XML 75 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]  
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Consistent with the process for rate recovery of pension and postretirement benefits for its employees, NSP-Wisconsin accounts for its participation in, and related costs of, pension and other postretirement benefit plans sponsored by Xcel Energy Inc. as multiple employer plans. NSP-Wisconsin is responsible for its share of cash contributions, plan costs and obligations and is entitled to its share of plan assets; accordingly, NSP-Wisconsin accounts for its pro rata share of these plans, including pension expense and contributions, resulting in accounting consistent with that of a single employer plan exclusively for NSP-Wisconsin employees.

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, offers various benefit plans to its employees. Approximately 71 percent of employees that receive benefits are represented by several local labor unions under several collective-bargaining agreements. At Dec. 31, 2014, NSP-Wisconsin had 402 bargaining employees covered under a collective-bargaining agreement, which expires at the end of 2016.

The plans invest in various instruments which are disclosed under the accounting guidance for fair value measurements which establishes a hierarchical framework for disclosing the observability of the inputs utilized in measuring fair value. The three levels in the hierarchy and examples of each level are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices.

Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs.

Level 3 — Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation.

Specific valuation methods include the following:

Cash equivalents The fair values of cash equivalents are generally based on cost plus accrued interest; money market funds are measured using quoted net asset values.

Insurance contracts — Insurance contract fair values take into consideration the value of the investments in separate accounts of the insurer, which are priced based on observable inputs.

Investments in equity securities and other funds — Equity securities are valued using quoted prices in active markets. The fair values for commingled funds, private equity investments and real estate investments are measured using net asset values, which take into consideration the value of underlying fund investments, as well as the other accrued assets and liabilities of a fund, in order to determine a per share market value. The investments in commingled funds may be redeemed for net asset value with proper notice. Proper notice varies by fund and can range from daily with one or two days notice to annually with 90 days notice. Private equity investments require approval of the fund for any unscheduled redemption, and such redemptions may be approved or denied by the fund at its sole discretion. Unscheduled distributions from real estate investments may be redeemed with proper notice, which is typically quarterly with 45-90 days notice; however, withdrawals from real estate investments may be delayed or discounted as a result of fund illiquidity. Based on the plan’s evaluation of its ability to redeem private equity and real estate investments, fair value measurements for private equity and real estate investments have been assigned a Level 3.

Investments in debt securities — Fair values for debt securities are determined by a third party pricing service using recent trades and observable spreads from benchmark interest rates for similar securities.

Derivative Instruments Fair values for foreign currency derivatives are determined using pricing models based on the prevailing forward exchange rate of the underlying currencies. The fair values of interest rate derivatives are based on broker quotes that utilize current market interest rate forecasts.

Pension Benefits

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, has several noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans that cover almost all employees. Generally, benefits are based on a combination of years of service, the employee’s average pay and, in some cases, social security benefits. Xcel Energy Inc.’s and NSP-Wisconsin’s policy is to fully fund into an external trust the actuarially determined pension costs recognized for ratemaking and financial reporting purposes, subject to the limitations of applicable employee benefit and tax laws.

In addition to the qualified pension plans, Xcel Energy maintains a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) and a nonqualified pension plan. The SERP is maintained for certain executives that were participants in the plan in 2008, when the SERP was closed to new participants. The nonqualified pension plan provides unfunded, nonqualified benefits for compensation that is in excess of the limits applicable to the qualified pension plans. The total obligations of the SERP and nonqualified plan as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013 were $46.5 million and $36.5 million, respectively, of which $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin. In 2014 and 2013, Xcel Energy recognized net benefit cost for financial reporting for the SERP and nonqualified plans of $4.7 million and $6.6 million, respectively, of which amounts attributable to NSP-Wisconsin were immaterial. Benefits for these unfunded plans are paid out of Xcel Energy’s consolidated operating cash flows.

Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin base the investment-return assumption on expected long-term performance for each of the investment types included in the pension asset portfolio and consider the historical returns achieved by the asset portfolio over the past 20-year or longer period, as well as the long-term return levels projected and recommended by investment experts. Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin continually review the pension assumptions. The pension cost determination assumes a forecasted mix of investment types over the long term.

Investment returns in 2014 and 2013 were below the assumed level of 7.25 percent in both years;
Investment returns in 2012 were above the assumed level of 7.50 percent; and
In 2015, NSP-Wisconsin’s expected investment-return assumption is 7.25 percent.

