-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, PNwswu9qe7EyTQPc/aI5Nmigmwg9xrs0FfPhvqg17Ff2AUyYM58QB8kSjDUEjohg Lokt9gya82J1USfnZVfgtA== 0000950134-05-022616.txt : 20051205 0000950134-05-022616.hdr.sgml : 20051205 20051205172846 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950134-05-022616 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20051029 FILED AS OF DATE: 20051205 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20051205 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: MICHAELS STORES INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000740670 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: RETAIL-HOBBY, TOY & GAME SHOPS [5945] IRS NUMBER: 751943604 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0201 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-09338 FILM NUMBER: 051245174 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 8000 BENT BRANCH DR STREET 2: ******** CITY: IRVING STATE: TX ZIP: 75063 BUSINESS PHONE: (972)409-1300 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: PO BOX 619566 CITY: DFW STATE: TX ZIP: 75261-9566 10-Q 1 d30945e10vq.htm FORM 10-Q e10vq
Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
 
 
 
FORM 10-Q
 
     
(Mark One)    
þ
  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended October 29, 2005
OR
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                   to                  
 
Commission file number 001-09338
 
 
 
 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware
  75-1943604
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. employer
identification number)
 
8000 Bent Branch Drive
Irving, Texas 75063
P.O. Box 619566
DFW, Texas 75261-9566
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 
(972) 409-1300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
     
    Shares Outstanding as of
Title
 
November 29, 2005
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share
  133,678,592
 


 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
 
             
  Financial Statements        
    Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 29, 2005, January 29, 2005, and October 30, 2004 (unaudited)     3  
    Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarter and nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (unaudited)     4  
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (unaudited)     5  
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)     6  
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     15  
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     24  
  Controls and Procedures     25  
 
  Legal Proceedings     26  
  Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities     27  
  Exhibits     28  
    29  
 Certifications Pursuant to Section 302
 Certifications Pursuant to Section 302
 Certifications Pursuant to Section 906


2


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
Part I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements.
 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
(In thousands, except share data)
 
(Unaudited)
 
                         
    October 29,
    January 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2005     2004  
ASSETS
                       
Current assets:
                       
Cash and equivalents
  $ 112,517     $ 535,852     $ 222,171  
Short-term investments
          50,379       50,235  
Merchandise inventories
    1,214,504       936,395       1,096,400  
Prepaid expenses and other
    49,033       26,613       34,633  
Deferred and prepaid income taxes
    30,405       22,032       19,471  
                         
Total current assets
    1,406,459       1,571,271       1,422,910  
                         
Property and equipment, at cost
    990,171       913,174       863,421  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (571,554 )     (506,193 )     (469,867 )
                         
      418,617       406,981       393,554  
                         
Goodwill
    115,839       115,839       115,839  
Other assets
    18,676       17,569       16,810  
                         
      134,515       133,408       132,649  
                         
Total assets
  $ 1,959,591     $ 2,111,660     $ 1,949,113  
                         
             
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
Current liabilities:
                       
Accounts payable
  $ 253,034     $ 256,266     $ 257,023  
Accrued liabilities and other
    259,211       242,682       222,248  
Income taxes payable
          12,992       6,066  
                         
Total current liabilities
    512,245       511,940       485,337  
                         
91/4% Senior Notes due 2009
          200,000       200,000  
Deferred income taxes
    26,848       30,355       27,550  
Other long-term liabilities
    85,582       72,200       41,256  
                         
Total long-term liabilities
    112,430       302,555       268,806  
                         
      624,675       814,495       754,143  
                         
Commitments and contingencies
                       
Stockholders’ equity:
                       
Preferred Stock, $0.10 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
                 
Common Stock, $0.10 par value, 350,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding of 134,800,844 at October 29, 2005, 135,726,717 at January 29, 2005, and 135,093,810 at October 30, 2004
    13,480       13,573       13,509  
Additional paid-in capital
    386,330       451,449       438,850  
Retained earnings
    922,907       826,821       733,069  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    12,199       5,322       9,542  
                         
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,334,916       1,297,165       1,194,970  
                         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,959,591     $ 2,111,660     $ 1,949,113  
                         
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 


3


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
(Unaudited)
 
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Net sales
  $ 839,663     $ 799,905     $ 2,406,172     $ 2,208,691  
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
    511,545       504,236       1,491,084       1,395,492  
                                 
Gross profit
    328,118       295,669       915,088       813,199  
Selling, general, and administrative expense
    239,048       220,489       681,530       633,348  
Store pre-opening costs
    2,456       2,408       6,649       7,534  
                                 
Operating income
    86,614       72,772       226,909       172,317  
Interest expense
    229       5,042       20,819       15,439  
Other (income) and expense, net
    (3,039 )     (1,077 )     (8,088 )     (2,743 )
                                 
Income before income taxes
    89,424       68,807       214,178       159,621  
Provision for income taxes
    33,982       26,319       81,388       61,055  
                                 
Net income
  $ 55,442     $ 42,488     $ 132,790     $ 98,566  
                                 
Earnings per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.41     $ 0.31     $ 0.98     $ 0.72  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.40     $ 0.31     $ 0.96     $ 0.71  
                                 
Dividends per common share
  $ 0.10     $ 0.07     $ 0.27     $ 0.19  
                                 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


4


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
(In thousands)
 
(Unaudited)
 
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2004  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 132,790     $ 98,566  
Adjustments:
               
Depreciation
    72,656       65,756  
Amortization
    292       294  
Loss from early extinguishment of debt
    12,136        
Other
    391       780  
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Merchandise inventories
    (278,109 )     (203,477 )
Prepaid expenses and other
    (22,420 )     (5,435 )
Deferred income taxes and other
    (4,871 )     (3,342 )
Accounts payable
    (3,232 )     84,315  
Income taxes payable
    (2,445 )     16,917  
Accrued liabilities and other
    24,679       33,157  
Other long-term liabilities
    10,265       4,099  
                 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
    (57,868 )     91,630  
                 
Investing activities:
               
Additions to property and equipment
    (85,785 )     (71,663 )
Purchases of short-term investments
    (226 )     (50,235 )
Sales of short-term investments
    50,605        
Net proceeds from sales of property and equipment
          60  
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (35,406 )     (121,838 )
                 
Financing activities:
               
Repayment of Senior Notes
    (209,250 )      
Proceeds from stock options exercised
    32,285       28,595  
Repurchase of Common Stock
    (119,133 )     (94,582 )
Cash dividends paid to stockholders
    (36,709 )     (25,867 )
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock and other
    2,746       2,408  
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (330,061 )     (89,446 )
                 
Net decrease in cash and equivalents
    (423,335 )     (119,654 )
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
    535,852       341,825  
                 
Cash and equivalents at end of period
  $ 112,517     $ 222,171  
                 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


5


Table of Contents

MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1.   Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Michaels Stores, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. All expressions of “us,” “we,” “our,” and all similar expressions are references to Michaels Stores, Inc. and our consolidated wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.
 
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and other items, as disclosed) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Because of the seasonal nature of our business, the results of operations for the quarter and nine months ended October 29, 2005 are not indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
 
The balance sheet at January 29, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005.
 
Share and per share data (except par value) presented for all periods reflect the effect of a two-for-one Common Stock split, which was effected in the form of a stock dividend on October 12, 2004, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2004.
 
All references herein to “fiscal 2005” relate to the 52 weeks ending January 28, 2006 and all references to “fiscal 2004” relate to the 52 weeks ended January 29, 2005. In addition, all references herein to “the third quarter of fiscal 2005” and “the first nine months of fiscal 2005” relate to the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 29, 2005 and all references to “the third quarter of fiscal 2004” and “the first nine months of fiscal 2004” relate to the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 30, 2004.


6


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 2.   Earnings per Share

 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:
 
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
Numerator:
                               
Net income
  $ 55,442     $ 42,488     $ 132,790     $ 98,566  
                                 
Denominator:
                               
Denominator for basic earnings per common share-weighted average shares
    135,395       135,550       135,729       136,138  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
Employee stock options
    2,605       3,246       3,072       3,119  
                                 
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share-weighted average shares adjusted for dilutive securities
    138,000       138,796       138,801       139,257  
                                 
Earnings per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.41     $ 0.31     $ 0.98     $ 0.72  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.40     $ 0.31     $ 0.96     $ 0.71  
                                 
 
Our purchase and subsequent retirement of 1.4 million and 3.3 million shares of our Common Stock in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2005, respectively, reduced the number of weighted average shares outstanding by 650,000 and 1.4 million shares for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2005, respectively. In addition, our purchase and subsequent retirement of 1.5 million shares and 3.6 million shares of our Common Stock in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2004, respectively, reduced the number of weighted average shares outstanding by 565,000 and 2.7 million shares for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2004, respectively.
 
Note 3.   Stock-Based Compensation
 
We have elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related guidance in accounting for our employee stock options. The exercise price of our employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant and, as a result, we do not recognize compensation expense for stock option grants.
 
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per common share, as required by the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, has been determined as if we had accounted for our employee stock options under the fair value method. For purposes


7


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 3.  Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
 
of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized over the options’ vesting periods. Our pro forma information is as follows:
 
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2004(1)     2005     2004(1)  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
Net income, as reported
  $ 55,442     $ 42,488     $ 132,790     $ 98,566  
Stock-based employee compensation cost:
                               
As if the fair value method were applied, net of income tax
    8,019       6,233       14,619       12,266  
                                 
Pro forma net income
  $ 47,423     $ 36,255     $ 118,171     $ 86,300  
                                 
Earnings per common share, as reported:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.41     $ 0.31     $ 0.98     $ 0.72  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.40     $ 0.31     $ 0.96     $ 0.71  
                                 
Pro forma earnings per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.35     $ 0.27     $ 0.87     $ 0.63  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.35     $ 0.26     $ 0.86     $ 0.62  
                                 
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    135,395       135,550       135,729       136,138  
Diluted
    137,270       138,012       137,716       138,304  
 
 
(1)  The pro forma information for the quarter and nine months ended October 30, 2004 was revised based on the results of management’s review of prior years’ calculations. The effects on the pro forma information resulting from the difference between previously reported stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax, and the revised presentation are as follows: for the third quarter of fiscal 2004, an increase in stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax, with a corresponding decrease in pro forma net income of $1.2 million, an increase in pro forma diluted weighted average shares outstanding of 360,000, and a decrease in pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.01; for the nine months ended October 30, 2004, an increase in stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax, with a corresponding decrease in pro forma net income of $254,000, an increase in pro forma diluted weighted average shares outstanding of 293,000, and a decrease in pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.01.
 
Note 4.   Debt
 
91/4% Senior Notes due 2009
 
In 2001, we issued $200 million in principal amount of 91/4% Senior Notes due July 1, 2009, which were unsecured and interest thereon was payable semi-annually on each January 1 and July 1. On July 1, 2005, we redeemed the Senior Notes at a price of $1,046.25 per $1,000 of principal amount. This early redemption resulted in a pre-tax charge of $12.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, which represents a combination of a $9.3 million call premium and $2.8 million of unamortized costs associated with the Senior Notes, and was recorded as interest expense.


8


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 4.   Debt (Continued)

 
 
Credit Agreement
 
On November 18, 2005, we entered into a new five-year, $300 million senior unsecured credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders. The new $300 million Credit Agreement replaced our existing $200 million revolving credit facility with Fleet National Bank and the other lenders, which we terminated immediately prior to entering into our new $300 million Credit Agreement. We were in compliance with all terms and conditions of our $200 million credit agreement through the termination date, and we did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with its termination. No borrowings were outstanding under our $200 million credit agreement as of October 29, 2005, January 29, 2005, or October 30, 2004. Borrowings available under our $200 million credit agreement were reduced by the aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding, which was $21.2 million as of October 29, 2005.
 
Our new $300 million Credit Agreement provides for a committed line of credit of $300 million (with a provision for an increase, at our option on stated conditions, of up to a total of $400 million), a $250 million sublimit on the issuance of letters of credit, and a $25 million sublimit for borrowings in Euro, Sterling, Yen, Canadian Dollars, and other approved currencies. We may use borrowings under our new $300 million Credit Agreement for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including stock repurchases and permitted acquisitions. Our new $300 million Credit Agreement limits our ability to, among other things, create liens, engage in mergers, consolidations and certain other transactions, and requires us to adhere to certain consolidated financial covenants. Our obligations under our new $300 million Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Michaels Stores Procurement Company, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, and such other of our subsidiaries as may be necessary to cause the assets owned by us and our subsidiary guarantors to be 85% of our consolidated total assets. Borrowings available under our new $300 million Credit Agreement will be reduced by the aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding.
 
Note 5.   Comprehensive Income
 
Our comprehensive income is as follows:
 
 
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
          (In thousands)        
Net income
  $ 55,442     $ 42,488     $ 132,790     $ 98,566  
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other
    2,721       5,154       6,877       5,324  
                                 
Comprehensive income
  $ 58,163     $ 47,642     $ 139,667     $ 103,890  
                                 
 
Note 6.   Legal Proceedings
 
Derivative Claims
 
On March 21, 2003, Julie Fathergill filed a purported stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the 192nd District Court for Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit names certain former and current officers and directors, including all of Michaels’ current directors, as individual defendants and Michaels as a nominal defendant. The derivative action relates to actions prior to our announcement on November 7, 2002, that we had revised our outlook for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2002, adjusting downward guidance for annual


9


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 6.   Legal Proceedings (Continued)

 
earnings per diluted share. The plaintiff alleges that, prior to that announcement, certain of the defendants made misrepresentations and failed to disclose negative information about the financial condition of Michaels while the individual defendants were selling shares of Michaels Common Stock. The plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duties, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. All of these claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of Michaels. On November 7, 2005, the Court entered a written order granting the defendants’ special exceptions and ordering that the case will be dismissed with prejudice unless the plaintiff amends her petition within 30 days to state an actionable claim against the defendants. We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously oppose them.
 
On September 11, 2003, Leo J. Dutil filed a purported stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The lawsuit names certain former and current officers and directors as individual defendants and Michaels as a nominal defendant. In this derivative action, the plaintiff makes allegations of fact similar to those made in the Fathergill derivative lawsuit described above. The plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential information, and contribution and indemnification. All of these claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of Michaels. We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously oppose them.
 
