-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, EfKTo5CT84Kty1jmKOvt3VGDvL0gz0twFanMT53xhpelBv987X7JzI/f9CXGGFaq 3l4VqonVIZkplbxlBy0uRA== 0000073902-96-000004.txt : 19960328 0000073902-96-000004.hdr.sgml : 19960328 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000073902-96-000004 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 9 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19951231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19960327 SROS: NYSE FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: OGDEN CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000073902 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-FACILITIES SUPPORT MANAGEMENT SERVICES [8744] IRS NUMBER: 135549268 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-03122 FILM NUMBER: 96539245 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: TWO PENNSYLVANIA PLZ - 25TH FLR CITY: NEW YORK STATE: NY ZIP: 10121 BUSINESS PHONE: 2128686100 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: TWO PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA CITY: NEW YORK STATE: NY ZIP: 10121 10-K 1 FORM 10-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED] For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1995 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] For the transition period from ____________________ to____________________ Commission File Number 1-3122 OGDEN CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-5549268 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Emlpoyer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) Two Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10121 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number including area code - (212) 868-6100 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange on Title of each class which registered Common Stock, par value New York Stock Exchange $.50 per share $1.875 Cumulative Convertible New York Stock Exchange Preferred Stock (Series A) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO______ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. [X] The aggregate market value of registrant's voting stock, held by non- affiliates based on the New York Stock Exchange closing price as reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system as of the close of business on March 1, 1996 was as follows: Common Stock, par value $.50 per share $1,029,726,015 $1.875 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (Series A) $ 6,328,704 The number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 1996 was 49,579,675 shares. The following documents are hereby incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K: (1) Portions of the Registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 1995 (Parts II and IV). (2) Portions of the Registrant's 1996 Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Part III). PART I Item 1. BUSINESS Ogden Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter together with its consolidated subsidiaries referred to as "Ogden" or the "Company"), has its executive offices located at Two Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, New York 10121, pursuant to a lease that expires on April 30, 2008 and which contains an option by Ogden to renew for an additional five years. Ogden is a diversified company primarily engaged in providing a wide range of services through its operating groups within each of its two business segments. Set forth in the following table is the amount of revenue attributable to each of the groups within Ogden's Services and Projects business segments for each of the last three fiscal years (In Thousands): YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 1994 1995 SERVICES REVENUES: ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES $242,347 $245,187 $ 301,315 AVIATION SERVICES 389,201 413,337 480,620 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 122,262 140,745 145,748 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 181,870 212,098 251,243 FACILITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 382,056 357,272 374,804 OTHER SERVICES 12,368 10,811 7,257 TOTAL SERVICES $1,330,104 $1,379,450 $1,560,987 PROJECTS REVENUES: INDEPENDENT POWER $ 24,696 $ 26,368 $ 57,443 WATER AND WASTEWATER 0 0 1,742 WASTE-TO-ENERGY 432,609 459,478 494,921 GAIN ON SALE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS 0 26,126 0 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 248,451 213,125 69,900 TOTAL PROJECTS $ 705,756 $ 725,097 $624,006 TOTAL REVENUES $2,035,860 $2,104,547 $2,184,993
The above table has been reclassified to conform with the 1995 presentation. The amounts of revenue, operating profit or loss and identifiable assets attributable to each of Ogden's two business segments for each of the last three fiscal years are set forth on pages 50 and 51 of Ogden's 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders, certain specified portions of which are incorporated herein by reference. SERVICES The operations of Ogden's Services business segment are performed by Ogden Services Corporation and its subsidiaries ("Ogden Services") principally through its Entertainment Services, Aviation Services and Other Services operating groups. Ogden Services, through joint ventures, partnerships and wholly-owned subsidiaries within each of the foregoing operating groups, provides a wide range of services to private and public facilities throughout the United States and many foreign countries. Its principal customers include airlines, transportation terminals, sports arenas, stadiums, banks, owners and tenants of office buildings, state, local and Federal governments, universities and other institutions and large industrial organizations. In foreign countries the development, construction, ownership and the providing of services may expose Ogden to potential risks that typically are not involved in such activities in the United States. Payment for services is often made in whole or part in the domestic currencies of the foreign country and the conversion of such currencies into U.S. dollars may not be assured by a governmental or other creditworthy foreign country agency. In addition, fluctuations in value of such currencies against the U.S. dollar may cause the operation to yield less return than expected. Also, the transfer of earnings and profits in any form beyond the borders of the foreign country may be subject to special taxes or limitations, imposed by the laws of the foreign country. Many customers are billed on cost-plus, fixed-price or time and materials basis. Where services are performed on a cost-plus basis, the customer reimburses the appropriate Ogden Services' group for all acceptable reimbursable expenditures made in connection with the job and also pays a fee, which may be a percentage of the reimbursable expenditures, a specific dollar amount, or a combination of the two. Fixed-price contracts, in most cases, contain escalation clauses increasing the fixed price in the event, and to the extent, that there are increases in payroll and related costs. Contracts in Aviation Services and Other Services may be written on a month-to-month basis or provide for a longer or indefinite term but are terminable by either party on notice varying from 30 to 180 days. ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES The Entertainment Services group provides total facility management services; presentation of concerts and family shows; food, beverage and novelty concessions; and janitorial, security, parking, and other maintenance services. These services are provided to a wide variety of public and private facilities including more than 100 stadiums, convention and exposition centers, arenas, parks, amphitheaters, and fairgrounds located in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Spain and the United Kingdom. Entertainment also operates a racetrack and five off-track betting parlors in Illinois. The facility management and concession arrangements under which this group operates are individually negotiated and vary widely as to terms and duration. Concession contracts and leases usually provide for payment by Entertainment of commissions or rentals based on a stipulated percentage of gross sales or net profits, sometimes with a minimum rental or payment. Most of the facility management contracts are on a cost-plus-a-fee basis but a number of such contracts provide for a sharing of profits and losses between Entertainment and the facility owner. Entertainment offers its customers a wide range of project- development options, including the operational design review, consultation during construction, and assistance with financing arrangements, as well as operations of facilities, usually in return for long-term services and concession contracts. In some cases Ogden Corporation guarantees Entertainment's performance of these contracts as well as the financing arrangements. In 1995, Entertainment acquired a 50% interest in The Metropolitan Entertainment Co., Inc. ("Metropolitan"), a leading concert promoter in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and parts of Massachusetts. Metropolitan and Entertainment, through their joint venture called the Metropolitan Entertainment Group ("MEG"), will continue existing concert promotion activities, operate amphitheaters in the eastern United States and concentrate on national and global music tours, artist management, Broadway and television productions, recording, and music publishing. In December of 1995, Metropolitan entered into a 25-year agreement to renovate and operate a 21,000 capacity amphitheater in Darien Lake, New York (located between Buffalo and Rochester). In 1995, Ogden acquired 100% of Firehole Entertainment Corp. ("Firehole"), an innovative themed attraction/film and merchandising developer. Through Firehole, Ogden now owns and operates Grizzly Park, a nature-based entertainment center located at the entrance to Yellowstone National Park. Within Grizzly Park are, among other attractions, the Grizzly Discovery Center, a natural habitat with grizzly bears and gray wolves, and a variety of stores and restaurants. Through the acquisition of Firehole, Entertainment plans the development of several new nature-themed attractions at major tourist destinations in the United States. Food, Beverage and Novelty Services at Stadiums and Arenas Food, beverage and novelty services are provided by Entertainment in the United States and Canada at a number of locations including those listed in the following table:
Name Location Wrigley Field Chicago, Illinois Anaheim Stadium Anaheim, California Rich Stadium Buffalo, New York USAir Arena Landover, Maryland Milwaukee Exposition and Convention Center Milwaukee, Wisconsin Los Angeles Convention Center Los Angeles, California The Kingdome Seattle, Washington Veterans Stadium Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Market Square Arena Indianapolis, Indiana McNichols Arena Denver, Colorado Cobo Hall Detroit, Michigan Tempe Diablo Stadium Tempe, Arizona University of Oklahoma Stadium Norman, Oklahoma The MGM Grand Gardens Arena Las Vegas, Nevada Saint John Regional Exhibition Centre New Brunswick, Canada Lansdowne Park Ottawa, Canada
During 1995 Entertainment began providing services at General Motors Place, a new sports and entertainment arena in Vancouver, British Columbia which opened in late 1995 and which is the home of the National Hockey League's Vancouver Canucks and the National Basketball Association's Vancouver Grizzlies. In 1995, Entertainment was also awarded an exclusive food and beverage contract for the MCI Center under construction in downtown Washington, D.C. This new 20,000-seat facility is anticipated to open in the fall of 1997 and will serve as the home of the Washington Bullets National Basketball Association team and the Washington Capitals National Hockey League team. In addition to operating three restaurants within the arena, Entertainment will provide concession services to the general seating area as well as in-seat services to 110 suites and more than 2,000 club seats. In 1995, Entertainment also acquired a 50% interest in the Australian and New Zealand business of the International Facility Corporation Pty Ltd. ("IFC"), a private facility management firm based in Brisbane, Australia. IFC is the managing general partner for all of the Entertainment/IFC joint venture accounts in Australia and New Zealand. These accounts include the Brisbane Entertainment Centre, the Newcastle Entertainment Centre, the Cairns Convention Centre, and a significant interest in Convex, operator of the Brisbane Convention and Exposition Centre. IFC is also acting as a consultant for the design, construction, and ongoing management of the Olympic 2000 Stadium in Sydney, Australia. In addition, in 1995 Entertainment purchased 100% of IFC's Asian business and established Ogden-IFC (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd. ("Ogden-IFC Asia Pacific"), a wholly-owned subsidiary, to manage certain Asian projects. The first contract award to Ogden-IFC Asia Pacific is a 10-year agreement to manage the Bangkok Arena and Trade & Exposition Centre, both of which are now under construction. The new 20,000-seat arena will be the site of the 1998 Asian Games. Ogden-IFC Asia Pacific has also formed joint venture relationships in other Asian countries such as Malaysia, Taiwan, and Singapore. Food, Beverage and Novelty Services at Amphitheaters Entertainment also provides food and beverage services at amphitheaters throughout the United States, including the Starlake Amphitheater (near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania); the Fiddler's Green Amphitheatre (Englewood, Colorado); the Sandstone Amphitheatre (Kansas City, Missouri); the Cynthia Woods Mitchell Pavilion (Woodlands, Texas); the Mega Star Amphitheater (Eufaula, Oklahoma); the all-seasons Meadows Music Theater (Hartford, Connecticut); the all-seasons Camden Amphitheater (Camden, New Jersey); the Polaris Amphitheater (Columbus, Ohio); and the Nissan Amphitheater (Manassas, Virginia). In 1995, Entertainment was awarded a 20-year contract to provide food and beverage services, parking and support for the long-term financing at an amphitheatre under construction in Virginia Beach, Virginia, to be operated by the Cellar Door Companies, expected to open during 1996. Facility Management and Concession Services Entertainment, through long-term management agreements operates and manages, and in some cases provides concession services, various convention centers, arenas and public facilities including the Pensacola Civic Center in Pensacola, Florida; the Sullivan Arena and Egan Convention Center in Anchorage, Alaska; the Rosemont Horizon, near Chicago, Illinois; the Target Center in Minneapolis; the Northlands Coliseum in Edmonton, Alberta; and The Great Western Forum in Los Angeles. The Ottawa Palladium, a 19,000-seat multipurpose indoor arena in Ottawa, Canada, which is owned by a third party, opened in January of 1996, and Entertainment commenced operations under a 30-year contract to provide complete facility management and concession services at this arena, which is the home of the Ottawa Senators of the National Hockey League. Pursuant to the 30-year contract, Entertainment agreed to advance funds, if necessary, to a customer to assist in financing senior secured debt incurred in connection with construction of the facility. Such requirements are not expected to exceed $75,000,000 at maturity of the senior secured debt, which is expected to be on or about March 1, 2001. In addition, at December 31, 1995 Ogden has guaranteed indebtedness of $6.2 million of an affiliate and principal tenant of Entertainment's customer. Ogden has agreed that the Ottawa Palladium, under Entertainment's management, will generate a minimum amount of revenues computed in accordance with its 30-year contract. The owners of the Ottawa Palladium are parties to a 30-year license agreement with the owner of the Ottawa Senators, pursuant to which the Ottawa Senators began to play their home games at the arena in January 1996. Pursuant to a management agreement between the City of Anaheim, California and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ogden, Entertainment manages and operates the Arrowhead Pond, a facility owned by and located within the City of Anaheim. The Arrowhead Pond is a multi-purpose facility capable of accommodating professional basketball and hockey, concerts and other attractions, and has a maximum seating capacity of approximately 19,400. Ogden has agreed that the Arrowhead Pond, under Entertainment's management, will generate a minimum amount of revenues computed in accordance with the 30-year management agreement with the City. Entertainment also has a 30-year lease agreement with The Walt Disney Company at the Arrowhead Pond where the Anaheim Mighty Ducks, a National Hockey League team owned by The Walt Disney Company, plays its home games. In 1995, the 19,000 seat Victoria Station Arena in Manchester, England opened; Entertainment will manage and operate this building pursuant to a 20-year lease. In 1995, Entertainment secured a 20-year contract to provide total facility management services at the 10,000-seat Newcastle Arena, a new sports and entertainment arena located in Newcastle, England, which opened in November 1995 and which will feature ice hockey, concerts and other events. Also in 1995, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey awarded Entertainment an eleven and one-half year lease to renovate and operate the 107th Floor Observation Deck at the World Trade Center in New York City. The Observation Deck will undergo a $5 to $6 million renovation which will include wide- screen, high-definition television theaters that will take visitors on an aerial sightseeing tour of New York City and environs; interactive, multi-lingual kiosks at various viewing points; a nightly rooftop light show; and exhibits showcasing the region's pre-eminence in international trade, finance and the arts. The lease agreement provides that Entertainment will pay the Port Authority an annual fee plus a percentage of gross revenues above a certain level. In Mexico, Entertainment provides food and beverage concessions at the Sports Palace, a 22,000 seat arena, and the Autodrome, a 45,000 seat open air facility, located in Mexico City, as well as the new Autodrome Fundidora Amphitheater in Monterey, Mexico that is able to accommodate 18,000 people. Other Activities During 1996, Entertainment acquired a long-term leasehold interest in Silver Springs and Wild Waters, two nature-based attractions located near Ocala, Florida, as well as other associated assets. Silver Springs is located on a 250-acre park which is open 365 days a year and features attractions consisting of jungle cruise boat rides, jeep safari rides, animal shows, a petting zoo, gift shops and eateries. Wild Waters is located on a six acre park featuring a variety of slides, a wave pool, miniature golf, food services and other attractions. Wild Waters is open March through Labor Day. In 1995, Entertainment formed a joint venture to operate La Rural de Palermo, a 28-acre fair and exhibition center located in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The joint venture will continue the existing fair and exhibition business on the property while developing a master plan for the development of the property to include an entertainment attraction. Entertainment owns a 50% interest in the joint venture and will serve as the managing partner. As such, Entertainment will direct day-to-day operations and be responsible for creating and implementing the development plan for this property. Entertainment also leases and operates a thoroughbred and harness racetrack and six off-track betting parlors in Illinois where it telecasts races from Fairmount Park and other racing facilities. Restaurants and other food and beverage services are provided by Entertainment at these facilities. A large portion of the track's revenue is derived from its share of the pari-mutuel handle, which can be adjusted by state legislation. Other income is derived from admission charges, parking, programs and concessions. Entertainment also owns an equity interest in Parques Tecnocultiroles, S.A. ("Partecsa"), a Spanish Corporation based in Seville, Spain. Partecsa was awarded a 30-year contract to convert, remodel, manage and operate a 200-acre site in Seville, Spain where the 1992 Exposition Fair was held. Entertainment also provides concessions at zoos located in Seattle, Washington; Cleveland, Ohio; and Columbia, South Carolina. AVIATION SERVICES Aviation Services provides specialized support services to 185 airlines at over 100 locations throughout the United States, Canada, Europe, Latin America and the Pacific Rim. The specialized support services provided by this group include comprehensive ground handling, ramp, passenger, cargo and warehouse, aviation fueling and in-flight catering services. These services are performed through contracts with individual airlines, through consolidated agreements with several airlines, and contracts with various airport authorities. Aviation Services continues to pursue opportunities associated with the privatization of airport operations and related airport projects. To capitalize on these opportunities, Ogden combines its Aviation Services skills with the development, financing and construction management expertise of its Projects business segment. Ground Handling and Specialized Support Services Ground handling services include diversified ramp operations such as baggage unloading and loading, aircraft cleaning, aircraft maintenance, flight planning, de-icing, cargo handling, warehouse operations and passenger-related services such as ticketing, check-in, porter ("sky-cap") service, passenger lounge operations, cargo/warehouse services and other miscellaneous services. Global expansion by the Aviation group has resulted in providing comprehensive ground handling and related services at many international locations throughout Europe, Canada, South America and other countries. Set forth below is a list of major foreign airports where Aviation currently conducts ground handling operations: Airport Location Heathrow Airport England Schiphol International Airport Netherlands Auckland International Airport New Zealand Jorge Chaves International Airport Lima, Peru Guarulhos International Airport Sao Paulo, Brazil Galeao International Airport Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Pearson International Airport Toronto, Canada Mirabel and Dorval Airports Montreal, Canada Simon Bolivar International Airport Caracas, Venezuela Mexico International Airport Mexico City, Mexico
Aviation also performs ground handling operations at eight different airports throughout Germany; the Czech Republic through a 50% interest in a Prague-based airport handling company; VIP lounge and ground handling operations at the Arturo Merino Benitez Airport in Santiago, Chile and through a joint venture with a Turkish company, aircraft cleaning, security and commissary supplies to carriers at Ataturk Airport in Istanbul and other locations in Turkey. Ogden Aviation continues to perform services at St. Maarten's Princess Juliana International Airport. In Aruba through a corporation jointly owned by Aviation Services and Air Aruba, Aviation Services provides ramp and passenger services at Reina Beatrix International Airport. During 1995 Aviation Services (i) was awarded a 10-year license to provide services at the new airport at Chek Lap Kok, Hong Kong, expected to open in April 1998. Aviation will provide a wide range of support services including ground services, passenger services, cargo handling, loading and unloading of mail and baggage, and aircraft marshalling, among others; (ii) was awarded a contract as the exclusive provider of ground handling services for all airlines at the La Union Airport in Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic; (iii) began ground handling operations at Belo Horizonte International Airport, Brazil as well as at Huatulco, Zihautanejo, and Mazatlan International Airports in Mexico; (iv) formed a joint venture with Aldeasa S.A. of Spain to provide cargo handling and warehousing services at airports located in Madrid and Barcelona, Spain. Fueling Services Aviation operates fueling facilities, including storage and hydrant fueling systems for the fueling of aircraft. This operation assists airlines in designing, arranging financing for, and installing underground fueling systems. These fueling operation services are principally performed in the North American market. However, pursuant to a 10-year contract running through 2004, Aviation Services is the sole fueling handling agent at Tocumen International Airport in Panama City, Panama. Also, pursuant to a 5-year contract which commenced in 1995, Aviation fuels aircrafts at the Luis Munoz International Airport in San Juan, Puerto Rico. During 1995 Aviation was also awarded a contract for the maintenance and operation of a new Fuel Farm located at the San Diego International Airport. In-Flight Catering Aviation operates 16 in-flight kitchens for over 85 airline customers at a number of locations, including John F. Kennedy International and LaGuardia Airports in New York; Newark International Airport in New Jersey; Los Angeles and San Francisco International Airports in California; Miami International Airport in Florida; Washington Dulles International Airport near Washington, D.C.; McCarren International in Las Vegas, Nevada; and Honolulu International in Hawaii. The Aviation in-flight kitchen at Honolulu International also provides catering services to two cruise ships owned by NAVATEK, a Hawaiian cruise line. During 1995 Aviation was awarded several long-term catering contracts in Spain at Gran Canaria Airport, Las Palmas; Palma De Mallorca Airport, Palma De Mallorca; and Tenerife-Sur/Reina Sofia Airport. At these locations Aviation will be providing catering for more than twenty-five different airlines. Airport Privatization and Related Projects In 1994 a consortium, composed of Ogden Aviation Services, Inc., Macau Aviation Services Corporation, EVA Airways, Air Macau and several local companies and prominent businessmen, was awarded a 19-year contract, with a 16-year exclusivity arrangement, to provide ramp and cargo handling, passenger services, and aircraft line maintenance service at the new Macau International Airport, which opened and began operations in November 1995. The consortium, of which Aviation Services is the managing partner with a 29% participation, is providing all necessary passenger and ramp equipment, has constructed a cargo warehouse and is in process of building cargo and engineering facilities, an aircraft hangar and a state-of-the-art training center at the airport. The consortium's investment in infrastructure improvements and equipment in the new Macau airport is expected to exceed $40 million. Aviation Services is also part of a consortium, of which Aviation has a 19% interest, that has been awarded a 20-year concession contract by the Civil Aviation Authority of Colombia to finance, build and operate a second runway at the El Dorado Airport, in Bogota, Colombia. Aviation's consortium partners, including Spain's Dragados y Contrucciones SA and Colombia's Conconcreto, will build the 3.8-kilometer runway at an estimated cost of $97 million. Construction is expected to begin in 1996 and be completed by May 1998. The consortium will maintain the new runway, and the pre-existing runway, for approximately 17 years in return for runway landing fees. Applied Data Technology During January 1995 Ogden acquired Applied Data Technology, Inc. ("ADTI"), located in San Diego, California. ADTI is a leading supplier of air combat maneuvering instrumentation systems and after-action reporting and display systems. ADTI's range systems are installed at Navy and Air Force aircraft training ranges to facilitate air-to-air combat exercises and monitor, record and graphically display the exact maneuvers of the aircraft on the ranges and simulate the various weapons systems aboard the aircraft. These range automated systems are used by the U.S. Navy and Air Force to train pilots for combat conditions and by the Department of Defense in training pilots to avoid "friendly fire" incidents. ADTI's systems are currently installed at four of the 14 domestic ranges, including the range at the Top Gun school at Miramar, California. The range systems business includes new ranges, expansion and upgrade of existing ranges, product support and related programs. In March 1995, ADTI was awarded a contract by the Naval Air Warfare Center - Aircraft Division to provide technical support services at the Patuxant River Naval Air Station in Patuxant River, Maryland. Pursuant to the contract, ADTI teamed with Raytheon Corporation, a leading defense contractor, to develop the Joint Tactical Combat Training System (JTCTS). JTCTS is the next generation training range, will be transportable for each deployment and will replace all existing "Top Gun" training ranges for the United States Navy and Air Force. The technology will be used until the year 2010. Also during 1995, ADTI, as part of a team with Lockhead Martin, was awarded a contract to develop Advanced Distributed Simulation Technologies II, another combat simulation system. ADTI also developed a proprietary flight line test set designed to test and trouble-shoot the Auxiliary Power Unit ("APU") on-board a Boeing air-to-air refueling aircraft. The APU tester was developed to fill the military's demand for a practical low cost flightline support unit that will isolate faults within the APU on-board the Boeing aircraft. OTHER SERVICES Environmental Services Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. ("OEES") provides a comprehensive range of environmental, infrastructure and energy consulting, engineering and design services to industrial and commercial companies, electric utilities and governmental agencies. These services include analysis and characterization, remedial investigations, engineering and design, data management, project management, and regulatory assistance. OEES provides services to a variety of clients in the public and private sectors in the United States and abroad. Principal clients include major Federal agencies, particularly the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy, as well as major corporations in the chemical, petroleum, transportation, public utility and health care industries and Federal and state regulatory authorities. United States Government contracts may be terminated, in whole or in part, at the convenience of the government or for cause. In the event of a convenience termination, the government is obligated to pay the costs incurred by Environmental under the contract plus a fee based upon work completed. Professional environmental engineering services, including program management, environmental analysis, and restoration continues to be provided by OEES to the United States Navy CLEAN Program (Comprehensive Long Term Environmental Action Navy) pursuant to a 10-year contract awarded during 1991. Thus far OEES has provided these services at Navy bases in Hawaii, Guam, Japan, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Australia and Korea. OEES also continues to oversee the removal of storage tanks and contaminated soil from Air Force bases across the United States and in U.S. territories. See Operational Restructuring below for further discussion concerning Environmental Services. Atlantic Design Atlantic Design, Inc., with principal offices located in Charlotte, North Carolina and engineering facilities located in Fairfield, New Jersey and locations within New York state, provides engineering design, drafting and technical services, as well as turn-key, integrated services in electronics contract manufacturing and assembly. Through its Lenzar operation in Florida, Atlantic Design develops and markets medical products and custom image capturing products. Atlantic Design provides services to customers primarily in the computer, medical and electronic industries, including IBM, General Electric, Seiko, Compaq, Martin Marietta, AT&T, EMC2 Corporation, Netrix Corporation and Pratt and Whitney. In 1995, Atlantic Design formed a strategic business and operations partnership with Genicom Corporation, based in Chantilly, Virginia, an international supplier of multivendor services, network systems management, and computer printer technologies. Under this long-term agreement, the group acquired the operating assets of Genicom's Reynosa, Mexico, and McAllen, Texas, manufacturing and distribution facilities. Atlantic Design will provide primary manufacturing support worldwide for impact printer products as well as related integration requirements, spares, and other proprietary supplies to service Genicom's original equipment manufacturer's customer base. Additionally, Atlantic Design purchased the operating assets of Logitech Ireland Limited of Cork, Ireland, and its 50,000- square-foot facility. Under terms of the agreement, the group will continue to provide manufacturing, warehousing, and engineering design services for the Logitech line of PC mice and peripherals. The acquisition enables Atlantic Design to grow into new markets, service the requirements of current United States customers, and extend its contract services business into Europe. OPERATIONAL RESTRUCTURING During 1995, Ogden began taking steps necessary to restructure its operations and concentrate its resources on its Entertainment, Aviation and Projects (Independent Power, Water and Wastewater and Waste-to-Energy) core businesses. The restructuring is expected to be completed during 1996 and entails the disposition of the non-core businesses Of Ogden as set forth and described below. Technology Services W.J. Schafer Associates, Inc. provides technology and engineering services and consultation in space-based and free electron laser technology and high energy systems research to the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization as well as technical research to the other agencies within the Department of Defense and the U.S. Government. This unit is also currently working under contract with the Defense Nuclear Agency to define and analyze sensor architectures that assess bomb damage to underground targets. WJSA is also involved in a program with the Department of Energy to develop an advanced technique for producing large-scale electric power. WJSA continues its efforts under contract with the Coleman Research Corporation to provide system engineering and technical assistance support for the Theater High Altitude Area Defense Project. Ogden Professional Services, Inc. provides automated business systems and software engineering and computer/telephone-related products and services to Government agencies and private industry. Some of their largest clients are the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), the Department of Defense, and the Office of Personnel Management. During 1995, this operation was awarded several large contracts ranging from one to five years in duration. Ogden BioServices Corporation which provides biomedical research, support and biological repository services for such customers as the National Institute of Health, the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Cancer Institute and other health agencies was sold during December 1995 to McKesson Corp., a leading provider of health care products and services. The laboratory operations of Environmental Services are in the process of being sold as part of Ogden's restructuring program. Facility Management Services Facility Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries' provides a comprehensive range of facility management, maintenance and manufacturing support services to industrial, commercial, and office buildings electric utilities, governmental agencies and education and institutional customers throughout the United States and Canada. The range of services provided include total facility management; facility operations and maintenance; operations, maintenance and repair of production equipment; security and protection; housekeeping; landscaping and grounds care; energy management; warehousing and distribution; project and construction management; and skilled craft support services. PROJECTS Operations in the Company's Projects business segment are conducted by the Company's Ogden Projects, Inc. ("OPI") subsidiary. In 1995 OPI substantially reorganized its operations to permit better focus on its three principal business areas: independent power, water and waste water and waste-to-energy. Independent power operations and waste-to-energy are now conducted by separate wholly-owned subsidiaries of OPI. Water and wastewater operations are conducted by Ogden's joint venture with Yorkshire Water Plc. Although the foregoing operations are linked in that the Company seeks through them to make equity investments in infrastructure assets and obtain long-term operating or service contracts, differences in the nature of the physical assets and the markets for such services led management to believe that each operation should have dedicated marketing and operational staff. The reorganization has accomplished this objective. Services such as overall management, financial, human resources, legal and construction management in which the requirements of the operating companies overlap are provided by staff at the OPI level. INDEPENDENT POWER Ogden's independent power business is conducted by a wholly- owned subsidiary of OPI, Ogden Energy, Inc. ("OEI"). OEI develops, operates and, in some cases, invests in and owns independent (i.e., non-utility) electric energy generation ("Independent Power Production" or "IPP") projects which sell their output to utilities, electricity distribution companies or industrial consumers in the United States and abroad. OEI presently has an ownership interest in, or is the operator or designated to be the operator of, eight generation facilities with a total nameplate capacity of 594 MW, located in the United States, Costa Rica and Bolivia. Additionally, it has an ownership interest and operates a geothermal resource in the United States which provides the geothermal brine required by two of its geothermal power plants. OEI continues to seek to expand its ownership and operation of IPP projects and is presently focusing on opportunities in the United States, Central and South America, the Pacific Rim and India. (a) Methods of doing business. OEI generally seeks to participate in IPP projects in which it can make an equity investment and become the operator. OEI also seeks to have a role in the development of the projects. The types of projects in which OEI seeks to participate sell the electrical power they generate under long term contracts or market concessions to utilities, government agencies providing power distribution or creditworthy industrial users. For power projects utilizing a combustible fuel or geothermal sources, OEI seeks projects which have a secure supply of fuel or geothermal brine through long- term supply arrangements or by obtaining control of the fuel source. OEI generally looks to finance its projects using equity or capital commitments provided by OEI or other investors, combined with non-recourse debt for which the lender's sole source of payment is project revenues and assets. In 1995 the Company opened an office in Hong Kong to facilitate OEI's ability to develop projects in Asia. (b) OEI's projects. OEI, through Catalyst New Martinsville Hydroelectric Corporation, manages and operates a hydroelectric power generating facility under a long-term contract with the City of New Martinsville, West Virginia. The plant has been in operation since 1988 and is rated at approximately 40 megawatts ("MW"). The plant's electrical output is sold to the Monongahela Power Company under a long-term power sales agreement. OEI, as a 50% partner in the Heber Geothermal Company ("HGC") (a partnership with Centennial Geothermal, Inc.), leases and manages a 52MW geothermal power plant in Heber, California. The power is sold to Southern California Edison under a long-term power sales agreement. An OEI subsidiary is also the operations and maintenance contractor at HGC. In 1994, OEI acquired the Second Imperial Geothermal Company ("SIGC") and its principal asset, a leasehold interest in a 48MW geothermal power plant located in Heber, California. SIGC is a party to a 30-year power purchase contract with Southern California Edison. An OEI subsidiary is also the operations and maintenance contractor at SIGC. OEI owns 50% of the lessee of the geothermal resource, which is adjacent to and supplies fluid to both the HGC and SIGC power plants. An OEI subsidiary operates and maintains the geothermal resource, which currently produces approximately fifteen million pounds per hour of fluid. OEI's operations were expanded into the Latin American market through the acquisition in 1994 of an approximate 6% equity interest in Energia Global, Inc. ("EGI") which interest will probably be reduced as a result of an offering of EGI stock in 1996 and a nominal ownership interest in each of the two run-of- river hydroelectric power plants being developed by EGI in Costa Rica (combined 31 MW). In addition, a subsidiary of OEI has entered into a long term contract to operate and maintain the first plant, Don Pedro, which is under construction and is scheduled for commercial operation in late 1996. The second hydroelectric power plant, Rio Volcan, is scheduled to begin construction in 1996 with commercial operation by mid 1997. An OEI subsidiary will also enter into a long-term operation and maintenance contract regarding Rio Volcan. During the design and construction phases of these two plants, OEI, through a subsidiary, will serve as a consultant. In June 1995, OPDB, Ltd. a subsidiary of OEI, along with its partners Constellation Energy International Holdings, Inc., PMDC Energia, Inc. and Energia Andina S.A., were the successful bidders for an interest in a Bolivian generating company, Empresa Valle Hermoso ("EVH"). EVH was formed by the Bolivian government as part of the capitalization of the government-owned utility ENDE. OEI owns a 20% interest in the consortium company, The Bolivian Generating Group, Ltd. (BGG), which in turn owns a 50% interest in EVH. The majority of the balance is held by Bolivian pension funds. EVH currently owns and operates a 87 MW gas-fired electric generating facility and is constructing two gas fired electric generating facilities (54 MW each) in Bolivia. Both of the units under construction are expected to be in commercial operation in 1996. In addition, a subsidiary of OEI is a participant in a joint venture which is under contract to supply EVH with management services