10-Q 1 form10q3qtr05.htm 10-Q 10-Q

FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)
(X)        QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005

OR

( )        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period                           to                          

Commission file number 1-11394

       MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.       
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware
95-3863205
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporated or organization) Identification No.)

402 West County Road D, St. Paul, Minnesota
55112
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number including area code:                    (651) 636-7466


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes       X       No           

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes            No       X     

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes            No       X     

The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.15 par value per share, outstanding as of October 25, 2005, was 8,141,245.

MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.

INDEX

Page
Part I        Financial Information:  
 
                  Item 1: Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
                           Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Nine
                           Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
 
                           Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 2005
                           and December 31, 2004
 
                           Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine
                           Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
 
                           Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
                  Item 2:
 
                           Management's Discussion and Analysis of
                           Financial Condition and Results of Operations 12 
 
                  Item 3:
 
                           Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
                           About Market Risk 27 
 
                  Item 4:
 
                           Controls and Procedures 27 
 
Part II       Other Information 28 
 
                  Item 1: Legal Proceedings 28 
                  Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 28 
                  Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities 28 
                  Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders 28 
                  Item 5: Other Information 28 
                  Item 6: Exhibits 28 
 
                           Signatures 29 
                           Exhibit Index 30 

2


PART I       FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1:        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)


Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2005
2004
2005
2004
REVENUES:                    
   Laboratory services   $ 12,740   $ 10,979   $ 36,808   $ 32,694  
   Product sales    3,773    3,494    11,239    10,426  




     16,513    14,473    48,047    43,120  
COST OF REVENUES:  
  Cost of services    7,783    7,055    22,758    20,638  
  Cost of sales    1,470    1,386    4,587    4,096  




     9,253    8,441    27,345    24,734  




GROSS PROFIT    7,260    6,032    20,702    18,386  
   
OPERATING EXPENSES:  
   Selling, general and administrative    5,020    4,397    14,264    13,310  
   Research and development    552    354    1,788    1,189  




     5,572    4,751    16,052    14,499  




INCOME FROM OPERATIONS    1,688    1,281    4,650    3,887  
   
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):  
   Interest expense    (182 )  (264 )  (620 )  (790 )
   Other expense, net    (175 )  (99 )  (383 )  (337 )




     (357 )  (363 )  (1,003 )  (1,127 )




INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE    1,331    918    3,647    2,760  
   
INCOME TAX EXPENSE    (506 )  (349 )  (1,386 )  (1,049 )




NET INCOME   $ 825   $ 569   $ 2,261   $ 1,711  




BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE   $ 0.10   $ 0.08   $ 0.30   $ 0.23  




DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE   $ 0.10   $ 0.07   $ 0.28   $ 0.22  




WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING:  
          Basic    7,896,777    7,444,973    7,662,716    7,451,174  
          Diluted    8,324,880    7,930,347    8,094,210    7,806,901  

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

3


MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)


September 30,
2005

December 31,
2004

ASSETS            
CURRENT ASSETS:    
   Cash and cash equivalents     $ 674   $ 263  
   Accounts receivable:    
       Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts ($563 in 2005 and $734 in 2004)       10,828     8,084  
       Other       183     203  


             Total accounts receivable       11,011     8,287  
   Inventories       3,074     3,624  
   Prepaid expenses and other       973     1,293  
   Deferred income taxes       1,531     1,531  


             Total current assets       17,263     14,998  
BUILDING, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS, net       17,753     16,348  
GOODWILL       15,967     15,967  
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net       1,326     1,608  
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES, net       5,347     6,733  
OTHER ASSETS       433     306  


TOTAL ASSETS     $ 58,089   $ 55,960  


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY    
CURRENT LIABILITIES:    
   Line of credit     $ 1,132   $ 4,690  
   Accounts payable       2,109     1,661  
   Accrued expenses       4,319     4,188  
   Current portion of long-term debt       1,032     1,469  
   Current portion of capital leases       24     73  


             Total current liabilities       8,616     12,081  
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion       5,600     6,050  
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES       219     --  
LONG-TERM PORTION OF CAPITAL LEASES, net of current portion       26     40  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES    
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:    
   Preferred stock, $1.00 par value per share; authorized shares, 50,000; none    
     issued and outstanding       --     --  
  Common stock, $0.15 par value per share; authorized shares, 28,000,000; issued    
     and outstanding shares, 8,147,745 in 2005 and 7,534,842 in 2004       1,222     1,130  
   Additional paid-in capital       85,690     81,693  
   Deferred stock-based compensation       (331 )   (508 )
   Accumulated deficit       (42,089 )   (44,350 )
   Common stock held in trust       (688 )   --  
   Treasury stock       (176 )   (176 )


             Total stockholders' equity       43,628     37,789  


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY     $ 58,089   $ 55,960  


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

4


MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2005
2004
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:            
   Net income     $ 2,261   $ 1,711  
   Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:    
      Depreciation and amortization       2,364     2,332  
      Provision for losses on accounts receivable       468     210  
      Loss on sale of equipment       1     7  
      Deferred compensation       430     336  
      Deferred income taxes       1,386     1,049  
      Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    
         Accounts receivable       (3,192 )   (1,079 )
         Inventories       550     17  
         Prepaid expenses and other current assets       320     610  
         Other assets       (127 )   12  
         Accounts payable and accrued expenses       (99 )   (50 )


                Net cash provided by operating activities       4,362     5,155  
     
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:    
    Capital expenditures       (2,781 )   (3,447 )
    Purchase of customer list       (27 )   (169 )
    Proceeds from sale of equipment       --     46  


                Net cash used in investing activities       (2,808 )   (3,570 )
     
