e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
|
x
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 |
or |
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 001-09338
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
75-1943604 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification number) |
8000 Bent Branch Drive
Irving, Texas 75063
P.O. Box 619566
DFW, Texas 75261-9566
(Address of
principal executive offices, including zip code)
(972) 409-1300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, Par Value $.10 per Share
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange
Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K or any
amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer x |
Accelerated file o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange
Act). Yes o No x
As of July 29, 2005, the aggregate market value of the
voting equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was
approximately $5,414,846,056 based on the closing price of the
Registrant’s Common Stock on such date, $41.00, as reported
on the New York Stock Exchange. Shares of the Registrant’s
Common Stock owned by its directors and executive officers were
excluded from this aggregate market value calculation; however,
such exclusion does not represent a conclusion by the Registrant
that any or all of such directors and executive officers are
affiliates of the Registrant.
As of March 23, 2006, 132,029,376 shares of the
Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
Part III of this report incorporates information from the
Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the
Registrant’s Annual Stockholders Meeting to be held on
June 20, 2006.
PART I
The following discussion, as well as other portions of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans,
estimates, and beliefs. Any statements contained herein
(including, but not limited to, statements to the effect that
Michaels or its management “anticipates,”
“plans,” “estimates,” “expects,”
“believes,” and other similar expressions) that are
not statements of historical fact should be considered
forward-looking statements. Our actual results could materially
differ from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences
include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and
particularly in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and
“Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Unless otherwise noted, all amounts contained in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K are as
of January 28, 2006. Unless otherwise noted, all references
to the number of shares of Common Stock and earnings per share
amounts in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K have
been adjusted to retroactively reflect each of the two-for-one
Common Stock splits effected in the form of a stock dividend to
stockholders of record as of the close of business on
November 12, 2001, and on September 27, 2004.
General
With almost $3.7 billion in sales in fiscal 2005, Michaels
Stores, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless the context
otherwise indicates) is the largest national arts and crafts
specialty retailer providing materials, ideas, and education for
creative activities. Michaels Stores, Inc. was incorporated in
Delaware in 1983, and as of March 23, 2006, we operate 897
Michaels retail stores in 48 states, as well as in Canada,
averaging 18,500 square feet of selling space. Our stores
offer arts and crafts supplies and products for the crafter and
do-it-yourself home decorator. We also operate 165 Aaron
Brothers stores as of March 23, 2006, in 11 states,
averaging 5,600 square feet of selling space, offering
photo frames, a full line of ready-made frames, custom framing
services, and a wide selection of art supplies. Recollections,
our scrapbooking/ paper crafting retail concept, operates
11 stores as of March 23, 2006, located in Arizona,
Maryland, Texas, and Virginia, providing merchandise,
accessories, and a variety of scrapbooking and paper crafting
support services in a community learning environment. In
addition, we own and operate four Star Decorators Wholesale
stores as of March 23, 2006, located in Arizona,
California, Georgia, and Texas, offering merchandise primarily
to interior decorators/ designers, wedding/ event planners,
florists, hotels, restaurants, and commercial display companies.
Unless the context otherwise indicates, references in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K to
“we,” “our,” “us,” the
“Company” and “Michaels” means Michaels
Stores, Inc., together with its subsidiaries.
Our mission is to help people express themselves creatively.
Through our broad product assortments, friendly and
knowledgeable sales associates, educational in-store events, and
project sheets and displays, we offer a shopping experience that
encourages creativity. We also offer classes and demonstrations
that teach basic and advanced skills and provide a hands-on
experience in a community environment.
We will make available our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, Current
Reports on
Form 8-K, and
amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, free of charge through our Internet website at
www.michaels.com under the heading “Corporate
Information” as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Additionally, charters for the Audit, Compensation, and
Governance and Nominating Committees of our Board of Directors
and our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics can be found on our Internet website at
www.michaels.com under the heading “Corporate
Information.” Stockholders may obtain copies of these
documents by printing them from our Internet website or by
writing to the Investor Relations Department at 8000 Bent
Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063.
2
Recent History
During the early 1990s, we embarked on an aggressive national
expansion program. By 1995, we had tripled our store base to
over 500 stores through new store openings and acquisitions,
accomplishing our goal of becoming the nation’s largest
specialty retailer in our industry. However, as a result of
inadequate information systems and infrastructure to support our
rapid growth, our financial performance weakened. Beginning in
1996, we focused on increasing the profitability of our existing
stores by implementing a variety of operating initiatives,
including installing
point-of-sale
(POS) systems chain-wide to record item-level sales,
implementing standardized merchandise planograms to enhance
merchandise presentation, eliminating non-core merchandise,
reducing costs through centralization of functions, and
strengthening the quality and depth of our management team.
Over the following few years, we strengthened our operations by
improving our infrastructure. We invested in technology, our
supply chain, and our associates to implement best practices and
process management. We also resumed a new store opening strategy
that continues today. See “Store Expansion and
Relocation.”
As a result of our initiatives, we have achieved an 8.8%
compounded annual Michaels store growth rate since fiscal 1997,
while maintaining a 12.3% compounded annual sales growth rate
and a 28.2% compounded annual earnings growth rate (growth rate
is based on income before cumulative effect of accounting
change). In addition, we have reported positive annual
comparable store sales growth for each of the past nine
consecutive fiscal years.
On March 20, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors
retained JPMorgan as our financial advisor to assist the Board
in a process to explore strategic alternatives to enhance
shareholder value. The alternatives to be explored include, but
are not limited to, a potential sale of Michaels Stores, Inc. We
cannot give any assurance that any transaction will result from
this process.
Industry Overview–Competition
We are the nation’s largest specialty retailer providing
materials, ideas, and education for creative activities in home
décor, art, and craft projects. We believe we are well
positioned to benefit from favorable demographics, particularly
a more affluent baby boomer population; continued investment in
homes and purchases of new homes; and an increasing focus on
home-based, family activities. According to industry consumer
participation surveys published in 2002 and 2005, our typical
customer is:
|
|
• |
Female–Over 94% are women and 67% are married. |
• |
Young–70% of crafters are under 55, with 48% of them
between the ages of 35 and 54. |
• |
Educated–92% are high school graduates, with almost 60% of
them having attended college. |
• |
Affluent–74% of crafters have household incomes greater
than $40,000, and 46% of them have household incomes over
$60,000. |
• |
Loyal–51% of crafters shop for craft supplies at least
twice a month and 21% shop at least once a week. |
We compete across many industries, including floral, fine art,
adult and kids crafts, scrapbooking and paper crafting, home
décor, party supplies, candles, photo frames, and custom
framing. Industry association and analyst research reports
estimate that the size of the markets in which we compete
exceeds $30 billion annually, and these markets have
experienced annual growth of 3.8% since 2002.
The markets in which we compete are highly fragmented,
containing stores across the nation operated primarily by small,
independent retailers along with a few regional chains. We are
the largest national retailer dedicated to serving the arts and
crafts market, and we believe that there are only three other
arts and crafts retailers in the United States with annual sales
in excess of $500 million.
3
We believe customers tend to choose where to shop based upon
store location, breadth of selection, price, quality of
merchandise, availability of product, and customer service. We
compete with many different types of retailers and classify our
competition within the following categories:
|
|
• |
Multi-store chains. This category includes several
multi-store chains each operating more than 30 stores and
comprises: Hobby Lobby, which operates approximately
367 stores in 28 states, primarily in the Midwestern
and Southern United States; A.C. Moore Arts &
Crafts, Inc., which operates approximately 111 stores in
the mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions;
Jo-Ann Superstores
(operated by Jo-Ann
Stores, Inc.), which operates approximately 170 Superstores
across the country; and Garden Ridge Corporation, which operates
approximately 35 stores in 13 states, primarily in the
Midwestern and Southern United States. We believe all of these
chains are significantly smaller than Michaels with respect to
number of stores and total net sales. |
|
• |
Small, local specialty retailers. This category includes
local “Mom & Pop” arts and crafts retailers.
Typically, these are single store operations managed by the
owner. These stores generally have limited resources for
advertising, purchasing, and distribution. Many of these stores
have established a loyal customer base within a given community
and compete with us based on relationships and customer service. |
|
• |
Mass merchandisers. This category includes companies such
as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and other mass merchandisers. These
retailers typically dedicate only a small portion of their
selling space to a limited selection of home décor, art and
craft supplies, and seasonal merchandise. In addition, these
mass merchandisers generally have limited customer service
staffs with varying amounts of experience in crafting projects. |
Business Strategy
We intend to increase our revenues and profits by strengthening
our position as the largest national retailer within the arts
and crafts, home décor, and custom framing sectors through
the following strategies:
|
|
• |
Increase Sales and Productivity of Existing Michaels
Stores. Michaels stores that have been open longer than
36 months currently average approximately $4.1 million
in net sales per store. We believe we can ultimately increase
average net sales in these stores to $5.0 million. We
continue to strive toward this objective by improving our
merchandise offering, increasing our merchandise in-stock
position, enhancing the in-store experience, and improving our
marketing execution, primarily through an initiative that we
call “Pursuit of the Perfect Store.” |
|
|
|
|
– |
Improving our merchandise offering. We are able to
improve our merchandise assortments by analyzing SKU
productivity information that is available from our perpetual
inventory system. This system also provides us with greater
capability to introduce and manage key trend items in a timely
manner. |
|
|
– |
Increasing our store merchandise in-stock position. As
part of our ongoing “Pursuit of the Perfect Store”
initiative, we will strive to have fully-stocked basic
assortments in our stores supported by timely displays of
ever-changing merchandise in our key feature space areas such as
power panels, end caps, drive aisles, and the area around the
checkout. We also plan to improve the timing of the receipt of
merchandise in our stores to take advantage of the natural
seasonal selling peaks we have throughout the year. |
|
|
– |
Enhancing the in-store experience. We intend to develop
an environment for our customers to rely on us for ideas,
inspiration, and information. We expect to make it easier and
more exciting to shop our stores with less clutter in the drive
aisles and more powerful promotional items in our feature space.
We plan to use technology to check our customers out faster and
provide more information on the sales floor. We will further
seek to serve our customers’ needs by providing more
classes, informative signage, and important services like custom
framing and custom floral. |
4
|
|
|
|
– |
Improving marketing execution. We are focused on
marketing vehicles that will drive customer traffic and demand
for our products. In order to successfully retain customers and
prospect high value new customers, we utilize a diversified
marketing mix including print, internet, direct mail, and
various in-store promotional activities. In addition, we
extensively utilize our database and analytical capabilities to
drive a productive, cost efficient marketing program. We plan to
continue to lower our advertising to sales ratio as we grow our
business. |
We intend to improve our execution of these marketing programs
by driving promotions focused on key items and by ensuring
better merchandise in-stock levels.
|
|
• |
Enhance Michaels Stores’ Merchandise Margins.
We intend to enhance merchandise margins through continued
improvement of our inventory management and supply chain
processes. We plan to utilize our technology systems to maximize
margins on seasonal products by allocating merchandise more
efficiently among our stores, and on promotional sales products
by determining the most profitable promotional programs for each
product. We also expect to further expand our direct importing
of basic assortment products. In addition, we continue to
evaluate opportunities to further reduce our merchandise costs
and ensure adequate supplies through vertical integration, such
as through Artistree, our frame and moulding manufacturing
operation that supplies our Michaels and Aaron Brothers stores
nationwide. |
|
• |
Grow Through New Michaels Store Openings. We
believe the United States and Canadian markets can support about
1,300 Michaels stores. We plan to open approximately 45 new
Michaels stores per year, extending into the foreseeable future,
funded primarily through cash provided by operating activities.
From the beginning of fiscal 1998 through March 23, 2006,
we have opened or relocated 649 Michaels stores using a
standardized store opening procedure, which has ensured store
openings with a merchandise assortment and presentation
consistent with our existing stores. We have developed and are
constantly refining our Michaels store prototype, consistent
with our store remodel program related to the Pursuit of the
Perfect Store, to incorporate improved merchandising techniques
and store layouts. |
|
• |
Expand Aaron Brothers. Aaron Brothers operates
primarily on the west coast, and currently averages
$1.1 million in net sales per store in stores open longer
than 36 months. We believe that we have the potential to
increase average net sales in these stores to $1.4 to
$1.5 million. We continue to refine the Aaron Brothers
concept and have one planned store opening and one planned store
closure in fiscal 2006, and we plan to open a limited number of
Aaron Brothers stores in years subsequent to fiscal 2006. The
one Aaron Brothers new store opening and one store closure
planned in fiscal 2006 will be an existing store relocating
within the same geographical market, which normally would be
considered a relocation; however, due to the length of time
between the store closure and the new store opening of
approximately eight months, we will not consider this a
relocation. We plan to fund new store openings primarily through
cash provided by operating activities. We believe the United
States and Canadian markets can eventually support up to 600
Aaron Brothers stores, subject to continuous review and
evaluation of our operations and strategy. |
|
• |
Expand the Wholesale Business Concept. In May
2000, in connection with our strategy of developing a wholesale
business concept, we acquired Star Decorators Wholesale in
Dallas, Texas. As part of our expansion strategy, we opened a
second location in Atlanta, Georgia, in September 2003. In
fiscal 2004, we realigned our Los Angeles wholesale-retail store
to be managed as part of our Star Decorators Wholesale concept.
In March 2005, we opened a fourth location in Phoenix, Arizona.
The target customers for this concept are interior
decorators/designers, wedding/event planners, florists, hotels,
restaurants, and commercial display companies. Star Decorators
Wholesale stores average 36,000 square feet of selling
space and offer approximately 20,000 SKUs. This is a
concept that we see as an additional area in which we can expand
our customer base and leverage our experience and vendor base. |
|
• |
Explore Additional Growth Opportunities. In fiscal
2003, we began testing a new scrapbooking/paper crafting retail
concept by opening two Recollections stores, providing
merchandise, accessories, and |
5
|
|
|
support services in a community learning environment. As of
March 23, 2006, we operate 11 Recollections locations.
These stores average approximately 3,600 square feet of
selling space, feature a large classroom, and offer
approximately 13,000 SKUs of scrapbooking and paper crafting
products. We continue to refine and test this concept using our
existing stores, and as such, have no store openings planned for
fiscal 2006. |
Merchandising and Marketing
Product Selection
Our Michaels store merchandising strategy is to provide a broad
selection of products in a convenient location with an appealing
store environment. Each Michaels store offers approximately
42,000 basic SKUs in a number of product categories. The
following table shows a breakdown of sales for Michaels stores
by department as a percentage of total sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General crafts
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Art supplies
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Picture framing
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
“Silk” and dried floral
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Seasonal
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Hobby, party, and candles
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We offer the following selection of merchandise in our Michaels
stores:
|
|
• |
products for the do-it-yourself home decorator, including wall
décor, candles, containers, baskets, and potpourri; custom
framing services, ready-made frames, mat boards, glass, framed
art, art prints, and photo albums; and “silk” flowers,
dried flowers, and artificial plants sold separately or in
ready-made and custom floral arrangements, accessories needed
for floral arranging, and other floral items, such as wreaths; |
|
• |
art supplies, including scrapbooking materials; surfaces and
pads; adhesives and finishes; pastels and watercolors, oil
paints, acrylics, easels, brushes, paper, canvas, and stenciling
materials; and |
|
• |
craft supplies, including beads, wood, foam, doll making
supplies, jewelry making supplies, rubber stamps, apparel
crafts, books and magazines, craft storage, and plaster;
needlecraft items, including stitchery supplies, hand-knitting
yarns, needles, canvas, and related supplies for needlepoint,
embroidery and cross stitching, knitting, crochet, rug making
kits, and quilt and afghan kits; ribbon and wedding accessories;
gifts; hobby items, including plastic model kits and related
supplies, kids’ craft materials, plush toys, and
paint-by-number kits; party needs, including gift wrap, candy
making supplies, and cake decorating supplies; and soap and
candle making supplies. |
Our Michaels stores regularly feature seasonal merchandise that
complements our core merchandising strategy. Seasonal
merchandise is offered for several holiday periods, including
Valentine’s Day, St. Patrick’s Day, Easter,
Mother’s Day, Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas, and many
other regional “mini season” programs. For example,
seasonal merchandise for the Christmas season includes home
decorating items such as artificial trees, wreaths, candles,
lights, and ornaments.
During the Christmas selling season, a significant portion of
floor and shelf space in a typical Michaels store is devoted to
Christmas crafts, Christmas decorations, gift making, and gift
giving merchandise. Because of the project-oriented nature of
many of these products, the Christmas selling season begins in
August and extends through December. Accordingly, a fully
developed seasonal merchandising program, including inventory,
merchandise layout, and instructional ideas, is implemented
6
during the third quarter of each fiscal year in each Michaels
store. This program requires additional inventory accumulation
so that each store is fully stocked during the peak selling
season to meet higher demand from increased customer traffic.
We routinely identify merchandise that requires some price
reduction to accelerate sales of the product. The need for this
reduction is generally attributable to either seasonal product
remaining at the end of the season or product that is being
displaced from its assigned location in the store to make room
for new merchandise. Additional product candidates for repricing
are identified using our
point-of-sale and
perpetual inventory data. In each case, the appropriate
repricing is determined at our corporate office and sent to the
stores with instructions on how to accelerate sales of the
repriced product.
Our Aaron Brothers stores offer on average approximately 6,500
SKUs, including photo frames, a full line of ready-made frames,
art prints, framed art, and a wide selection of art supplies and
custom framing services. The merchandising strategy for our
Aaron Brothers stores is to provide a unique, upscale framing
assortment and shopping experience. In addition, we strive to
provide a fashion forward framing merchandise selection in an
appealing environment with attentive customer service.
Customer Experience
We believe that our customer experience is a key advantage,
differentiates us from our competitors, and is a critical
component of our merchandising strategy. Many of the craft
supplies sold in Michaels stores can be assembled into unique
end products with an appropriate amount of guidance and
direction. Accordingly, we have displays in every store to
stimulate new project ideas and supply free project sheets with
detailed instructions on how to assemble the finished product.
We also offer project sheets on our Internet site,
www.michaels.com. In addition, many Michaels sales associates
are craft enthusiasts who are able to help customers with ideas,
inspiration, and instructions. We strive to complement our
innovative store design with a level of customer service that
provides an enjoyable shopping experience, and we believe that
knowledgeable associates who display prompt and enthusiastic
service foster customer loyalty and differentiate us from our
competition. We have a comprehensive annual calendar offering
classes and demonstrations to inspire our customers with product
ideas and information. We believe this strategy enhances
incremental sales and frequency of customer visits.
Advertising
We focus primarily on circular advertising. We believe that our
circular advertising, primarily utilized in Sunday newspapers,
is our most productive and cost efficient form of advertising.
The circulars advertise numerous products in order to emphasize
the wide selection of products available at Michaels stores. We
believe that our ability to advertise through circulars
throughout the year in each of our markets provides us with an
advantage over our smaller competitors and that it also
reinforces and strengthens our brand name.
Store Design and Operations
Our store design encourages purchases in a friendly, creative
environment. Store design is developed centrally and implemented
at the store level through the use of merchandise planograms,
which provide store associates with detailed descriptions and
illustrations with respect to store layout and merchandise
presentation. Planograms are also used to cluster various
products that can be combined to create individual projects.
A Michaels store is typically managed by a store manager, one
assistant manager, and three department managers. The field
organization for Michaels is headed by an executive vice
president and is divided into six geographic zones. Each zone
has its own vice president and 12 to 13 district managers.
There are a total of 76 districts in the United States and
Canada. Typically, an Aaron Brothers store is managed by a store
manager and one assistant manager. The field organization for
Aaron Brothers is headed by a divisional senior vice president
and is divided into 13 districts, each with a district
manager.
7
We believe this organizational structure enhances the
communication among the individual stores and between the stores
and corporate headquarters.
Purchasing and Inventory Management
We purchase merchandise from approximately 1,500 vendors. We
believe that our buying power and ability to make centralized
purchases enable us to acquire products on favorable terms.
Central merchandising management teams negotiate with vendors in
an attempt to obtain the lowest net merchandise costs and
improve control over product mix and inventory levels. In fiscal
2005, our top 10 vendors accounted for approximately 22% of
total purchases with no single vendor accounting for more than
4% of total purchases.
In addition to purchasing from outside vendors, our Michaels and
Aaron Brothers stores purchase custom and ready-made frames,
framing supplies, mats, framed art, and art prints from our
manufacturing operation, Artistree, which consists of a
manufacturing facility and three regional processing centers to
support our retail stores.
Substantially all of the products sold in Michaels stores are
manufactured in Asia, Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
Goods manufactured in Asia generally require long lead times and
are ordered four to six months in advance of delivery. Those
products are either imported directly by us or acquired from
distributors based in the United States and their purchase
prices are denominated in United States dollars.
Our primary objectives for inventory management are
(1) maximizing the efficiency of the flow of product to the
stores, (2) maintaining high store in-stock levels,
(3) enhancing store labor efficiency, (4) reducing
clearance inventory levels, and (5) optimizing our overall
investment in inventory. We manage our inventory in several
ways, including:
in-store management
using a handheld radio frequency device (RF gun), daily
tracking of inventory positions utilizing our perpetual
inventory and automated replenishment systems; the use of
merchandise planograms to control the merchandise assortment and
presentation; and the review of item-level sales information in
order to track the performance and sell-through of seasonal and
promotional items. The data that we obtain from our POS system
is an integral component in the inventory management process. In
addition, inventories are verified through periodic physical and
cycle counts conducted throughout the year on a rotating
systematic schedule.
The implementation of our perpetual inventory and automated
merchandise replenishment systems allows us to better achieve
our inventory management objectives. Our automated replenishment
system uses perpetual inventory records to analyze individual
store/ SKU on-hand
quantities, as well as other pertinent information such as
unfilled orders, seasonal selling patterns, promotional events,
and vendor lead times, to generate recommended merchandise
reorder information on a daily basis. These recommended orders
are reviewed daily and purchase orders are delivered
electronically to our vendors or replenishment orders are sent
to our distribution centers.
We began the rollout of our perpetual inventory and automated
replenishment systems in fiscal 2001. We completed the rollout
of our perpetual inventory system in fiscal 2003 and completed
the implementation of our automated replenishment system in July
2004. During fiscal 2005, we determined that our perpetual
inventory system could be used to value our inventory for
accounting purposes. As discussed in “Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations–Accounting Items,” we
changed our method of accounting for merchandise inventories
from a retail inventory method to the weighted average cost
method in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. In addition to
improving our store in-stock position, these systems allow us to
better forecast merchandise ordering quantities for our vendors
and give us the ability to identify, order, and replenish the
stores’ merchandise using less store associate labor. These
systems also allow us to react more quickly to selling trends
and allow our store associates to devote more time to customer
service, thereby improving inventory productivity and sales
opportunities.
In fiscal 2001, we implemented a seasonal allocation system to
better manage the distribution of seasonal merchandise to our
stores. Utilizing this allocation system, we are able to
allocate seasonal
8
merchandise to our stores based on prior year sales and current
store sales trends. For a discussion of the seasonal nature of
our business, see “Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations–Seasonality.”
Artistree
We currently operate a vertically integrated manufacturing
operation named Artistree that supplies our Michaels and Aaron
Brothers stores with quality custom and specialty framing
merchandise, including ready-made frames and art prints. Our
regional processing centers are located in City of Industry,
California; Coppell, Texas; and Kernersville, North Carolina.
Kernersville, North Carolina is also the home of our moulding
manufacturing and ready-made frame plant. Our art prints are
packaged and distributed out of our Coppell, Texas regional
processing center. Combined, these facilities occupy
approximately 402,000 square feet and, in fiscal 2005,
processed over 25 million linear feet of frame moulding for
our Michaels and Aaron Brothers stores.
Our moulding manufacturing plant converts the raw lumber into
finished frame moulding that is supplied to our regional
processing centers for custom framing orders or for the
completion of ready-made frames for our stores. We manufacture
approximately 18% of the moulding we process, import another 34%
from quality manufacturers in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brazil, and
Italy, and purchase the balance from distributors. During fiscal
2005, we began to directly source metal moulding for processing
in our regional centers, whereas in prior years we completely
outsourced the production and processing of metal frames. The
custom framing orders are processed (frames cut and joined, and
mats cut) and shipped to our stores where the custom frame order
is completed for customer pick-up.
We believe Artistree provides a competitive advantage to our
Michaels and Aaron Brothers stores. Based on the benefits we
have received from this vertically integrated solution, we
continue to evaluate additional future vertical integration
opportunities.
