The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Parkway Properties, Inc. ("Parkway" or "the Company"), its wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest. The other partners' equity interests in the consolidated joint ventures are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. Parkway also consolidates subsidiaries where the entity is a variable interest entity ("VIE") and Parkway is the primary beneficiary and has the power to direct the activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, Parkway did not have any VIEs that required consolidation. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in the accompanying financial statements.

The Company also consolidates certain joint ventures where it exercises control over major operating and management decisions, or where the Company is the sole general partner and the limited partners do not possess kick-out rights or other substantive participating rights. The equity method of accounting is used for those joint ventures that do not meet the criteria for consolidation and where Parkway exercises significant influence but does not control these joint ventures.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although the Company believes the assumptions and estimates made are reasonable and appropriate, as discussed in the applicable sections throughout these consolidated financial statements, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact reported results. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions, therefore, changes in market conditions could impact the Company's future operating results. The Company's most significant estimates relate to impairments on real estate, purchase price allocations and allowance for doubtful accounts.

Real estate properties are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes the carrying amount of the Company's investment plus any additional consideration paid, liabilities assumed, and improvements made subsequent to acquisition. Depreciation of buildings and building improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciation of tenant improvements, including personal property, is computed using the straight-line method over the lesser of useful life or the term of the lease involved. Maintenance and repair expenses are charged to expense as incurred.

		December 31		December 31
Asset Category	Estimated Useful Life	2011		2010
Land	Non-depreciable	$	116,598	$		176,614
Buildings and garages	40 years		801,619		1,278,275
Building improvements	7 to 40 years		53,909		121,540
Tenant improvements	Lesser of useful life or term of lease		111,934		178,881
		$	1,084,060	$		1,755,310

The Company evaluates its real estate assets upon occurrence of significant adverse changes in its operations to assess whether any impairment indicators are present that affect the recovery of the carrying amount. The carrying amount includes the net book value of tangible and intangible assets. Real estate assets are classified as held for sale or held and used. Parkway records assets held for sale at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. With respect to assets classified as held and used, Parkway recognizes an impairment loss if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the sum of undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The cash flow and fair value estimates are based on assumptions about employing the asset for its remaining useful life. Factors considered in projecting future cash flows include but are not limited to: existing leases, future leasing and terminations, market rental rates, capital improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, inflation and other known variables. This market information is considered a Level 3 input as defined by Accounting Standards Certification ("ASC") 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," ("ASC 820"). Upon impairment, Parkway recognizes an impairment loss to reduce the carrying value of the real estate asset to the estimate of its fair value.

The Company classifies certain assets as held for sale based on management having the authority and intent of entering into commitments for sale transactions to close in the next twelve months. The Company considers an office property as held for sale once it has executed a contract for sale, allowed the buyer to complete its due diligence review and received a substantial non-refundable deposit. Until a buyer has completed its due diligence review of the asset, necessary approvals have been received and substantive conditions to the buyer's obligation to perform have been satisfied, the Company does not consider a sale to be probable. When the Company identifies an asset as held for sale, it estimates the net realizable value of such asset and discontinues recording depreciation on the asset. The Company records assets held for sale at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.

Parkway allocates the purchase price of real estate to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on fair values. Tangible assets consist of land, building, garage, building improvements and tenant improvements. Intangible assets and liabilities consist of the value of above and below market leases, lease costs, the value of in-place leases, customer relationships and any value attributable to above or below market debt assumed with the acquisition.

The Company may engage independent third-party appraisers to perform the valuations used to determine the fair value of these identifiable tangible and intangible assets. These valuations and appraisals use commonly employed valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses. Factors considered in these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Parkway also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods depending on specific local market conditions and depending on the type of property acquired. Additionally, Parkway estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.