CASH FLOWS USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES:    
    Net proceeds (payments) on revolving credit facility       (3,558 )   384  
    Proceeds from long-term debt       300     --  
    Principal payments on long-term debt       (1,187 )   (2,481 )
    Principal payments on capital leases       (63 )   (55 )
    Purchase of common stock       (688 )   --  
    Net proceeds from sale of common stock       4,172     547  
    Payment of taxes from traded shares       (119 )   (149 )


              Net cash used in financing activities       (1,143 )   (1,754 )


INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS       411     (169 )
     
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD       263     711  


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD     $ 674   $ 542  


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    
   Cash paid for:    
          Interest     $ 637   $ 789  
          Taxes       189     34  
     
Supplemental noncash activities:    
          Asset additions and related obligations     $ 678     --  

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

5


MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
September 30, 2005

1.     BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition and results of operations have been included. Operating results for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be attained for the entire year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Stock-Based Compensation — Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” requires companies to measure employee stock compensation plans and non-employee stock-based compensation based on the fair value method of accounting. However, for stock compensation granted to employees, SFAS No. 123 allows the continued use of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APBO) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” with pro forma disclosure of net income and earnings per share determined as if the fair value method had been applied in measuring compensation cost. The Company has elected the continued use of APBO No. 25.

Had the Company determined compensation expense for its stock options under SFAS No. 123, (as amended by SFAS No. 148), the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below:


(In thousands, except per share data) Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2005
2004
2005
2004
Net income ......................................     As reported     $ 825   $ 569   $ 2,261   $ 1,711  
    Less: Total stock-based compensation  
     expense, net of related tax effect        (33 )  (60 )  (100 )  (214 )




    Pro forma    792    509    2,161    1,497  
 
Basic earnings per share...............   As reported   $ 0.10   $ 0.08   $ 0.30   $ 0.23  
    Pro forma    0.10    0.07    0.28    0.20  
 
Diluted earnings per share............   As reported   $ 0.10   $ 0.07   $ 0.28   $ 0.22  
    Pro forma    0.10    0.06    0.27    0.19  

6


New Accounting Standards – In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle, such as a change in non-discretionary profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change, should be recognized in the period of the accounting change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2006.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” that will require compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in the Company’s statement of operations. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will be re-measured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2006. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle capacity and spoilage costs should be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. SFAS No. 151 was effective on July 1, 2005. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

2.    SEGMENTS

The Company has two reportable segments: Laboratory Services and Product Sales. The Laboratory Services segment consists of MEDTOX Laboratories, Inc. and New Brighton Business Center, LLC. Services provided include forensic toxicology (primarily workplace drugs-of-abuse testing) and Specialty Laboratory Services, which include clinical toxicology, clinical testing for the pharmaceutical industry, pediatric lead testing, heavy metals analyses and courier delivery, and medical surveillance. The Product Sales segment consists of MEDTOX Diagnostics, Inc., which includes point-of-collection testing (POCT) disposable diagnostics devices. Products manufactured include easy to use, inexpensive, on-site drug tests such as PROFILE®-II, PROFILE®-II A, PROFILE-II ER®, VERDICT®-II, and SURE-SCREEN®, in addition to a variety of agricultural testing products. MEDTOX Diagnostics, Inc. also provides contract manufacturing services in its Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registered/ISO 13845 certified facility.

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer synergistic, but different products and services. They are managed separately, as each business requires different products, services and marketing strategies.

7


In evaluating financial performance, management focuses on income from operations as a segment’s measure of profit or loss.


(In thousands) Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2005
2004
2005
2004
Laboratory Services:                    
   
  Revenues   $ 12,740   $ 10,979   $ 36,808   $ 32,694  
  Depreciation and amortization    650    692    1,955    1,900  
  Income from operations    1,365    795    3,909    2,727  
  Segment assets    44,418    41,706    44,418    41,706  
  Capital expenditures for segment assets    817    675    2,509    3,152  
   
Product Sales:  
   
  Revenues   $ 3,773   $ 3,494   $ 11,239   $ 10,426  
  Depreciation and amortization    133    144    409    432  
  Income from operations    323    486    741    1,160  
  Segment assets    6,793    6,858    6,793    6,858  
  Capital expenditures for segment assets    17    139    272    295  
   
Corporate (unallocated):  
   
  Other expense   $ (357 ) $ (363 ) $ (1,003 ) $ (1,127 )
  Deferred tax assets, net    6,878    8,286    6,878    8,286  
   
Consolidated:  
   
  Revenues   $ 16,513   $ 14,473   $ 48,047   $ 43,120  
  Depreciation and amortization    783    836    2,364    2,332  
  Income from operations    1,688    1,281    4,650    3,887  
  Other expense    (357 )  (363 )  (1,003 )  (1,127 )
  Income before income tax expense    1,331    918    3,647    2,760  
  Total assets    58,089    56,850    58,089    56,850  
  Capital expenditures for assets    834    814    2,781    3,447  

The following is a summary of revenues from external customers for each group of services provided within the Laboratory Services segment:


(In thousands) Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2005
2004
2005
2004
Workplace drugs-of-abuse     $ 8,242   $ 7,228   $ 24,303   $ 21,050  
Other specialty laboratory services    4,498    3,751    12,505    11,644  




    $ 12,740   $ 10,979   $ 36,808   $ 32,694  





8


The following is a summary of revenues from external customers for each group of products and services provided within the Product Sales segment:


(In thousands) Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2005
2004
2005
2004
POCT products     $ 3,247   $ 2,890   $ 9,519   $ 8,658  
Contract manufacturing services    483    582    1,561    1,581  
Other diagnostic products    43    22    159    187  