The assets are invested in a portfolio according to Xcel Energy Inc.’s and NSP-Wisconsin’s return, liquidity and diversification objectives to provide a source of funding for plan obligations and minimize the necessity of contributions to the plan, within appropriate levels of risk. The principal mechanism for achieving these objectives is the projected allocation of assets to selected asset classes, given the long-term risk, return, and liquidity characteristics of each particular asset class. There were no significant concentrations of risk in any particular industry, index, or entity. Market volatility can impact even well-diversified portfolios and significantly affect the return levels achieved by pension assets in any year.

The following table presents the target pension asset allocations for NSP-Wisconsin at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2014
 
2013
Domestic and international equity securities
 
39
%
 
31
%
Long-duration fixed income and interest rate swap securities
 
23

 
29

Short-to-intermediate term fixed income securities
 
14

 
16

Alternative investments
 
22

 
22

Cash
 
2

 
2

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%


The ongoing investment strategy is based on plan-specific investment recommendations that seek to minimize potential investment and interest rate risk as a plan’s funded status increases over time. The investment recommendations result in a greater percentage of long-duration fixed income securities being allocated to specific plans having relatively higher funded status ratios and a greater percentage of growth assets being allocated to plans having relatively lower funded status ratios. The aggregate projected asset allocation presented in the table above for the master pension trust results from the plan-specific strategies.

Pension Plan Assets

The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s pension plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2014
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
7,910

 
$

 
$

 
$
7,910

Derivatives
 

 
28

 

 
28

Government securities
 

 
16,084

 

 
16,084

Corporate bonds
 

 
13,231

 

 
13,231

Asset-backed securities
 

 
162

 

 
162

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
475

 

 
475

Common stock
 
4,424

 

 

 
4,424

Private equity investments
 

 

 
7,078

 
7,078

Commingled funds
 

 
81,806

 

 
81,806

Real estate
 

 

 
2,510

 
2,510

Securities lending collateral obligation and other
 

 
(995
)
 

 
(995
)
Total
 
$
12,334

 
$
110,791

 
$
9,588

 
$
132,713

 
 
Dec. 31, 2013
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
4,332

 
$

 
$

 
$
4,332

Derivatives
 

 
937

 

 
937

Government securities
 

 
6,711

 

 
6,711

Corporate bonds
 

 
24,955

 

 
24,955

Asset-backed securities
 

 
307

 

 
307

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
684

 

 
684

Common stock
 
4,533

 

 

 
4,533

Private equity investments
 

 

 
7,502

 
7,502

Commingled funds
 

 
84,364

 

 
84,364

Real estate
 

 

 
2,299

 
2,299

Securities lending collateral obligation and other
 

 
311

 

 
311

Total
 
$
8,865

 
$
118,269

 
$
9,801

 
$
136,935



The following tables present the changes in NSP-Wisconsin’s Level 3 pension plan assets for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2014
 
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and
Settlements, Net
 
Transfer Out
of Level 3
 
Dec. 31, 2014
Private equity investments
 
$
7,502

 
$
1,197

 
$
(1,197
)
 
$
(424
)
 
$

 
$
7,078

Real estate
 
2,299

 
166

 
(234
)
 
279

 

 
2,510

Total
 
$
9,801

 
$
1,363

 
$
(1,431
)
 
$
(145
)
 
$

 
$
9,588


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2013
 
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and
Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3 (a)
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Asset-backed securities
 
$
749

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(749
)
 
$

Mortgage-backed securities
 
2,128

 

 

 

 
(2,128
)
 

Private equity investments
 
8,545

 
1,083

 
(1,960
)
 
(166
)
 

 
7,502

Real estate
 
3,472

 
(129
)
 
247

 
450

 
(1,741
)
 
2,299

Total
 
$
14,894

 
$
954

 
$
(1,713
)
 
$
284

 
$
(4,618
)
 
$
9,801



(a) 
Transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 were principally due to diminished use of unobservable inputs that were previously significant to these fair value measurements and were subsequently sold during 2013.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2012
 
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and
Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3
 
Dec. 31, 2012
Asset-backed securities
 
$
1,578

 
$
197

 
$
(273
)
 
$
(753
)
 
$

 
$
749

Mortgage-backed securities
 
3,781

 
93

 
(112
)
 
(1,634
)
 

 
2,128

Private equity investments
 
8,440

 
945

 
(1,197
)
 
357

 

 
8,545

Real estate
 
2,008

 
1

 
328

 
1,135

 

 
3,472

Total
 
$
15,807

 
$
1,236

 
$
(1,254
)
 
$
(895
)
 
$

 
$
14,894



Benefit Obligations — A comparison of the actuarially computed pension benefit obligation and plan assets for NSP-Wisconsin is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
153,590

 
$
153,894

 
 
 
 
