XML 68 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
American Realty Capital Trust
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
American Realty Capital Trust  
American Realty Capital Trust

4.                                     American Realty Capital Trust

 

A.  Acquisition

 

On January 22, 2013, we completed our acquisition of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., or ARCT. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 6, 2012, as amended on January 6, 2013, at the effective time of the acquisition, each outstanding share of ARCT common stock was converted into the right to receive a combination of: (i) $0.35 in cash and (ii) 0.2874 shares of our common stock. In connection with the acquisition, at the closing we terminated and repaid the amounts then outstanding of approximately $552.9 million under ARCT’s revolving credit facility and term loan. With this acquisition, we added 515 properties to our portfolio. Below is the preliminary allocation of the purchase price of the ARCT acquisition, based on the closing price of our common stock of $44.04 per share on January 22, 2013:

 

Consideration associated with equity issued

 

  $

 2,027,753

Cash consideration paid to previous owners of ARCT

 

59,142

Total preliminary purchase consideration

 

  $

 2,086,895

 

We will account for the ARCT acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, and are in the process of completing our allocation of the purchase price for this acquisition, which we expect to finalize during 2013.  The following table summarizes our preliminary purchase price allocation, which represents our current best estimate of fair value.  These estimates could change significantly as we complete our purchase price allocation analysis.

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

Total real estate and related intangible assets

 

  $

 3,178,862

 

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and other assets, net

 

45,667

 

Total Assets

 

3,224,529

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

Lines of credit payable

 

317,207

 

Term loan

 

235,000

 

Mortgage notes payable

 

538,888

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities, net

 

32,577

 

Total Liabilities

 

1,123,672

 

 

 

 

Non-controlling interest

 

13,962

Estimated fair value of net assets acquired

 

  $

 2,086,895

 

B.  Transaction Costs

 

In connection with our acquisition of ARCT, we expect to incur total merger-related transaction costs of approximately $19 million, which include, but are not limited to, advisor fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing fees and transfer taxes. We incurred $7.9 million of the estimated $19 million of total merger-related transaction costs, during 2012, which are included in income from continuing operations.  At December 31, 2012, we had contingent payments of approximately $6 million due to various banks for fairness opinions related to our acquisition of ARCT, which is included as part of the estimated $19 million of merger-related costs disclosed above.

 

C.  Litigation

 

All of the below actions name as defendants ARCT, members of the ARCT board of directors, Realty Income, and Tau Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Realty Income, or Merger Sub. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that the ARCT directors breached their fiduciary duties to ARCT and/or its stockholders in negotiating and approving the agreement, that the acquisition consideration negotiated in the agreement improperly values ARCT, that the ARCT stockholders will not receive fair value for their ARCT common stock in the acquisition, and that the terms of the agreement impose improper deal-protection devices that purportedly preclude competing offers. The complaints further allege that Realty Income, Merger Sub, and, in some cases, ARCT aided and abetted those alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The various amended complaints add allegations that disclosures regarding the proposed merger in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed on October 1, 2012, or the definitive proxy statement/prospectus filed on December 6, 2012, are inadequate. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, including enjoining or rescinding the acquisition, and an award of other unspecified attorneys’ and other fees and costs, in addition to other relief.

 

Realty Income believes that these actions have no merit and intends to respond to them in due course.

 

Maryland Actions. Since the announcement of the proposed acquisition of ARCT on September 6, 2012, six alleged class actions and/or shareholder derivative actions were filed on behalf of alleged ARCT stockholders and/or ARCT itself in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, under the following captions: Quaal v. American Realty Capital Trust Inc., et al., No. 24-C-12-005306, filed September 7, 2012; Hill v. American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., et al., No. 24-C-12-005502, filed September 19, 2012; Goldwurm v. American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., et al., No. 24-C-12-005524, filed September 20, 2012; Gordon v. Schorsch, et al., No. 24-C-12-005571, filed September 21, 2012; Gregor v. Kahane, et al., No. 24-C-12-005563, filed September 21, 2012; and Rooker v. American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., et al., No. 24-C-12-005924, filed October 5, 2012. On October 23, 2012, defendants moved to dismiss the actions and, on November 8, 2012, moved to stay discovery pending disposition of the motions to dismiss. On November 13, 2012, all plaintiffs except Sydelle Goldwurm filed motions to compel discovery and to expedite discovery. On November 16, 2012, the court consolidated the actions into a single action captioned In re American Capital Realty Trust, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, No. 24-C-12-005306 (the “Maryland State Action”).  On November 21, 2012, the court appointed plaintiff Randell Quaal as lead plaintiff and Brower Piven, P.C. as lead counsel for plaintiffs. On December 3, 2012, plaintiff Goldwurm voluntarily dismissed her action in Maryland state court without prejudice. On December 11, 2012, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction and to compel expedited discovery. On December 13, 2012, the court granted defendants’ motion to stay discovery and denied plaintiffs’ motion to expedite discovery. On December 14, 2012, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint, and defendants filed amended motions to dismiss the amended complaint on December 21, 2012.

 

On January 6, 2013, the parties in the Maryland State Action entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding settlement of all claims asserted on behalf of the alleged class of ARCT stockholders. In connection with the settlement contemplated by the memorandum of understanding, the Maryland State Action and all claims asserted in the litigation will be dismissed, subject to court approval. The proposed settlement terms required ARCT to make certain additional disclosures related to the merger, as set forth in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by ARCT on January 8, 2013. The parties also agreed that plaintiffs may seek attorneys’ fees and costs in an as-yet undetermined amount, with ARCT to pay such fees and costs if and to the extent they are approved by the Maryland state court. The memorandum of understanding further contemplates that the parties will enter into a stipulation of settlement, which will be subject to customary conditions, including confirmatory discovery and court approval following notice to ARCT’s stockholders. If the parties enter into a stipulation of settlement, a hearing will be scheduled at which the court will consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the settlement. There can be no assurance that the parties will ultimately enter into a stipulation of settlement, that the court will approve any proposed settlement, or that any eventual settlement will be under the same terms as those contemplated by the memorandum of understanding.

 

After the Maryland state court denied plaintiff Goldwurm’s motion for appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel in the Maryland State Action, plaintiff Goldwurm filed a class action and shareholder derivative action on November 29, 2012, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, captioned Goldwurm v. American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., et al., No. 1:12-cv-03516-JKB (the “Maryland Federal Action”). On December 12, 2012, plaintiff Goldwurm moved for expedited discovery. Defendants moved to stay the federal case on December 13, 2012, and moved to dismiss it on December 19, 2012. On January 11, 2013, plaintiff Goldwurm moved for a temporary restraining order seeking to enjoin the shareholder vote on the proposed merger set to take place on January 16, 2013.

 

On January 14, 2013, the parties in the Maryland Federal Action entered into an agreement to settle all claims.  In connection with the settlement, on January 25, 2013, the parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss the case with prejudice.  On January 28, 2013, the Maryland federal court dismissed the action.

 

New York Actions. Two alleged class actions were filed on behalf of alleged ARCT stockholders in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for New York, New York, under the following captions: The Carol L. Possehl Living Trust v. American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., et al., No. 653300-2012, filed September 20, 2012; and Salenger v. American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. et al., No. 353355-2012, filed September 25, 2012. On October 19, 2012, the court consolidated the actions into a single action captioned In re American Realty Capital Trust Shareholders Litigation, No. 653300-2012 (the “New York Action”) and appointed Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as lead counsel for plaintiffs. On October 19, 2012, defendants moved for a stay of proceedings. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on October 23, 2012. On November 9, 2012, the Court granted defendants’ motion to stay the New York Action pending the Maryland state actions.