XML 30 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.2
FAIR VALUES MEASUREMENTS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2023
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUES MEASUREMENTS
NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Overview

Accounting guidance on fair value measurements for certain financial assets and liabilities requires that financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1: Fair value calculated based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access.
Level 2: Fair value calculated using inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves.
Level 3: Fair value calculated using unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based on our own assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity.

The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange or transaction.
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments either recorded or disclosed on a recurring basis (dollars in thousands):
 As of June 30, 2023As of December 31, 2022
 Carrying
Amount
Fair ValueCarrying
Amount
Fair Value
Assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents (1)
$138,648 $138,648 $122,564 $122,564 
Escrow deposits and restricted cash (1)
71,699 71,699 48,181 48,181 
Stock warrants (3)(5)
40,451 40,451 23,621 23,621 
Secured mortgage loans and other, net (3)(4)
27,749 27,790 493,669 493,627 
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net (3)(4)(5)
24,500 23,626 24,338 23,416 
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments, net (3)
— — 43,406 43,406 
Derivative instruments (3)(5)
44,005 44,005 24,316 24,316 
Liabilities:
Senior notes payable and other debt, gross (3)(4)
13,438,942 12,633,140 12,361,244 11,493,824 
Derivative instruments (3)(6)
317 317 145 145 
Redeemable OP Units (2)
166,894 166,894 162,663 162,663 
______________________________
(1)The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
(2)Level 1 within fair value hierarchy.
(3)Level 2 within fair value hierarchy.
(4)Level 3 within fair value hierarchy.
(5)Included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(6)Included in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Real estate recorded as held for sale and any associated real estate impairment recorded due to the shortening of the expected hold period due to our change in intent to hold the asset (see “Note 4 – Dispositions And Impairments”) are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. We estimate the fair value of assets held for sale and any associated impairment charges based primarily on current sales price expectations, which reside within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Real estate impairment charges recorded due to our evaluation of recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable are based on company-specific inputs and our assumptions about the marketability of the properties as observable inputs are not available. As such, we have determined that these fair value measurements generally reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. We estimate the fair value of real estate deemed to not be recoverable using the income approach and unobservable data such as net operating income and estimated capitalization and discount rates, and giving consideration to local and national industry market data including comparable sales.

The fair value of the collateral received in connection with the equitization of the Santerre Mezzanine Loan was determined using fair value determinations within Level 1, 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the non-real estate assets and liabilities was based on their cost, given the short term nature of those balances and because cost was the best information available, which reside within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the CHC Mortgage Loan, which approximates par, was based on the absence of recent underlying trading activity, consideration of the near-term maturity date and adjustments for the credit-worthiness of the borrower, which reside within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of the real estate properties that secured the Santerre Mezzanine Loan of $1.566 billion (net of $31.8 million of capital expenditures) was determined using unobservable inputs primarily within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For SHOP and outpatient medical properties, fair value was based on either an income or market approach that took into account unobservable inputs such as direct capitalization rates, estimated NOI, market rents, costs per unit, replacement
cost and estimates of future cash flows, which are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known trends and market and economic conditions. For the majority of the SHOP properties, fair value was based on an income approach with significant unobservable inputs that included an average direct capitalization rate of 6.8% on estimated expected stabilized NOI, adjusted based on cost per unit in certain cases. For the majority of the outpatient medical properties, fair value was based on an income approach with significant unobservable inputs that included an average direct capitalization rate of 6.7% on estimated expected stabilized NOI, adjusted based on cost per square foot in certain cases. For triple-net leased properties, fair value was primarily based on an average estimated per bed value by property by state of $88,000, which was determined based on an assessment of recent transactions adjusted for property, operator and other characteristics such as contractual rent, tenant payment history, underlying operating trends, reimbursement rates and other market data.