8-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported)

October 3, 2011

CITY HOLDING COMPANY

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Commission File Number: 0-11733

West Virginia	55-0619957
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)

25 Gatewater Road, Cross Lanes, WV 25313

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

304-769-1100

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

	Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
	Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12(b))
	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17CFR240.13e-4(c))

-1-

Section 7 – Regulation FD

Item 7.01 – Regulation FD Disclosure.

City Holding Company (the “Company”) is scheduled to meet with and make presentations to certain investors on Tuesday, October 4, 2011.  Charles R. Hageboeck, President and CEO, will make the Company’s presentations.  A copy of the slide presentation to be used by the Company during these meetings is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference herein.  Such slide presentation will also be available on the Company’s web site at www.cityholding.com.  Information contained on the Company’s website expressly is not incorporated by reference into this Current Report on Form 8-K.

The information in the preceding paragraph, as well as Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. It may only be incorporated by reference into another filing under the Exchange Act or Securities Act of 1933 if such subsequent filing specifically references Section 7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K. All information in the slide presentation speaks as of the date thereof and the Company does not assume any obligation to update said information in the future. In addition, the Company disclaims any inference regarding the materiality of such information which otherwise may arise as a result of its furnishing such information under Item 7.01 of this report on Form 8-K.

Section 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c) Exhibits

99.1 Copy of slide presentation

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the Undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: October 3, 2011	City Holding Company
By:	/s/ David L. Bumgarner
	David L. Bumgarner
	Chief Financial Officer

-2-

EX-99.1

Janney, Montgomery,
Scott LLC
Chicago

October 4, 2011

Forward looking statements

This news release contains certain forward-looking statements that are included
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995.  Such information involves risks and uncertainties that could result in the
Company's actual results differing from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those discussed in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
(1) the Company may incur additional loan loss provision due to negative credit
quality trends in the future that may lead to a deterioration of asset quality; (2) the
Company may incur increased charge-offs in the future; (3) the Company may
experience increases in the default rates on previously securitized loans that would
result in impairment losses or lower the yield on such loans; (4) the Company may
not continue to benefit from strong recovery efforts on previously securitized loans
resulting in improved yields on these assets; (5)the Company could have adverse
legal actions of a material nature; (6) the Company may face competitive loss of
customers; (7) the Company may be unable to manage its expense levels; (8) the
Company may have difficulty retaining key employees; (9) changes in the interest
rate environment may have results on the Company’s operations materially different
from those anticipated by the Company’s market risk management functions; (10)
changes in general economic conditions and increased competition could adversely
affect the Company’s operating results; (11) changes in other regulations and
government policies affecting bank holding companies and their subsidiaries,
including changes in monetary policies, could negatively impact the Company’s
operating results; (12) the Company may experience difficulties growing loan and
deposit balances; (13) the current economic environment poses significant
challenges for us and could adversely affect ourfinancial condition and results of
operations; (14) continued deterioration in the financial condition of the U.S. banking
system may impact the valuations of investments the Company has made in the
securities of other financial institutions resulting in either actual losses or other than
temporary impairments on such investments; and (15) the effects of the Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) recently adopted by
the United States Congress.  Forward-looking statements made herein reflect
management's expectations as of the date such statements are made. Such
information is provided to assist stockholders and potential investors in
understanding current and anticipated financial operations of the Company and is
included pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-
looking statement to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date such
statements are made.

•Total Assets $2.7 bil

•Branches68

•FTE795

•Market Cap$407 mil

•Institutional Ownership63%

•Average Daily Volume $2.1 mil

Date: September 30, 2011

Value in the banking sector?Checklist for success in current environment:

•Capital

–Strongly capitalized

•Markets

–Solid distribution network

–Stable geographic markets

–Disciplined competition

•Performance

–Strong net interest margin

–Strong NIM management

–Strong fee income

–Ability to control expenses

•Growth

–Liquidity to grow

–Ability to grow share in
market

–Opportunity to grow into
new markets

•Management

City Holding Company

•Markets:Operates an extremely strong
retail/commercial franchise in stable markets
with disciplined competition

•Asset Quality:Strong compared to peers and
City’s management has recognized and dealt
with issues

•Performance:Has consistently outperformed
peers with respect to earnings, capital, and
liquidity

•Growth:Growing and succeeding in slow-
growth stable markets with targeted expansion
into new markets

Key markets

1st Branch Share & 9% Deposit Share

in Huntington WV/Ashland KY MSA

$4.2 Billion

1st Branch Share & 10% Deposit Share

in WV’s largest market; $5.7 Billion

1st & 27% Deposit Share

$1.9 Billion

2ndBranch Share & 8% Deposit

Share in Morgan, Berkeley

& Jefferson Co. WV

$2.1Billion

The key to City’s success: an
enviable deposit franchise

•Branches68

•Average Deposits per Branch$32.9 MM

•Average Households per Branch2,291

•Average Deposit Share12.5%

•Average Household Share42%

City’s deposit franchise:

