-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, RdyVPdJkVRjN0H5X9Lndyw5chFrcV4DHsIT0ifyacrGn/VUFhXVpGk7y96FCPUSJ pjQvWBD/akjqZ8xmzS0Vmw== 0000950134-00-002296.txt : 20000327 0000950134-00-002296.hdr.sgml : 20000327 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950134-00-002296 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: DEF 14A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20000505 FILED AS OF DATE: 20000324 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: TEMPLE INLAND INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000731939 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PAPERBOARD MILLS [2631] IRS NUMBER: 751903917 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1230 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: DEF 14A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-08634 FILM NUMBER: 577148 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 303 S TEMPLE DR STREET 2: PO DRAWER N CITY: DIBOLL STATE: TX ZIP: 75941 BUSINESS PHONE: 4098295511 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 303 SOUTH TEMPLE DR CITY: DIBOLL STATE: TX ZIP: 75941 DEF 14A 1 DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT 1 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. ) Filed by the Registrant [X] Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ] Check the appropriate box: [ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) [X] Definitive Proxy Statement [ ] Definitive Additional Materials [ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
TEMPLE-INLAND, INC. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): [X] No fee required. [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (5) Total fee paid: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Filing Party: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Date Filed: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 [TEMPLE-INLAND LOGO] 303 SOUTH TEMPLE DRIVE DIBOLL, TEXAS 75941 --------------------- NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD FRIDAY, MAY 5, 2000 To the Stockholders of Temple-Inland Inc. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Temple-Inland Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held at the principal executive offices of the Company, 303 South Temple Drive, Diboll, Texas 75941, on Friday, May 5, 2000, at 9:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes: 1. To elect four (4) directors to the Board of Directors of the Company to hold office until the expiration of their terms or until their respective successors have been duly elected and have qualified; 2. To ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2000; 3. To consider, if properly brought before the meeting, a stockholder proposal opposed by the Board of Directors regarding a spin off of the Company's financial services businesses; and 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 8, 2000 as the record date (the "Record Date") for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. Only stockholders of record on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. By Order of the Board of Directors /s/ LESLIE K. O'NEAL LESLIE K. O'NEAL Secretary Diboll, Texas March 24, 2000 YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING. HOWEVER, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED, SELF-ADDRESSED, STAMPED ENVELOPE PROMPTLY SO THAT YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK MAY BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR WISHES AND IN ORDER THAT THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM MAY BE ASSURED AT THE MEETING. YOUR PROXY WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU IF YOU SHOULD REQUEST SUCH RETURN IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR REVOCATION OF PROXIES ON THE INITIAL PAGE OF THE ENCLOSED PROXY STATEMENT. 3 [TEMPLE-INLAND LOGO] 303 SOUTH TEMPLE DRIVE DIBOLL, TEXAS 75941 --------------------- PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS SOLICITATION AND REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Temple-Inland Inc. (the "Company") for use at the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Friday, May 5, 2000, at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and at any adjournment(s) thereof. This Proxy Statement and form of proxy are first being sent to the stockholders of the Company on or about March 24, 2000. The accompanying form of proxy is designed to permit each stockholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting to vote for or withhold voting for any or all nominees for election as director, to vote for or against or to abstain from voting on proposals 2 and 3, and in the discretion of the proxies with respect to any other proposal brought before the Annual Meeting. When a stockholder's proxy card specifies a choice with respect to a voting matter, the shares will be voted and will be voted as specified. If no such specifications are made, the accompanying form of proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting: For the election of the nominees under the caption "Election of Directors;" For ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2000; and Against the stockholder proposal set forth in this proxy statement. Execution of the accompanying proxy will not affect a stockholder's right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Any stockholder giving a proxy has the right to revoke it by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company at its principal executive offices at any time before the proxy is voted or by executing and delivering a later-dated proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting his or her shares in person. No such notice of revocation or later-dated proxy, however, will be effective until received by the Company at or prior to the Annual Meeting. The Company has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc., a professional proxy solicitation firm ("D.F. King"), to assist in the solicitation of proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mail, employees of D.F. King and officers and regular employees of the Company may solicit the return of proxies by personal interview, mail, telephone and telegraph. Officers and employees of the Company will not receive additional compensation, but will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. D.F. King will be reimbursed for its expenses in soliciting proxies and, in addition, will receive a proxy solicitation fee not to exceed $15,000. Brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries will be requested to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of stock. All costs of solicitation are to be borne by the Company. The Annual Report to Shareholders, covering the Company's fiscal year ended January 1, 2000 and including audited financial statements, is enclosed herewith. The Annual Report does not form any part of the material for the solicitation of proxies. 4 PURPOSES OF THE MEETING At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders of the Company will consider and vote upon the following matters: 1. The election of four (4) directors to the Board of Directors of the Company to hold office until the expiration of their terms or until their respective successors have been duly elected and have qualified; 2. The ratification of the appointment by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2000; 3. If properly brought before the Annual Meeting, a stockholder proposal, opposed by the Board of Directors, that is set forth below; and 4. Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS GENERAL The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on March 8, 2000 as the record date (the "Record Date") for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 52,668,387 shares of Common Stock of the Company issued and outstanding. The Common Stock is the only class of stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters to be acted on at the Annual Meeting. The attendance, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum to transact business. CONFIDENTIAL VOTING POLICY On February 5, 1993, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a confidential voting policy. The policy provides that stockholder proxies, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify the vote of the specific stockholder will not be disclosed to the Company, its directors, officers, or employees except in certain limited situations such as when legally necessary or when expressly requested by a stockholder. 2 5 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS The following table and notes thereto indicate the name, address and stock ownership of each person or group of persons known by the Company to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 8, 2000.
