-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
FPG6S8uaqTYCJZIAS86WWOPEJ1Q07emryL++OeR4TMVRO66OsTQ+2yNdtNstfTup
YebDO9Ypil6f9+mjMuQbEQ==
0000072423-04-000007.txt : 20040330
0000072423-04-000007.hdr.sgml : 20040330
20040330132802
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000072423-04-000007
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 23
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20031231
FILED AS OF DATE: 20040330
FILER:
COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: NORTEK HOLDINGS INC
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000072423
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: MILLWOOD, VENEER, PLYWOOD & STRUCTURAL WOOD MEMBERS [2430]
IRS NUMBER: 050314991
STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE
FISCAL YEAR END: 1231
FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: 10-K
SEC ACT: 1934 Act
SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-06112
FILM NUMBER: 04699509
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 50 KENNEDY PLZ
CITY: PROVIDENCE
STATE: RI
ZIP: 02903
BUSINESS PHONE: 4017511600
MAIL ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 50 KENNEDY PLAZA
CITY: PROVIDENCE
STATE: RI
ZIP: 02903
FORMER COMPANY:
FORMER CONFORMED NAME: NORTEK INC
DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19920703
10-K
1
mar2904_10khold.htm
10-K
Nortek Holdings, Inc. 2003 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
Form 10-K |
|
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
[X] |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES |
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
OR |
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
|
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from _________ to ____________ |
|
Commission file number: 1-6112 |
|
|
|
NORTEK HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
(exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
16-1638891 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction |
|
(IRS Employer |
|
of incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
|
|
50 Kennedy Plaza |
|
|
|
Providence, Rhode Island |
|
02903-2360 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(zip code) |
|
|
|
REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (401) 751-1600 |
|
|
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: |
|
|
|
As of January 9, 2003, the registrant no longer has any securities registered pursuant to this section |
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __. |
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [X]. |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes __ No X . |
|
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates is zero
|
|
The number of shares of Capital Stock outstanding as of
March 30, 2004 was 8,527,822. |
NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
December 31, 2003 |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Recapitalization Transaction
On
November 20, 2002, Nortek, Inc. (Nortek) reorganized into a holding
company structure and each outstanding share of capital stock of Nortek was converted
into an identical share of capital stock of Nortek Holdings, Inc. (the Company or
Holdings), a Delaware corporation formed in 2002, with Holdings becoming
the successor public company and Nortek becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings
(the Holdings Reorganization). On January 9, 2003, Holdings completed a
recapitalization transaction (the Recapitalization), which resulted in
the acquisition of Holdings by certain affiliates and designees of Kelso & Company
L.P. (Kelso) and certain members of Norteks management. As a
result, the Companys shares of capital stock are no longer publicly traded,
however, the Company will continue to file periodic reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) as a voluntary filer as required by the
indenture of the Companys outstanding notes payable. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7 of
Part II of this report and Notes 1, 2 and 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, Item 8 of Part II of this report, incorporated herein by
reference. |
General
The
Company is a diversified manufacturer of residential and commercial building products,
operating within two principal segments. The Residential Building Products Segment
and the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment. Through these segments, the
Company manufactures and sells, primarily in the United States, Canada and Europe, a
wide variety of products for the residential and commercial construction, manufactured
housing, and the do-it-yourself (DIY) and professional remodeling and
renovation markets. As used in this report, the terms "Company" and "Holdings" refer
to Nortek Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, unless the context
indicates otherwise. Such terms as "Company" and "Holdings" are
used for convenience only and are not intended as a precise description of any of the
separate corporations, each of which manages its own affairs. |
The
Company's performance is dependent to a significant extent upon the levels of
residential replacement and remodeling, new residential construction and
non-residential construction, which are affected by such factors as interest rates,
inflation, seasonality, consumer spending habits and unemployment. |
On
February 12, 2004, the Company sold its wholly owned subsidiary Ply Gem Industries,
Inc. (Ply Gem). Ply Gem consists of the operating subsidiaries that
comprised the Companys former Windows, Doors and Siding Products (WDS)
Segment and Ply Gems corporate entity that was formerly part of Unallocated in
the Companys segment reporting. Prior to the sale of Ply Gem, the Company sold
certain subsidiaries of Ply Gem. The sale of Ply Gem and these subsidiaries and
their related operating results have been excluded from earnings (loss) from
continuing operations and are classified as discontinued operations for all periods
presented. (See Notes 1 and 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Item 8 of Part II of this report, incorporated herein by reference.) |
Additional
information concerning the Company's business is set forth in Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7 of Part II of
this report, incorporated herein by reference. Information on foreign and domestic
operations is set forth in Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, Item 8 of Part II of this report, incorporated herein by reference. |
Residential Building
Products Segment
The
Residential Building Products Segment manufactures and distributes built-in products
primarily for the residential new construction, DIY and professional remodeling and
renovation markets. The principal products sold by the Segment are: |
- kitchen range hoods
- built-in exhaust fans (such as bath fans and fan, heater and light combination units)
- indoor air quality products
- bath cabinets
- door chimes
- radio intercoms
- central vacuum systems
- surround sound systems and,
- multi-room audio and video distribution equipment
The
Segment is the largest supplier in North America of range hoods, bath fans and
combination units, indoor air quality products (such as continuous-ventilation
systems and energy-recovery ventilators) and one of the leading suppliers in Western
Europe and South America of luxury "Eurostyle" range hoods. Products are sold
under the Broan®, NuTone®, Nautilus®, Venmar®, vanEE®, Best®,
Channel Plus®, Elan® and SpeakerCraft® brand names, among others. A key
component of the Companys operating strategy for this Segment is to introduce new
products that capitalize on our strong brand names and on our extensive distribution
system. Other products sold by this Segment include, among others, door chimes,
trash compactors, attic and whole house ventilators, air quality and HEPA whole-house
filtration systems, ceiling fans, as well as, wireless security products, garage
door and gate operators and infrared control equipment (marketed under the Linear®,
Westinghouse®, Open House® and Xantech® brand names). This Segment also
manufactures and markets premium, hand crafted cooking ranges and accessories under
the La Cornue name. The Companys sales of kitchen range hoods and exhaust fans
accounted for approximately 18.5% and 17.2%, respectively, of the Companys
consolidated net sales in 2003, 18.5% and 17.6%, respectively, of the Companys
consolidated net sales in 2002 and 16.8% and 17.1%, respectively, of the Companys
consolidated net sales in 2001. |
A
key component of the Segment's operating strategy is the introduction of new
products which capitalize on the strong Broan®, NuTone®, Nautilus®, Venmar®,
vanEE®, and Best® brand names and the extensive distribution system of the
Segment's businesses. Products sold under these brand names include the Broan Allure® and
Rangemaster® range hoods, Sensaire®, Solitaire® and Solitaire Ultra Silent® fans
and fan lights, LoSone Select® fans, Best by Broan® Eurostyle luxury
range hoods, the Venmar®, Guardian Plus Air Systems and vanEE® line of
indoor air quality systems, NuTone SenSonic stereo speakers, Whispaire® range
hoods and the Broan 12" wide trash compactor. |
With
respect to certain product lines, private label customers accounted for approximately
16.8% of the total sales of this Segment in 2003. |
Production
generally consists of fabrication from coil and sheet steel and formed metal utilizing
stamping, pressing and welding methods, assembly with components and subassemblies
purchased from outside sources (principally motors, fan blades, heating elements,
wiring harnesses, controlling devices, glass, wood, mirrors, lighting fixtures and
polyethylene components, speakers, grilles and electronic components) and painting,
finishing and packaging. See the discussion on Raw Materials under General
Considerations below. |
The
Segment offers a broad array of products with various features and styles across a range
of price points. The Company believes that the Segment's variety of product offerings
helps the Segment maintain and improve its market position for its principal products.
At the same time, the Company believes that the Segment's status as a low-cost producer,
in large part as a result of advanced manufacturing processes, provides the Segment
with a competitive advantage. |
The
Segment's primary products compete with many domestic and international suppliers in
their various markets. The Segment competes with suppliers of competitive products
primarily on the basis of quality, distribution, delivery and price. Although the
Segment believes it competes favorably among other suppliers of the Segment's
products, certain of these suppliers have greater financial and marketing resources
than the Segment. |
The
Segment had 17 manufacturing plants and employed approximately 4,139 full-time people
as of December 31, 2003, 615 of whom are covered by collective bargaining agreements
which expire in 2004 and 171 of whom are covered by collective bargaining agreements
which expire between 2007 and 2008. The Company believes that the Segment's
relationships with its employees are satisfactory. |
Air Conditioning and
Heating Products Segment
The
Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment manufactures and sells heating,
ventilating and air conditioning systems and products (HVAC) for site-built
residential and manufactured housing structures and custom-designed commercial
applications and standard light commercial products. |
Residential Products
The
Segment manufactures air conditioners, heat pumps and furnaces for the residential and
light commercial markets. For site-built homes and light commercial structures, the
Segment markets its products under the licensed names, Frigidaire®, Tappan®,
Philco®, Kelvinator®, Gibson®, Westinghouse® and Maytag® and
certain private label names. Within the residential market, the Segment is one of
the largest suppliers of these products for manufactured homes in the United States
and Canada. In the manufactured housing market, the Segment markets its products
under the Intertherm® and Miller® brand names. |
The
principal factors affecting the market for the Segment's residential HVAC products are
the demand for replacement and modernization of existing equipment, housing starts and
the level of manufactured housing shipments. The Company anticipates that the
replacement market will continue to expand as a large number of previously installed
heating and cooling products become outdated or reach the end of their useful lives.
This growth may be accelerated by a tendency among consumers to replace older
heating and cooling products with higher efficiency models prior to the end of such
equipment's useful life. The market for residential cooling products, including those
sold by the Segment, is affected by spring and summer temperatures. The Segment
does not sell window air conditioners, a segment of the market which is highly
seasonal and significantly impacted by spring and summer temperatures. The Company
believes that the Segment's ability to offer both heating and cooling products helps
offset the effects of seasonality on the Segment's sales. |
The
Segment sells its manufactured housing products to builders of manufactured housing and,
through distributors, to manufactured housing retailers and owners of such housing.
The majority of sales to builders of manufactured housing consist of furnaces designed
and engineered to meet or exceed certain standards mandated by federal agencies,
including HUD. These standards differ in several important respects from the standards
for furnaces used in site-built residential homes. The aftermarket channel of
distribution includes sales of both new and replacement air conditioning units and
heat pumps and replacement furnaces. The Company believes that the Segment has one
major competitor in the furnace sector of this market, York International
Corporation, which markets its products primarily under the Coleman name. The Segment
competes with most major industry manufacturers for the air conditioning sector of this
market. |
Residential
HVAC products for use in site-built homes are sold through independently-owned
distributors who sell to HVAC contractors. The site-built residential HVAC market is
very competitive. In this market, the Segment competes with, among others, Carrier
Corporation, Rheem Manufacturing Company, Lennox Industries, The Trane Company, York
International Corporation and Goodman Manufacturing. The Company estimates that more
than half of the Segment's sales of residential HVAC products in 2003 were
attributable to the replacement market, which tends to be less cyclical than the new
construction market. |
The
Segment competes in both the manufactured housing and site-built markets on the
basis of breadth and quality of its product line, distribution, product availability
and price. Although the Company believes that the Segment competes favorably with
respect to certain of these factors, most of the Segments competitors have
greater financial and marketing resources than the Segment and certain competitors
may enjoy greater brand awareness. |
Commercial Products
The
Segment's commercial products consist of HVAC systems which are custom-designed to meet
customer specifications for commercial offices, manufacturing and educational
facilities, hospitals, retail stores and governmental buildings. Such systems are
primarily designed to operate on building rooftops (including large self-contained
walk-in-units) or on individual floors within a building, and range from 40 to 600 tons
of cooling capacity. The Segment markets its commercial products under the Governair®,
Mammoth®, Temtrol®, Venmar®, Ventrol® and Webco brand names.
Also part of the Segment, the Companys subsidiary Eaton-Williams Group Limited (Eaton-Williams),
manufactures and markets custom and standard air conditioning and humidification
equipment throughout Western Europe under the Vapac®, Cubit®, Qualitair®,
Edenaire®, Colman and Moducel brand names. |
The
market for commercial HVAC equipment is segmented between standard and
custom-designed equipment. Standard equipment can be manufactured at a lower cost
and therefore offered at substantially lower initial prices than custom-designed
equipment. As a result, suppliers of standard equipment generally have a larger
share of the overall commercial HVAC market than suppliers of custom-designed
equipment, including the Segment. However, because of certain building designs, shapes
or other characteristics, the Company believes there are many applications for which
custom-designed equipment is required or is more cost effective over the life of the
building. Unlike standard equipment, the Segment's custom-designed commercial
HVAC equipment can be designed to match the exact space, capacity and performance
requirements of the customer. The Segment's packaged rooftop and self-contained
walk-in equipment rooms maximize a building's rentable floor space because they are
located outside the building. In addition, factors relating to the manner of
construction and timing of installation of commercial HVAC equipment can often favor
custom-designed rather than standard systems. As compared with site-built and factory
built HVAC systems, the Segment's systems are factory assembled according to customer
specifications and then installed by the customer or third parties, rather than
assembled on site, permitting extensive testing prior to shipment. As a result, the
Segment's commercial systems can be installed later in the construction process
than site-built systems, thereby saving the owner or developer construction and
labor costs. The Segment sells its commercial products primarily to contractors,
owners and developers of commercial office buildings, manufacturing and educational
facilities, hospitals, retail stores and governmental buildings. The Segment seeks to
maintain strong relationships nationwide with design engineers, owners and
developers, and the persons who are most likely to value the benefits and long-term
cost efficiencies of the Segment's custom-designed equipment. |
The
Company estimates that about one-third of the Segment's commercial sales in 2003
were attributable to replacement and retrofit activity, which typically is less
cyclical than new construction activity and generally commands higher margins. The
Segment continues to develop product and marketing programs to increase penetration in
the growing replacement and retrofit market. |
The
Segment's commercial products are marketed through independently-owned manufacturers'
representatives and approximately 300 sales, marketing and engineering professionals
as of December 31, 2003. The independent representatives are typically HVAC engineers,
a factor which is significant in marketing the Segment's commercial products because
of the design intensive nature of the market segment in which the Segment competes. |
The
Company believes that the Segment is among the largest suppliers of custom-designed
commercial HVAC products in the United States. The Segment's four largest competitors
in the commercial HVAC market are Carrier Corporation (a subsidiary of United
Technologies Corporation), York International, McQuay International (a subsidiary
of OYL Corporation), and The Trane Company (a subsidiary of American Standard Inc.).
The Segment competes primarily on the basis of engineering support, quality,
flexibility in design and construction and total installed system cost. Although the
Company believes that the Segment competes favorably with respect to certain of these
factors, most of the Segment's competitors have greater financial and marketing
resources than the Segment and enjoy greater brand awareness. However, the Company
believes that the Segment's ability to produce equipment that meets the performance
characteristics required by the particular product application provides it with
advantages not enjoyed by certain of these competitors. |
The
Segment had 14 manufacturing plants and employed approximately 3,271 full-time people
as of December 31, 2003, 171 of whom are covered by a collective bargaining agreement
which expires in 2005. The Company believes that the Segment's relationships with its
employees are satisfactory. |
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Employees
Excluding
employees of discontinued operations, the Company employed approximately 7,450 persons at
December 31, 2003. |
Backlog
Backlog
expected to be filled during 2004 was approximately $138,200,000 at December 31, 2003
($131,900,000 at December 31, 2002). Backlog is not regarded as a significant factor
for operations where orders are generally for prompt delivery. While backlog stated
for December 31, 2003 is believed to be firm, the possibility of cancellations makes it
difficult to assess the firmness of backlog with certainty. |
Research and Development
The
Company's research and development activities are principally new product development
and represent approximately 1.5%, 1.4% and 1.4% of the Companys consolidated net
sales in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
Patents and Trademarks
The
Company holds numerous design and process patents that it considers important, but no
single patent is material to the overall conduct of its business. It is the Company's
policy to obtain and protect patents whenever such action would be beneficial to the
Company. The Company owns or licenses numerous trademarks that it considers
material to the marketing of its products, including Broan®, NuTone®,
Nautilus®, Venmar®, Guardian Plus Air Systems, vanEE®, Best®,
Governair®, Mammoth®, Temtrol®, Miller®, Intertherm®, Frigidaire®,
Tappan®, Philco®, Kelvinator®, Gibson®, Westinghouse®, Maytag®,
Ventrol®, Webco, Vapac®, Cubit®, Qualitair®, Edenaire®, Linear®,
Channel Plus®, Open House®, Xantech®, Elan®, Via!®, SpeakerCraft® and
OSCO®. The Company believes that its rights in these trademarks are adequately
protected. |
Raw Materials
The
Company purchases raw materials and most components used in its various manufacturing
processes. The principal raw materials purchased by the Company are rolled sheet steel,
formed and galvanized steel, copper, aluminum, plate mirror glass, polypropylene,
wood, various chemicals, paints and plastics. |
The
materials, molds and dies, subassemblies and components purchased from other
manufacturers, and other materials and supplies used in manufacturing processes have
generally been available from a variety of sources. From time to time increases in
raw material costs can affect future supply availability due in part to raw material
demands by other industries. Whenever practical, the Company establishes multiple
sources for the purchase of raw materials and components to achieve competitive
pricing, ensure flexibility and protect against supply disruption. In 2001, the
Company instituted a Company wide material procurement strategy designed to reduce the
purchase price of raw materials and purchased components. The strategy focuses on
adopting world-class procurement practices and Company-wide negotiation leverage to
reduce the costs of purchased materials. As part of this program, the Company has
invested in strategic procurement software. The Company expects that completion of
the development of this software and systems will occur in early 2005. The Company
believes the use of strategic sourcing software and systems development by its
procurement personnel will continue to enhance the Companys competitive
position by reducing costs from its vendors and limiting cost increases for goods and
services in sectors experiencing rising prices. |
The
Company is subject to significant market risk with respect to the pricing of its
principal raw materials. If prices of these raw materials were to increase
dramatically, the Company may not be able to pass such increases on to its customers
and, as a result, gross margins could decline significantly. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7 of
Part II of this report, incorporated herein by reference for further discussion. |
Working Capital
The
carrying of inventories to support customers and to permit prompt delivery of finished
goods requires substantial working capital. Substantial working capital is also
required to carry receivables. The demand for the Company's products is seasonal,
particularly in the Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States and in Canada
where inclement weather during the winter months usually reduces the level of
building and remodeling activity in both the home improvement and new construction
markets. Certain of the residential product businesses in the HVAC Segment have in
the past been more seasonal in nature than the Company's other businesses product
categories. As a result, the demand for working capital of the Company's
subsidiaries is greater from late in the first quarter until early in the fourth
quarter. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" in Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7 of Part II of
this report, incorporated herein by reference. |
Website
The
Companys periodic and current reports are available on Norteks website,
www.nortek-inc.com, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such
materials are filed with, or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). |
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Set
forth below is a brief description of the location and general character of the
principal administrative and manufacturing facilities and other material real
properties of the Companys continuing operations, all of which the Company
considers to be in satisfactory repair. All properties are owned, except for those
indicated by an asterisk, which are leased under operating leases and those with a
double asterisk, which are leased under capital leases. |
|
|
Approximate |
|
Location
|
Description
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
Residential Building Products Segment: |
|
|
|
Union, IL |
Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative |
197,000 |
(1) |
Hartford, WI |
Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative |
498,000 |
Mississauga, ONT, Canada |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
110,000 |
(1) |
Sylmar, CA |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
35,000* |
Xiang, Bao An County, Shenzhen, PRC |
Manufacturing |
113,000* |
Fabriano, Italy |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
168,000 |
Cerreto D'Esi, Italy |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
135,000 |
Montefano, Italy |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
84,000 |
Cleburne, TX |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
210,000 |
Los Angeles, CA |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
177,000 |
Drummondville, QUE, Canada |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
76,000 |
Cincinnati, OH |
Manufacturing |
836,000 |
Saint-Ouen l'Aumone, France |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
31,000* |
Lexington, KY |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
26,000* |
Carlsbad, CA |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
31,000 |
(1) |
Riverside, CA |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
66,000* |
Casnovia, MI |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
27,000* |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment: |
St. Leonard d'Aston, QUE, Canada |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
95,000* |
O'Fallon, MO |
Administrative |
70,000* |
St. Peters, MO |
Warehouse/Administrative |
250,000* |
St. Louis, MO |
Manufacturing |
214,000 |
(2) |
St. Louis, MO |
Manufacturing |
103,000* |
(2) |
Holland, MI |
Manufacturing/Warehouse |
45,000* |
Boonville, MO |
Manufacturing |
250,000 |
Tipton, MO |
Manufacturing |
50,000 |
Poplar Bluff, MO |
Manufacturing |
445,000** |
(1) |
Dyersburg, TN |
Manufacturing |
368,000** |
Chaska, MN |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
230,000* |
Oklahoma City, OK |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
127,000 |
Okarche, OK |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
210,000 |
Saskatoon, Canada |
Manufacturing |
49,000* |
Springfield, MO |
Manufacturing |
77,000* |
Montreal, QUE, Canada |
Manufacturing |
122,000* |
Edenbridge, U.K |
Manufacturing |
93,000* |
Fenton, Stoke, U.K |
Manufacturing/Administrative |
104,000* |
|
Other: |
Providence, RI |
Administrative |
23,900* |
|
(1) |
These facilities
are pledged as security under various subsidiary debt agreements. (See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, Item 8 of Part II of this report, incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
(2) |
During 2003,
the Company initiated restructuring activities related to the closure of two facilities in St. Louis, Missouri, in
order to relocate the operations to other facilities by the end of the first quarter of 2004. (See Note 13 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 8 of Part II of this report, incorporated herein by reference.) |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The
Company and its subsidiaries are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and
regulations, including environmental laws and regulations that impose limitations
on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for
the treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. The Company
believes that it is in substantial compliance with the material laws and regulations
applicable to it. The Company is involved in current, and may become involved in
future, remedial actions under federal and state environmental laws and regulations
which impose liability on companies to clean up, or contribute to the cost of cleaning
up, sites at which their hazardous wastes or materials were disposed of or released.
Such claims may relate to properties or business lines acquired by the Company after a
release has occurred. In other instances, the Company may be partially liable under law
or contract to other parties that have acquired businesses or assets from the Company
for past practices relating to hazardous substances management. The Company
believes that all such claims asserted against it, or such obligations incurred by
it, will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's financial condition
or results of operations. Expenditures in 2003, 2002 and 2001 to evaluate and remediate
such sites were not material. However, the Company is presently unable to estimate
accurately its ultimate financial exposure in connection with identified or yet to be
identified remedial actions due among other reasons to: (i) uncertainties surrounding
the nature and application of environmental regulations, (ii) the Company's lack of
information about additional sites to which it may be listed as a potentially
responsible party ("PRP"), (iii) the level of clean-up that may be
required at specific sites and choices concerning the technologies to be applied in
corrective actions and (iv) the time periods over which remediation may occur.
Furthermore, since liability for site remediation is joint and several, each PRP is
potentially wholly liable for other PRP's that become insolvent or bankrupt. Thus,
the solvency of other PRPs could directly affect the Company's ultimate aggregate
clean-up costs. In certain circumstances, the Company's liability for clean-up costs
may be covered in whole or in part by insurance or indemnification obligations of third
parties. |
A
previously owned subsidiary of the Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits
alleging damage caused by alleged defects in certain pressure treated wood products.
The Company has assumed the liability and is entitled to insurance coverage proceeds
related to specific pressure treated wood product claims. Many of the suits have
been resolved by dismissal or settlement with amounts being paid out of insurance
proceeds or other recoveries. The Company continues to vigorously defend the
remaining suits. Certain defense and indemnity costs are being paid out of insurance
proceeds and proceeds from a settlement with suppliers of material used in the
production of the pressure treated wood products. The Company has engaged in coverage
litigation with certain insurers and has settled all coverage claims with such
insurers on a satisfactory basis. |
In
addition to the legal matters described above, the Company and its subsidiaries
are named as defendants in a number of legal proceedings, including a number of
product liability lawsuits, incident to the conduct of their businesses. |
The
Company does not expect that any of the above described proceedings will have a material
adverse effect, either individually or in the aggregate, on the Company's financial
position, results of operations, liquidity or competitive position. (See Note 9 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 8 of Part II of this report,
incorporated herein by reference.) |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On
October 15, 2003, the Series B Convertible Preference stockholders of Nortek Holdings
consented to, by unanimous written consent in lieu of a special meeting, the issuance
of 10,869 shares of Class A Common Stock to Jeffrey C. Bloomberg, a Director of the
Company (or his permitted designee). |
On
November 19, 2003, the Series B Convertible Preference stockholders of Nortek
Holdings consented to, by unanimous written consent in lieu of a special meeting, the
issuance of Nortek Holdings $515,000,000 10% Senior Discount Notes due 2011. |
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
On
November 20, 2002, Nortek, Inc. (Nortek) reorganized into a holding
company structure and each outstanding share of capital stock of Nortek was converted
into an identical share of capital stock of Nortek Holdings, Inc. (the Company or
Holdings). Holdings became the successor public company, and Nortek
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings. On January 9, 2003, Holdings
completed the Recapitalization, which resulted in the acquisition of Holdings by
certain affiliates and designees of Kelso and certain members of Norteks
management. In connection with the Recapitalization, each share of the Companys
Common Stock and Special Common Stock was called for redemption at $46.00 per share.
As of January 9, 2003, there is no established public trading market for the Companys
capital stock. As of March 30, 2004, there were (i) 19,000,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, (ii) 14,000,000 shares of Class B Common
Stock, par value $1.00 per share and (iii) 19,000,000 shares of Preference Stock,
par value $1.00 per share of which 9,000,000 shares have been designated as Series B
Convertible Preference Stock (the Series B Preference Stock) of the
Company authorized and 397,380 shares of Class A Common Stock and 8,130,442 shares of
Series B Convertible Preference Stock of the Company outstanding, most of which were
owned by management of the Company and certain affiliates of Kelso. |
On
November 26, 2003, the Company declared a cash dividend of $35 per share on each
outstanding share of its Class A Common Stock and Series B Convertible Preference
Stock, which also resulted in an equal reduction of the exercise price of all of the
outstanding options to purchase shares of the Companys Common Stock. The Company
has not declared any other dividends in the past five years. |
The
Company declared a dividend on November 26, 2003 totaling approximately $298,474,000
which was paid to the Companys shareholders in the fourth quarter of 2003. Option
holders of the Rollover Options received a cash distribution of approximately
$41,600,000, which was treated as a charge to additional paid-in capital in the
accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders investment. The distribution
to each individual option holder of the Rollover Options was equal to the number of
shares held multiplied by the lesser of (i) $35 per share or (ii) $46 per share minus
the amount per share the exercise price was reduced. In conjunction with this
shareholder distribution, the Company adjusted the exercise price of all of the
Rollover Options to equal $10.50 per share and all of the other Class A stock options to
equal $11.00 per share. |
See
Notes 1, 2 and 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 8 of
Part II of this report, incorporated herein by reference. |
ITEM 6. CONSOLIDATED
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
Jan. 1, 2000 - |
Jan. 1, 1999 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
Dec. 31, 2000
|
Dec. 31, 1999
|
|
(In millions except ratios) |
|
Consolidated Summary of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales | | |
$ | 1,490 |
.1 |
$ | 24 |
.9 |
$ | 1,384 |
.1 |
$ | 1,293 |
.8 |
$ | 1,297 |
.4 |
$ | 1,180 |
.2 |
Operating earnings (loss) | | |
| 159 |
.5 |
| (81 |
.8) |
| 119 |
.6 |
| 109 |
.7 |
| 140 |
.2 |
| 138 |
.3 |
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
62 |
.0 |
|
(60 |
.9) |
|
43 |
.6 |
|
32 |
.8 |
|
58 |
.3 |
|
56 |
.4 |
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 12 |
.2 |
| (1 |
.0) |
| 18 |
.9 |
| (24 |
.8) |
| (16 |
.7) |
| (7 |
.1) |
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
74 |
.2 |
|
(61 |
.9) |
|
62 |
.5 |
|
8 |
.0 |
|
41 |
.6 |
|
49 |
.3 |
|
Financial Position: | | |
Unrestricted cash, investments and |
|
|
marketable securities |
|
|
$ |
194 |
.1 |
$ |
283 |
.6 |
$ |
294 |
.8 |
$ |
255 |
.6 |
$ |
138 |
.5 |
$ |
111 |
.4 |
Working capital |
|
|
|
686 |
.4 |
|
711 |
.6 |
|
813 |
.3 |
|
742 |
.3 |
|
727 |
.9 |
|
723 |
.5 |
Total assets |
|
|
|
2,100 |
.0 |
|
1,781 |
.2 |
|
1,830 |
.8 |
|
1,819 |
.9 |
|
1,836 |
.8 |
|
1,791 |
.4 |
Total debt-- | | |
Current | | |
| 15 |
.3 |
| 4 |
.4 |
| 5 |
.5 |
| 10 |
.0 |
| 20 |
.5 |
| 12 |
.9 |
Long-term |
|
|
|
1324 |
.6 |
|
953 |
.7 |
|
953 |
.8 |
|
959 |
.7 |
|
919 |
.4 |
|
918 |
.2 |
Current ratio |
|
|
|
2.6 |
:1 |
|
2.7 |
:1 |
|
3.0 |
:1 |
|
2.6 |
:1 |
|
2.4 |
:1 |
|
2.4 |
:1 |
Debt to equity ratio |
|
|
|
6.7 |
:1 |
|
6.1 |
:1 |
|
3.0 |
:1 |
|
3.6 |
:1 |
|
3.3 |
:1 |
|
3.6 |
:1 |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
including non-cash interest |
|
|
|
38 |
.3 |
|
0 |
.8 |
|
39 |
.2 |
|
40 |
.7 |
|
36 |
.1 |
|
35 |
.1 |
Amortization of goodwill included in | | |
depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
8 |
.7 |
|
8 |
.8 |
|
8 |
.2 |
Capital expenditures | | |
| 24 |
.7 |
| 0 |
.2 |
| 19 |
.1 |
| 27 |
.1 |
| 29 |
.7 |
| 21 |
.8 |
Stockholder's investment |
|
|
|
200 |
.2 |
|
272 |
.1 |
|
317 |
.5 |
|
271 |
.3 |
|
282 |
.2 |
|
259 |
.8 |
See the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere herein regarding the effect on operating results of
acquisitions, discontinued operations and other matters. See Part II, Item 5 of this report, incorporated herein
by reference, for a discussion on dividends declared or paid on the Company's Capital Stock.
|
NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
December 31, 2003 |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Nortek
Holdings, Inc. and its continuing wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and
collectively, the Company or Holdings) are diversified
manufacturers of residential and commercial building products, operating within two
principal segments: the Residential Building Products Segment and the Air
Conditioning and Heating Products Segment. Through these principal segments, the
Company manufactures and sells, primarily in the United States, Canada and Europe, a
wide variety of products for the residential and commercial construction,
manufactured housing, and the do-it-yourself (DIY) and professional
remodeling and renovation markets. As used in this report, the terms Company and
Holdings refer to Nortek Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries,
unless the context indicates otherwise. Such terms as Company and Holdings are
used for convenience only and are not intended as a precise description of any of the
separate corporations, each of which manages its own affairs. |
On
November 20, 2002, the Company was reorganized into a holding company structure and each
outstanding share of capital stock of Nortek, Inc. (Nortek) was
converted into an identical share of capital stock of Holdings, a Delaware
corporation formed in 2002, with Holdings becoming the successor public company and
Nortek becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (the Holdings
Reorganization). On January 9, 2003, the Company completed a recapitalization
transaction, which resulted in the acquisition of the Company by certain
affiliates and designees of Kelso & Company L.P. (Kelso) and certain
members of Norteks management (the Recapitalization). (See Liquidity
and Capital Resources and Notes 1, 2 and 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
On
February 12, 2004, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, WDS, LLC, sold all of
the capital stock of Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (Ply Gem); on April 2, 2002,
Ply Gem sold the capital stock of its subsidiary Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc. (Hoover);
on November 22, 2002, Ply Gem sold the capital stock of its subsidiary Richwood
Building Products, Inc. (Richwood); and on September 21, 2001, Ply
Gem sold the capital stock of its subsidiaries Peachtree Doors and Windows, Inc.
(Peachtree) and SNE Enterprises, Inc. (SNE). The results of
operations of the operating subsidiaries of Ply Gem, with the exception of Hoover,
comprised the Companys entire Windows, Doors and Siding Products (WDS)
reporting segment while Hoover and the corporate expenses of Ply Gem were previously
included in Unallocated other net in the Companys segment reporting. The
results of Ply Gem, Hoover, Richwood, Peachtree and SNE have been excluded from
earnings from continuing operations and are classified separately as discontinued
operations for all periods presented. Accordingly, for purposes of this presentation
of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, all discussion relates to the results from continuing operations.
(See Notes 1, 10 and 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.) |
The
Residential Building Products Segment manufactures and distributes built-in
products primarily for the residential new construction, DIY and professional
remodeling and renovation markets. The principal products sold by the segment
include, kitchen range hoods, built-in exhaust fans (such as bath fans and fan,
heater and light combination units) and indoor air quality products. The Air
Conditioning and Heating Products Segment manufactures and sells heating,
ventilating, and air conditioning systems (HVAC) for site-built residential
and manufactured housing structures and custom-designed commercial applications
and standard light commercial products. |
On
January 17, 2003, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary, Linear Corporation (Linear)
acquired Elan Home Systems L.L.C. (Elan). Elan is located in Lexington,
KY and manufactures and sells home automation and audio video distribution
equipment. On July 11, 2003, the Company through Linear, acquired SpeakerCraft, Inc.
(SPC). SPC is located in Riverside, CA and manufactures and sells in-wall
and in-ceiling speakers, amplifiers and subwoofers. On December 15, 2003, the
Company, through Linear, acquired all of the capital stock of Operator Specialty
Company, Inc. (OSCO). OSCO is located in Casnovia, MI and manufactures and
sells gate operators and door openers. On June 15, 2001, the Company acquired Senior
Air Systems (SAS) from a wholly owned subsidiary of Senior Plc. These
acquisitions have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
Accordingly, the results of Elan, SPC, OSCO and SAS are included in the Companys
consolidated results since the date of their acquisition. (See Liquidity and
Capital Resources and Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
Critical Accounting Policies
The
Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based upon the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States. (See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.) Certain of the Companys accounting policies require
the application of judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating
financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent
degree of uncertainty. The Company periodically evaluates the judgments and estimates
used for its critical accounting policies to ensure that such judgments and
estimates are reasonable for its interim and year-end reporting requirements. These
judgments and estimates are based on the Companys historical experience, current
trends and other information available, as appropriate. If different conditions
result from those assumptions used in the Companys judgments, the results
could be materially different from the Companys estimates. The Companys
critical accounting policies include: |
Revenue
Recognition and Related Expenses
The
Company recognizes sales based upon shipment of products to its customers and has
procedures in place at each of its subsidiaries to ensure that an accurate cut-off is
obtained for each reporting period. |
Allowances
for cash discounts, volume rebates, and other customer incentive programs, as well as
gross customer returns, among others, are recorded as a reduction of sales at the time
of sale based upon the estimated future outcome. Cash discounts, volume rebates and
other customer incentive programs are based upon certain percentages agreed to with
the Companys various customers, which are typically earned by the customer
over an annual period. The Company records periodic estimates for these amounts
based upon the historical results to date, estimated future results through the end
of the contract period and the contractual provisions of the customer agreements.
For calendar year customer agreements, the Company is able to adjust its periodic
estimates to actual amounts as of December 31 each year based upon the contractual
provisions of the customer agreements. For those customers who have agreements
that are not on a calendar year cycle, the Company records estimates at December 31
consistent with the above described methodology. As a result, at the end of any
given reporting period, the amounts recorded for these allowances are based upon
estimates of the likely outcome of future sales with the applicable customers and may
require adjustment in the future if the actual outcome differs. The Company
believes that its procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable and
historically have not resulted in material adjustments in subsequent periods when the
estimates are adjusted to the actual amounts. |
Customer
returns are recorded on an actual basis throughout the year and also include an
estimate at the end of each reporting period for future customer returns related to
sales recorded prior to the end of the period. The Company generally estimates
customer returns based upon the time lag that historically occurs between the date of
the sale and the date of the return while also factoring in any new business
conditions that might impact the historical analysis such as new product
introduction. The Company believes that its procedures for estimating such amounts
are reasonable and historically have not resulted in material adjustments in subsequent
periods when the estimates are adjusted to the actual amounts. |
Provisions
for the estimated costs for future product warranty claims and bad debts are recorded
in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively,
at the time a sale is recorded. The amounts recorded are generally based upon
historically derived percentages while also factoring in any new business conditions
that might impact the historical analysis such as new product introduction for
warranty and bankruptcies of particular customers for bad debts. The Company also
periodically evaluates the adequacy of its reserves for warranty and bad debts
recorded in its consolidated balance sheet as a further test to ensure the adequacy
of the recorded provisions. Warranty claims can extend far into the future and bad
debt analysis often involves subjective analysis of a particular customers
ability to pay. As a result, significant judgment is required by the Company in
determining the appropriate amounts to record and such judgments may prove to be
incorrect in the future. The Company believes that its procedures for estimating such
amounts are reasonable and historically have not resulted in material adjustments in
subsequent periods when the estimates are adjusted to the actual amounts. |
Inventory
Valuation
The
Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market with approximately 57%, as
of December 31, 2003, valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method
and the remainder valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
In connection with both LIFO and FIFO inventories, the Company will record
provisions, as appropriate, to write-down obsolete and excess inventory to
estimated net realizable value. The process for evaluating obsolete and excess
inventory often requires the Company to make subjective judgments and estimates
concerning future sales levels, quantities and prices at which such inventory will
be able to be sold in the normal course of business. Accelerating the disposal
process or incorrect estimates of future sales potential may cause the actual results
to differ from the estimates at the time such inventory is disposed or sold. The
Company believes that its procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable
and historically have not resulted in material adjustments in subsequent periods when
the estimates are adjusted to the actual amounts. |
Prepaid
Income Tax Assets and Deferred Tax Liabilities
The
Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with SFAS
No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which
requires that the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the
amounts recorded in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and the
amounts included in the Companys federal, state income and foreign tax returns
be recognized in the balance sheet. As the Company generally does not file their
income tax returns until well after the closing process for the December 31
financial statements is complete, the amounts recorded at December 31 reflect estimates
of what the final amounts will be when the actual income tax returns are filed for
that fiscal year. In addition, estimates are often required with respect to, among
other things, the appropriate state income tax rates to use in the various states that
the Company and its subsidiaries are required to file, the potential utilization of
operating and capital loss carry-forwards for both federal and state income tax purposes
and valuation allowances required, if any, for tax assets that may not be realizable
in the future. The Company requires each of its subsidiaries to submit year-end
tax information packages as part of the year-end financial statement closing
process so that the information used to estimate the deferred tax accounts at December
31 is reasonably consistent with the amounts expected to be included in the filed tax
returns. SFAS No. 109 requires balance sheet classification of current and long-term
deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon the classification of the
underlying asset or liability that gives rise to a temporary difference. As such,
the Company has historically had prepaid income tax assets due principally to the
unfavorable tax consequences of recording expenses for required book reserves for
such things as, among others, bad debts, inventory valuation, insurance, product
liability and warranty that cannot be deducted for income tax purposes until such
expenses are actually paid. The Company believes that the amounts recorded as
prepaid income tax assets will be recoverable through future taxable income generated
by the Company, although there can be no absolute assurance that all recognized
prepaid income tax assets will be fully recovered. The Company believes the
procedures and estimates used in its accounting for income taxes are reasonable
and in accordance with established tax law. The income tax estimates used have
historically not resulted in material adjustments to income tax expense in
subsequent periods when the estimates are adjusted to the actual filed tax return
amounts, although there may be reclassifications between the current and long-term
portion of the deferred tax accounts. |
Goodwill and
Other Long-Lived Assets
Subsequent
to June 30, 2001, the Company accounts for acquired goodwill and intangible assets in
accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141).
Prior to July 1, 2001, the Company accounted for acquired goodwill and intangible
assets in accordance with APB No. 16, Business Combinations (APB No.
16). Purchase accounting required by SFAS No. 141 and APB No. 16 involves
judgment with respect to the valuation of the acquired assets and liabilities in
order to determine the final amount of goodwill. The Company believes that the
estimates that it has used to record prior acquisitions were reasonable and in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 and APB No. 16. |
On
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). As a result, the Company
accounts for acquired goodwill and goodwill impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142
(see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere
herein). This pronouncement requires considerable judgment in the valuation of
acquired goodwill and the ongoing evaluation of goodwill impairment. The Company
primarily utilizes a discounted cash flow approach in order to value the Companys
operating segments required to be tested for impairment by SFAS No. 142, which
requires that the Company forecast future cash flows of the operating segments and
discount the cash flow stream based upon a weighted average cost of capital that is
derived from comparable companies within similar industries. The discounted cash
flow calculations also include a terminal value calculation that is based upon an
expected long-term growth rate for the applicable operating segment. The Company
believes that its procedures for applying the discounted cash flow methodology,
including the estimates of future cash flows, the weighted average cost of capital and
the long-term growth rate, are reasonable and consistent with market conditions at
the time of the valuation. The Company has evaluated the carrying value of segment
goodwill and determined that no impairment existed at either the date of adoption of
the standard, January 1, 2002, or as of its annual evaluation date of October 1.
Accordingly, no adjustments were required to be recorded in the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of adopting SFAS No. 142 or as a
result of its annual evaluation on October 1, 2003. |
The
Company performs an annual evaluation for the impairment of long-lived assets, other
than goodwill, based on expectations of non-discounted future cash flows compared
to the carrying value of the subsidiary in accordance with SFAS No. 144. The Companys
cash flow estimates are based upon historical cash flows, as well as future
projected cash flows received from subsidiary management in connection with the
annual Company wide planning process, and include a terminal valuation for the
applicable subsidiary based upon a multiple of earnings before interest expense, net,
depreciation and amortization expense and income taxes (EBITDA). The
Company estimates the EBITDA multiple by reviewing comparable company information
and other industry data. The Company believes that its procedures for estimating gross
future cash flows, including the terminal valuation, are reasonable and consistent
with current market conditions. The Company historically has not had any
material impairment adjustments. |
Pensions and
Post Retirement Health Benefits
The
Companys accounting for pensions, including supplemental executive retirement
plans, and post retirement health benefit liabilities requires the estimating of such
items as the long-term average return on plan assets, the discount rate, the rate of
compensation increase and the assumed medical cost inflation rate. Such estimates
require a significant amount of judgment. As evidenced during 2002 and 2001,
items such as stock market declines, changes in interest rates and plan amendments
can have a significant impact on the assumptions used and therefore on the ultimate
final actuarial determinations for a particular year. The Company believes the
procedures and estimates used in its accounting for pensions and post retirement
health benefits are reasonable and consistent with acceptable actuarial practices in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In
certain years, such as 2002 and 2001, revisions to actuarial assumptions caused by
adverse financial market conditions, changes in discount rates and increased
compensation levels have resulted in significant increases to pension and
post-retirement liabilities and other comprehensive loss from amounts recognized in
prior years. |
Insurance
Liabilities
The
Company records insurance liabilities and related expenses for health, workers
compensation, product and general liability losses and other insurance reserves and
expenses in accordance with either the contractual terms of its policies or, if
self-insured, the total liabilities that are estimable and probable as of the
reporting date. Insurance liabilities are recorded as current liabilities to the
extent they are expected to be paid in the succeeding year with the remaining
requirements classified as long-term liabilities. The accounting for self-insured
plans requires that significant judgments and estimates be made both with respect to
the future liabilities to be paid for known claims and incurred but not reported
claims as of the reporting date. The Company considers historical trends when
determining the appropriate insurance reserves to record in the consolidated
balance sheet. In certain cases where partial insurance coverage exists, the Company
must estimate the portion of the liability that will be covered by existing insurance
policies to arrive at the net expected liability to the Company. The Company believes
that its procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable and historically
have not resulted in material adjustments in subsequent periods when the estimated
amounts are adjusted to the actual insurance claims paid. |
Contingencies
The
Company is subject to contingencies, including legal proceedings and claims arising
out of its businesses that cover a wide range of matters, including, among others,
environmental matters, contract and employment claims, workers compensation claims,
product liability, warranty and modification, adjustment or replacement of component
parts of units sold, which may include product recalls. Product liability,
environmental and other legal proceedings also include matters with respect to
businesses previously owned. |
The
Company provides accruals for direct costs associated with the estimated resolution
of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability
has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated.
Costs accrued have been estimated based upon an analysis of potential results,
assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies and outcomes. |
While
it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with
respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits, the Company believes that the
aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered
by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations of the Company. It is possible, however, that
future results of operations for any particular future period could be materially
affected by changes in our assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies
or changes out of the Companys control. |
Overview
We
are a leading, diversified manufacturer and distributor of building products
used in the residential remodeling, replacement and new construction markets (including the manufactured housing industry) and to a lesser
extent the commercial construction and replacement markets. We have a diverse number of products that
serve multiple markets through various distribution channels. We operate through two
segments: the Residential Building Products Segment (RBP) and the Air
Conditioning and Heating Products Segment (HVAC). For the year ended
December 31, 2003 RBP accounted for about 55 % of consolidated net sales and 71 % of
operating earnings before unallocated expense. HVAC accounted for the balance. A
little more than half of our business is believed to be used in the replacement and
remodeling markets and the balance serves the new construction markets. The
manufactured housing and commercial construction industries have seen significant
declines in the level of business activity over the past several years, which have had
an adverse effect on our business, particularly for our HVAC Segment. The level of new
construction, replacement and remodeling activity in site-built residential markets
has been strong over the past several years and has contributed positively to our
operating performance. Key industry activity affecting our businesses in the United
States for the past three years was as follows: |
|
Source |
% Increase (Decrease)
|
|
of Data
|
2003
|
2002
|
2001
|
|
Residential construction spending |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
11 |
.0% |
|
9 |
.0% |
|
4 |
.0% |
Single family housing starts |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
10 |
.0 |
|
7 |
.0 |
|
4 |
.0 |
New home sales |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| 12 |
.0 |
| 7 |
.0 |
| 3 |
.0 |
Residential improvement spending |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| 2 |
.0 |
| 13 |
.0 |
| (1 |
.0) |
Air conditioning and heat pump shipments |
|
|
|
2 |
|
| 1 |
.0 |
| 7 |
.0 |
| (6 |
.0) |
Manufactured housing shipments |
|
|
|
1,3 |
|
|
(22 |
.0) |
|
(13 |
.0) |
|
(23 |
.0) |
Non-residential construction spending |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
(1 |
.5)% |
|
(13 |
.3)% |
|
(5 |
.6)% |
Source of data: |
|
|
(1) |
U.S. Census Bureau |
(2) |
Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute |
(3) |
Manufactured Housing Institute |
Our
manufactured housing business for 2003 was about 7 % of total sales vs. about 13% in
2000. Our HVAC business serving the commercial construction market was about 18%
(including foreign commercial sales) of consolidated sales in 2003. A large portion of
our manufacturing activity and customers are located in North America although we do
have manufacturing activity and sell product to customers in Canada, Europe and China
among other countries. Including Canada our foreign sales in 2003 were about 20 % of
total sales. About 14 % of total sales are through retail distribution and about 50% is
to distributors and wholesalers and similar channels of distribution. Principal RBP
products include kitchen range hoods, bath fans and indoor air quality products where we
have large market shares. Principal HVAC products include residential air conditioners,
heat pumps and furnaces and large custom and semi-custom commercial air handlers and
cooling equipment. We have leading market shares in HVAC products in both the
manufactured housing and custom and semi custom commercial markets that we serve. In
the site-built residential HVAC market we have a single digit market share that has
increased our share of market considerably over the past several years. In both
segments we have employed a strategy of using well-recognized and respected brand names
(both owned and licensed) and have introduced new products and made selected
acquisitions to improve growth and profitability. As a result we have experienced stable
and strong cash flow from continuing operations during the past three years. In both
our manufactured housing and Commercial HVAC products businesses, we have maintained our
market shares and we believe that we can quickly respond to rebounds in these markets
over the long term. In 2004 we expect manufactured housing and commercial construction
markets to remain weak, residential new construction to decline moderately and remodeling
and replacement activity to grow moderately. We also expect that our brand strategy for
residential site-built HVAC products will allow us to gain market share. In RBP in 2004
we expect to continue to grow and improve the profitability of our electronics products
through the integration of our acquisitions. In 2004 we also expect to achieve further
cost reductions in raw material and purchased components in all our businesses through
our strategic sourcing software and systems development. During 2002, 2003 and again in
the first quarter of 2004 we have periodically experienced significant increases in the
price we pay for raw steel and steel fabricated parts. Overall our annual purchases in
this category are about 6% of total cost of products sold. We also buy some component
parts from suppliers that use steel in their manufacturing process. While we have had
some success in raising prices to our customers for some products, as a result of higher
steel costs, there is no assurance that we will be able to offset all steel increases in
2004 due to extremely tight steel supply in the United States. We also rely on our
strategic sourcing initiatives to mitigate the effect of higher steel costs. Material
cost as a percentage of net sales improved, in part from these initiatives, from
approximately 45.4% in 2001 to 44.0% in 2002 and 43.7% in 2003. In the following
discussion of the results of operations for the year 2003 as compared to 2002 we will
talk about the significance of a number of factors that affected our operations
including, among others, the following: |
- The effect of the Acquisition by Kelso and the changes in our accounting
- The strong growth of our residential site-built HVAC business from our brand strategy
- The effect of acquisitions in RBP for our electronics businesses
- The softness in manufactured housing and commercial markets
- The effect of changes in foreign exchange
In
our discussion of liquidity and capital resources we have reviewed a number of
transactions and summarized and analyzed our cash flow activity during the past year.
We began the year with about $295,000,000 of unrestricted cash and investments and
ended the year with about $194,100,000. We have also enclosed information with
respect to our future cash flow requirements. During the past year we had a number of
transactions that significantly affected our financial position beginning with the
Recapitalization with Kelso on January 9, 2003 whereby we used about $160,700,000 of
our existing cash and significant equity investments were made by both Kelso and
management (through the rollover of stock and options) to take the Company private in a
transaction valued at $1.6 billion. In the fourth quarter of 2003 the Company sold
$515,000,000 aggregate principal amount at maturity ($349,400,000 gross proceeds)
of the Companys Senior Discount Notes and used these proceeds to pay a
dividend of about $298,500,000 to holders of the Companys capital stock and about
$41,000,000 to purchase additional capital stock of Nortek. Nortek used these
proceeds to fund the majority of a cash distribution of about $41,600,000 to option
holders of the Rollover Options. During the year we worked on the sale of Ply Gem,
which was completed in early 2004. Net proceeds of about $450,000,000 from the
sale of Ply Gem together with cash from the sale of $200,000,000 principal
amount of senior variable interest rate Notes, and existing cash allowed us to
redeem $695,000,000 principal amount of fixed rate senior notes in the first
quarter of 2004. As a result we also reduced the size of our Senior Secured Credit
Facility from $200,000,000 to $175,000,000. We have no borrowings outstanding under
this facility, which together with existing cash and cash from our subsidiaries,
provides the Company with its primary source of liquidity. We also used about
$76,000,000 in 2003 and about $16,500,000 of our cash in the first quarter of 2004
for acquisitions to further grow our electronics businesses in our RBP segment.
Upon completion of the first quarter 2004 debt redemptions, the Company expects total
indebtedness to be about $835,000,000 and unrestricted cash and investments to be about
$130,000,000. |
Results of Operations
The
combined year ended December 31, 2003 pre- and post-Recapitalization periods have
been compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 for purposes of managements
discussion and analysis of the results of operations. Any references, below, to
the year ended December 31, 2003 shall refer to the combined periods.
Material fluctuations in operations resulting from the effect of purchase accounting
have been highlighted. |
|
Pre-Recapitalization |
Post-Recapitalization |
Combined |
|
January 1, 2003 - |
January 10, 2003 |
Year Ended |
|
January 9, 2003
|
December 31, 2003
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 16 |
.3 |
$ | 814 |
.8 |
$ | 831 |
.1 |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 8 |
.6 |
| 675 |
.3 |
| 683 |
.9 |
|
Consolidated net sales | | |
$ | 24 |
.9 |
$ | 1,490 |
.1 |
$ | 1,515 |
.0 |
|
|
Operating earnings (loss) *: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 2 |
.7 |
$ | 137 |
.3 |
$ | 140 |
.0 |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| (1 |
.2) |
| 58 |
.4 |
| 57 |
.2 |
|
Subtotal | | |
$ | 1 |
.5 |
$ | 195 |
.7 |
$ | 197 |
.2 |
Unallocated: | | |
Expenses and charges arising from the |
|
|
Recapitalization | | |
| (83 |
.0) |
| -- |
|
| (83 |
.0) |
Strategic sourcing software and |
|
|
systems development expense | | |
| (0 |
.1) |
| (3 |
.4) |
| (3 |
.5) |
Stock based compensation charges | | |
| -- |
|
| (1 |
.8) |
| (1 |
.8) |
Other, net | | |
| (0 |
.2) |
| (31 |
.0) |
| (31 |
.2) |
|
Consolidated operating earnings (loss) | | |
$ | (81 |
.8) |
$ | 159 |
.5 |
$ | 77 |
.7 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense *: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 0 |
.3 |
$ | 19 |
.6 |
$ | 19 |
.9 |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 0 |
.3 |
| 11 |
.8 |
| 12 |
.1 |
Other | | |
| -- |
|
| 0 |
.6 |
| 0 |
.6 |
|
| | |
$ | 0 |
.6 |
$ | 32 |
.0 |
$ | 32 |
.6 |
|
|
Operating earnings (loss) margin: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
| 16 |
.6% |
| 16 |
.9% |
| 16 |
.8% |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| (14 |
.0) |
| 8 |
.6 |
| 8 |
.4 |
Consolidated | | |
| (328 |
.5)% |
| 10 |
.7% |
| 5 |
.1% |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | |
expense as a % of net sales: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
| 1 |
.8% |
| 2 |
.4% |
| 2 |
.4% |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 3 |
.5 |
| 1 |
.7 |
| 1 |
.8 |
Consolidated | | |
| 2 |
.4% |
| 2 |
.1% |
| 2 |
.2% |
* |
During
the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company recorded
approximately $5,400,000 of amortization of purchase price allocated to inventory as a
non-cash charge to cost of products sold. Approximately $4,800,000 related to the
Residential Building Products Segment and approximately $600,000 related to the Air
Conditioning and Heating Products Segment. |
|
The
tables that follow present the net sales from continuing operations, operating earnings
from continuing operations and depreciation and amortization expense from continuing
operations for the Companys principal segments for the combined period ended
December 31, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the dollar amount and
percentage change of such results as compared to the prior year and the percentage to net
sales of operating earnings and depreciation and amortization expense for the combined
period ended December 31, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001: |
|
Net Change
|
|
Year-ended December 31,
|
2003 to 2002
|
2002 to 2001
|
|
2003 (1)
|
2002
|
2001
|
$
|
%
|
$
|
%
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 831 |
.1 |
$ | 729 |
.6 |
$ | 660 |
.0 |
$ | 101 |
.5 |
| 13 |
.9% |
$ | 69 |
.6 |
| 10 |
.5% |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 683 |
.9 |
| 654 |
.5 |
| 633 |
.8 |
| 29 |
.4 |
| 4 |
.5 |
| 20 |
.7 |
| 3 |
.3 |
|
| | |
$ | 1,515 |
.0 |
$ | 1,384 |
.1 |
$ | 1,293 |
.8 |
$ | 130 |
.9 |
| 9 |
.5% |
$ | 90 |
.3 |
| 7 |
.0% |
|
|
Operating Earnings: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 140 |
.0 |
$ | 122 |
.9 |
$ | 93 |
.7 |
$ | 17 |
.1 |
| 13 |
.9% |
$ | 29 |
.2 |
| 31 |
.2% |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 57 |
.2 |
| 61 |
.5 |
| 53 |
.8 |
| (4 |
.3) |
| (7 |
.0) |
| 7 |
.7 |
| 14 |
.3 |
|
Subtotal | | |
| 197 |
.2 |
| 184 |
.4 |
| 147 |
.5 |
| 12 |
.8 |
| 6 |
.9 |
| 36 |
.9 |
| 25 |
.0 |
Unallocated: | | |
Recapitalization fees and expenses | | |
| (83 |
.0) |
| (6 |
.6) |
| -- |
|
| (76 |
.4) |
| * |
|
| (6 |
.6) |
| * |
|
Re-audit fees and expenses | | |
| -- |
|
| (2 |
.1) |
| -- |
|
| 2 |
.1 |
| * |
|
| (2 |
.1) |
| * |
|
1999 equity performance plan incentive | | |
| -- |
|
| (4 |
.4) |
| -- |
|
| 4 |
.4 |
| * |
|
| (4 |
.4) |
| * |
|
Strategic sourcing software and |
|
|
systems development expense | | |
| (3 |
.5) |
| (3 |
.7) |
| (5 |
.5) |
| 0 |
.2 |
| 5 |
.4 |
| 1 |
.8 |
| 32 |
.7 |
Stock based compensation charges |
|
|
|
(1 |
.8) |
|
(0 |
.7) |
|
|
-- |
|
(1 |
.1) |
|
(157 |
.1) |
|
(0 |
.7) |
|
|
* |
Other, net |
|
|
|
(31 |
.2) |
|
(47 |
.3) |
|
(32 |
.3) |
|
16 |
.1 |
|
34 |
.0 |
|
(15 |
.0) |
|
(46 |
.4) |
|
| | |
$ | 77 |
.7 |
$ | 119 |
.6 |
$ | 109 |
.7 |
$ | (41 |
.9) |
| (35 |
.0)% |
$ | 9 |
.9 |
| 9 |
.0% |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 19 |
.9 |
$ | 15 |
.6 |
$ | 22 |
.9 |
$ | 4 |
.3 |
| 27 |
.6% |
$ | (7 |
.3) |
| (31 |
.9)% |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 12 |
.1 |
| 13 |
.2 |
| 13 |
.8 |
| (1 |
.1) |
| (8 |
.3) |
| (0 |
.6) |
| (4 |
.3) |
Other |
|
|
|
0 |
.6 |
|
0 |
.3 |
|
0 |
.4 |
|
0 |
.3 |
|
100 |
.0 |
|
0 |
.1 |
|
25 |
.0 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
32 |
.6 |
$ |
29 |
.1 |
$ |
37 |
.1 |
$ |
3 |
.5 |
|
12 |
.0% |
$ |
(8 |
.0) |
|
(21 |
.6)% |
|
|
Operating Earnings Margin: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
| 16 |
.8% |
| 16 |
.8% |
| 14 |
.2% |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 8 |
.4 |
| 9 |
.4 |
| 8 |
.5 |
Consolidated | | |
| 5 |
.1% |
| 8 |
.6% |
| 8 |
.5% |
|
Depreciation and Amortization | | |
Expense as a % of Net Sales: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
| 2 |
.4% |
| 2 |
.1% |
| 3 |
.5% |
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 1 |
.8 |
| 2 |
.0 |
| 2 |
.2 |
Consolidated | | |
| 2 |
.2% |
| 2 |
.1% |
| 2 |
.9% |
|
(1) |
The year ended
December 31, 2003 represents the combined pre- and post-Recapitalization periods of January 1,
2003 to January 9, 2003 and January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, respectively.
|
|
* |
not
applicable or not meaningful |
The
combined year ended December 31, 2003 pre- and post-Recapitalization periods have been
compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 for purposes of managements
discussion and analysis of the results of operations. Any references, below, to the
year ended December 31, 2003 shall refer to the combined periods. Material fluctuations
in operations resulting from the effect of purchase accounting have been highlighted. |
|
Pre- |
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization |
Recapitalization |
Combined |
|
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Year Ended |
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
December 31, 2003
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
24 |
.9 |
$ |
1,490 |
.1 |
$ |
1,515 |
.0 |
Cost of products sold | | |
| 18 |
.6 |
| 1,060 |
.0 |
| 1,078 |
.6 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses, net | | |
| 5 |
.0 |
| 261 |
.6 |
| 266 |
.6 |
Amortization of intangible assets | | |
| 0 |
.1 |
| 9 |
.0 |
| 9 |
.1 |
Expenses and charges arising from the | | |
Recapitalization | | |
| 83 |
.0 |
| -- |
|
| 83 |
.0 |
|
Operating earnings (loss) | | |
| (81 |
.8) |
| 159 |
.5 |
| 77 |
.7 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(1 |
.0) |
|
(57 |
.7) |
|
(58 |
.7) |
Investment income |
|
|
|
0 |
.1 |
|
1 |
.5 |
|
1 |
.6 |
|
Earnings (loss) before provision (benefit) for | | |
income taxes |
|
|
|
(82 |
.7) |
|
103 |
.3 |
|
20 |
.6 |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
(21 |
.8) |
|
41 |
.3 |
|
19 |
.5 |
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
(60 |
.9) |
|
62 |
.0 |
|
1 |
.1 |
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| (1 |
.0) |
| 12 |
.2 |
| 11 |
.2 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
$ |
(61 |
.9) |
$ |
74 |
.2 |
$ |
12 |
.3 |
|
|
Percentage of Net Sales
|
|
Pre- |
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization |
Recapitalization |
Combined |
|
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Year Ended |
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
December 31, 2003
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
100 |
.0% |
|
100 |
.0% |
|
100 |
.0% |
Cost of products sold | | |
| 74 |
.7 |
| 71 |
.1 |
| 71 |
.2 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses, net | | |
| 20 |
.1 |
| 17 |
.6 |
| 17 |
.6 |
Amortization of intangible assets | | |
| 0 |
.4 |
| 0 |
.6 |
| 0 |
.6 |
Expenses and charges arising from the | | |
Recapitalization | | |
| 333 |
.3 |
| -- |
|
| 5 |
.5 |
|
Operating earnings (loss) | | |
| (328 |
.5) |
| 10 |
.7 |
| 5 |
.1 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(4 |
.0) |
|
(3 |
.9) |
|
(3 |
.8) |
Investment income | | |
| 0 |
.4 |
| 0 |
.1 |
| 0 |
.1 |
|
Earnings (loss) before provision (benefit) for | | |
income taxes |
|
|
|
(332 |
.1) |
|
6 |
.9 |
|
1 |
.4 |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
(87 |
.5) |
|
2 |
.7 |
|
1 |
.3 |
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
(244 |
.6) |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
0 |
.1 |
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(4 |
.0) |
| 0 |
.8 |
| 0 |
.7 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
(248 |
.6)% |
|
5 |
.0% |
|
0 |
.8% |
|
The
tables that follow set forth, for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2003, (a) certain consolidated operating results, (b) the
percentage change of such results as compared to the prior year, (c) the percentage
which such results bear to net sales and (d) the change of such percentages as
compared to the prior year: |
|
Percentage Change |
|
2003 |
2002 |
|
Year-ended December 31, |
to |
to |
|
2003 (1)
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
1,515 |
.0 |
$ |
1,384 |
.1 |
$ |
1,293 |
.8 |
|
9 |
.5% |
|
7 |
.0% |
Cost of products sold | | |
| 1,078 |
.6 |
| 992 |
.3 |
| 945 |
.6 |
| (8 |
.7) |
| (4 |
.9) |
Selling, general and administrative expense, net | | |
| 266 |
.6 |
| 262 |
.6 |
| 226 |
.5 |
| (1 |
.5) |
| (15 |
.9) |
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets | | |
| 9 |
.1 |
| 3 |
.0 |
| 12 |
.0 |
| (203 |
.3) |
| 75 |
.0 |
Expenses and charges arising from the Recapitalization |
|
|
|
83 |
.0 |
|
6 |
.6 |
|
-- |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
* |
|
Operating earnings | | |
| 77 |
.7 |
| 119 |
.6 |
| 109 |
.7 |
| (35 |
.0) |
| 9 |
.0 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(58 |
.7) |
|
(52 |
.4) |
|
(51 |
.8) |
|
(12 |
.0) |
|
(1 |
.2) |
Loss from debt retirement |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(5 |
.5) |
|
* |
|
|
100 |
.0 |
Investment income |
|
|
|
1 |
.6 |
|
5 |
.9 |
|
8 |
.2 |
|
(72 |
.9) |
|
(28 |
.0) |
|
Earnings from continuing operations | | |
before provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
20 |
.6 |
|
73 |
.1 |
|
60 |
.6 |
|
(71 |
.8) |
|
20 |
.6 |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
19 |
.5 |
|
29 |
.5 |
|
27 |
.8 |
|
33 |
.9 |
|
(6 |
.1) |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
43 |
.6 |
|
32 |
.8 |
|
(97 |
.5) |
|
32 |
.9 |
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
11 |
.2 |
|
18 |
.9 |
|
(24 |
.8) |
|
(40 |
.7) |
|
176 |
.2 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
$ |
12 |
.3 |
$ |
62 |
.5 |
$ |
8 |
.0 |
|
(80 |
.3)% |
|
681 |
.2% |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
Percentage of Net Sales |
2003 |
2002 |
|
Year-ended December 31, |
to |
to |
|
2003 (1)
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
100 |
.0% |
|
100 |
.0% |
|
100 |
.0% |
|
--- |
% |
|
--- |
% |
Cost of products sold | | |
| 71 |
.2 |
| 71 |
.7 |
| 73 |
.1 |
| 0 |
.5 |
| 1 |
.4 |
Selling, general and administrative expense, net | | |
| 17 |
.6 |
| 19 |
.0 |
| 17 |
.5 |
| 1 |
.4 |
| (1 |
.5) |
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets | | |
| 0 |
.6 |
| 0 |
.2 |
| 0 |
.9 |
| (0 |
.4) |
| 0 |
.7 |
Expenses and charges arising from the Recapitalization | | |
| 5 |
.5 |
| 0 |
.5 |
| -- |
|
| (5 |
.0) |
| (0 |
.5) |
|
Operating earnings | | |
| 5 |
.1 |
| 8 |
.6 |
| 8 |
.5 |
| (3 |
.5) |
| 0 |
.1 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(3 |
.8) |
|
(3 |
.8) |
|
(4 |
.0) |
|
-- |
|
|
0 |
.2 |
Loss from debt retirement | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (0 |
.4) |
| -- |
|
| 0 |
.4 |
Investment income | | |
| 0 |
.1 |
| 0 |
.5 |
| 0 |
.6 |
| (0 |
.4) |
| (0 |
.1) |
|
Earnings from continuing operations before |
|
|
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
1 |
.4 |
|
5 |
.3 |
|
4 |
.7 |
|
(3 |
.9) |
|
0 |
.6 |
Provision for income taxes | | |
| 1 |
.3 |
| 2 |
.1 |
| 2 |
.1 |
| 0 |
.8 |
| -- |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
0 |
.1 |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
2 |
.6 |
|
(3 |
.1) |
|
0 |
.6 |
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 0 |
.7 |
| 1 |
.3 |
| (2 |
.0) |
| (0 |
.6) |
| 3 |
.3 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
0 |
.8% |
|
4 |
.5% |
|
0 |
.6% |
|
(3 |
.7)% |
|
3 |
.9% |
|
|
(1) |
The year ended
December 31, 2003 represents the combined pre- and post-Recapitalization periods of January 1,
2003 to January 9, 2003 and January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, respectively.
|
|
* |
not
applicable or not meaningful |
Year-ended December 31,
2003 as Compared to the Year-ended December 31, 2002
Combined
consolidated net sales from continuing operations increased approximately $130,900,000
or 9.5% for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the year ended December
31, 2002. The Companys segments have a significant number of different
products across a wide range of price points and numerous distribution channels that
does not always allow meaningful quantitative analysis to be performed with respect
to the effect on net sales of changes in units sold or the price per unit sold. The
Company however, does ensure that whenever the underlying causes of material
increases or decreases in consolidated net sales can be adequately analyzed and
quantified, that, appropriate disclosure of such reasons, including changes in
price, volume and the mix of products is made. The effect of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates accounted for approximately $38,600,000 of the increase
in net sales from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. Net sales increased for the year
ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result
of the acquisitions of Elan and SPC, price increases and higher net sales volume.
In the Residential Building Products Segment, net sales increased approximately
$101,500,000 or 13.9% and include an increase of approximately $29,300,000
attributable to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The
acquisition of Elan in January of 2003 and SPC in July of 2003 contributed
approximately $46,000,000 of the increase in net sales for the Residential Building
Products Segment. In the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment, net sales
increased approximately $29,400,000 or 4.5% and include an increase of
approximately $9,300,000 attributable to the effect of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. |
Overall,
increases in sales levels in the year ended December 31, 2003 reflect the ongoing
stability of the housing construction and remodeling markets and our expanded
branding effort in our line of air conditioning and heating products, partially offset
by the general slowdown in commercial construction activity and the continued softness
in the manufactured housing market. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
the Companys net sales to customers serving the manufactured housing markets,
principally consisting of air conditioners and furnaces, constituted approximately
7.1% and 8.5%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated net sales. The
increase in net sales volume in the Residential Building Products Segment in the year
ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 was, in part,
the result of new products and the ongoing stability in the residential housing
construction and remodeling markets. Increased sales volume of bathroom exhaust fans,
range hoods and garage door openers was also a factor in the increase in this
segment. Net sales in the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment for HVAC
products sold to residential site-built customers constituted the largest category
of product sold to a particular group of customers within this segment in 2003 and
increased approximately 22% over 2002. The increase in net sales in this Segment in
the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to 2002 was due to continued growth
principally from this segment's brand-name strategy of HVAC products to the
residential site built market. In the year ended December 31, 2003, this Segment
benefited from the introduction of our Westinghouse ® and Maytag ® brands
which were introduced in the third quarter of 2002 and from the ongoing success of
existing brands. To a lesser extent, increased sales prices of HVAC residential
products were also a factor in the increase in net sales. These increases were
partially offset by the general slowdown in commercial construction activity, which
reduced sales of the Companys commercial HVAC products by
approximately 6% and an approximate 9% decrease in sales to the manufactured housing
market in this segment as continued softness is being experienced by this industry.
The trend of lower levels of orders and shipments of commercial HVAC products,
particularly in the office building and telecommunications markets, is expected to
continue into 2004. |
Combined
cost of products sold was approximately $1,078,600,000 for the year ended 2003
and approximately $992,300,000 for the year ended 2002. Cost of products sold, as
a percentage of net sales, decreased from approximately 71.7% in the year ended
December 31, 2002 to approximately 71.2% in the year ended December 31, 2003. Cost
of products sold for 2003 includes approximately $23,600,000 of cost of products
sold from the acquisitions of Elan and SPC, including non-cash charges of
approximately $800,000 related to the amortization of purchase price allocated to
inventory, an increase of approximately $30,600,000 related to the effect of changes
in foreign currency exchange rates, a non-cash charge of approximately $4,600,000
related to the amortization of purchase price allocated to inventory as a result of
the Recapitalization, approximately $8,100,000 of lower depreciation expense as a
result of the fair value adjustment to property, plant and equipment and approximately
$6,900,000 of restructuring charges and startup costs. A more complete discussion on
depreciation and its impact on the year ended December 31, 2003 and the expected
impact on 2004 is available in the second paragraph below. In the Residential
Building Products Segment, cost of products sold for 2003 was approximately
$541,800,000, as compared to approximately $480,000,000 in 2002, and includes
approximately $23,600,000 of cost of products sold from the acquisitions of Elan and
SPC, including non-cash charges of approximately $800,000 related to the
amortization of purchase price allocated to inventory, an increase of approximately
$22,700,000 related to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, a
non-cash charge of approximately $4,000,000 related to the amortization of purchase
price allocated to inventory related to the Recapitalization, and approximately
$4,600,000 of lower depreciation expense as a result of the fair value adjustment
to property, plant and equipment. In the Air Conditioning and Heating Products
Segment cost of products sold in 2003 was approximately $536,800,000, as compared to
approximately $512,300,000 in 2002, and includes an increase of approximately
$7,900,000 related to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates, a non-cash charge of approximately $600,000 related to the amortization
of purchase price allocated to inventory, approximately $6,900,000 of restructuring
charges and start-up costs and approximately $3,500,000 of lower depreciation expense
as a result of the fair value adjustment to property, plant and equipment. |
Material
costs were approximately 43.7% and 44.0% of net sales for the years ended December
31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cost reductions due to strategic sourcing
software and systems development were primarily responsible for the decrease in
material costs as a percentage of net sales in 2003 as compared to 2002.
Manufacturing cost reduction measures implemented in 2002 and 2003 combined with net
sales increases contributed to the decrease in cost of products sold as a
percentage of net sales in the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to 2002.
Increased sales volume of HVAC products to residential site built customers in
the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment, without a proportionate
increase in cost (in part, reflecting increased sales without an increase in
fixed costs) was a factor in the decrease in costs in the year ended December 31,
2003. Cost of products sold for the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment
for the year ended December 31, 2003 include approximately $5,800,000 of severance and
other costs associated with the closure of certain manufacturing facilities and include
approximately $1,100,000 of expenses associated with the start-up of a new
manufacturing facility. |
In
connection with both the initial and final allocations of purchase price to property,
plant and equipment acquired as part of the Recapitalization, the Company assigned
new useful lives based upon the initial estimated and then the final useful lives
adopted from the date of the Recapitalization, respectively, in order to determine
depreciation expense for all periods subsequent to the Recapitalization. For the
period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company reflected approximately
$8,100,000 of lower depreciation expense in continuing operations in cost of sales as
compared to the Companys historical basis of accounting prior to the
Recapitalization. The lower depreciation expense reflects the favorable impact of
approximately $12,200,000 related to revisions to the remaining useful lives, which
was partially offset by the unfavorable impact of approximately $4,100,000 related
to the increase in property, plant and equipment related to the allocation of
purchase price. In 2004, the Company expects to record approximately $5,100,000 of
lower depreciation expense in cost of products sold as compared to the Companys
historical basis of accounting prior to the Recapitalization. Depreciation expense
related to property, plant and equipment acquired as part of the Recapitalization
was recorded based upon the initial allocation of purchase price and initial
estimated useful lives for the period from January 10, 2003 to October 4, 2003 and
based upon the final allocation of purchase price and final useful lives adopted for
the period from October 5, 2003 to December 31, 2003. Depreciation expense would
have been approximately $3,600,000 higher for the period from January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003 if the final allocation of purchase price and final useful lives
adopted had been used to record depreciation expense for the period from January 10,
2003 to October 4, 2003, primarily due to the final remaining useful lives adopted
being shorter than the initial estimates, which was partially offset by the
reduction in the amount of the final purchase price allocation. During the period
from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company reflected amortization of
purchase price allocated to inventory of approximately $4,600,000 in continuing
operations in cost of sales related to inventory acquired as part of the
Recapitalization. (See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.) Additionally, amortization of purchase price allocated
to inventory of approximately $800,000 was reflected in continuing operations in
cost of sales relating to the acquisition of Elan and SPC. No similar amortization
was required for such inventory in 2002 under the Companys historical basis of
accounting. (See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.) |
Had
all year-end inventory values been stated on a FIFO basis, year-end inventory would
have been approximately $7,800,000 lower in 2003 and $800,000 higher in 2002.
Overall, changes in the cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales for one
period as compared to another period may reflect a number of factors including
changes in the relative mix of products sold, the effect of changes in sales prices,
material costs and changes in productivity levels. |
Combined
selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A) was approximately
$266,600,000 for the year ended 2003 and approximately $262,600,000 for the year
ended 2002. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased from approximately 19.0% in
2002 to approximately 17.6% in 2003. SG&A in 2003 includes approximately $15,200,000
of SG&A from the acquisitions of Elan and SPC in the Residential Building Products
Segment, and an increase of approximately $6,400,000 related to the effect of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates, of which approximately $4,200,000 is
included in the Residential Building Products Segment and $2,200,000 is included in
the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment. SG&A also includes in unallocated,
approximately $3,500,000 of direct expenses and fees associated with the Companys
strategic sourcing software and systems development. SG&A in 2003 is also higher due
to approximately $1,400,000 of stock based compensation from adopting SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123) and
$600,000 of compensation expense in the fourth quarter of 2003 from the sale of stock.
SG&A in 2002 includes approximately $3,700,000 of direct expenses and fees associated
with the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development,
approximately $2,100,000 of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
Norteks re-audit of Norteks Consolidated Financial Statements for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, a $4,400,000 charge
relating to an incentive earned by certain of Norteks officers under Norteks
1999 Equity Performance Plan and approximately $700,000 of stock based-compensation
charges, all of which are recorded in unallocated and approximately $1,000,000
in the fourth quarter of 2002 relating to restructuring charges in the Residential
Building Products Segment. The direct expenses and fees associated with the
Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development, the fees and
expenses related to the re-audit of Norteks Consolidated Financial
Statements and the charge relating to incentive earned by certain of Norteks
officers under Norteks 1999 Equity Performance Plan are set-forth separately
in the segment data. The decrease in the percentage is principally due, in part, to
lower compensation and benefit expenses of certain members of management subsequent
to the Recapitalization and higher sales without a proportionate increase in
expense (in part, reflecting increased sales without an increase in fixed expenses)
in the Air Conditioning and Heating Products segment in the fourth quarter and in
the year ended December 31,2003 in the Residential Building Products Segment. These
decreases were partially offset by increased expense levels associated with the Companys
brand name strategy of HVAC products sold to the residential site built market. |
Amortization
of intangible assets, as a percentage of net sales from continuing operations,
increased from approximately .2% in the year ended December 31, 2002 to
approximately .6% in the year ended December 31, 2003 principally as a result of
approximately $6,300,000 of higher amortization of intangible assets arising from the
Recapitalization as compared to the Companys historical basis of accounting
prior to the Recapitalization, of which approximately $3,600,000 and $2,700,000
relates to the Residential Building Products Segment and the Air Conditioning and
Heating Products Segment, respectively. This higher amortization reflects the
combination of the unfavorable impact of approximately $1,400,000 related to
revisions to the remaining useful lives and the unfavorable impact of approximately
$4,900,000 related to the increase in intangible assets as a result of the allocation
of purchase price. The acquisitions of Elan and SPC in the Residential Building
Products Segment accounted for an additional increase of approximately $700,000.
In 2004, the Company expects to record approximately $8,400,000 of higher
amortization of intangible assets as compared to the Companys historical basis
of accounting prior to the Recapitalization. Amortization expense related to
intangible assets acquired as part of the Recapitalization was recorded based upon
the initial allocation of purchase price and estimated useful lives for the period
from January 10, 2003 to October 4, 2003 and based upon the final allocation of
purchase price and final useful lives adopted for the period from October 5,
2003 to December 31, 2003. Amortization expense would have been approximately
$1,800,000 higher for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 if the
final allocation of purchase price and final remaining useful lives adopted had
been used to record amortization expense for the period from January 10, 2003 to
October 4, 2003, primarily due to the final remaining useful lives adopted being
shorter than the initial estimates, which was partially offset by the reduction in
the amount of the allocation of purchase price. (See Note 1 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
Expenses
and charges arising from the Recapitalization were $83,000,000 or 5.5%, as a
percentage of net sales, and $6,600,000 or .5%, as a percentage of net sales, in 2003
and 2002, respectively. See Liquidity and Capital Resources and Notes 1, 2 and 14 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein, for
further discussion of these expenses and charges. |
Consolidated
operating earnings decreased by approximately $41,900,000 from approximately
$119,600,000, or 8.6% as a percent of net sales, in 2002 to approximately
$77,700,000, or 5.1% as a percent of net sales, in 2003 as a result of the factors
discussed above. |
Consolidated
operating earnings have been reduced by depreciation and amortization expense
(other than amortization of deferred debt expense and debt premium and discount) of
approximately $32,600,000 and $29,100,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively. Consolidated operating earnings for the year ended December 31,
2003 includes approximately $5,400,000 of amortization expense from purchase price
allocated to inventory and approximately $6,300,000 of additional amortization expense
of intangible assets, partially offset by approximately $8,100,000 of lower
depreciation expense of property, plant and equipment as a result of the fair value
adjustments arising from acquisitions and the Recapitalization. |
Operating
earnings of the Residential Building Products Segment were approximately $140,000,000
in 2003 compared to approximately $122,900,000 in 2002 and include an increase of
approximately $2,400,000 from the effect of foreign currency exchange rates,
$7,600,000 of operating earnings contributed by the acquisition of Elan and SPC and an
increase of approximately $4,600,000 of lower depreciation expense as a result
of the fair value adjustment to property, plant and equipment in 2003. These
increases were offset by decreased operating earnings from approximately $4,800,000
of amortization expense from purchase price allocated to inventory in 2003 and
$3,600,000 of increased amortization from the estimated amount of fair value
adjustment to intangible assets in 2003. Operating earnings in 2002 include a
decrease of $1,000,000 relating to restructuring charges recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2002. Operating earnings of the Air Conditioning and Heating Products
Segment were approximately $57,200,000 in 2003 as compared to approximately
$61,500,000 in 2002 and include an increase of approximately $3,500,000 of lower
depreciation expense as a result of the fair value adjustment to property, plant and
equipment in 2003. This increase was offset by decreased operating earnings of
approximately $800,000 from the effect of foreign currency exchange rates,
approximately $600,000 of amortization expense from purchase price allocated to
inventory in 2003, $2,700,000 of increased amortization from the estimated amount
of fair value adjustment to intangible assets in 2003 and $6,900,000 of restructuring
charges and plant start-up costs in 2003. The operating expense in unallocated was
approximately $119,500,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to expense of
approximately $64,800,000 in 2002 and includes the effect of approximately $83,000,000
of fees and expenses associated with the Recapitalization, approximately $3,500,000
of direct expenses and fees associated with the Companys strategic sourcing
software and systems development incurred in 2003 and approximately $1,800,000
of stock based compensation expense in 2003. The operating expense in unallocated for
2002 includes approximately $6,600,000 of fees and expenses associated with the
Recapitalization, the effect of the incentive earned by certain of Norteks
officers under Norteks 1999 Equity Performance Plan of approximately $4,400,000
in the second quarter of 2002, the effect of the fees and expenses incurred in
connection with Norteks re-audit of Norteks Consolidated Financial
Statements for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 of
approximately $2,100,000 in the third quarter of 2002, $3,700,000 of direct expenses
and fees associated with the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems
development and approximately $700,000 of stock based compensation expense. |
The
increase in operating earnings in the Residential Building Products Segment in 2003 was
primarily as a result of increased sales volume, principally bathroom exhaust fans
and kitchen range hoods, due to the continued stability of new home construction
and remodeling markets and increased sales of garage door openers. The increase
in operating earnings in the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment in 2003
was principally due to increased sales volume of HVAC products to customers serving
the residential site built market without a proportionate increase in costs and
expenses (in part, reflecting increased sales without an increase in fixed costs and
expenses), strategic sourcing software and systems development and cost reduction
measures implemented in 2002 and, partially offset by a decrease in operating
earnings of certain product lines due to the general slowdown in the commercial
construction and manufactured housing markets. The operating results of the Air
Conditioning and Heating Products Segment for the year ended December 31, 2003 include
approximately $5,800,000 of severance and other costs associated with the closure
of certain manufacturing facilities and include approximately $1,100,000 of costs
associated with the start-up of a new manufacturing facility. |
Operating
earnings of foreign operations, consisting primarily of the results of operations of
the Company's Canadian and European subsidiaries were approximately 6.6% and 7.2% of
operating earnings (before unallocated and corporate expense) in 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Sales and earnings derived from international markets are subject to,
among others, the risks of currency fluctuations. |
Interest
expense increased approximately $6,300,000 or approximately 12.0% in 2003 as
compared to 2002. The increase in interest expense in 2003 is primarily due to
approximately $3,600,000 of interest expense associated with the sale, on November
24, 2003 of $515,000,000 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 10% Senior
Discount Notes due May 15, 2011 and approximately $4,100,000 of interest expense from
the amortization of the Bridge Facility commitment fees and related expenses and
reflects the effect of a net increase in debt and approximately $3,200,000 of lower
interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2003. These increases were
partially offset by approximately $5,700,000 in the year ended December 31, 2003 of
lower interest expense from the amortization of premium arising from the fair
value adjustment on the date of the Recapitalization allocated to indebtedness as
compared to the Companys historical basis of accounting prior to the
Recapitalization. Interest allocated to discontinued operations was approximately
$38,600,000 and $41,800,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. (See Liquidity and Capital Resources and Notes 2 and 10 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
Investment
income decreased approximately $4,300,000 or 72.9% in 2003 as compared to 2002
primarily as a result of lower average invested balances in 2003 as a result of the
funds utilized in the Recapitalization and for acquisitions. Included in investment
income in the year ended December 31, 2002 was approximately $2,600,000 related to
restricted investments and marketable securities held by certain pension trusts
(including related party amounts) which funds were distributed to participants on the
date of the Recapitalization. (See Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
The
provision for income taxes from continuing operations was approximately
$19,500,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to approximately
$29,500,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The income tax rates in both 2003
and 2002 differed from the United States Federal statutory rate of 35% principally as a
result of the effect of non-deductible expenses, foreign income tax on foreign
source income, state income tax provisions, and in 2003 due to the
Recapitalization. (See Notes 1, 2 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
The
table that follows presents a summary of the operating results of discontinued
operations for the periods presented. (See Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post-Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
522,600 |
|
$ |
8,800 |
|
$ |
529,700 |
|
|
|
Operating earnings (loss) of discontinued | | |
operations * | | |
| 58,237 |
|
| (368 |
) |
| 70,401 |
|
Interest expense, net | | |
| (38,537 |
) |
| (1,232 |
) |
| (42,701 |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) before provision (benefit) for | | |
income taxes | | |
| 19,700 |
|
| (1,600 |
) |
| 27,700 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| 7,500 |
|
| (600 |
) |
| 10,600 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 12,200 |
|
| (1,000 |
) |
| 17,100 |
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 2,400 |
|
Tax provision (benefit) on sale of discontinued | | |
operations | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 600 |
|
|
| | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 1,800 |
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
$ | 12,200 |
|
$ | (1,000 |
) |
$ | 18,900 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense | | |
$ | 16,101 |
|
$ | 315 |
|
$ | 14,902 |
|
|
|
* |
Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations are net of Ply Gem corporate expenses
previously included within Unallocated other, net in the Companys segment
reporting. |
|
Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations for the period from January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003 include approximately $600,000 of severance and other costs
associated with the closure of certain manufacturing facilities. Operating earnings
(loss) of discontinued operations for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31,
2003 also include approximately $1,300,000 of costs and expenses for expanded
distribution including new customers. |
SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS No. 143)
addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs.
SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement
obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable
estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are
capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2002 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1,
2003. Adoption of this accounting standard was not material to the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
SFAS
No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections (SFAS No. 145), was issued
in April 2002 and addresses the reporting of gains and losses resulting from the
extinguishment of debt, accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and rescinds or
amends other existing authoritative pronouncements. SFAS No. 145 requires that any
gain or loss on extinguishment of debt that does not meet the criteria of APB 30
for classification as an extraordinary item shall not be classified as
extraordinary and shall be included in earnings from continuing operations. The
Company adopted SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003. Adoption of this accounting
standard was not material to the results presented in the consolidated financial
statements but did require reclassification of the Companys $5,500,000 pre
tax extraordinary loss recorded in 2001 to earnings from continuing operations. |
Effective
January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146), which
addresses the accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal
activities, nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3,
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs
to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring) (EITF
94-3) and substantially nullifies EITF Issue No. 88-10, Costs Associated
with Lease Modification or Termination (EITF 88-10). SFAS No. 146
requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be
recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit
cost as defined in EITF 94-3 was recognized at the date of an entitys
commitment to an exit plan. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or
disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of
SFAS No. 146 did not have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements (see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein). |
On
December 31, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition
and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148). SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123) to
provide alternative methods of transition to SFAS No. 123s fair value method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also amends the
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company adopted the
fair value method of accounting for stock based employee compensation in accordance
with SFAS No. 123. (See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
In
November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). Along with new disclosure
requirements, FIN 45 requires guarantors to recognize, at the inception of certain
guarantees, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing
the guarantee. This differs from the prior practice to record a liability only when
a loss is probable and reasonably estimable. The recognition and measurement
provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions
of FIN 45 as of December 31, 2002 and adopted the entire interpretation on January 1,
2003. Adoption of FIN 45 was not material to the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements (see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein). |
In
January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN
46). FIN 46 clarifies the application of ARB No. 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not
have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have
sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. The consolidation requirements of
FIN 46 apply to the Company immediately for variable interest entities created after
January 31, 2003 and for existing variable interest entities no later than the end of
the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2003. The adoption
of FIN 46 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
In
April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 149), which
clarifies the financial accounting and reporting proscribed by SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133)
for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts. Certain provisions of SFAS No. 149 related to implementation issues
of SFAS No. 133 are already effective and other provisions related to forward purchases
or sales are effective for both existing contracts and new contracts entered into
after June 30, 2003. The Company has previously adopted SFAS No. 133, including the
implementation issues addressed in SFAS No. 149, and the adoption of the new
provisions of SFAS No. 149 on July 1, 2003 did not have an impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
In
May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS
No. 150), which addresses the accounting and reporting for the
classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics
of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial
instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and for all existing
financial instruments beginning in the first interim period after June 15, 2003,
except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities, which
are subject to the provisions for the first fiscal period beginning after December
15, 2004. The Company adopted SFAS No. 150 on July 1, 2003. Adoption of this
accounting standard did not have an impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
In
December 2003, the FASB issued the revised SFAS No. 132, Employers Disclosures
about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS No. 132) to
require additional disclosures to those in the original SFAS No. 132 about the assets,
obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension
plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The revised SFAS No. 132
provides only for additional disclosures and does not change the accounting for
pension and postretirement plans. The Company has previously adopted SFAS No. 132 and
has provided the required new disclosures of the revised SFAS No. 132 in Note 8 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. |
The
Company uses EBITDA as both an operating performance and liquidity measure. Operating
performance measure disclosures with respect to EBITDA are provided below. Refer to
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for liquidity measure disclosures with
respect to EBITDA and a reconciliation from net cash flows from operating activities
to EBITDA. |
EBITDA
is defined as net earnings (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization expense. EBITDA is not a measure of operating performance under
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) and
should not be considered as an alternative or substitute for GAAP profitability
measures such as operating earnings (loss) from continuing operations, discontinued
operations, extraordinary items and net income (loss). EBITDA as an operating
performance measure has material limitations since it excludes, among other
things, the statement of operations impact of depreciation and amortization expense,
interest expense and the provision (benefit) for income taxes and therefore does
not necessarily represent an accurate measure of profitability, particularly in
situations where a company is highly leveraged or has a disadvantageous tax
structure. The Company uses a significant amount of capital assets and depreciation
and amortization expense is a necessary element of the Companys costs and
ability to generate revenue and therefore its exclusion from EBITDA is a material
limitation. The Company has a significant amount of debt and interest expense is
a necessary element of the Companys costs and ability to generate revenue and
therefore its exclusion from EBITDA is a material limitation. The Company generally
incurs significant U.S federal, state and foreign income taxes each year and the
provision (benefit) for income taxes is a necessary element of the Companys
costs and therefore its exclusion from EBITDA is a material limitation. As a
result, EBITDA should be evaluated in conjunction with net income (loss) for a more
complete analysis of the Companys profitability, as net income (loss) includes
the financial statement impact of these items and is the most directly comparable GAAP
operating performance measure to EBITDA. As EBITDA is not defined by GAAP, the
Companys definition of EBITDA may differ from and therefore may not be comparable
to similarly titled measures used by other companies, thereby limiting its
usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of the limitations that EBITDA has as
an analytical tool, investors should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute
for analysis of the Companys operating results as reported under GAAP. |
Company
management uses EBITDA as a supplementary non-GAAP operating performance measure
to assist with its overall evaluation of Company and subsidiary operating
performance (including the performance of subsidiary management) relative to
outside peer group companies. In addition, the Company uses EBITDA as an operating
performance measure in financial presentations to the Companys Board of
Directors, shareholders, various banks participating in the Companys Credit
Facility, note holders and Bond Rating agencies, among others, as a supplemental
non-GAAP operating measure to assist them in their evaluation of the Companys
performance. The Company is also active in mergers, acquisitions and divestitures
and uses EBITDA as an additional operating performance measure to assess Company,
subsidiary and potential acquisition target enterprise value and to assist in the
overall evaluation of Company, subsidiary and potential acquisition target
performance on an internal basis and relative to peer group companies. The Company
uses EBITDA in conjunction with traditional GAAP operating performance measures
as part of its overall assessment of potential valuation and relative performance and
therefore does not place undue reliance on EBITDA as its only measure of operating
performance. The Company believes EBITDA is useful for both the Company and investors
as it is a commonly used analytical measurement for comparing company profitability,
which eliminates the effects of financing, differing valuations of fixed and
intangible assets and tax structure decisions. The Company believes that EBITDA is
specifically relevant to the Company, due to the different degrees of leverage
among its competitors, the impact of purchase accounting associated with the
Recapitalization, which impacts comparability with its competitors who may or may not
have recently revalued their fixed and intangible assets, and the differing tax
structures and tax jurisdictions of certain of the Companys competitors. The
Company has included EBITDA as a supplemental operating performance measure, which
should be evaluated by investors in conjunction with the traditional GAAP performance
measures discussed earlier in this Results of Operations section for a complete
evaluation of the Companys operating performance. |
The
following table presents a reconciliation from net earnings (loss), which is the most
directly comparable GAAP operating performance measure, to EBITDA: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post-Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
|
Net earnings (loss) * |
|
|
$ |
74,200 |
|
$ |
(61,900 |
) |
$ |
62,500 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes from |
|
|
continuing operations |
|
|
|
41,300 |
|
|
(21,800 |
) |
|
29,500 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes from discontinued | | |
operations | | |
| 7,500 |
|
| (600 |
) |
| 11,200 |
|
Interest expense from continuing operations |
|
|
|
57,627 |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
52,410 |
|
Interest expense from discontinued operations | | |
| 38,733 |
|
| 1,234 |
|
| 44,224 |
|
Investment income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
(119 |
) |
|
(5,943 |
) |
Investment income from discontinued operations | | |
| (196 |
) |
| (2 |
) |
| (1,523 |
) |
Depreciation expense from continuing operations |
|
|
|
17,502 |
|
|
586 |
|
|
26,130 |
|
Depreciation expense from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
10,865 |
|
|
245 |
|
|
11,784 |
|
Amortization expense from continuing operations | | |
| 14,460 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 2,988 |
|
Amortization expense from discontinued operations | | |
| 5,236 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 3,118 |
|
|
EBITDA | | |
$ | 265,745 |
|
$ | (81,165 |
) |
$ | 236,388 |
|
|
|
* |
Includes
approximately $12,200,000, $(1,000,000) and $18,900,000 of earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations for the periods from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and
from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the year ended December 31, 2002,
respectively. (See Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.) |
|
EBITDA
includes approximately $83,000,000 and $6,600,000 of expenses and charges arising from
the Recapitalization recorded in the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and
the year ended December 31, 2002, respectively (see Notes 2 and 11 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein) and approximately
$1,500,000 of stock based compensation from adopting SFAS No. 123 and $600,000 of
compensation expense in the fourth quarter of 2003 from the sale of stock (see Note 1 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein). |
Year-ended December 31,
2002 as Compared to the Year-ended December 31, 2001
Consolidated
net sales increased approximately $90,300,000 or 7.0% for 2002 as compared to 2001.
