Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies Amendment to Agreement with Windlas Healthcare Private Limited On August 17, 2017, we entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) of that certain Pharmaceutical Development Agreement dated as of March 30, 2017 by and between Windlas Healthcare Private Limited (“Windlas”) and our company (the “Development Agreement”), relating to the development by Windlas of certain pharmaceutical products to be used for conducting clinical trials or for regulatory submissions, as more fully described therein. Pursuant to the Amendment, we and Windlas agreed to amend the Development Agreement to reflect our agreement to issue to Windlas, and Windlas’ agreement to accept from us, in lieu of cash payments with respect to forty percent (40%) of the total amount reflected on invoices sent from time to time by Windlas to us, shares of our common stock having an aggregate value equal to forty percent (40%) of such invoiced amount (with the remaining portion of the invoiced amount being paid in cash). The maximum value of common stock that may be issued to Windlas pursuant to the Development Agreement (as modified by the Amendment) is $2 million. The parties also agreed that the foregoing payment arrangement would apply to any Contract Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (or similar agreement) relating to the manufacturing of commercial batches of the products covered by the Development Agreement that may be entered into between the parties. Litigation Because of the nature of the Company’s activities, the Company is subject to claims and/or threatened legal actions, which arise out of the normal course of business. Other than the disclosure below, as of the date of this filing, the Company is not aware of any pending lawsuits against the Company, its officers or directors. The Company has been named on a complaint filed in New York State as a defendant in the matter entitled Vaya Pharma, Inc. v. Symplmed Technologies, Inc., Symplmed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Erik Emerson and Marina Biotech, Inc. While this complaint has been filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, the Company has not been legally served. The complaint alleges, in relevant part, that: (i) the sale by Symplmed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of its assets related to its Prestalia product, and the sale by Symplmed Technologies, Inc. of its assets related to its DyrctAxess platform, should be set aside pursuant to New York law as they were consummated without fair consideration to the sellers (the “Symplmed Defendants”), and thereby had the effect of fraudulently depriving the creditors of the Symplmed Defendants, including Vaya Pharma, Inc., of funds that could have been used to pay their debts; and (ii) the Company is liable, as successor, for any and all claims by Vaya Pharma, Inc. against the Symplmed Defendants, though pursuant to the agreement the Company is only contractually responsible for liabilities that accrue after the parties entered into the agreement for Prestalia and any liabilities that existed prior to the agreement are contractually held by Symplmed. If and when the Company is legally served, it is the intention of the Company to dispute jurisdiction, the sufficiency of the pleading and the claims set forth in this complaint, and to defend this matter, vigorously. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain. An unfavorable outcome could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies

Amendment to Agreement with Windlas Healthcare Private Limited

On August 17, 2017, we entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) of that certain Pharmaceutical Development Agreement dated as of March 30, 2017 by and between Windlas Healthcare Private Limited (“Windlas”) and our company (the “Development Agreement”), relating to the development by Windlas of certain pharmaceutical products to be used for conducting clinical trials or for regulatory submissions, as more fully described therein. Pursuant to the Amendment, we and Windlas agreed to amend the Development Agreement to reflect our agreement to issue to Windlas, and Windlas’ agreement to accept from us, in lieu of cash payments with respect to forty percent (40%) of the total amount reflected on invoices sent from time to time by Windlas to us, shares of our common stock having an aggregate value equal to forty percent (40%) of such invoiced amount (with the remaining portion of the invoiced amount being paid in cash). The maximum value of common stock that may be issued to Windlas pursuant to the Development Agreement (as modified by the Amendment) is $2 million. The parties also agreed that the foregoing payment arrangement would apply to any Contract Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (or similar agreement) relating to the manufacturing of commercial batches of the products covered by the Development Agreement that may be entered into between the parties.

Litigation

Because of the nature of the Company’s activities, the Company is subject to claims and/or threatened legal actions, which arise out of the normal course of business. Other than the disclosure below, as of the date of this filing, the Company is not aware of any pending lawsuits against the Company, its officers or directors.

The Company has been named on a complaint filed in New York State as a defendant in the matter entitled Vaya Pharma, Inc. v. Symplmed Technologies, Inc., Symplmed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Erik Emerson and Marina Biotech, Inc. While this complaint has been filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, the Company has not been legally served. The complaint alleges, in relevant part, that: (i) the sale by Symplmed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of its assets related to its Prestalia product, and the sale by Symplmed Technologies, Inc. of its assets related to its DyrctAxess platform, should be set aside pursuant to New York law as they were consummated without fair consideration to the sellers (the “Symplmed Defendants”), and thereby had the effect of fraudulently depriving the creditors of the Symplmed Defendants, including Vaya Pharma, Inc., of funds that could have been used to pay their debts; and (ii) the Company is liable, as successor, for any and all claims by Vaya Pharma, Inc. against the Symplmed Defendants, though pursuant to the agreement the Company is only contractually responsible for liabilities that accrue after the parties entered into the agreement for Prestalia and any liabilities that existed prior to the agreement are contractually held by Symplmed. If and when the Company is legally served, it is the intention of the Company to dispute jurisdiction, the sufficiency of the pleading and the claims set forth in this complaint, and to defend this matter, vigorously. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain. An unfavorable outcome could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.