10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

Commission file number: 0-12668

Hills Bancorporation

Incorporated in Iowa I.R.S. Employer Identification
No. 42-1208067

131 MAIN STREET, HILLS, IOWA 52235

Telephone number: (319) 679-2291

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes o No

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definition of  “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated Filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	o	Small Reporting Company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

CLASS	SHARES OUTSTANDING At July 31, 2008
Common Stock, no par value	4,467,742

Page 1 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
Index to Form 10-Q

Part I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		Page      Number
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated balance sheets, June 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007		3
	Consolidated statements of income (unaudited) for three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007		4
	Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) (unaudited) for three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007		5
	Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity (unaudited) for six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007		6
	Consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited) for six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007		7 - 8
	Notes to consolidated financial statements		9 - 17
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18 - 32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		33
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		34
	Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal proceedings		35
Item 1A.	Risk factors		35
Item 2.	Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds		35
Item 3.	Defaults upon senior securities		35
Item 4.	Submission of matters to a vote of security holders		36
Item 5.	Other information		36
Item 6.	Exhibits		36
Signatures			37
Exhibits Index			38

Page 2 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts In Thousands, Except Shares)

ASSETS	June 30, 2008 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2007
Cash and due from banks	$	27,768		$	32,383
Federal funds sold		1			—
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	27,769		$	32,383
Investment securities available for sale at fair value (amortized cost June 30, 2008 $201,532; December 31, 2007 $198,551)		202,484			199,599
Stock of Federal Home Loan Bank		14,247			14,169
Loans held for sale		5,239			6,792
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses (June 30, 2008 $24,550; December 31, 2007 $19,710)		1,400,501			1,352,599
Property and equipment, net		21,495			21,220
Tax credit real estate		8,661			8,803
Accrued interest receivable		11,337			11,391
Deferred income taxes, net		9,868			7,731
Goodwill		2,500			2,500
Other assets		2,843			3,911
	$	1,706,944		$	1,661,098
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	162,071		$	154,219
Interest-bearing deposits		1,006,304			989,707
Total deposits	$	1,168,375		$	1,143,926
Short-term borrowings		105,564			87,076
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		265,348			265,348
Accrued interest payable		2,885			3,227
Other liabilities		10,516			8,626
	$	1,552,688		$	1,508,203
Redeemable Common Stock Held by Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)	$	22,425		$	22,205
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Capital stock, no par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued June 30, 2008 4,585,941 shares; December 31, 2007 4,583,520 shares	$	—		$	—
Paid in capital		12,963			12,823
Retained earnings		146,675			144,122
Accumulated other comprehensive income		588			647
Treasury stock at cost (June 30, 2008 117,399 shares; December 31, 2007 93,413 shares)		(5,970	)		(4,697	)
	$	154,256		$	152,895
Less maximum cash obligation related to ESOP shares		22,425			22,205
	$	131,831		$	130,690
	$	1,706,944		$	1,661,098

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 3 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(Amounts In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	22,010	$	21,888	$	44,492	$	43,262
Investment securities:
Taxable		1,236		1,202		2,486		2,241
Nontaxable		832		776		1,673		1,539
Federal funds sold		14		142		14		250
Total interest income	$	24,092	$	24,008	$	48,665	$	47,292
Interest expense:
Deposits	$	7,340	$	8,925	$	15,644	$	17,443
Short-term borrowings		374		484		922		989
FHLB borrowings		3,151		2,987		6,369		5,930
Total interest expense	$	10,865	$	12,396	$	22,935	$	24,362
Net interest income	$	13,227	$	11,612	$	25,730	$	22,930
Provision for loan losses		5,172		954		5,759		1,486
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	$	8,055	$	10,658	$	19,971	$	21,444
Other income:
Net gain on sale of loans	$	386	$	326	$	710	$	527
Trust fees		1,006		960		2,017		1,888
Service charges and fees		1,973		2,020		3,867		3,731
Rental revenue on tax credit real estate		228		190		506		306
Other noninterest income		655		640		1,458		1,313
	$	4,248	$	4,136	$	8,558	$	7,765
Other expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	5,091	$	4,832	$	10,097	$	9,648
Occupancy		588		585		1,206		1,163
Furniture and equipment		894		891		1,808		1,723
Office supplies and postage		336		321		664		639
Advertising and business development		403		454		764		815
Outside services		1,353		1,272		2,622		2,428
Rental expenses on tax credit real estate		288		240		593		491
Other noninterest expense		1,139		326		1,591		626
	$	10,092	$	8,921	$	19,345	$	17,533
Income before income taxes	$	2,211	$	5,873	$	9,184	$	11,676
Income taxes		361		1,806		2,545		3,604
Net income	$	1,850	$	4,067	$	6,639	$	8,072
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.41	$	0.90	$	1.48	$	1.79
Diluted		0.41		0.90		1.47		1.78

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 4 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)
(Amounts In Thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net income	$	1,850		$	4,067		$	6,639		$	8,072
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized holding losses arising during the period,	$	(3,969	)	$	(1,491	)	$	(96	)	$	(1,159	)
Income tax effect of unrealized losses		1,518			570			37			443
Other comprehensive loss:	$	(2,451	)	$	(921	)	$	(59	)	$	(716	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(601	)	$	3,146		$	6,580		$	7,356

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 5 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
(Amounts In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

	Paid In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Maximum Cash Obligation Related To ESOP Shares			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	12,364		$	131,852		$	(1,265	)	$	(20,940	)	$	(3,372	)	$	118,639
Issuance of 8,487 shares of common stock		188			—			—			—			—			188
Forfeiture of 476 shares of common stock		(20	)		—			—			—			—			(20	)
Share-based compensation		18			—			—			—			—			18
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation		93			—			—			—			—			93
Change related to ESOP shares		—			—			—			(826	)		—			(826	)
Net income		—			8,072			—			—			—			8,072
Cash dividends ($.86 per share)		—			(3,873	)		—			—			—			(3,873	)
Purchase of 14,628 shares of common stock		—			—			—			—			(751	)		(751	)
Other comprehensive loss		—			—			(716	)		—			—			(716	)
Balance, June 30, 2007	$	12,643		$	136,051		$	(1,981	)	$	(21,766	)	$	(4,123	)	$	120,824
Balance, December 31, 2007	$	12,823		$	144,122		$	647		$	(22,205	)	$	(4,697	)	$	130,690
Issuance of 3,166 shares of common stock		157			—			—			—			—			157
Forfeiture of 745 shares of common stock		(32	)		—			—			—			—			(32	)
Share-based compensation		11			—			—			—			—			11
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation		4			—			—			—			—			4
Change related to ESOP shares		—			—			—			(220	)		—			(220	)
Net income		—			6,639			—			—			—			6,639
Cash dividends ($.91 per share)		—			(4,086	)		—			—			—			(4,086	)
Purchase of 23,986 shares of common stock		—			—			—			—			(1,273	)		(1,273	)
Other comprehensive loss		—			—			(59	)		—			—			(59	)
Balance, June 30, 2008	$	12,963		$	146,675		$	588		$	(22,425	)	$	(5,970	)	$	131,831