Cotton Claim
 
On December 20, 2002, James Cotton, a former store manager of Michaels of Canada, ULC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, and Suzette Kennedy, a former assistant manager of Michaels of Canada, commenced a proposed class proceeding against Michaels of Canada and Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and current and former employees employed in Canada. The Cotton claim was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and alleges that the defendants violated employment standards legislation in Ontario and other provinces and territories of Canada by failing to pay overtime compensation as required by that legislation. The Cotton claim also alleges that this conduct was in breach of the contracts of employment of those individuals. The Cotton claim seeks a declaration that the defendants have acted in breach of applicable legislation, payment to current and former employees for overtime, damages for breach of contract, punitive, aggravated and exemplary damages, interest, and costs. In May of 2005, the plaintiffs delivered material in support of their request that this action be certified as a class proceeding. A date has not yet been set for the hearing with respect to certification. We intend to contest certification of this claim as a class action. Further, we believe we have certain defenses on the merits and intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate a range of possible loss, if any, in this claim.
 
Clark Claim
 
On July 13, 2005, Michael Clark, a former Michaels store assistant manager and Lucinda Prouty, a former Michaels store department manager in San Diego, California, commenced a proposed class action proceeding against Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and current and former hourly retail employees employed in California from July 13, 2001 to the present. The Clark suit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, and alleges that we failed to pay overtime wages, provide meal and rest periods (or compensation in lieu thereof), and provide itemized employee wage statements. The Clark suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of California’s unfair competition law. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break penalties, waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Under the Class Action Fairness Act, we removed the case to federal court on


10


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 6.   Legal Proceedings (Continued)

 
August 5, 2005. We are in the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe that the Clark claim lacks merit, and we intend to vigorously defend our interests.
 
Morris Claim
 
On November 16, 2005, Geoffrey Morris, a former Aaron Brothers employee in San Diego, California, commenced a proposed class action proceeding against Aaron Brothers, Inc. on behalf of himself and current and former Aaron Brothers employees in California from November 16, 2001 to the present. The Morris suit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, and alleges that Aaron Brothers failed to pay overtime wages, reimburse the plaintiff for necessary expenses (including the cost of gas used in driving his car for business purposes), and provide adequate meal and rest breaks (or compensation in lieu thereof). The Morris suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of California’s unfair competition law. With the exception of the meal and rest breaks claim, the claims are asserted on behalf of the putative class. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break penalties, waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. We are in the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe that the Morris claim lacks merit, and we intend to vigorously defend our interests.
 
General
 
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits incidental to our business. Based on currently available information, we believe that resolution of all known contingencies is uncertain. There can be no assurance that future costs of such litigation would not be material to our financial position or results of operations.
 
Note 7.   Segments
 
We consider our Michaels, Aaron Brothers, and Recollections stores and our Star Decorators Wholesale operations to be our operating segments for purposes of determining reportable segments based on the criteria set forth in SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. We determined that our Michaels and Aaron Brothers operating segments have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria in paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131. Our Aaron Brothers operating segment does not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure set forth in SFAS No. 131, and our Recollections stores and Star Decorators Wholesale operations are immaterial for segment reporting purposes individually, and in the aggregate. Therefore, we combine all operating segments into one reporting segment.


11


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 7.   Segments (Continued)

 
 
Our sales, operating income, and assets by country are as follows:
 
                                 
    Net Sales     Operating Income     Total Assets        
    (In thousands)        
Quarter ended October 29, 2005:
                               
United States
  $ 784,536     $ 77,463     $ 1,867,518          
Canada
    55,127       9,151       92,073          
                                 
Consolidated Total
  $ 839,663     $ 86,614     $ 1,959,591          
                                 
Quarter ended October 30, 2004:
                               
United States
  $ 756,597     $ 68,964     $ 1,878,045          
Canada
    43,308       3,808       71,068          
                                 
Consolidated Total
  $ 799,905     $ 72,772     $ 1,949,113          
                                 
Nine months ended October 29, 2005:
                               
United States
  $ 2,264,724     $ 204,922     $ 1,867,518          
Canada
    141,448       21,987       92,073          
                                 
Consolidated Total
  $ 2,406,172     $ 226,909     $ 1,959,591          
                                 
Nine months ended October 30, 2004:
                               
United States
  $ 2,096,983     $ 159,731     $ 1,878,045          
Canada
    111,708       12,586       71,068          
                                 
Consolidated Total
  $ 2,208,691     $ 172,317     $ 1,949,113          
                                 
 
Canada’s operating income includes allocations of permanent markdown reserves, corporate overhead, and amounts related to our distribution and Artistree operations. We present assets based on their physical, geographic location. Certain assets located in the United States are also used to support our Canadian operations, but we do not allocate those assets or their associated expenses to Canada.
 
Note 8.   Changes in Accounting Policies
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values at the time of grant. Pro forma disclosure will no longer be an alternative. Our effective date for adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) is January 29, 2006 (the first day of our fiscal year 2006); however, we are permitted to early adopt.
 
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we currently account for share-based payments to employees using the intrinsic value method under APB No. 25, and, as such, recognize no compensation cost for employee stock options. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and resulting recognition of compensation cost will significantly impact our results of operations but we are unable to quantify the impact because it is dependent upon, among other items, the number of share-based payments granted in the future, our selection of a methodology to determine fair value for grants, and our estimates of forfeitures.


12


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 8.   Changes in Accounting Policies (Continued)

 
 
We do not anticipate a material impact on our overall financial position or total cash flows, but
SFAS No. 123(R) does require that we report the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods following adoption. While we cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amounts of operating cash flows recognized for such excess tax deductions were $2.1 million and $3.4 million for the quarters ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively, and $18.9 million and $13.2 million for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively.
 
Inventory Costs
 
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, as an amendment to ARB No. 43. SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not currently believe that our adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 151 will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
 
Currently, we value inventory at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using a retail inventory method. This inventory method uses a broad store sampling process to estimate ending inventories valued at retail for all Michaels stores. These inventory values are used in our retail inventory calculation, which determines cost of sales and ending inventory using a single pool of inventory.
 
Subsequent to the implementation of our perpetual inventory system in fiscal 2004, we began evaluating the use of this system to value inventory for both operational and financial reporting purposes. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we determined that we would change our accounting method for valuing substantially all of our merchandise inventories from our current retail inventory method to the weighted average cost method. The weighted average cost method will utilize the newly available perpetual inventory records to value inventories at the lower of cost or market on a store-level SKU basis. We currently expect to adopt this new inventory accounting policy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, but no later than the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
 
Assuming we adopt the change in accounting policy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 under APB No. 20, Accounting Changes, we would record the cumulative effect of the change as of the beginning of fiscal year 2005 in accordance with SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. The non-cash cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle on prior periods, and related reduction in our inventory balance, is currently estimated at approximately $140 million on a pre-tax basis. On an after-tax basis, the cumulative effect is currently estimated at approximately $87 million ($0.62 per diluted share). For fiscal 2005, cost of goods sold under the weighted average cost method is estimated to be approximately $15 million higher on a pre-tax basis, or $0.07 per diluted share on an after-tax basis, than under our current retail inventory method. The estimates of the beginning of fiscal 2005 cumulative effect of accounting change, reduction in inventory balance, and fiscal 2005 income statement effect are preliminary and may change materially. We are unable to compute a pro forma annual impact in any years prior to fiscal 2005 as the information required to value inventory on the weighted average cost method is not available for prior years.