Distribution
We currently operate a distribution network that supplies our
stores with merchandise. Approximately 61% of Michaels
stores’ merchandise is shipped through the Michaels
distribution network, with the remainder shipped directly from
vendors. Approximately 63% of Aaron Brothers stores’
merchandise is shipped through the Aaron Brothers distribution
center, with the remainder being shipped directly from our
vendors. Our six current distribution centers are located in
California, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Texas. In
fiscal 2002, we completed an expansion of our Lancaster,
California distribution center and added a new distribution
facility in Hazleton, Pennsylvania, which added approximately
1.0 million square feet of capacity. In fiscal 2003, we
constructed a new distribution center located in the Chicago,
Illinois area, from which we began shipping orders in June 2004
as we ceased operations in our Kentucky distribution center. The
692,000 square feet of our new Illinois distribution
center, offset by the closing of our Kentucky distribution
center in fiscal 2004, added approximately 271,000 square
feet to our capacity, bringing the total capacity to
approximately 3.3 million square feet. In addition to these
distribution facilities, we utilize four third-party warehouse
facilities to store and supply our seasonal merchandise in
preparation for the holiday season. We currently have a
715,000 square foot distribution center under construction
in the Seattle, Washington area. This facility will add needed
capacity in the Northwest to support our direct importing
initiatives and will replace one of the third-party seasonal
facilities. We expect to start operations at the new
distribution center in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Michaels stores generally receive deliveries from the
distribution centers each week through an internal
transportation distribution network using a dedicated fleet of
trucks and contract carriers. Aaron Brothers stores receive
merchandise on a weekly or biweekly basis from their dedicated
174,000 square foot distribution center located in the Los
Angeles, California area. Star Decorators Wholesale stores
receive some merchandise from the distribution centers, but most
of their merchandise is received through direct vendor shipments.
9
In fiscal 2004, we completed the implementation of a new
transportation management system to manage our transportation
processes between our vendors, distribution centers, and stores.
This internet-based system has allowed us to increase the
visibility of merchandise shipments within our supply chain and
improve our overall transportation efficiency.
We currently have approximately 36% of our basic SKUs
replenished through the Michaels distribution network, with the
remainder shipped directly from vendors. In fiscal 2005, we
implemented a number of enhancements to our distribution
network. We refer to the improved network as our “Hybrid
Distribution network” through which we expect to ultimately
replenish approximately 85% to 95% of our basic SKUs. We expect
this reduction in direct deliveries from vendors to our stores
to result in the following benefits to our supply chain:
|
|
• |
Vendor cost reductions are expected to be shared; |
• |
Transportation costs should be reduced, partially offset by
additional handling costs; |
• |
Store labor should become more efficient; |
• |
Service levels to our stores should improve; |
• |
In-stocks in our stores should improve, and average inventory
per store, inclusive of distribution centers, should be reduced. |
We are now in the implementation phase of the Hybrid
Distribution network, and expect to have approximately 15% of
direct vendors converted by the end of fiscal 2006. We expect to
complete the transition to Hybrid Distribution in fiscal 2008.
Store Expansion and Relocation
Having become the largest national retailer of arts, crafts, and
decorative items, we recognized in 1995 that we had the critical
mass to achieve improved operating efficiencies that could
result in higher returns on capital by focusing on key
initiatives, such as strengthening our information systems and
infrastructure to support future growth in the number of stores.
In fiscal 1995, we announced a shift in focus from store growth
to higher returns on capital and as a result, moderated our
internal growth rate in number of stores. Beginning in fiscal
1998, we expanded our new store opening program and have
continued to grow our number of stores through fiscal 2005.
10
The following table shows our store growth for the last five
years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Michaels stores(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores open at beginning of year
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
Retail stores opened during the year
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Retail stores opened (relocations) during the year
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Retail stores closed during the year
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Retail stores closed (relocations) during the year
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores open at end of year
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
Aaron Brothers stores:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores open at beginning of year
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
Retail stores opened during the year
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Retail stores opened (relocations) during the year
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Retail stores closed during the year
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Retail stores closed (relocations) during the year
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores open at end of year
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Recollections stores:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores open at beginning of year
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Retail stores opened during the year
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores open at end the year
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Star Decorators Wholesale stores(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale stores open at beginning of year
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Wholesale stores opened during the year
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale stores open at end of year
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total store count at end of year
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Opening store counts reflect a reclassification of our Los
Angeles combination wholesale-retail store from a Michaels store
to a Star Decorators Wholesale store. Beginning in fiscal 2004,
our Los Angeles wholesale-retail store is managed as part of our
Star Decorators Wholesale concept. |
We plan to open approximately 45 Michaels and one Aaron Brothers
store in fiscal 2006 and plan to open a similar number of
Michael stores in each of the subsequent fiscal years, extending
into the foreseeable future. In fiscal 2006, we have no store
openings planned for Recollections or Star Decorators Wholesale.
Our long-term expansion strategy is to give priority to adding
stores in existing markets in order to enhance economies of
scale associated with advertising, distribution, field
supervision, and other regional expenses. The anticipated
opening of Michaels, Aaron Brothers, Recollections, and Star
Decorators Wholesale stores and the rate at which stores are
opened will depend upon a number of factors, including the
success of existing stores, the availability and the cost of
capital for expansion, the availability of suitable store sites,
and the ability to hire and train qualified managers.
We have developed a standardized store opening procedure that
allows for the efficient opening of new stores and their
integration into our information and distribution systems. We
develop the floor plan and merchandise layout and organize the
advertising and promotions in connection with the opening of
each new store. In addition, we maintain qualified store opening
teams to provide new store personnel with in-store training.
Costs for opening stores at particular locations depend upon the
type of building, the general cost levels in the area, store
size, operating format, and the time of the year the store is
opened. In fiscal 2005, the average net cost of opening a new
Michaels store included approximately $703,000 of leasehold
improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and pre-opening
costs, and an estimated initial inventory
11
investment, net of accounts payable, of approximately $599,000.
The initial inventory investment in new Michaels stores is
offset, in part, by vendor allowances.
In addition to new store openings, we continue to pursue a store
relocation program to improve the quality and performance of our
existing store base. We relocated 30 and 18 Michaels stores in
fiscal 2004 and 2005, respectively, and one Aaron Brothers store
in fiscal 2004. We plan to relocate approximately eight Michaels
stores during fiscal 2006.
During fiscal 2004 and 2005, we closed five Michaels stores each
year. During fiscal 2006, we plan to close four Michaels and one
Aaron Brothers store, but we currently have no specific plans to
close any Recollections or Star Decorators Wholesale stores. The
one Aaron Brothers new store opening and one store closure
planned in fiscal 2006 will be an existing store relocating
within the same geographical market, which normally would be
considered a relocation; however, due to the length of time
between the store closure and the new store opening of
approximately eight months, we will not consider this a
relocation.
Investment in Information Technology
We are committed to using information technology to increase
operating efficiencies, improve merchandise selection and flow,
and improve our ability to satisfy the needs of our customers.
Between fiscal 1998 and fiscal 2004, we invested heavily in
automated POS, perpetual inventory, automated replenishment,
distribution, and seasonal allocation systems. These systems
have significantly improved our ability to properly forecast,
manage, and analyze our inventory levels, margins, and
merchandise ordering quantities and have created efficiencies
within our stores, distribution centers, and corporate office.
We are seeing the benefits of these systems now with the
potential for improvements in the future as we further refine
the usage and integration among our systems. In fiscal 2004
and fiscal 2005, we installed a new human resource system,
as well as a new financial system, which we believe will enable
us to more closely manage payroll expense at the stores, provide
an efficient platform for future growth, and enable us to
utilize best practices for processes and controls, which are
built into the applications.
In fiscal 2006, we will begin the rollout of a labor management
system, with time and attendance functionality available in
fiscal 2006 and labor forecasting available in fiscal 2007. We
expect this system to give us detailed insight into our labor
force and how to best service our customers, with improvements
in labor efficiency and utilization over the next several years.
Our current merchandising systems will be significantly upgraded
over the next two years, giving us enhanced capabilities in
item and order management, while adding a sophisticated price
management system into our tool kit. We believe our ongoing
business system upgrades will support our anticipated future
growth and provide continued opportunities for improvement of
business operations.
Foreign Sales
All of our current international business is in Canada and
accounted for approximately 6.1% of total sales in fiscal 2005,
5.2% of total sales in fiscal 2004, and 4.7% of total sales in
fiscal 2003. During the last three years, less than 5% of our
assets have been located outside of the United States.
Service Marks
The names “Aaron Brothers,” “Aaron Brothers
Art & Framing,” “Artistree Art
Frame & Design,” “Michaels,”
“Michaels.com,” “Michaels The Arts and Crafts
Store,” “Recollections,” “Star Decorators
Wholesale Warehouse,” “Vendor Connect,” and the
Michaels logo are each federally registered service marks.
Employees
As of March 23, 2006, we employed approximately 43,700
associates, approximately 30,500 of whom were employed on a
part-time basis. The number of part-time associates
substantially increases during the
12
Christmas selling season. Of our full-time associates,
approximately 2,650 are engaged in various executive, operating,
training, distribution, and administrative functions in our
corporate and division offices and distribution centers, and the
remainder are engaged in store operations. None of our
associates are members of labor unions in association with their
Michaels employment.
Recent Management Changes
On March 20, 2006, we announced certain management changes.
Effective on March 15, 2006, R. Michael Rouleau
retired as President and Chief Executive Officer and became a
special advisor to the Board of Directors. The Board has left
the office of Chief Executive Officer vacant and has assigned
all the duties of that office to our newly appointed
co-Presidents, Jeffrey N. Boyer, formerly Executive Vice
President–Chief Financial Officer, and Gregory A. Sandfort,
formerly Executive Vice President–General Merchandise
Manager.
Mr. Boyer has become President and Chief Financial Officer,
responsible for information technology, human resources, real
estate, strategic planning, legal, and new businesses.
Mr. Sandfort has become President and Chief Operating
Officer, responsible for merchandising, store operations,
marketing, and supply chain areas. Mr. Boyer and
Mr. Sandfort report to our Board and to our Chairman,
Charles J. Wyly, Jr.
We have also promoted two senior executives. Harvey S. Kanter,
formerly President of our Aaron Brothers business, has been
named Executive Vice President–Chief Merchant, and Thomas
M. Bazzone, formerly President of our Recollections and Star
Wholesale businesses, has become Executive Vice
President–Specialty Businesses.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our current executive officers, their ages as of March 23,
2006, and their business experience during at least the past
five years are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Charles J. Wyly, Jr.
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Sam Wyly
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Jeffrey N. Boyer
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
President and Chief Financial Officer |
Gregory A. Sandfort
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
Thomas M. Bazzone
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Executive Vice President–Specialty Businesses |
Thomas C. DeCaro
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Executive Vice President–Supply Chain |
Harvey S. Kanter
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Executive Vice President–Chief Merchant |
Edward F. Sadler
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Executive Vice President–Store Operations |
Mr. Charles J. Wyly, Jr. became a director in 1984. He
served as Vice Chairman of the Board from 1985 until 2001 when
he became Chairman of the Board. He co-founded Sterling
Software, Inc., a worldwide supplier of software products, in
1981 and, until its acquisition in 2000 by another company, had
served as a director and since 1984 as Vice Chairman of the
Board. Mr. Wyly served as a director of Sterling Commerce,
Inc., a worldwide provider of electronic commerce software and
services, from December 1995 until its acquisition in 2000 by
another company. Mr. Wyly was a director of Scottish
Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd., a variable life
insurance and reinsurance company, from October 1998 until
November 2000. Mr. Wyly served from 1964 to 1975 as an
officer and director, including serving as President from 1969
to 1973, of University Computing Company. Mr. Wyly and his
brother, Sam Wyly, founded Earth Resources Company, an oil
refining and silver mining company, and Charles J.
Wyly, Jr. served as Chairman of the Board of that company
from 1968 to 1980. He was also a founding partner of Maverick
Capital, Ltd., a manager of equity hedge funds.
Mr. Sam Wyly has served as Vice Chairman of the Board since
July 2001 and a director of Michaels since 1984. He served as
Chairman of the Board from 1984 until 2001. Mr. Wyly is an
entrepreneur and
13
investor who has created and managed several public and private
companies. He was a manager of Ranger Capital, Ltd., a
Dallas-based hedge fund management company from November 2001
until June 2004. He founded Maverick Capital, Ltd., another
hedge fund manager, in 1990. He founded University Computing
Company, which became one of the first computer utility networks
and one of the first software products companies. He was a
founder and, until its acquisition in 2000 by another company,
was Chairman and a director of Sterling Software, Inc. He also
was Chairman of the Executive Committee and a director of
Sterling Commerce, Inc., until its acquisition in 2000 by
another company, and was Chairman and a director of Scottish
Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. from October 1998 until
June 2000.
Mr. Boyer was promoted to President and Chief Financial
Officer in March 2006. Prior to his promotion, he served as
Executive Vice President–Chief Financial Officer since
January 2003. Prior to joining us, Mr. Boyer was Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kmart Corporation
from May 2001 until November 2001. In January 2002, Kmart
Corporation filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Prior to
joining Kmart, he held various positions with Sears, Roebuck and
Co., where he served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer from October 1999 to May 2001, Corporate
Controller from June 1998 to October 1999, and Vice President,
Finance–Full Line Stores from June 1996 to June 1998. Prior
experience includes Vice President of Business Development at
The Pillsbury Company from 1995 to 1996 and over six years with
Kraft Foods, a unit of the Altria Group, in various senior
financial positions.
Mr. Sandfort was promoted to President and Chief Operating
Officer in March 2006. Prior to his promotion, he served as
Executive Vice President–General Merchandise Manager since
January 2004. From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Sandfort served as
Vice Chairman and Co-CEO of Kleinert’s Inc. (d/b/a Buster
Brown) where he was directly responsible for all merchandising
and operational aspects of Kleinert’s sleepwear, playwear,
and retail divisions. In May 2003, Kleinert filed a voluntary
petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code, which was subsequently converted to a
liquidation under Chapter 7. Prior to that,
Mr. Sandfort served as Vice President, General Merchandise
Manager–Children’s Apparel, Furniture, Toys, and
Electronic Games for Sears, Roebuck and Co. for four years.
Mr. Bazzone was promoted to Executive Vice
President–Specialty Businesses in March 2006. Prior to his
promotion, he served as President of our Recollections and Star
Decorators Wholesale businesses since May 2004. He came to us
from Restoration Hardware where he was Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer and Director from July 2001 to December
2003. Previously, he was with Red Envelope, where he held the
position of President and Chief Operating Officer from July 1999
to July 2001. Mr. Bazzone also held executive positions
with Williams-Sonoma from May 1995 through January 1997.
Mr. DeCaro became Executive Vice President–Supply
Chain in June 2005. Prior to this, Mr. DeCaro had served as
Senior Vice President–Inventory Management since joining us
in August 2000. From 1998 until joining us, he was Vice
President–Merchandise for Disneyland Resort. Prior to this,
he held the position of Senior Vice President–Merchandise
Planning and Allocation for Kohl’s Department Stores from
February 1996 to April 1998. In addition, Mr. DeCaro has
held various positions in Merchandise Planning and Allocation
and Finance for The Disney Store, The Limited Stores, May
Department Stores, and Sanger Harris Department Stores.
Mr. Kanter was promoted to Executive Vice
President–Chief Merchant in March 2006. Prior to his
promotion, he served as President of Aaron Brothers, a
subsidiary of Michaels, since April 2003. From 1995 until
joining us, Mr. Kanter held various positions with Eddie
Bauer, Inc. From 2002 until 2003, he was Managing Director of
the Home and Non-Apparel divisions and from 1998 until 2002, he
was Managing Director of the Home division. As a Managing
Director, Mr. Kanter was responsible for retail, catalog
and Internet merchandising, sourcing, planning, allocation, and
design and visual presentation. In March 2003, Spiegel, Inc. and
certain of its principal operating subsidiaries, including Eddie
Bauer, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
Mr. Sadler became Executive Vice President–Store
Operations in October 1999. From June 1995 until 1999, he was
Regional Vice President and subsequently Senior Vice
President–Stores of Caldor. Prior
14
to his service with Caldor, Mr. Sadler served with Target
for 19 years, most recently as Vice President–Store
Operations.
Our financial performance is subject to various risks and
uncertainties. The risks described below are those which we
believe are the material risks we face. Any of the risk factors
described below could significantly and adversely affect our
business, prospects, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Our Growth Depends on Our Ability to Open New Stores
One of our key business strategies is to expand our base of
retail stores. If we are unable to implement this strategy, our
ability to increase our sales, profitability, and cash flow
could be impaired. To the extent that we are unable to open new
stores as we anticipate, our sales growth would come only from
increases in comparable store sales. Growth in profitability in
that case would depend significantly on our ability to reduce
our costs as a percentage of our sales. We may be unable to
implement our strategy if we cannot identify suitable sites for
additional stores, negotiate acceptable leases, access
sufficient capital to support store growth, or hire and train a
sufficient number of qualified associates.
Our Success Will Depend on How Well We Manage Our Growth
Even if we are able to implement, to a significant degree, our
strategy of expanding our store base, or additionally, to expand
our business through acquisitions or vertical integration
opportunities, we may experience problems, which may prevent any
significant increase in profitability or negatively impact our
cash flow. For example:
|
|
|
|
• |
the costs of opening and operating new stores may offset the
increased sales generated by the additional stores; |
|
• |
the closure of unsuccessful stores may result in the retention
of liability for expensive leases; |
|
• |
a significant portion of our management’s time and energy
may be consumed with issues unrelated to advancing our core
business strategy, which could possibly result in a
deterioration of our operating results; |
|
• |
our expansion may outpace our planned technological advances and
current systems with the possible consequences of breakdowns in
our supply chain management and reduced effectiveness of our
operational systems and controls; |
|
• |
we may be unable to hire, train, and retain qualified managers
and other associates; |
|
• |
our suppliers may be unable to meet the increased demand of
additional stores in a timely manner; and |
|
• |
we may be unable to expand our existing distribution centers or
use third-party distribution centers on a cost-effective basis
to provide merchandise for sale by our new stores. |
We May Fail to Optimize or Adequately Maintain Our Perpetual
Inventory and Automated Replenishment
Systems
We have completed the rollout of our perpetual inventory,
automated replenishment, and weighted average cost stock ledger
systems, which we believe are necessary to properly forecast,
manage, and analyze our inventory levels, margins, and
merchandise ordering quantities. We may fail to properly
optimize the effectiveness of these systems, or to adequately
support and maintain the systems, which could have a material
adverse impact on our financial condition and operating results.
Improvements to Our Supply Chain May Not Be Fully
Successful
An important part of our efforts to achieve efficiencies, cost
reductions, and sales and cash flow growth is the identification
and implementation of improvements to our supply chain,
including merchandise ordering, transportation, and receipt
processing. During fiscal 2006, we will continue to test and
implement a number of enhancements to our distribution systems
with select suppliers, enabling us to
15
evaluate our ability to distribute additional SKUs through our
distribution centers. Significant changes to our supply chain
could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.
Our Exploration of Strategic Alternatives May Create
Uncertainties That Could Affect Our Business
On March 20, 2006, we announced that we retained JPMorgan
to assist us in evaluating strategic alternatives to enhance
stockholder value, including, but not limited to, our potential
sale. As this exploration is in its early stages, we are
uncertain as to what strategic alternatives may be available to
us, whether we will elect to pursue any such strategic
alternatives, or what impact any particular strategic
alternative will have on our stock price if pursued. There are
various uncertainties and risks relating to our exploration of
strategic alternatives, including:
|
|
|
|
• |
the exploration of strategic alternatives may distract
management and disrupt operations, which could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results; |
|
• |
we may not be able to successfully achieve the benefits of any
strategic alternative undertaken by us; |
|
• |
the process of exploring strategic alternatives may be time
consuming and expensive; and |
|
• |
perceived uncertainties as to our future direction may result in
the loss of employees or business partners. |
Changes in Customer Demands Could Materially Adversely Affect
Our Sales, Operating Results, and Cash
Flow
Our success depends on our ability to anticipate and respond in
a timely manner to changing customer demands and preferences for
products and supplies used in creative activities. If we
misjudge the market, we may significantly overstock unpopular
products and be forced to take significant inventory markdowns,
which would have a negative impact on our operating results and
cash flow. However, shortages of key items could have a material
adverse impact on our operating results. In addition, adverse
weather conditions, unfavorable economic trends, and consumer
confidence volatility could have a material adverse impact on
our sales and operating results.
Unexpected Consumer Responses to Changes in Our Promotional
Programs Could Materially Adversely
Affect Our Sales, Operating Results, and Cash
Flow
Brand recognition, quality, and price have a significant
influence on consumers’ choices among competing products
and brands. Advertising, promotion, merchandising, and the pace
and timing of new product introductions also have a significant
impact on consumers’ buying decisions. If we misjudge
consumer responses to changes in our promotional activities,
this could have a material adverse impact on our financial
condition and operating results.
Changes in Consumer Confidence Could Result in a Reduction in
Consumer Spending on Items Perceived
to be Discretionary
Our stores offer arts and crafts supplies and products for the
crafter and do-it-yourself home decorator, which some customers
may perceive as discretionary. Should their perception of the
economy deteriorate, consumers may change spending patterns to
reduce the amount spent on discretionary items.
Failure to Adequately Maintain the Security of Our Electronic
and Other Confidential Information Could
Materially Adversely Affect Our Financial
Condition and Operating Results
We have become increasingly centralized and dependent upon
automated information technology processes. In addition, a
portion of our business operations is conducted over the
Internet, increasing the risk of viruses that could cause system
failures and disruptions of operations. Any failure to maintain
the security of our data and our customers’ confidential
information, including via the penetration of our network
security and the misappropriation of confidential information,
could put us at a competitive
16
disadvantage, result in deterioration in our customers’
confidence in us, and thereby have a material adverse impact on
our financial condition and operating results.
Our Suppliers May Fail Us
Many of our suppliers are small firms that produce a limited
number of items. Given their limited resources, these firms are
susceptible to cash flow issues, production difficulties,
quality control issues, and problems in delivering agreed-upon
quantities on schedule. We cannot assure you that we would be
able, if necessary, to return products to these suppliers and
obtain refunds of our purchase price or obtain reimbursement or
indemnification from them if their products prove defective. In
addition, these suppliers may be unable to withstand a downturn
in economic conditions. Significant failures on the part of our
key suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results.
In addition, many of these suppliers require extensive advance
notice of our requirements in order to supply products in the
quantities we desire. This long lead time requires us to place
orders far in advance of the time when certain products will be
offered for sale, exposing us to shifts in demand.
Our Reliance on Foreign Suppliers Increases Our Risk of
Obtaining Adequate, Timely, and
Cost-Effective
Product Supplies
We rely to a significant extent on foreign manufacturers of
various products that we sell. In addition, many of our domestic
suppliers purchase a portion of their products from foreign
sources. This reliance increases the risk that we will not have
adequate and timely supplies of various products due to local
political, economic, social, or environmental conditions
(including acts of terrorism, the outbreak of war, or the
occurrence of natural disaster), transportation delays
(including dock strikes and other work stoppages), restrictive
actions by foreign governments, or changes in United States laws
and regulations affecting imports or domestic distribution.
Reliance on foreign manufacturers also increases our exposure to
fluctuations in exchange rates (including the potential
revaluation of the Chinese Yuan) and trade infringement claims
and reduces our ability to return product for various reasons.
All of our products manufactured overseas and imported into the
United States are subject to duties collected by the United
States Customs Service. We may be subjected to additional
duties, significant monetary penalties, the seizure and the
forfeiture of the products we are attempting to import, or the
loss of import privileges if we or our suppliers are found to be
in violation of U.S. laws and regulations applicable to the
importation of our products.
Increases in Transportation Costs Due to Trucking Industry
Challenges and Rising Fuel Costs May
Materially Adversely Affect Our Operating
Results
Our operating results may be adversely affected if we are unable
to secure adequate trucking resources to fulfill our delivery
schedules to the stores, particularly as we deliver our fall and
Christmas seasonal merchandise.
The price of oil has risen significantly in the last year. This
increase and any future increases may result in an increase in
our transportation costs for distribution to our stores as well
as our vendors’ transportation costs.
