XML 36 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
5. Fair Value Measurements
 
Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system, and defines required disclosures. It clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts business.
 
The Company's balance sheet contains derivative and warrant liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value is as follows:
 
Level 1: uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2: uses observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
 
Level 3: uses unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
 
The fair value of the Company’s recorded derivative and warrant liabilities is determined based on unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data, which require a Level 3 classification. A Binomial Lattice option valuation model was used to determine the fair value with similar assumptions to those described under “Stock-Based Compensation”. The Company records derivative and warrant liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operation.
 
The following table presents the balances of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level as of June 30, 2014:
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
Significant Other
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Observable
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
 
 
Identical Assets
 
Inputs
 
Inputs
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liability
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
1,064,552
 
$
1,064,552
 
Warrant liability
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
2,091,631
 
 
2,091,631
 
Total
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
3,156,183
 
$
3,156,183
 
 
The following table presents changes in the liabilities with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended June 30, 2014:
 
 
 
Warrant
 
Derivative
 
Total
 
 
 
Liability
 
Liability
 
Liability
 
Balance December 31, 2013
 
$
803,484
 
$
300,939
 
$
1,104,423
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liability on issuance of debt and warrants
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in estimated fair value (1)
 
 
1,288,147
 
 
763,613
 
 
2,051,760
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Elimination of liability on conversion
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance June 30, 2014
 
$
2,091,631
 
$
1,064,552
 
$
3,156,183
 
 
(1) Included in the Condensed Statements of Operation on the line “Change in fair value of derivative and warrant liabilities.”
 
Management used the following inputs to value the Derivative and Warrant Liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2014:
 
 
 
Derivative Liability
 
Warrant Liability
 
Expected term
 
6 months - 1 year
 
5 years
 
Exercise price
 
$0.045 - $0.099
 
$0.075 - $0.1287
 
Expected volatility
 
238% to 242%
 
189% to 190%
 
Expected dividends
 
None
 
None
 
Risk-free interest rate
 
0.11% to 0.13%
 
1.62% to 1.73%
 
Forfeitures
 
None
 
None
 
 
In computing the fair value of the derivative and warrant liability at June 30, 2014 for instruments under the Binomial Lattice option-pricing model, management estimated a 50% probability of a down round financing event at a price of $0.036 and a 20% to 80% probability that existing note holders with exchange privileges would exchange their existing debentures and warrants for new debentures and warrants.