    $ 3,773   $ 3,494   $ 11,239   $ 10,426  




3.    INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:


(In thousands) September 30,
2005

December 31,
2004

Raw materials     $ 875   $ 984  
Work in process    350    344  
Finished goods    322    627  
Supplies, including off-site inventory    1,527    1,669  


    $ 3,074   $ 3,624  


4.     EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:


(In thousands, except share and
per share data)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2005
2004
2005
2004
Net income (A)     $ 825   $ 569   $ 2,261   $ 1,711  




Weighted average number of basic  
  common shares outstanding (B)    7,896,777    7,444,973    7,662,716    7,451,174  
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants  
  computed based on the treasury stock  
  method using average market price    428,103    485,374    431,494    355,726  




Weighted average number of diluted  
  common shares outstanding (C)    8,324,880    7,930,347    8,094,210    7,806,901  




Basic earnings per common share (A/B)   $ 0.10   $ 0.08   $ 0.30   $ 0.23  




Diluted earnings per common share (A/C)   $ 0.10   $ 0.07   $ 0.28   $ 0.22  





Options and warrants to purchase 8,589, 8,589, 8,682 and 1,338,243 shares of common stock were outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

9


5.     INCOME TAXES

At December 31, 2004, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) of approximately $26.1 million and $28.2 million, respectively, which are available to offset future taxable income.  The Company’s federal and state NOLs expire in varying amounts each year from 2005 through 2023 in accordance with applicable federal and state tax regulations and the timing of when the NOLs were incurred.  For financial reporting purposes, a valuation allowance has been recorded to offset deferred tax assets that, more likely than not, will not be realized based on the Company’s projected future taxable income, the timing of expiring NOLs, and the Company’s tax planning strategies.  Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code restricts the annual utilization of certain NOLs incurred prior to a change in ownership.  However, such limitation is not expected to impair the realization of these NOLs.  In the future, subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of these deferred tax assets could cause the provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although the Company’s cash payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of the NOLs is completely utilized or expires unused. At September 30, 2005, the Company had a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $0.9 million, which represents the portion of its NOL carryforwards that will more likely than not expire unused in 2006 and future years.

6.     STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Conversion of Warrants — In connection with the Company’s private placements in July and August 2000, the Company issued warrants, exercisable for an aggregate of 1,120,439 shares of its common stock for a five-year period from the time of issuance at an exercise price of $6.75. The Company issued a total of 604,589 shares of its common stock in 2005, upon exercise of such warrants, resulting in proceeds of approximately $4.1 million. The remaining shares underlying the exercised warrants were issued in December 2004. Warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 511,219 shares expired in July or August 2005 without being exercised.

Deferred Compensation Plan — In December 2004, the Company adopted the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) to provide performance based compensation to selected executives. Under the LTIP, an executive becomes eligible for an annual long-term incentive contribution amount based upon performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Annual contribution amounts are subject to a three-year restriction period with a risk of forfeiture if a participant terminates service prior to becoming vested. Participants may elect to allocate LTIP awards in investment options authorized by the Committee, including shares of the Company’s stock.

The Compensation Committee determined the total 2005 contribution amount to be $688,000 allocated among all participants. All LTIP participants elected to allocate their 2005 contribution amounts to Company stock, and accordingly, the future payment of benefits will be settled by delivery of a fixed number of shares of stock. To fund the 2005 contribution amount, the Company purchased $688,000 or 94,874 shares of its own stock from June through September 2005, which was contributed to a grantor trust. Of the total stock purchased, 59,000 shares were purchased in the open market and 35,874 shares were purchased from an officer of the Company (at the closing market price on the American Stock Exchange on August 4, 2005). The acquired stock was recorded as unearned compensation in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet. In accordance with EITF 97-14, “Accounting for Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested,” the deferred compensation in the form of the Company’s stock was recorded at historical cost and classified as Common Stock Held in Trust. The Company will record compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period (April 1, 2005 through March 31, 2008 for the 2005 contribution amount per the LTIP agreement), which is recorded as a deferred compensation obligation in the Other Long-Term Liability section of the balance sheet. The Company recorded approximately $57,000 and $115,000 of compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, in conjunction with the LTIP.

10


7.     CONTINGENCIES

Leases — The Company leases offices and facilities and office equipment under certain operating leases, which expire on various dates through March 2016. Under the terms of the facility leases, a pro rata share of operating expenses and real estate taxes are charged as additional rent.

Legal — The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business activities, none of which, in the opinion of management, are expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

11


Item 2:   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by such acts. For this purpose, any statements that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward looking statements, including the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding our strategy, future operations, future expectations and future estimates, future financial position or results and future plans and objectives of management. Those statements in this Form 10-Q containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects” and similar expressions constitute forward looking statements, although not all forward looking statements contain such identifying words.

The forward looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our Company and its businesses. All such forward looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, including those risks identified in the next paragraph, many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by the forward looking statements included in this Form 10-Q. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward looking statements included in this Form 10-Q, you should not consider the inclusion of such information as a representation by us or anyone else that we will achieve such results. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update these forward looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in assumptions, expectations or projections. In addition, our financial and performance outlook concerning future revenues, margins, earnings, earnings per share and other operating or performance results does not include the impact of any future acquisitions, future acquisition-related expenses or accruals, or any future restructuring or other charges that may occur from time to time due to management decisions and changing business circumstances and conditions.

