XML 81 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures and records in its consolidated financial statements certain assets and liabilities at fair value. ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value hierarchy for instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). This hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
Level 1 – Assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market.
Level 2 – Assets and liabilities whose values are based on inputs other than those included in Level 1, including quoted market prices in markets that are not active; quoted prices of assets or liabilities with similar attributes in active markets; or valuation models whose inputs are observable or unobservable but corroborated by market data.
Level 3 – Assets and liabilities whose values are based on valuation models or pricing techniques that utilize unobservable inputs that are significant to the overall fair value measurement.
The Company’s investment in Tribune Publishing is recorded at fair value and is categorized as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy as the common stock of Tribune Publishing is publicly traded on the NYSE. The Company’s investment in Tribune Publishing is measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value and cost basis of the Company’s investment in Tribune Publishing was $7 million and $0, respectively, as of March 29, 2015 and the fair value and cost basis was $9 million and $0, respectively, as of December 28, 2014.
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short term to maturity.
Estimated fair values and carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
 
March 29, 2015
 
December 28, 2014
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
Cost method investments
$
18,418

 
$
18,418

 
$
18,238

 
$
18,238

Convertible note receivable
$
2,000

 
$
2,000

 
$
2,000

 
$
2,000

Term Loan Facility
$
3,480,005

 
$
3,471,316

 
$
3,411,744

 
$
3,471,017

Dreamcatcher Credit Facility
$
22,956

 
$
22,905

 
$
23,498

 
$
23,914


The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each category of financial instruments.
Cost Method Investments—The Company’s cost method investments are in private companies and recorded at cost, net of write-downs resulting from periodic evaluations of the carrying values of the investments. No events or changes in circumstances occurred during the three months ended March 29, 2015 that suggested a significant adverse effect in the fair values of these investments.
Convertible Note Receivable—The convertible note receivable is with a private company and is recorded at cost. No events or changes in circumstances have occurred during the three months ended March 29, 2015 that suggested a significant adverse effect in the fair value of this note receivable. The carrying value of the note receivable at March 29, 2015 approximated fair value.
Term Loan Facility—The fair value of the outstanding principal balance of the Company’s Term Loan Facility at both March 29, 2015 and December 28, 2014 is based on pricing from observable market information in a non-active market and would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Dreamcatcher Credit Facility—The fair value of the outstanding principal balance of the Company’s Dreamcatcher Credit Facility at both March 29, 2015 and December 28, 2014 is based on pricing from observable market information for similar instruments in a non-active market and would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.