R
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
or
|
|
£
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the Transition Period from to
|
Maryland
|
74-2123597
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
P.O. Box 24647
|
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (601) 948-4091
|
|
Registrant’s web site www.pky.com
|
Large accelerated filer £
|
Accelerated filer R
|
Non-accelerated filer £
|
Smaller reporting company £
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
PARKWAY PROPERTIES, INC. | |||
Date: November 9, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Mandy M. Pope | |
Mandy M. Pope | |||
Executive Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|||
10.1*
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Parkway Properties LP, a Delaware limited partnership; Parkway Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation; Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administration Agent; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent; PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., and U.S. Bank, N.A., as Documentation Agents; and the Lenders dated September 20, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 23, 2011).
|
31.1*
|
Certification of Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1*
|
Certification of Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
101**
|
The following materials from Parkway Properties, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of operations (iii) consolidated statement of changes in equity, (iv) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (v) the notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) | Sep. 30, 2011 | Dec. 31, 2010 |
---|---|---|
Parkway Properties, Inc. stockholders' equity | ||
Series D Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Series D Preferred stock, shares authorized (in shares) | 5,421,296 | 4,374,896 |
Series D Preferred stock, shares issued (in shares) | 5,421,296 | 4,374,896 |
Series D Preferred stock, shares outstanding (in shares) | 5,421,296 | 4,374,896 |
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares) | 64,578,704 | 65,625,104 |
Common stock, shares issued (in shares) | 22,118,817 | 21,923,610 |
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares) | 22,118,817 | 21,923,610 |
Common stock held in trust, shares (in shares) | 12,070 | 58,134 |
Document And Entity Information (USD $) | 9 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | Oct. 31, 2011 | Jun. 30, 2010 | |
Entity Registrant Name | Parkway Properties Inc | ||
Entity Central Index Key | 0000729237 | ||
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | ||
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer | No | ||
Entity Voluntary Filers | No | ||
Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes | ||
Entity Filer Category | Accelerated Filer | ||
Entity Public Float | $ 301,800,000 | ||
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 21,996,036 | ||
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2011 | ||
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 | ||
Document Type | 10-Q | ||
Amendment Flag | true | ||
Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2011 | ||
Amendment Description | Furnish XBRL materials |
"+ text.join( "
\n" ) +"
" + text[p] + "
\n"; } } }else{ formatted = '' + raw + '
'; } html = ''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+' formatted: '+ ( this.Default == 'raw' ? 'as Filed' : 'with Text Wrapped' ) +''+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
Discontinued Operations | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued Operations [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued Operations | Note E - Discontinued Operations All current and prior period income from the following office property dispositions and property held for sale is included in discontinued operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands).
On May 11, 2011, the Company sold 233 North Michigan, a 1.1 million square foot office building in Chicago, Illinois, for gross proceeds of $162.2 million and recorded a gain on the sale of $4.3 million. Accordingly, income from 233 North Michigan has been classified as discontinued operations for all current and prior periods presented. On July 19, 2011, Parkway sold Greenbrier Towers I & II for gross proceeds of $16.7 million and recorded a gain on the sale of $1.2 million. The two office buildings total 172,000 square feet and are located in Hampton Roads, Virginia. Accordingly, income from Greenbrier Towers I & II has been classified as discontinued operations for all current and prior periods presented. On August 16, 2011, Parkway sold Glen Forest, a 81,000 square foot office building in Richmond, Virginia, for gross proceeds of $9.3 million and recorded a gain on the sale of $1.1 million. Accordingly, income from Glen Forest has been classified as discontinued operations for all current and prior periods presented. On September 8, 2011, Parkway sold Tower at 1301 Gervais, a 298,000 square foot office building in Columbia, South Carolina, for gross proceeds of $19.5 million and recorded an impairment loss of $1.0 million. Accordingly, income from Tower at 1301 Gervais has been classified as discontinued operations for all current and prior periods presented. A non-cash impairment loss totaling $2.7 million was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, with respect to this property. In the third quarter of 2011, Parkway classified 111 East Wacker, a 1.0 million square foot office building in Chicago, Illinois, as held for sale. Accordingly, income from 111 East Wacker has been classified as discontinued operations for all current and prior periods presented. In accordance with GAAP, a non-cash impairment loss of $18.8 million was recognized during the third quarter of 2011, with respect to this property. The major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale for 111 East Wacker at September 30, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