 
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
163,930

 
$
179,995

Service cost
 
4,527

 
5,682

Interest cost
 
7,257

 
6,924

Plan amendments
 

 
(1,109
)
Actuarial loss (gain)
 
9,126

 
(11,097
)
Benefit payments
 
(19,171
)
 
(16,465
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
165,669

 
$
163,930


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
136,935

 
$
136,546

Actual return on plan assets
 
6,916

 
5,525

Employer contributions
 
8,033

 
11,329

Benefit payments
 
(19,171
)
 
(16,465
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
132,713

 
$
136,935


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Funded Status of Plans at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status (a)
 
$
(32,956
)
 
$
(26,995
)

(a) 
Amounts are recognized in noncurrent liabilities on NSP-Wisconsin’s consolidated balance sheets.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
90,007

 
$
84,773

Prior service cost
 
667

 
778

Total
 
$
90,674

 
$
85,551


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$
6,728

 
$
7,631

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
83,946

 
77,920

Total
 
$
90,674

 
$
85,551


Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
4.11
%
 
4.75
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
3.75

 
3.75

Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2000



Mortality — In 2014, the Society of Actuaries published a new mortality table and projection scale that increased the overall life expectancy of males and females. NSP-Wisconsin has reviewed its own population through a credibility analysis and adopted the RP 2014 table with modifications based on its population and specific experience.

Cash Flows — Cash funding requirements can be impacted by changes to actuarial assumptions, actual asset levels and other calculations prescribed by the funding requirements of income tax and other pension-related regulations. Required contributions were made in 2012 through 2015 to meet minimum funding requirements.

Total voluntary and required pension funding contributions across all four of Xcel Energy’s pension plans were as follows:

$90.0 million in January 2015, of which $4.9 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin;
$130.6 million in 2014, of which $8.0 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin;
$192.4 million in 2013, of which $11.3 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin; and
$198.1 million in 2012, of which $12.5 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin.

For future years, Xcel Energy and NSP-Wisconsin anticipate contributions will be made as necessary.

Plan Amendments — In 2014, there were no plan amendments made which affected the benefit obligation. Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, amended the plan in 2013 resulting in a decrease of the projected benefit obligation due to fully insuring the long-term disability benefit for NSP bargaining participants. This decrease was partially offset by an increase to the projected benefit obligation resulting from a change in the discount rate basis for lump sum conversion of annuities for participants in the Xcel Energy Pension Plan.

Benefit Costs The components of NSP-Wisconsin’s net periodic pension cost were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost
 
$
4,527

 
$
5,682

 
$
4,568

Interest cost
 
7,257

 
6,924

 
7,765

Expected return on plan assets
 
(9,642
)
 
(9,995
)
 
(10,489
)
Amortization of prior service cost
 
111

 
417

 
1,771

Amortization of net loss
 
6,617

 
7,924

 
6,004

Net periodic pension cost
 
$
8,870

 
$
10,952

 
$
9,619


 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.75
%
 
4.00
%
 
5.00
%
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
 
3.75

 
3.75

 
4.00

Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
7.25

 
7.25

 
7.50



In addition to the benefit costs in the table above, for the pension plans sponsored by Xcel Energy, Inc., costs are allocated to NSP-Wisconsin based on Xcel Energy Services Inc. employees’ labor costs. Amounts allocated to NSP-Wisconsin were $1.7 million, $2.2 million and $1.8 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Pension costs include an expected return impact for the current year that may differ from actual investment performance in the plan. The return assumption used for 2015 pension cost calculations is 7.25 percent. The cost calculation uses a market-related valuation of pension assets. Xcel Energy, including NSP-Wisconsin, uses a calculated value method to determine the market-related value of the plan assets. The market-related value begins with the fair market value of assets as of the beginning of the year. The market-related value is determined by adjusting the fair market value of assets to reflect the investment gains and losses (the difference between the actual investment return and the expected investment return on the market-related value) during each of the previous five years at the rate of 20 percent per year. As these differences between actual investment returns and the expected investment returns are incorporated into the market-related value, the differences are recognized over the expected average remaining years of service for active employees.

Defined Contribution Plans

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, maintains 401(k) and other defined contribution plans that cover substantially all employees. The expense to these plans for NSP-Wisconsin was approximately $1.4 million in 2014, $1.3 million in 2013 and $1.2 million in 2012.

Postretirement Health Care Benefits

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, has a contributory health and welfare benefit plan that provides health care and death benefits to certain Xcel Energy retirees. The former NSP, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, discontinued contributing toward health care benefits for nonbargaining employees retiring after 1998 and for bargaining employees who retired after 1999.

In 1993, Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin adopted accounting guidance regarding other non-pension postretirement benefits and elected to amortize the unrecognized APBO on a straight-line basis over 20 years.

Regulatory agencies for nearly all retail utility customers have allowed rate recovery of accrued postretirement benefit costs.

Plan Assets — Certain state agencies that regulate Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries also have issued guidelines related to the funding of postretirement benefit costs. These assets are invested in a manner consistent with the investment strategy for the pension plan.

The following table presents the target postretirement asset allocations for Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin at Dec. 31 for the upcoming year:
 
 
2014
 
2013
Domestic and international equity securities
 
25
%
 
41
%
Short-to-intermediate fixed income securities
 
57

 
40

Alternative investments
 
13

 
13

Cash
 
5

 
6

Total
 
100
%
 
100
%


Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin base investment-return assumptions for the postretirement health care fund assets on expected long-term performance for each of the investment types included in the asset portfolio. Assumptions and target allocations are determined at the master trust level. The investment mix at each of Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries may vary from the investment mix of the total asset portfolio. The assets are invested in a portfolio according to Xcel Energy Inc.’s and NSP-Wisconsin’s return, liquidity and diversification objectives to provide a source of funding for plan obligations and minimize the necessity of contributions to the plan, within appropriate levels of risk. The principal mechanism for achieving these objectives is the projected allocation of assets to selected asset classes, given the long-term risk, return, correlation and liquidity characteristics of each particular asset class. There were no significant concentrations of risk in any particular industry, index, or entity. Market volatility is not considered to be a material factor in postretirement health care costs.

The following tables present, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s proportionate allocation of the total postretirement benefit plan assets that are measured at fair value as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
 
Dec. 31, 2014
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
28

 
$

 
$

 
$
28

Government securities
 

 
52

 

 
52

Insurance contracts
 

 
54

 

 
54

Corporate bonds
 

 
59

 

 
59

Asset-backed securities
 

 
4

 

 
4

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
12

 

 
12

Commingled funds
 

 
304

 

 
304

Other
 

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
Total
 
$
28

 
$
484

 
$

 
$
512

 
 
Dec. 31, 2013
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash equivalents
 
$
31

 
$

 
$

 
$
31

Derivatives
 

 
(2
)
 

 
(2
)
Government securities
 

 
89

 

 
89

Insurance contracts
 

 
80

 

 
80

Corporate bonds
 

 
79

 

 
79

Asset-backed securities
 

 
5

 

 
5

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
37

 

 
37

Commingled funds
 

 
452

 

 
452

Other
 

 
(25
)
 

 
(25
)
Total
 
$
31

 
$
715

 
$

 
$
746



For the year ended Dec. 31, 2014 there were no assets transferred in or out of Level 3. The following tables present the changes in NSP-Wisconsin’s Level 3 postretirement benefit plan assets for the years ended Dec. 31, 2013 and 2012:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2013
 
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and
Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3 (a)
 
Dec. 31, 2013
Asset-backed securities
 
$
1

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(1
)
 
$

Mortgage-backed securities
 
54

 

 

 

 
(54
)
 

Total
 
$
55

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(55
)
 
$



(a) 
Transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 were principally due to diminished use of unobservable inputs that were previously significant to these fair value measurements and were subsequently sold during 2013.
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Jan. 1, 2012
 
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases,
Issuances and
Settlements, Net
 
Transfers Out of Level 3
 
Dec. 31, 2012
Asset-backed securities
 
$
14

 
$

 
$
3

 
$
(16
)
 
$

 
$
1

Mortgage-backed securities
 
48

 
(1
)
 
6

 
1

 

 
54

Total
 
$
62

 
$
(1
)
 
$
9

 
$
(15
)
 
$

 
$
55



Benefit Obligations — A comparison of the actuarially computed benefit obligation and plan assets for NSP-Wisconsin is presented in the following table:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
Obligation at Jan. 1
 
$
17,153

 
$
19,432

Service cost
 
35

 
25

Interest cost
 
791

 
760

Medicare subsidy reimbursements
 
2

 
31

Plan participants’ contributions
 
284

 
621

Actuarial gain
 
(38
)
 
(1,724
)
Benefit payments
 
(1,459
)
 
(1,992
)
Obligation at Dec. 31
 
$
16,768

 
$
17,153


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
 
$
746

 
$
647

Actual return on plan assets
 
(15
)
 
(13
)
Plan participants’ contributions
 
284

 
621

Employer contributions
 
956

 
1,483

Benefit payments
 
(1,459
)
 
(1,992
)
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
 
$
512

 
$
746


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Funded Status of Plans at Dec. 31:
 
 
 
 
Funded status
 
$
(16,256
)
 
$
(16,407
)
Current liabilities
 
(1,022
)
 
(718
)
Noncurrent liabilities
 
(15,234
)
 
(15,689
)
Net postretirement amounts recognized on consolidated balance sheets
 
$
(16,256
)
 
$
(16,407
)

(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
10,461

 
$
11,098

Prior service credit
 
(2,836
)
 
(3,187
)
Total
 
$
7,625

 
$
7,911


(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
 
 
 
 
Current regulatory assets
 
$
95

 
$
570

Noncurrent regulatory assets
 
7,530

 
7,341

Total
 
$
7,625

 
$
7,911


Measurement date
 
Dec. 31, 2014
 
Dec. 31, 2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
 
 
 
 
Discount rate for year-end valuation
 
4.08
%
 
4.82
%
Mortality table
 
RP 2014

 
RP 2000

Health care costs trend rate — initial
 
6.50
%
 
7.00
%


Effective Jan. 1, 2015, the initial medical trend rate was decreased from 7.0 percent to 6.5 percent. The ultimate trend assumption remained at 4.5 percent. The period until the ultimate rate is reached is four years. Xcel Energy Inc. and NSP-Wisconsin base the medical trend assumption on the long-term cost inflation expected in the health care market, considering the levels projected and recommended by industry experts, as well as recent actual medical cost increases experienced by the retiree medical plan.

A one-percent change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects on NSP-Wisconsin:
 
 
One-Percentage Point
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Increase
 
Decrease
APBO
 
$
1,722

 
$
(1,450
)
Service and interest components
 
98

 
(80
)


Cash Flows — The postretirement health care plans have no funding requirements under income tax and other retirement-related regulations other than fulfilling benefit payment obligations, when claims are presented and approved under the plans. Additional cash funding requirements are prescribed by certain state and federal rate regulatory authorities, as discussed previously. Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, contributed $17.1 million, $17.6 million and $47.1 million during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which $1.0 million, $1.5 million and $1.9 million were attributable to NSP-Wisconsin. Xcel Energy expects to contribute approximately $12.8 million during 2015, of which $1.5 million is attributable to NSP-Wisconsin.

Plan Amendments — In 2014 and 2013, there were no plan amendments made which affected the benefit obligation.

Benefit Costs — The components of NSP-Wisconsin’s net periodic postretirement benefit costs were:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost
 
$
35

 
$
25

 
$
20

Interest cost
 
791

 
760

 
1,075

Expected return on plan assets
 
(52
)
 
(42
)
 
(50
)
Amortization of transition obligation
 

 
1

 
171

Amortization of prior service credit
 
(351
)
 
(351
)
 
(14
)
Amortization of net loss
 
666

 
963

 
486

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
 
$
1,089

 
$
1,356

 
$
1,688


 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
4.82
%
 
4.10
%
 
5.00
%
Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
 
7.08

 
7.11

 
6.75



In addition to the benefit costs in the table above, for the postretirement health care plans sponsored by Xcel Energy, Inc., costs are allocated to NSP-Wisconsin based on Xcel Energy Services Inc. employees’ labor costs.

Projected Benefit Payments

The following table lists NSP-Wisconsin’s projected benefit payments for the pension and postretirement benefit plans:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Projected Pension
Benefit Payments
 
Gross Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
 
Expected Medicare
Part D Subsidies
 
Net Projected
Postretirement
Health Care
Benefit Payments
2015
 
$
12,517

 
$
1,547

 
$
13

 
$
1,534

2016
 
13,288

 
1,473

 
11

 
1,462

2017
 
13,164

 
1,397

 
9

 
1,388

2018
 
12,564

 
1,352

 
8

 
1,344

2019
 
13,289

 
1,311

 
7

 
1,304

2020-2024
 
65,118

 
5,816

 
30

 
5,786



Multiemployer Plans

NSP-Wisconsin contributes to several union multiemployer pension plans, none of which are individually significant. These plans provide pension benefits to certain union employees, including electrical workers and other construction and facilities workers who may perform services for more than one employer during a given period and do not participate in the NSP-Wisconsin sponsored pension plans. Contributing to these types of plans creates risk that differs from providing benefits under NSP-Wisconsin sponsored plans, in that if another participating employer ceases to contribute to a multiemployer plan, additional unfunded obligations may need to be funded over time by remaining participating employers.

Contributions to multiemployer plans were as follows for the years ended Dec. 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. There were no significant changes to the nature or magnitude of the participation of NSP-Wisconsin in multiemployer plans for the years presented:
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Multiemployer plan contributions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension
 
$
156

 
$
130

 
$
163

Total
 
$
156

 
$
130

 
$
163