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 6 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Amounts In Thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2008			2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	6,639		$	8,072
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		1,127			1,146
Provision for loan losses		5,759			1,486
Share-based compensation		11			18
Forfeiture of common stock		(32	)		(20	)
Compensation expensed through issuance of common stock		147			92
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		(4	)		(93	)
Provision for deferred income taxes		(2,100	)		(434	)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		355			—
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		54			(1,249	)
Amortization of discount on investment securities, net		182			176
Decrease (increase) in other assets		1,072			(249	)
Increase in accrued interest and other liabilities		1,548			1,374
Loans originated for sale		(80,300	)		(61,286	)
Proceeds on sales of loans		82,563			60,233
Net gain on sales of loans		(710	)		(527	)
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities	$	16,311		$	8,739
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities:
Available for sale	$	24,738		$	18,462
Held to maturity		—			45
Purchases of investment securities available for sale		(27,979	)		(29,120	)
Loans made to customers, net of collections		(53,661	)		(15,264	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,757	)		(686	)
Investment in tax credit real estate, net		142			171
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(58,517	)	$	(26,392	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits	$	24,449		$	21,351
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		18,488			(6,048	)
Stock options exercised		10			96
Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation		4			93
Borrowings from FHLB		20,000			30,000
Payments on FHLB borrowings		(20,000	)		(20,000	)
Borrowings from FRB		1,650			8,000
Payments on FRB borrowings		(1,650	)		—
Purchase of treasury stock		(1,273	)		(751	)
Dividends paid		(4,086	)		(3,873	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	37,592		$	28,868

Page 7 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (Continued)

(Amounts In Thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2008			2007
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(4,614	)	$	11,215
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of year		32,383			23,397
End of period	$	27,769		$	34,612
Supplemental Disclosures
Cash payments for:
Interest paid to depositors	$	15,986		$	17,410
Interest paid on other obligations		7,290			6,919
Income taxes paid		4,973			3,980
Noncash financing activities:
Increase in maximum cash obligation related to ESOP shares	$	220		$	826
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 8 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting and with instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. These financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which in the opinion of management are considered necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods shown. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The Company considers that it operates as one business segment, a commercial bank.

Operating results for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Form 10-K Annual Report of Hills Bancorporation and subsidiary (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2008.

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate, and as such, events may occur in the future which affect its accuracy. Actual default and loss rates may differ materially from levels assumed by the Company. Given the short period of time that has elapsed since the floods (as discussed in Note 4), it is difficult to make a determination regarding individual credit relationships at this stage. The Company anticipates that additional information will be gathered in the coming quarters which may require an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses for flood-related issues. Management will continue to closely monitor its portfolio.

Note 2. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing net income (the numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Diluted per share amounts assume the conversion, exercise or issuance of all potential common stock equivalents unless the effect is to reduce the loss or increase the income per common share from continuing operations.

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented is as follows:

	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2008			2007		2008			2007
Common shares outstanding at the beginning of the period		4,485,935			4,497,275		4,490,107			4,503,738
Weighted average number of net shares issued (redeemed)		(11,887	)		1,994		(9,433	)		270
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)		4,474,048			4,499,269		4,480,674			4,504,008
Weighted average of potential dilutive shares attributable to stock options granted, computed under the treasury stock method		20,024			26,945		19,987			27,130
Weighted average number of shares (diluted)		4,494,072			4,526,214		4,500,661			4,531,138
Net income (In Thousands)	$	1,850		$	4,067	$	6,639		$	8,072
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.41		$	0.90	$	1.48		$	1.79
Diluted	$	0.41		$	0.90	$	1.47		$	1.78

Page 9 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

As of January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements in its entirety. The Statement provides a single definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures concerning fair value. Previously, different definitions of fair value were contained in various accounting pronouncements that prescribe fair value as the relevant measure of value, except FAS 123R and related interpretation and pronouncements that require or permit measurement similar to fair value but are not intended to measure fair value. See Note 5.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“FAS 159”). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective of FAS 159 is to provide opportunities to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply hedge accounting provisions. FAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The Statement was effective for financial statements issued for the year beginning after November 15, 2007. As the fair value option was not elected for any financial assets or liabilities, the adoption of this Statement did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings (“SAB 109”). SAB 109 provides interpretive guidance on the accounting for written loan commitments recorded at fair value through earnings under generally accepted accounting principles. SAB 109 revises and rescinds portions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. The SEC staff belief is that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of a loan should be included in the measurement of derivative and other written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 109 was effective for financial statements issued for the year beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of SAB 109 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141 (revised), Business Combinations (“FAS 141R”). The standard changes the accounting for business combinations including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. FAS 141R is effective for financial statements issued for the year beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this Statement will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“FAS 160”). The standard changes the accounting for noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of consolidated stockholders’ equity, and the elimination of “minority interest” accounting in results of operations with earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests reported as part of consolidated earnings. Additionally, FAS 160 revises the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent’s controlling ownership interest. FAS 160 is effective for financial statements issued for the year beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this Statement will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Page 10 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In January 2008, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods (“SAB 110”) which amends Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment (“SAB 107”). SAB 110 allows for the continued use, under certain circumstances, of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of expected term of so-called “plain vanilla” stock options accounted for under FAS 123R. SAB 110 amends SAB 107 to permit the use of the “simplified” method beyond December 31, 2007. The adoption of SAB 110 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“FAS 161”). The standard requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative agreements. FAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued after November 15, 2008. The adoption of FAS 161 will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“FAS 162”). The standard identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. FAS 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The adoption of FAS 162 will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (“EITF No. 07-5”). EITF No. 07-5 defines when adjustment features within contracts are considered to be equity-indexed. EITF No. 07-5 is effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2008. The adoption of EITF No. 07-5 will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 08-3, Accounting by Lessees for Maintenance Deposits under Lease Agreements (“EITF No. 08-3”). EITF No. 08-3 states that lessees should account for nonrefundable maintenance deposits as deposit assets if it is probable that maintenance activities will occur and the deposit is therefore realizable. Amounts on deposit that are not probable of being used to fund future maintenance activities should be charged to expense. EITF No. 08-3 is effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2008. The adoption of EITF No. 08-3 will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities as defined in EITF 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share, and therefore should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Page 11 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 4. 2008 Floods

In June 2008, severe flooding occurred throughout southeastern Iowa. Two of the Company’s thirteen offices were damaged by the floods. The damaged offices are the Cedar Rapids downtown office located at 240 3^rd Avenue SE and the Iowa City office located at 1401 South Gilbert Street. Both damaged offices are temporarily closed. The Company’s operations center located in Hills, Iowa was not affected. Access to customer accounts was unaffected by the floods. The Company’s employees were relocated to other offices. No employees were laid off by the Company.

Financial Impact

The impact of the floods has decreased the Company’s earnings for 2008. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 included $2,751,000 of flood-related expenses, net of tax. The primary effect was from potential loan losses related to the floods. Based on an evaluation of the allowance for loan losses, the Company recorded an additional provision for loan losses of $3,790,000 in the second quarter of 2008. Other expenses increased $665,000. A tax benefit of $1,704,000 was recorded as a result of the $4,455,000 in additional expenses. Both basic and diluted earnings per share were reduced $0.61 because of the flood-related expenses. The Company does not have insurance to cover the flood-related expenses.

Provision for Loan Losses

Due to the wide-spread damage caused by the floods, the Company performed a review of its loan portfolio for impacted customers. Management of the Company analyzed the affected properties and businesses, flood insurance coverage, impact on sources of repayment and underlying collateral, and customer repayment capability.

The portfolio was considered in two categories by loan type. The first category included all 1-to-4 family, owner occupied mortgage loans. The second category included construction, 1-to-4 family non-owner occupied, multi-family real estate, commercial real estate and commercial operating loans. The Company evaluated the 1-to-4 family owner-occupied mortgage loans based on the address of where the collateral is located. Collateral addresses were matched to flooded areas. This listing was reviewed by management and it was determined that an additional provision of $931,000 was needed in the second quarter of 2008 for 1-to-4 family owner occupied mortgage loans. Loans in the second category of construction, 1-to-4 family non-owner occupied, multi-family, commercial real estate and commercial operating loans were evaluated for potential losses based on individual credit relationships. This evaluation included a determination of whether a customer business and/or loan collateral was located in a flooded area. Individual credit relationships for which asset quality was downgraded based on this review resulted in a provision of $2,859,000.