The following is a bullet point listing of some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q:


o

increased competition, including price competition


o

changes in general economic and business conditions, both nationally and internationally, which can influence the level of job growth and, in turn, the level of pre-employment drug screening activity


o

changes in business strategy or development plans


o

technological, evolving industry standards, or regulatory developments that could affect or delay the sale of our products


o

risks and uncertainties with respect to our patents and proprietary rights including:


12


    o other companies challenging our patents
    o patents issued to other companies that may harm our ability to do business
    o other companies designing around technologies we have developed
    o our inability to obtain appropriate licenses from third parties
    o our inability to protect our trade secrets
    o risk of infringement upon the proprietary rights of others
    o our inability to prevent others from infringing on our proprietary rights

o

our inability to obtain sufficient financing to continue to sustain or expand our operations


o

changes in demand for our services and products by our customers


o

our failure to obtain and retain new customers and alliance partners, or a reduction in tests ordered or specimens submitted by existing customers


o

adverse results in litigation matters


o

our ability to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel


o

losses due to bad debt


The above listing should not be construed as exhaustive; we cannot predict all the factors that could cause results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward looking statements.

Executive Overview

We are engaged primarily in distinct, but very much related, businesses, which for financial reporting purposes are divided into two reportable segments: Laboratory Services and Product Sales. For financial information relating to our segments, see Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Laboratory Services

Our “Laboratory Services” business segment includes the activities of our wholly-owned subsidiary, MEDTOX Laboratories, Inc. MEDTOX Laboratories, Inc. principally engages in forensic toxicology (primarily laboratory testing for identification of drugs-of-abuse), providing these services to private and public companies, drug treatment counseling centers, occupational health clinics and hospitals, as well as third party administrators.

Our “Specialty Laboratory Services” operations consist of clinical toxicology, clinical testing for the pharmaceutical industry (e.g., central laboratory services, bioanalytical and pharmacokinetic testing), and analysis of heavy and trace metals. We provide these services to hospitals, clinics, HMOs and small to mid-sized biotech and pharmaceutical companies and other laboratories.

Testing is conducted using methodologies that include various immunoassays, gas liquid chromatography, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

13


The Laboratory Services segment also includes New Brighton Business Center, LLC, a wholly-owned limited liability company formed for the sole purpose of acquiring the facilities in St. Paul, Minnesota, where our Laboratory Services segment’s administrative offices and laboratory operations are located. These facilities include other commercial tenants that have individual leases with terms of up to ten years.

      Product Sales

Our “Product Sales” business segment consists of our wholly-owned subsidiary, MEDTOX Diagnostics, Inc. MEDTOX Diagnostics, Inc. is engaged in the development manufacturing and distribution of a variety of point-of-collection testing (POCT) diagnostic drug screening devices, such as our PROFILE®-II, PROFILE®-II A, PROFILE-II ER®, VERDICT®-II, and SURE-SCREEN® products, in addition to a variety of agricultural testing products. MEDTOX Diagnostics, Inc. also provides contract manufacturing services, such as coagulation market controls. The operations of the Product Sales segment are located in Burlington, North Carolina, where we maintain the offices, research and development laboratories, production operations and warehouse/distribution.

Key Trends Influencing Our Operating Results

Our management believes that there are several notable trends that are currently influencing, and are expected in the foreseeable future to continue to influence, our operating results. These include:

      Consolidation in the Laboratory Services, Drugs-of-Abuse Business

The laboratory services, drugs-of-abuse industry is consolidating, with the consolidation being driven by customers’ desires to minimize the number of laboratories they work with, the need for operating efficiencies in the form of critical mass (testing volumes), required investment levels and government regulation. Given the competitive environment, we are increasingly seeking to differentiate ourselves through our technology and value-added services, such as data management, collection site management, training, and technical support and expertise.

      Increased POCT Diagnostic Device Test Competition

We have experienced increased competition with respect to our POCT diagnostic tests from systems and products developed by others, many of whom compete solely on price. As the number of firms marketing diagnostic tests has grown, we have experienced increased price competition for certain diagnostic testing devices.

Our Strategy

We believe that the combined operations of our Laboratory Services business and on-site test kits manufactured by the Product Sales segment have created synergy in the marketing of comprehensive, on-site and laboratory testing programs to a common customer base. Our management has positioned us to offer a full line of products and services for the substance abuse testing and occupational medicine marketplace, including on-site tests for the detection of substance of abuse drugs, Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) certified laboratory testing (screening and confirmation), biological monitoring of occupational toxins, consultation, and logistic, data management and program management services.

14


Our strategy is to build market share by offering the highest quality products and services, delivered rapidly, priced competitively and supported by value-added services for customers. These services include data management, collection site management, training, technical support and expertise, as well as policy review. In the data management area, we have a new service in development—e-Chain®, the first multi-purpose electronic chain-of-custody system in the market. Also in development is MEDTOXScan™, an electronic reader for our devices for use in hospital laboratories and emergency rooms. Recently, we introduced SURE-SCREEN®, a cup-based POCT device with significantly lower detection levels for eight drugs-of-abuse, into the forensic markets where FDA 510(k) marketing clearance is not required. On October 25, 2005, we received FDA 510(k) clearance for our SURE-SCREEN® device and will now be able to expand the markets into which it is sold. Specific markets to which SURE-SCREEN® will be targeted are, probation, parole, drug rehabilitation, hospital emergency departments, physician office clinics, laboratories, and corporate clients interested in lower detection levels for pre-employment testing. In the fourth quarter, we will also be introducing an integrated cup and testing device for sale to the workplace drug testing market. This new device will be in the same format as SURE-SCREEN®, with the higher detection levels typically used in the workplace drugs-of-abuse market.