Our Information Systems May Prove Inadequate
We depend on our management information systems for many aspects
of our business. We will be materially adversely affected if our
management information systems are disrupted or we are unable to
improve, upgrade, maintain, and expand our systems, particularly
in light of our continued significant increases in the number of
stores.
17
Failure to Adequately Establish Effective Internal Control
Over Our Newly Implemented Integrated
Financial Reporting System Could Result in Our
Inability to Comply with SEC Regulations, Including
Reporting Deadlines
We implemented a new financial reporting system during the first
quarter of fiscal 2006. We may be materially adversely affected
if we are unable to establish effective internal control over
the new system and related financial reporting processes.
A Weak Fourth Quarter Would Materially Adversely Affect Our
Operating Results
Our business is highly seasonal. Our inventories and short-term
borrowings, if any, grow in the second and third fiscal quarters
as we prepare for our peak selling season in the third and
fourth fiscal quarters. Our most important quarter in terms of
sales, profitability, and cash flow historically has been the
fourth fiscal quarter. If for any reason our fourth fiscal
quarter results were substantially below expectations, our
operating results for the full year would be materially
adversely affected, and we could have substantial excess
inventory, especially in seasonal merchandise that is difficult
to liquidate.
Competition Could Negatively Impact Our Operations
The retail arts and crafts industry is competitive, which could
result in the reduction of our prices and our loss of market
share. We must remain competitive in the areas of quality,
price, breadth of selection, customer service, and convenience.
Our primary competition is comprised of specialty arts and
crafts retailers, which include Hobby Lobby, A.C. Moore
Arts & Crafts, Inc., Jo-Ann Superstores (operated by
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.), and Garden Ridge Corporation. We also
compete with mass merchants (e.g., Wal-Mart), who
dedicate a portion of their selling space to a limited selection
of craft supplies and seasonal and holiday merchandise, regional
chains, and local merchants. Some of our competitors,
particularly the mass merchants, are larger and have greater
financial resources than we do. In addition, alternative methods
of selling crafts, such as over the Internet, could result in
additional competitors in the future and increased price
competition since our customers could more readily comparison
shop. Furthermore, we ultimately compete with alternative
sources of entertainment and leisure for our customers.
The Amount of Debt We May Incur Could Adversely Affect Us by
Reducing Our Flexibility to Respond to
Changing Business and Economic Conditions
Our needs for cash in the future will depend on many factors
that are difficult to predict, including our results of
operations and efforts to expand our existing operations. We
believe, based on current circumstances, that our available cash
and funds generated by operating activities, together with
available borrowings under our bank credit facility, will be
sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable
future. However, we cannot assure you that our business will
generate cash flow at or above current levels. If we are unable
to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future
to avoid incurrence of substantial debt and make necessary
investments, we may be required to seek new borrowings, reduce
or delay capital expenditures, reduce or eliminate dividends,
sell assets, seek additional equity capital, or delay, scale
back, or eliminate some aspects of our operations, including
delaying our plans for new store openings.
Moreover, it is possible that we may not be able to satisfy all
of the conditions and covenants under our bank credit facility.
In addition, we may not be able to obtain acceptable financing
upon the expiration of our bank credit facility. Our ability to
obtain additional financing will be significantly impacted by,
among other things, any changes in the ratings assigned to us by
nationally recognized ratings agencies. Any of these events, if
they were to occur, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, or results of operations.
18
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
Unresolved Staff Comments. |
Not applicable.
We lease substantially all of the sites for our Michaels, Aaron
Brothers, Recollections, and Star Decorators Wholesale stores,
with the majority of our stores having initial lease terms of
approximately 10 years. The base rental rates for Michaels
stores generally range from $155,000 to $380,000 per year.
Rental payments for stores open for the full
12-month period of
fiscal 2005 averaged $258,500 for our Michaels stores, $146,700
for our Aaron Brothers stores, $106,000 for our Recollection
stores, and $328,000 for our Star Decorators Wholesale stores.
The leases are generally renewable, with increases in lease
rental rates. Lessors have made leasehold improvements to
prepare our stores for opening under a majority of our existing
leases. As of January 28, 2006, in connection with stores
that we plan to open or relocate in future fiscal years, we had
signed 37 leases for Michaels stores.
As of March 23, 2006, we lease and occupy the following
non-store facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square | |
|
|
Footage | |
|
|
| |
Distribution centers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Commerce, California (Aaron Brothers)
|
|
|
174,000 |
|
|
Hazleton, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
692,000 |
|
|
Jacksonville, Florida
|
|
|
506,000 |
|
|
Lancaster, California
|
|
|
763,000 |
|
|
New Lenox, Illinois
|
|
|
692,000 |
|
|
Tarrant County, Texas (including Recollections)
|
|
|
431,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,258,000 |
|
Artistree:
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Industry, California (regional processing center)
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
Coppell, Texas (regional processing and fulfillment operations
center)
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
Kernersville, North Carolina (manufacturing plant and regional
processing center)
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,000 |
|
Office space:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coppell, Texas (corporate satellite office)
|
|
|
67,000 |
|
|
Grand Prairie, Texas (corporate processing center)
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Irving, Texas (corporate headquarters)
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,000 |
|
Coppell, Texas (new store staging warehouse)
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
19
The following table indicates the number of our retail stores
and wholesale operations located in each state or province as of
March 23, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Stores | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Aaron | |
|
|
|
Star Decorators | |
|
|
State/Province |
|
Michaels | |
|
Brothers | |
|
Recollections | |
|
Wholesale | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Alabama
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Alaska
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Alberta
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Arizona
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
British Columbia
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11 |
|
California
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Colorado
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Delaware
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Florida
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Georgia
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Idaho
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Illinois
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Indiana
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Iowa
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Kansas
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Maine
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Maryland
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Michigan
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Missouri
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Montana
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Nevada
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
New Brunswick
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Newfoundland and Labrador
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23 |
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
New York
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39 |
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
27 |
|
North Dakota
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Ohio
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Stores | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Aaron | |
|
|
|
Star Decorators | |
|
|
State/Province |
|
Michaels | |
|
Brothers | |
|
Recollections | |
|
Wholesale | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ontario
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Oregon
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Prince Edward Island
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Saskatchewan
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
South Dakota
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Texas
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Utah
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Vermont
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Virginia
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Washington
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33 |
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
Legal Proceedings. |
Derivative Claims
On March 21, 2003, Julie Fathergill filed a purported
stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the
192nd District Court for Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit
names certain former and current officers and directors,
including all of Michaels’ current directors, as individual
defendants and Michaels as a nominal defendant. The derivative
action relates to actions prior to our announcement on
November 7, 2002, that we had revised our outlook for the
fourth fiscal quarter of 2002, adjusting downward guidance for
annual earnings per diluted share. The plaintiff alleges that,
prior to that announcement, certain of the defendants made
misrepresentations and failed to disclose negative information
about the financial condition of Michaels while the individual
defendants were selling shares of Michaels Common Stock. The
plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for
breach of fiduciary duties, abuse of control, gross
mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment.
All of these claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of
Michaels. On November 7, 2005, the Court entered a written
order granting the defendants’ special exceptions and
ordering that the case will be dismissed with prejudice unless
the plaintiff amends her petition to state an actionable claim
against the defendants. On December 8, 2005, the plaintiff
filed an amended petition in which she reasserts many of the
same factual allegations, but also adds new allegations
questioning, among other things, issues relating to
Michaels’ inventory systems and infrastructure, as well as
transactions and holdings of Michaels Common Stock by certain
family-owned trusts or benefiting trusts of two of
Michaels’ directors. In her amended petition, the plaintiff
continues to assert all her claims derivatively on behalf of
Michaels against the individual defendants for breach of
fiduciary duties, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste
of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. We believe these
claims are without merit and will vigorously oppose them.
On September 11, 2003, Leo J. Dutil filed a purported
stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas
Division. The lawsuit names certain former and current officers
and directors as individual defendants and Michaels as a nominal
defendant. In this derivative action, the plaintiff makes
allegations of fact similar to those made in the Fathergill
derivative lawsuit described above. The plaintiff asserts claims
against the individual defendants
21
for breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential
information, and contribution and indemnification. All of these
claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of Michaels. We
believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously
oppose them.
Cotton Claim
On December 20, 2002, James Cotton, a former store manager
of Michaels of Canada, ULC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, and
Suzette Kennedy, a former assistant manager of Michaels of
Canada, commenced a proposed class proceeding against Michaels
of Canada and Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and
current and former employees employed in Canada. The Cotton
claim was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and
alleges that the defendants violated employment standards
legislation in Ontario and other provinces and territories of
Canada by failing to pay overtime compensation as required by
that legislation. The Cotton claim also alleges that this
conduct was in breach of the contracts of employment of those
individuals. The Cotton claim seeks a declaration that the
defendants have acted in breach of applicable legislation,
payment to current and former employees for overtime, damages
for breach of contract, punitive, aggravated and exemplary
damages, interest, and costs. In May of 2005, the plaintiffs
delivered material in support of their request that this action
be certified as a class proceeding. Michaels filed and served
its responding materials opposing class certification on
January 31, 2006. A date has not yet been set for the
hearing with respect to certification. We intend to contest
certification of this claim as a class action. Further, we
believe we have certain defenses on the merits and intend to
defend this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate a
range of possible loss, if any, in this claim.
Clark Claim
On July 13, 2005, Michael Clark, a former Michaels store
assistant manager, and Lucinda Prouty, a former Michaels store
department manager, commenced a proposed class action proceeding
against Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and
current and former hourly retail employees employed in
California from July 13, 2001 to the present. The Clark
suit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of
San Diego, and alleges that Michaels failed to pay overtime
wages, provide meal and rest periods (or compensation in lieu
thereof), and provide itemized employee wage statements. The
Clark suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of
California’s unfair competition law. The plaintiffs seek
injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break
penalties, waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’
fees and costs. Under the Class Action Fairness Act, we
removed the case to federal court on August 5, 2005. We are
in the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe
that the Clark claim lacks merit, and we intend to vigorously
defend our interests.
Morris Claim
On November 16, 2005, Geoffrey Morris, a former Aaron
Brothers employee in San Diego, California, commenced a
proposed class action proceeding against Aaron Brothers, Inc. on
behalf of himself and current and former Aaron Brothers
employees in California from November 16, 2001 to the
present. The Morris suit was filed in the Superior Court of
California, County of San Diego, and alleges that Aaron
Brothers failed to pay overtime wages, reimburse the plaintiff
for necessary expenses (including the cost of gas used in
driving his car for business purposes), and provide adequate
meal and rest breaks (or compensation in lieu thereof). The
Morris suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of
California’s unfair competition law. With the exception of
the meal and rest breaks claim, the claims are asserted on
behalf of the putative class. The plaintiff seeks injunctive
relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break penalties,
waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and
costs. We are in the early stages of our investigation; however,
we believe that the Morris claim lacks merit, and we intend to
vigorously defend our interests.
22
Olivas Claim
On December 2, 2005, Sandra Olivas and Jerry Soskins,
former Michaels store managers in Los Angeles, California,
commenced a proposed class action proceeding against Michaels
Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and current and former
salaried store employees employed in California from
December 1, 2001 to the present. Michaels was served with
the complaint on January 31, 2006. The Olivas suit was
filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles, and alleges that Michaels failed to pay overtime wages,
accurately record hours worked, and provide itemized employee
wage statements. The Olivas suit also alleges that this conduct
was in breach of California’s unfair competition law. The
plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime
pay, penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On
March 1, 2006, we removed the case to the United States
District Court for the Central District of California. We are in
the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe that
the Olivas claim lacks merit, and we intend to vigorously defend
our interests.
Governmental Inquiries and Related Matters
In early 2005, the District Attorney’s office of the County
of New York and the SEC opened inquiries concerning
non-U.S. trusts
that directly or indirectly hold and have held shares of
Michaels Common Stock and Common Stock options. The staff of a
U.S. Senate subcommittee and a federal grand jury have
requested information with respect to the same facts. The
Company is cooperating in these inquiries and requests for
information.
Certain of these trusts and corporate subsidiaries of the trusts
acquired securities of Michaels in transactions directly or
indirectly with Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and Sam Wyly, who are,
respectively, Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors and executive officers of Michaels, or with other Wyly
family members. In addition, subsidiaries of certain of these
trusts acquired securities directly from the Company in private
placement transactions in 1996 and 1997 and upon the exercise of
stock options transferred, directly or indirectly, to the trusts
or their subsidiaries by Charles Wyly, Sam Wyly, or other Wyly
family members.
We understand that Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly and/or certain of
their family members are beneficiaries of irrevocable
non-U.S. trusts.
The 1996 and 1997 private placement sales by the Company of
Michaels securities to subsidiaries of certain of these trusts
were disclosed by Michaels in filings with the SEC. The transfer
by Charles Wyly and/or Sam Wyly (or by other Wyly family members
or family-related entities) of Michaels securities to certain of
these trusts and subsidiaries was also disclosed in filings with
the SEC by us and/or by Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly.
Following the filing by Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly of an amended
Schedule 13D with the SEC on April 8, 2005, stating
that they may be deemed the beneficial owners of Michaels
securities held directly or indirectly by the
non-U.S. trusts,
Michaels disclosed in a press release that, as of March 31,
2005, under SEC
Rule 13d-3,
Charles Wyly may be deemed the owner of 6,045,818 shares,
or 4.4% of our outstanding Common Stock, and Sam Wyly may be
deemed the beneficial owner of 4,822,534 shares, or 3.5% of
the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. In our 2005 proxy
statement, Michaels included the securities held in the
non-U.S. trusts or
their separate subsidiaries, as reported in the Wylys’
amended Schedule 13D, in the beneficial ownership table of
our principal stockholders and management, with appropriate
footnotes referring to the amended Schedule 13D. Based on
information then available to the Company, Michaels SEC filings
did not report securities owned by the
non-U.S. trusts or
their corporate subsidiaries as beneficially owned by Charles
Wyly and Sam Wyly prior to 2005.
Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly have undertaken to file any additional
required Section 16 reports and to pay to Michaels the
amount of any Section 16 liability. Counsel for Michaels
and counsel for the Wylys have engaged in discussions of factual
and legal issues relating to Section 16.
Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly have made a proposal to settle any
issue of potential Section 16 liability, without admitting or
denying that they have or had, for Section 16 purposes,
beneficial ownership of Michaels securities that are or were
held by the
non-U.S. trusts or
their subsidiaries and without admitting
23
any liability to the Company under Section 16. Charles Wyly and
Sam Wyly have not yet filed any additional or amended
Section 16 reports with respect to transactions by the
non-U.S. trusts or their subsidiaries while these discussions
have been in progress.
On March 15, 2006, the Board of Directors appointed a
special committee of the Board to investigate and make decisions
on behalf of Michaels with respect to any potential
Section 16 liability issue. The members of the special
committee are Richard C. Marcus, Cece Smith and Liz Minyard, all
independent Board members. The special committee has the full
authority of the Board to make all decisions with respect to any
potential Section 16 issue, including the authority to
approve or reject the proposed settlement, to negotiate the
terms of any settlement, and to take all other actions it deems
necessary or appropriate to resolve any potential
Section 16 liability issue. The special committee has
retained the firm of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP as its
independent counsel to advise it in this matter.
General
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits incidental to
our business. Based on currently available information, we
believe that resolution of all known contingencies is uncertain.
There can be no assurance that future costs of such litigation
would not be material to our financial position or results of
operations.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
We did not submit any matter to a vote of security holders
during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5. |
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities. |
Market Information
Our Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the ticker symbol “MIK.”
The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of
our Common Stock for each quarterly period within the two most
recent fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$ |
36.85 |
|
|
$ |
30.37 |
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
43.61 |
|
|
|
33.03 |
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
41.95 |
|
|
|
30.38 |
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
38.75 |
|
|
|
32.10 |
|
Fiscal 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$ |
29.58 |
|
|
$ |
22.16 |
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
28.15 |
|
|
|
22.29 |
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
30.76 |
|
|
|
25.23 |
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
31.39 |
|
|
|
26.70 |
|
24
Holders
As of March 23, 2006, there were 479 holders of record of
our Common Stock.
Dividends
Michaels has declared quarterly cash dividends as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration Date |
|
Payable Date | |
|
Amount per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2005
|
|
|
April 29, 2005 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
June 16, 2005
|
|
|
July 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
September 13, 2005
|
|
|
October 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
December 6, 2005
|
|
|
January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Fiscal 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2004
|
|
|
April 30, 2004 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
June 17, 2004
|
|
|
July 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
September 16, 2004
|
|
|
October 29, 2004 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
December 1, 2004
|
|
|
January 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
We did not pay any dividends on our Common Stock prior to fiscal
2003. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2005, our Board of
Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per
share to be payable April 28, 2006, to stockholders of
record at the close of business on April 14, 2006.
Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
On December 5, 2000, our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to 4.0 million shares of our outstanding
Common Stock. By later resolutions, our Board of Directors
provided that proceeds of the exercise of options under our 2001
General Stock Option Plan may be used to repurchase shares under
the 2000 repurchase plan and that the maximum number of shares
authorized to be repurchased under the 2000 repurchase plan may
be increased to the extent necessary to so use the proceeds from
such option exercises. On June 16, 2005, in connection with
the adoption of our 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, we
permanently ceased granting options under the 2001 General Stock
Option Plan. As of January 28, 2006, options to
purchase 875,000 shares of Common Stock remained
outstanding pursuant to prior grants under the 2001 General
Stock Option Plan.
On March 15, 2005, and December 6, 2005, our Board of
Directors authorized a repurchase plan for up to
3.0 million shares and 5.0 million shares of our
outstanding Common Stock, respectively. For additional
information relating to our purchases of our Common Stock during
the past three years, see “Item 7. Management’s
Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations–Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
25
The following table sets forth our repurchases of Common Stock
for each fiscal month in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Shares That | |
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Purchased as | |
|
May Yet Be | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
Purchased | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price Paid | |
|
Announced Plans | |
|
Under the Plans | |
|
|
Purchased(1) | |
|
per Share | |
|
or Programs(1) | |
|
or Programs(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
October 30, 2005 through November 26, 2005
|
|
|
1,267,800 |
|
|
$ |
34.20 |
|
|
|
1,267,800 |
|
|
|
337,713 |
|
November 27, 2005 through December 31, 2005
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,337,713 |
|
January 1, 2006 through January 28, 2006
|
|
|
834,900 |
|
|
|
33.47 |
|
|
|
834,900 |
|
|
|
4,502,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,102,700 |
|
|
$ |
33.91 |
|
|
|
2,102,700 |
|
|
|
4,502,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We repurchased and subsequently retired 1.3 million shares
of our outstanding Common Stock authorized under the March 2005
repurchase plan. We repurchased and hold in Treasury
834,900 shares of our outstanding Common Stock as of
January 28, 2006. |
(2) |
As of January 28, 2006, we used the entire fixed portion of
the authority originally provided in the 2000 repurchase plan.
No repurchases from proceeds of stock option exercises under the
2001 General Stock Option Plan were made in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2005 since there were no additional options exercised
under the 2001 General Stock Option Plan during that quarter. In
addition, we have repurchased the entire number of shares which
we were authorized to repurchase under the March 2005 repurchase
plan. On December 6, 2005, our Board of Directors
authorized a repurchase plan for up to 5.0 million shares
of our outstanding Common Stock. As of January 28, 2006, we
had 4,502,812 shares available for repurchase under the
December 2005 repurchase plan. |
26
|
|
ITEM 6. |
Selected Financial Data. |
The following financial information for the five most recent
fiscal years has been derived from our consolidated financial
statements. This information should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto
included elsewhere herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except per share and store data) | |
Results of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,676,365 |
|
|
$ |
3,393,251 |
|
|
$ |
3,091,256 |
|
|
$ |
2,856,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,530,727 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
364,340 |
|
|
|
339,515 |
|
|
|
302,751 |
|
|
|
269,794 |
|
|
|
179,716 |
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
219,512 |
|
|
|
201,809 |
|
|
|
177,845 |
|
|
|
147,730 |
|
|
|
89,030 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax(2)(3)
|
|
|
88,488 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,433 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net income
|
|
|
131,024 |
|
|
|
201,809 |
|
|
|
177,845 |
|
|
|
140,297 |
|
|
|
89,030 |
|
Basic earnings per common share before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
Basic earnings per common share after cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share after cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$ |
452,449 |
|
|
$ |
535,852 |
|
|
$ |
341,825 |
|
|
$ |
218,031 |
|
|
$ |
193,025 |
|
Merchandise inventories
|
|
|
784,032 |
|
|
|
936,395 |
|
|
|
892,923 |
|
|
|
809,418 |
|
|
|
714,309 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,314,648 |
|
|
|
1,571,271 |
|
|
|
1,283,372 |
|
|
|
1,066,440 |
|
|
|
950,063 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,875,555 |
|
|
|
2,111,660 |
|
|
|
1,801,647 |
|
|
|
1,560,973 |
|
|
|
1,414,633 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
496,766 |
|
|
|
511,940 |
|
|
|
369,480 |
|
|
|
299,454 |
|
|
|
351,207 |
|
Long-term debt(4)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
588,206 |
|
|
|
814,495 |
|
|
|
634,349 |
|
|
|
548,946 |
|
|
|
590,069 |
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
1,287,349 |
|
|
|
1,297,165 |
|
|
|
1,167,298 |
|
|
|
1,012,027 |
|
|
|
824,564 |
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities
|
|
$ |
363,956 |
|
|
$ |
427,818 |
|
|
$ |
289,506 |
|
|
$ |
109,482 |
|
|
$ |
177,257 |
|
Cash flow from investing activities
|
|
|
(67,918 |
) |
|
|
(141,152 |
) |
|
|
(103,005 |
) |
|
|
(108,079 |
) |
|
|
(101,644 |
) |
Cash flow from financing activities
|
|
|
(379,441 |
) |
|
|
(92,639 |
) |
|
|
(62,707 |
) |
|
|
23,603 |
|
|
|
89,221 |
|
|
Other Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average net sales per Michaels store(5)
|
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
|
$ |
3,970 |
|
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
3,654 |
|
Comparable store sales increase(6)
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Total selling square footage
|
|
|
17,365 |
|
|
|
16,612 |
|
|
|
15,681 |
|
|
|
14,610 |
|
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
Stores Open at End of Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michaels(7)
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
Aaron Brothers
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Recollections
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Star Decorators Wholesale(7)
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stores open at end of year
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Notes on following page.)
27
(Notes from table on preceding page.)
|
|
(1) |
Effective as of the beginning of fiscal 2002, we no longer
amortize goodwill as a result of our adoption of the provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,
Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. Therefore, fiscal 2001 includes
amortization expense of approximately $3.7 million
($2.2 million, net of income tax) that is not included in
fiscal 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002. |
(2) |
We changed our method of accounting for merchandise inventories
from a retail inventory method to the weighted average cost
method in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. As a result, we
recorded a non-cash charge of $88.5 million, net of income
tax, in fiscal 2005 for the cumulative effect of accounting
change on prior fiscal years. For further information with
respect to this change and other accounting items that affect
the comparability of our financial statements, please see
“Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Accounting
Items.” |
(3) |
We changed our accounting policy with respect to recording
cooperative advertising allowances as of the beginning of fiscal
2002. As a result, we recorded a non-cash charge of
$7.4 million, net of income tax, in fiscal 2002 for the
cumulative effect of accounting change on fiscal years prior to
fiscal 2002. |
(4) |
Long-term debt consists of our
91/4
% Senior Notes due 2009 that we issued in July 2001
and redeemed in full on July 1, 2005. |
(5) |
The calculation of average net sales per Michaels store only
includes sales for Michaels stores open longer than
36 months, and excludes Aaron Brothers, Recollections, and
Star Decorators Wholesale stores. Prior year amounts have been
revised to exclude our Los Angeles combination wholesale-retail
store as a result of its reclassification in fiscal 2004 from a
Michaels store to a Star Decorators Wholesale store. |
(6) |
Comparable store sales increase represents the increase in net
sales for stores open the same number of months in the indicated
and comparable period of the previous year, including stores
that were relocated or expanded during either period. A store is
deemed to become comparable in its 14th month of operation
in order to eliminate grand opening sales distortions. A store
temporarily closed more than 2 weeks due to a catastrophic
event is not considered comparable during the month it closed.
