XML 47 R34.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits [Abstract]  
Projected Benefit Payments for the Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table lists NSP-Wisconsin’s projected benefit payments for the pension and postretirement benefit plans:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Projected Pension
Benefit Payments
 
Gross Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
 
Expected Medicare
Part D Subsidies
 
Net Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
2017
 
$
12,324

 
$
1,371

 
$
6

 
$
1,365

2018
 
11,496

 
1,308

 
5

 
1,303

2019
 
12,957

 
1,271

 
4

 
1,267

2020
 
13,329

 
1,226

 
4

 
1,222

2021
 
12,964

 
1,169

 
3

 
1,166

2022-2026
 
61,280

 
5,031

 
15

 
5,016

Contributions to Multiemployer Plans
Contributions to multiemployer plans were as follows for the years ended Dec. 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. There were no significant changes to the nature or magnitude of the participation of NSP-Wisconsin in multiemployer plans for the years presented:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Multiemployer plan contributions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension
 
$
707

 
$
944

 
$
156

Pension Plans  
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits [Abstract]  
Target Asset Allocations and Plan Assets Measured at Fair Value
The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s pension plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2016
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV (a)
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
3,939

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,939

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 

 

 

 
21,415

 
21,415

Non U.S. equity funds
 

 

 

 
16,348

 
16,348

U.S. corporate bond funds
 

 

 

 
10,581

 
10,581

Emerging market equity funds
 

 

 

 
8,577

 
8,577

Emerging market debt funds
 

 

 

 
7,306

 
7,306

Commodity funds
 

 

 

 
889

 
889

Private equity investments
 

 

 

 
4,652

 
4,652

Real estate
 

 

 

 
8,108

 
8,108

Other commingled funds
 

 

 

 
8,752

 
8,752

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
12,773

 

 

 
12,773

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
9,432

 

 

 
9,432

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
1,514

 

 

 
1,514

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
254

 

 

 
254

Asset-backed securities
 

 
120

 

 

 
120

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equities
 
4,219

 

 

 

 
4,219

Other
 

 
97

 

 

 
97

Total
 
$
8,158

 
$
24,190

 
$

 
$
86,628

 
$
118,976


(a) 
Based on the requirements of ASU No. 2015-07, investments measured at fair value using a NAV methodology have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 2 for further information on the adoption of ASU No. 2015-07.

 
 
Dec. 31, 2015
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV (a)
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
6,005

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
6,005

Derivatives
 

 
89

 

 

 
89

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 

 

 

 
17,338

 
17,338

Non U.S. equity funds
 

 

 

 
16,710

 
16,710

U.S. corporate bond funds
 

 

 

 
10,001

 
10,001

Emerging market equity funds
 

 

 

 
7,491

 
7,491

Emerging market debt funds
 

 

 

 
7,245

 
7,245

Commodity funds
 

 

 

 
2,461

 
2,461

Private equity investments
 

 

 

 
5,967

 
5,967

Real estate
 

 

 

 
8,663

 
8,663

Other commingled funds
 

 

 

 
9,321

 
9,321

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
13,048

 

 

 
13,048

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
9,008

 

 

 
9,008

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
1,446

 

 

 
1,446

Asset-backed securities
 

 
101

 

 

 
101

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equities
 
4,213

 

 

 

 
4,213

Other
 

 
207

 

 

 
207

Total
 
$
10,218

 
$
23,899

 
$

 
$
85,197

 
$
119,314



(a) 
Based on the requirements of ASU No. 2015-07, investments measured at fair value using a NAV methodology have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 2 for further information on the adoption of ASU No. 2015-07.
The following table presents the target pension asset allocations for NSP-Wisconsin at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2016
 
2015
Domestic and international equity securities
 
40
%
 
41
%
Long-duration fixed income and interest rate swap securities
 
23

 
23

Short-to-intermediate fixed income securities
 
16

 
14

Alternative investments
 
19

 
20

Cash
 
2

 
2

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
A comparison of the actuarially computed pension benefit obligation and plan assets for NSP-Wisconsin is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
146,448

 
$
140,917

 
 
 
 
 
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
152,545

 
$
165,669

Service cost
 
4,417

 
4,759

Interest cost
 
6,816

 
6,520

Plan amendments
 
305

 

Actuarial loss (gain)
 
7,315

 
(11,159
)
Benefit payments
 
(13,941
)
 
(13,244
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
157,457

 
$
152,545

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
119,314

 
$
132,713

Actual return (loss) on plan assets
 
6,163

 
(5,087
)
Employer contributions
 
7,440

 
4,932

Benefit payments
 
(13,941
)
 
(13,244
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
118,976

 
$
119,314

Funded Status of Plans
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Funded Status of Plans at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status (a)
 
$
(38,481
)
 
$
(33,231
)
(a) 
Amounts are recognized in noncurrent liabilities on NSP-Wisconsin’s consolidated balance sheets.
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
91,531

 
$
86,614

Prior service cost
 
750

 
556

Total
 
$
92,281

 
$
87,170

Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs Recorded on the Balance Sheet Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$
5,972

 
$
6,300

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
86,309

 
80,870

Total
 
$
92,281

 
$
87,170

Schedule of Assumptions Used
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.66
%
 