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL PERCENT OF NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP CLASS ------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- J. P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated............................. 4,960,541(1) 8.88%(2) 60 Wall Street New York, N.Y. 10260 The Prudential Insurance Company of America................. 3,097,602(3) 5.55%(4) 751 Broad Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-3777 Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., Inc. ........................... 3,899,534(5) 7.00%(6) 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 Wellington Management Company, LLP.......................... 3,060,700(7) 5.48%(8) 75 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109
- --------------- (1) Based on a statement on Schedule 13G dated September 30, 1997 and Amendments No. 1, 2 and 3 thereto dated December 31, 1997, December 31, 1998, and December 31, 1999, respectively, (the "J.P. Morgan 13G") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated may be deemed beneficial owner of these shares, all or the majority of which are owned by investment advisor clients or account holders. (2) Based upon the calculation in the J.P. Morgan 13G, which assumes 55,861,948 shares of Common Stock outstanding. (3) Based on a statement on Schedule 13G dated February 1, 1999 and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated January 31, 2000 (the "Prudential 13G") filed with the SEC, The Prudential Insurance Company of America may have direct or indirect voting and/or investment discretion over these shares which are held for the benefit of its clients by its separate accounts, externally managed accounts, registered investment companies, subsidiaries and/or other affiliates. (4) Based upon the calculation in the Prudential 13G, which assumes 55,812,649 shares of Common Stock outstanding. (5) Based on a statement on Schedule 13G dated February 5, 1999 and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated February 8, 2000 (the "Sanford Bernstein 13G") filed with the SEC, these shares are held for the accounts of discretionary clients. (6) Based upon the calculation in the Sanford Bernstein 13G, which assumes 55,707,629 shares of Common Stock outstanding. (7) Based on a statement on Schedule 13G dated February 10, 1994 and Amendments No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 thereto dated January 30, 1995, February 1, 1996, January 24, 1997, January 17, 1998, December 31, 1998, and February 9, 2000 respectively, (the "Wellington 13G") filed with the SEC, Wellington Management Company, in its capacity as investment advisor, may be deemed beneficial owner of these shares, which are owned by numerous investment counseling clients. (8) Based upon the calculation in the Wellington 13G, which assumes 55,852,190 shares of Common Stock outstanding. 3 6 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT The following table and notes thereto set forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as of March 8, 2000 by (i) each of the Company's directors and nominees for director, (ii) the Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers, (iii) the former Chief Executive Officer, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF PERCENT BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP(1) OF CLASS(2) ---------------- ----------------------- ----------- Robert Cizik...................................... 31,540(3)(4) * Kenneth R. Dubuque................................ 40,560(3)(4) * Anthony M. Frank.................................. 20,500(3)(4) * Clifford J. Grum.................................. 374,056(3)(4)(5)(6) * James T. Hackett.................................. 100(3)(4) * William B. Howes.................................. 100,282(3)(4)(6) * Bobby R. Inman.................................... 15,500(3)(4) * Kenneth M. Jastrow, II............................ 244,407(3)(4)(6) * James A. Johnson.................................. 14,800(3)(4) * Harold C. Maxwell................................. 119,013(3)(4)(6) * W. Allen Reed..................................... 12,000(3)(4) * Herbert A. Sklenar................................ 23,000(3)(4) * Walter P. Stern................................... 57,880(3)(4)(5) * Arthur Temple III................................. 589,199(3)(4)(5)(7) 1.12% Charlotte Temple.................................. 386,126(3)(4)(8) * Larry E. Temple................................... 11,000(3)(4) * M. Richard Warner................................. 82,858(3)(4)(5)(6) * All directors and executive officers (25 persons) as a group...................................... 2,416,401(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) 4.59%
- --------------- * Represents less than one percent. (1) Beneficial ownership as reported in the above table has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Rule 13d-3"), with additional information included as set forth in footnote (4) below. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership includes both sole voting and sole dispositive power. Certain of the directors and executive officers disclaim beneficial ownership with respect to certain of these shares. Unless otherwise indicated, the above table does not include any shares that may be held by pension and profit-sharing plans of the corporations or endowment funds of educational and charitable institutions for which various directors and officers serve as directors or trustees. (2) Based upon a total of 52,668,387 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on March 8, 2000. (3) Includes the following number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within a period of 60 days from March 8, 2000: Mr. Cizik -- 2,000; Mr. Dubuque -- 0; Mr. Frank -- 18,000; Mr. Grum -- 15,750; Mr. Hackett -- 0; Mr. Howes -- 10,569; Mr. Inman -- 2,000; Mr. Jastrow -- 17,529; Mr. Johnson -- 0; Mr. Maxwell -- 10,029; Mr. Reed -- 0; Mr. Sklenar -- 20,000; Mr. Stern -- 12,000; Mr. Temple III -- 6,000; Ms. C. Temple -- 7,500; Mr. L. Temple -- 10,000; Mr. Warner -- 6,792; and all directors and executive officers (25 persons) as a group -- 214,292. (4) Also includes the following number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options with exercise dates and terms ranging from approximately five months to fifteen years from March 8, 2000: Mr. Cizik -- 3,000; Mr. Dubuque -- 40,500; Mr. Frank -- 2,000; Mr. Grum -- 19,250; Mr. Hackett -- 0; Mr. Howes -- 66,411; Mr. Inman -- 3,000; Mr. Jastrow -- 203,595; Mr. Johnson -- 12,000; Mr. Maxwell -- 65,751; Mr. Reed -- 12,000; Mr. Sklenar -- 2,000; Mr. Stern -- 5,000; Mr. Temple III -- 5,000; Ms. C. Temple -- 2,500; Mr. L. Temple -- 0; Mr. Warner -- 47,848; and all directors and executive officers (25 persons) as a group -- 695,556. These options are not required to be 4 7 reported under Rule 13d-3 and the shares underlying these options are not considered "beneficially owned" under Rule 13d-3. (5) Includes 57,102, 2,680, 1,000, and 14,473 shares of Common Stock owned by certain relatives of Messrs. Grum, Stern, Temple III, and Warner, respectively. Also includes, with respect to Mr. Grum, 3,550 shares of Common Stock held by a corporation controlled by a relative of Mr. Grum and 4,000 shares held by a family foundation. Certain of these shares may be considered by the Securities and Exchange Commission to be beneficially owned for purposes of this Proxy Statement. Certain of the named individuals disclaim any beneficial interest in such shares. (6) Includes 60, 4,105, 11,000, 2,109, 1,550, and 375 shares of Common Stock held for Messrs. Dubuque, Grum, Howes, Jastrow, Maxwell, and Warner, respectively, and 42,161 shares of Common Stock held for all directors and executive officers (25 persons) as a group by trusts under two (2) employee stock plans of the Company's subsidiaries. These shares are considered by the Securities and Exchange Commission to be beneficially owned for purposes of this Proxy Statement. (7) Includes 134,460 shares of Common Stock held in a trust over which Mr. Temple III is trustee. Mr. Temple III has a future income interest with respect to 33,615 of these shares and a remainder interest with respect to 33,615 of these shares. Also includes 10,608 shares held by various trusts and custodial accounts, with respect to which Mr. Temple III has sole voting and dispositive power. Mr. Temple III disclaims any beneficial ownership with respect to these 10,608 shares. Includes 137,190 shares held in two trusts for Mr. Temple III and certain of his relatives with respect to which he has a present income interest but no voting or dispositive power. Mr. Temple III has a remainder interest with respect to 58,500 of the shares held in one of these trusts. Does not include 1,260,626 shares of Common Stock held by the T.L.L. Temple Foundation, a charitable trust, of which Mr. Temple III is one of five trustees and shares voting and dispositive power. Mr. Temple III disclaims any beneficial ownership with respect to such shares. (8) Includes 67,230 shares of Common Stock held in a trust. Ms. C. Temple has a future income interest with respect to 33,615 of these shares and a remainder interest with respect to 33,615 of these shares. Also includes 126,190 shares held in two trusts for Ms. C. Temple and certain of her relatives with respect to which she has a present income interest but no voting or dispositive power. Ms. C. Temple has a remainder interest with respect to 58,500 of the shares held in one of these trusts. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS The By-laws of the Company provide that the number of directors that constitutes the Board of Directors shall be established by vote of the Board of Directors and that the directors shall be classified with respect to the time for which they severally hold office into three classes, which classes shall as nearly as possible be equal in size. The Board of Directors has accordingly set the number of directors at thirteen (13), with two classes of four (4) directors each and one class of five (5) directors. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of the Company's Common Stock at a meeting at which a quorum is present. "Plurality" means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the meeting. Consequently, any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker nonvote or otherwise) have no impact in the election of directors except to the extent the failure to vote for an individual results in another individual receiving a larger number of votes. NOMINEES Unless otherwise indicated in the enclosed form of proxy, the persons named in such proxy intend to nominate and vote for the election of the following nominees for the office of director of the Company, to serve 5 8 as directors for three (3) years or as otherwise stated herein, or until their respective successors have been duly elected and have qualified. All nominees are presently serving as directors with the exception of Mr. Hackett. NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR TO BE ELECTED AT THE 2000 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