If a store is closed longer than 2 weeks but less than
2 months, it becomes comparable in the month in which it
reopens, subject to a mid-month convention. A store closed
longer than 2 months becomes comparable in its
14th month of operation after its reopening. |
(7) |
Store counts have been restated to reflect a reclassification of
our Los Angeles combination wholesale-retail store from a
Michaels store to a Star Decorators Wholesale store. Beginning
in fiscal 2004, our Los Angeles wholesale-retail store is
managed as part of our Star Decorators Wholesale concept. |
|
|
ITEM 7. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The
following discussion, as well as other portions of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans,
estimates, and beliefs. Any statements contained herein
(including, but not limited to, statements to the effect that
Michaels or its management “anticipates,”
“plans,” “estimates,” “expects,”
“believes,” and other similar expressions) that are
not statements of historical fact should be considered
forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction
with our consolidated financial statements and related notes
contained elsewhere in this report. Specific examples of
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
statements regarding our future cash dividend policy, forecasts
of financial performance, capital expenditures, working capital
requirements, stock repurchases, workers’ compensation
claims exposure, forecasts of effective tax rate, and future
proceeds from the exercise of stock options. Our actual results
could materially differ from those discussed in these
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and
particularly in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
28
Overview
We are the largest national arts and crafts specialty retailer,
with sales of almost $3.7 billion in the United States and
Canada. Our primary retail business is our operation of 897
Michaels stores across North America. We also operate three
additional businesses: our 165 Aaron Brothers stores, a custom
frame, framing, and art supply chain; our 11 Recollections
stores, a scrapbooking/paper crafting concept; and four Star
Decorators Wholesale locations, a floral/home décor concept
(all store counts are as of March 23, 2006).
Our mission is to help people express themselves creatively.
Through our broad product assortments, friendly, knowledgeable
sales associates, educational in-store events, project sheets
and displays, and on-line information, we offer a shopping
experience that encourages creativity in the areas of arts,
crafts, floral displays, framing, home décor, and
children’s hobbies and activities.
Over the past nine years, we have focused on improving store
operations and inventory management capabilities in our Michaels
stores while continuing a strong store growth program and
developing new retail and wholesale concepts.
Since fiscal 1996, we have refined or implemented our:
|
|
|
|
• |
inventory management system, |
|
• |
point-of-sale system, |
|
• |
warehouse management capabilities, |
|
• |
transportation management system, |
|
• |
seasonal merchandise allocation system, |
|
• |
financial and human resource management systems, |
|
• |
store merchandise planogram processes, |
|
• |
retail merchandising systems, and |
|
• |
weighted average cost stock ledger. |
During fiscal 2003, we completed the first phase of a two-part
project to further improve our inventory management
capabilities. The first phase involved implementing a perpetual
inventory system in our Michaels stores, which was completed in
January 2004. In fiscal 2004, we completed the implementation of
the second phase of this project, the installation of an
automated replenishment system for our basic, replenishable SKUs.
As a result of our focus on operations, we have improved our
sales productivity and overall profitability. During fiscal
2005, we achieved same-store sales growth of 3.6% and opened 52
new stores. Our operating margin was 9.9% of net sales in fiscal
2005 and 10.0% of net sales in fiscal 2004. Our operating and
financial performance has resulted in a stronger financial
position, which enabled us in fiscal 2005 to continue declaring
cash dividends, expand our Common Stock repurchase program, and
redeem our $200 million
91/4
% Senior Notes originally due in 2009.
In fiscal 2006, one of our primary objectives will be to
increase the sales and productivity of our Michaels stores
through improving our merchandise offering and enhancing the
in-store experience as
part of our “Pursuit of the Perfect Store” initiative.
In addition, we will continue to refine the business models of
our Aaron Brothers, Recollections, and Star Decorators Wholesale
operations as we seek to continue their expansion. Also in
fiscal 2006, we plan to open approximately 45 Michaels stores,
funded primarily by our available cash and funds generated by
operating activities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have prepared our financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
and these financial statements necessarily include some amounts
that are based on our informed judgments and estimates. Our
senior management has discussed the development and selection of
these critical accounting estimates, and the disclosure in this
section of this report regarding them, with the Audit Committee
of our Board of Directors. Our significant accounting policies
29
are discussed in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. Our critical accounting policies represent those
policies that are subject to judgments and uncertainties. As
discussed below, our financial position and results of
operations may be materially different when reported under
different conditions or when using different assumptions in the
application of these policies. In the event estimates or
assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts,
adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more
current information. Our critical accounting policies include:
Merchandise Inventories–For fiscal 2005, merchandise
inventories at Michaels stores are valued at the lower of cost
or market, with cost determined using a weighted average method.
Included in our cost basis are costs incurred in making
inventories available for sale in our stores, such as freight
and other distribution costs. We utilize perpetual inventory
records to value inventory in our Michaels stores. Physical
inventory counts are performed in a significant number of stores
at the end of each fiscal quarter by a third party inventory
counting service firm, with substantially all stores open longer
than one year subject to at least one annual count. We adjust
our perpetual records based on the results of the physical
counts.
Cost is calculated based upon the actual landed cost of an item
at the time it is received by us using actual vendor invoices
and also includes the cost of warehousing, handling, purchasing,
and transporting the inventory to the stores. Vendor allowances,
which primarily represent volume rebates and cooperative
advertising funds, are recorded as a reduction of the cost of
the merchandise inventories. The cost of warehousing, handling,
purchasing, and transporting, and the vendor allowances are
recognized through cost of sales based on our estimates of when
the inventories are sold. Changes in these estimates could have
a material impact on the financial statements.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, as a result of our
reviews and analysis related to our transition to cost
accounting, we made certain refinements to our calculation for
deferring costs related to preparing inventory for sale and for
vendor allowance recognition. These refinements resulted in a
non-cash charge of approximately $23.9 million
($15.0 million, net of income tax).
We maintain a provision for estimated shrinkage based on the
actual historical results of our physical inventories. We
compare our estimates to the actual results of the physical
inventory counts as they are taken and adjust the shrink
estimates accordingly. We also record adjustments to the value
of inventory equal to the difference between the carrying value
and the estimated market value, based on assumptions about
future demand.
Fiscal 2004 merchandise inventories at Michaels stores were
valued at the lower of cost or market using a retail inventory
method. We performed complete physical inventories at a
significant sample of stores at the end of each fiscal quarter
to estimate ending inventories valued at retail for all Michaels
stores to be used in our retail inventory method. In determining
our cost of goods sold and ending inventory at cost, we utilized
a single pool of inventory for our Michaels’ stores
inventories. We recorded permanent markdown reserves in the
period in which we determined that markdowns were required to
sell certain merchandise. Such markdowns were based on each
store’s perpetual inventory records.
Our success in managing our inventories is dependent on our
ability to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to changing
customer demand and preferences for products and supplies used
in creative activities. If we misjudge the market, we may
significantly overstock unpopular products and be forced to
record significant inventory reserves. Amounts recorded for
inventory reserves are estimates, which could vary
significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual
requirements if future economic conditions or competitive
conditions differ from our expectations.
Goodwill–We have made acquisitions in the past that
included a significant amount of goodwill. We perform annual
impairment tests of goodwill by comparing the book values of our
reporting units to their estimated fair values. The estimated
fair values of our reporting units are computed using estimates
that include a discount factor in valuing future cash flows.
There are assumptions and estimates underlying the determination
of fair value and any resulting impairment loss. Another
estimate using different, but still reasonable, assumptions
could produce different results. To date, we have not
experienced any impairment
30
of our goodwill; however, there can be no assurance that future
impairment will not result should our operating results
deteriorate for reasons such as those described under
“Item 1A. Risk Factors” herein.
Reserve for Closed Facilities–We maintain a reserve
for future rental obligations, carrying costs, and other closing
costs related to closed facilities, primarily closed and
relocated stores. In accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 146, Costs Associated With Disposal
Activities, we recognize exit costs for any store closures
at the time the store is closed.
The cost of closing a store or facility is calculated as the
lesser of the present value of future rental obligations
remaining under the lease (less estimated sublease rental
income) or the lease termination fee. Once a store has been
identified for closure, we accelerate the remaining depreciation
so that the assets are fully depreciated at the date of closure.
The determination of the reserves is dependent on our ability to
make reasonable estimates of costs to be incurred post-closure
and of rental income to be received from subleases. In planning
our store closures, we generally try to time our exits as close
to the lease termination date as possible to minimize the need
for sublease income to offset any remaining lease obligation.
The reserves could vary materially if market conditions were to
vary significantly from our assumptions.
Revenue Recognition–Revenue from sales of our
merchandise is recognized at the time of the merchandise sale,
excluding revenue from the sale of custom frames, which is
recognized at the time of delivery. Revenue is presented net of
sales taxes collected. We allow for merchandise to be returned
under most circumstances and provide for a reserve of estimated
returns. When calculating our deferred framing revenue, we
currently estimate the length of time between the customer
placing the order at the store and customer
pick-up based on the
best available information from our systems. A significant
change in the length of time between the custom frame order and
customer pick-up or a
significant change in the underlying trends of our sales returns
may materially affect our future operating results.
We record a gift card liability on the date we issue the gift
card to the customer. We record revenue and reduce the gift card
liability as the customer redeems the gift card. We escheat the
value of unredeemed gift cards where required by law. Any
remaining liabilities not subject to escheatment are evaluated
to determine whether the likelihood of the gift card being
redeemed is remote (gift card breakage). We recognize gift card
breakage as revenue, by applying our estimate of the rate of
gift card breakage over the period of estimated performance
(40 months as of the end of fiscal 2005). Our estimates of
the gift card breakage rate are based on customers’
historical redemption rates and patterns, which may not be
indicative of future redemption rates and patterns. Prior to
fiscal 2005, we did not have adequate historical information to
estimate gift card breakage. During the fourth quarter of fiscal
2005, we recognized revenue of approximately $7.9 million
related to gift card balances that we estimated will not be
redeemed.
Share-Based Compensation Expenses–We elected to
early adopt SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. This accounting
standard requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair value over the
requisite service period. We applied the provisions of the
modified retrospective transition method as permitted by
SFAS No. 123(R) from the beginning of fiscal 2005. As
a result, we recorded compensation expense for unvested awards
based on the amounts previously determined for pro forma
disclosure under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, for the first three quarters of
fiscal 2005 and under the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
The Company recorded compensation expense related to share-based
payments totaling approximately $18.7 million, net of an
income tax benefit of $11.1 million, or $0.14 per
diluted share on an after-tax basis, for fiscal 2005.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, compensation
cost is based on the grant date fair value of the award and
ratably recognized as an expense over the effective vesting
period. Determining fair value of our stock options requires
judgment, including estimating the expected terms of the
options, expected volatility of our Common Stock share price,
and expected dividends. In addition, we must estimate the number
of stock options that we expect employees to forfeit in the
future. If actual results differ
31
significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation
expense and our results of operations could be materially
impacted.
Income Taxes–We record income tax expense using the
liability method for taxes and are subject to income tax in many
jurisdictions, including the United States, various states and
localities, and Canada. A current tax liability or asset is
recognized for the estimated taxes payable or refundable on the
tax returns for the current year and a deferred tax liability or
asset is recognized for the estimated future tax effects
attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
income tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates is
recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the
carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely
than not that such assets will be realized. If different
assumptions had been used, our tax expense, assets, and
liabilities could have varied from recorded amounts. If actual
results differ from estimated results or if we adjust these
assumptions in the future, we may need to adjust our deferred
tax assets or liabilities, which could impact our effective tax
rate.
General
We report on the basis of a 52 or
53-week fiscal year,
which ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. References to
fiscal year mean the year in which that fiscal year began.
Fiscal 2005 ended on January 28, 2006, fiscal 2004 ended on
January 29, 2005, and fiscal 2003 ended on January 31,
2004. Each fiscal year contained 52 weeks. All references
herein to fiscal 2006 relate to the 53 weeks ending
February 3, 2007.
Accounting Items
Fiscal 2005
Transition to Cost Accounting–We changed our method
of accounting for merchandise inventories from a retail
inventory method to the weighted average cost method in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, effective as of the beginning of
that fiscal year. We believe the weighted average cost method is
preferable because we believe it:
|
|
|
|
• |
results in greater precision in the determination of cost of
sales and inventories as each store/ SKU combination is
supported by perpetual records valued at cost using SKU level
purchase order inputs, allowing for a reduction in the number of
significant management estimates that were used in our retail
inventory method; |
|
|
• |
provides greater insight into shrink using more accurate
periodic shrink expense analysis and reporting at the store/ SKU
level; |
|
|
• |
aligns financial reporting with the operational view of the
Company, which provides consistency in analysis of inventory
management measures; and |
|
|
• |
increases the accuracy of matching sales with related expenses,
as cost of sales will represent the average cost of the
individual items sold rather than an average of the entire pool,
eliminating any fluctuations as a result of seasonal changes in
the markup percentage of inventory on hand at the end of each
quarter. |
The effect of this change as of January 28, 2006, has been
presented in the income statement as a cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle of $88.5 million, or
approximately $0.64 per diluted share, which is net of an
income tax benefit of $54.2 million. The inventory balance
as of the beginning of fiscal 2005 is approximately
$794 million on the weighted average cost method, which is
approximately $143 million lower than the inventory balance
reported under our retail inventory method. The non-cash
reduction in the inventory balance is due to the change in
accounting principle and is not an indication of an inventory
impairment, as the underlying retail value of the Company’s
inventories is not affected by this
32
accounting change. As a result of the adoption of this policy,
fiscal 2005 cost of sales decreased by approximately $300,000,
pre-tax, which had no impact on our diluted earnings per share
calculation.
Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)–We elected to
early adopt SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. This accounting
standard requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair value over the
requisite service period. We applied the provisions of the
modified retrospective transition method as permitted by
SFAS No. 123(R) from the beginning of fiscal 2005. As
a result, we recorded compensation expense for unvested awards
based on the amounts previously determined for pro forma
disclosure under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, for the first three quarters of
fiscal 2005, and under the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
We recorded compensation expense related to share-based payments
totaling approximately $29.8 million on a pre-tax basis, or
$0.14 per diluted share on an after-tax basis, for fiscal
2005.
Prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we reported
the excess tax benefits associated with share-based awards as an
operating cash inflow in our statement of cash flows. Beginning
with our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we now report
excess tax benefits as a cash inflow in the financing section of
our statement of cash flows and would record a tax deficiency,
if any, as a cash outflow from operating activities. For fiscal
years 2003 and 2004, we reported $33.7 million and
$29.1 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits as cash
inflows in the operating activities section. For fiscal 2005, we
reported $25.2 million of excess tax benefits as a cash
inflow to financing activities.
Refinement of Inventory Related Costs and Vendor Allowance
Recognition–As a result of our reviews and analyses
related to our transition to cost accounting, we made certain
refinements to our calculation for deferring costs related to
preparing inventory for sale and for vendor allowance
recognition. We implemented these refinements in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2005 and recorded a non-cash, cumulative
adjustment of approximately $15.0 million (net of income
taxes of $8.9 million), of which $8.0 million (net of
income taxes of $4.7 million) related to prior years.
Gift Card Breakage–As a result of comments made in
SEC staff speeches providing clarity as to the SEC’s views
on accounting for gift card breakage, and our analysis of our
gift card liability and redemption history, we concluded that it
was appropriate to recognize cumulative breakage during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. During the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2005, we recognized revenue of approximately
$7.9 million related to gift card balances that we
estimated will not be redeemed. In future periods, we will
recognize the estimated value of unused gift cards over the
period of estimated performance (40 months as of the end of
fiscal 2005). Prior to fiscal 2005, we did not have adequate
historical information to estimate gift card breakage.
Fiscal 2004
Lease Accounting Correction–Based on certain views
expressed in a letter of February 7, 2005 from the Office
of the Chief Accountant of the SEC to the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, we reviewed our accounting
policies and practices associated with property leases.
Consistent with industry practices, we historically reported
straight-line rental expense beginning on the earlier of the
store opening date or the commencement date of the lease. This
had the effect of excluding the pre-opening or build-out period
of our stores from the calculation of the period over which we
expensed rent. In addition, amounts received as tenant
allowances were reflected in the balance sheet as a reduction to
store leasehold improvement costs instead of classifying them as
deferred lease credits. Following our review, we corrected our
accounting policies such that we begin recording rent expense on
the date we take possession of or control physical access to the
premises. We also recognize tenant allowances as a liability and
accrete the liability as a reduction to rent expense over the
same period in which rent expense is calculated.
As a result of these corrections, we recorded a non-cash,
$12.8 million ($8.0 million, net of income tax)
cumulative adjustment to earnings during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004. We also increased our gross property and equipment
balances by $34.8 million ($18.0 million, net of
accumulated depreciation), our accrued liabilities by
$1.7 million; and other long-term liabilities by
$29.1 million. The increase in
33
gross property and equipment reflects the reclassification of
tenant allowances to other long-term liabilities, which were
previously reflected as a reduction of property and equipment.
The increase in other long-term liabilities was to reflect the
cumulative adjustment to the accrued rent balance and deferred
lease credits related to tenant allowances. We reduced our
long-term deferred income tax liability by $4.8 million
primarily as a result of a change in the cumulative timing
differences related to deductions associated with straight-line
rent expense and leasehold amortization expense. The adjustments
did not impact historical or future net cash flows or the timing
of the payments under related leases. We believe that the new
lease accounting policies will not have a material effect on
future diluted earnings per share. Prior years’ financial
statements were not restated as the impact of these issues was
immaterial to previously reported results for any individual
prior year.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship to
net sales of each line item of our consolidated statements of
income. This table should be read in conjunction with the
following discussion and with our consolidated financial
statements, including the related notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Store pre-opening costs
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Other (income) and expense, net
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Net Sales–Net sales increased $283.1 million,
or 8.3%, from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005. Net sales from our 52
new stores opened during the year, partially offset by lost
sales from our five store closures, accounted for approximately
$155.5 million of the increase in net sales. In addition,
our fiscal 2005 comparable store sales increase of 3.6%
contributed $119.7 million to the net sales increase while
our recognition of gift card breakage provided $7.9 million
of incremental sales. Comparable store sales growth was
strongest in our general crafts, needlework and yarn, kids
crafts, paper crafting, and candles/bakeware categories. The
average ticket increased 2.7%, transactions increased 0.5%, and
custom framing deliveries increased 0.4% from fiscal 2004 to
fiscal 2005. The increase in average ticket includes favorable
pricing/product mix trends and a 40 basis point benefit
from the strengthening of the Canadian dollar. We currently
expect that our comparable store sales results for the first
half of fiscal 2006 will be lower than the 3.6% full year 2005
comparable store sales results, primarily due to a challenging
comparison to 2005, in which yarn sales were very strong. Our
ability to continue to generate comparable store sales increases
is dependent, in part, on our ability to continue to maintain
store in-stock positions on the top-selling items, to properly
allocate merchandise to our stores, to effectively execute our
pricing and sales promotion
34
efforts, to anticipate customer demand and trends in the arts
and crafts industry, and to respond to competitors’
activities.
Cost of Sales and Occupancy Expense–Cost of sales
and occupancy expense increased $170.1 million due to
increased sales from a 4.6% increase in the number of stores
operated in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004, a 3.6%
comparable store sales increase, and the combined impact of our
accounting changes during fiscal 2005 and 2004. Included in our
fiscal 2005 cost of sales are total pre-tax, non-cash charges of
$27.1 million related to changes in our accounting policies
and estimates. The refinement of our inventory related costs and
vendor allowance estimates resulted in a $23.9 million
charge, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) resulted in a
$3.5 million charge, and our conversion to the weighted
average cost method provided a reduction in our cost of sales of
$300,000.
The following table details the change in cost of sales and
occupancy expense, as a percentage of net sales, from 2004 to
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
Store cost of sales
|
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
Occupancy costs
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Weighted average cost method conversion
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Cost deferral and entitlement recognition calculation refinement
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Gift card breakage
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Fiscal 2004 lease accounting correction
|
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Total decrease
|
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales and occupancy expense, as a percentage of net
sales, decreased approximately 30 basis points. Cost of
sales was favorably impacted by improved leverage on our
distribution expenses against higher net sales in fiscal 2005,
reduced inventory costs on improved domestic sourcing, and
improved leverage on our vertically integrated custom framing
manufacturing operations. Included in the cost of sales for
fiscal 2004 was a non-cash $12.8 million charge related to
our correction of lease accounting policies and
$4.1 million of cost associated with the closure of our
Lexington, Kentucky distribution center and opening of a new
distribution center in New Lenox, Illinois. Partially offsetting
the favorable reductions in costs of sales, as a percentage of
net sales, were the $27.1 million of non-cash charges
related to our accounting changes. See the preceding section
“Accounting Items.”
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expense–Selling, general, and administrative expense
was $987.3 million, or 26.9% of net sales in fiscal 2005
compared to $898.4 million, or 26.5% of net sales in fiscal
2004. The expense increase was primarily due to an increase in
the number of stores we operated compared to last year and the
recognition of $26.3 million of share-based compensation
cost related to our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). See
the preceding section “Accounting Items.” Store and
corporate personnel costs, inclusive of share-based compensation
costs, accounted for $52.7 million of the total
$88.9 million increase from fiscal 2004.
As a percentage of net sales, selling, general, and
administrative expense increased 40 basis points from 26.5%
of sales in fiscal 2004 to 26.9% of sales in fiscal 2005. The
increase was primarily a result of inclusion of
$26.3 million of share-based compensation costs in fiscal
2005 that were not present in fiscal 2004, which increased
fiscal 2005 selling, general, and administrative expenses by
70 basis points. Increased legal and professional expenses
also resulted in an unfavorable increase of 20 basis
points. These expense increases were partially offset by a
decrease in store personnel benefits of 50 basis points.
Store personnel benefits decreased primarily because of a
decrease in workers’ compensation insurance costs of
$11.6 million. In fiscal 2004, we recognized a reserve of
$4.1 million for claims that we believed would not be
covered due to the deteriorating financial condition of an
insurance company with which we previously conducted business.
The reserve amount did not materially change during fiscal 2005,
and it represents our current estimate of probable loss as
determined in consultation with third party experts. As actual
claims continue to be filed with the insurer or as existing
claims are fully resolved, it may be necessary for us to
35
record additional adjustments in order to be fully reserved for
the estimate of probable losses that we expect to incur, but we
currently believe that all significant costs have been
recognized.
Provision for Income Taxes–The effective tax rate
was 37.35% in fiscal 2005 and 37.65% in fiscal 2004. Based on
current projections, we believe our effective tax rate in fiscal
2006 will be between 37.5% and 38.0%.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change–In fiscal
2005, we changed our method of accounting for merchandise
inventories from a retail inventory method to the weighted
average cost method. See the previous section, “Accounting
Items.” As a result, we recorded a non-cash charge of
$88.5 million, net of income tax, or $0.64 per diluted
share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 for the cumulative
effect of accounting change on fiscal years prior to fiscal 2005.
Net Income–As a result of the above, net income for
fiscal 2005 decreased 35.1% from $201.8 million, or
$1.45 per diluted share, in fiscal 2004 to
$131.0 million, or $0.95 per diluted share, after the
cumulative effect of accounting change. Income before the
cumulative effect of the accounting change increased 8.8% from
$201.8 million in fiscal 2004, or $1.45 per diluted
share, to $219.5 million in fiscal 2005, or $1.59 per
diluted share.
Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003
Net Sales–Net sales increased $302.0 million,
or 9.8%, from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. Net sales from our
58 new stores opened during the year, partially offset by
lost sales from our six store closures, accounted for
$152.2 million of the increase in net sales. In addition,
our fiscal 2004 comparable store sales increase of 4.7%
contributed $149.8 million to the net sales increase.
Comparable store sales growth was strongest in our needlework
and yarn, kids crafts, impulse, framing, and art categories.
Customer traffic increased 3.8% and average ticket increased
0.9% from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. The increase in average
ticket was driven primarily by the strengthening of the Canadian
dollar (contributing 30 basis points) and favorable
pricing/product mix trends.
Cost of Sales and Occupancy Expense–Cost of sales
and occupancy expense increased $189.7 million due to
increased sales from a 5.4% increase in the number of stores
operated in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003, as well as a
4.7% comparable store sales increase.
