XML 30 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
NOTE 7: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company measures and records in its consolidated financial statements certain assets and liabilities at fair value. ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value hierarchy for instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). This hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
Level 1 – Assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market.
Level 2 – Assets and liabilities whose values are based on inputs other than those included in Level 1, including quoted market prices in markets that are not active; quoted prices of assets or liabilities with similar attributes in active markets; or valuation models whose inputs are observable or unobservable but corroborated by market data.
Level 3 – Assets and liabilities whose values are based on valuation models or pricing techniques that utilize unobservable inputs that are significant to the overall fair value measurement.
On January 27, 2017, concurrent with the 2017 Amendment, the Company entered into interest rate swaps with certain financial institutions for a total notional value of $500 million with a duration that matches the maturity of the Company’s Term C Loans. The interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and are considered highly effective. As a result, no ineffectiveness has been recognized in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Additionally, for the interest rate swaps, no amounts are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The monthly net interest settlements under the interest rate swaps are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and recognized in interest expense consistent with the recognition of interest expense on the Company’s Term C Loans. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, realized losses of $2 million and $3 million, respectively, were recognized in interest expense. As of June 30, 2017, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was recorded in other current liabilities in the amount of $6 million with the unrealized loss recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income. As of June 30, 2017, the Company expects approximately $5 million to be reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and into interest expense over the next twelve months. The interest rate swap fair value is considered Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy as it includes quoted prices for similar instruments as well as interest rates and yield curves that are observable in the market.
The Company holds certain marketable equity securities which are traded on national stock exchanges. These securities are recorded at fair value and are categorized as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. These investments are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. On January 31, 2017, the Company sold its tronc shares for net proceeds of $5 million and recognized a pretax gain of $5 million in the first quarter of 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value and cost basis was $5 million and $0, respectively. The fair value and the cost basis of other marketable equity securities held by the Company as of June 30, 2017 were not material.
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short term to maturity. Certain of the Company’s cash equivalents are held in money market funds which are valued using net asset value (“NAV”) per share, which would be considered Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Estimated fair values and carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
Cost method investments
$
25,943

 
$
25,943

 
$
26,748

 
$
26,748

Term Loan Facility
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Term B Loans due 2020
$
201,626

 
$
197,661

 
$
2,359,571

 
$
2,312,218

Term C Loans due 2024
$
1,770,222

 
$
1,732,285

 
$

 
$

5.875% Senior Notes due 2022
$
1,155,484

 
$
1,085,946

 
$
1,120,482

 
$
1,084,563

Dreamcatcher Credit Facility
$
12,929

 
$
12,770

 
$
14,952

 
$
14,770


The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each category of financial instruments.
Cost Method Investments—Cost method investments in private companies are recorded at cost, net of write-downs resulting from periodic evaluations of the carrying value of the investments. No events or changes in circumstances occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2017 that suggested a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the Company’s investments. The carrying value of the cost method investments at both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 approximated fair value. The cost method investments would be classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Term Loan Facility—The fair value of the outstanding principal balance of the term loans under the Company’s Term Loan Facility at both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is based on pricing from observable market information in a non-active market and would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
5.875% Senior Notes due 2022—The fair value of the outstanding principal balance of the Company’s 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is based on pricing from observable market information in a non-active market and would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Dreamcatcher Credit Facility—The fair value of the outstanding principal balance of the Company’s Dreamcatcher Credit Facility at both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is based on pricing from observable market information for similar instruments in a non-active market and would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.