Other Expenses

The Company recognized a loss of $355,000 in the second quarter of 2008 on the net book value of property and equipment at its two damaged locations. This loss is included in other expenses on the income statement.

The Company has recorded $310,000 of expenses related to the floods. These expenses are included in other expenses on the income statement. The expenses include approximately $183,000 for decontaminating, drying and demolishing the two flooded offices. This expense also includes drying of a minimal amount of the Company’s records. In addition, the Company incurred $55,000 in expenses related to the evacuation of the two damaged locations. The remaining expense of $72,000 includes various items including meals, sandbagging and other supplies and extra mileage due to road closings and relocation of offices.

Page 12 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 4. 2008 Floods (continued)

Office Locations

The Company is currently operating a 2,000 square foot temporary location at 1210 South Gilbert Street in Iowa City, Iowa. This temporary space is being leased on a month-to-month basis. Rents, including common area charges and real estate taxes, total $2,650 per month.

In the third quarter of 2008, the Company intends to open two additional temporary locations. The Company’s Trust Department will be located at a 6,600 square foot building at 2771 Oakdale Boulevard in Coralville, Iowa with rent of $6,600 per month. The lease term for the Coralville location will be one year. The Company will also lease an 800 square foot space in downtown Cedar Rapids for $1,025 a month. The Cedar Rapids space will be at 240 3^rd Avenue SE, located on the second floor of the Company’s damaged office. The lease term for the Cedar Rapids location will be three months. The rents for both of these locations include common area charges and real estate taxes. The Company intends to open the two locations in August 2008.

The Company intends to rebuild both offices affected by the floods. No contracts have been signed for the construction but the Company estimates remodeling costs in Cedar Rapids of $525,000 and in Iowa City of $1,045,000, for a total of $1,570,000. Additional costs of $425,000 are estimated to replace equipment and ATMs at the locations. Total costs are estimated to be $760,000 for Cedar Rapids and $1,235,000 for Iowa City, for a total of $1,995,000.

Note 5. Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”), in its entirety on January 1, 2008. FAS 157 provides a single definition for fair value, a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures concerning fair value. Fair value is defined under FAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

The Company determines the fair market value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in FAS 157. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as follows:

Level 1	Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 includes securities purchased from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2	Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Level 2 includes securities issued by state and political subdivisions. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Level 3	Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets and liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. The Company does not have any Level 3 assets or liabilities.

Page 13 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Note 5.	Fair Value Measurements (continued)

It is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimating fair value for assets or liabilities not recorded at fair value.

ASSETS

Investment securities available for sale: Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If a quoted price is not available, the fair value is obtained from benchmarking the security against similar securities. Level 1 securities include securities from the FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA. Level 2 securities include securities issued by state or political subdivisions.

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at historical cost. The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between origination of the loan and its sale on the secondary market.

Loans: The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company does record nonrecurring fair value adjustments to loans to reflect (1) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value.

Foreclosed assets: Foreclosed assets consist mainly of other real estate owned but may include other types of assets repossessed by the Company. Foreclosed assets are adjusted to the lower of carrying value or fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Fair value is generally based upon independent market prices or appraised values of the collateral. Foreclosed assets are classified as Level 2.

Non-marketable equity investments: Non-marketable equity investments are recorded under the cost or equity method of accounting. There are generally restrictions on the sale and/or liquidation of these investments, including stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank. The carrying value of stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank approximates fair value.

LIABILITIES

Deposit liabilities: Deposit liabilities are carried at historical cost. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market account deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. If the fair value of the fixed maturity certificates of deposit is calculated at less than the carrying amount, the carrying value of these deposits is reported as the fair value.

Short-term borrowings: Short-term borrowings are carried at historical cost and include federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the relatively short time between the origination of the liability and its expected realization.

Long-term borrowings: Long-term borrowings are recorded at historical cost. The fair values of the Company’s long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Valuation methodologies have not changed during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

Page 14 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Note 5.	Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below represents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	June 30, 2008
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(Amounts in Thousands)
Investment securities available for sale	$	104,219	$	98,265	$	—	$	202,484
Total	$	104,219	$	98,265	$	—	$	202,484

All securities from the FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA are included in Level 1.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company is required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The valuation methodologies used to measure these fair value adjustments are described above. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in 2008 that were still held on the balance sheet at June 30, 2008, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual assets at quarter end.

	June 30, 2008								Quarter Ended June 30, 2008
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Total Losses
	(Amounts in Thousands)
Loans (1)	$	—	$	3,319	$	—	$	3,319	$	186
Foreclosed assets (2)		—		15		—		15		—
Total	$	—	$	3,334	$	—	$	3,334	$	186

(1)	Represents carrying value and related write-downs of loans for which adjustments are based on the value of the collateral. The carrying value of loans fully-charged off is zero.
(2)	Represents the fair value and related losses of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets.

Page 15 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Note 6.	Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has a Stock Option and Incentive Plan for certain key employees and directors whereby shares of common stock have been reserved for awards in the form of stock options or restricted stock awards. Under the plan, the aggregate number of options and shares granted cannot exceed 198,000 shares. A Stock Option Committee may grant options at prices equal to the fair value of the stock at the date of the grant. Options expire 10 years from the date of the grant. Director options granted on or before December 31, 2006 may be exercised immediately. Director options granted on or after January 1, 2007 and officers’ rights under the plan vest over a five-year period from the date of the grant.

Information concerning the issuance of stock options is presented in the following table:

	Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In Thousands)
Options outstanding at January 1, 2008		48,365	$   31.02			5.05		$   1,500
Options outstanding at June 30, 2008		47,965		31.06		4.56		1,490
Options exercisable at June 30, 2008		40,385		28.49		4.01		1,151

The fair value of each option is estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected lives of options granted incorporate historical employee exercise behavior. The risk-free rate for periods that coincide with the expected life of the options is based on the annual 10 year interest rate swap rate as published by the Federal Reserve Bank. Expected volatility is based on volatility levels of the Company’s peer’s common stock as the Company’s stock has limited trading activity. Expected dividend yield was based a set dividend rate.

At June 30, 2008, 108,929 shares were available for issuance under the plan. Stock options for 400 shares with a weighted-average exercise price of $25.67 were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The intrinsic value of the options exercised was $10,268.

As of June 30, 2008, there was $19,092 in unrecognized compensation cost for stock options granted under the plan compared to $34,472 as of June 30, 2007. This unrecognized cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.52 years.

Note 7. Stock Repurchase Program

In July of 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to a total of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “2005 Stock Repurchase Program”). This authorization will expire on December 31, 2009. The Company expects the purchases pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program to be made from time to time in private transactions at a price equal to the most recent quarterly independent appraisal of the shares of the Company’s common stock and with the Board reviewing the overall results of the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program on a quarterly basis. The amount and timing of stock repurchases will be based on various factors, such as the Board’s assessment of the Company’s capital structure and liquidity, the amount of interest shown by shareholders in selling shares of stock to the Company at their appraised value, and applicable regulatory and legal factors. The Company has purchased 117,399 shares of its common stock in privately negotiated transactions from August 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008. Of these 117,399 shares, 18,386 shares were purchased during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, at an average price per share of $53.09. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, 23,986 shares were purchased at an average price per share of $53.07.