NAME AND YEAR FIRST ELECTED DIRECTOR PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND OTHER INFORMATION ------------------- ------------------------------------------ Robert Cizik................... Mr. Cizik, 68, is the former Chairman and Chief Executive 1984 Officer of Cooper Industries, Inc., Houston, Texas, a diversified international manufacturing company (1975-1996). He currently serves as Non-Executive Chairman of Koppers Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Stanadyne Automotive, Windsor, Connecticut. He is also a Director of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. He previously served as a director of Harris Corporation from 1988 until November 1999. James T. Hackett............... Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ocean Energy, Inc. Mr. Hackett, age 46, was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Seagull Energy Corporation from 1998 until it merged with Ocean Energy, Inc. in March 1999, when he assumed the title of Chief Executive Officer and President. He assumed the Chairman title on January 1, 2000. Mr. Hackett served as President-Energy Services Group of Duke Energy Corporation, Houston, Texas from 1997 until 1998 and as Executive Vice President of PanEnergy Corporation (which merged into Duke Energy) from 1996 until 1997. Mr. Hackett served as Senior Vice President and President of the Trident Division of NGC Corporation from 1995 until 1996. Mr. Hackett is also a director of New Jersey Resources Corporation. Arthur Temple III.............. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Exeter 1984 Investment Company. Mr. Temple III, 58, has served as Chairman of the Board of Exeter Investment Company from 1975 to early 1982 and since March 1986. From 1973 until 1980 Mr. Temple III served as a member of the Texas legislature and from January 1981 until March 1986 he served as a member and Chairman of the Railroad Commission of Texas, which regulates mineral resources and for-hire highway transportation in Texas. Mr. Temple III is also Chairman of the Board of First Bank & Trust, East Texas. Larry E. Temple................ Mr. Temple, 64, is an attorney and during the last five 1991 years has been in private practice. He has served as Chairman of the Texas Select Committee on Higher Education, as Chairman of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, and as a member of the Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation. Mr. Temple has also served on several boards of the University of Texas and is a member of the Board of the Lyndon B. Johnson Foundation. Mr. Temple formerly served as Special Counsel to President Lyndon B. Johnson and as an Executive Assistant to Texas Governor John Connally.
6 9 Although the Company does not anticipate that any of the above-named nominees will refuse or be unable to accept or serve as a director of the Company, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy intend, if any nominee becomes unavailable, to vote the shares represented by the proxy for the election of such other person or persons as may be nominated or designated by management, unless they are directed by the proxy to do otherwise. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF MESSRS. CIZIK, HACKETT, TEMPLE III, AND TEMPLE AS DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. CONTINUING DIRECTORS The following information is provided with respect to directors who will continue to serve as directors of the Company until the expiration of their terms or as otherwise stated herein. DIRECTORS TO SERVE UNTIL THE 2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
NAME AND YEAR FIRST ELECTED DIRECTOR PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND OTHER INFORMATION ------------------- ------------------------------------------ Bobby R. Inman....................... Admiral Inman, 68, served as Chairman of the Board of 1987 Westmark Systems, Inc., a Texas-based electronics industry holding company, from September 1986, and as its Chief Executive Officer from December 31, 1986 until December 31, 1989. From January 1983 until December 1986, Admiral Inman was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corp. in Austin, Texas. Admiral Inman retired from active duty with the United States Navy with permanent four star rank on July 1, 1982. Admiral Inman served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from January 1987 to December 1990. He is a director of Fluor Corporation, SBC Communications Inc., Science Applications International Corp. and Xerox Corporation. Kenneth M. Jastrow, II............... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. 1998 Jastrow, 52, was elected to his current office effective January 1, 2000. He served as Group Vice President of the Company from 1995 until 1998, as President and Chief Operating Officer in 1998 and 1999, and as Chief Financial Officer of the Company from November 1991 until 1999. Mr. Jastrow is also a director of MGIC Investment Corporation. James A. Johnson..................... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Capital 2000 Partners. Mr. Johnson, 56, served as Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Fannie Mae in 1999 and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fannie Mae from 1991 through 1998. He is also a director of Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Target Corporation, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation and UnitedHealth Group. Herbert A. Sklenar................... Chairman of the Board Emeritus of Vulcan Materials Company, 1993 a producer of construction materials and chemicals. Mr. Sklenar, 68, served as President of Vulcan Materials Company from 1983 until his election as Chairman in 1992, he served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1986 until February 1997 and he served as Chairman from 1992 until his retirement in 1997. In addition to being a director of Vulcan Materials Company, Mr. Sklenar also is a director of AmSouth Bancorporation.
7 10 DIRECTORS TO SERVE UNTIL THE 2002 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
NAME AND YEAR FIRST ELECTED DIRECTOR PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND OTHER INFORMATION ------------------- ------------------------------------------ Anthony M. Frank..................... Chairman of Belvedere Capital Partners, Inc. Mr. Frank, 68, 1992 served as Postmaster General of the United States from 1988 until 1992. Prior to his appointment as Postmaster General, Mr. Frank served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the San Francisco-based First Nationwide Bank. He has also served as Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and Chairman of the California Housing Finance Agency, and was the first Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Advisory Board. Mr. Frank is also a director of The Charles Schwab Corporation, General American Investors Company, Inc., Bedford Properties, Inc., Crescent Real Estate Equities, Financial Security Assurance, and Cotelligent, Inc. William B. Howes..................... Executive Vice President of the Company. Mr. Howes, 62, 1996 served as Group Vice President of the Company from July 1993 until his election as Executive Vice President in 1996. Mr. Howes was elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company's Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc. subsidiary ("Inland") in 1993 after serving as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Inland since April 1992. W. Allen Reed........................ President and Chief Executive Officer of General Motors 2000 Investment Management Corporation. Mr. Reed, 52, was elected to his current position in 1994 and also serves as Chairman and CEO of the GM Trust Company and as a Corporate Vice President of General Motors Corporation. He is also a director of WEBS Funds, Inc., FLIR Systems, Inc. and General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC). Walter P. Stern...................... Vice Chairman of the Board of Capital Group International, 1984 Inc. ("CGII"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Capital Group Companies, Inc. From March 1988 until December 1998, Mr. Stern, 71, served as Chairman of the Board of CGII. He has been serving as Chairman of Capital International, Inc., a registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and wholly-owned subsidiary of CGII, since 1988. Mr. Stern also serves as Chairman of the Board of The American Balanced Fund, The Income Fund of America, Inc., and New Perspective Fund, Inc., all managed by a subsidiary of The Capital Group Companies, Inc. Mr. Stern is also Chairman and a director of the Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. Under the Company's policy, Mr. Stern's retirement from the Board will take effect at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Charlotte Temple..................... Investor. During at least the past five years, Ms. Temple, 1994 60, has been associated with various civic organizations while pursuing private interests. Her prior experience was in the commercial real estate investment area. Ms. Temple is also a director of Exeter Investment Company.