13


Table of Contents

 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)

Note 9.   Certain Issues Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we were informed by Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and Sam Wyly, who are the Chairman and Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors, respectively, that they have filed a report with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to Michaels securities held by certain non-U.S. trusts and subsidiaries. We understand that Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly and certain of their family members are direct or contingent beneficiaries of certain of those trusts. According to this report, Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly may be deemed the beneficial owners in the aggregate as of March 31, 2005 of 10,868,352 shares of Common Stock or 7.9% of the then-outstanding Common Stock. As a result of the Wylys’ filing, we included this ownership information in our proxy statement for the 2005 annual meeting of stockholders.
 
It is possible that purchases and sales of Michaels securities by the trusts or their subsidiaries may have resulted in short-swing profits under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Pursuant to Section 16, Charles Wyly and Sam Wyly will reimburse us for those profits, if any. Any resulting impact will not affect our previously reported consolidated statement of income or adversely affect our consolidated balance sheet.


14


Table of Contents

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
All expressions of “us,” “we,” “our,” and all similar expressions are references to Michaels Stores, Inc. and its consolidated wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.
 
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Information
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion, as well as other portions of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs. Any statements contained herein (including, but not limited to, statements to the effect that Michaels or its management “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “expects,” “believes,” and other similar expressions) that are not statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005. Specific examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our future cash dividend policy, forecasts of financial performance, capital expenditures, working capital requirements, and stock repurchases. Our actual results could materially differ from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to:
 
  •  our ability to remain competitive in the areas of merchandise quality, price, breadth of selection, customer service, and convenience;
 
  •  our ability to anticipate and/or react to changes in customer demand and preferences for products and supplies used in creative activities and the related potential impact to merchandise inventories in categories that represent a significant portion of our business;
 
  •  changes in consumer confidence resulting in a reduction in consumer spending on items perceived to be discretionary;
 
  •  unexpected consumer responses to changes in promotional programs;
 
  •  the execution and management of our store growth, including new concepts, the impact of new competitor stores in locations near our existing stores, and the availability of acceptable real estate locations for new store openings;
 
  •  the effective optimization and maintenance of our perpetual inventory and automated replenishment systems and related impacts to inventory levels;
 
  •  the identification and implementation of enhancements to our supply chain to enable us to distribute additional SKUs through our distribution centers;
 
  •  delays in the receipt of merchandise ordered from our suppliers due to delays in connection with either the manufacture or shipment of such merchandise;
 
  •  transportation delays (including dock strikes and other work stoppages) and increases in transportation costs due to fuel surcharges and transportation regulations;
 
  •  restrictive actions by foreign governments or changes in United States laws and regulations affecting imports or domestic distribution;
 
  •  significant increases in inflation or commodity prices, such as petroleum, natural gas, steel, and paper, which may adversely affect our costs, including cost of merchandise;
 
  •  significant increases in tariffs or duties levied on imports which may limit the availability of certain merchandise from our foreign suppliers;
 
  •  changes in political, economic, and social conditions;
 
  •  significant fluctuations in exchange rates;


15


Table of Contents

  •  financial difficulties of any of our key vendors, suppliers, or service providers;
 
  •  the design and implementation of new management information systems as well as the maintenance and enhancement of existing systems, particularly in light of our continued store growth and the addition of new concepts;
 
  •  our ability to maintain the security of electronic and other confidential information;
 
  •  our ability to establish effective internal controls over financial reporting for inventories and cost of sales under our proposed weighted average cost method;
 
  •  our ability to comply with the terms and restrictions of our Credit Agreement;
 
  •  our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel to successfully execute our operating plans;
 
  •  the seasonality of the retail business; and
 
  •  other factors as set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005, particularly in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and “Risk Factors,” and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
 
We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only as of the time of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and do not undertake to update or revise them as more information becomes available.
 
General
 
All references herein to “fiscal 2005” relate to the 52 weeks ending January 28, 2006 and all references to “fiscal 2004” relate to the 52 weeks ended January 29, 2005. In addition, all references herein to “the third quarter of fiscal 2005” and “the first nine months of fiscal 2005” relate to the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 29, 2005 and all references to “the third quarter of fiscal 2004” and “the first nine months of fiscal 2004” relate to the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 30, 2004.


16


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth certain of our unaudited operating data (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Michaels stores:
                               
Retail stores open at beginning of period
    870       827       844       804  
Retail stores opened during the period
    19       22       46       45  
Retail stores opened (relocations) during the period
    7       8       18       30  
Retail stores closed during the period
                (1 )      
Retail stores closed (relocations) during the period
    (7 )     (8 )     (18 )     (30 )
                                 
Retail stores open at end of period
    889       849       889       849  
Aaron Brothers stores:
                               
Retail stores open at beginning of period
    165       160       164       158  
Retail stores opened during the period
    1       4       2       7  
Retail stores opened (relocations) during the period
          1             1  
Retail stores closed during the period
                      (1 )
Retail stores closed (relocations) during the period
          (1 )           (1 )
                                 
Retail stores open at end of period
    166       164       166       164  
Recollections stores:
                               
Retail stores open at beginning of period
    11       5       8       2  
Retail stores opened during the period
          3       3       6  
                                 
Retail stores open at end of period
    11       8       11       8  
Star Wholesale stores:
                               
Wholesale stores open at beginning of period
    4       3       3       3  
Wholesale stores opened during the period
                1        
                                 
Wholesale stores open at end of period
    4       3       4       3  
                                 
Total store count at end of period
    1,070       1,024       1,070       1,024  
                                 
Other operating data:
                               
Average inventory per Michaels store(1)
  $ 1,264     $ 1,213     $ 1,264     $ 1,213  
Comparable store sales increase(2)
    0.8 %     0.9 %     4.2 %     3.9 %
 
 
(1) Average inventory per Michaels store calculation excludes our Aaron Brothers, Recollections, and Star Wholesale stores.
(2) Comparable store sales increase represents the increase in net sales for stores open the same number of months in the indicated period and the comparable period of the previous year, including stores that were relocated or expanded during either period. A store is deemed to become comparable in its 14th month of operation in order to eliminate grand opening sales distortions. A store temporarily closed more than 2 weeks due to a catastrophic event is not considered comparable during the month it closed. If a store is closed longer than 2 weeks but less than 2 months, it becomes comparable in the month in which it reopens, subject to a mid-month convention. A store closed longer than 2 months becomes comparable in its 14th month of operation after its reopening.


17


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
 
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of each line item of our unaudited consolidated statements of income. This table should be read in conjunction with the following discussion and with our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, contained herein.
 
