LEGAL CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
Apr. 29, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
LEGAL CONTINGENCIES	NOTE 9: LEGAL CONTINGENCIES On October 15, 2015, a lawsuit entitled Southern Independent Bank v. Fred’s, Inc. was filed in the United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama related to the data security incident. The complaint includes allegations made by the plaintiff on behalf of itself and financial institutions similarly situated (“alleged class of financial institutions”) that the Company was negligent in failing to use reasonable care in obtaining, retaining, securing and deleting the personal and financial information of customers who use debit cards issued by the plaintiff and alleged class of financial institutions to make purchases at Fred’s stores. The complaint also includes allegations that the Company made negligent misrepresentations that the Company possessed and maintained adequate data security measures and systems that were sufficient to protect the personal and financial information of shoppers using debit cards issued by the plaintiff and alleged class of financial institutions. The complaint seeks monetary damages and equitable relief to be proved at trial as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company has denied the allegations and has filed a motion to dismiss all claims. This motion has since been denied, and the Company has now filed a motion to reconsider by certifying the question to the Alabama Supreme Court for clarity, which is still pending before the court. Future costs or liabilities related to the incident may have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company has not made an accrual for future losses related to these claims at this time as the future losses are not considered probable. The Company has general liability policy with a $10 million limit and $350,000 deductible. The $350,000 deductible represents the Company’s estimate of potential exposure related to this matter. On July 24, 2016, a lawsuit entitled First Tennessee Bank National Association v. Fred’s Inc. was filed in the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tennessee for the Thirtieth Judicial District in Memphis related to the data security incident. The complaint includes allegations that the Company failed to comply with Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (“PCI DSS”), and that the Company was then in breach of a duty owed to the plaintiff, as an alleged third-party beneficiary of the Company’s contract with Visa. The complaint also alleges that the Company breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as a violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Lastly, the complaint alleges that the Company acted negligently and made negligent misrepresentations regarding PCI DSS. The plaintiff seeks declaratory and monetary relief for damages, including reasonable attorney fees. The Company has denied all allegations and filed a motion to dismiss all claims, which is currently pending before the court. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company has not made an accrual for future losses related to these claims at this time as the future losses are not considered probable. The Company has general liability policy with a $10 million limit and $350,000 deductible. The $350,000 deductible represents the Company’s estimate of potential exposure related to this matter. On July 27, 2016, a lawsuit entitled The State of Mississippi v. Fred’s Inc., et al was filed in the Chancery Court of Desoto County, Mississippi, Third Judicial District. The complaint alleges that the Company fraudulently reported their usual and customary prices to Mississippi’s Division of Medicaid in order to receive higher reimbursements for prescription drugs. The complaint seeks declaratory and monetary relief for the profits alleged to have been unfairly earned as well as attorney costs. The Company denies these allegations and believes it acted appropriately in its dealings with the Mississippi Division of Medicaid. The Company successfully filed a Motion to Transfer to Circuit Court. Once a Circuit Court Judge is assigned to this matter, the Company plans to file a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable. The Company has multiple insurance policies which the Company believes will limit its potential exposure. On September 29, 2016, the Company reported to the Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) that an unencrypted laptop containing clinical and demographic data for 9,624 individuals had been stolen from an employee’s vehicle while the vehicle was parked at the employee’s residence. On January 13, 2017, the OCR opened an investigation into the incident. The Company has fully complied with the investigation and timely responded to all requests for information from the OCR. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable. On March 30, 2017, a lawsuit entitled Tiffany Taylor, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. Fred’s Inc. and Fred’s Stores of Tennessee, Inc. was filed in the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Southern Division. The complaint alleges that the Company wrongfully and willfully violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”). The complaint is filed as a Class Action, with the class being open for five (5) years before the date the complaint was filed. The complaint seeks statutory damages, attorney’s fees, punitive damages, an injunctive order, and other such relief that the court may deem just and equitable. The Company has filed a Motion to Dismiss this complaint, and this Motion is still pending before the court. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable. On April 11, 2017, a lawsuit entitled Melanie Wallace, Sascha Feliciano, and Heather Tyler, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Fred’s Stores of Tennessee, Inc. was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County in the state of Georgia. The complaint alleges that the Company wrongfully and willfully violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”). The complaint is filed as a Class Action. The complaint seeks statutory damages, attorney’s fees, punitive damages, and other such relief that the court may deem just and equitable. The Company is still completing the discovery stage of this lawsuit, as no filing deadlines have been set at this time. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable. In addition to the matters disclosed above, the Company is party to several pending legal proceedings and claims arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these proceedings and claims against the Company cannot be determined with certainty, management of the Company is of the opinion that these proceedings and claims should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements as a whole. However, litigation involves an element of uncertainty. Future developments could cause these actions or claims, individually or in aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements as a whole. The Company has not made an accrual for future losses related to these proceedings and claims as future losses are not considered probable at this time and estimates are unavailable.

