of additional financial resources. Following settlement of the lawsuit, the directors of the Company did not take this compensation and agreed that this compensation would be paid only from receipt of proceeds from the sale/exit of its holdings in StoreAge or Enargis or the raising of additional financial resources. The amount of compensation due but unpaid to the Company’s officers and directors as of December 31, 2006 according to this arrangement is approximately $172,000. This amount was accrued in the financial statements in “accounts payable and accruals” and was paid in May 2007.

2) On December 20, 2007, the Company’s general meeting of shareholders approved that the compensation of any director of the Company who is not an employee, consultant or service provider to the Company or any of its subsidiaries, shall be $12,000 per annum. Three directors (one of them is the CEO and then serving Chairman of the Board) were granted options to purchase 15,000 ordinary shares of the Company, per annum as long as such person acts as a director of the Company.

The Company also granted to each of the two external directors of the Company options to purchase 45,000 ordinary shares of the Company. The options vest in three equal annual installments commencing April 17, 2007 for one director and December 20, 2007 for the other director (for further details, see also note 7c(3)).

F - 20

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS (continued):

c. Rent agreement

In February 2001, a portion of the Company office space located in Ramat Gan, Israel was leased from West End. As of April 1, 2003, this lease was assumed by Enargis which sublet 35% of the premises to us at an annual cost of approximately $12,000 which was reduced by 50% to $6,000 per annum with effect from August 2004, following our entry into voluntary liquidation proceedings in July 2004. The other 50%, $6,000, was postponed to until receipts of proceeds from the sale of StoreAge or Enargis. These amounts were paid only in May 2007 following termination of our voluntary liquidation proceedings. As of November 2005, the Company became a direct tenant of West End. Following termination of the Company’s voluntary liquidation proceedings in April 2007, the rent increased from 35% to 50% of the premises and annual cost according to the original agreement, amounting to $1,450 per month.

According to the Company’s Audit Committee’s approval, from May 15, 2007, the agreement will be valid until the exchange agreement with Witech is approved or December 31, 2007 at the latest.

On the 29, 2008, the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved the extension of the above agreement until December 31, 2008. The extension is subject to additional fund raise of at least $2,500,000, after this approval.

d. Consulting Agreement with West End

On December 20, 2007, the Company’s general meeting of shareholders approved an agreement with West End. According to the agreement the CEO and Chairman of the board will provide to the Company consulting services for a monthly fee of NIS 60,000 (approximately $15,000). The effective date of the agreement is April 17, 2007 and continues until either party terminates the agreement at any time, as its sole discretion, by giving the other party at least 180 days advance written notice. In addition, in the event that the Company terminates the Agreement after April 16, 2011 (but not prior to this date), except in the case of a substantial breach, West End will be paid a one-time payment equal to an additional 400% of the monthly fee.

F - 21

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE LOAN

On November 15, 2007, the Company announced that it has signed definitive agreements with private investors (the “purchasers”) for the issuance of convertible notes in the principal amount of $1,655,000, out of which $827,500 were received on that day and the remaining 50% were received on January 8, 2008, since the additional 50% were subject to the closing of the Exchange Agreement which was on January 2, 2008 (see also note 1a(2)). The principal amount of the notes bear an annual interest rate of 8%. The principal amount and interest shall be repaid in 12 equal quarterly installments commencing 36 months from issuance. Unpaid principal and interest may at the option of the purchasers be converted into ordinary shares in such number as calculated by dividing the conversion amount by the conversion price. The Conversion price is $0.65 per share, subject to adjustment from time to time upon certain additional share issuance by the Company. The Company shall have the right to redeem the principal amount and interest of the notes that have not been converted into shares, in whole or in part, between December 31 and January 31 of each year commencing December 31, 2008 or at the closing of a Transaction (which is defined as either the merger of the Company into another company or the purchase of all shares of the Company) at a 20% premium per year, or a pro-rata portion of a year if redeemed in the event of a Transaction. The notes are secured by a floating charge on the assets of the Company, subordinated only to bank financing in an amount not to exceed $500,000.

The Company also issued to the purchasers of the notes warrants exercisable for 165,500 ordinary shares at the price per share equal to the average trading share price of the Company during the 20 trading days prior to the closing of the Exchange Agreement ($0.44), and will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction.

The allocation of the proceeds from the purchaser has been based on the respective fair values of the warrants and the convertible loan.

The warrants issued on November 15, 2007 are classified as equity, at a total amount of $55,823, using the Black Scholes option-pricing model and was based on the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 141%; risk-free interest rates of 3.88%; and contractual lives of 5 years.

On January 8, 2008, the Company issued additional 165,500 warrants at the amount and terms described above.

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

a. Share capital:

At balance sheet date, the Company’s shares were traded on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service (“Pink Sheets”) in the United States.

On April 2008, the Company’s Ordinary Shares were admitted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB®) in the United States.

F - 22

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued):

The ordinary shares confer upon the holders the right to receive notices of, participate and vote in the general meetings of the Company, the right to receive dividends, if and when declared by the board of directors and the right to receive, upon liquidation, a pro rata share of any remaining assets.

b. Increase of Registered Share Capital

On December 20, 2007, the Company’s general meeting of shareholders approved theincrease of the registered share capital of the Company by NIS 100,000 consisting of 33,333,334 Ordinary Shares of NIS 0.003 par value each, so that following such increase the registered share capital of the Company shall consist of NIS 150,000 divided into 50,000,000 Ordinary Shares of NIS 0.003 par value each.

c. Stock Option Plans:

1) Under the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan (“the 1993 Plan”), options may be granted to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company. Pursuant to the 1993 Plan, the Company reserved for issuance 1,192,929 ordinary shares. The exercise price of the options granted under the 1993 plan may not be less than 85% of the fair market value of the Company’s ordinary shares on the date of grant. The options vested primarily up to 3-4 years.

No options were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. The 1993 Plan expired in 2003. The options of the liquidators of the Company expired during 2006; all other outstanding options issued under the 1993 Plan have either been expired or forfeited in previous years.

2) In November 2007 the Company’s board of directors approved the Company’s 2007 Israeli Share Option Plan (“the 2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan is in a “capital gains track with a trustee” pursuant to section 102 to the Income Tax Ordinance. According to the plan employees, directors, consultants and service providers of the Company will receive up to 3,300,000 options, which may be exercised into NIS 0.003 par value of Company’s ordinary shares. The options may be exercised for a period of 10 years from the grant date. Any options not exercised by this date will expire. The ordinary shares that will be issued following the exercise of the options will be equal in rights to the Company’s ordinary shares immediately upon their allocation.

In accordance with the capital gains track chosen by the company and pursuant to the terms thereof, the company is not allowed to claim, as an expense for tax purposes, the amounts credited to employees as a benefit, including amounts recorded as salary benefits in the company’s accounts, in respect of options granted to employees under the plan –with the exception of the work-income benefit component, if any, determined on the grant date.

F - 23

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued):

3) As mentioned in note 5b(2), the Company granted 135,000 options under the 2007 plan to five directors at an exercise price of $0.44. The fair value of these options on the date of grant is $58,262 using the Black Scholes option-pricing model and was based on the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 141%; risk-free interest rates of 3.88%; and expected lives of 5.5-5.7 years. See also note 1a(2).

As to options granted after balance sheet date, see note 1a(2).

4) Following is a summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan and related information:

	Year ended December 31
	2007				2006				2005
	Amount of options		Weighted average exercise price		Amount of options		Weighted average exercise price		Amount of options		Weighted average exercise price
Outstanding at the
beginning of the
year		-,-				406,550	$	3.63		406,550	$	3.63
Granted during the
year		135,000	$	0.44
Forfeited and
cancelled		-;-				(406,550)	$	3.63
Outstanding at the
end of the year		135,000				-;-				406,550	$	3.63
Exercisable at the
end of the year		-,-				-;-				406,550	$	3.63

All of the outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2005 expired in November 2006.

Costs incurred in respect of stock based compensation for year ended December 31, 2007 were $974 (no options were granted during 2005, 2006).

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2007 was (no options were granted during 2005, 2006) is $0.43.

