-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, AMZr0zj1lkopw2CVRMkhG38xxrodblcPpzf7+8NmtS7oCoEHfwHLb9xLdHNjzCxg QddLEeJYL8cN9ebRLAMJXw== 0000072741-04-000090.txt : 20040707 0000072741-04-000090.hdr.sgml : 20040707 20040707150205 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000072741-04-000090 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: U-1 PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 FILED AS OF DATE: 20040707 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: NORTHEAST UTILITIES SYSTEM CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000072741 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: ELECTRIC SERVICES [4911] IRS NUMBER: 042147929 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: U-1 SEC ACT: 1935 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 070-10234 FILM NUMBER: 04904208 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 174 BRUSH HILL AVE CITY: WEST SPRINGFIELD STATE: MA ZIP: 01090-0010 BUSINESS PHONE: 4137855871 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 107 SELDEN ST CITY: BERLIN STATE: CT ZIP: 06037-1616 U-1 1 nuu1070704.txt NU U-1 070704 File No. 70-_________ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM U-1 APPLICATION/DECLARATION Under THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 NORTHEAST UTILITIES 107 Selden Street Berlin, Connecticut 06037-5457 (Name of company filing this statement and address of principal executive offices) NORTHEAST UTILITIES (Name of top registered holding company parent of declarant) Gregory B. Butler, Esq. Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel Northeast Utilities Service Company P.O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 (Name of address of agent for service) The Commission is requested to mail signed copies of all orders, notices and communications to: Randy A. Shoop Jane P. Seidl, Esq. Assistant Treasurer - Finance Senior Counsel Northeast Utilities Service Northeast Utilities Service Company Company P.O. Box 270 P.O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 ITEM 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS 1. Northeast Utilities, a Massachusetts business trust and registered holding company ("NU" or the "Company") under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended (the "Act"), hereby requests authority, through June 30, 2007 (the "Authorization Period"), for it to guarantee, indemnify and otherwise provide credit support (each, a "Guarantee") in the aggregate amount of up to $100 million (the "Guarantee Limit") in respect of the debt or obligations of Northeast Utilities Service Company, a service company subsidiary of NU ("NUSCO"), and The Rocky River Realty Company, a non-utility subsidiary of NU ("RRR", and together with NUSCO, the "Service Subsidiaries"). 2. NU is the parent of a number of companies comprising the Northeast Utilities system (the "System") and is not itself an operating company. The System furnishes franchised retail electric service in Connecticut, New Hampshire and western Massachusetts through three of NU's wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Connecticut Light and Power Company ("CL&P"), Public Service Company of New Hampshire ("PSNH") and Western Massachusetts Electric Company ("WMECO" and collectively with CL&P and PSNH, the "NU Utility Companies"). In addition to their retail electric service business, the NU Utility Companies together furnish wholesale electric service to various municipalities and other utilities throughout the Northeast United States. 3. NU is also the parent of Yankee Energy System, Inc. ("YES"), an exempt gas utility holding company. YES is primarily engaged in the retail distribution of natural gas through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Yankee Gas Services Company ("Yankee Gas"), a Connecticut retail gas distribution company, and also has several non-utility subsidiaries. In addition, NU Enterprises, Inc. ("NUEI"), a wholly-owned holding company subsidiary of NU, acts as the holding company for NU's unregulated businesses, including Northeast Generation Company ("NGC"), the System's only exempt wholesale generator. 4. NUSCO and RRR are wholly-owned subsidiaries of NU. NUSCO, a Connecticut corporation, provides centralized support services to NU System companies. RRR, a Connecticut corporation, engages in real estate transactions on behalf of NU System companies. 5. NU requests authorization, through the Authorization Period, to provide Guarantees with respect to the obligations of the Service Subsidiaries as may be appropriate or necessary to enable such Service Subsidiaries to carry on in the ordinary course of their respective businesses, including guarantees of non-affiliated third-party obligations in the ordinary course of the System's business, in an aggregate amount which shall not exceed $100 million outstanding at any one time. Guarantees may take the form of NU agreeing to guarantee, undertake reimbursement obligations or assume liabilities or other obligations with respect to or act as surety on, real estate and equipment leases, letters of credit, evidences of indebtedness, equity commitments and performance and other obligations undertaken by the Service Subsidiaries. 