LEGAL CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2017

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

NOTE 9: LEGAL CONTINGENCIES

On October 15, 2015, a lawsuit entitled Southern Independent Bank v. Fred’s, Inc. was filed in the United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama related to the data security incident. The complaint includes allegations made by the plaintiff on behalf of itself and financial institutions similarly situated (“alleged class of financial institutions”) that the Company was negligent in failing to use reasonable care in obtaining, retaining, securing and deleting the personal and financial information of customers who use debit cards issued by the plaintiff and alleged class of financial institutions to make purchases at Fred’s stores. The complaint also includes allegations that the Company made negligent misrepresentations that the Company possessed and maintained adequate data security measures and systems that were sufficient to protect the personal and financial information of shoppers using debit cards issued by the plaintiff and alleged class of financial institutions. The complaint seeks monetary damages and equitable relief to be proved at trial as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company has denied the allegations and has filed a motion to dismiss all claims. This motion has since been denied, and the Company has now filed a motion to reconsider by certifying the question to the Alabama Supreme Court for clarity, which is still pending before the court. Future costs or liabilities related to the incident may have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company has not made an accrual for future losses related to these claims at this time as the future losses are not considered probable. The Company has general liability policy with a $10 million limit and $350,000 deductible. The $350,000 deductible represents the Company’s estimate of potential exposure related to this matter.

On July 24, 2016, a lawsuit entitled First Tennessee Bank National Association v. Fred’s Inc. was filed in the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tennessee for the Thirtieth Judicial District in Memphis related to the data security incident. The complaint includes allegations that the Company failed to comply with Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (“PCI DSS”), and that the Company was then in breach of a duty owed to the plaintiff, as an alleged third-party beneficiary of the Company’s contract with Visa. The complaint also alleges that the Company breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as a violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Lastly, the complaint alleges that the Company acted negligently and made negligent misrepresentations regarding PCI DSS. The plaintiff seeks declaratory and monetary relief for damages, including reasonable attorney fees. The Company has denied all allegations and filed a motion to dismiss all claims, which is currently pending before the court. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company has not made an accrual for future losses related to these claims at this time as the future losses are not considered probable. The Company has general liability policy with a $10 million limit and $350,000 deductible. The $350,000 deductible represents the Company’s estimate of potential exposure related to this matter.

On July 27, 2016, a lawsuit entitled The State of Mississippi v. Fred’s Inc., et al was filed in the Chancery Court of Desoto County, Mississippi, Third Judicial District. The complaint alleges that the Company fraudulently reported their usual and customary prices to Mississippi’s Division of Medicaid in order to receive higher reimbursements for prescription drugs. The complaint seeks declaratory and monetary relief for the profits alleged to have been unfairly earned as well as attorney costs. The Company denies these allegations and believes it acted appropriately in its dealings with the Mississippi Division of Medicaid. The Company successfully filed a Motion to Transfer to Circuit Court. Once a Circuit Court Judge is assigned to this matter, the Company plans to file a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable. The Company has multiple insurance policies which the Company believes will limit its potential exposure.

On September 29, 2016, the Company reported to the Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) that an unencrypted laptop containing clinical and demographic data for 9,624 individuals had been stolen from an employee’s vehicle while the vehicle was parked at the employee’s residence. On January 13, 2017, the OCR opened an investigation into the incident. The Company has fully complied with the investigation and timely responded to all requests for information from the OCR. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable.

On March 30, 2017, a lawsuit entitled Tiffany Taylor, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. Fred’s Inc. and Fred’s Stores of Tennessee, Inc. was filed in the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Southern Division. The complaint alleges that the Company wrongfully and willfully violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”). The complaint is filed as a Class Action, with the class being open for five (5) years before the date the complaint was filed. The complaint seeks statutory damages, attorney’s fees, punitive damages, an injunctive order, and other such relief that the court may deem just and equitable. The Company has filed a Motion to Dismiss this complaint, and this Motion is still pending before the court. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable.

On April 11, 2017, a lawsuit entitled Melanie Wallace, Sascha Feliciano, and Heather Tyler, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Fred’s Stores of Tennessee, Inc. was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County in the state of Georgia. The complaint alleges that the Company wrongfully and willfully violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”). The complaint is filed as a Class Action. The complaint seeks statutory damages, attorney’s fees, punitive damages, and other such relief that the court may deem just and equitable. The Company is still completing the discovery stage of this lawsuit, as no filing deadlines have been set at this time. Future costs and liabilities related to this case may have a material adverse effect on the Company; however, the Company has not made an accrual for future probable losses related to these claims as future losses are not considered probable and an estimate is unavailable.

In addition to the matters disclosed above, the Company is party to several pending legal proceedings and claims arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these proceedings and claims against the Company cannot be determined with certainty, management of the Company is of the opinion that these proceedings and claims should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements as a whole. However, litigation involves an element of uncertainty. Future developments could cause these actions or claims, individually or in aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements as a whole. The Company has not made an accrual for future losses related to these proceedings and claims as future losses are not considered probable at this time and estimates are unavailable.