support. OEI is providing start-up services and will be the operator of a 240MW gas-fired cogeneration facility located in Maryland. The plant is expected to begin full commercial operation in 1996. As part of an incorporated consortium, OEI is developing a 480MW coal-fired independent electric generating facility in the Republic of the Philippines. The other members of the consortium are International Generating Company, a corporation formed by subsidiaries of Bechtel Enterprises, Inc. and PG&E Enterprises, Inc., and PMR Power, Inc., a company doing business exclusively in the Philippines. In August 1994, the consortium entered into a power purchase agreement with Manila Electric Company ("Meralco"), the largest electric distribution company in the Philippines, which serves the area surrounding and including the metropolitan Manila area and other areas. Under the terms of the agreement, Meralco is obligated, for a period of 25 years, to purchase stated minimum annual quantities of electricity produced by the facility pursuant to price terms set forth in the agreement. The consortium has entered into contracts for the supply of coal at stated prices for a portion of the term of the power purchase agreement. The power purchase agreement has been approved by the Philippines Energy Regulatory Board, and the project has applied for and substantially completed the substantive requirements in order to receive an environmental clearance certificate, the primary environmental permit required for construction and operation. A site for the facility, on the east coast of Luzon Island in the Quezon province, has been selected, and site acquisition is under way. An information memorandum describing the project has been circulated among several multi-lateral finance agencies and the Export-Import Bank of the United States, and applications have been filed with these agencies seeking debt financing for the project. Financing is expected to be completed in 1996. Total cost of development and construction of the project is expected to be approximately $800 million. Commencement of construction is subject to a number of conditions including completion of financing and site acquisition, new agreement and an agreement with Meralco regarding the project transmission line and issuance of required governmental permits and approvals. There can be no assurance that the conditions, some of which are in whole or in part beyond the control of the Company, will be satisfied. If the project proceeds, OEI intends to retain a portion of its equity interest in the entity owning the facility and to sell the balance of its equity. OEI will also operate and maintain the facility under a 25 year contract with the owner. WATER AND WASTEWATER In 1994, Ogden and OPI, through a subsidiary formed a joint venture, Ogden Yorkshire Water Company ("OYWC"), with a wholly- owned subsidiary of Yorkshire Water, plc, a major British water and wastewater utility. The purpose of the joint venture is to develop, design, construct, maintain, operate, and in some cases own, water and wastewater treatment facilities and distribution and collection networks in the United States, Canada, Latin America and elsewhere. The Company has a 55% interest in the joint venture, but such percentage interest may be greater with respect to projects outside the United States. In the United States, OYWC seeks to participate in projects in which under contracts with municipalities, it privatizes water or wastewater facilities, agrees to build new or substantially augment existing facilities and agrees to operate and maintain the facilities under long term contracts. Although OYWC in certain situations would consider entering into operational contracts for facilities in which it has no ownership or long term leasehold interest, and presently has such contracts with three small communities in New York State, OYWC generally does not believe such contracts provide adequate returns. To the extent such projects require debt financing, OYWC intends to obtain such financing on a non-recourse basis in which the only source of repayment are project revenues and project assets. The development of the privatization market for water and wastewater projects in the United States has been hampered by certain legal constraints. Many of the water and waste water facilities that could be considered for privatization were financed with tax-exempt municipal bonds or grants from the Federal government. Sale of all or a significant portion of the assets could trigger a loss of the tax exempt status of the bonds issued to finance these facilities or obligations to refund the grant. The financial burdens these constraints place on municipalities and the likelihood that their effect would be to raise the cost of service to consumers has been a disincentive to privatization. Nonetheless, there are opportunities for such projects in the United States, especially in circumstances where substantial new construction is required. In countries other than the United States, OYWC is seeking opportunities in which it will provide water services to municipalities in which it can own an equity interest in water facilities under a concession which grants it the right to provide service to, and collect revenues from, consumers. OYWC believes that the lack of creditworthiness of non-U.S. municipalities, which may result from their limited ability to raise revenues or from other causes, makes the collection of tariffs from the consumer a more secure source of revenue. Under contractual arrangements, OYWC may be required to warrant certain levels of performance and may be subject to financial penalties or termination if it fails to meet these warranties. The Company and Yorkshire may be required to guarantee the performance of OYWC. OYWC seeks not to take responsibility for conditions that are beyond its control. OYWC's projects. OYWC operates and maintains wastewater treatment facilities for three small municipalities in New York State. Such facilities cumulatively process approximately 11.8 million gallons per day ("mgd"). In addition, OYWC operates and maintains the municipal wastewater treatment facilities for several other small government and privately owned concerns that cumulatively process less than 1 mgd. All of the facilities are operated pursuant to short-term contracts. In December 1995 OYWC, through a joint venture in which it has a majority interest, entered into a 25 year concession contract with the Tourist, Historical and Cultural District of Santa Marta Colombia to provide water and wastewater services. Implementation of the contract is subject to substantial conditions, some of which are beyond the control of OYWC and is not assured. WASTE-TO-ENERGY The Waste-to-Energy operations have been consolidated in a wholly-owned subsidiary of OPI, Ogden Waste to Energy, Inc. ("OWTE"). Waste-to-energy facilities combust municipal solid waste to make saleable energy in the form of electricity or steam. This group completed construction of its first waste-to- energy projects in 1986. It currently operates 28 waste-to- energy facilities at 27 locations. OWTE is the owner or lessee of 17 of its facilities and has been awarded a contract for one additional facility that is not yet under construction. OWTE has the exclusive right to market in the United States the proprietary, mass-burn technology of Martin Gmbh fur Umwelt-und Energietechnik ("Martin"). All of the facilities OWTE has constructed use this Martin technology. In addition OWTE operates facilities using other technologies. Generally, OWTE, through wholly-owned subsidiaries ("Operating Subsidiaries"), provides waste-to-energy services pursuant to long-term service contracts ("Service Agreements") with local governmental units sponsoring the waste-to-energy project ("Client Communities"). Certain of its facilities do not have sponsoring Client Communities and in the future OWTE may undertake projects for which there is no such sponsoring Client Community. (a) Terms and Conditions of Service Agreements. Projects generally have been awarded by Client Communities pursuant to competitive procurement. However, OWTE has also built and is operating projects that were not competitively bid. Following execution of a Service Agreement between the Operating Subsidiary and the Client Community, several conditions must be met before construction commences. These usually include, among other things, financing the facility, executing an agreement providing for the sale of the energy produced by the facility, purchasing or leasing the facility site, and obtaining of required regulatory approvals, including the issuance of environmental and other permits required for construction. In many respects, satisfaction of these conditions is not wholly within OWTE's control and, accordingly, implementation of an awarded project is not assured, or may occur only after substantial delays. Each Service Agreement is different in order to reflect the specific needs and concerns of the Client Community, applicable regulatory requirements, and other factors. The following description sets forth terms that are generally common to these agreements: (i) the Operating Subsidiary designs the facility, generally applies for the principal permits required for its construction and operation, helps to arrange for financing, and then constructs and equips the facility on a fixed price and schedule basis. The actual construction and installation of equipment is performed by contractors under the supervision of the Operating Subsidiary. The Operating Subsidiary bears the risk of costs exceeding the fixed price of the facility and may be charged liquidated damages for construction delays, unless caused by the Client Community or by unforeseen circumstances beyond its control, such as changes of law ("Unforeseen Circumstances"). After the facility successfully completes acceptance testing, the Operating Subsidiary operates and maintains the facility for an extended term, generally 20 years or more; (ii) the Operating Subsidiary generally guarantees that the facility will meet minimum processing capacity and efficiency standards, energy production levels, and environmental standards. The Operating Subsidiary's failure to meet these guarantees or to otherwise observe the material terms of the Service Agreement (unless caused by the Client Community or by Unforeseen Circumstances) may result in liquidated damages to the Operating Subsidiary or, if the breach is substantial, continuing, and unremedied, the termination of the Service Agreement. In the case of such Service Agreement termination, the Operating Subsidiary may be obligated to discharge project indebtedness; (iii) the Client Community is generally required to deliver minimum quantities of municipal solid waste ("MSW") to the facility and, regardless of whether that quantity of waste is delivered to the facility, to pay a service fee. Generally, the Client Community also provides or arranges for debt financing. Additionally, the Client Community bears the costs of disposing of ash residue from the facility and, in many cases, of transporting the residue to the disposal site. Generally, expenses resulting from the delivery of unacceptable and hazardous waste to the facility, and from the presence of hazardous materials on the site, are also borne by the Client Community. In addition, the Client Community is also generally responsible to pay increased expenses and capital costs resulting from Unforeseen Circumstances, subject to limits which may be specified in the Service Agreement; (iv) Ogden typically guarantees each Operating Subsidiary's performance under its respective Service Agreement. After construction is completed and the facility is accepted, the Client Community pays the Operating Subsidiary a fixed operating fee which escalates in accordance with specified indices, reimburses the Operating Subsidiary for certain costs specified in the Service Agreement including taxes, governmental impositions (other than income taxes), ash disposal and utility expenses, and shares with the Operating Subsidiary a portion of the energy revenues (generally 10%) generated by the facility. If the facility is owned by the Operating Subsidiary, the Client Community also pays as part of the Service Fee an amount equal to the debt service due to be paid on the bonds issued to finance the facility. At most facilities, OWTE may earn additional fees from accepting waste from the Client Community or others utilizing the capacity of the facility which exceeds the amount of waste committed by the Client Community. OWTE operates transfer stations in connection with some of its waste-to-energy facilities and, in connection with the Montgomery County, Maryland project, uses a railway system to transport Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) and ash residue to and from the facility. OWTE leases and operates a landfill located at its Haverhill, Massachusetts, facility, and leases, but does not operate, a landfill in connection with its Bristol, Connecticut, facility. (b) Other Arrangements for Providing Waste-to-Energy Services. OWTE owns two facilities that are not operated pursuant to Service Agreements with Client Communities and may undertake in the future additional such projects. In such projects, OWTE must obtain sufficient waste under contracts with haulers or communities to ensure sufficient project revenues. In these cases, OWTE is subject to risks usually assumed by the Client Community, such as those associated with Unforeseen Circumstances and the supply and price of municipal waste to the extent not contractually assumed by other parties. This group's current contracts with waste suppliers for these two facilities provide that the fee charged for waste disposal service is subject to limited increases in the event that costs of operation increase as a result of Unforeseen Circumstances. On the other hand, in these cases, OWTE generally retains all of the energy revenues from sales of power to utilities or industrial power users and disposal fees for waste accepted at these facilities. Accordingly, OWTE believes that such projects carry both greater risks and greater potential rewards than projects in which there is a Client Community. For the projects that are not operated pursuant to a Service Agreement, tipping fees, which are generally subject to escalation in accordance with specified indices, and energy revenues are paid to the OWTE group. Electricity generated by these projects is sold to public utilities and in one instance, steam and a portion of the electricity generated is sold to industrial users. In certain of the contracts under which waste is provided to these facilities, OWTE may be entitled to fee adjustments to reflect certain Unforeseen Circumstances. (c) Project Financing. Financing for projects is generally accomplished through the issuance of a combination of tax-exempt and taxable revenue bonds issued by a public authority. If the facility is owned by the Operating Subsidiary, the authority lends the bond proceeds to the Operating Subsidiary and the Operating Subsidiary contributes additional equity to pay the total cost of the project. For such facilities, project-related debt is included as a liability in Ogden's consolidated financial statements. Generally, such debt is secured by the revenues pledged under the respective indenture and is collateralized by the assets of the Operating Subsidiary and otherwise provides no recourse to Ogden, subject to construction and operating performance guarantees and commitments. (d) OWTE Projects. Certain information with respect to projects as of March 1, 1996 is summarized in the following table: WASTE-TO-ENERGY PROJECTS
Tons Boiler Commencement In Operation Per Day Units of Operations Tulsa,OK(I)(1)............. 750 2 1986 Haverhill/Lawrence, MA-RDF(8)................. 950 1 1984 Marion County, OR.......... 550 2(2) 1987 Hillsborough County, FL(3). 1,200 3(2) 1987 Tulsa, OK(II)(1)(4)........ 375 1 1987 Bristol, CT................ 650 2(2) 1988 Alexandria/Arlington, VA... 975 3 1988 Indianapolis, IN........... 2,362 3(2) 1988 Hennepin County, MN (1)(5). 1,000 2 1990 Stanislaus County, CA...... 800 2 1989 Babylon, NY................ 750 2(2) 1989 Haverhill, MA-Mass Burn.... 1,650 2 1989 Warren County, NJ (5)...... 400 2 1990 Kent County, MI(3)......... 625 2(2) 1990 Wallingford, CT(5)......... 420 3(2) 1990 Fairfax County, VA......... 3,000 4(2) 1990 Huntsville, AL(3).......... 690 2(2) 1990 Lake County, FL............ 528 2(2) 1990 Lancaster County, PA(3).... 1,200 3(2) 1991 Pasco County, FL(3)........ 1,050 3(2) 1991 Huntington, NY (6)......... 750 3(2) 1991 Hartford, CT (3)(7)(8)..... 2,000 3 1989 Detroit, MI (1)(8)......... 3,300 3 1989 Honolulu, HI (1)(8)........ 2,160 2 1990 Union County, NJ(3)........ 1,440 3 1994 Lee County, FL (3)......... 1,200 3(2) 1994 Onondaga, NY(6)............ 990 3 1995 Montgomery County, MD. (3). 1,800 3(2) 1995 Total................ 33,565
Estimated Construction Expected Revenues Awarded--Not yet Tons Boiler Commencement (in thousands Under Construction Per Day Units of Construction of dollars) Mercer County, NJ (9)... 1,450 2 1996 $188,200
(1) Facility is owned by an owner/trustee pursuant to a sale/leaseback arrangement. (2) Facility has been designed to allow for the addition of another unit. (3) Facility is owned (or, with respect to facilities not under construction, is to be owned) by the Client Community. (4) Phase II of the Tulsa facility, which was financed as a separate project, expanded the capacity of the facility from two to three units. (5) Operating Subsidiaries were purchased after completion, and use a mass-burn technology that is not the Martin Technology. (6) Owned by a limited partnership in which the limited partners are not affiliated with Ogden. (7) Under contracts with the Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority and Northeast Utilities, OWTE operates only the boiler and turbine for this facility. (8) Operating contracts were acquired after completion. Facility uses a refuse-derived fuel technology and does not employ the Martin Technology. (9) All permits for the Mercer County project have been received, and some construction tasks have commenced. However, substantial construction has been delayed as the Mercer County Improvement Authority considers the impact of legal challenges to New Jersey's flow control system and the continuing lack of curative legislation in Congress. The Authority has confirmed its commitment to the project and is exploring changes to its waste management system that would permit the project to proceed without legal flow control. OWTE and the Authority are working toward this end, and in this regard have discussed the possibility of OWTE owning the project. Were this occur, the OWTE would recognize no revenues in connection with the construction of this facility. (e) Technology. The principal feature of the Martin Technology is the reverse-reciprocating stoker grate upon which the waste is burned. The patent for the basic stoker grate technology used in the Martin Technology expired in 1989. Ogden has no information that would cause it to believe that any other company uses the basic stoker grate technology that was protected by the expired patent. Moreover, Ogden believes that unexpired patents on other portions of the Martin technology would limit the ability of other companies to effectively use the basic stoker grate technology in competition with Ogden. There are several unexpired patents related to the Martin Technology including: (i) Grate Bar for Grate Linings, Especially in Incinerators - expires, 1999; (ii) Method and Arrangement for Reducing NOx Emissions from Furnaces - expires 2000; (iii) Method and Apparatus for Regulating the Furnace Output of Incineration Plants - expires 2007; (iv) Method for Regulating the Furnace Output in Incineration Plants - expires 2008; and (v) Feed Device with Filling Hopper and Adjoining Feed Chute for Feeding Waste to Incineration Plants - expires 2008. More importantly, Ogden believes that it is Martin's know-how in designing and manufacturing stoker and grate components, Martin's worldwide reputation in the waste-to- energy field, and Ogden's know-how in designing, constructing and operating waste-to-energy facilities, rather than the use of patented technology, that is important to Ogden's competitive position in the waste-to-energy industry in the United States. Ogden does not believe that the expiration of the patent covering the basic stoker grate technology or patents on other portions of the Martin Technology will have a material adverse effect on Ogden's financial condition or competitive position. The Company believes that mass burn technology is now the predominant technology used for the combustion of solid waste. Although the Company believes the Martin technology as superior overall, there are several other mass-burn technologies available in the market including those of Von Roll, Widmer & Ernst, Takuma, Volund, Steinmueller, Deutsche Babcock, O'Connor, and Detroit Stoker. In addition, other innovative non-mass burn technologies have been developed from time-to-time. Such technologies may claim reduced air emissions, but to date have been unproven on a large scale operation and appear likely to be substantially more expensive. Martin seeks to implement improvements and modifications to its technology in order to maintain its competitive position with non-mass burn technologies. However, should such technologies develop that offer competitive advantages to mass burn, OWTE's ability to respond in the United States would be limited by the Cooperation Agreement--see(f) below. (f) The Cooperation Agreement. Under an agreement between Martin and Ogden (the "Cooperation Agreement"), OPI has the exclusive rights to market the proprietary technology (the "Martin Technology") of Martin in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, certain Caribbean countries, most of Central and South America, and Israel. In addition, in Germany, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Poland, and Italy, OPI has the preferential right to cooperate with Martin to utilize the Martin Technology to provide full service design, construct, and operate projects. Martin is obligated to assist OPI in installing, operating, and maintaining facilities incorporating the Martin Technology. The fifteen year term of the Cooperation Agreement renews automatically each year unless notice of termination is given, in which case the Cooperation Agreement would terminate 15 years after such notice. Additionally, the Cooperation Agreement may be terminated by either party if the other fails to remedy its material default within 90 days of notice. The Cooperation Agreement is also terminable by Martin if there is a change of control (as defined in the Cooperation Agreement) of Ogden Martin Systems, Inc. ("OMS"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OPI or any direct or indirect parent of OMS not approved by its respective board of directors. Although termination would not affect the rights of OPI to design, construct, operate, maintain, or repair waste-to-energy facilities for which contracts have been entered into or proposals made prior to the date of termination, the loss of OPI's right to use the Martin Technology could have a material adverse effect on OPI's future business and prospects. (g) Backlog. OWTE's backlog as of December 31, 1995, is set forth under (d) above. As of December 31, 1994, the estimated unrecognized construction revenues for projects under construction was $44,764,000 and the estimated construction revenues for projects awarded but not yet under construction was approximately $260,000,000. The amounts in 1995 and 1994 for projects under construction were estimated based on the difference between the total contract value and the cumulative construction revenue recognized as of that date. The completion of the facility in Montgomery County, Maryland, accounted for the entire decrease in the amount for projects under construction. As of December 31, 1995, there were no longer any projects under construction. The decrease in the amount for projects awarded but not yet under construction was due to the termination of the project in Halifax, Nova Scotia. PROJECTS' FOREIGN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OWTE, OEI and OYWC develop projects in foreign countries. In 1995 OWTE modified its strategy for the development of its waste-to-energy business in selected international markets to focus on a limited number of opportunities which can be developed in conjunction with local companies. OWTE has entered into an agreement with CTCI Corporation in Taiwan to jointly pursue waste-to-energy operation and maintenance contracts in Taiwan. The agreement provides that OPI will perform as a technical advisor to CTCI and will receive a share of pretax profits from certain awarded contracts. In 1995, CTCI bid and was awarded the operation and maintenance of a 900-metric tonnes per day facility in Hsintien, Taipei County, for a period of six years commencing November 1995. In addition, as indicated in the discussions about their businesses, OEI and OYWC are actively pursuing opportunities in many foreign countries and OEI has established an office in Hong Kong where opportunities for the services provided by these groups are highly dependent upon the elimination of historic legal and political barriers to the participation of foreign capital and foreign companies in the financing, construction, ownership and operation of infrastructure facilities. For example, in many countries, the production, distribution and delivery of electricity has traditionally been provided by governmental or quasi-governmental agencies. Although a number of these countries have recently liberalized their laws and policies with regard to the participation of private interests and foreign capital in their electric sectors, not all have done so, and not all that have done so may afford acceptable opportunities for OPI. The development, construction, ownership and operation of facilities in foreign countries also exposes the Company to several potential risks that typically are not involved in such activities in the United States. Many of the countries in which OWTE, OEI and OYWC are or intend to be active in developing projects are lesser developed countries or developing countries. The financial condition and creditworthiness of the potential purchasers of power and services provided by OWTE, OEI and OYWC which may be a governmental or private utility or industrial consumer--or of the suppliers of fuel for alternate energy projects or of waste for waste-to- energy projects in these countries--may not be as strong as those of similar entities in developed countries. The obligations of the purchaser under the power purchase agreement, the services recipient under the related service agreement and the supplier under the fuel supply agreement generally are not guaranteed by any host country governmental or other creditworthy agency. OWTE and OEI projects in particular are keenly dependent on the reliable and predictable delivery of fuel, municipal solid waste in the case of waste-to-energy, meeting the quantity and quality requirements of the project facilities. OWTE and OEI will in all cases seek to negotiate long- term contracts for the supply of fuel with creditworthy and reliable suppliers under terms that will permit it to project the future cost of fuel through the life of the contract. However, the reliability of fuel deliveries may be compromised by one or more of several factors that may be more acute or may occur more frequently in developing countries than in developed countries, including a lack of sufficient infrastructure to support deliveries under all circumstances, bureaucratic delays in the import, transportation and storage of fuel in the host country, customs and tariff disputes and local or regional unrest or political instability. Payment for services that OWTE, OEI and OYWC provide will often be made in whole or part in the domestic currencies of the host countries. Conversion of such currencies into U.S. dollars generally as not assured by a governmental or other creditworthy host country agency, and may be subject to limitations in the currency markets, as well as restrictions of the host country. In addition, fluctuations in value of such currencies against the value of the U.S. dollar may cause OPI's participation in such projects to yield less return than expected. Transfer of earnings and profits in any form beyond the borders of the host country may be subject to special taxes or limitations imposed by host country laws. In addition, OWTE, OEI and OYWC will generally participate in projects, the facilities for which will be fixed and practically immovable. The provision of electric power, waste disposal and water and wastewater services are treated as a matter of national or key economic importance by the laws and politics of many host countries. There is therefore some risk that the assets constituting the facilities of these projects could be temporarily or permanently expropriated or nationalized by a host country, or made subject to martial or exigent law or control. OPI will seek to manage and mitigate these risks through all available means that it deems appropriate. They will include: careful political and financial analysis of the host countries and the key participants in each project; guarantees of relevant agreements with creditworthy entities; political risk and other forms of insurance; participation by international finance institutions, such as affiliates of the World Bank, in financing of projects in which it participates; and joint ventures with other companies to pursue the development, financing and construction of these projects. GAIN ON SALE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS During 1994, an Operating Subsidiary of OWTE that is the owner of the Onondaga County, New York, facility sold limited partnership interests and tax benefits to third party investors. Under the Onondaga limited partnership agreement, the Operating Subsidiary is the general partner and retains responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the facility. OTHER ACTIVITIES OPI also intends to develop, operate and, in some cases, own projects that process recyclable paper products into containerboard for reuse in the commercial sector. As with OWTE's projects, such projects involve various contractual arrangements with a variety of private and public entities, including municipalities, lenders, joint venture partners (which may provide some of the financing or technical support), purchasers of the plant output, and contractors and subcontractors which build the facilities. In addition, such projects require significant amounts of energy in the form of steam, which may be provided by present or future waste-to-energy projects operated by OWTE. In 1993, OPI discontinued the fixed-site hazardous waste business conducted through American Envirotech, Inc., an indirect subsidiary. In light of substantial and adverse changes in the market for hazardous waste incineration services and regulatory uncertainty stemming from EPA pronouncements, OPI ceased all development activities. Although OPI continues to hold permits and certain related assets pending resolution of certain litigation, any other related assets have been disposed of or otherwise abandoned. (See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Environmental Matters" of this Form 10-K.) OTHER INFORMATION MARKETS, COMPETITION AND GENERAL BUSINESS CONDITIONS Ogden's Services and Projects business segments can be adversely affected by general economic conditions, war, inflation, adverse competitive conditions, governmental restrictions and controls, natural disasters, energy shortages, weather, the adverse financial condition of customers and suppliers, various technological changes and other factors over which Ogden has no control. The economic climate can also adversely affect several of Ogden's Services' operations, including, but not limited to, fewer airline flights, reduced inflight meals and flight cancellations in Services' Aviation group; and, reduced event attendance in Services' Entertainment group. In addition, disputes between owners of professional sports organizations and the professional players of such organizations have affected and may continue to affect the operations of the Entertainment group. OWTE markets its services principally to governmental entities, including city, county, and state governments as well as public authorities or special purpose districts established by one or more local government units for the purpose of managing the collection and/or disposal of municipal solid waste ("MSW"). Since 1989 there has been a decline in the number of communities requesting proposals for waste-to-energy facilities. The Company believes that it is likely that there will be few or no opportunities for new waste-to-energy facilities in the United States in the next three to five years. Ogden believes that this decline has resulted from a number of factors that adversely affected communities' willingness to make long-term capital commitments to waste disposal projects, including: declining prices at which energy can be sold; declining alternative disposal costs; uncertainties about the impact of recycling on the waste stream; and continuing concerns arising from the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Ogden believes that waste-to-energy facilities and recycling are complementary methods of managing a community's waste disposal needs. The fact that many of Ogden's Client Communities have recycling rates in excess of national averages demonstrates that a properly sized waste-to-energy facility does not hinder achievement of aggressive recycling goals. MSW is typically supplied to OWTE's facilities pursuant to long-term contracts. In most of the markets that OWTE currently serves, the cost of waste-to-energy services to its current Client Communities is competitive with the cost of other disposal alternatives, mainly landfilling. Compliance with regulations adopted in 1996 by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") to control air pollutant emissions from landfills will to some extent increase the cost of landfilling, although landfills may be less expensive in some cases, in the short term, than waste-to-energy facilities. Landfills generally do not commit their capacity for extended periods. Much of the landfilling done in the United States is done on a spot market or through short term contracts (less than 5 years). Accordingly, landfill pricing tends to be more volatile as a result of periodic changes in waste generation and available capacity than Ogden's pricing, which is based on long-term contracts. Ogden believes that landfills have not been required to comply with permitting requirements under existing law relating to the emission of air pollutants and that this provides landfills with a competitive advantage. Another factor affecting the competitiveness of waste-to- energy fees are the additional charges imposed by Client Communities and included in such fees to support recycling programs, household hazardous waste collections, citizen education, and similar initiatives. The cost competitiveness of waste-to-energy facilities also depends on the prices at which the facility can sell the energy it generates. Waste-to-energy facilities also compete with other disposal technologies such as mixed solid-waste composting. Mixed waste composting is not a proven technology, and Ogden believes that it has not been applied successfully to date in a large scale facility. Another factor affecting the demand for new waste-to-energy projects was a 1994 United States Supreme Court decision invalidating state and local laws and regulations mandating that waste generated within a given jurisdiction be taken to a designated facility. See "Flow Control." Notwithstanding the decline in opportunities for new waste-to- energy facilities, OWTE believes there may be opportunities at existing facilities for expansion. Competition for projects is intense in all markets in which Projects does business or intends to do business. There are numerous companies in the United States and in several foreign countries that pursue these projects. Many of these companies have more experience, capital and other resources than does Ogden. OWTE, OEI and OYWC expend substantial amounts for the development of new businesses some of which expenditures are capitalized. Expenditures include the costs of contract and site acquisition, feasibility and environmental studies, technical and financial analysis, and in some cases the preparation of extensive proposals in response to public or private requests for proposals. Development of independent power projects involves substantial risk to the developers which is not within their control. Success depends upon obtaining in a timely manner acceptable contractual arrangements and financing, appropriate sites, acceptable licenses and environmental permits and other government approvals. Even after the required contractual arrangements are achieved, implementation of the contract often is subject to substantial conditions that may be outside the control of the developer. If development opportunities in which the Company is involved are no longer viewed as viable, such costs are written off as an expense. OWTE has made contractual arrangements with some of its Client Communities for the partial recovery of development costs if the project fails to be implemented for reasons beyond OWTE's control. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY In recent years, governmental agencies (including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) and representatives of minority groups and women have asserted claims against many companies, including some Ogden subsidiaries, alleging that certain persons have been discriminated against in employment, promotions, training, or other matters. Frequently, private actions are brought as class actions, thereby increasing the practical exposure. In some instances, these actions are brought by many plaintiffs against groups of defendants in the same industry, thereby increasing the risk that any defendant may incur liability as a result of activities which are the primary responsibility of other defendants. Although Ogden and its subsidiaries have attempted to provide equal opportunity for all of its employees, the combination of the foregoing factors and others increases the risk of financial exposure. EMPLOYEE AND LABOR RELATIONS As of January 31, 1996, Ogden and its subsidiaries employed approximately 45,000 people. Certain employees of Ogden are employed pursuant to collective bargaining agreements with various unions. During 1995 Ogden successfully renegotiated collective bargaining agreements in certain of its business sectors with no strike-related loss of service. However, in January, 1996 negotiations between New York City commercial office building owners and Local 32B-32J Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO broke off following the December 31, 1995 expiration of the previous industry wide collective bargaining agreement. As a result thereof approximately 30,000 Union employees went on strike on January 4, 1996. Ogden's Facility Management Services employs approximately 1,700 Union employees which were effected by the strike under contracts with the building owners. The strike was settled in February 1996 and there was no significant impact on Ogden's consolidated operations as a result of this strike. Ogden considers relations with its employees to be good and does not anticipate any further significant labor disputes in 1996. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY LAWS Ogden's business activities are pervasively regulated pursuant to federal, state, and local environmental laws. Federal laws, such as the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, and their state counterparts, govern discharges of pollutants to air and water. Other federal, state, and local laws, such as RCRA, comprehensively govern the generation, transportation, storage, treatment, and disposal of solid waste, including hazardous waste (such laws and the regulations thereunder, "Environmental Regulatory Laws"). The Environmental Regulatory Laws and other federal, state, and local laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") (collectively, "Environmental Remediation Laws"), make Ogden potentially liable on a joint and several basis for any environmental contamination which may be associated with its activities at sites, including landfills, which OPI has owned, operated, or leased or at which there has been disposal of residue or other waste handled or processed by OPI. OPI leases and operates a landfill in Haverhill, Massachusetts, and leases a landfill in Bristol, Connecticut, in connection with its projects at those locations. Some state and local laws also impose liabilities for injury to persons or property caused by site contamination. Some Service Agreements provide for indemnification of the Operating Subsidiaries from some such liabilities. The Environmental Regulatory Laws require that many permits be obtained before the commencement of construction and operation of waste-to-energy, independent power and water and wastewater projects. There can be no assurance that all required permits will be issued, and the process of obtaining such permits can often cause lengthy delays, including delays caused by third party appeals challenging permit issuance. Failure to meet conditions of these permits or of the Environmental Regulatory Laws and the corresponding regulations can subject an Operating Subsidiary to regulatory enforcement actions by the appropriate governmental unit, which could include monetary penalties, and orders requiring certain remedial actions or limiting or prohibiting operation. To date, OPI has not incurred material penalties, been required to incur material capital costs or additional expenses, nor been subjected to material restrictions on its operations as a result of violations of environmental laws, regulations, or permits. Certain of the Environmental Regulatory Laws also authorize suits by private parties for damages and injunctive relief. Repeated unexcused failure to comply with environmental standards may also constitute a default by OWTE or OYWC. The Environmental Regulatory Laws and federal and state governmental regulations and policies governing their enforcement are subject to revision. New technology may be required or stricter standards may be established for the control of discharges of air or water pollutants or for solid waste or ash handling and disposal. Thus, as new technology is developed and proven, it may be required to be incorporated into new facilities or major modifications to existing facilities. This new technology may often be more expensive than that used previously. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 required EPA to promulgate New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS") and Emission Guidelines ("EG") applicable to new and existing municipal waste combustion units for particulate matter (total and fine), opacity (as appropriate), sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride, oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide, dioxins and dibenzofurans. The laws of other countries also may require permitting, regulate emissions into the environment, and provide governmental entities with authority to impose sanctions for violations, although these requirements are generally not as rigorous as those of the United States. Compliance with environmental standards comparable to those of the United States may also be conditions to the provision of credit from multi-lateral lenders such as the World Bank. The NSPS and EG, which were issued in final form in 1995, will require capital improvements or operating changes to most of the waste to energy facilities operated by OWTE to control nitrogen oxides, organics, mercury and acid gases. The exact timing and cost of such modifications cannot be stated definitively because State regulations embodying these have generally not been finally adopted. The costs to meet new rules for existing facilities owned by Client Communities will be borne by the Client Communities. For projects owned or leased by Ogden and operated under a Service Agreement, the Client Community has the obligation to fund such capital improvements, to which Ogden may be required to make an equity contribution, generally 20%. In addition, Ogden is required to fund the full cost of these capital improvements at those facilities that are either not operated pursuant to a Service Agreement or whose Service Agreement does not require the costs to be borne by the Client Community. At December 31, 1995, the Company estimates that its commitments for these capital improvements to total approximately $30,000,000 over the next four years. Ogden believes that most costs incurred to meet EG and operating permit requirements at facilities it operates may be recovered from Client Communities and other users of its facilities through increased tipping fees permitted under applicable contracts. The Clean Air Act also requires each state to develop a state implementation plan that outlines how areas out of compliance with federally-established national ambient air quality standards will achieve compliance. In addition, states must also develop an operating permit program. Most states are now in the process of implementing these requirements. The state implementation plans and the operating permits to be issued under them may place new requirements on waste-to-energy facilities. Under federal law, the new operating permits may have a term of up to 12 years after issuance or renewal, subject to review every five years. Domestic drinking water facilities developed in the future by OYWC will be subject to regulation of water quality by the EPA under the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and by similar state laws. Domestic wastewater facilities are subject to regulation under the Federal Clean Water Act and by similar state laws. These laws provide for the establishment of uniform minimum national water quality standards, as well as governmental authority to specify the type of treatment processes to be used for public drinking water. Under the federal Clean Water Act, OYWC may be required to obtain and comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits for discharges from its treatment stations. Generally, under its current contracts the client community is responsible for fines and penalties resulting from the delivery to OYWC's treatment facilities of water not meeting standards set forth in the contract. The Environmental Remediation Laws prohibit disposal of hazardous waste other than in small, household-generated quantities at OWTE's municipal solid waste facilities. The Service Agreements recognize the potential for improper deliveries of hazardous wastes and specify procedures for dealing with hazardous waste that is delivered to a facility. Although certain Service Agreements require the Operating Subsidiary to be responsible for some costs related to hazardous waste deliveries, to date, no Operating Subsidiary has incurred material hazardous waste disposal costs. ENERGY AND WATER REGULATION OWTE and OEI's domestic businesses are subject to the provisions of federal, state and local energy laws applicable to their development, ownership and operation of their domestic facilities, and to similar laws applicable to their foreign operations. Federal laws and regulations govern transactions with utilities, the types of fuel used and the power plant ownership. State regulatory regimes govern rate approval and other terms under which utilities purchase electricity from independent producers, except to the extent such regulation is pre-empted by federal law. Pursuant to federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act ("PURPA"), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") has promulgated regulations that exempt qualifying facilities (facilities meeting certain size, fuel and ownership requirements) from compliance with certain provisions of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 ("PUHCA"), and, except under certain limited circumstances, state laws regulating the rates charged by, or the financial and organizational activities of, electric utilities. PURPA was promulgated in 1978 to encourage the development of cogeneration facilities and small facilities making use of non- fossil fuel power sources, including waste-to-energy facilities. The exemptions afforded by PURPA to qualifying facilities from the FPA and PUHCA and most aspects of state electric utility regulation are of great importance to OPI and its competitors in the waste-to-energy and independent power industries. State public utility commissions must approve the rates, and in some instances other contract terms, by which public utilities purchase electric power from Ogden's projects. PURPA requires that electric utilities purchase electric energy produced by qualifying facilities at negotiated rates or at a price equal to the incremental or "avoided" cost that would have been incurred by the utility if it were to generate the power itself or purchase it from another source. While public utilities are not required by PURPA to enter into long-term contracts, PURPA creates a regulatory environment in which such contracts can typically be negotiated. In 1995, the FERC issued two orders in which it modified its previous interpretation of PURPA and held that state laws and regulatory orders directing utilities to purchase electricity from qualifying facilities at rates in excess of the utility's projected avoided costs were pre-empted by PURPA and that contracts providing for such above-avoided cost rates were void. Such laws and regulations have been used in the past by states to encourage the development of environmentally beneficial facilities such as waste-to-energy facilities. The FERC stated in both orders that it intends to apply its reinterpretation of PURPA only on a prospective basis and that it will not entertain requests by utilities to invalidate power sales agreements entered into pursuant to such state laws and regulatory orders unless the purchasing utility raised the issue of the legality of the rate at the time of contract execution. Ogden does not believe any of the power sales agreements related to its OWTE and OEI facilities is subject to challenge based on the prospective nature of the orders. Under PUHCA, any entity owning or controlling ten percent or more of the voting securities of a "public utility company" or company which is a "holding company" of a public utility company is subject to registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and regulation by the SEC unless exempt from registration. Under PURPA, projects that satisfy the definition of a "qualifying facility" are exempt from regulation under PUHCA. Under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, projects that satisfy the definition of an "exempt wholesale generator" ("EWG") are not public utility companies under PUHCA. Finally, projects that satisfy the definition of "foreign utility companies" are exempt from regulation under PUHCA. Ogden believes that all of its projects involved in the generation, transmission and/or distribution of electricity, both domestically and internationally, will qualify for an exemption from PUHCA and Ogden will not be required to register with the SEC. In October, 1992, Congress enacted, and the President signed into law, comprehensive energy legislation, several provisions of which are intended to foster the development of competitive, efficient bulk power generation markets throughout the country. Although the impact of the legislation cannot be fully known because Federal and State regulatory agencies are still engaged in the process of developing policies and promulgating implementing regulations, OPI believes that, over the long term, the legislation will create business opportunities both in the waste-to-energy field as well as in other power generation fields. At present, certain members of Congress have indicated their intention of introducing legislation designed to increase competition in the electric utility industry. Modification or repeal of the PURPA and PUHCA are among the legislative changes that have been discussed. Ogden cannot predict when or if energy legislation will be enacted or what impact, if any, such legislation will have on its businesses. OEI presently has, and intends to continue to acquire, ownership and operating interests in projects outside the United States. Most countries have expansive systems for the regulation of the power business. These generally include provisions relating to ownership, licensing, rate setting and financing of generating and transmission facilities. OYWC's business may be subject to the provisions of state, local and, in the case of foreign operations, national utility laws applicable to the development, ownership and operation of water supply and waste-water facilities. Whether such laws apply depends upon the local regulatory scheme as well as the manner in which OYWC provides its services. Where such regulations apply, they may relate to rates charged, services provided, accounting procedures, acquisitions and other matters. In the United States, rate regulations have typically been structured to provide a pre-determined return on the regulated entities investments. In other jurisdictions, the trend is towards periodic price reviews comparing rates to anticipated capital and operating revenues. The regulated entity benefits from efficiencies achieved during the period for which the rate is set. FLOW CONTROL Many states provide for local and regional solid waste planning and require that new solid waste facilities may be constructed only in conformity with these plans. Certain of these laws, sometimes referred to as legal flow control, authorize state agencies to require delivery of waste generated within their jurisdiction to designated facilities. In 1994, the United States Supreme court held that such laws were constitutionally invalid. Federal legislation proposed to authorize flow control has not been adopted to date. Although the rates OWTE charges its Client Community are generally competitive with other disposal options, additional administrative, recycling and similar charges added to OWTE's rates may raise the costs of disposal at its facilities. Some Client Communities have experienced erosion of waste deliveries. Under most Service Agreements, the Client Community bears the economic impact of waste delivery shortfalls. Client Communities are now evaluating options to attract additional waste to facilities. Certain of these options have been tested in the federal courts and sustained. Although it is likely that the Supreme Court's decision has adversely effected the market for new waste-to-energy facilities, other factors are believed by Ogden to be more significant for the inactive market. See Other Information: MARKETS, COMPETITION, AND GENERAL BUSINESS CONDITIONS. ASH RESIDUE In 1994, the United States Supreme Court held that municipal solid waste ash residue demonstrated by testing to possess hazardous characteristics is subject to RCRA's provisions for management as a hazardous waste relating to transportation, disposal and treatment downstream of the point of generation. The Supreme Court's ruling has not had a significant impact on OWTE's business. Following that decision and related EPA actions, OWTE made adjustments to its operations and, as required by EPA guidelines issued after the Court's decision, sampled and tested the ash residue leaving its facilities. No ash residue from a fully operational facility operated by Ogden has been characterized as hazardous under the present or past EPA prescribed test procedures and such ash residue is currently disposed of in permitted landfills as non-hazardous waste. In certain states, ash residue from certain waste-to-energy facilities of other vendors or communities has, on occasion, been found to have hazardous characteristics under these test procedures. In 1994, as previously reported, trade association of which Ogden is a member, Ogden and other industry members filed an action against the EPA in federal court challenging certain actions taken by the EPA following the Court's ruling which could have required some waste-to-energy facilities to obtain permits under RCRA in connection with their handling of ash. Subsequent agency actions confirmed that such permitting would not be required and the suit has been withdrawn. Item 2. PROPERTIES (a) Services The principal physical properties of Services are the fueling installations at various airports in the United States and Canada and the corporate premises located at Two Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, New York 10121 under lease, which expires on April 30, 2008 and which contains an option by Ogden to renew for an additional five years. Atlantic Design Company's corporate offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Atlantic Design owns a 51,000 square foot operating facility on 3.5 acres of land in Vestal, New York. Atlantic Design also leases operating facilities at various locations in Florida, New Jersey and New York. The leases range from a term of one year to as long as ten years. Ogden Services Corporation, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns and leases buildings in various areas in the United States and several foreign countries which house office, laboratory and warehousing operations. The leases range from a month-to-month term to as long as five years. Ogden Services Corporation also owns a 12,000 square-foot warehouse and office facility located in Long Island City, New York. The Aviation Services in-flight food service operation facilities, aggregating approximately 600,000 square feet, are leased, except at Newark, New Jersey; Miami, Florida; and Las Vegas, Nevada, which are owned. Entertainment operates Fairmount Park racetrack pursuant to a long-term lease which expires in 2017. Fairmount Park conducts thoroughbred and harness racing on a 150-acre site located in Collinsville, Illinois, eight miles from downtown St. Louis. Entertainment also owns a 148-acre site located at East St. Louis, Illinois. Entertainment also owns and operates Grizzly Park, a nature- based entertainment facility located on approximately 25-acres near Yellowstone National Park in West Yellowstone, Montana. Pursuant to a lease agreement with the State of Florida, which expires in 2008, Entertainment also has a leasehold interest in Silver Springs, a 250-acre nature-based park, and Wild Waters, a 6-acre park featuring a variety of water slides and events, both parks are located near Ocala, Florida. Ogden Technology leases most of its facilities, consisting almost entirely of office space. This includes a 15-year lease which began in 1995 for its headquarters facility in Fairfax, Virginia, for approximately 139,000 square feet as well as office space in other locations throughout the United States under lease terms of five years or less. Ogden Professional Services occupies approximately 77,000 square feet and Ogden Communications, Inc. occupies approximately 15,000 square feet of the Fairfax headquarters facility. Environmental also leases an aggregate of approximately 347,000 square feet of office and laboratory space in 40 separate locations in 17 states in the United States. These leases are generally short term in nature, with terms which range from five to ten years or less and include (i) the headquarters office described above, (ii) office and laboratory space in Nashville and Oak Ridge, Tennessee; San Diego, California; Pensacola, Florida; and Phoenix, Arizona, and (iii) laboratory office space owned in Fort Collins, Colorado. In addition to its Fairfax, Virginia headquarters, Environmental maintains regional headquarters in San Diego, California and Nashville, Tennessee. Many of the other Services segment facilities operate from leased premises located principally within the United States. (b) Projects OPI's principal executive offices are located in Fairfield, New Jersey, in an office building located on a 5.4-acre site owned by OPI. It also leases approximately 47,000 square feet of office space in Fairfax, Virginia. The following table summarizes certain information relating to the locations of the properties owned or leased by OPI or its subsidiaries as of January 31, 1996(1).
Approximate Site Size Location in Acres Site Use Nature of Interest Fairfield, New Jersey 5.4 Office space Own Marion County, Oregon 15.2 Waste-to-energy facility Own (2) Alexandria/Arlington, Virginia 3.3 Waste-to-energy facility Acquiring the Alexandria Authority's and the Arlington Authority's interest under Site lease (expires Oct. 1, 2025) pursuant to Conditional Sale Agreement Bristol, Connecticut 18.2 Waste-to-energy facility Own (2) Bristol, Connecticut 35.0 Landfill Site lease (expires Jul. 1, 2014) Indianapolis, Indiana 23.5 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Dec., 2008 subject to four 5-year renewal options) (2) Stanislaus County, California 16.5 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Aug. 20, 2021 subject to 15-year renewal option) (2) Babylon, New York 9.5 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Dec. 19, 2010, with renewal options) Haverhill, Massachusetts 12.7 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Mar. 16, 1997, subject to sixteen 5-year renewal options) (2) Haverhill, Massachusetts 16.8 RDF processing facility Site lease (expires Mar. 16, 1997, subject to sixteen 5-year renewal options) (2) Haverhill, Massachusetts 20.2 Landfill Site lease (expires Mar. 16, 1997, subject to sixteen 5-year renewal options) (2) Lawrence, Massachusetts 11.8 RDF power plant Own (2) Lake County, Florida 15.0 Waste-to-energy facility Own (2) Wallingford, Connecticut 10.3 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Dec. 1, 2026) (2) Fairfax County, Virginia 22.9 Waste-to-energy facility Acquiring Fairfax Authority's interest under Site Lease (expires Mar. 10, 2016) pursuant to Conditional Sale Agreement Imperial County, California 83.0 Undeveloped land Own Montgomery County, Maryland 35.0 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Nov. 16, 2030) (2) Huntington, New York 13.0 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Oct. 28, 2012, subject to successive renewal terms through Jan. 28, 2029)(2) Warren County, New Jersey 19.8 Waste-to-energy facility Site lease (expires Nov. 16, 2005 subject to two ten-year renewals)(2) Hennepin County, Minnesota 14.6 Waste-to-energy facility Leases of site and facility (expires Oct. 1, 2017 subject to renewal options to December 20, 2024)(2)(3) Stockton, California 4.5 Contaminated soil Site lease (expired remediation remediation facility February 1, 1994) (discontinued) Tulsa, Oklahoma 22.0 Waste-to-energy facility Leases of site and facility (expires April 30, 2012 subject to renewal options to August 2, 2026)(2)(3) Harris County, Texas 14.0 Undeveloped land Own Onondaga County, New York 12.0 Facility site Site lease expires contemporaneously with service agreement, subject to renewal options to May 9, 2020(2) New Martinsville, West Virginia N/A Hydroelectric Power (See description under Generating Facility "Projects Independent Power") Heber, California N/A Geothermal Power Plant (See description under "Projects Independent Power") Heber, California N/A Geothermal Power Plant (See description under "Projects Independent Power")
_______________________ (1) Two Facilities not listed in the table were initially owned by political subdivisions and were sold to a leveraged lessor. The leverage lessor entered into lease agreements with the respective Operating subsidiaries as accommodation leases. All of the lease obligations, including the obligation to pay rent, are passed through to the client communities. (2) The Operating Subsidiary's ownership or leasehold interest is subject to material liens in connection with the financing of the related project. (3) Sublease of site expires contemporaneously with facility lease. Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS (a) Legal Proceedings Ogden Corporation and its subsidiaries (the "Company") are parties to various legal proceedings involving matters arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that there are any pending legal proceedings for damages against the Company, including the legal proceeding described below, the outcome of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company on a consolidated basis. As previously disclosed, Ogden was the defendant in actions brought in state court in Fort Worth and Houston, Texas by several individuals who claimed that Ogden had breached its obligations to them to develop a hazardous waste facility. In March 1995, the Fort Worth court entered partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs (the "Fort Worth Plaintiffs") in that action on the issue of whether Ogden had breached its contractual obligations. Subsequently, the Houston case was abated and the plaintiffs in that case (the "Intervening Plaintiffs") intervened in the Fort Worth action. In October 1995 the Company settled with the Fort Worth Plaintiffs, pursuant to which the summary judgment was vacated. In February 1996, the Intervening Plaintiffs and Ogden reached an oral agreement to settle their action as well. A definitive settlement agreement is being prepared. (b) Environmental Matters The Company conducts regular inquiries of its subsidiaries regarding litigation and environmental violations which include determining the nature, amount and likelihood of liability for any such claims, potential claims or threatened litigation. In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may become involved in Federal, state, and local proceedings relating to the laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment and the protection of the environment. These include proceedings for the issuance, amendment, or renewal of the licenses and permits pursuant to which a Company subsidiary operates. Such proceedings also include actions brought by individuals or local governmental authorities seeking to overrule governmental decisions on matters relating to the subsidiaries' operations in which the subsidiary may be, but is not necessarily, a party. Most proceedings brought against the Company by governmental authorities or private parties under these laws relate to alleged technical violations of regulations, licenses, or permits pursuant to which a subsidiary operates. The Company believes that such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company on a consolidated basis. The Company's operations are subject to various Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Although the Company operations are occasionally subject to proceedings and orders pertaining to emissions into the environment and other environmental violations, the Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations. In connection with certain previously divested operations, the Company may be identified, along with other entities, as being among potentially responsible parties responsible for contribution for costs associated with the correction and remediation of environmental conditions at various hazardous waste disposal sites subject to CERCLA. In certain instances the Company may be exposed to joint and several liability for remedial action or damages. The Company's ultimate liability in connection with such environmental claims will depend on many factors, including its volumetric share of waste, the total cost of remediation, the financial viability of other companies that also sent waste to a given site and its contractual arrangement with the purchaser of such operations. The potential costs related to such matters and the possible impact on future operations are uncertain due in part to the complexity of government laws and regulations and their interpretations, the varying costs and effectiveness of cleanup technologies, the uncertain level of insurance or other types of recovery, and the questionable level of the Company's responsibility. Although the ultimate outcome and expense of environmental remediation is uncertain, the Company believes that required remediation and continuing compliance with environmental laws will not have a material adverse effect on the Company on a consolidated basis. Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to a vote of the security holders of Ogden during the fourth quarter of 1995. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OGDEN Set forth below are the names, ages, position and office held and year appointed, of all "executive officers" (as defined by Rule 3b-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of Ogden as of March 31, 1996:
CONTINUALLY AN POSITIONS & AGE AS OF OGDEN OFFICER NAME OFFICE HELD 3/31/96 SINCE _________________________________________________________________ Ralph E. Ablon Chairman of the Board 79 1962 R. Richard Ablon President & 46 1987 Chief Executive Officer Constantine G.Caras Executive Vice 57 1990 President & Chief Administrative Officer Scott G. Mackin President & Chief 39 1992 Operating Officer, Ogden Projects, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ogden Philip G. Husby Senior Vice 49 1991 President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Lynde H. Coit Senior Vice 41 1991 President & General Counsel David L. Hahn Senior Vice President 44 1995 Rodrigo Arboleda Senior Vice President 55 1995 Robert M. DiGia Vice President, 71 1965 Controller & Chief Accounting Officer Quintin G. Marshall Vice President- 34 1995 Investor Relations Kathleen Ritch Vice President & 53 1981 Secretary
There is no family relationship by blood, marriage or adoption (not more remote than first cousins) between any of the above individuals and any Ogden director, except that R. Richard Ablon, an Ogden director and President and Chief Executive Officer, is the son of Ralph E. Ablon, an Ogden director and Chairman of the Board. The term of office of all officers shall be until the next election of directors and until their respective successors are chosen and qualified. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the above officers and any other person pursuant to which any of the above was selected as an officer. The following briefly describes the business experience, the principal occupation and employment of the foregoing Executive Officers during the past five years: Ralph E. Ablon has been Chairman of the Board of Ogden since 1962 and served as its Chief Executive Officer prior to May 1990. R. Richard Ablon has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Ogden since May 1990 and has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Ogden Projects, Inc., since November 1990. Constantine G. Caras has been Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since July 1990. Scott G. Mackin has been considered an Executive Officer of Ogden since 1992. He has been President and Chief Operating Officer of Ogden Projects, Inc. since January 1991. Philip G. Husby has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ogden since January 1, 1991 and Treasurer since January 19, 1995. Lynde H. Coit has been a Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Ogden since January 17, 1991. David L. Hahn was elected Senior Vice President of Ogden in January 1995. He has served as Vice President-Marketing of Ogden Services Corporation for more than the past five years. Rodrigo Arboleda was elected Senior Vice President of Ogden in January 1995. Since 1992, he has served as Senior Vice President-Business Development for Latin America of Ogden Services Corporation. From 1989 to 1992 he owned and served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Interamerican Consulting Group, Inc., a consulting firm located in Miami, Florida specializing in management, financing, and restructuring of troubled companies. Robert M. DiGia has been Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer for more than the past five years. Quintin G. Marshall has served as Vice President - Investor Relations since October 1995. From May 1993 to October 1995 he served as Managing Director of CDA Investment Technologies, a division of Thomson Financial. From July 1992 to May 1993 he served as Senior Vice President at Gavin Andersen & Company, an investor relations consulting firm. From September 1986 to March 1992 he served first as Managing Director and then Co-Chief Operation Officer of Georgeson & Company, a proxy solicitation and consulting company. Kathleen Ritch has been Vice President and Secretary of Ogden for more than the past five years. Part II Item 5. MARKET FOR OGDEN'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Pursuant to General Instruction G (2), the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Page 55 of Ogden's 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders. As of March 1, 1996, the approximate number of record holders of Ogden common stock was 9,100. Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Pursuant to General Instruction G (2), the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Page 32 of Ogden's 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders. Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Pursuant to General Instruction G (2), the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Pages 28 through 31 of Ogden's 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders. Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Pursuant to General Instruction G (2), the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Pages 32 through 52 and Page 55 of Ogden's 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders. Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not Applicable. PART III Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OGDEN Pursuant to General Instruction G (3), the information regarding directors called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Ogden's 1996 Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Pursuant to General Instruction G (3), the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Ogden's 1996 Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information regarding officers called for by this item is included at the end of Part I of this document under the heading "Executive Officers of Ogden." Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT Pursuant to General Instruction G (3), the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Ogden's 1996 Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS Pursuant to General Instruction G (3), the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from Ogden's 1996 Proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Part IV Item 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Listed below are the documents filed as a part of this report: 1). All financial statements contained on pages 33 through 52 and the Independent Auditors' Report on page 53 of Ogden's 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference. 2). Financial statement schedules as follows: (i) Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. 3). Those exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K: EXHIBITS 2.0 Plans of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession. 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 31, 1989, among Ogden, ERCI Acquisition Corporation and ERC International, Inc.* 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger among Ogden Corporation, ERC International, Inc., ERC Acquisition Corporation and ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc., dated as of January 17, 1991.* 2.3 Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger among Ogden Corporation, OPI Acquisition Corp. and Ogden Projects, Inc., dated as of September 27, 1994.* 3.0 Articles of Incorporation and By-laws. 3.1 Ogden's Restated Certificate of Incorporation as amended.* 3.2 Ogden's By-Laws, as amended.* 4.0 Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders. 4.1 Fiscal Agency Agreement between Ogden and Bankers Trust Company, dated as of June 1, 1987, and Offering Memorandum dated June 12, 1987, relating to U.S. $85 million Ogden 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures, Due 2002.* 4.2 Fiscal Agency Agreement between Ogden and Bankers Trust Company, dated as of October 15, 1987, and Offering Memorandum, dated October 15, 1987, relating to U.S. $75 million Ogden 5-3/4% Convertible Subordinated Debentures, Due 2002.* 4.3 Indenture dated as of March 1, 1992 from Ogden Corporation to The Bank of New York, Trustee, relating to Ogden's $100 million debt offering.* 10.0 Material Contracts 10.1 Credit Agreement by and among Ogden, The Bank of New York, as Agent and the signatory bank Lenders thereto dated as of September 20, 1993.* (i) Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 1995. Transmittal herewith as Exhibit 10.1(i). 10.2 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated May 31, 1988, between Ogden and Ogden Projects, Inc.* 10.3 Tax Sharing Agreement, dated January 1, 1989, between Ogden, Ogden Projects, Inc. and subsidiaries, Ogden Allied Services, Inc. an subsidiaries, and Ogden Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries.* 10.4 Stock Purchase Option Agreement, dated June 14, 1989, between Ogden and Ogden Projects, Inc. as amended on November 16, 1989.* 10.5 Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 7, 1989, between Ogden Financial Services, Inc. and Image Data Corporation.* 10.6 Rights Agreement between Ogden Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, dated as of September 20, 1990 and amended August 15, 1995 to provide The Bank of New York as successor agent.* 10.7 Executive Compensation Plans (a) Ogden Corporation 1986 Stock Option Plan.* (b) Ogden Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan.* (i) Ogden Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated as of January 19, 1994.* (c) Ogden Services Corporation Executive Pension Plan.* (d) Ogden Services Corporation Select Savings Plan.* (i) Ogden Services Corporation Select Savings Plan Amendment and Restatement as of January 1, 1995.* (e) Ogden Services Corporation Select Savings Plan Trust.* (i) Ogden Services Corporation Select Savings Plan Trust Amendment and Restatement dated as of January 1, 1995.* (f) Ogden Services Corporation Executive Pension Plan Trust.* (g) Changes effected to the Ogden Profit Sharing Plan effective January 1, 1990.* (h) Ogden Corporation Profit Sharing Plan.* (i) Ogden Profit Sharing Plan as amended and restated January 1, 1991 and as in effect through January 1, 1993.* (ii) Ogden Profit Sharing Plan as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 1995.* (i) Ogden Corporation Core Executive Benefit Program.* (j) Ogden Projects Pension Plan.* (k) Ogden Projects Profit Sharing Plan.* (l) Ogden Projects Supplemental Pension and Profit Sharing Plans.* (m) Ogden Projects Employee's Stock Option Plan.* (i) Amendment, dated as of December 29, 1994 to the Ogden Projects Employees' Stock Option Plan. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 10.7 (u)(i).* (n) Ogden Projects Core Executive Benefit Program.* (o) Form of amendments to the Ogden Projects, Inc. Pension Plan and Profit Sharing Plans effective as of January 1, 1994.* (i) Form of Amended Ogden Projects, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, effective as of January 1, 1994. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 10.7 (w)(i).* (ii) Form of Amended Ogden Projects, Inc. Pension Plan, effective as of January 1, 1994. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 10.7 (w)(ii).* (p) Ogden Corporation CEO Formula Bonus Plan.* 10.8 Employment Agreements (a) Employment Letter Agreement between Ogden and Lynde H. Coit dated January 30, 1990.* (b) Employment Agreement between Ogden and R. Richard Ablon dated as of May 24, 1990.* (i) Letter Amendment Employment Agreement between Ogden and R. Richard Ablon dated as of October 11, 1990.* (c) Employment Agreement between Ogden and C. G. Caras dated as of July 2, 1990.* (i) Letter Amendment to Employment Agreement between Ogden Corporation and C.G. Caras, dated as of October 11, 1990.* (d) Employment Agreement between Ogden and Philip G. Husby as of July 2, 1990.* (e) Termination Letter Agreement between Maria P. Monet and Ogden dated as of October 22, 1990.* (f) Letter Agreement between Ogden Corporation and Ogden's Chairman of the Board, dated as of January 16, 1992.* (g) Employment Agreement between Ogden and Ogden's Chief Accounting Officer dated as of December 18, 1991.* (h) Employment Agreement between Scott G. Mackin and Ogden Projects, Inc. dated as of January 1, 1994.* (i) Employment Agreement between David L. Hahn and Ogden Corporation, dated December 1, 1995. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 10.8(i). 10.9 First Amended and Restated Ogden Corporation Guaranty Agreement made as of January 30, 1992 by Ogden Corporation for the benefit of Mission Funding Zeta and Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation.* 10.10 Ogden Corporation Guaranty Agreement as of January 30, 1992 by Ogden Corporation for the benefit of Allstate Insurance Company and Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Nine Corporation.* 11 Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Detail of Computation of Earnings Applicable to Common Stock for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 11. 13 Those portions of the Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 1995, which are incorporated herein by reference. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 13. 21 Subsidiaries of Ogden. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 21. 23 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 23. 27 Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR Filing Only). * Incorporated by reference as set forth in the Exhibit Index of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (b) No Reports on Form 8-K were filed by Ogden during the fourth quarter of 1995. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. OGDEN CORPORATION Date: March 27, 1996 By /S/ R. Richard Ablon R. Richard Ablon President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated. SIGNATURE TITLE /S/ Ralph E. Ablon Chairman of the Board & Director RALPH E. ABLON /S/ R. Richard Ablon President & Chief Executive Officer R. RICHARD ABLON and Director /S/ Philip G. Husby Senior Vice President, Treasurer and PHILIP G. HUSBYChief Financial Officer /S/ Robert M. DiGia Vice President, Controller and Chief ROBERT M. DIGIA Accounting Officer /S/ David M. Abshire Director DAVID M. ABSHIRE /S/ Norman G. Einspruch Director NORMAN G. EINSPRUCH /S/ Constantine G. Caras Director CONSTANTINE G. CARAS /S/ Attallah Kappas Director ATTALLAH KAPPAS Director TERRY ALLEN KRAMER Director MARIA P. MONET /S/ Judith D. Moyers Director JUDITH D. MOYERS /S/ Homer A. Neal Director HOMER A. NEAL /S/ Stanford S. Penner Director STANFORD S. PENNER /S/ Jesus Sainz Director JESUS SAINZ /S/ Frederick Seitz Director FREDERICK SEITZ /S/ Robert E. Smith Director ROBERT E. SMITH /S/ Helmut F.O. Volcker Director HELMUT F.O. VOLCKER /S/ Abraham Zaleznik Director ABRAHAM ZALEZNIK INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Ogden Corporation: We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Ogden Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, and have issued our report thereon dated February 5, 1996, which report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 106, 112, 115, and 121; such consolidated financial statements and report are included in your 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of Ogden Corporation and subsidiaries, listed in Item 14. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. /s/Deloitte & Touche, LLP New York, New York February 5, 1996 SCHEDULE II OGDEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E ADDITIONS BALANCE AT CHARGED TO BALANCE AT BEGINNING COSTS AND CHARGED TO END OF DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES OTHER ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS PERIOD Allowances deducted in the balance sheet from the assets to which they apply: Doubtful receivables - current $25,547,000 $ 5,869,000 $10,241,000 (A) $ 9,047,000 (D) $32,783,000 31,000 (B) 142,000 (C) Deferred charges on projects 750,000 5,650,000 1,350,000 (B) 750,000 (E) 7,000,000 TOTAL $26,297,000 $11,519,000 $11,764,000 $ 9,797,000 $39,783,000 Allowances not deducted: Provision for consolidation of facilities $ 4,720,000 $ 1,320,000 (G) $ 3,400,000 Estimated cost of disposal of discontinued operations 1,008,000 $ 1,485,000 (F) 1,548,000 (G) 945,000 Reserves relating to tax indemnification and other contingencies in connection with the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of a waste-to-energy facilty $ 6,000,000 6,000,000 Other 1,477,000 3,500,000 (1,350,000) (B) 23,000 (G) 3,604,000 TOTAL $ 7,205,000 $ 9,500,000 $ 135,000 $ 2,891,000 $13,949,000 Notes: (A) Reserve for contract billing adjustments. (B) Transfer from other accounts. (C) Recoveries of amounts previously written off. (D) Write-offs of receivables considered uncollectible. (E) Write-offs of unsuccessful development costs. (F) Net proceeds from operations and sale of assets relating to discontinued operations credited to provision. (G) Payments charged to allowances.