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Net sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales and occupancy expense
    60.9       63.0       62.0       63.2  
                                 
Gross profit
    39.1       37.0       38.0       36.8  
Selling, general, and administrative expense
    28.5       27.6       28.3       28.7  
Store pre-opening costs
    0.3       0.3       0.3       0.3  
                                 
Operating income
    10.3       9.1       9.4       7.8  
Interest expense
          0.6       0.8       0.7  
Other (income) and expense, net
    (0.3 )     (0.1 )     (0.3 )     (0.1 )
                                 
Income before income taxes
    10.6       8.6       8.9       7.2  
Provision for income taxes
    4.0       3.3       3.4       2.7  
                                 
Net income
    6.6 %     5.3 %     5.5 %     4.5 %
                                 
 
Quarter Ended October 29, 2005 Compared to the Quarter Ended October 30, 2004
 
Net Sales—Net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 increased $39.8 million, or 5.0%, over the third quarter of fiscal 2004. At the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we operated 889 Michaels, 166 Aaron Brothers, 11 Recollections, and four Star Wholesale stores. The results for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 include sales from 46 Michaels, two Aaron Brothers, three Recollections, and one Star Wholesale store that were opened during the 12-month period ended October 29, 2005, more than offsetting lost sales from the closure of six Michaels stores during the same period. Comparable store sales accounted for $6.3 million of the increase in net sales, and sales at our new stores (net of closures) opened since the third quarter of fiscal 2004 accounted for the remaining increase of $33.5 million.
 
Comparable store sales increased 0.8% in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2004, reflecting increases in the average ticket of 3.7% and custom framing deliveries of 0.3%, partially offset by a decline in customer transactions of 3.2%. A favorable currency translation, due to the stronger Canadian dollar, contributed approximately 0.4% to the average ticket increase for the quarter. Comparable store sales growth was strongest in our General Crafts, Custom Framing, Yarn, and Wedding and Ribbon categories. Our ability to continue to generate comparable store sales increases is dependent, in part, on our ability to continue to maintain store in-stock positions on the top-selling items, to properly allocate merchandise to our stores, to effectively execute our pricing and sales promotion efforts, to anticipate customer demand and trends in the arts and crafts industry, and to respond to competitors’ activities.
 
Cost of Sales and Occupancy Expense—Cost of sales and occupancy expense increased $7.3 million primarily due to a 4.5% increase in the number of stores operated in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2004, as well as a 0.8% comparable store sales increase. These increases were partially offset by improved merchandise margins as more fully described in the following paragraph.
 
Cost of sales and occupancy expense, as a percentage of net sales, decreased approximately 210 basis points in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2004. This decrease was primarily a result of improved merchandise margins driven by an increase in sales of regular priced merchandise as a percentage of total sales, improved margins on regular and clearance merchandise, cost reductions as a result of improved merchandise sourcing, and improved efficiencies in our supply chain and vertical manufacturing operations. Occupancy costs were favorably impacted by the absence of approximately $2.0 million of costs associated with the closure of our Lexington, Kentucky distribution center and opening costs of a new distribution center in New Lennox, Illinois recorded during the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The


18


Table of Contents

decreases in expenses as a percentage of sales were partially offset by higher occupancy costs as a percentage of net sales compared to last year, due primarily to higher utilities and repairs and maintenance activities. Due to planned promotional activities, recent trends in sales of regular priced merchandise as a percentage of our overall sales may not be indicative of future performance.
 
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense—Selling, general, and administrative expense was $239.0 million, or 28.5% of net sales, in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $220.5 million, or 27.6% of net sales, in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The expense increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of stores we operated compared to last year, in particular store operating expenses, totaling approximately $16.4 million of the overall $18.6 million increase.
 
As a percentage of net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses increased approximately 90 basis points, with an increase in store personnel costs generating the majority of the increase. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we hired holiday seasonal labor earlier compared to last year in order to improve staffing for the holiday selling season. Also, administrative expenses were higher in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 due to increases in legal and professional fees and store and corporate bonus accruals.
 
Operating Income—As a result of the above, operating income increased from $72.8 million, or 9.1% of sales, in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to $86.6 million, or 10.3% of sales, in the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
 
Interest Expense—Interest expense decreased from $5.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to $229,000 during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we redeemed our 91/4% Senior Notes, and, as a result of the early redemption, we did not incur interest expense associated with the Senior Notes in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and will no longer incur interest expense in connection with the Senior Notes.
 
Other Income—Other income increased from $1.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to $3.0 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. This increase was due to a $2.2 million settlement related to the Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation.
 
Provision for Income Taxes—The effective tax rate was 38.0% for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and 38.25% for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
 
Net Income—As a result of the above, net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 increased 30.5% to $55.4 million, or $0.40 per diluted share, from $42.5 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
 
Nine Months Ended October 29, 2005 Compared to the Nine Months Ended October 30, 2004
 
Net Sales—Net sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 increased $197.5 million, or 8.9%, over the first nine months of fiscal 2004. A comparable store sales increase of 4.2% accounted for $91.0 million of the increase in net sales, and sales at our new stores (net of closures) opened since the first nine months of fiscal 2004 accounted for the remaining increase of $106.5 million.
 
The comparable store sales increase of 4.2% in first nine months of fiscal 2005 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2004, reflected increases in the average ticket of 2.8%, customer transactions of 0.9%, and custom framing deliveries of 0.5%. Comparable store sales growth was strongest in our General Crafts, Needlework and Yarn, Art, and Wedding and Ribbon departments.
 
Cost of Sales and Occupancy Expense—Cost of sales and occupancy expense increased $95.6 million primarily due to a 4.5% increase in the number of stores operated in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 compared to first nine months of fiscal 2004, as well as a 4.2% comparable store sales increase.
 
Cost of sales and occupancy expense, as a percentage of net sales, decreased approximately 120 basis points in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2004. This decrease was primarily a result of improved merchandise margins driven by an increase in sales of regular priced merchandise as a percentage of total sales, improved margins on regular and clearance merchandise, cost reductions as a result of improved merchandise sourcing, and improved efficiencies in our supply chain and


19


Table of Contents

vertical manufacturing operations. Costs of sales was also favorably impacted by the absence of $3.8 million of costs associated with the closure of our Lexington, Kentucky distribution center and opening costs of a new distribution center in New Lennox, Illinois recorded during the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The decreases in expenses as a percentage of net sales were partially offset by higher occupancy costs compared to last year, due primarily to remodeling costs associated with the Perfect Store project.
 
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense—Selling, general, and administrative expense was $681.5 million, or 28.3% of net sales, in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 compared to $633.3 million, or 28.7% of net sales, in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The expense increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of stores we operated compared to last year, in particular, store personnel costs, store operating expenses, and advertising expenses, totaling approximately $39.2 million of the overall $48.1 million increase.
 
As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased approximately 40 basis points primarily due to lower workers’ compensation insurance expense, partially offset by higher store compensation and other store operating costs. Included in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 was a $4.9 million pre-tax charge related to the deteriorating financial condition of a previous insurance carrier.
 
Operating Income—As a result of the above, operating income increased from $172.3 million, or 7.8% of sales, in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to $226.9 million, or 9.4% of sales, in the first nine months of fiscal 2005.
 
Interest Expense—Interest expense increased from $15.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to $20.8 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we recognized a pre-tax charge of approximately $12.1 million related to the redemption of our 91/4% Senior Notes. The charge was comprised of $9.3 million for the call premium and $2.8 million for unamortized debt costs associated with the Notes. These charges were partially offset by the reduction in the Senior Notes interest expense subsequent to their redemption. As a result of the early redemption, we will no longer incur interest expense in connection with the Senior Notes.
 