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS There is no family relationship between any of the nominees, continuing directors and executive officers of the Company other than Mr. Temple III and Ms. C. Temple, who are brother and sister. 8 11 Mr. Temple III is a director, officer and 66 2/3% stockholder of Demco Manufacturing Company ("Demco"). During 1999, Demco performed machinery repair services for Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation ("Forest Products"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, in the ordinary course of business at an aggregate cost to Forest Products of $226,211. It is expected that Demco will continue to perform services for subsidiaries of the Company in the future. During 1999, Forest Products purchased all merchantable pine timber on approximately 117 acres in Angelina County, Texas from Arthur Temple, Jr., Mr. Temple III's and Ms. C. Temple's father, in the ordinary course of business for a total consideration of $137,168. A subsidiary of Forest Products sold a lot in a subdivision to Mr. Temple III and his wife for $290,000 during 1999 in the ordinary course of business. By agreement in the ordinary course of business dated March 29, 1999, Lumbermen's Investment Corporation ("LIC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, agreed to purchase three lots in a subdivision and sell each lot at its cost plus carry (interest plus taxes) to a builder at the time the builder began construction of a home on each lot. In August 1999, Mr. Jastrow and his wife purchased one of these lots from LIC at a cost of $81,795.19, which represented the same price that the builder would have paid LIC for the lot under the terms of the agreement. SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company pursuant to Rule 16a-3(e) during its most recent fiscal year and Forms 5 and amendments thereto or written representations in lieu of Form 5 furnished to the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year, the Company has not identified any person who failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the above forms, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year or prior fiscal years. COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS There are six standing committees of the Board. Set forth below is a description of the functions of those committees and the members of the Board serving on such committees. Messrs. Hackett, Johnson and Reed will be elected to serve on committees at the May meeting when the Board conducts its annual evaluation of committee memberships. Audit Committee. The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is to provide the Board of Directors assistance in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibility to the stockholders and the investment community relating to the accounting and reporting practices of the Company, the adequacy of corporate financial controls, and the quality and integrity of the consolidated financial statements of the Company and all of its wholly and majority owned subsidiaries, except for Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B., which has an audit committee consisting of outside directors from its own board of directors. The functions of the Audit Committee include the review of the professional services and independence of the Company's independent auditors; the review, in consultation with the independent and internal auditors, of the plan and results of the annual audit, the adequacy of the Company's internal control systems and the results of the Company's internal audits; and the review, with management and the independent auditors, of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee annually considers the qualifications of the Company's independent auditors and makes recommendations to the Board as to their selection. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Sklenar (Chairman), Frank, L. Temple and Ms. C. Temple. During 1999, the Audit Committee met three (3) times. Executive Committee. The Executive Committee may exercise all the authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Company, except for matters related to the composition of the Board, changes in the By-laws and certain other significant corporate matters. The members of the Executive Committee are the Chairman of the Board, who will serve as Chairman of the Executive Committee, and the Chairman of each standing committee of the Board. The Executive Committee did not meet in 1999. 9 12 Finance Committee. The Finance Committee reviews the Company's financial planning, structure, condition and requirements for funds; makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning all forms of major financing, including the issuance of securities, corporate borrowings, and investments; monitors the Company's relationship with its lenders, compliance with financing agreements, and financial disclosure policies; reviews capital expenditures and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the financing thereof; makes recommendations to the Board concerning the Company's dividend policy; makes recommendations to the Board concerning the stock repurchase program; and oversees the Company's employee benefit plan investment committee and policies. The members of the Finance Committee are Messrs. Cizik (Chairman), Stern, and Temple III. The Chairman of the Board is a nonvoting ex-officio member. The Finance Committee met three (3) times during 1999. Management Development and Executive Compensation Committee. The Management Development and Executive Compensation Committee ("Compensation Committee") is responsible for ensuring that a proper system of short and long-term compensation is in place to provide performance-oriented incentives to management; overseeing management succession and development programs; making recommendations concerning compensation programs, retirement plans and other employee benefit programs; approving the salaries and bonuses of all officers of the Company and certain other personnel; and making recommendations with respect to bonus, stock option, restricted stock, phantom stock, stock performance, stock appreciation right or other current or proposed incentive plans. Certain of the foregoing plans are administered by a subcommittee composed solely of those members of the Compensation Committee who meet the definition of "outside director" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the definition of "non-employee director" under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to those employees who are covered by such laws. The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Frank (Chairman), Cizik, Inman, Sklenar, and Temple III. The Chairman of the Board attends the meetings as a nonvoting ex-officio member. During 1999, the Compensation Committee met four (4) times. Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the structure of the Board to assure that the proper skills and experience are represented on the Board, recommends nominees to serve on the Board of Directors, reviews potential conflicts of prospective Board members, recommends the size of the Board, recommends the membership of the committees, reviews corporate governance issues, reviews shareholder proposals, and reviews outside directorships in other publicly held companies by senior officers of the Company. Nominees to serve on the Board of Directors are selected on the basis of recognized achievements and their ability to bring various skills and experience to the deliberations of the Board. The members of the Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Inman (Chairman), Frank, Sklenar, and Stern. The Chairman of the Board is a nonvoting ex-officio member. The Corporate Governance Committee met three (3) times during 1999. Pursuant to the Company's By-laws, notice of a stockholder's intent to make a nomination for the Board of Directors must contain certain specified information regarding the nominating stockholder and the nominee and must be received by the Secretary of the Company not less than 75 days nor more than 100 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders (or in the case of an annual meeting called for a date more than 50 days prior to such anniversary date or in the case of a special meeting of stockholders, not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the date on which notice of such annual meeting or special meeting is first mailed to stockholders or made public, whichever occurs first). Public Policy/Environmental Committee. The Public Policy/Environmental Committee acts in an advisory and consulting capacity to the Board of Directors regarding the Company's activities that relate to matters of public policy and the environment. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the committee considers and reviews from time to time the Company's policies and practices that address issues of social and public concern, as well as significant legislative, regulatory and social trends. The members of the Public Policy/ Environmental Committee are Messrs. L. Temple (Chairman), Cizik and Ms. C. Temple. The Chairman of the Board is a nonvoting ex-officio member. The Public Policy/Environmental Committee met two (2) times during 1999. 