SCHEDULE II OGDEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E ADDITIONS BALANCE AT CHARGED TO BALANCE AT BEGINNING COSTS AND CHARGED TO END OF DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES OTHER ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS PERIOD Allowances deducted in the balance sheet from the assets to which they apply: Doubtful receivables - current $19,730,000 $7,682,000 $4,073,000 (A) $ 6,034,000 (D) $25,547,000 119,000 (B) 94,000 (E) 71,000 (C) Deferred charges on projects 750,000 750,000 TOTAL $20,480,000 $7,682,000 $4,263,000 $ 6,128,000 $26,297,000 Allowances not deducted: Provision for consolidation of facilities $ 6,040,000 $ 1,320,000 (G) $ 4,720,000 Estimated cost of disposal of discontinued operations 7,620,000 $1,706,000 $4,061,000 (F) 12,379,000 (H) 1,008,000 Other 285,000 1,350,000 158,000 (G) 1,477,000 TOTAL $13,945,000 $3,056,000 $4,061,000 $13,857,000 $ 7,205,000 Notes: (A) Reserve for contract billing adjustments. (B) Transfer from other accounts. (C) Recoveries of amounts previously written off. (D) Write-offs of receivables considered uncollectible. (E) Transfer to other accounts. (F) Net proceeds from on-site remediation utilizing mobile technology $3,853,000 and reclassification of liabilities pertaining to fixed- site hazardous waste business $208,000. (G) Payments charged to allowances. (H) Gain from on-site remediation business utilizing mobile technology.
SCHEDULE II OGDEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E ADDITIONS BALANCE AT CHARGED TO BALANCE AT BEGINNING COSTS AND CHARGED TO END OF DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES OTHER ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS PERIOD Allowances deducted in the balance sheet from the assets to which they apply: Doubtful receivables - current $32,783,000 $ 7,204,000 $ 64,000 (A) $ 3,012,000 (B) $37,039,000 Deferred charges on projects 7,000,000 3,670,000 7,000,000 (C) 3,670,000 TOTAL $39,783,000 $10,874,000 $ 64,000 $10,012,000 $40,709,000 Allowances not deducted: Provision for consolidation of facilities $ 3,400,000 $ 2,850,000 (D) 550,000 (E) Estimated cost of disposal of discontinued operations 945,000 $ 4,510,000 5,269,000 (E) $ 186,000 Estimated cost of disposal of assets 14,993,000 14,993,000 Provision for restructuring 8,200,000 2,090,000 (E) 6,110,000 Reserves relating to tax indemnification and other contingencies in connection with the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits a of waste-to-energy facility 6,000,000 3,000,000 (D) 3,000,000 Other 3,604,000 7,267,000 1,500,000 (D) 9,371,000 TOTAL $13,949,000 $34,970,000 $15,259,000 $33,660,000 Notes: (A) Recoveries of amounts previously written off. (B) Write-offs of receivables considered uncollectible. (C) Write-offs of unsuccessful development costs. (D) Reversal to operating costs of provisions no longer required. (E) Payments charged to allowances.
EX-99 2 EXHIBIT INDEX EXHIBIT INDEX EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FILING INFORMATION 2 Plans of Acquisition, Reorganization Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession. 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, Filed as Exhibit 2 to Ogden's dated as of October 31, 1989, Form S-4 Registration Statement among Ogden, ERCI Acquisition File No. 33-32155, and Corporation and ERC International incorporated herein by Inc. reference. 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger Filed as Exhibit (10)(x) to among Ogden Corporation, ERC Ogden's Form 10-K for the International Inc., ERC fiscal year ended December 31, Acquisition Corporation and 1990 and incorporated herein ERC Environmental and Energy by reference. Services Co., Inc. dated as of January 17, 1991. 2.3 Amended and Restated Agreement Filed as Exhibit 2 to Ogden's and Plan of Merger among Ogden Form S-4 Registration Statement Corporation, OPI Acquisition File No. 33-56181 and Corporation sub. and Ogden incorporated herein by Projects, Inc. dated as of reference. September 27, 1994. 3 Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. 3.1 Ogden's Restated Certificate Filed as Exhibit (3)(a) of Incorporation as amended. to Ogden's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988 and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2 Ogden's By-Laws, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Ogden's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference. 4 Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders. 4.1 Fiscal Agency Agreement between Filed as Exhibits (C)(3) and Ogden and Bankers Trust Company, (C)(4) to Ogden's Form 8-K dated as of June 1, 1987 and filed with the Securities and Offering Memorandum dated June Exchange Commission on July 7, 12, 1987, relating to U.S. 1987 and incorporated herein $85 million Ogden 6% Convertible by reference. Subordinated Debentures, Due 2002. EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FILING INFORMATION 4.2 Fiscal Agency Agreement between Filed as Exhibit (4) to Ogden's Ogden and Bankers Trust Company, Form S-3 Registration Statement dated as of October 15, 1987, filed with the Securities and and Offering Memorandum, dated Exchange Commission on December October 15, 1987, relating to 4, 1987, Registration No. U.S. $75 million Ogden 5-3/4% 33-18875, and incorporated Convertible Subordinated herein by reference. Debentures, Due 2002. 4.3 Indenture dated as of March 1, Filed as Exhibit (4)(C) to 1992 from Ogden Corporation to Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal The Bank of New York, Trustee, year ended December 31, 1991, relating to Ogden's $100 million and incorporated herein by debt offering. reference. 10 Material Contracts 10.1 Credit Agreement by and among Filed as Exhibit No. 10.2 to Ogden, The Bank of New York, as Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal Agent and the signatory Lenders year ended December 31, 1993, thereto dated as of September 20, and incorporated herein by 1993. reference. (i) Amendment to Credit Transmitted herewith as Agreement, dated as of Exhibit 10.1(i). November 16, 1995. 10.2 Stock Purchase Agreement dated Filed as Exhibit (10)(d) to May 31, 1988, between Ogden and Ogden's Form 10-K for the Ogden Projects, Inc. fiscal year ended December 31, 1989 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.3 Tax Sharing Agreement, dated Filed as Exhibit (10)(e) to January 1, 1989 between Ogden, Ogden's Form 10-K for the Ogden Projects, Inc. and fiscal year ended December 31, subsidiaries, Ogden Allied 1989 and incorporated herein Services, Inc. and subsidiaries by reference. and Ogden Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries. 10.4 Stock Purchase Option Agreement, Filed as Exhibit (10)(f) to dated June 14, 1989, between Ogden's Form 10-K for the Ogden and Ogden Projects, Inc. fiscal year ended December 31, as amended on November 16, 1989. 1989 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.5 Preferred Stock Purchase Filed as Exhibit (10)(g) to Agreement, dated July 7, 1989, Ogden's Form 10-K for the between Ogden Financial Services, fiscal year ended December 31, Inc. and Image Data Corporation. 1989 and incorporated herein by reference. EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FILING INFORMATION 10.6 Rights Agreement between Ogden Filed as Exhibit (10)(h) to Corporation and Manufacturers Ogden's Form 10-K for the Hanover Trust Company, dated as fiscal year ended December 31, of September 20, 1990 and amended 1990 and incorporated herein August 15, 1995 to provide The by reference. Bank of New York as successor agent. 10.7 Executive Compensation Plans. (a) Ogden Corporation 1986 Filed as Exhibit (10)(k) to Stock Option Plan. Ogden's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1985 and incorporated herein by reference. (b) Ogden Corporation 1990 Filed as Exhibit (10)(j) to Stock Option Plan. Ogden's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Ogden Corporation 1990 Filed as Exhibit 10.6(b)(i) to Stock Option Plan as Ogden's Form 10-Q for the Amended and Restated as of quarterly period ended January 19, 1994. September 30, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference. (c) Ogden Services Corporation Filed as Exhibit (10)(k) to Executive Pension Plan. Ogden's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (d) Ogden Services Corporation Filed as Exhibit (10)(l) to Select Savings Plan. Ogden's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Ogden Services Corporation Filed as Exhibit 10.7(d)(i) Select Savings Plan to Ogden's Form 10-K for the Amendment and Restatement fiscal year ended December 31, as of January 1, 1995. 1994 and incorporated herein by reference. (e) Ogden Services Corporation Filed as Exhibit (10)(m) to Select Savings Plan Trust. Ogden's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Ogden Services Corporation Filed as Exhibit 10.7(e)(i) to Select Savings Plan Trust Ogden's Form 10-K for the Amendment and Restatement fiscal year ended December 31, as of January 1, 1995. 1994 and incorporated herein by reference. EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FILING INFORMATION (f) Ogden Services Corporation Filed as Exhibit (10)(n) to Executive Pension Plan Trust. Ogden's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (g) Changes effected to the Ogden Filed as Exhibit (10)(o) to Profit Sharing Plan effective Ogden's Form 10-K for the January 1, 1990. fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (h) Ogden Corporation Profit Sharing Filed as Exhibit 10.8(p) to Plan. Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Ogden Profit Sharing Plan Filed as Exhibit 10.8(p)(i) to as amended and restated Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal January 1, 1991 and as in year ended December 31, 1993 effect through January 1, and incorporated herein by 1993. reference. (ii) Ogden Profit Sharing Plan Filed as Exhibit 10.7(p)(ii) as amended and restated to Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal effective as of January 1, year ended December 31, 1994 1995. and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Ogden Corporation Core Executive Filed as Exhibit 10.8(q) to Benefit Program. Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference. (j) Ogden Projects Pension Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.8(r) to Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference. (k) Ogden Projects Profit Sharing Filed as Exhibit 10.8(s) to Plan. Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference. (l) Ogden Projects Supplemental Filed as Exhibit 10.8(t) to Pension and Profit Sharing Plans. Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference. EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FILING INFORMATION (m) Ogden Projects Employees' Stock Filed as Exhibit 10.8(u) to Option Plan. Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Amendment dated as of Filed as Exhibit 10.7(u)(i) to December 29, 1994, to the Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal Ogden Projects Employees' year ended December 31, 1994 Stock Option Plan. and incorporated herein by reference. (n) Ogden Projects Core Executive Filed as Exhibit 10.8(v) to Benefit Program. Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference. (o) Form of amendments to the Ogden Filed as Exhibit 10.8(w) to Projects, Inc. Pension Plan and Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal Profit Sharing Plans effective as year ended December 31, 1993 of January 1, 1994. and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Form of amended Ogden Filed as Exhibit 10.7(w)(i) to Projects Profit Sharing Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal Plan effective as of year ended December 31, 1994 January 1, 1994 and and incorporated herein by incorporated herein by reference. reference. (ii) Form of amended Ogden Filed as Exhibit 10.7(w)(ii) Projects Pension Plan, to Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal effective as of January 1, year ended December 31, 1994 1994 and incorporated and incorporated herein by herein by reference. reference. (p) Ogden Corporation CEO Formula Filed as Exhibit 10.6(w) to Bonus Plan. Ogden's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.8 Employment Agreements (a) Employment Letter Agreement Filed as Exhibit (10)(p) to between Ogden and an executive Ogden's Form 10-K for the officer dated January 30, 1990. fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FILING INFORMATION (b) Employment Agreement between Filed as Exhibit (10)(r) to R. Richard Ablon and Ogden Ogden's Form 10-K for the dated as of May 24, 1990. fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Letter Amendment to Filed as Exhibit (10)(r)(i) Employment Agreement to Ogden's Form 10-K for the between Ogden Corporation fiscal year ended December 31, and R. Richard Ablon, dated 1990 and incorporated herein as of October 11, 1991. by reference. (c) Employment Agreement between Filed as Exhibit (10)(s) to Ogden and C. G. Caras dated Ogden's Form 10-K for the as of July 2, 1990. fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Letter Amendment to Filed as Exhibit (10)(s)(i) Employment Agreement to Ogden's Form 10-K for the between Ogden Corporation fiscal year ended December 31, and C. G. Caras, dated as 1990 and incorporated herein of October 11, 1990. by reference. (d) Employment Agreement between Filed as Exhibit (10)(t) to Ogden and Philip G. Husby, Ogden's Form 10-K for the dated as of July 2, 1990. fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (e) Termination Letter Agreement Filed as Exhibit (10)(v) to between Maria P. Monet and Ogden Ogden's Form 10-K for the dated as of October 22, 1990. fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference. (f) Letter Agreement between Ogden Filed as Exhibit 10.2 (p) to Corporation and Ogden's Chairman Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal of the Board, dated as of year ended December 31, 1991 January 16, 1992. and incorporated herein by reference. (g) Employment Agreement between Filed as Exhibit 10.2 (q) to Ogden Corporation and Ogden's Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal Chief Accounting Officer dated year ended December 31, 1991 as of December 18, 1991. and incorporated herein by reference. (h) Employment Agreement between Filed as Exhibit 10.8(o) to Scott G. Mackin and Ogden Ogden's Form 10-K for fiscal Projects, Inc. dated as of year ended December 31, 1993 January 1, 1994. and incorporated herein by reference. (i) Employment Agreement between Transmitted herewith as Ogden Corporation and Exhibit 10.8(i). David L. Hahn, dated December 1, 1995. EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FILING INFORMATION 10.9 First Amended and Restated Filed as Exhibit 10.3 (b) (i) Ogden Corporation Guaranty to Ogden's Form 10-K for Agreement made as of January 30, fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 by Ogden Corporation for 1991 and incorporated herein the benefit of Mission Funding by reference. Zeta and Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation. 10.10 Ogden Corporation Guaranty Filed as Exhibit 10.3 (b) (iii) Agreement made as of January to Ogden's Form 10-K for 30, 1992 by Ogden Corporation fiscal year ended December 31, for the benefit of Allstate 1991 and incorporated herein Insurance Company and Ogden by reference. Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Nine Corp. 11 Ogden Corporation and Transmitted herewith as Subsidiaries Detail of Exhibit 11. Computation of Earnings Applicable to Common Stock for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. 13 Those portions of the Annual Transmitted herewith as Report to Stockholders for the Exhibit 13. year ended December 31, 1995, which are incorporated herein by reference. 21 Subsidiaries of Ogden. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 21. 23 Consent of Deloitte & Touche. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 23. 27 Financial Data Schedule. Transmitted herewith as Exhibit 27. EX-10 3 EXHIBIT 10.1(I) EXHIBIT 10.1(i) AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CREDIT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2 (this "Amendment"), dated as of November 16, 1995, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 1993, by and among Ogden Corporation (the "Company"), the signatory Lenders thereto and The Bank of New York, as Agent (the "Agent"), as amended by Consent and Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 12, 1994 (the "Agreement"). RECITALS I. Capitalized terms used herein which are defined in the Agreement shall have the meanings therein defined. II. The Company has requested that the Agreement be amended to extend the Termination Date by one year. III. In addition, the Company has requested that the Aggregate Commitments be increased to $200,000,000, that the Commitment of Swiss Bank Corporation be increased by $5,000,000, that Bank of America Illinois ("B of A") be added as a Lender under the Agreement with a Commitment of $20,000,000 and that the Agreement be amended in certain other respects as set forth herein. IV. On the date hereof and on the Amendment Effective Date (as defined in paragraph 5) no Competitive Bid Loans are or will be outstanding, no Letter of Credit has been or will have been issued and the only Loans outstanding under the Agreement are and will be R/C Loans (the "Existing Loans"). The Existing Loans will be outstanding as Eurodollar Loans having a one-month Interest Period expiring on December 6, 1995. V. In order to avoid the need for assigning portions of the Existing Loans to conform to the revised Commitments and Commitment Percentages arising from this Amendment, on the Amendment Effective Date, the Company will deliver to the Agent a Borrowing Request requesting R/C Loans from the Lenders, including B of A, in an aggregate amount at least equal to the aggregate amount due on the Existing Loans on the requested Borrowing Date, which Loans will be made based on the revised Commitments and Commitment Percentages set forth in Attachment A hereto, and the proceeds of such Loans will be used, in whole or in part, to retire the Existing Loans. In consideration of the Recitals, the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 1.1 of the Agreement is amended to restate the following definition in its entirety: "Termination Date": October 29, 1998, or any date subsequent thereto resulting from an extension of the Termination Date pursuant to paragraph 2.18. 2. Paragraph 1.1 of the Agreement is further amended to change the amount contained in clause (viii) of the definition of "Permitted Subsidiary Indebtedness" from "$25,000,000" to "$50,000,000". 3. Exhibit A to the Agreement is restated in its entirety to read as set forth in Attachment A hereto. 4. Schedule 1.1 to the Agreement is restated in its entirety to read as set forth in Attachment B hereto. 5. This Amendment shall not become effective until the date (the "Amendment Effective Date ") on which each of the following conditions precedent has been fulfilled, provided that if such conditions are fulfilled prior to December 6, 1995, the Amendment Effective Date shall be December 6, 1995: a. The Agent shall have received this Amendment executed by a duly authorized officer or officers of the Company, the Agent and the Lenders. b. The Agent shall have received notes, dated the Amendment Effective Date, as follows: (i) on behalf of Swiss Bank, a new Note (the "Replacement Note") in the principal amount of its increased Commitment in replacement of its existing Note (which existing Note shall be marked "SUPERCEDED" and returned to the Company) and (ii) on behalf of B of A, a new Note in the principal amount of its Commitment (the "B of A Note", and with the Replacement Note, the "New Notes") each in the form of Exhibit E to the Agreement, with appropriate insertions therein, executed by a duly authorized officer or officers of the Company. c. The Agent shall have timely received an R/C Borrowing Request from the Company requesting R/C Loans in an aggregate amount at least equal to the aggregate amount due on the Existing Loans on the requested Borrowing Date, upon the making of which the Company hereby directs the Agent to remit all or such part of the proceeds thereof as shall be necessary to repay the full amount due on the Existing Loans on such Borrowing Date to the Lenders thereof for application in payment of such Loans and to credit the remainder of such proceeds, if any, as provided in the Agreement or as otherwise directed by the Company. d. The Agent shall have received a certificate, dated the date hereof, of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Company (i) attaching a true and complete copy of the resolutions of its Board of Directors and of all documents evidencing other necessary corporate action (in form and substance satisfactory to the Agent and to Special Counsel) taken by it to authorize the execution and delivery of this Amendment No. 2, the New Notes and the transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) attaching a true and complete copy of its Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws, (iii) setting forth the incumbency of its officer or officers who may sign this Amendment and the New Notes, including therein a signature specimen of such officer or officers and (iv) attaching a certificate of good standing of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, together with such other documents as the Agent or Special Counsel shall reasonably require. e. The Agent shall have received an opinion of general counsel of the Company, dated the date hereof, substantially in the form of Attachment C hereto. f. All conditions precedent set forth in paragraph 6 of the Agreement shall have been satisfied. 6. By its execution hereof, B of A agrees that, simultaneously upon the occurrence of the Amendment Effective Date, it shall become a Lender for all purposes under the Agreement and shall be deemed to have appointed the Agent to act on its behalf under, and on the terms set forth in, paragraph 10 of the Agreement. 7. The Company hereby (a) reaffirms and admits the validity and enforceability of all the Loan Documents and its obligations thereunder, (b) agrees and admits that it has no valid defenses to or offsets against any of its obligations to the Agent or any Lender under the Loan Documents, (c) agrees to pay the reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel to the Agent incurred in connection with the preparation, negotiation and closing of this Amendment, and (d) represents and warrants that, after giving effect to this Amendment, no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing. 8. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one agreement. It shall not be neces- sary in making proof of this Amendment to produce or account for more than one counterpart signed by the party against which enforcement is sought. 9. In all other respects, the Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain in full force and effect. 10. THIS AMENDMENT IS BEING DELIVERED IN AND IS INTENDED TO BE PERFORMED IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCEABLE AND BE GOVERNED BY, THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written. OGDEN CORPORATION By: /s/Philip G. Husby Title: Senior V.P. & CFO THE BANK OF NEW YORK, Individually and as Agent By: /s/William A. Klein Title: V.P. BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS By: illegible signature Title: Authorized Officer DEUTSCHE BANK AG New York and/or Cayman Islands Branches By: /s/Robert M. Wood Title: Vice President By: /s/James Fox Title: Assistant Vice President MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK By: /s/James S. Finch Title: Vice President NATIONSBANK, N.A. By: /s/Michael R. Heredia Title: Vice President NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK, PLC New York Branch By: /s/Maria Amaral-LeBlanc Title: Vice President NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK, PLC Nassau Branch By: /s/Maria Amaral-LeBlanc Title: Vice President SWISS BANK CORPORATION New York Branch By: /s/Robert O. Gurman Title: Director, Merchant Banking By: /s/David C. Hemingway Title: Director, Merchant Banking UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND, New York Branch By: /s/James P. Kelleher Title: Assistant Vice President By: /s/Peter B. Yearley Title: Vice President CHEMICAL BANK By: /s/Robert K. Gaynor Title: Vice President THE MITSUBISHI BANK, LIMITED, New York Branch By: /s/Paula Mueller Title: Vice President ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT A COMMITMENTS
COMMITMENT BANK COMMITMENT PERCENTAGE The Bank of New York $ 30,000,000 15.00% Bank of America Illinois 20,000,000 10.00 Deutsche Bank AG 20,000,000 10.00 New York and/or Cayman Islands Branches Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York 20,000,000 10.00 NationsBank, N.A. 20,000,000 10.00 National Westminster 20,000,000 10.00 Bank, PLC Swiss Bank Corporation 20,000,000 10.00 Union Bank of Switzerland 20,000,000 10.00 New York Branch Chemical Bank 15,000,000 7.50 The Mitsubishi Bank, 15,000,000 7.50 Limited, New York Branch ___ Totals $200,000,000 100%
ATTACHMENT B SCHEDULE 1.1 LIST OF LENDING OFFICES DOMESTIC LENDING OFFICES EURODOLLAR LENDING OFFICES (1) The Bank of New York The Bank of New York New York Corporate Division New York Corporate Division 8th Floor 8th Floor One Wall Street One Wall Street New York, New York 10286 New York, New York 10286 Attention: William G.C. Dakin, Attention: William G.C. Dakin, Assistant Vice President Assistant Vice President Telephone: (212) 635-1473 Telephone: (212) 635-1473 Telecopy: (212) 635-1483 Telecopy: (212) 635-1483 (2) Bank of America Bank of America 200 West Jackson Blvd. 200 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, Illinois 60697 Chicago, Illinois 60697 Attention: David Noda Attention: David Noda Telephone: (212) 503-7948 Telephone: (212) 503-7948 Telecopy: (212) 503-7771 Telecopy: (212) 503-7771 (3) Deutsche Bank AG Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch Cayman Islands Branch 24th Floor 24th Floor 31 West 52nd Street 31 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019 New York, New York 10019 Attention: Robert Wood Attention: Robert Wood Telephone: (212) 469-7839 Telephone: (212) 469-7839 Telecopy: (212) 469-8212 Telecopy: (212) 469-8212 (4) Morgan Guaranty Trust Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York Company of New York 60 Wall Street Nassau, Bahamas Office New York, New York 10260-0060 c/o J. P. Morgan Services Inc.- Attention: James Finch 3/OP52 Vice President 500 Stanton Christiana Road Telephone: (212) 648-6985 Newark, Delaware 19713 Telecopy: (212) 648-5016 Telephone: (212) 648-6957 Telecopy: (212) 648-5014 (5) NationsBank, NA NationsBank, NA 6610 Rockledge Dr. 6610 Rockledge Dr. Corporate Bank Corporate Bank 6th Floor 6th Floor Bethesda, MD 20817 Bethesda, MD 20817 Attention: Michael Heredia Attention: Michael Heredia Telephone: (301) 571-0724 Telephone: (301) 571-0724 Telecopy: (301)-571-0719 Telecopy: (301)-571-0719 (6) National Westminster Bank PLC National Westminster Bank PLC New York Marketing Office New York Marketing Office 175 Water Street - 19th Floor 175 Water Street - 19th Floor New York, New York 10038 New York, New York 10038 Attention: David Apps, Attention: David Apps, Vice President Vice President Telephone: (212) 602-4221 Telephone: (212) 602-4221 Telecopy: (212) 602-4500 Telecopy: (212) 602-4500 (7) Swiss Bank Corporation Swiss Bank Corporation New York Branch Cayman Islands Branch 222 Broadway c/o Swiss Bank Corporation 222-04-E New York Branch New York, New York 10038 222 Broadway Attention: Robert O. Gurman, 222-04-E Director New York, New York 10038 Telephone: (212) 574-3127 Attention: Robert O. Gurman, Telecopy: (212) 574-4131 Director Telephone: (212) 574-3127 Telecopy: (212) 574-4131 (8) Union Bank of Switzerland Union Bank of Switzerland New York Branch New York Branch 299 Park Avenue 299 Park Avenue New York, New York 10171 New York, New York 10171 Attention: Peter B. Yearley Attention: Peter B. Yearley Vice President Vice President Telephone: (212) 821-3339 Telephone: (212) 821-3339 Telecopy: (212) 821-3878 Telecopy: (212) 821-3878 (9) Chemical Bank Chemical Bank 270 Park Avenue 270 Park Avenue New York, New York 10017 New York, New York 10017 Attention: Chris Perkins, Attention: Chris Perkins, Vice President Vice President Telephone: (212) 270-4769 Telephone: (212) 270-4769 Telecopy: (212) 270-0330 Telecopy: (212) 270-0330 (10) The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited- The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited- New York Branch New York Branch 225 Liberty Street 225 Liberty Street Two World Financial Center Two World Financial Center New York, New York 10281 New York, New York 10281 Attention: Paula Mueller Attention: Paula Mueller Telephone: (212) 667-2890 Telephone: (212) 667-2890 Telecopy: (212) 667-3562 Telecopy: (212) 667-3562 ATTACHMENT C FORM OF OPINION OF COUNSEL _______ __, 1995 TO THE PARTIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE A ATTACHED HERETO I have acted as counsel to Ogden Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") in connection with Amendment No. 2, dated as of November 16, 1995 (the "Amendment"), to the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 1993, by and among the Company, the signatory Banks thereto, and The Bank of New York, as Agent, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated as of September 12, 1994 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein that are defined in the Amendment or the Agreement shall have the meanings therein defined. In furnishing this opinion, I have examined and relied upon originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to my satisfaction as being true copies, of such instruments, documents and certificates of officers of the Company or of government officials, and have conducted such investigations of fact and law, as I have deemed necessary or appropriate as the basis for the opinions hereinafter expressed, including, without limitation, (i) the Restated Certificate of Incorpora- tion and By-Laws of the Company, (ii) the Amendment and the Agreement and (iii) the New Notes. With respect to questions of fact material to any opinions expressed herein, I have relied solely upon inquiries made of the appropriate officers of the Company and its Subsidiaries. I express no opinion as to any question of law other than with respect to the laws of the State of New York, the corpo- rate laws of the State of Delaware, and the laws of the United States of America. Wherever in this opinion the phrase "to the best of my knowledge" is used, it shall be construed as being limited, without independent investigation, to my actual knowledge and the actual knowledge of those attorneys in my office who have directly participated in this matter. Based upon and subject to the foregoing, I am of the opinion that: 11. The Company and each Material Subsidiary is duly or- ganized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation or formation, has all requisite corporate power and authority to own its Property and to carry on its business as now conducted, and is in good standing and authorized to do business in each jurisdiction in which there is a reasonable likelihood of a Material Adverse Effect as a consequence of the failure to be so authorized. 12. The Company has full corporate power and authority to enter into, execute, deliver and carry out the terms of the Amendment and the New Notes, and to make the borrowings and to incur the other obligations contemplated thereby, to execute, deliver and carry out the terms of the New Notes and to incur the obligations provided for therein, all of which have been duly authorized by all proper and necessary corporate action and are not in violation of its Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws. 13. No consent, authorization or approval of, filing with, notice to, or exemption by, stockholders, any Governmen- tal Body or any other Person (except for those which have been obtained, made or given) is required to authorize, or is re- quired in connection with the execution, delivery and perfor- mance of the Amendment and the New Notes or is required as a condition to the validity or enforceability of the Amendment and the New Notes. No provision of any applicable statute, law (including, without limitation, any applicable usury or similar law), rule or regulation of any Governmental Body will prevent the execution, delivery or performance of, or affect the validity of, the Amendment and the New Notes. 14. The Amendment constitutes, and the New Notes, when issued and delivered pursuant thereto for value received, will constitute, the valid and legally binding obligations of the Company enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except (i) as such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally or by general principles of equity, including, without limitation, principles of materiality, reasonableness and good faith (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or an action at law), and (ii) that the enforceability of any provision of the Agreement providing for indemnification might be limited by considerations of public policy. 15. There are no actions, suits, arbitration proceedings or claims pending or, to the best of my knowledge, threatened against the Company or any Subsidiary, or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary, at law or in equity, before any Governmental Body as to which there is a reasonable likelihood of a Material Adverse Effect. There are no proceedings pending or, to the best of my knowledge, threatened against the Company or any Subsidiary which call into question the validity or en- forceability of any of the Loan Documents. 16. To the best of my knowledge, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is in default under any mortgage, indenture, contract or agreement to which it is a party or by which it or any of its Property is bound, as to which, taken as a whole, there is a reasonable likelihood of a Material Adverse Effect. To the best of my knowledge, the execution, delivery or carry- ing out of the terms of the Loan Documents will not constitute a default under, conflict with, require any consent under (other than consents which have been obtained), or result in the creation or imposition of, or obligation to create, any Lien upon the Property of the Company or any Subsidiary pur- suant to the terms of any such mortgage, indenture, contract, agreement, judgment, decree or order as to which, if not con- sented to, waived or obtained, there is a reasonable likelihood of a Material Adverse Effect. 17. To the best of my knowledge, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is in default with respect to any judgment, or- der, writ, injunction, decree or decision of any Governmental Body as to which there is a reasonable likelihood of a Material Adverse Effect and the Company and each Subsidiary is complying in all material respects with all applicable statutes and regulations, including ERISA, of all Governmental Bodies, a violation of which is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect. 18. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary (a) is subject to regulation under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, the Federal Power Act (other than the minimum statutory requirements that do not violate clause (b) below) or the Investment Company Act of 1940, or (b) is subject to any statute or regulation which prohibits or restricts the in- currence of Indebtedness under the Loan Documents, including, without limitation, statutes or regulations relative to common or contract carriers or to the sale of electricity, gas, steam, water, telephone, telegraph or other public utility services. 19. To the best of my knowledge, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received written notice or otherwise learned of any claim, demand, action, event, condition, report or investigation indicating or concerning any potential or actual liability as to which individually or in the aggregate there is a reasonable likelihood of a Material Adverse Effect arising in connection with any non-compliance with or violation of the requirements of any Environmental Laws. Very truly yours, Lynde H. Coit Senior Vice President & General Counsel SCHEDULE A The Bank of New York Bank of America Illinois Deutsche Bank AG Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York NationsBank of Virginia, N.A. National Westminster Bank PLC Swiss Bank Corporation Union Bank of Switzerland Chemical Bank The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited
EX-10 4 EXHIBIT 10.8(I) EXHIBIT 10.8(i) CONFIDENTIAL AND LEGALLY PRIVILEGED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the 1st day of December 1995, by and between OGDEN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation maintaining its principal office at Two Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, New York (the "Company") and David L. Hahn, an individual now residing at 19 Janes Lane, Lloyd Harbor, New York 11743 (the "Employee"). WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the Employee is currently serving in an executive capacity as a Senior Vice President of the Company and the Company desires to ensure that the Employee will continue to be available to provide services in a similar capacity in the future, which services are significant to the Company's long-range prospects and the long-range prospects of the Company's subsidiaries; and WHEREAS, to induce the Employee to provide such services, the Company is offering to provide the Employee with the compensation, benefits and security provided for in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Employment/Capacity/Term. (a) The Company agrees to and does hereby employ the Employee, and the Employee agrees to and hereby does enter into the employ of the Company upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Such employment shall be in an executive capacity as Senior Vice President, Business Development - Asia of the Company. (b) Such employment shall commence on December 1, 1995 and shall continue through November 30, 1998, and from year to year thereafter subject to the right of the Employee or the Company to terminate such employment as of November 30, 1996, or any subsequent November 30, by written notice given to the other party at least sixty (60) days prior to such termination date stating an intention to so terminate such employment. Termination by either party, in accordance with the provisions of the preceding sentence shall not require a statement of the reason or cause for such termination and shall not be deemed a breach or violation of this Agreement by the party giving such notice. As used in this Agreement, the phrase "term of this Agreement" shall be deemed to include the period subsequent to the date hereof and prior to termination of this Agreement. 2. Time and Effort/Absences. During the "term of this Agreement", the Employee shall devote his entire time and attention during normal business hours to the business of the Company and its subsidiaries (the "Ogden Group") subject to the supervision of the Board of Directors of the Company and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and he shall not engage in any other business activity whether or not such business activity is pursued for gain, profit, or other pecuniary advantage, but this restriction shall not be construed to restrict the Employee (i) from performing services as a member of the Board of Directors, Board of Trustees or the like of any non-profit entity for which the Employee receives no compensation, provided that, such services do not unreasonably interfere with the ability of the Employee to perform the services and discharge the responsibilities required of him under this Agreement, and (ii) from investing his assets in such form or manner as will not require any services on the part of the Employee in the operation of the business of the entity in which such investments are made. The Employee shall be excused from rendering his services during reasonable vacation periods and during other reasonable temporary absences as authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors or the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 3. Corporate Offices. If elected, the Employee will serve, without additional compensation, as an officer and director (or in either capacity) of the Company and the Ogden Group. 4. Salary/Bonus/Other Benefits. In consideration of the services and duties to be rendered and performed by the Employee during the term of this Agreement, the Company agrees to pay and provide for the Employee the compensation and benefits described below: (a) An annual salary, payable in equal monthly or bi- weekly installments, in the amount of One Hundred Seventy Thousand Dollars ($170,000) or in such greater amount as may from time to time be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Company. (b) An annual incentive bonus in such amount as may from time to time be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Company. (c) Other Benefits. It is intended that the Company shall continue to provide the Employee with benefits at least as favorable as benefits provided on behalf of other executives of the Company who furnish services of comparable significance, as they may exist from time to time. Such benefits presently include Ogden's Core Group Life Insurance, Supplemental Executive Group Life Insurance, Medical and Health Insurance, Automobile, Ogden Stock Option Plan, Executive Pension Plan, Ogden Select Plan and Profit Sharing Plan. Except as otherwise provided herein, any such participation shall be in accordance with the provisions of such plans and nothing contained in this Agreement in intended to or shall be deemed to affect adversely any of the Employee's rights as a participant under any such plans. Nothing herein shall prevent the Company from modifying or discontinuing any benefit plan on a consistent and non-discriminatory basis applicable to all such executives. 5. Expenses. The Employee shall be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred from time to time on behalf of the Company and the Ogden Group or in the performance of his duties under this Agreement, upon the presentation of such supporting documents and forms as the Company shall reasonably request. 6. Disability/Disability Benefit. In the event that the Employee is incapable because of physical or mental illness of rendering services of the character contemplated hereby, for a period of six (6) consecutive months, the Board of Directors of the Company may determine that the Employee has become disabled. In the event of such a determination of disability, the Company shall have the continuing right and option while such disability continues to terminate this Agreement by notice in writing to the Employee, effective thirty (30) days after such notice of termination is so given, unless, within such thirty (30) day period, the Employee resumes rendering full-time services of the character contemplated hereby. The incapacity due to physical or mental illness to render the services of the character contemplated hereby, shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement by the Employee. If this Agreement is terminated by the Company as a result of a determination of disability, as aforesaid, the Company shall be obligated to continue the salary of the Employee as provided in Paragraph 4. for a period equal to the greater of (a) twelve (12) months, or (b) such longer period as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company, in each case reduced by any disability insurance benefits provided for the benefit of the Employee at the expense of the Company. 7. Death/Death Benefit. In the event of the death of the Employee during the term of this Agreement, this Agreement shall terminate and the Employee's salary shall continue to be paid to his designated beneficiary or, if none, to his personal representative, through the last day of the month in which such death occurs. 8. Severance Pay. If the Company gives notice to terminate in accordance with Paragraph 1.(b), or if the employment of the Employee is terminated at any time (i) by the Employee for Good Reason (as defined in Paragraph 9., or (ii) by the Company for any reason other than for Cause (as hereinafter defined), the Company will be obligated to pay to the Employee a cash payment in an amount equal to the product of (i) and (ii); where (i) shall equal the sum of (A) the Employee's annual salary and (B) the Employee's annual incentive bonus during the twelve (12) month period ending with the close of the month in which such termination of employment occurs (the "Date of Termination"), but not less than the incentive bonus awarded to the Employee in December 1994, which was Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000), divided by twelve (12); and where (ii) shall be the lesser of, (x) thirty-six (36), or (y) the number of months until the Employee's normal retirement date (the "Severance Pay"). Termination of the Employee's employment on account of his disability, death or retirement (as hereinafter defined) will not be considered a termination of the Employee's employment by the Company and will not require the Company to pay and provide any Severance Pay. No Severance Pay will be required if the employment of the Employee is terminated by the Company for Cause (as hereinafter defined) or by the Employee (other than for Good Reason as defined in Paragraph 9.) or if the Employee gives notice to terminate in accordance with Paragraph 1.(b). The Severance Pay provided herein is provided in order to reinforce and encourage the continued loyalty, attention, and dedication of the Employee to the Company's business and affairs without the concerns which normally arise from the possibility of a loss of employment security. As used herein, the terms "Retirement" and "Cause" shall have the following meanings, respectively: (a) Retirement. Termination of the Employee's employment on account of "Retirement" shall mean termination on or after the Employee's normal retirement date in accordance with the terms of the Ogden Profit Sharing Plan; and (b) Cause. Termination by the Company of the Employee's employment for "Cause" shall mean termination as a result of (i) the willful and continued failure by the Employee to perform substantially the services contemplated by this Agreement (other than any such failure resulting from the Employee's incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Employee by a member or representative of the Board of Directors of the Company or the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company which specifically identifies the manner in which it is alleged that the Employee has not substantially performed such services, or (ii) the willful engaging by the Employee in gross misconduct which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company; provided that, no act, or failure to act, on the Employee's part shall be considered "willful" unless done, or omitted to be done, in bad faith and without reasonable belief that such action or omission was in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Company. 9. Termination by the Employee for Good Reason. The termination by the Employee of this Agreement and his employment for "Good Reason" shall be deemed a justifiable termination of his employment and shall excuse the Employee from the obligation to render services as provided in Paragraph 2. hereof. Upon such termination, the Employee shall be entitled to Severance Pay in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 8. hereof. As used herein, the phrase "Good Reason" shall mean: (a) a change in the Employee's status, title or position as an officer of the Company in the executive capacity set forth in this Agreement which, in his reasonable judgment, does not represent a promotion from or enhancement of his status, title and position, or, any removal of the Employee from or any failure to reappoint or reelect him to such position, except in connection with a justifiable termination by the Company of the Employee's employment for Cause or on account of disability, the retirement or death of the Employee or the termination by the Employee of his employment other than for Good Reason; (b) a reduction in the Employee's annual salary or a failure by the Company to pay to the Employee any installment of the annual salary required by Paragraph 4. which failure continues for a period of twenty (20) days after written notice thereof is given by the Employee to the Company; (c) the failure by the Company within ten (10) days of notice from the Employee to obtain the assumption of this Agreement in form and substance to the reasonable satisfaction of the Employee by any successor (other than by merger of consolidation for which no separate assumption is necessary) as referred to in Paragraph 16; or (d) any refusal by the Company to allow the Employee to attend to matters or engage in activities not directly related to the business of the Company which is permitted by this Agreement. 10. Notice of Termination. Any purported notice of termination of the Employee's employment (other than a Notice given by either party pursuant to Paragraph 1. hereof) shall be communicated in writing and delivered to the other party as provided in Paragraph 17. (hereinafter a "Notice of Termination"). 11. Trade Secrets, Etc. The Employee acknowledges that prior to his employment by the Company he had no knowledge of the formulae, processes or methods of manufacture or other trade secrets of the Company. Upon the termination of his employment, the Employee agrees forthwith to deliver up to the Company notebooks and other data relating to research or experiments as conducted by him or relating to the products, formulae, processes or methods of manufacture of the Company. 12. Customer List. The Employee recognizes and acknowledges that the written list of the customers of the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates, as it may exist from time to time, is a valuable, special and unique asset. The Employee agrees that he will not during the term of his employment or within five (5) years thereafter, use for his own personal benefit or disclose the written list of the customers of the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates or any part thereof, to any person, firm, corporation, association or other entity for any reason or purpose whatsoever. 13. Limited Covenant Not to Compete. If the employment of the Employee hereof is terminated (i) by the Employee pursuant to Paragraph 1.(b) hereof, or (ii) by the Company for Cause (as defined in Paragraph 8. above), then in either case (y) the Employee will not, for a period of two (2) years form such termination of employment within the territorial confines of the United States of America, directly or indirectly, own, manage, operate, control, be employed by, participate in, or be connected in any manner with the ownership, management, operation or control of any business in competition with the business conducted by the Company at the time of such termination, and (z) the Employee will, for a period of two (2) years from such termination refrain from carrying on a business similar to that presently carried on by the Company within the states in which the business of the Company has been carried on, so long as the Company carries on like business therein. 14. Injunctive Relief. In the event of a breach or threatened breach by the Employee of the provisions of Paragraph 11., 12., or 13. during or after the term of this Agreement, the Company shall be entitled to an injunction restraining the Employee from violation of such paragraph. Nothing herein shall be construed as prohibiting the Company from pursuing any other remedy it may have in the event of breach of this Agreement by the Employee. 15. Certain Proprietary Rights. Employee agrees to and hereby does assign to the Company all his right, title and interest in and to all inventions, whether or not patentable, which are made or conceived solely or jointly by him: (a) At any time during the term of his employment by the Company in an executive, managerial, planning, technical research or engineering capacity (including development, manufacturing, systems, applied science and sales), or (b) During the course of or in connection with his duties during the term of this Agreement, or (c) With the use of time or materials of the Company. The Employee agrees to communicate to the Company or its representatives all facts known to him concerning such inventions, to sign all rightful papers, make all rightful oaths and generally to do everything possible to aid the Company in obtaining and enforcing proper patent protection for all such inventions in all countries and in vesting title to such inventions and patents in the Company. For the purpose of this Agreement, the subject matter of any application for patent naming Employee as a sole or joint inventor filed during the course of employment or within one year subsequent to the termination thereof shall be deemed to be an invention made or conceived by him during the course of his employment by the Company and assignable to the Company hereunder, unless the Employee establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that such invention was made or conceived by him subsequent to termination of his employment hereunder. At the Company's request (during or after the term of this Agreement) and expense, the Employee will promptly execute a specific assignment of title to the Company, and perform any other acts reasonably necessary to implement the foregoing assignment. 16. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of: (a) Any successors or assigns of the Company, whether by way of a merger or consolidation, or liquidation of the Company, or by way of the Company selling all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to a successor entity; however, in the event of the assignment by the Company of this Agreement, the Company shall nevertheless remain liable and obligated to the Employee in accordance with the terms hereof; and (b) The Employee's estate, his executors, adminis- trators, heirs and beneficiaries. 17. Notices. Any notice or other communication required under this Agreement shall be in writing, shall be deemed to have been given and received when delivered in person, or, if mailed, shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in the United States mail, first class, registered or certified, return receipt requested, with proper postage prepaid, and shall be deemed to have been received on the third business day thereafter, and shall be addressed as follows: If to the Company, addressed to: Ogden Corporation Two Pennsylvania Plaza New York, New York 10121 Attention: General Counsel If to the Employee, addressed to: David L. Hahn 19 Janes Lane Lloyd Harbor, New York 11743 or such other address as to which any party hereto may have notified the other in writing. 18. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 19. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire arrangement or understanding between the Employee and the Company relating to the employment of the Employee by the Company. No provision of the Agreement may be modified or amended except by any instrument in writing by or for both parties hereto. All references to paragraphs refer to paragraphs of this Agreement. 20. Waiver. Failure of either party hereto to insist upon strict compliance by the other party with any term, covenant or condition hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment or failure to insist upon strict compliance of any right or power hereunder at any one or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any other time or times. 21. Assignment by Employee. The rights and benefits of the Employee under this Agreement are personal to him and no such right or benefit shall be subject to voluntary or involuntary alienation, assignment or transfer; provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph 21 shall preclude the Employee from designating a beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive any benefit payable on his death. 22. Severability. If for any reason any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement not held so invalid, and all other provisions shall to the full extent consistent with law continue in full force and effect. If any such provision shall be held invalid in part, such invalidity shall in no way affect the remaining portion of such provision not held so invalid, and the remaining portion of such provision, together with all other provisions of this Agreement, shall to the full extent consistent with law continue in full force and effect. 23. Headings. The headings of paragraphs are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not control the meaning or interpretation of any of the provisions of this Agreement. OGDEN CORPORATION /s/David L. Hahn By: /s/R. Richard Ablon David L. Hahn - Employee President and Chief Executive Officer EX-11 5 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE EXHIBIT 11 OGDEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES DETAIL OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
1995 1994 1993 NUMBER OF SHARES USED FOR COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE: Average number of common shares 49,385,000 43,610,000 43,378,000 NUMBER OF SHARES USED FOR COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE ASSUMING FULL DILUTION: Average number of common shares 49,385,000 43,610,000 43,378,000 Issuable for options-treasury stock method Shares issuable for conversion of preferred stock 306,000 329,000 356,000 Shares issuable for conversion of debentures 42,000 Number of shares used for computation 49,691,000 43,939,000 43,776,000 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES: Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles $ 7,444,000 $67,826,000 $62,130,000 Add (deduct): Adjustments arising from minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries 10,000 32,000 Dividends on Ogden preferred stock (171,000) (184,000) (199,000) Consolidated income applicable to Ogden common stock $ 7,273,000 $67,652,000 $61,963,000 Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles ($1,520,000)($ 5,340,000) COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARE ASSUMING FULL DILUTION: Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles $ 7,444,000 $67,826,000 $62,130,000 Add: Adjustments arising from minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries 10,000 32,000 Debenture interest (net of applicable income taxes) 16,000 Consolidated income applicable to Ogden common stock $ 7,444,000 $67,836,000 $62,178,000 Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles ($1,520,000) ($5,340,000) Note: Current options result in less than three percent dilution with the expectation of continuing at less than three percent dilution.
EX-13 6 FINANCIALS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries
December 31, 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 (In thousands of dollars, except per-share amounts) Total Revenues $2,184,993 $2,104,547 $2,035,860 $1,766,443 $1,566,579 Income (Loss) From: Continuing operations 7,444 67,826 62,130 60,767 57,604 Discontinued operations (13,880) Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (1,520) (5,340) (5,186) Net income 7,444 66,306 56,790 55,581 43,724 Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: Continuing operations 0.15 1.55 1.43 1.41 1.33 Discontinued operations (0.32) Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (0.03) (0.12) (0.12) Total 0.15 1.52 1.31 1.29 1.01 Total Assets 3,652,671 3,644,886 3,340,729 3,187,826 2,846,254 Shareholders' Equity 546,978 596,818 486,267 481,084 478,122 Shareholders' Equity Per Common Share 11.04 12.21 11.15 11.11 11.09
Net income in 1995 reflects a net after-tax charge of $48.9 million, or $.99 per share. (See Notes 21 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.) Net income in 1993 was reduced by $.08 per share, reflecting the retroactive effect of the increased Federal income tax rate that was enacted in August 1993 on the prior years' deferred income tax balances. Total Revenues (expressed in millions of dollars) Year - Revenues 1991 - 1,567 1992 - 1,766 1993 - 2,036 1994 - 2,105 1995 - 2,185 [presented as a bar chart] Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest (expressed in millions of dollars) Year - income as described above 1991 - 104 1992 - 113 1993 - 126 1994 - 139 1995 - 41 [presented as bar chart] Total Assets (expressed in millions of dollars) Year - Assets 1991 - 2,846 1992 - 3,188 1993 - 3,341 1994 - 3,645 1995 - 3,653 [presented as bar chart] Reflects an unusual net pretax charge of $69.3 million. (See Notes 21 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.) Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Operations The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Corporation's Financial Statements and notes thereto. Operations: Revenues for 1995 were $80,400,000 higher than the comparable period of 1994, primarily due to increased revenues of $67,300,000 in Aviation Services reflecting the acquisition in 1995 of an air range and pilot training systems company, four airline catering kitchens in the Canary and Balearic islands, and in late 1994, an airline cargo operation at Heathrow Airport in the United Kingdom; $56,100,000 in Entertainment Services, chiefly associated with new contracts at Wrigley Field, the Target Center, General Motors Place, amphitheaters, as well as the start-up of operations in the United Kingdom; $39,100,000 in Technology Services due to increased customer activity and new contracts in the Atlantic Design operations, as well as the start-up of operations in Ireland; $35,400,000 in waste-to-energy services, primarily due to revenues generated at the Lee County (Florida), Onondaga County (New York), and Montgomery County (Maryland) facilities, which commenced commercial operations in December 1994 and March and August 1995, respectively; $31,100,000 in Independent Power Services income, primarily reflecting the acquisition of the SIGC facility in December 1994; and $17,500,000 in Facility Services, reflecting several new contracts and increased customer activity. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $143,200,000 in construction revenues due primarily to the completion of the Union County (New Jersey) and Lee County facilities in May and December 1994, respectively; from reduced construction activity at the Montgomery County facility; and from a reduction of $26,100,000 in revenues from the gain on the sale of limited partnership interests and related tax benefits in 1994, which did not recur in 1995. Consolidated operating income for 1995 was $92,400,000 lower than 1994, primarily reflecting the effects of the early adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of"; restructuring initiatives; and other unusual losses and costs totaling $82,800,000, which were reduced by a gain of $13,500,000 from the sale of a noncore business, for a net charge of $69,300,000. The charges principally related to the early adoption of SFAS No. 121, amounting to $45,300,000, included anticipated losses on the sale of noncore businesses of $32,800,000; costs of restructuring initiatives of $8,200,000; and an impairment loss of $12,200,000 for the write-down of certain deferred charges relating to a previously awarded contract not expected to be completed, unusual waste-to-energy repair costs, and an adjustment of inventory balances resulting from a physical inventory. Also included in the second quarter of 1995 was a charge of $17,100,000 relating to the write-off of accounts receivable of $10,300,000, disposal of inventory of $3,900,000, and $2,900,000 of costs related to curtailment of operations all at Ogden Communications, Inc. Of the net charge of $69,300,000, $56,900,000 was applicable to the Services segment and $12,400,000 pertained to Projects. (Also see Notes 21 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.) Before the charges discussed above, consolidated operating income for 1995 would have been $23,100,000 lower than 1994, primarily reflecting lower income of $26,100,000 due to the gain on the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of the Onondaga County facility in 1994, which did not recur in 1995; $10,500,000 in Entertainment Services, primarily reflecting development costs in Europe, lower income from the Ottawa Palladium, and costs associated with the acquisition of Firehole Entertainment Corp.; $6,800,000 at Ogden Environmental, primarily due to reduced activity in the environmental laboratory area; and $3,200,000 in Water/Wastewater Treatment Services, its first year of operations, primarily reflecting continuing development costs. These decreases were partially offset by increased income of $9,000,000 in construction activities, primarily reflecting increased activity on the Detroit (Michigan) facility and an early completion bonus on the Montgomery County facility; $5,600,000 in Independent Power, primarily due to the acquisition of SIGC in 1994; and $2,600,000 in waste-to-energy service income (service revenues less operating costs and debt service charges), primarily reflecting increased income from the full commercial operations of the Lee County, Onondaga County, and Montgomery County facilities, as well as enhanced performance at the Honolulu (Hawaii) facility, offset in part by lower income at the Union County and Hartford (Connecticut) facilities resulting from lower margins in 1995 than 1994 due to a contract renegotiation. Debt service charges for 1995 increased $11,500,000 over 1994 and included $7,000,000 in waste-to-energy services, chiefly associated with the Onondaga County facility being in full commercial operation during 1995, and $4,500,000 for project debt assumed as part of the SIGC acquisition. Three interest rate swap agreements entered into as hedges against interest rate exposure on three series of adjustable-rate project debt resulted in lower debt service of $230,000 in 1995 and additional debt service of $1,400,000 in 1994. The effect of these swap agreements on the weighted-average interest rate was not significant. Selling, administrative, and general expenses increased $4,800,000, primarily reflecting increased marketing and development expenses. The effective income tax rate for 1995 was 84.5%, compared with 44.4% for 1994. This increase of 40.1% was primarily due to the effect of adopting SFAS No. 121, which included the write-down of goodwill for which the Corporation will not receive tax benefits, as well as higher foreign tax rates and certain nondeductible foreign losses. Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contains a more detailed reconciliation of the variances from the Federal statutory income tax rate. Interest income for 1995 was $2,400,000 higher than 1994, primarily reflecting interest earned on loans made in the second half of 1994. Interest expense was $6,800,000 higher, chiefly associated with higher interest rates on variable-rate debt, higher borrowings, and a net increase of $1,412,000 in interest costs on two interest rate swap agreements covering notional amounts of $100,000,000 each. One swap agreement expired in March 1994. The other swap agreement expires on December 16, 1998. These swap agreements were entered into in order to convert Ogden's fixed-rate $100,000,000, 9.25% debentures into variable-rate debt. During 1995, Ogden paid $603,000 on the remaining swap, while in 1994, Ogden received $809,000 on the two swaps. The effect of these swap agreements on the weighted-average interest rate was not significant. Revenues for 1994 were $68,700,000 higher than the comparable period of 1993, primarily due to increased revenues of $26,100,000, reflecting the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of the Onondaga County facility in 1994; $26,900,000 in waste-to-energy service revenues due primarily to increased revenues at the Detroit, Hartford, and Honolulu facilities acquired in January 1993, revenues from the start-up and full operation of the Union County facility, and the operation of the transfer station at Montgomery County; $24,100,000 in Aviation Services, reflecting the start-up of operations in Brazil and increased activity in Venezuela, Chile, and European operations; $30,200,000 in Technology Services, primarily in the Atlantic Design operations and the Systems Engineering group, reflecting several new contracts and increased customer activity; $18,500,000 in Environmental Services due primarily to increased activity in the consulting group (these increases were partially offset by lower revenues of $35,300,000 in construction revenues, primarily due to reduced construction activity at the Union County facility completed in May 1994 and the Lee County facility completed in December 1994, which reductions were partially offset by increased activity at the Montgomery County facility); and $24,800,000 in the Facility Management Services group due primarily to the loss of several building cleaning contracts and certain utility maintenance contracts as well as reduced customer activity. Consolidated operating income for 1994 was $15,400,000 higher than 1993, primarily due to increased income of $26,100,000, reflecting the gain on the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of the Onondaga County facility in 1994; $3,500,000 in Technology Services, primarily due to several new contracts and increased customer activity in the Atlantic Design operations; $2,600,000 in construction income (construction revenues less construction costs), primarily due to increased activity at the Montgomery County facility; $1,600,000 in waste-to-energy service income (service revenues less operating costs and debt service charges), primarily associated with the start-up and full commercial operations of the Union County facility, partially offset by additional maintenance work at the Detroit facility; and a provision of $8,000,000 for the potential write-offs of deferred proposal costs on property for which construction had not commenced and for litigation and contractor settlements. These increases were partially offset by lower income of $5,000,000 in Facility Management Services, reflecting the loss of several building cleaning and utility maintenance contracts; $2,500,000 in Aviation Services, primarily reflecting lower margins in the in-flight catering area and a loss on the devaluation of the Mexican peso, partially offset by increased earnings in overseas ground services operations; and $800,000 in Entertainment Services, primarily reflecting the effect of the baseball strike and hockey lockout and start-up costs of overseas operations, partially offset by the opening of Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim and several new customer contracts. Debt service charges increased $1,700,000. This increase was due to higher interest rates resulting from the conversion of one series of adjustable-rate project debt to fixed rates in 1993 and higher interest rates resulting from two fixed interest rate swap agreements entered into as hedges against two series of adjustable-rate project debt. The swap agreements resulted in additional interest expense of $1,400,000 and $1,500,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively. The effect of these swap agreements on the weighted-average interest rate was not significant. Interest income for 1994 was $3,500,000 higher than in 1993, primarily reflecting interest earned on loans made in the third quarter of 1994 and higher interest rates on earnings from investments. Interest expense for 1994 was $3,400,000 higher than in 1993, primarily reflecting higher borrowings and a reduction of $2,600,000 in income received on two variable-rate interest rate swap agreements covering notional amounts of $100,000,000 each. One swap agreement expired in March 1994. The other swap agreement expires on December 16, 1998. These swap agreements were entered into as a hedge against Ogden's $100,000,000, 9.25% debentures. Income received on these swap agreements reduced interest expense by $800,000 and $3,400,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively. The effect of these swap agreements on the weighted-average interest rate was not significant. The effective income tax rate for 1994 was 44.4%, compared with 45.0% for 1993. This decrease was primarily due to a charge of $4,100,000 in 1993, reflecting the adjustment of prior years' deferred income tax balances to the new 35% rate enacted in 1994 in accordance with SFAS No. 109, offset by investment tax credits of $3,600,000 in 1994 due to the recapture of investment tax credits relating to the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of the Onondaga County facility. Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contains a more detailed reconciliation of the variances from the Federal statutory income tax rate. Capital Investments and Commitments: During 1995, capital investments amounted to $92,800,000, of which $26,800,000, inclusive of restricted funds transferred from funds held in trust, was for Projects' waste-to-energy operations and $66,000,000 was for normal replacement and growth in Services' and Projects' operations. At December 31, 1995, capital commitments amounted to $53,400,000 for normal replacement, modernization, and growth in Services' ($42,100,000) and Projects' ($11,300,000) operations. In addition, compliance with recently promulgated standards and guidelines under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 may require additional capital expenditures of $30,000,000 during the next four years. Ogden and certain of its subsidiaries have issued or are party to performance bonds and guarantees and related contractual obligations undertaken mainly pursuant to agreements to construct and operate certain waste-to-energy, entertainment, and other facilities. In the normal course of business, they are involved in legal proceedings in which damages and other remedies are sought. Management does not expect that these contractual obligations, legal proceedings, or any other contingent obligations incurred in the normal course of business will have a material adverse effect on Ogden's Consolidated Financial Statements. During 1994, a subsidiary of the Corporation entered into a 30-year facility management contract pursuant to which it agreed to advance funds to a customer, if necessary, to assist refinancing senior secured debt incurred in connection with construction of the facility. Such refinancing requirements are not expected to exceed $75,000,000 at maturity of the senior secured debt, which is expected to be on or about March 1, 2001. In addition, at December 31, 1995, the Corporation has guaranteed indebtedness of $6,200,000 of an affiliate and principal tenant of this customer. The Corporation expects this guaranty will increase to approximately $16,100,000 in 1996. Ogden continues as guarantor of surety bonds and letters of credit totaling approximately $19,200,000 on behalf of International Terminal Operating Co. Inc. and has guaranteed borrowings of certain customers amounting to approximately $29,200,000. Management does not expect that these arrangements will have a material adverse effect on Ogden's Consolidated Financial Statements. Liquidity/Cash Flow: Net cash provided from operating activities was $94,300,000 lower, primarily reflecting lower net income of $58,900,000; reductions of $20,400,000 in billings in excess of costs and estimated profit on uncompleted contracts resulting from the timing of billings and construction activity on the Montgomery County facility; a decrease of $17,300,000 from the timing of retention payments relating to the construction on the waste-to-energy facilities; payment in 1995 of $8,300,000 relating to a construction contract adjustment on the Babylon (New York) facility; and decreases of $13,200,000 in Federal and State taxes payable, offset, in part, by increases in the effect of noncash operating expenses. Net cash used in investing activities was $106,100,000 lower than 1994, primarily reflecting lower investments in waste-to-energy facilities of $49,900,000 due to the completion of construction of the Onondaga County facility in early 1995; a reduction of $56,400,000 in the repurchase of marketable securities held for sale; lower costs of acquisitions of $16,900,000; and a decrease of $18,300,000 in other receivables reflecting lower noncurrent loans made to customers. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $23,000,000 in other capital expenditures, principally in the Entertainment Services business, reflecting increased activity, and $28,300,000 in other investments, reflecting increased equity investments in Argentina and other investee affiliates. Net cash used in financing activities increased $40,500,000, primarily reflecting a decrease of $42,800,000 in amounts of restricted funds utilized due to the completion of the Onondaga County facility; increased dividends of $5,000,000 related to shares issued in connection with the acquisition of the minority interest in Ogden Projects, Inc., in late 1994; and increases of $8,300,000 in payments of other debt. These increases in cash used in financing activities were partially offset by increases of $9,400,000 in other borrowings. Increased borrowings for waste-to-energy facilities of $96,800,000 represent amounts borrowed, net of issuance and related costs, in connection with the refinancing of approximately $92,500,000 of project debt, which is reflected under the heading "Payment of Debt." Exclusive of changes in waste-to-energy facility construction activities, the Corporation's various types of contracts are not expected to have a material effect on liquidity. Debt service associated with project debt, which is an explicit component of a client community's obligation under its service agreement, is paid as it is billed and collected. Cash required for investing and financing activities is expected to be satisfied from operating activities; available funds, including short-term investments; proceeds from the sale of noncore businesses; and the Corporation's unused credit facilities to the extent needed. At December 31, 1995, the Corporation had $96,800,000 in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities and unused revolving credit lines of $167,600,000. Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Selected Financial Data
December 31, 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 (In thousands of dollars, except per-share amounts) Total Revenues $2,184,993 $2,104,547 $2,035,860 $1,766,443 $1,566,579 Income (Loss) From: Continuing operations 7,444 67,826 62,130 60,767 57,604 Discontinued operations (13,880) Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (1,520) (5,340) (5,186) Net income 7,444 66,306 56,790 55,581 43,724 Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: Continuing operations 0.15 1.55 1.43 1.41 1.33 Discontinued operations (0.32) Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (0.03) (0.12) (0.12) Total 0.15 1.52 1.31 1.29 1.01 Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share Assuming Full Dilution: Continuing operations 0.15 1.54 1.42 1.40 1.32 Discontinued operations (0.32) Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (0.03) (0.12) (0.12) Total 0.15 1.51 1.30 1.28 1.00 Total Assets 3,652,671 3,644,886 3,340,729 3,187,826 2,846,254 Long-Term Obligations 2,044,186 2,047,031 1,946,547 2,003,091 1,781,576 Shareholders' Equity 546,978 596,818 486,267 481,084 478,122 Shareholders' Equity Per Common Share 11.04 12.21 11.15 11.11 11.09 Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
