XML 31 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Retirement Benefits [Abstract]  
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Consistent with the process for rate recovery of pension and postretirement benefits for its employees, NSP-Wisconsin accounts for its participation in, and related costs of, pension and other postretirement benefit plans sponsored by Xcel Energy Inc. as multiple employer plans. NSP-Wisconsin is responsible for its share of cash contributions, plan costs and obligations and is entitled to its share of plan assets; accordingly, NSP-Wisconsin accounts for its pro rata share of these plans, including pension expense and contributions, resulting in accounting consistent with that of a single employer plan exclusively for NSP-Wisconsin employees.

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, offers various benefit plans to its employees. Approximately 71 percent of employees that receive benefits are represented by several local labor unions under several collective-bargaining agreements. At Dec. 31, 2017, NSP-Wisconsin had 383 bargaining employees covered under a collective-bargaining agreement, which expires in December 2019.

The plans invest in various instruments which are disclosed under the accounting guidance for fair value measurements which establishes a hierarchical framework for disclosing the observability of the inputs utilized in measuring fair value. The three levels in the hierarchy and examples of each level are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices.

Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs.

Level 3 — Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation.

Specific valuation methods include the following:

Cash equivalents The fair values of cash equivalents are generally based on cost plus accrued interest; money market funds are measured using quoted NAVs.

Insurance contracts — Insurance contract fair values take into consideration the value of the investments in separate accounts of the insurer, which are priced based on observable inputs.

Investments in commingled funds, equity securities and other funds — Equity securities are valued using quoted prices in active markets. The fair values for commingled funds are measured using NAVs, which take into consideration the value of underlying fund investments, as well as the other accrued assets and liabilities of a fund, in order to determine a per share market value. The investments in commingled funds may be redeemed for NAV with proper notice. Proper notice varies by fund and can range from daily with a few days’ notice to annually with 90 days’ notice. Private equity investments require approval of the fund for any unscheduled redemption, and such redemptions may be approved or denied by the fund at its sole discretion. Depending on the fund, unscheduled distributions from real estate investments may require approval of the fund or may be redeemed with proper notice, which is typically quarterly with 45-90 days’ notice; however, withdrawals from real estate investments may be delayed or discounted as a result of fund illiquidity.

Investments in debt securities — Fair values for debt securities are determined by a third party pricing service using recent trades and observable spreads from benchmark interest rates for similar securities.

Derivative Instruments Fair values for foreign currency derivatives are determined using pricing models based on the prevailing forward exchange rate of the underlying currencies. The fair values of interest rate derivatives are based on broker quotes that utilize current market interest rate forecasts.

Pension Benefits

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, has several noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans that cover almost all employees. Generally, benefits are based on a combination of years of service, the employee’s average pay and, in some cases, social security benefits. Xcel Energy Inc.’s and NSP-Wisconsin’s policy is to fully fund into an external trust the actuarially determined pension costs recognized for ratemaking and financial reporting purposes, subject to the limitations of applicable employee benefit and tax laws.

In addition to the qualified pension plans, Xcel Energy maintains a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) and a nonqualified pension plan. The SERP is maintained for certain executives that were participants in the plan in 2008, when the SERP was closed to new participants. The nonqualified pension plan provides unfunded, nonqualified benefits for compensation that is in excess of the limits applicable to the qualified pension plans, with distributions attributable to NSP-Wisconsin funded by NSP-Wisconsin’s consolidated operating cash flows. The total obligations of the SERP and nonqualified plan as of Dec. 31, 2017 and 2016 were $37 million and $44 million, respectively, of which $1 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin in both 2017 and 2016. In 2017 and 2016, Xcel Energy recognized net benefit cost for financial reporting for the SERP and nonqualified plans of $5 million and $8 million, respectively, of which amounts attributable to NSP-Wisconsin were immaterial.

In 2016, Xcel Energy established rabbi trusts to provide partial funding for future distributions of the SERP and its deferred compensation plan. Rabbi trust funding of deferred compensation plan distributions attributable to NSP-Wisconsin will be supplemented by NSP-Wisconsin’s consolidated operating cash flows as determined necessary. The amount of rabbi trust funding attributable to NSP-Wisconsin is immaterial. Also in 2016, Xcel Energy amended the deferred compensation plan to provide eligible participants the ability to diversify deferred settlements of equity awards, other than time-based equity awards, into various fund options.

Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin base the investment-return assumption on expected long-term performance for each of the investment types included in the pension asset portfolio and consider the historical returns achieved by the asset portfolio over the past 20-year or longer period, as well as the long-term return levels projected and recommended by investment experts. Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin continually review pension assumptions. The pension cost determination assumes a forecasted mix of investment types over the long term.

Investment returns in 2017 were above the assumed level of 7.10 percent;
Investment returns in 2016 were below the assumed level of 7.10 percent;
Investment returns in 2015 were below the assumed level of 7.25 percent; and
In 2018, NSP-Wisconsin’s expected investment-return assumption is 7.10 percent.

The assets are invested in a portfolio according to Xcel Energy Inc.’s and NSP-Wisconsin’s return, liquidity and diversification objectives to provide funding for plan obligations and minimize contributions to the plan, within appropriate levels of risk. The principal mechanism for achieving these objectives is the projected asset allocation given the long-term risk, return, and liquidity characteristics of each particular asset class. There were no significant concentrations of risk in any particular industry, index, or entity. Market volatility can impact even well-diversified portfolios and significantly affect the return levels achieved by pension assets in any year.

The following table presents the target pension asset allocations for NSP-Wisconsin at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2017
 
2016
Domestic and international equity securities
 
38
%
 
40
%
Long-duration fixed income and interest rate swap securities
 
23

 
23

Short-to-intermediate fixed income securities
 
21

 
16

Alternative investments
 
16

 
19

Cash
 
2

 
2

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%


The ongoing investment strategy is based on plan-specific investment recommendations that seek to minimize potential investment and interest rate risk as a plan’s funded status increases over time. The investment recommendations result in a greater percentage of long-duration fixed income securities being allocated to specific plans having relatively higher funded status ratios and a greater percentage of growth assets being allocated to plans having relatively lower funded status ratios. The aggregate projected asset allocation presented in the table above for the master pension trust results from the plan-specific strategies.

Pension Plan Assets

The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s pension plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
8,091

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
8,091

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 
21,850

 

 

 

 
21,850

Non U.S. equity funds
 
3,900

 

 

 
8,479

 
12,379

U.S. corporate bond funds
 
14,035

 

 

 

 
14,035

Emerging market equity funds
 

 

 

 
13,381

 
13,381

Emerging market debt funds
 
3,198

 

 

 
7,079

 
10,277

Private equity investments
 

 

 

 
3,583

 
3,583

Real estate
 

 

 

 
8,309

 
8,309

Other commingled funds
 
206

 

 

 
4,965

 
5,171

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
12,167

 

 

 
12,167

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
10,178

 

 

 
10,178

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
1,730

 

 

 
1,730

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equities
 
4,863

 

 

 

 
4,863

Other
 
(1,334
)
 
149

 

 
23

 
(1,162
)
Total
 
$
54,809

 
$
24,224

 
$

 
$
45,819

 
$
124,852

 
 
Dec. 31, 2016
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
3,939

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,939

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 
21,415

 

 

 

 
21,415

Non U.S. equity funds
 
7,406

 

 

 
8,942

 
16,348

U.S. corporate bond funds
 
10,581

 

 

 

 
10,581

Emerging market equity funds
 

 

 

 
8,577

 
8,577

Emerging market debt funds
 
3,519

 

 

 
3,787

 
7,306

Commodity funds
 

 

 

 
889

 
889

Private equity investments
 

 

 

 
4,652

 
4,652

Real estate
 

 

 

 
8,108

 
8,108

Other commingled funds
 

 

 

 
8,752

 
8,752

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
12,773

 

 

 
12,773

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
9,432

 

 

 
9,432

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
1,514

 

 

 
1,514

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
254

 

 

 
254

Asset-backed securities
 

 
120

 

 

 
120

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equities
 
4,219

 

 

 

 
4,219

Other
 

 
97

 

 

 
97

Total
 
$
51,079

 
$
24,190

 
$

 
$
43,707

 
$
118,976



There were no assets transferred in or out of Level 3 for the years ended Dec. 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.