10 13 BOARD MEETINGS During 1999, the Board of Directors held four (4) meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he served except for Mr. Frank, who missed the May meetings due to a serious injury. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Directors who are not employees of the Company will receive in 2000 an annual retainer of $35,000 and a $2,000 fee for attendance at regular and special Board meetings. Directors who serve on committees of the Board receive $1,000 for each committee meeting held in conjunction with a Board meeting and $2,000 for each other committee meeting. The chairmen of committees of the Board receive an additional annual retainer of $2,500. Directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings, including those for travel, food and lodging. Directors and members of committees of the Board who are employees of the Company are not compensated for their Board and committee activities. Under the Company's Stock Option Plan, each person who is first elected a non-employee director is automatically granted upon such election a nonqualified stock option covering 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date the option is granted. This award vests 10% after one year, 15% after four years, and 25% each after five, six and seven years. At the expiration of this initial grant, and each five years thereafter, a director may be granted an additional non-qualified stock option covering up to 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of the option grant. All options vest 40% after one year, 40% after two years, and 20% after three years. All options have a term of 10 years. Any non- employee director may also, pursuant to the terms of the Company's Stock Option Plan, make an election to receive 2,000 nonqualified stock options in lieu of his annual retainer fees at a price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the first trading day in January less the amount of the annual retainer fee. This option vests 100% after one year and has a term of fifteen years. Under the Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Temple-Inland Inc. (the "Directors' Retirement Plan"), a non-employee director who remains a member of the Board until retirement age or who retires earlier after serving on the Board for a period of at least ten (10) years is entitled to receive an annual retirement benefit equal to the then current annual retainer fee. The benefit will be paid for a number of years equal to the greater of (i) the number of years the director served as a member of the Board, or (ii) five (5) years. In the event of the director's death, the remainder of the benefit will be paid to his spouse if living. In lieu of the retirement benefits previously described, if a non-employee director ceases to be a member of the Board at any time within two (2) years after the occurrence of a change in control of the Company for any reason other than the director's retirement or death, the director will be paid a lump-sum retirement benefit equal to the product of (A) and (B), where (A) is the greater of five (5) or the number of years the director served as a member of the Board, and(B) is the greater of the annual retainer fee being paid to directors at the time the director ceases to be a member of the Board or the annual retainer fee in effect immediately prior to the change in control. In the event that the retirement benefit payable to a director is subject to the 20% excise tax imposed under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to certain payments made in connection with a change in control, the Directors' Retirement Plan provides for an additional payment to be made to the director such that he retains on an after-tax basis the same amount as he would have if no excise tax had been imposed. Under the Directors' Retirement Plan, a non-employee director may also elect to defer his Board fees until the earlier of retirement, death, or, in certain circumstances, termination of membership on the Board. Any Board fees that are deferred accrue interest at the prime commercial lending rate. 11 14 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Report of the Management Development and Executive Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation The Company's executive compensation program is designed to align compensation with business strategy, performance, and stockholder values. The program includes salary, short-term cash incentives, and a long-term incentive program based on stock options. The Committee considers all elements of the compensation package in total, rather than any one element in isolation. In 1999, for example, salaries were increased for the first time since 1997 (except for officers whose salaries were increased in connection with a promotion), while incentive bonuses were used to reward performance and long-term incentive awards were made as motivation for future performance. In making compensation decisions, the Committee bases its judgments on a review of personal and business unit performances. It is the Company's policy to obtain the maximum deduction on its tax return for compensation paid to its executive officers consistent with the Company's compensation goals. The Committee has adopted a policy requiring the deferral of any compensation that exceeds the permissible deduction under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code until such time as the maximum deduction under Section 162(m) may be taken. However, the Committee reserves the right to waive this requirement to further the Company's compensation goals from time to time. All compensation paid in 1999 should qualify for a deduction under Section 162(m). Since its inception in 1984, Temple-Inland's compensation philosophy has been to ensure that stockholder returns are a top priority in evaluating the effectiveness of the compensation program. The following paragraphs outline the Compensation Committee's objectives. Base Salary. Base salaries are maintained at competitive levels considering the performance and longevity of the employee. To ensure that the Company's compensation remains competitive, the Committee from time to time reviews information from several independent surveys of comparably-sized companies. Since the market for executive talent extends beyond any particular industry, the survey data includes both companies in the industry as well as companies outside the industrial classification represented in the Paper Industry Index referred to below under "Performance Graph." Surveys indicate base salaries for the Company's named executive officers are currently competitive to the mid ranges. Base salaries are usually reviewed every two years and were increased in 1999. In making its salary decisions, the Committee places its emphasis on the particular executive's experience, responsibilities, and performance. No specific formula is applied to determine the weight of each factor. However, the Company has historically followed a policy of using the incentive bonus rather than base salary to reward outstanding performance. Incentive Bonus. Short-term cash incentive awards are largely based on individual performance and on the performance of the group or business segment in which the individual is a key employee. Included in the evaluation of an employee are the current earnings of the group, personal performance, and the degree to which the employee's actions have laid the groundwork for future earnings. Financial performance of the business segment is given greater weight than other business accomplishments in determining bonus payments. The types and relative importance of specific financial and other business factors vary among the Company's executives depending on their positions and the particular operations or functions for which they are responsible. The evaluations of the CEO and of the Chief Administrative Officer are based on the consolidated results of the Company. The Committee does not establish targeted award levels or goals at the beginning of the year. Instead, the Committee reviews actual earnings and performance (including comparisons to competitors where appropriate) after the end of the year and determines in its business judgment the size of each executive's award. The Paper Group had earnings of $102.9 million in 1999 compared with $38.9 million in 1998; the Executive Vice President over this segment received a $250,000 bonus for 1999 compared with a bonus of $100,000 for 1998. The Building Products Group had earnings of $173.7 million in 1999 compared with $112.5 million in 1998, and the Executive Vice President over this segment received a bonus of $450,000 for 1999 compared with $275,000 for 1998. The Financial Services Group had earnings of $138.1 million in 1999 compared with $154.1 million in 1998. The Group Vice President Financial Services received a bonus of $325,000 for 1999. 12 15 Mr. Jastrow, II received a bonus of $600,000 for 1999 in his role as President and Chief Operating Officer. He received a bonus of $450,000 for 1998, in his capacity both as President and as head of the Financial Services Group for most of the year. The Chief Administrative Officer received a bonus of $250,000 for 1999 compared with $150,000 for 1998. No specific weightings have been assigned under the bonus program to the factors considered by the Committee in the exercise of its business judgment. Long-Term Incentive Awards. In 1999, the key executives listed in the proxy statement received an annual grant of stock options under a long-term incentive program and one officer also received a special award of options in connection with his promotion. There is no other long-term incentive program. The program is based exclusively on the stock option grant, which is a dollar value of options based on the executive's position and importance to the Company's long range performance. These options are granted at market and expire in ten (10) years. The options will vest 15% per year on the second, third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries and 40% on the sixth anniversary following the date of grant. Option awards are basically set at a percentage of targeted compensation. However, within these guidelines, the Committee also considers previous option grants, tenure, and responsibilities of the executive. In the case of a new key executive, an initial grant may be made above targeted levels. To further align executives' financial interests with those of the Company and its stockholders, the Committee has adopted minimum stock ownership guidelines for these executives: VALUE OF OWNERSHIP OF STOCK AS A MULTIPLE OF ANNUAL SALARY