The Companys segments have a significant number of different products across
a wide range of price points and numerous distribution channels that does not
always allow meaningful quantitative analysis to be performed with respect to the
effect on net sales of changes in units sold or the price per unit sold. The Company
however, does ensure that whenever the underlying causes of material increases
or decreases in consolidated net sales can be adequately analyzed and quantified,
that, appropriate disclosure of such reasons, including changes in price, volume and
the mix of products is made. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
accounted for approximately $5,600,000 of the increase in net sales in 2002. In the
Residential Building Products Segment, net sales increased approximately
$69,600,000 or 10.5% and include an increase of approximately $3,800,000
attributable to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In the Air
Conditioning and Heating Products Segment, net sales increased approximately
$20,700,000 or 3.3% and include an increase of approximately $1,800,000 attributable to
the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. |
Overall,
increases in sales levels in 2002 reflect continued strength in new home construction
and remodeling markets and favorable weather conditions, partially offset by the
continued slowdown in the manufactured housing market. For the years ended December
31, 2002 and 2001, the Companys net sales to customers serving the
manufactured housing markets, principally consisting of air conditioners and furnaces,
constituted approximately 8.5% and 9.8%, respectively, of the Companys
consolidated net sales. The increase in net sales volume in the Residential Building
Products Segment was, in part, the result of steady new home construction and
strong remodeling business, increases in average unit sales prices of range hoods
due to changes in product mix and increased sales of garage door openers. The
increase in net sales in the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment, was
principally due to continued growth resulting from this Segment's brand-name strategy
resulting in increased sales volume of HVAC products to the residential site built
market, partially offset by the general slowdown in commercial construction activity
which reduced the level of shipments of the Companys commercial HVAC products
and lower sales to the manufactured housing market in this segment in 2002 as
continued softness was being experienced by this industry. |
Cost
of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, decreased from approximately 73.1%
for the year ended 2001 to approximately 71.7% for the year ended 2002. In the
Residential Building Products Segment, cost of products sold for 2002 was
approximately $480,000,000 compared to $443,200,000 for 2001 and includes an
increase of approximately $3,200,000 related to the effect of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. In the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment cost
of products sold was approximately $512,300,000 for 2002 compared to approximately
$502,400,000 for 2001. Cost of products sold for 2002 includes an increase of
approximately $1,500,000 related to the effect of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates while cost of products sold for 2001 includes an increase of $2,700,000
over 2000 attributable to costs incurred in the start-up of a residential HVAC
manufacturing facility. |
Material
costs represented approximately 44.0% and 45.4% of net sales for the year 2002 and
2001, respectively. Material costs as a percentage of net sales decreased for the
year 2002 as compared to the year 2001, primarily due to increased net sales levels
and decreases in product costs including lower costs achieved from the Companys
strategic sourcing software and systems development discussed further below. |
The
decrease in the percentage in 2002 as compared to 2001 principally resulted from
reductions realized in the cost of certain purchased materials and component parts,
in part, due to lower prices and the effect of lower costs from cost reduction
measures implemented in 2001. The Company realized slightly lower prices on steel
products for the first half of 2002 as compared to 2001, but higher steel prices in the
second half of 2002 began to mitigate cost savings achieved. In addition, increased
sales volume of HVAC products to residential site built customers in the Air
Conditioning and Heating Products Segment and increased sales volume and higher average
unit sales prices of range hoods due to changes in product mix toward higher priced
units in the Residential Building Products Segment, all without a proportionate
increase in cost (in part, reflecting increased sales without an increase in fixed
costs) were also a factor. During 2002 the Company estimates that it has realized
benefits related to its strategic sourcing software and systems development of
between approximately $9,000,000 and $17,000,000 of lower cost of sales, before
implementation costs as compared to between approximately $4,000,000 and $6,000,000
of lower cost of sales, before implementation costs in 2001. Cost savings achieved
from this strategy were partially offset by the effect of increases in steel prices
noted above. Had all year-end inventory values been stated on a FIFO basis, year-end
inventory would have been approximately $800,000 higher in 2002 and $2,700,000 higher
in 2001. Overall, changes in the cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales
for one period as compared to another period may reflect a number of factors
including changes in the relative mix of products sold, the effect of changes in
sales prices, material costs and changes in productivity levels. |
Selling,
general and administrative expense increased from $226,500,000 or approximately 17.5% as
a percentage of net sales in the year 2001 to approximately $262,600,000 or
approximately 19.0% as a percentage of net sales in the year 2002. SG&A in 2002
includes approximately $3,700,000 of direct expenses and fees associated with the
Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development, approximately
$2,100,000 of fees and expenses incurred in connection with Norteks re-audit of
Norteks Consolidated Financial Statements for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2001, and a $4,400,000 charge relating to an incentive
earned by certain of Norteks officers under Norteks 1999 Equity
Performance Plan all of which are recorded in unallocated and approximately
$1,000,000 in the fourth quarter of 2002 relating to restructuring charges in the
Residential Building Products Segment. The direct expenses and third party fees
associated with the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems
development, the fees and expenses related to the re-audit of Norteks
Consolidated Financial Statements and the charge relating to an incentive earned
by certain of Norteks officers under Norteks 1999 Equity Performance
Plan are forth separately in the segment data. Selling, general and
administrative expense in 2001 included approximately $5,500,000 of fees and expenses
related to the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development
recorded in unallocated. All of the above amounts are set forth separately in the
segment data except for the restructuring charges in the fourth quarter of 2002,
which were recorded in the Residential Building Products Segment. |
The
increase in the percentage is due, in part, to compensation and benefit expenses
of certain members of management prior to the Recapitalization in 2002. |
Amortization
of goodwill and intangible assets, as a percentage of net sales, decreased from
approximately 0.9% in 2001 to approximately 0.2% in 2002. Beginning January 1,
2002, goodwill is no longer being amortized by the Company in accordance with the
adoption of SFAS No. 142. Amortization of goodwill of continuing operations was
approximately $8,700,000 for 2001, as determined under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States in effect in the year 2001 (see below). |
Expenses
and charges arising from the Recapitalization were $6,600,000 or .5%, as a percentage
of net sales, in 2002. See Liquidity and Capital Resources and Notes 1, 2 and 14
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein, for
further discussion of these expenses and charges. |
Consolidated
operating earnings increased approximately $9,900,000 or approximately 9.0% from
approximately $109,700,000 in 2001 to approximately $119,600,000 in 2002 as a result of
the factors discussed above. |
Consolidated
operating earnings have been reduced by depreciation and amortization expense
(other than amortization of deferred debt expense and debt discount) of approximately
$29,100,000 and $37,100,000 for 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
Operating
earnings of the Residential Building Products Segment were approximately $122,900,000
in 2002 compared to approximately $93,700,000 in 2001 and include an increase of
approximately $200,000 from the effect of foreign currency exchange rates in 2002, and
a decrease of $1,000,000 relating to restructuring charges recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2002. Operating earnings of the Air Conditioning and Heating
Products Segment were approximately $61,500,000 in 2002 compared to approximately
$53,800,000 in 2001 and include a decrease of approximately $100,000 from the
effect of foreign currency exchange rates in 2002 and approximately $2,700,000
attributable to costs incurred in the start-up of a residential HVAC
manufacturing facility in 2001. The operating expense in unallocated was
approximately $64,800,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to expense of
approximately $37,800,000 in 2001 and includes the effect of approximately
$6,600,000 of fees and expenses in 2002 associated with the Recapitalization of the
Company, the effect of the incentive earned by certain of Norteks officers
under Norteks 1999 Equity Performance Plan of approximately $4,400,000 in the
second quarter of 2002, the effect of the fees and expenses incurred in connection
with Norteks re-audit of Norteks Consolidated Financial Statements for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 of approximately
$2,100,000 in the third quarter of 2002 and $3,700,000 of direct expenses and fees
associated with the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development
incurred in 2002. |
The
increase in operating earnings in the Residential Building Products Segment was
primarily as a result of increased sales volume due to continued strength in 2002
in new home construction and remodeling markets, favorable weather conditions,
increases in sales volume and higher average unit sales prices of range hoods due to
changes in product mix and increased sales of garage door openers. The increase in
operating earnings in the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment in 2002 was
principally due to increased sales volume of HVAC products to customers serving the
residential site built market, partially offset by a decrease in operating earnings
of commercial products principally due to the softness in the commercial construction
market. During 2002, both segments realized benefits associated with the Companys
strategic sourcing software and systems development. |
Operating
earnings of foreign operations, consisting primarily of the results of operations of
the Company's Canadian and European subsidiaries, were approximately 7.2% and 6.3%
of operating earnings (before unallocated and corporate expense) in 2002 and 2001,
respectively. Sales and earnings derived from international markets are subject to,
among others, the risks of currency fluctuations. |
Interest
expense in 2002 increased approximately $600,000 or approximately 1.2% as
compared to 2001. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to approximately
$2,200,000 in 2002 associated with the refinancing of Norteks 9 7/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2011 and increased interest and deferred debt amortization
associated with Norteks Senior Secured Credit Facility entered into in 2002
partially offset by duplicative interest expense of approximately $1,750,000
incurred in 2001 in connection with the refinancing of Norteks 9 7/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2004 since the redemption of the 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes
due 2004 did not occur on the same day as the financing. Interest allocated to
discontinued operations remained unchanged at approximately $41,800,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. (See Liquidity and Capital Resources and
Notes 6, 10 and 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere herein.) |
On
July 11, 2001, Nortek redeemed $204,822,000 principal amount of Norteks 9 7/8%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2004, plus an approximate $2,900,000 redemption
premium thereon. As a result of this redemption, the Company recorded a pre-tax
loss of approximately $5,500,000 in the third quarter of 2001. (See Note 6 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
Investment
income decreased approximately $2,300,000 or 28.0% in 2002 as compared to 2001
primarily as a result of (a) approximately $1,700,000 of interest income resulting
from the favorable abatement of state income taxes in 2001, (b) additional interest
income of approximately $500,000 in 2001, earned on the funds from the financing held
in escrow for the subsequent redemption of the 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes
due 2004 and (c) lower investment income rates in 2002. Included in investment
income was approximately $2,600,000 in 2002 and $2,200,000 in 2001, respectively,
related to restricted investments and marketable securities held by certain pension
trusts (including related party amounts). (See Note 8 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
The
provision for income taxes from continuing operations was approximately $29,500,000
for 2002 as compared to approximately $27,800,000 for 2001. The income tax rates in
both years differed from the United States Federal statutory rate of 35% principally
as a result of the effect of non-deductible expenses, foreign income tax on foreign
source income, state income tax provisions and, in 2002, by the effect of
approximately $2,000,000 of income taxes no longer required as a result of the
Companys Hong Kong subsidiary permanently investing un-remitted foreign
earnings outside the United States and, in 2001 and non-deductible amortization expense
(for tax purposes). Beginning January 1, 2002, goodwill and intangible assets
determined to have an indefinite life are no longer being amortized (non-deductible
for tax purposes). (See Notes 1 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
The
table that follows presents a summary of the operating results of discontinued
operations for 2002 and 2001. (See Notes 1 and 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
2002
|
2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
529,700 |
|
$ |
787,400 |
|
|
|
Operating earnings of discontinued operations * | | |
$ | 70,401 |
|
$ | 43,188 |
|
Interest expense, net | | |
| (42,701 |
) |
| (47,688 |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) before provision for income taxes | | |
| 27,700 |
|
| (4,500 |
) |
Provision for income taxes | | |
| 10,600 |
|
| 300 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
$ | 17,100 |
|
$ | (4,800 |
) |
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations | | |
$ | 2,400 |
|
$ | (34,000 |
) |
Tax provision (benefit) on sale of discontinued operations | | |
| 600 |
|
| (14,000 |
) |
|
| | |
$ | 1,800 |
|
$ | (20,000 |
) |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
$ | 18,900 |
|
$ | (24,800 |
) |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense | | |
$ | 14,902 |
|
$ | 26,291 |
|
|
|
* |
Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations are net of Ply Gem corporate expenses
previously included within Unallocated other, net in the Companys segment
reporting. |
|
Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2001 include
approximately $600,000 of direct expenses and third party fees associated with the
Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development and
approximately $3,200,000 of net death benefit insurance proceeds related to life
insurance maintained on former managers, both of which were previously included
within Unallocated other, net in the Companys segment reporting. Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2001 also
include approximately $300,000 of manufacturing costs incurred in connection with the
start-up of a vinyl fence and decking facility, which were previously included in
the WDS Segment in the Companys segment reporting. |
In
accordance with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company ceased recording goodwill
amortization expense as of January 1, 2002. The table that follows presents earnings
from continuing operations and net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2001, as
adjusted, to reflect the elimination of goodwill amortization expense and the
related income tax impact: |
|
For the Year Ended |
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
Earnings from |
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Operations
|
Net Earnings
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
As reported in the accompanying |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
consolidated statement of operations | | |
$ | 32,800 |
|
$ | 8,000 |
|
Eliminate goodwill amortization expense |
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
16,394 |
|
Eliminate related tax impact |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
(294 |
) |
|
As adjusted |
|
|
$ |
41,400 |
|
$ |
24,100 |
|
|
Comprehensive
income included in stockholders investment was approximately $44,700,000 for
2002. Included in comprehensive income was a loss of approximately $22,700,000 (net
of tax benefit of approximately $12,900,000) primarily as a result of actuarial
losses due to market declines in plan assets, compensation increases and changes in
discount rates and a gain recorded on the change in the cumulative amount of
currency translation adjustment of approximately $5,250,000. (See Notes 1 and 8 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
The
Company uses EBITDA as both an operating performance and liquidity measure. Operating
performance measure disclosures with respect to EBITDA are provided below. Refer to
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for liquidity measure disclosures with
respect to EBITDA and a reconciliation from net cash flows from operating activities
to EBITDA. |
EBITDA
is defined as net earnings (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization expense. EBITDA is not a measure of operating performance under
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) and
should not be considered as an alternative or substitute for GAAP profitability
measures such as operating earnings (loss) from continuing operations, discontinued
operations, extraordinary items and net income (loss). EBITDA as an operating
performance measure has material limitations since it excludes, among other
things, the statement of operations impact of depreciation and amortization expense,
interest expense and the provision (benefit) for income taxes and therefore does
not necessarily represent an accurate measure of profitability, particularly in
situations where a company is highly leveraged or has a disadvantageous tax
structure. The Company uses a significant amount of capital assets and depreciation
and amortization expense is a necessary element of the Companys costs and
ability to generate revenue and therefore its exclusion from EBITDA is a material
limitation. The Company has a significant amount of debt and interest expense is
a necessary element of the Companys costs and ability to generate revenue and
therefore its exclusion from EBITDA is a material limitation. The Company generally
incurs significant U.S federal, state and foreign income taxes each year and the
provision (benefit) for income taxes is a necessary element of the Companys
costs and therefore its exclusion from EBITDA is a material limitation. As a
result, EBITDA should be evaluated in conjunction with net income (loss) for a more
complete analysis of the Companys profitability, as net income (loss) includes
the financial statement impact of these items and is the most directly comparable GAAP
operating performance measure to EBITDA. As EBITDA is not defined by GAAP, the
Companys definition of EBITDA may differ from and therefore may not be comparable
to similarly titled measures used by other companies, thereby limiting its
usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of the limitations that EBITDA has as
an analytical tool, investors should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute
for analysis of the Companys operating results as reported under GAAP. |
Company
management uses EBITDA as a supplementary non-GAAP operating performance measure
to assist with its overall evaluation of Company and subsidiary operating
performance (including the performance of subsidiary management) relative to
outside peer group companies. In addition, the Company uses EBITDA as an operating
performance measure in financial presentations to the Companys Board of
Directors, shareholders, various banks participating in the Companys Credit
Facility, note holders and Bond Rating agencies, among others, as a supplemental
non-GAAP operating measure to assist them in their evaluation of the Companys
performance. The Company is also active in mergers, acquisitions and divestitures
and uses EBITDA as an additional operating performance measure to assess Company,
subsidiary and potential acquisition target enterprise value and to assist in the
overall evaluation of Company, subsidiary and potential acquisition target
performance on an internal basis and relative to peer group companies. The Company
uses EBITDA in conjunction with traditional GAAP operating performance measures
as part of its overall assessment of potential valuation and relative performance and
therefore does not place undue reliance on EBITDA as its only measure of operating
performance. The Company believes EBITDA is useful for both the Company and investors
as it is a commonly used analytical measurement for comparing company profitability,
which eliminates the effects of financing, differing valuations of fixed and
intangible assets and tax structure decisions. The Company believes that EBITDA is
specifically relevant to the Company, due to the different degrees of leverage
among its competitors, the impact of purchase accounting associated with the
Recapitalization, which impacts comparability with its competitors who may or may not
have recently revalued their fixed and intangible assets, and the differing tax
structures and tax jurisdictions of certain of the Companys competitors. The
Company has included EBITDA as a supplemental operating performance measure, which
should be evaluated by investors in conjunction with the traditional GAAP performance
measures discussed earlier in this Results of Operations section for a complete
evaluation of the Companys operating performance. |
The
following table presents a reconciliation from net earnings, which is the most
directly comparable GAAP operating performance measure, to EBITDA: |
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
|
2002
|
2001
|
|
Net earnings* |
|
|
$ |
62,500 |
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
Provision for income taxes from continuing operations | | |
| 29,500 |
|
| 27,800 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes from discontinued operations | | |
| 11,200 |
|
| (13,700 |
) |
Interest expense from continuing operations | | |
| 52,410 |
|
| 51,748 |
|
Interest expense from discontinued operations | | |
| 44,224 |
|
| 50,150 |
|
Investment income from continuing operations | | |
| (5,943 |
) |
| (8,189 |
) |
Investment income from discontinued operations | | |
| (1,523 |
) |
| (2,462 |
) |
Depreciation expense from continuing operations |
|
|
|
26,130 |
|
|
25,166 |
|
Depreciation expense from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
11,784 |
|
|
15,148 |
|
Amortization expense from continuing operations | | |
| 2,988 |
|
| 11,955 |
|
Amortization expense from discontinued operations | | |
| 3,118 |
|
| 11,143 |
|
|
EBITDA | | |
$ | 236,388 |
|
$ | 176,759 |
|
|
|
* |
Includes
approximately $18,900,000 and $(24,800,000) of earnings (loss) from discontinued
operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively (see Note 10
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein). |
|
EBITDA
includes approximately $6,600,000 of expenses and charges arising from the
Recapitalization recorded for the year ended December 31, 2002 (see Notes 2 and 11
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein). |
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
From
January 1, 2004 through February 3, 2004, the Company purchased approximately
$14,800,000 of Norteks 9 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007 (9 1/4% Notes) and
approximately $10,700,000 of Norteks 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2007 (9 1/8%
Notes) in open market transactions. These purchases resulted in a pre-tax loss
of approximately $400,000, which will be recorded in the first quarter of 2004. |
On
February 13, 2004, the Company called for redemption on March 15, 2004 all of Norteks
outstanding 9 1/4% Notes (approximately $160,200,000 in principal amount) and
called for redemption on March 14, 2004 all of Norteks outstanding 9 1/8%
Notes (approximately $299,300,000 in principal amount). The 9 1/4% Notes and 9 1/8%
Notes were called at a redemption price of 101.542% and 103.042%, respectively, of the
principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 9 1/4% Notes and
9 1/8% Notes ceased to accrue interest as of the respective redemption dates
indicated above. The Company used the estimated net after tax proceeds from the sale of
Ply Gem of approximately $450,000,000, together with existing cash on hand, to fund
the redemption of the 9 1/4% Notes and 9 1/8% Notes. On February 13, 2004, the
Company called for redemption on March 14, 2004 $60,000,000 of Norteks
outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (8 7/8% Notes). On March 1, 2004,
the Company called for redemption on March 31, 2004 the remaining $150,000,000 of
Norteks outstanding 8 7/8% Notes (see below). The 8 7/8% Notes were called at a
redemption price of 104.438% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and
unpaid interest. |
Approximately
$60,000,000 principal amount of the 8 7/8% Notes ceased to accrue interest as of March
14, 2004 and approximately $150,000,000 principal amount of such Notes will cease to
accrue interest as of March 31, 2004. Nortek will use the net proceeds of
approximately $196,000,000 from the sale of the Floating Rate Notes, together with
existing cash on hand, to fund the redemption of the 8 7/8% Notes. |
The
Company expects that the redemption of the 9 1/4% Notes, 9 1/8% Notes and 8 7/8%
will result in a pre-tax loss of approximately $11,500,000, based upon the difference
between the respective redemption prices indicated above and the estimated carrying
values at the redemption dates of the 9 1/4% Notes, 9 1/8% Notes and 8 7/8% Notes,
which include the principal amount to be redeemed and the estimated remaining
unamortized premium recorded in connection with the Recapitalization (see Note 16
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein).
The Company will record such loss in the first quarter of 2004. |
On
March 1, 2004, Nortek completed the sale of $200,000,000 of Senior Floating Rate Notes
due 2010 (the Floating Rate Notes). The Floating Rate Notes will bear
interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, as defined, plus 3% (4.17% as of March 1,
2004). Interest on the Floating Rate Notes will be determined and payable semi-annually
on June 30 and December 31 of each year commencing June 30, 2004. Nortek incurred
fees and expenses, including the initial purchasers discount, of
approximately $4,000,000 in connection with the sale, which will be amortized over the
life of the Floating Rate Notes. The Floating Rate Notes are unsecured obligations
of Nortek, which mature on December 31, 2010, and may be redeemed in whole or in part
prior to December 31, 2010 at the redemption prices as defined in the indenture
governing the Floating Rate Notes (the Indenture). The Indenture contains
covenants that limit the Companys ability to engage in certain transactions,
including incurring additional indebtedness and paying dividends or distributions.
The terms of the Floating Rate Notes require Nortek to register notes having
substantially identical terms (the Exchange Notes) with the SEC as part
of an offer to exchange freely tradable Exchange Notes for the Floating Rate Notes
(the Exchange). In the event Nortek does not complete the Exchange in
accordance with the timing requirements outlined in the Indenture, Nortek may be
required to pay a higher interest rate. Nortek expects to complete the Exchange within
the required time period. |
On
November 24, 2003, the Company completed the sale of $515,000,000 aggregate
principal amount at maturity (approximately $349,400,000 gross proceeds) of its 10%
Senior Discount Notes due May 15, 2011 (Senior Discount Notes). The
Senior Discount Notes, which are structurally subordinate to all debt and
liabilities of the Companys subsidiaries, were issued and sold in a private Rule
144A offering to institutional investors. The net proceeds of the offering were used
to pay a dividend of approximately $298,474,000 to holders of the Companys
capital stock and approximately $41,000,000 of these proceeds were used by the
Company to purchase additional capital stock of Nortek. Nortek used these proceeds to
fund the majority of a cash distribution of approximately $41,600,000 to option
holders of the Rollover Options in the fourth quarter of 2003 (see Note 1, 6 & 7 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein). The
accreted value of the 10% Senior Discount Notes will increase from the date of issuance
at a rate of 10% per annum compounded semi-annually such that the accreted value
will equal the principal amount of $515,000,000 on November 15, 2007. No cash
interest will accrue on the 10% Senior Discount Notes prior to November 15, 2007
and, thereafter, cash interest will accrue at 10% per annum payable semi-annually
in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The Senior Discount Notes are
unsecured obligations of the Company, which mature on May 15, 2011, and may be
redeemed in whole or in part at the redemption prices as defined in the indenture
governing the Senior Discount Notes (the Indenture). The Indenture
contains covenants that limit the Companys ability to engage in certain
transactions, including incurring additional indebtedness and paying dividends or
distributions. The terms of the Senior Discount Notes require the Company to
register notes having substantially identical terms (the Holdings Exchange
Notes) with the SEC as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable Holdings
Exchange Notes for the Senior Discount Notes (the Holdings Exchange). In
the event the Company does not complete the Holdings Exchange in accordance with the
timing requirements outlined in the Indenture, the Company may be required to pay a
higher interest rate. The Company expects to complete the Holdings Exchange within
the required time period. Under certain limited circumstances, Nortek may be required
in the future to guarantee the Senior Discount Notes on a senior subordinated basis.
This requirement will not apply if the terms of any of Norteks senior
indebtedness restricts the issuance of such guarantee. Norteks Senior Secured
Credit Facility does not permit such a guarantee. In addition the issuance of such a
guarantee by Nortek would constitute a restricted payment under the terms of Norteks
indentures. |
The
Companys pro forma interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003
would have been approximately $78,300,000, after adjusting the combined historical
interest expense for the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the period
from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 to give effect to the redemption of the 9
1/4% Notes, 9 1/8% Notes and 8 7/8% Notes, the sale of the Floating Rate Notes and
the 10% Senior Discount Notes, as if they had occurred on January 1, 2003. |
On
January 9, 2003, Holdings, the parent company of Nortek, was acquired by Kelso,
and certain members of Norteks management (the Management Investors)
in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Recapitalization by and among Nortek,
Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and K Holdings, Inc. (K Holdings) dated as of
June 20, 2002, as amended, (the Recapitalization Agreement) in a
transaction valued at approximately $1.6 billion, including the assumption of certain
indebtedness (the Recapitalization). |
On
January 8, 2003, at a special meeting of stockholders of the Company, the stockholders
approved the following amendments to the certificate of incorporation (the Stockholder
Approval), which were required in connection with the terms of the
Recapitalization Agreement: |
A new class of common stock, Class A Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Nortek Holdings was created
consisting of 19,000,000 authorized shares.
At the time that the amendment to the certificate of incorporation became effective, each share of common stock,
par value $1.00 per share and special common stock, par value $1.00 per share outstanding, was reclassified into
one share of a new class of mandatorily redeemable common stock, Class B Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share,
of Nortek Holdings consisting of 14,000,000 authorized shares.
Class B Common Stock was required to be immediately redeemable for $46 per share in cash upon completion of the
Recapitalization.
The authorized number of shares of Series B Preference Stock, par value $1.00 per share, was increased to
19,000,000 authorized shares.
Following
the Stockholder Approval, common stock and special common stock held by the Management
Investors were exchanged for an equal number of newly created shares of Series B
Preference Stock. In addition, certain options to purchase shares of common and
special common stock held by the Management Investors were exchanged for fully vested
options to purchase an equal number of shares of the newly created Class A Common
Stock. The remaining outstanding options, including some held by Management
Investors, were cancelled in exchange for the right to receive a single lump sum cash
payment equal to the product of the number of shares of common stock or special
common stock underlying the option and the amount by which the redemption price of $46
per share is greater than the per share exercise price of the option. |
On
January 9, 2003, in connection with the Recapitalization, Kelso purchased newly
issued shares of Series B Preference Stock for approximately $355,923,000 and
purchased shares of Series B Preference Stock held by the Management Investors for
approximately $18,077,000. Newly issued Class A Common Stock of approximately
$3,262,000 was purchased by designated third parties. Shares of Series B Preference
Stock held by the Management Investors that were not purchased by Kelso were
converted into an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock. In addition,
Nortek declared and distributed to the Company a dividend of approximately $120,000,000
and distributed approximately $27,900,000 for reimbursement of fees and expenses of
Kelso, which were paid out of Norteks unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on
hand and were permissible under the most restrictive covenants with respect to the
indentures of Norteks 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008, 9 1/4% Senior Notes due
2007, 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2007 and 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the
Existing Notes). |
The
Company used the proceeds from the purchase by Kelso of the newly issued Series B
Preference Stock, Class A Common Stock and the dividend from Nortek to redeem the
Companys Class B Common Stock and to cash out options to purchase common and
special common stock totaling approximately $497,262,000. |
In
connection with the Recapitalization, Nortek received a bridge financing letter
from a lender for a senior unsecured term loan facility not to exceed $955,000,000
(the Bridge Facility). The Bridge Facility was intended to be used to
fund, if necessary, any change in control offers Nortek might have made in connection
with the Recapitalization. Nortek did not use this Bridge Facility because the
structure of the Recapitalization did not require Nortek to make any change of control
offers. The commitment letter expired on January 31, 2003. |
In
January 2003, the Company filed for the deregistration of its shares of common and
special common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys
shares of common and special common stock are no longer publicly traded. The
Company will continue to file periodic reports with the SEC as required by the
respective indentures of the Companys Notes. |
Under
the terms of one of Norteks supplemental executive retirement plans (SERP), Nortek was
required to make one-time cash payments to participants in such plan in
satisfaction of obligations under that plan when the Recapitalization was
completed. Accordingly, Nortek made a distribution of approximately $75,100,000 to
the participants in the plan from funds included in the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet in long-term assets in restricted investments and marketable
securities held by pension trusts and transferred to one of the participants a
life insurance policy with approximately $10,300,000 of cash surrender value to
satisfy a portion of such participants obligation upon the Stockholder Approval. |
The
total amount of transaction fees and costs incurred by Nortek and Kelso associated with
the Recapitalization was approximately $47,300,000, including the $27,900,000
noted above, of which approximately $10,500,000 of advisory fees and expenses was
paid to Kelso & Company L.P. A portion of these fees and expenses were recorded, by
Nortek in selling, general and administrative expenses, since they were obligations
of Nortek prior to the Recapitalization, including approximately $6,600,000 during
the year ended December 31, 2002. An additional amount of approximately
$12,800,000 was recorded as expense in January 2003 since these fees and expenses became
obligations of Nortek upon consummation of the Recapitalization. |
Nortek
has a $175,000,000 Senior Secured Credit Facility, as amended, (the Senior
Secured Credit Facility), which is syndicated among several banks. The Senior
Secured Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of Norteks accounts
receivable and inventory, as well as certain intellectual property rights, and, as
amended, permits borrowings up to the lesser of $175,000,000 or the total of 85% of
eligible accounts receivable, as defined, and 50% of eligible inventory, as
defined. The outstanding principal balances under the Senior Secured Credit Facility
accrue interest at Norteks option at either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.0%
to 2.5% or the banks prime rate plus a margin ranging from 0.5% to 1.0% depending
upon the excess available borrowing base, as defined, and the timing of the
borrowing as the margin rates will be adjusted quarterly. In addition, Nortek pays
an unused line fee of between 0.375% and 0.5% on the excess available borrowing
capacity, as defined. The Senior Secured Credit Facility includes customary
limitations and covenants, but does not require Nortek to maintain any financial
covenant unless the excess available borrowing base, as defined, is less than
$30,000,000 in which case Nortek would be required to maintain, on a trailing
four quarter basis, a minimum level of $155,000,000 of earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined. At December 31, 2003 there were no
outstanding borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. |
The
Company is highly leveraged and expects to continue to be highly leveraged for the
foreseeable future. The Company had consolidated debt at December 31, 2003, of
approximately $1,339,975,000 consisting of (i) $15,349,000 of short-term borrowings
and current maturities of long-term debt, (ii) $15,843,000 of long-term notes, mortgage
notes and other indebtedness, (iii) $212,698,000 of 8 7/8% Notes, (iv)
$314,456,000 of 9 1/8% Notes, (v) $178,136,000 of 9 1/4% Notes, (vi) $250,577,000
of 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (9 7/8% Notes) and (vii)
$352,916,000 of 10% Senior Discount Notes due 2011. |
The
indentures and other agreements governing Norteks and its subsidiaries indebtedness
(including the indentures for the 8 7/8% Notes, the 9 1/8% Notes and the 9 1/4% Notes
(collectively, the Senior Notes) which will be redeemed in the first quarter
of 2004, the 9 7/8% Notes, and the Companys Senior Discount Notes, as well as, the
Senior Secured Credit Facility) contain restrictive financial and operating covenants
including covenants that restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to
complete acquisitions, pay dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets
and take certain other corporate actions. The Senior Floating Rate Notes also contain
restrictive covenants, which will apply to the Company beginning March 1, 2004. During
the year 2003, the Company had a net increase in its consolidated debt of approximately
$1,300,000. |
At
March 26, 2004 approximately $34,300,000 was available for the payment of cash
dividends, stock purchases or other restricted payments by the Company as defined
under the terms of the Companys most restrictive indenture based on the
redemption and refinancing of certain of the Norteks Notes. Restricted
payments to Holdings from Nortek are limited by the amount of cash available for
payment under the terms of Norteks most restrictive indenture which was
approximately $91,100,000 at March 26, 2004. (See Notes 6, 7 and 16 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
At
December 31, 2003, the Company had consolidated unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities of approximately $194,120,000 as compared to approximately
$294,804,000 at December 31, 2002. Approximately $160,748,000 of the Companys
consolidated cash and cash equivalents was used to fund a portion of the cost of the
Recapitalization. The Companys debt to equity ratio was approximately 6.7:1
at December 31, 2003 as compared to approximately 3.0:1 at December 31, 2002. The
change in the ratio was primarily due to an increase in debt from the sale of the
Companys Senior Discount Notes and a decrease in stockholders investment
primarily as a result of the distributions to the Companys shareholders and
stock option holders. (See Notes 1 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
The
Company's ability to pay interest on or to refinance its indebtedness depends on
the Companys future performance, working capital levels and capital
structure, which are subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors which may be beyond its control.
There can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient cash flow from
the operation of its subsidiaries or that future financings will be available on
acceptable terms or in amounts sufficient to enable the Company to service or refinance
its indebtedness, or to make necessary capital expenditures. |
The
Company has evaluated and expects to continue to evaluate possible acquisition
transactions and possible dispositions of certain of its businesses on an ongoing
basis and at any given time may be engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect
to possible acquisitions or dispositions. |
The
following is a summary of the Companys estimated future cash obligations under
current and long-term debt obligations (excluding unamortized debt premium of
approximately $10,867,000), interest expense (based upon interest rates in effect
at the time of the preparation of this summary), capital lease obligations, minimum
annual rental obligations primarily for non-cancelable lease obligations (operating
leases), purchase obligations and other long-term liabilities and other obligations.
Long-term debt and interest payments in the table below consider the financing
transactions subsequent to December 31, 2003 previously described. (See Notes 6, 8, 9,
12 and 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere
herein.): |
|
Payments due by period |
|
Less than |
Between |
Between |
5 Years |
Total |
|
1 Year
|
1 & 2 Years
|
3 & 4 Years
|
or Greater
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Debt obligations |
|
|
$ |
709,620 |
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
$ |
200 |
|
$ |
965,180 |
|
$ |
1,677,500 |
|
Interest payments |
|
|
|
69,800 |
|
|
71,600 |
|
|
121,700 |
|
|
179,600 |
* |
|
442,700 |
* |
Capital lease obligations | | |
| 680 |
|
| 1,500 |
|
| 1,600 |
|
| 9,920 |
|
| 13,700 |
|
Operating lease obligations | | |
| 12,018 |
|
| 19,126 |
|
| 12,302 |
|
| 26,403 |
|
| 69,849 |
|
Purchase obligations | | |
| 296 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 296 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | | |
| -- |
|
| 26,876 |
|
| 24,200 |
|
| 85,757 |
|
| 136,833 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
8,136 |
|
|
13,976 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
792,414 |
|
$ |
124,412 |
|
$ |
163,032 |
|
$ |
1,274,996 |
|
$ |
2,354,854 |
|
|
* |
Subsidiary
debt used for working capital purposes such as lines of credit are estimated to
continue through December 31, 2011 in the above table. |
Certain
subsidiaries, which are classified as discontinued operations, have guaranteed
approximately $27,700,000 of third party obligations relating to guarantees of
rental payments through June 30, 2016 under a facility leased by SNE, which was sold
on September 21, 2001. The Company has indemnified these guarantees in connection
with the sale of Ply Gem on February 12, 2004 (see Notes 9 and 10 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein). The buyer of SNE
has provided certain indemnifications and other rights to the subsidiary for any
payments that it might be required to make pursuant to this guarantee. Should the
buyer of SNE cease making payments then the Company may be required to make payments
on its indemnifications. The Company does not anticipate incurring any loss under
these guarantees and accordingly has not recorded any liabilities at December 31,
2003 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. |
The
Company has guaranteed certain obligations of third parties of approximately
$4,300,000 which relates to guarantees of the remaining principal and interest
balances of mortgages of a third-party on certain buildings, one of which houses the
Companys corporate headquarters. These guarantees expire on December 31, 2020
and are payable in the event of non-payment of the mortgage. These guarantees are
collateralized by the buildings to which the mortgages relate and any liability to
the Company would first be reduced by the Companys pro-rata share of proceeds
received on the sale of the buildings. The Company does not anticipate incurring
any loss under these guarantees and accordingly has not recorded any liabilities at
December 31, 2003 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. |
As
of December 31, 2003, approximately $6,900,000 of letters of credit had been issued as
additional security for certain of the Company's insurance programs. |
At
December 31, 2003, the Company had approximately $194,120,000 of unrestricted cash
and cash equivalents to fund its cash flow needs for 2004. During 2004, the
Company expects that it is reasonably likely that the following major cash
requirements will occur as compared to 2003: |
|
For the Year-ended December 31,
|
|
2004
|
2003
|
|
The Recapitalization |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
160,748,000 |
|
Interest payments, net | | |
| 69,800,000 |
|
| 91,991,000 |
|
Principal payments, net | | |
| 709,620,000 |
|
| 6,244,000 |
|
Capital lease obligations | | |
| 680,000 |
|
| 680,000 |
|
Capital expenditures | | |
| 35,000,000 |
|
| 17,357,000 |
|
Operating lease and rental payments | | |
| 15,000,000 |
|
| 16,700,000 |
|
Income tax payments, net |
|
|
|
70,000,000 |
|
|
11,971,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
900,100,000 |
|
$ |
305,691,000 |
|
|
The
Company expects to meet its cash flow requirements for debt payments and retirements
through fiscal 2004 from net proceeds from the sale of Ply Gem in February 2004, net
proceeds from the sale of Senior Floating Rate Notes in February 2004 and existing cash
and cash equivalents. |
The
Company has recorded all pension liabilities for the Companys defined benefit
retirement plans at their fair values based upon the projected benefit obligations
determined. As a result, on January 9, 2003, the amount of Norteks projected
benefit obligation was increased by approximately $5,000,000 as compared to the
amount recorded in its consolidated balance sheet prior to the Recapitalization.
Accordingly, as of January 10, 2003, the Company recorded accrued pension
liabilities of approximately $59,500,000, which represent the estimated combined
under funding of the Companys various pension plans. In addition, as discussed
previously, Nortek settled all obligations related to Norteks SERP in connection
with the Recapitalization. The Companys policy, generally, is to make annual
contributions to the various pension plans in such amounts and at such times so as to
meet at least the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974. The amount of under funding will change in future periods for
a variety of factors including, among others, the actual performance of the
various pension plans investments and changes, if any, in actuarial
assumptions resulting from changing external economic conditions. Consistent with
many pension plans in the United States, the Companys various pension plans have
been negatively impacted by the performance of the United States equity markets over
the past several years and the decline in yields available in fixed income markets. |
The
Company has recorded all post retirement health benefit plan liabilities at their fair
values based upon the accumulated projected benefit obligations determined. As a
result, on January 9, 2003, the amount of the Companys accumulated
projected benefit obligation was increased by approximately $17,231,000 as compared to
the amount recorded in its consolidated balance sheet prior to the Recapitalization.
Accordingly, as of January 10, 2003, the Company has recorded accrued post retirement
health liabilities of approximately $35,000,000, which represents the current
discounted amount of the remaining estimated amounts to be paid out under the Companys
various post retirement health benefit plans. The Companys policy is to fund
the costs associated with its various post retirement health benefit plans as
they become due and there are no investments or other assets associated with these
plans. Consistent with many post retirement health benefit plans in the United States,
the Companys liabilities under these plans have been negatively impacted by
rising medical costs in the United States. |
Unrestricted
cash and cash equivalents decreased from approximately $294,804,000 at December
31, 2002 to approximately $194,120,000 at December 31, 2003. The Company has
classified as restricted in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet certain
investments that are not fully available for use in its operations. At December
31, 2003, approximately $2,346,000 (of which $1,223,000 is included in current
assets) of cash, investments and marketable securities is held primarily as
collateral for insurance and letter of credit requirements. (See Note 1 of the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
Capital
expenditures were approximately $17,400,000 in 2003 and are expected to be between
$30,000,000 and $35,000,000 in 2004. As of December 31, 2003, the Company is
obligated to fund future cash payments, primarily related to operating leases for
facilities and equipment, of approximately $69,800,000, of which approximately
$12,000,000 will be funded in 2004. Since these payments are for operating leases,
future cash requirements and the value of the assets leased are not included in the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles currently in effect in the United States. (See Note 9
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
The
Company's working capital and current ratio decreased from approximately
$813,300,000 and 3.0:1, respectively, at December 31, 2002 to approximately
$686,400,000 and 2.6:1, respectively, at December 31, 2003, principally as a result of
the factors described below. |
Accounts
receivable increased approximately $34,487,000 or approximately 19.2%, between
December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003, while net sales increased approximately
$41,235,000 or approximately 12.7% in the fourth quarter of 2003 as compared to the
fourth quarter of 2002. These increases are primarily a result of increased sales
levels and the acquisitions of Elan and SPC, which contributed approximately
$18,000,000 to net sales in the fourth quarter of 2003 and approximately $9,200,000 to
accounts receivable at December 31, 2003. The rate of change in accounts receivable
in certain periods may be different than the rate of change in sales in such
periods principally due to the timing of net sales. Increases or decreases in net
sales near the end of any period generally result in significant changes in the
amount of accounts receivable on the date of the balance sheet at the end of such
period, as was the situation on December 31, 2003 as compared to December 31, 2002.
The Company did not experience any significant overall changes in credit
terms, collection efforts, credit utilization or delinquency in accounts receivable
in 2003. |
Inventories
increased approximately $27,011,000 or approximately 20.4%, between December 31, 2002
and December 31, 2003. Approximately $7,000,000 of the increase was as a result of
the net remaining fair market value adjustment of inventories at December 31, 2003
arising from the Recapitalization. The acquisition of Elan and SPC contributed
approximately $9,400,000 to the increase in inventories. Increased levels of
inventory in anticipation of relocation of certain manufacturing facilities within
the HVAC Segment also contributed to the increase. |
Accounts
payable increased approximately $3,699,000 or approximately 3.4%, between December 31,
2002 and December 31, 2003. The acquisitions of Elan and SPC contributed approximately
$3,200,000 to this increase. |
Changes
in certain working capital accounts, as noted above, between December 31, 2002 and
December 31, 2003, differ from the changes reflected in the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for such period as a result of the specific items
mentioned in the three preceding paragraphs and from other non-cash items,
including among others, the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. |
Unrestricted
cash and cash equivalents decreased approximately $11,204,000 from December 31, 2002
to January 9, 2003 and decreased approximately $89,480,000 from January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003, principally as a result of the following: |
|
Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows (*)
|
|
January 10, 2003 - |
January 1, 2003 - |
|
December 31, 2003
|
January 9, 2003
|
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations, net | | |
$ | 108,214,000 |
|
$ | 7,175,000 |
|
Stock option and other stock compensation expense | | |
| 2,071,000 |
|
| -- |
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net | | |
| (18,390,000 |
) |
| 4,298,000 |
|
Increase in inventories | | |
| (595,000 |
) |
| (4,457,000 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in prepaids and other current assets | | |
| (2,145,000 |
) |
| 268,000 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable | | |
| (6,251,000 |
) |
| (777,000 |
) |
Decrease in net assets of discontinued operations | | |
| 3,808,000 |
|
| 1,717,000 |
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and taxes | | |
| 60,546,000 |
|
| (19,766,000 |
) |
Investing Activities: | | |
Net cash paid for acquisitions | | |
| (76,016,000 |
) |
| -- |
|
Capital expenditures | | |
| (17,150,000 |
) |
| (207,000 |
) |
Redemption of publicly held shares in connection |
|
|
with the Recapitalization | | |
| (469,655,000 |
) |
| -- |
|
Payment of fees and expenses in connection with | | |
with the Recapitalization | | |
| (27,900,000 |
) |
| -- |
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and investments | | |
| 1,028,000 |
|
| (49,000 |
) |
Financing Activities: | | |
Sale of 10% Senior Discount Notes, net of fees | | |
| 339,522,000 |
|
| -- |
|
Issuance of preferred and common stock in connection | | |
with the Recapitalization | | |
| 359,185,000 |
|
| -- |
|
Dividend to preferred and common stockholders | | |
| (298,474,000 |
) |
| -- |
|
Increase (decrease) in borrowings, net | | |
| 2,658,000 |
|
| (1,313,000 |
) |
Issuance of 32,608 shares of class A common stock | | |
| 1,500,000 |
|
| -- |
|
Cash distributions to stock option holders | | |
| (41,600,000 |
) |
| -- |
|
Other, net | | |
| (9,836,000 |
) |
| 1,907,000 |
|
|
| | |
$ | (89,480,000 |
) |
$ | (11,204,000 |
) |
|
(*) |
Prepared
from the Companys Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period from
January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the period from January 10, 2003 to December
31, 2003. (See Nortek, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements for
2003 included elsewhere herein.) |
The
impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on cash was not material and has
been included in other, net. |
Income
tax payments, net of refunds, were approximately $11,971,000 in 2003. At December
31, 2003, the Company has approximately $8,500,000 of foreign net operating loss
carry-forwards that if utilized would offset future foreign tax payments. |
The
Company uses EBITDA as both a liquidity and operating performance measure. Liquidity
measure disclosures with respect to EBITDA are provided below. Refer to the Results
of Operations section for operating performance measure disclosures with respect to
EBITDA and a reconciliation from net income (loss) to EBITDA. |
EBITDA
is defined as net earnings (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization expense. EBITDA is not a measure of cash flow under generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) and should not be
considered as an alternative or substitute for GAAP cash flow measures such as cash
flows from operating, investing and financing activities. EBITDA does not necessarily
represent an accurate measure of cash flow performance because it excludes, among
other things, capital expenditures, working capital requirements, significant debt
service for principal and interest payments, income tax payments and other
contractual obligations, which may have a significant adverse impact on a companys
cash flow performance thereby limiting its usefulness when evaluating the Companys
cash flow performance. The Company uses a significant amount of capital assets and
capital expenditures are a significant component of the Companys annual cash
expenditures and therefore their exclusion from EBITDA is a material limitation.
The Company has significant working capital requirements during the year due to the
seasonality of its business, which require significant cash expenditures and therefore
its exclusion from EBITDA is a material limitation. The Company has a significant
amount of debt and the Company has significant cash expenditures during the year
related to principal and interest payments and therefore their exclusion from EBITDA
is a material limitation. The Company generally pays significant U.S federal,
state and foreign income taxes each year and therefore its exclusion from
EBITDA is a material limitation. As a result, EBITDA should be evaluated in
conjunction with net cash from operating, investing and financing activities for a
more complete analysis of the Companys cash flow performance, as they include
the financial statement impact of these items. Although depreciation and
amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized
will often have to be replaced in the future and EBITDA does not reflect any cash
requirements for replacements. As EBITDA is not defined by GAAP, the Companys
definition of EBITDA may differ from and therefore may not be comparable to similarly
titled measures used by other companies thereby limiting its usefulness as a
comparative measure. Because of the limitations that EBITDA has as an analytical
tool, investors should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis
of the Companys cash flows as reported under GAAP. |
Company
management uses EBITDA as a supplementary non-GAAP liquidity measure to allow the
Company to evaluate its operating units cash-generating ability to fund income tax
payments, corporate overhead, capital expenditures and increases in working capital.
EBITDA is also used by management to allocate resources for growth among its
businesses, to identify possible impairment charges, to evaluate the Companys
ability to service its debt and to raise capital for growth opportunities, including
acquisitions. In addition, the Company uses EBITDA as a liquidity measure in
financial presentations to the Companys Board of Directors, shareholders,
various banks participating in the Companys Credit Facility, note holders
and Bond Rating agencies, among others, as a supplemental non-GAAP liquidity
measure to assist them in their evaluation of the Companys cash flow
performance. The Company uses EBITDA in conjunction with traditional GAAP
liquidity measures as part of its overall assessment and therefore does not place
undue reliance on EBITDA as its only measure of cash flow performance. The Company
believes EBITDA is useful for both the Company and investors as it is a commonly used
analytical measurement for assessing a companys cash flow ability to
service and/or incur additional indebtedness, which eliminates the impact of
certain non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization. The Company believes
that EBITDA is specifically relevant to the Company due to the Companys leveraged
position as well as the common use of EBITDA as a liquidity measure within the Companys
industries by lenders, investors, others in the financial community and peer group
companies. The Company has included EBITDA as a supplemental liquidity measure,
which should be evaluated by investors in conjunction with the traditional GAAP
liquidity measures discussed earlier in this Liquidity and Capital Resources
section for a complete evaluation of the Companys cash flow performance. |
The
following table presents a reconciliation from net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities, which is the most directly comparable GAAP liquidity measure, to
EBITDA: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities * |
|
|
$ |
138,078 |
|
$ |
(5,705 |
) |
$ |
51,276 |
|
$ |
110,583 |
|
Cash (provided from) used by working capital and other | | |
long-term asset and liability changes |
|
|
|
(27,793 |
) |
|
12,880 |
|
|
43,569 |
|
|
(27,197 |
) |
Effect of the Recapitalization, net | | |
| -- |
|
| (62,397 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Deferred federal income tax credit (provision) from |
|
|
continuing operations | | |
| 4,800 |
|
| (5,900 |
) |
| 200 |
|
| 2,800 |
|
Deferred federal income tax credit (provision) from |
|
|
discontinued operations | | |
| (500 |
) |
| -- |
|
| (2,000 |
) |
| 2,000 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 2,400 |
|
| (34,000 |
) |
Loss from debt retirement |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(5,500 |
) |
Non-cash interest expense, net |
|
|
|
(6,352 |
) |
|
(125 |
) |
|
(3,827 |
) |
|
(3,565 |
) |
Stock option and other stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
(2,071 |
) |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing |
|
|
operations |
|
|
|
41,300 |
|
|
(21,800 |
) |
|
29,500 |
|
|
27,800 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes from discontinued |
|
|
operations | | |
| 7,500 |
|
| (600 |
) |
| 11,200 |
|
| (13,700 |
) |
Interest expense from continuing operations |
|
|
|
57,627 |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
52,410 |
|
|
51,748 |
|
Interest expense from discontinued operations | | |
| 38,733 |
|
| 1,234 |
|
| 44,224 |
|
| 50,150 |
|
Investment income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
(119 |
) |
|
(5,943 |
) |
|
(8,189 |
) |
Investment income from discontinued operations | | |
| (196 |
) |
| (2 |
) |
| (1,523 |
) |
| (2,462 |
) |
Depreciation expense from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
10,865 |
|
|
245 |
|
|
11,784 |
|
|
15,148 |
|
Amortization expense from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
11,143 |
|
|
EBITDA | | |
$ | 265,745 |
|
$ | (81,165 |
) |
$ | 236,388 |
|
$ | 176,759 |
|
|
|
* |
Includes
approximately $12,200,000, $(1,000,000), $18,900,000 and $(24,800,000) of earnings (loss)
from discontinued operations for the periods from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003
and from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001. (See Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere herein.) |
|
EBITDA
includes approximately $83,000,000 and $6,600,000 of expenses and charges
arising from the Recapitalization recorded in the period from January 1, 2003 to
January 9, 2003 and the year ended December 31, 2002, respectively (see Notes 2 and
11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein)
and approximately $1,500,000 of stock based compensation from adopting SFAS No. 123 and
$600,000 of compensation expense in the fourth quarter of 2003 from the sale of stock
(see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere
herein). |
Inflation, Trends and
General Considerations
The
Company has evaluated and expects to continue to evaluate possible acquisition
transactions and the possible dispositions of certain of its businesses on an ongoing
basis and at any given time may be engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect
to possible acquisitions or dispositions. |
The
Company's performance is dependent to a significant extent upon the levels of new
residential construction, residential replacement and remodeling and
non-residential construction, all of which are affected by such factors as interest
rates, inflation, consumer confidence and unemployment. |
The
demand for the Company's products is seasonal, particularly in the Northeast and
Midwest regions of the United States where inclement weather during the winter
months usually reduces the level of building and remodeling activity in both the
home improvement and new construction markets. The Company's lower sales levels
usually occur during the first and fourth quarters. Since a high percentage of the
Company's manufacturing overhead and operating expenses are relatively fixed
throughout the year, operating income and net earnings tend to be lower in quarters
with lower sales levels. In addition, the demand for cash to fund the working capital
of the Company's subsidiaries is greater from late in the first quarter until early in
the fourth quarter. |
Market Risk
As
discussed more specifically below, the Company is exposed to market risks related
to changes in interest rates, foreign currencies and commodity pricing. The Company
does not use derivative financial instruments, except, on a limited basis to
periodically mitigate certain economic exposures. The Company does not enter into
derivative financial instruments or other financial instruments for trading purposes. |
A. Interest Rate Risk
The
Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates primarily through
its investing and borrowing activities. In addition, the Companys ability
to finance future acquisition transactions may be impacted if the Company is unable
to obtain appropriate financing at acceptable interest rates. |
The
Companys investing strategy, to manage interest rate exposure, is to invest in
short-term, highly liquid investments and marketable securities. Short-term
investments primarily consist of federal agency discount notes, treasury bills and
bank issued money market instruments with original maturities of 90 days or less. At
December 31, 2003, the fair value of the Companys unrestricted and
restricted investments and marketable securities was not materially different from
their cost basis. |
The
Company manages its borrowing exposure to changes in interest rates by optimizing the
use of fixed rate debt with extended maturities. At December 31, 2003, approximately
99.7% of the carrying values of the Companys long-term debt was at fixed
interest rates. |
See
the table set forth in item D (Long-term Debt) below and Notes 1 and 6 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for further
disclosure of the terms of the Companys debt. |
B. Foreign Currency Risk
The
Companys results of operations are affected by fluctuations in the value of the
U.S. dollar as compared to the value of currencies in foreign markets primarily
related to changes in the Euro, the Canadian Dollar and the British Pound. In 2003,
the net impact of foreign currency changes was not material to the Companys
financial condition or results of operations. The impact of foreign currency changes
related to translation resulted in an increase in stockholders investment of
approximately $1,096,000 and $19,501,000 for the periods January 1, 2003 to January 9,
2003 and January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company manages its
exposure to foreign currency exchange risk principally by trying to minimize the
Companys net investment in foreign assets through the use of strategic short and
long-term borrowings at the foreign subsidiary level. Consistent with this
strategy, notes payable and other short-term obligations at December 31, 2003
consist primarily of short-term borrowings by certain of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries. At December 31, 2003, the Companys net investment in foreign assets
was approximately $113,500,000. An overall unfavorable change in foreign exchange
rates of 10% would result in an approximate $10,300,000 reduction in equity as a
result of the impact on the cumulative translation adjustment. The Company generally
does not enter into derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency
exposure. At December 31, 2003, the Company did not have any significant outstanding
foreign currency hedging contracts. |
C. Commodity Pricing Risk
The
Company is subject to significant market risk with respect to the pricing of its
principal raw materials, which include, among others, steel, copper, packaging
material, plastics, resins, glass, wood and aluminum. If prices of these raw materials
were to increase dramatically, the Company may not be able to pass such increases on
to its customers and, as a result, gross margins could decline significantly.
The Company manages its exposure to commodity pricing risk by continuing to
diversify its product mix, strategic buying programs and vendor partnering. |
The
Company generally does not enter into derivative financial instruments to manage
commodity-pricing exposure. At December 31, 2003, the Company did not have any material
outstanding commodity forward contracts. |
D. Long-term Debt
The
table that follows sets forth as of December 31, 2003, the Companys long-term
debt obligations, principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average
interest rates and estimated fair market values. 0.3% of the Companys total
long-term indebtedness is denominated in foreign currencies. The weighted average
interest rates for variable rate debt are based on December 31, 2003 interest rates.
See Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of changes in the Company debt
subsequent to December 31, 2003. |
Long-term Debt:
|
Scheduled Maturity
|
Average Interest Rate
|
|
Fixed |
Variable |
|
Fixed |
Variable |
|
Year-ending
|
Rate
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Rate
|
Rate
|
Total
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
.3 |
$ |
1 |
.9 |
$ |
7 |
.2 |
|
7 |
.5% |
|
3 |
.6% |
|
6 |
.5% |
2005 | | |
| 1 |
.1 |
| 1 |
.6 |
| 2 |
.7 |
| 7 |
.0 |
| 3 |
.7 |
| 5 |
.0 |
2006 | | |
| 1 |
.2 |
| 0 |
.2 |
| 1 |
.4 |
| 7 |
.1 |
| 3 |
.3 |
| 6 |
.7 |
2007 | | |
| 485 |
.9 |
| -- |
|
| 485 |
.9 |
| 9 |
.2 |
| -- |
|
| 9 |
.2 |
2008 | | |
| 210 |
.9 |
| -- |
|
| 210 |
.9 |
| 8 |
.9 |
| -- |
|
| 8 |
.9 |
Thereafter (1) |
|
|
|
612 |
.9 |
|
-- |
|
|
612 |
.9 |
|
9 |
.9 |
|
-- |
|
|
9 |
.9 |
|
Total Principal |
|
|
|
1,317 |
.3 |
|
3 |
.7 |
|
1,321 |
.0 |
|
9 |
.5% |
|
3 |
.6% |
|
9 |
.4% |
Unamortized Debt Premium |
|
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
-- |
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Total Long-term Debt at |
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
.2 |
$ |
3 |
.7 |
$ |
1,331 |
.9 |
|
Fair Market Value of Long-term | | |
Debt at December 31, 2003 |
|
|
$ |
1,387 |
.1 |
$ |
3 |
.7 |
$ |
1,390 |
.8 |
|
|
(1) |
Senior and Senior Subordinated Notes with a total principal of $1,297,900,000 and a
weighted average interest rate of 9.5% mature at various times from 2007 through
2011. A substantial portion of Norteks fixed rate debt was called for redemption
or refinanced with variable rate debt in the first quarter of 2004. (See Liquidity
and Capital Resources and Notes 6 and 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) |
Recent Developments
On
December 15, 2003, the Company, through Linear, acquired Operator Specialty Company,
Inc. (OSCO), located in Casnovia, MI for approximately $2,600,000. OSCO
is a manufacturer and designer of gate operators and access controls. |
On
February 12, 2004, the Company sold all of the capital stock of Ply Gem Industries,
Inc. for approximately $560,000,000. |
On
March 9, 2004, the Company, through Linear, acquired OmniMount Systems, Inc. (OmniMount)
located in Phoenix, AZ, for approximately $16,500,000. OmniMount is a leading
designer and supplier of audio and video mounting devices, speakerstands and related
furniture. |
Forward-Looking Statements
This
document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this discussion and
throughout this document, words, such as intends, plans,
estimates, believes, anticipates and expects or
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
statements are based on the Companys current plans and expectations and
involve risks and uncertainties, over which the Company has no control, that could
cause actual future activities and results of operations to be materially different
from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that
could cause actual future activities and operating results to differ include the
availability and cost of certain raw materials, (including, among others, steel,
copper, packaging materials, plastics, resins, glass, wood and aluminum) and
purchased components, the level of domestic and foreign construction and
remodeling activity affecting residential and commercial markets, interest rates,
employment, inflation, foreign currency fluctuations, consumer spending levels,
exposure to foreign economies, the rate of sales growth, price, and product and
warranty liability claims. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company
undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent
written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons
acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary
statements. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various
disclosures made by the Company, in this document, as well as the Company's periodic
reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, filed with the SEC. |
ITEM 7a. QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative
and qualitative disclosure about market risk is set forth in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Market
Risk. |
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Financial
statements and supplementary data required by this Item 8 are set forth at the pages
indicated in Item 15(a), including exhibits, of Part IV of this report, incorporated
herein by reference. |
ITEM 9. DISAGREEMENTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
An
evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) was carried out under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer along with the
Companys Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the members of the
Company's Disclosure and Controls Committee as of the end of the period covered by
this annual report on Form 10-K. The Company's Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer along with the Companys Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as currently in
effect, are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed
by the Company in the reports it files or submits to the SEC, is (i) accumulated and
communicated to the Company's management (including the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure,
and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Commission's rules and forms. |
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Directors of the Registrant
Name
|
Principal Occupation
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
|
Richard L. Bready |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive |
59 |
1976 |
|
Officer of the Company |
|
Philip E. Berney |
Managing Director, Kelso & Company L.P. |
40 |
2003 |
|
Jeffrey C. Bloomberg |
Office of the Chairman, Gordon Brothers |
56 |
2003 |
|
Group LLC |
|
Joseph M. Cianciolo |
Independent Director |
64 |
2003 |
|
David B. Hiley |
Financial Consultant |
65 |
2003 |
Mr.
