XML 34 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
INVESTMENT - OTHERS
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements 
Note 18 - INVESTMENT - OTHERS

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company entered into a joint-venture agreement with JiaSheng Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiaSheng”) to develop real estate projects in China. The Company invested RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,526 based on the exchange rate as of September 30, 2011 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, for a 10% interest in the newly formed joint venture, which was incorporated as a limited liability company, Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. (the “joint venture”), in China. The agreement stipulates that the Company will nominate two of the five members of the Board of Directors of the joint venture and has the ability to assign two members of management to the joint venture.  The agreement also stipulates that the Company will receive a fee of RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,526 based on the exchange rate as of September 30, 2011 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, for the services rendered in connection with obtaining priority to bid in certain real estate projects from the local government. Upon signing of the agreement, JiaSheng paid the Company RMB5,000 in cash, or approximately $763 based on the exchange rate as on September 30, 2011 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The remaining RM B5,000 will be paid over 72 months commencing in 36 months from the date of the agreement when Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. secures a property development project stated inside the joint venture agreement. The Company considered the RMB 5,000, or approximately $763 based on the exchange rate as on September 30, 2011 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, received in cash from JiaSheng, the controlling venturer in the joint venture, as a partial return of the Company’s initial investment of RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,526 based on the exchange rate as of September 30, 2011 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Therefore, the RMB 5,000 received in cash was offset against the initial investment of RMB 10,000 resulting in a net investment of RMB 5,000 as of September 30, 2011.  The Company considers that the collectability of the remaining RMB 5,000 is uncertain due to the extended terms of the payment, and therefore had not recorded this amount as a receivable as of September 30, 2011.

 

On September 29, 2012, due to the resignation of two directors representing Trio-Tech on the board of the joint venture, the Company concluded that it could no longer exert a significant influence over the joint venture and its operating and financial activities; therefore, the Company began accounting for this investment using the cost method, effective September 29, 2011. An impairment review was made during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the carrying value of this investment at September 29, 2011 was $760,000, which approximates the Company’s pro rata share of the underlying value of the joint venture.

 

In accordance with ASC Topic 323 Investments – Other, Cost Method Investments, ‘‘investment in unconsolidated joint venture’’ as shown on the Company’s Balance Sheet consists of the cost of an investment in the joint venture, in which the Company has a 10.89% interest. Prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company’s 10.89% ownership in this China affiliate was recorded on the equity basis.

 

In accordance with ASC Topic 810-10-50, Disclosure for Variable Interest Entities, the Company analyzed its investments in joint ventures to determine if the joint venture is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and would require consolidation. The Company (a) evaluates the sufficiency of the total equity at risk, (b) reviews the voting rights and decision-making authority of the equity investment holders as a group, and whether there are any guaranteed returns, protection against losses, or capping of residual returns within the group, and (c) establishes whether activities within the venture are on behalf of an investor with disproportionately few voting rights in making this VIE determination. The Company is required to consolidate a venture that is determined to be a VIE if the Company is the primary beneficiary. Beginning January 1, 2010, a new accounting standard became effective and changed the method by which the primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined to a primarily qualitative approach whereby the variable interest holder, if any, who has the power to direct the VIE’s most significant activities is considered to be the primary beneficiary. The Company has analyzed its investment in the joint venture and determined that, while such investment is a VIE, the Company is not the primary beneficiary and it does not have significant influence over the VIE.  Therefore, the Company is not required to consolidate such joint venture and the investment is accounted for using the cost method.