Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Dec. 31, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each period presented. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2017 or for any future period.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).   The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of Company’s management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IThenaPharma Inc. and Marina Biotech, Inc. and the wholly-owned subsidiaries, Cequent, MDRNA, and Atossa, and eliminate any inter-company balances and transactions.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IThenaPharma Inc. and Marina Biotech, Inc. and the wholly-owned subsidiaries, Cequent, MDRNA, and Atossa, and eliminate any inter-company balances and transactions.

Going Concern and Management’s Liquidity Plans

Going Concern and Management’s Liquidity Plans

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $3,033,860 and a negative working capital of $2,297,576. We anticipate that we will continue to incur operating losses as we execute our plan to raise additional funds and investigate strategic and business development initiatives. In addition, we have had and will continue to have negative cash flows from operations. We have previously funded our losses primarily through the sale of common and preferred stock and warrants, the sale of notes, revenue provided from our license agreements and, to a lesser extent, equipment financing facilities and secured loans. In 2016 and 2015, we funded operations with a combination of the issuance of notes and preferred stock, and license-related revenues. At March 31, 2017, we had a cash balance of $216,441. Our operating activities consume the majority of our cash resources.

There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may affect our ability to obtain future financing or engage in strategic transactions, and may require us to curtail our operations. We cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of our actions to generate liquidity, including the availability of additional debt financing, or whether such actions would generate the expected liquidity as currently planned.

Going Concern and Plan of Operations

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $1,951,082 and a negative working capital of $2,651,189. To the extent that sufficient funding is available, we will continue to incur operating losses as we execute our plan to raise additional funds and investigate strategic and business development initiatives. In addition, we have had and will continue to have negative cash flows from operations. We have funded our losses primarily through the sale of common and preferred stock and warrants, the sale of the Notes, revenue provided from our license agreements and, to a lesser extent, equipment financing facilities and secured loans.   In 2016 and 2015, we funded operations with a combination of the issuance of the Notes, preferred stock and license-related revenues. At December 31, 2016, we had a cash balance of $105,347. Our limited operating activities consume the majority of our cash resources.

There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may affect our ability to obtain future financing or engage in strategic transactions, and may require us to curtail our operations. We cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of our actions to generate liquidity, including the availability of additional debt financing, or whether such actions would generate the expected liquidity as currently planned.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from such estimates under different assumptions or circumstances.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from such estimates under different assumptions or circumstances.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. There are no cash equivalent as of December 31, 2016 or 2015.

The Company deposits its cash with major financial institutions and may at times exceed the federally insured limit. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had $0 and $11,848, respectively, in excess of the federal insurance limit.

Goodwill

Goodwill

The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of intangible assets not subject to amortization, including goodwill, to determine whether impairment may exist. Goodwill and certain intangible assets are assessed annually, or when certain triggering events occur, for impairment using fair value measurement techniques. These events could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, a decline in operating performance, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of the business, or other factors. Specifically, goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company uses level 3 inputs and a discounted cash flow methodology to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit. A discounted cash flow analysis requires one to make various judgmental assumptions including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates, and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the Company’s budget and long-term plans. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the respective reporting units. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit.

The Company did not record an impairment loss on goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Research and Development

Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development expenses were $108,858 and $322,317 for the years ended on December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Research and development expenses include compensation and related overhead for employees and consultants involved in research and development and the cost of materials purchased for research and development.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We consider the fair value of cash, accounts payable, due to related parties, notes payable, convertible notes payable and accrued liabilities not to be materially different from their carrying value. These financial instruments have short-term maturities. We follow authoritative guidance with respect to fair value reporting issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for financial assets and liabilities, which defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. The guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1:	Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3:	Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Our cash is subject to fair value measurement and is determined by Level 1 inputs. We measure the liability for committed stock issuances with a fixed share number using Level 1 inputs. We measure the liability for price adjustable warrants and certain features embedded in notes, using the probability adjusted Black-Scholes option pricing model (“Black-Scholes”), which management has determined approximates values using more complex methods, using Level 3 inputs. The following tables summarize our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017:

	Balance at December 31, 2016		Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets		Level 2 Significant other observable inputs		Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs
Liabilities:
Fair value liability for price adjustable warrants	$	141,723	$	-	$	-	$	141,723
Total liabilities at fair value	$	141,723	$	-	$	-	$	141,723

	Balance at March 31, 2017		Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets		Level 2 Significant other observable inputs		Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs
Liabilities:
Fair value liability for price adjustable warrants	$	244,795	$	-	$	-	$	244,795
Total liabilities at fair value	$	244,795	$	-	$	-	$	244,795

The following presents activity of the fair value liability of price adjustable warrants determined by Level 3 inputs for the period ended March 31, 2017:

	Fair value liability for price adjustable warrants
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	141,723
Fair value of warrants issued		-
Exercise of warrants		-
Change in fair value included in condensed consolidated statement of operations		103,072
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	244,795