Other Income—Other income increased from $2.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to $8.1 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. The increase was due to increased interest income from higher cash balances during the first nine months of fiscal 2005 as compared the first nine months of fiscal 2004, as well as a $2.2 million settlement related to the Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation.
 
Provision for Income Taxes—The effective tax rate was 38.0% for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 38.25% for the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
 
Net Income—As a result of the above, net income for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 increased 34.7% to $132.8 million, or $0.96 per diluted share, from $98.6 million, or $0.71 per diluted share, for the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our cash and equivalents decreased $423.3 million, or 79.0%, from $535.9 million at the end of fiscal 2004 to $112.5 million at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily as result of our early redemption of the Senior Notes, repurchases of our Common Stock, and incremental purchases of merchandise inventory. Compared to the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2004, cash and equivalents decreased $109.7 million, or 49.4%, primarily because of our early redemption of the Senior Notes, the incremental investment in merchandise inventory in preparation for the fourth quarter holiday selling season, and the repurchases of our Common Stock, partially offset by our net income.
 
We require cash principally for day-to-day operations and to finance capital investments, inventory for new stores, inventory replenishment for existing stores, and seasonal working capital needs. In recent years, we have financed our operations, new store openings, Common Stock repurchases, dividend payments, and other capital investments with cash from operations and proceeds from stock option exercises. We expect that cash from operations and proceeds from stock option exercises will be sufficient to fund our anticipated cash


20


Table of Contents

requirements. In addition, borrowings under our new Credit Agreement may be an additional source of cash for us to finance future growth, inventory purchases, and other capital investments.
 
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
 
Cash flow used in operating activities during the first nine months of fiscal 2005 was $57.9 million compared to cash provided by operating activities of $91.6 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The increased use of cash of $149.5 million was primarily due to a incremental investment in higher growth inventory categories, net of accounts payable.
 
Inventories per Michaels store (including warehouse inventory) increased 4.2% from October 30, 2004 to October 29, 2005. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we continued to redeploy our inventory from slower selling categories to ones demonstrating higher growth trends. Accordingly, we made incremental inventory investments in Yarn and Gift Giving categories in preparation for the fall and holiday selling season. We now anticipate average inventory per Michaels store at the end of fiscal 2005 compared to the end of fiscal 2004 to increase approximately 3% to 5%.
 
Cash Flow used in Investing Activities
 
Cash flow used in investing activities was primarily the result of the following capital expenditure activities:
 
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    October 29,
    October 30,
 
    2005(1)     2004(2)  
    (In thousands)  
New and relocated stores and stores not yet opened
  $ 31,725     $ 41,296  
Existing stores
    23,489       8,270  
Distribution system expansion
    4,839       6,998  
Information systems
    17,485       11,917  
Corporate and other
    8,247       3,182  
                 
    $ 85,785     $ 71,663  
                 
 
 
(1) In the first nine months of fiscal 2005, we incurred capital expenditures related to the opening of 46 Michaels, two Aaron Brothers, three Recollections, and one Star Wholesale store, and the relocation of 18 Michaels stores. Capital expenditures for existing stores for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 increased $15.2 million over the first nine months of fiscal 2004 primarily due to incremental expenditures associated with the Perfect Store concept and new radio frequency guns for our stores.
(2) In the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we incurred capital expenditures related to the opening of 45 Michaels, seven Aaron Brothers, and six Recollections stores, the relocation of 30 Michaels and one Aaron Brothers store, and the completion of our New Lenox, Illinois distribution center.
 
We anticipate capital expenditures for fiscal 2005 to be in the range of $105 million to $110 million. At the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we completed our fiscal 2005 store opening and relocation activities.
 
During the nine months ended October 29, 2005, we liquidated our investment in a Massachusetts business trust for proceeds of approximately $50.6 million, which was classified as a short-term investment for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 and third quarter of fiscal 2004.
 
Cash Flow used in Financing Activities
 
Proceeds from the exercise of outstanding stock options have served as a source of cash for us, and we expect to receive proceeds from the exercise of outstanding stock options, as well as options to be granted under our stock option plans in the future. Proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $32.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and $28.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004.


21


Table of Contents

Cash used for repurchases of our Common Stock increased $24.5 million from $94.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to $119.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2005. The following table sets forth information regarding our Common Stock repurchase plans as of October 29, 2005:
 
                         
    Shares
          Shares
 
    Authorized for
    Shares
    Available for
 
    Repurchase     Repurchased     Repurchase  
December 5, 2000 repurchase plan (variable portion)
    72,510       (72,509 )     1 (1)
February 2, 2004 repurchase plan
    5,000,000       (5,000,000 )     (2)
March 15, 2005 repurchase plan
    3,000,000       (1,394,488 )     1,605,512 (3)
                         
      8,072,510       (6,466,997 )     1,605,513  
                         
 
 
(1) Our Board of Directors provided that proceeds of the exercise of options under our 2001 General Stock Option Plan may be used to repurchase shares under the 2000 repurchase plan and that the maximum number of shares authorized to be repurchased under the 2000 repurchase plan may be increased to the extent necessary to so use the proceeds from such option exercises. In fiscal 2004, we repurchased and subsequently retired 54,551 shares of our Common Stock at an average price of $27.03 per share. During the first nine months of fiscal 2005, we repurchased and subsequently retired 17,958 shares of our Common Stock at an average price of $40.93 per share. The share repurchases were made using proceeds from exercises of stock options granted under the 2001 General Stock Option Plan that were exercised during fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005.
(2) In the first nine months of fiscal 2005, we repurchased and subsequently retired approximately 1.9 million shares of our Common Stock authorized to be repurchased under the 2004 repurchase plan at an average price of $36.78 per share. As a result of these repurchases, and those made in the prior fiscal year, we exhausted our availability for further share repurchases under the 2004 repurchase plan.
(3) On March 15, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized an additional repurchase plan for up to 3.0 million shares of our outstanding Common Stock. In the first nine months of fiscal 2005, we repurchased and subsequently retired approximately 1.4 million shares of our Common Stock authorized to be repurchased under the 2005 repurchase plan at an average price of $34.79 per share. As a result of these repurchases, we had 1,605,512 shares available for repurchase under the 2005 repurchase plan as of October 29, 2005.
 
Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we repurchased an additional 1,267,800 shares for a total cost, including commissions, of $43.4 million, or $34.20 per share. As a result of these subsequent repurchases, as of November 22, 2005, we have a total of approximately 340,000 shares available for repurchase. We anticipate that we will continue to repurchase shares of our Common Stock during the remainder of fiscal 2005. However, we may be restricted by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission from making future repurchases during certain time periods.
 
We paid dividends of $0.10 per share and $0.07 per share during the quarters ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively, and dividends of $0.27 and $0.19 per share during the nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively. These dividends reflect the strength of our financial position and our Board of Directors’ commitment to encouraging long-term investment by a diverse stockholder base.
 
