XML 49 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments, Contingencies and Related Parties
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
8. Commitments, Contingencies and Related parties

 

A. Commitments and Contingencies

 

1) Except as described in item 4 below, Presidential is not a party to any material legal proceedings. The Company may from time to time be a party to routine litigation incidental to the ordinary course of its business.

 

2) In the opinion of management, all of the Company’s properties are adequately covered by insurance in accordance with normal insurance practices.

 

 

3) On December 22, 2011 an action entitled Centro De Recaudacion de Ingresos Municipals against IATG Puerto Rico, LLC was filed in Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Hunacao in respect of approximately $7.7 million of unpaid interest, taxes and penalties owed by IATG Puerto Rico, LLC, the owner of Las Piedras Industrial Park in Las Piedras, Puerto Rico. We believe the value of the property is less than the amount of taxes owed. We own a 50% interest in the defendant. The Company has evaluated its potential exposure and has concluded that the Company is not responsible for any of the debts or liabilities of IATG Puerto Rico and that the Company’s only exposure is the complete loss of its investment. At December 31, 2011 the Company wrote off its investment in the property.

 

4) On April 4, 2012, a mortgage foreclosure action was filed in the Court of First Instance, San Juan Superior Part, in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to foreclose on the Company’s Hato Rey property. The action is entitled U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as trustee for the Registered Holders of GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1998-C1, acting by and through Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC in its capacity as special servicer pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement dated October 11, 1998 against PDL, Inc. & Associates, Limited Co-partnership; PDL, Inc., Presidential Realty Corporation; Lester Cohen and F.D. Rich Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. The complaint seeks a judgment against the Hato Rey Partnership in the amount of not less than $19,512,591, consisting of i) $14,484,138 in principal, ii) $1,119,406 in accrued interest, iii) $685,985 in default interest, iv) $48,371 in late charges, v) $1,424,691 in deferred interest and vi) $1,750,000 in liquidated damages as well as additional interest and default charges which continue to accrue under the mortgage loan on the Hato Rey property and foreclosure of the mortgage notes in order to sell the Hato Rey property and apply the proceeds of sale against the indebtedness. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, PDL, Inc., is the general partner of the partnership and the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Presidential Matmor Corporation, is a limited partner of the partnership.

 

The complaint also seeks judgments against PDL, Inc., the Company, Lester Cohen and F.D. Rich Company of Puerto Rico, Inc., with liability among them to be allocated 1%, 45%, 9% and 45%, respectively, under the terms of certain guarantees issued by them in connection with the mortgage loans, for alleged physical waste to the Property and, the costs of certain repairs to the property of not less than $1,100,000 and the reasonable legal costs and expenses in connection with the enforcement of the loan documents.

 

In 1998, at the time the mortgage loan was made, F.D. Rich Company was a limited partner of the partnership. In April 2006, Presidential Matmor acquired the limited partnership interest in the partnership owned by F.D. Rich. In connection with the acquisition of that interest, the parties executed a release and indemnification agreement which provides, among other things, that the Company and Presidential Matmor agree to indemnify F.D. Rich against any liability under the guaranty.

 

The guarantees provide that the guarantors will pay the lender any loss, damage, cost, expense, liability, claim or other obligation incurred by the lender arising out of fraud, intentional material misrepresentation, willful misconduct, physical waste committed on the subject property, failure to pay any valid taxes and assessments to the extent rents from the property are sufficient to pay such taxes, mechanics liens, materialmen’s liens or other liens which could create liens superior to the mortgage lien, reasonable legal costs and expenses incurred by lender in connection with litigation or other legal proceedings to enforce the loan, the breach of any material representation, covenant and warranty under the related environmental and hazardous substance indemnification agreement, misapplication or conversion of any insurance proceeds, awards or other amounts received in connection with condemnation of all or a portion of the property or any rents following an event of default and any security deposits not delivered to the lender.

 

 

The lender has not asserted any claims against the Company other than those asserted under the guarantees as referenced above and the Company believes that its maximum exposure in respect of the complaint would be the total loss of its investment in the partnership and to be held 100% responsible for all claims asserted under the guarantees. At this time, the total of the claims asserted under the guarantees is the $1,100,000 for certain repairs which the lender has characterized as waste and an unspecified amount of legal fees. The amount of any potential liability beyond the $1,100,000 actually asserted is not reasonably estimable by the Company. The Company believes the claims under the guarantees are remote, without merit and does not believe there is any basis for any additional claims against the Company in respect of the partnership and the mortgage loan.

 

B. Related Parties

 

Property Management Agreement

 

On November 8, 2011, the Company and Signature entered into a Property Management Agreement pursuant to which the Company has retained Signature as the exclusive managing and leasing agent for the Company’s Mapletree Industrial Center property in Palmer, Massachusetts (the “Mapletree Property”). Signature shall manage the Mapletree Property in accordance with specific management guidelines and leasing guidelines and shall meet specific reporting requirements and vendor insurance requirements. Signature will receive compensation of 5% of monthly rental income actually received from tenants at the Mapletree Property. The Company will reimburse Signature for all reasonable expenses incurred by Signature in performance of its duties under the Property Management Agreement that are either in accordance with the annual budget or which have been approved in writing by the Company. Such expense shall include, but not be limited to, Signature’s costs of the salaries, benefits and appropriate and prudent training for Signature’s employees who are engaged solely in management or operation of the Mapletree Property, but excluding certain expenses that will be borne by Signature, as specified in the Property Management Agreement. The Property Management Agreement has a term of one year and will be automatically renewable for one year terms until it is terminated by either party upon written notice. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company incurred management fees of $6,416 and $24,144, respectively.

 

Asset Management Agreement

 

On November 8, 2011, the Company and Signature entered into an Asset Management Agreement pursuant to which the Company engaged Signature to oversee the Company’s Mapletree Industrial Center property in Palmer, Massachusetts and an office building at Hato Rey, Puerto Rico (the “Properties”). Signature’s duties include leasing, marketing and advertising, financing, construction and dispositions of the Properties. Signature will receive a construction fee for any major renovations or capital projects, subject to the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors, an asset management fee of 1.5% of the monthly gross rental revenues collected for the Properties (provided that the monthly fee for the Hato Rey property will be accrued and not paid until the receipt of mortgage proceeds on the Mapletree Property), a finance fee of 1% on any debt placement, and a disposition fee of 1% on the sale of any assets, as specified in the Asset Management Agreement. The Asset Management Agreement has a term of one year and will be automatically renewable for one year terms until it is terminated by either party upon written notice. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 the company incurred an asset management fee of $10,291 and $34,953, respectively.

 

Sublease

 

The Company subleases their executive office space under a month to month lease with Signature for a monthly rental payment of $433 or $5,200 per year. Either party may terminate the sublease upon 30 days prior written notice. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company incurred approximately $1,300 and $3,900, respectively in rent expense.