POSITION MULTIPLE OF SALARY - -------- ------------------ Chief Executive Officer.................................. 5x Executive Vice Presidents and Group Vice Presidents...... 3x Other Tier I Executives.................................. 3x Tier II Executives....................................... 2x
Generally, "Tier I" includes the Company's senior executive officers (including the five executives listed in the proxy statement) and "Tier II" includes the next highest level of Company management. Although annual awards were made from 1984 through 1995 under the Company's Performance Unit Plan, the specified formulas only generated one (1) cash payment which occurred in 1991. In all other years, including 1999, the performance unit awards have been terminated without payment, although the related stock option awards continued for another year. The plan was discontinued after 1995 and no further grants were made. With the exception of an initial award to Mr. Howes upon his employment in 1990 to replace awards from his former employer that were forfeited, the key executives included in the proxy statement do not receive restricted stock awards. The Company maintains a policy of having this alternative available to attract new executives. The Chief Executive Officer. In reviewing Mr. Jastrow's performance, the Committee will consider all of the factors set forth in the above paragraphs. However, the Committee will focus primarily on the Company's performance, measured in large part by its net earnings. The former Chief Executive Officer's performance was measured in that manner. In 1998 the Company had continuing earnings of $88.9 million (including nonrecurring items) and Mr. Grum received a bonus of $200,000. In 1999 the Company had continuing earnings of $191.6 million and Mr. Grum received a bonus of $700,000. A comparison of Mr. Grum's cash compensation for the last three (3) years with the Company's net earnings during that period is set forth in the following table:
INCENTIVE NET EARNINGS YEAR SALARY COMPENSATION TOTAL OF THE COMPANY - ---- -------- ------------ ---------- -------------- 1999............................... $700,000 $700,000 $1,400,000 $99.2 million 1998............................... $726,923 $200,000 $ 926,923 $64.5 million 1997............................... $688,462 0 $ 688,462 $50.8 million
13 16 Mr. Grum was not awarded long-term incentives in 1997, 1998, or 1999 due to his planned retirement at age 65 in accordance with Company policy. Other Information. Reference is made to the following charts and tables for actual compensation grants and awards to key executives, as well as the Company's performance for the last five (5) years, and to the inside cover and page 37 of the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders for information concerning the Company's profitability. Anthony M. Frank, Chairman Robert Cizik Bobby R. Inman Herbert A. Sklenar Arthur Temple III The following table summarizes all compensation earned with respect to the Company's last fiscal year by the Chief Executive Officer, the former Chief Executive Officer, and the four other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year: TABLE 1: SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM COMPENSATION ---------------------------------- --------------------------------- AWARD(S) PAYOUTS ----------------------- ------- RESTRICTED SECURITIES NAME AND OTHER ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER PRINCIPAL SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION AWARD(S) OPTIONS/ PAYOUTS COMPENSATION POSITION YEAR ($) ($) ($)(1) ($) SARS(#) ($) ($)(2) --------- ---- -------- -------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------- ------------ (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Kenneth M. Jastrow, II, 1999 $475,000 $600,000 N/A $0 48,000 $0 $3,000 Chairman and Chief 1998 448,077 450,000 N/A 0 51,344 0 3,000 Executive Officer 1997 344,231 450,000 N/A 0 12,480 0 3,000 Kenneth R. Dubuque, Group 1999 $310,000 $325,000 N/A $0 12,500 $0 $9,100 Vice President, Financial 1998 75,314 150,000 $145,088 0 10,000 0 0 Services 1997 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A William B. Howes, Director 1999 $449,932 $250,000 N/A $0 15,000 $0 $3,000 and Executive Vice President 1998 425,672 100,000 N/A 0 14,000 0 3,000 1997 422,921 0 N/A 0 12,480 0 3,000 Harold C. Maxwell, Executive 1999 $383,922 $450,000 N/A $0 15,000 $0 $3,000 Vice President 1998 332,308 275,000 N/A 0 14,000 0 3,000 1997 315,385 300,000 N/A 0 12,480 0 3,000 M. Richard Warner, Chief 1999 $301,924 $250,000 N/A $0 12,500 $0 $3,000 Administrative Officer 1998 249,231 150,000 N/A 0 10,000 0 3,000 1997 237,115 110,000 N/A 0 7,140 0 3,000 Clifford J. Grum, former 1999 $700,000 $700,000 N/A $0 0 $0 $3,000 Chairman and Chief 1998 726,923 200,000 N/A 0 0 0 3,000 Executive Officer 1997 688,462 0 N/A 0 0 0 3,000
- --------------- (1) The amount shown for Mr. Dubuque is a relocation bonus. For all other officers, this column is not applicable. The dollar value of perquisites and other personal benefits, or securities or property paid or earned during the fiscal year other than pursuant to a plan, does not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the annual salary and bonus reported for each officer and is therefore not reported. (2) Amounts shown are annual contributions or other allocations to defined contribution plans. 14 17 None of the five (5) executive officers named above has an employment contract with the Company or an agreement providing for severance payments in the event his employment is terminated. During 1999, the Company had a stock option plan in place under which options were granted to employees. Employees also exercised options granted under a prior plan. Each of the plans was approved by the stockholders and administered by non-employee members of the Board of Directors. The options were granted at full market value on the date of the grant, and these exercise prices have never been reduced. Options have been granted to approximately 440 current middle and upper level company employees who have direct responsibilities to improve the profitability of the Company. The following table summarizes the stock options granted to the five (5) named executive officers and one former executive officer in the last fiscal year: TABLE 2: OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR (1)
GRANT DATE INDIVIDUAL GRANTS VALUE(2) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- PERCENT OF TOTAL GRANT NUMBER OF SECURITIES OPTIONS/SARS EXERCISE OR DATE UNDERLYING OPTIONS/ GRANTED TO EMPLOYEES BASE PRICE PRESENT NAME SARS GRANTED(#) IN FISCAL YEAR ($/SH) EXPIRATION DATE VALUE ($) ---- -------------------- -------------------- ----------- --------------- ---------- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) Kenneth M. Jastrow, II... 48,000 11.46% $75.28 05/07/09 $1,498,080 Kenneth R. Dubuque....... 12,500 2.98% $59.25 02/05/09 $ 307,125 William B. Howes......... 15,000 3.58% $59.25 02/05/09 $ 368,550 Harold C. Maxwell........ 15,000 3.58% $59.25 02/05/09 $ 368,550 M. Richard Warner........ 12,500 2.98% $59.25 02/05/09 $ 307,125 Clifford J. Grum......... 0 0% N/A N/A $ 0
- --------------- (1) Options to purchase Temple-Inland Inc. Common Stock. The exercise price is the average of the high and low sales price of a share of Company Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. Exercise prices have never been repriced. Withholding taxes may be paid with exercised shares. No general or freestanding stock appreciation rights ("SARs") were granted. All grants to the named executive officers under the Stock Option Plan include a provision for acceleration of vesting in certain change of control situations. The options in Mr. Jastrow's award become exercisable as follows: 15% on 05/07/01, 15% on 05/07/02, 15% on 05/07/03, 15% on 05/07/04, and 40% on 05/07/05. All other options awarded to the executives become exercisable in 15% increments on 02/05/01, 02/05/02, 02/05/03, 02/05/04, and the remaining 40% becomes exercisable on 02/05/05. (2) The Grant Date Present Value was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected volatility was measured by the Standard Deviation of a statistical distribution using daily closing stock prices for the last ten years for an assumed expected volatility of 29.39%. The annual risk free rate of return during the expected life of the option (ten years) was 6.82%. The expected dividend yield or dividend adjusted stock prices was assumed to be 2.00%. The time of exercise was assumed to be at the expiration of the options. 15 18 The following table summarizes the stock option exercises and value of options held at year-end of the five (5) named executive officers and one former executive officer: TABLE 3: AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FY-END OPTION/SAR VALUES