We have committed to improve productivity and quality in our organization through LEAN and Six-Sigma processes. Our LEAN initiatives are designed to improve quality and productivity, cut costs and increase throughput. The LEAN process has already been implemented in our forensic laboratory and Product Sales segment, with measurable improvements in streamlining work flow. We are currently in the process of implementing LEAN initiatives in our Specialty Labs and Sales organization. Six-Sigma is a highly disciplined process that helps us focus on reducing waste and eliminating unnecessary steps in our business processes. We have implemented Six-Sigma across the organization addressing quality and variability in processes.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the policies outlined below as critical to understanding our business and results of operations. The listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Note that the preparation of this Form 10-Q requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.

Our critical accounting policies are as follows:

Accounts Receivable:
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon payment history and the customers’ current credit worthiness, as determined by management’s review of their current credit information. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that have been identified. While such credit losses have generally been within our historical expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that have occurred in the past. Our consolidated trade accounts receivable balance as of September 30, 2005 was $10.8 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.6 million.

15


Some of our Laboratory Services revenues for certain types of tests are billed to third-party payors including insurance companies, state Medicaid and Medicare agencies. These payors pay for such services at established amounts, which are typically lower than gross amounts billed by us. However, the tests are sometimes billed directly to patients or other parties and paid at the gross amount billed for these tests. In addition, billings for the tests are occasionally re-billed to alternative payors in situations where incorrect billing information was submitted to us by the customer. We estimate a discount on the billings for these tests, and recognize revenue and related accounts receivable at a net amount, after discount, in order to state revenue and accounts receivable at the amount expected to be paid. While we believe that estimated discounts and the related net revenue and net accounts receivable from these testing services are materially correct, there can be differences in amounts ultimately paid compared to estimated amounts. These differences are recorded upon payment and may affect previously recorded amounts. We consider historical discounts when estimating future discounts on a monthly basis.

Off-Site Supplies Inventory:
Off-site supplies represent collection kits and forms located at collections sites throughout the United States used by Laboratory Services’ customers to submit specimens for testing services. At September 30, 2005, off-site inventory was $0.9 million. The process for valuing off-site inventory involves significant assumptions regarding the average time that a collection site uses the inventory, as well as the amount of inventory expected to be scrapped.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longer amortized, but are instead reviewed for impairment at least annually and between annual test dates in certain circumstances. We perform our annual impairment test for goodwill and other intangible assets in the fourth quarter of each year. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets, projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors are made to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates or related projections change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets in future periods.

Accounting for Income Taxes:
As part of the process of preparing the consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. We must then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and tax planning strategies, and to the extent management believes that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we increase or decrease the valuation allowance in a period, we must include an expense or benefit within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of operations.

16


Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. Our deferred tax assets primarily consist of certain net operating losses (NOLs) carried forward. At September 30, 2005, we had a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $0.9 million, which represents the portion of our NOL carryforwards that will more likely than not expire unused in 2006 and future years. The valuation allowance is based on management’s estimate of future taxable income, the period over which NOLs will be recoverable, and tax planning strategies. In the future, subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of these deferred tax assets could cause the provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although our cash payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of the NOLs is completely utilized or expires unused.

Results of Operations

In evaluating our financial performance, our management has primarily focused on three objectives: maximizing operating income, increasing our cash flows and improving our balance sheet. The first of these objectives is discussed in this section. The other two are addressed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

To maximize our operating income, we have sought revenue growth, improved gross margins and reduced selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense as a percentage of revenues. As discussed below, during the third quarter of 2005 we were able to achieve solid revenue growth and improved gross margins. During the first nine months of this year, we have made positive strides on all three fronts.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2004

Revenues


Three Months Ended
Quarter over Quarter
September 30,
2005

% of Total
Revenues

September 30,
2004

% of Total
Revenues

$
Change

%
Change

Revenues:                            
   
Laboratory Services   $ 12,740    77 .2% $ 10,979    75 .9% $ 1,761    16 %
   
Product Sales    3,773    22 .8%  3,494    24 .1%  279    8 %





Total Revenues   $ 16,513    100 .0% $ 14,473    100 .0% $ 2,040    14 %






Total revenues increased by 14% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the corresponding period of the prior year. Our Laboratory Services revenues were $12.7 million, approximately 77% of total revenues in the quarter (a slight increase compared to the third quarter of 2004).

17


In the Laboratory Services segment, revenues from workplace drugs-of-abuse testing increased 14% in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the corresponding period of the prior year due to an increase in sample volume, partially offset by a decrease in the average price per testing specimen. Pricing for our workplace drugs-of-abuse testing services tends to be stable overall; however, the average price per testing specimen can vary slightly from quarter to quarter depending on client mix. Test price can vary by client based on the amount of confirmation testing and transportation charges associated with the client’s workplace drugs-of-abuse samples. Our increased sample volume during the quarter was from both new and existing customers across a broad customer base and resulted from the execution of our business strategy.

Revenues from our Specialty Laboratory Services increased 20% to $4.5 million in the third quarter due to strong growth in testing for our clinical trial services. Overall, our clinical trial services have grown steadily from quarter to quarter during 2005. However, revenues from these services can fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the actual timing of clinical trials as shown in the table below:

Revenues from Specialty Laboratory Services:


First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

Revenues:                    
   
2005   $ 3,775   $ 4,232   $ 4,498    NA  
   
2004    3,737    4,156    3,751   $ 3,661  

In the Product Sales segment, sales of POCT products, which consists of the PROFILE®-II, PROFILE-II ER®, PROFILE®-II A, VERDICT®-II and SURE-SCREEN® on-site test kits and other ancillary products for the detection of abused substances, increased 12% to $3.2 million in the third quarter of 2005. This growth reflected strong sales of PROFILE®-II products, which grew 14% from the prior year period. Sales within the VERDICT®-II product line to government clients for probation, parole and rehabilitation were flat with the prior year period. During the quarter, we also continued the introduction of our new lower detection POCT device (SURE-SCREEN®) into the forensic market.