Bready has been Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and/or Nortek for more than the past five years. Mr. Berney has been a Managing
Director of Kelso, a private investment firm, since 1999. From 1996 to 1999, he was
a Senior Managing Director and head of the High Yield Capital Markets Group at Bear,
Stearns & Co., a financial services company. Mr. Berney is currently a director of
Key Components, LLC. Mr. Bloomberg has served since 2001 in the Office of the
Chairman of Gordon Brothers Group LLC, a company which assists retail and consumer
goods companies in asset redeployment and providing capital solutions to middle
market companies in the retail and consumer product industries. From 1994 to 2001,
Mr. Bloomberg served as the President of Bloomberg Associates, an investment banking
company. Mr. Bloomberg is a director of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, Inc. Mr.
Cianciolo retired in June 1999 as the managing partner of the Providence, RI office
of KPMG, LLP. Mr. Cianciolo is currently a director of United Natural Foods, Inc.
Mr. Hiley, for more than the past five years, has been a financial consultant,
including a financial consultant to the Company. From April 1, 1998 through March 1,
2000, Mr. Hiley served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Koger Equity, Inc., a real estate investment trust. Mr. Hiley is currently a
director of Koger Equity, Inc. Each director holds office until the Companys
next annual meeting of stockholders and until such directors successor is duly
elected and qualified. |
Executive Officers of the
Company
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Richard L. Bready |
59 |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
|
Robert E.G. Ractliffe |
60 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
Almon C. Hall |
57 |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Edward J. Cooney |
56 |
Vice President and Treasurer |
|
Kevin W. Donnelly |
49 |
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Messrs. Bready, Hall and Donnelly
have served in the same or substantially similar executive positions with the
Company since November 20, 2002 and with Nortek for at least the past five years. Mr. Ractliffe served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (Ply Gem) and as Chief Executive Officer of
Nordyne, Inc., both subsidiaries of the Company, prior to joining Nortek in January 2002, and Nortek Holdings in
November 2002. Mr. Cooney served as Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
Sales and Marketing at Amtrol Inc. and as Chief Financial Officer at Speidel Inc. prior to joining Nortek in
August 2001 and Nortek Holdings in November 2002. Executive Officers are elected annually by the Board of
Directors of the Company and serve until their successors are chosen and qualified. The Companys executive
officers include only those officers of the Company who perform policy-making functions for the Company as a
whole and have managerial responsibility for major aspects of the Companys overall operations. A number of other
individuals who serve as officers of the Companys subsidiaries perform policy-making functions and have
managerial responsibilities for the subsidiary or division by which they are employed, although not for the
Company overall. Certain of these individuals could, depending on earnings of such unit, be more highly
compensated than some executive officers of the Company. |
The
Companys board of directors has an audit committee comprised of Joseph M.
Cianciolo and Jeffrey C. Bloomberg. Although the Company is not a listed
issuer within the meaning of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, the board of
directors of the Company has determined that each of Mr. Cianciolo and Mr. Bloomberg
would be considered an independent director within the meaning of the
rules of the New York Stock Exchange for listed companies and within the meaning of
Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In addition, Mr. Cianciolo is an audit committee
financial expert as that term is used in Item 401(h)(2) of Regulation S-K adopted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Code of Ethics
The
Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its President and Chief
Executive Officer, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and
Treasurer, Vice President and Controller and other persons performing similar
functions as identified by the President and Chief Executive Officer. The Company
filed a copy of its code of ethics as Exhibit 14 to this Form 10-K. |
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth, on an
accrual basis, information concerning the compensation for services to the
Company and its subsidiaries for 2003, 2002, and 2001 of those persons who were, at December 31, 2003, the Chief
Executive Officer and the other four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company or its
subsidiaries.
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
Long-Term Compensation
|
|
|
Awards
|
Payouts
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Name and |
|
Other Annual |
Underlying |
LTIP |
All Other |
Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Compensation (1)
|
Options
|
Payouts
|
Compensation (2)
|
|
Richard L. Bready |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
$ |
295,351 |
|
|
1,869,149 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
127,331 |
|
Chairman, President and | | |
2002 | | |
| 1,068,768 |
|
| 8,230,780 |
|
| 61,184 |
|
| 50,000 |
|
$ | 2,586,489 |
|
| 1,012,214 |
|
Chief Executive Officer | | |
2001 | | |
| 1,051,932 |
|
| 6,259,140 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 612,961 |
|
|
Robert E. G. Ractliffe (3) | | |
2003 | | |
$ | 600,000 |
|
$ | 532,380 |
|
$ | 105,669 |
|
| 167,000 |
|
| -- |
|
$ | 465,445 |
|
Vice President and | | |
2002 | | |
| 600,000 |
|
| 500,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| 15,000 |
|
$ | 776,122 |
|
| 72,945 |
|
Chief Operating Officer | | |
2001 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
|
Almon C. Hall |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
410,000 |
|
$ |
725,000 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
147,900 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
114,760 |
|
Vice President and | | |
2002 | | |
| 393,750 |
|
| 600,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| 15,000 |
|
$ | 776,122 |
|
| 42,447 |
|
Chief Financial Officer | | |
2001 | | |
| 375,000 |
|
| 450,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 28,501 |
|
|
Kevin W. Donnelly | | |
2003 | | |
$ | 265,000 |
|
$ | 350,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| 96,047 |
|
| -- |
|
$ | 69,000 |
|
Vice President, General | | |
2002 | | |
| 252,000 |
|
| 450,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| 10,000 |
|
$ | 258,561 |
|
| 16,000 |
|
Counsel and Secretary | | |
2001 | | |
| 240,000 |
|
| 175,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 13,600 |
|
|
Edward J. Cooney (4) | | |
2003 | | |
$ | 240,000 |
|
$ | 250,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| 42,500 |
|
| -- |
|
$ | 64,000 |
|
Vice President and | | |
2002 | | |
| 210,000 |
|
| 200,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 16,000 |
|
Treasurer | | |
2001 | | |
| 73,913 |
|
| 30,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| 15,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
(1) |
Except
for Messrs. Bready and Ractliffe in 2003 and Mr. Bready in 2002, the aggregate amount
of any compensation in the form of perquisites and other personal benefits paid in
each of the years, based on the Company's incremental cost, did not exceed the lesser
of 10% of any executive officer's annual salary and bonus or $50,000. The amount
for Messrs. Bready and Ractliffe in 2003 includes $246,142 and $78,346 respectively,
relating to the installation of products from the Companys subsidiaries. The
amount for Mr. Bready in 2002 includes $49,410 relating to personal use of automobiles
provided by the Company. |
(2) |
The
amounts in 2003, for each of Messrs. Bready and Hall, include premiums paid by the
Company for split dollar life insurance pursuant to agreements between each of them and
the Company, of which $31,791 and $49 represent the term life portion of the premiums
and $79,540 and $16,711 represent the non-term portion, in each case for Messrs. Bready
and Hall, respectively. Pursuant to certain of the split dollar life insurance
agreements, the Company will be reimbursed for premiums that it pays on the split dollar
life insurance policies upon the death of the second to die of the executive and his
spouse. Pursuant to other split dollar agreements between the Company and Mr. Bready,
the Company will be reimbursed for premiums that it pays on split dollar life insurance
policies on Mr. Breadys life, upon the earlier of Mr. Breadys death or the
Companys termination of such split dollar agreement. |
|
For
each of Messrs. Ractliffe, Hall, Donnelly and Cooney, includes change in control
payments made in connection with the Recapitalization of $120,000, $82,000, $53,000 and
$48,000. |
|
Includes
$329,445 in relocation expenses for Mr. Ractliffe. |
|
Includes
$6,000 in matching contributions and $10,000 in profit sharing contributions by the
Company in 2003 for each of Messrs. Bready, Ractliffe, Hall, Donnelly and Cooney under
the Companys 401(k) Savings Plan, which is a defined contribution retirement plan. |
(3) |
Mr. Ractliffes date
of hire was January 1, 2002. |
(4) |
Mr.
Cooney's date of hire was August 20, 2001. |
Stock Option Tables
Upon
reorganization of Nortek into a holding company structure in November 2002, each
stock option for the Norteks common stock and special common stock then
outstanding was exchanged for a stock option to purchase an equal number of shares of
the common stock or special common stock of Holdings at the same per share exercise
price. |
Options Granted in Last
Fiscal Year
The
following table provides information regarding stock options for the Companys
common stock granted to named executive officers in 2003 pursuant to the Companys
2002 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan). |
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares |
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Granted to |
|
Price as of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Options |
|
Employees |
Exercise |
Grant |
|
Expiration |
Present |
Name
|
Granted
|
|
in 2003
|
Price (3)
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
Value (4)
|
|
Richard L. Bready |
|
|
|
1,398,849 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
44 |
.29% |
$ |
10 |
.50 |
$ |
23 |
.31 |
|
(5 |
) |
|
01/09/2013 |
|
$ |
39,250,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
470,300 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
14 |
.89% |
|
11 |
.00 |
|
46 |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
3,226,258 |
|
Robert E.G. Ractliffe |
|
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
2 |
.75% |
|
10 |
.50 |
|
24 |
.38 |
|
(5 |
) |
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
2,384,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
2 |
.53% |
|
11 |
.00 |
|
46 |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
548,800 |
|
Almon C. Hall |
|
|
|
67,900 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
2 |
.15% |
|
10 |
.50 |
|
25 |
.95 |
|
(5 |
) |
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
1,808,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
2 |
.53% |
|
11 |
.00 |
|
46 |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
548,800 |
|
Kevin W. Donnelly |
|
|
|
46,047 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
1 |
.46% |
|
10 |
.50 |
|
24 |
.72 |
|
(5 |
) |
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
1,251,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
1 |
.58% |
|
11 |
.00 |
|
46 |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
343,000 |
|
Edward J. Cooney |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
0 |
.24% |
|
10 |
.50 |
|
20 |
.25 |
|
|
|
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
225,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
1 |
.11% |
|
11 |
.00 |
|
46 |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
01/09/2013 |
|
|
240,100 |
|
(1) |
Represent Rolled Over Options which were exercisable in full as of the date of the grant. |
(2) |
One-third of the shares underlying theses options are Class A options and two-thirds are Class B options to
purchase shares of Holdings common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Option Plan, Class A options
generally become exercisable on a quarterly basis over a three-year period, although Class A options will
become exercisable in full when certain of the investors affiliated with Kelso have sold or disposed of at
least 90% of their equity securities for cash or marketable securities in Holdings. In addition Class A
options will become exercisable in full in any liquidity event which results in the Class B options becoming
exercisable in full. The Option Plan defines a liquidity event as the receipt of cash or marketable
securities by certain of the investors affiliated with Kelso in respect of their equity investment in
Holdings.
|
|
The Class B options will become exercisable upon liquidity events relating to the equity securities held by
investors affiliated with Kelso, but only if those investors receive at least 17% internal rate of return
through the liquidity events. Assuming this condition is satisfied, the Class B options become exercisable
ratably beginning when those investors have received at least two times the amount of their investment
through the liquidity events, with such options becoming exercisable in full when the investors have
received four times the amount of their investment through liquidity events.
|
(3) |
On November 26, 2003, the Company declared a dividend of $35.00 per share which resulted in an equal reduction of
the Exercise Price of the options to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. |
(4) |
Pre-tax amounts based on Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: interest rates are
based on the risk-free interest rate at grant date, a maximum of an expected life of 5 years, expected volatility
of 38% for Rolled Over options and expected volatility of 0% for Class A and B options and a dividend yield of 0%. |
(5) |
Exercise prices are based upon a weighted average.
|
Aggregated Option
Exercises in 2003 and Year-End Option Values
|
Number of Unexercised |
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money |
|
Options at Year-End
|
Options at Year-End (1)
|
|
Aggregated Shares |
Value |
|
Name
|
Acquired on Exercise
|
Realized
|
Exercisable (2)
|
Unexercisable (3)
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Richard L. Bready |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
1,438,041 |
|
|
431,108 |
|
$ |
84,465,313 |
|
$ |
25,112,041 |
|
Robert E.G. Ractliffe | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 93,667 |
|
| 73,333 |
|
| 5,499,603 |
|
| 4,271,647 |
|
Almon C. Hall | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 74,567 |
|
| 73,333 |
|
| 4,377,478 |
|
| 4,271,647 |
|
Kevin W. Donnelly | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 50,214 |
|
| 45,833 |
|
| 2,947,989 |
|
| 2,669,772 |
|
Edward J. Cooney | | |
| 7,500 |
|
$ | 193,125 |
|
| 10,417 |
|
| 32,083 |
|
| 610,540 |
|
| 1,868,835 |
|
(1) |
Calculated by multiplying the relevant number of unexercised options by the difference between the stock price
for the Companys common stock on December 31, 2003 of $69.25 (based upon a valuation prepared on November
19, 2003) and the exercise price of the options. |
(2) |
Includes Rolled-Over options for the named individuals for the following amounts: Bready 1,398,849; Ractliffe
87,000; Hall 67,900; Donnelly 46,047; and Cooney 7,500 and Exercisable Class A options.
|
(3) |
Includes Unexercisable Class A options and all of the Class B options to purchase shares of Nortek Holdings
common stock.
|
Pension and Similar Plans
Norteks
qualified pension plan (the Pension Plan) was frozen as of December 31,
1995, and no further increases in benefits may occur as a result of increases in service
or compensation. The benefit payable to a participant at normal retirement equals
the accrued benefit as of December 31, 1995 and will be payable as a joint and 50%
survivor annuity in the case of a married employee and as a single-line annuity in
the case of an unmarried employee. The annual pension benefits entitled to be paid
to the executive officers beginning at age 65 under the Pension Plan are as follows:
Mr. Bready $160,000, Mr. Hall $52,163, Mr. Donnelly $15,574 and Mr. Ractliffe $7,891. |
In
1996, Nortek established a supplemental executive retirement plan (the SERP),
pursuant to which participants were entitled to supplemental pension payments equal
to a specified percentage of their highest consecutive three-year average W-2
compensation, less amounts payable to the participant under the Pension Plan.
Messrs. Bready, Hall and Donnelly were participants in the SERP. The SERP provided
that, upon a change of control of Nortek, each participant would be paid a lump sum
payment equal to the actuarially determined present value of the benefits payable
under the SERP calculated at the time of the change in control as though retirement
benefits had commenced on such date without reduction for early retirement. The
Recapitalization was considered a change of control and, accordingly, Messrs. Bready,
Hall and Donnelly received distributions of $73,658,948, $8,563,677 and $3,156,380,
respectively, and the SERP was subsequently terminated. |
Mr.
Ractliffe is a participant in a Nortek supplemental executive retirement plan. His
annual pension benefit under this plan entitled to be paid to him beginning at age 65
is projected to be $244,274. |
Compensation of Directors
The directors of the Company are not compensated for their services. However, the Board of Directors of the
Company is identical to the Board of Directors of its subsidiary, Nortek. For their services as directors of
Nortek, directors who are not officers, employees or consultants of the Company or its subsidiaries, or of Kelso,
receive directors fees from Nortek. The fees currently payable to such directors (as of January 9, 2003), are a
$50,000 annual retainer, payable quarterly in advance, $1,500 per meeting ($1,000 if director participates by
telephone) and $1,000 per committee meeting ($750 if director participates by telephone).
Employment Contracts,
Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements
Employment
Arrangement for Mr. Bready
Mr.
Bready entered into an employment agreement with the Company and Nortek that became
active upon completion of the Recapitalization. The agreement replaced Mr. Bready's
existing employment agreement with Nortek, entered into in 1997. The new employment
agreement has a five-year term, renewable for successive one-year terms unless the
Company and Nortek provide Mr. Bready with written notice of their intent not to renew
the agreement at least 90 days prior to the end of the original term or any
successive term. The employment agreement provides that during the employment
term Mr. Bready will serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and Nortek. |
The
employment agreement provides that the basic annual salary for Mr. Bready during the
employment term would be not less than $1,068,767 for the year ended December 31,
2002 and not less than $2,500,000 per year during the remainder of the employment
term. Mr. Breadys salary for 2003 was $2,500,000. Mr. Bready is eligible for
cash performance bonus awards under the employment agreement to the extent our
company achieves specific levels of EBITDA. The maximum amount of such
performance award in any year is $5,000,000. Mr. Bready is entitled to receive all
other benefits, including medical and dental insurance, generally available to
executive personnel. In addition, Mr. Bready is entitled to reimbursement of
the costs of automobile and private aircraft transportation for personal and
business use consistent with his employment prior to the Recapitalization. |
If
the employment of Mr. Bready is terminated (1) without cause, as defined in
the employment agreement, (2) as a result of any notice not to renew his employment
as described above or (3) as a result of his disability or death, Mr. Bready
terminates his employment for good reason, as defined in the employment
agreement, the Company and Nortek are obligated to pay Mr. Bready, or, in the
event of death, his estate or designated beneficiary, an annual severance and
other benefits for the period equal to the longer of (1) one year from the date of such
termination and (2) the remaining period of the original five-year employment term.
The annual severance payment in all cases is equal to $1,750,000. |
If
his employment is terminated for any reason, Mr. Bready has agreed not to compete with
the Company and Nortek for various periods of time depending on the reason for
such termination. In the event his employment is, terminated without cause or
as a result of disability, or if he terminates his employment for good reason,
Mr. Bready has agreed not to compete with the Company and Nortek for the duration of
time in which he receives the severance payments described above. In the event
his employment is terminated for cause or if he terminates his
employment without good reason, Mr. Bready has agreed not to compete for a
period of one year from such termination. |
In
1997, Nortek made a ten-year loan to Mr. Bready in the amount of $3,000,000, repayable
annually, in arrears, in installments of $300,000 principal plus accrued interest.
The interest on this loan accrues daily at the applicable federal long-term rate in
effect on each day the loan is outstanding, determined in accordance with Section
1274 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
Consistent with the terms of the prior employment agreement, the new employment
agreement for Mr. Bready provides that the installment payment for any year is deferred
until operating earnings, as defined in the agreement, for the prior fiscal year has
been determined. If Mr. Bready is an employee of the Company and Nortek on the date an
installment payment is due and if operating earnings for the prior fiscal year are in
excess of $35,000,000, then the installment payment and accrued interest for that
year will be forgiven. The installment payments under the loan will also be forgiven
if Mr. Bready is terminated without cause, if he resigns for good
reason, or dies or is disabled during the term of the agreement. As of December
31, 2003, the outstanding principal balance of the loan is $1,200,000 and accrued
interest due of $88,304. |
Subject
to the limit referred to below in this paragraph, following the termination of
employment of Mr. Bready for any reason, the Company and Nortek will provide, at no
additional cost to Mr. Bready, lifetime medical coverage to Mr. Bready, his spouse
and dependents. The lifetime medical coverage includes all medical and dental benefits
provided to Mr. Bready as of the date of effectiveness of the Recapitalization. In
lieu of lifetime medical coverage, Mr. Bready may request a lump sum payment in
an amount to be established by the board of directors as reasonably sufficient to
provide such lifetime medical coverage. The Company and Nortek have also agreed to
make payments to Mr. Bready to cover any and all state and federal income taxes that
may be due as a result of the provision of lifetime medical coverage as described in
the three preceding sentences. In no event will the reimbursement obligations of
the Company and Nortek, exclusive of the tax gross-up obligations, to provide
lifetime medical coverage under the employment agreement exceed $1,000,000 in the
aggregate during the lifetime of Mr. Bready and his spouse. |
If
it is determined that any payment or benefit provided by the Company and Nortek to
Mr. Bready under the employment agreement or any other agreement or plan is
subject to the 20% excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the Company and
Nortek will make an additional lump-sum payment to Mr. Bready sufficient, after giving
effect to all federal, state and other taxes and charges with respect to that payment,
to restore him to the same after-tax position that he would have been in if the excise
tax had not been imposed. |
Employment
Arrangements for Messrs. Hall and Donnelly
Messrs.
Hall and Donnelly have entered into employment agreements with the Company and
Nortek on terms substantially similar to each other, except as otherwise noted below.
Each of the employment agreements became effective upon the completion of the
Recapitalization and terminates upon termination of employment. The employment
agreements provide that during their respective employment, Mr. Hall will serve as
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Nortek and
Mr. Donnelly will serve as Vice President and General Counsel of the Company and
Nortek. |
The
basic annual salary for Mr. Hall will not be less than $393,750. Mr. Halls
salary for 2003 was $410,000. The basic annual salary for Mr. Donnelly will not be
less than $252,000. Mr. Donnellys salary for 2003 was $265,000. Messrs. Hall
and Donnelly are also eligible for incentive compensation in each year of the
employment period. In each year, the incentive compensation will be in an amount
recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the compensation committee
of the board of directors. Messrs. Hall and Donnelly are entitled to receive all other
benefits, including medical and dental insurance, generally available to executive
personnel. Messrs. Hall and Donnelly are also entitled to reimbursement of the
costs of automobile transportation for personal and business use consistent with
their employment prior to the Recapitalization. |
If
employment is terminated (1) without cause, as defined in the employment
agreement, (2) by the employee for good reason, as defined in the
employment agreement, or (3) on account of the employee's death or disability, the
Company and Nortek are obligated to pay the respective employee or his estate an
annual severance for two years from the date of termination. The annual severance
payments for Messrs. Hall and Donnelly would be equal to their respective basic
annual salaries as of the date of termination plus the highest amount of bonus or
incentive compensation, exclusive of Norteks 1999 Equity Performance Plan,
paid or payable in cash to such employee in any one of the three calendar years
immediately prior to the completion of the Recapitalization (or, if higher, the three
calendar years immediately prior to such termination). |
If
employment is terminated without cause, as a result of disability, or by
the employee for good reason, each employee has agreed not to compete
with the Company and Nortek for two years from the date of the termination. In
the event employment is terminated for cause or if the employee
terminates his employment without good reason, each of Messrs. Hall and
Donnelly has agreed not to compete for a period of one year from such termination. |
Subject
to the limit referred to below in this paragraph, the Company and Nortek will provide,
at no additional cost to Messrs. Hall and Donnelly, lifetime medical coverage for each
such employee and his spouse and dependents beginning upon such employee's termination
with the Company and Nortek. The lifetime medical coverage includes all medical
and dental benefits provided to each such employee as of the date of
effectiveness of the Recapitalization. Each of Messrs. Hall and Donnelly are
irrevocably entitled to 25% of his lifetime medical coverage and shall become
irrevocably entitled to an additional 25% on each of the following three anniversaries
of the completion of the Recapitalization. If the employment of Messrs. Hall or
Donnelly is terminated at any time (1) by the Company and Nortek for any reason other
than a conviction of the employee of a crime involving theft, embezzlement, or
fraud against the employer or a civil judgment involving fraud or misappropriation by the
employee against the employer, (2) as a result of death, disability or a medical
emergency in his immediate family, or (3) by the employee for good reason,
as defined in the employment agreement, the respective employee shall become
irrevocably entitled to 100% of his lifetime medical coverage. |
In
addition the respective employee shall become irrevocably entitled to 100% of his
lifetime medical coverage upon a change of control regardless of whether such
employee is terminated. Following their termination of employment for any reason or
in the event of a change of control, in lieu of lifetime medical coverage, Messrs.
Hall and Donnelly may request a lump sum payment in an amount to be established by
the board of directors as reasonably sufficient to provide the percentage of lifetime
medical coverage to which he has become irrevocably entitled. In no event will the
reimbursement obligations of the Company and Nortek, exclusive of tax gross-up
obligations, to provide lifetime medical coverage under the employment agreement
exceed $1,000,000 in the aggregate during the lifetime of the employee and his
spouse. The Company and Nortek have also agreed to make payments to Messrs. Hall and
Donnelly to cover any and all state and federal income taxes that may be due as a
result of the provision of lifetime medical coverage as described in this paragraph. |
If
it is determined that any payment or benefit provided by the Company and Nortek to
Messrs. Hall and Donnelly, under their respective employment agreements or any other
agreement or plan is subject to the excise tax, imposed by Section 4999 of the Code,
the Company and Nortek will make an additional lump-sum payment to Mr. Hall or Mr.
Donnelly, as the case may be, sufficient, after giving effect to all federal, state
and other taxes and charges with respect to such payment, to restore him to the same
after-tax position that he would have been in if the excise tax had not been imposed. |
Retention
Plan
Nortek
established a retention plan for its executive officers and others, other than Mr.
Bready, which provides that, in consideration of each employee agreeing not to
voluntarily terminate his employment or service as a consultant if there is an
attempted change of control, as that term is defined in the plan, of Nortek, the
individual will be entitled to an immediate payment equal to 20% of his basic annual
salary, and, if the employee is terminated within the twenty-four month period
following the change of control, including termination by reason of a material
adverse change in the terms of employment as provided in the plan, the individual also
will be entitled at the time of termination to severance pay for a period of twenty-four
months following termination at an annual rate equal to his base salary plus the
highest amount of bonus or incentive compensation paid or payable to him for any one
of the three calendar years prior to the Recapitalization (or, if higher, the three
calendar years immediately prior to such termination), and to continued medical,
life insurance and other benefits for the twenty-four month period, at payment
of an amount equal to the cost of providing these benefits. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the terms of the employment agreements for Messrs. Hall and Donnelly,
rather than the retention plan, govern their rights to any severance pay in the event
of their termination of employment following the completion of the Recapitalization. |
The
Recapitalization was a change of control for purposes of the retention plan.
Accordingly, upon the completion of the Recapitalization, Nortek made immediate cash
payments in 2003 to participants in the retention plan in the following amounts: Mr.
Cooney, $48,000; Mr. Donnelly, $53,000; Mr. Hall, $82,000; Mr. Hiley, $30,000; and Mr.
Ractliffe, $120,000. |
Deferred
Compensation Arrangements
Since
March 1983, Nortek has been a party to individual deferred compensation agreements with
Messrs. Bready and Hall, under which Nortek will make 180 monthly payments commencing
at age 65 to each of Messrs. Bready and Hall. The annual payments to Messrs. Bready
and Hall will be, assuming retirement at age 65, $60,600 and $22,000,
respectively. The deferred compensation agreements provide that, in the event of
a change in control, the covered executive will be paid a lump sum payment equal to
the present value of the unreduced benefit that would be payable to the executive upon
retirement on or after age 65. Although the Recapitalization was otherwise a change
in control for purposes of the deferred compensation agreements, Mr. Bready and Mr.
Hall each waived their right to receive the lump sum payment described above. Following
the Recapitalization, the deferred compensation agreements and all of the obligations
of Nortek remained in effect. |
Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation
From
January 1, 2003 through the completion of the Recapitalization on January 9,
2003, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
consisted of William I. Kelly and Phillip L. Cohen. After January 9, 2003 and through
the end of the fiscal year, the Company has a Compensation Committee consisting of
Mr. Bready, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr. Berney,
which determines compensation of the executive officers of the Company other than Mr.
Bready. Mr. Breadys compensation is determined by the full Board of Directors
of the Company. With respect to Mr. Berney, see Financial Advisory
Arrangement with Kelso under Item 12 of this report. With respect to Mr. Berney, see Financial
Advisory Arrangement with Kelso under Item 12 of this report. |
Compensation Committee
Report on Executive Compensation
The
Companys executive compensation program was administered for the 2003 fiscal
year by the Board of Directors through its Compensation Committee for all
executives, except for Mr. Bready whose compensation program was determined and
administered by the full Board of Directors. During fiscal year 2003, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and of Nortek, after January 9,
2003 and through the end of the fiscal year, consisted of Richard L. Bready and Philip
E. Berney. |
The
Companys policy with respect to the compensation of its executive officers, other
than Messrs. Bready, Hall and Donnelly, is primarily based on the performance of the
individual officer along with such other factors as compensation paid by our
competitors, geographical factors, the terms of employment and salary surveys.
Bonuses for executive officers are awarded on a discretionary basis by the Chief
Executive Officer based on individual goals derived from the responsibilities of the
individual and which are determined, in part, on the company's performance and to a
greater extent on individual performance. The compensation of Messrs. Bready, Hall
and Donnelly during fiscal year 2003 was governed, in part, by the terms of their
employment agreements, the terms of which are set forth above under Employment
Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements. |
The
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table received salary
increases in 2003 based on competitive salary analyses and individual performance
of job goals and objectives. Bonuses awarded such executive officers for the year
reflected the achievement of individual goals, the operating performance of the
company and certain units and other factors. |
The
full Board of Directors of Nortek and the Company are authorized to approve
changes in the compensation arrangement with the Chief Executive Officer and with
respect to the named executive officers. |
During
2003, Mr. Bready earned a $5,000,000 bonus pursuant to his employment agreement
with the Company and Nortek. |
With
respect to long-term incentive compensation, the Company believes that stock
options are an additional incentive for executive officers and other selected key
employees of Nortek Holdings and its subsidiaries and upon whose efforts the Company
is largely dependent for the successful conduct of its business. The award of
stock options will encourage such persons to improve operations and increase profits
and to accept employment with, or remain in the employ of, Nortek Holdings or its
subsidiaries. The Nortek Holdings stock option plan is administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board. In 2003, the Committee awarded options to its
executive officers in the amounts set forth above in the table entitled Options
Granted in Last Fiscal Year. |
Five-Year Shareholder
Return Comparison
The
following graph compares the yearly percentage change for the last five years plus
January 1, 2003 through January 9, 2003, in the cumulative total shareholder return
of the Companys Common Stock against the cumulative total return of the Russell
2000 Index and a group of peer companies which are listed below. Following the
completion on January 9, 2003 of the Recapitalization, the Companys common stock
ceased to be publicly traded. |
* |
$100
INVESTED ON 12/31/97 IN STOCK OR INDEX- INCLUDING REINVESTMENT OF DIVIDENDS. LAST
PERIOD INCLUDES CALENDAR YEAR 2002 THROUGH JANUARY 9, 2003. |
The
peer group companies are: |
|
Armstrong
World Industries, Inc. Fedders Corporation Masco Corporation Maytag Corporation The
Stanley Works Whirlpool Corporation York International Corp. |
ITEM 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
As
of March 30, 2004, the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company consists
of (i) 397,380 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share and (ii)
8,130,442 shares of Series B Convertible Preference Stock, par value $1.00 per
share. The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Class A Common
Stock and the Series B Convertible Preference Stock of the Company, as of March 30,
2004, by the Companys directors, by its executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table and by its directors and executive officers as a group. |
|
Class A Common Stock
|
Series B Convertible Preference Stock
|
|
Amount and Nature of |
Percent of |
Amount and Nature of |
Percent of |
Name (1)
|
Beneficial Ownership (2)
|
Class (3)
|
Beneficial Ownership (4)
|
Class
|
|
Philip E. Berney |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
% |
|
8,130,442 |
|
|
100 |
% |
Jeffrey C. Bloomberg |
|
|
|
15,036 |
|
|
3 |
.7 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Richard L. Bready |
|
|
|
1,722,319 |
|
|
92 |
.5 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Joseph M. Cianciolo |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
1 |
.0 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Edward J. Cooney |
|
|
|
12,361 |
|
|
3 |
.0 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Kevin W. Donnelly |
|
|
|
58,702 |
|
|
13 |
.0 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Almon C. Hall |
|
|
|
96,011 |
|
|
20 |
.2 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
David B. Hiley |
|
|
|
11,945 |
|
|
2 |
.9 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Robert E.G. Ractliffe |
|
|
|
111,111 |
|
|
22 |
.4 |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
All directors and executive |
|
|
officers as a group |
|
|
|
2,031,652 |
|
|
95 |
.6% |
|
8,130,442 |
|
|
100 |
% |
(1) |
The address of all
such persons is c/o Nortek, Inc., 50 Kennedy Plaza, Providence, Rhode Island 02903. Certain
of the shares shown in the table are shown as to which the persons named in the table have the right to
acquire beneficial ownership, or specified in Rule 13d-3(d)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons identified in this table have sole
voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially held by them, subject to
community property laws where applicable.
|
(2) |
Includes shares
subject to options outstanding and exercisable within sixty (60) days after March 30, 2004 as
follows: Bready 1,464,169 shares, Hall 79,011 shares, Donnelly 52,922 shares, Ractliffe 98,111 shares,
Cooney 12,361 shares, Bloomberg 4,167 shares, Cianciolo 4,167 shares and Hiley 11,945 shares.
|
(3) |
Assuming the exercise
by all of our directors and executive officers of all options to acquire Class A Common
Stock exercisable or, pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1), deemed exercisable, ownership percentages would be as
follows: Bready 81.1%; Hall 4.5%; Donnelly 2.8%; Ractliffe 5.2%; Cooney .6%; Bloomberg .7%; Cianciolo .2%;
Hiley .6%; and all directors and officers as a group 95.6%.
|
(4) |
Mr. Berney may be
deemed to share beneficial ownership of shares of Series B Convertible Preference Stock owned
of record by Kelso Investment Associates VI, L.P., Kelso Nortek Investors LLC and KEP VI, LLC, by virtue of his
status as a managing member of KEP VI, LLC and Kelso GP VI, LLC (which is the general partner of Kelso Investment
Associates VI, L.P. and the managing member of Kelso Nortek Investors, LLC). Mr. Berney shares investment and
voting power with respect to the shares of Series B Convertible Preference Stock owned by Kelso Investment
Associates VI, L.P., Kelso Nortek Investors, LLC and KEP VI, LLC but disclaims beneficial ownership of such
shares, except with respect to his pecuniary interest therein. |
The
Companys Series B Preference Stock is convertible at any time subsequent to
January 9, 2004 into one full share of Class A Common Stock. Upon occurrence of
certain events, the Series B Preference Stock can automatically be converted
into Class A Common Stock. The Series B Preference Stock does not provide for
distributions to shareholders and has a liquidation preference of $0.01 per share.
In addition to the election of directors, the consent of a majority of the Series B
Preference Stockholders is required; i) to amend the certificate of incorporation
of Holdings to modify the powers, preferences or special rights of the holders of the
Series B Preference Stock, ii) to authorize or issue any series of capital stock
ranking senior to or on parity with the Series B Preference Stock as to either
payments of dividends or rights on liquidation, iii) to enter into a material
transaction in excess of $50,000,000, iv) to incur indebtedness outside the ordinary
course of business, v) to make certain capital expenditures, vi) to enter into
agreements and arrangements with members of senior management of Holdings, vii) to
create, issue, grant, deliver or sell equity securities, including warrants and
options, other than under the 2002 Stock Option Plan and other agreements and
arrangements in existence on or prior to the date of the completion of the
Recapitalization, viii) to enter into legal settlements in excess of $25,000,000
and ix) to take any other significant actions involving the Company. |
Securities Authorized for
Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
securities remaining |
|
securities to be |
|
for future issuance |
|
issued upon exercise |
Weighted average |
under equity |
|
of outstanding |
price of outstanding |
compensation plans |
|
options, warrants |
options, warrants |
(excluding securities |
|
and rights |
and rights |
on column (a)) |
|
|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
|
Equity |
Compensation Plans |
3,151,120 |
$10.70 |
128,100 |
approved by |
security holders |
|
Equity |
Compensation Plans |
none |
N/A |
none |
not approved by |
security holders |
|
The
only equity compensation plan of the Company is the Nortek Holdings, Inc. 2002 Stock
Option Plan. See Stock Option Tables and the footnotes thereto in Item 11 of
this Report. |
Other Transactions
Other
transactions between the Registrant and certain of its Executive Officers are
described in Footnote 2 of the Summary Compensation Table above and in the
section entitled Employment Arrangements and Severance Agreements of
Item 11 of this Report. |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Recapitalization
On
November 20, 2002, Nortek reorganized into a holding company structure and each
outstanding share of capital stock of Nortek was converted into an identical share of
capital stock of Holdings. On January 9, 2003, Holdings completed the
Recapitalization which resulted in the acquisition of Holdings by Kelso and certain
members of Norteks management. Pursuant to the terms of certain Exchange
Agreements by and among Nortek, the Company and each of Richard L. Bready, President
and CEO and director of the Company, Almon C. Hall, Vice President and CFO of the
Company, Robert E.G. Ractliffe, Executive Vice President and COO of the Company, Kevin
W. Donnelly, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company, Edward J.
Cooney, Vice President and Treasurer of the Company and David B. Hiley, director of
the Company, Messrs. Hall, Donnelly and Hiley rolled-over all of their equity
interests in Nortek as part of the Recapitalization and Messrs. Bready, Ractliffe and
Cooney have sold or cashed-out a portion of their equity interests in Holdings as part
of the Recapitalization and have retained or rolled-over the remainder of their
interests. (See Item 12 of this Report, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management.) Such members of Norteks management received amounts in
connection with the cash-out of a portion of their equity interests in hHoldings as
follows: Mr. Bready $17,166,372; Mr. Ractliffe $556,048; and Mr. Cooney $193,125.
Immediately after the completion of the transaction, Kelso held approximately 79.4% of
the fully-diluted equity of Holdings, and the Companys management held
approximately 18.4% (with approximately 16.0% held by Mr. Bready). Members of Norteks
management received various amounts in connection with payments in respect of the
termination of Norteks SERP as follows: Mr. Bready, $73,658,948; Mr. Hall,
$8,563,677; and Mr. Donnelly $3,156,380; and payments under Norteks retention
plan as follows: Mr. Cooney, $48,000; Mr. Donnelly, $53,000; Mr. Hall, $82,000;
Mr. Hiley, $30,000; and Mr. Ractliffe, $120,000. (See Pension and Similar
Plans and Retention Plan under Item 11 of this Report.) Mr. Hiley
received a fee of $3,000,000 in connection with the transaction. |
Members
of the Companys management, the Company, Nortek, Kelso and other
stockholders entered into a Stockholders Agreement that sets forth the terms of
their relationship as stockholders of the Company upon the completion of the
Recapitalization. Under the Stockholders Agreement, members of the Cmpanys
management have customary tag-along rights to participate on a pro-rata
basis with affiliates of Kelso in sales of equity securities of Holdings. The
Stockholders Agreement also provides that members of the Companys management
will be subject to customary drag-along rights, which will permit
affiliates of Kelso to require the certain members of the Companys management to
sell their shares pro-rata with these Kelso affiliates in a transaction involving a
sale of at least 75% of the ownership by the Kelso affiliates of their equity interest in
Holdings. |
Certain
members of the Companys management have also been granted rights to have their
shares of Nortek Holdings registered for sale under the Securities Act of 1933 in
certain circumstances, pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement
by and among the Company, Kelso affiliates and certain members of the Companys
management. Nortek Holdings is only required to use best efforts to
register the shares and is under no further obligation to the Registration Rights
holders. |
Mr.
Bready is also a party to a Preemptive Rights Agreement with Holdings that provides
him with the right to participate in any future equity financings of Holdings, subject
to limited exceptions, in an amount necessary to permit Mr. Bready to maintain his
fully diluted ownership interest in Holdings. |
Fees Paid to Consultant
David
B. Hiley, a director of the Company, provides consulting services to the Company for
a fee of $12,500 per month, plus a year-end bonus of $325,000 in 2003 and for a fee of
$16,667 per month plus a discretionary year-end bonus in 2004. |
Financial Advisory
Arrangement with Kelso
Philip
E. Berney, a director of the Company, is also a managing director of Kelso. Upon
completion of the Recapitalization, Nortek paid Kelso and its designees a fee of
$10,500,000 and reimbursed Kelso and its designees for their expenses and entered
into a financial advisory agreement with Kelso with respect to services to be
provided by Kelso or some of its related parties to the Company in return for financial
advisory fees to be paid annually to Kelso by Nortek. The amount of the financial
advisory fee will be determined by Kelso, but will not exceed $1,500,000 per year. The
financial advisory agreement includes indemnification and expense reimbursement by
Nortek of Kelso and other related parties with respect to the Recapitalization,
including with respect to the financing of the Recapitalization and any services to
be provided by Kelso or any related party to Nortek on a going forward basis. |
Equity Purchase by Director
In
October 2003, Mr. Bloomberg, a member of the Companys Board of Directors,
purchased, individually and in the name of a family trust, directly from the Company
10,869 shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock for a purchase price of
$499,974. |
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees
The
Company was billed $2,872,000 and $3,720,000 for audit services for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Audit fees for the year ended December 31,
2003 include fees for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements for
the years ended December 31, 2003, the audit of the combined financial statements of
the Companys subsidiary Ply Gem Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and
2001 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002 and as of December 31,
2003 and for the year then ended, review of the financial statements included in
Norteks Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed during 2003, professional services
rendered in connection with the Companys private placement of Senior Discount
Notes, and statutory audits. Audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2002 include
fees for the audit of Norteks annual financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2002, the re-audit of Norteks financial statements as of December
31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2001, the review
of the financial statements included in Norteks Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
filed during 2002, and statutory audits. |
Audit-Related Fees
The
Company was billed $270,000 and $400,000 for non-audit services from the Companys
principal accountant during the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. Audit-related
fees billed during 2003 include fees for the audits of the Companys employee
benefit plans, accounting consultations and audit procedures related to
acquisitions, and consultations related to the Companys Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Section 404 project. Audit-related fees billed during 2002 include fees for the
audits of Norteks employee benefit plans and accounting consultations
related to acquisitions. |
Tax Fees
The
Company was billed $1,059,000 and $525,000 for professional services rendered by the
Companys accountants for tax compliance, tax advice related to acquisitions,
tax advice and tax planning during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. |
All Other Fees
The
Company was billed $16,000 for other services during 2003. Other services billed
in 2003 relate to the Companys subscription to Ernst & Youngs accounting
information database and other services. The Company was not billed for other
services in 2002. |
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) |
Financial
Statements and Schedules |
|
The
following documents are filed as part of this report: |
|
Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003,
the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years ended December 31,
2002 and 2001 |
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
|
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003,
the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years ended December 31,
2002 and 2001 |
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders Investment for the period from January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003, the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 |
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
Report
of Independent Auditors |
|
2. |
Financial
Statement Schedule |
|
Schedule
I - Consolidated Parent Company Financial Statements |
|
Schedule
II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
All
other financial statements are not required under the related instructions or
are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted. |
|
3. |
The
exhibits are listed in the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference |
|
- March 12, 2003, Item 5, Other Events
- May 15, 2003, Item 9, Regulation FD Disclosure
- August 7, 2003, Item 7, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- November 6, 2003, Item 12, Results of Operations and Financial Condition
- December 22, 2003, Item 5, Other Events
- February 13, 2004, Item 5, Current Report
- February 17, 2004, Item 2, Acquisition or Disposition of Assets
- February 17, 2004, Item 7, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- March 1, 2004, Item 5, Current Report
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 30, 2004. |
|
NORTEK, INC. |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard L. Bready |
|
Richard L. Bready |
|
Chairman of the Board |
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
indicated, as of March 30, 2004. |
/s/ Richard L. Bready |
|
/s/ Philip E. Berney |
Richard L. Bready, Chairman, |
|
Philip E. Berney |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Almon C. Hall |
|
/s/ Jeffrey C. Bloomberg |
Almon C. Hall, Vice President, |
|
Jeffrey C. Bloomberg |
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph M. Cianciolo |
|
|
Joseph M. Cianciolo |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David B. Hiley |
|
|
David B. Hiley |
|
|
Director |
Consolidated Statement of
Operations
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Net Sales |
|
|
$ | 1,490,073 |
|
$ | 24,951 |
|
$ | 1,384,125 |
|
$ | 1,293,780 |
|
|
Costs and Expenses: | | |
Cost of products sold | | |
| 1,060,004 |
|
| 18,635 |
|
| 992,299 |
|
| 945,617 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense | | |
| 261,569 |
|
| 5,014 |
|
| 262,671 |
|
| 226,549 |
|
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets | | |
| 9,055 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 2,988 |
|
| 11,955 |
|
Expenses and charges arising from the Recapitalization | | |
| -- |
|
| 83,000 |
|
| 6,600 |
|
| -- |
|
|
| | |
| 1,330,628 |
|
| 106,716 |
|
| 1,264,558 |
|
| 1,184,121 |
|
|
Operating earnings (loss) | | |
| 159,445 |
|
| (81,765 |
) |
| 119,567 |
|
| 109,659 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(57,627 |
) |
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
(52,410 |
) |
|
(51,748 |
) |
Loss from debt retirement | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (5,500 |
) |
Investment income |
|
|
|
1,482 |
|
|
119 |
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
8,189 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | |
before provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
103,300 |
|
|
(82,700 |
) |
|
73,100 |
|
|
60,600 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
41,300 |
|
|
(21,800 |
) |
|
29,500 |
|
|
27,800 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
(60,900 |
) |
|
43,600 |
|
|
32,800 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 12,200 |
|
| (1,000 |
) |
| 18,900 |
|
| (24,800 |
) |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
$ |
74,200 |
|
$ |
(61,900 |
) |
$ |
62,500 |
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
Post-
|
Pre-
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Recapitalization
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: | | |
Unrestricted | | |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$ |
194,120 |
|
$ |
294,804 |
|
Restricted | | |
Cash, investments and marketable securities at cost, |
|
|
which approximates fair value |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
2,808 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $5,880,000 and $6,003,000 | | |
| 214,267 |
|
| 179,780 |
|
Inventories: | | |
Raw materials | | |
| 54,144 |
|
| 51,245 |
|
Work in process | | |
| 19,229 |
|
| 16,110 |
|
Finished goods | | |
| 86,042 |
|
| 65,049 |
|
|
| | |
| 159,415 |
|
| 132,404 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses | | |
| 6,765 |
|
| 8,528 |
|
Other current assets | | |
| 14,868 |
|
| 9,571 |
|
Prepaid income taxes | | |
| 17,826 |
|
| 15,964 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations | | |
| 494,851 |
|
| 567,457 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
1,103,335 |
|
|
1,211,316 |
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, at Cost: | | |
Land | | |
| 7,591 |
|
| 8,250 |
|
Buildings and improvements | | |
| 67,814 |
|
| 85,909 |
|
Machinery and equipment | | |
| 136,769 |
|
| 243,749 |
|
|
| | |
| 212,174 |
|
| 337,908 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation | | |
| 17,719 |
|
| 194,533 |
|
|
Total property and equipment, net | | |
| 194,455 |
|
| 143,375 |
|
|
|
Other Assets: | | |
Goodwill | | |
| 678,063 |
|
| 287,164 |
|
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of | | |
$9,122,000 and $21,081,000 | | |
| 94,645 |
|
| 43,205 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | |
| -- |
|
| 9,882 |
|
Deferred debt expense |
|
|
|
12,589 |
|
|
19,494 |
|
Restricted investments and marketable securities held by |
|
|
pension trusts (including related party amounts - see Note 8) |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
76,503 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
15,770 |
|
|
39,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
802,190 |
|
|
476,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,099,980 |
|
$ |
1,830,826 |
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholder's Investment | | |
|
Current Liabilities: | | |
Notes payable and other short-term obligations | | |
$ | 8,120 |
|
$ | 3,338 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt | | |
| 7,229 |
|
| 2,208 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
112,772 |
|
|
109,073 |
|
Accrued expenses and taxes, net |
|
|
|
151,048 |
|
|
133,569 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations | | |
| 137,683 |
|
| 149,859 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
416,852 |
|
|
398,047 |
|
|
|
Other Liabilities: | | |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
21,461 |
|
|
-- |
|
Other long-term liabilities | | |
| 136,833 |
|
| 161,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,294 |
|
|
161,428 |
|
|
|
Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations | | |
Payable, Less Current Maturities |
|
|
|
1,324,626 |
|
|
953,846 |
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9) | | |
|
Stockholder's Investment: | | |
Preference stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 7,000,000 shares; |
|
|
none issued as of December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Series B Preference Stock, $1.00 par value; authorized | | |
19,000,000 shares; 8,130,442 shares issued and outstanding | | |
as of December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
8,130 |
|
|
-- |
|
Class A Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 19,000,000 |
|
|
shares; 397,380 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
as of December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
-- |
|
Class B Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 14,000,000 | | |
shares outstanding; none issued as of December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 40,000,000 |
|
|
shares; 10,502,627 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
as of December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
10,503 |
|
Special Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 5,000,000 | | |
shares; 501,224 shares issued and outstanding | | |
as of December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
501 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
172,244 |
|
|
108,617 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
255,366 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | |
| 19,437 |
|
| (57,482 |
) |
|
Total stockholder's investment |
|
|
|
200,208 |
|
|
317,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,099,980 |
|
$ |
1,830,826 |
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated Statement of
Cash Flows
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | |
$ | 62,000 |
|
$ | (60,900 |
) |
$ | 43,600 |
|
$ | 32,800 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 12,200 |
|
| (1,000 |
) |
| 18,900 |
|
| (24,800 |
) |
|
Net earnings (loss) | | |
| 74,200 |
|
| (61,900 |
) |
| 62,500 |
|
| 8,000 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) provided by (used in) operating | | |
activities: | | |
Depreciation and amortization expense, including amortization of purchase price |
|
|
allocated to inventory | | |
| 31,962 |
|
| 653 |
|
| 29,118 |
|
| 37,121 |
|
Non-cash interest expense, net | | |
| 6,352 |
|
| 125 |
|
| 3,827 |
|
| 3,565 |
|
Stock option and other stock compensation expense | | |
| 2,071 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (2,400 |
) |
| 34,000 |
|
Loss on debt retirement | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 5,500 |
|
Deferred federal income tax (credit) provision from continuing operations | | |
| (4,800 |
) |
| 5,900 |
|
| (200 |
) |
| (2,800 |
) |
Deferred federal income tax provision (credit) from discontinued operations | | |
| 500 |
|
| -- |
|
| 2,000 |
|
| (2,000 |
) |
Effect of the Recapitalization, net | | |
| -- |
|
| 62,397 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Changes in certain assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions: | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | |
| (18,390 |
) |
| 4,298 |
|
| (8,782 |
) |
| 6,588 |
|
Inventories | | |
| (595 |
) |
| (4,457 |
) |
| 8,426 |
|
| 7,356 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets | | |
| (2,145 |
) |
| 268 |
|
| (2,742 |
) |
| (1,727 |
) |
Net assets of discontinued operations | | |
| 3,808 |
|
| 1,717 |
|
| (53,143 |
) |
| (11,261 |
) |
Accounts payable | | |
| (6,251 |
) |
| (777 |
) |
| (2,403 |
) |
| 7,112 |
|
Accrued expenses and taxes | | |
| 60,546 |
|
| (19,766 |
) |
| (1,143 |
) |
| 20,724 |
|
Long-term assets, liabilities and other, net | | |
| (9,180 |
) |
| 5,837 |
|
| 16,218 |
|
| (1,595 |
) |
|
Total adjustments to net earnings (loss) | | |
| 63,878 |
|
| 56,195 |
|
| (11,224 |
) |
| 102,583 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | |
| 138,078 |
|
| (5,705 |
) |
| 51,276 |
|
| 110,583 |
|
|
Cash Flows from investing activities: | | |
Capital expenditures | | |
$ | (17,150 |
) |
$ | (207 |
) |
$ | (19,095 |
) |
$ | (27,141 |
) |
Net cash paid for businesses acquired | | |
| (76,016 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (1,900 |
) |
Redemption of publicly held shares in connection with the Recapitalization | | |
| (469,655 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Payment of fees and expenses in connection with the Recapitalization | | |
| (27,900 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Purchase of investments and marketable securities | | |
| (30,015 |
) |
| -- |
|
| (332,069 |
) |
| (240,366 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of investments and marketable securities | | |
| 30,015 |
|
| -- |
|
| 428,307 |
|
| 152,170 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued businesses | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 29,516 |
|
| 45,000 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments | | |
| 1,028 |
|
| (49 |
) |
| (2,867 |
) |
| (34,194 |
) |
Other, net | | |
| (663 |
) |
| 109 |
|
| (4,097 |
) |
| 1,822 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | |
$ | (590,356 |
) |
$ | (147 |
) |
$ | 99,695 |
|
$ | (104,609 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from financing activities: | | |
Sale of 10% Senior Discount Notes due 2011, net of fees | | |
$ | 339,522 |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
Sale of 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 241,800 |
|
Redemption of 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2004 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (207,700 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in borrowings, net | | |
| 2,658 |
|
| (1,313 |
) |
| (12,143 |
) |
| (12,558 |
) |
Issuance of preferred and common stock in connection with the Recapitalization | | |
| 359,185 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Dividend to preferred and common stockholders | | |
| (298,474 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Cash distributions to stock option holders | | |
| (41,600 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Purchase of common and special common stock | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (1 |
) |
| (3 |
) |
Issuance of 32,608 shares of class A common stock | | |
| 1,500 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Exercise of stock options | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 631 |
|
| 1,307 |
|
Other, net | | |
| 7 |
|
| (4,039 |
) |
| (4,022 |
) |
| 48 |
|
|
Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities | | |
| 362,798 |
|
| (5,352 |
) |
| (15,535 |
) |
| 22,894 |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents | | |
| (89,480 |
) |
| (11,204 |
) |
| 135,436 |
|
| 28,868 |
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | | |
| 283,600 |
|
| 294,804 |
|
| 159,368 |
|
| 130,500 |
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | | |
$ | 194,120 |
|
$ | 283,600 |
|
$ | 294,804 |
|
$ | 159,368 |
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholder's Investment For the Year Ended December 31, 2001 (Dollar
amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Special |
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Common |
Common |
Paid-in |
Retained |
Treasury |
Comprehensive |
Comprehensive |
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Stock
|
Loss
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
|
|
$ |
18,753 |
|
$ |
828 |
|
$ |
208,813 |
|
$ |
184,866 |
|
$ |
(111,682 |
) |
$ |
(19,367 |
) |
$ |
-- |
|
Net earnings | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 8,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 8,000 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: | | |
Currency translation adjustment | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (4,444 |
) |
| (4,444 |
) |
Minimum pension liability net of |
|
|
tax of $8,969 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (15,823 |
) |
| (15,823 |
) |
Unrealized decline in the fair value | | |
of marketable securities | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (91 |
) |
| (91 |
) |
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
$ |
(12,358 |
) |
|
|
13,721 shares of special common stock | | |
converted into 13,721 shares of | | |
common stock | | |
| 14 |
|
| (14 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
62,504 shares of common stock issued |
|
|
upon exercise of stock options | | |
| 62 |
|
| -- |
|
| 1,401 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
130 shares of treasury stock acquired | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (3 |
) |
| -- |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2001 | | |
$ | 18,829 |
|
$ | 814 |
|
$ | 210,214 |
|
$ | 192,866 |
|
$ | (111,685 |
) |
$ | (39,725 |
) |
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholder's Investment For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 (Dollar
amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Nortek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nortek |
Holdings |
|
Nortek |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Holdings |
Special |
Nortek |
Special |
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Common |
Common |
Common |
Common |
Paid-in |
Retained |
Treasury |
Comprehensive |
Comprehensive |
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Stock
|
Loss
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 18,829 |
|
$ | 814 |
|
$ | 210,214 |
|
$ | 192,866 |
|
$ | (111,685 |
) |
$ | (39,725 |
) |
$ |
-- |
|
Net earnings | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 62,500 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 62,500 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
Currency translation adjustment | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 5,250 |
|
| 5,250 |
|
Minimum pension liability net of |
|
|
tax of $12,920 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (22,701 |
) |
| (22,701 |
) |
Unrealized decline in the fair value | | |
of marketable securities | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (306 |
) |
| (306 |
) |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
$ |
44,743 |
|
|
|
22,390 shares of special common stock | | |
converted into 22,390 shares of | | |
common stock | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 22 |
|
| (22 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
28,963 shares of common stock issued |
|
|
Upon exercise of stock options | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 29 |
|
| -- |
|
| 682 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
The effect of directors stock options | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 739 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
33 shares of treasury stock acquired |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
-- |
|
Nortek Holdings Reorganization (See | | |
Notes 1, 2 and 7) |
|
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
501 |
|
|
(18,880 |
) |
|
(792 |
) |
|
(103,018 |
) |
|
-- |
|
|
111,686 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
|
|
$ |
10,503 |
|
$ |
501 |
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
108,617 |
|
$ |
255,366 |
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
(57,482 |
) |
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholder's Investment For the Period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 (Dollar
amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Series B |
Class A |
|
Special |
Additional |
|
Other |
|
|
Preference |
Common |
Common |
Common |
Paid-in |
Retained |
Comprehensive |
Comprehensive |
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 10,503 |
|
$ | 501 |
|
$ | 108,617 |
|
$ | 255,366 |
|
$ | (57,482 |
) |
$ |
-- |
|
Net loss | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (61,900 |
) |
| -- |
|
| (61,900 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | |
Currency translation adjustment | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 1,096 |
|
| 1,096 |
|
Minimum pension liability net of | | |
tax of $9,906 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 18,398 |
|
| 18,398 |
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
$ |
(42,406 |
) |
|
|
Settlement of stock options held by | | |
employees, net of taxes of $1,710 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
Subtotal | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 10,503 |
|
| 501 |
|
| 105,617 |
|
| 193,466 |
|
| (37,988 |
) |
|
Effect of the Recapitalization | | |
| 8,130 |
|
| 365 |
|
| (10,503 |
) |
| (501 |
) |
| 328,857 |
|
| (193,466 |
) |
| 37,988 |
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 9, 2003 | | |
$ | 8,130 |
|
$ | 365 |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 434,474 |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholder's Investment For the Period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 (Dollar
amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Series B |
|
Additional |
|
Other |
|
|
Preference |
Common |
Paid-in |
Retained |
Comprehensive |
Comprehensive |
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income (Loss)
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Balance, January 9, 2003 |
|
|
$ | 8,130 |
|
$ | 365 |
|
$ | 434,474 |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ |
-- |
|
Net earnings | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 74,200 |
|
| -- |
|
| 74,200 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | |
Currency translation adjustment | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 19,501 |
|
| 19,501 |
|
Minimum pension liability, net of | | |
tax of $35 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (64 |
) |
| (64 |
) |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
$ |
93,637 |
|
|
|
Issuance of 32,608 shares of Class A | | |
Common Stock | | |
| -- |
|
| 32 |
|
| 1,468 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Dividend to common and preferred |
|
|
stockholders | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (224,274 |
) |
| (74,200 |
) |
| -- |
|
Cash distribution to stock option holders | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (41,600 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Stock option and other stock compensation |
|
|
expense | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 2,179 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Other, net | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (3 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 | | |
$ | 8,130 |
|
$ | 397 |
|
$ | 172,244 |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 19,437 |
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
NORTEK HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nortek
Holdings, Inc. and its continuing wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and
collectively, the Company or Holdings) are diversified
manufacturers of residential and commercial building products, operating within two
principal segments (see Note 10 for a discussion of discontinued operations
related to the Companys subsidiary, Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (Ply Gem)
and Ply Gems current and former subsidiaries): the Residential Building Products
Segment and the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment. Through these
remaining principal segments, the Company manufactures and sells, primarily in the
United States, Canada and Europe, a wide variety of products for the residential and
commercial construction, manufactured housing, and the do-it-yourself (DIY)
and professional remodeling and renovation markets. |
The
consolidated financial statements prior to November 20, 2002 reflect the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of Nortek, Inc. (Nortek),
the predecessor company. On November 20, 2002, Nortek and Holdings reorganized into a
holding company structure and each outstanding share of capital stock of Nortek was
converted into an identical share of capital stock of Holdings, a Delaware
corporation formed in 2002, with Holdings becoming the successor public company and
Nortek becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (the Holdings
Reorganization). Subsequent to November 20, 2002, the consolidated financial
statements reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of
Holdings (the successor company). On January 9, 2003, Holdings was acquired by
certain affiliates and designees of Kelso & Company L.P. (Kelso) and
certain members of Norteks management (the Management Investors)
in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Recapitalization by and among Nortek,
Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and K Holdings, Inc. (K Holdings) dated as of
June 20, 2002, as amended, (the Recapitalization Agreement) in a
transaction valued at approximately $1.6 billion, including all of the Companys
indebtedness (the Recapitalization) (see Notes 2 and 7). |
Beginning
on January 9, 2003, the Company accounted for the Recapitalization as a purchase in
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141), which resulted
in a new valuation for the assets and liabilities of the Company and its subsidiaries
based upon fair values as of the date of the Recapitalization. SFAS No. 141 requires
the Company to establish a new basis for its assets and liabilities based on the
amount paid for its ownership at January 9, 2003. Accordingly, the Companys
ownership basis (including the fair value of options rolled over by the Management
Investors) is reflected in the Companys consolidated financial statements
beginning upon completion of the Recapitalization. The Companys purchase price of
approximately $586,266,000, including net dividends and distributions from Nortek of
approximately $115,397,000 to fund the Recapitalization, was allocated to the assets
and liabilities based on their relative fair values and approximately $442,969,000 was
reflected in Stockholders Investment as the value of the Companys ownership
upon completion of the Recapitalization. Immediately prior to the Recapitalization,
Stockholders Investment was approximately $272,099,000. |
The
Company completed the final allocation of purchase price as of October 5, 2003,
which reflects the excess purchase price over the net assets acquired in the
Recapitalization. The following table shows a comparison of the initial allocation of
purchase price reflected in Norteks Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 5, 2003
and the final allocation of purchase price included in the Companys accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, both of which
include amounts allocated to discontinued operations which were sold subsequent to
January 9, 2003 (see Note 10): |
|
Initial |
Final |
|
Allocation
|
Allocation
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
$ | 13,234,000 |
|
$ | 12,908,000 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | | |
| 102,474,000 |
|
| 38,035,000 |
|
Intangible assets | | |
| 72,953,000 |
|
| 21,686,000 |
|
Indebtedness | | |
| (33,777,000 |
) |
| (33,777,000 |
) |
Pension and post retirement health care benefits | | |
| (32,195,000 |
) |
| (23,781,000 |
) |
Prepaid and deferred income taxes | | |
| (38,325,000 |
) |
| (11,370,000 |
) |
Goodwill | | |
| 227,671,000 |
|
| 310,240,000 |
|
Other | | |
| -- |
|
| 226,000 |
|
|
Total | | |
$ | 312,035,000 |
|
$ | 314,167,000 |
|
|
The
following is a summary of the material adjustments made to the initial allocation of
purchase price and the final allocation of purchase price: |
|
Purchase price increased by $2,132,000 from $584,134,000 to $586,266,000 due to refinements made to the fair value of
the options to purchase common stock of the Management Investors that were included in the purchase price as they were
exchanged for fully vested options to purchase common stock of the new entity (see Note 2).