Net income in 1995 reflects a net after-tax charge of $48.9 million, or $.99 per share. (See Notes 21 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.) Net income in 1993 was reduced by $.08 per share, reflecting the retroactive effect of the increased Federal income tax rate that was enacted in August 1993 on the prior years' deferred income tax balances. Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Statements of Consolidated Income
For the years ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Service revenues $1,563,748,000 $1,408,710,000 $1,364,080,000 Net sales 551,345,000 456,586,000 423,329,000 Construction revenues 69,900,000 213,125,000 248,451,000 Gain on sale of limited partnership interests 26,126,000 Total revenues 2,184,993,000 2,104,547,000 2,035,860,000 Operating costs and expenses 1,318,847,000 1,127,348,000 1,077,102,000 Costs of goods sold 518,457,000 405,190,000 376,553,000 Construction costs 41,756,000 194,022,000 231,956,000 Selling, administrative, and general expenses 144,714,000 135,852,000 125,219,000 Debt service charges 111,850,000 100,358,000 98,664,000 Total costs and expenses 2,135,624,000 1,962,770,000 1,909,494,000 Consolidated operating income 49,369,000 141,777,000 126,366,000 Equity in net income of investees and joint ventures 6,866,000 7,683,000 6,895,000 Interest income 15,126,000 12,709,000 9,181,000 Interest expense (30,491,000) (23,655,000) (20,289,000) Other income (deductions) net (344,000) 850,000 3,348,000 Income before income taxes and minority interests 40,526,000 139,364,000 125,501,000 Less: income taxes 34,237,000 61,883,000 56,526,000 minority interests (1,155,000) 9,655,000 6,845,000 Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles 7,444,000 67,826,000 62,130,000 Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (net of income taxes of $1,100,000 and $3,710,000 for 1994 and 1993, respectively) (1,520,000) (5,340,000) Net income $7,444,000 $66,306,000 $56,790,000 Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles $0.15 1.55 $1.43 Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (0.03) (0.12) Total $0.15 $1.52 $1.31 Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share Assuming Full Dilution: Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles $0.15 $1.54 $1.42 Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles (0.03) (0.12) Total $0.15 $1.51 $1.30 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 1995 1994 ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $96,782,000 $117,359,000 Marketable securities available for sale 13,939,000 86,676,000 Restricted funds held in trust 95,238,000 110,295,000 Receivables (less allowances: 1995, $37,039,000 and 1994, $32,783,000) 597,644,000 574,184,000 Deferred income taxes 31,979,000 26,451,000 Other 90,784,000 80,932,000 Total current assets 926,366,000 995,897,000 Property, plant, and equipment net 1,879,179,000 1,884,774,000 Restricted funds held in trust 218,551,000 213,999,000 Unbilled service and other receivables 191,753,000 171,441,000 Unamortized contract acquisition costs 148,342,000 133,172,000 Goodwill and other intangible assets 87,596,000 100,416,000 Other assets 200,884,000 145,187,000 Total Assets $3,652,671,000 $3,644,886,000 Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Liabilities: Current Liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt $4,680,000 $3,483,000 Current portion of project debt 55,774,000 45,279,000 Dividends payable 15,294,000 13,637,000 Accounts payable 114,648,000 93,362,000 Federal and foreign income taxes payable 10,141,000 Accrued expenses, etc. 291,421,000 320,154,000 Deferred income 28,702,000 26,843,000 Total current liabilities 510,519,000 512,899,000 Long-term debt 344,333,000 304,393,000 Project debt 1,551,203,000 1,593,988,000 Deferred income taxes 310,400,000 281,065,000 Other liabilities 230,558,000 196,305,000 Minority interests 10,030,000 10,768,000 Convertible subordinated debentures 148,650,000 148,650,000 Total Liabilities 3,105,693,000 3,048,068,000 Shareholders' Equity: Serial cumulative convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; authorized, 4,000,000 shares; shares outstanding: 49,469 in 1995 and 53,503 in 1994, net of treasury shares of 29,820 in 1995 and 1994, respectively 50,000 54,000 Common stock, par value $.50 per share; authorized, 80,000,000 shares; shares outstanding: 49,467,781 in 1995 and 48,777,092 in 1994, net of treasury shares of 3,735,123 and 3,864,123 in 1995 and 1994, respectively 24,734,000 24,388,000 Capital surplus 197,921,000 194,496,000 Earned surplus 328,047,000 381,864,000 Cumulative translation adjustment net (2,657,000) (1,399,000) Pension liability adjustment (760,000) (441,000) Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale (357,000) (2,144,000) Total Shareholders' Equity 546,978,000 596,818,000 Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity 3,652,671,000 $3,644,886,000 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Statements of Shareholders' Equity
For the years ended December 31,. 1995 1994 1993 Shares Amounts Shares Amounts Shares Amounts Serial Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Par Value $1.00 Per Share; Authorized, 4,000,000 Shares: Balance at beginning of year 83,323 $ 84,000 87,017 $ 87,000 91,714 $ 92,000 Shares converted into common stock (4,034) (4,000) (3,694) (3,000) (4,697) (5,000) Total 79,289 80,000 83,323 84,000 87,017 87,000 Treasury shares (29,820) (30,000) (29,820) (30,000) (29,820) (30,000) Balance at end of year (aggregate involuntary liquidation vlaue 1995, $996,800) 49,469 50,000 53,503 54,000 57,197 57,000 Common Stock, Par Value $.50 Per Share; Authorized, 80,000,000 Shares: Balance at beginning of year 52,641,215 26,320,000 47,472,245 23,736,000 47,287,048 23,643,000 Acquisition of Ogden Projects, Inc., minority interests 5,139,939 2,570,000 Exercise of stock options, less common stock utilized 10,735 6,000 6,977 3,000 65,389 33,000 Shares used for pooling of interests 526,869 264,000 Conversion of preferred shares 24,085 12,000 22,054 11,000 28,046 14,000 Conversion of debentures 91,762 46,000 Total 53,202,904 26,602,000 52,641,215 26,320,000 47,472,245 23,736,000 Treasury shares at beginning of year 3,864,123 1,932,000 3,973,123 1,986,000 4,096,123 2,048,000 Exercise of stock options (129,000) (64,000) (109,000) (54,000) (123,000) (62,000) Treasury shares at end of year 3,735,123 1,868,000 3,864,123 1,932,000 3,973,123 1,986,000 Balance at end of year 49,467,781 24,734,000 48,777,092 24,388,000 43,499,122 21,750,000 Capital Surplus: Balance at beginning of year 194,496,000 100,223,000 94,659,000 Acquisition of Ogden Projects, Inc., minority interests 91,876,000 Exercise of stock options, less common stock utilized 2,620,000 2,164,000 3,640,000 Arising from pooling of interests 813,000 Capital transactions of subsidiary companies net 241,000 696,000 Conversion of preferred shares (8,000) (8,000) (10,000) Conversion of debentures 1,238,000 Balance at end of year 197,921,000 194,496,000 100,223,000 Earned Surplus: Balance at beginning of year 381,864,000 370,231,000 367,908,000 Net income 7,444,000 66,306,000 56,790,000 Total 389,308,000 436,537,000 424,698,000 Preferred dividends per share 1995, 1994, and 1993, $3.35 171,000 184,000 199,000 Common dividends per share 1995, 1994, and 1993, $1.25 61,090,000 54,489,000 54,268,000 Total dividends 61,261,000 54,673,000 54,467,000 Balance at end of year 328,047,000 381,864,000 370,231,000 Cumulative Translation Adjustment Net (2,657,000) (1,399,000) (4,639,000) Pension Liability Adjustment (760,000) (441,000) (928,000) Net Unrealized Loss on Securities Available For Sale (357,000) (2,144,000) Net Unrealized Loss on Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities (427,000) Total Shareholders' Equity $546,978,000 $596,818,000 $486,267,000 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Net income $ 7,444,000 $ 66,306,000 $ 56,790,000 Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: Depreciation and amortization 109,604,000 90,545,000 85,643,000 Deferred income taxes 18,153,000 37,704,000 47,598,000 Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles 1,520,000 5,340,000 Long-lived asset write-downs 45,260,000 Other 11,986,000 38,390,000 19,596,000 Management of Operating Assets and Liabilities: Decrease (Increase) in Assets: Accounts receivable (43,852,000) (63,527,000) (56,180,000) Other assets (68,235,000) (61,595,000) (36,772,000) Increase (Decrease) in Liabilities: Accounts payable 8,472,000 3,153,000 8,087,000 Accrued expenses 1,920,000 17,629,000 38,481,000 Deferred income 3,861,000 1,222,000 (1,152,000) Other liabilities (22,369,000) 35,218,000 24,315,000 Net cash provided by operating activities 72,244,000 166,565,000 191,746,000 Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Entities purchased, net of cash acquired (15,474,000) (32,404,000) (54,224,000) Proceeds from sale of marketable securities available for sale 71,364,000 63,545,000 88,775,000 Purchase of marketable securities available for sale (56,418,000) (83,084,000) Proceeds from sale of business 18,000,000 12,516,000 Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment 5,402,000 2,824,000 8,185,000 Investments in waste-to-energy facilities (26,827,000) (76,686,000) (77,777,000) Other capital expenditures (65,999,000) (42,961,000) (38,423,000) Decrease (increase) in other receivables (2,809,000) (21,127,000) (7,920,000) Other (27,983,000) 268,000 7,111,000 Net cash used in investing activities (44,326,000) (150,443,000) (157,357,000) Cash Flows From Financing Activities: Borrowings for waste-to-energy facilities 96,822,000 Decrease (increase) in funds held in trust 9,514,000 52,337,000 60,347,000 Other new debt 40,948,000 31,589,000 680,000 Payment of debt (139,205,000) (38,455,000) (49,973,000) Dividends paid (59,604,000) (54,630,000) (54,347,000) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 2,691,000 3,524,000 5,366,000 Other 630,000 (2,043,000) (3,488,000) Net cash used by financing activities (48,204,000) (7,678,000) (41,415,000) Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (291,000) (182,000) (334,000) Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (20,577,000) 8,262,000 (7,360,000) Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 117,359,000 109,097,000 116,457,000 Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $ 96,782,000 $117,359,000 $109,097,000 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation, Combinations, etc.: The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Ogden Corporation and its subsidiaries (Ogden). Companies in which Ogden has equity investments of 50% or less are accounted for using the "Equity Method," if appropriate. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. In December 1995, Ogden issued 526,869 shares of common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of Firehole Entertainment Corp. (Firehole). This transaction was accounted for as a pooling of interests. The accompanying financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to include the accounts of Firehole, since the amounts did not have a significant effect on prior period reported results or balances. In addition, in other transactions accounted for as purchases in 1995, Ogden acquired the shares of Applied Data Technology, Inc., an air range and pilot training systems company, and four airline catering kitchens in the Canary and Balearic islands for a total cost of $15,474,000. The operations of these companies have been included in the accompanying financial statements from dates of acquisition. If Ogden had acquired these companies at January 1, 1994, total revenues, net income, and earnings per share would have been $2,185,000,000, $7,346,000, and $.15 for 1995 and $2,157,000,000, $65,255,000, and $1.49 for 1994. Ogden also acquired a 50% interest in Metropolitan Entertainment, Inc.; a 50% interest in IFC, an Australian entertainment company; as well as a 50% interest in SFTA, a Turkish airport handling company. On December 29, 1994, in a transaction accounted for as a purchase, Ogden acquired the minority interest in Ogden Projects, Inc. (OPI), for .84 of an Ogden common share for each OPI share. Ogden issued 5,139,939 shares of common stock valued at $18.375 per share for a total purchase price of $94,446,000. The cost of other 1994 acquisitions was $32,404,000. Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments having original maturities of three months or less. Marketable Securities: Ogden adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," at January 1, 1994. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, prior years' financial statements have not been restated to reflect the change in accounting method. Under this Statement, the Corporation's marketable securities have been classified as available for sale and are recorded at current market value with an offsetting adjustment to Shareholders' Equity. The adoption of this Statement did not have a significant effect on the Corporation's consolidated financial position. At December 31, 1993, marketable securities were carried at the lower of cost or market. Net unrealized losses on noncurrent marketable equity securities were charged to Shareholders' Equity (see Note 2). Contracts and Revenue Recognition: Service revenues primarily include only the fees for cost-plus contracts and the gross billings for fixed-fee and other types of contracts. Both the service revenues and operating expenses exclude reimbursed expenditures of $450,696,000, $439,195,000, and $432,891,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. Subsidiaries engaged in governmental contracting recognize revenues from cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts on the basis of direct costs incurred plus indirect expenses and the allocable portion of the fixed fee. Revenues under time and material contracts are recorded at the contracted rates as the labor hours and other direct costs are incurred. Revenues under fixed-price contracts are recognized on the basis of the estimated percentage of completion of services rendered. Service revenues also include the fees earned under contracts to operate and maintain the waste-to-energy facilities and to service the facilities' debt, with additional fees earned based on excess tonnage processed and energy generation. Long-term unbilled service receivables related to waste-to-energy operations are discounted in recognizing the present value for services performed currently. Such unbilled receivables amounted to $108,953,000 and $92,522,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Subsidiaries engaged in long-term construction contracting record income on the percentage-of-completion method of accounting and recognize income as the work progresses. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized as soon as they become known. Revenues include the gain on sales of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of waste-to-energy facilities. Inventories: Inventories, consisting primarily of finished goods, are recorded principally at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. Property, Plant, and Equipment: Property, plant, and equipment is stated at cost. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range generally from five years for machinery and equipment to 50 years for waste-to-energy facilities. Accelerated depreciation is generally used for Federal income tax purposes Leasehold improvements are amortized by the straight-line method over the terms of the leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements as appropriate. Landfills are amortized based on the quantities deposited into each landfill compared to the total estimated capacity of such landfill. Property, plant, and equipment is periodically reviewed to determine recoverability by comparing the carrying value to expected future cash flows. Contract Acquisition Costs: Costs associated with the acquisition of specific contracts are amortized over their respective terms. Bond Issuance Costs: Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of revenue bonds are amortized over the terms of the respective debt issues. Deferred Charges on Projects: Costs incurred in connection with certain project development efforts are deferred until the award of the related project is determined. Costs on awarded projects are deferred until the commencement of construction, at which time they are either capitalized in property, plant, and equipment for privately owned facilities or charged to construction costs for municipally owned facilities. Costs associated with projects that are no longer under consideration are charged to operating costs. Restricted Funds: Restricted funds represent proceeds from the financing of waste-to-energy facilities and the operations of a waste-to-energy facility and a power plant. Funds are held in trust and released as expenditures are made or upon satisfaction of conditions provided under the respective trust agreements. Interest Rate Swap Agreements: Amounts received or paid relating to swap agreements during the year are credited or charged to interest expense. Goodwill: Goodwill acquired subsequent to 1970 is being amortized by the straight-line method over periods ranging from 15 to 40 years. Goodwill acquired prior to 1970 is not being amortized. Goodwill is periodically reviewed to determine recoverability by comparing its carrying value to expected future cash flows of the businesses to which it relates. Retirement Plans: The Corporation and certain subsidiaries have several retirement plans covering all salaried and hourly employees. Certain subsidiaries also contribute to multiemployer plans for unionized hourly employees that cover, among other benefits, pensions and postemployment health care. Ogden adopted SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions," as of January 1, 1993. The effect of adopting SFAS No. 106 is shown in the accompanying financial statements for 1993 as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and is reflected as a charge to income of $5,340,000 (see Note 19). Ogden adopted SFAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," as of January 1, 1994. The effect of adopting SFAS No. 112 is shown as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and is reflected as a charge to income of $1,520,000 in 1994. Income Taxes: Ogden files a consolidated Federal income tax return, which includes all eligible United States subsidiary companies. Foreign subsidiaries are taxed according to regulations existing in the countries in which they do business. Provision has not been made for United States income taxes on distributions, which may be received from foreign subsidiaries, that would be substantially offset by foreign tax credits. Investment credits are accounted for by the "flow-through" method, and provisions for income taxes have been reduced by the amount of investment credits earned. Long-Lived Assets: Ogden adopted SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of," in the fourth quarter of 1995. The effect of adopting SFAS No. 121 resulted in an after-tax charge of $34,700,000 in 1995 (see Note 21). Reclassification: The accompanying financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 1995 presentation. 2. Investments in Marketable Securities Available for Sale Ogden adopted SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," at January 1, 1994, and has classified its marketable securities as available for sale and recorded them at current market value with an offsetting adjustment to Shareholders' Equity. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, prior years' financial statements have not been restated to reflect this change in accounting. At December 31, 1993, marketable securities were carried at the lower of cost or market. Net unrealized losses on noncurrent marketable equity securities were charged to Shareholders' Equity. At December 31, 1993, noncurrent marketable securities having a cost of $5,549,000 and a market value of $4,846,000 resulted in an unrealized loss of $703,000, which was offset by deferred income taxes of $276,000. The net valuation allowance of $427,000 was charged to Shareholders' Equity. At December 31, 1995 and 1994, marketable equity and debt securities available for current operations are classified in the balance sheet as current assets while securities held for noncurrent uses, such as nonqualified pension liabilities and a deferred compensation plan, are classified as long-term assets. Marketable securities at December 31, 1995 and 1994 (expressed in thousands of dollars), include the following:
1995 1994 Market Market Value Cost Value Cost Classified as Current Assets: United States government securities $ 1,652 $ 1,736 $ 1,567 $ 1,736 Tax-exempt municipal bonds 6,214 6,374 52,158 53,295 Mortgage-backed securities 5,560 5,727 31,146 31,669 Other securities 513 360 1,805 1,954 Total current 13,939 14,197 86,676 88,654 Classified as Noncurrent Assets: United States government securities 236 236 Mutual and bond funds 16,538 17,037 12,174 14,122 Total noncurrent 16,538 17,037 12,410 14,358 Total $30,477 $31,234 $99,086 $103,012
The United States government securities mature April 15, 1998; $3,000,000, $2,200,000, and $1,000,000 of the tax-exempt municipal bonds mature on July 1, 1998, January 1, 2006, and October 1, 2013, respectively; $400,000, $2,300,000, $1,500,000, and $900,000 of the mortgage-backed securities mature July 1, 2019, June 25, 2020, August 25, 2021, and March 29, 2030, respectively. Unrealized holding losses at December 31, 1995 and 1994, amounted to $757,000 and $3,926,000, respectively. Deferred tax benefits on these losses amounted to $400,000 and $1,782,000, respectively, resulting in net charges of $357,000 and $2,144,000, respectively, to Shareholders' Equity. Proceeds and realized gains and losses from the sales of securities classified as available for sale for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, were $71,364,000, $235,000, and $1,749,000 and $63,545,000, $256,700, and $476,700, respectively. For the purpose of determining realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. 3. Unbilled Service and Other Receivables Unbilled service and other receivables (expressed in thousands of dollars) consisted of the following:
1995 1994 Unbilled service receivables $108,953 $92,522 Notes receivable 82,800 78,919 Total $191,753 $171,441
Unbilled service receivables are for services performed currently for municipalities that are due by contract at a later date and are discounted in recognizing the present value of such services. Long-term notes receivable primarily represent loans made to the owners of entertainment and sports facilities. Current unbilled service receivables amounted to $34,482,000 and $32,240,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. 4. Restricted Funds Held in Trust Funds held by trustees from proceeds received from the financing of waste-to-energy facilities and the operations of a waste-to-energy facility and a power plant are segregated principally for the construction of the facilities; debt service reserves for payment of principal and interest on project debt; lease reserves for lease payments under operating leases; capitalized interest for payment of interest during the construction period; and deposits of revenues received. Such funds are invested principally in United States Treasury bills and notes and United States government agencies securities. Fund balances (expressed in thousands of dollars) were as follows:
1995 1994 Current Noncurrent Current Noncurrent Construction funds $ 2,931 $20,734 Debt service funds 64,706 $144,915 36,803 $158,746 Revenue funds 12,173 21,013 Lease reserve funds 14,190 15,260 Capitalized interest funds 8,847 Other funds 15,428 59,446 22,898 39,993 Total $95,238 $218,551 $110,295 $213,999
5. Property, Plant, and Equipment Property, plant, and equipment (expressed in thousands of dollars) consisted of the following:
1995 1994 Land $ 6,667 $ 6,698 Waste-to-energy facilities 1,722,375 1,577,147 Geothermal power plant 105,738 105,738 Buildings and improvements 175,214 155,904 Machinery and equipment 352,238 313,404 Landfills 10,927 9,841 Construction in progress 26,864 161,303 Total 2,400,023 2,330,035 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 520,844 445,261 Property, plant, and equipment net $1,879,179 $1,884,774
6. Other Assets Other assets (expressed in thousands of dollars) consisted of the following:
1995 1994 Investment in and advances to investees and joint ventures $ 67,095 $ 40,040 Unamortized bond issuance costs 38,473 29,290 Spare parts 19,544 13,915 Noncurrent securities available for sale 16,538 12,410 Deferred charges on projects 10,975 5,708 Insurance deposits 5,388 5,388 Other 42,871 38,436 Total $200,884 $145,187
7. Accrued Expenses, etc. Accrued expenses, etc. (expressed in thousands of dollars), consisted of the following:
1995 1994 Debt service charges and interest $ 33,886 $ 38,278 Payroll 25,743 31,493 Insurance 37,278 25,782 Construction costs 12,740 25,442 Operating expenses 37,847 21,802 Billings in excess of costs 19,167 Municipalities' share of energy revenues 18,154 17,756 Retainage payable 6,641 17,550 Lease payments 12,538 16,193 Payroll and other taxes 16,171 10,533 Pension and profit sharing 9,050 6,499 Commissions 8,477 7,226 Other 72,896 82,433 Total $291,421 $320,154
8. Deferred Income Deferred income (expressed in thousands of dollars) was comprised of the following:
1995 1994 Current Noncurrent Current Noncurrent Sale and leaseback arrangements $ 1,523 $23,360 $ 1,523 $24,883 Advance billings to municipalities 11,644 13,028 Other 15,535 12,292 Total $28,702 $23,360 $26,843 $24,883
Deferred income arose primarily from the gain from sale and leaseback transactions consummated in 1986 and 1987. Such gain was deferred and is being amortized as a reduction of rental expense. Advance billings to various customers prior to performance of service are billed one or two months in advance and are recognized as income in the period the service is provided. Other includes interest earnings on restricted funds, which accrue to the benefit of municipalities. Such amounts are deferred and recognized as income in the period in which the municipality receives a credit against service fees for such interest. 9. Long-Term Debt Long-term debt (expressed in thousands of dollars) consisted of the following:
1995 1994 Adjustable-rate revenue bonds due 2014 2024 $124,755 $124,755 9.25% debentures due 2022 100,000 100,000 Variable-rate revolving credit lines due 1998 48,000 26,820 Other long-term debt 71,578 52,818 Total $344,333 $304,393
The adjustable-rate revenue bonds are adjusted periodically to reflect current market rates for similar issues, generally with an upside cap of 15%. The average rate for this debt was 3.90% and 2.79% in 1995 and 1994, respectively. These bonds were issued under agreements that contain various restrictions, the most significant being the requirements to comply with certain financial ratios and to maintain Shareholders' Equity of $400,000,000. At December 31, 1995, Ogden was in compliance with all requirements and had $146,978,000 in excess of the required amount of Shareholders' Equity. At December 31, 1995, Ogden had two long-term interest rate swap agreements covering notional amounts of $100,000,000 and $7,500,000, respectively, which expire December 16, 1998, and November 30, 2000, respectively. These swaps were entered into to convert Ogden's fixed-rate $100,000,000, 9.25% debentures due in 2022 to variable-rate debt and Ogden's $7,500,000 variable-rate debt to a fixed rate. On the $100,000,000 swap, Ogden receives a fixed rate of 5.52% per annum paid on a semi-annual basis and pays a floating rate of three months LIBOR set in arrears on a quarterly basis. On the $7,500,000 swap, Ogden pays a fixed rate of 5.83% paid on a quarterly basis and receives a floating rate of three months LIBOR on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 1995, the three-month LIBOR rate was 5.63%. The counterparties to these interest rate swaps are major financial institutions. Management believes its credit risk associated with nonperformance by the counterparties is not significant. Amounts (received) or paid on the swap agreements amounted to $603,000, $(809,000), and $(3,352,000) for 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively, and were (credited) or charged to interest expense. The effect on Ogden's weighted-average borrowing rate for 1995, 1994, and 1993, was an increase (decrease) of .14%, (.20)%, and (.82)%, respectively. Other long-term debt includes an obligation for approximately $28,400,000, representing the equity component of a sale and leaseback arrangement relating to a waste-to-energy facility. This arrangement is accounted for as a financing, has an effective interest rate of 5%, and extends through 2017. Additionally, other long-term debt includes $22,450,000 resulting from the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of the Onondaga County, New York, waste-to-energy facility, which has been accounted for as a financing for accounting purposes. This obligation has an effective interest rate of 10% and extends through 2015. The remaining other debt of $20,728,000 consists primarily of debt associated with entertainment facilities in the United Kingdom and Argentina as well as debt acquired in the Firehole acquisition. These loans bear various interest rates and maturity dates. The maturities on long-term debt (expressed in thousands of dollars) at December 31, 1995, were as follows: 1996.................................. $4,680 1997.................................. 10,967 1998.................................. 43,189 1999.................................. 5,292 2000.................................. 2,031 Later years........................... 282,854 Total................................. 349,013 Less current portion.................. 4,680 Total long-term debt.................. $344,333
10. Project Debt Project debt (expressed in thousands of dollars) consisted of the following:
1995 1994 Revenue Bonds Issued by and Prime Responsibility of Municipalities: 4.25 8.1% serial revenue bonds due through 2005 $ 198,933 $ 222,036 5.4 8.5% term revenue bonds due through 2019 845,476 939,740 Adjustable-rate revenue bonds due through 2013 86,965 10,875 Total 1,131,374 1,172,651 Revenue Bonds Issued by Municipal Agencies with Sufficient Service Revenues Guaranteed by Third Parties: 4.95 8.9% serial revenue bonds due through 2007 71,006 78,591 7.25 7.4% term revenue bonds due 1999 through 2011 105,901 106,109 Adjustable-rate revenue bonds due through 2011 127,820 133,467 Total 304,727 318,167 Other project debt 115,102 103,170 Total long-term project debt $1,551,203 $1,593,988
Project debt associated with the financing of waste-to-energy facilities is generally arranged by municipalities through the issuance of tax-exempt and taxable revenue bonds. The category, "Revenue Bonds Issued by and Prime Responsibility of Municipalities," includes bonds issued with respect to which debt service is an explicit component of the client community's obligation under the related service agreement. In the event that a municipality is unable to satisfy its payment obligations, the bondholders' recourse with respect to the Corporation is limited to the waste-to-energy facilities and restricted funds pledged to secure such obligations. The category, "Revenue Bonds Issued by Municipal Agencies with Sufficient Service Revenues Guaranteed by Third Parties," includes bonds issued to finance three facilities for which contractual obligations of third parties to deliver waste ensure sufficient revenues to pay debt service, although such debt service is not an explicit component of the third parties' service fee obligations. Payment obligations for the project debt associated with waste-to-energy facilities are nonrecourse to the Corporation subject to construction and operating performance guarantees and commitments. These obligations are secured by the revenues pledged under various indentures and are collateralized principally by a mortgage lien and a security interest in each of the respective waste-to-energy facilities and related assets. At December 31, 1995, such revenue bonds were collateralized by property, plant, and equipment with a net carrying value of $1,546,392,000, credit enhancements of approximately $180,000,000 for which Ogden has certain reimbursement obligations, and substantially all restricted funds (see Note 4). The interest rates on adjustable-rate revenue bonds are adjusted periodically to reflect current market rates for similar issues, generally with an upside cap of 15%. The average rate for such revenue bonds was 5.28% and 3.33% in 1995 and 1994, respectively. Other project debt includes an obligation of a special-purpose limited partnership acquired by two special-purpose subsidiaries of Ogden in December 1994 and represents the lease of a geothermal power plant, which has been accounted for as a financing. This obligation, which amounted to $95,156,000 at December 31, 1995, has an effective interest rate of 5.3% and extends through 2008 with options to renew for additional periods and has a fair market value purchase option at the conclusion of the initial term. Payment obligations under this lease arrangement are limited to assets of the limited partnership and revenues derived from a power purchase agreement with a third party, which are expected to provide sufficient revenues to make rental payments. Such payment obligations are secured by all the assets, revenues, and other benefits derived from the geothermal power plant, which had a net carrying value of approximately $111,389,000 at December 31, 1995. In September 1995, the Corporation borrowed $20,984,000 from a financial institution as part of the refinancing of project debt in the category "Revenue Bonds Issued by and Prime Responsibility of Municipalities." The debt service associated with this loan is included as an explicit component of the client community's obligation under the related service agreement. A portion of the funds was retained in the Corporation's restricted funds and is loaned to the community each month to cover the community's monthly service fees. The Corporation's repayment for the other part of the loan is limited to the extent repayment is received from the client community. This overall obligation totaled $19,946,000 at December 31, 1995, has an effective interest rate of 7.05%, and extends through 2005. At December 31, 1995, Ogden had three interest rate swap agreements as hedges against interest rate exposure on certain adjustable-rate revenue bonds. The first two interest rate swap agreements expire in May 1999 and the third swap expires in 2019 and had notional amounts at December 31, 1995, of $91,070,000, $38,835,000, and $80,220,000, respectively, which are reduced in accordance with the scheduled repayments of the revenue bonds. Under the first swap agreement, Ogden pays a fixed rate of 3.95% per annum on a semi-annual basis and receives a floating rate based on an index of tax-exempt, variable-rate obligations. Under the second swap agreement, Ogden pays a fixed rate of 5.25% per annum on a semi-annual basis and receives a floating rate based on a defined commercial paper rate. Under the third swap agreement, Ogden pays a fixed rate of 6.07% per annum on a semi-annual basis through 1998 and thereafter a fixed rate of 5.18% and receives a floating rate based on a defined LIBOR-based rate. At December 31, 1995, the floating rates on the three swaps were 4.22%, 5.87%, and 5.99%, respectively. These swap agreements were entered into to convert from floating rates to fixed interest rates $91,070,000 of tax-exempt, adjustable-rate revenue bonds and $119,055,000 of taxable, adjustable-rate revenue bonds. The counterparties to these interest rate swaps are major financial institutions. Management believes the credit risk associated with nonperformance by the counterparties is not significant. Amounts (received) or paid on these swap agreements amounted to $(230,000), $1,400,000, and $1,500,000 for 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively, and were charged or (credited) to debt service charges. The effect on Ogden's weighted-average borrowing rate was an increase (decrease) of (.01)%, .09%, and .10% for 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. The maturities on long-term project debt (expressed in thousands of dollars) at December 31, 1995, were as follows: 1996............................... $ 55,774 1997............................... 61,873 1998............................... 68,672 1999............................... 76,092 2000............................... 77,003 Later years........................ 1,267,563 Total.............................. 1,606,977 Less current portion............... 55,774 Total long-term project debt....... $1,551,203
11. Credit Arrangements At December 31, 1995, Ogden had unused revolving credit lines amounting to $167,557,000, of which $160,000,000 is available under its principal revolving credit line at various borrowing rates including prime, the Eurodollar rate plus .30%, or certificate-of-deposit rates plus .425%. Ogden is not required to maintain compensating balances; however, Ogden pays a facility fee of 3/16 of 1% on its principal revolving credit line of $200,000,000, which expires October 29, 1998. 12. Convertible Subordinated Debentures Convertible subordinated debentures (expressed in thousands of dollars) consisted of the following:
1995 1994 6% debentures due June 1, 2002............. $ 85,000 $ 85,000 53/4% debentures due October 20, 2002...... 63,650 63,650 Total...................................... $148,650 $148,650