The intrinsic value of the outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2007 is $57,865. The intrinsic value of the outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2005 is zero.

The weighted average remaining contractual term of the outstanding options at December 31, 2007 is approximately 10 years.

F - 24

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued):

At December 31, 2007, there was $57,288 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options, granted under the 2007 Plan. The cost is generally expected to be recognized over a period of three years.

NOTE 8 – TAXES:

a. Measurement of results for tax purposes under the Income Tax (Inflationary Adjustments) Law, 1985 (the “inflationary adjustments law”)

Measurement of results for tax purposes under the Income Tax (Inflationary Adjustments) Law, 1985 (the “inflationary adjustments law”).

Under the inflationary adjustments law, results for tax purposes are measured in real terms, having regard to the changes in the Israeli consumer price index (“CPI”). The Company is taxed under this law.

In February 2008, the Knesset (the Israeli parliament), cancelled the provisions of the Inflationary Adjustments Law, and as a result it will no longer apply to the company in 2008 and thereafter.

b. Tax rates

The income of the Company is taxed at the statutory rate. The corporate tax rates for 2005 and thereafter, as amended in August 2006 are as follows: 2005 – 34%, 2006 – 31%, 2007 – 29%, 2008 – 27%, 2009 – 26% and for 2010 and thereafter – 25%.

Capital gains are taxed at a reduced rate of 25% of the capital gains derived after January 1, 2003 and at the regular corporate tax rate on the gains derived through the aforementioned date.

F - 25

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – TAXES (continued):

c. Deferred income taxes

The deferred income taxes are composed as follows:

	December 31
	2007			2006
Provided for:
Operating loss carryforward	$	11,774		$	10,308
Capital loss carryforward		10,666			9,390
In respect of investments		5			5
Total		22,445			19,703
Less - valuation allowance		(22,445	)		(19,703	)
		-,-			-,-

The deferred tax assets are computed at the tax rates of 25% as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.

d. Tax loss carryforward

As of December 31, 2007, the Company has carryforward tax losses in the amount of approximately $47 million which may be carried forward and offset against taxable income in the future for an indefinite period (December 31, 2006 – $41 million).

In addition, as of December 31, 2007, the Company has accumulated carryforward capital losses in a total amount of approximately $43 million, which may be offset against future capital gain for tax purposes (December 31, 2006 – $38 million).

Under the inflationary adjustments law (see a. above), carryforward losses are linked to the Israeli CPI until December 31, 2007.

F - 26

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – TAXES (continued):

e. Tax assessments

Tax assessments for the Company are considered final through the year ended December 31, 2002.

f. Reconciliation of the theoretical tax expenses to actual tax expenses:

	Year ended December 31
	2007			2006			2005
	U.S. dollar in thousands
Income (loss) before taxes, as reported in the
statements of operations	$	(99	)	$	4,639		$	(106	)
Theoretical income on taxes (tax benefit) at the
statutory rate (29%, 31%, 34% for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively)	$	(29	)	$	1,438		$	(36	)
Utilization of tax losses carryforward					(1,375	)		14
Changes in taxes in respect of tax losses incurred in the
reported year for which deferred taxes were not created		143
Difference between the basis of measurement of
loss reported for tax purposes and the basis of
measurement of loss for financial reporting
Purposes		(115	)		(66	)		23
Provision for uncertain tax position		4
Deductible expenses								(1	)
Other		1			3
		4			-;-			-,-

F - 27

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – TAXES (continued):

g. Uncertainty in income taxes

As described in Note 1c above, the company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007.

The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a non-material cumulative impact to retained earnings. Following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of the company’s unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning and the end of the year ended on December 31, 2007:

	U.S. dollar in thousand
Balance at beginning of year		-
Increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during a prior
period		4
Balance at end of year		4

F - 28

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 9 – SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION:

Balance sheets:

a. Accounts receivable:

	December 31
	2007		2006
	U.S. dollar in thousands
Government authorities	$	32
Income from management fee		49
Prepaid expenses		7
Related parties				5
Other		11
	$	99	$	5

b. Accounts payable and accruals:

Payroll and related expenses	$	1	$	1
Related parties		133		227
Accrued expenses		325		27
Trade		14
Other				6
	$	473	$	261

Statement of operations:

c. General and administrative expenses:

	Year ended December 31
	2007		2006		2005
	U.S. dollar in thousands
Liquidators fees			$	24	$	24
Directors fees		43
Payroll and related expenses		8		12		12
Rent and office maintenance		36		19		16
Management fee		133
Professional fees		346		7		23
Other		41		29		28
	$	607	$	91	$	103

d. Financial income (expenses) - net:

Interest income, net	$	445	$	19		$	1
Other		8		(2	)		(4	)
	$	453	$	17		$	(3	)

F - 29

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 10 – RELATED PARTIES – TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES:

a. Transactions with related parties:

	Year ended December 31
	2007		2006		2005
	U.S. dollar in thousands
Rent expenses (1)	$	15	$	19	$	16
Management fee (2)	$	133		-,-		-,-
Other general and administrative
expenses (3)		-,-		-,-	$	8

(1) See note 5c.

(2) See note 5d.

(3) To Storage, in respect of services received until April 2005.

b. Related party balances:

	December 31
	2007		2006
	U.S. dollar in thousands
Accounts receivable (1)		-,-	$	5
Accounts payables (2)	$	133	$	227

(1) See note 5c.

(2) See note 5d.

c. Under the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan (see note 7c(1)), the Company granted the CEO of the Company and the then serving chairmen of the board, on November 30, 2000, 356,550 options with exercise price of $3.63 as follows:

55,600 of the options had no vesting terms, the remaining options vested annually in four equal batches, from March 22, 2001 until March 21, 2004. All options expired on November 30, 2006.

d. As to options granted during 2007 to the CEO and then serving Chairman of the Board, see note 5b(2).

e. As to directors’ compensation, see note 5b(2).

f. As to liquidators’ compensation, see note 5a.

F - 30

I.I.S. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

a. On February 28, 2008 Witech signed an agreement with one of IIS shareholders to receive a loan in the amount of $400,000. The loan with its accrued interest will be repaid on July 1, 2008 with a monthly interest rate of 0.917%.

In addition, IIS has issued to the lender warrants exercisable for 160,000 ordinary shares of IIS at the price per share of $0.44, and will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction, as defined in the agreement.

b. On April 10, 2008, CDRide Corp., a US subsidiary of Witech (“CDRide”) signed and agreement with a company whose beneficial shareholders are affiliated with the beneficial shareholders of CDC Holdings Ltd., which holds 5.44% of the issued and outstanding share capital of IIS, to borrow an aggregate amount of up to $1,400,000 in three installments and upon meeting certain milestones as set forth in the agreement. An initial advance of $850,000 was granted on April, 13, 2008, and a second advance of $300,000 on June 11, 2008. Each advance shall accrue interest at the rate of 0.8% for each month or part thereof that such Advance is outstanding. The principal or any part thereof that is outstanding at such time, with its accrued interest, shall be repayable on the earliest of (i) June 30, 2008; (ii) upon the closing of an investment in either of CDRide, Witech or IIS; or (iii) the raising of debt financing (including convertible debt) by any of CDRide, Witech or IIS. The remaining $250,000 will be disbursed at the discretion of the lender if required to repay bank financing.

The repayment of the Loan Amount, the Interest and any other amount due to the lender under this Agreement, shall be secured by a pledge on future income of CDRide as well as a guaranty by the Company and Witech.

At the agreement day, IIS also issued to the lender warrants exercisable for 560,000 ordinary shares at the price per share equal to the lower of (i) $0.44 and (ii) the price per share of the shares of IIS reflected in an investment in IIS through equity or convertible debt.

c. In May 6, 2008, the Company’s Compensation committee approved the grant of stock options to Witech’s employees, in accordance with the 2007 options plan of the Company (see note 7c(2)), to purchase an aggregate of 731,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.44, vesting in six (6) semi- annual installments as long as each such employee continues to be employed by Witech. The fair value of the above options on the date of the said approval is $252,884 using the Black Scholes option-pricing model and is based on the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 141%; risk-free interest rates of 3.88%; and expected lives of 5.66 years.