The fair value liability of price adjustable warrants for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was determined using the probability adjusted Black-Scholes option pricing model using exercise prices of $0.28 to $0.75, stock price of $0.28, volatility of 123% to 184%, contractual lives of 2.5 to 6 years, and risk free rates of 0.62% to 1.93%.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We consider the fair value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities not to be materially different from their carrying value. These financial instruments have short-term maturities. We follow authoritative guidance with respect to fair value reporting issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for financial assets and liabilities, which defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. The guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Our cash is subject to fair value measurement and is determined by Level 1 inputs. We measure the liability for committed stock issuances with a fixed share number using Level 1 inputs. We measure the liability for price adjustable warrants and certain features embedded in notes, using the probability adjusted Black-Scholes option pricing model (“Black-Scholes”), which management has determined approximates values using more complex methods, using Level 3 inputs. The following tables summarize our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

	Balance at December 31, 2016		Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets		Level 2 Significant other observable inputs		Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs
Liabilities:
Fair value liability for price adjustable warrants	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	141,723
Total liabilities at fair value	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	141,723

		Balance at December 31, 2015		Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets		Level 2 Significant other observable inputs		Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs
Liabilities:
Fair value liability for warrants	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	36,470
Total liabilities at fair value	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	36,470

The following presents activity of the fair value liability of price adjustable warrants determined by Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

	Fair value liability for price adjustable warrants
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	-
Fair value of warrants issued		-
Exercise of warrants		-
Change in fair value included in consolidated statement of operations		-
Balance at December 31, 2015		-
Fair value of warrants issued		-
Fair value of warrants assumed in reverse merger		66,623
Change in fair value included in consolidated statement of operations		75,100
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	141,723

The fair value liability of price adjustable warrants for the year ended December 31, 2016 was determined using the probability adjusted Black-Scholes option pricing model using exercise prices of $0.28 to $0.75, stock price of $0.15, volatility of 121% to 157%, contractual lives of 2.5 to 6 years, and risk free rates of 0.62% to 1.93%.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review all of our long-lived assets for impairment indicators throughout the year and perform detailed testing whenever impairment indicators are present. In addition, we perform detailed impairment testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually at December 31. When necessary, we record charges for impairments. Specifically:

● For finite-lived intangible assets, such as developed technology rights, and for other long-lived assets, we compare the undiscounted amount of the projected cash flows associated with the asset, or asset group, to the carrying amount. If the carrying amount is found to be greater, we record an impairment loss for the excess of book value over fair value. In addition, in all cases of an impairment review, we re-evaluate the remaining useful lives of the assets and modify them, as appropriate; and

● For indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as acquired in-process R&D assets, each year and whenever impairment indicators are present, we determine the fair value of the asset and record an impairment loss for the excess of book value over fair value, if any.

Management determined that no impairment indicators were present and that no impairment charges were necessary as of March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review all of our long-lived assets for impairment indicators throughout the year and perform detailed testing whenever impairment indicators are present. In addition, we perform detailed impairment testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually at December 31. When necessary, we record charges for impairments. Specifically:

● For finite-lived intangible assets, such as developed technology rights, and for other long-lived assets, we compare the undiscounted amount of the projected cash flows associated with the asset, or asset group, to the carrying amount. If the carrying amount is found to be greater, we record an impairment loss for the excess of book value over fair value. In addition, in all cases of an impairment review, we re-evaluate the remaining useful lives of the assets and modify them, as appropriate; and

● For indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as acquired in-process R&D assets, each year and whenever impairment indicators are present, we determine the fair value of the asset and record an impairment loss for the excess of book value over fair value, if any.

Management determined that no impairment indicators were present and that no impairment charges were necessary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Revenue will be recognized when persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, collectability is reasonably assured, and fees are fixed or determinable. Deferred revenue expected to be recognized within the next 12 months is classified as current. Substantially all of our revenue will be generated from licensing arrangements that do not involve multiple deliverables and have no ongoing influence, control or R&D obligations. Our license arrangements may include upfront non-refundable payments, development milestone payments, patent-based or product sale royalties, and commercial sales, all of which are treated as separate units of accounting. In addition, we may receive revenues from sub-licensing arrangements. For each separate unit of accounting, we will determine that the delivered items have value to the other party on a stand-alone basis, we will have objective and reliable evidence of fair value using available internal evidence for the undelivered item(s) and our arrangements generally do not contain a general right of return relative to the delivered item.

Revenue from licensing arrangements will be recorded when earned based on the specific terms of the contracts. Upfront non-refundable payments, where we are not providing any continuing services as in the case of a license to our IP, are recognized when the license becomes available to the other party.

Milestone payments typically represent nonrefundable payments to be received in conjunction with the uncertain achievement of a specific event identified in the contract, such as initiation or completion of specified development activities or specific regulatory actions such as the filing of an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”). We believe a milestone payment represent the culmination of a distinct earnings process when it is not associated with ongoing research, development or other performance on our part and it is substantive in nature. We recognize such milestone payments as revenue when it becomes due and collection is reasonably assured.

