XML 76 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Investments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Investments [Abstract]  
Investments
Investments

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of the Company's securities are shown in the following table (in thousands):
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Estimated Fair Value
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasuries and U.S.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
government agencies
 
$
2,511

 
$
61

 
$

 
$
2,572

 
$
3,792

 
$
96

 
$

 
$
3,888

Obligations of states and
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

political subdivisions
 
41,109

 
814

 
74

 
41,849

 
47,293

 
1,651

 
15

 
48,929

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. government agencies
 
255,889

 
3,351

 
4,601

 
254,639

 
279,336

 
7,231

 
85

 
286,482

Private label
 
2,383

 
19

 
2

 
2,400

 
3,235

 
37

 

 
3,272

Trust preferred
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

securities
 
13,456

 
1,047

 
2,495

 
12,008

 
15,402

 
55

 
2,812

 
12,645

Corporate securities
 
9,783

 
172

 
639

 
9,316

 
16,152

 
207

 
412

 
15,947

Total Debt Securities
 
325,131

 
5,464

 
7,811

 
322,784

 
365,210

 
9,277

 
3,324

 
371,163

Marketable equity  securities
 
3,381

 
1,575

 

 
4,956

 
3,381

 
804

 

 
4,185

Investment funds
 
1,525

 

 
18

 
1,507

 
1,724

 
50

 

 
1,774

Total Securities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Available-for-Sale
 
$
330,037

 
$
7,039

 
$
7,829

 
$
329,247

 
$
370,315

 
$
10,131

 
$
3,324

 
$
377,122


 
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Estimated Fair Value
Securities held-to-maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust preferred securities
 
$
3,994

 
$
2,412

 
$

 
$
6,406

 
$
13,454

 
$
465

 
$
58

 
$
13,861

Total Securities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Held-to-Maturity
 
$
3,994


$
2,412

 
$

 
$
6,406

 
$
13,454

 
$
465

 
$
58

 
$
13,861

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other investment securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Non-marketable equity securities
 
$
13,344

 
$

 
$

 
$
13,344

 
$
11,463

 
$

 
$

 
$
11,463

Total Other Investment
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

   Securities
 
$
13,344

 
$

 
$

 
$
13,344

 
$
11,463

 
$

 
$

 
$
11,463


 
Securities with limited marketability, such as stock in the Federal Reserve Bank or the Federal Home Loan Bank, are carried at cost and are reported as non-marketable equity securities in the table above.

Certain investment securities owned by the Company were in an unrealized loss position (i.e., amortized cost basis exceeded the estimated fair value of the securities).  The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
Less Than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Unrealized Loss
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Unrealized Loss
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Unrealized Loss
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 
$
3,471

 
$
73

 
$
448

 
$
1

 
$
3,919

 
$
74

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government agencies
 
129,114

 
4,485

 
5,217

 
116

 
134,331

 
4,601

     Private label
 
1,604

 
2

 

 

 
1,604

 
2

Trust preferred securities
 
130

 
270

 
4,497

 
2,225

 
4,627

 
2,495

Corporate securities
 
6,081

 
639

 

 

 
6,081

 
639

Investment funds
 
1,482

 
18

 

 

 
1,482

 
18

Total
 
$
141,882

 
$
5,487

 
$
10,162

 
$
2,342

 
$
152,044

 
$
7,829


 
 
December 31, 2012
 
Less Than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Unrealized Loss
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Unrealized Loss
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Unrealized Loss
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 
$
1,163

 
$
15

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,163

 
$
15

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government agencies
 
16,225

 
85

 

 

 
16,225

 
85

Trust preferred securities
 
348

 
51

 
5,836

 
2,761

 
6,184

 
2,812

Corporate securities
 
1,950

 
49

 
4,344

 
363

 
6,294

 
412

Total
 
$
19,686

 
$
200

 
$
10,180

 
$
3,124

 
$
29,866

 
$
3,324

Securities held-to-maturity:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Trust preferred securities
 
$

 
$

 
$
3,380

 
$
58

 
$
3,380

 
$
58



Marketable equity securities consist of investments made by the Company in equity positions of various community banks.  Included within this portfolio are meaningful (2-5%) ownership positions in the following community bank holding companies: First National Corporation (FXNC) and First United Corporation (FUNC).

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company did not record any credit-related net investment impairment losses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded $0.6 million in credit-related net investment impairment losses. The charges deemed to be other-than-temporary were related to pooled bank trust preferred securities with a remaining carrying value of $5.6 million at September 30, 2012. The credit-related net impairment charges related to the pooled bank trust preferred securities were based on the Company’s quarterly reviews of its investment securities for indications of losses considered to be other-than-temporary.
Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary would be reflected in earnings as realized losses.  In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other things (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition, capital strength, and near-term (12 months) prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer such as changes in technology that may impair the earnings potential of the investment or the discontinuance of a segment of the business that may affect the future earnings potential; (iii) the historical volatility in the market value of the investment and/or the liquidity or illiquidity of the investment; (iv) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, an industry, or a geographic area; or (v) the intent to sell the investment security and if it’s more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis.  In addition, management also employs a continuous monitoring process in regards to its marketable equity securities, specifically its portfolio of regional community bank holdings.  Although the regional community bank stocks that are owned by the Company are publicly traded, the trading activity for these stocks is minimal, with trading volumes of less than 0.1% of each respective company being traded on a daily basis.  Another factor influencing the market value of these equity securities is a depressed stock market, particularly in the smaller community bank financial sector.  As part of management’s review process for these securities, management reviews the financial condition of each respective regional community bank for any indications of financial weakness.