F - 31

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD

(An Israeli corporation)

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD

(An Israeli corporation)

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	W – 2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Balance sheets	W – 3
Statements of operations	W – 5
Statements of changes in capital deficiency	W – 6
Statements of cash flows	W – 7
Notes to consolidated financial statements	W – 8 – W – 34

The amounts are stated in U.S. dollars ($)

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders of

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Witech Communications Ltd (the “Company”) and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in capital deficiency and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s Board of Directors and management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Company’s Board of Directors and management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated results of their operations, changes in capital deficiency and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has net losses for the period from inception (February 1, 2004) through December 31, 2007, as well as negative cash flow from operating activities. Currently, the Company does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its requirements in the twelve months following January 1, 2008. These reasons raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Tel-Aviv, Israel	Kesselman & Kesselman
June 30, 2008	Certified Public Accountant (Isr.)
	A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers
	International Limited

W – 2

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

	December 31
	2007		2006
A s s e t s
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	53	$	31
Restricted bank deposit		51		31
Accounts receivable		513		*77
T o t a l current assets		617		139
FUNDS IN RESPECT OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UPON RETIREMENT (note 6)		120		43
LONG TERM DEPOSITS AND PREPAID EXPENSES (note 2)		78		*24
FIXED ASSETS, net (note 3)		1,672		757
T o t a l assets	$	2,487	$	963

* Reclassified.

/s/ Robi Hartman	/s/ Charles Moss	/s/ Yifat Zommer
Robi Hartman	Charles Moss	Yifat Zommer
Chairman of the Board	Chief Executive	Chief Financial
of Directors	Officer	Officer

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

W – 3

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

	December 31
	2007			2006
Liabilities net of capital deficiency
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Credit and current maturities of long term loans from banks	$	361		$	*253
Short terms loans and convertible loans and current maturities of long term loans from others		5,501			*216
Accounts payable and accruals:
Trade payables		271			92
Other		1,095			475
T o t a l  current liabilities		7,228			1,036
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Loans (net of current maturities):
Bank loans (note 4d)		142			137
Other loans and convertible loans (note 4)		303			801
Warrants issued to a bank (note 4d)		203			131
Provision for uncertain tax position		89
Liability for employee rights upon retirement (note 6)		178			67
T o t a l  long-term liabilities		915			1,136
T o t a l  liabilities		8,143			2,172
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES, see note 7
CAPITAL DEFICIENCY:
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value at December 31, 2007 and 2006:
Authorized - 500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 26,527 shares and 25,000 shares, respectively		1			1
Additional paid-in capital		2,448			1,536
Accumulated deficit		(8,105	)		(2,746	)
T o t a l capital deficiency	$	(5,656	)	$	(1,209	)
T o t a l liabilities net of capital deficiency	$	2,487		$	963

* Reclassified.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

W – 4

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Year ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
REVENUES	$	1,524		$	272		$	25
COST OF REVENUES		2,681			740			57
GROSS LOSS		(1,157	)		(468	)		(32	)
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES, net		258			407			200
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		2,990			820			208
OPERATING LOSS		(4,405	)		(1,695	)		(440	)
FINANCIAL EXPENSES, net		852			316			14
LOSS BEFORE TAXES ON INCOME		(5,257	)		(2,011	)		(454	)
TAXES ON INCOME		(102	)		(5	)
NET LOSS	$	(5,359	)	$	(2,016	)	$	(454	)
NET LOSS PER SHARE -
basic and diluted	$	(213.7	)	$	(105.4	)	$	(29.4	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORDINARY SHARES USED IN COMPUTING LOSS PER ORDINARY SHARES -
basic and diluted		25,071			19,125			15,421

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

W – 5

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL DEFICIENCY
(U.S dollars in thousands, except share data)

	Ordinary shares
	Total Number of shares	Shares issued to be held by the Company		Total Number of Shares, net of shares issued to be held by the Company	Amount		Additional Paid-in capital			Accumulated deficit			Total capital deficiency
BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005	2,000	720		1,280		*	$	230		$	(276	)	$	(46	)
CHANGES DURING 2005:
Issuance of share capital and receipts on account of shares		(469	)	469		*		570						570
Net loss											(454	)		(454	)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005	2,000	251		1,749		*	$	800		$	(730	)	$	70
CHANGES DURING 2006:
Stock based compensation related to shares granted to an employee (see note 8b(2))		(1,033	)	1,033				233						233
Stock split (see note 8a(2))	18,000	1,953		16,047	$	1		(1	)
Shares issued to be held by the Company (see note 8a(3))	5,000	5,000
Issuance of share capital (see note 8a(5))		(2,444	)	2,444		*		418						418
Conversion of a loan into shares (see note 8a(4))		(365	)	365		*		86						86
Net loss											(2,016	)		(2,016	)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006	25,000	3,362		21,638	$	1	$	1,536		$	(2,746	)	$	(1,209	)
CHANGES DURING 2007:
Stock based compensation related to options granted to employees (see note 8b(1))								122						122
Exercise of options granted to employees	1,000			1,000		*							*
Shares issued to be held by the Company (see note 8a(3))	492	492
Issuance of share capital (see note 8a(5))		(2,417	)	2,417		*		484						484
Issuance of shares in respect of loan granted (see note 8a(7))	35			35		*		7						7
Conversion of loans (see note 8a(6))		(753	)	753		*		176						176
Conversion of loan by shareholder (see note 4e(4))		(684	)	684		*		123						123
Net loss											(5,359	)		(5,359	)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007	26,527	-,-		26,527	$	1	$	2,448		$	(8,105	)	$	(5,656	)

          * Represents an amount of less than $1,000.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

W – 6

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(U.S dollars in thousands)

	Year ended December 31
	2007			2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(5,359	)	$	(2,016	)	$	(454	)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		710			197			32
Changes in accrued liability for employee rights upon retirement		111			39			27
Impairment of fixed assets		478
Loss (gain) on amounts funded in respect of employee rights upon retirement		4			(7	)		(2	)
Share based compensation		122			233
Inducement of conversion rights		88
Increase in provision for uncertain tax position		89
Accrued interest in respect of loans received		560			229
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable		(490	)		9			(99	)
Increase in accounts payable and accruals		799			497			31
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,888	)		(819	)		(465	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of fixed assets		(2,103	)		(827	)		(156	)
Investment grants relating to fixed assets					16			24
Investment in a restricted bank deposit		(20	)		(31	)
Amounts funded in respect of employee rights upon retirement		(81	)		(21	)		(12	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,204	)		(863	)		(144	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Short-term credit from banks – net		(12	)		43			(33	)
Long term loans received from banks and warrants issued to a bank		270			400
Long term convertible loans received from others					156			90
Short term loans and convertible loans received from others		4,790			685
Discharge of short-term loans		(200	)
Discharge of long-term loans		(218	)
Issuance of share capital		484			409			570
Net cash provided by financing activities		5,114			1,693			627
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		22			11			18
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		31			20			2
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR	$	53		$	31		$	20
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON FINANCING ACTIVITIES NOT INVOLVING CASH FLOWS:
Conversion of loans into ordinary shares	$	211		$	86			-,-
Issuance of shares to an employee as a settlement of a liability		-,-		$	9			-,-

* Represents an amount of less than $1,000.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

W – 7

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1    –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
	a.	General:
		1)	Operations
			Witech Communications Ltd. (the “Company”) was established in Israel in 2004. The Company operates in one operating segment - development and manufacture of wireless video technology, and provides wireless video solutions for diverse commercial application systems. The system marketed currently, captures dynamic videos, for installation on roller coasters and other thrill rides in amusement parks. The revenue of the Company is mainly derived from the sale of DVDs and other media products to roller coasters riders, which were filmed by the Company’s systems. The Company and its subsidiary (the “Group”) signed contracts with amusement parks according to which it was granted the right to operate the systems in the said parks and is entitled to a percentage of revenue from the sale of DVDs. In 2007, the company also sold one system. The sales in the US, which represent the majority of the Group’s sales, are done through a wholly owned subsidiary, CDRide Corp. (“CDRide”) which was established in June 2005 and registered in the state of Delaware.
		2)	Share exchange agreement
			On February 20, 2007, the Company signed a Memorandum Of Agreement (“MOA”) with I.I.S Intelligent Information Systems Limited (“IIS”) with respect to a contemplated merger between the Company and IIS, under which IIS is to acquire full control and ownership of the Company, in consideration of 50% of IIS’s shares.
			On November 5, 2007, the Company signed a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with IIS shareholders, which was approved on December 20, 2007 by IIS’s general shareholders meeting, for the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of the Company in exchange for the issuance of 11,552,229 shares of IIS to the shareholders of the Company, representing 50% of the issued and outstanding shares of IIS less those shares due to IIS by virtue of the loan agreement between IIS and the Company (see also note 4e(1)).
			Following the transaction, the Company became a wholly owned subsidiary of IIS.
			According to the agreement, IIS will grant stock options to senior management and shareholders of the Company to purchase an aggregate amount of 2,300,000 shares of IIS at an exercise price equal to the average trading share price during the twenty (20) trading days prior to the Closing, vesting in eight (8) semi - annual installments as long as each such executive continues to be employed by IIS.