Page 16 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company’s subsidiary, Hills Bank and Trust (the “Bank”) is a party to financial instruments with off-balance–sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, credit card participations and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, credit card participations and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. A summary of the Bank’s commitments at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is as follows:

	June 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
	(Amounts In Thousands)
Firm loan commitments and unused portion of lines of credit:
Home equity loans	$	37,704	$	36,360
Credit card participations		33,899		30,737
Commercial, real estate and home construction		102,297		99,580
Commercial lines and real estate purchase loans		158,650		123,007
Outstanding letters of credit		8,906		10,961

Commitments for commercial lines of credit and real estate loans increased $35.6 million since December 31, 2007. Real estate loan commitments were $19.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and $43.7 million as of June 30, 2008, an increase of $24.2 million. The increase in real estate commitments is due in part to the decline in interest rates and the level of refinancing activity. Real estate loan commitments are generally higher during the summer months when compared to commitment levels at year-end. Real estate loan commitments were $34.9 million at June 30, 2007. In addition, commercial lines increased to $74.4 million and agricultural lines increased to $24.3 million, a change of $11.5 million in commercial and agricultural lines since December 31, 2007. This change is due to lines of credit for new customers and increases in lines for existing customers.

Note 9. Income Taxes

Federal income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was computed using the consolidated effective federal tax rate. The Company also recognized income tax expense pertaining to state franchise taxes payable individually by the subsidiary bank. On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The evaluation was performed for those tax years which remain open to audit. The Company files a consolidated tax return for federal purposes and separate tax returns for the State of Iowa purposes. The tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. For state tax purposes, the tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, remain open for examination. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company did not recognize any increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits. There were no material unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008. No interest or penalties on these unrecognized tax benefits has been recorded. As of June 30, 2008, the Company does not anticipate any significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2009.

Page 17 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Hills Bancorporation (“Hills Bancorporation” or “the Company”) and its banking subsidiary Hills Bank and Trust Company (“the Bank”) for the dates and periods indicated. The discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying footnotes.

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This report contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. The severe flooding that occurred in June 2008 in a large part of the Company’s trade area is discussed below in the “Overview” section and in various other sections of this report. This flooding caused significant uncertainties, the outcome of which will impact the Company’s future results. Additional factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company include, but are not limited to, the following:

• The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts its operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of the Company’s assets.

• The effects of, and changes in, laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters as well as any laws otherwise affecting the Company.

• The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments of the Company’s assets) and the policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

• The ability of the Company to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as the Company currently intends due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector.

• The ability of the Company to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers.

• The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet.

• Technological changes implemented by the Company and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to the Company and its customers.

• The ability of the Company to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems.

Page 18 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

• The ability of the Company to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that the Company may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner.

• Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects the Company’s business adversely.

• The economic impact of natural disasters, terrorist attacks and military actions.

• Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses and assets which may be more difficult or expensive than expected.

• The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation.

• Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

• The ability of the Company to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning the Company and its business, including other factors that could materially affect the Company’s financial results, is included in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained within these statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective decisions and assessments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those which are related to the allowance for loan losses. The Company’s allowance for loan loss methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative in establishing an allowance for loan loss that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative factors include the Company’s historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in non-performing loans, and other factors. Quantitative factors also incorporate known information about individual loans, including borrowers’ sensitivity to interest rate movements. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in the Company’s markets, including economic conditions throughout the Midwest and in particular, the state of certain industries. Size and complexity of individual loans in relation to loan structure, existing loan policies and pace of portfolio growth are other qualitative factors that are considered in the methodology. As the Company adds new products and increases the complexity of its loan portfolio, it will enhance its methodology accordingly. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein, as well as the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation that is included. Although management believes the levels of the allowance as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, a decline in local economic conditions, or other factors, could result in increasing losses that cannot be reasonably predicted at this time. Given the short period of time that has elapsed since the floods (as discussed in Note 4), it is difficult to make a determination regarding individual credit relationships at this stage. The Company anticipates that additional information will be gathered in the coming quarters which may require an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses for flood-related issues.

Page 19 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Overview

This overview highlights selected information and may not contain all of the information that is important to you in understanding our performance during the period. For a more complete understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources, and critical accounting estimates, you should carefully read this entire report.

The Company is a holding company engaged in the business of commercial banking. The Company’s subsidiary is Hills Bank and Trust Company, Hills, Iowa (the “Bank”), which is wholly-owned. The Bank was formed in Hills, Iowa in 1904. The Bank is a full-service commercial bank extending its services to individuals, businesses, governmental units and institutional customers primarily in the communities of Hills, Iowa City, Coralville, North Liberty, Mount Vernon, Kalona, Wellman, Cedar Rapids and Marion, Iowa. At June 30, 2008, the Bank has thirteen full-service locations.

The severe flooding that occurred in June 2008 impacted a large part of the Company’s trade area and operations. Two of the Bank’s offices were seriously damaged and are temporarily closed. The flooding damaged the local economy and infrastructure. Many homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed. The flooding affected the Company’s loan portfolio by damaging properties pledged as collateral and by impairing certain borrowers’ abilities to repay their loans. The Company’s success depends to a great extent on the success of the local economy, and the 2008 floods have negatively impacted the Company’s earnings. The initial financial effect of the 2008 floods on the Company is addressed in the analysis that follows and in Note 4.

Net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 was $6.64 million compared to $8.07 million for the same six months of 2007, a decrease of 17.75%. The decline in net income is due mainly to flood-related expenses. These flood-related expenses consisted of (1) a $3,790,000 addition to the provision for loan losses, (2) recognition of a $355,000 loss in the value of property and equipment and (3) $310,000 of expenses incurred in dealing with the floods. These flood-related expenses totaled $2,751,000, net of a resulting $1,704,000 tax benefit. The $3,790,000 flood-related addition to the provision for loan losses was part of an overall increase in the provision for loan losses of $4,273,000 from 2007 to 2008. The $355,000 loss in the value of property and equipment and $310,000 of expenses incurred in dealing with the floods were part of the $1,812,000 increase in other expense for the first six months of 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007. These expense increases were partially offset by the increases in net interest income of $2,800,000 and other income of $793,000. Return on average equity was 11.97% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 13.49% for the same period in 2007. Return on average assets was 0.97% in 2008 compared to 1.03% in 2007. Return on average assets and return on average equity are calculated based on annualized income based on the first six months of the year. Dividends of $.91 per share were paid in January 2008 to 1,572 shareholders. The 2008 dividend was a 5.81% increase over the prior year’s dividend of $.86 per share.

The Bank’s net interest income is the largest component of revenue and it is primarily a function of the average earnings assets and the net interest margin percentage. The Bank achieved a net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis of 3.39% in 2008 compared to 3.23% in 2007. Average earning assets were $1.588 billion in 2008 and $1.491 billion in 2007.

Highlights noted on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 for the Company included the following:

• Total assets are $1.707 billion.

• Net loans are $1.406 billion.

• Loan growth of $46.3 million since December 31, 2007.

• Deposit growth of $24.4 million since December 31, 2007.

• Short-term borrowings increased $18.5 million since December 31, 2007.

A detailed discussion of the financial condition and results of operations follows this overview.