The amount of revenues and expenses for these six office properties reported in discontinued operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
Share-Based and Long-Term Compensation Plans | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-Based and Long-Term Compensation Plans [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-Based and Long-Term Compensation Plans | Note J - Share-Based and Long-Term Compensation Plans Effective May 1, 2010, the stockholders of the Company approved Parkway's 2010 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "2010 Equity Plan") that authorized the grant of up to 600,000 equity based awards to employees and directors of the Company. The 2010 Equity Plan replaces the Company's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2001 Non-Employee Directors Equity Compensation Plan. At present, it is Parkway's intention to grant restricted shares and/or deferred incentive share units instead of stock options although the 2010 Equity Plan authorizes various forms of incentive awards, including options. The 2010 Equity Plan has a ten-year term. Compensation expense, including estimated forfeitures, for service-based awards is recognized over the expected vesting period. The total compensation expense for the long-term equity incentive awards granted under the FOCUS Plan is based upon the fair value of the shares on the grant date, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. Time-based restricted shares and deferred incentive share units are valued based on the New York Stock Exchange closing market price of Parkway common shares (NYSE ticker symbol, PKY) as of the date of grant. The grant date fair value for awards that are subject to market conditions is determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the awards. Restricted shares and deferred incentive share units are forfeited if an employee leaves the Company before the vesting date except in the case of the employee's death or permanent disability or upon termination following a change of control. Shares and/or units that are forfeited become available for future grant under the 2010 Equity Plan. Compensation expense related to restricted shares and deferred incentive share units of $1.4 million and $877,000 was recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total compensation expense related to nonvested awards not yet recognized was $3.7 million at September 30, 2011. The weighted average period over which the expense is expected to be recognized is approximately 2.3 years. On January 9, 2011, 25,935 restricted shares vested and were issued to officers of the Company due to the achievement of performance goals established in 2009 by the Board of Directors. On January 12, 2011, 27,125 restricted shares vested and were issued to officers of the Company. These shares were granted in January 2007 and vested four years from the grant date. On January 14, 2011, the Board of Directors approved 55,623 FOCUS Plan long-term equity incentive awards to officers of the Company. The long-term equity incentive awards are valued at $736,000 which equates to an average price per share of $13.23 and consist of 25,620 time-based awards, 16,883 market condition awards subject to an absolute total return goal, and 13,120 market condition awards subject to a relative total return goal. These shares are accounted for as equity-classified awards. On May 12, 2011, the Company's Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the Parkway Properties, Inc. 2011 Employee Inducement Award Plan (the "2011 Inducement Plan"). The 2011 Inducement Plan is substantively similar to the Company's 2010 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, approved by the Company's stockholders on May 13, 2010, however the potential awards under the 2011 Inducement Plan are limited to shares of restricted stock and restricted share units to new employees of the Company as a result of the Company's combination with Eola. On May 18, 2011, the Board of Directors approved 63,241 FOCUS Plan long-term equity incentive awards to new officers of the Company. The long-term equity incentive awards are valued at $577,000 which equates to an average price per share of $9.12 and consist of 11,384 time-based awards, 29,091 market condition awards subject to an absolute total return goal, and 22,766 market condition awards subject to a relative total return goal. The Company also awarded 17,530 deferred incentive share units to approximately 136 other former employees of Eola who became employees of the Company effective May 18, 2011. These shares are accounted for as equity-classified awards. Also on May 18, 2011, the Board of Directors approved 68,802 FOCUS Plan long-term equity incentive awards to new officers of the Company effective June 1, 2011. The long-term equity incentive awards are valued at $628,000 which equates to an average price per share of $9.13 and consist of 12,384 time-based awards, 31,649 market condition awards subject to an absolute total return goal, and 24,769 market condition awards subject to a relative total return goal. These shares are accounted for as equity-classified awards. On June 20, 2011, the Board of Directors approved 8,705 FOCUS Plan long-term equity incentive awards to officers of the Company. The long-term equity incentive awards are valued at $68,000 which equates to an