W – 8

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1   –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
			In addition, according to the agreement, IIS will increase the shares reserved for issuance to directors, employees, consultants and service providers of IIS and its subsidiaries pursuant to its incentive stock option plans by an additional 1,000,000 shares so that the total amount of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to such plan will be 3,300,000.
			In addition, IIS will issue to all registered shareholders of IIS as of November 9, 2007 (the “record date”) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,600,000 Ordinary Shares of IIS nominal value NIS 0.003 per share, on a pro-rata basis according to the percentage of holding of each such shareholder in the issued and outstanding share capital of IIS on such record date. These warrants will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction. A “Transaction” means each of (i) merger, acquisition or reorganization of IIS with one or more other entities in which IIS is not the surviving entity, or (ii) a sale of all or substantially all of the assets or shares of IIS. The exercise price of each warrant has been set at 0.44$per share, based on the average trading price per share of IIS’s Ordinary Shares during the twenty trading days prior to the Closing.
			These warrants will be non-transferable and non-exercisable until all applicable Israeli and United States securities laws and regulations have been complied with in connection with the warrants and the underlying shares, including without limitation, that a registration statement covering the underlying shares is declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
			The closing of the transaction was on January 2, 2008.
		3)	Going Concern
			The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has accumulated net losses for the period from inception (February 1, 2004) through December 31, 2007 of $8,105 thousands, as well as negative cash flow from operating activities for the year ended 31 December 2007 of $2,888 thousands. Currently, the Company does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its requirements in the twelve months following January 1, 2008. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is in the process of evaluating various financing alternatives. Although there is no assurance that the Company will be successful with those initiatives, management is of the opinion that it will be able to secure the necessary financing as a result of ongoing financing discussions with third party investors and existing shareholders.
			These financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability.

W – 9

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD

(An Israeli corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1    –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
		4)	Accounting principles
			The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). The significant accounting policies were applied on a consistent basis.
		5)	Functional currency
			The currency of the primary economic environment in which the operations of the Group are conducted is the U.S. dollar (“dollar”; “$”). Almost all of the Group’s income is incurred in dollars. Thus, the functional currency of the Group is the dollar. Transactions and balances originally denominated in dollars are presented at their original amounts. Balances in non-dollar currencies are translated into dollars using historical and current exchange rates for non-monetary and monetary balances, respectively. Non-dollar transactions reflected in the statements of operations are translated into dollars using exchange rates at the transaction dates or average rates. Currency transaction gains or losses are carried to financial income or expenses, as appropriate.
		6)	Use of estimates in preparation of financial statements
			The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	b.	Principles of consolidation:
		1)	The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary.
		2)	Intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated in consolidation.

W – 10

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD

(An Israeli corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1    –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
	c.	Fixed assets
		Fixed assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and of related investment grants received from the Office of the Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Israel (the “OCS”) (see also note 6c) in the depreciated amount of $12,274 and $28,540 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Depreciation is calculated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets at the following annual rates:

	%
Computers and peripheral equipment	33
Office furniture and equipment	7
Installed systems	33

	Direct labor and overhead costs related to the construction and installation of fixed assets that are required to bring the asset to its intended use, are capitalized to the extent that it is expected that they are to generate economic future benefits. The direct payroll and related costs of employees that are related to construction and installation activities are capitalized based on specific time devoted to these activities where identifiable. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expenses as incurred.
d.	Deferred income taxes
	The Group accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Deferred taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability method, based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial accounting and tax bases of assets and liabilities under the applicable tax laws. Deferred tax balances are computed using the tax rates expected to be in effect at time when these differences reverse.
	Valuation allowance in respect of the deferred tax assets is provided when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The Group has provided a full valuation allowance with respect to its deferred tax assets as it expects that it is more likely than not that it will not have taxable income in the foreseeable future.
	Taxes that would apply in the event of disposal of investments in its non-Israeli subsidiary have not been taken into account in computing the deferred taxes, as it is the Company’s intention to hold these investments, not to realize them.

W – 11

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1   –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
		Paragraph 9(f) of SFAS 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”, prohibits the recognition of deferred tax liabilities or assets that arise from differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities that are measured from local currency into dollars using historical exchange rates, and that result from changes in exchange rates or indexing for tax purposes. Consequently, the aforementioned differences were not reflected in the computation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
		As of January 1, 2007, the Group adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, ‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109’ (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 specifies how tax benefits for uncertain tax positions are to be recognized, measured, and derecognized in financial statements; requires certain disclosures of uncertain tax positions; specifies how reserves for uncertain tax positions should be classified on the balance sheet; and provides transition and interim-period guidance, among other provisions. The Group’s accounting policy, pursuant to the adoption of FIN 48, is to classify interest and penalties recognized in the financial statements relating to uncertain tax positions under the provision for income taxes. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a non-material impact on the financial statements. See also note 8(h).
	e.	Revenue recognition
		Revenues from sales of DVDs and other media products to roller coaster riders, which were filmed by the Company’s systems, are recognized at the point of sale on a net basis pursuant to EITF 99-19 “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent”, based on the percentage stated in the agreements with the amusement parks (see also note 1a(1)).
		Revenue from sale of systems is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable, delivery of the product to the customer has occurred and the company has determined that collection of the fee is probable, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104 – “Revenue Recognition”.
	f.	Research and development
		Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and consist primarily of personnel, facilities, equipment, and supplies for research and development activities. Grants received from the Office of the Chief Scientist (“OCS”) are recognized when the grants become receivable, provided there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the conditions attached to the grant and there is reasonable assurance the grant will be received. The grants are deducted from the related research and development expenses as the costs are incurred. See also note 6c.

W – 12

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1    –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
	g.	Net loss per share
		Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributed to ordinary shares for the period by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period after giving retroactive effect to the stock split effected on February 20, 2006, see note 7a(1). The calculation of diluted net loss per share excludes potential additional ordinary shares issuable upon the conversion of stock options, warrants and convertible loans as their effect was anti-dilutive.
	h.	Stock - based compensation
		Effective January 1, 2006, the Group adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-based Payment” (“FAS 123(R)”). FAS 123(R) supersedes APB 25 and related interpretations and amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows” (“FAS 95”). FAS 123(R) requires awards classified as equity awards be accounted for using the grant-date fair value method. The fair value of share-based payment transactions is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company estimated forfeitures based on historical experience and anticipated future conditions.
		In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”). SAB 107 provides supplemental implementation guidance on FAS 123(R), including guidance on valuation methods, inventory capitalization of share-based compensation cost, income statement effects, disclosures and other issues. SAB 107 requires share-based payment to be classified in the same expense line items as cash compensation. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of FAS 123(R).
		For information about the Company’s option plan see note 7b.
	i.	Fair value of financial instruments
		In view of their nature, the fair value of the financial instruments included in the working capital of the Group is usually identical or close to their carrying value.
		The carrying amounts of the Group’s long-term assets, long-term loans payable, and other long-term liabilities approximate their fair value.