6. As part of normal business activities, from time to time, NU is requested to provide financial or performance assurances of the obligations of the Service Subsidiaries to third parties. Such agreements include contract guarantees, surety bonds and rating-contingent collateralization provisions. In addition, NU is requested to provide payment and performance guarantees in connection with the real-estate contracting activities of RRR, including construction, acquisition and leasing of properties and facilities utilized by certain NU System companies. 7. Guarantees may be provided from time to time with respect to obligations of the Service Subsidiaries that are not capable of exact quantification. In such cases, NU will determine the exposure under such Guarantee for purposes of measuring compliance with the $100 million limitation in accordance with standard and customary financial practices, including estimation of exposure based on loss experience or projected potential payment amounts. If appropriate, such estimates will be made in accordance with GAAP. Such estimation will be re-evaluated periodically. NU may, in its discretion, charge each Service Subsidiary a fee for each Guarantee provided on its behalf that will be determined by multiplying the amount of the Guarantee provided by the cost of obtaining the liquidity necessary to perform the Guarantee (for example, bank line commitment fees or letter of credit fees, plus other transactional expenses) for the period of time the Guarantee remains outstanding. Any guarantees or other credit support arrangements outstanding at the end of the Authorization Period will remain in place and expire or terminate in accordance with their terms. 8. The System attempts to have each individual company assume responsibility for its own financial obligations. NU, the NU Utility Companies, Yankee Gas and NGC have credit ratings which enable them to incur obligations to non-affiliates without parent support. However, in some instances, the Service Subsidiaries need to enter into obligations with third parties on behalf of all or some of the System companies. This can occur with any shared resource such as real estate, insurance policies, operating leases for vehicle fleets, etc. The Service Subsidiaries do not themselves have independent credit standing and depend upon internal service or reimbursement agreements from System companies to meet their obligations. As the recent financial difficulties of large holding company systems demonstrate, creditors can be harmed if the underlying credit structure of a transaction is not handled properly. It is now apparent that NU will need to have the ability to guarantee relatively routine commitments of the Service Subsidiaries to enable necessary resources to be procured on a shared basis. In a similar scenario, the Commission authorized NU to guaranty the debt obligations of RRR in 1992 (Rel. No. 35-25514, File 70-7878, April 10, 1992). 9. By Commission Order, NU and NUEI are authorized to issue guarantees and similar forms of credit support or enhancements for the benefit of NUEI and NUEI's non-utility affiliates, which do not include the Service Subsidiaries, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $750 million through June 30, 2007 (Holding Co. Act Release No. 27868, June 30, 2004, the "2004 Order"). NU seeks an order herein for the authorization of separate guarantee authority which would allow it to issue Guarantees on behalf of the Service Subsidiaries. The authorization sought herein is also separate form the guaranty authority provided under the Commission's Rule 45(b)(6). OTHER MATTERS 10. Except in accordance with the Act, neither NU nor any subsidiary thereof (a) has acquired an ownership interest in an EWG or a FUCO, as defined in Sections 32 and 33 of the Act, or (b) now is or as a consequence of the transactions proposed herein will become a party to, or has or will as a consequence of the transactions proposed herein have a right under, a service, sales, or construction contract with an EWG or a FUCO. None of the proceeds from the transactions proposed herein will be used by NU and its subsidiaries to acquire any securities of, or any interest in, an EWG or a FUCO. 11. NU currently meets all of the conditions of Rule 53(a), except for clause (1). At March 31, 2004, NU's "aggregate investment," as defined in Rule 53(a)(1), in EWGs and FUCOs was approximately $448.2 million, or approximately 54.3% of NU's average "consolidated retained earnings," also as defined in Rule 53(a)(1), for the four quarters ended March 31, 2004 ($825.7 million). With respect to Rule 53(a)(1), however, the Commission has determined that NU's financing of its investment in EWGs in an amount not to exceed $1 billion would not have either of the adverse effects set forth in Rule 53(c). (See the 2004 Order). NU continues to assert that its EWG investments will not adversely affect the System. 