The fair value of above or below market in-place lease values is the present value of the difference between the contractual amount to be paid pursuant to the in-place lease and the estimated current market lease rate expected over the remaining non-cancelable life of the lease. The capitalized above market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases. The capitalized below market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases. Total amortization for above and below market leases, excluding amounts classified as discontinued operations, was a net reduction of rental income of $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, and a net increase of rental income of $163,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

The fair value of customer relationships represents the quantifiable benefits related to developing a relationship with the current customer. Examples of these benefits would be growth prospects for developing new business with the existing customer, the ability to attract similar customers to the building, the customer's credit quality and expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors. Management believes that there would typically be little value associated with customer relationships that is in excess of the value of the in-place lease and their typical renewal rates. Any value assigned to customer relationships is amortized over the remaining terms of the respective leases plus any expected renewal periods as a lease cost amortization expense. Currently, the Company has no value assigned to customer relationships.

The fair value of at market in-place leases is the present value associated with re-leasing the in-place lease as if the property was vacant. Factors to be considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods. The value of at market in-place leases is amortized as a lease cost amortization expense over the expected life of the lease. Total amortization expense for the value of in-place leases, excluding amounts classified as discontinued operations, was $12.3 million, $5.2 million and $3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

A separate component of the fair value of in-place leases is identified for the lease costs. The fair value of lease costs represents the estimated commissions and legal fees paid in connection with the current leases in place. Lease costs are amortized over the non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as lease cost amortization expense.

In no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a customer terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvement, in-place lease value, lease cost and customer relationship intangibles would be charged to expense. Additionally, the unamortized portion of above market in-place leases would be recorded as a reduction to rental income and the below market in-place lease value would be recorded as an increase to rental income.

During 2011, the Company early adopted Accounting Standards Updated ("ASU") 2011-08, which allows an entity to first assess the qualitative factors in determining when a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test is necessary. If an entity determines, based on qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the entity would then be required to calculate the fair value of the reporting entity. During 2011, the Company assessed certain qualitative factors and determined that it was not necessary to perform the second step of the quantitative impairment test and determined that there was no goodwill impairment in 2011. The Company acquired goodwill in 2011 when it closed on the agreement with Eola Capital, LLC and related entities ("Eola") in which Eola contributed its property management company to Parkway (see further discussion in Note B).

Parkway records its mortgage loans receivable at the stated principal amount net any premium or discount. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the carrying amount of mortgage loans receivable was $1.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively. The Company recognizes the premium or discount over the life of the mortgage loan using the effective interest method. Parkway evaluates the collectability of principal and interest on its mortgage loans, if circumstances warrant, to determine whether it is impaired. A loan is impaired when based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a loan is impaired, the amount of the loss provision is calculated by comparing the recorded investment to the value determined by discounting the expected future cash flow at the loan's effective interest rate.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment loss on a mortgage loan of $9.2 million in connection with the B participation piece of a first mortgage secured by an 844,000 square foot office property in Dallas, Texas known as 2100 Ross. The borrower is currently in default on the first mortgage and based on current information, the Company does not believe it will recover its investment in the loan. Therefore, Parkway has written off its investment in the mortgage loan. The Company's original cash investment in the loan was $6.9 million and was purchased in November 2007.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, Parkway had a noncontrolling interest in one and three unconsolidated joint ventures, respectively, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore, Parkway reports its share of income and losses based on its economic interest in these entities, as measured by its ownership interest or expected cash distributions if materially different than distributions based on ownership interest. Parkway classifies its interests as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures when it holds less than a majority voting interest in the entity and does not have control, based on the terms of the joint venture agreements, to make decisions about the entities' significant activities such as major leases, encumbering the entities with debt, major capital expenditures and whether to dispose of the entities.

When circumstances indicate there may have been a loss in value of an equity investment, the Company evaluates the investment for impairment by estimating its ability to recover its investment from future cash flows. If Parkway determines the loss in value is other than temporary, the Company recognizes an impairment charge to reflect the investment at fair value. The use of projected future cash flows and other estimates of fair value, the determination of when a loss is other than temporary, and the calculation of the amount of the loss are complex and subjective. Use of other estimates and assumptions may result in different conclusions. Changes in economic and operating conditions that occur subsequent to the Company's review could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of our equity investments.

Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that the Company estimates to be uncollectible. The receivable balance is comprised primarily of rent and expense reimbursement income due from the customers. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts considering such factors as the credit quality of our customers, delinquency of payment, historical trends and current economic conditions. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts for customer balances that are over 90 days past due and for specific customer receivables for which collection is considered doubtful.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has an interest in two joint ventures whose operations are included in its consolidated financial statements. These joint ventures were originally structured such that the Company would own a 25% and 30% interest in Parkway Properties Office Fund, LP ("Fund I") and Parkway Properties Office Fund II, LP ("Fund II"), respectively.

Parkway serves as the general partner of Fund I and provides asset management, property management, leasing and construction management services to the fund, for which it is paid market-based fees. Cash distributions from the fund are made to each joint venture partner based on their actual percentage of ownership in the fund. Since Parkway is the sole general partner and has the authority to make major decisions on behalf of the fund, Parkway is considered to have a controlling interest. Accordingly, Parkway is required to consolidate the fund in its consolidated financial statements. At February 15, 2008, Fund I was fully invested. Parkway has entered into an agreement to sell the Fund I portfolio, comprised of 2.7 million square feet and 13 office properties, to its partner in the fund. At December 31, 2011, nine of the office properties, which represent a majority of the Fund I portfolio, had been sold. Additionally, on March 1, 2012, the Company completed the sale of its interest in Renaissance Center, a 190,000 square foot office property located in Memphis, Tennessee. The sale of the remaining three assets in the Fund I portfolio is expected to close during the first half of 2012.

Parkway serves as the general partner of Fund II and provides asset management, property management, leasing and construction management services for the fund, for which it will be paid market-based fees. Cash distributions from the fund will be made to each joint venture partner based on the actual percentage of ownership in the fund. Since Parkway is the sole general partner and has the authority to make major decisions on behalf of the fund, Parkway is considered to have a controlling interest. Accordingly, Parkway is required to consolidate the fund in its consolidated financial statements. At February 10, 2012, Fund II was fully invested.

Noncontrolling interest in real estate partnerships represents the other partners' proportionate share of equity in the partnerships discussed above at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Income is allocated to noncontrolling interest based on the weighted average percentage ownership during the year.

Revenue from real estate rentals is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. The cumulative difference between lease revenue recognized under this method and contractual lease payment terms is recorded as straight-line rent receivable on the accompanying balance sheets. The straight-line rent adjustment increased revenue by $6.0 million, $1.4 million and $1.9 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

When the Company is the owner of the customer improvements, the leased space is ready for its intended use when the customer improvements are substantially completed. In limited instances, when the customer is the owner of the customer improvements, straight-line rent is recognized when the customer takes possession of the unimproved space.

The leases also typically provide for customer reimbursement of a portion of common area maintenance and other operating expenses. Property operating cost recoveries from customers ("expense reimbursements") are recognized as revenue in the period in which the expenses are incurred. The computation of expense reimbursements is dependent on the provisions of individual customer leases. Most customers make monthly fixed payments of estimated expense reimbursements. The Company makes adjustments, positive or negative, to expense reimbursement income quarterly to adjust the recorded amounts to the Company's best estimate of the final property operating costs based on the most recent quarterly budget. After the end of the calendar year, the Company computes each customer's final expense reimbursements and issues a bill or credit for the difference between the actual amount and the amounts billed monthly during the year.

Management company income represents market-based fees earned from providing management, construction, leasing, brokerage and acquisition services to third parties. Management fee income is computed and recorded monthly in accordance with the terms set forth in the stand alone management service agreements. Leasing and brokerage commissions are recognized pursuant to the terms of the stand-alone agreements at the time underlying leases are signed, which is the point at which the earnings process is complete and collection of the fees is reasonably assured. Fees relating to the purchase or sale of property are recognized when the earnings process is complete and collection of the fees is reasonably assured, which usually occurs at closing. All fees on Company-owned properties and consolidated joint ventures are eliminated in consolidation. The Company recognizes its share of fees earned from unconsolidated joint ventures in management company income.

The Company recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, the type of hedge transaction. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if any, is immediately recognized in earnings.

Effective May 1, 2010, the stockholders of the Company approved Parkway's 2010 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "2010 Equity Plan") that authorized the grant of up to 600,000 equity based awards to employees and directors of the Company. The 2010 Equity Plan replaces the Company's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2001 Non-Employee Directors Equity Compensation Plan. At present, it is Parkway's intention to grant restricted shares and/or deferred incentive share units instead of stock options although the 2010 Equity Plan authorizes various forms of incentive awards, including options. The 2010 Equity Plan has a ten-year term.