average price per share of $7.81 and consist of 534 time-based awards, 4,584 market condition awards subject to an absolute total return goal, and 3,587 market condition awards subject to a relative total return goal. These shares are accounted for as equity-classified awards. On July 1, 2011, 6,345 restricted shares vested and were issued to officers of the Company. These shares were granted in July 2010 and vested one year from the grant date. On October 13, 2011, 1,000 restricted shares vested and were issued to officers of the Company. These shares were granted in 2004 and vested seven years from the grant date. On October, 14, 2011, 10,152 restricted shares vested and were issued to an executive officer of the Company. The executive officer resigned from the Company effective October 15, 2011, and forfeited 41,349 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the terms of the 2010 Equity Plan. The time-based awards granted as part of the FOCUS plan will vest ratably over four years from the date the shares are granted. The market condition awards granted as part of the FOCUS Plan are contingent on the Company meeting goals for compounded annual total return to stockholders ("TRS") over the three year period beginning July 1, 2010. The market condition goals are based upon (i) the Company's absolute compounded annual TRS; and (ii) the Company's absolute compounded annual TRS relative to the compounded annual return of the MSCI US REIT ("RMS") Index calculated on a gross basis, as follows:
With respect to the absolute return goal, 15% of the award is earned if the Company achieves threshold performance and a cumulative 60% is earned for target performance. With respect to the relative return goal, 20% of the award is earned if the Company achieves threshold performance and a cumulative 55% is earned for target performance. In each case, 100% of the award is earned if the Company achieves maximum performance or better. To the extent actually earned, the market condition awards will vest 50% on each of July 15, 2013 and 2014. The FOCUS Plan also includes a long-term cash incentive that was designed to reward significant outperformance over the three year period beginning July 1, 2010. The performance goals for actual payment under the long-term cash incentive will require the Company to (i) achieve an absolute compounded annual TRS that exceeds 14% AND (ii) achieve an absolute compounded annual TRS that exceeds the compounded annual return of the RMS by at least 500 basis points. Notwithstanding the above goals, in the event the Company achieves an absolute compounded annual TRS that exceeds 19%, then the Company must achieve an absolute compounded annual TRS that exceeds the compounded annual return of the RMS by at least 600 basis points. The aggregate amount of the cash incentive earned would increase with corresponding increases in the absolute compounded annual TRS achieved by the Company. There will be a cap on the aggregate cash incentive earned in the amount of $7.1 million. Achievement of the maximum cash incentive would equate to an absolute compounded annual TRS that approximates 23%, provided that the absolute compounded annual TRS exceeds the compounded annual return of the RMS by at least 600 basis points. The total compensation expense for the long-term cash incentive awards granted under the FOCUS Plan is based upon the fair market value of the award on the grant date and adjusted as necessary each reporting period. The long-term cash incentive awards are accounted for as a liability-classified award on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The grant date and quarterly fair value estimates for awards that are subject to a market condition are determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the awards. A summary of the Company's restricted shares and deferred incentive share unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
Basis of Presentation | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Basis of Presentation [Abstract] | |
Basis of Presentation | Note A - Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Parkway Properties, Inc. ("Parkway" or "the Company"), its wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest. The other partners' equity interests in the consolidated joint ventures are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. Parkway also consolidates subsidiaries where the entity is a variable interest entity ("VIE") and Parkway is the primary beneficiary and has the power to direct the activities of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive the benefits from the VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Parkway did not have any VIEs that required consolidation. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in the accompanying financial statements. The Company also consolidates certain joint ventures where it exercises significant control over major operating and management decisions, or where the Company is the sole general partner and the limited partners do not possess kick-out rights or other substantive participating rights. The equity method of accounting is used for those joint ventures that do not meet the criteria for consolidation and where Parkway exercises significant influence but does not control these joint ventures. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2011. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2010 annual report and the notes thereto. The balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States GAAP for complete financial statements. In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income", which modifies reporting requirements for comprehensive income in order to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income in the financial statements. ASU 2011-05 requires presentation of either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate, but consecutive statements in which the first statement presents net income and its components followed by a second statement that presents total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income. The requirements of ASU 2011-05 will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-05 on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, which allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors in determining when a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test is necessary. If an entity determines, based on qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the entity would then be required to calculate the fair value of the reporting unit. The requirements of ASU 2011-08 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-08 on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through the issuance date of the financial statements. |
Management Contracts | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Management Contracts [Abstract] | |
Management Contracts | Note G - Management Contracts During the second quarter of 2011, as part of the Company's combination with Eola, Parkway purchased the management contracts associated with Eola's property management business. At the purchase date, the contracts were valued by an independent appraiser at $52.0 million. The value of the management contracts is based on the sum of the present value of future cash flows attributable to the management contracts, in addition to the value of tax savings as a result of the amortization of intangible assets. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded amortization expense of $867,000 and $1.3 million, respectively, on the management contracts. Also, in conjunction with the valuation of the management company, the Company recorded $26.2 million of goodwill, a $31.0 million liability related to contingent consideration and a deferred tax liability of $14.8 million. At September 30, 2011, the allocation of purchase price is still preliminary. |
Litigation | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Litigation [Abstract] | |
Litigation | Note L - Litigation As previously disclosed, J. Mitchell Collins, the Company's former Chief Financial Officer, has brought and threatened claims against the Company relating to the termination of his employment with the Company. There have been no significant changes in the litigation by Mr. Collins since the filing of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and management continues to believe that the final outcome of the litigation by Mr. Collins will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements. In early April 2011, the Company filed an injunction action against Mr. Collins, Parkway Properties, Inc. v. J. Mitchell Collins, Madison County (MS) No. 2011-340-G, seeking a permanent injunction forbidding Mr. Collins to assume an anonymous or false identity to communicate any accusation against the Company. |
Capital and Financing Transactions | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |||||||||
Capital and Financing Transactions [Abstract] | |||||||||
Capital and Financing Transactions | Note H - Capital and Financing Transactions At September 30, 2011, the Company had a total of $113.9 million outstanding under its credit facilities (collectively, the "Credit Facility") and was in compliance with all loan covenants under each credit facility. The interest rate on the Company's Credit Facility is based on LIBOR plus 275 to 350 basis points depending on the Company's overall leverage, with the current rate set at LIBOR plus 325 basis points. Additionally, the Company pays fees on the unused portion of the Company's credit facility ranging between 40 and 50 basis points based upon usage of the aggregate commitment, with the current rate set at 40 basis points. Mortgage notes payable at September 30, 2011 totaled $979.0 million with an average interest rate of 5.8% and were secured by office properties. On January 31, 2011, the Company closed a new $190.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and a new $10.0 million unsecured working capital revolving credit facility. The new credit facilities have an initial term of three years and replaced the existing unsecured revolving credit facility, term loan and working capital facility that were scheduled to mature on April 27, 2011. The Company had a $100.0 million interest rate swap associated with the credit facilities that expired March 31, 2011, and locked LIBOR at 3.635%. Wells Fargo Securities and JP Morgan Securities LLC acted as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners on the unsecured revolving credit facility. In addition, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. acted as Administration Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. acted as Syndication Agent. Other participating lenders include PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., US Bank, N.A., Trustmark National Bank, and BancorpSouth Bank. The working capital revolving credit facility was provided solely by PNC Bank, N.A. On September 20, 2011, the Company entered into an amendment to the revolving credit facility, which amendment became effective the date of its execution. The amendment reduced the Tangible Net Worth requirement and adjusted the definition of FFO under the revolving credit facility. On January 21, 2011, in connection with its purchase of 3344 Peachtree in Atlanta, Georgia, Fund II assumed the $89.6 million existing non-recourse first