($000’s omitted)	Deposits	Share	Branches	Share
Charleston MSA	$574,866	10%	17	17%
Huntington/Ashland MSA	$366,184	9%	13	12%
Beckley MSA	$322,515	28%	7	25%
Greenbrier County, WV (Lewisburg)	$179,306	25%	6	33%
Eastern Panhandle Counties	$172,615	8%	7	13%
Mason County, WV	$83,879	26%	3	33%
Braxton County, WV	$65,615	33%	3	38%
Paintsville, KY	$94,723	24%	2	22%

Low cost and stable deposits:

Data: December 31, 2010

Solid core deposits drive strong net
interest margin:

Peer Data as of June 30, 2011

3.89%

CHCO is well positioned with respect
to interest rate risk:

Immediate Basis Point Change in Interest Rates	Estimated Increase or Decrease in Net Income between 1-12 months
+400 Bp	+17.5%
+300 Bp	+12.0%
+200 Bp	6.8%
+100 Bp	1.4%

Data: June 30, 2011

Strong deposit franchise drives top
decile non-interest revenue:

*As of December 31, 2010. Non-interest
income excludes investment
gains/(losses)

Sample of 284 reporting publicly traded banks
and thrifts with assets between $1 and $10
billion as of December 31, 2010, excluding
investment gains/(losses)

Non-interest income is branch driven:

	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011 YTD
Branch Service Charges	42.6	44.4	46.0	45.0	40.0	28.7
Insurance	2.3	4.1	4.2	5.6	5.5	4.5
Investment Management	2.1	2.0	2.2	2.3	2.8	2.2
BOLI	2.4	2.5	2.9	3.3	3.4	2.3

2011 Data as of September 30, 2011

City’s deposit franchise:

Branch Service Charges	2008	2009	2010	2011
Fiscal Year	46.0	45.0	40.0
1st Nine Mo. of Year	34.5	33.4	30.4	28.7
1st Quarter	11.2	10.4	10.2	9.1
2nd Quarter	11.3
3rd Quarter	12.0		9.7	9.8
4th Quarter	11.5		9.6

Decreases in branch service charges reflect :

•Real-time processing in May 2010

•Regulation E in August 2011

Service Charge challenges:

•NSF - real-time processing - May 2010

•NSF - Regulation E - August 2010

•NSF - forthcoming OCC Guidance - 2012

•Durbin Amendment - Effective Fall 2011

Service Charge competitive landscape:

	Actions
BB&T	$10 monthly svc charge
Chase	$12 monthly svc charge
United	Still offers free checking
Huntington	Still offers free checking
Fifth Third	$15 monthly svc charge
FCBC	Still offers free checking

Asset quality:A function of culture and market

•City’s loans are 60% retail/40% commercial

•City’s market area tends to be more stable

•Real estate prices in City’s market area have
been relatively stable

•City’s past-due loan trends are stable

•City’s non-performing asset levels are
stronger than peers

•City has been aggressive about charging
down non-performing loans

Conservative loan portfolio mix

City Holding Company

Peer Group

As of June 30, 2011

Sample of 283 publicly traded banks and thrifts with
assets between $1-$10 billion as of December 31, 2010

Retail loan facts:

•Residential real estate are 1,3,5 and 10 Yr
ARMs

•No sub-prime, interest-only, option adjustable

•Home equity loans include LOCs, fixed
amortizing loans, non-purchase adjustable
loans

•65% of home equity loans are 1st lien position

•66% of home equity loans have an LTV < 80%

•Ave loan balance for residential real estate is
$78,000

•Ave loan balance for home equity loans is
$35,000

Stable past-due loans (30+ days)Past-due loans trends are stable and reflect
better economics in City’s core markets

Charge-off trends:

Source: FDIC, All Insured Depository Institutions

Non-performing assets & OREO

Source: FDIC, All Insured Depository Institutions

Peer data as of June 30, 2011

Net charge-offs: 2010Net C/O: $7.4 MM(0.41% of Average Loans)
Provision $7.1 MM

Retail charge-offs: 2010

CHCO consistently strong performance

	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2010 Regional Peer Median
Reported ROA	2.11%	2.03%	1.12%	1.63%	1.47%	0.88%- 95th %ile
ROTE	22.4%	21.0%	11.4%	18.0%	15.1%	12.2%- 75th %ile
Tangible Common Equity/TA	10.1%	9.7%	8.83%	9.78%	10.01%	9.19%-85th %ile
NIM	4.56%	4.34%	4.64%	4.18%	4.06%	3.98%-55th %ile
Efficiency Ratio	44.5%	45.9%	46.3%	50.0%	51.6%	58.9% - 95th %ile
Non-Int Rev/Total Rev*	36.3%	36.6%	35.9%	37.9%	36.3%	28.3%-95th %ile