As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales and occupancy
expense were relatively constant. In fiscal 2004, we placed more
emphasis on product displays to reduce the need for clearance
markdowns, which strengthened our gross margins. Sales of
regular priced merchandise, as a percentage of total sales,
increased 210 basis points in fiscal 2004, offset by a
corresponding decrease in sales of both promotionally priced and
clearance merchandise. Cost of sales was also favorably impacted
by better leverage on our distribution expenses against higher
net sales in fiscal 2004. These reductions in costs of sales, as
a percentage of net sales, were largely offset by (1) costs
associated with our distribution center realignment,
(2) increases in occupancy expenses related to store
closures, and (3) the correction of our lease accounting
policies. The cost of closing our Lexington, Kentucky
distribution center and opening a new distribution center in
New Lenox, Illinois was approximately $4.1 million.
All significant costs associated with this distribution center
realignment project were recognized in fiscal 2004. Occupancy
expense in fiscal 2004 includes incremental store closure costs
of approximately $6.0 million over fiscal 2003 expense.
Store closure costs vary with the timing and extent of store
relocation and closure activities, and are driven primarily by
the remaining lease term and estimated sublease income
associated with each closed store. In addition, we recorded a
non-cash $12.8 million charge ($8.0 million, net of
income tax), related to the correction of our lease accounting
policies, as more fully explained in the preceding section
entitled “Lease Accounting Correction.”
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expense–Selling, general, and administrative expense
was $898.4 million, or 26.5% of net sales in fiscal 2004
compared to $823.2 million, or 26.6% of net sales in fiscal
2003. The expense increase was primarily due to an increase in
the number of stores we operated compared to last year. In
particular, store personnel costs, store operating expenses,
advertising expenses,
36
corporate overhead costs, and costs associated with relocating
the Aaron Brothers’ headquarters to the Dallas, Texas area
contributed $60.8 million to the total $75.2 million
increase from fiscal 2003. In addition, in fiscal 2004, we
incurred $13.5 million of higher workers’ compensation
insurance costs, which includes a $4.1 million reserve for
claims that we believe will not be covered due to the
deteriorating financial condition of an insurance company with
which we previously conducted business. The reserve amount
represented our current estimate of probable loss as determined
in consultation with third party experts.
As a percentage of net sales, store personnel costs, excluding
the workers’ compensation charges described above, and
other operating costs decreased approximately 30 basis
points primarily as a result of a heightened focus on expense
control during fiscal 2004 and a leveraging of those expenses on
higher net sales. In addition, advertising expense decreased
approximately 20 basis points in 2004, primarily due to six
less ad weeks than the previous year (14 fewer newspaper
ads, partially offset by eight additional circular ads). These
decreases were partially offset by the higher workers’
compensation costs described above of $13.5 million, or
40 basis points.
Provision for Income Taxes–The effective tax rate
was 37.65% in fiscal 2004. The effective tax rate for the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2004 was reduced from 38.25% to 37.1%
primarily due to the resolution of an Internal Revenue Service
audit, bringing our full year effective tax rate to 37.65%.
Net Income–As a result of the above, net income for
fiscal 2004 increased 13.5% to $201.8 million, or
$1.45 per diluted share, from $177.8 million, or
$1.27 per diluted share, in fiscal 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our combined cash and equivalents and short-term investment
balances decreased $133.8 million, or 23%, from
$586.2 million at the end of fiscal 2004 to
$452.4 million at the end of fiscal 2005. We require cash
principally for
day-to-day operations
and to finance capital investments, inventory for new stores,
inventory replenishment for existing stores, and seasonal
working capital needs. In recent years, we have financed our
operations, new store openings, Common Stock repurchases,
dividend payments, redemption of the $200 million
91/4
% Senior Notes, and other capital investments with
cash from operations and proceeds from stock option exercises.
In addition, borrowings under our Credit Agreement may be an
additional source of cash flow for our operations and to finance
future growth and other capital investments.
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Cash flow provided by operating activities in fiscal 2005 was
$364.0 million compared to $427.8 million in fiscal
2004. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was
due, in part, to payments on our accounts payable balances. This
was partially offset by sales growth and various accounting
items included in our net income for fiscal 2005. Included in
our fiscal 2005 net income are non-cash charges related to
the change in accounting method for valuing inventories of
$88.5 million, net of tax, a $15.0 million charge, net
of tax, for the refinement of our inventory related costs and
vendor allowance recognition calculations, and an
$18.7 million charge, net of tax, related to share-based
compensation costs. Inventories per Michaels store under the
weighted average cost method were $793,000 at January 28,
2006, a decrease of 5.9% from the beginning of the fiscal year.
The decrease was a result of continued efficiencies from our
perpetual inventory and automated merchandise replenishment
systems and the corresponding improvement in inventory
management. In addition, the cash provided by excess tax
benefits from stock option exercises in fiscal 2005 are now
classified as a component of financing activities whereas the
fiscal 2004 tax benefit is classified as operating activities.
For fiscal year 2004, we reported $29.1 million of excess
tax benefits as cash inflows in the operating activities
section. For fiscal 2005, we reported $25.2 million of
excess tax benefits as a cash inflow to financing activities.
37
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Cash flow from investing activities was primarily the result of
the following capital expenditure activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004(2) | |
|
2003(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
New and relocated stores and stores not yet opened
|
|
$ |
40,431 |
|
|
$ |
50,307 |
|
|
$ |
37,964 |
|
Existing stores
|
|
|
39,665 |
|
|
|
13,257 |
|
|
|
17,576 |
|
Distribution system expansion
|
|
|
7,104 |
|
|
|
7,124 |
|
|
|
29,100 |
|
Information systems
|
|
|
23,604 |
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
|
|
13,053 |
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
7,542 |
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,346 |
|
|
$ |
90,906 |
|
|
$ |
103,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In fiscal 2005, we incurred capital expenditures related to the
opening of 46 Michaels, two Aaron Brothers, three Recollections
stores, and one Star Decorators Wholesale store and the
relocation of 18 Michaels stores. |
(2) |
In fiscal 2004, we incurred capital expenditures related to the
opening of 45 Michaels, seven Aaron Brothers, and six
Recollections stores, and the relocation of 30 Michaels and one
Aaron Brothers store. |
(3) |
In fiscal 2003, we incurred capital expenditures related to the
construction of our Illinois distribution center, the opening of
55 Michaels, 10 Aaron Brothers, two Recollections, and one Star
Decorators Wholesale store, and the relocation of 16 Michaels
stores. |
Our fiscal 2005 capital expenditures increased primarily due to
expenditures related to our Perfect Store remodel initiative,
our new financial reporting system, new radio frequency guns for
the stores, and new energy management and workforce management
systems.
We currently estimate that our capital expenditures will range
from $125 million to $130 million in fiscal 2006. We
anticipate spending approximately $28 million to open
approximately 45 Michaels and one Aaron Brothers store and
relocate eight Michaels stores; $36 million for
improvements in existing stores, including our Perfect Store
initiative; $25 million for new and existing distribution
centers, including our new distribution center in the Seattle,
Washington area; $24 million on information systems
projects, including an upgrade to our merchandising systems and
implementation of our workforce management system; and
$14 million for corporate expansion and various other
capital investment activities. We expect to spend on average
approximately $1.3 million to open a new Michaels store,
which includes $599,000 in net inventory and $113,000 of
pre-opening costs. We anticipate that our new Michaels stores,
as a group, will become profitable within their first
12 months of operation.
During fiscal 2004, we purchased interests in a Massachusetts
business trust that invests primarily in auction rate securities
with auction reset periods of less than twelve months. The
purchase price of these interests was approximately
$50.4 million. During fiscal 2005, we liquidated our
interest in the business trust for proceeds of
$50.6 million.
38
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Beginning in June 2003, Michaels has declared quarterly cash
dividends as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration Date |
|
Payable Date | |
|
Amount per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2005
|
|
|
April 29, 2005 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
June 16, 2005
|
|
|
July 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
September 13, 2005
|
|
|
October 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
December 6, 2005
|
|
|
January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Fiscal 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2004
|
|
|
April 30, 2004 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
June 17, 2004
|
|
|
July 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
September 16, 2004
|
|
|
October 29, 2004 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
December 1, 2004
|
|
|
January 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
Fiscal 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2003
|
|
|
July 30, 2003 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
September 23, 2003
|
|
|
October 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
December 2, 2003
|
|
|
January 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Cash used for repurchases of our Common Stock increased
$85.3 million from $105.1 million in fiscal 2004 to
$190.4 million in fiscal 2005. Common Stock repurchases
were $75.5 million in fiscal 2003. The following table sets
forth information regarding our Common Stock repurchase plans as
of January 28, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
Authorized for | |
|
Shares | |
|
Available for | |
|
|
Repurchase | |
|
Repurchased | |
|
Repurchase | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 5, 2000 repurchase plan (variable portion)
|
|
|
72,510 |
|
|
|
(72,509 |
) |
|
|
1 |
(1) |
June 18, 2003 repurchase plan
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
(2) |
February 2, 2004 repurchase plan
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
(5,000,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
(3) |
March 15, 2005 repurchase plan
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
(4) |
December 6, 2005 repurchase plan
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
(497,188 |
) |
|
|
4,502,812 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,072,510 |
|
|
|
(10,569,697 |
) |
|
|
4,502,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In fiscal years 2005 and 2004, we repurchased and subsequently
retired 17,958 shares and 54,551 shares of our Common
Stock, respectively, at average prices of $40.93 and $27.03,
respectively, using proceeds from exercises of stock options
granted under the 2001 General Stock Option Plan. |
(2) |
In fiscal 2003, we repurchased and subsequently retired
approximately 1.2 million shares of our Common Stock
authorized to be repurchased under the 2003 repurchase plan at
an average price of $21.55 per share. In fiscal 2004, we
repurchased and subsequently retired 816,200 shares of our
Common Stock authorized under the 2003 repurchase plan at an
average price of $24.34 per share and, as a result, we have
used the entire authority originally provided in the 2003
repurchase plan. |
(3) |
In fiscal 2004, we repurchased and subsequently retired
approximately 3.1 million shares of our Common Stock
authorized to be repurchased under the 2004 repurchase plan at
an average price of $27.02 per share. In fiscal 2005, we
repurchased and subsequently retired 1.9 million shares of
our Common Stock at an average price of $36.78 per share
and, as a result, we have used the entire authority originally
provided in the 2004 repurchase plan. |
(4) |
In fiscal 2005, we repurchased approximately 3.0 million
shares of our Common Stock authorized to be repurchased under
the March 2005 repurchase plan at an average price of
$34.36 per share and, as a result, we have used the entire
authority provided in the March 2005 repurchase plan. We retired |
39
|
|
|
approximately 2.7 million shares of our Common Stock
repurchased under the March 2005 repurchase plan and hold the
remaining shares as Treasury Stock. |
(5) |
In fiscal 2005, we repurchased approximately 497,000 shares
of our Common Stock authorized to be repurchased under the
December 2005 repurchase plan at an average price of
$33.64 per share and, as a result, we had 4.5 million
shares available for repurchase under the plan as of
January 28, 2006. We hold the repurchased shares as
Treasury Stock. |
We anticipate that we will continue to repurchase shares of our
Common Stock in fiscal 2006. On March 15, 2005, and
December 6, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a
repurchase plan for up to 3.0 million shares and
5.0 million shares of our outstanding Common Stock,
respectively. We may be restricted by regulations of the SEC
from making future repurchases during certain time periods.
Proceeds from the exercise of outstanding stock options have
historically served as a source of cash for us. Proceeds from
the exercise of stock options were $37.7 million,
$35.5 million, and $30.7 million in fiscal 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively. Proceeds from the exercise of stock
options under our 2001 General Stock Option Plan are required to
be used to repurchase shares of our Common Stock under the 2000
repurchase plan, except where not permitted by law or if there
is a compelling need to use the proceeds for other corporate
purposes.
Debt
In fiscal 2001, we issued $200 million in principal amount
of
91/4
% Senior Notes due July 1, 2009, which were
unsecured and interest thereon was payable semi-annually on each
January 1 and July 1. On July 1, 2005, we redeemed the
Senior Notes at a price of $1,046.25 per $1,000 of
principal amount. This early redemption resulted in a pre-tax
charge of $12.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2005, which represents a combination of a $9.3 million call
premium and $2.8 million of unamortized costs associated
with the Senior Notes, which was recorded as interest expense.
On November 18, 2005, we entered into a new five-year,
$300 million senior unsecured credit facility with Bank of
America, N.A. and other lenders. The new $300 million
Credit Agreement replaced our existing $200 million
revolving credit facility with Fleet National Bank and the other
lenders, which we terminated immediately prior to entering into
our new $300 million Credit Agreement. We were in
compliance with all terms and conditions of our
$200 million credit agreement through the termination date,
and we did not incur any early termination penalties in
connection with its termination. No borrowings were outstanding
under our $200 million credit agreement as of
January 29, 2005, or at any time during fiscal 2005 and
2004.
Our new $300 million Credit Agreement provides for a
committed line of credit of $300 million (with a provision
for an increase, at our option on stated conditions, of up to a
total of $400 million), a $250 million sublimit on the
issuance of letters of credit, and a $25 million sublimit
for borrowings in Euro, Sterling, Yen, Canadian Dollars, and
other approved currencies. We may use borrowings under our new
$300 million Credit Agreement for working capital and other
general corporate purposes, including stock repurchases and
permitted acquisitions. Our new $300 million Credit
Agreement limits our ability to, among other things, create
liens, engage in mergers, consolidations and certain other
transactions, and requires us to adhere to certain consolidated
financial covenants. Our obligations under our new
$300 million Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Michaels
Stores Procurement Company, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary,
and such other of our subsidiaries as may be necessary to cause
the assets owned by us and our subsidiary guarantors to be 85%
of our consolidated total assets.
We are in compliance with all terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement. During fiscal 2005 and as of January 28, 2006,
we had no borrowings under our Credit Agreement. Borrowings
available under the Credit Agreement are reduced by the
aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding under the
Credit Agreement ($21.2 million as of January 28,
2006).
40
General
We believe that our available cash, funds generated by operating
activities, and funds available under our Credit Agreement will
be sufficient to fund planned capital expenditures, working
capital requirements, and any anticipated dividend payments or
stock repurchases for the foreseeable future.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in
Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of
Regulation S-K.
Contractual Obligations
All of our significant contractual obligations are fully
recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets or fully discussed
in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
It is not our business practice to enter into off-balance sheet
arrangements, except for arrangements related to operating lease
commitments, service contract commitments, and letters of
credit, as disclosed in the table below. In addition, it is not
our normal policy to issue guarantees to third parties. We
currently have no commitments for capital leases and do not
expect that to change in the immediate future.
As of January 28, 2006, our contractual obligations were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
|
|
More Than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Operating lease commitments(1)
|
|
$ |
1,786,567 |
|
|
$ |
279,274 |
|
|
$ |
534,824 |
|
|
$ |
414,451 |
|
|
$ |
558,018 |
|
Other commitments(2)
|
|
|
81,232 |
|
|
|
57,254 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
21,200 |
|
Deferred compensation(3)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchase obligations(4)
|
|
|
31,221 |
|
|
|
31,221 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,899,020 |
|
|
$ |
367,749 |
|
|
$ |
537,271 |
|
|
$ |
414,782 |
|
|
$ |
579,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Our operating lease commitments generally include non-cancelable
leases for property and equipment used in our operations.
Excluded from our operating lease commitments are amounts
related to insurance, taxes, and common area maintenance
associated with property and equipment. Such amounts
historically represented approximately $2.91 to $4.06 per
selling square foot over the previous six fiscal years. |
(2) |
Other commitments primarily include service contract
obligations, letters of credit, and certain post-employment
obligations. |
(3) |
The provisions of our deferred compensation plan do not provide
for specific payment dates. Therefore, we have excluded from
this table our obligations pursuant to our deferred compensation
plan. Our deferred compensation obligations of
$18.9 million were included in our consolidated balance
sheet at January 28, 2006, within other long-term
liabilities. |
(4) |
Purchase obligations represent legally binding commitments to
purchase merchandise inventories, which are made in the normal
course of business to meet operational requirements. |
Additional information regarding our commitments and
contingencies is provided in Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Seasonality
Our business is highly seasonal, with higher sales in the third
and fourth fiscal quarters. For the last nine fiscal years, our
fourth quarter, which includes the Christmas selling season, has
accounted for approximately 34.9% of our sales and approximately
54.1% of our operating income.
41
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs, as an amendment to ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing. SFAS No. 151
clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs, and wasted materials
(spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges
and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to
inventory based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory
costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2005. We early adopted SFAS No. 151 during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2005, which did not have a material impact on
our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation
No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations–an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 143. FIN 47 clarifies that the term
“conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in
SFAS No. 143 refers to a legal obligation to perform
an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method
of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may
not be within the control of the entity. Entities are required
to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional
asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability
can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later
than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15,
2005. We adopted FIN 47 during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2005, which did not have a material impact on our results of
operations, financial position, or cash flows.
In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. This statement
supersedes APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changesand
SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements. The statement applies to all voluntary
changes in accounting principle and changes the requirements for
accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle.
SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to
prior period financial statements of a voluntary change in
accounting principle unless it is impracticable to do so. The
statement requires that a change in method of depreciation,
amortization, or depletion for long-lived, nonfinancial assets
be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate that is
effected by a change in accounting principle.
SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The statement does not change the
transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements,
including those that are in a transition phase as of the
effective date of this statement. We will adopt
SFAS No. 154 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal
2006, which is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash
flows.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We invest cash balances in excess of operating requirements
primarily in money market mutual funds and short-term
interest-bearing securities, generally with maturities of
90 days or less. Due to the short-term nature of our
investments, the fair value of our cash and equivalents at
January 28, 2006 approximated carrying value. The interest
rates on our revolving line of credit are repriced frequently,
at market rates, which would result in carrying amounts that
approximate fair value. We had no borrowings outstanding under
the line of credit at January 28, 2006. We believe that the
effect, if any, of possible near-term changes in interest rates
on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows
would not be material.
ITEM 8. Consolidated Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
The Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data are
included as an annex of this report. See the Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on page
F-1.
ITEM 9. Changes in and
Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on
accounting and financial disclosure for the fiscal year ended
January 28, 2006.
42
ITEM 9A. Controls and
Procedures.
Included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K are
certifications of our President and Chief Financial Officer and
our President and Chief Operating Officer, which are required in
accordance with
Rule 13a-14 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This section includes
information concerning the controls and controls evaluation
referred to in the certifications. Page F-3 of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K includes
the attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, regarding its
audit of our assessment and effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. This section should be read in
conjunction with the Ernst & Young attestation for a
complete understanding of this section.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)
promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our
President and Chief Financial Officer and our President and
Chief Operating Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Based
on that evaluation, our President and Chief Financial Officer
and our President and Chief Operating Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and
forms. We note that the design of any system of controls is
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions.
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has not been any change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) as
promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Subsequent Event
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company implemented
a new financial reporting system. The Company will evaluate
whether this change materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting in connection with our first quarter financial
reporting processes.
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal controls over financial reporting as defined
in Rules 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company,
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company, and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and, even when
determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable, not
absolute, assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of
43
effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that
controls may become inadequate as a result of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of January 28, 2006. Management
used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its
Internal Control–Integrated Framework.
Management’s assessment included the evaluation of such
elements as the design and operating effectiveness of financial
reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies,
and the overall control environment. This assessment is
supported by testing and monitoring performed by both our
Internal Audit and Internal Control organizations.
Based on our assessment, management believes that we maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
January 28, 2006, the end of the fiscal year.
The independent registered public accounting firm,
Ernst & Young LLP, issued an attestation report on our
assessment of and on the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting. The Ernst & Young LLP report
is included on
Page F-3 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
Other Information. |
Not applicable.
44
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. |
Certain information concerning our directors is set forth in the
Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection
with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
June 20, 2006 under the heading “Proposal For
Election of Directors,” which is incorporated herein by
reference. Certain information concerning our executive officers
is set forth under the heading “Executive Officers of the
Registrant” in Item 1 of this Annual Report, which is
incorporated herein by reference. The information concerning
compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
The information concerning our Audit Committee and Audit
Committee financial expert is set forth in the Proxy Statement
under the heading “Corporate Governance,” which is
incorporated herein by reference.
We adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to
the principal executive officer, financial officer, and
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is
available on our Internet website at www.michaels.com under
“Corporate Information.” Copies are also available to
stockholders upon request from our Investor Relations
Department. Furthermore, we will post any amendments to our Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics, or waivers of the Code for our
directors or executive officers, on our Internet website at
www.michaels.com under “Corporate Information.”
|
|
ITEM 11. |
Executive Compensation. |
The information concerning executive compensation is set forth
in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Management
Compensation,” “Compensation of Directors,” and
“Corporate Governance,” which is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
The information concerning security ownership of certain
beneficial owners and management is set forth in the Proxy
Statement under the heading “Principal Stockholders and
Management Ownership,” which is incorporated herein by
reference. The information regarding our equity plans under
which shares of our Common Stock are authorized for issuance is
set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Equity
Compensation Plan Information,” which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. |
The information concerning certain relationships and related
transactions is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
heading “Certain Transactions,” which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
The information concerning principal accountant fees and
services is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading
“Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees,”
which is incorporated herein by reference.
45
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
report:
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements:
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data on page F-1.
(2) Exhibits:
The exhibits listed below and on the accompanying Index to
Exhibits immediately following the financial statement schedules
are incorporated herein or incorporated by reference into this
report.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc.,
as amended (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on July 7, 2004, SEC
File No. 001-09338).
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on
July 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on
July 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.4 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on
July 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
3.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously
filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant
on March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 1, 2003, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2003, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.1
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan, as amended and
restated effective August 1, 1999 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for period ended
August 4, 2001, filed by Registrant on September 18,
2001, SEC File No. 000-11822).*
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated December 5, 2001 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for period ended May 4,
2002, filed by Registrant on June 18, 2002, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amendment to Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan,
as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999, dated
January 17, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to
Form 10-Q for period ended May 4, 2002, filed by
Registrant on June 18, 2002, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.4
|
|
Third Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated December 3, 2002 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for period ended
November 1, 2003, filed by Registrant on December 16,
2003, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.5
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated as of January 1, 2004 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K for period ended
January 29, 2005, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.6
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated March 15, 2005 (filed herewith).*
|
46
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Employees Stock
Purchase Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.2 to
Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on February 1, 2002, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.8
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1997 Employees
Stock Purchase Plan (filed herewith).*
|
10.9
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option
Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on July 24, 2003, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.10
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2001 Employee
Stock Option Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.3 to
Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on July 24, 2003, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.11
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 2001 General Stock Option Plan
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by
the Registrant on September 28, 2004, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.12
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by
Registrant on June 17, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.13
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement relating to June
2005 Director Grants (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3
to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on June 17, 2005, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.14
|
|
Forms of Award Agreements under the Registrant’s 2005
Incentive Compensation Plan (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
August 4, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.15
|
|
Forms of Restricted Stock Award Agreements under the
Registrant’s 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed
herewith).*
|
10.16
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated effective as of July 18, 2003 (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.4 to Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on
July 24, 2003, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.17
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Executive
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on April 13, 2005, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.18
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Chief Financial Officer (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
April 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.19
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Store Operations (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
April 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.20
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–General Merchandise Manager (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
April 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.21
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Executive
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on March 20, 2006, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.22
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Chief Financial Officer (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.23
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–General Merchandise Manager (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.24
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Store Operations (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
47
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Supply Chain (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.26
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Financial
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on March 30, 2006, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.27
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Operating
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on March 30, 2006, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.28
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Chief Merchant (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 30, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.29
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Specialty Businesses (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 30, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.30
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Michaels
Stores, Inc. and R. Michael Rouleau, dated July 7, 2004
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for
period ended July 31, 2004, filed by Registrant on
September 1, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.31
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between
Michaels Stores, Inc. and R. Michael Rouleau, dated
March 15, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed by Registrant on March 20, 2006, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.32
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release, dated July 28, 2004,
between Ronald Staffieri and Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K for period ended
January 29, 2005, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.33
|
|
Description of Compensation Regarding Company Car for R. Michael
Rouleau (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to
Form 10-K for period ended January 29, 2005, filed by
Registrant on April 11, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.34
|
|
Description of Compensation Regarding Company Car for Charles J.