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY SHARES OPTIONS/SARS AT FISCAL OPTIONS/SARS ACQUIRED YEAR-END(#)(2) AT FISCAL YEAR-END($)(3) ON VALUE --------------------------- --------------------------- NAME EXERCISE(#) REALIZED($)(1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE ---- ----------- -------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Kenneth M. Jastrow, II.... 14,248 $147,406 4,662 116,462 $ 78,789 $376,659 Kenneth R. Dubuque........ 0 0 0 22,500 0 $196,978 William B. Howes.......... 7,620 $ 68,351 14,622 46,958 $ 261,042 $478,648 Harold C. Maxwell......... 6,668 $ 37,274 13,194 46,118 $ 233,657 $459,982 M. Richard Warner......... 0 0 17,035 33,469 $ 307,921 $330,908 Clifford J. Grum.......... 11,428 $110,394 47,800 0 $1,010,080 0
- --------------- (1) Value based on the average of the high and low sales prices of a share of Temple-Inland Inc. Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of exercise, which is the valuation used in the Stock Option Plan, less the option exercise price. (2) SARs are not granted under the Company's Stock Option Plan. (3) Value based on the average of the high and low sales prices of a share of Temple-Inland Inc. Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 1999, less the option exercise price. 16 19 PERFORMANCE GRAPH During the five preceding fiscal years, the Company's cumulative total stockholder return compared to the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and to the Standard & Poor's Paper Industry Index was as shown in the following Table 4: TABLE 4: TEMPLE-INLAND INC. COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
S&P 500 S&P PAPER & MEASUREMENT PERIOD TEMPLE- ------- FOREST (FISCAL YEAR COVERED) INLAND INC. PRODUCTS - --------------------- ------------ ----------- 1994 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 1995 $ 99.60 $137.58 $110.11 1996 $126.09 $169.17 $121.79 1997 $124.53 $225.60 $130.59 1998 $144.60 $290.08 $133.19 1999 $164.13 $351.12 $186.22
PERFORMANCE GRAPH ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON THE LAST TRADING DAY IN FISCAL YEAR 1994 *TOTAL RETURN ASSUMES REINVESTMENT OF DIVIDENDS 17 20 The named executive officers (except for Mr. Dubuque) and one former executive officer also participate in defined benefit pension plans of the Company's subsidiaries, with estimated benefits shown below. TABLE 5: PENSION PLAN TABLE
YEARS OF SERVICE --------------------------------------------------------- REMUNERATION 10 15 20 25 30 35 - ------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ 500,000........................... 78,000 117,000 156,000 195,000 234,000 273,000 550,000.......................... 86,000 129,000 172,000 215,000 258,000 301,000 600,000.......................... 94,000 141,000 188,000 235,000 282,000 329,000 650,000.......................... 102,000 153,000 204,000 255,000 306,000 357,000 700,000.......................... 110,000 165,000 220,000 275,000 330,000 385,000 750,000.......................... 118,000 177,000 236,000 295,000 354,000 413,000 800,000.......................... 126,000 189,000 252,000 315,000 378,000 441,000 850,000.......................... 134,000 201,000 268,000 335,000 402,000 469,000 900,000.......................... 142,000 213,000 284,000 355,000 426,000 497,000 1,000,000.......................... 158,000 237,000 316,000 395,000 474,000 553,000 1,100,000.......................... 174,000 261,000 348,000 435,000 522,000 609,000 1,200,000.......................... 190,000 285,000 380,000 475,000 570,000 665,000 1,300,000.......................... 206,000 309,000 412,000 515,000 618,000 721,000 1,400,000.......................... 222,000 333,000 444,000 555,000 666,000 777,000 1,500,000.......................... 238,000 357,000 476,000 595,000 714,000 833,000 1,600,000.......................... 254,000 381,000 508,000 635,000 762,000 889,000 1,700,000.......................... 270,000 405,000 540,000 675,000 810,000 945,000
The above table shows the estimated annual pension payable upon retirement to employees in specified remuneration and years-of-service classifications. Retirement benefits are calculated using final average pay based on the highest five (5) of the employee's last ten (10) years of service. Compensation covered by the Company's retirement plans includes salaries and bonuses, but excludes all other forms of compensation shown in the foregoing tables such as stock options. Messrs. Jastrow, Howes, Maxwell, and Warner are currently credited with approximately 21, 9 1/2, 36, and 13 1/2 years of service, respectively. If such officers continue in the employ of the Company until their respective retirement dates, at such time they would be credited with approximately 33, 11 1/2, 42, and 30 years of service, respectively. Mr. Grum was credited with 31.25 years of service on his retirement date. The estimated amounts are based on the assumption that payments under the Company's retirement plans will commence upon normal retirement (age 65), that the Company's retirement plans will continue in force and that the benefit payment will be in the form of a life annuity. Amounts shown in the table above are not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts. Mr. Dubuque participates in a defined contribution pension plan. Under this plan, an amount equal to 3 1/2% of his compensation is contributed to an account in his name each year. This amount is calculated based upon his salary and bonus, but excludes all other forms of compensation shown in the foregoing tables such as stock options. This amount vests after five years of service and is not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts. 18 21 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION There are no Compensation Committee interlocks among the members of the board. Mr. Temple III, a member of the Compensation Committee, however, participated in the following transactions: Mr. Temple III is a director, officer and 66 2/3% stockholder of Demco. During 1999, Demco performed machinery repair services for Forest Products in the ordinary course of business at an aggregate cost to Forest Products of $226,211. It is expected that Demco will continue to perform services for subsidiaries of the Company in the future. During 1999, Forest Products purchased all merchantable pine timber on approximately 117 acres in Angelina County, Texas from Arthur Temple, Jr., Mr. Temple III's and Ms. C. Temple's father, in the ordinary course of business for a total consideration of $137,168. A subsidiary of Forest Products sold a lot in a subdivision to Mr. Temple III and his wife for $290,000 during 1999 in the ordinary course of business. PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 30, 2000 Upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, none of whose members is an officer of the Company, the Board of Directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the Company to examine its consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2000 and has determined that it would be desirable to request that the stockholders ratify such selection. Ernst & Young LLP currently serves the Company and its subsidiaries as independent auditors. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. Stockholder ratification is not required for the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, since the Board of Directors has the responsibility for selecting the Company's independent auditors. The selection, however, is being submitted for ratification at the Annual Meeting. No determination has been made as to what action the Board of Directors would take if stockholders do not ratify the selection. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 30, 2000. STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE SPIN OFF OF FINANCIAL SERVICES BUSINESS The Company has been informed that Nell Minow, a Principal of LENS Investment Management, LLC (the "Proponent"), intends to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposal and supporting statement, for which the Board of Directors and the Company accept no responsibility, are set forth below. The Board of Directors opposes this proposal for the reasons set forth below in the Board of Directors Statement in Opposition. Nell Minow, whose address is Suite 400, 45 Exchange Street, Portland, Maine 04101, and who is a beneficial owner of 120 shares of Common Stock, submitted the following resolution: "RESOLVED: That the shareholders of Temple-Inland Inc. recommend that the board of directors take action necessary to spin off to shareholders the banking and financial services division as a separate company." 19 22 The Proponent has furnished the following statement setting forth the reasons advanced by her in support of her proposal: "This board and management have failed to demonstrate that the conglomeration of paper and forest products with banking and financial services can provide optimal value to the shareholders. There are no synergies of any kind and no reason to keep them together. "Separating the two businesses into independent companies will liberate their intrinsic values by (1) providing greater accountability by management, (2) ensuring greater accounting transparency, (3) facilitating analysis and valuation by the investment community, and (4) allowing shareholders to diversify. "Quite simply, Temple-Inland's current conglomerated structure is not working. Temple-Inland's performance has been disappointing, significantly trailing the S&P 500, S&P Paper and Forest Index, and S&P Savings and Loan Index over the last five years. If $100 were invested in Temple-Inland five years ago (November 19, 1994), it would be worth $149 today (November 19, 1999); whereas $100 would be worth $175 if invested in the S&P Paper and Forest Index, $284 if invested in the S&P Savings and Loan Index, and $338 if invested in the S&P 500 Index. "Keeping these two completely unrelated businesses together results in shares that trade at a significant discount to the sum of the real values of the financial and paper businesses. Stand-alone financial service companies have experienced excellent profit growth and multiple expansion in recent years, but the value of Temple-Inland's financial business