Management has the ability and intent to hold the securities classified as held to maturity until they mature, at which time the Company will receive full value for the securities.  Furthermore, as of September 30, 2013, management does not intend to sell an impaired security and it is not more than likely that it will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis.  The unrealized losses on debt securities are primarily the result of interest rate changes, credit spread widening on agency-issued mortgage related securities, general financial market uncertainty and unprecedented market volatility.  These conditions will not prohibit the Company from receiving its contractual principal and interest payments on its debt securities.  The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date.   As of September 30, 2013, management believes the unrealized losses detailed in the table above are temporary and no impairment loss has been recognized in the Company’s consolidated income statement.  Should the impairment of any of these securities become other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period of the other-than-temporary impairment is identified, while any noncredit loss will be recognized in other comprehensive income.

At September 30, 2013, the book value of the Company’s five pooled trust preferred securities totaled $4.2 million with an estimated fair value of $2.3 million.  All of these securities are mezzanine tranches.  Pooled trust preferred securities represent beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that the Company analyzes within the scope of ASC 320, “Investments-Debt and Equity Securities” and are evaluated quarterly for other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”).  Management performs an analysis of OTTI utilizing its internal methodology as described below to estimate expected cash flows to be received in the future.  The Company reviews each of its pooled trust preferred securities to determine if an OTTI charge would be recognized in current earnings in accordance with ASC 320, “Investments-Debt and Equity Securities”.  There is a risk that continued collateral deterioration could cause the Company to recognize additional OTTI charges in earnings in the future.

When evaluating pooled trust preferred securities for OTTI, the Company determines a credit related portion and a noncredit related portion.  The credit related portion is recognized in earnings and represents the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security.  The noncredit related portion is recognized in other comprehensive income, and represents the difference between the book value and the fair value of the security less the amount of the credit related impairment.  The determination of whether it is probable that an adverse change in estimated cash flows has occurred is evaluated by comparing estimated cash flows to those previously projected as further described below.  The Company considers this process to be its primary evidence when determining whether credit related OTTI exists.  The results of these analyses are significantly affected by other variables such as the estimate of future cash flows, credit worthiness of the underlying issuers and determination of the likelihood of defaults of the underlying collateral.

The Company utilizes a third party model to compute the present value of expected cash flows which considers the structure and term of each of the five respective pooled trust preferred securities and the financial condition of the underlying issuers.  Specifically, the third party model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. For issuing banks that have defaulted, management generally assumes no recovery. For issuing banks that have deferred its interest payments, management excludes the collateral balance associated with these banks and assumes no recoveries of such collateral balance in the future. The exclusion of such issuing banks in a current deferral position is based on such bank experiencing a certain level of financial difficulty that raises doubt about its ability to satisfy its contractual debt obligation, and accordingly, the Company excludes the associated collateral balance from its estimate of expected cash flows. Other assumptions used in the estimate of expected cash flows include expected future default rates and prepayments. Specifically, the model assumes annual prepayments of 1.0% with 100% at maturity and assumes 150 basis points of additional annual defaults from banks that are currently not in default or deferral.  In addition, the model assumes no recoveries except for one trust preferred security which assumes that one of the banks currently deferring will cure such positions.  Management compares the present value of expected cash flows to those previously projected to determine if an adverse change in cash flows has occurred. If an adverse change in cash flows has occurred, management determines the credit loss to be recognized in the current period and the portion related to noncredit factors to be recognized in other comprehensive income.

The following table presents a progression of the credit loss component of OTTI on debt and equity securities recognized in earnings during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and for the year ended December 31, 2012 (in thousands).  The credit loss component represents the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security.  The credit component of OTTI recognized in earnings during a period is presented in two parts based upon whether the credit impairment in the current period is the first time the security was credit impaired (initial credit impairment) or if there is additional credit impairment on a security that was credit impaired in previous periods.
 