* Non-int rev excludes gain on Visa IPO; securities losses

Growth:CHCO is positioned to achieve “reasonable
growth” in its core franchise

•Commercial

•Retail

•Insurance

•Trust & Investment Management

Commercial loan growth:Success achieved due to community bank
orientation, strong team, strong underwriting,
and strong local economies

Deposit growth opportunity:CHCO has many small deposit relationships;
peers tend to have larger commercial & public
deposits

	Branches	Deposits	Deposits/Branch
CHCO	68	$ 2.2 B	$33 million
BBT	36	$ 3.3 B	$92 million
JPM	20	$ 1.2 B	$60 million
UBSI	20	$ 1.2 B	$60 million
HBAN	14	$ 0.9 B	$64 million
FITB	10	$ 0.4 B	$40 million

Includes branches within 5 miles of City branch

Source: SNL

Growth:Expanding retail distribution to capture
additional retail households

Source: SNL

Sept 2010Expansion into South
Charleston WV has
encouraging early results

CityInsurance: Growing

RevenuesLines of Business

•2006$2.3 millionPersonal Lines

•2007 $4.1 millionWorkers Compensation

•2008$4.2 millionHealth/Benefits/Life Ins

•2009$5.6 millionProperty/Casualty

•2010$5.5 million

•2011 YTD (9/30) $4.5 million

MarketsAcquisitions

Charleston (3 locations)Dickens & Clark (Teays Valley)

HuntingtonPatton Insurance - Nitro

RipleyMillcreek Insurance - Ripley

BeckleyAshland Area Insurance

Martinsburg

Ashland

Trust AUM: Strong growthCAGR (December 31, 2004-September 30,
2011) of 8.96%

CHCO: Capital flexibility

•Tangible common equity at 6/30/11:9.56%

•No TARP!!!!

•Dividends

-Increased 10% in April 2004 to $0.88

-Increased 14% in April 2005 to $1.00

-Increased 12% in April 2006 to $1.12

-Increased 11% in April 2007 to $1.24

-Increased 10% in April 2008 to $1.36

-Dividend yield of 5.00% (as of 9/30/11)

-Dividend payout ratio 53% (Analyst est.EPS for 2011)

•Share repurchases

-Purchased 606,500 shares during 1st Nine Months

of 2011 (3.9%)

-Driven by CHCO’s strong profitability, CHCO can achieve
greater long-term share repurchase activity than peers.

Share Count:

Growth per share (12/31/04 -
12/31/10):

•Loans per share:8.2% CAGR

•Deposits per share:5.9% CAGR

•Non-interest inc per share:3.1% CAGR

•Expenses per share:4.3% CAGR

Implication: While CHCO operates in relatively
low growth markets, high profitability allows
share repurchases, which have driven core
earnings despite the economic environment of
the last several years

Acquisition philosophy:

•Historically less acquisitive than peers

•Acquisitions must truly be strategic or
meaningfully accretive

•Opportunities have increased

•Actively looking at FDIC and non-FDIC deals

•In-market

•Adjacent market

•Growth markets

•Size: Generally $100MM to $1B

Acquisition territory:

TITLE	EXPERIENCE	AGE	JOINED
CEO	PPLS; CHCO CFO; PHD	49	2001
EVP - Retail	PPLS	55	2001
EVP - Commercial	One Valley; BB&T, CPA	61	2004
CFO	Public Accounting, CPA	46	2005
CAO/CIO	City National Bank	47	1989
SVP - Branches	BB&T	42	2001
SVP - CCO	United Bankshares, CPA	37	1998
SVP - CRO	BB&T	55	2001
SVP Consumer	Bank One	44	2001
SVP Mortgage	United Bankshares	59	2004
SVP Trust	City National Bank	56	1985
SVP Insurance	Rogers; Principal	41	2007
Treasurer	City National Bank	44	1990

Value in the banking sector?Checklist for success in current environment:

Capital

•Strongly capitalized -Top 10%

Markets

•Solid distribution network -Excellent

•Stable geographic markets - Yes; WV & E Kentucky

•Disciplined competition -Yes; see NIM

Performance

•Strong net interest margin - Yes

•Strong NIM management - See results (floors)

•Dependence on NII - Top decile

•Ability to control expenses - Top decile efficiency ratio

Growth

•Liquidity to grow - Extremely strong

•Ability to grow share in market -5-mile branch share 32%; deposit share
14%

•Opportunity to grow into new markets - Well positioned

•Management- Experienced team with great results

CHCO represents good value and
stability

•Pricing Metrics*:

•Price to Book: 131%

•Price to Tangible Book: 160%

•Price to 2011 Projected Earnings**10.5x

•Dividend Yield5.0%

•Div Payout Ratio (First Call)**53%

•Tangible Capital/Tangible Assets9.56%

•Institutional Ownership63%

*Based on Price of $26.99 (9/30/11)

** Based on analyst estimate of $2.56 (average of 8)