The change in the allocations to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets reflect adjustments recorded based
upon the finalization of the Companys asset appraisals for each of the Companys significant locations in the fourth
quarter of 2003.
The change in the allocations to pension and post retirement health benefits reflect adjustments recorded subsequent to
April 5, 2003 based upon the finalization of the Companys actuarial studies for significant pension and post
retirement health benefit liabilities.
The change in the allocation to prepaid and deferred income taxes principally reflects the deferred tax consequences of
the adjustments made to property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and pensions and post-retirement health
benefits discussed above.
The increase in the allocation to goodwill principally reflects the net impact of the changes to property, plant and
equipment, intangible assets, pensions and post-retirement health benefits and prepaid and deferred income taxes and
the $2,132,000 of additional purchase price discussed above. Goodwill associated with the Recapitalization will not be
deductible for federal, state or foreign income tax purposes.
|
The following table shows a comparison of the initial allocation of purchase price reflected in the quarter ended April
5, 2003 and the final allocation of purchase price for the year ended December 31, 2003 allocated to discontinued
operations which were discontinued subsequent to January 9, 2003 (see Note 10): |
|
Initial |
Final |
|
Allocation
|
Allocation
|
|
Fair Value Adjustments: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Inventories | | |
$ | 892,000 |
|
$ | 892,000 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | | |
| 30,429,000 |
|
| 3,026,000 |
|
Intangible assets | | |
| (2,429,000 |
) |
| (18,429,000 |
) |
Prepaid and deferred income taxes | | |
| (12,972,000 |
) |
| 5,450,000 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| (11,513,000 |
) |
| (40,567,000 |
) |
Other | | |
| 90,000 |
|
| 542,000 |
|
|
Total | | |
$ | 4,497,000 |
|
$ | (49,086,000 |
) |
|
The following table presents a summary of the activity in goodwill for continuing operations and discontinued
operations for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9,
2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. Goodwill related to discontinued operations is included in assets
of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. |
|
Continuing |
Discontinued |
|
|
Operations
|
Operations
|
Total
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2000 |
|
|
$ |
302,899 |
|
$ |
279,537 |
|
$ |
582,436 |
|
Amortization of goodwill |
|
|
|
(8,718 |
) |
|
(7,676 |
) |
|
(16,394 |
) |
Purchase accounting adjustments | | |
| (6,551 |
) |
| (380 |
) |
| (6,931 |
) |
Impact of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
72 |
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2001 |
|
|
|
286,396 |
|
|
271,553 |
|
|
557,949 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments | | |
| 426 |
|
| (3,401 |
) |
| (2,975 |
) |
Allocated to subsidiary sold |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
(4,200 |
) |
|
(4,200 |
) |
Impact of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
388 |
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2002 | | |
| 287,164 |
|
| 263,998 |
|
| 551,162 |
|
Impact of foreign currency translation | | |
| 269 |
|
| 74 |
|
| 343 |
|
|
Balance as of January 9, 2003 | | |
| 287,433 |
|
| 264,072 |
|
| 551,505 |
|
Effect of Recapitalization | | |
| 350,807 |
|
| (40,567 |
) |
| 310,240 |
|
Acquisitions during the period from January 10, 2003 to December |
|
|
31, 2003 | | |
| 46,248 |
|
| -- |
|
| 46,248 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments | | |
| (11,979 |
) |
| (4,195 |
) |
| (16,174 |
) |
Impact of foreign currency translation | | |
| 5,554 |
|
| 667 |
|
| 6,221 |
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003 | | |
$ | 678,063 |
|
$ | 219,977 |
|
$ | 898,040 |
|
|
Goodwill
associated with the Recapitalization will not be deductible for income tax purposes.
Approximately $7,300,000 of the goodwill associated with acquisitions during the
period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 will be deductible for income tax
purposes. Purchase accounting adjustments relate principally to final revisions
resulting from the completion of fair value adjustments and adjustments to deferred
income taxes that impact goodwill. |
During
the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company reflected
amortization of purchase price allocated to inventory of approximately $4,600,000
in continuing operations in cost of sales related to inventory acquired as part of
the Recapitalization. No similar amortization was required for such inventory in
2002 under the Companys historical basis of accounting. |
In
connection with both the initial and final allocations of purchase price to property,
plant and equipment acquired as part of the Recapitalization, the Company assigned
new useful lives based upon the initial estimate and then the final remaining useful
lives adopted from the date of the Recapitalization, respectively, in order to
determine depreciation expense for all periods subsequent to the Recapitalization.
For the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company reflected
approximately $8,057,000 of lower depreciation expense in continuing operations in
cost of sales as compared to the Companys historical basis of accounting prior to
the Recapitalization. The lower depreciation expense reflects the favorable impact of
approximately $12,212,000 related to revisions to the remaining useful lives, which
was partially offset by the unfavorable impact of approximately $4,155,000 related to
the increase in property, plant and equipment related to the allocation of purchase
price. Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment acquired as
part of the Recapitalization was recorded based upon the initial allocation of
purchase price and initial estimated useful lives for the period from January 10, 2003
to October 4, 2003 and based upon the final allocation of purchase price and final
useful lives adopted for the period from October 5, 2003 to December 31, 2003.
Depreciation expense would have been approximately $3,633,000 higher for the period
from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 if the final allocation of purchase price
and final remaining useful lives adopted had been used to record depreciation
expense for the period from January 10, 2003 to October 4, 2003, primarily due to the
final remaining useful lives adopted being shorter than the initial estimates,
which was partially offset by the reduction in the final purchase price allocation. |
In
connection with both the initial and final allocations of purchase price to intangible
assets acquired as part of the Recapitalization, the Company assigned new useful
lives based upon the initial estimated and then the final remaining useful lives
adopted from the date of the Recapitalization, respectively, in order to determine
amortization expense for all periods subsequent to the Recapitalization. For the
period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company reflected in continuing
operations approximately $6,325,000 of higher amortization of intangible assets as
compared to the Companys historical basis of accounting prior to the
Recapitalization. The higher amortization reflects the combination of the
unfavorable impact of approximately $1,460,000 related to revisions to the remaining
useful lives adopted and the unfavorable impact of approximately $4,865,000 related
to the increase in intangible assets as a result of the allocation of purchase price.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired as part of the
Recapitalization was recorded based upon the initial allocation of purchase price and
estimated useful lives for the period from January 10, 2003 to October 4, 2003 and
based upon the final allocation of purchase price and final useful lives adopted for
the period from October 5, 2003 to December 31, 2003. Amortization expense would have
been approximately $1,839,000 higher for the period from January 10, 2003 to December
31, 2003 if the final allocation of purchase price and final remaining useful lives
adopted had been used to record amortization expense for the period from January 10,
2003 to October 4, 2003, primarily due to the final remaining useful lives adopted
being shorter than the initial estimates, which was partially offset by the reduction
in the amount of the allocation of purchase price allocated to intangible assets other
than goodwill. |
As
a result of the allocation of purchase price to indebtedness, during the period from
January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company reflected approximately
$5,700,000 of lower interest expense as compared to the Companys historical
basis of accounting prior to the Recapitalization. |
Principles of Consolidation
The
Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and all of
its wholly-owned continuing subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany
accounts and transactions. Certain amounts in the prior years Consolidated
Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. |
Accounting Policies and Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States involves estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of income and expense during the reporting periods. Certain of the Companys
accounting policies require the application of judgment in selecting the appropriate
assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments
are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. The Company periodically evaluates
the judgments and estimates used for its critical accounting policies to ensure
that such judgments and estimates are reasonable for its interim and year-end reporting
requirements. These judgments and estimates are based on the Companys
historical experience, current trends and information available from other sources,
as appropriate. If different conditions result from those assumptions used in the
Companys judgments, the results could be materially different from the Companys
estimates. |
Recognition of Sales and
Related Costs, Incentives and Allowances
The
Company recognizes sales upon the shipment of its products net of applicable
provisions for discounts and allowances. Allowances for cash discounts, volume
rebates and other customer incentive programs, as well as gross customer returns,
among others, are recorded as a reduction of sales at the time of sale based upon
the estimated future outcome. Cash discounts, volume rebates and other customer
incentive programs are based upon certain percentages agreed to with the Companys
various customers, which are typically earned by the customer over an annual period.
The Company records periodic estimates for these amounts based upon the historical
results to date, estimated future results through the end of the contract period and
the contractual provisions of the customer agreements. For calendar year customer
agreements, the Company is able to adjust its periodic estimates to actual amounts
as of December 31 each year based upon the contractual provisions of the customer
agreements. For those customers who have agreements that are not on a calendar year
cycle, the Company records estimates at December 31 consistent with the above
described methodology. Customer returns are recorded on an actual basis throughout
the year and also include an estimate at the end of each reporting period for future
customer returns related to sales recorded prior to the end of the period. The Company
generally estimates customer returns based upon the time lag that historically occurs
between the date of the sale and the date of the return while also factoring in any new
business conditions that might impact the historical analysis such as new product
introduction. The Company also provides for its estimate of warranty, bad debts and
shipping costs at the time of sale. Shipping and warranty costs are included in cost
of products sold. Bad debt provisions are included in selling, general and
administrative expense. The amounts recorded are generally based upon historically
derived percentages while also factoring in any new business conditions that might
impact the historical analysis such as new product introduction for warranty and
bankruptcies of particular customers for bad debts. |
Cash, Investments and
Marketable Securities
Cash
equivalents consist of short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of
three months or less which are readily convertible into cash. |
At
December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company did not have any marketable securities
available for sale. During the fourth quarter of 2002, all marketable securities
available for sale matured and the proceeds were invested in short-term
investments. |
The
Company has classified as restricted in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet certain investments and marketable securities that are not fully available
for use in its operations. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, approximately
$2,346,000 (of which $1,223,000 is included in current assets) and $79,311,000 (of
which $2,808,000 is included in current assets), respectively, of cash,
investments and marketable securities have been pledged as collateral or are held
in pension trusts (including related party amounts) for insurance, employee benefits
and other requirements (see Notes 2 and 8). |
Disclosures About Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class
of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value: |
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents-- The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short
maturity of those instruments. |
|
Investments
- -- The fair value of investments
are based on quoted market prices. The fair value of investments was not materially different from their cost basis at December 31, 2003 or
2002. |
|
Long-Term
Debt--At December 31, 2003, the fair value of the Companys long-term indebtedness was approximately $69,800,000 higher,
before unamortized premium ($17,600,000 higher, before original issue discount, at December 31, 2002), than the amount
on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2003, the carrying value of the Companys 10% Senior
Discount Notes due May 15, 2011 (Senior Discount Notes) was approximately $352,916,000 and will continue to accrete
interest until November 15, 2007, at which time the carrying value of the obligation will be $515,000,000 (see Note 6). |
Inventories
Inventories
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet are valued at the lower of cost or market.
At December 31, 2003 and 2002, approximately $91,099,000 and $78,909,000 of total
inventories, respectively, were valued on the last-in, first-out method (LIFO).
Under the first-in, first-out method (FIFO) of accounting, such inventories
would have been approximately $7,755,000 lower and $840,000 higher at December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively. All other inventories were valued under the FIFO method. In
connection with both LIFO and FIFO inventories, the Company will record provisions, as
appropriate, to write-down obsolete and excess inventory to estimated net realizable
value. The process for evaluating obsolete and excess inventory often requires the
Company to make subjective judgments and estimates concerning future sales levels,
quantities and prices at which such inventory will be able to be sold in the normal
course of business. Accelerating the disposal process or incorrect estimates of future
sales potential may cause the actual results to differ from the estimates at the time
such inventory is disposed or sold. |
Depreciation and
Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is provided on a straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives, which are generally as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
10-35 years |
Machinery and equipment, including leases |
3-15 years |
Leasehold improvements |
term of lease |
Expenditures
for maintenance and repairs are expensed when incurred. Expenditures for renewals and
betterments are capitalized. When assets are sold, or otherwise disposed, the cost
and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the resulting gain or loss is
recognized. |
Purchase
price allocated to the fair value of inventory is amortized over the estimated period
in which the inventory will be sold. |
Intangible Assets and
Goodwill
In
the third quarter of 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), which addresses financial
accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets but does
not apply to goodwill or intangible assets that are not being amortized and certain
other long-lived assets and, as required by the standard, applied this accounting
standard as of January 1, 2001. Adoption of this accounting standard did not result in
any material changes in net earnings from accounting standards previously applied.
Adoption of this standard did result in the accounting for the gain (loss) on the sale
of certain businesses and their related operating results as discontinued operations.
The presentation for all periods presented has been reclassified to conform to the new
standard (see Note 10). |
Subsequent
to June 30, 2001, the Company accounts for acquired goodwill and intangible assets in
accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141).
Prior to July 1, 2001, the Company accounted for acquired goodwill and intangible
assets in accordance with APB No. 16, Business Combinations (APB
No. 16). Purchase accounting required by SFAS No. 141 and APB No. 16 involves
judgment with respect to the valuation of the acquired assets and liabilities in
order to determine the final amount of goodwill. The Company believes that the
estimates that it has used to record prior acquisitions were reasonable and in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 and APB No. 16 (see Note 3). |
On
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS No. 142). This statement applies to goodwill and
intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001, as well as goodwill and intangible
assets previously acquired. Under this statement, goodwill and intangible assets
determined to have an indefinite useful life are no longer amortized, instead these
assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or business
conditions warrant. All other intangible assets will continue to be amortized over
their remaining estimated useful lives and are evaluated for impairment in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did not
result in any material changes to the Companys accounting for intangible assets.
The Company has evaluated the carrying value of goodwill and determined that no
impairment exists and therefore no impairment loss was required to be recorded in the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of adopting SFAS No. 142. |
In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Company has evaluated the realizability of
non-goodwill long-lived assets, which primarily consist of property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets (the SFAS No. 144 Long-Lived Assets) based
on expectations of non-discounted future cash flows for each subsidiary having a
material amount of SFAS No. 144 Long-Lived Assets. If the sum of the expected
non-discounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of all assets
including SFAS No. 144 Long-Lived Assets, the Company would recognize an impairment
loss. The Companys cash flow estimates are based upon historical cash flows, as
well as future projected cash flows received from subsidiary management in
connection with the annual Company wide planning process, and include a terminal
valuation for the applicable subsidiary based upon a multiple of earnings before
interest expense, net, depreciation and amortization expense and income taxes (EBITDA).
The Company estimates the EBITDA multiple by reviewing comparable company
information and other industry data. The Company believes that its procedures for
estimating gross future cash flows, including the terminal valuation, are reasonable
and consistent with current market conditions. Based on its most recent analysis,
the Company believes that no material impairment of SFAS No. 144 Long-Lived Assets
exists at December 31, 2003. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 144 and SFAS No.
142, the Company accounted for the impairment of long-lived assets, including
goodwill, in accordance with the then existing accounting standards and did not result
in any impairment losses in prior years. |
Intangible
assets consist principally of patents, trademarks, customer relationships and
non-compete agreements and are amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted
average estimated useful life of approximately 8.5 years. Amortization of
intangible assets charged to operations amounted to approximately $9,055,000, $67,000,
$2,988,000 and $3,237,000 for period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the
period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003, and the years ended December 31, 2002
and 2001, respectively. The table that follows presents the major components of
intangible assets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002: |
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Gross Carrying |
Accumulated |
Net Intangible |
Remaining |
|
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Assets
|
Useful Lives
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except for Useful Lives) |
|
|
December 31, 2003: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Trademarks | | |
$ | 51,396 |
|
$ | (3,257 |
) |
$ | 48,139 |
|
| 15 |
.0 |
Patents | | |
| 16,908 |
|
| (680 |
) |
| 16,228 |
|
| 16 |
.1 |
Customer relationships | | |
| 29,965 |
|
| (4,883 |
) |
| 25,082 |
|
| 4 |
.6 |
Other |
|
|
|
5,498 |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
5,196 |
|
|
4 |
.7 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,767 |
|
$ |
(9,122 |
) |
$ |
94,645 |
|
|
8 |
.5 |
|
December 31, 2002: | | |
Trademarks | | |
$ | 43,613 |
|
$ | (8,365 |
) |
$ | 35,248 |
|
Patents | | |
| 8,331 |
|
| (1,658 |
) |
| 6,673 |
|
Other | | |
| 12,342 |
|
| (11,058 |
) |
| 1,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,286 |
|
$ |
(21,081 |
) |
$ |
43,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2003, the estimated annual intangible asset amortization
expense for each of the succeeding five years aggregates approximately $54,100,000 as
follows: |
Year Ended |
Annual Amortization |
December 31,
|
Expense
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
(Unaudited) |
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
13,200 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
5,500 |
|
The
Company has classified as goodwill the cost in excess of fair value of the net assets
(including tax attributes) of companies acquired in purchase transactions. Prior to
January 1, 2002, goodwill was amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years through
December 31, 2001. Goodwill amortization related to continuing operations and
discontinued operations was approximately $8,718,000 and $7,676,000, respectively for
2001, as determined under the then applicable accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. See Note 11 for a rollforward of the activity in
goodwill by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. |
The
table that follows presents earnings from continuing operations and net earnings for
the year ended December 31, 2001, as adjusted to reflect the elimination of goodwill
amortization expense and the related income tax impact: |
|
For the Year Ended |
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
Earnings from |
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Operations
|
Net Earnings
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
As reported in the accompanying |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
consolidated statement of operations | | |
$ | 32,800 |
|
$ | 8,000 |
|
Eliminate goodwill amortization expense |
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
16,394 |
|
Eliminate related tax impact |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
(294 |
) |
|
As adjusted |
|
|
$ |
41,400 |
|
$ |
24,100 |
|
|
Pensions and Post
Retirement Health Benefits
The
Company accounts for pensions, including supplemental executive retirement plans,
and post retirement health benefit liabilities under SFAS No. 87 Employers'
Accounting for Pensions (SFAS No. 87) and SFAS No. 106, Employers'
Accounting for Post Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS No. 106).
SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 106 require the estimating of such items as the long-term
average return on plan assets, the discount rate, the rate of compensation increase
and the assumed medical cost inflation rate. Such estimates require a significant
amount of judgment. |
Insurance Liabilities
The
Company records insurance liabilities and related expenses for health, workers
compensation, product and general liability losses and other insurance reserves and
expenses in accordance with either the contractual terms of its policies or, if
self-insured, the total liabilities that are estimable and probable as of the
reporting date. Insurance liabilities are recorded as current liabilities to the
extent they are expected to be paid in the succeeding year with the remaining
requirements classified as long-term liabilities. The accounting for self-insured
plans requires that significant judgments and estimates be made both with respect to
the future liabilities to be paid for known claims and incurred but not reported
claims as of the reporting date. The Company considers historical trends when
determining the appropriate insurance reserves to record in the consolidated
balance sheet for a substantial portion of its workers compensation and general and
product liability losses. In certain cases where partial insurance coverage exists,
the Company must estimate the portion of the liability that will be covered by
existing insurance policies to arrive at the net expected liability to the Company. |
Income Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with SFAS
No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which
requires that the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the
amounts recorded in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and the
amounts included in the Companys federal and state income tax returns be
recognized in the balance sheet. As the Company generally does not file their income
tax returns until well after the closing process for the December 31 financial
statements is complete, the amounts recorded at December 31 reflect estimates of
what the final amounts will be when the actual income tax returns are filed for that
fiscal year. In addition, estimates are often required with respect to, among other
things, the appropriate state income tax rates to use in the various states that the
Company and its subsidiaries are required to file, the potential utilization of
operating and capital loss carry-forwards for both federal and state income tax
purposes and valuation allowances required, if any, for tax assets that may not be
realizable in the future. SFAS No. 109 requires balance sheet classification of
current and long-term deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon the
classification of the underlying asset or liability that gives rise to a temporary
difference (see Note 5). |
Interest Allocation to
Dispositions
The
Company allocates interest to dispositions that qualify as a discontinued operation for
debt instruments which, are entered into specifically and solely with the entity
disposed of and from debt which is settled with proceeds received from the disposition. |
Stock-Based Compensation of
Employees, Officers and Directors
In
the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company adopted the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation in accordance with, SFAS No. 123
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123) and
recorded pre-tax charges of approximately $1,400,000 in selling, general and
administrative expense and $100,000 in earnings from discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the period January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003 related to stock options issued during the period. No stock options
were issued during the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003. The Company had
previously accounted for stock-based employee compensation in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), including related
interpretations, and followed the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123. The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123 using the prospective method of transition in
accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition
and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148). The prospective method under SFAS
No. 148 required the Company to adopt SFAS No. 123 effective January 1, 2003 for all
employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2003. Of the
$1,400,000 total charge, approximately $700,000, $200,000, $300,000 and $200,000
related to the period from January 10, 2003 to April 5, 2003 and the quarters ended
July 5, 2003, October 4, 2003 and December 31, 2003, respectively. In addition,
in the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a $600,000 compensation based
charge related to the sale of certain capital stock. |
During
the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003, the Company had previously
recorded a pre-tax stock-based employee compensation charge of approximately
$4,710,000 (approximately $3,000,000 net of tax) related to the cash settlement and
cancellation of outstanding stock options that were tendered in connection with the
Recapitalization in accordance with the provisions of APB 25. In connection with
the adoption of SFAS No. 123, the compensation charge, net of tax, of approximately
$3,000,000 was reclassified in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 to
be reflected as an equity adjustment to additional paid-in capital in the
accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders investment for the period
from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003. |
The
following tables summarize the Companys common and special common stock option
transactions for stock options issued prior to the Recapitalization and Class A stock
options issued subsequent to the Recapitalization, including options held by the
Management Investors that were exchanged in connection with the Recapitalization.
Options issued prior to the Holdings Reorganization on November 20, 2002 for the
common and special common stock of Nortek were converted to options to purchase
the common and special common stock of Holdings in connection with the Holdings
Reorganization (see Note 7). |
Stock Options Issued:
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Number |
Option Price |
Exercise |
|
Of Shares
|
Per Share
|
Price
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2000 |
|
|
|
2,040,663 |
|
$ |
8.75- |
$33.06 |
$ |
23 |
.39 |
Granted |
|
|
|
33,100 |
|
|
20.25- |
27.65 |
|
24 |
.30 |
Exercised |
|
|
|
(65,954 |
) |
|
8.75- |
22.94 |
|
21 |
.45 |
Canceled |
|
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
21.63- |
27.65 |
|
23 |
.07 |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2001 |
|
|
|
1,983,809 |
|
$ |
8.75- |
$33.06 |
$ |
23 |
.47 |
Granted |
|
|
|
133,300 |
|
|
26.33- |
44.16 |
|
26 |
.44 |
Exercised |
|
|
|
(28,963 |
) |
|
20.44- |
22.94 |
|
21 |
.79 |
Canceled |
|
|
|
(2,600 |
) |
|
21.63- |
22.94 |
|
21 |
.93 |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
2,085,546 |
|
$ |
8.75- |
$44.16 |
$ |
23 |
.69 |
Exercised and tendered in connection with the |
|
|
Recapitalization |
|
|
|
(217,226 |
) |
|
20.25- |
44.16 |
|
24 |
.81 |
|
Options canceled and exchanged for new Class A stock options | | |
in connection with the Recapitalization on January 9, 2003 |
|
|
|
1,868,320 |
|
$ |
8.75- |
$33.06 |
$ |
23 |
.56 |
Granted |
|
|
|
443,266 |
|
|
46.00- |
46.00 |
|
46 |
.00 |
Canceled |
|
|
|
(2,333 |
) |
|
46.00- |
46.00 |
|
46 |
.00 |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
2,309,253 |
|
$ |
10.50- |
$11.00 |
$ |
10 |
.62 |
|
As
of December 31, 2002 and 2001, 1,948,525 and 1,854,411, respectively, of options to
acquire shares of common and special common stock were exercisable. |
As
defined by the stock option plans, all options became fully vested upon the completion
of the Recapitalization on January 9, 2003. Options to purchase 217,226 of common
stock of the Company were exercised and tendered in connection with the
Recapitalization for a cash settlement of approximately $4,700,000. Options to
purchase 1,868,320 shares of common stock and special common stock of the Company, that
were rolled-over by the Management Investors, were exchanged for fully vested stock
options to purchase an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company at
the same price per share (the Rollover Options). Such rolled-over options
will expire on January 9, 2013 (see Note 2). |
In
connection with a dividend of approximately $298,474,000 paid to the Companys
shareholders in the fourth quarter of 2003, option holders of the Rollover Options
received a cash distribution of approximately $41,600,000 (see Note 7), which was
treated as a charge to additional paid-in capital in the accompanying consolidated
statement of stockholders investment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS
No. 123. The distribution to each individual option holder was equal to the number
of shares held multiplied by the lesser of (i) $35 per share or (ii) $46 per share
minus the amount per share the exercise price was reduced. In conjunction with this
shareholder distribution, the Company adjusted the exercise price of all of the
Rollover Options to equal $10.50 per share and all of the other Class A stock options
to equal $11.00 per share, which has been reflected in the above table. |
The
Rollover Options are fully vested and the other Class A common stock options vest
quarterly in equal installments over three years. As of December 31, 2003, 1,977,026
of Class A common stock options were exercisable. The weighted average remaining
contractual life for all Class A stock options is approximately 9 years. As of
December 31, 2003, there was approximately $2,500,000 of remaining unamortized
stock-based employee compensation with respect to the Class A stock options, which
will be amortized on a pro-rata basis over the remaining vesting period for the
respective options. |
In
2003, the Company issued 846,534 of Class B common stock options of which 841,867 remain
outstanding at December 31, 2003 as 4,667 of Class B common stock options were
cancelled during the year. The Class B stock options only vest in the event that
certain performance-based criteria, as defined, are met. The weighted average
remaining contractual life for all Class B stock options is approximately 9 years.
No stockbased employee compensation charges have been recognized for the Class
B common stock options under SFAS No. 123, as it is uncertain when, if ever, these
options will vest. As of December 31, 2003, there was approximately $6,400,000
of unamortized stock-based employee compensation with respect to the Class B stock
options, which will be amortized in the event that it becomes probable that the Class
B options or any portion thereof will vest. |
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of
stock options at the date of grant. The following table summarizes the
weighted-average assumptions for the periods presented. The weighted-average
assumptions for options granted subsequent to January 1, 2003 were used to calculate
the stock-based employee compensation charge of approximately $1,400,000 for the
period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 in connection with the Companys
adoption of SFAS No. 123. As Holdings was no longer a public company during this period,
the weighted-average assumptions reflect the use of the minimum value calculations
permitted under SFAS No. 123 for non-public companies, whereby a volatility
assumption is excluded from the calculation. The weighted-average assumptions
for options granted prior to January 1, 2003 included in the pro forma information
for the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years ended December 31,
2002 and 2001 presented below include a volatility assumption as Holdings and, prior
to the Holdings Reorganization, Norteks common stock was publicly traded as of
the end of these periods. The weighted average assumptions related to earnings (loss)
from continuing operations exclude options issued to employees of Ply Gem, which has
been treated as a discontinued operation for all periods presented. |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
Assumptions for Earnings (Loss) from |
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations: |
Risk-free interest rate |
Between 2.33% |
|
Between 4.29% |
Between 4.33% |
|
and 2.85% |
N/A |
and 4.54% |
and 4.87% |
Expected life |
5 years |
N/A |
5 years |
5 years |
Expected volatility |
N/A |
N/A |
38% |
40% |
Expected dividend yield |
0% |
N/A |
0% |
0% |
Weighted average fair value at grant |
date of options granted |
$8.03 |
N/A |
$10.68 |
$8.54 |
|
Assumptions for Net Earnings (Loss): |
Risk-free interest rate |
Between 2.33% |
|
Between 4.29% |
Between 4.33% |
|
and 2.85% |
N/A |
and 4.54% |
and 4.87% |
Expected life |
5 years |
N/A |
5 years |
5 years |
Expected volatility |
N/A |
N/A |
38% |
40% |
Expected dividend yield |
0% |
N/A |
0% |
0% |
Weighted average fair value at grant |
date of options granted |
$7.93 |
N/A |
$10.67 |
$8.98 |
No
pro-forma information for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 is
required under SFAS No. 148 as all options issued prior to January 1, 2003 were fully
vested as of January 9, 2003 and the consolidated statement of operations for the
period includes the actual stock-based employee compensation for options issued
subsequent to January 1, 2003. |
Pro
forma information for the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 has been determined as if the Company had been
accounting for its employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No.
123 for all options issued prior to January 1, 2003 and subsequent to the initial
effective date of SFAS No. 123. The pro forma stock-based employee compensation
charge for the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 reflects the pro forma
impact of the accelerated vesting associated with the immediate vesting of all
unvested options in connection with the Recapitalization. No historical stock-based
employee compensation is reflected for the period from January 1, 2003 to January
9, 2003 as no options were issued. No historical stock-based employee
compensation is reflected in the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, as all
employee options granted under those plans had an intrinsic value of zero on the date
of grant. The pro forma amounts with respect to earnings (loss) from continuing
operations exclude the pro forma impact of options issued to employees of Ply Gem, which
has been treated as a discontinued operation for all periods presented. |
|
For the Periods |
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations, as reported | | |
$ | (60,900 |
) |
$ | 43,600 |
|
$ | 32,800 |
|
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
expense determined under the fair value method | | |
for awards issued prior to January 1, 2003, | | |
net of related tax effects | | |
| (500 |
) |
| (1,000 |
) |
| (700 |
) |
|
Pro forma (loss) earnings from continuing |
|
|
operations | | |
$ | (61,400 |
) |
$ | 42,600 |
|
$ | 32,100 |
|
|
Net earnings (loss), as reported | | |
$ | (61,900 |
) |
$ | 62,500 |
|
$ | 8,000 |
|
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
expense determined under the fair value method | | |
for awards issued prior to January 1, 2003, | | |
net of related tax effects | | |
| (600 |
) |
| (1,200 |
) |
| (1,000 |
) |
|
Pro forma net (loss) earnings | | |
$ | (62,500 |
) |
$ | 61,300 |
|
$ | 7,000 |
|
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
The
Company provides accruals for all direct costs associated with the estimated
resolution of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that
a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably
estimated. Costs accrued are estimated based upon an analysis of potential results,
assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies and outcomes (see Note
9). |
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive
income (loss) includes net earnings and unrealized gains and losses from currency
translation, marketable securities available for sale and minimum pension liability
adjustments, net of tax attributes. The components of the Companys
comprehensive income (loss) and the effect on earnings for the periods presented
are detailed in the accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders investment. |
The
balances of each classification, net of tax attributes, within accumulated other
comprehensive loss as of the periods presented are as follows: |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Total |
|
|
Gains |
Minimum |
Accumulated |
|
Foreign |
(Losses) on |
Pension |
Other |
|
Currency |
Marketable |
Liability |
Comprehensive |
|
Translation
|
Securities
|
Adjustment
|
Loss
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Balance December 31, 2000 |
|
|
$ | (12,051 |
) |
$ | 19 |
|
$ | (7,335 |
) |
$ | (19,367 |
) |
Change during the period | | |
| (4,444 |
) |
| (91 |
) |
| (15,823 |
) |
| (20,358 |
) |
|
Balance December 31, 2001 | | |
| (16,495 |
) |
| (72 |
) |
| (23,158 |
) |
| (39,725 |
) |
Change during the period | | |
| 5,250 |
|
| (306 |
) |
| (22,701 |
) |
| (17,757 |
) |
|
Balance December 31, 2002 | | |
| (11,245 |
) |
| (378 |
) |
| (45,859 |
) |
| (57,482 |
) |
Change during the period | | |
| 1,096 |
|
| -- |
|
| 18,398 |
|
| 19,494 |
|
|
Balance January 9, 2003 | | |
| (10,149 |
) |
| (378 |
) |
| (27,461 |
) |
| (37,988 |
) |
Effect of the Recapitalization | | |
| 10,149 |
|
| 378 |
|
| 27,461 |
|
| 37,988 |
|
Change during the period | | |
| 19,501 |
|
| -- |
|
| (64 |
) |
| 19,437 |
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003 | | |
$ | 19,501 |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | (64 |
) |
$ | 19,437 |
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation
The
financial statements of subsidiaries outside the United States are generally
measured using the foreign subsidiaries local currency as the functional
currency. The Company translates the assets and liabilities of its foreign
subsidiaries at the exchange rates in effect at year-end. Net sales and expenses are
translated using average exchange rates in effect during the year. Gains and losses
from foreign currency translation are credited or charged to accumulated other
comprehensive loss included in stockholders investment in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. Transaction gains and losses are recorded in selling,
general and administrative expense and have not been material during any of the
periods from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and January 1, 2003 to January 9,
2003 and during any of the years ending December 31, 2002 and 2001. |
Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities
The
Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
amended in 1999 by SFAS No. 137, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities Deferral of the Effective Date of SFAS No. 133 Amendment of
SFAS No. 133 and amended in June 2000 by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for
Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities an amendment to
SFAS No. 133 (combined SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 requires that every
derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts) issued, acquired, or substantially modified after December 31, 1997 be
recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair
value. SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivatives fair value be
recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivatives gains and losses
to offset related results on the hedged item in the income statement, and requires that
a company formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions
that receive hedge accounting. |
Other New Accounting
Pronouncements
SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS No. 143)
addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement
costs. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset
retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a
reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement
costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.
SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2002 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. Adoption of this accounting standard was not material
to the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
SFAS
No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections (SFAS No. 145), was
issued in April 2002 and addresses the reporting of gains and losses resulting from the
extinguishment of debt, accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and rescinds
or amends other existing authoritative pronouncements. SFAS No. 145 requires that
any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt that does not meet the criteria of APB 30
for classification as an extraordinary item shall not be classified as extraordinary
and shall be included in earnings from continuing operations. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003. Adoption of this accounting standard was not
material to the results presented in the consolidated financial statements but did
require reclassification of the Companys $5,500,000 pre tax extraordinary
loss recorded in 2001 to earnings from continuing operations. |
Effective
January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146), which
addresses the accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal
activities, nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3,
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs
to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring) (EITF
94-3) and substantially nullifies EITF Issue No. 88-10, Costs Associated
with Lease Modification or Termination (EITF 88-10). SFAS No. 146
requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be
recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit
cost as defined in EITF 94-3 was recognized at the date of an entitys commitment
to an exit plan. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal
activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146
did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements
(see Note 13). |
In
November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN
45). Along with new disclosure requirements, FIN 45 requires guarantors to
recognize, at the inception of certain guarantees, a liability for the fair value of
the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. This differs from the prior
practice to record a liability only when a loss is probable and reasonably estimable.
The recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective
basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The Company adopted
the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 as of December 31, 2002 and adopted the entire
interpretation on January 1, 2003. The adoption of FIN 45 on January 1, 2003 was
not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
In
January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46).
FIN 46 clarifies the application of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. The consolidation requirements
on FIN 46 apply to the Company immediately for all variable interest entities
created after December 31, 2003 and begin on January 1, 2005 for all variable
interest entities created prior to January 1, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 is not
expected to have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
In
April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 149),
which clarifies the financial accounting and reporting proscribed by SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS
No. 133) for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments
embedded in other contracts. Certain provisions of SFAS No. 149 related to
implementation issues of SFAS No. 133 are already effective and other provisions
related to forward purchases or sales are effective for both existing contracts and
new contracts entered into after June 30, 2003. The Company has previously
adopted SFAS No. 133, including the implementation issues addressed in SFAS No. 149,
and the adoption of the new provisions of SFAS No. 149 on July 1, 2003 did not
have an impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. |
In
May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS No.
150), which addresses the accounting and reporting for the classification and
measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and for all existing financial
instruments beginning in the first interim period after June 15, 2003, except for
mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities, which are
subject to the provisions for the first fiscal period beginning after December 15,
2003. The Company adopted SFAS No. 150 on July 1, 2003. Adoption of this accounting
standard did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
In
December 2003, the FASB issued the revised SFAS No. 132, Employers Disclosures
about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS No. 132) to
require additional disclosures to those in the original SFAS No. 132 about the assets,
obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension
plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The revised SFAS No. 132
provides only for additional disclosures and does not change the accounting for
pension and postretirement plans. The Company has previously adopted SFAS No. 132 and
has provided the required new disclosures of the revised SFAS No. 132 in Note 8. |
2. RECAPITALIZATION
TRANSACTION
On
January 8, 2003, at a special meeting of stockholders of the Company, the
stockholders approved the following amendments to the certificate of incorporation
(the Stockholder Approval), which were required in order to complete the
Recapitalization: |
|
A new class of common stock, Class A Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Nortek Holdings was created
consisting of 19,000,000 authorized shares.
At the time that the amendment to the certificate of incorporation became effective, each share of common
stock, par value $1.00 per share and special common stock, par value $1.00 per share outstanding, was
reclassified into one share of a new class of mandatorily redeemable common stock, Class B Common Stock,
par value $1.00 per share, of Nortek Holdings consisting of 14,000,000 authorized shares.
Class B Common Stock was required to be immediately redeemed for $46 per share in cash upon completion of the
Recapitalization.
The authorized number of shares of Series B Preference Stock, par value $1.00 per share, was increased to 19,000,000
authorized shares.
|
Following
the Stockholder Approval, common stock and special common stock held by the
Management Investors were exchanged for an equal number of newly created shares of
Series B Preference Stock. In addition, certain options to purchase shares of
common and special common stock held by the Management Investors were exchanged for
fully vested options to purchase an equal number of shares of the newly created Class
A Common Stock. The remaining outstanding options, including some held by
Management Investors, were cancelled in exchange for the right to receive a single lump
sum cash payment equal to the product of the number of shares of common stock or special
common stock underlying the option and the amount by which the redemption price
of $46 per share exceeded the per share exercise price of the option. |
On
January 9, 2003, in connection with the Recapitalization, Kelso purchased newly issued
shares of Series B Preference Stock for approximately $355,923,000 and purchased shares
of Series B Preference Stock held by the Management Investors for approximately
$18,077,000. Newly issued Class A Common Stock of approximately $3,262,000 was
purchased by designated third parties. Shares of Series B Preference Stock held by
the Management Investors that were not purchased by Kelso were converted into an
equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock. In addition, Nortek declared and
distributed to the Company a dividend of approximately $120,000,000 and distributed
approximately $27,900,000 for reimbursement of fees and expenses of Kelso, which
were paid out of the Companys unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on
hand and were permissible under the most restrictive covenants with respect to the
indentures of Norteks 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008, 9 1/4% Senior Notes due
2007, 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2007 and 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the
Existing Notes). |
The
Company used the proceeds from the purchase by Kelso and designated third parties
of the newly issued Series B Preference Stock and Class A Common Stock and the
dividend from Nortek to redeem the Companys Class B Common Stock and to cash out
options to purchase common and special common stock totaling approximately
$479,185,000. Kelso also purchased from certain Management Investors 392,978 shares of
Series B Preference Stock for approximately $18,077,000. |
In
connection with the Recapitalization, K Holdings received a bridge financing letter
from a lender for a senior unsecured term loan facility not to exceed $955,000,000
(the Bridge Facility). The Bridge Facility was intended to be used to
fund, if necessary, any change in control offers Nortek might have made in
connection with the Recapitalization. Nortek did not use this Bridge Facility
because the structure of the Recapitalization did not require Nortek to make any
change of control offers. The commitment letter expired on January 31, 2003. As a
result, the Companys consolidated interest expense for the period from
January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 includes approximately $4,100,000 of
interest expense from the amortization of the Bridge Facility commitment fees and
related expenses. |
In
January 2003, the Company filed for the deregistration of its shares of common and
special common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys
shares of common and special common stock are no longer publicly traded. The
Company will continue to file periodic reports with the SEC as required by the
respective indentures of Norteks Existing Notes. |
Under
the terms of one of Norteks supplemental executive retirement plans (SERP),
Nortek was required to make one-time cash payments to participants in such plan
in satisfaction of obligations under that plan when the Recapitalization was
completed. Accordingly, Nortek made a distribution of approximately $75,100,000
to the participants in the plan from funds included in the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2002 and classified in long-term
assets in restricted investments and marketable securities held by pension trusts
and transferred to one of the participants a life insurance policy with approximately
$10,300,000 of cash surrender value to satisfy a portion of the SERPs obligation
to such participants obligation upon the Stockholder Approval. The
termination and settlement of the obligation of this SERP resulted in a curtailment
loss on January 9, 2003 (see Notes 8 and 14). |
The
total amount of transaction fees and related costs incurred by Nortek and
Kelso associated with the Recapitalization was approximately $47,300,000,
including the $27,900,000 noted above, of which approximately $10,500,000 of
advisory fees and expenses was paid to Kelso & Company L.P. A portion of these fees
and expenses was recorded by Nortek in selling, general and administrative expense,
since they were obligations of Nortek prior to the Recapitalization. Approximately
$12,800,000 was recorded as expense on January 9, 2003 since these fees and expenses
became obligations of Nortek upon consummation of the Recapitalization (see Note
14). Approximately $6,600,000 of expense was previously recorded by Nortek in the year
ended December 31, 2002. |
The
following reflects the unaudited pro forma effect of the Recapitalization on
continuing operations for the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the
year ended December 31, 2002: |
|
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma |
|
For the Period |
For the |
|
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Year Ended |
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
$ |
1,384,100 |
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
123,100 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
$ |
(3,400 |
) |
$ |
46,100 |
|
The
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated summary of operations for the period from
January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 presented above has been prepared by adjusting
historical amounts for the period to give effect to the Recapitalization as if it
had occurred on January 1, 2003. The pro forma adjustments to the historical
results of operations for the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003
include the pro forma impact of the Pushdown Accounting for such period and the
elimination of approximately $83,000,000 of expenses and charges of the
Recapitalization recorded during such period as the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated summary of operations assumes that the Recapitalization occurred on
January 1, 2003 (see Note 1). The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
summary of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 presented above has been
prepared by adjusting historical amounts for the year to give effect to the
Recapitalization as if it occurred January 1, 2002. |
3. ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions
are accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, have been included in the Company's
consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date. Purchase price
allocations are subject to refinement until all pertinent information regarding the
acquisitions is obtained (see Note 2). |
On
January 17, 2003, the Company acquired Elan Home Systems L.L.C. (Elan),
a manufacturer and seller of consumer electronic equipment that controls whole-house
entertainment, communication and automation systems for new residential construction
and retrofit markets. For the year ended December 31, 2002, Elan reported net sales
of approximately $21,300,000 (unaudited). |
On
July 11, 2003, the Company acquired SpeakerCraft, Inc. (SPC), a leading
designer and supplier of architectural loudspeakers and audio products used in
residential custom applications. For the year ended December 31, 2002, SPC reported
net sales of approximately $34,800,000 (unaudited). |
Pro
forma results related to the acquisitions of Elan and SPC have not been presented as
the effect is not material. Operating earnings and depreciation and amortization
expense for these acquisitions from January 1, 2003 to the date of their acquisition
were approximately $4,600,000 (unaudited) and $200,000 (unaudited), respectively. |
On
June 15, 2001, the Company acquired Senior Air Systems ("SAS") from a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Senior Plc. The acquired company is located in
Stoke-on-Trent, England and manufactures and sells air conditioning equipment. |
4. CASH FLOWS
Interest
paid was $91,991,000, $95,352,000 and $102,406,000 for the period from January 10,
2003 to December 31, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. There was no interest paid for the period from January 1, 2003 to
January 9, 2003. |
The
fair value of the assets of the businesses acquired was approximately $95,000,000 and
$1,950,000 in the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and the year
ended December 31, 2001, respectively. Liabilities assumed or created from
businesses acquired were approximately $17,184,000 and $50,000 in the period from
January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and the year ended December 31, 2001,
respectively. Net cash paid for acquisitions was approximately $76,000,000 and
$1,900,000 in the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and the year ended
December 31, 2001, respectively. The Company had no acquisitions during the
period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 or in 2002. |
Significant
non-cash financing and investing activities excluded from the accompanying consolidated
statement of cash flows include capitalized lease additions of approximately
$7,589,000 in the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and a decline of
approximately $306,000 and $91,000 in the fair market value of marketable
securities available for sale for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. There were no declines in the fair market value of marketable
securities available for sale for the periods from January 10, 2003 to December 31,
2003 and from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003. |
5. INCOME TAXES
The
following is a summary of the components of earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before provision (benefit) for income taxes: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Domestic |
|
|
$ |
87,900 |
|
$ |
(82,300 |
) |
$ |
54,250 |
|
$ |
48,300 |
|
Foreign | | |
| 15,400 |
|
| (400 |
) |
| 18,850 |
|
| 12,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,300 |
|
$ |
(82,700 |
) |
$ |
73,100 |
|
$ |
60,600 |
|
|
The
following is a summary of the provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing
operations included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Federal income taxes |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current |
|
|
$ |
34,100 |
|
$ |
(27,800 |
) |
$ |
21,500 |
|
$ |
23,000 |
|
Deferred | | |
| (4,800 |
) |
| 5,900 |
|
| (200 |
) |
| (2,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
29,300 |
|
|
(21,900 |
) |
|
21,300 |
|
|
20,200 |
|
Foreign | | |
| 8,700 |
|
| 100 |
|
| 6,800 |
|
| 6,800 |
|
State | | |
| 3,300 |
|
| -- |
|
| 1,400 |
|
| 800 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,300 |
|
$ | (21,800 |
) |
$ | 29,500 |
|
$ | 27,800 |
|
|
Income
tax payments, net of refunds, were approximately $11,690,000, $281,000, $49,879,000 and
$4,500,000 in the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the period from
January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. |
Income
tax benefits of approximately $14,600,000 related to a cash distribution of
approximately $41,600,000 to option holders of Rollover Options in the period from
January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and were reflected as a reduction of goodwill.