Sales of contract manufacturing services, microbiological and associated products decreased 17% to $0.5 million in the quarter and were impacted by the timing of the placement of orders from our two existing clients for these services. Product sales from agricultural diagnostic products were up $21,000, or 96%, due to increased purchases by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The USDA’s need for our products varies from year-to-year and sales to the USDA are expected to fluctuate accordingly.

18


Gross Profit


Three Months Ended
Quarter over Quarter
September 30,
2005

% of
Revenues

September 30,
2004

% of
Revenues

$
Change

%
Change

Cost of Revenues:                            
   
Cost of Services   $ 7,783    61 .1% $ 7,055    64 .3% $ 728    10 %
   
Cost of Sales    1,470    39 .0%  1,386    39 .7%  84    6 %





Total Cost of  
   Revenues   $ 9,253    56 .0% $ 8,441    58 .3% $ 812    10 %






Consolidated gross margin increased to 44.0% of revenues for the third quarter of 2005, compared to 41.7% of revenues for the same period in 2004. The increase was driven by improvement in both Laboratory Services’ and Product Sales’ gross margins.

Laboratory Services gross margin was 38.9% for third quarter of 2005, up from 35.7% for the same period in 2004. The margin improvement was attributable to increased revenues from additional testing volume through the current infrastructure. We also continued the implementation of LEAN initiatives within our Specialty Laboratory Services.

Gross margin from Product Sales improved slightly to 61.0% for the third quarter of 2005, from 60.3% in the comparable period of 2004. Our margin benefited from increased volume and from the elimination of costs incurred earlier in the year associated with the transition to a new and improved product format for our PROFILE®-II product line. We also continued the implementation of LEAN initiatives in our manufacturing processes of our diagnostics operation.

Operating Expenses

Three Months Ended
Quarter over Quarter
September 30,
2005

% of Total
Revenues

September 30,
2004

% of Total
Revenues

$
Change

%
Change

Operating Expenses:                            
   
Selling, general and  
    administrative   $ 5,020    30 .4% $ 4,397    30 .4% $ 623    14 %
   
Research and  
   development    552    3 .3%  354    2 .4%  198    56 %





Total Operating  
   Expenses   $ 5,572    33 .7% $ 4,751    32 .8% $ 821    17 %






Operating expenses increased in the third quarter of 2005, but were held constant as a percentage of revenues. The increase reflected a continued increased investment in sales and marketing, information technology and research and development activities.

19


        Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $5.0 million in the third quarter of 2005 compared to $4.4 million in the third quarter of 2004, but remained constant at 30.4% of revenues. The increase in spending reflects the continued increased investment in sales and marketing and information technology, as well as higher bad debt expense. Our increased sales and marketing expense was primarily associated with higher performance-based compensation related to the increase in revenues. Bad debt expense, although up slightly in the third quarter, is anticipated to continue to run at our historical level of around 1% of revenues for the year.

        Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses increased $0.2 million, or 56%, to $0.6 million in the third quarter of 2005 primarily due to continued spending for significant development projects in our Product Sales segment. During the quarter, we continued to make substantial progress on development of an electronic reader (MEDTOXScan™) with production units scheduled to be available late in the first quarter of 2006. The MEDTOXScan™ is expected to be utilized with our devices in the hospital laboratory and emergency room market.

Other Expense

Other income and expense consists primarily of interest expense and the net expenses associated with our building rental activities. Other expenses of $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2005 were comparable to the third quarter of last year. Interest expense was down due to lower average debt levels, which was offset by reduced net operating results of New Brighton Business Center, LLC.

Income Taxes

We recorded a tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 based upon an effective tax rate of 38%. At September 30, 2005, we had a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $0.9 million, which represents the portion of our net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards that will more likely than not expire unused in 2006 and future years. Should operating results for the remainder of 2005 and future years differ from expectations, the valuation allowance against the NOL carryforwards and the related deferred tax asset may require adjustment in future periods.

20


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004

Revenues

Nine Months Ended
Period over Period
September 30,
2005

% of Total
Revenues

September 30,
2004

% of Total
Revenues

$
Change

%
Change

Revenues:                            
   
Laboratory Services   $ 36,808    76 .6% $ 32,694    75 .8% $ 4,114    13 %
   
Product Sales    11,239    23 .4%  10,426    24 .2%  813    8 %





Total Revenues   $ 48,047    100 .0% $ 43,120    100 .0% $ 4,927    11 %






Total revenues increased 11% to $48.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the corresponding period of the prior year.

In the Laboratory Services segment, revenues from workplace drugs-of-abuse testing increased 15% in the first nine months of 2005 compared to the corresponding period of the prior year due to increased sample volume and stable pricing for our testing services. The increased sample volume was from both new and existing customers across a broad customer base and resulted from the execution of our business strategy. Client and prospect interest in our development of our eChain® system for enhanced electronic results reporting and sample and donor tracking remains strong and significant progress on the development of eChain® was made during the year. In addition, during the first quarter of 2005, we entered into contracts for collection and testing services with two of the largest national third-party administrators. Revenues from our Specialty Laboratory Services increased 7% with an increase in sample volume from clinical trial services partially offset by reduced sample volume from therapeutic drug monitoring as hospitals and other laboratories brought certain types of this testing in-house last year. The decline in therapeutic drug monitoring samples has resulted in a lower average price for our Specialty Laboratory Services year over year. Pricing for our Specialty Laboratory Services has stabilized during the current year from quarter to quarter.