Page 20 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Financial Condition

The asset growth for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $45.8 million included a net loan increase of $46.3 million and an increase in investment securities available for sale of $2.9 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $4.6 million. The Federal Open Market Committee decreased the federal funds target rate four times in the first six months of 2008 to 2.00%. The downward movement started on September 18, 2007 when the rate decreased from 5.25% to 4.75%. The September 18, 2007 decrease was the first change in the target rate since June 20, 2006 and the first decrease since June 25, 2004 when the rate was increased from 1.00% to 1.25% and increased 17 times to 5.25% over the two-year period to June 2006. The Federal Reserve Board did not change the rate at its last meeting on June 25, 2008. Interest rates on loans are generally affected by such decreases since interest rates for the U.S. Treasury market normally decrease when the Federal Reserve Board lowers the federal funds target rate. In pricing of loans and deposits, the Bank considers the U.S. Treasury indexes as benchmarks in determining interest rates. As of June 30, 2008, the average rate indexes for one, three and five year indexes were 2.36%, 2.91% and 3.34%, respectively. The one year index decreased 51.93% from 4.91% at June 30, 2007, the three year index decreased 40.49% and the five year index decreased 32.11%. The three year index was at 4.89% and the five year index was at 4.92% at June 30, 2007. During this same six-month period, the average federal funds rate decreased from 5.31% in 2007 to 2.47% in 2008.

The tables below set forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands), along with changes in the allowance for loan losses and non-performing loan information:

	June 30, 2008					December 31, 2007
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
	(Amounts In Thousands)					(Amounts In Thousands)
Agricultural	$	54,747		3.84	%	$	60,004		4.37	%
Commercial and financial		152,340		10.69			132,070		9.62
Real estate:
Construction		129,524		9.09			123,144		8.97
Mortgage		1,054,780		74.02			1,020,802		74.40
Loans to individuals		33,660		2.36			36,289		2.64
	$	1,425,051		100.00	%	$	1,372,309		100.00	%
Less allowance for loan losses		24,550					19,710
	$	1,400,501				$	1,352,599

The Bank has an established formal loan origination policy. In general, the loan origination policy attempts to reduce the risk of credit loss to the Bank by requiring that, among other things, maintenance of minimum loan to value ratios, evidence of appropriate levels of insurance carried by borrowers and documentation of appropriate types and amounts of collateral and sources of expected payment.

Page 21 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods shown in the following table were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(Amounts In Thousands)						(Amounts In Thousands)
Balance, beginning	$	19,790		$	18,410		$	19,710		$	17,850
Provision charged to expense		5,172			954			5,759			1,486
Recoveries		232			259			402			723
Loans charged off		(644	)		(773	)		(1,321	)		(1,209	)
Balance, ending	$	24,550		$	18,850		$	24,550		$	18,850

Non-performing loan information at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, was as follows:

	June 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
	(Amounts in thousands)
Non-accrual loans	$	4,314		$	4,948
Accruing loans past due ninety days or more		7,930			6,019
Restructured loans		—			—
Non-performing loans (includes non-accrual loans)		41,750			39,583
Loans held for investment		1,425,051			1,372,309
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held for investment		1.72	%		1.44	%
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		58.80			49.79

Non-performing loans increased by $2.2 million from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008. Non-performing loans include any loan that has been placed on nonaccrual status. Non-performing loans also include loans that, based on management’s evaluation of current information and events, the Bank expects to be unable to collect in full according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. These loans are also considered impaired loans. Non-performing loans were 2.93% of loans held for investment as of June 30, 2008 and 2.88% as of December 31, 2007. The increase in non-performing loans is due mainly to $10.1 million in flood related loans. This increase was partially offset by several improvements including the payoff of one loan with a balance of approximately $2.2 million at December 31, 2007. In addition, one commercial customer with an aggregate loan balance of approximately $5.7 million at December 31, 2007 was upgraded during 2008. The majority of the non-performing loans is secured by real estate and is believed to be adequately collateralized. Loans 90 days past due that are still accruing interest increased $1.9 million in the first six months of 2008. This increase is due mainly to six loans to six different borrowers. These six loans are not concentrated in one industry. The Company believes that the allowance for loan losses is at a level commensurate with the overall risk exposure of the loan portfolio. However, if economic conditions deteriorate, certain borrowers may experience difficulty and the level of non-performing loans, chargeoffs and delinquencies could continue to rise and require increases in the provision for loan losses. Given the short period of time that has elapsed since the floods (as discussed in Note 4), it is difficult to make a determination regarding individual credit relationships at this stage. The Company anticipates that additional information will be gathered in the coming quarters which may require an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses for flood-related issues.

Page 22 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Investment securities available for sale held by the Company increased by $2.9 million from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008. The market value of securities available for sale was $952,000 more than the amortized cost of such securities as of June 30, 2008. This is a decrease of $96,000 in market value since December 31, 2007. This decrease in market value of $0.1 million was more than offset by purchases of investment securities available for sale in excess of maturities of $3.2 million. There was also a decrease related to amortization of the discount on the securities of $0.2 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. The carrying values of investment securities for June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2008					December 31, 2007
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Securities available for sale
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)	$	104,219		51.47	%	$	104,965		52.59	%
State and political subdivisions		98,265		48.53			94,634		47.41
Total securities available for sale	$	202,484		100.00	%	$	199,599		100.00	%

Deposit growth was $24.4 million in the first six months of 2008. Repurchase agreements decreased $10.4 million in the same period. Short-term borrowings at December 31, 2007 included federal funds purchased that increased $28.9 million to $68.6 million as of June 30, 2008. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the Company continues to have sufficient liquidity resources available to fund expected additional loan growth.

Dividends and Equity

In January 2008, Hills Bancorporation paid a dividend of $4,086,000 or $.91 per share, a 5.81% increase from the $.86 per share paid in January 2007. After payment of the dividend and the adjustment for accumulated other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity as of June 30, 2008 totaled $131.8 million. Under risk-based capital rules, the total amount of risk based capital of the Company as of June 30, 2008, was 12.76% of risk-adjusted assets, and is substantially in excess of the required minimum of 8.00%. Risk-based capital was 12.75% and 13.37% as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively. As of June 30, 2008, the most recent notifications from the Federal Reserve System categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Company’s category.

Page 23 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007

Net Income Overview

Net income decreased $1,433,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the first six months of 2007. Total net income was $6,639,000 in 2008 and $8,072,000 in the comparable period in 2007. The changes in net income in 2008 from the first six months of 2007 were the result of the following:

• Net interest income increased by $2,800,000.

• The provision for loan losses increased by $4,273,000.

• Other income increased by $793,000.

• Other expenses increased by $1,812,000.

• Income taxes decreased by $1,059,000.

Net income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was $6.64 million compared to $8.07 million for the same six months of 2007, a decrease of 17.75%. The decline in net income is due mainly to flood-related expenses. These flood-related expenses consisted of (1) a $3,790,000 addition to the provision for loan losses, (2) recognition of a $355,000 loss in the value of property and equipment and (3) $310,000 of expenses incurred in dealing with the floods. These flood-related expenses totaled $2,751,000, net of a resulting $1,704,000 tax benefit.

For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, basic earnings per share were $1.48 and $1.79, respectively. Diluted earnings per share were $1.47 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $1.78 for the same period in 2007.

Quarterly fluctuations in the Company’s net income continue to be driven primarily by three important factors. The first important factor is the interaction between changes in net interest margin and changes in average earnings assets. Net interest income of $25.7 million for the first six months of 2008 was derived from the Company’s $1.588 billion of average earning assets during that period and its net interest margin of 3.39%. Average earning assets in the six months ending June 30, 2007 were $1.491 billion and the net interest margin was 3.23%. The importance of net interest margin is illustrated by the fact that a decrease in the net interest margin of 10 basis points to 3.29% would have resulted approximately in a $790,000 decrease in income before income taxes in the six month period ended June 30, 2008. Similarly, an increase in the net interest margin of 10 basis points to 3.49% would have resulted in approximately a $790,000 increase in net interest income before taxes. Net interest income for the Company increased due to the increase in average earning assets over the same period in 2007 and the increase in the net interest margin of 16 basis points.