Debt
 
In 2001, we issued $200 million in principal amount of 91/4% Senior Notes due July 1, 2009, which were unsecured and interest thereon was payable semi-annually on each January 1 and July 1. On July 1, 2005, we redeemed the Senior Notes at a price of $1,046.25 per $1,000 of principal amount. This early redemption resulted in a pre-tax charge of $12.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, which represents a combination of a $9.3 million call premium and $2.8 million of unamortized costs associated with the Senior Notes, which was recorded as interest expense.
 
On November 18, 2005, we entered into a new five-year, $300 million senior unsecured credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders. The new $300 million Credit Agreement replaced our existing


22


Table of Contents

$200 million revolving credit facility with Fleet National Bank and the other lenders, which we terminated immediately prior to entering into our new $300 million Credit Agreement. We were in compliance with all terms and conditions of our $200 million credit agreement through the termination date, and we did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with its termination. No borrowings were outstanding under our $200 million credit agreement as of October 29, 2005, January 29, 2005, or October 30, 2004. Borrowings available under our $200 million credit agreement were reduced by the aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding, which was $21.2 million as of October 29, 2005.
 
Our new $300 million Credit Agreement provides for a committed line of credit of $300 million (with a provision for an increase, at our option on stated conditions, of up to a total of $400 million), a $250 million sublimit on the issuance of letters of credit, and a $25 million sublimit for borrowings in Euro, Sterling, Yen, Canadian Dollars, and other approved currencies. We may use borrowings under our new $300 million Credit Agreement for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including stock repurchases and permitted acquisitions. Our new $300 million Credit Agreement limits our ability to, among other things, create liens, engage in mergers, consolidations and certain other transactions, and requires us to adhere to certain consolidated financial covenants. Our obligations under our new $300 million Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Michaels Stores Procurement Company, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, and such other of our subsidiaries as may be necessary to cause the assets owned by us and our subsidiary guarantors to be 85% of our consolidated total assets. Borrowings available under our new $300 million Credit Agreement will be reduced by the aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding.
 
General
 
We believe that our available cash, funds generated by operating activities, funds available under our new Credit Agreement, and proceeds from the exercise of stock options will be sufficient to fund planned capital expenditures, working capital requirements, and any anticipated dividend payments and stock repurchases for the foreseeable future. In addition, borrowings under our new Credit Agreement may be an additional source of cash for us to finance future growth, inventory purchases, and other capital investments.
 
Contractual Obligations
 
Due to our early redemption of the Senior Notes, certain information presented in our table of contractual obligations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 materially changed. Specifically, the contractual obligations associated with our long-term debt and the interest on long-term debt were eliminated.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values at the time of grant. Pro forma disclosure will no longer be an alternative. Our effective date for adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) is January 29, 2006 (the first day of our fiscal year 2006); however, we are permitted to early adopt.
 
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we currently account for share-based payments to employees using the intrinsic value method under APB No. 25, and, as such, recognize no compensation cost for employee stock options. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and resulting recognition of compensation cost will significantly impact our results of operations but we are unable to quantify the impact because it is dependent upon, among other items, the number of share-based payments granted in the future, our selection of a methodology to determine fair value for grants, and our estimates of forfeitures.


23


Table of Contents

We do not anticipate a material impact on our overall financial position or total cash flows but SFAS No. 123(R) does require that we report the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods following adoption. While we cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amounts of operating cash flows recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions were $2.1 million and $3.4 million for the quarters ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively, and $18.9 million and $13.2 million for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively.
 
Inventory Costs
 
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, as an amendment to ARB No. 43. SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not currently believe that our adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 151 will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
 
Proposed Change in Accounting for Merchandise Inventories
 
Currently, we value inventory at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using a retail inventory method. This inventory method uses a broad store sampling process to estimate ending inventories valued at retail for all Michaels stores. These inventory values are used in our retail inventory calculation, which determines cost of sales and ending inventory using a single pool of inventory.
 
Subsequent to the implementation of our perpetual inventory system in fiscal 2004, we began evaluating the use of this system to value inventory for both operational and financial reporting purposes. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we determined that we would change our accounting method for valuing substantially all of our merchandise inventories from our current retail inventory method to the weighted average cost method. The weighted average cost method will utilize the newly available perpetual inventory records to value inventories at the lower of cost or market on a store-level SKU basis. We currently expect to adopt this new inventory accounting policy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, but no later than the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
 
Assuming we adopt the change in accounting policy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 under APB No. 20, Accounting Changes, we would record the cumulative effect of the change as of the beginning of fiscal year 2005 in accordance with SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. The non-cash cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle on prior periods, and related reduction in our inventory balance, is currently estimated at approximately $140 million on a pre-tax basis. On an after-tax basis, the cumulative effect is currently estimated at approximately $87 million ($0.62 per diluted share). For fiscal 2005, cost of goods sold under the weighted average cost method is estimated to be approximately $15 million higher on a pre-tax basis, or $0.07 per diluted share on an after-tax basis, than under our current retail inventory method. The estimates of the beginning of fiscal 2005 cumulative effect of accounting change, reduction in inventory balance, and fiscal 2005 income statement effect are preliminary and may change materially. We are unable to compute a pro forma annual impact in any years prior to fiscal 2005 as the information required to value inventory on the weighted average cost method is not available for prior years.
 
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
 
We typically invest cash balances in excess of operating requirements primarily in money market mutual funds and short-term interest-bearing securities, generally with maturities of 90 days or less. Due to the short-term nature of our investments, the fair value of our cash and equivalents at October 29, 2005 approximated


24


Table of Contents

carrying value. We have market risk exposure arising from changes in interest rates. The interest rates on our new $300 million Credit Agreement will reprice frequently, at market prices, which will likely result in carrying amounts that approximate fair value. No borrowings were outstanding under our $200 million Credit Agreement as of October 29, 2005, which we terminated subsequent to the end of the third fiscal quarter of 2005 and replaced with the new $300 million Credit Agreement.
 
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures.
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. We note that the design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
 
Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


25


Table of Contents

MICHAELS STORES, INC.
Part II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings.
 
Derivative Claims
 
On March 21, 2003, Julie Fathergill filed a purported stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the 192nd District Court for Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit names certain former and current officers and directors, including all of Michaels’ current directors, as individual defendants and Michaels as a nominal defendant. The derivative action relates to actions prior to our announcement on November 7, 2002, that we had revised our outlook for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2002, adjusting downaward guidance for annual earnings per diluted share. The plaintiff alleges that, prior to that announcement, certain of the defendants made misrepresentations and failed to disclose negative information about the financial condition of Michaels while the individual defendants were selling shares of Michaels Common Stock. The plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duties, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. All of these claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of Michaels. On November 7, 2005, the Court entered a written order granting the defendants’ special exceptions and ordering that the case will be dismissed with prejudice unless the plaintiff amends her petition within 30 days to state an actionable claim against the defendants. We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously oppose them.
 
On September 11, 2003, Leo J. Dutil filed a purported stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The lawsuit names certain former and current officers and directors as individual defendants and Michaels as a nominal defendant. In this derivative action, the plaintiff makes allegations of fact similar to those made in the Fathergill derivative lawsuit described above. The plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential information, and contribution and indemnification. All of these claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of Michaels. We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously oppose them.
 