The 6% convertible subordinated debentures are convertible into Ogden common stock at the rate of one share for each $39.077 principal amount of debentures. The debentures are redeemable at Ogden's option at 102.4% of principal amount during the year commencing June 1, 1995, and at decreasing prices thereafter. The 5 3/4% convertible subordinated debentures are convertible into Ogden common stock at the rate of one share for each $41.772 principal amount of debentures. The debentures are redeemable at Ogden's option at 100% of face value. During 1994, the Corporation purchased $3,100,000 face value of these debentures at prevailing market rates. The net gain on the acquisition of these securities amounted to $620,000 and is included in Other Income. 13. Preferred Stock The outstanding Series A $1.875 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at any time at the rate of 5.97626 common shares for each preferred share. Ogden may redeem the outstanding shares of preferred stock at $50 per share, plus all accrued dividends. These preferred shares are entitled to receive cumulative annual dividends at the rate of $1.875 per share, plus an amount equal to 150% of the amount, if any, by which the dividend paid or any cash distribution made on the common stock in the preceding calendar quarter exceeded $.667 per share. 14. Common Stock and Stock Options In 1986, Ogden adopted a nonqualified stock option plan (the "1986 Plan"). Under the 1986 Plan, options and/or stock appreciation rights may be granted to key management employees to purchase Ogden common stock at prices not less than the fair market value at the time of grant, which become exercisable during a five- year period from the date of grant, except for the grant to the Chairman of the Board, which vested in its entirety six months after the date of the grant. As adopted, and as adjusted for stock splits, the 1986 Plan calls for up to an aggregate of 2,700,000 shares of Ogden common stock to be available for issuance upon the exercise of options and stock appreciation rights, which may be granted over a 10-year period ending March 10, 1996. At December 31, 1995, all of the authorized shares of this plan had been granted. In October 1990, Ogden adopted the Ogden 1990 Stock Option Plan (the "1990 Plan"). Under the 1990 Plan, nonqualified options, incentive stock options, and/or stock appreciation rights and stock bonuses may be granted to key management employees and outside directors to purchase Ogden common stock at an exercise price to be determined by the Ogden Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the 1990 Plan, which was amended in 1994 to increase the number of shares available by 3,200,000 shares, an aggregate of 6,200,000 shares of Ogden common stock is available for issuance upon the exercise of such options, rights, and bonuses, which may be granted over a 10-year period ending October 11, 2000; 2,158,200 shares were available for grant at December 31, 1995. Under the foregoing plans, Ogden issued 4,466,300 limited stock appreciation rights in conjunction with the stock options granted. These limited rights are exercisable only during the period commencing on the first day following the occurrence of any of the following events and terminate 90 days after such date: the acquisition by any person of 20% or more of the voting power of Ogden's outstanding securities; the approval by Ogden shareholders of an agreement to merge or to sell substantially all of its assets; or the occurrence of certain changes in the membership of the Ogden Board of Directors. The exercise of these limited rights entitles participants to receive an amount in cash with respect to each share subject thereto, equal to the excess of the market value of a share of Ogden common stock on the exercise date or the date these limited rights become exercisable, over the related option price. In connection with the acquisition of ERC International, Inc. (ERCI), Ogden assumed pre-existing ERCI stock option plans and converted all options then outstanding into options to acquire shares of Ogden common stock. No further options were granted under the ERCI plans. These options expired in 1993. In connection with the acquisition of the minority interest of OPI, Ogden assumed the pre-existing OPI stock option plan then outstanding and converted these options into options to acquire shares of Ogden common stock. No further options will be granted under this plan. In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," which is required to be adopted in the Corporation's 1996 financial statements. The Corporation expects to adopt only the disclosure provisions of this Statement. Information regarding the Corporation's stock option plans is summarized as follows:
Option Available Price For Per Share Outstanding Exercisable Grant 1986 Plan: December 31, 1992, balance $14.98-28.54 1,080,000 668,000 115,500 Became exercisable 144,000 Exercised 14.98 (49,313) (49,313) December 31, 1993, balance 14.98-28.54 1,030,687 762,687 115,500 Granted 22.50 115,500 (115,500) Became exercisable 134,000 Exercised 14.98 (18,644) (18,644) December 31, 1994, balance 14.98-28.54 1,127,543 878,043 --- Became exercisable 18.31-28.54 157,100 Exercised 14.98 (16,618) (16,618) --- December 31, 1995, balance 14.98-28.54 1,110,925 1,018,525 1990 Plan: December 31, 1992, balance 18.31-21.19 2,655,000 1,037,400 345,000 Granted 23.56 158,000 (158,000) Became exercisable 522,900 Exercised 18.31-20.31 (123,000) (123,000) Cancelled 18.31-20.31 (50,000) (4,000) 50,000 December 31, 1993, balance 18.31-23.56 2,640,000 1,433,300 237,000 Increase in authorized option shares 3,200,000 Granted 21.50-22.50 1,169,500 (1,169,500) Became exercisable 507,500 Exercised 18.31-20.31 (109,000) (109,000) Cancelled 18.31-23.56 (115,000) (32,000) 115,000 December 31, 1994, balance 18.31-23.56 3,585,500 1,799,800 2,382,500 Granted 20.06-22.69 409,000 (409,000) Became exercisable 699,900 Exercised 18.31-20.31 (129,000) (129,000) Cancelled 18.31-23.56 (184,700) (34,000) 184,700 December 31, 1995, balance 18.31-23.56 3,680,800 2,336,700 2,158,200 Conversion of ERCI Plan: December 31, 1992, balance 21.05-24.74 70,117 70,117 Exercised 21.05 (23,102) (23,102) Cancelled 21.05-24.74 (47,015) (47,015) December 31, 1993, 1994, and 1995, balance --- --- --- --- Conversion of OPI Plan: December 29, 1994 14.17-29.46 266,561 266,561 --- December 31, 1994 and 1995, balance 14.17-29.46 266,561 266,561 --- Total December 31, 1995 14.17-29.46 5,058,286 3,621,786 2,158,200
At December 31, 1995, there were 11,211,067 shares of common stock reserved for the exercise of stock options and the conversion of preferred shares and debentures. 15. Preferred Stock Purchase Rights In 1990, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred stock purchase right (Right) on each outstanding share of common stock. Among other provisions, each Right may be exercised to purchase a one one-hundredth share of a new series of cumulative participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $80, subject to adjustment. The Rights may only be exercised after a party has acquired 15% or more of the Corporation's common stock or commenced a tender offer to acquire 15% or more of the Corporation's common stock. The Rights do not have voting rights, expire October 2, 2000, and may be redeemed by the Corporation at a price of $.01 per Right at any time prior to the acquisition of 15% of the Corporation's common stock. In the event a party acquires 15% or more of the Corporation's outstanding common stock in accordance with certain defined terms, each Right will then entitle its holders (other than such party) to purchase, at the Right's then-current exercise price, a number of the Corporation's common shares having a market value of twice the Right's exercise price. At December 31, 1995, 49,468,000 preferred stock purchase rights were outstanding. 16. Sale of Limited Partnership Interests In 1994, revenues include $26,100,000 from the sale of limited partnership interests in and related tax benefits of the Onondaga County waste-to-energy facility, which was partially offset by the recapture of investment tax credits and minority interests. 17. Foreign Exchange Foreign exchange translation adjustments for 1995, 1994, and 1993, amounting to $(1,258,000), $3,240,000, and $(2,095,000), respectively, have been credited (charged) directly to Shareholders' Equity. Foreign exchange transaction adjustments, amounting to $1,590,000 and $(1,844,000), have been credited (charged) directly to income for 1995 and 1994, respectively. 18. Debt Service Charges Debt service charges for Ogden's project debt (expressed in thousands of dollars) consisted of the following:
1995 1994 1993 Interest incurred on taxable and tax-exempt borrowings $112,029 $109,586 $107,846 Interest earned on temporary investment of borrowings during construction, etc. 4,908 6,782 9,985 Net interest incurred 107,121 102,804 97,861 Interest capitalized during construction in property, plant, and equipment 1,512 8,893 5,538 Interest expense net 105,609 93,911 92,323 Amortization of bond issuance costs 6,241 6,447 6,341 Debt service charges $111,850 $100,358 $ 98,664
19. Retirement Plans Ogden has retirement plans that cover substantially all of its employees. A substantial portion of hourly employees of Ogden Services Corporation participates in defined contribution plans. Other employees participate in defined benefit or defined contribution plans. The defined benefit plans provide benefits based on years of service and either employee compensation or a flat benefit amount. Ogden's funding policy for those plans is to contribute annually an amount no less than the minimum funding required by ERISA. Contributions are intended to provide not only benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the future. The following table sets forth the defined benefit plans' funded status and related amounts recognized in Ogden's Consolidated Balance Sheets (expressed in thousands of dollars):
1995 1994 Assets Accumulated Assets Accumulated Exceed Benefits Exceed Benefits Accumulated Exceed Accumulated Exceed Benefits Assets Benefits Assets Accumulated Benefit Obligation: Vested $ 7,015 $ 9,724 $ 5,408 $ 7,800 Nonvested 389 501 311 413 Total $ 7,404 $10,225 $ 5,719 $ 8,213 Projected benefit obligation for services rendered to date $10,773 $14,319 $ 8,278 $11,733 Plan assets at fair value 10,325 5,581 7,832 5,138 Underfunded projected benefits $ 448 $ 8,738 $ 446 $ 6,595 Source of Underfunded Status: Unrecognized net (loss) from past experience different from that assumed and effects of changes in assumptions $ (480) $(1,241) $(1,251) $ (625) Unrecognized net transition asset (obligation) at January 1, 1986, being recognized over 13 years 494 (400) 566 (390) Pension liability costs (961) (4,146) (412) (1,997) Unrecognized prior service costs 499 (2,951) 651 (3,583) Underfunded projected benefits $ 448 $ 8,738 $ 446 $ 6,595
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the accumulated benefit obligation of certain pension plans exceeded plan assets. The Corporation's liability for those plans was increased by $2,033,000 and $1,677,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Such amounts were offset by intangible assets and reductions in Shareholders' Equity, net of income taxes of $760,000 and $441,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Pension costs for Ogden's defined plans included the following components (expressed in thousands of dollars):
1995 1994 1993 Service cost on benefits earned during the period $2,078 $1,979 $1,610 Interest cost on projected benefit obligation. 1,716 1,629 1,457 Net amortization and deferral 2,584 (436) 40 Actual return on plan assets (3,260) 32 (979) Net periodic pension cost $3,118 $3,204 $2,128
The weighted-average discount rate and rate of increase in future compensation levels used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligations were 7 1/2% and 4 1/2% for 1995, 8 1/4% and 5% for 1994, and 7 1/2% and 4 1/2% for 1993, respectively. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 8% for each year. Contributions and costs for defined contribution plans are determined by benefit formulas based on percentage of compensation as well as discretionary contributions and totaled $10,358,000, $12,052,000, and $13,061,000 in 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. Plan assets at December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, primarily consisted of common stocks, United States government securities, and guaranteed insurance contracts. With respect to union employees, the Corporation is required under contracts with various unions to pay, generally based on hours worked, retirement, health, and welfare benefits. These multiemployer defined benefit and defined contribution plans are not controlled or administered by the Corporation. The amount charged to expense for such plans during 1995, 1994, and 1993 was $27,900,000, $30,100,000, and $32,000,000, respectively. 20. Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits In 1992, the Corporation discontinued its policy of providing postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for all salaried employees, except those employees who were retired or eligible for retirement at December 31, 1992, or who were covered under certain company-sponsored union plans. The Corporation adopted SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions," as of January 1, 1993. SFAS No. 106 requires the accrual method of accounting for postretirement health care and life insurance benefits, based on actuarial determined costs to be recognized over the period from the date of hire to the full eligibility date of employees who are expected to qualify for such benefits. As of January 1, 1993, the Corporation recognized the full amount of its estimated accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, representing the present value of the estimated future benefits payable to current retirees, and a pro rata portion of estimated benefits payable to eligible active employees after retirement. The effect of recognizing SFAS No. 106 at January 1, 1993, is shown in the accompanying financial statements as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and is reflected as a charge to income of $5,340,000 (net of income taxes of $3,710,000), or $.12 per share. For the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, the components of the periodic expense for these benefits were as follows: Recognition of Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Costs for the Years Ended December 31:
1995 1994 Service costs $131,966 $162,107 Interest 755,944 775,142 Amortization of unrecognized net (gain) loss (22,113) 67,820 Total $865,797 $1,005,069
As of December 31, 1995 and 1994, the actuarial recorded liabilities for these postretirement benefits, none of which have been funded, were as follows:
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation: Retirees $ 4,352,614 $3,884,885 Eligible active participants 4,832,637 4,581,234 Other active 1,740,792 1,480,725 Total accumulated postretirement obligation 10,926,043 9,946,844 Unrecognized net loss 611,978 117,947 Accrued postretirement benefit liability $10,314,065 $9,828,897
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was determined using discount rates of 7 1/2% and 8 1/4%; an estimated increase in compensation levels of 4 1/2% and 5% for 1995 and 1994, respectively; and a health care cost rate of approximately 14 1/2%, decreasing in subsequent years until it reaches 6% in the year 2008 and thereafter. The effect of a one percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rates for each future year on the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement health care benefit cost and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for health care benefits would be $77,711 and $716,704, respectively. 21. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Ogden adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of," in the fourth quarter of 1995. SFAS No. 121 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity, including any goodwill related to these assets, be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. In performing this review for recoverability, the Corporation estimated future cash flows expected from the use of such assets and their eventual disposition. If the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted) was less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss was recognized. The Statement also requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be disposed of be reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value less the costs to sell. The effect of recognizing SFAS No. 121 resulted in a pretax charge of $45,300,000 and an after-tax charge of $34,700,000, or $.70 per share. This charge included estimated losses on the disposal of noncore businesses, as announced in the fourth quarter of 1995, of $32,800,000 and the write-down of other long-lived assets of $12,500,000. The loss of $32,800,000 on the assets to be disposed of was based on the Corporation's estimate of realizable or liquidation values of the operations and bids received from prospective purchasers. The impairment loss of $12,500,000 on other long-lived assets represents the difference between the carrying amount of the assets and their estimated fair values, which was determined based on operating projections and future discounted cash flows. The remaining carrying value of these assets is not significant. These amounts were charged to cost of goods sold ($4,500,000) and operating expenses ($40,800,000) in the accompanying financial statements. 22. Other Charges During 1995, the Corporation recognized unusual charges of $37,500,000, which were reduced by a $13,500,000 gain on the sale of a noncore business in the fourth quarter for a net charge of $24,000,000. The charge of $37,500,000 includes, in the second quarter, $17,100,000 at Ogden Communications, Inc. (OCI), for the write-off of receivables of $10,300,000 and related costs recorded in connection with a telecommunications project at OCI, as well as a loss on the disposal of inventory of $3,900,000 and costs related to the curtailment of operations of $2,900,000; and in the fourth quarter, $8,200,000 for costs, principally severance pay relating to restructuring activities, and $12,200,000 representing the write-down of deferred charges relating to a previously awarded waste-to-energy project that is not expected to be completed; unusual waste-to-energy repair costs; and an adjustment of inventory balances resulting from a physical inventory. The $17,100,000 charge at OCI resulted from a review of the activities of this unit during which the Corporation concluded that contracts and other documentation did not provide a basis for recovering any of the accounts receivable related to the telecommunications project and that the sale of inventory would not recover its full carrying value. In addition, the Corporation decided to discontinue the business of OCI and estimated the costs relating thereto. These amounts were charged to sales allowances ($10,300,000); operating costs ($3,800,000); cost of goods sold ($6,000,000); and selling, administrative, and general expenses ($3,900,000) in the accompanying financial statements. The gain on the sale of the noncore business of $13,500,000 was included as a reduction of operating expenses. In December 1991, the Corporation discontinued the on-site remediation business, utilizing mobile technology, of OPI. During 1993, the Corporation recognized a pretax gain of $12,379,000 resulting primarily from the receipt of amounts previously withheld pending satisfactory completion of obligations under existing contracts and from proceeds from the sale of assets in excess of previously estimated net realizable values. In December 1993, the Corporation discontinued its fixed-site hazardous waste business. Provision was made in 1993 for the write-down of assets, primarily development costs, resulting in a pretax loss of $12,629,000. In addition, 1995 operating expenses include $3,500,000 for the settlement of litigation relating to the discontinuance of the fixed-site hazardous waste business. For the year ended December 31, 1993, the $250,000 net loss from both discontinued operations is reported as Operating Costs and Expenses in the Statements of Consolidated Income. 23. Income Taxes The components of the provision for income taxes (expressed in thousands of dollars) were as follows:
1995 1994 1993 Current: Federal......................... $6,444 $10,141 $ 453 State........................... 5,038 11,616 6,999 Foreign......................... 4,602 2,422 1,476 Total current................... 16,084 24,179 8,928 Deferred: Federal......................... 17,120 36,520 43,295 State........................... 1,033 1,184 4,303 Total deferred.................. 18,153 37,704 47,598 Total provision for income taxes.. $34,237 $61,883 $56,526
The current provision for Federal income tax results principally from the alternative minimum tax. In August 1993, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act was enacted, which increased the corporate Federal income tax rate from 34% to 35% retroactive to January 1, 1993. As a consequence, deferred Federal income tax balances were adjusted to this new rate as required by SFAS No. 109, which resulted in a one-time charge for Federal income taxes of $4,066,000 in 1993. The provision for income taxes (expressed in thousands of dollars) varied from the Federal statutory income tax rate due to the following:
1995 1994 1993 Percent Percent Percent of Income of Income of Income Amount Before Amount Before Amount Before of Tax Taxes of Tax Taxes of Tax Taxes Taxes at statutory rate $14,184 35.0% $48,777 35.0% $43,925 35.0% Adjustment of deferred income tax benefits 4,066 3.2 State income taxes, net of Federal tax benefit 3,946 9.7 8,320 6.0 7,346 5.8 Recapture (benefit) of investment tax credits 1,807 1.3 (1,807) (1.4) Foreign taxes and non- deductible foreign losses 6,694 16.5 1,425 1.0 1,982 1.6 Amortization of goodwill 1,206 3.0 1,030 .7 838 .7 Write-down of goodwill 5,263 13.0 Pooling-related taxes and costs 1,807 4.5 Other net 1,137 2.8 524 .4 176 .1 Provision for income taxes $34,237 84.5% $61,883 44.4% $56,526 45.0%
The components of the net deferred income tax liability (expressed in thousands of dollars) as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, were as follows:
1995 1994 Deferred Tax Assets: Deferred income..................... $ 14,387 $ 16,291 Accrued expenses.................... 47,125 51,055 Other liabilities................... 13,500 16,779 Investment tax credits.............. 28,930 31,064 Alternative minimum tax credits..... 27,521 19,387 Net operating loss carryforwards.... 120,298 137,488 Total deferred tax assets........... 251,761 272,064 Deferred Tax Liabilities: Unbilled accounts receivable........ 48,734 47,119 Property, plant, and equipment...... 448,334 445,699 Other............................... 33,114 33,860 Total deferred tax liabilities...... 530,182 526,678 Net deferred tax liability.......... $278,421 $254,614
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented as follows in the accompanying balance sheets:
1995 1994 Net deferred tax liability noncurrent... $310,400 $281,065 Less net deferred tax asset current..... 31,979 26,451 Net deferred tax liability.............. $278,421 $254,614
At December 31, 1995, for Federal income tax purposes, the Corporation had investment and energy tax credit carryforwards of approximately $28,930,000 and net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $299,170,000, which will expire in 2004 through 2008. Deferred Federal income taxes have been reduced by the tax effect of these amounts. 24. Leases Total rental expense amounted to $93,396,000, $77,190,000, and $73,138,000 (net of sublease income of $193,000, $328,000, and $2,606,000) for 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. Included in rental expense are amounts based on contingent factors (principally sales) in excess of minimum rentals, amounting to $21,676,000, $15,181,000, and $19,836,000 for 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. Principal leases are for leaseholds, sale and leaseback arrangements on waste-to-energy facilities, trucks and automobiles, airplane, and machinery and equipment. Some of these operating leases have renewal options. The following is a schedule (expressed in thousands of dollars), by year, of future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 1995: 1996............................... $ 65,007 1997............................... 62,854 1998............................... 61,528 1999............................... 54,042 2000............................... 44,564 Later years........................ 350,596 Total.............................. $638,591
These future minimum rental payment obligations include $108,183,000 of future nonrecourse rental payments that relate to a waste-to-energy facility, which are supported by third-party commitments to provide sufficient service revenues to meet such obligations. Also included are $85,792,000 of nonrecourse rental payments relating to a hydroelectric power generating facility operated by a special-purpose subsidiary, which are supported by contractual power purchase obligations of a third party and which are expected to provide sufficient revenues to make the rent payments. These nonrecourse rental payments (in thousands of dollars) are due as follows: 1996............................... $ 18,698 1997............................... 19,197 1998............................... 19,492 1999............................... 20,797 2000............................... 21,402 Later years........................ 94,389 Total.............................. $193,975
25. Earnings Per Share Earnings per common share were computed by dividing net income, reduced by preferred stock dividend requirements, by the weighted average of the number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents, where dilutive, outstanding during each year. Earnings per common share, assuming full dilution, were computed on the assumption that all convertible debentures, convertible preferred stock, and stock options converted or exercised during each year or outstanding at the end of each year were converted at the beginning of each year or at the date of issuance or grant, if dilutive. This computation provided for the elimination of related convertible debenture interest and preferred dividends. The weighted-average number of shares used in computing earnings per common share was as follows:
1995 1994 1993 Primary................... 49,385,000 43,610,000 43,378,000 Assuming full dilution.... 49,691,000 43,939,000 43,776,000
26. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities Ogden and certain of its subsidiaries have issued or are party to performance bonds and guarantees and related contractual obligations undertaken mainly pursuant to agreements to construct and operate certain waste-to-energy, entertainment, and other facilities. In the normal course of business, they are involved in legal proceedings in which damages and other remedies are sought. Management does not expect that these contractual obligations, legal proceedings, or any other contingent obligations incurred in the normal course of business will have a material adverse effect on Ogden's Consolidated Financial Statements. During 1994, a subsidiary of the Corporation entered into a 30-year facility management contract pursuant to which it agreed to advance funds to a customer, if necessary, to assist refinancing senior secured debt incurred in connection with construction of the facility. Such refinancing requirements are not expected to exceed $75,000,000 at maturity of the senior secured debt, which is expected to be on or about March 1, 2001. In addition, at December 31, 1995, the Corporation has guaranteed indebtedness of $6,200,000 of an affiliate and principal tenant of this customer. Ogden continues as guarantor of surety bonds and letters of credit totaling approximately $19,200,000 on behalf of International Terminal Operating Co. Inc. (ITO) and has guaranteed borrowings of certain customers amounting to approximately $29,200,000. Management does not expect that these arrangements will have a material adverse effect on Ogden's Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 1995, capital commitments amounted to $53,400,000 for normal replacement, modernization, and growth in Services' ($42,100,000) and Projects' ($11,300,000) operations. In addition, compliance with recently promulgated standards and guidelines under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 may require additional capital expenditures of $30,000,000 during the next four years. 27. Information Concerning Business Segments Ogden classifies its business segments as Services and Projects. The Services segment includes principally ground services, fueling, cargo, food catering, and related services to the aviation industry; food and beverage, janitorial, maintenance, and other services related to the management and operations of arenas, stadiums, amphitheaters, and parks; management, maintenance, security, janitorial, and related services to commercial office buildings and industrial and other facilities; and professional technical and environmental consulting services to a wide range of customers. The Projects segment includes all of Ogden's waste-to-energy activities, its independent power business, the operation of two geothermal power stations and related well field activities and a hydroelectric power station, its water and wastewater project business, and its construction activities all of which activities are commonly managed by Projects. The operations of these two segments are performed principally in the United States. Revenues and income from continuing operations (expressed in thousands of dollars) for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, were as follows:
1995 1994 1993 Revenues: Services................... $1,560,987 $1,379,450 $1,330,104 Projects................... 624,006 725,097 705,756 Total revenues............. $2,184,993 $2,104,547 $2,035,860 Income from Operations: Services................... $ (17,832) $ 50,674 $ 60,193 Projects................... 79,382 104,137 80,272 Total income from operations.... 61,550 154,811 140,465 Equity in Net Income of Investees and Joint Ventures: Services........................ 2,443 2,045 3,418 Projects........................ 4,423 5,638 3,477 Total........................... 68,416 162,494 147,360 Corporate unallocated income and expenses net (12,525) (12,184) (10,751) Corporate interest net....... (15,365) (10,946) (11,108) Consolidated Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest $ 40,526 $ 139,364 $ 125,501
In 1995, income from operations of Services and Projects reflects pretax charges of $56,900,000 and $12,400,000, respectively, reflecting the adoption of SFAS No. 121 and other unusual charges (see Notes 21 and 22). Services' revenues include $250,300,000, $248,500,000, and $245,100,000 from the United States government contracts for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. Total revenues by segment reflect sales to unaffiliated customers. In computing income from operations, none of the following have been added or deducted: unallocated corporate expenses, nonoperating interest expense, interest income, and income taxes. A summary (expressed in thousands of dollars) of identifiable assets, depreciation and amortization, and capital additions of continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, is as follows:
Identifiable Depreciation and Capital Assets Amortization Additions 1995 Services.......... $ 903,218 $ 45,344 $ 57,424 Projects.......... 2,558,411 63,397 35,391 Corporate......... 191,042 863 11 Consolidated...... $3,652,671 $109,604 $ 92,826 1994 Services.......... $ 800,011 $ 39,658 $ 37,207 Projects.......... 2,556,655 49,061 82,418 Corporate......... 288,220 1,826 22 Consolidated...... $3,644,886 $ 90,545 $119,647 1993 Services.......... $ 719,964 $ 35,973 $ 33,877 Projects.......... 2,361,499 47,186 81,852 Corporate......... 259,266 2,484 471 Consolidated...... $3,340,729 $ 85,643 $116,200
28. Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
(Expressed in thousands of dollars) 1995 1994 1993 Cash Paid for Interest and Income Taxes: Interest (net of amounts capitalized) $140,878 $119,188 $114,381 Income taxes 9,885 8,298 3,197 Noncash Investing and Financing Activities: Conversion of preferred shares for common shares 4 3 5 Conversion of debentures for common shares 1,287 Contract acquisition costs, etc. 22,539 Future contract obligations (22,539) Purchase of Minority Interest: Common stock issued 94,446 Adjustment to net assets for excess of purchase price over book value of net assets acquired 21,589 Detail of Entities Acquired: Fair value of assets acquired 32,293 158,212 76,875 Liabilities assumed (16,819) (125,808) (22,651) Net cash paid for acquisitions 15,474 32,404 54,224
29. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments." The estimated fair-value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Ogden would realize in a current market exchange. The estimated fair value (expressed in thousands of dollars) of financial instruments at December 31, 1995 and 1994, is summarized as follows:
1995 1994 Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 96,782 $ 96,782 $ 117,359 $ 117,359 Marketable securities available for sale 30,477 30,477 99,086 99,086 Receivables 789,397 791,712 743,480 748,807 Restricted funds 313,789 315,987 318,699 317,631 Other assets 4,957 4,957 12,900 12,900 Liabilities: Long-term debt 299,247 322,016 307,876 298,648 Convertible subordinated debentures 148,650 137,608 148,650 119,770 Project debt 1,606,977 1,694,722 1,639,267 1,661,813 Other liabilities 76,944 79,449 34,906 28,794 Off Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments: Unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements 6,839 9,355 Unrealized gains on interest rate swap agreements 1,103 8,716
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value: For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying value of these amounts is a reasonable estimate of their fair value. The fair value of long-term unbilled receivables is estimated by using a discount rate that approximates the current rate for comparable notes. Marketable securities' fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. The fair value of restricted funds held in trust is based on quoted market prices of the investments held by the trustee. The fair value of noncurrent receivables is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to such borrowers based on the remaining maturities, consideration of credit risks, and other business issues pertaining to such receivables. Other assets, consisting primarily of insurance and escrow deposits and other miscellaneous financial instruments used in the ordinary course of business, are valued based on quoted market prices or other appropriate valuation techniques. Fair values for short-term debt and long-term debt were determined based on interest rates that are currently available to the Corporation for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities for debt issues that are not traded or quoted on an exchange. With respect to convertible subordinated debentures, fair values are based on quoted market prices. The fair value of project debt is estimated based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. Other borrowings and liabilities are valued by discounting the future stream of payments using the incremental borrowing rate of the Corporation. The fair value of the Corporation's interest rate swap agreements is the estimated amount that the Corporation would receive or pay to terminate the swap agreements at the reporting date based on third-party quotations. The fair value of Ogden financial guarantees provided on behalf of ITO and customers (see Note 26) would be zero because Ogden receives no fees associated with such commitments. The fair-value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 1995 and 1994. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair-value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date, and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein. Independent Auditors' Report Deloitte & Touche llp Two World Financial Center New York, NY 10281 The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ogden Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ogden Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related statements of shareholders' equity, consolidated income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the companies at December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the results of their operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, in 1995 the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 relating to long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of. In 1994 the Corporation changed its methods of accounting for postemployment benefits to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 112 and for certain investments in debt and equity securities to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115. In 1993, the Corporation changed its method of accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106. February 5, 1996 Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Report of Management Ogden's management is responsible for the information and representations contained in this annual report. Management believes that the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the circumstances to reflect in all material respects the substance of events and transactions that should be included and that the other information in the annual report is consistent with those statements. In preparing the financial statements, management makes informed judgments and estimates of the expected effects of events and transactions currently being accounted for. In meeting its responsibility for the reliability of the financial statements, management depends on the Corporation's internal control structure. This structure is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In designing control procedures, management recognizes that errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur. Also, estimates and judgments are required to assess and balance the relative cost and expected benefits of such controls. Management believes that the Corporation's internal control structure provides reasonable assurance that errors or irregularities that could be material to the financial statements are prevented and would be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. The Board of Directors pursues its oversight role for these financial statements through the Audit Committee, which is composed solely of nonaffiliated directors. The Audit Committee, in this oversight role, meets periodically with management to monitor their responsibilities. The Audit Committee also meets periodically with the independent auditors and the internal auditors, both of whom have free access to the Audit Committee without management present. The independent auditors elected by the shareholders express an opinion on our financial statements. Their opinion is based on procedures they consider to be sufficient to enable them to reach a conclusion as to the fairness of the presentation of the financial statements. R. Richard Ablon Philip G. Husby President and Senior Vice President, Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Quarterly Results of Operations
1995 Quarter Ended March 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31 (In thousands of dollars, except per-share amounts) Total revenues........ $502,408 $537,645 $588,402 $556,538 Gross profit.......... $85,650 $82,406 $106,547 $31,330 Net income............ $12,092 $10,080 $23,828 $(38,556) Earnings (loss) per common share......... $0.24 $0.21 $0.48 $(0.78) Earnings (loss) per common share assuming full dilution $0.24 $0.21 $0.48 $(0.78)
1994 Quarter Ended March 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31 (In thousands of dollars, except per-share amounts) Total revenues.......... $478,424 $526,424 $544,296 $555,403 Gross profit............ $86,381 $95,975 $95,852 $99,779 Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle $15,328 $17,640 $18,742 $16,116 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (1,520) Net income............... $13,808 $17,640 $18,742 $16,116 Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle $0.35 $0.40 $0.43 $0.37 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (0.03) Total.................... $0.32 $0.40 $0.43 $0.37 Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share Assuming Full Dilution: Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle $0.34 $0.40 $0.43 $0.37 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (0.03) Total..................... $0.31 $0.40 $0.43 $0.37 The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle reflects the adoption of SFAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," effective January 1, 1994.