remains suppressed by the paper business. Our belief is that the potential values of the component businesses significantly exceed the current share price. "There are no financial or industrial synergies between the paper business and the financial services business. Strong results in the company's financial services division have shielded the paper and forest products division from market discipline for its own lackluster performance. The paper and forest products industry has experienced increased global competition in recent years, resulting in over-capacity and a squeezing of margins and cash flows. While other industry players have responded to these conditions with substantial restructurings, Temple-Inland has failed to respond aggressively. Despite the recent announcement to sell the Evadale bleached paperboard facility, the company continues to manage its assets lethargically. Indeed, Temple-Inland invested heavily into their core paper businesses over the past years and failed to even meet their cost of capital. We also note that timber values have risen substantially during the last decade, and that these values are currently lost in the price of the stock. "If other shareholders believe, as we do, that the value of the underlying assets of Temple-Inland is not reflected in the stock price, then the board and the management have not met their obligation to prove that they can add value with the current conglomerated structure. The company needs to be fundamentally restructured. We recommend that the board start with a spin-off of its financial services business." YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL The Board of Directors is cognizant of its fiduciary responsibilities to its stockholders and strives to discharge these responsibilities in a manner that the Board believes is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The members of the Board of Directors, the majority of whom are independent, non-employee directors, draw upon broad business backgrounds and experience in making strategic decisions pertaining to the Company's operations and the value each operation adds to stockholder value. In its continuing review of issues such as those associated with the proposal, the Board of Directors is convinced that stockholder value will be best served by continuing to operate and, where appropriate, grow the Financial Services Group as a wholly-owned unit of the Company. 20 23 The strategy behind the Company's entry into financial services, to provide a line of business in which earnings would offset the cyclicality of earnings from paper and forest products, remains valid. The diversified earning power of each of the operations has served as a source of financial strength for the Company, increased return on investment, and therefore provided greater contributions to stockholder value. As a matter of course, the Board regularly reviews all the operations of the Company, including Management reports evaluating the contribution of each business unit to the Company's performance. In addition, the Board of Directors has always been, and continues to be, active in exploring strategic alternatives to enhance stockholder value. Recent examples of the Board's activity include the sale of the bleached paperboard business, the Mplus50 plan to increase profitability of the corrugated packaging operations, the stock re-purchase program, the growth in the Building Products Group and the growth in the Financial Services Group. Strategic or tactical adjustments will continue to be made when they enhance stockholder value. The Company's strategy is to operate a related array of businesses, with a goal to maximize returns to its stockholders. If a business cannot reasonably achieve market leadership or targeted returns in a value creating way, it will be evaluated for sale, merger, or other actions that will produce results. These considerations were a major factor in the Company's decision in 1999 to sell its bleached paperboard business. Clearly, the Company has demonstrated a willingness to acquire or divest businesses and to implement other forms of corporate reorganization where value can be created for stockholders. However, at this time the Company's Board and Management believe that value will continue to be created by retaining the Financial Services Group as a wholly-owned unit of the Company. In conclusion, the Board of Directors does not believe that a vote for the proposal would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders and therefore recommends voting against the proposal. Approval of the stockholder proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes attributable to all shares of Common Stock represented at the meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote. In determining whether the proposal has received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal; broker non-votes will be disregarded and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. ACCORDINGLY, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "AGAINST" THIS PROPOSAL, AND YOUR PROXY WILL BE SO VOTED IF THE PROPOSAL IS PRESENTED UNLESS YOU SPECIFY OTHERWISE. OTHER BUSINESS The Board of Directors knows of no other business that may properly be, or that is likely to be, brought before the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other business should properly be presented to the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote the proxy as in their discretion they may deem appropriate. 21 24 DATE FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement and for consideration at its Annual Meeting of Stockholders by submitting their proposals to the Company in a timely manner. In order to be so included for the 2001 Annual Meeting, stockholder proposals must be received by the Company by November 24, 2000 and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8. The Company's By-laws contain an advance notice procedure with regard to items of business to be brought before an Annual Meeting of Stockholders by a stockholder. These procedures require that notice be made in writing to the Secretary of the Company and that such notice be received at the executive offices of the Company not less than 75 days nor more than 100 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Stockholders (or in the case of an annual meeting called for a date more than 50 days prior to such anniversary date, not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the date on which notice of such annual meeting is first mailed to stockholders or made public, whichever occurs first). Shareholder proposals submitted outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 will be considered untimely if they are submitted before January 25, 2001 or after February 19, 2001. The By-laws require that the notice of the proposal contain certain information concerning the proposing stockholder and the proposal. The Company's By-laws also contain an advance notice procedure for the nomination of candidates for election to the Board of Directors by stockholders. For a brief description of such procedures, see "Committees of the Board of Directors -- Corporate Governance Committee." A copy of the By-law advance notice provision may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth on page 1 of this Proxy Statement. By Order of the Board of Directors /S/ LESLIE K. O'NEAL LESLIE K. O'NEAL Secretary Diboll, Texas March 24, 2000 22 25 PROXY TEMPLE-INLAND INC. 303 SOUTH TEMPLE DRIVE DIBOLL, TEXAS 75941 PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING ON MAY 5, 2000 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement each dated March 24, 2000 and does hereby appoint Kenneth M. Jastrow, II, David H. Dolben, and M. Richard Warner, and each of them as Proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and vote, as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Temple-Inland Inc. held of record by the undersigned on March 8, 2000 at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Friday, May 5, 2000, and any adjournment(s) thereof: CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD. DO NOT FOLD. PLEASE VOTE. ----------- SEE REVERSE SIDE ----------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - FOLD AND DETACH HERE - [X] PLEASE MARK YOUR ---- VOTES AS IN THIS 5340 EXAMPLE. ---- THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2 AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 3. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE DIRECTORS OF TEMPLE-INLAND INC. RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Proposal to elect as Directors of Temple-Inland Inc. the following persons to hold office until the expiration of their terms or until their successors have been duly elected and have qualified. Nominees for Director: Robert Cizik, James T. Hackett, Arthur Temple III, and Larry E. Temple. FOR WITHHOLD AUTHORITY [ ] [ ] (Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for individual nominees write the names of such nominees in the space provided below.) - ------------------------------------------------------- 2. Proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of Temple-Inland Inc. for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2000. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN [ ] [ ] [ ] - -------------------------------------------------------------- THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 3. - -------------------------------------------------------------- 26 3. Stockholder proposal regarding a spin off of the Company's financial services businesses. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN [ ] [ ] [ ] 4. In their discretion the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- SIGNATURE(S) DATE - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - FOLD AND DETACH HERE - -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----