12. In addition, NU and its subsidiaries are in compliance and will continue to comply with the other provisions of Rule 53(a) and (b), as demonstrated by the following determinations: (i) NGC, NU's only EWG, maintains books and records, and prepares financial statements, in accordance with Rule 53(a)(2). Furthermore, NU has undertaken to provide the Commission access to such books and records and financial statements, as it may request; (ii) No employees of NU's public utility subsidiaries have rendered services to NGC; (iii) NU has submitted (a) a copy of each Form U-1 and Rule 24 certificate that has been filed with the Commission under Rule 53 and (b) a copy of Item 9 of the Form U5S and Exhibits G and H thereof to each state regulator having jurisdiction over the retail rates of NU's affected public utility subsidiaries; (iv) Neither NU nor any subsidiary has been the subject of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding unless a plan of reorganization has been confirmed in such proceeding; (v) NU's average CREs for the four most recent quarterly periods have not decreased by 10% or more from the average for the previous four quarterly periods; and (vi) In the previous fiscal year, NU did not report operating losses attributable to its investment in EWGs/FUCOs exceeding 3 percent of NU's consolidated retained earnings. 13. The proposed transactions, considered in conjunction with the effect of the capitalization and earnings of NU's EWG, would not have a material adverse effect on the financial integrity of the NU system, or an adverse impact on NU's public-utility subsidiaries, their customers, or the ability of State commissions to protect such public-utility customers. The 2004 Order concerning EWG investments was predicated, in part, upon an assessment of NU's overall financial condition which took into account, among other factors, NU's consolidated capitalization NU's current EWG investment, NGC, (it has no FUCO investment) has been profitable for all quarterly periods ending June 30, 2000 through March 31, 2004 (NGC was acquired in March 2000). 14. The consolidated capitalization ratios of NU as of March 31, 2004, with consolidated debt including all short-term debt and non-recourse debt of the EWG, were as follows: As of March 31, 2004 (thousands of dollars) % Common shareholders' equity $ 2,333,356 34.4% Preferred stock 116,200 1.7 Long-term and short-term debt 2,642,413 39.0 Rate Reduction Bonds 1,682,500 24.9 $ 6,774,469 100.0 If Rate Reduction Bonds are excluded the consolidated capitalization ratio of NU as of March 31, 2004 is as follows: As of March 31, 2004 (thousands of dollars) % Common shareholders' equity $ 2,333,356 45.8 Preferred stock 116,200 2.3 Long-term and short-term debt 2,642,413 51.9 $ 5,091,969 100.0% 15. In addition, NGC has made a positive contribution to earnings by contributing $146.8 million in revenues in the 12-month period ending March 31, 2004 and net income of $38.3 million for the same period. ITEM II FEES, COMMISSIONS, AND EXPENDITURES 16. The estimated fees, commissions, and expenses paid or incurred, or to be paid or incurred, directly or indirectly, in connection with the proposed transactions by the Company or any associate company thereof are estimated to be not in excess of $25,000. 17. None of such fees, commissions, or expenses are to be paid to any associate company or affiliate of the Companies or any affiliate of any such associate company except for financial, legal, and other services to be performed at cost by NUSCO, an affiliated service company. ITEM III APPLICABLE STATUTORY PROVISIONS 18. The Guarantees by NU are subject to Section 12(b) of the Act and Rule 45 thereunder. ITEM IV REGULATORY APPROVAL 19. No other state commission has jurisdiction with respect to any aspect of the proposed transaction, and no Federal commission other than the Securities and Exchange Commission has jurisdiction with respect to any aspect thereof. ITEM V PROCEDURE 20. The Company respectfully requests the Commission's approval, pursuant to this Application/Declaration, of NU's Guarantees as described herein, whether under the sections of the Act and rules thereunder enumerated in Item III or otherwise. The Company also requests the Commission's approval as may be necessary of any other aspect of the transactions described in this Application/Declaration under the appropriate provisions of the Act or rules thereunder. 21. The Company hereby waives any recommended decision by a hearing officer or by any other responsible officer of the Commission and waives the 30-day waiting period between the issuance of the Commission's order and the date on which it is to become effective, since it is desired that the Commission's order, when issued, become effective forthwith. The Company consents that the Office of Public Utility Regulation within the Division of Investment Management may assist in the preparation of the Commission's decision and/or order unless the Office opposes the transactions covered by this Application. It is requested that the Commission issue an order authorizing the jurisdictional transactions proposed herein at the earliest practicable date but in any event not later than 40 days from filing date. It is further requested that (i) there not be a recommended decision by an Administrative Law Judge or other responsible officer of the Commission, (ii) the Office of Public Utility Regulation be permitted to assist in the preparation of the Commission's decision, and (iii) the Commission's order become effective forthwith upon issuance. ITEM VI EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (a) Exhibits F. Preliminary Opinion of Counsel. H. Proposed notice of the proceeding initiated by the filing of this Application/Declaration. VII INFORMATION AS TO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS (a) The issuance of an order with respect to this Application/Declaration is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. (b) No Federal agency has prepared or is preparing an environmental impact statement with respect to the subject transactions. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, the undersigned have duly caused this statement to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Dated: July 7, 2004 NORTHEAST UTILITIES By /s/ Randy A. Shoop Name: Randy A. Shoop Title: Assistant Treasurer - Finance EX-99 2 nuu1exhfopin070704.txt NU EXHIBIT F - JCM OPINION 070704 EXHIBIT F July 7, 2004 Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Judiciary Plaza Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Northeast Utilities Ladies and Gentlemen: I am Assistant General Counsel of Northeast Utilities Service Company("NUSCO"), a service company affiliate of Northeast Utilities ("NU"). I have acted as counsel to NU in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Application/Declaration to which this opinion is an exhibit (the "Application"). This opinion is given to you with respect to the transactions described in the Application pursuant to your Instructions as to Exhibits to applications and declarations filed on Form U-1. Except as otherwise defined herein, terms used herein shall have the meanings given them in the Application. In connection with this opinion, I have reviewed or caused to be reviewed the Application and the exhibits thereto, and such other papers, documents and records, and have made or caused to be made such examination of law, as I have deemed relevant and necessary in order to give this opinion. I have assumed that, in respect of the Application, an appropriate order of the Commission under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 will be issued and all actions of NU will be in conformity therewith. The opinions set forth herein are qualified in their entirety as follows: (a) every opinion rendered herein is expressly subject to the consummation of such transactions in accordance with the Application; (b) no opinion is expressed as to any laws other than the federal laws of the United States and the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; (c) insofar as any opinion relates to the Declaration of Trust of NU, I have assumed that the Declaration of Trust will not be amended between now and the time the transactions contemplated by the Application are consummated; and (d) no opinion is expressed as to the securities laws of any state. Based on and subject to the foregoing, I am of the opinion that: 1. All state laws applicable to each of the transactions for which the Commission's approval is sought in the Application will have been complied with at the time each transaction is consummated. 2. NU is validly organized and duly existing under the laws of Massachusetts and any Guarantees issued by NU pursuant to the authorization sought in the Application will be the valid and binding obligation of NU. 3. The consummation of the transactions for which the Commission's approval is sought in the Application will not violate the legal rights of the holders of any securities issued by NU or any associate company of NU. I hereby consent to the use of this opinion in connection with the filing of the Application. I am a member of the Bar of the State of New York. As to matters involving the laws of other jurisdictions, I have made a study of such laws and consulted with lawyers employed by NUSCO who are admitted to the Bars of such other jurisdictions. Very truly yours, /s/ Jeffrey C. Miller Jeffrey C. Miller Assistant General Counsel Northeast Utilities Service Company EX-99 3 nuu1exhnotice070704.txt NU EXH. H - NOTICE 070704 EXHIBIT H FORM OF NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following filing has been made with the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (the "Act") and rules promulgated under the Act. All interested persons are referred to the application(s) and/or declaration(s) for complete statements of the proposed transaction(s) summarized below. The application(s) and/or declaration(s) and any amendment(s) is/are available for public inspection through the Commission's Branch of Public Reference. Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the application(s) and/or declaration(s) should submit their views in writing by ________________, 2004 to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549-0609, and serve a copy on the relevant applicant(s) and/or declarant(s) at the address(es) specified below. Proof of service (by affidavit or, in the case of an attorney at law, by certificate) should be filed with the request. Any request for hearing should identify specifically the issues of facts or law that are disputed. A person who so requests will be notified of any hearing, if ordered, and will receive a copy of any notice or order issued in the matter. After ____________, 2004, the application(s) and/or declaration(s), as filed or as amended, may be granted and/or permitted to become effective. Northeast Utilities, et al. (70- ) Northeast Utilities ("NU"), 107 Selden Street, Berlin, CT, 06037, a registered public-utility holding company under the Act, has filed an application-declaration ("Application") under sections 12(b) of the Act and rule 45 thereunder. NU proposes that the Commission authorize NU to guarantee, indemnify and otherwise provide credit support ("Guarantees") of up to $100 million ("Guarantee Limit") through June 30, 2007 (the "Authorization Period") of the debt or obligations of two of its direct subsidiaries, Northeast Utilities Service Company ("NUSCO") and The Rocky River Realty Company ("RRR" and, with NUSCO, the "Service Companies"). NU is the parent of a number of companies comprising the Northeast Utilities system (the "System") and is not itself an operating company. The System furnishes franchised retail electric service in Connecticut, New Hampshire and western Massachusetts through three of NU's wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts Electric Company. NU is also the parent of Yankee Energy System, Inc. ("YES"), an exempt gas utility holding company. NU states that YES is primarily engaged in the retail distribution of natural gas through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Yankee Gas Services Company, a Connecticut retail gas distribution company. In addition, NU Enterprises, Inc. ("NUEI"), a wholly-owned holding company subsidiary of NU, acts as the holding company for NU's unregulated businesses. NUSCO and RRR are wholly-owned subsidiaries of NU. According to NU, NUSCO, a Connecticut corporation, provides centralized support services to NU System companies and RRR, a Connecticut corporation, engages in real estate transactions on behalf of NU System companies. NU requests authorization, through the Authorization Period, to provide Guarantees with respect to the obligations of the Service Subsidiaries as may be appropriate or necessary to enable such Service Subsidiaries to carry on in the ordinary course of their respective businesses in an aggregate amount which shall not exceed $100 million outstanding at any one time. NU states that Guarantees may take the form of NU agreeing to guarantee, undertake reimbursement obligations or assume liabilities or other obligations with respect to or act as surety on, real estate and equipment leases, letters of credit, evidences of indebtedness, equity commitments and performance and other obligations undertaken by the Service Subsidiaries. According to NU, Guarantees may be provided from time to time with respect to obligations of the Service Subsidiaries that are not capable of exact quantification. In such cases, NU states that it will determine the exposure under such Guarantee for purposes of measuring compliance with the $100 million limitation in accordance with standard and customary financial practices, including estimation of exposure based on loss experience or projected potential payment amounts. If appropriate, NU states that such estimates will be made in accordance with GAAP and such estimation will be re-evaluated periodically. NU states that it may, in its discretion, charge each Service Subsidiary a fee for each Guarantee provided on its behalf that will be determined by multiplying the amount of the Guarantee provided by the cost of obtaining the liquidity necessary to perform the Guarantee (for example, bank line commitment fees or letter of credit fees, plus other transactional expenses) for the period of time the Guarantee remains outstanding. According to NU, any guarantees or other credit support arrangements outstanding at the end of the Authorization Period will remain in place and expire or terminate in accordance with their terms. NU states that the Service Subsidiaries do not themselves have independent credit standing and thus depend upon internal service or reimbursement agreements from System companies to meet their obligations. NU believes that it is now apparent that it will need to have the ability to guarantee relatively routine commitments of the Service Subsidiaries to enable necessary resources to be procured on a shared basis. NU states that, except in accordance with the Act, neither NU nor any subsidiary thereof (a) has acquired an ownership interest in an EWG or a FUCO, as defined in Sections 32 and 33 of the Act, or (b) now is or as a consequence of the transactions proposed herein will become a party to, or has or will as a consequence of the transactions proposed herein have a right under, a service, sales, or construction contract with an EWG or a FUCO and that none of the proceeds from the transactions proposed herein will be used by NU and its subsidiaries to acquire any securities of, or any interest in, an EWG or a FUCO. NU states that it currently meets all of the conditions of Rule 53(a), except for clause (1). At March 31, 2004, NU's "aggregate investment," as defined in Rule 53(a)(1), in EWGs and FUCOs was approximately $448.2 million, or approximately 54.3% of NU's average "consolidated retained earnings," also as defined in Rule 53(a)(1), for the four quarters ended March 31, 2004 ($825.7 million). With respect to Rule 53(a)(1), however, NU states that the Commission has determined that NU's financing of its investment in EWGs in an amount not to exceed $1 billion would not have either of the adverse effects set forth in Rule 53(c). See Northeast Utilities, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27868, dated June 30, 2004 (the "Rule 53(c) Order"). NU continues to assert that its EWG investment in NGC will not adversely affect the System. -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----