XML 45 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
D. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
D. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

D.            FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

In accordance with Codification 820-10, the Company determines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The Company generally applies the income approach to determine fair value.  This method uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount.  The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations with respect to those future amounts.

 

Codification 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).  The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

·   Level 1 – Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
·   Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and amounts derived from valuation models where all significant inputs are observable in active markets

 

·   Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s assumptions

 

 

 

For disclosure purposes, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy level based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

 

The table below sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2012:

 

    Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1)    

Significant Other Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

    Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)     Total  
                         
Derivative instruments   $ -     $ -     $ 8,437,492     $ 8,437,492  
                                 

 

The table below sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the condensed balance sheet at September 30, 2012:

 

    Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1)    

Significant Other Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

    Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)     Total  
                         
Derivative instruments   $ -     $ -     $ 6,983,690     $ 6,983,690  
                                 

 

The following sets forth the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances related to fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended September 30, 2012:

 

    December 31, 2012     September 30, 2012  
Beginning balance   $ 6,983,690     $ 7,261,073  
Issuances     4,200,000       6,706,667  
Settlements     -       (5,072,367 )
Realized and unrealized gains                
recorded in earnings     (2,746,198 )     (1,911,683 )
Ending balance   $ 8,437,492     $ 6,983,690  

 

The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments disclosed above are primarily derived from valuation models where significant inputs such as historical price and volatility of the Company’s stock as well as U.S. Treasury Bill rates are observable in active markets.