Ogden Corporation and Subsidiaries Price Range of Stock and Dividend Data
1995 1994 High Low High Low Common: First Quarter.......... 21 1/2 18 1/2 24 3/8 21 3/4 Second Quarter......... 22 3/8 19 7/8 23 3/8 19 7/8 Third Quarter.......... 23 7/8 22 23 1/8 20 1/2 Fourth Quarter......... 24 19 7/8 21 5/8 17 3/4 Preferred: First Quarter.......... 120 113 1/2 137 137 Second Quarter......... Not Traded 128 1/2 128 1/2 Third Quarter.......... 134 3/8 134 3/8 131 1/2 131 1/2 Fourth Quarter......... 139 133 5/8 122 122
Quarterly common stock dividends of $.3125 per share were paid to shareholders of record for the four quarters of 1995 and 1994, the dividends for the last quarters of 1995 and 1994 being paid in January of the subsequent years. Quarterly dividends of $.8376 were paid for the four quarters of 1995 and 1994 on the $1.875 preferred stock. Ogden common and $1.875 preferred stocks are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
EX-21 7 SUBSIDIARY LIST EXHIBIT 21 December 31, 1995 OGDEN CORPORATION - U.S. SUBSIDIARIES (See Attachment A for foreign subsidiaries) PERCENT DOMESTIC COMPANY OWNERSHIP STATE Ogden Corporation Delaware Ogden Management Services, Inc. 100 Delaware OFS Equity of Babylon, Inc. 100 New York OFS Equity of Huntington, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Services Corporation 100 Delaware Firehole Entertainment Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Asia Pacific Services, Inc. 100 Delaware (See attachment A for subsidiaries) Ogden Central and South America, Inc. 100 Delaware (See attachment A for subsidiaries) Ogden International Europe Inc. 100 Delaware (See Attachment A for subsidiaries) Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. 100 Delaware Analytical Technologies, Inc. 100 Delaware Analytical Technologies of California, Inc. 100 California Analytical Technologies of Alaska, Inc. 100 Alaska G A Technical Services, Inc. 100 Tennessee Multiple Dynamics Corporation 100 Michigan Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. of Ohio 100 Ohio Ogden Environmental & Engineering Services Co., Inc. 100 N. Carolina Ogden Environmental Services Alaska Co., Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Remediation Services Co., Inc. 100 Florida Ogden Entertainment Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Doggie Diner, Inc. 100 Delaware Offshore Food Service, Inc. 100 Louisiana Gulf Coast Catering Company, Inc. 100 Louisiana Ogden Allied Security Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden American Food Services, Inc. 100 Ohio Ogden Aviation Food Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Food Services (ALC), Inc 100 New York Ogden-Burtco Services, Inc. 100 Washington Alpine Food Products, Inc. 100 Washington Ogden Facility Management of Alaska, Inc. 100 Alaska Ogden Entertainment Services of Indiana, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Corporation Page 2 Ogden Services Corporation Ogden Entertainment Services, Inc. (con't.) Ogden Facility Management Corporation 100 New York Ogden Facility Management Corporation of Anaheim 100 California Ogden Facility Management Corporation of California 100 California Ogden Facility Management Corporation of Huntington 100 W. Virginia Ogden Facility Management Corporation of Iowa 100 Iowa Ogden Facility Management Corporation of Pensacola 100 Florida Ogden Facility Management Corporation of West Virginia 100 W. Virginia Ogden Food Service Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden Confection Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden Food Service Corporation of Connecticut 100 Connecticut Ogden Food Service Corporation of Indiana 100 Indiana Ogden Food Service Corporation of Kansas 100 Kansas Ogden Food Service Corporation of Miami, Inc. 100 Florida Ogden Food Service Corporation of Milwaukee 100 Wisconsin Ogden Food Service Corporation of Texas 100 Texas Ogden Food Service Corporation of Wisconsin 100 Wisconsin Ogden Leisure, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Fairmount, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Leisure Services of New York, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Technology Services Corporation 100 Delaware Applied Data Technology, Inc. 100 California InterCAD Corporation 100 Maryland Ogden/ERC Aviation Technology Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Professional Services Corporation 100 Virginia Ogden Range Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Logistics Operations, Inc. 100 Virginia Ogden Support Services, Inc. 100 Delaware W. J. Schafer Associates, Inc. 100 Mass. Laser Corporation of America 49.92 Mass. Laser Royalties, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation 100 New York Atlantic Design Company, Inc. 100 New York Atlantic Design Technicals, Inc. 100 New Jersey Lenzar Electro-Optics, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Payroll Services, Inc. 100 New York Ogden CISCO, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden CISCO Maintenance, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Communications, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Corporation Page 3 Ogden Services Corporation Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation (con't.) Ogden Aviation Services, Inc. Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Distributing Corp. 100 New York Ogden Aviation Fleet Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Fueling Company, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Fueling Company of Atlanta, Inc. 100 Georgia Ogden Aviation Fueling Company of Houston, Inc. 100 Texas Ogden Aviation Fueling Company of St. Louis, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc. 100 Texas Ogden Aviation Fueling Company of Virginia, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Service Company of Colorado, Inc. 100 Colorado Ogden Aviation Service Company of Hawaii, Inc. 100 Hawaii Ogden Aviation Service Company of Kansas City, Inc. 100 Missouri Ogden Aviation Service Company of New Jersey, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Aviation Service Company of New York, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Ground Services, Inc. 100 Delaware ARA Sunset Airport Systems, Inc. 100 California Kenworthy Air Freight Services, Inc 100 Indiana Ogden Aviation Service Company of Pennsylvania, Inc. 100 Penn. Ogden Aviation Service Company of Texas, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Service Company of Washington, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Service International Corporation 100 New York Ogden Aviation, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Aviation Security Services of Indiana, Inc. 100 Indiana Ogden Aviation Terminal Services, Inc. 100 Mass. Ogden Consolidated Aviation Services of Houston, Inc. 100 Texas Ogden New York Services, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Pipeline Services Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden Corporation Page 4 Ogden Services Corporation Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation (con't.) Ogden Facility Holdings, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Facility Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Hawaiian Building Maintenance Company, Limited 100 Hawaii Ogden Allied Building & Airport Services Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Building Service Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Commercial Cleaning Systems Corporation 100 California Ogden Allied Eastern States Maintenance Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Maintenance Company of Hawaii, Inc. 100 Hawaii Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation of New England 100 Mass. Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation of Pennsylvania 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation of Texas 100 Texas Ogden Allied Service Agency Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Window Cleaning Company, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Industrial Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Plant Maintenance Company, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Plant Maintenance Company of Missouri 100 Missouri Ogden Plant Maintenance Company of North Carolina 100 N. Carolina Ogden Resource Recovery Support Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Plant Services of New Jersey, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Water Treatment Support Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Abatement & Decontamination Service, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Projects, Inc. 100 Delaware (See Attachment B for subsidiaries) Ogden Corporation (con't.) Page 5 Ogden Financial Services, Inc. 100 Delaware B D C Liquidating Corp. 100 Delaware Bouldin Development Corp. 100 California Ogden Bulk Systems Company, Inc. 90 New York BiE Leasing Company 100 Delaware Greenway Insurance Company of Vermont 100 Vermont International Terminal Operating Co., Inc. 50 Delaware OFS Equity of Delaware, Inc. 100 Delaware OFS Equity of Alexandria/Arlington, Inc. 100 Virginia OFS Equity of Indianapolis, Inc. 100 Indiana OFS Equity of Stanislaus, Inc. 100 California Ogden Allied Financial Services Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden Allied Maintenance Securities, Inc. 100 Delaware Denver Fuel Facilities Corporation 100 Colorado Kansas City International Fueling Facilities Corporation 100 Missouri LaGuardia Fuel Facilities Corporation 100 New York Lambert Field Fueling Facilities Corporation 100 Delaware Love Field Fueling Facilities Corporation 100 Texas Newark Automotive Fuel Facilities Corporation 100 New Jersey Ogden Allied Facilities, Inc. 100 New York Philadelphia Fuel Facilities Corporation 100 Penn. Rototest Laboratories, Inc. 91 California 12/31/95 ATTACHMENT A OGDEN CORPORATION - FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES PERCENT DOMESTIC OWNERSHIP COUNTRY Ogden Corporation Ogden Projects, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Martin Systems, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Martin Systems, Ltd. 100 Ontario Ogden Martin Systems of Nova Scotia, Ltd. 100 Nova Scotia Ogden Power Development, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Power Development of Bolivia, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Power Development of Bolivia, Ltd. 100 Cayman Islands Ogden Projects Asia Pacific Limited 50 Hong Kong (50% held by Ogden Power Systems, Inc.) Ogden Projects GmbH 100 Germany Ogden Projects Holdings, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Projects (U.K.) Limited 100 U.K. Ogden Projects (Birmingham) Limited 100 U.K. Ogden Projects of Hamilton, Ltd. 100 Ontario Ogden Projects of London, Ltd. 100 Ontario Ogden Waste Treatment Services, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Environmental Services Limited 100 Canada Ogden Water Holdings, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Water Systems, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Yorkshire Water of Canada, Ltd. 55 Ontario OPI Quezon, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Quezon Power, Inc. 75 Cayman Islands Projets Ogden Quebec Inc. 100 Quebec Ogden Services Corporation 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Aviation Services Limited 100 U.K. Ogden Aviation Engineering Limited 100 U.K. Ogden Entertainment Services (UK) Ltd. 100 U.K. Ogden Basketball (Newcastle) Limited 60 U.K. Ogden Ice Hockey Limited 100 U.K. Ogden Entertainment Services (Ireland) Limited 19 U.K. Ogden SkyCare Cargo Limited 100 U.K. SkyCare Limited 100 U.K. Air Cargo Enterprises Limited 50 U.K. Page A-2 Ogden Corporation Ogden Services Corporation (con't.) Ogden Asia Pacific Services, Inc. 100 DE/USA IEA of Japan Company Ltd. 50 Japan HO/Ogden Investimentos e Transportes, Limitada 51 Macau Ogden Aviation (Hong Kong) Limited 100 Hong Kong Ogden Aviation Services (NZ) Limited 100 New Zealand Ogden International Facilities Corporation (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd. 100 Australia Ogden International Facilities Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd. 50 Australia International Facilities Corporation (Cairns) Pty Ltd. 100 Australia International Facilities Corporation (NZ) Pty Ltd. 100 New Zealand International Facility Corporation (Newcastle) Ltd. 100 U.K. International Facility Corporation (Hong Kong) Pty Ltd. * Hong Kong * Boscastle Ltd and Coverack Ltd are shareholders due to residency requirements. Ogden Central and South America, Inc. 100 DE/USA Ogden/Air Aruba Ground Services N.V. 49 Aruba Ogden Argentina, S.A. 100 Argentina Ogden Aviation Services (Chile) Ltda. 99 Chile (1% held by Ogden Asia Pacific Services Inc.) Aviation Services Leader S.A. 80 Chile Ogden Aviation Services Dominicana, S.A. 99 Dominican Rep. Ogden Aviation Services (Panama) Corp. 85 Panama Ogden Ground Services of Panama Corp. 75 Panama Ogden Aviation Services (Venezuela), S.A. 100 Venezuela Ogden Ground Services Caracas, C.A. 100 Venezuela Ogden do Brazil Participacoes S/C Ltda. 100 Brazil Ogden Hellen's International Ltda. 60 Brazil Ogden - Servicos de Atendimento Aeroterrestre Ltda. ("SERVAIR") 100 Brazil Ogden Alimentos Comercio e Servicoes Ltda. 100 Brazil Ogden Ground Services, Inc. 100 Virgin (St. Thomas) Islands Ogden Saint Maarten Ground 100 Netherlands Services, N.V. Antilles Ogden, S. de R.L. de C.V. 66.67 Mexico Ogden Servair Servicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. 50 Mexico Ogden Servicios Aeroportuarios, SA de CV 94.9 Mexico Ogden SEITSA Leasing, S.A. de C.V. 94.9 Mexico Ogden Sint Maarten Ground Services N.V. 100 Netherlands Antilles Ogden & Talma Aviation Services of Peru S.A. 54 Peru Page A-3 Ogden Corporation Ogden Services Corporation (con't.) Ogden International Europe Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Atlantic Design (Europe) Limited 100 Ireland Ogden Holdings B.V. 100 Netherlands Compania General de Sondeos CGS, S.A. 100 Spain Czech-Ogden Airhandling s.r.o. 50 Czech. Rep. KCL Ogden Aviation Services (Private) Limited 50 Pakistan Ogden Aviation (Schiphol) B.V. 100 Netherlands Ogden Cargo B.V. 100 Netherlands Ogden Aviation Spain S.A. 100 Spain Ogden Aviation Services, S.A. 100 Spain Ogden Entertainment Services Portugal, S.A. 100 Portugal Ogden Entertainment Services Spain, S.A. 100 Spain Ogden Power Agua y Energia Torre Pacheco, S.A. 83.3 Spain Sezai Turkes Feyzi Akkaya Ogden Hizmet Ve Isletmecilik A.S. 50 Turkey ("STFA Ogden Maintenance and Service Co.") Ogden Holdings (Deutschland) GmbH 100 Germany Ogden Allied Services GmbH 100 Germany Ogden Aviation Services GmbH & Co. KG 100 Germany Ogden Services GmbH Gesellschaft fur Kultur-, Medien- und Veranstaltungsmanagement 100 Germany Ogden Tegel Verwaltungs GmbH 100 Germany (formerly DAN AIR Services GmbH) Tegel Aircraft Handling GmbH 100 Germany Verwaltung Ogden Aviation Services GmbH 100 Germany Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden umwelt und energie systeme GmbH 100 Germany IEAL energie consult GmbH 100 Germany IEAL energie + umwelt consult, Berlin 100 Germany Olmec Insurance, Ltd. 100 Bermuda Ogden Entertainment Services, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Entertainment Services (Canada) Inc. 100 Canada Fortier Associates International, Inc. 100 Canada The Ogden Northmount Evergreen Group Limited 100 Canada Ogden Palladium Services (Canada) Inc. 100 Canada Ogden Entertainment Services de Mexico, SA de CV 100 Mexico Servicios de Alimentos Bebidas Especializados, SA de CV 100 Mexico Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation 100 NY/U.S.A. Atlantic Design Company, Inc. 100 NY/U.S.A. Datacom de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. 100 Mexico Ogden Facility Services, Inc. 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Allied Eastern States Maintenance Corporation 100 DE/U.S.A. Ogden Servicios de Seguridad, S.A. 100 Costa Rica Ogden Agencia de Seguridad, S.A. 100 Panama Allied Aviation Service Company of Newfoundland, Ltd. 100 Canada Page A-4 Ogden Corporation Ogden Services Corporation Ogden Allied Maintenance Corporation (con't.) Ogden Services of Canada Inc. 100 Canada Cafas Inc. 100 Canada Airconsol Aviation Services Ltd. 100 Canada Ogden Ground Services (Canada) Ltd. 100 Canada Aircraft Services Ltd. 100 Canada Consolidated Aviation Fueling of Toronto Limited 100 Ontario Consolidated Aviation Services of Alberta Limited 100 Canada Ogden Allied Security Services Inc. 100 Canada Ogden Allied Services Inc. 100 Canada ATTACHMENT B 12/31/95 OGDEN PROJECTS, INC. - U.S. SUBSIDIARIES (See Attachment A for foreign subsidiaries) PERCENT DOMESTIC COMPANY OWNERSHIP STATE Ogden Projects, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Energy, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Power Corporation 100 Delaware Geothermal, Inc. 100 Virginia Imperial Power Services, Inc. 100 California New Martinsville Hydro-Operations Corporation 100 W. Virginia Ogden Brandywine Operations, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Geothermal Operations, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Hydro Operations, Inc. 100 Tennessee Ogden Oil & Gas, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Power Equity Corporation 100 Delaware Catalyst New Martinsville Hydroelectric Corporation 100 Delaware ERC Energy, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Heber Field Energy, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Hydro Energy, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Power International Holdings, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden SIGC Energy, Inc. 100 Delaware AMOR 14 Corporation 100 Delaware Ogden SIGC Energy II, Inc. 100 California Ogden SIGC Geothermal Operations, Inc. 100 California Ogden Power Development, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Power Development of Bolivia, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Power Development of Bolivia, Ltd. 100 Cayman Islands Ogden Energy Resource Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Land Management, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Land Management of Warren, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Projects, of Campo, Inc. 100 California Ogden Martin Systems, Inc. 100 Delaware Grey Acre Development Corporation 100 Mass. Ogden Engineering Services, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Marion Land Corp. 100 Oregon Ogden Martin Systems of Alexandria/Arlington, Inc. 100 Virginia OMS Equity of Alexandria/Arlington, Inc. 100 Virginia Ogden Martin Systems of Babylon, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Martin Systems of Bristol, Inc. 100 Connecticut Ogden Martin Systems of Clark, Inc. 100 Ohio OMSC One, Inc. 100 Delaware OMSC Two, Inc. 100 Delaware OMSC Three, Inc. 100 Delaware OMSC Four, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Dakota, Inc. 100 Minnesota Ogden Martin Systems of Eastern/Central Connecticut, Inc. 100 Connecticut Ogden Martin Systems of Fairfax, Inc. 100 Virginia Ogden Martin Systems of Ford Heights, Inc. 100 Illinois Ogden Martin Systems of Haverhill, Inc. 100 Mass. Haverhill Power, Inc. 100 Mass. LMI, Inc. 100 Mass. Ogden Omega Lease, Inc. 100 Delaware Page B-2 Ogden Projects, Inc. Ogden Martin Systems, Inc. (con't.) Ogden Haverhill Properties, Inc. 100 Mass. Ogden Martn Systems of Hillsborough, Inc. 100 Florida Ogden Martin Systems of Hudson, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery One Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Two Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Three Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Four Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Five Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Six Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Huntington Resource Recovery Seven Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Huntsville, Inc. 100 Alabama Ogden Martin Systems of Indianapolis, Inc. 100 Indiana Ogden Martin Systems of Kent, Inc. 100 Michigan Ogden Martin Systems of Knox, Inc. 100 Tennessee NRG/Recovery Group, Inc. 100 Florida Ogden Martin Systems of Lancaster, Inc. 100 Penn. Ogden Martin Systems of Lawrence, Inc. 100 Mass. Ogden Martin Systems of Lee, Inc. 100 Florida Ogden Martin Systems of Long Island, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of L.A., Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Marion, Inc. 100 Oregon Ogden Martin Systems of Mercer, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Martn Systems of Montgomery, Inc. 100 Maryland Ogden Martin Systems of Morris, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Martin Systems of North Carolina, Inc. 100 N. Carolina Ogden Martin Systems of Oakland, Inc. 100 Michigan Ogden Martin Systems of Onondaga, Inc. 100 New York Ogden Martin Systems of Onondaga Two Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Onondaga Three Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Onondaga Four Corp. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Onondaga Five Corp. 100 Delaware OMS Onondaga Operations, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Martin Systems of Pasco, Inc. 100 Florida Ogden Martin Systems of Rhode Island, Inc. 100 R.I. Ogden Martin Systems of San Bernardino, Inc. 100 California Ogden Martin Systems of San Diego, Inc. 100 California Ogden Martin Systems of Stanislaus, Inc. 100 California OMS Equity of Stanislaus, Inc. 100 California Ogden Martin Systems of Tulsa, Inc. 100 Oklahoma Ogden Martin Systems of Union, Inc. 100 New Jersey Ogden Power Systems 7, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Projects Americas, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Projects Holdings, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Projects of Haverhill, Inc. 100 Mass. Ogden Projects of Lawrence, Inc. 100 Mass. Page B-3 Ogden Projects, Inc. (con't.) Ogden Recycling Systems, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Recycling Systems of Chicago, Inc. 100 Illinois Ogden Recycling Systems of Fairfax, Inc. 100 Virginia Ogden Recycling Systems of Indianapolis, Inc. 100 Indiana Ogden Wallingford Associates, Inc. 100 Connecticut Ogden Waste Treatment Services, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Environmental Services of Houston, Inc. 100 Texas American Envirotech,Inc. 100 Texas Stockton Soil Treatment Facility, Inc. 100 California Ogden Water Holdings, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Water Systems, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Water Systems of Jerusalem, Inc. 100 Delaware Ogden Water Systems of Lee County, Inc. 100 Florida OPI Quezon, Inc. 100 Delaware OPW Associates, Inc. 100 Connecticut OPWH, Inc. 100 Delaware RRS Holdings Inc. 100 Delaware Michigan Waste Energy Recovery, Inc. 100 Delaware Oahu Waste Energy Recovery, Inc. 100 California Ogden Projects of Hawaii, Inc. 100 Hawaii Resource Recovery Systems of Connecticut, Inc. 100 Connecticut EX-23 8 AUDITORS' CONSENT EXHIBIT 23 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT Ogden Corporation: We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-36658, 33-38489, 33-36667, 33-17558, 33-54143 of Ogden Corporation on Forms S-8 of our reports dated February 5, 1996 (which express an unqualified opinion and include an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 106, 112, 115, and 121) appearing or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ogden Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995. /s/Deloitte & Touche, LLP New York, New York March 27, 1996 EX-27 9 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME OF THE COMPANY AS OF AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS. 1,000 12-MOS DEC-31-1995 JAN-01-1995 DEC-31-1995 96,782 13,939 634,683 37,039 36,583 926,366 2,400,023 520,844 3,652,671 510,519 2,044,186 0 50 24,734 522,194 3,652,671 551,345 2,184,993 518,457 1,465,249 0 7,204 30,491 40,526 34,237 7,444 0 0 0 7,444 $0.15 $0.15
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----