The second significant factor affecting the Company’s net income is the provision for loan losses. The majority of the Company’s interest-earning assets are in loans outstanding, which amounted to more than $1.406 billion at June 30, 2008. The provision is computed on a quarterly basis and is a result of management’s determination of the quality of the loan portfolio. The provision reflects a number of factors including the size of the loan portfolio, loan concentrations, the level of non-performing loans (which includes non-accrual loans) and loans past due 90 days or more. The provision for loan losses was $5,759,000 in the first six months of 2008 compared to $1,486,000 the same period in 2007. The increase of $4,273,000 is primarily due to the $3,790,000 of flood-related provision expense.

The amount of mortgage loans sold on the secondary market is the third factor that can cause fluctuations in net income. In the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the net gain on sale of loans was $710,000 and $527,000 respectively. The sale of loans is influenced by the real estate market and interest rates.

Page 24 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (continued)

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the excess of the interest and fees earned on interest-earning bearing assets over the interest expense of the interest-bearing liabilities. The factors that have the greatest impact on net interest income are the volume of average earning assets and the net interest margin. The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the net dollar amounts of the change in each. The net interest margin for the first six months of 2008 was 3.39% compared to 3.23% in 2007 for the same period. The measure is shown on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% to make the interest earned on taxable and non-taxable assets more comparable. The change in average balances and average rates between periods and the effect on the net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the six months ended in 2008 compared to the comparable period in 2007 are shown in the following table:

							Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income
	Change in			Change in
	Average Balance			Average Rate			Volume Changes			Rate Changes			Net Change
	(Amounts in Thousands)
Interest income:
Loans, net	$	89,797			(0.29	) %	$	3,479		$	(2,250	)	$	1,229
Taxable securities		7,696			0.15			159			86			245
Nontaxable securities		8,116			(0.03	)		222			(16	)		206
Federal funds sold		(8,624	)		(3.42	)		(236	)		—			(236	)
	$	96,985					$	3,624		$	(2,180	)	$	1,444
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	25,785			(0.42	)	$	(179	)	$	367		$	188
Savings deposits		(8,057	)		(0.75	)		289			751			1,040
Time deposits		5,708			(0.26	)		(155	)		726			571
Short-term borrowings		26,209			(1.67	)		(728	)		795			67
FHLB borrowings		21,787			(0.11	)		(547	)		108			(439	)
	$	71,432					$	(1,320	)	$	2,747		$	1,427
Change in net interest income							$	2,304		$	567		$	2,871

A summary of the net interest spread and margin is as follows:

(Tax Equivalent Basis)	2008			2007
Yield on average interest-earning assets		6.28	%		6.51	%
Rate on average interest-bearing liabilities		3.40			3.83
Net interest spread		2.88	%		2.68	%
Effect of noninterest-bearing funds		0.51			0.55
Net interest margin (tax equivalent interest income divided by average interest-earning assets)		3.39	%		3.23	%

Page 25 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (continued)

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $5,759,000 in 2008 compared to $1,486,000 in 2007, an increase of $4,273,000. The loan loss provision is the amount necessary to adjust the allowance for loan losses to the level considered appropriate by management. The provision is computed on a quarterly basis and is a result of management’s determination of the quality of the loan portfolio. The provision reflects a number of factors, including the size of the loan portfolio, loan concentrations, the impact of borrowers’ ability to repay, loan collateral values, the level of impaired loans and loans past due ninety days or more. In addition, management considers the credit quality of the loans based on management’s review of problem and watch loans, including loans with historically higher credit risks (primarily agricultural and spec real estate construction loans).

Provision expense increased in 2008 due to the increase in loans classified as potential watch, watch or problem loans in 2008. Potential watch, watch and problem loans increased $33.8 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to an increase of $27.4 million during the same period in 2007. Approximately $15.4 million of the growth in potential watch, watch and problem loans was due to loans to customers affected by flooding, accounting for an increase in the provision of $3.8 million. The additional $18.4 million increase in potential watch, watch and problem loans resulted in an increased provision of $933,000. The provision for loan losses was also larger in 2008 due to loan growth of $46.3 million in the first six months compared to $15.4 million in loan growth in the same period in 2007.

The allowance for loan losses balance is also affected by the charge-offs, net of recoveries, for the periods presented. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, recoveries were $402,000 and $723,000, respectively; and charge-offs were $1,321,000 in 2008 and $1,209,000 in 2007. The allowance for loan losses totaled $24,550,000 at June 30, 2008 compared to $19,710,000 at December 31, 2007. The allowance represented 1.72% and 1.44% of outstanding loans at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Except for determinations concerning customers affected by flooding as explained in Note 4, the methodology used in 2008 is consistent with 2007.

Net Gain on Sale of Loans

Net gain on sale of loans for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $710,000 compared to $527,000 for the comparable period ended June 30, 2007. Loans sold in the first six months of 2008 totaled $82.6 million compared to $60.2 million in the same period in 2007, an increase of 31%.

Other Income

Other income, other than the net gain on sale of loans discussed above, increased by $610,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Trust fees increased $129,000 in 2008 although assets under management decreased from $927.2 million as of June 30, 2007 to $885.8 million as of June 30, 2008. Assets under management by the Trust Department decreased due to overall market conditions resulting in a decline in value of such assets. Service charges and fees were up $136,000 in 2008. Debit card and point of sale (POS) interchange fees increased during 2008 by $232,000 due to volume of activity. This increase was offset by a decrease of $137,000 from fee income strategies. Rental revenue on tax credit real estate increased $200,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This increase was partially due to adjustments to income of $50,000 recorded upon receipt of the 2007 audited financial statements for the tax credit properties. In 2007, the audit adjustments decreased rental revenue on tax credit real estate by $96,000. In addition, the Company acquired a fourth tax credit real estate property in December 2007 and the 2008 results reflect amounts related to the new property.

Page 26 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (continued)

Other noninterest income was $1,458,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a $145,000 increase over the same period in 2007. Included in other noninterest income are amounts related to Visa, Inc. (“Visa”). In the first quarter of 2008, Visa completed its initial public offering (“IPO”). After the redemption, the Company has 4,210 shares of Visa Class B Common Stock which is valued at its carryover basis of $0 on the Company’s balance sheet. The sale of the stock is restricted for the longer of 3 years or the end of the litigation noted below. The Company received $114,000 in proceeds from the redemption of shares as a part of the IPO and recorded a gain. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a $50,000 reserve related to the Bank’s contingent liability, as a member of Visa, for the Bank’s portion of settlement payments arising from Visa’s litigation with American Express Company and Discover Financial Services. In conjunction with the IPO, Visa created a litigation escrow which is to be used to pay the litigation settlement payments. As a result, the Company recorded a receivable equal to the $50,000 reserve during the first quarter of 2008. This receivable is recorded as a contra-liability to the reserve. Both the liability and receivable are reflected in other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The economic benefit of the receivable is recorded in other noninterest income.

Other Expenses

Other expenses increased $1,812,000 in 2008 to $19,345,000 from the same period in 2007. This increase of 10.33% included an increase of $449,000 in salaries and benefits. Direct salary expense was up $409,000, or 5.75%, due to annual pay adjustments and the addition of employees in 2008. Occupancy expenses increased $43,000 in 2008 due to an increase of $56,000 related to building maintenance and upkeep related to increased snow removal costs in the first quarter of 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, furniture and equipment expense was $1,808,000 compared to $1,723,000 for 2007. The increase of $85,000 includes $44,000 for equipment and software maintenance contracts. This expense was $640,000 in 2008 and $596,000 one year ago. The change in the maintenance contract expense is due to increased costs of recurring maintenance contracts with the Company’s core processing system and other existing systems. Advertising and business development expenses decreased $51,000 in comparing the first six months of 2008 and 2007. The decrease is due to office promotions held in 2007 for the retail and commercial areas of the Bank.