Cotton Claim
 
On December 20, 2002, James Cotton, a former store manager of Michaels of Canada, ULC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, and Suzette Kennedy, a former assistant manager of Michaels of Canada, commenced a proposed class proceeding against Michaels of Canada and Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and current and former employees employed in Canada. The Cotton claim was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and alleges that the defendants violated employment standards legislation in Ontario and other provinces and territories of Canada by failing to pay overtime compensation as required by that legislation. The Cotton claim also alleges that this conduct was in breach of the contracts of employment of those individuals. The Cotton claim seeks a declaration that the defendants have acted in breach of applicable legislation, payment to current and former employees for overtime, damages for breach of contract, punitive, aggravated and exemplary damages, interest, and costs. In May of 2005, the plaintiffs delivered material in support of their request that this action be certified as a class proceeding. A date has not yet been set for the hearing with respect to certification. We intend to contest certification of this claim as a class action. Further, we believe we have certain defenses on the merits and intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate a range of possible loss, if any, in this claim.
 
Clark Claim
 
On July 13, 2005, Michael Clark, a former Michaels store assistant manager and Lucinda Prouty, a former Michaels store department manager in San Diego, California, commenced a proposed class action proceeding against Michaels Stores, Inc. on behalf of themselves and current and former hourly retail employees employed in California from July 13, 2001 to the present. The Clark suit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego and alleges that we failed to pay overtime wages, provide meal and


26


Table of Contents

rest periods (or compensation in lieu thereof), and provide itemized employee wage statements. The Clark suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of California’s unfair competition law. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break penalties, waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Under the Class Action Fairness Act, we removed the case to federal court on August 5, 2005. We are in the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe that the Clark claim lacks merit and we intend to vigorously defend our interests.
 
Morris Claim
 
On November 16, 2005, Geoffrey Morris, a former Aaron Brothers employee in San Diego, California, commenced a proposed class action proceeding against Aaron Brothers, Inc. on behalf of himself and current and former Aaron Brothers employees in California from November 16, 2001 to the present. The Morris suit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego and alleges that Aaron Brothers failed to pay overtime wages, reimburse the plaintiff for necessary expenses (including the cost of gas used in driving his car for business purposes), and provide adequate meal and rest breaks (or compensation in lieu thereof). The Morris suit also alleges that this conduct was in breach of California’s unfair competition law. With the exception of the meal and rest breaks claim, the claims are asserted on behalf of the putative class. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, damages for unpaid overtime pay, meal break penalties, waiting time penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. We are in the early stages of our investigation; however, we believe that the Morris claim lacks merit, and we intend to vigorously defend our interests.
 
General
 
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits incidental to our business. Based on currently available information, we believe that resolution of all known contingencies is uncertain. There can be no assurance that future costs of such litigation would not be material to our financial position or results of operations.
 
Item 2.   Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
 
On December 5, 2000, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 4.0 million shares of our outstanding Common Stock. By later resolutions, our Board of Directors provided that proceeds of the exercise of options under our 2001 General Stock Option Plan may be used to repurchase shares under the 2000 repurchase plan and that the maximum number of shares authorized to be repurchased under the 2000 repurchase plan may be increased to the extent necessary to so use the proceeds from such option exercises. On June 16, 2005, in connection with the adoption of our 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, we permanently ceased granting options under the 2001 General Stock Option Plan. As of October 29, 2005, options to purchase 875,000 shares of Common Stock remain outstanding pursuant to prior grants under the 2001 General Stock Option Plan.
 
On February 2, 2004, and March 15, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 5.0 million and 3.0 million shares of our outstanding Common Stock, respectively.


27


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our repurchases of Common Stock for each fiscal month in the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
                                 
                Total Number
    Maximum
 
                of Shares
    Number of
 
                Purchased as
    Shares That
 
                Part of Publicly
    May Yet Be
 
    Total Number
    Average
    Announced
    Purchased
 
    of Shares
    Price Paid
    Plans or
    Under the Plans
 
    Purchased(1)     per Share     Programs(1)     or Programs(2)  
July 31, 2005 through August 27, 2005
    542,100       38.31       542,100       2,444,013  
August 28, 2005 through October 1, 2005
    294,400       32.55       294,400       2,149,613  
October 2, 2005 through October 29, 2005
    544,100       32.33       544,100       1,605,513  
                                 
Total
    1,380,600     $ 34.72       1,380,600       1,605,513  
                                 
 
 
(1)  Repurchased and subsequently retired 1,380,600 shares under the 2005 repurchase plan.
 
(2)  Under our 2000 repurchase plan, the Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to 4.0 million shares of our outstanding Common Stock, with the ability to increase the maximum number of shares authorized to be repurchased under the plan to the extent necessary to use the proceeds from stock options exercised under our 2001 General Stock Option Plan to make repurchases. We have used the entire 4.0 million share fixed portion of the authority originally provided in the 2000 repurchase plan. We have used the entire 5.0 million share authorization provided under the 2004 repurchase plan. As of October 29, 2005, we had 1,605,512 shares available for repurchase under the 2005 repurchase plan.
 
Item 6.   Exhibits.
 
(a) Exhibits:
 
     
10.1
  Forms of Award Agreements under the Registrant’s 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on August 4, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
10.2
  Credit Agreement, entered into as of November 18, 2005, among Registrant, Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent for itself and the other lenders, as Swing Line Lender as Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on November 22, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
31.1
  Certifications of R. Michael Rouleau pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2
  Certifications of Jeffrey N. Boyer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.1
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).


28


Table of Contents

MICHAELS STORES, INC.
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
 
  By:  /s/  Jeffrey N. Boyer
Jeffrey N. Boyer
Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
Dated:  December 2, 2005


29


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 
         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
  10 .1   Forms of Award Agreements under the Registrant’s 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on August 4, 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
  10 .2   Credit Agreement, entered into as of November 18, 2005, among Registrant, Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent for itself and the other lenders, as Swing Line Lender as Letter of Credit Issuer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed by Registrant on November 22 2005, SEC File No. 001-09338).
  31 .1   Certifications of R. Michael Rouleau pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
  31 .2   Certifications of Jeffrey N. Boyer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
  32 .1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

EX-31.1 2 d30945exv31w1.htm CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 exv31w1
 

Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
     I, R. Michael Rouleau, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michaels Stores, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Date: December 2, 2005  /s/ R. Michael Rouleau    
  R. Michael Rouleau   
  President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 

 

EX-31.2 3 d30945exv31w2.htm CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 exv31w2
 

         
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
     I, Jeffrey N. Boyer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michaels Stores, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Date:  December 2, 2005  /s/ Jeffrey N. Boyer    
  Jeffrey N. Boyer   
  Executive Vice President —
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 

 

EX-32.1 4 d30945exv32w1.htm CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 exv32w1
 

         
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended October 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:
  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
     
Date:  December 2, 2005
  /s/ R. Michael Rouleau
 
   
 
  R. Michael Rouleau
 
  President and Chief Executive Officer
 
  (Principal Executive Officer)
 
   
 
  /s/ Jeffrey N. Boyer
 
   
 
  Jeffrey N. Boyer
 
  Executive Vice President —
 
  Chief Financial Officer
 
  (Principal Financial Officer)
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----