mortgage loan, which matures on October 1, 2017, and carries a fixed interest rate of 4.8%. In accordance with GAAP, the mortgage loan was recorded at $87.2 million to reflect the value of the instrument based on a market interest rate of 5.25% on the date of purchase. On February 18, 2011, Fund II obtained a $10.0 million mortgage loan secured by Carmel Crossing, a 326,000 square foot office complex in Charlotte, North Carolina. The mortgage loan has a fixed rate of 5.5% and is interest only through maturity at March 10, 2020. Parkway received $2.4 million in net proceeds from the loan, which represents its 30% equity investment in the property. The proceeds were used to reduce amounts outstanding under the Company's credit facility. On March 31, 2011, Fund II obtained a $9.3 million mortgage loan secured by 245 Riverside, a 135,000 square foot office property in Jacksonville, Florida. The mortgage has a stated rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points, an initial thirty-six month interest only period and a maturity of March 31, 2019. In connection with this mortgage, Fund II entered into an interest rate swap that fixes the interest rate at 5.3% through September 30, 2018. On April 8, 2011, Fund II obtained a $22.5 million mortgage loan secured by Corporate Center Four, a 250,000 square foot office property in Tampa, Florida. The mortgage has a stated rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points, an initial thirty-six month interest only period and a maturity of April 8, 2019. In connection with this mortgage, Fund II entered into an interest rate swap that fixes the interest rate at 5.4% through October 8, 2018. On May 11, 2011, the Company sold 233 North Michigan, a 1.1 million square foot office property located in the central business district of Chicago, for a gross sale price of $162.2 million. At closing, the Company repaid the $84.6 million non-recourse mortgage loan secured by the property that was scheduled to mature in July 2011. Parkway received net cash proceeds after the repayment of the mortgage loan of approximately $74 million, which were used to reduce amounts outstanding under the Company's credit facility. The Company recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $302,000 during the second quarter of 2011, which is recorded in income from discontinued operations. On May 18, 2011, Fund II obtained the following mortgage loans in connection with the purchase of four office properties:
On May 18, 2011, the Company issued 1.0 million additional shares of its 8.0% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock to an institutional investor at a price of $25.00 per share, equating to a yield of 8.0%. The Series D Preferred Stock has a $25.00 liquidation value per share and is redeemable at the option of the Company at any time upon proper notice. The Company used the net proceeds of approximately $26.2 million to fund the combination with Eola and the Company's share of equity contributions to purchase Fund II office properties. On June 1, 2011, the Company repaid a $9.9 million non-recourse mortgage loan secured by Forum I, a 163,000 square foot office property in Memphis, Tennessee. The mortgage loan had a fixed interest rate of 5.3%. The Company repaid the mortgage loan using available proceeds under the credit facility. Upon its maturity on June 1, 2011, the Company elected not to repay an $8.5 million non-recourse mortgage loan secured by the Wells Fargo Building, a 136,000 square foot office building in Houston. This mortgage loan had a fixed interest rate of 4.4%. The Company is currently in default on this mortgage and the lender has identified a third-party buyer for the mortgage. The Company expects a loan foreclosure or deed in lieu of loan foreclosure on the property, and has recognized an impairment loss on real estate of $7.0 million during the third quarter of 2011. Upon foreclosure, the Company expects to record a gain on foreclosure of $3.9 million. On July 25, 2011, Fund II obtained a $22 million mortgage loan secured by Hayden Ferry I, a 203,000 square foot office property located in the Tempe submarket of Phoenix, Arizona. The mortgage loan has a stated rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points, an initial thirty-six month interest only period, and a maturity date of July 25, 2018. In connection with this mortgage, Fund II entered into an interest rate swap that fixes the interest rate at 4.5% through January 25, 2018. |
Mortgage Loans | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Mortgage Loans [Abstract] | |
Mortgage Loans | Note F - Mortgage Loans The Company owns the B participation piece (the "B piece") of a first mortgage secured by an 844,000 square foot office building in Dallas, Texas known as 2100 Ross at an original cost of $6.9 million which was purchased in November 2007. The B piece was originated by Wachovia Bank, N.A., a Wells Fargo Company, and has a face value of $10.0 million, a stated coupon rate of 6.065% and a scheduled maturity in May 2012. At September 30, 2011, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment loss on the mortgage loan in the amount of $9.2 million. The borrower is currently in default on the first mortgage and based on current information, the Company does not believe it will recover its investment in the loan. Therefore, Parkway has written off its investment in the mortgage loan. In connection with the sale of One Park Ten, the Company seller-financed a $1.5 million note receivable that bears interest at 7.25% per annum on an interest-only basis through maturity in June 2012. The carrying amount of the mortgage loan was $1.5 million at September 30, 2011. |