W – 13

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1   –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
	j.	Concentration of credit risks
		Financial instruments that subject the Group to credit risk consist of cash, restricted cash deposits and account receivables. These balances do not represent a substantial concentration of credit risks at December 31, 2007.
	k.	Impairment of long-lived assets
		Under FAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“FAS 144”), the Group reviews long-lived assets, to be held and used, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Under FAS 144, if the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the long-lived assets is less than the carrying amount of such assets, an impairment loss would be recognized, and the assets are written down to their estimated fair values.
		During 2007, the Group has recorded $478,398 as impairment charges, that was recognized as cost of revenues as of December 31, 2007. See also note 3a.
	l.	Advertising costs
		Cost related to advertising and promotion of products, which amounted to $13 thousands, $83 thousands and $3 thousands for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, are charged to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred.
	m.	Newly issued accounting pronouncements
		In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 (January 1, 2008 for the Group), and interim periods within those fiscal years.

W – 14

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1   –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
		Subsequent to the issuance of SFAS 157, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” (“FSP 157-1”) and FSP No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-1 excludes, in certain circumstances, SFAS No. 13 “Accounting for Leases” and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under statement 13 from the provision of SFAS 157. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 for such instruments to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years (January 1, 2009, for the Group). The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.
		In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 is expected to expand the use of fair value accounting, but does not affect existing standards which require certain assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at its initial application or at other specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years (January 1, 2008, for the Group). Were the Group to elect the fair value option for its existing assets and liabilities, the effect as of the adoption date, shall be reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of comprehensive loss. The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

W – 15

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1   –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
		In June 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-3, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received to Be Used in Future Research and Development Activities” (“EITF 07-3”). EITF 07-3 requires that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities be deferred and amortized over the period that the goods are delivered or the related services are performed, subject to an assessment of recoverability. The provisions of EITF 07-3 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years (January 1, 2008, for the Group). Early application is prohibited. The provisions of EITF 07-3 are applicable for new contracts entered into on or after the effective date. The Group does not expect the adoption of EITF 07-3 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.
		In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”) which replaces SFAS No 141. SFAS 141R changes the accounting for business combinations, including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance and income tax uncertainties. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years (January 1, 2009, for the Group). Early application is prohibited. The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS 141R to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.
		In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements” (“EITF 07-1”). EITF 07-1 defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and third parties. EITF 07-1 also establishes the appropriate income statement presentation and classification for joint operating activities and payments between participants, as well as the sufficiency of the disclosures related to these arrangements. EITF 07-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for the Group). EITF 07-1 shall be applied using a modified version of retrospective transition for those arrangements in place at the effective date. Companies are required to report the effects of applying EITF-07-1 as a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all prior periods presented for all arrangements existing as of the effective date, unless it is impracticable to apply the effects of the change retrospectively. The Group is currently assessing the impact that EITF 07-1 may have on its results of operations and financial position.

W – 16

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1   – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (“SAB 110”). SAB 110 amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of

Topic 14, Share-Based Payment, of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14 expresses the views of the staff regarding the use of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain vanilla” share options and allows usage of the “simplified” method for share option grants prior to December 31, 2007. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experience to provide a reasonable estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. The Group currently uses the “simplified” method to estimate the expected term for share option grants as the group does not have enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate. The Group will continue to use the “simplified” method until we have enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate of expected term in accordance with SAB 110. SAB 110 is effective for the group on January 1, 2008.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”).

SFAS 160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. An ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent should be presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. SFAS 160 requires that changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary should be accounted for similarly as equity transactions. When a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary should be initially measured at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.

SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interests.

SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The statement shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirement which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Group will be required to adopt SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

W – 17

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 1    –	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):
		In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162 “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“FAS 162”). FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. FAS 162 is effective sixty days following the SEC’s approval of PCAOB amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of ‘Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles’“. The Group is currently assessing the impact, if any, that FAS 162 may have on its results of operations and financial position.
NOTE 2    –	LONG TERM DEPOSITS AND PREPAID EXPENSES

	December 31,
	2007		2006
Deposits in respect of vehicles lease agreements	$	24	$	3
Prepaid expenses in respect of booth constructions in amusement parks		54		21
	$	78	$	24

NOTE 3    –	FIXED ASSETS:
	a.	Composition of assets, grouped by major classifications, is as follows:

	December 31
	2007			2006
	U.S. dollars in thousands
Cost:
Computers and peripheral equipment	$	184		$	41
Office furniture and equipment		11			10
Installed systems		2,732			941
Systems under construction		168
		3,095			992
Less - accumulated depreciation		(945	)		(235	)
Impairment of installed systems (see d. below)		(478	)
Net carrying amount	$	1,672		$	757

b.	Depreciation expenses totaled $710, $197 and $32 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively.
c.	As for pledges – see note 6a.
d.	In December 2007 as a result of the change in expectations relating to the economic environment in which the Company operates that caused a decrease in the forecasted revenues generated from certain installed systems, the Company tested the installed system for impairment and calculated the fair value of such long-lived assets using a discounted cash flow technique which resulted in a total impairment of $478 thousands which was included in cost of revenues.
	The Company calculated the fair value of the installed systems based on the discounted cash-flow method.

W – 18

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 4    –	LONG-TERM LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS:
	a.	Long term loans are composed as follows:

	December 31
	2007			2006
	U.S. dollars in thousands
Loans from banks (see d. below)	$	451		$	326
Loans from others* (see f. and h. below)		242			293
Convertible loans from others (see e. and h. below)		654			724
		1,347			1,343
Less - current maturities (see note 9b)		(902	)		(405	)
	$	445		$	938

*	Including loan from Opcom Ltd (“Opcom”), a company controlled and owned by the CEO and shareholder of the Company in the amount of $59 thousands.
Presented in the balance sheet as follows:

	December 31
	2007		2006
	U.S. dollars in thousands
Long term loans:
Bank loans	$	142	$	137
Other loans		303		801
	$	445	$	938
Short term loans:
Current maturities of long-term loans from Banks	$	309	$	189
Current maturities of long-term loans from others		593		216
	$	902	$	405

W – 19

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 4    –	LONG-TERM LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS (continued):
	b.	Classified by currency of repayment, linkage terms and interest rates, the total amount of the liabilities (before deduction of current maturities) is as follows:

	December 31
	2007	2006
C u r r e n c y	Interest rates	A m o u n t
	%	U.S. dollars in thousands
U.S. dollars	7.82%-42.5%**		955	*$1,017
U.S. dollars	Libor+4.5-5%		392	326
		$	1,347	$1,343
	*       Reclassified.
	** Mainly 40.5%.

c. The loans (net of current maturities) mature in the following years after the balance sheet dates:

	December 31
	2007		2006
	U.S. dollars in thousands
Second year	$	318	$	693
Third year		121		187
Fourth year		6		58
	$	445	$	938

d.	Bank loans
	On June 21, 2006 and July 3, 2006, the Company was granted loans from Mizrahi-Tefahot bank (“the Bank”) in an aggregate amount of $400,000. The loans bear an annual interest rate of Libor+5%. The principal amount is to be repaid in 12 monthly installments commencing 12 months from grant date. The interest on one of the loans is to be repaid in 24 months, commencing one month from the grant date, the interest on the other loan is to be repaid with the principal installments.
	On the dates both loans were received and in their respect, the Company granted the Bank warrants to purchase in aggregate, 4% of the then outstanding Company’s share capital, on a fully diluted basis, for no consideration, exercisable at any time for a period of 6 years commencing at grant date.
	The bank also received a PUT option to sell back to the Company those warrants for the amount of $400,000. The PUT option was to be exercised, in whole or in part, at the end of 4 years after grant date and in accordance with the provisions stated in the agreements, among them the right of early exercise in case of an exit, as defined in the agreement.