4.11
%
 
4.75
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
4.00

 
3.75

 
3.75

Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
7.10

 
7.25

 
7.25

Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2016
 
Dec. 31, 2015
 
 
2016
 
2015
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
4.13
%
 
4.66
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
3.75

 
4.00

Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2014

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs
The components of NSP-Wisconsin’s net periodic pension cost were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Service cost
 
$
4,417

 
$
4,759

 
$
4,527

Interest cost
 
6,816

 
6,520

 
7,257

Expected return on plan assets
 
(9,157
)
 
(9,483
)
 
(9,642
)
Amortization of prior service cost
 
111

 
111

 
111

Amortization of net loss
 
5,392

 
6,804

 
6,617

Net periodic pension cost
 
$
7,579

 
$
8,711

 
$
8,870

Postretirement Benefit Plan  
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits [Abstract]  
Target Asset Allocations and Plan Assets Measured at Fair Value
The following table presents the target postretirement asset allocations for Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2016
 
2015
Domestic and international equity securities
 
25
%
 
25
%
Short-to-intermediate fixed income securities
 
57

 
57

Alternative investments
 
13

 
13

Cash
 
5

 
5

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%
The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s proportionate allocation of the total postretirement benefit plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2016
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV (a)

 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
25

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
25

Insurance contracts
 

 
58

 

 

 
58

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 

 

 

 
67

 
67

U.S fixed income funds
 

 

 

 
33

 
33

Emerging market debt funds
 

 

 

 
38

 
38

Other commingled funds
 

 

 

 
67

 
67

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
46

 

 

 
46

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
77

 

 

 
77

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
21

 

 

 
21

Asset-backed securities
 

 
23

 

 

 
23

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
36

 

 

 
36

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non U.S. equities
 
50

 

 

 

 
50

Other
 

 
2

 

 

 
2

Total
 
$
75

 
$
263

 
$

 
$
205

 
$
543

(a) 
Based on the requirements of ASU No. 2015-07, investments measured at fair value using a NAV methodology have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 2 for further information on the adoption of ASU No. 2015-07.

 
 
Dec. 31, 2015
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Investments Measured at NAV (a)

 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
18

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
18

Insurance contracts
 

 
44

 

 

 
44

Commingled funds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. equity funds
 

 

 

 
36

 
36

Non U.S. equity funds
 

 

 

 
31

 
31

U.S fixed income funds
 

 

 

 
23

 
23

Emerging market equity funds
 

 

 

 
10

 
10

Emerging market debt funds
 

 

 

 
33

 
33

Other commingled funds
 

 

 

 
58

 
58

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government securities
 

 
37

 

 

 
37

U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
56

 

 

 
56

Non U.S. corporate bonds
 

 
12

 

 

 
12

Asset-backed securities
 

 
27

 

 

 
27

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
33

 

 

 
33

Total
 
$
18

 
$
209

 
$

 
$
191

 
$
418


(a) 
Based on the requirements of ASU No. 2015-07, investments measured at fair value using a NAV methodology have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 2 for further information on the adoption of ASU No. 2015-07.
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
A comparison of the actuarially computed benefit obligation and plan assets for NSP-Wisconsin is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
14,718

 
$
16,768

Service cost
 
24

 
29

Interest cost
 
651

 
653

Medicare subsidy reimbursements
 
7

 
13

Plan participants’ contributions
 
87

 
130

Actuarial loss (gain)
 
775

 
(1,645
)
Benefit payments
 
(1,289
)
 
(1,230
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
14,973

 
$
14,718

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
418

 
$
512

Actual loss on plan assets
 
(12
)
 
(12
)
Plan participants’ contributions
 
87

 
130

Employer contributions
 
1,339

 
1,018

Benefit payments
 
(1,289
)
 
(1,230
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
543

 
$
418

Funded Status of Plans
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Funded Status of Plans at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status
 
$
(14,430
)
 
$
(14,300
)
Current liabilities
 
(822
)
 
(1,017
)
Noncurrent liabilities
 
(13,608
)
 
(13,283
)
Net postretirement amounts recognized on consolidated balance sheets
 
$
(14,430
)
 
$
(14,300
)
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
8,883

 
$
8,402

Prior service credit
 
(2,134
)
 
(2,485
)
Total
 
$
6,749

 
$
5,917

Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs Recorded on the Balance Sheet Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$

 
$
99

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
6,749

 
5,818

Total
 
$
6,749

 
$
5,917

Schedule of Assumptions Used
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.65
%
 
4.08
%
 
4.82
%
Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
5.80

 
5.80

 
7.08

Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2016
 
Dec. 31, 2015
 
 
2016
 
2015
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
4.13
%
 
4.65
%
Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2014

Health care costs trend rate — initial
 
5.50
%
 
6.00
%
Effects of One-Percent Change in Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rate
A one-percent change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects on NSP-Wisconsin:
 
 
One-Percentage Point
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Increase
 
Decrease
APBO
 
$
1,423

 
$
(1,212
)
Service and interest components
 
71

 
(60
)
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs
The components of NSP-Wisconsin’s net periodic postretirement benefit costs were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Service cost
 
$
24

 
$
29

 
$
35

Interest cost
 
651

 
653

 
791

Expected return on plan assets
 
(24
)
 
(30
)
 
(52
)
Amortization of prior service credit
 
(351
)
 
(351
)
 
(351
)
Amortization of net loss
 
330

 
456

 
666

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
 
$
630

 
$
757

 
$
1,089