Outside services expense increased $194,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007. Outside services include professional fees, courier services and ATM fees, and processing charges for the merchant credit card program, retail credit cards and other data processing services. Credit card, debit card and merchant card processing expenses increased $99,000 due to the volume of transactions in 2008 compared to 2007. In addition, during the first six months of 2008, the gain or loss on repossessed real estate properties decreased $35,000 from the same period in 2007. During 2007, two properties were sold at a gain of approximately $41,000. The five properties sold in 2008 were at a net loss of $22,000.

Rental expenses on tax credit real estate were $593,000 in 2008, an increase of $102,000 from the six-month period ended June 30, 2007. This increase is due mainly to the addition of the fourth property noted above under other income. Other noninterest expense increased $965,000 to $1,591,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The majority of this increase is due to the $665,000 in flood-related items detailed in Note 4. Also, there was an increase in the FDIC assessment of $281,000 in 2008 compared to 2007.

Page 27 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (continued)

Income Taxes

Federal and state income tax expenses were $2,545,000 and $3,604,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Income taxes as a percentage of income before taxes were 27.71% in 2008 and 30.87% in 2007. The amount of tax credits was $353,000 and $280,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The decrease in the effective tax rate is due mainly to tax-exempt interest income and its relationship to total income before income taxes. For the first six months of 2007, tax-exempt interest income was $1,700,000, or 15% of income before income taxes resulting in a 5.10% decrease in the effective tax rate. For the first six months of 2008, tax-exempt interest income was $1,832,000, or 20% of income before income taxes. This decreased the effective tax rate an additional 1.88% for a total reduction in the effective tax rate of 6.98% in 2008. Also, tax credits increased $73,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, reducing the effective tax rate an additional 1.44%.

Page 28 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (continued)

Net Income

Net income decreased to $1,850,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $4,067,000 for the same period in 2007, a decrease of 54.51%. Earnings per share, both basic and diluted, decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.41. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.90. Return on average equity was 5.44% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 13.33%, for the same period in 2007. Return on average assets was 0.44% in 2008 and 1.03% in 2007. Return on average assets and return on average equity are calculated based on annualized results for the second quarter.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income increased for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 by $1,615,000 from the similar period in 2007. The net interest margin in 2008 was 3.45% compared to 3.24% in 2007. Net interest income changes on a tax-equivalent basis for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

	Change in Average Balance			Change in Average Rate			Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income
							Volume Changes			Rate Changes			Net Change
	(Amounts in Thousands)
Interest income:
Loans, net	$	98,982			(0.43	)%	$	1,897		$	(1,780	)	$	117
Taxable securities		6,422			(0.12	)		73			(39	)		34
Nontaxable securities		7,472			(0.07	)		102			(16	)		86
Federal funds sold		(8,675	)		(2.93	)		(128	)		—			(128	)
	$	104,201					$	1,944		$	(1,835	)	$	109
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	27,668			(0.68	)	$	(109	)	$	325		$	216
Savings deposits		(12,051	)		(1.05	)		157			569			726
Time deposits		9,721			(0.51	)		(114	)		757			643
Short-term borrowings		28,766			(2.21	)		(410	)		520			110
FHLB borrowings		19,821			(0.14	)		(250	)		86			(164	)
	$	73,925					$	(726	)	$	2,257		$	1,531
Change in net interest income							$	1,218		$	422		$	1,640

A summary of the net interest spread and margin is as follows:

(Tax Equivalent Basis)	2008			2007
Yield on average interest-earning assets		6.16	%		6.54	%
Rate on average interest-bearing liabilities		3.20			3.86
Net interest spread		2.96	%		2.68	%
Effect of noninterest-bearing funds		0.49			0.56
Net interest margin (tax equivalent interest income divided by average interest-earning assets)		3.45	%		3.24	%

Page 29 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (continued)

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $5,172,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to $954,000 for the comparable quarter in 2007, an increase of $4,218,000. As discussed in connection with the results of operations for the six months, the allowance for loan losses was increased due to management’s analysis of the outstanding loans at June 30, 2008. Loans classified as potential watch, watch or problem loans increased $34.7 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to a decrease of $0.7 million in these categories during the second quarter of 2007. Approximately $15.4 million of the growth in potential watch, watch and problem was due to loans to customers affected by flooding, accounting for an increase in the provision of $3.8 million. The additional $19.3 million increase in potential watch, watch and problem loans resulted in an increased provision of $1.4 million. In addition, the provision for loan losses was larger in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 due to loan growth of $31.3 million compared to loan growth of $9.7 million in the same period in 2007.

The allowance for loan losses balance is also affected by the charge-offs, net of recoveries, for the periods presented. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, recoveries were $232,000 and $259,000, respectively; and charge-offs were $644,000 in 2008 and $773,000 in 2007. The allowance for loan losses totaled $24,550,000 at June 30, 2008 compared to $18,850,000 at June 30, 2007. The allowance represented 1.72% and 1.44% of outstanding loans at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively.

Other Income

Total other income was $4,248,000 and $4,136,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Net gain on sale of loans increased by $60,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same quarter in 2007 due to an increase in the volume of loans sold in 2008. The trust fees for 2008 were $46,000 higher than 2007 although assets under management declined. Service charges and fees were down $47,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decline was mainly due to a decrease of $169,000 from fee income strategies. These decreases are offset by an increase of $119,000 in debit card and point of sale (POS) pin interchange fees. These fees increased due to the volume of activity. Rental revenue on tax credit real estate increased $38,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. As noted in the six-month discussion, the Company acquired a fourth tax credit real estate property in December 2007 and the 2008 results reflect amounts related to the new property.

Other Expenses

Total expenses for the 2008 quarter compared to the 2007 quarter increased $1,171,000 to $10,092,000. Salaries and employee benefits increased $259,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to 2007. Direct salary expense was up $234,000, or 6.53%, due to annual pay adjustments and additional employees in 2008. Advertising and business development expenses decreased $51,000 in comparing the quarters. The decrease is due to office promotions held in 2007 for the retail and commercial areas of the Bank. Outside services increased $81,000 from the second quarter of 2007. Credit card, merchants’ card and debit card processing charges increased $46,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 due to volume of card activity. Professional fees increased $61,000 in 2008 due to amounts paid to an outside third party for internal audit services. The internal audit fees were incurred later in the year during 2007.

Rental expenses on tax credit real estate were $288,000 in the second quarter of 2008, an increase of $48,000 from the second quarter of 2007. This increase is due mainly to the addition of the fourth property noted under other income. Other noninterest expense increased $813,000 to $1,139,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The majority of the increase is due to the $665,000 in flood-related items discussed in Note 4. Also, there was an increase in the FDIC assessment of $134,000 in 2008.

Page 30 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (continued)

Income Taxes

Income tax expense as a percentage of income before taxes decreased to 16.33% in 2008 from 30.75% in 2007. Income tax expense was $1,445,000 less in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to the $3,662,000 decrease in income before income taxes. The amount of tax credits was $177,000 for the second quarter of 2008 and $140,000 for the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in the effective tax rate is due mainly to tax-exempt interest income and its relationship to total income before income taxes. In the second quarter of 2007, tax-exempt interest income was $861,000, or 15% of income before income taxes resulting in a 5.13% decrease in the effective tax rate. In the second quarter of 2008, tax-exempt interest income was $909,000, or 41% of income before income taxes. This decreased the effective tax rate an additional 9.26% for a total reduction in the effective tax rate of 14.39% in 2008. Also, tax credits increased $37,000 for the second quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, reducing the effective tax rate an additional 5.63%.