W – 20

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 4    –	LONG-TERM LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS (continued):
		Based on APB 14 “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants” the allocation of the proceeds from the bank was based on allocation of full fair value to the warrant and the residual proceeds to the loans.
		On December 31, 2007, the Company and the Bank signed a Notice and Agreement of Exercise And Redemption (“the Notice”) in respect of the warrants and related PUT options that were granted to the Bank as described above. According to the Notice, subject to closing, the Bank will receive 610 ordinary shares of the Company on account of half of the warrants mentioned above. The second half of the warrant is to be redeemed and converted by exercising the PUT option for an amount of $200,000. After that, the Bank has no further rights under the warrants.
		On December 16, 2007, the Company paid an amount of $200,000 on account of the redemption of the warrant mentioned above, on the same date the bank granted a new loan in the amount of $200,000, which bears an annual interest rate of Libor+4.5% and will be repaid in 12 monthly installments commencing July 2008.
		The shares in respect with the Notice mentioned above were issued at the closing date (see also note 1a(2)).
	e.	Convertible loans from others:

1)	On November 30, 2005 the Company was granted a loan in the amount of $90,206 by a lender. The loan bears an effective annual interest rate of 11.8%. According to the original terms of the loan the principal amount and interest was to be repaid 24 months after the grant date. In addition the lender may convert the loan into the Company’s shares at an increasing conversion ratio as a factor of time. See note 8a(4) in respect to conversion of the interest incurred on the loan up to December 15, 2006. See h. below in respect of postponement of repayment date and cancellation of conversion rights.
2)	On January 10, 2006 and February 5, 2006, the Company was granted loans in the amount of $100,000 and $50,000, respectively from two lenders. These loans bear an effective annual interest rate of 40.5%. The principal amount and interest was to be repaid in 4 annual installments commencing 12 months from grant date.
	According to the terms of the loans, should the Company not be able to repay the first installment, the lenders would be entitled to choose to either convert the said installment into the Company’s shares or postpone the payment in consideration for an additional interest. In case that the Company would not be able to repay the loans, each installment would be converted into a certain percentage of the Company’s share capital, at the date of conversion.

W – 21

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 4    –	LONG-TERM LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS (continued):
		When the final installment was to be due, the lender had the right to receive shares comprising a certain percentage of the Company’s issued shares, in lieu of $50,000 and $25,000, respectively, which would be deducted from the final payment.
		The amount of the installments may be adjusted according to a formula detailed in the agreements based on certain operational indexes of the Company which it did not yet achieve. In any case, the total amount of repayment will not be less than $150,000 and $75,000, respectively.
		On January 20, 2007 an amount of $70,809 ($50,000 principal and $20,809 interest out of $100,000 loan) was converted into 311 shares of the Company. See h. below in respect of postponement of repayment date and cancellation of conversion rights.
	3)	On May 16, 2006 the Company signed loan agreements with a group of lenders (“the lenders”) in the total amount of $360,000. The loans bear an annual interest rate of LIBOR +9%. According to the original terms of the loan the principal amount and interest was to be repaid 18 months after the grant date in 18 equal installments. According to the loan agreement, the lender may convert the loan into 4% of the Company’s outstanding share capital on a fully diluted basis.
		On April 22, 2007, an agreement was signed between the Company and the lenders, in anticipation of a proposed merger with IIS (“the merger”) to remove the pledge on all of the Company’s assets that was registered in the lender’s favor in accordance with the loan agreement mentioned above. As a condition to granting the above consent, the Company shall repay the interest on the loan no later than the date of merger with IIS. (See h. below in respect of postponement of repayment date).
		In addition, the said agreement changed the conversion rights as follows: in the event that merger occurs, the loan shall be converted into 7% of the Company’s outstanding share capital, while in the event that a merger does not occur the loan shall be converted into 10% of the Company’s outstanding share capital.
		On the Closing date (see also note 1a(2)), the loans were converted into 1,838 shares of the Company.
	4)	On August 2, 2007 the Company was granted a loan by the CEO and a shareholder of the Company in an amount of $30,000. The loan bears effective annual interest rate of 12%. The principal amount and interest were to be repaid not later than the end of 2008.
		According to the terms of the loan the lender may convert the loan into the Company’s shares at a price of $136 per share.

W – 22

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 4    –	LONG-TERM LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS (continued):
		On November 1, 2007 an amount of $34,498 ($30,000 principal and $4,498 interest) was converted, at an induced conversion rate, into 684 shares of the Company. The benefit amount resulting from said induced conversion in the amount of $88,212 was recognized as an expense.
	f.	As to pledges – see note 6a.
	g.	According to the Exchange Agreement, at the date of the closing, a) the repayment date of liabilities in the total amount of $630,000 (including, inter alia, loans described in f(1) and f(2) above, accrued interest described in f(3) above and a contingent liability of approximately $110 thousands in respect of finders’ fee, see note 6(d)) will be postponed until IIS raises at least $6 million in equity or convertible debt financing (up to the date of issuance these financial statements, $1.655 million of this amount has already been raised), b) warrants and other rights to purchase the Company’s shares will be expired.
NOTE 5    –	SHORT-TERM LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS:
	Loans from IIS:
		1)	On April 23, 2007 and May 28, 2007, IIS signed loan agreements with the Company to grant an aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 to the Company. The loans bear an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 5%, whilst in the event that the Exchange Agreement with IIS is not consummated, the interest on the loan will be increased to LIBOR plus 10% retroactively to the date it was granted. The maturity date was determined as the earlier of (i) 90 days following the termination of the MOA (ii) January 20, 2008.
			The interest accrued in respect of these loans has been included in these Financial statements based on LIBOR plus 10%.
			In connection with these loans, the Company issued promissory notes to IIS. According to these promissory notes, IIS had the right at any time following an event of default, as defined in the agreement, or in the event that the Exchange Agreement is not consummated, to convert any unpaid amount into fully-paid up and duly issued shares of the Company at a pre-conversion fully-diluted valuation of $5,000,000.
			The loan agreements include certain covenants. The Company satisfied the respective covenants as at December 31, 2007.
			Effective January 20, 2008 the loans and the accrued interest up to that date were converted into capital notes denominated in NIS, bearing no interest and repayable at request, but not before the expiration of a period of 5 years. In occasion of liquidation of the Company, amounts to be paid in respect of these capital notes are subordinate to all other debts.

W – 23

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 5    –	SHORT-TERM LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS (continued):
		2)	From August to November, 2007 the Company was granted loans from IIS in an aggregate amount of $1,590,000. The loans bear an interest rate of 1.5% per month. According to the original agreements, the maturity date was December 16, 2007, whilst in December 2007 the maturity date was lengthened by additional three months on the same terms. In addition, for every month or part thereof that the principal amount for each loan (including interest) or part thereof shall be outstanding, IIS will be entitled to newly issued ordinary shares of the Company equal to 0.0259% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company, on a fully diluted basis. According to the alternative settlement of the above mentioned shares as stipulated in the loan agreements, due to the fact that the exchange agreement was closed prior to issuance of the shares, the amount of shares of IIS that the shareholders of the Company received in such exchange agreement has been reduced by 64 shares The loans are secured by a pledge over the shares of the Company held by certain shareholders.
			Effective March 16, 2008 the loans and the accrued interest up to that date were converted into capital notes denominated in NIS, bearing no interest and repayable at request, but not before the expiration of a period of 5 years. In occasion of liquidation of the Company, amounts to be paid in respect of these capital notes are subordinate to all other debts.
NOTE 6    –	EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UPON RETIREMENT:
	a.	Israeli law generally requires payment of severance pay and/or pensions upon dismissal of an employee or upon termination of employment in certain other circumstances. Other the describe below, the severance pay liabilities are fully provided for in these consolidated financial statements, as if it was payable at each balance sheet date on an undiscounted basis, based upon the number of years of service and the most recent monthly salary of the Company’s employee.
		The amounts funded are presented as non-current assets. The severance pay expenses were $101 thousand and $21 thousand in the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
		In accordance with the Company’s current employment agreements with certain employees, the Company makes regular deposits with certain insurance companies for accounts controlled by each applicable employee in order to secure the employee’s rights upon retirement. The Company is fully relieved from any severance pay liability with respect to each such employee after it makes the payments on behalf of the employee. The liability accrued in respect of these employees and the amounts funded, as of the respective agreement dates, are not reflected in the balance sheets, as the amounts funded are not under the control and management of the Company and the risks have been irrevocably transferred to the applicable insurance companies.