On May 12, 2011, the Board of Directors approved Parkway's 2011 Employee Inducement Award Plan that authorized the grant of up to 149,573 restricted shares and/or deferred incentive share units to employees and directors of the Company in connection with the combination with Eola. The Plan shall continue in effect until the earlier of (a) its termination by the Board or (b) the date on which all of the shares of stock available for issuance under the Plan have been issued; provided that awards outstanding on that date shall survive in accordance with their terms.

Compensation expense, including estimated forfeitures, for service-based awards is recognized over the expected vesting period. The total compensation expense for the long-term equity incentive awards is based upon the fair value of the shares on the grant date, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. Time-based restricted shares and deferred incentive share units are valued based on the New York Stock Exchange closing market price of Parkway common shares (NYSE ticker symbol, PKY) as of the date of grant. The grant date fair value for awards that are subject to market conditions is determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the awards.

Restricted shares and deferred incentive share units are forfeited if an employee leaves the Company before the vesting date, except in the case of the employee's death or permanent disability or upon termination following a change of control. Shares and/or units that are forfeited become available for future grant under the 2010 Equity Plan.

The Company also adopted a long-term cash incentive that was designed to reward significant outperformance over the three year period which began July 1, 2010. The total compensation expense for the long-term cash incentive awards is based upon the estimated fair value of the award on the grant date and adjusted as necessary each reporting period. The long-term cash incentive awards are accounted for as a liability-classified award on the Company's 2011 and 2010 consolidated balance sheets. The grant date and quarterly fair value estimates for awards that are subject to a market condition are determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the awards.

Effective January 1, 1997, the Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company completed its reorganization into the Umbrella Partnership REIT ("UPREIT") structure effective January 1, 1998. The Company believes that the UPREIT structure will enable it to pursue additional investment opportunities by having the ability to offer tax-advantaged operating partnership units to property owners in exchange for properties.

A corporate REIT is a legal entity that holds real estate assets, and through distributions to stockholders, is exempt from the payment of Federal income taxes at the corporate level. To maintain qualification as a REIT, the Company is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute to stockholders at least 90% of its annual taxable income.

Effective May 18, 2011, the Company acquired the Eola Management Company and contributed the entity into a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary "TRS". In connection with the purchase of the Eola Management Company, the TRS recorded a deferred income tax liability of $14.8 million. The TRS pays income taxes at the federal and state level.

Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the year. In arriving at net loss attributable to common stockholders, preferred stock dividends are deducted. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if share equivalents such as employee stock options, restricted shares and deferred incentive share units were exercised or converted into common stock that then shared in the earnings of Parkway.

	Year Ended December 31
	2011		2010		2009
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Basic and diluted net loss
attributable to common stockholders	$	(136,995)	$	(8,943)	$	(16,403)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted weighted average shares		21,497		21,421		19,304
Diluted net loss per share attributable to
Parkway Properties, Inc.	$	(6.37)	$	(0.42)	$	(0.85)

During 2011, the Company changed its method of allocating certain general and administrative expenses to property operating expenses. Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2010 and 2009 consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2011 classifications with no impact on previously reported net income or equity. The change resulted in an increase in general and administrative expenses of $8.0 million in 2010 and $8.2 million in 2009. These expenses were previously allocated to property operating expenses.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS", which change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value, changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The FASB does not intend for ASU 2011-04 to result in a change in the application of the requirements in ASC 820. The requirements of ASU 2011-04 will be effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-04 on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income", which modifies reporting requirements for comprehensive income in order to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income in the financial statements. ASU 2011-05 requires presentation of either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate, but consecutive statements in which the first statement presents net income and its components followed by a second statement that presents total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income. The requirements of ASU 2011-05 will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-05 on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, which allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors in determining when a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test is necessary. If an entity determines, based on qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the entity would then be required to calculate the fair value of the reporting unit. The requirements of ASU 2011-08 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, but early adoption is permitted. At December 31, 2011, the Company had implemented ASU 2011-08.