Benefit Obligations — A comparison of the actuarially computed pension benefit obligation and plan assets for NSP-Wisconsin is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
145,387

 
$
146,448

 
 
 
 
 
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
157,457

 
$
152,545

Service cost
 
4,618

 
4,417

Interest cost
 
6,218

 
6,816

Plan amendments
 
(713
)
 
305

Actuarial loss
 
6,499

 
7,315

Benefit payments (a)
 
(17,331
)
 
(13,941
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
156,748

 
$
157,457


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
118,976

 
$
119,314

Actual return on plan assets
 
13,923

 
6,163

Employer contributions
 
9,284

 
7,440

Benefit payments (a)
 
(17,331
)
 
(13,941
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
124,852

 
$
118,976


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Funded Status of Plans at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status (b)
 
$
(31,896
)
 
$
(38,481
)
(a) 
2017 amount includes approximately $13 million of lump-sum benefit payments used in the determination of a settlement charge.
(b) 
Amounts are recognized in noncurrent liabilities on NSP-Wisconsin’s consolidated balance sheets.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
80,429

 
$
91,531

Prior service (credit) cost
 
(346
)
 
750

Total
 
$
80,083

 
$
92,281


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$
5,548

 
$
5,972

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
74,535

 
86,309

Total
 
$
80,083

 
$
92,281


Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2017
 
Dec. 31, 2016
 
 
2017
 
2016
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
3.63
%
 
4.13
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
3.75

 
3.75

Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2014



Mortality — In 2014, the Society of Actuaries published a new mortality table (RP-2014) that increased the overall life expectancy of males and females. In 2014, NSP-Wisconsin adopted this mortality table, with modifications, based on its population and specific experience. During 2017, a new projection table was released (MP-2017). NSP-Wisconsin evaluated the updated projection table and concluded that the methodology currently in use and adopted in 2016 is consistent with the recently updated 2017 table and continues to be representative of NSP-Wisconsin’s population.

Cash Flows — Cash funding requirements can be impacted by changes to actuarial assumptions, actual asset levels and other calculations prescribed by the funding requirements of income tax and other pension-related regulations. Required contributions were made in 2015 through 2018 to meet minimum funding requirements.

Total voluntary and required pension funding contributions across all four of Xcel Energy’s pension plans were as follows:

$150 million in January 2018, of which $10 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin;
$162 million in 2017, of which $9 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin;
$125 million in 2016, of which $7 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin; and
$90 million in 2015, of which $5 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin.

For future years, Xcel Energy and NSP-Wisconsin anticipate contributions will be made as necessary.

Plan Amendments — Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, amended the Xcel Energy Pension Plan in 2017 to reduce supplemental benefits for non-bargaining participants as well as to allow the transfer of a portion of non-qualified pension obligations into the qualified plans.  In 2016, the Xcel Energy Pension Plan was amended to change the discount rate basis for lump-sum conversion to annuity participants and annuity conversion to lump-sum participants.

Benefit Costs The components of NSP-Wisconsin’s net periodic pension cost were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Service cost
 
$
4,618

 
$
4,417

 
$
4,759

Interest cost
 
6,218

 
6,816

 
6,520

Expected return on plan assets
 
(9,180
)
 
(9,157
)
 
(9,483
)
Amortization of prior service cost
 
138

 
111

 
111

Amortization of net loss
 
5,846

 
5,392

 
6,804

Settlement charge (a)
 
7,107

 

 

Net periodic pension cost
 
14,747

 
7,579

 
8,711

Costs not recognized due to effects of regulation
 
(4,176
)
 

 

Net benefit cost recognized for financial reporting
 
$
10,571

 
$
7,579

 
$
8,711


(a) 
A settlement charge is required when the amount of lump-sum distributions during the year is greater than the sum of the service and interest cost components of the annual net periodic pension cost. In the fourth quarter of 2017 as a result of lump-sum distributions during the 2017 plan year, NSP-Wisconsin recorded a total pension settlement charge of $7 million, the majority of which was not recognized due to the effects of regulation. A total of $2 million of that amount was recorded in O&M expenses in the fourth quarter of 2017.
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.13
%
 
4.66
%
 
4.11
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
3.75

 
4.00

 
3.75

Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
7.10

 
7.10

 
7.25



In addition to the benefit costs in the table above, for the pension plans sponsored by Xcel Energy Inc., costs are allocated to NSP-Wisconsin based on Xcel Energy Services Inc. employees’ labor costs. The amount allocated to NSP-Wisconsin was $3 million, $2 million and $2 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Pension costs include an expected return impact for the current year that may differ from actual investment performance in the plan. The return assumption used for 2018 pension cost calculations is 7.10 percent. The cost calculation uses a market-related valuation of pension assets. Xcel Energy, including NSP-Wisconsin, uses a calculated value method to determine the market-related value of the plan assets. The market-related value begins with the fair market value of assets as of the beginning of the year. The market-related value is determined by adjusting the fair market value of assets to reflect the investment gains and losses (the difference between the actual investment return and the expected investment return on the market-related value) during each of the previous five years at the rate of 20 percent per year. As these differences between actual investment returns and the expected investment returns are incorporated into the market-related value, the differences are recognized over the expected average remaining years of service for active employees.