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share | Note B - Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share Basic earnings per share ("EPS") are computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In arriving at net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, preferred stock dividends are deducted. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if share equivalents such as employee stock options, restricted shares and deferred incentive share units were exercised or converted into common stock that then shared in the earnings of Parkway. The computation of diluted EPS is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
The computation of diluted EPS for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 did not include the effect of employee stock options, deferred incentive share units and restricted shares because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information and Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activity | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information and Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activity [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information and Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activity | Note C - Supplemental Cash Flow Information and Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activity The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
|
Fair Values of Financial Instruments | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Fair Values of Financial Instruments [Abstract] | |
Fair Values of Financial Instruments | Note K - Fair Values of Financial Instruments FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" ("ASC 820"), defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also provides guidance for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities. The Codification requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3). Cash and cash equivalents The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Mortgage loan receivable The Company owns the B participation piece (the "B piece") of a first mortgage secured by an 844,000 square foot office building in Dallas, Texas known as 2100 Ross at an original cost of $6.9 million, which was purchased in November 2007. The B piece was originated by Wachovia Bank, N.A., a Wells Fargo Company, and has a face value of $10.0 million, a stated coupon rate of 6.065% and a scheduled maturity in May 2012. At September 30, 2011, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment loss on the mortgage loan in the amount of $9.2 million. The borrower is currently in default on the first mortgage and based on current information, the Company does not believe it will recover its investment in the loan. Therefore, Parkway has written off its investment in the mortgage loan. In connection with the sale of One Park Ten, the Company seller-financed a $1.5 million note receivable, and the carrying amount of the note was $1.5 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The carrying amount of the mortgage loan approximated fair value at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Mortgage notes payable The fair value of the mortgage notes payable is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the Company's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The aggregate fair value of the mortgage notes payable at September 30, 2011 was $967.0 million as compared to its carrying amount of $979.0 million. The aggregate fair value of the mortgage notes payable at December 31, 2010 was $734.6 million as compared to its carrying amount of $773.5 million. Notes payable to banks The fair value of the Company's notes payable to banks is estimated by discounting expected cash flows at current market rates. The aggregate fair value of the notes payable to banks at September 30, 2011 was $103.2 million as compared to its carrying amount of $113.9 million. The aggregate fair value of the notes payable to banks at December 31, 2010 was $109.6 million as compared to its carrying amount of $110.8 million. Interest rate swap agreements The fair value of the interest rate swaps is determined by estimating the expected cash flows over the life of the swap using the mid-market rate and price environment as of the last trading day of the reporting period. This information is considered a Level 2 input as defined by ASC 820. The aggregate fair value liability of the interest rate swaps at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $13.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively. |
4V7MX.U:C5MNU.2^9=-+([
M]WT9_+SG=OQZP./I[5>W[K_LZ+N=O;V]EOYV>FLL%]T(S3JM?W_]\MT=BPEO
MWI0'NY=/D)^7>HE^7F^[X01N=.`?>Z_ ;UZOQ8W%I!/D6FURZG[7Z)I;!.-T
M5_*A\A%+T[:RL2`-)PWGT7,[2],V&DZZ*YE&EGBW#L-Y]+;5_:[DVR#F'N-1
M)&):1*Y"W*K=(K)E]&S;Z-L=FNPD!2$%>2Z\OF78;=(.T@Z:]EQH/OI6R[!Z
M-JD%J04M)2_4D(YI&2W-SF3%OFAK>-S#I)@]?C(%C/Q2//9$?$G:2*3!Q8$6[
MR3)U%^.RA8JH6YB[_`358+HHP`7`C#V2R#9L4_AOD5%YSZ>^3*E4:SGYAR!%
M'1=?3`$C:QTA4&^Z[4X-I!Z-_T9K&.'>U'`U4RSS]\2MEUJ(YSPLY=.-Y3F$
M/G@M2C6,DE41AQ%B9L8EV.
I'K%:,9KZ(QG!%^++Y-?ICP
M]JZ^+UI3.JY7G>L85[O$UR#HL-'GT,.AX8B`G7'A97'8II;>0\>"
MW[WXUT7]V"_#X6ZY2Y=_EW+4U6YO<6T-74\4,EMFCN*UP::]H8$3:]P@]#6"
M)`'=1B&M>0.NNZHU(E:76\\*D:B[6L^:@:;+K6^%`-)MKF_+\:'+K76%
Z(`O%"@\(/)U#(ID8DNLYAEB;(^`^=)WKF+^3@;
MC#,3S@D2&.-UHI05=-\NR^O%]Z@9B%(%#[]>?;RY4Z96X"EZIX5N8J.ERHNK
M*9:)PB,'EE^D_('LR,X3Q>8H%A=-@VOQ%5UX=S'FY[$9`:<7)*SY%?!
MBWP15N82;\I>/-%97,(4V%3&;"J:3N14P4RC$L"R'W%)X0U>4UP%9] S$I&PVM-BDO,8L/?*N"M!:B_5*@@8_^&[\)_)_):`J
M`772`LI(1HDM)Z`R-Y@)0=74M67.Q(7'AQO7`D/6.;#$ZAY88G7F2ZQ.);$J
MB96Q[R,*?36R2U_=N'IX=I0[;$MM,N72A2,[B2VC6RBV,MZ/"RF^,+%APO%P
MFS*XLM?%>Q9@,@PCWY6W/P'6Z\V78`6.O$J"O3X)]FKD5D]-1%0L+[>^FGT2
M1;<8]HARJ]