Wyly, Jr. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.19 to
Form 10-K for period ended January 29, 2005, filed by
Registrant on April 11, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.35
|
|
Description of Compensation of Directors (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
June 17, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.36
|
|
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement between Michaels
Stores, Inc. and certain directors of the Registrant (filed
herewith).
|
10.37
|
|
Form of Officer Indemnification Agreement between Michaels
Stores, Inc. and certain officers of the Registrant (filed
herewith).
|
10.38
|
|
Term Lease Master Agreement between IBM Credit Corporation as
Lessor and Michaels Stores, Inc. as Lessee (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 1, 1997, filed by Registrant on May 2, 1997,
SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
10.39
|
|
Credit Agreement, entered into as of November 18, 2005,
among Registrant, Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders
party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative
Agent for itself and the other lenders, as Swing Line Lender and
as Letter of Credit Issuer (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
November 22, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.40
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2001,
between Michaels Stores, Inc. and Fleet National Bank and the
other lenders named therein (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for period ended May 5,
2001, filed by Registrant on June 19, 2001, SEC File
No. 000-11822).
|
48
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
First Amendment and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
as of December 31, 2001, among Michaels Stores, Inc., Fleet
National Bank, and the other lenders named therein (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 2, 2002, filed by Registrant on April 12,
2002, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.42
|
|
Second Amendment and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement,
dated as of December 31, 2003, among Michaels Stores, Inc.,
Fleet National Bank, and the other lenders named therein
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Form 10-K for
the year ended January 31, 2004, filed by Registrant on
April 2, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.43
|
|
Third Amendment and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
as of October 6, 2004, among Michaels Stores, Inc., Fleet
National Bank, and the other lenders named therein (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the period
ended October 30, 2004, filed by Registrant on
December 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.44
|
|
Option Agreement, dated as of December 23, 1996, between
Michaels Stores, Inc. and Elegance Limited (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.29 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 1, 1997, filed by Registrant on May 2, 1997,
SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
10.45
|
|
Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated as of October 16,
1984, between Michaels Stores, Inc. and Peoples Restaurants,
Inc., including form of Warrant (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended
January 31, 1993, filed by Registrant on April 30,
1993, SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
10.46
|
|
First Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated
October 31, 1984, between The First Dallas Group, Ltd. and
Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to
Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1993, filed
by Registrant on April 30, 1993, SEC File
No. 000-11822).
|
10.47
|
|
Second Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated
November 28, 1984, between First Dallas
Investments-Michaels I, Ltd. and Michaels Stores, Inc.
(previously filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Form 10-K for the
year ended January 31, 1993, filed by Registrant on
April 30, 1993, SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
10.48
|
|
Third Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated
February 27, 1985, between First Dallas
Investments-Michaels I, Ltd., The First Dallas Group, Ltd.,
Sam Wyly, Charles J. Wyly, Jr., and Michaels Stores, Inc.
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-09456), filed by Registrant on
October 14, 1986).
|
10.49
|
|
Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1992, between Michaels Stores, Inc. and the
other parties named therein (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.8 to Form S-8 (Registration
No. 33-54726), filed by Registrant on November 20,
1992).
|
18.1
|
|
Preferability Letter from Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 21.1 to Form 10-K for period ended
January 29, 2005, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed
herewith).
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Gregory A. Sandfort pursuant to §302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Jeffrey N. Boyer pursuant to §302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith).
|
|
|
* |
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
49
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
The following consolidated financial statements of Michaels
Stores, Inc. are included in response to Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 28, 2006 and
January 29, 2005
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended
January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005, and
January 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended
January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005, and
January 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the
fiscal years ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005,
and January 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal years
ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005, and
January 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
Unaudited Supplemental Quarterly Financial Data for the fiscal
years ended January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005
|
|
|
F-32 |
|
All schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable
or the required information is included in the financial
statements or the notes thereto.
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Michaels Stores, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Michaels Stores, Inc. as of January 28, 2006 and
January 29, 2005, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended January 28, 2006. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free from material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Michaels Stores, Inc. at January 28,
2006 and January 29, 2005, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended January 28, 2006, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, in fiscal 2005, the Company changed its method of
accounting for merchandise inventories and share-based
compensation.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Michaels Stores, Inc.’s internal control
over financial reporting as of January 28, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 27, 2006
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Dallas, TX
March 27, 2006
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Michaels Stores, Inc.
We have audited management’s assessment, included in
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting (see Item 9A), that Michaels Stores, Inc.
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of January 28, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). Michaels Stores, Inc.’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Michaels
Stores, Inc. maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of January 28, 2006, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria.
Also, in our opinion, Michaels Stores, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of January 28, 2006, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Michaels Stores, Inc. as of
January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
January 28, 2006 and our report dated March 27, 2006
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Dallas, TX
March 27, 2006
F-3
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$ |
452,449 |
|
|
$ |
535,852 |
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
50,379 |
|
|
Merchandise inventories
|
|
|
784,032 |
|
|
|
936,395 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
44,042 |
|
|
|
26,613 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
34,125 |
|
|
|
22,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,314,648 |
|
|
|
1,571,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
1,011,201 |
|
|
|
913,174 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(586,382 |
) |
|
|
(506,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,819 |
|
|
|
406,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
115,839 |
|
|
|
115,839 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,249 |
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,088 |
|
|
|
133,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,875,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,111,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
193,595 |
|
|
$ |
256,266 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
282,499 |
|
|
|
242,682 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
20,672 |
|
|
|
12,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
496,766 |
|
|
|
511,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91/4% Senior
Notes due 2009
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
30,355 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
88,637 |
|
|
|
72,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
91,440 |
|
|
|
302,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
588,206 |
|
|
|
814,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Common Stock, $0.10 par value, 350,000,000 shares
authorized; 133,821,417 shares issued and
132,986,517 shares outstanding at January 28, 2006 and
135,726,717 shares issued and outstanding at
January 29, 2005
|
|
|
13,382 |
|
|
|
13,573 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
386,627 |
|
|
|
451,449 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
907,773 |
|
|
|
826,821 |
|
|
Treasury Stock (834,900 shares at January 28, 2006 and
none at January 29, 2005)
|
|
|
(27,944 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
7,511 |
|
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
1,287,349 |
|
|
|
1,297,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
1,875,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,111,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,676,365 |
|
|
$ |
3,393,251 |
|
|
$ |
3,091,256 |
|
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
|
|
|
2,317,082 |
|
|
|
2,146,934 |
|
|
|
1,957,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,359,283 |
|
|
|
1,246,317 |
|
|
|
1,133,983 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
987,312 |
|
|
|
898,445 |
|
|
|
823,161 |
|
Store pre-opening costs
|
|
|
7,631 |
|
|
|
8,357 |
|
|
|
8,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
364,340 |
|
|
|
339,515 |
|
|
|
302,751 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
22,409 |
|
|
|
20,434 |
|
|
|
20,262 |
|
Other (income) and expense, net
|
|
|
(9,944 |
) |
|
|
(4,604 |
) |
|
|
(2,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
351,875 |
|
|
|
323,685 |
|
|
|
285,190 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
132,363 |
|
|
|
121,876 |
|
|
|
107,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
219,512 |
|
|
|
201,809 |
|
|
|
177,845 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax of
$54.2 million
|
|
|
88,488 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
131,024 |
|
|
$ |
201,809 |
|
|
$ |
177,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
131,024 |
|
|
$ |
201,809 |
|
|
$ |
177,845 |
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
99,686 |
|
|
|
88,876 |
|
|
|
83,472 |
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
29,808 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
(25,221 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Loss from early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
12,136 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Non-cash charge for the cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
142,723 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise inventories
|
|
|
10,885 |
|
|
|
(43,472 |
) |
|
|
(83,505 |
) |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(17,429 |
) |
|
|
2,585 |
|
|
|
(10,559 |
) |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other
|
|
|
(42,657 |
) |
|
|
(3,942 |
) |
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(62,671 |
) |
|
|
83,558 |
|
|
|
77,944 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
38,027 |
|
|
|
38,443 |
|
|
|
18,007 |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
32,901 |
|
|
|
39,699 |
|
|
|
13,287 |
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
13,351 |
|
|
|
18,580 |
|
|
|
7,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
363,956 |
|
|
|
427,818 |
|
|
|
289,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(118,346 |
) |
|
|
(90,906 |
) |
|
|
(103,110 |
) |
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(50,379 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Sales of short-term investments
|
|
|
50,605 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Net proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(67,918 |
) |
|
|
(141,152 |
) |
|
|
(103,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Senior Notes
|
|
|
(209,250 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Cash dividends paid to stockholders
|
|
|
(46,181 |
) |
|
|
(25,867 |
) |
|
|
(20,145 |
) |
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
|
|
(190,431 |
) |
|
|
(105,099 |
) |
|
|
(75,499 |
) |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
37,690 |
|
|
|
35,494 |
|
|
|
30,724 |
|
|
Tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
25,221 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock and other
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(379,441 |
) |
|
|
(92,639 |
) |
|
|
(62,707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
(83,403 |
) |
|
|
194,027 |
|
|
|
123,794 |
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
535,852 |
|
|
|
341,825 |
|
|
|
218,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
452,449 |
|
|
$ |
535,852 |
|
|
$ |
341,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
19,653 |
|
|
$ |
19,570 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$ |
94,591 |
|
|
$ |
85,368 |
|
|
$ |
85,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Three Years Ended January 28, 2006
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
Treasury Stock, | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
at Cost | |
|
Income/ (Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at February 1, 2003
|
|
|
134,933,224 |
|
|
$ |
13,494 |
|
|
$ |
498,045 |
|
|
$ |
502,665 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(2,177 |
) |
|
$ |
1,012,027 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
177,845 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
177,845 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,245 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other
|
|
|
5,361,510 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
32,401 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
32,937 |
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33,733 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33,733 |
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(20,145 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(20,145 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
(4,299,600 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(75,499 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(75,499 |
) |
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(75,069 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
75,499 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2004
|
|
|
135,995,134 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
489,110 |
|
|
|
660,365 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,223 |
|
|
|
1,167,298 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
201,809 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
201,809 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,908 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other
|
|
|
3,702,083 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
37,957 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
38,327 |
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29,084 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29,084 |
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(35,353 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(35,353 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
(3,970,500 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(105,099 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(105,099 |
) |
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(104,702 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
105,099 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 29, 2005
|
|
|
135,726,717 |
|
|
|
13,573 |
|
|
|
451,449 |
|
|
|
826,821 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
1,297,165 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
131,024 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
131,024 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,189 |
|
|
|
2,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,213 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other
|
|
|
2,675,197 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
40,933 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
41,200 |
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
31,053 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
31,053 |
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,221 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,221 |
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(50,072 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(50,072 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
(5,415,397 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(190,431 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(190,431 |
) |
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
(162,029 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
162,487 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 28, 2006
|
|
|
132,986,517 |
|
|
$ |
13,382 |
|
|
$ |
386,627 |
|
|
$ |
907,773 |
|
|
$ |
(27,944 |
) |
|
$ |
7,511 |
|
|
$ |
1,287,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Description of Business
Michaels Stores, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless
the text otherwise indicates) owns and operates a chain of
specialty retail stores in 48 states and Canada featuring
arts, crafts, framing, floral, decorative wall décor, and
seasonal merchandise for the hobbyist and do-it-yourself home
decorator. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Aaron Brothers, Inc.,
operates a chain of framing and art supply stores located in
11 states. Recollections, our scrapbooking/paper crafting
retail concept, operates locations in Arizona, Maryland, Texas,
and Virginia. We also operate Star Decorators Wholesale, with
operations located in Arizona, California, Georgia, and Texas,
offering merchandise primarily to interior decorators/designers,
wedding/event planners, florists, hotels, restaurants, and
commercial display companies.
Fiscal Year
We report on the basis of a 52 or
53-week fiscal year,
which ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. References to
fiscal year mean the year in which that fiscal year began.
Fiscal 2005 ended on January 28, 2006, fiscal 2004 ended on
January 29, 2005, and fiscal 2003 ended on January 31,
2004. Each fiscal year contained 52 weeks.
Adjustment of Stock Split
All references to the number of shares of Common Stock and
earnings per share amounts have been adjusted to retroactively
reflect the two-for-one Common Stock split effected in the form
of a stock dividend to stockholders of record as of the close of
business on September 27, 2004.
Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Michaels Stores, Inc. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
Translation adjustments result from translating our Canadian
subsidiary’s financial statements into U.S. dollars.
Balance sheet accounts are translated at exchange rates in
effect at the balance sheet date. Income statement accounts are
translated at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) in our
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. The
cumulative translation adjustment is net of deferred taxes of
$5.5 million, of which $2.0 million relates to fiscal
2005.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents are comprised of highly liquid instruments
with original maturities of three months or less. Cash
equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
We record interest income earned from our cash and equivalents
as a component of other income and expense, net, in our
financial statements. Interest income was $7.9 million,
$4.6 million, and $2.0 million for fiscal 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively.
F-8
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Short-Term Investments
Our investments, which consist of interests in a Massachusetts
business trust, are classified as available-for-sale under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt & Equity Securities. The investment objective
of the trust is to achieve higher current income and total
returns than bank short-term investment funds and registered
money market funds. The trust invests primarily in auction rate
securities with auction reset periods of less than twelve
months. The carrying value of the investments approximated fair
value.
Merchandise Inventories
We value our fiscal 2005 merchandise inventories at Michaels
stores at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined
using a weighted average method. We utilize perpetual inventory
records to value inventory in our Michaels stores. Physical
inventory counts are performed in a significant number of stores
at the end of each fiscal quarter by a third party inventory
counting service firm, with substantially all stores open longer
than one year subject to at least one annual count. We adjust
our perpetual records based on the results of the physical
counts.
Cost is calculated based upon the actual landed cost of an item
at the time it is received by us using actual vendor invoices
and also includes the cost of warehousing, handling, purchasing,
and transporting the inventory to the stores. Vendor allowances,
which primarily represent volume rebates and cooperative
advertising funds, are recorded as a reduction of the cost of
the merchandise inventories. The cost of warehousing, handling,
purchasing, and transporting, and the vendor allowances are
recognized through cost of sales based on our estimates of when
the inventories are sold.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we made certain
refinements to our calculation for deferring costs related to
preparing inventory for sale and for vendor allowance
recognition as a result of our reviews and analyses related to
our transition to cost accounting. These refinements resulted in
a non-cash charge of approximately $23.9 million
($15.0 million net of income tax).
We maintain a provision for estimated shrinkage based on the
actual historical results of our physical inventories. We
compare our estimates to the actual results of the physical
inventory counts as they are taken and adjust the shrink
estimates accordingly. We also record adjustments to the value
of inventory equal to the difference between the carrying value
and the estimated market value, based on assumptions about
future demand.
Fiscal 2004 merchandise inventories at Michaels stores were
valued at the lower of cost or market using a retail inventory
method. We performed complete physical inventories in a
significant number of stores at the end of each fiscal quarter
to estimate ending inventories valued at retail for all Michaels
stores to be used in our retail inventory method. In determining
our cost of goods sold and ending inventory at cost, we utilized
a single pool of inventory for our Michaels’ stores
inventories. We recorded permanent markdown reserves in the
period in which we determined that markdowns were required to
sell certain merchandise. Such markdowns were based on each
store’s perpetual inventory records.
We value the inventory at our distribution centers, Aaron
Brothers stores, Star Decorators Wholesale stores, and custom
framing operations at the lower of cost or market, with cost
determined using a weighted average method. The cost of
inventory also includes certain costs associated with the
warehousing, handling, purchasing, and transporting of the
inventory.
F-9
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation is
recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. We expense repairs and maintenance costs as
incurred. We capitalize and depreciate significant renewals or
betterments that substantially extend the life of the asset.
Useful lives are generally estimated as follows (in years):
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
30 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10 |
|
Fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
8 |
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
5 |
|
Goodwill
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, we do not amortize goodwill, but
instead perform annual (or, under certain circumstances, more
frequent) impairment tests. We have performed the required
impairment tests of goodwill and the tests have not resulted in
an impairment charge. We use discounted cash flow models to
determine the fair value of our reporting units for purposes of
our annual impairment tests.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically review long-lived assets for impairment by
comparing the carrying value of the assets with their estimated
future undiscounted cash flows. If it is determined that an
impairment loss has occurred, the loss would be recognized
during that period. The impairment loss is calculated as the
difference between asset carrying values and the present value
of estimated net cash flows or comparable market values, giving
consideration to recent operating performance and pricing
trends. In fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003, we had no impairment
losses related to long-lived assets.
Reserve for Closed Facilities
We maintain a reserve for future rental obligations, carrying
costs, and other closing costs related to closed facilities,
primarily closed and relocated stores. In accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 146, Costs Associated With
Disposal Activities, we recognize exit costs for any store
closures at the time the store is closed.
The cost of closing a store or facility is calculated based on
management’s estimate of costs to exit the lease, which
generally represents the lesser of the present value of future
rental obligations remaining under the lease (less estimated
sublease rental income) or the lease termination fee. Once a
store has been identified for closure, we accelerate the
remaining depreciation so the assets are fully depreciated at
the date of closure.
F-10
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
The following is a detail of account activity related to closed
facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of fiscal year
|
|
$ |
6,769 |
|
|
$ |
4,492 |
|
|
$ |
10,171 |
|
Additions (reductions) charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
|
(973 |
) |
Payment of rental obligations and other
|
|
|
(5,236 |
) |
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
|
|
(4,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of fiscal year
|
|
$ |
4,170 |
|
|
$ |
6,769 |
|
|
$ |
4,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Liabilities
We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for our
workers’ compensation, general liability, and
employee-related health care plans. We pay premiums for these
coverages, a portion of which are paid by our associates for
health care costs. In addition, under our self-insurance, we pay
all claims up to the limits provided for in our contracts.
Liabilities associated with these plans are actuarially
estimated, giving consideration to historical claims experience
and industry trends. In the event our insurance carriers are
unable to pay claims submitted to them, we would record a
liability for such estimated payments we expect to incur.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from sales of our merchandise is recognized at the time
of the merchandise sale, excluding revenue from the sale of
custom frames, which is recognized at the time of delivery.
Revenue is presented net of sales taxes collected. We allow for
merchandise to be returned under most circumstances and provide
a reserve for estimated returns.
We record a gift card liability on the date we issue the gift
card to the customer. We record revenue and reduce the gift card
liability as the customer redeems the gift card. We escheat the
value of unredeemed gift cards where required by law. Any
remaining liabilities not subject to escheatment are evaluated
to determine whether the likelihood of the gift card being
redeemed is remote (gift card breakage). We recognize gift card
breakage as revenue, by applying our estimate of the rate of
gift card breakage over the period of estimated performance
(40 months as of the end of fiscal 2005). Our estimates of
the gift card breakage rate are based on customers’
historical redemption rates and patterns, which may not be
indicative of future redemption rates and patterns. Prior to
fiscal 2005, we did not have adequate historical information to
estimate gift card breakage. During the fourth quarter of fiscal
2005, we recognized revenue of approximately $7.9 million
related to gift card balances that we estimated will not be
redeemed.
Costs of Sales and Occupancy Expenses
Included in our costs of sales are the following:
|
|
|
|
• |
purchase price or invoiced cost of merchandise, net of vendor
allowances and rebates, |
|
• |
inbound freight, inspection costs, and duties, |
|
• |
warehousing, handling, and transporting costs (including
internal transfer costs) and purchasing and receiving costs, and |
|
• |
share-based compensation costs. |
These costs are included in merchandise inventories and expensed
as the merchandise is sold.
F-11
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Included in our occupancy expenses are the following:
|
|
|
|
• |
store expenses such as rent, insurance, taxes, common area
maintenance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, and |
|
• |
amortization of store buildings and leasehold improvements. |
We record rent expense ratably over the term of the lease
beginning with the date we take possession of or control the
physical access to the premises. We record leasehold improvement
reimbursements as a liability and ratably accrete the liability
as a reduction to rent expense over the lease term beginning
with the date we take possession of or control the physical
access to the premises.
We reviewed our accounting policies and practices associated
with property leases during fiscal 2004. Consistent with
industry practices, we historically had reported straight line
rental expense beginning on the earlier of the store opening
date or the commencement date of the lease. This had the effect
of excluding the pre-opening or build-out period of our stores
from the calculation of the period over which we expensed rent.
In addition, amounts received as tenant allowances were
reflected in the balance sheet as a reduction to store leasehold
improvement costs instead of classifying them as deferred lease
credits.
Following our review, we corrected our accounting policies such
that we begin recording rent expense on the date we take
possession of or control physical access to the premises. We
also recognize tenant allowances as a liability and accrete the
liability as a reduction to rent expense over the same period in
which rent expense is calculated.
As a result of these corrections, we recorded a non-cash,
$12.8 million ($8.0 million, net of income tax)
cumulative adjustment to earnings during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004. We also increased our gross property and equipment
balances by $34.8 million ($18.0 million, net of
accumulated depreciation), our accrued liabilities by
$1.7 million and other long-term liabilities by
$29.1 million. The increase in gross property and equipment
reflects the reclassification of tenant allowances to other
long-term liabilities, which were previously reflected as a
reduction of property and equipment. The increase in other
long-term liabilities was to reflect the cumulative adjustment
to the accrued rent balance and deferred lease credits related
to tenant allowances. We reduced our long-term deferred income
tax liability by $4.8 million primarily as a result of the
cumulative adjustment to earnings. The adjustments did not
impact historical or future net cash flows nor the timing of the
payments under related leases. Prior years’ financial
statements were not restated as the impact of these issues was
immaterial to previously reported results for any individual
prior year.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs
Included in our selling, general, and administrative costs are
store personnel costs (including share-based compensation),
store operating expenses, advertising expenses, store
depreciation expense, and corporate overhead costs.
Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which the
advertising first occurs. Our cooperative advertising allowances
are accounted for as a reduction in the purchase price of
merchandise since an obligation to advertise specific product
does not exist in our cooperative advertising arrangements.
Advertising expense was $163.1 million,
$148.4 million, and $141.6 million for fiscal 2005,
2004, and 2003, respectively, and is included in selling,
general, and administrative expense.
F-12
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Store Pre-Opening Costs
We expense all start-up
activity costs as incurred, which primarily include store
pre-opening costs. Rent expense incurred prior to the store
opening is recorded in cost of sales and occupancy expense on
our consolidated income statement.
Income Taxes
We record income tax expense using the liability method for
taxes and are subject to income tax in many jurisdictions,
including the United States, various states and localities, and
Canada. A current tax liability or asset is recognized for the
estimated taxes payable or refundable on the tax returns for the
current year and a deferred tax liability or asset is recognized
for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary
differences and carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted income tax rates expected
to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in
the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation
allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred
tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets
will be realized. If different assumptions had been used, our
tax expense, assets, and liabilities could have varied from
recorded amounts. If actual results differ from estimated
results or if we adjust these assumptions in the future, we may
need to adjust our deferred tax assets or liabilities, which
could impact our effective tax rate.
F-13
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
219,512 |
|
|
$ |
201,809 |
|
|
$ |
177,845 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax
|
|
|
88,488 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
131,024 |
|
|
$ |
201,809 |
|
|
$ |
177,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per common share–weighted
average shares
|
|
|
135,264 |
|
|
|
135,875 |
|
|
|
134,356 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share–weighted
average shares adjusted for dilutive securities
|
|
|
137,936 |
|
|
|
139,016 |
|
|
|
139,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our purchases of approximately 5.4 million shares of our
Common Stock in fiscal 2005 reduced the weighted average shares
outstanding by approximately 2.2 million shares for fiscal
2005. Our purchases of approximately 4.0 million shares of
our Common Stock in fiscal 2004 reduced the weighted average
shares outstanding by approximately 2.0 million shares for
fiscal 2004. Our purchases of 4.3 million shares of our
Common Stock in fiscal 2003 reduced the number of weighted
average shares outstanding by approximately 2.0 million
shares for fiscal 2003.
Share-Based Compensation
Prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we elected to follow
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related guidance in accounting for our
employee stock options. The exercise price of our employee stock
options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the
date of grant and, as a result, we did not recognize
compensation expense for stock option grants.
As more fully described in Note 2 below, we elected to
early adopt SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. We applied the
provisions of the modified retrospective transition method as
permitted by SFAS No. 123(R) from the beginning of
fiscal 2005. As a result, we recorded compensation expense for
unvested awards based on the amounts previously determined for
pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, for the first three quarters
of fiscal 2005 and under SFAS No. 123(R) for the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. Beginning in the
F-14
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, compensation cost is based on the
grant date fair value of the award and ratably recognized as
expense over the effective vesting period.