In the Product Sales segment, sales of POCT products, which consists of the PROFILE®-II, PROFILE-II ER®, PROFILE®-II A, VERDICT®-II, and SURE-SCREEN® on-site test kits and other ancillary products for the detection of abused substances, increased 10% to $9.5 million during the first nine months of 2005. This growth reflected strong sales of PROFILE®-II products, which grew 14% from the prior year period. Sales within the VERDICT®-II product line to government clients for probation, parole and rehabilitation were down 1% from the prior year period. During the second quarter, we also began selling our new lower detection POCT device (SURE-SCREEN®) into the forensic market.

Sales of contract manufacturing services, microbiological and associated products decreased 1% to $1.6 million in the first nine months of 2005. Product sales from agricultural diagnostic products were down $28,000, or 15%, due to decreased purchases by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The USDA’s need for our products varies from year-to-year and sales to the USDA are expected to fluctuate accordingly.

21


Gross Profit


Nine Months Ended
Period over Period
September 30,
2005

%
of Revenues

September 30,
2004

% of
Revenues

$
Change

%
Change

Cost of Revenues:                            
   
Cost of Services   $ 22,758    61 .8% $ 20,638    63 .1% $ 2,120    10 %
   
Cost of Sales    4,587    40 .8%  4,096    39 .3%  491    12 %





Total Cost of  
   Revenues   $ 27,345    56 .9% $ 24,734    57 .4% $ 2,611    11 %






Consolidated gross margin increased to 43.1% of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to 42.6% of revenues for the same period in 2004. The increase was due to improvement in Laboratory Services’ gross margin, partially offset by a decline in Product Sales’ gross margin.

Laboratory Services gross margin was 38.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, up from 36.9% for the same period in 2004. The margin improvement was attributable to increased revenues from additional testing volume through the current infrastructure. We also continued the implementation of LEAN initiatives within our Specialty Laboratory Services.

Gross margin from Product Sales declined to 59.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from 60.7% in the comparable period of 2004, largely due to the impact of costs associated with the transition to a new and improved product format for our PROFILE®-II product line during the first half of the year. The new product began shipping late in the first quarter of 2005. We also continued the implementation of LEAN initiatives in our manufacturing processes of our diagnostics operation.

Operating Expenses


Nine Months Ended
Period over Period
September 30,
2005

% of Total
Revenues

September 30,
2004

% of Total
Revenues

$
Change

%
Change

Operating Expenses:                            
   
Selling, general and  
    Administrative   $ 14,264    29 .7% $ 13,310    30 .9% $ 954    7 %
   
Research and  
   Development    1,788    3 .7%  1,189    2 .7%  599    50 %





Total Operating  
   Expenses   $ 16,052    33 .4% $ 14,499    33 .6% $ 1,553    11 %






22


Operating expenses increased in the first nine months of 2005, but were down slightly as a percentage of revenues. The increase reflected a continued increased investment in sales and marketing, information technology and research and development activities.

        Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $14.3 million, or 29.7% of revenues in the first nine months of 2005, compared to $13.3 million, or 30.9% of revenues in same period of 2004. The lower percentage reflects the increase in revenue on marginally higher year-over-year expenses. The increase in spending reflects the continued increased investment in sales and marketing and information technology, as well as higher bad debt expense. Our increased sales and marketing expense was primarily associated with higher performance-based compensation related to the increase in revenues. Although bad debt expense increased slightly in the third quarter, it is anticipated to continue to run at our historical level of around 1% of revenues for the entire year.

        Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses increased $0.6 million, or 50%, to $1.8 million in the first nine months of 2005 primarily due to continued spending for significant development projects in our Product Sales segment. During the year, we completed enhancements to PROFILE®-II, PROFILE®-II A, and PROFILE-II ER® products that shorten run times, darken line intensity, improve readability and extend the positive result hold time; filed a 510(k) application with the FDA for SURE-SCREEN®, which is a POCT device intended to provide significantly lower detection levels for eight commonly abused drugs, initially targeted at the probation, parole and rehabilitation markets; and made substantial progress on development of an electronic reader (MEDTOXScan™) expected to be utilized with our devices in the hospital laboratory and emergency room market.

Other Expense

Other income and expense consists primarily of interest expense and the net expenses associated with our building rental activities. These expenses decreased 11% to $1.0 million in the first nine months of 2005. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest expense, reflecting a reduction in average debt levels, partially offset by reduced net operating results from our building rental activities.

Income Taxes

We recorded a tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 based upon an effective tax rate of 38%. At September 30, 2005, we had a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $0.9 million, which represents the portion of our net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards that will more likely than not expire unused in 2006 and future years. Should operating results for the remainder of 2005 and future years differ from expectations, the valuation allowance against the NOL carryforwards and the related deferred tax asset may require adjustment in future periods.

23


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our working capital requirements have been funded primarily by various combinations of profitable operations, cash received from debt financing, and the sale of equity securities. Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2005 were $0.7 million, compared to $0.3 million at December 31, 2004.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to $5.2 million for the same period of 2004. The decrease was primarily due to a significant increase in accounts receivable from December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005 due to strong August and September 2005 sales. Our days sales outstanding was at 60 days for the third quarter of 2005 compared to 58 days in the third quarter of last year.

Net cash used in investing activities, consisting primarily of capital expenditures, was $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to $3.6 million in the same period of 2004. The increased spending in 2004 reflects equipment purchased and costs incurred in redesigning the laboratory operations to improve operating efficiencies.

Net cash used in financing activities was $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to $1.8 million in the prior year period.

