10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 1-9511

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	94-2490990
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
350 Woodview Avenue, Morgan Hill, California	95037
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(408) 782-6686

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed, since last year)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

5,096,734 shares of Common Stock as of November 1, 2013

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page No.
Part I. Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements		1
	Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		11
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		18
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		19
Part II. Other Information
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		19
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		19
	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		19
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		19
	Item 5.	Other Information		20
	Item 6.	Exhibits		20
SIGNATURES				S-1
INDEX TO EXHIBITS				E-1
	Exhibit 10.99	Seventeenth Amendment, dated November 12, 2013, to Bank Credit Line Agreement between the Company and Bank of America, N.A.
	Exhibit 31.1	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	Exhibit 31.2	Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	Exhibit 32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	Exhibit 32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	Exhibit 101	XBRL (eXtensive Business Reporting Language). The following financial materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013, formatted in WBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

(i)

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,236	$	1,942
Accounts receivable – net of allowances of $349 and $311	$	8,323	$	9,933
Inventories		28,077		30,289
Other current assets		2,182		3,207
Total current assets		42,818		45,371
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net		1,236		1,188
Other Assets		2,447		3,100
Total Assets	$	46,501	$	49,659
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	4,322	$	6,135
Accrued liabilities		3,879		3,518
Total current liabilities		8,201		9,653
Long-Term Obligations		8,757		10,933
Total Liabilities		16,958		20,586
Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $.001 par value: 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding:		—		—
Common stock, $.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 5,096,734 and 4,923,431 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		17,968		17,766
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,527		1,904
Retained earnings		10,048		9,403
Total Stockholders’ Equity		29,543		29,073
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	46,501	$	49,659

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Net sales	$	33,101	$	34,484	$	94,063	$	92,847
Cost of sales, including distribution costs		27,002		28,796		76,624		78,141
Gross profit		6,099		5,688		17,439		14,706
Selling, general and administrative expenses		5,059		5,128		15,572		14,904
Operating income (loss)		1,040		560		1,867		(198	)
Other expense
Interest		119		127		477		415
Other		13		35		24		46
		132		162		501		461
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		908		398		1,366		(659	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		421		91		721		(125	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	487	$	307	$	645	$	(534	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.10	$	0.07	$	0.14	$	(0.12	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.10	$	0.07	$	0.14	$	(0.12	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (LOSS)

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013			2012
Net earnings (loss)	$	487	$	307	$	645		$	(534	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		204		387		(377	)		450
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	691	$	694	$	268		$	(84	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

Nine months ended September 30,

(Unaudited)

	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)	$	645		$	(534	)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		468			507
Stock-based compensation expense		228			333
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(10	)		(9	)
Deferred income taxes		625			57
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,610			1,920
Inventories		2,212			(4,817	)
Other current assets		936			346
Accounts payable		(1,814	)		1,813
Accrued liabilities		361			322
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		5,261			(62	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		12			18
Capital expenditures		(322	)		(288	)
Increase in other assets		(95	)		(145	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(405	)		(415	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under line of credit agreement		100,135			102,462
Repayments under line of credit agreement		(102,311	)		(101,624	)
Common stock cancelled in payment of payroll taxes due on vesting of restricted shares under employee stock incentive plans		(49	)		—
Excess tax benefit (shortfall) from stock-based payments		—			(13	)
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity incentive plans		24			3
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(2,201	)		828
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(361	)		432
NET INCREASE IN CASH		2,294			783
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period		1,942			4,180
Cash and cash equivalents end of period	$	4,236		$	4,963

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Significant Accounting Policies. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “2012 10-K”). All of the other financial statements contained in this report are unaudited and condensed and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles and SEC rules applicable to interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2013 and its consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note A to the Company’s audited financial statements included in its 2012 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 29, 2013. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included in this report, and the notes that follow, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our 2012 10-K.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, and useful lives of property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, warranty liability, and other contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of certain of our assets and liabilities. However, such estimates and the assumptions on which they were based may later prove to have been incorrect due to unforeseen changes in market or economic conditions or the occurrence of unexpected events. As a result, the carrying values of our assets and our results of operations could differ in the future from the carrying values and the results of operations that were based on our earlier estimates and assumptions. See “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Item 2 of Part I of this report.

2. Seasonality. The Company’s business is seasonal and its results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any other interim period during, or for the full year ending, December 31, 2013. See “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – Seasonality and Inflation” in Item 2 of Part I of this Report.

3. Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share for each period are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during such period. Unvested restricted shares are excluded from outstanding shares for purposes of this calculation. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and unvested restricted shares (using the treasury stock method). However, unvested restricted shares are excluded from this computation. Other potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, options to purchase 107,000 shares of our common stock and 357,593 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, options to purchase 263,000 shares of common stock and 317,001 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. These options and restricted shares were excluded because either (i) their respective exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during these periods, or (ii) the inclusion, in the calculation of common stock equivalents under the Treasury method, of the unvested compensation expense attributable to those options or restricted shares would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, options to purchase 107,000 shares of common stock and 357,593 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. All of the Company’s common shares issuable on exercise of stock options and all unvested restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the first nine months of 2012, because the Company incurred a net loss in that period and, as a result, the inclusion of those securities would have been anti-dilutive.

5

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Cont.-)

The table which follows sets forth the manner in which diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were calculated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss)	$	487	$	307	$	645	$	(534	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)		4,712		4,607		4,679		4,590
Dilutive effect of stock options and non-vested restricted shares		92		57		81		—
Denominator for diluted net earnings (loss) per share		4,804		4,664		4,760		4,590

(1) Does not include unvested restricted shares.

4. Commitments. The Company leases its corporate offices, warehouse facilities and data processing equipment. Those leases are classified as operating leases as they do not meet the required capitalization criteria. The office and warehouse leases expire over the next ten years. Minimum future rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Year Ending December 31,	(In thousands)
2013 (remaining three months)	$	922
2014		3,618
2015		3,443
2016		2,882
2017		629
Thereafter		1,419
	$	12,913

5. Operating Segment. The Company has one operating segment, the distribution of replacement parts, accessories and supplies for the recreation industry. The following table sets forth the net sales, by region, for the periods presented below:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
USA	$	25,240	$	25,991	$	71,606	$	69,075
Canada		7,861		8,493		22,457		23,772
	$	33,101	$	34,484	$	94,063	$	$92,847

6. Stock-Based Compensation. In August 2012, our stockholders approved the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which provides for the grant of equity incentives, consisting of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units to officers, other key employees, directors and consultants. The 2012 Plan initially set aside, for the grant of equity incentives, 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, plus an additional 17,666 shares which was equal to the total number of shares that were then available for grants of new equity incentives under our stockholder-approved stock incentive plans that were in effect immediately prior to the approval of the 2012 Plan (the “Previously Approved Plans”). At the same time, those 17,666 shares ceased to be issuable under the Previously Approved Plans. At September 30, 2013, options to purchase a total of 284,000 shares of our common stock and a total of 374,497 of unvested restricted shares were outstanding under the 2012 Plan and the

6

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Cont.-)

Previously Approved Plans. As of that same date, 299,530 shares remained available for future equity incentive grants under the 2012 Plan, whereas no shares remained available for future equity incentive grants under the Previously Approved Plans.

The Previously Approved Plans had provided that, if any options outstanding under any of those Plans were to expire or otherwise terminate unexercised, or if any restricted shares outstanding under any of those Plans were to be forfeited or reacquired by the Company, the shares that had been subject to those equity incentives would become available for the grant of new options or other equity incentives under those Previously Approved Plans. However, the 2012 Plan provides that those shares will, instead, cease to be available for the grant of new equity incentives under the Previously Approved Plans and the number of shares that will be available for future equity incentives under the 2012 Plan will be increased by an equal number of shares.

The fair value of each outstanding option is estimated as of its date of grant using a binomial model. This model incorporates certain assumptions including a risk-free market interest rate, expected dividend yield of the underlying common stock, expected option life and expected volatility in the market value of the underlying common stock.

Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk free interest rate is based upon market yields for United States Treasury debt securities. The expected dividend yield is based upon the Company’s dividend policy and the fair market value of the Company’s shares at the time of grant. Expected lives are based on several factors, including the average holding period of outstanding options, their remaining terms and the cycle of our long range business plan.

We used the following weighted average assumptions in estimating the fair values of the options granted in the periods indicated below:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Stock Incentive Plans:
Expected volatility		66.0	%		59.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.64	%		1.64	%
Expected dividend yields		N/A			N/A
Expected lives		10 years			10 years

The weighted averaged grant-date fair values of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $2.82 and $1.28, respectively.

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013:

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Average Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		433,000		$	3.60
Granted		8,000			3.87
Exercised		(25,500	)		0.95
Forfeited		(131,500	)		4.83
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		284,000		$	3.28		2.4 years	$	433,900
Exercisable at September 30, 2013		276,000		$	3.27		2.2 years	$	433,900
Options vested and expected, as of September 30, 2013, to vest thereafter		284,000		$	3.28		2.4 years	$	433,900

The average intrinsic value set forth in the above table represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the average of the differences between the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on September 30, 2013 and the exercise prices of the then outstanding in-the-money options) that would have been realized by the option holders if all of the in-the-money options had been exercised on September 30, 2013.

7

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Cont.-)

A summary of the status of the Company’s unvested options as of September 30, 2013 and changes during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 is presented below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2013		8,000		$	1.28
Granted		8,000			2.82
Vested		(8,000	)		1.28
Forfeited		—			—
Unvested at September 30, 2013		8,000		$	2.82

Unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options granted under the Company’s 2012 Plan and Previously Approved Plans totaled $18,000 and $9,000 as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average periods of 0.5 years and 1.0 years from September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. At September 30, 2013 a total of 284,000 shares of our common stock were subject to outstanding stock options that were exercisable or were expected to become exercisable in the future.

Restricted Shares of Common Stock. During the first three months of 2010, we began granting awards of restricted shares of common stock to some of our officers and other key management employees. Restricted shares generally vest in equal annual increments over a three or four year service period. Compensation expense for such awards, which is based on the fair market value of the awards on their respective dates of grant, is recorded over those service periods.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Compensation Committee granted, under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, a total of 167,500 performance contingent restricted shares to our officers and other key management employees. One third of these performance contingent shares will vest, in each of 2013, 2014 and 2015, only if the Company achieves a specified annual financial performance goal for such year. Stock based compensation expense with respect to each one-third of these shares will be recognized only if, and when, a determination is made that the Company’s achievement of the performance goal for any of those years has become probable. However, if any compensation expense were to be recognized based on a determination that achievement of a performance goal had become probable, but the performance goal is not ultimately achieved (due, for example, to the occurrence of subsequent changes in market or economic conditions or other circumstances that adversely affect the Company’s financial performance during the remainder of the year), then, the previously recognized stock-based compensation expense would be reversed. As of September 30, 2013, achievement of the fiscal 2013 performance goal had not become probable. As a result, no stock-based compensation expense was recorded for any of the performance-contingent restricted shares in either the quarter or nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Under our Equity Incentive Plans, employees who hold restricted shares may, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, elect to satisfy their tax withholding obligations which arise upon the vesting of restricted shares, by instructing the Company to cancel a number of those shares with a fair market value, measured as of the vesting date, equal to the amount of the withholding obligations.

A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted share activity follows:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Values
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		312,501		$	3.39
Granted		167,500			2.96
Vested		(105,504	)		(3.29	)
Forfeited		—			—
Unvested at September 30, 2013		374,497		$	3.23

Unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested service-contingent restricted shares totaled approximately $495,800 and $700,000 at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This cost is expected to be recognized generally over weighted average periods of 2.4 years and 1.7 years measured, respectively, from

8

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Cont.-)

September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012. All 374,497 shares of our unvested service contingent restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2013 are expected to vest. The aggregate intrinsic value of these shares was $1,438,070 as of September 30, 2013.

We recognized stock-based compensation expense of $63,000 and $114,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $228,000 and $333,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

7. Warranty Reserve. We generally do not independently warrant the products that we sell. Instead, in most instances, the manufacturers of the products warrant the products and allow us to return and receive a credit for defective products, including those that have been returned to us by our customers. However, we sell a line of portable generators under a product supply arrangement which obligates us to provide warranty service for these products and to share the costs of providing those services with the manufacturer. We maintain a reserve for warranty claims against which the warranty costs we incur are charged. We replenish or make additions to the reserve from time to time, based primarily on our warranty claims experience and the volume of generators we sell, by a provision we make for warranty claims, recorded as a component of costs of products sold, in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

Accrued warranty expense (in thousands of dollars), which is included in accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:

	2013			2012
Accrued warranty balance – January 1,	$	690		$	564
Warranty costs incurred		(854	)		(895	)
Provision for warranty expense		926			1024
Accrued warranty balance – September 30,	$	762		$	693

8. Fair Value Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities. We apply fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. We define fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and credit risk.

GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring the fair values of such financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. These tiers consist of:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

9

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Cont.-)

The following tables summarize the fair value measurements (in thousands of dollars) of our financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	At September 30, 2013
	Total		Quoted market prices in active markets (level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (level 2)
Cash Equivalents – Overnight Investments	$	3,016	$	—	$	3,016

As the above table indicates, at September 30, 2013, we had no financial assets that were required to be recognized at fair value.

	At December 31, 2012
	Total		Quoted market prices in active markets (level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (level 2)
Cash Equivalents – Overnight Investments	$	1,283	$	—	$	1,283

The Company had no level 3 assets or liabilities at September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

We sometimes purchase derivative instruments primarily to hedge our foreign currency exchange risks. However, we had no derivatives at September 30, 2013 or 2012. We use the income approach when valuing such derivatives, using observable Level 2 market expectations at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single discounted present amount, assuming that participants are motivated but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs are limited to quoted prices that are observable for the asset and liabilities, which include interest rate and credit risk. We have used mid-market pricing as a practical expedient for fair value measurements.

9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements. With the exception of the items discussed below, there have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements that we believe are of significance, or potential significance, to the Company based on our current operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued amended guidance for impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets. The guidance allows for an option to first access qualitative factors to determine whether the existence or events or circumstances leads to a determination that is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds it carrying amount. If the qualitative facts lead us to conclude it is more likely than not that the fair value exceeds to carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset, then the fair value does not need to be calculated. This update was effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for the fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Accordingly, the amended guidance is effective for the year ending December 31, 2013. This new standard, which we adopted in the first quarter of 2013, has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB amended the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) to require entities to provide information about amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income by component. The Company is required to present, either on the face of its financial statements or in the notes thereto, amounts that have been reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) to the respective line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). This new standard, which we adopted in the first quarter of 2013, has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance related to the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The guidance requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

10

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward Looking Information and Factors that Could Affect Our Future Financial Performance

Statements contained in this Report that are not historical facts or that discuss our expectations, beliefs or views regarding our future financial performance or future financial condition, or financial or trends in our business or in the markets in which we operate, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Often, they include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.” Such forward-looking statements are based on current information that is available to us, and on assumptions that we make, about future events over which we do not have control. In addition, our business and the markets in which we operate are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Such risks and uncertainties, and unexpected future events, could cause our financial condition or actual operating results in the future to differ significantly from our expected financial condition and operating results that are set forth in the forward looking statements contained in this Report and could, therefore, also affect the price performance of our shares.

The principal risks and uncertainties to which our business is subject are discussed in (i) Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (our “2012 10-K”) that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 29, 2013, and (ii) in the subsection below in this Item 2 captioned “Management Overview-Factors Generally Affecting Sales of RV and Boating Products”. Therefore, you are urged to read not only the information contained below in this Item 2, but also the risk factors and other cautionary information contained in Item 1A of our 2012 10-K, which qualify the forward looking statements contained in this report.

Due to these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report and not to make predictions about our future financial performance based solely on our historical financial performance. We also disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this Report or in our 2012 10-K or any other of our filings previously made with the SEC, except as may otherwise be required by law or the rules of the American Stock Exchange.

Management Overview

We believe that we are one of the largest wholesale distributors of replacement parts, accessories and supplies for recreational vehicles (“RVs”), and boats in North America. We supply more than 10,000 products and serve more than 10,000 customers throughout the United States and Canada, from 13 regional distribution centers in the United States and 4 regional distribution centers in Canada. Our sales are made primarily to retail parts and supplies stores, service and repair establishments and new and used RV and boat dealers (“After-Market Customers”). Ours sales to our Aftermarket Customers are affected primarily by (i) the usage of RVs and boats by consumers, because such usage affects their need for and their purchases of replacement parts, repair services and supplies from our Aftermarket Customers, and (ii) sales of new RVs and boats, because consumers often “accessorize” their RVs and boats at the time of purchase.

Factors Generally Affecting Sales of RV and Boating Products

Our sales and operating results are directly affected by the extent to which consumers purchase and use RVs and boats. Such purchases and usage, in turn, depend, in large measure, upon the extent of discretionary income available to consumers, their confidence about future economic conditions and the availability of credit that consumers often use to finance the purchase of RVs and boats, each of which can affect the willingness and ability of consumers to use and purchase RVs and boats. As a result, recessionary conditions or a tightening in the availability or increases in the costs of credit often lead consumers to reduce their purchases and, to a lesser extent, their usage of RVs and boats and, therefore, their purchases of the products that we sell. Additionally, increases in the prices and shortages in the supply of gasoline can lead to declines in the usage and purchases of RVs and boats, because these conditions increase the costs of, and can create difficulties for consumers in, using RVs and boats.

11

Weather conditions also can affect our operating results. Purchases and the usage of RVs and boats declines in the winter months. As a result, our sales and operating results in the first and fourth calendar quarters generally are lower than in the second and third calendar quarters of the year. See “Seasonality and Inflation” below. Moreover, our sales and operating results can be adversely affected if unusually severe or winter weather conditions occur during the spring or summer months, because conditions of this nature will cause consumers to reduce their usage of RVs and boats, therefore, their purchases of the products we sell during periods when such purchases and usage ordinarily increase.

These same conditions, in turn, affect the willingness and ability of Aftermarket Customers to purchase the products that we sell. Aftermarket Customers will reduce their purchases of products from us if consumer demand for those products declines, or Aftermarket Customers lose confidence about future economic conditions or encounter difficulties in obtaining or affording bank financing they need to fund their working capital requirements. Moreover, during the winter, as well as any other periods of the year that may encounter unusually adverse weather conditions, Aftermarket Customers also reduce their purchases of the products we sell due to declines in the usage and purchases of RVs and boats by consumers. By contrast, when the economy is strong and financing is readily available, and weather conditions are good, Aftermarket Customers are more willing to increase their product purchases in order to be able to meet expected increases in consumer demand.

As a result, our sales and operating results can be, and in the past have been, affected by economic conditions, the availability and the costs of consumer and business financing, the supply and prices of gasoline and weather conditions.

Overview of Operating Results for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2013

The following table compares our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 to our results of operations for the same corresponding periods of 2012:

	Three Months Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Amounts				% Change			Amounts					% Change
	2013		2012		2013 vs. 2012			2013		2012			2013 vs. 2012
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales	$	33,101	$	34,484		(4.0	)%	$	94,063	$	92,847			1.3	%
Cost of sales (including distribution costs)		27,002		28,796		(6.2	)%		76,624		78,141			1.9	%
Gross profit		6,099		5,688		7.2	%		17,439		14,706			18.6	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		5,059		5,128		(1.3	)%		15,572		14,904			4.5	%
Operating income (loss)		1,040		560		85.7	%		1,867		(198	)		1,042.9	%
Other expense, net		132		162		(18.5	)%		501		461			8.7	%
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		908		398		128.1	%		1,366		(659	)		307.3	%
Income taxes provision (benefit)		421		91		362.6	%		721		(125	)		676.8	%
Net earnings (loss)	$	487	$	307		58.6	%	$	645	$	(534	)		220.8	%
Earnings (loss) per common share – Basic	$	0.10	$	0.07		42.9	%	$	0.14	$	(0.12	)		216.7	%
Earnings (loss) per common share – Diluted	$	0.10	$	0.07		42.9	%	$	0.14	$	(0.12	)		216.7	%

Operating Income. In this year’s third quarter, operating income increased by $480,000, or 85.7%, to $1.0 million, as compared to operating income of $560,000 in the third quarter of 2012, due primarily to a $411,000, or 7.2%, increase in gross profits and a $69,000, or 1.3%, decrease in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, operating income improved by $2.1 million to nearly $1.9 million, from a loss from operations of $198,000 in the same period of 2012. That improvement was due primarily to increases of $1.2 million, or 1.3%, in net sales and of $2.7 million, or 18.6%, in gross profits, partially offset by a $668,000, or 4.5%, increase in SG&A expenses.

The increases in gross profits in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were due primarily to a change in the mix of products sold to a higher proportion of our proprietary products on which we generate higher margins than on sales of other products, and selected price increases which we implemented in the first quarter of 2013.

Net Earnings. As the above table indicates, due primarily to increases in operating income, our net earnings increased by $180,000, or 59%, to $487,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2013, and by $1.2 million, or 221%, to $645,000, in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same corresponding periods of 2012. The positive impact on our net earnings of those increases in operating income was partially offset, however, by significant increases in the provision for income taxes in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, due primarily to increases in our effective income tax rates in both of those periods. Earnings per diluted share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased to $0.10 and $0.14, respectively, as compared to earnings of $0.07 per diluted share and a loss of $0.12 per diluted share, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

12

Additional information regarding our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 is set forth under the caption “Results of Operations” below.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

General

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we record most of our assets at the lower of cost or fair value. In the case of some of our assets, principally accounts receivable, inventories and deferred income taxes, we make adjustments to their cost or fair values to arrive at what we expect to be able to collect on outstanding accounts receivables, the amounts for which we expect to be able to sell our inventories and the amount of available tax loss and credit carryforwards and deductions that we will be able to use to reduce our future income tax liability. Those adjustments are made on the basis of estimates which require us to make assumptions and judgments regarding economic and market conditions and trends and their impact on our financial performance. However, those assumptions and judgments are necessarily based on current information available to us. If those conditions or trends were to change in ways that we did not expect, or other unexpected events were to occur, then, pursuant to GAAP, we may be required to further adjust the carrying values at which we record these assets for financial reporting purposes. Any resulting downward adjustments are commonly referred to as “write-downs” of the assets affected by the changed conditions.

It is our practice to establish reserves or allowances against which we are able to charge any such downward adjustments or “write-downs” to these assets. Examples include an allowance established for uncollectible accounts receivable (sometimes referred to as “bad debt reserves”), an allowance for inventory obsolescence, a reserve for product warranty claims and a valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset to the extent necessary to reduce its carrying value to the amount of that asset that we believe we are likely to be able to use to reduce our income tax liability in future periods. The amounts at which those allowances or reserves are established and maintained involve estimates that are based on our historical experience and also on our assumptions and judgments about economic or market conditions or trends and any other factors that could affect the values at which we had recorded such assets. We periodically increase or replenish the allowances following write-downs of uncollectible accounts or to take account of increased risks due to changes in economic or market conditions or trends. Increases in the allowances are effectuated by charges to income or increases in expense in the periods when those allowances are increased. As a result, our judgments or assumptions about market and economic conditions or trends and about their effects on our financial performance can and will affect not only the amounts at which we record these assets on our balance sheet, but also our results of operations.

The decisions as to the timing of (i) adjustments or write-downs of this nature and (ii) the increases we make to our allowances or reserves, also require subjective evaluations or assessments about the effects and duration of changes in economic or market conditions or trends. For example, it is difficult to predict whether events or changes in economic or market conditions, such as increasing gasoline prices or interest rates or economic downturns, will be of short or long-term duration, and it is not uncommon for it to take some time after the onset of such changes for their full effects on our business to be recognized. However, we are only able to make such estimates based upon the information available to us at that time and, for that reason, we reevaluate our estimates and judgments on a quarterly basis and, if necessary, we adjust the reserves and allowances for potential write-downs based on the most current information then available to us.

13

Under GAAP, most businesses also must make estimates or judgments regarding the periods during which sales are recorded and also the amounts at which they are recorded. Those estimates and judgments will depend on such factors as the steps or actions that a business must take to complete a sale of products to or to perform services for a customer and the circumstances under which a customer would be entitled to return the products or reject or adjust the payment for the services rendered to it. Additionally, in the case of a business that grants its customers contractual rights to return products sold to them, GAAP requires that a reserve or allowance be established for product returns by means of a reduction in the amount at which its sales are recorded, based primarily on the nature, extensiveness and duration of those rights and historical return experience.

In making our estimates and assumptions we follow GAAP and accounting practices applicable to our business that we believe will enable us to make fair and consistent estimates of the carrying value of those assets and to establish adequate reserves or allowances for downward adjustments in those values that we may have to make in future periods.

Our Critical Accounting Policies

Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that we believe are material to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations that are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition and the Allowance for Product Returns. We recognize revenue from the sale of a product upon its shipment to the customer. Shipping and handling costs that are billed to our customers are included in revenue and our shipping and handling costs are included in costs of sales. We provide our customers with limited rights to return products that we sell to them. We establish an allowance for potential returns that reduces the amounts of our reported sales. We estimate the allowance based primarily on historical experience with returns of like products.

Accounts Receivable and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. In the normal course of our business we extend 30 day payment terms to our customers and, due to the seasonality of our business, during late fall and winter we sometimes grant payment terms of longer duration to those of our customers that have good credit records. We regularly review our customers’ accounts and estimate the amount of, and establish an allowance for, uncollectible accounts receivable in each reporting period. The amount of the allowance is based on several factors, including the age of unpaid amounts, a review of significant past due accounts and current economic and market trends that can affect the ability of customers to keep their accounts current. Estimates of uncollectible amounts are reviewed periodically to determine if the allowance should be increased, and any increases are recorded in the accounting period in which the events or circumstances that require such increases become known. Since the allowance is increased or replenished by recording a charge which is included in, and has the effect of increasing, selling, general and administrative expenses, an increase in the allowance will reduce income in the period when the increase is recorded.

Inventory and Reserve for Excess, Slow-Moving and Obsolete Inventory. We are a wholesale distributor and not a manufacturer of products and, therefore, all of our inventory consists of finished goods. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value and that value is reduced by an allowance for excess and slowing-moving or obsolete inventories. The amount of the allowance is determined on the basis of historical experience with different product lines and estimates or assumptions concerning future economic and market conditions and trends. If there is an economic downturn or a decline in sales, causing inventories of some product lines to accumulate, it may become necessary for us to increase the allowance. Increases in this allowance will cause a decline in operating results as such increases are effectuated by charges against income. Our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory was $1,363,000, or approximately 4.8% of gross inventory, at September 30, 2013 and $1,383,000, or approximately 4.5% of gross inventory, at September 30, 2012.

Deferred Tax Asset and Valuation Allowance. We record as a “deferred tax asset” on our balance sheet an amount equal to the tax credit and tax loss carryforwards and tax deductions (“tax benefits”) that we believe will be available to us to offset or reduce the amounts of our income taxes in future periods. Under applicable federal and state income tax laws and regulations, such tax benefits generally will expire if not used within specified periods of time. Accordingly, the ability to fully use our deferred tax asset depends on the amount of taxable income that we generate during those time periods. At least once each year, we make estimates of future taxable income that we believe we are likely to generate during those future periods. If we conclude, on the basis of those estimates and the aggregate amount of the tax benefits available to us, that it is more likely, than not, that we will be able to fully utilize those tax benefits prior to their expiration, we recognize the deferred tax asset in full on our balance sheet. On the other hand, if we conclude on the basis of those estimates and the aggregate amount of the tax benefits available to us that it is more

14

likely, than not, that we will be unable to utilize those tax benefits in their entirety prior to their expiration, then we would establish (or increase any existing) valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax asset on our balance sheet to the amount that we believe we will be able to utilize. That reduction would be implemented by recognizing a non-cash charge that would have the effect of increasing the provision, or reducing any credit, for income taxes that would otherwise be recorded in our statement of operations. The aggregate amount of our net deferred tax asset was approximately $2.6 million at September 30, 2013 and $2.9 million at September 30, 2012.

Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets are reviewed for possible impairment at least annually or if and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of any of those assets may not be recoverable in full, by comparing the fair value of the long-lived asset to its carrying amount.

Foreign Currency Translation. The financial position and results of operations of our Canadian and other foreign subsidiaries are measured using local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of each foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange in effect at the end of each reporting period. Revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the reporting period. Foreign currency translation gains and losses not impacting cash flows are credited to or charged against other comprehensive earnings. Foreign currency translation gains and losses arising from cash transactions are credited to or charged against current earnings.

Stock-Based Compensation. We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation, which requires the recognition of the fair value of compensation paid in stock or other equity instruments as an expense in the calculation of net earnings (loss). We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the respective vesting periods of the individual equity instruments. The vesting of some restricted shares is conditioned on the achievement of one or more specific performance goals in addition to continued service. In those instances, we recognize compensation expense at such time as we determine that it has become probable that the performance goal will be achieved. In the event we later determine that the performance goal was not achieved, we would reverse any previously recognized compensation expense. Stock-based compensation expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, totaled $63,000 and $114,000, respectively, and $228,000 and $333,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Results of Operations

Net Sales

Net sales consist of revenues from the sales of the products we supply or distribute, net of an allowance for product returns. The following table sets forth and compares our net sales (in thousands of dollars) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
Amounts				% Change			Amounts				% Change
2013		2012		2013 vs. 2012			2013		2012		2013 vs. 2012
(Unaudited)
$	33,101	$	34,484		(4.0	)%	$	94,063	$	92,847		1.3	%

The decline in sales in the three months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period of 2012, was primarily the result of (i) mild summer weather through the Midwest, Northeast, Southeast and Canada, which resulted in significantly lower sales of air conditioners, (ii) a reported decrease in the usage of RVs, and (iii) some initial large stocking orders in the third quarter of 2012 from specialty retailers commencing sales of certain of our proprietary products. By contrast, purchases by these specialty retailers in this year’s third quarter were made primarily to replenish or increase their inventories to meet on-going purchases by their customers. The increase in sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period of 2012, was primarily the result of a number of different factors, including a strengthening of economic conditions and an increase in consumer confidence which led to increases in purchases of RVs and, therefore, in the products we sell, our implementation of new marketing programs, and an increase in sales of our proprietary products to specialty retailers and mass merchandisers, which represents a new distribution channel for us.

15

Gross Profit

Gross profit is calculated by subtracting the cost of sales from net sales. Cost of sales consists primarily of the amounts paid to manufacturers and suppliers for the products that we purchase for resale, and warehouse and distribution costs, including warehouse labor costs and freight charges. Gross margin is gross profits stated as a percentage of net sales.

The following table compares our gross profits (in thousands of dollars) and our gross margin in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Gross profit	$	6,099		$	5,688		$	17,439		$	14,706
Gross Margin		18.4	%		16.5	%		18.5	%		15.8	%

The increases in our gross profits and our gross margin in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same respective periods of 2012, were primarily due to (i) a change in the mix of products sold to a greater proportion of our proprietary products, on which we generate higher gross margins, and (ii) selected price increases that we implemented in this year’s first quarter.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	5,059		$	5,128		$	15,572		$	14,904
As a percentage of net sales		15.3	%		14.9	%		16.6	%		16.1	%

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses declined by $69,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2013. However, as a percentage of net sales such expenses increased to 15.3%, from 14.9% of net sales in the same three months of 2012, due primarily to the decline in net sales in the three months ended September 30, 2013. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, SG&A expenses increased by $668,000, or 4.5% and, as a percentage of net sales, to 16.6% from 16.1% in the same nine months of 2012, due primarily to our implementation of new marketing initiatives and the hiring of additional sales people in order to grow our sales and to increase our penetration in the specialty retail channel in which we sell standby generators and other proprietary products.

Other Expense

The largest component of other expense is the interest expense that we incur on bank borrowings. To a lesser extent, other expense also includes foreign currency gains or losses and gains or losses on the disposal of assets.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest expense	$	119		$	127		$	477		$	415
Other expense		13			35			24			46
Total	$	132		$	162		$	501		$	461
As a percentage of net sales		0.4	%		0.5	%		0.5	%		0.5	%

16

Income Taxes

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income tax provision (benefit)	$	421		$	91		$	721		$	(125	)
Effective tax rate		46.4	%		22.9	%		52.8	%		19.0	%

Our effective income tax rate is affected primarily by the amount of our expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes, such as stock-based compensation expense, and by varying tax rates on income generated by our foreign subsidiaries, because tax rates in their respective countries vary, sometimes considerably, from income tax rates in the United States.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

We finance our working capital requirements for our operations primarily with borrowings under a long-term revolving bank line of credit and internally generated funds.

Our revolving bank line of credit agreement permits us to borrow up to the lesser of (i) $24 million, or (ii) an amount equal to 85% of the value of our eligible accounts receivable and up to 55% of the value of our eligible inventory. Our borrowing base under our revolving credit line was $14.6 million at September 30, 2013 as compared to $16.9 million at September 30, 2012. Our outstanding revolving credit line borrowings totaled approximately $8.8 million at September 30, 2013 and $7.1 million at October 30, 2013. Interest on our credit line borrowings is payable at the bank’s prime rate (3.25% at September 30, 2013) plus 1.75% or, at the Company’s option but subject to certain limitations, at the bank’s LIBOR rate (0.179% at September 30, 2013) plus 3.25%. Our bank borrowings are secured by substantially all of our assets, and rank senior in priority to other indebtedness of the Company. The maturity date of the revolving bank line of credit is July 10, 2017.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our operations generated cash of $5.3 million, comprised of a $2.2 million reduction in inventory, a $1.6 million reduction in accounts receivable, net income of $645,000 and $1,311,000 of non-cash expenses, partially offset by the use of $1.8 million of cash to reduce accounts payable. By comparison, in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we used $62,000 of cash in our operations, primarily to fund $4.8 million in inventories and a net loss of $534,000, which were partially offset by approximately $3.5 million of cash from operations, comprised primarily of (i) a $1.9 million reduction in accounts receivable, (ii) an $888,000 increase in non-cash expenses, (iii) a $346,000 reduction in other current assets, and (iv) an increase of $322,000 in accrued liabilities.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we used net cash of $405,000 in investing activities, consisting of $322,000 of capital expenditures, primarily for purchases of computer and office equipment, and a $95,000 increase in other assets. By comparison, we used $415,000 in investing activities in the first nine months of 2012, consisting of capital expenditures of $288,000, and a $145,000 increase in other assets.

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities. Cash provided by financing activities consists primarily of cash from our revolving credit line borrowings and cash used in financing activities consists primarily of repayments of such borrowings. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we used cash to repay credit line borrowings in an amount that exceeded our credit line borrowings by $2.2 million in that nine month period. By comparison, in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 financing activities provided us with cash of $828,000, consisting primarily of credit line borrowings in an amount that exceeded our repayments of credit line borrowings by $838,000 in that nine month period.

Lease and Other Contractual Obligations

We lease the majority of our facilities and certain of our equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Our future lease commitments are described in Note 4 of Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

17

included elsewhere in this report. Our other long term contractual obligations consist of borrowings under our long term revolving bank credit facility. The following table sets forth, by maturity dates, the total of our contractual obligations (in thousands of dollars), as of September 30, 2013:

	Total		Less than One Year		One to Three Years		Four to Five Years		More than Five Years
Contractual Obligations at September 30, 2013:
Long-term debt obligations	$	8,757	$	—	$	8,757	$	—	$	—
Operating lease obligations		12,913		922		7,061		3,511		1,419
Total	$	21,670	$	922	$	15,818	$	3,511	$	1,419

It is not possible to calculate future estimated interest payments on our credit line borrowings with any predictably, because the amounts of such borrowings fluctuate throughout the year depending on our liquidity needs and the amounts of our internally generated cash flow, which can vary widely primarily due to the seasonality of our business and the effects of prevailing economic conditions on the demand for and the purchases of our products by customers. In addition, the interest rate on those borrowings is determined by reference to the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR, which also can and often do fluctuate during the year. Furthermore, the formulas for determining the specific interest rate that will apply to such borrowings can change from year to year. Set forth above, under the caption “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” are the formulas for determining the interest rates that applied to those borrowings during the first nine months of 2013.

Expected Uses and Sources of Funds. We expect our principal uses for cash over the 12 month period ending September 30, 2014 will be to fund operations and capital expenditures and we anticipate that we will be able to fund those cash requirements with borrowings under our revolving credit facility and internally generated funds.

We will continue to explore opportunities to increase our sales and our market shares and to improve our profit margins. We plan to establish new product supply relationships, including relationships that enable us to increase the products that we source from lower cost, but high quality, overseas suppliers, including product suppliers in China and other countries in the Far East, and in Canada, Europe and the United States, and to invest in tooling needed for such products. In addition, we may consider acquiring other product distribution companies that would enable us to increase our sales if attractive opportunities arise to do so. As a result, we may have occasion in the future to use internally generated funds or bank borrowings for these purposes as well. However, there is no assurance that we will have sufficient funds to take advantage of acquisition opportunities or that we will be able to obtain any approvals required from our bank lender for any such acquisitions.

Seasonality and Inflation

Seasonality. Sales of recreational vehicle and boating parts, supplies and accessories are seasonal. We generate significantly higher sales during the six-month period from March through August, when usage of RVs and boats are at their peak, than we do during the remainder of the year when weather conditions are not optimal for outdoor activities. Because a substantial portion of our expenses are fixed, operating income declines and we may incur losses and must rely more heavily on borrowings to fund operating requirements during the period from September through February when our sales are lower.

Inflation. Generally, we have been able to pass inflationary price increases on to our customers. However, inflation also may cause or may be accompanied by increases in gasoline prices and interest rates. Such increases, or even the prospect of increases in the price or shortages in the supply of gasoline, can adversely affect the purchase and usage of RVs and boats, which can result in a decline in the demand for our products.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risk with respect to financial instruments is primarily related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowing activities, which may adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, we manage exposures through our regular operating and financing activities. The fair value of borrowings under our revolving credit facility approximates the carrying value of such obligations. As of September 30, 2013, outstanding borrowings under our bank revolving line of credit totaled approximately $8.8 million.

18

We have substantial sales operations in Canada and as a result, our earnings, cash flows and financial position can be affected by movements in the Canadian dollar exchange rate. Consequently, we are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations associated with our Canadian operations and our Canadian currency denominated debt. Therefore, from time to time, we may hedge the net investment of our foreign operations in Canada by purchasing foreign exchange derivatives, such as purchased put option contracts, to mitigate the risk of changes in the value of our net investment in our Canadian subsidiary that can occur as a result of changes in currency exchange rates. As of September 30, 2013 we held no foreign currency derivatives. We do not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any system of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

In accordance with SEC rules, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness, as of September 30 2013, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2013, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in the risk factors that were disclosed in Item 1A, under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I of our 2012 10-K.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

19

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

As discussed above in Item 2 of Part I of this report, entitled “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION”, the Company finances a substantial portion of its working capital requirements with borrowings under a long-term revolving bank line of credit, which is governed by that certain Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, as amended (the “Credit Line Agreement”) entered into by the Company with Bank of America N. A., as lender (the “Bank”).

The Credit Line Agreement contains a single financial covenant which requires the Company to achieve a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.10–to-1.0 for successive rolling 12 month periods ending on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The first of those rolling 12-month periods to which the covenant was to have been applicable was the 12 month period ended September 30, 2013.

On November 12, 2013, the Company and the Bank entered into the Seventeenth Amendment to the Credit Line Agreement (the “17th Amendment”), which provides, instead, that the first of those rolling 12-month periods to which that financial covenant will apply will be the 12 month period ending March 31, 2014. The 17th Amendment adds an additional financial covenant which requires the Company’s earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization expense (“EBITDA”) to total at least $500,000 for the twelve (12) months ending December 31, 2013.

The foregoing summary of the 17th Amendment is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to that Amendment, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.99 to, and by this reference is incorporated into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits.

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
10.99	Seventeenth Amendment, dated November 12, 2013, to Bank Credit Line Agreement between the Company and Bank of America, N.A.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101*	XBRL (eXtensive Business Reporting Language). The following financial materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

* As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

20

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.
Dated: November 14, 2013	By:	/S/    SANDRA A. KNELL
		Sandra A. Knell
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

S-1

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
10.99	Seventeenth Amendment, dated November 12, 2013, to Bank Credit Line Agreement between the Company and Bank of America, N.A.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101*	XBRL (eXtensive Business Reporting Language). The following financial materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

* As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

E-1

EX-10.99

Exhibit 10.99

November 12, 2013

The Coast Distribution System, Inc.

350 Woodview Avenue

Morgan Hill, California 95037

Re: Seventeenth Amendment

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Coast Distribution System, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Coast Delaware”), United Sales & Warehouse of Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation (“United Sales”), C/P Products Corp., an Indiana corporation (“C/P”), Mohawk Trailer Supply, Inc., a New York corporation (“Mohawk”), and Les Systemes De Distribution Coast (Canada) Inc. The Coast Distribution System (Canada) Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Quebec (“Coast Canada”) (Coast Delaware, United Sales, C/P, Mohawk, and Coast Canada are referred to individually as “Borrower” and collectively as “Borrowers”), and Bank of America, N.A., (in its individual capacity, “US Lender”), acting by and through Bank of America, N.A., a national banking association, as agent for US Lender (in such capacity, “Agent”) and Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada branch) (“Canadian Lender”), (US Lender, acting through Agent, and Canadian Lender are referred to collectively as “Lender”), have entered into that certain Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated August 30, 2005 (the “Security Agreement”). From time to time thereafter, Borrowers and Lender may have executed various amendments (each an “Amendment” and collectively the “Amendments”) to the Security Agreement (the Security Agreement and the Amendments hereinafter are referred to, collectively, as the “Agreement”). Borrowers and Lender now desire to further amend the Agreement as provided herein, subject to the terms and conditions set forth hereinafter set forth.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. The Agreement hereby is amended as follows:

(a) The definition of “Equity Interest” is hereby added to Section 1 of the Agreement in the appropriate alphabetical order as follows:

“Equity Interest” shall mean the interest of any (a) shareholder in a corporation; (b) partner in a partnership (whether general, limited, limited liability or joint venture); (c) member in a limited liability company; or (d) other Person having any other form of equity security or ownership interest.

(b) Subsection 4(c)(v) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(c)(v) Amendment Fee. Borrowers shall pay to Lender a one time fee of Fifteen Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($15,000.00), which shall be fully earned and payable on the date hereof.

(c) Section 13(d)(ii) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(d)(ii) No Borrower shall merge, amalgamate or consolidate with any other Person, or commence a dissolution or liquidation without the prior written consent of Lender, except that, without the Lender’s consent, any Borrower may merge with any other Borrower or Borrowers unless such merger would be contrary to clause (iv) of this subsection 13(d).

(d) Section 13(d)(iii) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(d)(iii) No Borrower shall enter into a transaction or series of transactions resulting in the acquisition of a business division or substantially all of the assets of a Person.

(e) Section 13(f) is hereby amended by amending and restating clause (i) thereof as follows:

(f)(i) purchase or otherwise acquire, or contract to purchase or otherwise acquire, the obligations or Equity Interests of any Person or make an advance or capital contribution or other investment in a Person, other than (x) direct obligations of the United States and Hedging Agreements for interest rate protection in accordance with subsection 12(l) hereof, obligations insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and obligations unconditionally guaranteed by the United States and (y) the Equity Interest of a Person (“Target”) provided that (1) the payments with respect to the acquisition of such Equity Interest (the “Acquisition”) shall not exceed $3,000,000 in the aggregate, (2) Lender shall be furnished a copy of the documentation evidencing the Acquisition, which shall be in form and substance satisfactory to Lender (the “Acquisition Documents”), (3) payments may be made in an amount not to exceed (a) $250,000 during the twelve (12) month period commencing on the date of this Seventeenth Amendment, (b) $250,000 during the succeeding twelve (12) month period, (c) $250,000 during the succeeding twelve (12) month period and (d) $2,250,000 during the succeeding twelve (12) month period, provided further that (i) at the time of the initial payment to be made pursuant to the Acquisition Documents, Borrowers shall have average Excess Availability (calculated after giving effect to the availability block of $1,000,000) of at least $2,500,000 for the thirty (30) day period prior to the making of such payment and, projected on a pro forma basis, for the thirty (30) day period subsequent to the making of such payment; provided that prior to making such payment, Borrowers shall provide projections of average Excess Availability for such thirty (30) day period and (ii) at the time of each subsequent payment made pursuant to the Acquisition Documents, Borrowers shall have average Excess Availability of at least $3,000,000 for the sixty (60) day period prior to the making of such payment and, projected on a pro forma basis, for the sixty (60) day period subsequent to the making of such payment; provided that prior to making such payment, Borrowers shall provide projections of average Excess Availability for such sixty (60) day period, (4) no Event of Default shall be in existence at the time of any such payment or would occur as a result of any such payment, (5) at the time that Target becomes a wholly owned Subsidiary of a Borrower, such Borrower shall pledge 100% of the Equity Interest of Target to Lender and Target shall become either a Borrower or a guarantor under the Agreement (6) Lender shall be satisfied with the corporate structure of Borrowers after giving effect to the Acquisition and (7) Lender may, in its sole discretion, consider lending on the assets of Target at such time as Target has become a wholly owned Subsidiary of a Borrower and Lender has completed its due diligence with respect to the Acquisition, including without limitation, review of the Acquisition Documents, completion of a field exam and a search of the public records and

(f) Subsection 14(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(a) Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio.

Borrowers shall not permit their Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for each period set forth below to be less than the ratio set forth below for the corresponding period set forth below (it being understood that the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is not being measured for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013):

Period	Ratio
For the 12 month period ending on March 31, 2014 and for each twelve (12) month period ending on the last day of each fiscal quarter thereafter	1.10:1.0

(g) Subsection 14(c) is hereby amended is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(c) EBITDA

Borrowers shall maintain EBITDA of at least $500,000 for the twelve (12) month period ending December 31, 2013.

2

2. Borrowers represent and warrant to Lender that this Amendment has been approved by all necessary corporate action, and each individual signing below represents and warrants that he or she is fully authorized to do so.

3. Except as expressly amended hereby and by any other supplemental documents or instruments executed by either party hereto in order to effectuate the transactions contemplated by this Amendment, the Agreement and all Exhibits thereto are ratified and confirmed by Borrowers and Lender and remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.

4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Amendment may be delivered by facsimile, and when so delivered will have the same force and effect as delivery of an original signature.

5. Borrowers shall reimburse Lender for all reasonable attorney’s fees (whether for internal or outside counsel) incurred by Lender in connection with the documentation and consummation of this Seventeenth Amendment to the Agreement.

6. Lender shall have received a copy of this Amendment executed by Borrowers and Lender, together with the Guarantor’s Acknowledgment attached hereto, executed by each Guarantor, and payment of the “Amendment Fee” required to be paid pursuant to Subsection 4(c)(v) hereof.

(Remainder of page intentionally blank; signatures follow)

3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and duly authorized officers as of the date first set forth above.

LENDER:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Agent
By:	/s/ JOHN W. MUNDSTOCK
Title:	Senior Vice President
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as US Lender
By:	/s/ JOHN W. MUNDSTOCK
Title:	Senior Vice President
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., acting through its Canada branch, as Canadian Lender
By:	/s/ MEDINA SALES DE ANDRADE
Title:	Vice President

4

BORROWERS:
THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.
By:	/s/ SANDRA A. KNELL
Title:	Chief Financial Officer
UNITED SALES & WAREHOUSE OF TEXAS, INC.
By:	/s/ SANDRA A. KNELL
Title:	Executive Vice President
C/P PRODUCTS, CORP.
By:	/s/ SANDRA A. KNELL
Title:	Executive Vice President
MOHAWK TRAILER SUPPLY, INC.
By:	/s/ SANDRA A. KNELL
Title:	Executive Vice President
LES SYSTEMES DE DISTRIBUTION COAST (CANADA) INC. THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (CANADA) INC.
By:	/s/ SANDRA A. KNELL
Title:	Executive Vice President

5

GUARANTOR’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The undersigned guarantor acknowledges that Bank of America, N.A., (in its individual capacity, “US Lender”), acting by and through Bank of America, N.A., as agent for US Lender (in such capacity, “Agent”) and Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada branch), (“Canadian Lender”) (US Lender, acting through Agent, and Canadian Lender are referred to collectively as “Lender”) have no obligation to provide it with notice of, or to obtain its consent to, the terms of the foregoing Seventeenth Amendment (the “Seventeenth Amendment”) to the Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated August 30, 2005, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time. The undersigned guarantor nevertheless: (i) acknowledges and agrees to the terms and conditions of the Seventeenth Amendment; and (ii) acknowledges that its guaranty remains fully valid, binding, and enforceable.

9002-1288 QUEBEC INC.
By:	/s/ SANDRA A. KNELL
Title:	Executive Vice President

6

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, James Musbach, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2013;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2013

/s/    JAMES MUSBACH        

James Musbach

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Sandra A. Knell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2013;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2013

/s/    SANDRA A. KNELL        

Sandra A. Knell

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended September 30, 2013

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc (the “Company”), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2013

/s/    JAMES MUSBACH        

James Musbach

President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended September 30, 2013

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2013

/s/    SANDRA A. KNELL        

Sandra A. Knell

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Commitments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Operating Leases Future Minimum Rent Payable

Minimum future rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Year Ending December 31,	(In thousands)
2013 (remaining three months)	$	922
2014		3,618
2015		3,443
2016		2,882
2017		629
Thereafter		1,419
	$	12,913

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Net sales	$ 33,101	$ 34,484	$ 94,063	$ 92,847
Cost of sales, including distribution costs	27,002	28,796	76,624	78,141
Gross profit	6,099	5,688	17,439	14,706
Selling, general and administrative expenses	5,059	5,128	15,572	14,904
Operating income (loss)	1,040	560	1,867	(198)
Other expense
Interest	119	127	477	415
Other	13	35	24	46
Total other expense, net	132	162	501	461
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	908	398	1,366	(659)
Income tax provision (benefit)	421	91	721	(125)
Net earnings (loss)	$ 487	$ 307	$ 645	$ (534)
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$ 0.10	$ 0.07	$ 0.14	$ (0.12)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$ 0.10	$ 0.07	$ 0.14	$ (0.12)

XML

Commitments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Commitments

4. Commitments. The Company leases its corporate offices, warehouse facilities and data processing equipment. Those leases are classified as operating leases as they do not meet the required capitalization criteria. The office and warehouse leases expire over the next ten years. Minimum future rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Year Ending December 31,	(In thousands)
2013 (remaining three months)	$	922
2014		3,618
2015		3,443
2016		2,882
2017		629
Thereafter		1,419
	$	12,913

XML

Commitments - Additional Information (Detail) (Office and Warehouse)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Office and Warehouse
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Lease, expired period	10 years

XML

Operating Segment (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Component of Net Sales by Region

The following table sets forth the net sales, by region, for the periods presented below:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
USA	$	25,240	$	25,991	$	71,606	$	69,075
Canada		7,861		8,493		22,457		23,772
	$	33,101	$	34,484	$	94,063	$	$92,847

XML

Component of Net Sales by Region (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales	$ 33,101	$ 34,484	$ 94,063	$ 92,847
USA
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales	25,240	25,991	71,606	69,075
Canada
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales	$ 7,861	$ 8,493	$ 22,457	$ 23,772

XML

Operating Segment - Additional Information (Detail)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013 Segment
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Number of Operating Segments	1

XML

Fair Value Measurements of Financial Assets and Liabilities (Detail) (Short Term Investments and Cash Equivalents, USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Cash Equivalents - Overnight Investments	$ 3,016	$ 1,283
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Cash Equivalents - Overnight Investments
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Cash Equivalents - Overnight Investments	$ 3,016	$ 1,283

XML

Summary of Share Based Compensation Option Unvested (Detail) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Shares - Unvested
Granted	8,000
Forfeited	131,500
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Granted	$ 2.82	$ 1.28
Unvested Stock Options
Shares - Unvested
Beginning Balance	8,000
Granted	8,000
Vested	(8,000)
Forfeited
Ending Balance	8,000
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Beginning Balance	$ 1.28
Granted	$ 2.82
Vested	$ 1.28
Forfeited
Ending Balance	$ 2.82

XML

Operating Leases Future Minimum Rent Payable (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
2013 (remaining three months)	$ 922
2014	3,618
2015	3,443
2016	2,882
2017	629
Thereafter	1,419
Total	$ 12,913

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)	$ 645	$ (534)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	468	507
Stock-based compensation expense	228	333
Gain on sale of property and equipment	(10)	(9)
Deferred income taxes	625	57
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	1,610	1,920
Inventories	2,212	(4,817)
Other current assets	936	346
Accounts payable	(1,814)	1,813
Accrued liabilities	361	322
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	5,261	(62)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	12	18
Capital expenditures	(322)	(288)
Increase in other assets	(95)	(145)
Net cash used in investing activities	(405)	(415)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under line of credit agreement	100,135	102,462
Repayments under line of credit agreement	(102,311)	(101,624)
Common stock cancelled in payment of payroll taxes due on vesting of restricted shares under employee stock incentive plans	(49)
Excess tax benefit (shortfall) from stock-based payments		(13)
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity incentive plans	24	3
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(2,201)	828
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(361)	432
NET INCREASE IN CASH	2,294	783
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period	1,942	4,180
Cash and cash equivalents end of period	$ 4,236	$ 4,963

XML

Seasonality

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Seasonality

2. Seasonality. The Company’s business is seasonal and its results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any other interim period during, or for the full year ending, December 31, 2013. See “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – Seasonality and Inflation” in Item 2 of Part I of this Report.

XML

Operating Segment

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Operating Segment

5. Operating Segment. The Company has one operating segment, the distribution of replacement parts, accessories and supplies for the recreation industry. The following table sets forth the net sales, by region, for the periods presented below:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
USA	$	25,240	$	25,991	$	71,606	$	69,075
Canada		7,861		8,493		22,457		23,772
	$	33,101	$	34,484	$	94,063	$	$92,847

XML

Earnings Per Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Earnings Per Share

3. Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share for each period are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during such period. Unvested restricted shares are excluded from outstanding shares for purposes of this calculation. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and unvested restricted shares (using the treasury stock method). However, unvested restricted shares are excluded from this computation. Other potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, options to purchase 107,000 shares of our common stock and 357,593 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, options to purchase 263,000 shares of common stock and 317,001 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. These options and restricted shares were excluded because either (i) their respective exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during these periods, or (ii) the inclusion, in the calculation of common stock equivalents under the Treasury method, of the unvested compensation expense attributable to those options or restricted shares would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, options to purchase 107,000 shares of common stock and 357,593 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. All of the Company’s common shares issuable on exercise of stock options and all unvested restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the first nine months of 2012, because the Company incurred a net loss in that period and, as a result, the inclusion of those securities would have been anti-dilutive.

The table which follows sets forth the manner in which diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were calculated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss)	$	487	$	307	$	645	$	(534	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)		4,712		4,607		4,679		4,590
Dilutive effect of stock options and non-vested restricted shares		92		57		81		—
Denominator for diluted net earnings (loss) per share		4,804		4,664		4,760		4,590

(1) Does not include unvested restricted shares.

XML

Stock Based Compensation - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended			9 Months Ended			1 Months Ended		9 Months Ended							1 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013 Restricted Stock	Dec. 31, 2012 Restricted Stock	Sep. 30, 2013 Common Stock	Aug. 31, 2012 2012 Equity Incentive Plan	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Equity Incentive Plan	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock	Sep. 30, 2012 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Minimum	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Maximum	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Non Vested Stock Options	Sep. 30, 2012 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Non Vested Stock Options	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock and Performance Shares	Aug. 31, 2012 Previously Approved Plans	Sep. 30, 2013 Previously Approved Plans Restricted Stock	Sep. 30, 2013 Previously Approved Plans Non Vested Stock Options	Sep. 30, 2012 Previously Approved Plans Non Vested Stock Options	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Plan and Previously Approved Plans	Sep. 30, 2013 2012 Plan and Previously Approved Plans Restricted Stock
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares initially authorized for issuance under equity incentive plan									300,000
Additional shares authorized for issuance under equity incentive plan									17,666
Shares ceased to be issuable																		17,666
Outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock	284,000		284,000		433,000																	284,000
Unvested restricted shares outstanding						374,497	312,501																374,497
Outstanding shares remained available for future grants										299,530
Restricted shares outstanding																			0
Weighted average fair value of options granted			$ 2.82	$ 1.28
Unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested options											$ 495,800	$ 700,000			$ 18,000	$ 9,000				$ 18,000	$ 9,000
Unrecognized compensation costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period (years)											2 years 4 months 24 days	1 year 8 months 12 days			6 months	1 year
Common stock outstanding								284,000
Vesting period													3 years	4 years
Performance based restricted stock granted																	167,500
Stock-based compensation expense	63,000	114,000	228,000	333,000													0
Service contingent restricted shares outstanding expected to vest																			374,497
Aggregate intrinsic value						$ 1,438,070

XML

Summary of Restricted Share Activity (Detail) (Restricted Stock, USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock
Shares
Beginning Balance	312,501
Granted	167,500
Vested	(105,504)
Forfeited
Ending Balance	374,497
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Values
Beginning Balance	$ 3.39
Granted	$ 2.96
Vested	$ (3.29)
Forfeited
Ending Balance	$ 3.23

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Accounts receivable, allowance	$ 349	$ 311
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	2,000,000	2,000,000
Preferred stock, issued
Preferred stock, outstanding
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	5,096,734	4,923,431
Common stock, shares outstanding	5,096,734	4,923,431

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities

8. Fair Value Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities. We apply fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. We define fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and credit risk.

GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring the fair values of such financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. These tiers consist of:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The following tables summarize the fair value measurements (in thousands of dollars) of our financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	At September 30, 2013
	Total		Quoted market prices in active markets (level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (level 2)
Cash Equivalents – Overnight Investments	$	3,016	$	—	$	3,016

As the above table indicates, at September 30, 2013, we had no financial assets that were required to be recognized at fair value.

	At December 31, 2012
	Total		Quoted market prices in active markets (level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (level 2)
Cash Equivalents – Overnight Investments	$	1,283	$	—	$	1,283

The Company had no level 3 assets or liabilities at September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

We sometimes purchase derivative instruments primarily to hedge our foreign currency exchange risks. However, we had no derivatives at September 30, 2013 or 2012. We use the income approach when valuing such derivatives, using observable Level 2 market expectations at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single discounted present amount, assuming that participants are motivated but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs are limited to quoted prices that are observable for the asset and liabilities, which include interest rate and credit risk. We have used mid-market pricing as a practical expedient for fair value measurements.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Net earnings (loss)	$ 487	$ 307	$ 645	$ (534)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	204	387	(377)	450
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)	$ 691	$ 694	$ 268	$ (84)

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 4,236	$ 1,942
Accounts receivable - net of allowances of $349 and $311	8,323	9,933
Inventories	28,077	30,289
Other current assets	2,182	3,207
Total current assets	42,818	45,371
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net	1,236	1,188
Other Assets	2,447	3,100
Total Assets	46,501	49,659
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	4,322	6,135
Accrued liabilities	3,879	3,518
Total current liabilities	8,201	9,653
Long-Term Obligations	8,757	10,933
Total Liabilities	16,958	20,586
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $.001 par value: 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding:
Common stock, $.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 5,096,734 and 4,923,431 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	17,968	17,766
Accumulated other comprehensive income	1,527	1,904
Retained earnings	10,048	9,403
Total Stockholders' Equity	29,543	29,073
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 46,501	$ 49,659

XML

Assumption of Estimated Fair Value of Options (Detail)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Stock Incentive Plans:
Expected volatility	66.00%	59.00%
Risk-free interest rate	2.64%	1.64%
Expected dividend yields
Expected lives	10 years	10 years

XML

Computation of Diluted Earning Per Share with Exclusion of Antidilutive Securities (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012		Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss)	$ 487		$ 307		$ 645		$ (534)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding	4,712	[1]	4,607	[1]	4,679	[1]	4,590	[1]
Dilutive effect of stock options and non-vested restricted shares	92		57		81
Denominator for diluted net earnings (loss) per share	4,804		4,664		4,760		4,590

[1] Does not include unvested restricted shares.

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial assets	$ 0
Level 3 assets	0	0
Level 3 liabilities	0	0
Derivatives	$ 0		$ 0

XML

Warranty Reserve

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Warranty Reserve

7. Warranty Reserve. We generally do not independently warrant the products that we sell. Instead, in most instances, the manufacturers of the products warrant the products and allow us to return and receive a credit for defective products, including those that have been returned to us by our customers. However, we sell a line of portable generators under a product supply arrangement which obligates us to provide warranty service for these products and to share the costs of providing those services with the manufacturer. We maintain a reserve for warranty claims against which the warranty costs we incur are charged. We replenish or make additions to the reserve from time to time, based primarily on our warranty claims experience and the volume of generators we sell, by a provision we make for warranty claims, recorded as a component of costs of products sold, in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

Accrued warranty expense (in thousands of dollars), which is included in accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:

	2013			2012
Accrued warranty balance – January 1,	$	690		$	564
Warranty costs incurred		(854	)		(895	)
Provision for warranty expense		926			1024
Accrued warranty balance – September 30,	$	762		$	693

XML

Summary Of Stock Option Activity (Detail) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Number of Shares
Beginning Balance	433,000
Granted	8,000
Exercised	(25,500)
Forfeited	(131,500)
Ending Balance	284,000
Exercisable	276,000
Options vested and expected to vest thereafter	284,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Beginning Balance	$ 3.60
Granted	$ 3.87
Exercised	$ 0.95
Forfeited	$ 4.83
Ending Balance	$ 3.28
Exercisable	$ 3.27
Options vested and expected to vest thereafter	$ 3.28
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
Outstanding, end of period	2 years 4 months 24 days
Exercisable, end of period	2 years 2 months 12 days
Options vested and expected to vest thereafter	2 years 4 months 24 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, end of period	$ 433,900
Exercisable	433,900
Options vested and expected to vest thereafter	$ 433,900

XML

Earnings Per Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Computation of Basic and Diluted Earning Per Common Share

The table which follows sets forth the manner in which diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were calculated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss)	$	487	$	307	$	645	$	(534	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)		4,712		4,607		4,679		4,590
Dilutive effect of stock options and non-vested restricted shares		92		57		81		—
Denominator for diluted net earnings (loss) per share		4,804		4,664		4,760		4,590

(1) Does not include unvested restricted shares.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Stock-Based Compensation

6. Stock-Based Compensation. In August 2012, our stockholders approved the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which provides for the grant of equity incentives, consisting of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units to officers, other key employees, directors and consultants. The 2012 Plan initially set aside, for the grant of equity incentives, 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, plus an additional 17,666 shares which was equal to the total number of shares that were then available for grants of new equity incentives under our stockholder-approved stock incentive plans that were in effect immediately prior to the approval of the 2012 Plan (the “Previously Approved Plans”). At the same time, those 17,666 shares ceased to be issuable under the Previously Approved Plans. At September 30, 2013, options to purchase a total of 284,000 shares of our common stock and a total of 374,497 of unvested restricted shares were outstanding under the 2012 Plan and the

Previously Approved Plans. As of that same date, 299,530 shares remained available for future equity incentive grants under the 2012 Plan, whereas no shares remained available for future equity incentive grants under the Previously Approved Plans.

The Previously Approved Plans had provided that, if any options outstanding under any of those Plans were to expire or otherwise terminate unexercised, or if any restricted shares outstanding under any of those Plans were to be forfeited or reacquired by the Company, the shares that had been subject to those equity incentives would become available for the grant of new options or other equity incentives under those Previously Approved Plans. However, the 2012 Plan provides that those shares will, instead, cease to be available for the grant of new equity incentives under the Previously Approved Plans and the number of shares that will be available for future equity incentives under the 2012 Plan will be increased by an equal number of shares.

The fair value of each outstanding option is estimated as of its date of grant using a binomial model. This model incorporates certain assumptions including a risk-free market interest rate, expected dividend yield of the underlying common stock, expected option life and expected volatility in the market value of the underlying common stock.

Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk free interest rate is based upon market yields for United States Treasury debt securities. The expected dividend yield is based upon the Company’s dividend policy and the fair market value of the Company’s shares at the time of grant. Expected lives are based on several factors, including the average holding period of outstanding options, their remaining terms and the cycle of our long range business plan.

We used the following weighted average assumptions in estimating the fair values of the options granted in the periods indicated below:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Stock Incentive Plans:
Expected volatility		66.0	%		59.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.64	%		1.64	%
Expected dividend yields		N/A			N/A
Expected lives		10 years			10 years

The weighted averaged grant-date fair values of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $2.82 and $1.28, respectively.

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013:

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Average Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		433,000		$	3.60
Granted		8,000			3.87
Exercised		(25,500	)		0.95
Forfeited		(131,500	)		4.83
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		284,000		$	3.28		2.4 years	$	433,900
Exercisable at September 30, 2013		276,000		$	3.27		2.2 years	$	433,900
Options vested and expected, as of September 30, 2013, to vest thereafter		284,000		$	3.28		2.4 years	$	433,900

The average intrinsic value set forth in the above table represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the average of the differences between the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on September 30, 2013 and the exercise prices of the then outstanding in-the-money options) that would have been realized by the option holders if all of the in-the-money options had been exercised on September 30, 2013.

A summary of the status of the Company’s unvested options as of September 30, 2013 and changes during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 is presented below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2013		8,000		$	1.28
Granted		8,000			2.82
Vested		(8,000	)		1.28
Forfeited		—			—
Unvested at September 30, 2013		8,000		$	2.82

Unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options granted under the Company’s 2012 Plan and Previously Approved Plans totaled $18,000 and $9,000 as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average periods of 0.5 years and 1.0 years from September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. At September 30, 2013 a total of 284,000 shares of our common stock were subject to outstanding stock options that were exercisable or were expected to become exercisable in the future.

Restricted Shares of Common Stock. During the first three months of 2010, we began granting awards of restricted shares of common stock to some of our officers and other key management employees. Restricted shares generally vest in equal annual increments over a three or four year service period. Compensation expense for such awards, which is based on the fair market value of the awards on their respective dates of grant, is recorded over those service periods.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Compensation Committee granted, under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, a total of 167,500 performance contingent restricted shares to our officers and other key management employees. One third of these performance contingent shares will vest, in each of 2013, 2014 and 2015, only if the Company achieves a specified annual financial performance goal for such year. Stock based compensation expense with respect to each one-third of these shares will be recognized only if, and when, a determination is made that the Company’s achievement of the performance goal for any of those years has become probable. However, if any compensation expense were to be recognized based on a determination that achievement of a performance goal had become probable, but the performance goal is not ultimately achieved (due, for example, to the occurrence of subsequent changes in market or economic conditions or other circumstances that adversely affect the Company’s financial performance during the remainder of the year), then, the previously recognized stock-based compensation expense would be reversed. As of September 30, 2013, achievement of the fiscal 2013 performance goal had not become probable. As a result, no stock-based compensation expense was recorded for any of the performance-contingent restricted shares in either the quarter or nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Under our Equity Incentive Plans, employees who hold restricted shares may, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, elect to satisfy their tax withholding obligations which arise upon the vesting of restricted shares, by instructing the Company to cancel a number of those shares with a fair market value, measured as of the vesting date, equal to the amount of the withholding obligations.

A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted share activity follows:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Values
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		312,501		$	3.39
Granted		167,500			2.96
Vested		(105,504	)		(3.29	)
Forfeited		—			—
Unvested at September 30, 2013		374,497		$	3.23

Unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested service-contingent restricted shares totaled approximately $495,800 and $700,000 at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This cost is expected to be recognized generally over weighted average periods of 2.4 years and 1.7 years measured, respectively, from September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012. All 374,497 shares of our unvested service contingent restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2013 are expected to vest. The aggregate intrinsic value of these shares was $1,438,070 as of September 30, 2013.

We recognized stock-based compensation expense of $63,000 and $114,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $228,000 and $333,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

XML

Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Significant Accounting Policies

1. Significant Accounting Policies. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “2012 10-K”). All of the other financial statements contained in this report are unaudited and condensed and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles and SEC rules applicable to interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2013 and its consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note A to the Company’s audited financial statements included in its 2012 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 29, 2013. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included in this report, and the notes that follow, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our 2012 10-K.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, and useful lives of property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, warranty liability, and other contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of certain of our assets and liabilities. However, such estimates and the assumptions on which they were based may later prove to have been incorrect due to unforeseen changes in market or economic conditions or the occurrence of unexpected events. As a result, the carrying values of our assets and our results of operations could differ in the future from the carrying values and the results of operations that were based on our earlier estimates and assumptions. See “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Item 2 of Part I of this report.

XML

Component of Accrued Warranty Expenses (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Warranty Liability [Line Items]
Accrued warranty beginning balance	$ 690	$ 564
Warranty costs incurred	(854)	(895)
Provision for warranty expense	926	1,024
Accrued warranty ending balance	$ 762	$ 693

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Assumptions of Estimated Fair Value of Options

We used the following weighted average assumptions in estimating the fair values of the options granted in the periods indicated below:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Stock Incentive Plans:
Expected volatility		66.0	%		59.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.64	%		1.64	%
Expected dividend yields		N/A			N/A
Expected lives		10 years			10 years

Summary of Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013:

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Average Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		433,000		$	3.60
Granted		8,000			3.87
Exercised		(25,500	)		0.95
Forfeited		(131,500	)		4.83
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		284,000		$	3.28		2.4 years	$	433,900
Exercisable at September 30, 2013		276,000		$	3.27		2.2 years	$	433,900
Options vested and expected, as of September 30, 2013, to vest thereafter		284,000		$	3.28		2.4 years	$	433,900

Summary of Share Based Compensation Option Unvested

A summary of the status of the Company’s unvested options as of September 30, 2013 and changes during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 is presented below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2013		8,000		$	1.28
Granted		8,000			2.82
Vested		(8,000	)		1.28
Forfeited		—			—
Unvested at September 30, 2013		8,000		$	2.82

Summary of Restricted Share Activity

A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted share activity follows:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Values
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		312,501		$	3.39
Granted		167,500			2.96
Vested		(105,504	)		(3.29	)
Forfeited		—			—
Unvested at September 30, 2013		374,497		$	3.23

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements. With the exception of the items discussed below, there have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements that we believe are of significance, or potential significance, to the Company based on our current operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued amended guidance for impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets. The guidance allows for an option to first access qualitative factors to determine whether the existence or events or circumstances leads to a determination that is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds it carrying amount. If the qualitative facts lead us to conclude it is more likely than not that the fair value exceeds to carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset, then the fair value does not need to be calculated. This update was effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for the fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Accordingly, the amended guidance is effective for the year ending December 31, 2013. This new standard, which we adopted in the first quarter of 2013, has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB amended the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) to require entities to provide information about amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income by component. The Company is required to present, either on the face of its financial statements or in the notes thereto, amounts that have been reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) to the respective line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). This new standard, which we adopted in the first quarter of 2013, has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance related to the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The guidance requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

XML

Earnings Per Share - Additional Information (Detail)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
Computation Of Earnings Per Share Line Items
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share	107,000	263,000	107,000
Restricted Stock
Computation Of Earnings Per Share Line Items
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share	357,593	317,001	357,593

XML

Warranty Reserve (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Component of Accrued Warranty Expenses

Accrued warranty expense (in thousands of dollars), which is included in accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:

	2013			2012
Accrued warranty balance – January 1,	$	690		$	564
Warranty costs incurred		(854	)		(895	)
Provision for warranty expense		926			1024
Accrued warranty balance – September 30,	$	762		$	693

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Nov. 01, 2013
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Trading Symbol	CRV
Entity Registrant Name	COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000728303
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		5,096,734

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Summary of Fair Value Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities

The following tables summarize the fair value measurements (in thousands of dollars) of our financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	At September 30, 2013
	Total		Quoted market prices in active markets (level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (level 2)
Cash Equivalents – Overnight Investments	$	3,016	$	—	$	3,016

As the above table indicates, at September 30, 2013, we had no financial assets that were required to be recognized at fair value.

	At December 31, 2012
	Total		Quoted market prices in active markets (level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (level 2)
Cash Equivalents – Overnight Investments	$	1,283	$	—	$	1,283