XML 30 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Policies)
3 Months Ended
May 05, 2018
Basis Of Presentation Policies  
Basis of Presentation

Fred’s, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Fred’s”, “Fred’s Pharmacy”, “We”, “Our”, “Us” or “Company”) operate, as of May 5, 2018, 595 discount general merchandise stores and three specialty pharmacy-only locations (now classified as Assets Held-for-Sale), in fifteen states in the Southeastern United States. Included in the count of discount general merchandise stores are 12 franchised locations. There are 348 full service pharmacy departments located within our discount general merchandise stores, including one within franchised locations.

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and therefore do not include all information and notes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. The accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position in conformity with GAAP. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2018.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2017, Fred’s Board of Directors approved a plan to actively market its specialty pharmacy business. The specialty pharmacy business met the criteria for “Assets held for Sale” in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360 (ASC 360), Property, Plant and Equipment as of February 3, 2018. The Specialty Pharmacy assets and liabilities are reflected as “Assets Held-for-Sale” on the consolidated balance sheets in accordance with ASC 360. In addition, the results of operations for the specialty pharmacy business have been presented as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 205-20, Results of Operations – Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. Excluding the “Assets Held-for-Sale” subsection, amounts and percentages for all periods discussed below reflect the results of operations and financial condition from Fred’s continuing operations.

 

On May 4, 2018, Fred’s entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“the Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Advance Care Scripts, Inc. (“the Buyer”), pursuant to which the Buyer agreed to purchase certain Specialty Pharmacy assets of National Pharmaceutical Network, Inc. and Reeves-Sain Drug Store, Inc. (collectively known as “Entrust”), consisting of three pharmacy locations, pharmaceutical inventory, and related intellectual property. The amount to be paid by the Buyer to Fred’s for the purchased assets is $40.0 million (plus an additional amount for inventory, not to exceed $5.5 million), subject to any adjustments. On June 1, 2018, the specialty pharmacy assets were sold. See Note 13, Subsequent Events for additional information.

 

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2018 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net loss.

 

The results of operations for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

 

All references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to 2017 and 2018 refer to the fiscal years ended February 3, 2018 and ending February 2, 2019, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU provides companies with the option to reclassify tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) within Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Retained Earnings. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

  

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory. ASU 2016-16 requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The guidance must be applied using the modified retrospective basis. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2016-16 to have a material impact on its financial statements. This update will be effective for the Company at the beginning of fiscal 2018.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The amendments in the ASU are designed to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including the interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has identified all leases impacted by this pronouncement. Currently, the Company is evaluating different software available to maintain all leases in compliance with this pronouncement. The Company has established a committee to ensure compliance with this standard upon adoption in 2019. The Company does not plan to early adopt and expects material changes to the financial position created at the inception of compliance with this standard. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact the guidance will have on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

 

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), an update to ASU 2014-09. This ASU amends ASU 2014-09 to defer the effective date by one year for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Subsequently, the FASB has also issued accounting standards updates which clarify the guidance. This ASU removes inconsistencies, complexities and allows transparency and comparability of revenue transactions across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets by providing a single comprehensive principles-based model with additional disclosures regarding uncertainties. The principles-based revenue recognition model has a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In transition, the ASU may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company has implemented this standard and there was no material impact to the Company’s statement of position, results of operations, or statement of cash flow.

 

Sales

 

The vast majority of Fred’s contracts with customers are made at the point of sale (POS) in the retail stores, and the performance obligation is the transfer of merchandise which is satisfied at POS when customer pays for merchandise and title transfers to them. As such, the new Revenue Standard will have limited applicability.

 

340B Revenues

 

We evaluated principal versus agent considerations with regards to the 340B Direct program under ASC 606, which states that (ASC 6060-10-55-37A):

 

“When another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer, an entity that is principal obtains control of any one of the following: 

  a. A good or another asset from the other party that it then transfers to the customer.

 

  b. A right to a service to be performed by the other party, which gives the entity the ability to direct that party to provide the service to the customer on the entity’s behalf.

 

  c. A good or service from the other party that it then combines with other goods or services in providing the specified good or service to the customer.”

 

Because Fred’s is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide the 340B Direct prescription drugs and assumes control of and risk for inventory prior to transfer of goods to the customer, including pricing apart from when determined by federal mandate, Fred’s should recognize revenue on a gross basis as principal for the 340B Direct program.

 

Gift Card and Breakage

 

When customers purchase gift cards, the sale is not recognized until the card is redeemed. The gift cards are not always fully redeemed and as such, the Company recognizes breakage. Based on the results from our historical breakage model, the Company defines the likelihood of redemption as remote after three years of no activity.

 

Layaway Plans

 

Store layaways are agreements with our customers to provide or deliver goods for a specified price at a future date. Layaway programs run annually for a duration of less than one year and are most popular during the Christmas seasons. Under the Company’s layaway plan, the customer is obligated to pay only the amount equivalent to the value of the good plus sales tax. The Company does not assess a layaway fee or interest, but requires an upfront deposit. The customer does not take delivery of the merchandise until the full value is collected.

 

According to ASC 606-10-25-23, “an entity shall recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service (that is, an asset) to a customer. An asset is transferred when (or as) the customer obtains control of that asset.”

 

Our performance obligation is the transfer of merchandise which is satisfied at the point of customer pick-up, not at transaction initiation. Any payments received prior to customer pick-up are considered advance payments and deferred and recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied. Layaway sales are deferred when the customer transaction is initiated and are recognized as revenue when the layaway merchandise is transferred.

 

Disaggregated Revenues

 

In the following table, sales are disaggregated by major merchandising category.

 

    Thirteen Weeks Ended  
(in thousands)   May 05, 2018  
Pharmacy     272,724  
Consumables     136,442  
Household Goods and Softlines     94,786  
Franchise     3,007  
Total     506,959  

Termination of Asset Purchase Agreement

Termination of Asset Purchase Agreement

 

On December 19, 2016, Fred’s and its wholly-owned subsidiary, AFAE, LLC (“Buyer”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Rite Aid Corporation (“Rite Aid”) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (“Walgreens”), pursuant to which Buyer agreed to purchase 865 stores, certain intellectual property and other tangible assets (collectively, the “Assets”) and to assume certain liabilities for a cash purchase price of $950 million (the “Rite Aid Transaction”).  Pursuant to Section 8.01(g) of the Asset Purchase Agreement, each of Buyer, Walgreens or Rite Aid is permitted to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement upon the termination of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 27, 2015, among Walgreens, Rite Aid and the other parties thereto (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”).

 

On June 29, 2017, the Merger Agreement was terminated and, accordingly, the Asset Purchase Agreement was also terminated, effective immediately. In connection with the termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company received a termination fee payment of $25 million on June 30, 2017.

 

See Note 11: Indebtedness for additional information relating to the termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement.