XML 23 R6.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Business, Liquidity and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Business, Liquidity and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1 — Business, Liquidity and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Business

 

Marina Biotech, Inc. (collectively “Marina”, “the company”, “us” or “we”), in conjunction with our wholly-owned and financially consolidated subsidiaries, Cequent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Cequent”), MDRNA Research, Inc. (“MDRNA”), and Atossa Healthcare, Inc. (“Atossa”), is a biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of nucleic acid-based therapies to treat orphan diseases. Since 2010, we have strategically acquired/in-licensed and further developed nucleic acid chemistry and delivery-related technologies to form an integrated drug discovery platform. We distinguish ourselves from others in the nucleic acid therapeutics area through this unique platform that enables the development of a variety of therapeutics targeting coding and non-coding RNA via multiple mechanisms of action such as RNA interference (“RNAi”), messenger RNA (“mRNA”) translational inhibition, exon skipping, miRNA (“miRNA”) replacement, miRNA inhibition, and steric blocking in order to modulate gene expression either up or down depending on the specific mechanism of action. Our goal is to dramatically improve the lives of the patients and families affected by orphan diseases through either our own efforts or those of our collaborators and licensees.

 

We plan to focus our efforts and resources on the discovery and development of our own pipeline of nucleic acid-based compounds in order to commercialize drug therapies to treat orphan diseases. In addition, we will seek to establish collaborations and strategic partnerships with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to generate revenue through up-front, milestone and royalty payments related to our technology and/or the products that are developed using such technology.

 

Liquidity

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $328.4 million. To the extent that sufficient funding is available, we will in the future continue to incur losses as we continue our research and development (“R&D”) activities. In addition, we have had and will continue to have negative cash flows from operations. We have funded our losses primarily through the sale of common and preferred stock and warrants, revenue provided from our license agreements with other parties, and, to a lesser extent, equipment financing facilities and secured loans. During 2013, we funded operations with a combination of issuances of debt, license-related revenues, sales of reagents and services, and sales of property and equipment. At March 31, 2013, we had a working capital deficit of $5.2 million and $0.1 million in cash.

 

On February 24, 2014, certain debt holders exchanged secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal and interest amount of $1.5 million for 2.0 million shares of our common stock. In addition, on March 7, 2014, we sold 1,200 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and 6.0 million warrants to purchase one share of common stock for $0.75 per share, resulting in proceeds of $6.0 million. We believe that our current cash resources, which include the proceeds of the March 2014 offering, will enable us to fund our intended operations through May 2015.

 

Basis of Preparation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Preparation — The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each period presented. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2013 or for any future period.

 

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates having relatively higher significance include revenue recognition, research and development costs, stock-based compensation, valuation of warrants and subscription investment units, valuation and estimated lives of identifiable intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, valuation of features embedded within note agreements and amendments, estimated accrued restructuring charges and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments —We consider the fair value of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities to not be materially different from their carrying value. These financial instruments have short-term maturities.

 

We follow authoritative guidance with respect to fair value reporting issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for financial assets and liabilities, which defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. The guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

 

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

 

Our cash and restricted cash are subject to fair value measurement and are valued determined by Level 1 inputs. We measure and report at fair value our accrued restructuring liability using discounted estimated cash flows. We measure the liability for committed stock issuances with a fixed share number using Level 1 inputs. We measure the liability for price adjustable warrants, subscription investment units, and certain features embedded in notes, using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, using Level 3 inputs. The following tables summarize our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013:

 

          Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
    Balance at     Quoted prices in         Significant  
    December 31,     active markets for     Significant other     unobservable  
    2012     identical assets     observable inputs     inputs  
Liabilities:                                
Fair value liability for price adjustable warrants   $ 4,169     $ -     $ -     $ 4,169  
Fair value liability for shares to be issued     901       901       -       -  
Total liabilities at fair value   $ 5,070     $ 901     $ -     $ 4,169  

 

          Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
          Quoted prices in         Significant  
    Balance at March     active markets for     Significant other     unobservable  
    31, 2013     identical assets     observable inputs     inputs  
Liabilities:                                
Fair value liability for price adjustable warrants   $ 2,469     $ -     $ -     $ 2,469  
Fair value liability for shares to be issued     523       523       -       -  
Total liabilities at fair value   $ 2,992     $ 523     $ -     $ 2,469  

 

The following presents activity of the fair value liability of price adjustable warrants determined by Level 3 inputs for the three month period from December 31, 2012 to March 31, 2013:

 

    Fair value     Weighted average as of each measurement date  
    liability for price                       Contractual        
    adjustable warrants     Exercise     Stock           life     Risk free  
    (in thousands)     Price     Price     Volatility     (in years)     rate  
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2012   $ 4,169     $ 0.28     $ 0.46       146 %     4.64       0.66 %
Fair value of warrants issued with note amendment 5     342       0.28       0.37       142 %     5.5       1.09 %
Change in fair value included in statement of operations     (2,042 )     -       -       -       -       -  
Balance at March 31, 2013   $ 2,469     $ 0.28     $ 0.25       140 %     4.65       0.65 %

 

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share — Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock has been computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share of common stock has been computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the diluting effect, if any, of outstanding stock options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted net loss per share of common stock has been computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such period. In a net loss period, options, warrants and convertible securities are anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from diluted loss per share calculations.

 

The following number of shares have been excluded from diluted net income (loss) since such inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

 

    Three months ended March 31,
    2012   2013
Stock options outstanding     535,650       284,829  
Warrants     11,251,086       1,306,058  
Total     11,786,736       1,590,887  

 

The following is a reconciliation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding:

 

    Three months ended March 31,
 (In thousands)   2012   2013
Weighted average common shares outstanding     10,700       16,938  
Assumed conversion of net common shares issuable under warrants     —         2,078  
Assumed conversion of notes payable with conversion feature     —         5,270  
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding, diluted     10,700       24,286  

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards - In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires additional disclosures. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on the financial statements.

 

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” which changes the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies the related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results and is disposed of or classified as held for sale. The standard also introduces several new disclosures. The guidance applies prospectively to new disposals and new classifications of disposal groups as held for sale after the effective date. ASU 2014-08 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on the financial statements.