Defined Contribution Plans

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, maintains 401(k) and other defined contribution plans that cover substantially all employees. The expense to these plans for NSP-Wisconsin was approximately $1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Postretirement Health Care Benefits

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, has a contributory health and welfare benefit plan that provides health care and death benefits to certain Xcel Energy retirees. NSP-Wisconsin discontinued contributing toward health care benefits for nonbargaining employees retiring after 1998 and for bargaining employees who retired after 1999.

Regulatory agencies for nearly all retail utility customers have allowed rate recovery of accrued postretirement benefit costs.

Plan Assets — Certain state agencies that regulate Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries also have issued guidelines related to the funding of postretirement benefit costs. These assets are invested in a manner consistent with the investment strategy for the pension plan.

The following table presents the target postretirement asset allocations for Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2017
 
2016
Domestic and international equity securities
 
24
%
 
25
%
Short-to-intermediate fixed income securities
 
60

 
57

Alternative investments
 
9

 
13

Cash
 
7

 
5

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%


Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin base investment-return assumptions for the postretirement health care fund assets on expected long-term performance for each of the investment types included in the asset portfolio. Assumptions and target allocations are determined at the master trust level. The investment mix at each of Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries may vary from the investment mix of the total asset portfolio. The assets are invested in a portfolio according to Xcel Energy Inc.’s and NSP-Wisconsin’s return, liquidity and diversification objectives to provide a source of funding for plan obligations and minimize contributions to the plan, within appropriate levels of risk. The principal mechanism for achieving these objectives is the projected asset allocation given the long-term risk, return, correlation and liquidity characteristics of each particular asset class. There were no significant concentrations of risk in any particular industry, index, or entity. Market volatility is not considered to be a material factor in postretirement health care costs.

The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s proportionate allocation of the total postretirement benefit plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV

 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
68

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
68

Insurance contracts
 

 
115

 

 

 
115

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 
172

 

 

 

 
172

U.S fixed income funds
 
79

 

 

 

 
79

Emerging market debt funds
 
94

 

 

 

 
94

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
134

 

 

 
134

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
147

 

 

 
147

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
50

 

 

 
50

Asset-backed securities
 

 
54

 

 

 
54

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
80

 

 

 
80

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non U.S. equities
 
82

 

 

 

 
82

Other
 

 
3

 

 

 
3

Total
 
$
495

 
$
583

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,078



 
 
Dec. 31, 2016
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV

 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
25

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
25

Insurance contracts
 

 
58

 

 

 
58

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 
67

 

 

 

 
67

U.S fixed income funds
 
33

 

 

 

 
33

Emerging market debt funds
 
38

 

 

 

 
38

Other commingled funds
 

 

 

 
67

 
67

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
46

 

 

 
46

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
77

 

 

 
77

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
21

 

 

 
21

Asset-backed securities
 

 
23

 

 

 
23

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
36

 

 

 
36

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non U.S. equities
 
50

 

 

 

 
50

Other
 

 
2

 

 

 
2

Total
 
$
213

 
$
263

 
$

 
$
67

 
$
543



There were no assets transferred in or out of Level 3 for the years ended Dec. 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Benefit Obligations — A comparison of the actuarially computed benefit obligation and plan assets for NSP-Wisconsin is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
14,973

 
$
14,718

Service cost
 
29

 
24

Interest cost
 
590

 
651

Medicare subsidy reimbursements
 

 
7

Plan participants’ contributions
 
71

 
87

Actuarial loss
 
2,069

 
775

Benefit payments
 
(1,368
)
 
(1,289
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
16,364

 
$
14,973


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
543

 
$
418

Actual loss on plan assets
 
(6
)
 
(12
)
Plan participants’ contributions
 
71

 
87

Employer contributions
 
1,838

 
1,339

Benefit payments
 
(1,368
)
 
(1,289
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
1,078

 
$
543


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Funded Status of Plans at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status
 
$
(15,286
)
 
$
(14,430
)
Current liabilities
 
(269
)
 
(822
)
Noncurrent liabilities
 
(15,017
)
 
(13,608
)
Net postretirement amounts recognized on consolidated balance sheets
 
$
(15,286
)
 
$
(14,430
)

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
10,553

 
$
8,883

Prior service credit
 
(1,783
)
 
(2,134
)
Total
 
$
8,770

 
$
6,749


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$
110

 
$

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
8,660

 
6,749

Total
 
$
8,770

 
$
6,749


Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2017
 
Dec. 31, 2016
 
 
2017
 
2016
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
3.62
%
 
4.13
%
Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2014

Health care costs trend rate — initial Pre-65
 
7.00
%
 
5.50
%
Health care costs trend rate — initial Post-65
 
5.50
%
 
5.50
%


Beginning with the Dec. 31, 2017 measurement, Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin separated its initial medical trend assumption for pre-Medicare (Pre-65) and post-Medicare (Post-65) claims costs of 7.0 percent and 5.5 percent, respectively, in order to reflect different short-term expectations based on recent experience differences. The ultimate trend assumption remained at 4.5 percent for both Pre-65 and Post-65 claims costs as similar long-term trend rates are expected for both populations. The period until the ultimate rate is reached is five years. Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin base the medical trend assumption on the long-term cost inflation expected in the health care market, considering the levels projected and recommended by industry experts, as well as recent actual medical cost increases experienced by the retiree medical plan.

A one-percent change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects on NSP-Wisconsin:
 
 
One-Percentage Point
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Increase
 
Decrease
APBO
 
$
1,588

 
$
(1,344
)
Service and interest components
 
65

 
(55
)


Cash Flows — The postretirement health care plans have no funding requirements under income tax and other retirement-related regulations other than fulfilling benefit payment obligations, when claims are presented and approved under the plans. Additional cash funding requirements are prescribed by certain state and federal rate regulatory authorities. Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, contributed $20 million, $18 million and $18 million during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of which $2 million, $1 million and $1 million were attributable to NSP-Wisconsin. Xcel Energy expects to contribute approximately $12 million during 2018, of which $1 million is attributable to NSP-Wisconsin.

Plan Amendments — In 2017 and 2016, there were no plan amendments made which affected the benefit obligation.

Benefit Costs — The components of NSP-Wisconsin’s net periodic postretirement benefit costs were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Service cost
 
$
29

 
$
24

 
$
29

Interest cost
 
590

 
651

 
653

Expected return on plan assets
 
(31
)
 
(24
)
 
(30
)
Amortization of prior service credit
 
(351
)
 
(351
)
 
(351
)
Amortization of net loss
 
436

 
330

 
456

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
 
$
673

 
$
630

 
$
757


 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.13
%
 
4.65
%
 
4.08
%
Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
5.80

 
5.80

 
5.80



In addition to the benefit costs in the table above, for the postretirement health care plans sponsored by Xcel Energy Inc., costs are allocated to NSP-Wisconsin based on Xcel Energy Services Inc. employees’ labor costs.

Projected Benefit Payments

The following table lists NSP-Wisconsin’s projected benefit payments for the pension and postretirement benefit plans:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Projected Pension
Benefit Payments
 
Gross Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
 
Expected Medicare
Part D Subsidies
 
Net Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
2018
 
$
11,189

 
$
1,352

 
$
5

 
$
1,347

2019
 
11,812

 
1,329

 
4

 
1,325

2020
 
12,361

 
1,298

 
3

 
1,295

2021
 
11,842

 
1,254

 
3

 
1,251

2022
 
11,640

 
1,215

 
3

 
1,212

2023-2027
 
58,627

 
5,111

 
14

 
5,097



Multiemployer Plans

NSP-Wisconsin contributes to several union multiemployer pension plans, none of which are individually significant. These plans provide pension benefits to certain union employees who may perform services for multiple employers and do not participate in the NSP-Wisconsin sponsored pension plans. Contributing to these types of plans creates risk that differs from providing benefits under NSP-Wisconsin sponsored plans, in that if another participating employer ceases to contribute to a multiemployer plan, additional unfunded obligations may need to be funded over time by remaining participating employers.

Contributions to multiemployer plans were as follows for the years ended Dec. 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. There were no significant changes to the nature or magnitude of the participation of NSP-Wisconsin in multiemployer plans for the years presented:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Multiemployer plan contributions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension
 
$
248

 
$
707

 
$
944