Royalty and earn-out payment revenues will generally be recognized upon commercial product sales by the licensee as reported by the licensee.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based Compensation

We use Black-Scholes for the valuation of stock-based awards. Stock-based compensation expense is based on the value of the portion of the stock-based award that will vest during the period, adjusted for expected forfeitures. The estimation of stock-based awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual or updated results differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded in the period the estimates are revised. Black-Scholes requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, and other reasonable assumptions could provide differing results. Our determination of the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected life of the award and expected stock price volatility over the term of the award. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized immediately for immediately-vested portions of the grant, with the remaining portions recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting periods based on the fair value of such stock-based awards on the grant date. Forfeiture rates have been estimated based on historical rates and compensation expense is adjusted for general forfeiture rates in each period. Beginning in September 2014, Marina did not use historical forfeiture rates and did not apply a forfeiture rate as the historical forfeiture rate was not believed to be a reasonable estimate of the probability that the outstanding awards would be exercised in the future. Given the specific terms of the awards and the recipient population, we expect these options will all be exercised in the future.

Non-employee stock compensation expense is recognized immediately for immediately-vested portions of a grant, with the remaining portions recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting periods. At the end of each financial reporting period prior to vesting, the value of the unvested stock options, as calculated using Black-Scholes, is re-measured using the fair value of our common stock, and the stock-based compensation recognized during the period is adjusted accordingly.

Net Income (loss) Per Common Share

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes the effect of common stock equivalents (stock options, unvested restricted stock, and warrants) when, under either the treasury or if-converted method, such inclusion in the computation would be dilutive. Net income (loss) is adjusted for the dilutive effect of the change in fair value liability for price adjustable warrants, if applicable. The following number of shares have been excluded from diluted net income (loss) since such inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Stock options outstanding		2,334,000		-
Warrants		27,029,995		139,173
Convertible Notes Payable		1,716,123		-
Total		31,080,118		139,173

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes the effect of common stock equivalents (stock options, unvested restricted stock, and warrants) when, under either the treasury or if-converted method, such inclusion in the computation would be dilutive. Net income (loss) is adjusted for the dilutive effect of the change in fair value liability for price adjustable warrants, if applicable. The following number of shares have been excluded from diluted net income (loss) since such inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015
Stock options outstanding		1,688,106		-
Warrants		24,466,783		117,720
Convertible Notes Payable		892,857		-
Total		27,047,746		117,720

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carry forwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method to compute the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the related financial amounts, using currently enacted tax rates.

Under the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and there was no effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations as a result of adopting the provisions of ASC 740.

The Company recognizes a tax benefit only if it is more likely than not that the position is sustainable, based solely on its technical merits and considerations of the relevant taxing authorities; administrative practice and precedents. The Company completed its analysis of uncertain tax positions in accordance with applicable accounting guidance and determined no amounts were required to be recognized in the financial statements at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation – Improvements to Employee Shared-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). This guidance is intended to simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual periods. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual periods. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this ASU on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases. This update requires lessees to recognize at the lease commencement date a lease liability which is the lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and right-of-use assets, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. This update is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Lessees and lessors must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Applying a full retrospective transition approach is not allowed. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). The Update intends to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial instruments with more decision-useful information and addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This new standard affects all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. Entities should apply the amendments as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values, including disclosure requirement, should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption of the update. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, including not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans within the scope of ASC Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting, ASC 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities that are not public business entities may adopt the ASC 2016-01 earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2015, the FASB issued changes to the accounting for measurement-period adjustments related to business combinations. Currently, an acquiring entity is required to retrospectively adjust the balance sheet amounts of the acquiree recognized at the acquisition date with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill during the measurement period, as well as revise comparative information for prior periods presented within financial statements as needed, including revising income effects, such as depreciation and amortization, as a result of changes made to the balance sheet amounts of the acquiree. Such adjustments are required when new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts initially recognized or would have resulted in the recognition of additional assets or liabilities. The measurement period is the period after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may adjust the balance sheet amounts recognized for a business combination (generally up to one year from the date of acquisition). The changes eliminate the requirement to make such retrospective adjustments, and, instead require the acquiring entity to record these adjustments in the reporting period they are determined. Additionally, the changes require the acquiring entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of the amount recorded in current-period income by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the balance sheet amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. These changes were to become effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued changes to the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. These changes created a comprehensive framework for all entities in all industries to apply in the determination of when to recognize revenue, and, therefore, supersede virtually all existing revenue recognition requirements and guidance. This framework is expected to result in less complex guidance in application while providing a consistent and comparable methodology for revenue recognition. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract(s), (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract(s), and (v) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year, making these changes effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its financial statements.

Subsequent Event Policy

Subsequent Events

Except for the event(s) discussed in Note 9, there were no subsequent events that required recognition or disclosure. The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Subsequent Event Policy

Management has evaluated all activity since December 31, 2016, through the date the financial statements were issued and has concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Financial Statements or disclosure in the Notes to the Financial Statements, other than those described in Note 12.