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per
common share for fiscal 2004 and 2003, as required by the
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation–Transition and Disclosure, has been
determined as if we had accounted for our employee stock options
under the fair value method. For purposes of pro forma
disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is
amortized over the options’ vesting periods. Our pro forma
information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands | |
|
|
except per share | |
|
|
data) | |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
201,809 |
|
|
$ |
177,845 |
|
Share-based employee compensation cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As if fair value method were applied, net of income tax
|
|
|
15,344 |
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
186,465 |
|
|
$ |
163,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share, as reported:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
Pro forma earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
135,875 |
|
|
|
134,356 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
138,077 |
|
|
|
136,953 |
|
Prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we reported
the excess tax benefits associated with share-based awards as an
operating cash inflow in our statement of cash flows. Beginning
with our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we now report
excess tax benefits as a cash inflow in the financing section of
our statement of cash flows and would record a tax deficiency,
if any, as a cash outflow from operating activities. For fiscal
years 2003 and 2004, we reported $33.7 million and
$29.1 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits as cash
inflows in the operating activities section. For fiscal 2005, we
reported $25.2 million of excess tax benefits as a cash
inflow to financing activities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs, as an amendment to ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing. SFAS No. 151
clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should
be recognized as current period charges and requires the
allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on
the normal capacity of the production facilities.
SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred
during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We early
adopted SFAS No. 151 during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2005, which did not have a material impact on our results
of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation
No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations–an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 143. FIN 47 clarifies that the term
“conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in
SFAS No. 143 refers to a legal obligation to perform
an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method
of settlement are conditional on a future
F-15
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
event that may or may not be within the control of the entity.
Entities are required to recognize a liability for the fair
value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair
value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47
is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2005. We adopted FIN 47 during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2005, which did not have a material impact on
our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. This statement
supersedes APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes
and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements. The statement applies to all
voluntary changes in accounting principle and changes the
requirements for accounting and reporting of a change in
accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires
retrospective application to prior period financial statements
of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is
impracticable to do so. The statement requires that a change in
method of depreciation, amortization, or depletion for
long-lived, nonfinancial assets be accounted for as a change in
accounting estimate that is effected by a change in accounting
principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2005. The statement does not change the
transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements,
including those that are in a transition phase as of the
effective date of this statement. We will adopt
SFAS No. 154 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal
2006, which is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash
flows.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the
current year presentation.
|
|
Note 2. |
Changes in Accounting |
Transition to Cost Accounting– We changed our method
of accounting for merchandise inventories from a retail
inventory method to the weighted average cost method in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, effective as of the beginning of
that fiscal year. We believe the weighted average cost method is
preferable because we believe it:
|
|
|
|
• |
results in greater precision in the determination of cost of
sales and inventories as each store/ SKU combination is
supported by perpetual records valued at cost using SKU level
purchase order inputs, allowing for a reduction in the number of
significant management estimates that were used in our retail
inventory method; |
|
|
• |
provides greater insight into shrink using more accurate
periodic shrink expense analysis and reporting at the store/ SKU
level; |
|
|
• |
aligns financial reporting with the operational view of the
Company, which provides consistency in analysis of inventory
management measures; and |
|
|
• |
increases the accuracy of matching sales with related expenses,
as cost of sales will represent the average cost of the
individual items sold rather than an average of the entire pool,
eliminating any fluctuations as a result of seasonal changes in
the markup percentage of inventory on hand at the end of each
quarter. |
The effect of this change has been presented in the income
statement as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle of $88.5 million, or approximately $0.64 per
diluted share, which is net of an income tax benefit of
$54.2 million. The inventory balance as of the beginning of
fiscal 2005 is approximately $794 million on the weighted
average cost method, which is approximately $143 million
lower than the inventory balance reported under our retail
inventory method. The non-cash reduction in
F-16
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 2. |
Changes in Accounting (continued) |
the inventory balance is due to the change in accounting
principle and is not an indication of an inventory impairment,
as the underlying retail value of the Company’s inventories
is not affected by this accounting change. As a result of the
change in accounting principle, fiscal 2005 cost of sales
decreased by approximately $300,000, pre-tax, which had no
impact on our diluted earnings per share calculation. For the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, cost of sales reported under the
weighted average cost method was lower than cost of sales
reported under the previous retail inventory method by
$25.9 million.
Amounts for the interim periods of fiscal 2005, are presented
below under our previous retail inventory method, and as
adjusted for the effect of the retroactive application of the
weighted average cost method, had the weighted average cost
method been in effect during the respective interim periods. The
effect of the change in accounting principle for periods prior
to fiscal 2005 is not determinable as the information required
to value inventory on the weighted average cost method in prior
periods is not available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 2 | |
|
|
|
Quarter 3 | |
|
|
Quarter 1 | |
|
Quarter 2 | |
|
YTD | |
|
Quarter 3 | |
|
YTD | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
As previously reported(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
821,016 |
|
|
$ |
745,493 |
|
|
$ |
1,566,509 |
|
|
$ |
839,663 |
|
|
$ |
2,406,172 |
|
|
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
|
|
|
516,336 |
|
|
|
463,203 |
|
|
|
979,539 |
|
|
|
511,545 |
|
|
|
1,491,084 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
304,680 |
|
|
|
282,290 |
|
|
|
586,970 |
|
|
|
328,118 |
|
|
|
915,088 |
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
77,471 |
|
|
|
62,824 |
|
|
|
140,295 |
|
|
|
86,614 |
|
|
|
226,909 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
46,533 |
|
|
|
30,815 |
|
|
|
77,348 |
|
|
|
55,442 |
|
|
|
132,790 |
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
As Restated(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
821,016 |
|
|
$ |
745,493 |
|
|
$ |
1,566,509 |
|
|
$ |
839,663 |
|
|
$ |
2,406,172 |
|
|
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
|
|
|
503,204 |
|
|
|
481,263 |
|
|
|
984,467 |
|
|
|
535,155 |
|
|
|
1,519,622 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
317,812 |
|
|
|
264,230 |
|
|
|
582,042 |
|
|
|
304,508 |
|
|
|
886,550 |
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
87,179 |
|
|
|
39,671 |
|
|
|
126,850 |
|
|
|
50,817 |
|
|
|
177,667 |
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
52,554 |
|
|
|
16,461 |
|
|
|
69,015 |
|
|
|
33,247 |
|
|
|
102,262 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
88,488 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
88,488 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
88,488 |
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(35,934 |
) |
|
|
16,461 |
|
|
|
(19,473 |
) |
|
|
33,247 |
|
|
|
13,774 |
|
|
Before cumulative effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
After cumulative effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
(Notes on following page)
F-17
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 2. |
Changes in Accounting (continued) |
(Notes from table on preceding page)
|
|
(1) |
Amounts for the first three quarters are as previously reported
on our fiscal 2005
Forms 10-Q. The
amounts for each quarter presented represent our operations
using a retail inventory method and do not include the effects
of expensing share-based compensation. |
|
(2) |
Amounts have been restated to reflect weighted average cost
accounting and the impact of expensing stock options under
SFAS No. 123(R). |
Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)– We elected to
early adopt SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. This accounting
standard requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair value over the
requisite service period. We applied the provisions of the
modified retrospective transition method as permitted by
SFAS No. 123(R) from the beginning of fiscal 2005. As
a result, we recorded compensation expense for unvested awards
based on the amounts previously determined for pro forma
disclosure under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, for the first three quarters of
fiscal 2005 and under the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
We recorded compensation expense related to share-based payments
totaling approximately $29.8 million on a pre-tax basis, or
$0.14 per diluted share on an after-tax basis, for fiscal
2005.
The following table provides the fiscal 2005 quarterly impact of
our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 2 | |
|
|
|
Quarter 3 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 1 | |
|
Quarter 2 | |
|
YTD | |
|
Quarter 3 | |
|
YTD | |
|
Quarter 4 | |
|
Fiscal 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
$ |
4,478 |
|
|
$ |
6,168 |
|
|
$ |
10,646 |
|
|
$ |
12,932 |
|
|
$ |
23,578 |
|
|
$ |
6,230 |
|
|
$ |
29,808 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
|
6,600 |
|
|
|
8,020 |
|
|
|
14,620 |
|
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
18,675 |
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
F-18
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 3. |
Detail of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
244,383 |
|
|
|
220,927 |
|
|
Fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
765,199 |
|
|
|
690,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,011,201 |
|
|
$ |
913,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, bonuses, and other payroll-related costs
|
|
$ |
112,888 |
|
|
$ |
108,252 |
|
|
Taxes, other than income and payroll
|
|
|
38,097 |
|
|
|
31,225 |
|
|
Rent and common area maintenance
|
|
|
9,217 |
|
|
|
10,243 |
|
|
Gift certificate and gift card liability
|
|
|
19,701 |
|
|
|
22,738 |
|
|
Property and general liability insurance
|
|
|
8,977 |
|
|
|
8,499 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
17,656 |
|
|
|
18,574 |
|
|
Dividend payable
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
9,486 |
|
|
Professional fees and litigation settlements
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
59,306 |
|
|
|
32,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
282,499 |
|
|
$ |
242,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91/4% Senior
Notes due 2009
In fiscal 2001, we issued $200 million in principal amount
of
91/4
% Senior Notes due July 1, 2009, which were
unsecured and interest thereon was payable semi-annually on each
January 1 and July 1. On July 1, 2005, we redeemed the
Senior Notes at a price of $1,046.25 per $1,000 of
principal amount. This early redemption resulted in a pre-tax
charge of $12.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2005, which represents a combination of a $9.3 million call
premium and $2.8 million of unamortized costs associated
with the Senior Notes, and was recorded as interest expense.
Credit Agreement
On November 18, 2005, we entered into a new five-year,
$300 million senior unsecured credit facility with Bank of
America, N.A. and other lenders. The new $300 million
Credit Agreement replaced our existing $200 million
revolving credit facility with Fleet National Bank and the other
lenders, which we terminated immediately prior to entering into
our new $300 million Credit Agreement. We were in
compliance with all terms and conditions of our
$200 million credit agreement through the termination date,
and we did not incur any early termination penalties in
connection with its termination. No borrowings were outstanding
under our $200 million credit agreement as of
January 29, 2005, or at any time during fiscal 2005 and
2004.
Our new $300 million Credit Agreement provides for a
committed line of credit of $300 million (with a provision
for an increase, at our option on stated conditions, of up to a
total of $400 million), a $250 million sublimit on the
issuance of letters of credit, and a $25 million sublimit
for borrowings in Euro, Sterling, Yen, Canadian Dollars, and
other approved currencies. We may use borrowings under our new
$300 million Credit Agreement for working capital and other
general corporate purposes, including
F-19
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock repurchases and permitted acquisitions. Our new
$300 million Credit Agreement limits our ability to, among
other things, create liens, engage in mergers, consolidations
and certain other transactions, and requires us to adhere to
certain consolidated financial covenants. Our obligations under
our new $300 million Credit Agreement are guaranteed by
Michaels Stores Procurement Company, Inc., our wholly owned
subsidiary, and such other of our subsidiaries as may be
necessary to cause the assets owned by us and our subsidiary
guarantors to be 85% of our consolidated total assets.
We are in compliance with all terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement. During fiscal 2005 and as of January 28, 2006,
we had no borrowings under our Credit Agreement. Borrowings
available under the Credit Agreement are reduced by the
aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding under the
Credit Agreement ($21.2 million as of January 28,
2006).
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of deferred
tax assets and liabilities as of the respective year-end balance
sheets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset (Liability) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 28, 2006 | |
|
January 29, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Current | |
|
Noncurrent | |
|
Current | |
|
Noncurrent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net operating loss, general business credit, and alternative
minimum tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,366 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,344 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
32,134 |
|
|
|
31,692 |
|
|
|
29,423 |
|
|
|
25,894 |
|
Other deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
24,738 |
|
|
|
16,176 |
|
|
|
13,618 |
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(53,365 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(62,474 |
) |
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,510 |
) |
Other deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(3,722 |
) |
|
|
(6,605 |
) |
|
|
(23,567 |
) |
|
|
(8,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,125 |
|
|
$ |
(2,803 |
) |
|
$ |
22,032 |
|
|
$ |
(30,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 5. |
Income Taxes (continued) |
The federal and state income tax provision is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
95,916 |
|
|
$ |
94,210 |
|
|
$ |
81,760 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
13,118 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
9,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total federal income tax provision
|
|
|
109,034 |
|
|
|
94,103 |
|
|
|
91,561 |
|
State:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
14,029 |
|
|
|
19,018 |
|
|
|
11,378 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(3,183 |
) |
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
(2,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total state income tax provision
|
|
|
10,846 |
|
|
|
20,732 |
|
|
|
9,043 |
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
10,553 |
|
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
|
6,551 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international income tax provision
|
|
|
12,483 |
|
|
|
7,041 |
|
|
|
6,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
132,363 |
|
|
$ |
121,876 |
|
|
$ |
107,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the tax benefit related to the cumulative
effect of accounting change are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Federal
|
|
$ |
(45,724 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
State
|
|
|
(3,917 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
International
|
|
|
(4,594 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit, cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
(54,235 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current federal and state income tax payable includes a
reduction in taxes of approximately $57 million, which
relates to a request for a change in our tax inventory
accounting method, currently pending approval by the Internal
Revenue Service.
The reconciliation between the actual income tax provision and
the income tax provision calculated by applying the federal
statutory rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Income tax provision at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
123,156 |
|
|
$ |
113,290 |
|
|
$ |
99,817 |
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect
|
|
|
8,787 |
|
|
|
13,476 |
|
|
|
5,878 |
|
Other
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
(4,890 |
) |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision
|
|
$ |
132,363 |
|
|
$ |
121,876 |
|
|
$ |
107,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 5. |
Income Taxes (continued) |
At January 28, 2006, we had state net operating loss
carryforwards to reduce future taxable income of approximately
$89 million expiring at various dates between fiscal 2006
and fiscal 2024. A valuation allowance has been established to
reserve for certain state operating loss carryforwards, because
we believe it is more likely than not that we will be unable to
deduct these amounts. During fiscal 2003, we utilized our
deferred tax assets related to foreign net operating losses,
which had previously been reserved through a valuation
allowance. The decrease in the valuation allowance was offset by
amounts provided for United States federal income taxes owed for
related foreign earnings.
|
|
Note 6. |
Stockholders’ Equity |
Share-Based Compensation
On May 10, 2005, our Board of Directors adopted our 2005
Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”)
authorizing the grant of options, appreciation rights,
restricted shares of our Common Stock, restricted stock units,
performance shares, performance units, and senior executive plan
bonuses. A maximum of 12.0 million shares will be available
for grant for all equity awards under the 2005 Plan, with no
more than 3.0 million shares of our Common Stock issued
upon the exercise of appreciation rights or as performance
shares, restricted shares, and restricted stock units. Eligible
participants include executive officers, key employees, and
directors of Michaels or a subsidiary of Michaels.
The 2005 Plan was approved by our stockholders at our Annual
Meeting of Stockholders on June 16, 2005. Concurrent with
stockholder approval, we ceased granting options under the 1997
Stock Option Plan, 2001 General Stock Option Plan, and the 2001
Employee Stock Option Plan. Awards outstanding under the
previous plans will remain in effect according to their
respective terms and provisions. Proceeds from the exercise of
stock options under our 2001 General Stock Option Plan are
required to be used to repurchase shares of our own Common Stock
under our current stock repurchase plan, except where not
permitted by law or there is a compelling need to use the
proceeds for other corporate purposes. Generally, options and
restricted shares issued to employees under the plans have a
five year term and vest over a three year period following the
date of grant, while options issued to directors under the plans
have a five year term and vest immediately. Exercise prices of
options may not be less than 100% of the market value per share
of our Common Stock on the date of grant. As of January 28,
2006, up to approximately 8.8 million shares of Common
Stock remain available for grant under our 2005 Plan. To the
extent available, we plan to issue Treasury shares of our Common
Stock to satisfy share issuance upon option exercises;
otherwise, we will issue new shares. Certain of our equity
compensation plans provide for, and other plans permit,
acceleration of vesting for share-based awards upon a change in
control.
As more fully described in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, we elected to early adopt
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. We applied the provisions of the
modified retrospective transition method from the beginning of
fiscal 2005. As a result, we recorded compensation expense for
unvested awards based on the amounts previously determined for
pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, for the first three quarters
of fiscal 2005. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005,
compensation cost was recorded based on the grant date fair
value of the award and ratably recognized as expense over the
effective vesting period.
F-22
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 6. |
Stockholders’ Equity (continued) |
The fair value for options granted under
SFAS No. 123(R) was estimated at the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model with the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
Assumptions(1) |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rates(2)
|
|
|
3.5% - 4.4% |
|
|
|
2.4% - 3.4% |
|
|
|
1.7% - 2.6% |
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.8% - 1.2% |
|
|
|
0.9% - 1.1% |
|
|
|
0% - 0.9% |
|
Expected volatility rates of our Common Stock(3)
|
|
|
28.3% - 45.7% |
|
|
|
45.9% - 50.2% |
|
|
|
56.5% - 68.8% |
|
Expected life of options (in years)(4)
|
|
|
2.5 - 3.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 - 3.3 |
|
|
|
3.1 - 3.2 |
|
The footnotes to the assumptions relate to fiscal 2005 only.
|
|
(1) |
Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience. |
|
(2) |
Based on constant maturity interest rates for U.S. Treasury
instruments with terms consistent with the expected lives of the
awards. |
|
(3) |
We considered both the historical volatility of our Common Stock
price as well as implied volatilities from the exchange-traded
options on our Common Stock. |
|
(4) |
Expected lives were based on an analysis of historical exercise
and post-vesting employment termination behavior. |
For fiscal 2005, our stock option activity and other summary
data are summarized in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Activity | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
at Beginning | |
|
|
|
Forfeited/ | |
|
at End of | |
|
at End of | |
|
|
of Year | |
|
Granted | |
|
Exercised | |
|
Expired | |
|
Year | |
|
Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Number of options
|
|
|
11,561 |
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
(2,548 |
) |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
11,988 |
|
|
|
5,809 |
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
|
$18.46 |
|
|
$ |
37.96 |
|
|
|
$14.78 |
|
|
$ |
26.69 |
|
|
|
$24.62 |
|
|
$ |
18.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 28, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Options | |
|
Options | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Aggregate intrinsic value (In thousands)
|
|
$ |
130,205 |
|
|
$ |
96,344 |
|
Weighted average remaining life (In years)
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
As of the beginning of fiscal 2005, there were 6.1 million
nonvested options with a weighted average fair value of $8.44.
As of the end of fiscal 2005, there were 6.2 million
nonvested options with a weighted average fair value of $10.41.
F-23
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 6. |
Stockholders’ Equity (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year
(per share)
|
|
$ |
12.21 |
|
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
|
$ |
7.64 |
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year
|
|
$ |
58,055 |
|
|
$ |
57,516 |
|
|
$ |
73,634 |
|
Total fair value of options that vested during the year
|
|
|
26,014 |
|
|
|
29,411 |
|
|
|
33,144 |
|
As of January 28, 2006, compensation cost related to
nonvested awards not yet recognized totaled $38.7 million
and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 1.6 years.
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable at January 28, 2006 (shares
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Outstanding | |
|
Stock Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
Range of | |
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
Exercise Prices | |
|
of Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
of Shares | |
|
Price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
6.08 - 8.64 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
8.65 - 12.96 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
10.52 |
|
|
12.97 - 17.28 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
16.86 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
16.96 |
|
|
17.29 - 21.61 |
|
|
|
2,209 |
|
|
|
18.20 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
18.42 |
|
|
21.62 - 25.93 |
|
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
25.35 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
25.26 |
|
|
25.94 - 30.25 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
27.31 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
26.99 |
|
|
30.26 - 34.57 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
32.99 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30.25 |
|
|
34.58 - 38.89 |
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
37.85 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
37.96 |
|
|
38.90 - 43.21 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
41.94 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
41.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,988 |
|
|
$ |
24.62 |
|
|
|
5,809 |
|
|
$ |
18.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Repurchases
On March 15, 2005, and December 6, 2005, our Board of
Directors authorized a repurchase plan for up to
3.0 million shares and 5.0 million shares of our
outstanding Common Stock, respectively. The
F-24
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 6. |
Stockholders’ Equity (continued) |
following table sets forth information regarding our Common
Stock repurchase plans as of January 28, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
Authorized for | |
|
Shares | |
|
Available for | |
|
|
Repurchase | |
|
Repurchased | |
|
Repurchase | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 5, 2000 repurchase plan (variable portion)
|
|
|
72,510 |
|
|
|
(72,509 |
) |
|
|
1 |
(1) |
June 18, 2003 repurchase plan
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
(2) |
February 2, 2004 repurchase plan
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
(5,000,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
(3) |
March 15, 2005 repurchase plan
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
(4) |
December 6, 2005 repurchase plan
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
(497,188 |
) |
|
|
4,502,812 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,072,510 |
|
|
|
(10,569,697 |
) |
|
|
4,502,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In fiscal years 2005 and 2004, we repurchased and subsequently
retired 17,958 shares and 54,551 shares of our Common
Stock, respectively, at average prices of $40.93 and $27.03,
respectively, using proceeds from exercises of stock options
granted under the 2001 General Stock Option Plan. |
|
(2) |
In fiscal 2003, we repurchased and subsequently retired
approximately 1.2 million shares of our Common Stock
authorized to be repurchased under the 2003 repurchase plan at
an average price of $21.55 per share. In fiscal 2004, we
repurchased and subsequently retired 816,200 shares of our
Common Stock authorized under the 2003 repurchase plan at an
average price of $24.34 per share and, as a result, we have
used the entire authority originally provided in the 2003
repurchase plan. |
|
(3) |
In fiscal 2004, we repurchased and subsequently retired
approximately 3.1 million shares of our Common Stock
authorized to be repurchased under the 2004 repurchase plan at
an average price of $27.02 per share. In fiscal 2005, we
repurchased and subsequently retired 1.9 million shares of
our Common Stock at an average price of $36.78 per share
and, as a result, we have used the entire authority originally
provided in the 2004 repurchase plan. |
|
(4) |
In fiscal 2005, we repurchased approximately 3.0 million
shares of our Common Stock authorized to be repurchased under
the March 2005 repurchase plan at an average price of
$34.36 per share and, as a result, we have used the entire
authority provided in the March 2005 repurchase plan. We retired
approximately 2.7 million shares of our Common Stock
repurchased under the March 2005 repurchase plan and hold the
remaining shares as Treasury Stock. |
|
(5) |
In fiscal 2005, we repurchased approximately 497,000 shares
of our Common Stock authorized to be repurchased under the
December 2005 repurchase plan at an average price of
$33.64 per share and, as a result, we had 4.5 million
shares available for repurchase under the plan as of
January 28, 2006. We hold the repurchased shares as
Treasury Stock. |
We may be restricted by regulations of the SEC from making
future repurchases during certain time periods.
We sponsor a 401(k) Savings Plan for our eligible employees and
certain of our subsidiaries. Participation in the 401(k) Savings
Plan is voluntary and available to any employee who is
21 years of age and has completed 500 hours of service
in a six-month eligibility period. Participants may elect to
contribute up to 15% of their considered compensation on a
pre-tax basis and up to 10% on an after-tax
F-25
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 7. Retirement Plans
(continued)
basis. In accordance with the provisions of the 401(k) Savings
Plan, we make a matching cash contribution to the account of
each participant in an amount equal to 50% of the
participant’s pre-tax contributions that do not exceed 6%
of the participant’s considered compensation for the year.
Matching contributions, and the actual earnings thereon, vest to
the participants based on years of continuous service, with 100%
vesting after three years. Our matching contribution expense,
net of forfeitures, was $2.6 million, $2.2 million,
and $1.9 million, for fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively.
We also sponsor the Michaels Stores, Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan to provide eligible employees, directors, and certain
consultants the opportunity to defer receipt of current
compensation. The amount of compensation deferred by each
participant electing to participate in the Deferred Compensation
Plan is determined in accordance with the terms of the Deferred
Compensation Plan, based on elections by the plan participants
and paid in accordance with the terms of the Deferred
Compensation Plan. We provide matching cash contributions equal
to 50% of the participant’s pre-tax contributions that do
not exceed 6% of the participant’s considered compensation
deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan, reduced by the
matching contributions credited to the participant under our
401(k) Savings Plan. Our matching contribution expense was
$452,000, $423,000, and $414,000, for fiscal 2005, 2004, and
2003, respectively. Deferred amounts and matching contributions
are deposited each pay period in a trust that qualifies as a
grantor trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. The funds are invested in individual participant life
insurance contracts. We own these contracts and are
co-beneficiaries with the participant’s designee.