Income tax benefits of approximately $1,710,000, related to the settlement of certain
stock options, were reflected as an equity adjustment to additional paid-in-capital in
the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003. |
The
table that follows reconciles the federal statutory income tax rate of continuing
operations to the effective tax rate of such earnings of approximately 40.0%, 26.4%,
40.4% and 45.9% in the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the period
from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2002
and 2001, respectively. |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations at the federal statutory rate |
|
|
$ |
36,155 |
|
$ | (28,945 |
) |
$ | 25,585 |
|
$ | 21,210 |
|
|
Net change from statutory rate: | | |
Amortization of goodwill not deductible for income | | |
tax purposes | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 2,991 |
|
State income tax provision, net of federal income |
|
|
tax effect | | |
| 2,145 |
|
| -- |
|
| 910 |
|
| 520 |
|
Non-deductible expenses, net | | |
| (311 |
) |
| 4,888 |
|
| 2,113 |
|
| 1,069 |
|
Tax effect resulting from foreign activities | | |
| 3,286 |
|
| 242 |
|
| 545 |
|
| 1,256 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
25 |
|
| 2,015 |
|
| 347 |
|
| 754 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,300 |
|
$ | (21,800 |
) |
$ | 29,500 |
|
$ | 27,800 |
|
|
Effective tax rate %:
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations at the federal statutory rate | | |
| 35 |
.0% |
| (35 |
.0)% |
| 35 |
.0% |
| 35 |
.0% |
|
Net change from statutory rate: | | |
Amortization of goodwill not deductible for income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purposes | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 4 |
.9 |
State income tax provision, net of federal income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect |
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
| -- |
|
| 1 |
.2 |
| 0 |
.9 |
Non-deductible expenses, net | | |
| (0 |
.3) |
| 5 |
.9 |
| 2 |
.9 |
| 1 |
.8 |
Tax effect resulting from foreign activities |
|
|
|
3 |
.2 |
| 0 |
.3 |
| 0 |
.7 |
| 2 |
.1 |
Other, net | | |
| -- |
|
| 2 |
.4 |
| 0 |
.6 |
| 1 |
.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
.0% |
| (26 |
.4)% |
| 40 |
.4% |
| 45 |
.9% |
|
The
tax effect of temporary differences which give rise to significant portions of
deferred income tax assets and liabilities for continuing operations as of December 31,
2003 and December 31, 2002 are as follows: |
|
December 31,
|
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Prepaid Income Tax Assets (classified current) |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Arising From: | | |
Accounts receivable | | |
$ | 1,616 |
|
$ | 1,738 |
|
Inventories | | |
| (1,709 |
) |
| 400 |
|
Insurance reserves | | |
| 6,525 |
|
| 6,430 |
|
Warranty accruals | | |
| 4,239 |
|
| 4,287 |
|
Other reserves and assets, net | | |
| 7,155 |
|
| 3,109 |
|
|
| | |
$ | 17,826 |
|
$ | 15,964 |
|
|
|
Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities) | | |
(classified non-current) | | |
Arising From: | | |
Property and equipment, net | | |
$ | (33,591 |
) |
$ | (22,544 |
) |
Intangible assets, net | | |
| (32,127 |
) |
| (13,890 |
) |
Pension and other benefit accruals | | |
| 18,312 |
|
| 40,046 |
|
Insurance reserves | | |
| 6,073 |
|
| 4,415 |
|
Warranty accruals | | |
| 5,006 |
|
| 4,148 |
|
Capital loss carryforward / net loss carryforward | | |
| 3,174 |
|
| 3,549 |
|
Valuation allowances | | |
| (5,411 |
) |
| (2,904 |
) |
Deferred debt expense / debt premium | | |
| 11,822 |
|
| -- |
|
Other reserves and assets, net |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
(2,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(21,461 |
) |
$ | 9,882 |
|
|
The
Company has established valuation allowances related to certain reserves and
foreign net operating loss carry-forwards. The Company has not provided United
States income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on un-remitted foreign earnings,
with the exception of its Hong Kong subsidiary, as they are considered permanently
invested. In the fourth quarter of 2002, cumulative earnings of the Companys
Hong Kong subsidiary were permanently invested which resulted in a reduction in the
tax provision of approximately $2,000,000 for previously provided United States
income taxes no longer required. In addition, the Company has approximately
$8,500,000 of foreign net operating loss carry-forwards that if utilized would
offset future foreign tax payments. |
Included
in the valuation allowances of $5,411,000 at December 31, 2003 are valuation
allowances of approximately $3,963,000 which will reduce goodwill in the future
should the tax assets they relate to be realized, as these tax assets existed at the
date of the Recapitalization. |
6. NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OBLIGATIONS PAYABLE
Short-term
bank obligations for continuing operations at December 31, 2003 and 2002 consist of the
following: |
|
December 31,
|
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Secured lines of credit and bank advances of the |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Company's European subsidiaries | | |
$ | 8,120 |
|
$ | 3,338 |
|
|
These
short-term bank obligations are secured by approximately $34,165,000 of accounts
receivable, inventory and other assets, and have a weighted average interest rate of
approximately 2.52% at December 31, 2003. |
Notes,
mortgage notes and obligations payable for continuing operations, included in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003 and 2002, consist of the
following: |
|
December 31,
|
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 ("8 7/8% Notes"), including unamortized |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
premium of $2,698,000 and net of original issue discount of $501,000 | | |
$ | 212,698 |
|
$ | 209,499 |
|
9 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007 ("9 1/4% Notes"), including unamortized | | |
premium of $3,136,000 and net of original issue discount of $541,000 | | |
| 178,136 |
|
| 174,459 |
|
9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2007 ("9 1/8% Notes"), including unamortized |
|
|
premium of $4,456,000 and net of original issue discount of $1,450,000 | | |
| 314,456 |
|
| 308,550 |
|
9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 ("9 7/8% Notes"), including | | |
unamortized premium of $577,000 and net of original issue discount of $2,461,000 | | |
| 250,577 |
|
| 247,539 |
|
10% Senior Discount Notes due 2011 ("Senior Discount Notes"), |
|
|
net of unamortized discount of $162,084,000 |
|
|
|
352,916 |
|
|
-- |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Mortgage notes payable | | |
| 1,647 |
|
| 2,122 |
|
Other | | |
| 21,425 |
|
| 13,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,331,855 |
|
| 956,054 |
|
Less amounts included in current liabilities | | |
| 7,229 |
|
| 2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,324,626 |
|
$ | 953,846 |
|
|
On
November 24, 2003, the Company completed the sale of $515,000,000 aggregate
principal amount at maturity ($349,400,000 gross proceeds) of its 10% Senior Discount
Notes due May 15, 2011 (Senior Discount Notes). The Notes, which are
structurally subordinate to all debt and liabilities of the Companys
subsidiaries, were issued and sold in a private Rule 144A offering to institutional
investors. The net proceeds of the offering were used to pay a dividend of
approximately $298,474,000 to holders of the Companys capital stock and
approximately $41,000,000 of these proceeds were used by the Company to purchase
additional capital stock of Nortek. Nortek used these proceeds to fund the majority
of a cash distribution of approximately $41,600,000 to option holders of the Rollover
Options in the fourth quarter of 2003 (see Note 1). The accreted value of the 10%
Senior Discount Notes will increase from the date of issuance at a rate of 10% per
annum compounded semi-annually such that the accreted value will equal the
principal amount of $515,000,000 on November 15, 2007. No cash interest will
accrue on the 10% Senior Discount Notes prior to November 15, 2007 and, thereafter,
cash interest will accrue at 10% per annum payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15
and November 15 of each year. The Senior Discount Notes are unsecured obligations of
the Company, which mature on May 15, 2011, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at
the redemption prices as defined in the indenture governing the Senior Discount Notes
(the Indenture). The Indenture contains covenants that limit the
Companys ability to engage in certain transactions, including incurring
additional indebtedness and paying dividends or distributions. The terms of the Senior
Discount Notes require the Company to register notes having substantially identical
terms (the Holdings Exchange Notes) with the SEC as part of an offer to
exchange freely tradable Holdings Exchange Notes for the Senior Discount Notes
(the Holdings Exchange). In the event the Company does not complete the
Holdings Exchange in accordance with the timing requirements outlined in the
Indenture, the Company may be required to pay a higher interest rate. The Company
expects to complete the Holdings Exchange within the required time period. Under
certain limited circumstances, Nortek may be required in the future to guarantee
the Senior Discount Notes on a senior subordinated basis. This requirement will
not apply if the terms of any of Norteks senior indebtedness restricts the
issuance of such guarantee. Norteks Senior Secured Credit Facility does not
permit such a guarantee. In addition the issuance of such a guarantee by Nortek
would constitute a restricted payment under the terms of Norteks indentures. |
Nortek
has a $175,000,000 Senior Secured Credit Facility, as amended, (the Senior
Secured Credit Facility), which is syndicated among several banks. The Senior
Secured Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of Norteks accounts
receivable and inventory, as well as certain intellectual property rights, and, as
amended, permits borrowings up to the lesser of $175,000,000 or the total of 85% of
eligible accounts receivable, as defined, and 50% of eligible inventory, as
defined. The outstanding principal balances under the Senior Secured Credit Facility
accrue interest at the Companys option at either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from
2.0% to 2.5% or the banks prime rate plus a margin ranging from 0.5% to 1.0%
depending upon the excess available borrowing base, as defined, and the timing of
the borrowing as the margin rates will be adjusted quarterly. In addition, Nortek
pays an unused line fee of between 0.375% and 0.5% on the excess available
borrowing capacity, as defined. The Senior Secured Credit Facility includes
customary limitations and covenants, but does not require Nortek to maintain any
financial covenant unless the excess available borrowing base, as defined, is less
than $30,000,000 in which case Nortek would be required to maintain, on a trailing
four quarter basis, a minimum level of $155,000,000 of earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as defined. At December 31, 2003 there were no
outstanding borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. |
The
indentures and other agreements governing Norteks and its subsidiaries indebtedness
(including the indentures for the 8 7/8% Notes, the 9 1/8% Notes and the 9 1/4% Notes
(collectively, the Senior Notes), the 9 7/8% Notes, the Senior Secured
Credit Facility, the Companys Senior Discount Notes and in 2004, Norteks
Senior Floating Rate Notes) contain restrictive financial and operating covenants
including covenants that restrict, among other things, the payment of cash dividends,
repurchase of the Companys capital stock and the making of certain other
restricted payments, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the making of certain
investments, mergers, consolidations and sale of assets (all as defined in the
indentures and other agreements). Upon certain asset sales (as defined in the
indentures), the Company will be required to offer to purchase, at 100% principal
amount plus accrued interest to the date of purchase, Senior Notes in a principal
amount equal to any net cash proceeds (as defined in the indentures) that are not
invested in properties and assets used primarily in the same or related business to
those owned and operated by the Company at the issue date of the Senior Notes or at
the date of such asset sale and such net cash proceeds were not applied to permanently
reduce Senior Indebtedness (as defined in the indentures). |
At
March 26, 2004, approximately $34,300,000 was available for the payment of cash
dividends, stock purchases or other restricted payments by the Company as defined
under the terms of the Company's most restrictive indenture based on the redemption
and refinancing of certain of the Norteks Notes (see Notes 7 and 16).
Restricted payments to Holdings from Nortek are limited by the amount of cash
available for payment under the terms of Norteks most restrictive indenture
which was approximately $91,100,000 at March 26, 2004. |
Mortgage
notes payable of approximately $1,647,000 outstanding at December 31, 2003 include
various mortgage notes and other related indebtedness payable in installments
through 2009. These notes bear interest at rates ranging from approximately 3.25% to
6.25% and are collateralized by property and equipment with an aggregate net book value
of approximately $6,847,000 at December 31, 2003. |
Other
obligations of approximately $21,425,000 outstanding at December 31, 2003 include
borrowings relating to equipment purchases, notes payable issued for acquisitions
and other borrowings bearing interest at rates primarily ranging 3.25% to 10.5% and
maturing at various dates through 2018. Approximately $13,700,000 of such
indebtedness is collateralized by property and equipment with an aggregate net
book value of approximately $14,039,000 at December 31, 2003. |
The
table that follows is a summary of maturities of all of the Companys debt
obligations, excluding unamortized debt premium of approximately $10,867,000 and
the remaining approximately $162,084,000 to be accreted on the Senior Discount
Notes, due after December 31, 2004: |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
2,745,000 |
|
2006 | | |
| 1,331,000 |
|
2007 | | |
| 485,873,000 |
|
2008 | | |
| 210,934,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
774,960,000 |
|
As
of December 31, 2003, approximately $6,900,000 of letters of credit had been issued
as additional security for certain of the Company's insurance programs. |
A
substantial portion of Norteks fixed rate debt was called for redemption or
refinanced with variable rate debt in the first quarter of 2004. The above table of
maturities does not reflect the effect of these subsequent events (see Note 16). |
7. COMMON STOCK, SPECIAL COMMON STOCK, PREFERENCE STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION
In
connection with the Holdings Reorganization on November 20, 2002, Nortek became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company as each outstanding share of capital stock of
Nortek was converted into an identical share of capital stock of the Company with
the Company receiving 100 shares of Norteks common stock. As a result
of the Holdings Reorganization, Norteks previously outstanding common stock
and treasury stock balances were reclassified to additional paid-in capital to
reflect the Companys new capital structure as shown in the accompanying
consolidated statement of stockholders investment for the year ended December 31,
2002. |
On
January 9, 2003, Nortek declared and distributed to the Company a cash dividend of
approximately $120,000,000 and distributed approximately $27,900,000 for
reimbursement of fees and expenses of Kelso as contemplated by the
Recapitalization (see Note 2). |
Prior
to the Holdings Reorganization, each share of Norteks special common stock had 10
votes on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote, except that the holders of
common stock, voting separately as a class, had the right to elect 25% of the
directors to be elected at a meeting, with the remaining 75% being elected by the
combined vote of both classes. Shares of Norteks special common stock were
generally non-transferable, but were freely convertible on a share-for-share basis
into shares of Norteks common stock. |
Prior
to the Holdings Reorganization, Nortek had a shareholder rights plan which
expired March 31, 2006. Each shareholder right entitled shareholders to buy 1/100
of a share of a new series of preference stock of Nortek at an exercise price of $72
per share, subject to adjustments for stock dividends, splits and similar events.
The rights, which were never exercisable, were attached to each share of Norteks
common stock. The Company assumed the shareholder rights plan in connection with
the Holdings Reorganization. |
Prior
to the Holdings Reorganization, Nortek had several Equity and Cash Incentive Plans,
which provided for the granting of options and other awards to certain officers,
employees and non-employee directors of Nortek. Nortek also had a cash incentive
program for certain key employees under the 1999 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan and
the 1999 Equity Performance Plan based on the performance of Norteks stock
price. During 2002, approximately $4,400,000 was paid to the participants in the
plan under this cash incentive program and is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2002. No amounts were required to be paid under the cash
incentive program in prior years. Options that were granted under the Equity and Cash
Incentive Plans vested over periods ranging up to five years and expired ten years from
the date of grant. As of the date of the Holdings Reorganization, the Company
assumed and was assigned each of the plans and Nortek no longer has any stock-based
compensation programs for the granting of options or other awards. Certain
officers, employees, consultants and directors of Nortek and its subsidiaries,
however, are recipients of stock option awards in the stock of the Company. See Note 1,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for a further discussion related to
stock options. |
As
of December 31, 2002, the Company had 40,000,000 authorized shares of common stock with
10,502,627 shares issued and outstanding and 5,000,000 authorized shares of special
common stock with 501,224 shares issued and outstanding. In connection with the
Holdings Reorganization, Nortek retired all treasury shares held by Nortek, which
consisted of 8,377,968 shares of common stock and 290,136 shares of special common
stock. The retirement of Norteks treasury shares was recorded as a reduction
to Norteks common stock and special common stock for the par value of the
retired shares with the remaining balance recorded as a reduction to additional
paid-in capital. The net outstanding Nortek shares of common and special common
stock, after the retirement of the respective treasury shares, were then converted to
an equal number of outstanding shares of Holdings' common and special common stock
as of the date of the Holdings Reorganization. The impact of the retirement of
Nortek's treasury shares and the conversion of Nortek common and special common
stock to Holdings common and special common stock is included in the accompanying
consolidated statement of stockholders investment for the year ended December 31,
2002. |
The
Companys Preference Stock is convertible at any time subsequent to January 9,
2004 into one full share of Class A Common Stock. Upon occurrence of certain events,
the preference stock can automatically be converted into Class A Common Stock. The
preference stock does not provide for distributions to shareholders and has a
liquidation preference of $0.01 per share. In addition to the election of directors,
the Preference Stock has the following rights with the consent of at least the
majority of the outstanding shares; i) amend the certificate of incorporation of
Nortek to modify the powers, preferences or special rights of the holders of the
Series B Preference Stock, ii) authorize or issue any series of capital stock
ranking senior to or on parity with the Series B Preference Stock as to either
payments of dividends or rights on liquidation, iii) material transactions in excess of
$50,000,000, iv) incurrence of indebtedness outside the ordinary course of business,
v) certain capital expenditures, vi) agreements and arrangements with members of
senior management of Nortek, vii) creation, issuance, grant, delivery or sale of
equity securities, including warrants and options, other than under the 2002 Stock
Option Plan and other agreements and arrangements in existence on or prior to the
date of the completion of the Recapitalization, viii) legal settlements in excess
of $25,000,000 and ix) any other significant matters involving the Company. |
8. PENSION, PROFIT SHARING AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The
Company and its subsidiaries have various pension, supplemental retirement plans
for certain officers, profit sharing and other post retirement benefit plans
requiring contributions to qualified trusts and union administered funds. |
Pension
and profit sharing expense charged to operations aggregated approximately
$14,400,000 for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, $950,000 for
the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003, $19,300,000 in 2002 and
$14,900,000 in 2001. The Companys policy is to generally fund currently the
maximum allowable annual contribution of its various qualified defined benefit
plans. In 2004, the Company expects to contribute approximately $7,600,000 to its
defined benefit pension plans. |
The
Company uses a September 30 measurement date for its plans. The table that follows
provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status of
the plans in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003 and
2002: |
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Benefit obligation at October 1, | | |
$ | 238,910 |
|
$ | 187,478 |
|
Service cost | | |
| 2,035 |
|
| 2,833 |
|
Interest cost | | |
| 9,655 |
|
| 12,399 |
|
Plan participant contributions | | |
| 342 |
|
| 446 |
|
Amendments | | |
| 690 |
|
| 302 |
|
Actuarial loss due to exchange rate | | |
| 2,930 |
|
| 2,491 |
|
Actuarial (gain) loss excluding assumption changes | | |
| (2,460 |
) |
| 30,822 |
|
Actuarial loss due to assumption changes | | |
| 2,692 |
|
| 15,703 |
|
Actuarial loss due to Recapitalization | | |
| 1,548 |
|
| -- |
|
Benefits and expenses paid | | |
| (94,643 |
) |
| (13,564 |
) |
|
Benefit obligation at September 30, | | |
$ | 161,699 |
|
$ | 238,910 |
|
|
|
Change in plan assets: | | |
Fair value of plan assets at October 1, | | |
$ | 96,930 |
|
$ | 104,583 |
|
Actual return (loss) on plan assets | | |
| 15,385 |
|
| (3,624 |
) |
Actuarial gain due to exchange rate | | |
| 1,867 |
|
| 1,676 |
|
Employer contribution | | |
| 88,671 |
|
| 7,413 |
|
Plan participant contributions | | |
| 342 |
|
| 446 |
|
Benefits and expenses paid | | |
| (94,643 |
) |
| (13,564 |
) |
|
Fair value of plan assets at September 30, | | |
$ | 108,552 |
|
$ | 96,930 |
|
|
|
Funded status and statement of financial position: | | |
Fair value of plan assets at September 30, | | |
$ | 108,552 |
|
$ | 96,930 |
|
Benefit obligation at September 30, | | |
| (161,699 |
) |
| (238,910 |
) |
|
Funded status | | |
| (53,147 |
) |
| (141,980 |
) |
Amount contributed during fourth quarter | | |
| 390 |
|
| 66 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss | | |
| (3,502 |
) |
| 88,645 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost | | |
| 378 |
|
| 22,914 |
|
|
Accrued benefit cost | | |
$ | (55,881 |
) |
$ | (30,355 |
) |
|
Amount recognized in the statement of financial position consists of: | | |
Accrued benefit liabilities | | |
$ | (55,952 |
) |
$ | (111,531 |
) |
Intangible pension asset | | |
| -- |
|
| 15,981 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss before tax benefit | | |
| 71 |
|
| 65,195 |
|
|
Accrued benefit cost | | |
$ | (55,881 |
) |
$ | (30,355 |
) |
|
The
projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan
assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets were approximately $161,699,000, $155,004,000 and $108,552,000,
respectively, as of December 31, 2003 and $238,910,000, $208,470,000 and $96,930,000,
respectively, as of December 31, 2002. |
As
a result of the Recapitalization, purchase accounting adjustments were made for all
defined benefit plans as of the January 9, 2003 transaction date. The purchase
accounting adjustments reflect the immediate recognition of all unrecognized
actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs as well as the reversal of the
accumulated other comprehensive loss before tax benefit and the intangible pension
asset. The actuarial loss excluding assumption changes decreased approximately
$33,282,000 between December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003 primarily due to the
termination of one of Norteks supplemental executive retirement plans as part
of the Recapitalization as discussed below. |
Plan
assets primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, common stock (including
283,063 shares of the Companys common stock and special common stock with a fair
market value of approximately $12,248,000 at September 30, 2002. There were no
shares of the Companys common stock held in plan assets at September 30,
2003.), U.S. Government securities, corporate debt and mutual funds, as well as
other investments, and include certain commingled funds. At December 31, 2003 and
2002, the Company has recorded as long-term restricted investments and marketable
securities held by pension trusts (including related party amounts), in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet, approximately $1,123,000 and $76,500,000,
respectively, which have been contributed to trusts. These assets are not included in
the amount of fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 but are
available to fund certain of the benefit obligations included in the table above
relating to certain supplemental retirement plans, and in the period from January
1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 were used to fund the payment required upon the
termination of one of Norteks supplemental executive retirement plans, and
were the primary reason for the increase in employer contributions and benefits paid
in the above table. Under the terms of one of Norteks supplemental executive
retirement plans, Nortek was required to make one-time distributions to participants
in such plan in satisfaction of obligations under that plan upon a change of control,
as defined. Accordingly, upon completion of the Recapitalization, this plan was
terminated and Nortek made distributions of approximately $75,100,000 to the
participants in the plan and transferred to one of the participants a life insurance
policy with approximately $10,300,000 of cash surrender value to satisfy a portion of
such participants obligation. Assets of the related pension trust were
used to pay the amounts due to plan participants, and these amounts are included
in benefits and expenses paid and employer contributions in the above table. As a
result of this plan termination and settlement of participant benefit obligations, the
Company recorded in January 2003 a curtailment loss of approximately $65,800,000.
During 2001 and 2000, this pension trust loaned funds to certain officers of the
Company who had fully vested retirement benefits in such plans. At December 31,
2002, approximately $34,622,000 of notes receivable from these officers are included in
restricted investments and marketable securities held by pension trusts in the Companys
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The notes receivable from these officers
were repaid in full on January 9, 2003 in connection with the Recapitalization. |
The
weighted average rate assumptions used in determining pension, supplemental
retirement plans and post retirement costs and the projected benefit obligation are as
follows: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
Discount rate for projected benefit obligation |
|
|
|
6 |
.00% |
|
6 |
.25% |
|
6 |
.25% |
|
7 |
.00% |
Discount rate for pension costs | | |
| 6 |
.25% |
| 6 |
.25% |
| 7 |
.00% |
| 7 |
.75% |
Expected long-term average return on plan assets | | |
| 7 |
.75% |
| 7 |
.75% |
| 8 |
.50% |
| 8 |
.50% |
Rate of compensation increase | | |
| 5 |
.00% |
| 5 |
.00% |
| 5 |
.00% |
| 5 |
.00% |
The
Companys net periodic benefit cost for its defined benefit plans for the periods
presented consist of the following components: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
$ |
2,833 |
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
Interest cost | | |
| 9,270 |
|
| 385 |
|
| 12,399 |
|
| 11,621 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | | |
| (7,438 |
) |
| (184 |
) |
| (8,531 |
) |
| (10,046 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost | | |
| 210 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 2,860 |
|
| 1,419 |
|
Recognized actuarial loss | | |
| 29 |
|
| 210 |
|
| 1,828 |
|
| 1,471 |
|
Curtailment loss | | |
| 123 |
|
| 65,766 |
|
| -- |
|
| 1,921 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost | | |
$ | 4,149 |
|
$ | 66,327 |
|
$ | 11,389 |
|
$ | 8,680 |
|
|
The
Companys pension plan weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2003
and 2002, by asset category are as follows: |
|
Plan Assets at December 31, |
Asset Category
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
| 3 |
.4% |
| 4 |
.4% |
Equity securities | | |
| 56 |
.9 |
| 64 |
.9 |
Fixed income securities | | |
| 39 |
.2 |
| 30 |
.2 |
Other | | |
| 0 |
.5 |
| 0 |
.5 |
|
| | |
| 100 |
.0% |
| 100 |
.0% |
|
The
Companys domestic qualified defined benefit plans assets are invested to
maximize returns without undue exposure to risk. The investment objectives are also to
produce a total return exceeding the median of a universe of portfolios with similar
average asset allocation and investment style objectives, and to earn a return, net
of fees, greater or equal to the long-term rate of return used by the Company in
determining pension expense. |
Risk
is controlled by maintaining a portfolio of assets that is diversified across a
variety of asset classes, investment styles and investment managers. The plans asset
allocation policies are consistent with the established investment objectives and
risk tolerances. The asset allocation policies are developed by examining the
historical relationships of risk and return among asset classes, and are designed to
provide the highest probability of meeting or exceeding the return objectives at
the lowest possible risk. For 2004, the target allocation is 57% for equity
securities, 41% for fixed income securities and 2% for cash. |
The
table that follows provides a reconciliation of the benefit obligations, plan
assets and funded status of the Companys post retirement health benefit plans
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003 and 2002: |
|
Non-pension |
|
Post Retirement |
|
Health Benefits
|
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Benefit obligation at October 1, | | |
$ | 40,174 |
|
$ | 26,257 |
|
Service cost | | |
| 994 |
|
| 352 |
|
Interest cost | | |
| 2,237 |
|
| 2,148 |
|
Plan participant contributions | | |
| 134 |
|
| 129 |
|
Amendments | | |
| (1,857 |
) |
| 2,686 |
|
Actuarial loss excluding assumption changes | | |
| (3,068 |
) |
| 3,735 |
|
Actuarial loss due to assumption changes | | |
| 4,520 |
|
| 6,417 |
|
Actuarial gain due to Recapitalization | | |
| (33 |
) |
| -- |
|
Benefits and expenses paid | | |
| (1,609 |
) |
| (1,550 |
) |
|
Benefit obligation at September 30, | | |
$ | 41,492 |
|
$ | 40,174 |
|
|
|
Change in plan assets: | | |
Fair value of plan assets at October 1, | | |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
Employer contribution | | |
| 1,474 |
|
| 1,421 |
|
Plan participant contributions | | |
| 135 |
|
| 129 |
|
Benefits and expenses paid | | |
| (1,609 |
) |
| (1,550 |
) |
|
Fair value of plan assets at September 30, | | |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
Funded status and statement of financial position: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Fair value of plan assets at September 30, | | |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
Benefit obligation at September 30, | | |
| (41,492 |
) |
| (40,174 |
) |
|
Funded status | | |
| (41,492 |
) |
| (40,174 |
) |
Amount contributed during fourth quarter | | |
| 411 |
|
| 343 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss | | |
| 3,888 |
|
| 18,607 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost | | |
| -- |
|
| 2,633 |
|
|
Accrued benefit cost | | |
$ | (37,193 |
) |
$ | (18,591 |
) |
|
The
Companys net periodic benefit cost for its subsidiarys Post Retirement Health
Benefit Plan for the periods presented consists of the following components: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
|
$ |
981 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
352 |
|
$ |
285 |
|
Interest cost | | |
| 2,175 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 2,148 |
|
| 1,509 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost | | |
| 8 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 310 |
|
| 52 |
|
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss | | |
| (8 |
) |
| 35 |
|
| 760 |
|
| 149 |
|
Curtailment gain | | |
| -- |
|
| (355 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
|
Net periodic post retirement health benefit | | |
cost (income) | | |
$ | 3,156 |
|
$ | (243 |
) |
$ | 3,570 |
|
$ | 1,995 |
|
|
For
purposes of calculating the post retirement health benefit cost, a medical inflation
rate of 12% was assumed for 2002. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to an
ultimate rate of 5.5% by 2010. |
Assumed
health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the
post retirement health benefit plan. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health
care cost trend rate would have the following effect: |
|
Decrease Trend 1%
|
Increase Trend 1%
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Effect on the total service and interest cost components |
|
|
$ |
(367 |
) |
$ |
445 |
|
Effect on the post retirement benefit obligation | | |
$ | (4,822 |
) |
$ | 5,798 |
|
On
December 8, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). The Act expanded
Medicare to include, for the first time, coverage for prescription drugs. The
Company sponsors a retiree medical program for certain of its locations and the Company
expects that this legislation will eventually reduce the Companys cost for
the program. At this point, the Companys investigation into its response to
the legislation is preliminary, as we await guidance from various governmental and
regulatory agencies concerning the requirements that must be met to obtain these
cost reductions as well as the manner in which such savings should be measured.
Because of various uncertainties related to the Companys response to this
legislation and the appropriate accounting methodology for this event, the Company
has elected to defer financial recognition of this legislation until the FASB issues
final accounting guidance. When issued, that final guidance could require the
Company to change previously reported information. This deferral election is
permitted under FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-1. |
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The
Company provides accruals for all direct costs associated with the estimated
resolution of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that
a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably
estimated. |
At
December 31, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries are obligated under lease
agreements for the rental of certain real estate and machinery and equipment used
in its operations. Future minimum rental obligations related to continuing
operations aggregate approximately $69,849,000 at December 31, 2003. The obligations are
payable as follows: |
Year ended December 31,
|
Amount
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
12,018,000 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
10,452,000 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
8,674,000 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
7,374,000 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
4,928,000 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
26,403,000 |
|
Certain
of these lease agreements provide for increased payments based on changes in the
consumer price index. Rental expense charged to continuing operations in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations was approximately $16,600,000,
$400,000, $15,600,000 and $15,000,000 for the period from January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003, the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Under certain of these lease
agreements, the Company or its subsidiaries are also obligated to pay insurance and taxes. |
Certain
subsidiaries, which are classified as discontinued operations, have guaranteed
approximately $27,700,000 of third party obligations relating to guarantees of rental
payments through June 30, 2016 under a facility leased by SNE, which was sold on
September 21, 2001. The Company has indemnified these guarantees in connection with
the sale of Ply Gem on February 12, 2004 (see Note 10). The buyer of SNE has provided
certain indemnifications and other rights to the subsidiary for any payments that
it might be required to make pursuant to this guarantee. Should the buyer of SNE
cease making payments then the Company may be required to make payments on its
indemnification. The Company does not anticipate incurring any loss under this
indemnification and accordingly has not recorded any liabilities at December 31, 2003
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. |
The
Company has guaranteed certain obligations of third parties of approximately $4,300,000
which relates to guarantees of the remaining principal and interest balances of
mortgages of a third-party on certain buildings, one of which houses the Companys
corporate headquarters. These guarantees expire on December 31, 2020 and are payable in
the event of non-payment of the mortgage. These guarantees are collateralized by the
buildings to which the mortgages relate and any liability to the Company would first be
reduced by the Companys pro-rata share of proceeds received on the sale of the
buildings. The Company does not anticipate incurring any loss under these guarantees
and accordingly has not recorded any liabilities at December 31, 2003 in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. |
The
Company has indemnified third parties for certain matters in a number of transactions
involving dispositions of former subsidiaries. The Company has recorded liabilities
in relation to these indemnifications of approximately $20,900,000 at December 31,
2003 and $27,100,000 at December 31, 2002. Approximately $18,200,000 and $24,200,000
of these liabilities are included in liabilities of discontinued operations at December
31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
The
Company sells a number of products and offers a number of warranties including in
some instances, extended warranties. The specific terms and conditions of these
warranties vary depending on the product sold and country in which the product is
sold. The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its warranties,
with the exception of extended warranties, and records a liability for such costs at
the time of sale. Proceeds received from extended warranties are amortized over the
life of the warranty and reviewed to ensure that the liability recorded is equal to or
greater than estimated future costs. Factors that affect the Companys
warranty liability include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated
rates of warranty claims, cost per claim and new product introduction. The
Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty claims and
adjusts the amounts as necessary. Changes in the Companys combined short-term
and long-term warranty liabilities (see Note 12) during the periods presented are as
follows: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
$ |
25,983 |
|
$ |
26,007 |
|
$ |
24,757 |
|
Warranties provided during period | | |
| 16,259 |
|
| 234 |
|
| 12,375 |
|
Settlements made during period | | |
| (15,187 |
) |
| (274 |
) |
| (11,606 |
) |
Changes in liability estimate, including acquisitions | | |
| 2,032 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 481 |
|
|
Balance, end of period | | |
$ | 29,087 |
|
$ | 25,983 |
|
$ | 26,007 |
|
|
The
Company is subject to other contingencies, including legal proceedings and claims
arising out of its businesses that cover a wide range of matters, including, among
others, environmental matters, contract and employment claims, product liability,
warranty and modification, adjustment or replacement of component parts of units sold,
which may include product recalls. Product liability, environmental and other
legal proceedings also include matters with respect to businesses previously
owned. The Company has used various substances in its products and manufacturing
operations which have been or may be deemed to be hazardous or dangerous, and the extent
of its potential liability, if any, under environmental, product liability and
workers compensation statutes, rules, regulations and case law is unclear.
Further, due to the lack of adequate information and the potential impact of present
regulations and any future regulations, there are certain circumstances in which no
range of potential exposure may be reasonably estimated. |
A
former subsidiary of the Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits alleging
damage caused by alleged defects in certain pressure treated wood products. A
subsidiary of the Company has indemnified the buyer of the former subsidiary for all
known liabilities and future claims relating to such matters and retained the
rights to all potential reimbursements related to insurance coverage. Many of the
lawsuits have been resolved by dismissal or settlement with amounts being paid out of
insurance proceeds or other recoveries. The Company and the former subsidiary
continue to vigorously defend the remaining suits. Certain defense and indemnity
costs are being paid out of insurance proceeds and proceeds from a settlement with
suppliers of material used in the production of the treated wood products. The
Company has recorded, within liabilities of discontinued operations, liabilities
of approximately $6,602,000 at December 31, 2003 for the estimated costs to resolve
these outstanding matters. The Company has also recorded, within assets of
discontinued operations, receivables at December 31, 2003 of approximately
$2,385,000 for the estimated recoveries which are deemed probable of collection
related primarily to insurance litigation coverage claims. The Company has
indemnified the buyer of Ply Gem for these liabilities in connection with the sale of
Ply Gem on February 12, 2004 (see Note 10). |
While
it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect
to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits, the Company believes that the
aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered
by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations of the Company. It is possible, however, that
future results of operations for any particular future period could be materially
affected by changes in our assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies
or changes out of the Companys control. |
10. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On
February 12, 2004, the Company sold Ply Gem, to an affiliate of Caxton-Iseman Capital,
Inc. in a transaction valued at approximately $560,000,000, including debt assumed
by the buyer and expects to record a net after-tax gain upon the sale of between
approximately $60,000,000 and $70,000,000 in the first quarter of 2004. Ply Gem,
through its operating subsidiaries, is a manufacturer and distributor of a range of
products for use in the residential new construction, do-it-yourself and professional
renovation markets, including vinyl siding, windows, patio doors, fencing, railing,
decking and accessories. The results of operations of the operating subsidiaries of
Ply Gem comprised the Companys entire Windows, Doors and Siding Products (WDS)
reporting segment and the corporate expenses of Ply Gem were previously included in
Unallocated other, net in the Companys segment reporting (see Note 11). |
On
November 22, 2002, Ply Gem sold the capital stock of its subsidiary Richwood Building
Products, Inc. (Richwood) for approximately $8,500,000 of net cash
proceeds and recorded a pre-tax loss of approximately $3,000,000 in the fourth quarter
of 2002. Prior to the sale of Ply Gem, the operating results of Richwood were
previously included in WDS in the Companys segment reporting. As required by
SFAS No. 142, the Company allocated $4,200,000 of goodwill to Richwood in connection
with the determination of the loss on sale based upon the relative fair value of
Richwood to the total fair value of the WDS operating segment. The related goodwill
amortization prior to January 1, 2002 and goodwill have been included in the results of
discontinued operations and assets of discontinued operations, respectively, for all
periods presented below, as required. |
On
April 2, 2002, Ply Gem sold the capital stock of its subsidiary Hoover Treated Wood
Products, Inc. (Hoover) for approximately $20,000,000 of net cash
proceeds and recorded a pre-tax gain of approximately $5,400,000 in the second quarter
of 2002. Prior to the sale of Ply Gem, the operating results of Hoover were
previously included in Other in the Companys segment reporting. Approximately
$8,500,000 of the cash proceeds was used to pay down outstanding debt under the Companys
Ply Gem credit facility in the second quarter of 2002. |
On
September 21, 2001, Ply Gem sold the capital stock of Peachtree Doors and Windows,
Inc. (Peachtree) and SNE Enterprises, Inc. (SNE) for
approximately $45,000,000 in cash, and recorded a pre-tax loss on the sale of
approximately $34,000,000 in the third quarter of 2001, including the write off of
approximately $11,700,000 of unamortized intangible assets. Prior to the sale of
Ply Gem, Peachtree and SNE were previously part of WDS. A portion of the cash proceeds
was used to pay down approximately $20,500,000 of outstanding debt under the Companys
Ply Gem credit facility. |
Interest
allocated to discontinued operations, included in interest expense, net in the table
below, was approximately $23,600,000 (net of taxes of approximately $13,800,000),
$800,000 (net of taxes of approximately $400,000), $26,300,000 (net of taxes of
approximately $15,500,000) and $26,300,000 (net of taxes of approximately $15,500,000)
for the periods from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 and from January 1, 2003 to
January 9, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
The
sale of Ply Gem, Richwood, Hoover, SNE and Peachtree and the related operating
results have been excluded from earnings (loss) from continuing operations and are
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. |
The
table that follows presents a summary of the results of discontinued operations for the
periods presented: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ | 522,600 |
|
$ | 8,800 |
|
$ | 529,700 |
|
$ | 787,400 |
|
|
|
Operating earnings (loss) of discontinued operations * | | |
$ | 58,237 |
|
$ | (368 |
) |
$ | 70,401 |
|
$ | 43,188 |
|
Interest expense, net | | |
| (38,537 |
) |
| (1,232 |
) |
| (42,701 |
) |
| (47,688 |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| 19,700 |
|
| (1,600 |
) |
| 27,700 |
|
| (4,500 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| 7,500 |
|
| (600 |
) |
| 10,600 |
|
| 300 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
$ | 12,200 |
|
$ | (1,000 |
) |
$ | 17,100 |
|
$ | (4,800 |
) |
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations | | |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 2,400 |
|
$ | (34,000 |
) |
Tax provision (benefit) on sale of discontinued operations | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 600 |
|
| (14,000 |
) |
|
| | |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 1,800 |
|
$ | (20,000 |
) |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
$ | 12,200 |
|
$ | (1,000 |
) |
$ | 18,900 |
|
$ | (24,800 |
) |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense | | |
$ | 16,101 |
|
$ | 315 |
|
$ | 14,902 |
|
$ | 26,291 |
|
|
|
* |
Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations are net of Ply Gem corporate expenses
previously included within Unallocated other, net in the Companys segment
reporting. |
|
Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations for the period from January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003 include approximately $600,000 of severance and other costs
associated with the closure of certain manufacturing facilities. Operating earnings
(loss) of discontinued operations for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31,
2003 also include approximately $1,300,000 of costs and expenses for expanded
distribution including new customers. |
|
Operating
earnings (loss) of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2001
include approximately $600,000 of direct expenses and third party fees associated
with the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development and
approximately $3,200,000 of net death benefit insurance proceeds related to life
insurance maintained on former managers, both of which were previously included within
Unallocated in the Companys segment reporting. Operating earnings (loss) of
discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2001 also include
approximately $300,000 of manufacturing costs incurred in connection with the
start-up of a vinyl fence and decking facility, which were previously included with
the WDS Segment in the Companys segment reporting. |
The
table that follows presents a breakdown of the major components of assets and
liabilities of discontinued operations as of December 31, 2003 and 2002: |
|
December 31, |
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $8,695,000 and $7,129,000 | | |
$ | 45,236 |
|
$ | 45,852 |
|
Inventories | | |
| 44,136 |
|
| 43,481 |
|
Prepaid income taxes | | |
| 8,392 |
|
| 11,100 |
|
Property and equipment, net | | |
| 122,816 |
|
| 123,618 |
|
Goodwill | | |
| 219,977 |
|
| 263,998 |
|
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $3,849,000 | | |
and $12,929,000 | | |
| 44,363 |
|
| 66,710 |
|
Other assets | | |
| 9,931 |
|
| 12,698 |
|
|
Total assets of discontinued operations | | |
$ | 494,851 |
|
$ | 567,457 |
|
|
|
Liabilities: | | |
Accounts payable | | |
$ | 18,876 |
|
$ | 17,327 |
|
Accrued expenses | | |
| 33,803 |
|
| 36,177 |
|
Notes, mortgage notes and obligations payable | | |
| 29,562 |
|
| 31,027 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | |
| 25,323 |
|
| 31,507 |
|
Other liabilities | | |
| 30,119 |
|
| 33,821 |
|
|
Total liabilities of discontinued operations | | |
$ | 137,683 |
|
$ | 149,859 |
|
|
11. OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The
Company is a diversified manufacturer of residential and commercial building products,
which is organized within two principal operating segments: the Residential
Building Products Segment; and the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment.
Individual subsidiary companies are included in each of the Companys two
principal operating segments based on the way the chief operating decision maker
manages the business and on the similarity of products, production processes,
customers and expected long-term financial performance. In the tables below,
Unallocated includes corporate related items, intersegment eliminations and
certain income and expense items not allocated to reportable segments. |
The
Residential Building Products Segment manufactures and distributes built-in products
primarily for the residential new construction, DIY and professional remodeling and
renovation markets. The principal products sold by the segment include, kitchen
range hoods, exhaust fans (such as bath fans and fan, heater and light combination
units), indoor air quality products, bath cabinets, radio intercoms and central
vacuum systems. The Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment principally
manufactures and sells heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC)
systems for custom-designed commercial applications and for manufactured and site-built
residential housing. |
On
February 12, 2004, the Company sold its Ply Gem subsidiary, which encompasses the
WDS Segment and the corporate costs of Ply Gem that were formerly included in
Unallocated other, net in the Companys segment reporting. On November 22,
2002, the Company sold the capital stock of Richwood. On April 2, 2002, the Company
sold the capital stock of Hoover. On September 21, 2001, the Company sold the
capital stock of Peachtree and SNE. Accordingly, the results of Ply Gem which were
previously the WDS Segment, Hoover, which were previously part of the Other Segment,
and Richwood, Peachtree and SNE, which were previously part of the WDS Segment prior
to the sale of Ply Gem, have been excluded from earnings from continuing operations and
classified separately as discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Notes
1 and 10). Accordingly the segment information presented below excludes the WDS
Segment, Richwood, Hoover, Peachtree and SNE for all periods. |
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies. The Company evaluates segment performance
based on operating earnings before allocations of corporate overhead costs.
Intersegment net sales and intersegment eliminations are not material for any
of the periods presented. The income statement impact of all purchase accounting
adjustments, including goodwill and intangible assets amortization, is reflected
in the operating earnings of the applicable operating segment. Unallocated assets
consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, prepaid and
deferred income taxes, deferred debt expense and long-term restricted investments and
marketable securities. |
Summarized
financial information for the Companys reportable segments is presented in the
tables that follow for each of the periods presented: |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 814,770 |
|
$ | 16,338 |
|
$ | 729,566 |
|
$ | 660,008 |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 675,303 |
|
| 8,613 |
|
| 654,559 |
|
| 633,772 |
|
|
Consolidated net sales | | |
$ | 1,490,073 |
|
$ | 24,951 |
|
$ | 1,384,125 |
|
$ | 1,293,780 |
|
|
|
Operating Earnings (loss): | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 137,282 |
|
$ | 2,731 |
|
$ | 122,863 |
|
$ | 93,708 |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 58,408 |
|
| (1,258 |
) |
| 61,461 |
|
| 53,801 |
|
|
Subtotal | | |
| 195,690 |
|
| 1,473 |
|
| 184,324 |
|
| 147,509 |
|
Unallocated: | | |
Expenses and charges arising from the |
|
|
Recapitalization | | |
| -- |
|
| (83,000 |
) |
| (6,600 |
) |
| -- |
|
Re-audit fees and expenses | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (2,100 |
) |
| -- |
|
1999 equity performance plan incentive | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (4,400 |
) |
| -- |
|
Strategic sourcing, software and |
|
|
system development expense | | |
| (3,400 |
) |
| (100 |
) |
| (3,700 |
) |
| (5,500 |
) |
Stock based compensation charges | | |
| (1,800 |
) |
| -- |
|
| (700 |
) |
| -- |
|
Other, net | | |
| (31,045 |
) |
| (138 |
) |
| (47,257 |
) |
| (32,350 |
) |
|
Consolidated operating earnings (loss) | | |
| 159,445 |
|
| (81,765 |
) |
| 119,567 |
|
| 109,659 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(57,627 |
) |
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
(52,410 |
) |
|
(51,748 |
) |
Loss from debt retirement | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| (5,500 |
) |
Investment income |
|
|
|
1,482 |
|
| 119 |
|
| 5,943 |
|
| 8,189 |
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | |
before provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
$ |
103,300 |
|
$ | (82,700 |
) |
$ | 73,100 |
|
$ | 60,600 |
|
|
See
Notes 1, 2, 13 and 14 with respect to restructuring charges and certain other income
(expense) items affecting segment earnings (loss). |
|
For the Periods
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Recapitalization
|
Pre-Recapitalization
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2003 - |
Jan. 1, 2002 - |
Jan. 1, 2001 - |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
Dec. 31, 2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Segment Assets: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 863,400 |
|
$ | 544,677 |
|
$ | 543,701 |
|
$ | 531,871 |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 494,830 |
|
| 257,475 |
|
| 256,965 |
|
| 265,395 |
|
|
| | |
| 1,358,230 |
|
| 802,152 |
|
| 800,666 |
|
| 797,266 |
|
|
Unallocated: | | |
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities |
|
|
|
195,343 |
|
|
286,411 |
|
|
297,612 |
|
|
258,455 |
|
Prepaid income taxes | | |
| 17,826 |
|
| 53,747 |
|
| 15,964 |
|
| 22,303 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations | | |
| 494,851 |
|
| 568,114 |
|
| 567,457 |
|
| 608,724 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
33,730 |
|
|
70,793 |
|
|
149,127 |
|
|
133,166 |
|
|
Consolidated assets |
|
|
$ |
2,099,980 |
|
$ |
1,781,217 |
|
$ |
1,830,826 |
|
$ |
1,819,914 |
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 8,526 |
|
$ | 295 |
|
$ | 13,062 |
|
$ | 12,751 |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 8,407 |
|
| 276 |
|
| 12,674 |
|
| 12,003 |
|
Other | | |
| 569 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 394 |
|
| 412 |
|
|
Consolidated depreciation expense | | |
$ | 17,502 |
|
$ | 586 |
|
$ | 26,130 |
|
$ | 25,166 |
|
|
|
Amortization of goodwill, intangible assets and purchase | | |
price allocated to inventory: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 10,985 |
|
$ | 53 |
|
$ | 2,502 |
|
$ | 10,160 |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 3,475 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 486 |
|
| 1,795 |
|
|
Consolidated amortization expense and purchase price |
|
|
allocated to inventory | | |
$ | 14,460 |
|
$ | 67 |
|
$ | 2,988 |
|
$ | 11,955 |
|
|
|
Amortization of Goodwill included in Amortization Expense: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 7,401 |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| 1,317 |
|
|
Consolidated goodwill amortization expense | | |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | 8,718 |
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures: | | |
Residential Building Products | | |
$ | 10,556 |
|
$ | 91 |
|
$ | 9,551 |
|
$ | 14,412 |
|
Air Conditioning and Heating Products | | |
| 13,434 |
|
| 116 |
|
| 9,335 |
|
| 11,165 |
|
Other | | |
| 749 |
|
| -- |
|
| 209 |
|
| 1,564 |
|
|
Consolidated capital expenditures | | |
$ | 24,739 |
|
$ | 207 |
|
$ | 19,095 |
|
$ | 27,141 |
|
|
The
following table presents a summary of the activity in goodwill for continuing operations
by reporting segment for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the
period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001. |
|
|
Air |
|
|
Residential |
Conditioning |
|
|
Building |
and Heating |
Consolidated |
|
Products
|
Products
|
Nortek
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2000 |
|
|
$ |
260,399 |
|
$ |
42,500 |
|
$ |
302,899 |
|
Amortization of goodwill | | |
| (7,401 |
) |
| (1,317 |
) |
| (8,718 |
) |
Purchase accounting adjustments | | |
| (184 |
) |
| (6,367 |
) |
| (6,551 |
) |
Impact of foreign currency translation | | |
| (916 |
) |
| (318 |
) |
| (1,234 |
) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2001 | | |
| 251,898 |
|
| 34,498 |
|
| 286,396 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments | | |
| 403 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 426 |
|
Impact of foreign currency translation | | |
| (15 |
) |
| 357 |
|
| 342 |
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2002 | | |
| 252,286 |
|
| 34,878 |
|
| 287,164 |
|
Impact of foreign currency translation | | |
| 264 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 269 |
|
|
Balance as of January 9, 2003 | | |
| 252,550 |
|
| 34,883 |
|
| 287,433 |
|
Effect of the Recapitalization | | |
| 163,395 |
|
| 187,412 |
|
| 350,807 |
|
Acquisitions during the period from January 10, 2003 to December | | |
31, 2003 | | |
| 46,248 |
|
| -- |
|
| 46,248 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments | | |
| (7,807 |
) |
| (4,172 |
) |
| (11,979 |
) |
Impact of foreign currency translation | | |
| 1,511 |
|
| 4,043 |
|
| 5,554 |
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003 | | |
$ | 455,897 |
|
$ | 222,166 |
|
$ | 678,063 |
|
|
In
accordance with SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142, the Company allocated the effect of the
Recapitalization on goodwill to its reportable segments (see Note 1). Purchase
accounting adjustments relate principally to fair value revisions resulting from
completion of the final valuation of assets and liabilities and adjustments to
deferred income taxes that impact goodwill. |
Foreign
net sales were approximately 20.3%, 21.5%, 19.4% and 18.1% of consolidated net
sales for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the period from
January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. Foreign Long-Lived Assets were approximately 9.2%, 15.3%, 15.2%
and 14.4% of consolidated Long-Lived Assets for the period from January 10, 2003 to
December 31, 2003, the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Foreign net sales are attributed
based on the location of the Companys subsidiary responsible for the sale. As
required, Long-Lived Assets exclude financial instruments and deferred income taxes. |
No
single customer accounts for 10% or more of consolidated net sales or accounts receivable. |
The
Company operates internationally and is exposed to market risks from changes in foreign
exchange rates. Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash investments and
trade receivables. The Company places its temporary cash investments with high
credit quality financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any
one financial institution. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade
receivables are limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company's
customer base and their dispersion across many different geographical regions. At
December 31, 2003, the Company had no significant concentrations of credit risk. |
12. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND
TAXES, NET
Accrued
expenses and taxes, net, included in current liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet, consist of the following at December 31, 2003 and 2002: |
|
December 31, |
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Payroll, pension and employee benefits |
|
|
$ | 48,917 |
|
$ | 37,771 |
|
Insurance and employee health benefit accruals | | |
| 12,846 |
|
| 11,254 |
|
Interest | | |
| 23,176 |
|
| 23,244 |
|
Product warranty | | |
| 14,456 |
|
| 13,921 |
|
Sales and marketing | | |
| 23,089 |
|
| 19,792 |
|
Employee termination and other costs | | |
| 1,843 |
|
| 1,465 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
26,721 |
|
|
26,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
151,048 |
|
$ |
133,569 |
|
|
Accrued
expenses, included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet, consist of the following at December 31, 2003 and 2002: |
|
December 31, |
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Employee pension retirement benefit obligations |
|
|
$ | 55,497 |
|
$ | 110,474 |
|
Product warranty | | |
| 14,631 |
|
| 12,086 |
|
Post retirement health benefit obligations | | |
| 35,994 |
|
| 17,395 |
|
Insurance | | |
| 17,350 |
|
| 14,348 |
|
Other, net | | |
| 13,361 |
|
| 7,125 |
|
|
| | |
$ | 136,833 |
|
$ | 161,428 |
|
|
In
January 2003, in connection with the Recapitalization, approximately $62,000,000 of
the $110,474,000 of employee pension retirement benefit obligations noted in the
table above at December 31, 2002 were settled (see Note 8). |
13. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
The
Company records restructuring costs primarily in connection with operations acquired
or facility closings which management plans to eliminate in order to improve future
operating results of the Company. During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company
provided approximately $1,000,000 for liabilities related to restructuring and
closing costs of certain subsidiaries within its Residential Building Products
Segment. During the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company
recognized restructuring charges primarily associated with plant closings in the Air
Conditioning Segment. |
Within
the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment, the Company, in the second quarter
of 2003, initiated restructuring activities related to the closure of two facilities
in St. Louis, Missouri, in order to relocate the operations to other facilities by
the end of the first quarter of 2004. Approximately 293 employees have been
terminated to date and approximately 159 additional employees are expected to be
terminated during 2004. The facilities currently support manufacturing,
warehousing and distribution activities of the segments residential HVAC
products. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company provided
approximately $5,800,000 in cost of goods sold related to liabilities incurred as a
result of the restructuring and expects to provide an additional estimated
$2,400,000 of costs through early 2004. The facilities to be closed are owned by the
Company and are expected to be sold in 2004. |
The
following table sets forth restructuring activity in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations for the periods presented. These costs are included in
cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations of the Company. |
|
Employee |
|
Total |
|
Separation |
|
Restructuring |
|
Expenses
|
Other
|
Costs
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
|
|
$ | 710 |
|
$ | 159 |
|
$ | 869 |
|
Provision | | |
| 524 |
|
| 486 |
|
| 1,010 |
|
Payments and asset write downs | | |
| (200 |
) |
| -- |
|
| (200 |
) |
Other adjustments | | |
| (214 |
) |
| -- |
|
| (214 |
) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | |
$ | 820 |
|
$ | 645 |
|
$ | 1,465 |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | |
$ | 820 |
|
$ | 645 |
|
$ | 1,465 |
|
Other adjustments | | |
| (90 |
) |
| (110 |
) |
| (200 |
) |
|
Balance at January 9, 2003 | | |
| 730 |
|
| 535 |
|
| 1,265 |
|
Provision | | |
| 3,629 |
|
| 2,128 |
|
| 5,757 |
|
Payments and asset write downs | | |
| (2,369 |
) |
| (2,205 |
) |
| (4,574 |
) |
Other adjustments | | |
| (352 |
) |
| (253 |
) |
| (605 |
) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2003 | | |
$ | 1,638 |
|
$ | 205 |
|
$ | 1,843 |
|
|
Employee
separation expenses are comprised of severance, vacation, outplacement and retention
bonus payments. Other restructuring costs include expenses associated with
terminating other contractual arrangements, costs to prepare facilities for
closure, costs to move equipment and products to other facilities and write-offs
related to equipment sales and disposals attributable to a restructuring which occurred
prior to December 31, 2002. |
14. OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE
For
the nine days ended January 9, 2003, the Company incurred certain charges in connection
with the Recapitalization. These charges were as follows: |
|
Curtailment loss upon termination of a SERP |
|
|
$ | 70,142,000 |
|
Recapitalization fees, expenses and other | | |
| 12,848,000 |
|
Other | | |
| 10,000 |
|
|
| | |
$ | 83,000,000 |
|
|
During
the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the Company recorded a
pre-tax charge to continuing operations of approximately $1,400,000 for compensation
expense related to stock options issued to employees, officers and Directors in
accordance with SFAS No. 123, and recorded compensation expense of approximately
$600,000 in the fourth quarter of 2003 in connection with the issuance of common stock. |
The
operating results of the Air Conditioning and Heating Products Segment for the
period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 include approximately $5,800,000,
of severance and other costs associated with the closure of certain manufacturing
facilities (see Note 13). The operating results of the Air Conditioning and Heating
Products Segment for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 also
include approximately $1,100,000, of expenses associated with the start-up of a new
manufacturing facility. |
During
the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company provided approximately $1,000,000 for
liabilities related to restructuring and closing costs of certain subsidiaries within
its Residential Building Products Segment. |
In
the second quarter of 2002, approximately $4,400,000 was charged to operating
earnings and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses relating to
an incentive earned by certain of Norteks officers under Norteks 1999 Equity
Performance Plan. In addition, as discussed in Note 2, Nortek has recorded expenses of
approximately $6,600,000 in the year ended 2002 related to fees and expenses
associated with the Recapitalization of Nortek. In the third quarter of 2002, the
Company incurred approximately $2,100,000 in connection with its re-audit of Norteks
Consolidated Financial Statements for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001 (see Note 10). In the year ended December 31, 2002, the
Company incurred approximately $3,700,000 of direct expenses and third party fees
associated with the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems development
which are recorded in Unallocated in the Companys segment reporting. |
In
2001, the Company incurred approximately $5,500,000 of direct expenses and third
party fees associated with the Companys strategic sourcing software and systems
development which are recorded as unallocated expense. In 2001, the Company expensed
approximately $2,700,000 of manufacturing costs incurred in connection with the
start up of a residential air conditioning facility. In 2001, the Company also
incurred certain duplicative net interest expense as discussed in Note 6. Also, in
the third quarter of 2001, the Company recorded approximately $1,700,000 of
interest income resulting from the favorable abatement of state income taxes. The
abatement of state income taxes did not have a significant effect on the overall annual
effective income tax rate in 2001. |
15. SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The
tables that follow summarize unaudited quarterly financial data for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002: |
|
For the Quarters Ended
|
|
April 5 (1)
|
July 5
|
October 4
|
December 31
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales | | |
$ | 361,028 |
|
$ | 390,029 |
|
$ | 398,553 |
|
$ | 365,414 |
|
Gross profit | | |
| 102,736 |
|
| 109,292 |
|
| 120,017 |
|
| 104,340 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense | | |
| 65,087 |
|
| 63,425 |
|
| 68,321 |
|
| 69,750 |
|
Recapitalization Fees and Expenses | | |
| 83,000 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Depreciation expense | | |
| 4,350 |
|
| 3,939 |
|
| 4,006 |
|
| 5,793 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets and purchase price | | |
allocated to inventory | | |
| 5,921 |
|
| 2,964 |
|
| 2,306 |
|
| 3,336 |
|
Operating earnings (loss) | | |
| (47,241 |
) |
| 43,847 |
|
| 49,713 |
|
| 31,361 |
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
(49,900 |
) |
|
18,500 |
|
|
20,900 |
|
|
11,600 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| (6,500 |
) |
| 7,400 |
|
| 9,000 |
|
| 1,300 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
$ |
(56,400 |
) |
$ |
25,900 |
|
$ |
29,900 |
|
$ |
12,900 |
|
|
(1) |
The
first quarter ended April 5, 2003 represents the combined pre- and post-Recapitalization
periods of January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and January 10, 2003 to April 5, 2003,
respectively. |
|
For the Quarters Ended
|
|
March 30
|
June 29
|
September 28
|
December 31
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales | | |
$ | 327,802 |
|
$ | 374,134 |
|
$ | 358,010 |
|
$ | 324,179 |
|
Gross profit | | |
| 91,777 |
|
| 108,474 |
|
| 98,926 |
|
| 92,649 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense | | |
| 58,994 |
|
| 68,530 |
|
| 67,187 |
|
| 67,960 |
|
Recapitalization Fees and Expenses | | |
| -- |
|
| 5,200 |
|
| 1,000 |
|
| 400 |
|
Depreciation expense | | |
| 6,841 |
|
| 6,463 |
|
| 6,414 |
|
| 6,412 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets | | |
| 729 |
|
| 712 |
|
| 683 |
|
| 864 |
|
Operating earnings | | |
| 32,054 |
|
| 34,032 |
|
| 30,056 |
|
| 23,425 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations | | |
| 12,700 |
|
| 13,100 |
|
| 8,700 |
|
| 9,100 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| (2,100 |
) |
| 14,600 |
|
| 8,000 |
|
| (1,600 |
) |
Net earnings | | |
$ | 10,600 |
|
$ | 27,700 |
|
$ | 16,700 |
|
$ | 7,500 |
|
See
Notes 1, 2, 3 and 13 and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7 of Part II of this report, regarding
certain other quarterly transactions which impact the operating results in the above
table including dispositions, financing activities, new accounting pronouncements,
acquisitions, sales volume, material costs, rationalization and relocation of
manufacturing operations, material procurement strategies and weakness in the
manufactured housing industry. |
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
(UNAUDITED)
From
January 1, 2004 through February 3, 2004, the Company purchased approximately
$14,800,000 of Norteks 9 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007 (9 1/4% Notes)
and approximately $10,700,000 of Norteks 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2007 (9
1/8% Notes) in open market transactions. These purchases resulted in a pre-tax
loss of approximately $400,000, which will be recorded in the first quarter of 2004. |
On
February 13, 2004, the Company called for redemption on March 15, 2004 all of Norteks
outstanding 9 1/4% Notes (approximately $160,200,000 in principal amount) and
called for redemption on March 14, 2004 all of Norteks outstanding 9 1/8%
Notes (approximately $299,300,000 in principal amount). The 9 1/4% Notes and 9 1/8%
Notes were called at a redemption price of 101.542% and 103.042%, respectively, of
the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 9 1/4% Notes and 9
1/8% Notes ceased to accrue interest as of the respective redemption dates
indicated above. The Company used the estimated net after tax proceeds from the
sale of Ply Gem of approximately $450,000,000, together with existing cash on hand,
to fund the redemption of the 9 1/4% Notes and 9 1/8% Notes. On February 13, 2004,
the Company called for redemption on March 14, 2004 $60,000,000 of Norteks
outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (8 7/8% Notes). On March 1,
2004, the Company called for redemption on March 31, 2004 the remaining
$150,000,000 of Norteks outstanding 8 7/8% Notes (see below). The 8 7/8% Notes
were called at a redemption price of 104.438% of the principal amount thereof plus
accrued and unpaid interest. |
On
March 1, 2004, Nortek completed the sale of $200,000,000 of Senior Floating Rate Notes
due 2010 (the Floating Rate Notes). The Floating Rate Notes will bear
interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, as defined, plus 3% (4.17% as of March 1,
2004). Interest on the Floating Rate Notes will be determined and payable
semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 of each year commencing June 30, 2004.
Nortek incurred fees and expenses, including the initial purchasers
discount, of approximately $4,000,000 in connection with the sale, which will be
amortized over the life of the Floating Rate Notes. The Floating Rate Notes are
unsecured obligations of Nortek, which mature on December 31, 2010, and may be
redeemed in whole or in part prior to December 31, 2010 at the redemption prices as
defined in the indenture governing the Floating Rate Notes (the Nortek Indenture).
The Nortek Indenture contains covenants that limit Norteks ability to
engage in certain transactions, including incurring additional indebtedness and
paying dividends or distributions. The terms of the Floating Rate Notes require Nortek
to register notes having substantially identical terms (the Nortek Exchange
Notes) with the SEC as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable Nortek
Exchange Notes for the Floating Rate Notes (the Nortek Exchange). In the
event Nortek does not complete the Nortek Exchange in accordance with the timing
requirements outlined in the Indenture, Nortek may be required to pay a higher
interest rate. Nortek expects to complete the Exchange within the required time period. |
Approximately
$60,000,000 principal amount of the 8 7/8% Notes ceased to accrue interest as of
March 14, 2004 and approximately $150,000,000 principal amount of such Notes will
cease to accrue interest as of March 31, 2004. The Company will use the net proceeds
of approximately $196,000,000 from the sale of the Floating Rate Notes, together with
existing cash on hand, to fund the redemption of the 8 7/8% Notes. |
The
Company expects that the redemption of the 9 1/4% Notes, 9 1/8% Notes and 8 7/8% will
result in a pre-tax loss of approximately $11,500,000, based upon the difference
between the respective redemption prices indicated above and the estimated carrying
values at the redemption dates of the 9 1/4% Notes, 9 1/8% Notes and 8 7/8% Notes,
which include the principal amount to be redeemed and the estimated remaining
unamortized premium recorded in connection with the Recapitalization (see Note 16
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein).
The Company will record such loss in the first quarter of 2004. |
The
Companys pro forma interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003
would have been approximately $78,300,000, after adjusting the combined historical
interest expense for the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and the period
from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 to give effect to the redemption of the 9
1/4% Notes, 9 1/8% Notes and 8 7/8% Notes, the sale of the Floating Rate Notes and the
sale of the Senior Discount Notes, as if they had occurred on January 1, 2003. |
The
table that follows is a summary of maturities of the Companys debt
obligations, including the offerings and redemptions discussed in the previous
paragraphs and excluding unamortized debt premiums: |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
710,300,000 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2,700,000 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
975,100,000 |
|
The
Company expects to meet its cash flow requirements for debt payments and retirements
through fiscal 2004 from, net proceeds from the sale of Ply Gem in February 2004,
net proceeds from the sale of Senior Floating Rate Notes in February 2004 and
existing cash and cash equivalents. |
On
March 9, 2004, the Company acquired OmniMount Systems, Inc. (OmniMount)
for approximately $16,500,000 in cash. OmniMount is a manufacturer and designer
of speaker mountings and other products to maximize the home theater experience.
Net sales, operating earnings and depreciation and amortization were approximately
$28,300,000, $3,500,000 and $231,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31,
2003. |
Report of Independent
Auditors
To
Nortek Holdings, Inc.: |
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nortek Holdings, Inc. (a
Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders investment, and
cash flows for the period from January 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the period from
January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 2002. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules
listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedules based on our audits. |
We
conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. |
In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Nortek Holdings, Inc.
and subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of their
operations and their cash flows for the period from January 10, 2003 to December
31, 2003, the period from January 1, 2003 to January 9, 2003 and for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein. |
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2003 the Company
changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation, pursuant to the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an Amendment of FASB statement
No. 123. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002
the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible
assets, pursuant to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. |
Boston,
Massachusetts March 26, 2004 |
NORTEK HOLDINGS, INC.
(PARENT COMPANY)
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Condensed Balance Sheet
|
December 31, |
|
2003
|
2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
$ | 11,771 |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
Investments and Other Assets: | | |
Net intercompany balance and investment in subsidiaries | | |
| 537,290 |
|
| 317,505 |
|
Deferred debt expense, net | | |
| 9,801 |
|
| -- |
|
|
| | |
| 547,091 |
|
| 317,505 |
|
|
| | |
$ | 558,862 |
|
$ | 317,505 |
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Investment | | |
|
Current Liabilities: | | |
Accounts payable | | |
$ | 8 |
|
$ | -- |
|
Accrued expenses | | |
| 5,730 |
|
| -- |
|
|
| | |
| 5,738 |
|
| -- |
|
|
|
10% Senior Discount Notes due 2011 | | |
| 352,916 |
|
| -- |
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 3) |
|
|
|
Stockholders Investment: | | |
|
Preference stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 7,000,000 shares; |
|
|
none issued as of December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Series B preference stock, $1.00 par value; authorized | | |
19,000,000 shares; 8,130,442 shares issued and outstanding | | |
as of December 31, 2003 | | |
| 8,130 |
|
| -- |
|
Class A common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 19,000,000 |
|
|
shares; 397,380 shares issued and outstanding as of |
|
|
December 31, 2003 | | |
| 397 |
|
| -- |
|
Class B common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 14,000,000 | | |
shares; none issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003 | | |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 40,000,000 shares; | | |
10,502,627 shares issued and outstanding as of | | |
December 31, 2002 | | |
| -- |
|
| 10,503 |
|
Special Common Stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 5,000,000 | | |
shares; 501,224 shares issued and outstanding as of | | |
December 31, 2002 | | |
| -- |
|
| 501 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | | |
| 172,244 |
|
| 108,617 |
|
Retained earnings | | |
| -- |
|
| 255,366 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | |
| 19,437 |
|
| (57,482 |
) |
|
Total stockholders investment | | |
| 200,208 |
|
| 317,505 |
|
|
| | |
$ | 558,862 |
|
$ | 317,505 |
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. |
Condensed Statement of Operations
|
For the periods
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 to |
Jan. 1, 2003 to |
Nov. 21, 2002 to |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income | | |
$ | 131 |
|
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
Expenses: | | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | | |
| 37 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Interest expense | | |
| 3,594 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
|
| | |
| 3,631 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before equity | | |
in subsidiaries earnings (loss) | | |
| (3,500 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Equity in subsidiaries earnings (loss) before |
|
|
provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| 106,800 |
|
| (82,700 |
) |
| 7,000 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before | | |
provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| 103,300 |
|
| (82,700 |
) |
| 7,000 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| 41,300 |
|
| (21,800 |
) |
| 2,900 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | |
| 62,000 |
|
| (60,900 |
) |
| 4,100 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 12,200 |
|
| (1,000 |
) |
| (5,800 |
) |
|
Net earnings (loss) | | |
$ | 74,200 |
|
$ | (61,900 |
) |
$ | (1,700 |
) |
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. |
Condensed Statement of Cash
Flows
|
For the periods
|
|
Jan. 10, 2003 to |
Jan. 1, 2003 to |
Nov. 21, 2002 to |
|
Dec. 31, 2003
|
Jan. 9, 2003
|
Dec. 31, 2002
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | |
$ | 62,000 |
|
$ | (60,900 |
) |
$ | 4,100 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 12,200 |
|
| (1,000 |
) |
| (5,800 |
) |
|
Net earnings (loss) | | |
| 74,200 |
|
| (61,900 |
) |
| (1,700 |
) |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash: | | |
Non-cash interest expense | | |
| 3,593 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Equity in subsidiaries (earnings) loss before | | |
provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| (106,800 |
) |
| 82,700 |
|
| (7,000 |
) |
(Earnings) loss from discontinued operations before | | |
provision (benefit) for income taxes | | |
| (19,700 |
) |
| 1,600 |
|
| 8,700 |
|
Current income tax provision (benefit) for | | |
Subsidiary continuing operations | | |
| 47,300 |
|
| (27,700 |
) |
| 2,900 |
|
Deferred income tax (credit) provision for | | |
Subsidiary continuing operations | | |
| (4,800 |
) |
| 5,900 |
|
| (2,100 |
) |
Current income tax provision (benefit) for | | |
discontinued operations | | |
| 7,000 |
|
| (600 |
) |
| (800 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision (credit) for | | |
discontinued operations | | |
| 500 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Changes in certain assets and liabilities, net of | | |
effects from acquisitions and dispositions: | | |
Accounts payable | | |
| 8 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Accrued expenses and taxes | | |
| 3,995 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings | | |
| (68,904 |
) |
| 61,900 |
|
| 1,700 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | | |
| 5,296 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | |
Redemption of publicly held shares in connection | | |
with the Recapitalization | | |
| (469,655 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
Payment of fees and expenses in connection with | | |
the Recapitalization | | |
| (27,900 |
) |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities | | |
$ | (497,555 |
) |
$ | -- |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of 10% Senior Discount Notes, net of fees |
|
|
$ |
339,522 |
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
-- |
|
Issuance of Series B preference stock in connection | | |
with the Recapitalization | | |
| 355,923 |
|
| -- |
|
|
-- |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock in connection | | |
with the Recapitalization | | |
| 3,262 |
|
| -- |
|
|
-- |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock | | |
| 1,500 |
|
| -- |
|
|
-- |
|
Dividend to preferred and common stockholders | | |
| (298,474 |
) |
| -- |
|
|
-- |
|
Dividends and distributions received from | | |
Nortek, Inc. | | |
| -- |
|
| 147,900 |
|
|
-- |
|
Purchase of Nortek, Inc. common stock | | |
| (41,000 |
) |
| (4,603 |
) |
|
-- |
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities | | |
| 360,733 |
|
| 143,297 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | |
| (131,526 |
) |
| 143,297 |
|
|
-- |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | | |
| 143,297 |
|
| -- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | | |
$ | 11,771 |
|
$ | 143,297 |
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. |
Notes to Condensed
Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
1. |
On
November 20, 2002, Nortek, Inc. (Nortek) reorganized into a holding
company structure and each outstanding share of capital stock of the Company was
converted into an identical share of capital stock of Nortek Holdings, Inc. (Holdings),
a Delaware corporation formed on June 19, 2002, with Holdings becoming the successor
public company and Nortek becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (the Holdings
Reorganization). From June 19, 2002 through November 20, 2002, Holdings was a
wholly owned subsidiary of Nortek, which had no operating or cash flow activity.
Prior to the Holdings Reorganization, Nortek was the Registrant and parent company
for all filings required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
As of December 31, 2001, Nortek met the restricted net asset requirements under SEC
rules and regulations for financial statement schedules and, accordingly, Nortek
filed Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of the Registrant in its Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, Holdings
also met the restricted net asset requirements under SEC rules and regulation,
which require Holdings to file Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of the
Registrant. Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant included in
this Form 10-K provides all parent company information for the periods subsequent to
the Holdings Reorganization, when Holdings became the parent company, that are
required to be presented in accordance with SEC rules and regulations for financial
statement schedules. The Nortek, Inc. (Parent Company) - Schedule I - Condensed
Financial Information of Nortek, Inc., which cover the required periods prior to the
Holdings Reorganization, are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K and are incorporated
herein by reference. The accompanying condensed financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the reduced disclosure requirements permitted by Form 10-K,
Part IV, Item 14, Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of the Registrant. The
Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes of Nortek Holdings, Inc. are
included elsewhere in this Form 10-K (Part II, Item 8) and are incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
On
January 9, 2003, Holdings, the parent company of Nortek, was acquired by Kelso and
Company L.P. (Kelso), and certain members of Norteks management
in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Recapitalization by and among Nortek,
Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and K Holdings, Inc. dated as of June 20, 2002, as
amended, (the Recapitalization Agreement) in a transaction valued at
approximately $1.6 billion, including the assumption of certain indebtedness (the
Recapitalization). Holdings accounted for the Recapitalization as a
purchase in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Standards No. 141,
Business Combinations, which resulted in a new valuation for the assets
and liabilities of Holdings and its subsidiaries based upon fair values as of the
date of the Recapitalization. Refer to Notes 1 and 2 of the Notes to the Nortek
Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements, which are
incorporated herein by reference for a complete discussion of the Recapitalization and
the related purchase accounting recorded by Holdings. |
2. |
In
the third quarter of 2001, Holdings adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of
long-lived assets and does not apply to goodwill or intangible assets that are not
being amortized and certain other long-lived assets and, as required by standard,
applied this accounting standard as of January 1, 2001. Adoption of this accounting
standard did not result in any material changes in net earnings from accounting
standards previously applied. Adoption of this standard did result in the accounting
for the gain (loss) on the sale of certain businesses and their related operating
results as discontinued operations. The presentation for all periods presented has
been reclassified to conform to the new standard. |
|
On
February 12, 2004, Nortek sold its subsidiary, Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (Ply
Gem). In 2002 and 2001, Nortek sold certain former subsidiaries of Ply Gem.
The sale of the former subsidiaries of Ply Gem in 2002 and 2001 and their related
operating results, together with the operating results of Ply Gem, have been
excluded from earnings (loss) from continuing operations and have been classified as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. Information pertaining to Ply Gem
and its subsidiaries is included in Note 10 of the Notes to the Nortek Holdings, Inc.
and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements, which are incorporated herein by
reference. |
3. |
On
November 24, 2003, Holdings completed the sale of $515,000,000 aggregate principal
amount at maturity (approximately $349,400,000 of gross proceeds) of its 10% Senior
Discount Notes due May 15, 2011 (Senior Discount Notes). The Notes, which
are structurally subordinate to all debt and liabilities of Holdings
subsidiaries, were issued and sold in a private Rule 144A offering to institutional
investors. Holdings used the net proceeds of the offering to pay a dividend to holders
of capital stock of approximately $298,474,000 and to make a capital contribution
to Nortek of $41,000,000. Nortek used the capital contribution, together with cash on
hand, to make an approximately $41,600,000 distribution to option holders of Holdings common
stock. The accreted value of the 10% Senior Discount Notes will increase from the
date of issuance at a rate of 10% per annum compounded semi-annually such that the
accreted value will equal the principal amount at maturity of $515,000,000 on November
15, 2007. No cash interest will accrue on the 10% Senior Discount Notes prior to
November 15, 2007 and, thereafter, cash interest will accrue at 10% per annum payable
semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The Senior Discount
Notes are unsecured obligations of Holdings, which mature on May 15, 2011, and may be
redeemed in whole or in part at the redemption prices as defined in the indenture
governing the Senior Discount Notes (the Indenture). The Indenture contains
covenants that limit the Companys ability to engage in certain transactions,
including incurring additional indebtedness and paying dividends or
distributions. The terms of the Senior Discount Notes require Holdings to register
notes having substantially identical terms (the Holdings Exchange Notes)
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an offer to exchange freely
tradable Holdings Exchange Notes for the Senior Discount Notes (the Holdings
Exchange). In the event the Company does not complete the Holdings Exchange
in accordance with the timing requirements outlined in the Indenture, the Company
may be required to pay a higher interest rate. The Company expects to complete the
Holdings Exchange within the required time period. See Notes 1 and 6 of the Notes to
the Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements, which are
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
On
March 1, 2004, Nortek completed the sale of $200,000,000 of Floating Rate Notes. The
Floating Rate Notes will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, as defined,
plus 3% (4.17% as of March 1, 2004). Interest on the Floating Rate Notes will be
determined and payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 of each year
commencing June 30, 2004. Nortek incurred fees and expenses, including the initial
purchasers discount, of approximately $4,000,000 in connection with the
sale, which will be amortized over the life of the Floating Rate Notes. See Notes 6
and 16 of the Notes to the Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated
Financial Statements, which are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
In
2004, Nortek, at various times, either purchased on the open market or called for
redemption all of Norteks 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008, 9 1/4% Senior Notes due
2007 and 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2007. Nortek used the proceeds from the sale of Ply Gem
and the Floating Rates Notes to fund these redemptions. See Notes 6 and 16 of the
Notes to the Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial
Statements, which are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
Descriptions
of material contingencies, significant provisions of other long-term debt
obligations and commitments of Holdings and its subsidiaries are included in Notes 1, 6
and 9 of the Notes to the Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial
Statements, which are incorporated herein by reference. |
4. |
At
December 31, 2003, Nortek Holdings subsidiaries, principally Nortek, had
unrestricted cash and investments and marketable securities of approximately
$182,349,000. |
5. |
Nortek
is Nortek Holdings only directly owned subsidiary and all of Holdings other
subsidiaries are either directly or indirectly owned by Nortek. As a result, Holdings
ability to receive cash from Nortek is limited to the amount of cash transfers or
dividends that can be paid by Nortek, which are restricted under the terms of certain
of Norteks indebtedness. As part of the Recapitalization, Nortek declared and
distributed to the Company a dividend of approximately $120,000,000 and distributed
approximately $27,900,000 for reimbursement of fees and expenses of Kelso, which were
paid out of Norteks unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on hand and were
permissible under the most restrictive covenants with respect to the indentures of
Norteks 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008, 9 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007, 9 1/8% Senior
Notes due 2007 and 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the Existing Notes).
At March 26, 2004, approximately $92,300,000 was available for the payment of cash
dividends, stock purchases or other restricted payments as defined under the terms
of Norteks most restrictive indenture based upon the redemption and
refinancing of certain of Norteks Existing Notes in fiscal 2004. See Notes 6 and
16 of the Notes to the Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial
Statements, which are incorporated herein by reference. |
6. |
The
combined liabilities, excluding deferred income taxes, of Norteks
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 were approximately $1,516,474,000 consisting of
$987,059,000 of short and long-term debt (prior to the redemption and refinancing
discussed in 5. above), $112,764,000 of accounts payable, $278,968,000 of short and
long-term accruals, taxes and other obligations (of which approximately
$142,135,000 are classified as short-term) and $137,683,000 of liabilities of discontinued
operations. |
NORTEK HOLDINGS, INC.
(PARENT COMPANY)
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF NORTEK, INC.
Condensed Statement of
Operations
|
For the Period |
|
|
from January 1, |
For the Year |
|
2002 to |
Ended |
|
November 20, |
December 31, |
|
2002
|
2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges and allocations to subsidiaries | | |
$ | 21,307 |
|
$ | 30,142 |
|
Investment income | | |
| 2,586 |
|
| 5,514 |
|
Other income | | |
| 48 |
|
| 234 |
|
|
Total revenues | | |
| 23,941 |
|
| 35,890 |
|
|
Expenses: | | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | | |
| 59,275 |
|
| 31,173 |
|
Loss from debt retirement | | |
| -- |
|
| 5,500 |
|
Interest expense | | |
| 52,712 |
|
| 53,540 |
|
Other expense | | |
| 885 |
|
| 689 |
|
|
Total expenses | | |
| 112,872 |
|
| 90,902 |
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before equity in | | |
subsidiaries earnings | | |
| (88,931 |
) |
| (55,012 |
) |
Equity in subsidiaries earnings before provision for income taxes | | |
| 155,031 |
|
| 115,612 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before provision | | |
for income taxes | | |
| 66,100 |
|
| 60,600 |
|
Provision for income taxes | | |
| 26,600 |
|
| 27,800 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations | | |
| 39,500 |
|
| 32,800 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | | |
| 24,700 |
|
| (24,800 |
) |
|
Net earnings | | |
$ | 64,200 |
|
$ | 8,000 |
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. |
Condensed Statement of Cash
Flows
|
For the Period |
|
|
from January 1, |
For the Year |
|
2002 to |
Ended |
|
November 20, |
December 31, |
|
2002
|
2001
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations | | |
$ | 39,500 |
|
$ | 32,800 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | | |
| 24,700 |
|
| (24,800 |
) |
|
Net earnings | | |
| 64,200 |
|
| 8,000 |
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash: | | |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | |
| 313 |
|
| 380 |
|
Non-cash interest expense, net | | |
| 3,351 |
|
| 3,529 |
|
Loss on debt retirement | | |
| -- |
|
| 5,500 |
|
Equity in subsidiaries earnings before provision for | | |
income taxes | | |
| (155,031 |
) |
| (115,612 |
) |
Charges and allocations to subsidiaries | | |
| (21,307 |
) |
| (30,142 |
) |
Net transfers from subsidiaries, principally cash | | |
| 205,290 |
|
| 159,112 |
|
Deferred federal income tax credit from continuing operations | | |
| -- |
|
| (1,200 |
) |
Deferred federal income tax credit from discontinued operations | | |
| -- |
|
| (3,700 |
) |
|
Changes in certain assets and liabilities, net of effects | | |
from acquisitions and dispositions: | | |
Notes and accounts receivable and other current assets | | |
| (252 |
) |
| 6 |
|
Other assets | | |
| (4,777 |
) |
| (428 |
) |
Accounts payable | | |
| (5,352 |
) |
| 4,231 |
|
Accrued expenses and taxes | | |
| 51,482 |
|
| 3,194 |
|
Long-term liabilities | | |
| 6,580 |
|
| 1,710 |
|
Other, net | | |
| 738 |
|
| 80 |
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings | | |
| 81,035 |
|
| 26,660 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | | |
| 145,235 |
|
| 34,660 |
|
|
|
Cash Flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures | | |
$ | (120 |
) |
$ | (1,556 |
) |
Purchases of investments and marketable securities | | |
| (236,926 |
) |
| (117,798 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of investments and marketable securities | | |
| 148,227 |
|
| 76,968 |
|
Cash contributed to subsidiaries for businesses acquired | | |
| -- |
|
| (1,900 |
) |
Change in restricted cash, investments and marketable securities | | |
| (2 |
) |
| 5,201 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities | | |
| (88,821 |
) |
| (39,085 |
) |
|
|
Cash Flows from financing activities: | | |
Sale of 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 | | |
| -- |
|
| 241,800 |
|
Redemption of 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2004 | | |
| -- |
|
| (207,700 |
) |
Repayment of other long-term debt | | |
| (5 |
) |
| (5,005 |
) |
Payment of fees associated with Norteks Senior Secured | | |
Credit Facility | | |
| (3,873 |
) |
| -- |
|
Exercise of stock options | | |
| 615 |
|
| 1,307 |
|
Purchase of Nortek Common and Special Common Stock | | |
| -- |
|
| (3 |
) |
Other, net | | |
| 27 |
|
| 68 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | |
| (3,236 |
) |
| 30,467 |
|
|
Net increase in unrestricted cash and investments | | |
| 53,178 |
|
| 26,042 |
|
Unrestricted cash and investments at the beginning of the year | | |
| 83,260 |
|
| 57,218 |
|
|
Unrestricted cash and investments at the end of the year | | |
$ | 136,438 |
|
$ | 83,260 |
|
|
|
Interest paid on indebtedness | | |
$ | 38,277 |
|
$ | 51,985 |
|
|
|
Net income taxes paid, including amounts paid by subsidiaries | | |
$ | 16,900 |
|
$ | 4,500 |
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. |
Notes to Condensed
Financial Statements
For the Period from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002
1. |
On
November 20, 2002, Nortek, Inc. (Nortek) reorganized into a holding
company structure and each outstanding share of capital stock of the Company was
converted into an identical share of capital stock of Nortek Holdings, Inc. (Holdings),
a Delaware corporation formed in 2002, with Holdings becoming the successor public
company and Nortek becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (the Holdings
Reorganization). Prior to the Holdings Reorganization, Nortek was the
Registrant and parent company for all filings required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). As of December 31, 2001, Nortek met the
restricted net asset requirements under SEC rules and regulations for financial
statement schedules and, accordingly, Nortek filed Schedule I - Condensed Financial
Information of the Registrant in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, Holdings also met the restricted net assets
requirements under SEC rules and regulation, which require Holdings to file
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of the Registrant. Schedule I -
Condensed Financial Information of Nortek included in this Form 10-K Statement
provides all parent company information for the periods prior to the Holdings
Reorganization, when Nortek was the parent company, that are required to be presented
in this Form 10-K in accordance with SEC rules and regulations for financial statement
schedules. The Nortek Holdings, Inc. (Parent Company) - Schedule I - Condensed
Financial Information of Registrant, which cover the required periods subsequent to the
Holdings Reorganization, are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K and are incorporated
herein by reference. The accompanying condensed financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the reduced disclosure requirements permitted by Form
10-K, Part IV, Item 14, Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of the
Registrant. The Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes of Nortek
Holdings, Inc. are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K (Part II, Item 8) and are
incorporated herein by reference. |
2. |
In
the third quarter of 2001, Nortek adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of
long-lived assets and does not apply to goodwill or intangible assets that are not
being amortized and certain other long-lived assets and, as required by standard,
applied this accounting standard as of January 1, 2001. Adoption of this accounting
standard did not result in any material changes in net earnings from accounting
standards previously applied. Adoption of this standard did result in the accounting
for the gain (loss) on the sale of certain businesses and their related operating
results as discontinued operations. The presentation for all periods presented has
been reclassified to conform to the new standard. |
|
On
February 12, 2004, Nortek sold its subsidiary, Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (Ply
Gem). In 2002 and 2001, Nortek sold certain former subsidiaries of Ply Gem.
The sale of the former subsidiaries of Ply Gem in 2002 and 2001 and their related
operating results, together with the operating results of Ply Gem, have been excluded
from earnings from continuing operations and have been classified as discontinued
operations for all periods presented. Information pertaining to Ply Gem and its
subsidiaries is included in Note 10 of the Notes to the Nortek Holdings, Inc. and
Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements, which are incorporated herein by
reference. |
3. |
Descriptions
of material contingencies, significant provisions of long-term debt obligations and
commitments of Nortek and Holdings are included in Notes 1, 6 and 9 of the Notes to the
Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements, which
are incorporated herein by reference. |
4. |
Included
in interest expense in the accompanying condensed statement of operations for the
period from January 1, 2002 to November 20, 2002 and the year ended December 31,
2001 is approximately $6,900,000 and $3,900,000, respectively, related to notes
payable to a subsidiary of Nortek that bear interest at rates ranging from 8% to 10%.
Interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed
statement of operations for the period from January 1, 2002 to November 20, 2002 and
the year ended December 31, 2001 is approximately $37,800,000 and $41,800,000,
respectively. |
5. |
Included
in the Registrants condensed statement of cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2001 (in net transfers from subsidiaries, principally cash) are
non-cash dividends (declared by subsidiaries Board of Directors) from
subsidiaries of approximately $280,000,000. |
NORTEK HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
Deduction |
at |
|
Beginning |
Charged to Cost |
Other |
from |
End of |
Classification
|
of Year
|
and Expense
|
Accounts
|
Reserves
|
Year
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the year-ended December 31, 2001: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances | | |
$ | 4,069 |
|
$ | 2,196 |
|
$ | (171 |
)(b) |
$ | (1,331 |
)(a) |
$ | 4,763 |
|
|
For the year-ended December 31, 2002: | | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances | | |
$ | 4,763 |
|
$ | 3,035 |
|
$ | 70 |
(b) |
$ | (1,865 |
)(a) |
$ | 6,003 |
|
|
For the year-ended December 31, 2003: |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances | | |
$ | 6,003 |
|
$ | 3,431 |
|
$ | 711 |
(b) |
$ | (4,265 |
)(a) |
$ | 5,880 |
|
|
(a) |
Amounts
written off, net of recoveries |
|
(b) |
Other including acquisitions |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits
marked with an asterisk are filed herewith. The remainder of the exhibits have
heretofore been filed with the Commission and are incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibits marked with a double asterisk identify each management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
2.1 |
|
Agreement
and Plan of Recapitalization, dated as of June 20, 2002, by and among Nortek, Inc.,
Nortek Holdings, Inc. and K Holdings, Inc. (Exhibit 2 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 8-K
filed June 24, 2002). |
|
2.2 |
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Recapitalization, dated as of September 16, 2002, by
and among Nortek, Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and K Holdings, Inc. (Exhibit 2 to
Nortek, Inc.s Form 8-K filed September 16, 2002). |
|
2.3 |
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger by and among Nortek, Inc. and Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Nortek
Holdings Merger Sub, Inc., dated as of November 20, 2002. (Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed
November 20, 2002). |
|
2.4 |
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Recapitalization, dated November 20, 2002, by and
among Nortek, Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and K Holdings, Inc. (Exhibit (d)(13) to
Nortek, Inc.s Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13E-3 filed November 27, 2002). |
|
2.5 |
|
Amendment
No. 3 to Agreement and Plan of Recapitalization, dated December 4, 2002, by and
among Nortek, Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and K Holdings, Inc. (Exhibit (d)(15)
to Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13E-3 filed December 4, 2002). |
|
*3.1 |
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Nortek Holdings, Inc. |
|
*3.2 |
|
Amended
and Restated By-laws of Nortek Holdings, Inc., effective December 8, 2003. |
|
*4.1 |
|
Indenture
dated as of November 24, 2003 by and between Nortek Holdings, Inc. and U.S. Bank
National Association, relating to the 10% Senior Discount Notes due 2011. |
|
4.2 |
|
Indenture
dated as of June 12, 2001 between Nortek, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company,
as Trustee, relating to the 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (Exhibit 4.1
to Nortek, Inc.s Registration Statement No. 333-64130 filed July 11, 2001). |
|
4.3 |
|
Indenture
dated as of March 1, 2004 by and between Nortek, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee relating to the Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2010 (Exhibit 4.3 to Nortek,
Inc.s form 10-K filed March 30,2004). |
|
*4.4 |
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of November 24, 2003 by and among Nortek Holdings, Inc.,
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., UBS Securities LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and
Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. |
|
4.5 |
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of March 1, 2004 by and among Nortek, Inc., Deutsche Bank
Securities, Inc., Fleet Securities, Inc. and UBS Securities LLC (Exhibit 4.5 to
Nortek, Inc.s form 10-K filed March 30,2004). |
|
4.6 |
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2003, among Nortek Holdings, Inc., Nortek,
Inc., Kelso Investment Associates VI, L.P., Kelso Nortek Investors, LLC, KEP VI,
LLC, the Third Party Investors and the Management Stockholders (Exhibit 4.8 to
Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
9.1 |
|
Voting
Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2002, by and among Nortek, Inc., K Holdings, Inc. and
Richard L. Bready (Exhibit 9 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 8-K filed June 24, 2002). |
|
**10.1 |
|
Change
in Control Severance Benefit Plan for Key Employees adopted February 10, 1986, and
form of agreement with employees (Exhibit 10.19 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed
March 31, 1986). |
|
**10.2 |
|
Change
in Control Severance Benefit Plan for Key Employees as Amended and Restated June 12,
1997, and form of agreement with employees (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc.s Form
10-Q filed August 8, 1997). |
|
**10.3 |
|
Form
of Indemnification Agreement between Nortek, Inc. and its directors and certain officers
(Appendix C to Nortek, Inc.s Proxy Statement dated March 23, 1987 for Annual
Meeting of Nortek Stockholders). |
|
10.4 |
|
Split
Dollar Agreement dated as of June 29, 1999 between Nortek, Inc. and Douglass N. Ellis,
Jr. as trustee of The Richard L. Bready and Cheryl A. Bready 1998 Irrevocable Trust,
together with appendix prepared by Nortek, Inc. (Exhibit 10.7 to Nortek, Inc.s
Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2000). |
|
10.5 |
|
Split
Dollar Agreement dated as of June 29, 1999 between Nortek, Inc. and Almon C. Hall,
together with appendix prepared by Nortek, Inc. (Exhibit 10.8 to Nortek, Inc.s
Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2000). |
|
10.6 |
|
Split
Dollar Agreement dated as of June 29, 1999 between Nortek, Inc. and Mark Richard
Harris and Pamela Jean Harris as trustees of the Richard J. and Carole M. Harris 1999
Irrevocable Trust, together with appendix prepared by Nortek, Inc. (Exhibit 10.9
to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2000). |
|
**10.7 |
|
Exchange Agreement, dated June 20, 2002, by and among Nortek, Inc., Nortek Holdings,
Inc., K Holdings, Inc. and Richard L. Bready (Exhibit 5 to Schedule 13D/A filed by
Richard L. Bready on June 24, 2002). |
|
10.8 |
|
$200,000,000
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2002, among Nortek, Inc., certain
of its subsidiaries, certain banks, Fleet Capital Corporation, Individually and as
Administrative Agent and Fleet Capital Canada Corporation, Individually and as
Canadian Agent. (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-Q filed August 13, 2002). |
|
**10.9 |
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Exchange Agreement, dated September 16, 2002, by and among Nortek, Inc., Nortek
Holdings, Inc., K Holdings, Inc. and Richard L. Bready (Exhibit 2 to Schedule 13D/A
filed by Richard L. Bready on September 18, 2002). |
|
**10.10 |
|
Nortek,
Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Richard L. Bready Employment Agreement dated January 9,
2003 (Exhibit 10.13 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
**10.11 |
|
Nortek,
Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Kevin W. Donnelly Employment Agreement dated January 9,
2003 (Exhibit 10.14 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
**10.12 |
|
Nortek,
Inc., Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Almon C. Hall, III Employment Agreement dated January 9,
2003 (Exhibit 10.15 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
**10.13 |
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Exchange Agreement, dated January 9, 2003, by and among Nortek, Inc.,
Nortek Holdings, Inc., K Holdings, Inc. and Richard L. Bready (Exhibit 10.6 to Nortek,
Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
10.14 |
|
Equity
Subscription Agreement, dated January 9, 2003, between Nortek Holdings, Inc., Nortek,
Inc. and RGIP, LLC (Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
10.15 |
|
Equity
Subscription Agreement, dated January 9, 2003, between Nortek Holdings, Inc., Nortek,
Inc. and Magnetitte Asset Investors III, LLC (Exhibit 10.18 to Nortek, Inc.s Form
10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
10.16 |
|
Equity
Subscription Agreement, dated January 9, 2003, between Nortek Holdings, Inc., Nortek,
Inc. and Daroth Investors LLC (Exhibit 10.19 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed
March 27, 2003). |
|
10.17 |
|
Stockholders
Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2003 by and among Nortek Holdings, Inc., Nortek,
Inc., Kelso Investment Associates VI, L.P., Kelso Nortek Investors, LLC, KEP VI,
LLC, the Third Party Investors and the Management Stockholders (Exhibit 10.20 to
Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 27, 2003). |
|
10.18 |
|
Nortek
Holdings, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.9 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-Q
filed May 19, 2003). |
|
*10.19 |
|
Equity
Subscription Agreement, dated July 11, 2003 between Nortek Holdings, Inc. and Jeremy
Burkhardt. |
|
*/**10.20 |
|
Equity
Subscription Agreement, dated October 31, 2003 among Nortek Holdings, Inc.,
Jeffery C. Bloomberg and Jeffrey C. Bloomberg as Trustee of the Jeffrey C. Bloomberg
Family Trust. |
|
10.21 |
|
Amendment
No.1 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2004 by and among Nortek, Inc.,
certain of its subsidiaries, certain banks, Fleet Capital Corporate, individually and as
Administrative Agent and Fleet Capital Canada Corporation, individually and as Canadian
Agent (Exhibit 10.21 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004). |
|
10.22 |
|
Amendment
No. 2 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2004 by and among Nortek, Inc.,
certain of its subsidiaries, certain banks, Fleet Capital Corporate, individually and as
Administrative Agent and Fleet Capital Canada Corporation, individually and as Canadian
Agent (Exhibit 10.22 to Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004). |
|
**10.23 |
|
Nortek,
Inc. Supplement Executive Retirement Plan C, dated December 18, 2003 (Exhibit 10.23 to
Nortek, Inc.s Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004). |
|
16.1 |
|
Letter
from Nortek, Inc.s former independent accountant regarding its concurrence or
disagreement with statements made by Nortek, Inc. in the current report concerning the
resignation or dismissal as Nortek, Inc.s principal accounts. (Exhibit 16 to
Nortek, Inc.s Form 8-K filed June 28, 2002). |
|
*21.1 |
|
List
of subsidiaries. |
|
*31.1 |
|
Certificate
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
*31.2 |
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
10-K
3
mar2904_10khold.pdf
PDF COPY OF 10-K
begin 644 mar2904_10khold.pdf
M)5!$1BTQ+C0-)>+CS],-"C,Y,CDS(#`@;V)J(#P\+TQI;F5A-KL5F]H&V48?Y-<+I>[]\]==[-MUG5I5F$RP96N
M4F&?,K6W0ZT)+*/]((Y!.8^)4(3B"O/?!\.<;D%;
ML4-PG2,+*CBG3$5T"Z-24#K?NURR)'=I]8/??.`N3Y[W>7[O[WF>]][W!0!X
M`0C<`A@`F`X@@ALB4AM+'^ZL]6T11.@;OPPIXB7\5
M;H![^?.A-\DLCJ-Q\0!Z&^]`?Y$F_M9UI'6Z863#);1`($Z27ORIN)4-DS#,
MPCWB2GT7_!6WX9/K0NR,\*Y3P(KW@7O[P#X
MT](6?`4+C?OJ'\0/U?\LS^(]^#C^LJX.>>`D7(09,D^>@HTPQ^\B'6(01"F+!