W – 24

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 6    –	EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UPON RETIREMENT (continued):
	b.	Cash flow information regarding the Company’s liability for employee rights upon retirement:
		1)	For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company contributed to insurance companies, in respect of its severance obligations to its Israeli employees, $81,000 and $21,000, respectively, and expects to contribute, in 2008, $152,000 to insurance companies in respect of its severance obligations to its Israeli employees.
		2)	Due to the relatively young age of the Company’s and its subsidiary’s employees, benefit payments to employees reaching retirement age in the next 10 years, are not material. The amounts were determined based on the employees’ current salary rates and the number of service years that will accumulate upon their retirement date. These amounts do not include amounts that might be paid to employees who will cease working for the subsidiary before their normal retirement age.
NOTE 7    –	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES:
	a.	The Company has on-going collateral including rights derived from, on all its assets, and fixed collateral on its share capital and goodwill in favor of the Bank (see note 4d) and IIS (See note 5).
	b.	In February 2007 the Company signed an agreement (“the Lease agreement”) for the lease of its facilities for a period of one year ending on March 1, 2008. The monthly rental payments are in the amount of $6,600. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay a monthly amount of $900 in respect of management and maintenance fee. Lease expenses totaled to $154 thousand, $55 thousand and $5 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. On March 12, 2008 the Company signed an extension to the Lease agreement, according to which the original leasing period was extended until December 31, 2008, and additional area was leased for a monthly rate of $350.
	c.	Royalties to the OCS
		The Company is committed to pay royalties to the Government of Israel at a rate of 3%-5% of the proceeds from sales of products in the research and development expenses of which the Government of Israel participated by way of grants. The commitment is determined on a product-by-product basis, in an amount not to exceed the total of the grants received (dollar linked) with an additional of an annual interest based on Libor.
		As of December 31, 2007, the Company has outstanding contingent obligations to pay royalties in the amount of $91,000 in respect of future sales of products derived from such research and development. Royalty expenses amounted to $55 thousands, $3 thousands and $3 thousands for the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively.

W – 25

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 7    –	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued):
	d.	On January 23, 2007, the Company signed an agreement which settles the finder’s fee (subject to closing) in respect of the share exchange agreement with IIS. The finder group included one of the then directors of the Company. According to the agreement with the finder, the Company will pay in cash 2.25% of $4,900,000 (see note 4h in respect of postponement of repayment), which represents the estimated balance of cash in IIS at that date, and 4.7% of the ordinary shares of the Company which were converted into 545,270 IIS shares at the Closing date (see note 1a (1)).
	e.	In June, 2007 the Company entered into a lease agreement for offices for a monthly rental of $20,000 commencing from March 2008 for 121 month. The Company did not occupy the premises and has not made any payments under this agreement. An amount of approximately $62 thousands is provided on behalf of potential fee requirement.
NOTE 8    –	SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
	a.	Share capital:
		1)	Composed as follows:

	Number of shares
	Authorized		Issued and paid
			December 31
		December 31, 2007 and 2006
			2007		2006
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value		500,000		26,527		25,000

2)	On February 20, 2006, the Company executed a stock split by distributing, prorata, to its shareholders 18,000 ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value, for no consideration.
3)	On September 1, 2006 and January 10, 2007, the Company issued 5,000 and 492 ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value for no consideration to be held by the Company, respectively.
4)	On December 15, 2006, a non-convertible loan that was received by the Company from a lender on March 23, 2006 in the amount of $74,709 ($59,957 principal and $14,752 interest), together with the accumulated interest on the loan granted from the same lender as described in 4f(1), which amounted to $10,647, were converted into 365 ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value of the Company. The above amount of $85,356 was classified as equity on the date of conversion.
5)	During 2007, the Company issued 2,417 ordinary shares that were held by the Company, of NIS 0.1 par value, in consideration of $484 thousands.
	During 2006, the Company issued 2,444 ordinary shares, of NIS 0.1 par value, that were held by the Company as follows: 2,094 ordinary shares in consideration of $418 thousands and 350 ordinary shares in consideration of receipt on account of shares received in 2005.

W – 26

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8    – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued):

	6)	During 2007, loans in a total amount of $176 thousands were converted into 753 ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value of the Company.
	7)	On April 25, 2007, the company issued 35 ordinary shares in respect of loan granted and repaid during 2007.
b.	Employee compensation:
	1)	Company’s option plan
		In August 2007 the Board of Directors approved an employee share option plan (hereafter – the Plan), according to which employees and service providers of the Company will receive up to 1,000 options, which could be exercised into NIS 0.1 par value of Company’s ordinary shares. The ordinary shares that will be issued following the exercise of the options will be equal in rights to the Company’s ordinary shares immediately upon exercise. The maximum term of the options is 10 years.
		The share option plan is subject to the capital gain track stipulated by the section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance. Pursuant to the terms thereof, the Company is not allowed to claim, as an expense for tax purposes, the amounts credited to employees as a benefit, including amounts recorded as salary benefits in the Company’s accounts, in respect of options granted to employees under the Plan - with the exception of the work-income benefit component, if any, determined on the grant date.
		In September 2007, the Company granted 1,000 options to employees (out of these options 333 options where granted to the CEO, see also note 10d), at an exercise price of NIS 0.1 per share. All of the options were vested immediately. All of the options were exercised in September 2007. The fair value of these options on the date of grant is $121,550. Given the negligible exercise price, the fair value of these options equaled the fair value of the Company’s shares as of such date which for practical reasons was calculated based on the share price of IIS as of that date.
	2)	On June 28, 2006, and August 31, 2006, 800 and 233 shares that were held by the Company, respectively, were granted to an employee at par value and $9,227, respectively. The total fair value of the above shares on the grant dates, based on the Company’s estimates is $233,000.
c.	As to convertible loans and warrants issued - see note 4.

W – 27

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 9    – TAXES:

a.	Corporate taxation in Israel:
	1)	Measurement of results for tax purposes under the Income Tax (Inflationary Adjustments) Law, 1985 (the “inflationary adjustments law”).
		Under the inflationary adjustments law, results for tax purposes are measured in real terms, having regard to the changes in the Israeli consumer price index (“CPI”). The Company is taxed under this law.
		In February 2008, the Knesset (the Israeli parliament), cancelled the provisions of the Inflationary Adjustments Law, and as a result it will no longer apply to the company in 2008 and thereafter.
	2)	Tax rates
		The income of the Company is taxed at the statutory rate. The corporate tax rates for 2005 and thereafter, as amended in August 2006 are as follows: 2005 - 34%, 2006 - 31%, 2007 - 29%, 2008 - 27%, 2009 - 26% and for 2010 and thereafter - 25%.
b.	Subsidiary outside Israel - CDRide
	The subsidiary that is incorporated outside of Israel is assessed for tax under the tax laws in the U.S. The applicable corporate tax rate for the subsidiary is 17%.
	Tax expenses related to CDRide are included as part of “taxes on income” in the consolidated statement of operations.
c.	Deferred income taxes
	The deferred income taxes are composed as follows:

	December 31
	2007			2006
	U.S. dollar in thousand
Provided for:
Operating loss carryforward	$	1,832		$	550
Provisions for employee related obligations		25			20
Total		1,857			570
Less – valuation allowance		(1,857	)		(570	)
		-;-			-;-

The deferred tax assets are computed at the tax rates of 25% as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.