Participants must elect investments for their deferrals and
matching contributions from a variety of hypothetical benchmark
funds. The return on the underlying investments determines the
amount of earnings and losses that increase or decrease the
participant’s account. Amounts deferred, matching
contributions, and earnings and losses are 100% vested. Our
obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan are unsecured
general obligations and rank equally with our other unsecured
general creditors.
|
|
Note 8. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
Commitments
We operate stores and use distribution centers, office
facilities, and equipment that are generally leased under
non-cancelable operating leases, the majority of which provide
for renewal options. Future minimum annual rental commitments
for all non-cancelable operating leases as of January 28,
2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
279,274 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
278,478 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
256,346 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
226,706 |
|
|
2010
|
|
|
187,745 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
558,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum rental commitments
|
|
$ |
1,786,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense applicable to non-cancelable operating leases was
$263.2 million, $243.5 million, and
$225.0 million, in fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively.
F-26
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8. Commitments and
Contingencies (continued)
Derivative Claims
On March 21, 2003, Julie Fathergill filed a purported
stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the
192nd District Court for Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit
names certain former and current officers and directors,
including all of Michaels’ current directors, as individual
defendants and Michaels as a nominal defendant. The derivative
action relates to actions prior to our announcement on
November 7, 2002, that we had revised our outlook for the
fourth fiscal quarter of 2002, adjusting downward guidance for
annual earnings per diluted share. The plaintiff alleges that,
prior to that announcement, certain of the defendants made
misrepresentations and failed to disclose negative information
about the financial condition of Michaels while the individual
defendants were selling shares of Michaels Common Stock. The
plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for
breach of fiduciary duties, abuse of control, gross
mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment.
All of these claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of
Michaels. On November 7, 2005, the Court entered a written
order granting the defendants’ special exceptions and
ordering that the case will be dismissed with prejudice unless
the plaintiff amends her petition to state an actionable claim
against the defendants. On December 8, 2005, the plaintiff
filed an amended petition in which she reasserts many of the
same factual allegations, but also adds new allegations
questioning, among other things, issues relating to
Michaels’ inventory systems and infrastructure, as well as
transactions and holdings of Michaels Common Stock by certain
family-owned trusts or benefiting trusts of two of
Michaels’ directors. In her amended petition, the plaintiff
continues to assert all her claims derivatively on behalf of
Michaels against the individual defendants for breach of
fiduciary duties, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste
of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. We believe these
claims are without merit and will vigorously oppose them.
On September 11, 2003, Leo J. Dutil filed a purported
stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of
Texas, Dallas Division. The lawsuit names certain former and
current officers and directors as individual defendants and
Michaels as a nominal defendant. In this derivative action, the
plaintiff makes allegations of fact similar to those made in the
Fathergill derivative lawsuit described above. The plaintiff
asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of
fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential information,
and contribution and indemnification. All of these claims are
asserted derivatively on behalf of Michaels. We believe these
claims are without merit and will vigorously oppose them.
Cotton Claim
On December 20, 2002, James Cotton, a former store manager
of Michaels of Canada, ULC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, and
Suzette Kennedy, a former assistant manager of Michaels of
Canada, commenced a proposed class proceeding against Michaels
of Canada and Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and
current and former employees employed in Canada. The Cotton
claim was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and
alleges that the defendants violated employment standards
legislation in Ontario and other provinces and territories of
Canada by failing to pay overtime compensation as required by
that legislation. The Cotton claim also alleges that this
conduct was in breach of the contracts of employment of those
individuals. The Cotton claim seeks a declaration that the
defendants have acted in breach of applicable legislation,
payment to current and former employees for overtime, damages
for breach of contract, punitive, aggravated and exemplary
damages, interest, and costs. In May of 2005, the plaintiffs
delivered material in support of their request that this action
be certified as a class proceeding. Michaels filed and served
its responding materials opposing class certification on
January 31, 2006. A date has not yet been set for the
hearing with respect to certification. We intend to contest
certification of this claim as a class action. Further, we
believe we have certain defenses on the merits and intend to
defend this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate a
range of possible loss, if any, in this claim.
F-27
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8. Commitments and
Contingencies (continued)
Clark Claim
On July 13, 2005, Michael Clark, a former Michaels store
assistant manager, and Lucinda Prouty, a former Michaels store
department manager, commenced a proposed class action proceeding
against Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and
current and former hourly retail employees employed in
California from July 13, 2001 to the present. The Clark
suit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of
San Diego, and alleges that Michaels failed to pay overtime
wages, provide meal and rest periods (or compensation in lieu
thereof), and provide itemized employee wage statements. The
Clark suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of
California’s unfair competition law. The plaintiffs seek
injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break
penalties, waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’
fees and costs. Under the Class Action Fairness Act, we
removed the case to federal court on August 5, 2005. We are
in the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe
that the Clark claim lacks merit, and we intend to vigorously
defend our interests.
Morris Claim
On November 16, 2005, Geoffrey Morris, a former Aaron
Brothers employee in San Diego, California, commenced a
proposed class action proceeding against Aaron Brothers, Inc. on
behalf of himself and current and former Aaron Brothers
employees in California from November 16, 2001 to the
present. The Morris suit was filed in the Superior Court of
California, County of San Diego, and alleges that Aaron
Brothers failed to pay overtime wages, reimburse the plaintiff
for necessary expenses (including the cost of gas used in
driving his car for business purposes), and provide adequate
meal and rest breaks (or compensation in lieu thereof). The
Morris suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of
California’s unfair competition law. With the exception of
the meal and rest breaks claim, the claims are asserted on
behalf of the putative class. The plaintiff seeks injunctive
relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break penalties,
waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and
costs. We are in the early stages of our investigation; however,
we believe that the Morris claim lacks merit, and we intend to
vigorously defend our interests.
Olivas Claim
On December 2, 2005, Sandra Olivas and Jerry Soskins,
former Michaels store managers in Los Angeles, California,
commenced a proposed class action proceeding against Michaels
Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and current and former
salaried store employees employed in California from
December 1, 2001 to the present. Michaels was served with
the complaint on January 31, 2006. The Olivas suit was
filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles, and alleges that Michaels failed to pay overtime wages,
accurately record hours worked, and provide itemized employee
wage statements. The Olivas suit also alleges that this conduct
was in breach of California’s unfair competition law. The
plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime
pay, penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On
March 1, 2006, we removed the case to the United States
District Court for the Central District of California. We are in
the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe that
the Olivas claim lacks merit, and we intend to vigorously defend
our interests.
Governmental Inquiries and Related Matters
In early 2005, the District Attorney’s office of the County
of New York and the SEC opened inquiries concerning
non-U.S. trusts
that directly or indirectly hold and have held shares of
Michaels Common Stock and Common Stock options. The staff of a
U.S. Senate subcommittee and a federal grand jury have
requested information with respect to the same facts. The
Company is cooperating in these inquiries and requests for
information.
F-28
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8. Commitments and
Contingencies (continued)
Certain of these trusts and corporate subsidiaries of the trusts
acquired securities of Michaels in transactions directly or
indirectly with Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and Sam Wyly, who are,
respectively, Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors and executive officers of Michaels, or with other Wyly
family members. In addition, subsidiaries of certain of these
trusts acquired securities directly from the Company in private
placement transactions in 1996 and 1997 and upon the exercise of
stock options transferred, directly or indirectly, to the trusts
or their subsidiaries by Charles Wyly, Sam Wyly, or other Wyly
family members.
We understand that Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly and/or certain of
their family members are beneficiaries of irrevocable
non-U.S. trusts.
The 1996 and 1997 private placement sales by the Company of
Michaels securities to subsidiaries of certain of these trusts
were disclosed by Michaels in filings with the SEC. The transfer
by Charles Wyly and/or Sam Wyly (or by other Wyly family members
or family-related entities) of Michaels securities to certain of
these trusts and subsidiaries was also disclosed in filings with
the SEC by us and/or by Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly.
Following the filing by Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly of an amended
Schedule 13D with the SEC on April 8, 2005, stating
that they may be deemed the beneficial owners of Michaels
securities held directly or indirectly by the
non-U.S. trusts,
Michaels disclosed in a press release that, as of March 31,
2005, under SEC
Rule 13d-3,
Charles Wyly may be deemed the owner of 6,045,818 shares,
or 4.4% of our outstanding Common Stock, and Sam Wyly may be
deemed the beneficial owner of 4,822,534 shares, or 3.5% of
the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. In our 2005 proxy
statement, Michaels included the securities held in the
non-U.S. trusts or
their separate subsidiaries, as reported in the Wylys’
amended Schedule 13D, in the beneficial ownership table of
our principal stockholders and management, with appropriate
footnotes referring to the amended Schedule 13D. Based on
information then available to the Company, Michaels SEC filings
did not report securities owned by the
non-U.S. trusts or
their corporate subsidiaries as beneficially owned by Charles
Wyly and Sam Wyly prior to 2005.
Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly have undertaken to file any additional
required Section 16 reports and to pay to Michaels the
amount of any Section 16 liability. Counsel for Michaels
and counsel for the Wylys have engaged in discussions of factual
and legal issues relating to Section 16.
Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly have made a proposal to settle any
issue of potential Section 16 liability, without admitting
or denying that they have or had, for Section 16 purposes,
beneficial ownership of Michaels securities that are or were
held by the
non-U.S. trusts or
their subsidiaries and without admitting any liability to the
Company under Section 16. Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly have
not yet filed any additional or amended Section 16 reports
with respect to transactions by the non-U.S. trusts or
their subsidiaries while these discussions have been in progress.
On March 15, 2006, the Board of Directors appointed a
special committee of the Board to investigate and make decisions
on behalf of Michaels with respect to any potential
Section 16 liability issue. The members of the special
committee are Richard C. Marcus, Cece Smith and Liz Minyard, all
independent Board members. The special committee has the full
authority of the Board to make all decisions with respect to any
potential Section 16 issue, including the authority to
approve or reject the proposed settlement, to negotiate the
terms of any settlement, and to take all other actions it deems
necessary or appropriate to resolve any potential
Section 16 liability issue. The special committee has
retained the firm of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP as its
independent counsel to advise it in this matter.
General
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits incidental to
our business. Based on currently available information, we
believe that resolution of all known contingencies is uncertain.
There can be no
F-29
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8. Commitments and
Contingencies (continued)
assurance that future costs of such litigation would not be
material to our financial position or results of operations.
|
|
Note 9. |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
We invest the majority of our cash and equivalents and
short-term investments in money market funds and trusts which
are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation or any other financial or government institution. We
also deposit a portion of our cash and equivalents with numerous
federally-insured financial institutions, the balances of which
often exceed $100,000. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insures each account up to a maximum of $100,000 of the
aggregate account balance with each institution. We believe
counterparty default risk is low as we only use financial
institutions with investment grade ratings or funds and trusts
which invest in securities with investment grade ratings and
that possess the necessary liquidity to satisfy our redemption
needs.
|
|
Note 10. |
Segments and Geographic Information |
We consider our Michaels, Aaron Brothers, and Recollections
stores and our Star Decorators Wholesale operations to be our
operating segments for purposes of determining reportable
segments based on the criteria of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. We determined that our Michaels and Aaron
Brothers operating segments have similar economic
characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria set forth in
paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131. With regard to our
Aaron Brothers operating segment, we determined that it did not
meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure set
forth in SFAS No. 131. We also determined that
individually, and in the aggregate, the Recollections stores and
Star Decorators Wholesale operations were immaterial for segment
reporting purposes. Therefore, we combine all operating segments
into one reporting segment.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same
as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies in Note 1.
Our sales, operating income, and assets by country are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
Income | |
|
Assets | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
3,451,696 |
|
|
$ |
325,016 |
|
|
$ |
1,809,868 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
224,669 |
|
|
|
39,324 |
|
|
|
65,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$ |
3,676,365 |
|
|
$ |
364,340 |
|
|
$ |
1,875,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
3,216,152 |
|
|
$ |
311,819 |
|
|
$ |
2,047,043 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
177,099 |
|
|
|
27,696 |
|
|
|
64,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$ |
3,393,251 |
|
|
$ |
339,515 |
|
|
$ |
2,111,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
2,945,629 |
|
|
$ |
280,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,740,710 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
145,627 |
|
|
|
22,099 |
|
|
|
60,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$ |
3,091,256 |
|
|
$ |
302,751 |
|
|
$ |
1,801,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 10. Segments and
Geographic Information (continued)
Canada’s operating income includes corporate allocations,
such as overhead and amounts related to our distribution and
Artistree operations. We present assets based on their physical,
geographic location. Certain assets located in the United States
are also used to support our Canadian operations, but we do not
allocate these assets or their associated expenses to Canada.
|
|
Note 11. |
Subsequent Event |
On March 20, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors
had retained JPMorgan as our financial advisor to assist the
Board in a process to explore strategic alternatives to enhance
shareholder value. The alternatives to be explored include, but
are not limited to, a potential sale of Michaels Stores, Inc. We
cannot give any assurance that any transaction will result from
this process.
On March 20, 2006, we announced certain management changes.
Effective on March 15, 2006, R. Michael Rouleau
retired as President and Chief Executive Officer and became a
special advisor to the Board of Directors. The Board has left
the office of Chief Executive Officer vacant and has assigned
all the duties of that office to our newly appointed
co-Presidents, Jeffrey N. Boyer, formerly Executive Vice
President–Chief Financial Officer, and Gregory A. Sandfort,
formerly Executive Vice President–General Merchandise
Manager.
Mr. Boyer has become President and Chief Financial Officer,
responsible for information technology, human resources, real
estate, strategic planning, legal, and new businesses.
Mr. Sandfort has become President and Chief Operating
Officer, responsible for merchandising, store operations,
marketing, and supply chain areas. Mr. Boyer and
Mr. Sandfort report to our Board and to our Chairman,
Charles J. Wyly, Jr.
F-31
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
UNAUDITED SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal 2005: As restated(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
821,016 |
|
|
$ |
745,493 |
|
|
$ |
839,663 |
|
|
$ |
1,270,193 |
|
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
|
|
|
503,204 |
|
|
|
481,263 |
|
|
|
535,155 |
|
|
|
797,460 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
317,812 |
|
|
|
264,230 |
|
|
|
304,508 |
|
|
|
472,733 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
227,894 |
|
|
|
223,104 |
|
|
|
251,235 |
|
|
|
285,079 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
87,179 |
|
|
|
39,671 |
|
|
|
50,817 |
|
|
|
186,673 |
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
52,554 |
|
|
|
16,461 |
|
|
|
33,247 |
|
|
|
117,250 |
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(35,934 |
) |
|
|
16,461 |
|
|
|
33,247 |
|
|
|
117,250 |
|
Before cumulative effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
After cumulative effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
Common shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
136,018 |
|
|
|
135,774 |
|
|
|
135,395 |
|
|
|
133,870 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
138,435 |
|
|
|
138,408 |
|
|
|
137,270 |
|
|
|
136,627 |
|
Fiscal 2005: As previously reported(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
821,016 |
|
|
$ |
745,493 |
|
|
$ |
839,663 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
|
|
|
516,336 |
|
|
|
463,203 |
|
|
|
511,545 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
304,680 |
|
|
|
282,290 |
|
|
|
328,118 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
224,470 |
|
|
|
218,012 |
|
|
|
239,048 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
77,471 |
|
|
|
62,824 |
|
|
|
86,614 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net income
|
|
|
46,533 |
|
|
|
30,815 |
|
|
|
55,442 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Common shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
136,018 |
|
|
|
135,774 |
|
|
|
135,395 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
139,233 |
|
|
|
139,134 |
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Fiscal 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
725,852 |
|
|
$ |
682,934 |
|
|
$ |
799,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,184,560 |
|
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
|
|
|
465,628 |
|
|
|
425,628 |
|
|
|
504,236 |
|
|
|
751,442 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
260,224 |
|
|
|
257,306 |
|
|
|
295,669 |
|
|
|
433,118 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
205,701 |
|
|
|
207,158 |
|
|
|
220,489 |
|
|
|
265,097 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
52,040 |
|
|
|
47,505 |
|
|
|
72,772 |
|
|
|
167,198 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
29,332 |
|
|
|
26,746 |
|
|
|
42,488 |
|
|
|
103,243 |
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
Common shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
136,562 |
|
|
|
136,304 |
|
|
|
135,550 |
|
|
|
135,086 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
139,692 |
|
|
|
139,280 |
|
|
|
138,796 |
|
|
|
138,295 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts have been restated to reflect weighted average cost
accounting and the impact of expensing stock options under
SFAS No. 123(R). The changes to our accounting
policies are more fully described in Note 2 to these
financial statements. |
(2) |
Amounts for the first three quarters are as previously reported
on our fiscal 2005
Forms 10-Q. The
amounts for each quarter presented represent our operations
using a retail inventory method and do not include the effects
of expensing share-based compensation. Fourth quarter amounts
were excluded from this “As previously reported”
presentation since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 was never
previously reported using a retail inventory method and
excluding share-based compensation, as we adopted these new
accounting principles in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. |
F-32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 29, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey N. Boyer |
|
President and Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles J. Wyly
Charles J. Wyly |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
March 29, 2006 |
|
/s/ Sam Wyly
Sam Wyly |
|
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
March 29, 2006 |
|
/s/ Jeffrey N. Boyer
Jeffrey N. Boyer |
|
President and Chief Financial Officer (Co-Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
March 29, 2006 |
|
/s/ Gregory A. Sandfort
Gregory A. Sandfort |
|
President and Chief Operating Officer (Co-Principal
Executive Officer) |
|
March 29, 2006 |
|
/s/ Richard E. Hanlon
Richard E. Hanlon |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2006 |
|
/s/ Richard C. Marcus
Richard C. Marcus |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2006 |
|
/s/ Liz Minyard
Liz Minyard |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2006 |
|
/s/ Cece Smith
Cece Smith |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2006 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc.,
as amended (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on July 7, 2004, SEC
File No. 001-09338).
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on
July 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on
July 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.4 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on
July 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
3.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously
filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant
on March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 1, 2003, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2003, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.1
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan, as amended and
restated effective August 1, 1999 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for period ended
August 4, 2001, filed by Registrant on September 18,
2001, SEC File No. 000-11822).*
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated December 5, 2001 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for period ended May 4,
2002, filed by Registrant on June 18, 2002, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amendment to Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan,
as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999, dated
January 17, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to
Form 10-Q for period ended May 4, 2002, filed by
Registrant on June 18, 2002, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.4
|
|
Third Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated December 3, 2002 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for period ended
November 1, 2003, filed by Registrant on December 16,
2003, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.5
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated as of January 1, 2004 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K for period ended
January 29, 2005, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.6
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k)
Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1999,
dated March 15, 2005 (filed herewith).*
|
10.7
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Employees Stock
Purchase Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.2 to
Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on February 1, 2002, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.8
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1997 Employees
Stock Purchase Plan (filed herewith).*
|
10.9
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option
Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on July 24, 2003, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.10
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2001 Employee
Stock Option Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.3 to
Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on July 24, 2003, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.11
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 2001 General Stock Option Plan
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by
the Registrant on September 28, 2004, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by
Registrant on June 17, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.13
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement relating to June
2005 Director Grants (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3
to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on June 17, 2005, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.14
|
|
Forms of Award Agreements under the Registrant’s 2005
Incentive Compensation Plan (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
August 4, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.15
|
|
Forms of Restricted Stock Award Agreements under the
Registrant’s 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed
herewith).*
|
10.16
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated effective as of July 18, 2003 (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.4 to Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on
July 24, 2003, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.17
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Executive
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on April 13, 2005, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.18
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Chief Financial Officer (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
April 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.19
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Store Operations (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
April 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.20
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–General Merchandise Manager (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
April 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.21
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Executive
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on March 20, 2006, SEC File
No. 001-09338).*
|
10.22
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Chief Financial Officer (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.23
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–General Merchandise Manager (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.24
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Store Operations (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.25
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Supply Chain (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 20, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.26
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Financial
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on March 30, 2006, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.27
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for President and Chief Operating
Officer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
filed by Registrant on March 30, 2006, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.28
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Chief Merchant (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 30, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.29
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan for Executive Vice
President–Specialty Businesses (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
March 30, 2006, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Michaels
Stores, Inc. and R. Michael Rouleau, dated July 7, 2004
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for
period ended July 31, 2004, filed by Registrant on
September 1, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.31
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between
Michaels Stores, Inc. and R. Michael Rouleau, dated
March 15, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed by Registrant on March 20, 2006, SEC
File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.32
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release, dated July 28, 2004,
between Ronald Staffieri and Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K for period ended
January 29, 2005, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.33
|
|
Description of Compensation Regarding Company Car for R. Michael
Rouleau (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to
Form 10-K for period ended January 29, 2005, filed by
Registrant on April 11, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.34
|
|
Description of Compensation Regarding Company Car for Charles J.
Wyly, Jr. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.19 to
Form 10-K for period ended January 29, 2005, filed by
Registrant on April 11, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.35
|
|
Description of Compensation of Directors (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
June 17, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).*
|
10.36
|
|
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement between Michaels
Stores, Inc. and certain directors of the Registrant (filed
herewith).
|
10.37
|
|
Form of Officer Indemnification Agreement between Michaels
Stores, Inc. and certain officers of the Registrant (filed
herewith).
|
10.38
|
|
Term Lease Master Agreement between IBM Credit Corporation as
Lessor and Michaels Stores, Inc. as Lessee (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 1, 1997, filed by Registrant on May 2, 1997,
SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
10.39
|
|
Credit Agreement, entered into as of November 18, 2005,
among Registrant, Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders
party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative
Agent for itself and the other lenders, as Swing Line Lender and
as Letter of Credit Issuer (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on
November 22, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.40
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2001,
between Michaels Stores, Inc. and Fleet National Bank and the
other lenders named therein (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for period ended May 5,
2001, filed by Registrant on June 19, 2001, SEC File
No. 000-11822).
|
10.41
|
|
First Amendment and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
as of December 31, 2001, among Michaels Stores, Inc., Fleet
National Bank, and the other lenders named therein (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 2, 2002, filed by Registrant on April 12,
2002, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.42
|
|
Second Amendment and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement,
dated as of December 31, 2003, among Michaels Stores, Inc.,
Fleet National Bank, and the other lenders named therein
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Form 10-K for
the year ended January 31, 2004, filed by Registrant on
April 2, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.43
|
|
Third Amendment and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
as of October 6, 2004, among Michaels Stores, Inc., Fleet
National Bank, and the other lenders named therein (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the period
ended October 30, 2004, filed by Registrant on
December 7, 2004, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
10.44
|
|
Option Agreement, dated as of December 23, 1996, between
Michaels Stores, Inc. and Elegance Limited (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.29 to Form 10-K for the year ended
February 1, 1997, filed by Registrant on May 2, 1997,
SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
10.45
|
|
Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated as of October 16,
1984, between Michaels Stores, Inc. and Peoples Restaurants,
Inc., including form of Warrant (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended
January 31, 1993, filed by Registrant on April 30,
1993, SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
First Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated
October 31, 1984, between The First Dallas Group, Ltd. and
Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to
Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1993, filed
by Registrant on April 30, 1993, SEC File
No. 000-11822).
|
10.47
|
|
Second Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated
November 28, 1984, between First Dallas
Investments-Michaels I, Ltd. and Michaels Stores, Inc.
(previously filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Form 10-K for the
year ended January 31, 1993, filed by Registrant on
April 30, 1993, SEC File No. 000-11822).
|
10.48
|
|
Third Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated
February 27, 1985, between First Dallas
Investments-Michaels I, Ltd., The First Dallas Group, Ltd.,
Sam Wyly, Charles J. Wyly, Jr., and Michaels Stores, Inc.
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-09456), filed by Registrant on
October 14, 1986).
|
10.49
|
|
Amendment to Common Stock and Warrant Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1992, between Michaels Stores, Inc. and the
other parties named therein (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.8 to Form S-8 (Registration
No. 33-54726), filed by Registrant on November 20,
1992).
|
18.1
|
|
Preferability Letter from Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Michaels Stores, Inc. (previously filed as
Exhibit 21.1 to Form 10-K for period ended
January 29, 2005, filed by Registrant on April 11,
2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed
herewith).
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Gregory A. Sandfort pursuant to §302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Jeffrey N. Boyer pursuant to §302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith).
|
|
|
* |
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |