XML 22 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

5. Fair Value Measurements

 

Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system, and defines

required disclosures. It clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts business.

 

The Company’s balance sheet contains derivative and warrant liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value is as follows:

 

Level 1: uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2: uses observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

 

Level 3: uses unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

 

The fair value of the Company’s recorded derivative and warrant liabilities is determined based on unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data, which require a Level 3 classification. A Binomial Lattice option valuation model was used to determine the fair value with similar assumptions to those described under “Stock-Based Compensation”. The Company records derivative and warrant liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operation.

 

The following table presents the balances of derivative liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level as of June 30, 2016:

 

    Fair Value Measurements Using  
    Quoted Prices in     Significant Other     Significant        
    Active Markets for     Observable     Unobservable        
    Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs        
    (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total  
                         
As of June 30, 2016                                
Derivative liability   $ -     $ -     $ 343,824     $ 343,824  
Warrant liability     -       -       229,523       229,523  
Commitment in excess of authorized stock     -       -       196,558       196,558  
Total   $ -     $ -     $ 769,905     $ 769,905  

 

The following table presents changes in the derivative liabilities with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2016:

 

                Commitment        
    Warrant     Derivative     In Excess of     Total  
    Liability     Liability     Authorized Stock     Liability  
Balance December 31, 2015   $ 60,420     $ 495,473     $ 64,428     $ 620,321  
                                 
Liability on issuance of debt and warrants     44,394       233,017       -       277,411  
                                 
Elimination of liability on conversion     -       (522,577 )     -       (522,577 )
                                 
Change in estimated fair value (1)     124,709       137,911       -       262,620  
                                 
Commitment in excess of authorized stock     -       -       132,130       132,130  
                                 
Balance June 30, 2016   $ 229,523     $ 343,824     $ 196,558     $ 769,905  

 

(1) Included in the Condensed Statements of Operation on the line “Change in fair value of derivative and warrant liabilities.”

 

Management used the following inputs to value the Derivative and Warrant Liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2016:

 

    Derivative Liability   Warrant Liability
Expected term   6 months to 2 years   5 years
Exercise price   $0.00025 - $0.099   $0.02 - $0.1287
Expected volatility   272% to 334%   249% to 283%
Expected dividends   None   None
Risk-free interest rate   0.37% to 1.05%   1.21% to 1.49%
Forfeitures   None   None

 

In computing the fair value of the derivative and warrant liability at June 30, 2016, management estimated a 60% probability of a down round financing event at a price of $0.025 and a 9% to 34% probability that existing note holders with exchange privileges would exchange their existing debentures and warrants for new debentures and warrants.