W – 28

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD

(An Israeli corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 9    – TAXES (continued):

d.	Carryforward tax losses
	As of December 31, 2007, the Company has carryforward tax losses in the amount of approximately $7.33 million which may be carried forward and offset against taxable income in the future for an indefinite period (December 31, 2006 - $2.22 million).
	Under the inflationary adjustments law (see a. above), carryforward losses are linked to the Israeli CPI until December 31, 2007.
e.	Tax assessments
	The Company and its subsidiary have not yet been assessed for tax purposes since incorporation.
f.	The components of loss before income taxes are as follows:

	Year ended December 31
	2007			2006			2005
	U.S. dollar in thousand
United States	$	76		$	13		$	1
Israel		(5,333	)		(2,024	)		(455	)
	$	(5,257	)	$	(2,011	)	$	(454	)

g. Reconciliation of theoretical tax expenses to actual tax expenses:

	Year ended December 31
	2007			2006			2005
	U.S. dollar in thousand
Loss before taxes, as reported in the statements of operations	$	(5,257	)	$	(2,011	)	$	(454	)
Theoretical tax benefit at the statutory rate (29%, 31%, 34% for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively)	$	(1,525	)	$	(623	)	$	(154	)
Changes in taxes in respect of tax losses incurred in the reported year for which deferred taxes were not created		1,243			475			111
Difference between the basis of measurement of loss reported for tax purposes and the basis of measurement of loss for financial reporting purposes		158			41			(2	)
Difference between tax rates of a US subsidiary		10
Non deductible expenses		123			107			45
Provision for uncertain tax position		89
Other		4			5
	$	102		$	5		$	-,-

W – 29

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD

(An Israeli corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 9    – TAXES (continued):

h.	Uncertainty in income taxes
	As described in Note 1d above, the company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007.
	The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a non-material impact on the Financial statements.
	Following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of the company’s unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning and the end of the year ended on December 31, 2007:

	U.S. dollar in thousand
Balance at beginning of year		-
Increase in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during a prior period		10
Increase in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during the current period		79
Balance at end of year		89

NOTE 10   –	SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION:
	Balance sheets:

		December 31
		2007		2006
		U.S. dollar in thousands
a.       Accounts receivable:
	Government authorities	$	49	$	26
	Payment on account of PUT option		200
	OCS				36
	Prepaid expenses		98		*4
	Amusement parks		68
	Related parties		55
	Others		43		*11
		$	513	$	77

* Reclassified

W – 30

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 10   – SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION (continued):

			December 31
			2007		2006
			U.S. dollar in thousands
b.	Credit and current maturities of long term loans from banks:
	Short-term credit from banks		$	52	$	64
	Current maturities of long-term loans			309		189
			$	361	$	253
c.	Short terms loans and current maturities of long term from others:
	Current maturities of long-term loans			593		216
	Short term loans and convertible loans (note 5)			4,908
			$	5,501		216
d.	Accounts payables and accruals:
	1)	Trade payable:
		Open accounts	$	132	$	36
		Checks and notes payable		139		56
			$	271	$	92
	2)	Other:
		Payroll and related expenses	$	269	$	250
		Accrued expenses		285		*57
		Accrued liabilities for professional fees		309		*90
		Advanced income		65
		OCS		56
		Related party		7		66
		Other		104		12
			$	1,095	$	475

* Reclassified.

W – 31

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 11   – RELATED PARTIES - TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES:

a.	Transactions with related parties:
		Year ended December 31
		2007		2006
		U.S. dollar in thousands
	Management fees (see c. below)		-,-	$	43
	Selling, general and administrative expenses (see d. below)	$	40		-,-
	Financing expenses	$	102		-,-
b.	Related party balances:
		December 31
		2007		2006
		U.S. dollar in thousands
	Current assets – presented under “Accounts receivable”	$	55		-,-
	Current liabilities – presented under “Credit from banks and loans” - “Current maturities of long term loans from others”	$	7	$	11
	Current liabilities – presented under “Accounts payable and accruals” - “Other payable”	$	7	$	66
	Long-term liabilities – presented under “Loans” - “Other” (see also note 4a and note 4e(3))	$	59	$	94

c.	During 2006 the Company paid to Opcom (see also note 4a) $43,000 in respect of management services and operational expenses, according to the agreement signed with Opcom. The agreement expired on December 31, 2006.
d.	In September 2007, the Company granted 333 options to the CEO and shareholder of the Company. The fair value of these options on the date of grant is $40,473.
e.	In November 2007, a loan that was granted by the CEO and shareholder of the Company was converted into 684 ordinary shares of the Company. See also note 4f(1).

W – 32

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 12   –	SEGMENT INFORMATION
	The Group operates in one reportable segment.
	Disaggregated financial data is provided below as follows: (1) revenues by geographic area and tangible long-lived assets by geographic location; and (2) revenues from principal customers:
	1)	Geographic and by products information
		Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the customer. The following is a summary of revenues by geographic areas:

	Year ended December 31
	2007		2006		2005
	U.S. dollar in thousands
USA	$	1,412	$	201	$	15
Canada		110		61
Israel		2		10		10
	$	1,524	$	272	$	25

Fixed assets by geographic location are as follows:

	December 31
	2007		2006
	U.S. dollar in thousands
USA	$	1,295	$	631
Canada		87		105
Israel		290		21
	$	1,672	$	757

2) Revenues from principal amusement parks - revenues from single amusement park each of which exceeds 10% of total revenues in the relevant year:

	Year ended December 31
	2007			2006			2005
Park A		33	%		0	%		0	%
Park B		13	%		0	%		0	%
Park C		9	%		28	%		0	%
Park D		7	%		22	%		0	%
Park E		3	%		12	%		0	%
Park F		2	%		12	%		60	%

W – 33

WITECH COMMUNICATIONS LTD
(An Israeli corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 13  –	SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
	a.	As to conversion of loans received from IIS into capital notes, see note 4e.
	b.	As to issuance of shares in connection with the Notice signed with the bank, see note 4d.
	c.	As to a loan which was converted into shares, see note 4f(3).
	d.	On February 28, 2008 the Company signed an agreement with one of IIS shareholders to receive a loan in the amount of $400,000. The loan with its accrued interest will be repaid on July 1, 2008 with a monthly interest rate of 0.917%.
		In addition, IIS has issued to the lender warrants exercisable for 160,000 ordinary shares of IIS at the price per share of $0.44, and will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of issuance, and (ii) the closing of a Transaction, as defined in the agreement.
	e.	On April 10, 2008, CDRide signed and agreement with a company whose beneficial shareholders are affiliated with the beneficial shareholders of CDC Holdings Ltd., which holds 5.44% of the issued and outstanding share capital of IIS, to borrow an aggregate amount of up to $1,400,000 in three installments and upon meeting certain milestones as set forth in the agreement. An initial advance of $850,000 was granted on April, 13, 2008, and a second advance of $300,000 on June 11, 2008. Each advance shall accrue interest at the rate of 0.8% for each month or part thereof that such Advance is outstanding. The principal or any part thereof that is outstanding at such time, with its accrued interest, shall be repayable on the earliest of (i) June 30, 2008; (ii) upon the closing of an investment in either of CDRide, Witech or IIS; or (iii) the raising of debt financing (including convertible debt) by any of CDRide, Witech or IIS. The remaining $250,000 will be disbursed at the discretion of the lender if required to repay bank financing.
		The repayment of the Loan Amount, the Interest and any other amount due to the lender under this Agreement, shall be secured by a pledge a pledge on future income of CDRide Corp. as well as a guaranty by IIS and Witech.
		At the agreement day, IIS also issued to the lender warrants exercisable for 560,000 ordinary shares at the price per share equal to the lower of (i) $0.44 and (ii) the price per share of the shares of IIS reflected in an investment in IIS through equity or convertible debt.
	f.	In May 6. 2008, , IIS’s Compensation committee approved the grant of stock options to Witech’s employees, in accordance with the 2007 options plan of IIS, to purchase an aggregate of 731,000 shares of IIS at an exercise price of $0.44, vesting in six (6) semi- annual installments as long as each such employee continues to be employed by the Company. The fair value of the above options on the date of grant is $252,884 using the Black Scholes option-pricing model and was based on the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 141%; risk-free interest rates of 3.88%; and expected lives of 5.66 years.

W – 34

EX-8.1

Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited

List of Significant Subsidiaries	Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
Witech Communications Ltd.	Israel

EX-12.1

Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robi Hartman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented by this Annual Report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivlanet function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

By: /s/ Robi Hartman
——————————————
Robi Hartman
Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 30, 2008

EX-12.2

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification by Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Yifat Zommer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented by this Annual Report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivlanet function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

By: /s/ Yifat Zommer
——————————————
Yifat Zommer
Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 30, 2008

EX-13.1

Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        I, Robi Hartman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robi Hartman
——————————————
Robi Hartman
Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 30, 2008

        This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-13.2

Exhibit 13.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        I, Yifat Zommer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Yifat Zommer
——————————————
Yifat Zommer
Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 30, 2008

        This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.