In 2005, we received proceeds of approximately $4.1 million from the exercise of warrants to acquire 604,589 common shares issued in connection with our private placements in July and August 2000. Of the 604,589 total shares issued in 2005, 590,700 were issued in the third quarter. The warrants were exercisable for a five-year period from the time of issuance at an exercise price of $6.75. In July or August 2005, warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 511,219 shares expired without being exercised. The proceeds received from the exercise of such warrants were used to reduce the amount outstanding on our revolving credit facility during the third quarter.

In 2005, we purchased 59,000 shares of our common stock in the open market and 35,874 shares of our common stock from an officer of our Company for a total cost of $688,000. The acquired stock was contributed to our Long-Term Incentive Plan.

We also made payments on long-term debt of $1.2 million and $2.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

We are party to a credit security agreement (the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement) with Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. (Wells Fargo). The Wells Fargo Credit Agreement, as amended, consists of (i) a revolving line of credit, payable on demand, of not more than $8.0 million or 85% of our eligible trade accounts receivable bearing interest at prime + 1%; and (ii) a capex note of up to $1.5 million for the purchase of capital equipment bearing interest at prime + 0.75%. According to the terms of the agreement, the capex note may be amended, supplemented or restated from time to time and is generally done so on an annual basis.

The Wells Fargo Credit Agreement requires us to comply with certain financial covenants, including a minimum annual debt service coverage ratio and minimum quarterly pre-tax net income levels. It also sets a maximum quarterly level for capital expenditures, as well as a limitation on the year-over-year increase in compensation of any director, shareholder or consultant. At September 30, 2005, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement.

24


We are relying on expected positive cash flow from operations and our line of credit to fund our future working capital and asset purchases. The amount available on the revolving line of credit is based primarily on the receivables of the Company and, as such, varies with accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2005, we had total borrowing capacity of $8.0 million on our line of credit, of which $1.1 million was borrowed, leaving a net availability of $6.9 million.

In the short term, we believe that the aforementioned capital will be sufficient to fund our planned operations through the remainder of 2005. While there can be no assurance that the available capital will be sufficient to fund our future operations beyond 2005, we believe that future profitable operations, as well as access to additional capital through debt or equity financings, will be the primary means for funding our operations for the long term.

We continue to follow a plan which includes (i) aggressively monitoring and controlling costs, (ii) increasing revenue from sales of our existing products and services (iii) developing new products and services, as well as (iv) continuing to selectively pursue synergistic acquisitions to increase our critical mass. However, there can be no assurance that costs can be controlled, revenues can be increased, financing may be obtained, acquisitions successfully consummated, or that we will be profitable.

Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table aggregates all contractual commitments and commercial obligations that affect our financial condition and liquidity position as of September 30, 2005:


Payments Due by Period
(In thousands) Total
Less than
1 year

1-3 years
4-5 years
More than
5 years

Long-term debt (1)     $ 10,365   $ 1,476   $ 2,088   $ 1,174   $ 5,627  
   
Capital lease obligations (1)    55    27    28    --    --  
   
Operating leases    4,969    732    1,643    825    1,769  





Total contractual obligations   $ 15,389   $ 2,235   $ 3,759   $ 1,999   $ 7,396  






(1)     Amounts include interest payments based upon contractual or prevailing interest rates.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

We do not maintain any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or others that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

25


Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The impact of inflation and changing prices has been primarily limited to salary, laboratory and operating supplies and rent increases and has historically not been material to our operations. In the future, we may not be able to increase the prices of laboratory testing by an amount sufficient to cover the cost of inflation, although we are responding to these concerns by refocusing the laboratory operations towards higher margin testing (including clinical and pharmaceutical trials) as well as emphasizing the marketing, sales and operations of the Product Sales business.

Seasonality

We believe that the laboratory testing business is subject to seasonal fluctuations in pre-employment screening. These seasonal fluctuations include reduced volume in the summer months, year-end holiday periods, and other major holidays. In addition, inclement weather may have a negative impact on volume thereby reducing net revenues and cash flow.

Impact of New Accounting Standards

In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle, such as a change in non-discretionary profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change, should be recognized in the period of the accounting change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2006.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” that will require compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in the Company’s statement of operations. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will be re-measured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2006. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle capacity and spoilage costs should be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. SFAS No. 151 was effective on July 1, 2005. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

26


Item 3:  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

There have been no material changes in our market risk during the quarter ended September 30, 2005. For additional information refer to Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Item 4:  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information that is required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

27


PART II    OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1      LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.   Inapplicable

ITEM 2      UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (a)

Average
Price Paid
per Share

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs

Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs

July 1-31, 2005      3,000   $6 .98   -     -  
August 1-31, 2005    70,374   $7 .41  -   - 
September 1-30, 2005    8,000   $ 7 .10  -   - 


    Total    81,374   $ 7 .36



(a)   Represents shares of common stock acquired in the open market or purchased from an officer of the Company and contributed to the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan.

ITEM 3      DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.  Inapplicable

ITEM 4      SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIY HOLDERS.  Inapplicable

ITEM 5      OTHER INFORMATION.   Inapplicable

ITEM 6      EXHIBITS.   See Exhibit Index on page following signature page

28


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Richard J. Braun President, Chief Executive Officer, and November 2, 2005
Richard J. Braun Chairman of the Board of Directors
  (Principal Executive Officer)
 
/s/ Kevin J. Wiersma Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 2, 2005
Kevin J. Wiersma (Principal Financial Officer)
 
/s/ Angela M. Lacis Controller November 2, 2005
Angela M. Lacis (Principal Accounting Officer)


29



EXHIBIT INDEX

MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005


Exhibit number
Description
   
31.1     Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
31.2     Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.1     Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.2     Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


30