Page 31 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (continued)

Liquidity

The Company actively monitors and manages its liquidity position with the objective of maintaining sufficient cash flows to fund operations, meet client commitments, take advantage of market opportunities and provide a margin against unforeseeable liquidity needs. Federal funds sold and investment securities available for sale are readily marketable assets. Maturities of all investment securities are managed to meet the Company’s normal liquidity needs, to respond to market changes or to adjust the Company’s interest rate risk position. Federal funds sold and investment securities available for sale comprised 11.86% of the Company’s total assets at June 30, 2008, compared to 12.02% at December 31, 2007.

The Company has historically maintained a stable deposit base and a relatively low level of large deposits, which has mitigated the volatility in the Company’s liquidity position. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had borrowed $265.4 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Des Moines. Two advances of $10 million each matured in February and April 2008 and were repaid. There was one new advance in May 2008 for $20 million at 3.65%. This new advance is due in 2018 but is callable as early as 2013. These advances were used as a means of providing both long and short-term, fixed-rate funding for certain assets and for managing interest rate risk. The Company had additional borrowing capacity available from the FHLB of approximately $162 million at June 30, 2008.

As additional sources of liquidity, the Company has the ability to borrow up to $10 million from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, and has lines of credit with two banks totaling $73 million. Those two lines of credit require the pledging of investment securities when drawn upon. The combination of high levels of potentially liquid assets, low dependence on volatile liabilities and additional borrowing capacity provided sources of liquidity for the Company which management considered sufficient at June 30, 2008.

As of June 30, 2008, investment securities with a carrying value of $105,564,000 were pledged to collateralize public and trust deposits, short-term borrowings and for other purposes, as permitted by law. As of December 31, 2007, investment securities with a carrying value of $87,076,000 were pledged.

Contractual Obligations

As of June 30, 2008, there had been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations from those disclosed in its Annual Report in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Page 32 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk Management

The Company’s primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates. The Company’s asset/liability management, or its management of interest rate risk, is focused primarily on evaluating and managing net interest income given various risk criteria. Factors beyond the Company’s control, such as market interest rates and competition, may also have an impact on the Company’s interest income and interest expense. In the absence of other factors, the Company’s overall yield on interest-earning assets will increase, as will its cost of funds on its interest-bearing liabilities when market interest rates increase over an extended period of time. Conversely, the Company’s yields and cost of funds will decrease when market rates decline. The Company is able to manage these swings to some extent by attempting to control the maturity or rate adjustments of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities over given periods of time.

Asset/Liability Management

The Bank maintains an asset/liability committee, which meets at least quarterly to review the Bank’s interest rate sensitivity position and to review various strategies as to interest rate risk management. In addition, the Bank uses a simulation model to review various assumptions relating to interest rate movement. The model attempts to limit rate risk even if it appears the Bank’s asset and liability maturities are perfectly matched and a favorable interest margin is present.

In order to minimize the potential effects of adverse material and prolonged increases or decreases in market interest rates on the Company’s operations, management has implemented an asset/liability program designed to mitigate the Company’s interest rate sensitivity. The program emphasizes the origination of adjustable rate loans, which are held in the portfolio, the investment of excess cash in short or intermediate term interest-earning assets, and the solicitation of savings or transaction deposit accounts, which are less sensitive to changes in interest rates and can be re-priced rapidly.

Net interest income should decline as interest rates increase, while net interest income should increase as interest rates decline. Generally, during periods of increasing interest rates, the Company’s interest rate sensitive liabilities would re-price faster than its interest rate sensitive assets causing a decline in the Company’s interest rate spread and margin. This would tend to reduce net interest income because the resulting increase in the Company’s cost of funds would not be immediately offset by an increase in its yield on earning assets. In times of decreasing interest rates, fixed rate assets could increase in value and the lag in re-pricing of interest rate sensitive assets could be expected to have a positive effect on the Company’s net interest income.

Page 33 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the first six months of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Page 34 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

No material legal proceedings are pending.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following risk factor should be considered in addition to those disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

A natural disaster could harm the Company’s business.

The severe flooding that occurred in 2008 affected our loan portfolio by damaging properties pledged as collateral and by impairing certain borrowers’ abilities to repay their loans. As a result of the floods, we made a significant provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2008. The after effects of the floods may continue to affect our loan quality into the future. The severity and duration of the effects of the flooding will depend on a variety of factors that are beyond our control, including the amount and timing of government investment in the area, the pace of rebuilding and economic recovery in Johnson and Linn Counties and the extent to which any property damage is covered by insurance. The effects described above are difficult to accurately predict or quantify at this time. As a result, uncertainties remain regarding the impact the flooding will have on the financial results of the Company. Further, the area in which the Company operates may experience flooding and other natural disasters in the future, and some of those events may have effects similar to those caused by the 2008 flooding.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table sets forth information about the Company’s stock purchases, all of which were made pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program, for the three months ended June 30, 2008:

Period	Total number of shares purchased		Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs		Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (1)
April 1 to April 30		13,026		$   53.00		112,039		637,961
May 1 to May 31		2,759		53.12		114,798		635,202
June 1 to June 30		2,601		53.50		117,399		632,601
Total		18,386		$   53.09		117,399		632,601

(1) On July 26, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “2005 Stock Repurchase Program”). This authorization will expire on December 31, 2009. The Company expects the purchases pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program to be made from time to time in private transactions at a price equal to the most recent quarterly independent appraisal of the shares of the Company’s common stock and with the Board reviewing the overall results of the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program on a quarterly basis. All purchases made pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program since its inception have been made on that basis. The amount and timing of stock repurchases will be based on various factors, such as the Board’s assessment of the Company’s capital structure and liquidity, the amount of interest shown by shareholders in selling shares of stock to the Company at their appraised value, and applicable regulatory and legal factors.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Hills Bancorporation has no senior securities.

Page 35 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
(continued)

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 21, 2008. The only matter voted was for the election of directors. The following individuals were elected to serve as Directors of the Company for a three year term at the Annual Meeting. The results of the voting by individuals and those withholding authority are as follows:

	For		Withhold Authority		Term
1.   James A. Nowak		2,959,700		27,395		3 years to 2011
2.   Theodore H. Pacha		2,936,803		50,292		3 years to 2011
3.   Ann Marie Rhodes		2,943,831		43,264		3 years to 2011
4.   Ronald E. Stutsman		2,887,509		99,586		3 years to 2011

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6.	Exhibits
31.1	Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Page 36 of 42

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HILLS BANCORPORATION
Date: August 8, 2008	By: /s/ Dwight O. Seegmiller
	Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 8, 2008	By: /s/ James G. Pratt
	James G. Pratt, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer

Page 37 of 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008

Exhibit Number	Description	Page Number In The Sequential Numbering System June 30, 2008 Form 10-Q
31.1	Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	39 of 42
31.2	Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	40 of 42
32.1	Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	41 of 42
32.2	Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	42 of 42

Page 38 of 42

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dwight O. Seegmiller, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hills Bancorporation;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2008	By: /s/ Dwight O. Seegmiller
	Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Page 39 of 42

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James G. Pratt, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hills Bancorporation;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2008	By: /s/ James G. Pratt
	James G. Pratt, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer

Page 40 of 42

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY DWIGHT O. SEEGMILLER

In connection with the quarterly report of Hills Bancorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2008	By: /s/ Dwight O. Seegmiller
	Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Page 41 of 42

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY JAMES G. PRATT

In connection with the quarterly report of Hills Bancorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Pratt, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2008	By: /s/ James G. Pratt
	James G. Pratt, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer

Page 42 of 42