XML 121 R66.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Investments (Additional Information Of Trust Preferred Securities With Credit Rating Below Investment Grade) (Details) (USD $)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Dec. 31, 2012
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Available-for-sale Securities, Amortized Cost $ 355,771,000 $ 370,315,000
Securities available-for-sale 352,660,000 377,122,000
Held-to-maturity, Amortized Cost 4,117,000 13,454,000
Securities held-to-maturity, Estimated Fair Value 5,335,000 13,861,000
P3 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Other than temporary impairment losses 0 11,000,000
P4 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Other than temporary impairment losses 0 565,000,000
Available-for-sale Securities [Member] | P1 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Pooled  
Class Mezz  
Original Cost 827,000  
Available-for-sale Securities, Amortized Cost 191,000  
Securities available-for-sale 667,000  
Difference 476,000 [1]  
Lowest Credit Rating Caa3  
Number of issuers currently performing 7  
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar) 19.50%  
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral) 21.00% [2]  
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral 52.50% [3]  
Available-for-sale Securities [Member] | P2 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Pooled  
Class Mezz  
Original Cost 2,535,000  
Available-for-sale Securities, Amortized Cost 0  
Securities available-for-sale 0  
Difference 0 [1]  
Lowest Credit Rating Ca  
Number of issuers currently performing 6  
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar) 22.30%  
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral) 0.00% [2]  
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral 0.00% [3]  
Available-for-sale Securities [Member] | P3 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Pooled [4]  
Class Mezz [4]  
Original Cost 2,962,000 [4]  
Available-for-sale Securities, Amortized Cost 1,419,000 [4]  
Securities available-for-sale 645,000 [4]  
Difference (774,000) [1],[4]  
Lowest Credit Rating Caa3 [4]  
Number of issuers currently performing 22 [4]  
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar) 24.10% [4]  
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral) 8.20% [2],[4]  
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral 18.10% [3],[4]  
Available-for-sale Securities [Member] | P4 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Pooled [5]  
Class Mezz [5]  
Original Cost 4,060,000 [5]  
Available-for-sale Securities, Amortized Cost 400,000 [5]  
Securities available-for-sale 155,000 [5]  
Difference (245,000) [1],[5]  
Lowest Credit Rating Ca [5]  
Number of issuers currently performing 9 [5]  
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar) 19.20% [5]  
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral) 7.10% [2],[5]  
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral 23.70% [3],[5]  
Available-for-sale Securities [Member] | P5 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Pooled  
Class Mezz  
Original Cost 6,228,000  
Available-for-sale Securities, Amortized Cost 826,000  
Securities available-for-sale 2,280,000  
Difference 1,454,000 [1]  
Lowest Credit Rating Ca  
Number of issuers currently performing 9  
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar) 26.00%  
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral) 21.00% [2]  
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral 34.30% [3]  
Available-for-sale Securities [Member] | S5 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Single  
Original Cost 261,000  
Available-for-sale Securities, Amortized Cost 235,000  
Securities available-for-sale 305,000  
Difference 70,000 [1]  
Lowest Credit Rating NR  
Number of issuers currently performing 1  
Held-to-maturity Securities [Member] | P6 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Pooled  
Class Mezz  
Original Cost 1,599,000  
Held-to-maturity, Amortized Cost 117,000  
Securities held-to-maturity, Estimated Fair Value 1,334,000  
Difference 1,217,000 [1]  
Lowest Credit Rating Caa3  
Number of issuers currently performing 7  
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar) 19.50%  
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral) 21.00% [2]  
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral 52.50% [3]  
Held-to-maturity Securities [Member] | P7 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Pooled  
Class Mezz  
Original Cost 3,367,000  
Held-to-maturity, Amortized Cost 0  
Securities held-to-maturity, Estimated Fair Value 0  
Difference 0 [1]  
Lowest Credit Rating Ca  
Number of issuers currently performing 6  
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar) 22.30%  
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral) 0.00% [2]  
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral 0.00% [3]  
Held-to-maturity Securities [Member] | S9 [Member]
   
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]    
Type Single  
Original Cost 4,000,000  
Held-to-maturity, Amortized Cost 4,000,000  
Securities held-to-maturity, Estimated Fair Value $ 4,000,000  
Lowest Credit Rating NR  
Number of issuers currently performing 1  
[1] The differences noted consist of unrealized losses recorded at December 31, 2013 and noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses recorded subsequent to April 1, 2009 that have not been reclassified as credit losses.
[2] Performing collateral is defined as total collateral minus all collateral that has been called, is currently deferring, or currently in default. This model for this security assumes that all collateral that is currently deferring will default with a zero recovery rate. The underlying issuers can cure, thus this bond could recover at a higher percentage upon default than zero.
[3] Excess subordination is defined as the additional defaults/deferrals necessary in the next reporting period to deplete the entire credit enhancement (excess interest and over-collateralization) beneath our tranche within each pool to the point that would cause a "break in yield." This amount assumes that all currently performing collateral continues to perform. A break in yield means that our security would not be expected to receive all the contractual cash flows (principal and interest) by maturity. The "percent of current performing collateral" is the ratio of the "excess subordination amount" to current performing collateral—a higher percent means there is more excess subordination to absorb additional defaults/deferrals, and the better our security is protected from loss.
[4] ther-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013. Other-than-temporary impairment losses of $11,000 were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2012.
[5] ther-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013. Other-than-temporary impairment losses of $565,000 were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2012.