 
Debt Securities
 
Equity Securities
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2012
 
$
20,610

 
$
6,048

 
$
26,658

Additions:
 
 

 
 

 
 

  Initial credit impairment
 

 

 

  Additional credit impairment
 
576

 

 
576

Deductions:
 
 

 
 

 
 

  Called
 

 
(1,235
)
 
(1,235
)
Balance at December 31, 2012
 
21,186

 
4,813

 
25,999

Additions:
 
 

 
 

 
 

  Initial credit impairment
 

 

 

  Additional credit impairment
 

 

 

Deductions:
 
 

 
 

 
 

  Called
 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2013
 
$
21,186

 
$
4,813

 
$
25,999



The following table presents additional information about the Company’s trust preferred securities with a credit rating of below investment grade as of September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):
Deal Name
 
Type
 
Class
 
Original Cost
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Difference (1)
 
Lowest Credit Rating
 
# of issuers currently performing
 
Actual deferrals/defaults (as a % of original dollar)
 
Expected deferrals/defaults (as a % of remaining of performing collateral)
 
Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral (4)
 
 
 
Pooled trust preferred securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other-than-temporarily impaired
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available for Sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
P1
 
 
Pooled
 
Mezz
 
$
827

 
$
268

 
$
368

 
100

 
Caa3
 
7

 
19.5
%
 
21.0
%
(2) 
 
52.5
%
P2
 
 
Pooled
 
Mezz
 
3,279

 
436

 
1,252

 
816

 
Ca
 
6

 
22.3
%
 
5.2
%
(2) 
 
23.4
%
P3
(5) 
 
Pooled
 
Mezz
 
2,962

 
1,419

 
365

 
(1,054
)
 
Caa3
 
22

 
25.5
%
 
8.2
%
(2) 
 
12.9
%
P4
(6) 
 
Pooled
 
Mezz
 
4,060

 
400

 
130

 
(270
)
 
Ca
 
9

 
19.2
%
 
7.1
%
(3) 
 
22.8
%
P5
 
 
Pooled
 
Mezz
 
6,228

 
826

 
457

 
(369
)
 
Ca
 
9

 
26.0
%
 
21.0
%
(2) 
 
24.7
%
 
 
 
Held to Maturity:
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

P6
 
 
Pooled
 
Mezz
 
1,599

 

 
737

 
737

 
Caa3
 
7

 
19.5
%
 
21.0
%
(2) 
 
52.5
%
P7
 
 
Pooled
 
Mezz
 
4,354

 

 
1,669

 
1,669

 
Ca
 
6

 
22.3
%
 
5.2
%
(2) 
 
23.4
%
 
 
 
Single issuer trust preferred securities
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
Available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

S5
 
 
Single
 
 
 
261

 
235

 
289

 
54

 
NR
 
1

 
%
 
%
 
 
 

 
 
 
Held to Maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

S9
 
 
Single
 
 
 
4,000

 
3,994

 
4,000

 
6

 
NR
 
1

 
%
 
%
 
 
 

 
(1)
The differences noted consist of unrealized gains (losses) recorded at September 30, 2013 and noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses recorded subsequent to April 1, 2009 that have not been reclassified as credit losses.
(2)
Performing collateral is defined as total collateral minus all collateral that has been called, is currently deferring, or currently in default. This model for this security assumes that all collateral that is currently deferring will default with a zero recovery rate. The underlying issuers can cure, thus this bond could recover at a higher percentage upon default than zero.
(3)
Performing collateral is defined as total collateral minus all collateral that has been called, is currently deferring, or currently in default.  The model for this security assumes that one of the banks that is currently deferring will cure.  If additional underlying issuers cure, this bond could recover at a higher percentage.
(4)
Excess subordination is defined as the additional defaults/deferrals necessary in the next reporting period to deplete the entire credit enhancement (excess interest and over-collateralization) beneath our tranche within each pool to the point that would cause a "break in yield." This amount assumes that all currently performing collateral continues to perform. A break in yield means that our security would not be expected to receive all the contractual cash flows (principal and interest) by maturity. The "percent of current performing collateral" is the ratio of the "excess subordination amount" to current performing collateral—a higher percent means there is more excess subordination to absorb additional defaults/deferrals, and the better our security is protected from loss.
(5)
No other-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.  Other-than-temporary impairment losses of $11,000 were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2012.
(6)
No other-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.  Other-than-temporary impairment losses of $565,000 were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2012.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown in the following table (in thousands).  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.  Mortgage-backed securities have been allocated to their respective maturity groupings based on their contractual maturity.
 
Cost
 
Estimated Fair Value
Securities Available-for-Sale
 
 
 
Due in one year or less
$
5,566

 
$
5,581

Due after one year through five years
24,206

 
24,677

Due after five years through ten years
36,483

 
37,258

Due after ten years
258,876

 
255,268

 
$
325,131

 
$
322,784

Securities Held-to-Maturity
 

 
 

Due in one year or less
$

 
$

Due after one year through five years

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

Due after ten years
3,994

 
6,406

 
$
3,994

 
$
6,406



Gross gains and gross losses realized by the Company from investment security transactions are summarized in the table below (in thousands). The specific identification method is used to determine the cost basis of securities sold.
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross realized gains
$

 
$
830

 
$
93

 
$
1,776

Gross realized losses

 
(100
)
 

 
(246
)
Net investment security gains
$

 
$
730

 
$
93

 
$
1,530


    
The carrying value of securities pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law approximated $266 million and $228 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.