MC^4'ZD;Y;KDU-"&]A]XA5]&B_!$W@S_FGX`'@E^'0F1%^`UM%+*><_QMPAO"
M*+S,;/8MX!C84V/3X@FZD54W3#&/!T'5--3155X^JJJKIJJEJ5-%_T=47
M)PW#.*&EM;2A:H:NOG#"T&F4IAOZ41JLJ8/4J!DT<-3LDLBUU0%"*W^(:3YA`:8VW8,7]AB+KM[$Y$Y<,%G)$QIBR\!$OU$HVB
MGJ^F6N`SG'2DX/#1%FOQMS@X_*LF=08.]M=TCHXQK@S=G6ND4TN/?F^].S;V
MMEJS+&\:]ZQ"^S.0[]D9MWN=PH2K6VU)N=>1H
M!\T1XS&VDB$#1)XJ.#FFO0BKRJ&9@RQ87`NO[5CF!K)G;63@BU^
M%\1X&3/+9_=$HN:L4L0:5,"_%`NC-=Y,DOMP+7V;MTH
M%6*@*M<2JX@C4JIVE:E&_AN^'8LF=4
M.$:_S`]]AYLSQ6;N!7#Z"%66`3BRGS;Q&R`?SP+K'@KNHC]#`&VGMU'/RR"@
MG3/7%_!GKV7^%F``MAA$APT*96YDF4@,SDR.3,O3&5N9W1H(#8U-B]&:6QT97(O1FQA=&5$96-O9&4O
M1&5C;V1E4&%R;7,\/"]#;VQU;6YS(#0O4')E9&EC=&]R(#$R/CXO5ULQ(#(@
M,5TO5'EP92]84F5F+TEN9&5X6S$P,3$@,S@R.#)=/CYS=')E86T-"GC:[-,Q
M$0`P#`,QQSA+K5R[ET*T/`#KW/:D24869:X-F`MS82[,A;DP%^;"7)@+7!E+T]#1R].86UE*$AE861E7!E+TA&/CX^/CX^
M#65N9&]B:@TS.3(Y-R`P(&]B:CP\+T-O;G1E;G1S6S,Y,S`S(#`@4B`S.3,P
M-"`P(%(@,SDS,#4@,"!2(#,Y,S`V(#`@4B`S.3,P-R`P(%(@,SDS,#@@,"!2
M(#,Y,S`Y(#`@4B`S.3,Q,"`P(%)=+U1Y<&4O4&%G92]087)E;G0@.3DQ(#`@
M4B]2;W1A=&4@,"]-961I84)O>%LP(#`@-C$R(#%LP(#`@
M-C$R(#'1'4W1A=&4\/"]'
M4S`@,SDS,#(@,"!2/CX^/B]3=')U8W1087)E;G1S(#`^/@UE;F1O8FH-,SDR
M.3@@,"!O8FH\/"]4>7!E+T9O;G0O16YC;V1I;F7!E+T9O;G0O
M16YC;V1I;F7!E
M+U1R=654>7!E+T9O;G1$97-C%LM-38X("TS,#<@,C`P,"`Q,#`W72]&;VYT3F%M
M92]4:6UE7!E+T5X=$=3=&%T92]302!F86QS92]/4"!F86QS92]332`P+C`R
M+V]P(&9A;'-E+T]032`Q/CX-96YD;V)J#3,Y,S`S(#`@;V)J/#PO3&5N9W1H
M(#0Y,R]&:6QT97(O1FQA=&5$96-O9&4^/G-T8Y""$R/X/"!(6K'\_AXB*N\G)F/[V\G,YLKH?`
M'@(YT6E?R$>)YH1SK14H*4B"6K]?%<]6G5!"42E'WX64)D[$*18FFBAT4"(E
M0E#:0W5%OFA+4Q8=9/4,BMO\)JNO"\B;JBJ[KFQJ&&/#CMG0@0T[6#GXQBQL
MJK36H+CXJ]H2N`N_1CI<11,,=S_6FZ?]R^8CS$A.@-%$Z.C>?.H[H_[)\0&7
MG.#;:J/.\7'G<'`.T7/6!^=\Q*QSDH%"1K1M4>J!KEZVSW9$)I\=X#`Z*)UZ
M_]9'/&&$IR=OQTB*44-=WP[MY7CL+*9$,9!:D43VEL*PEF&UVOZ"9O-]&4$T
M82Q-++YS]0R!9+RC-/4:';[29_%33I2TM[W$HW5W>W^(\```3_OY0T*96YD[YS;KS\-H/7G^+BHG^;C89(
M<'EY-;1W5\;K&T-@F(U',"O8QQ,2H5-KT=$(*4:LM-`16)4)*QUA)BU"-/6O_7N>WBU[NU^@!]$=.:PRQ2#\6QD
M1I,QBGPZ*0RF\V(V'XP-S`2S/&M=',*RLUKTU@L?DVLL/IF;'/Z#^?:F&NY6
M\ZR%B<^J1DI(6S6)V%HJ)8[:JEF(>6$1\QGRN^QF,/Z:8Y`9A\$ZC#I+*CLA
MWFVB6`L.M6U7I5DD:4OL:GIJI$.SW.VK0U7O\+MLJGJ-35-O_;2'[Z>%0_UR
M<.?.0H6=C$3167ED*J+V$ZO$C1-)?03+VNQN5WX@>_N]0]M4CR5V?]RM;?$O
M``]\BCF"5)RQ`1M+50]M(C4KM5JU
MOFWVP(*3NIM`!%3=W4^_8ZB:/VURJ#G86/C-_![/R!`Q!?,*0C`4@/2,*X&*
MI0*R-&,9UUJ"V03A?=/V]C?<-NO*U:ON`N9U&9GG($:&/$DXF)($2(WG@Q1-
M*2)+2"`_DF+@#\Y,,+N[@6#R'2XO)W88[GW^UGK(9:>^8CLS3)9*/(:4_T%Q,AI/ASCH6>E&?=(>__Q[*!0N[ILVFW3%@.(QVM7
M1>W^#>\^RW&29OA!*XHY%Q^VYY6M>[H4Y:AV_[*)\O#7V3LA^!LQ_!=@``SB
M^((-"F5N9'-T.[:FJQ(^H8RL44?=I[`$E0$B85J`3"Q#;:T%]S,((7(_@M0%Z7@`
M07<*%Q?=\6`T!"'@\K(_](>U-J^U.\A0D#X7E;!?N*E4E6)6DN37$$X>"N%+
ML5X7^5^8KA:/D0T7$'USGX]F%+=FA,@YU?LF*2D8EXBF+O6$,=UM[LN\6&?%
M."?``,`#S7O^0T*96YD@4:8>H)(8"`W#A(+L`DR61Q"Y2MT73MPN(;R!\Q
M3&;R:QL32R>^F8$SOH/+R_'-+)D#B^#J:CHW%Z?2&4M)@8+<.J1%M11FSL2>
M.`DLFW#@(<>,$,I!/COHPVCQ/IITT?9;J.`6,&H_)GR/"2,<<2$\X+[`/B/4
M:RF3&JHM7&?E(=-'$!=@"N`7T.P4:/58U(W.R@;*"O95^:@T[+(:LO((MH7?V4U]W8SIWT'!YX'\0UT8I:)WW_,Z]PD644=J5X806J2/&;.4>Y24
MFR+/&@4/1W<4(LAW*G^"9S="FW
M7RI]GB8):5\)CSI;/!R0(#CITEC-?A\*JY@QYD'U47T5:22-U_"??9<;X-_^)P+X$?P48``9K"L4-
M"F5N9'-TNB]K]ZP[9:3;VDG5!/_R[]Z$$LH9@[P$7$61D\`3DL0T!&KA
M?E7N[J,
MA!F/V5BX:"N4RA/N'^?>],\IX`FK0:_>'HP#-=6+:-$9-@5'5=<<))PX*D@`CL2
MD&\]_P^X'@^XXYF,L`3_'TDY5HQ#@?>5]%;>]-=)3'Q=#.7"BIDX[RZJ"6E,
ML)US-0`_.WA])6>:OB*3BTCJ&G<4/B`XL,QJYTF"E&/Y:V73ZYT<8QAFF;C4
MR`B*0Q*A30XT]V=MU92%D;!T/Q?*6I;O8&-0X']6[]"LH&ITN>ETKZ2=HDIB
M8#YZB2&VH54:=KW2_6D>:'84DE@=<]\&'O,V,RY?$&%(L=!ON>XWA6FZ%EXF
M/X8TN5LNPF&*?D1,C&EO-+2=@1)'M&A:G)E:*MFT-V#'8&_M&MB)93-&XL2F
M?[R[V;C+2PFG@^(@,N2'B1$T_3HP\"G``'P-&/L-"F5N9'-TF/KBOZ6?'8Y0)%G%(<^BV40#I`7A`E?1]8)`6SI)L=?&F
MKZ`R4.BR,I6M?FO8-_6?OZX7$:@;_%76S%;!"^)B@@U(WVN2Z$_"4G2`?5<=JE!U*)0=@
MTEA(DJ3+P*ZK%MSTY^@V'I\Q)GM!GA]1U67@<X/IZ\7B7W(.,X>;F
M]AX/;U-GD:8,D+QT6*^PM\2HZI)BXX['-.)1&(!`LX%@G=B=0WIW<_AJ%G^(
M+YARX(Q?YF*"QB$+HHYK21)35#DV-!64KW6^@PZ>?P.'^`
M&64&LCS76]TW/%,E8V$G14@:RQ!/ARJAK/`)O)"L'480IP.'X=NOK08N5IX8
M6M;P,;^?@%/JQRBDC-\06XS/#!\UD(XRV\
M/X404.'_'T*O"_X),`#`FQ)9#0IE;F1S=')E86T-96YD;V)J#3,Y,S$P(#`@
M;V)J/#PO3&5N9W1H(#0Q-B]&:6QT97(O1FQA=&5$96-O9&4^/G-TB!\:6;26.5$AR@O;I
M2RIN@A12?G00"$'\9F9WELO%>O7E"B3#Q<7EU0J22Y!]#B&RS_T?-1^AP%,DH;1?[G
MDQ&:K"8@BX(143\IQ&=*14YGF,9K+91$RM\.H*8#T#`C$2RJL4&1DD);&WZC
M0@HK47&4^I&Z0PE^OV_+O>]+N,],ZC-.V[NRAP=_/)70[."AZ:MZ#UW?;.[@
M4!ZW,[F^L4ZJ:>^]VN.E;A<@=5!W_*MH'LI_LZZK]X;[W\9)DAQR)X)I$;
MI)>9?"@IDR`)E!LAS4O&^A2SW91M#-0=?!O\AM/*_ZIZ?X3O0[;FU'?]X/Y<
MBB@U'[2(!K%":"X,1;O;)/7U-@[ZBU;S>'8'P6NAAN/H:O9J98SPRS>*,O
M^I.=CZ5AM!R2*F'XN9-3?#/*GZ92+JAXMXKV-97.U%<+M/:\@DF,P@]@C!*%
M&8T)?P48`.6\\Q`-"F5N9'-T%LP(#`@-C$R(#%LP(#`@-C$R(#'1'4W1A=&4\/"]'4S`@,SDS,#(@,"!2
M/CXO4')O<&5R=&EE^S9;5C?[Q_?WYYP4YF'R[8[/J"L_@;9P\G@A7X^N<%
M/C6*W;\^,0X8\N&"1Y^?L-ORYH)B9\\_(B9
MJ<2FSF5L^>7DIYL/=\NK7]DO'WZ[G-_\O#AE\YN+A)W=7++%Q_/%_')^=C>_
M6K`WR_^>7"U/KJZ15?QO=JS#>?AUD%A,)A4AK[?'ST\DBU0D7'&N8A:7?N6_
MW/N:I>*421R(`7F\V?BH%(G+',H8C@Y2F]V&MEQ?S"]A?2CIN&9"]24+GZAW
M[A)I\*?H_?;L;LGF(01\B,/U)M(20B92.Z?)^9C=P+]Q.M&6<_GR][]LZ="!
M%8G1??_FRZMK)A+&SC\NYC=7B\7?R#5SB44&&7$UD:O)_D:EQ62E8_KZ!0-Z
M?!&M$H[H'03N_"K?%6V^+;X-\Q`2!N=<.G8NS:O>?RC93?75?Z'7-8E0#B,PM+XG9JF,
M9H:8888DCS,D3^&^;OUGS'2Y2MBGGSY)F79?X9/Z](;5OJH?\K+X!AXJRK9B
M.7NLMNNB?&"?_K&J2&8JXXE2F74DY(Z:F6#F!#'+RV?6M/5^U>YKW\UW(KB2
M$PC',&4XYP[GULR#*UFU;YL6OX7TFL<<3JH-.X`&GJO5Y_!%NG_/4D.2>'
M85+DEJH08QC-?V9/><-65?G5HU)]74I6K'W9%JL0JH_]$N80)9OHN78V<98+
M$]U/IHN8OW1E;XZ]:A\]"_VZ.`3)-'$M'6;3A.(.(]"NI2)-I.#6$+L=^A%@
MP*HZ!NHSZ*!Q"BA<^FW^%*ZZJNI=5>?'&7L9;7Q2=GQEJQ-AN>QF:%/5)"4P
MH-12&V(8BWU`[E/1/AZ+PN[]"(Q26UP+C$"<%,3,B$0#LI:8`4*APLU^U$.E
M2*%3;A*.0M-T5RO?-"C>;G^_+59LE"%6++:]!`2'Y^BXL72,QQU!R!
M-2*-3A4YL:-F)IBA+D.SK0_4DX.@CTNQ&[^6K+L(6$[D52K@-=9]Z/6%5>Z(
MWW[HGQX+$&WMF_VVXSXV:&3/IL:)L:+#+0*/JHY>\M7_]D53Q$2K#=U=-M$N
MRU)RYM7`/[,5Z#='`OFC[DM(N#/S@\,L/4:J,U,2NV1=[Z)L[6B,N,H96$
MF#O`:.!E[9OBH?3P0^^68DFF0EM![_:KWS85^R>[&*U5O`^PB5)#3E">4#:8
M*>HX$,5OR6V_WV.8PWH?#R"W$Y"&OL):"/OEL&W[TD]@VBGE##GB)S!M,V!N
M:$:]:>A@Z:@5E3F!OV&5TIAU\[(]<5W9T&RE%J$1H_N-86)T9JA9F3]0828M
M4&M=IGY\?>G2Q*583=1C"^89"1-(."I,0.O6N5&5SYK(!V$R3^-4CH&$=Q'$
M5X#>X"0%DLR"649+VND!%#+JF^:UN!HM2>RV,8[`.E@O'2H[?1/$0UFQ;54^
M^'Y1;I\#B:W]^A1:\\E#9?77&5-PZJAHLSVQO0Y&%V^*"RH91O^U%2E#BBF"
ME5%#JS!.3\5V&Q1@6Y1[SR#_-L76LYVOBVJ-35][J*&V&8\7GY)_7(;U8SH&
MCK(FW';A5_L:['A@HJL_5X\YBC1N*K8#Q)\0FGBB9ID"VE.=$3,JA[(L,1F>
M4,2L:0)/=PQ"V5X@/.T#*L;1"$O<+*XN#M23![1^K;;[L@UKEI"D2D,`X)5F
MNP5,<+3V6!XU%A#VP)22D&*BTBK.)X1RYZH,>GW?"?7)<1%6@J>T3,E)NJ+Q
MQV"FB=EQ7%X_2\HJ[!8JP&5B##!-PN3/^?W6@Q06WK/K?()Q5*J#.LAH:$\W
M`T\,MY!`0[.R[1*\+)K5ONOP8.NI_FT4-@DM)O"$'6.[I]M9F6^?FR)RPK^*
M,B]7!5CAHL*EV][M7:2F:/)A-U(,3M!W7BK31,2R#$+Y[IT1'D(MK4?JT'K'
M54;.L"Q$ON;',588'-NR>@3>QD0+J,#K(>A1UWX,2
M.DB53;4MUGG02J,K*ZOHU-A$"`?H#D*]%'31YA-W=DEF'$D/T)ZLD%*8;RM`
M:@-S9J<*1);1V^-G6A@X!3^Z+/KJRGH*;=@_"W'Y1U]["`:,:^TW^%RN`.S@
M_VIY$^#)^B!E!QM8=Z7'#(.Q5&:>@H:),B
M<&Y`OZG3>IWE[2!/+@+H$CX#4#6ACY#+6>;`@#P0G)W1^:E08)7F0
MDT7]0N`A@^#J%]]=]@?9I-PFRBEIB3\?]>WRL:[V#U'B-'ZB/.A^DCJ=9>/3
MS7=4;5!G1AG([N$1,D):RFCFB%D8H9&B`6+&Y=$<91:3;Q4K`'FIAC9DP"S&
MT"J([X$1QHN,.@2/-D:1@-T,=F*P\=LMJ@&847#A:<#Q!C3D;%U`5`=PHGX?
MRR(0\J*E:QZ7-G0#HV1Q'PW=8<.=L@L(DG7>B=-]C3F@$(MB<^!/X>&7QI?+
MP-\I^.L)B&=?D:AOG\/^&>L#-5[(*9@-G)QV>Z9+:IZGC3O^0;B2PN.C7L3%:BHQI($C8<(T#%Q6:[_M>:3^/^/5TANW#83O`?H?"%_:`K96
MXD.4@"!`'*=I#FD,V$4/20[R+FT+4:2%J+6S_[[?4%I[.5+27A:+W>&0',Y\
M#S<#VY2H)VX_I2<3$2=JNX<@`6=5+$`?)0GQ.)Y7L=1)H7+%T_9?78#@UU[L
M/(H9YN5))A[H`4-BY[4#<0%WS:@VJ?"#ZV=,3\VOB(ZB:"].YJK`V`3")<]9
M[!9@=1(*>/)G%WC!GXR"BA0G?V9<5/&!MHF"N2M9WK]P0?=5'')".+;K!'#;
MW3E$Z:(CC9[Y-?(4C-3&)"\P"7+MJH]1.75;GV_4'YX2"))9?CQR$[.7T`K
MD@QH91:^^`+S7D[+N7"0(`E@7CZ--HQG:#-"*Y3BP;4UJ6+1MAM&"%!+!#B9%^^V%>EU
M9@'/#E_YC7)+.&1'[7U0^Z,Y`6D?[VM\F?$47(@)U8U2<$E*\PFI5+"P
MMKI#MU`_=H_PEK>W5=W[T4[\P"5(HVC2"Z[>GY1>NN#W(&)I1HK_D._26LV#
M%^0[PC#[<1A*_RN+A/ZQ"I\LT@L(3;0*WQ_*5H&92IZ8AT$BE2D_);4;`&[C
MMM1@4(L`D4KX^JZ%D5A7^`'S2;_OMMTH'AKWX!I/[WI,KI]_X70M2^YMJ9XR
MITDBE3':Q*9:<_*`=DW*7*8\^J!E9VR366!!&?H]6C"QS:EHW6-TV&,B#BG;
MKCW[4<#I\=T.5D_;!2/2C&*O;VZ8:#^Q=Y8F8ZV%_&NZRF]D%9)!JE@LX[ZD1
MB*-C##X[?&67SLH"4RG'H;JO;F@BJ:*[=O9*4%IY;DV\A$^)R4.0BJ.:;L^S
MD=RV&?Z/`H/#^`D(9/!)P/2L>`:!M]O3J_
MP&_GUR]6U]?80US?1L(VS=4-\US9XW;&I*S74`8"L\:9R,\!2]
M^D39>W$),GK'7U/G`*FBS/BM(1LV.\Q.8'J2$`M`FVO.YG;4.ZJ0:E0CH^1<
MW#F3!HXD-X8O@3AED0K:WA1`.A;Y.R3>M$!EE>9+N._--(6IDH6A
M<5`UZ1G7XYLR<^PF7H(GE:.8F!,11)+41:Y9(##E'P[P98)>!E'$D35_:$!3
MB69A8>VF>T1S770!0X$U5W4`K,N#^1N;AVT*0DUL;JA44;:+N7)3.BOYL*C)
MM<:+KR9'=.7NN-:T:'1HZX)78R*QY:$R&42M*C.VB!Z)1QIH!%7P8GMQD&!.
M$)<-^YDE`!3,G5\FRZ304IG)O:"-'T%/"VI#P6!E!:1PO,3UN!"4XT`3\C>X
MI^E(T$\6BEJ7ZX/4V((S'#HH:/HX-R\M7E+G4O$PUO1*IHMA3TWO%Q[-)!J^
M,..7PZ.-%A!]1MC1UUVP6T$P5XVC2U.JLU'W'X!NL=+P@*F6>IS`R_@`MH`F
MMGG!HIHX"N0->9]9%K5G405%R9Q%"3:TD--A>5+*
ME*`Y"OMV.@<`H&RF?GXVDLPP-Y*G6X3"+$<(J)W?A`L,L%5IB]F%GSAT[?JA
M0M-&N-[=\M[2>"CJD_C\BU.MK$P@.:1FT'-?Y
M7^?019DHI4I:!)K"]'S#FNU)2K[C$P30"`9ZJ$
MT-TUP.?[ZL&)&^=:>(MULR-?>]MWWT:9?`K^Q;Y".B;SGO@
M+RUGE*<#D"M^V`,<&J(??B^,#&2WL9.7!7ZV.SKX=`5H@'`_$O7KIO(>%@EG
M!TYN:C^%/U^8HH&?<`\`0[)N=;>!A4,1`"=N`QCY_-N5<[$&?0V((7M`4O1Z
MOW5B=5G=U6U()U;GY]UW\0D'529),U-80&8)$0"HTIC-+ZO7PU"M[W&&3ZOS
M;ABZ;^++I&17']\(B-M4+.C:9:FL(*OS-,TBI1PM/$9N1?$Y*')$3'E\J_#Q
MKP`#`)Z.V?4-"F5N9'-T%LP(#`@-C$R(#%LP(#`@-C$R(#Y?,?<>3:9LNW'+XPS-JF9X/'G'_@V
MJ9B0^,GCC\XSG:3*>\7"3N_O6)W
M?[^XN[FZ.?_EYOJ.?3?YS]'UY.CZ';SJ_CO;YN$B?ATXUCFC1/3K=/OY"_%"
MB81KSG7GQ568AL_WH6)*G#")!YU!WD4V?BI%XIU'&N/3@6MG'V)9WEW>7$%Z
MG=+>-;&3,V_[E`FE[5@[]XF"]MZQV[()2";+BAE2RLH'ULP#ZW_;E-V7R[*H
MRT4^RQI4\\<\NM-;X>O*"!ESO6M&29,X!&^(M2(KIGFV8'<-E'V.FG;>>)M8
M8R7U,!1-C:J-Y#7*K+3V@LBS-$;Q(:L:=G/3!Y37;.LU]Z.,6&\2DW(NN_=5
M6)95<\+R8EI6^-B%/0]5R`MVOV)5>,#G8AJ2C]\=*HW86YH#U;:I2%S:^;6I
M=M_L?7*5]7*/R]8E/N7"=H_.9[,\PA.9S8N'LB*9$E8EVDE'7O6(GI:(I2KR
MXG%=;%H6#IRG0#MYO:1BKA/3U$BQ^O8Y)+^)R8X:QB8&);3D>)A5<%!TAECX)=3MHNDTOE^&JNN#_1"S%FE*%761.0*Q;9@;
MKM9ZS(A6H_)IQY70T:'R?\;:"!9<>4JZTLLD-=Y[8HG=[,&$DCZQ0EI%A'M0
MX!^>A/RQS^^,@D(;F7CA-345ZB:?LG*;5+9FGN$@6BF$QA(R4K.W_VZE[9H)\
MRTPP/HW`->J91,$^@J;NS`&['CS696\52-7V,I1$U,OXY-T$2O.S2LKTQC*X&,
MB*[H-H4UNL[:R#Y#T8PVK,)NYFG'(NDVK@'#MT4;U\"V`@HZ,LCKILKOVXB*
M>WC?G*(%EAOO-W:$6`/#JG%_&:UB?]F>39=53J+P&MRDL,\,!;,J7ZPB,750
MK':R6(0O<9##,3B1CX:.B4PUY$HL'6D:"S)6+:%@V4-HLHCFD=MY\2'+D23A&=L?VR*OSE$.+5
MFQ`O;!RP;F<+W*-2[ZJ\E/]>,\).YW!FL+#IC9/?H\1I/%!^&(/6/E>"7`D"
MK#U0<_PI;W#,%:S*BL?`YF4YJP_Y:/;[N"]N>*M1L%1S]YJS+S%V='=7S_$6
MEN'K/&OKT2P5'D<+ETX/GV54RB1:&_QQ((6I_O&X;J=SEH$`,DQ6HEVZ%-*I
M!;BL2PMJ*%U4J0-+@7B!A`=+S@'E5=9H7^>.\`5E0
M."OLK8I;0S));RX5I0P)#=.\`WE;Y$U]^"RR;^L,AY@U^/.UUCC,*%UC[*J!
MI[,2_)GE%?N]S19YLQI2]QZOW=N\CJ,#@'H5?:]XO:OFN.NR:7:/0^BPG^G;
M_-18EBVW?]+-'2W'76:G8EM#[`9844`X,H)'(7#-P>*LZOF>(IQ
M56'H/673MJ4!8;1:&-'D#:M7]6C;E@),X2R6XZ'PX>C%FZ)7V'VQFO3+ZTO1
M'UZ!8_0#->#KJBI;T%_=_[\WKC2QSDM!GT;:/#D8G'Q;<)'UH?JU;GVEM`,U
M=$\2*%"W*`VE6B(EU3ZI19.?5N6HXZU,C(TR0VF6M1$F<:X\81DMGY?C.`["
M[VV^I,N4\HGSW%.[FQ-D7XK?M$@IQS&UN7(O+E)"[]?YO&K@HQ1C[2`SJ[G6
MVV-FO"\*B455GA"*NU@.2!`+53[-XJ&[LZ:=K'>4;+U9C-@,8P8J;&J(LGLJ%O\(@!"Q
MS>RG!Y;`DC5>\%4<`7I#F-V^<,)>&LK/JQ;NF]Z&$,8)FA"!KO(QY0,#35ZT
M95N?/L4[:=$[N@_[6N$B=#+UY'V?LE"$ZG%U6H5I^12JU7.HZ[-72#T^>Q5N
M!=R8IB>1C0-E%?>CJ+0L0JQ4UPT!PP8GTZ8;ZM@._Z2[G-ZM%^&:W/Q/V85-K'%/]*0:*!B:V1I18&T'\I.Y"8Q_UD4T&
MMF)6+ZHR*SY*8T_8;3M!NM>?,Y#3HJW[;_\(!84#QH`Q4E&56=6_6'NEZ!'B
M^BX$];A^U7S*BNOK_LT%L-Y_NIQG11$6[,/6@^M%[V5?E67(/FTLQ'5_&&V<
M30,;H;JLLH=.-[NOHH8BHR5%/*F/L"1/B9C4B51"&2(&>(XT:@^-J=%$M$0+
ME\A\A9JR<_8IC)'"1U3FXB7D(I^DZSV%\I/'Z$F==$1NB8J"4-<0NAQ-K-1@
MFDMT!GE&;SS1B5'M6;'Z**6L&?!2@3%QQ1[`5V!%^#*\/0:`DB(.1IHIIR(YI>FZR3,<LU=([K'O!.T7=6&E(PEZ42GN!Y=<(`A@
MN09R:!HC$(H"20ZL0EN$6;]W:^N,EV
M(R:39--@41B9A\E_VA\Z@O-I:,3%IEM%*YU\?[BYO1+>^I=@?==V-%9S[;_^
ME%:_T)G5!/SQE7"^:]J.!I.HS8H80M((NM`+H6L%T))A,)^:KL/1E7AJCTW7
M#&B(9C<=+RG(2MS7QQKKBFK&VUZ;M.T5UH9/7W23?_\]$&2&%.3'_]3V=T+6>Y`N>!YRY1;4QOYJQUW!2]^S71#`8C7!7J,"T)G/Y83I$=>[)#
M(92C2D16H(*9V"X#C[0F,\XJ'@%5K^Z&@TC4JP%E`&=@]C4WL>,;$WLL>XDE^R@X/!!J>@0XQX)W61ZYMV@C$%'(CM9IAP.!Q;
M^+@8CAI$Y-A/S<+>+10&6:)38D=\.(HR`^19;D9]LL!R=([=J`NIF3D#?Z+)
M2V9GEC/4P#[B4@_MN-MC>"X(>I!`S_MZ@F#EXK10PQHT0"OCF-G8="^"V/M;49_C+.8X)>V[
M6#+:K)0."!-[P6,EOK]="0S#8[,;05*ZE]6K1+,@E,5$\:!9"9!\,G.2O^U4
M@@2.JM*DB;6:-HHI9ZK<@[ZTWVM*:]^,[<*
M#[99=7ZZ7"AF,O02;1>GQ"C('.M%L.0G1VWS$
M/M@T([H@P+.!:2`)$N18Q#>3F5(T_#9T7C++N2E2FB&!,.C6TOHS0=4E'!10
MFY4Y-XX5V@*W5L`B4ISQ,9SYF0]\"2%A3<4LN3KC0Y\;]!PKJE291GXD<^6%
M'2DT1'J2:)Z5(OI(J#WMV]T^29U4)AU69ZC+J\!78YU&U\PZ;7,\U'V@+;]/
M6Z1L_EQ/YTO,Z1+%6Q2X#DP!M$5W@7]/0W#S1],GC2HS#?31\9D3I_NG[F]N
MPD>:GDTSC$N7N?\A'1)A9
M*RWS=0D!Y?DUEB]^VA*21"P[O=S1&MM;@;X:]KBDHS64K'-::?[`OZ8!!'L8
MFB$3MY%PCQ(S=I]*\6TL@X*K0`_L&\BI4+:F!A&:TMH)"C?XP%!Q1,'MP1?T3^3S3],_$.Q+ZYU":`E0_
M.L/)9X5VMB4P,(YV;'QG7S*:%4K7#]"F\ZR1HYOMFYN/U^+-^NHXML2%Q;MW
MZ^W+8R/6M_5]VP>-NMYL#L_B2TFE1FY`_?$B!PZ`&PW`X-OZ:AQK,*COXLMZ
M_<:K.LJ*VV>RQ]PC2BC
M@Y>)U60//NT"[=67K_)__A5@`!)KB,\-"F5N9'-T%LP(#`@-C$R(#%LP(#`@
M-C$R(#'1'4W1A=&4\/"]'4S`@,SDS,#(@,"!2/CXO4')O<&5R=&EE4K837=G3%B@ZMG-Y>7D?YYQ[^:KKJV4Y[]D//US.MFO/+C^4#U53]E7;
ML,NKJ_8K^\5*9K7@PACGF-*29RJ7AEEC\9LH'/OU\E7?E_.57[!?+F?MFOWZ
MXX]7KZ_9V>7[:W;Y]CICZ5O&'LX$J_#SFSM\#F=7L[/+V2QC@LV69Q<9S[+,
M%FPV9X>/3RQC;!:8R.*_O^/;K&-"XM\L_I,BT]RIHK!L]N7LNW?O/\YN_LW^
M]?ZGU[?OWMR=L]MWUYR]>O>:W?U\=7?[^O;5Q]N;._;][']G-[.SF[>(*OWO
M\I"'J_AU%%@*1HD8U\7A\Q.)0@F>Z2S3*8K7?NZ_W/N.*7'.)`ZD"[/TLNE1
M*7AA"Z0Q'AV%=ODAEN7M]>UK6.]2.H0FGD,3F=BE3!13YUG!%9P/<=VU==67
M5><_29.SLEFPPR_LY[KO2G97U;[ITY^7,9)G9S*77&@E%?%94C/+M3.3JYN0
M[B-.569XX:0ZZC3EVNS?9N3X<4H(+EW,+;F(U=7#J@_G[*?VKFT\N_.UGQ]]
MDE8%-S;/_^!)&AU6B"*SDR>=LRL?>G:_95==6S;ICEWD:,MI-?+"<(.893K_
M24IUL^G:T&]K5$1J5F^^;KHMZ\KFP;-5VRYP0[_R[#^^^4+2[-`TF;7$9=G%
M&,[9F\TA@7:7P+R@;:MBX^7Q*'6RJ,J&?:@WX9/$H5=5Q^ZVH?=?:%XL5UEN
M#3D_5/JQ;&YN4D;J"E78Q2,*=20M>(S%\2(=;Y>L:A9MVS'T)?MM4Z)#MRP<
M"4"B>ZPTA2$>D+5WF]E0^P8]4,WC.YXSLH<8X13MJ9PKS*L@#AGN[GS+PMJ7
MGWT'__\EJ1`95UHK&LF*FN713%IB5H7U82I?%#_E<5S(B_U'FD*,7>$RD2=_
ML6=21^*O?V=/U<(S#'=8L7E+4R@,EP!/13RLB1E:)9II8@;`;#O.V"G4$L=1
MZS@0YD9SX3*IOPF$\C00ZCUUF*EOC0*YA-SP3:KG%)<8/TVLJG[%.H^:@Q7Z
MELU]!Z1LV+IK%QO\%-L:G;#NJL>R]ZP^8-8S($!F(+!Q'O\:&'=UT[VLV
MWX2>5D>9C.?&"$OLT8*LG,_;3=.#0$
M9`0T2!S*3W6$^DM-)F0)U_L\GTR2;+\EUMM=,3YP;UQ7`8E9Q_&!HE"JD'
MW_BNK)'/>=N$*O0I%\OROJOF@]1:=D/Q4P/M^T=3L%3`&?!/H88GKP8VZWA/HZA#R%>%!_]Y.M%_$R;S.1)
MI(FQ`_(>O!A#(+4:6_6K1,=E")2&E+0<>ACP,SIP3ZR42E9F;(66>(I`,T%F
MQ,FM-1FQ7X/6FGZ@AK"Y/Q(.X"*2F,V_&8Z1*EE9$DZ%,9TP)3CKB+8T-B8J
MRX=)76^Z^:H,$8\Z^A9L"5RH7`MRAK6;/D1V"BU.X^9/WP%.FWFU3K-">T9I
M-=$P6F1@A1T/S$JIVCUMWS-&@+&3!-*]8J`"!D55(090>:"?%.0$??M74='2S\
M8S6//S[4:`'XA5XXGQ9.6SV1S6I'0>-[)CTMN+(`H66Q$B);)"(LY4_(B4$AC@W+L^)=902[7*9
MM!.[ASI>L++KRFUDXIVF"PF+)ZL3*C-9G3!;:74:WX&MIZO:36!+X,.AX=."
M%Q4;=KUX^2#Q<>UPD]#635ZJG<,\";%K,N@$C\%!K$H`-QW'=NR'5D-%.5=$LA_;
MH1K_));H?V6MHV\/*:F^?UFHH9`8IP`DKMDGK&ZQ\]
MJ]"G$V4CN9;.?CL2"8RV5D#HC\VZSY",ZS9428GNTF@H_$5&R",^C@_'[2-&
M="#NPS!A+WPUM%&@2LZ`MBUJ;6B6J9217,A,T3RPGF;,*,$M>KN@#I])41TA
M%LPP@!2%W$F\8W,%P@09Y)88T[D242S;.'XCLU-S-5F`M..9U9J>G\Z)S*'?
MK:#!!\`,,`?X\BS@`(5Q$EY.+10P%HA)E`P4<#%O0[^KGN_.X][UO-0._'RQ
M__@RCUHY[E11$)\=,&Y==GT,")CGPZ;NGT'O(%(N#I]'M1$<:T[$`FW!)T(-
M^%HN'LMF/EU5!`@Q5W%Q)?9T%#4V70PC,6LV2RI8\1)0&74W!ZA'2D>2YCM5
M%F<29!I.U%7A2ELXZBG"2=+]Y3'E;W!$8I\8GR$=IX'`,`-+$=<]YA@PD7+5
MEP^>GV)A^^>)_5`.;#&@.RCY;]&[.TWO>YF7*7GJ"DP2T%^[/^#X3,0ZCHRG
MPR*4Y6!G:IC@BOK,'7@.VQ.Q+;OMLSZ8%`L;'1:0'&@Y/K6>0N\Q,]_[H0]H
MVV2.*R.R23!TK\%262C\<6S6/"]/0ARF3$Q4C.,YN,:0TPOZ2*4+[IRC=C[T
M$,^)P!HHS2;I21!`V*S70#P(+4`(QJ+JIIL)X/AD`\3^=\(,,+)75),.@"H1
MN17$G$X\%A2L)[$!1F:1\G9*Z@@69YC9'$LO.12'=MH`D"U&&GH!K3\R""M)
M7X?Z#Z*3A:E\05TGZZ[@`DDJB)M#PH&ODP@AJKB&+WJ(A*B0'1Z*SN20*,AR2PYGOP>HHH?)L
M7\=XIT5%HF73K7>'U3J!Z#0#3DN00[R6NN/$]/5,IQAA,-,:XQ8O9.]@@&T4
MYGA^:A7N3:32R1HZ3ZPP&+'G\F77E$]X#2[%!-A;6R5UO&`'EMNA`,W%-.,%
M$B2'5[>@(A_GF-'X$)%P.]`?46![:JZ;#-*CU\7#9FUUL?^Z?+EHH[0@.9<`
M4@ELY89=5@U,&2[T7&\A(FH`%?7+Q$9![CF#5HX7<_""%=(($#N
M[`[-8M!\VU39-"0U!#E/@KHE.3N\G[,5Q`Q`&_!]C;-%D29M.P(29$QB"V5I
M[(-\@[.#U[!+<33-S;I<9NB%R5NX'#01'%O!WR+(W"DX`!8&57<6;!MH(>C0
M*0]Y+3DV8*S`BH&G6V;5Q-P64+[>>!:ZW^Q>(5++/=KZ^P0L"Q"&]N:-6VDH
M`!\*SW-W%898WP@5LN?#9G,[L4)`\-Q:H0RO<[:O=OO-Q02I(]&88),CA(D%
M!H714/8@\$NUX)40I`L!<'S!$^9-B1M0:J%N,BL,K?^VGI"H=;F$58V
M%8`4X%Y-7\XX.1$T(@>T!\72++.G5Z39;*I%3V5/9;,"QE!CE$`%?AF-OC-&
M.L_25-1"W];U8GVNH1P/8U6R@D4`TI%.[W-\W]>X$P`.)=$]`@F(F/FJH*@2
M^H*ER#B_X?TXO^'E@PK.LJ7GGY@:^-Q-
MI)>$4(\[RT@8#O1!G"DE$0H+<CX9YRN&?'V9@CM73(E4R=#EWF+D^FWNX5L>=MME
M30_1#P::\A,T!'U_/JIA>GVBL-29U/L)6^J"1DR.A)U,K=.,;8X60B6'3UKJ
M.'6F[!^_+S>A!@,#!F8YJ^T$J"0'*H45Q@4(GWAMQ[5`KY4D*<'N]UD+WC`>C-<]'1F>W)A26B70E*;'U$%C(\2+BY+
MV+ZV'1\]"710`+`0KV]'^S+6^?&G1RG5I[_O'_!;/_X\8P\5JZ62HZF)\F;/
M.XCXNJMNGP[UIB-I6B_IPO,"6$,`RZ"49[?C41`9RD`01E&G,B^/=33:)(HG
MH%,PTWH@$CBNMB]8UQPN'FIQ:+L)]L.`84J]9BENE[C9:HN])]:+-)WWDQ43
M&X.Y4X5W+*R:NAWME.)AS>`IR*TL!O`>>JW#S[)99IMZM9ZSA87.11&,N'XX
M(TAAR8*'53P,#Q,T_,OG@.)$L:.3%H2B+HDQ,UEQQ?0S'7>+O)49637O3XW"V/_S')/[MZ9NC7*'(GL4[[(=I>SXTVW*!;0CU2)UQ
MN!NF\(2F\EA(B(L4S`MA\P(;#>IC,L"PGP!S)(KC>`$+@=,**F`45O$PA^G0
MX/8X;)C?R:-@E&"]>#!_%&US;2#W>,Y_*QKK[&-,$#/NS,+FSAR]'2MZJN:Q
MF,)/B![W&K1AG&,6$A4.;(T4;Y14&9/[`(*Y6E%E80J5]7ZVHF>^N4F)>:`A
MU7BRS71(C!"Y$D#?Z^]A\$]K81GGWF/J[N"[DIU9R%QJ"1JF]>003OKAL%U6
MPP2`CJIM"UK%9(E9!:;`?<"*P,)3L8U.OZF5YZH"3\'1$0:P#
M1&Y%<(9E::I':>Q-]A>8L]P.WY_7]6:Q&[Y_JS8O];:$"QG^_K5^:G=C'*\5
MZFE2M8)BT1K*IM_T'^:&H'DDV94HB)4!_S-66Y:I)=5(ZJ6_1C\0OY>O7;DZ
M_;FHFJZLMWB:^J7L\![E!'TPQ)[#7)$'$R!9HMU@6Z?/J%P!.L%X7CN]<@:D
M'@2+HOEGQ=`%V,EZ&^)(>%!<@D/J9`+@:$,AV-K)`/@<.&YM'$7]/_.F5B<]
M+AC::E4,##`_O@)[!5/`.$3!-+UUFX&!LMWS,"9ELZK:+FL/I.!`3/C'F9&.
M9P'D\K;6P#MP1Y2>,K;5>1J)C3BN0-`)XP'>T4HNM'%\@_W9\2^$]@2N=;`0
ME,+P&[?9^'Z1WKAONIIRD>SXZW5?97>?RQ7-&]@YN_OP8?<]^^((:W%+`Z6@
M\!@&:EIKB,BO=_==5R[6.,:7NP^[#EH]^SJ*EKL_'C((F2)+2$.N/K$'!*LM
MCA4<3YG04JI0%`^_$TP?KR]OU?_X7X`!`/XA$!D-"F5N9'-T%LP(#`@-C$R(#%LP(#`@-C$R(#'1'4W1A=&4\/"]'4S`@,SDS,#(@,"!2/CXO4')O<&5R=&EEYF=`RVU+,XJI):D
MXGA^_;PB)<6L9I(])):$ZNKJJE>O7BU>MWVU*5>]>/ERL7S:1['X6#Y4==E7
M32T65U?-5_%;KD5N5::<*PIAK,ZD\=J)W.7X385"_+YXW??E:AO7XK?%LMF+
MWU^]NKJY%A>+#]=B\>Y:BN&;%`\72E3X^9<[?.XNKI87B^52"B66FXL7,I-2
MYD$L5^+\\5%((9:=4)+^_HEORU8HC;^2_@R1V:PP(>1B^?GB[^\__+I\\T_Q
M]L._;F[?_W)W*6[?7V?B]?L;?IZN[VYO;UK[=O[L0_EG]O'F'J(;_
M%N<\7-'726!#,$917"_.GQ]9%$9ETDIIARANXBI^OH^M,.I2:!P8+I3#R]*C
M6F4A#T@C'9V$MOA(97EW?7L#ZV-*Q]#4L]#ZZE&D
MN[[L8R?*>BVNR[I=#>9\Y9JYBCDIGE*BN"+QPSJP^4
MTT,[/)]B#:=8+0O5*&3!T+FI!T2[;0Y=53_PT$RA,Z3=AQ^'9HHBDWGR@/:_
ML;\<7GP7'YAGZTU6Y,%Z'DO=\R!L(-/"F!\'84/(M)9)/2B*3E3X1_8O3BEB
M-?3!9:Z04@]G]FVS/JQPY%"O`3%ZPFW=QQ8?6EX]Y3)EK0W,Q7^T\T/UWU6[
M76R'K_3F!SVB
MO]\C9UK)$6+BW>=9P"/]X'V)A.[;JEY5^W(G"+]-BU[9;.*J)QC.=8G3&8A0
M>N:*=PD(L_#*Y,R,4"`V32O.;>)/T5H[C5:'(C-@%,5>8[G&RL'G:;/X99"ZA'2Z\B"",A-$>C1
M$SN6FX#XAF:>6@&2E)@V[G?EBGM6.3W/*LL.49\2F'F50+1`IW7,O$$;U=6?
MX\AK-B)^K;J^XI0%;N>4I6TF/16+Q?P@XO\.U9X7(T69X[J^;/N1
MF:D`N_@E[BBFG20MMIX9L7*4(#N"YOX.O'X
M,S;NMLD+\;8L=S+P.R*O`UX2C$DNZ<$6@MKONN&>0;.&$C8]L>=6@:R(JZ9O
MK)_."53FE$"3)_54F7$AA.1X7Q$9T,CLMV4_5&8>DECT!4:1S)G90!F/8.^T1[4NBE0'>$V5E694&:L&;ZH/Z/(&<-\3W$J@3NS*
M]B&*^C##;]XAM,LL([?"Q,V+W#`ST1SZ=4DB:*`5B-:AG!%1
MXB7X6+7BT,7-,4(3-$>)++*^VU2=9T3(=.8
MG!SF53[4[2R$'BND=UL]0/6(N-F@0X>GC;=HA;TU
M710=H$S--B^S=&&SX$DC3_T-D[TZ:<>Q73N2EB,K)FUE0;,V."P34S_)D($8
M-B1DV77<+,]D,11I8@8H)V,+_1Q\7A0\(=RL(+.@^,4@(VB#H]:?#".EYU@)
M.AA#A)3X46^G.55ZD-24BXDUC=)U@TE<-[WH(@;@8U6OFT=1@KC!5>N*9!R(
MB-=?:9_,^Y!93YO*](I+<&J7:NE<9TJI/)\):)P<"=D;X!_3*K`3"=D'#%?E
M^4O'$;^M0#3`$#'=[FE&D9LB3Q-L#4V-XKB#Q;)K:K3&`+KJH:[`EA`U-*X3
M!6>@'U0HF(M]^?_@UQCPM_-)`,E6`F"&`"D[->,K)76#58;',H-?-`,&AR?Z
MGH;-S`I29UXZ?O$9O[/BT^8XIHS]B7>;!S(SW#NIS_NXJR#E3\)'8@M)BP8X
M8N:%XSYWU)DSG4%"4)&0G9Q(1XP"G)0<2/6Y(?CHOMI5_1.-M`;4U(K[AF;I
M2;#Q74.&=/Q@_F-0NZGGN3&]C;M]1]=T<7Q0',BPFRPU`Y9?G#[RO@>M#
M/@$SQ8]U[3LI*HH,;>5S=GAF#$N7:6,2RTYTY>[$:&^6%V_>78N+Q4?Q\N7B
MW?7MC3#BU:NK&_QVM;Q8+)=*@%LV%W)(6/H"J<&62H[[WO=JCD9A`RML!0GIK-K(QG
M4`!X]X>*U.&``]YO*A\PQ]_&>1,3`JL6"O;3B\%6E]\VP*.J0F>D8+,Y5EBX
M.G5AVQP>MF)==7U;W1_ZIH4X0/1)JEPFP>"6G2\YV-"YCG:2J=E,Q&WLRVH7
MIZWXXO1Q.L5(X]'/4Z=(+9%T\U@?LSQ(UJ/_657GL-FX0/G\T2,<1D2PLN!F
M?S0M]62B\F5ATVT4)`S:P$@>9=YF[+:?X(*Z6J./`CN>`-+0%'7\EE.6SSB0
M9R"PE((0,I>'X)F'9_6AK0B@H"@WA[;&MM.)=:3A"B/*>ZP?JCI&JFF*%Z<]
M7J(4#S&"([ENT2KGPH42B!FJ:"B-"<0*]'45<=093M.NEJ#;A@
ML22H3EQPJ!J)K@ZY9V9P>A0"F[B.IV7+\DXRTF.;"-`1T^,MJ9`'+&I5G*CL
MMY]N!DB2U#Y'GA8J5VHF%:@64$$HPPWK:IAHE`(,7+J/:QSE?680&S^Y;Y`Z
M$"*$P'Z84)N6*P&=0T?FTEMV=!A#"/P8L4^RX;*BH(I.CQW?N4'YSB`Z=$@O
M15_U\04U0S_9;E+]%ZR:H3$5B!'MJ,^W_!WH$*AADS.[DP(J-WULDZS9S&F:
M]-,SY2!35]NRKN..VN',E9#AIW`+O@08F9](:^)M1$0\3E]R-TB3.CX.3=7&
M_0Y9FN,MC[V$/P?%I*U@#$+9F4W$HC*@,#>VWWE]($@>:IJ)="L)(['G8E=#
MW4NM7&!.]ET2ZF0-L;0T3<64R_S`ZU-'%/X)%M]3INA2/>QM+`9NYLD,>]O4
M;*),SXISJLIP@;8S76>"(N+"UD*>4LD10J9S6RAF2(_:_D5YM>VV;ES17^%;
M&\"6YWYY/,Z]+C9?M"OF1L-E>X)SL$T[OL-G"6,%AT!^P4
M27\R5%=U-5_/&J0IB^IGR(:CXL:1J+=B-_QOO+[_P=
MP;=0"N_/S,3'2X'H(A@\Q[&^CN2+(ZQYCFI&S/M[.Y;=8.'M!,[,/N@Y+"88
M0\$.%=T%PG-1<&317H@04FJ^[:]I]O:O$)2/PL?@J+!1"$2K2RL;-L$%^)@<
M=K'.ENQ\M9FF3T"T0/\8!D^,G`_7#E1?[VTZ?'KY-/581Y8=ZEL!ZTG-!0
MK'Q=-&0]@%K[`_SR.77AZ9MCT]%VAX]["C+[65!,?/@T3#[P*^1#=37
MIYQ+5CR=&L\\#C6][BG-<&$UP8M<]#2"#T(!#76V4W/+JZ6=.-UXA[65X,?E
M_!4DNMM8R6#);*$5X6SGJ"6M$0NOAJ[#1R';?&:LW/!&K=]8790EAEM5'1
M;TQRGOD"O$T18)Q3QJU72$N58+$HT9EA[RHN.!K^)<)\\QOT(!QX71#27?58
M#T,+##^\-%P_)1Q@1!4E@U;_J&=.).HKK*:2
M$/(8X<[R[[B3@CP#QE%PFG?5WYNNZW]'TR1&IP18OI?2;.@0F*;G8LEE7[PVN5H^3
M0-7;0T/"1+>[$7#)33H)'\?/^X?M)-FEB`\7R0Y%5Y@&CF)T'<"\P5#1,M3$
MUE.X&*'6)[K+MJE0Q5.U^]@=VAT*F-Z1;M@U[Z2^(`"4DL:"]U@$@03MUL\"
MR=LX10:[/,Q-4^67'="RJ5*&3(!2=M54A153-8^=BPLTK1P8ATI.JR]G"*GD
M)@@M.'J2.@YV`K0>8!AR\)'#','@GMB:-,'HSBT4*#U3X;8MVAFNA'W'W;:3
ME":E9K"+V][#$+Z>2&"(#:]\$R<.;3>H/;7!VGX&CV2=)U'*8%,P[:>.V]:G
M-@UT08@:L:!X&4G)2DVN=#LT]1X5H^][4^M.,'+725>*M#VS5WU>PVSUMH
M4[B.@"XE.KA>?M+U>:7ZK6X/];9-N]".QZ'=D*XQF.-PN#`5&8S48=LEXXNFH#([0"4C;R]Z
M\6"(!ZVY2?`:1CM',1F&:U?&()[FJ--87%["#(9HK670&XT@$7P1]##-.1R-
M\$4I=5KH!A0B2$6MEWU1N,T(F#;%PD@HE/M>ZK>F>L80P\?Q)]%@#)@.R4O7
M`'(/(BAD03]J_#;IJQ
M;FGX;ZH]CDOBY=2*__$B1`:DP:3[S#U?J@P2FU,!WBO_D!,'UG?*1PZ;GX4_
MML'H:Q?YN;FX&/2GCU#D'`:KVOW:?US>>3O0'>KW>F@Z>)";=B#^&3L@K2=]
M0:98LP-2Y&NJP@_3V,1;'W<4$K-O[K?(Z@\=_!6D*N+]JFS^$D-CBO?"10%RQ_<
M[3A`I)JAFF9!7X%YTK?.#XH2(5;;EV0,&A<$HS>,L?"M:.]"]'[6HR32=.
MYE@."A,D/W//89%@BA=@6%`@&S#PIH!R&`*94\X5E^>V!9+@HK1\X]1V_>75
MQ/QJBN=)`8E0E'KS!;BH05,"?"8O+H?!A0;(E%Q_`S@19%M5O$$#+\);VJ!<
MWEM>!\;A&FG-XQK\G1`0&!!3[X71O/PI1LSYH<&PIGY`#;D]@P21S^8;U3OR
MUVWSU4T9$^M.Q'>L#OAD:"..APA!`G=,9GONW9NB*Y@'+
M".]UOA!O"HLS&CCD'-5AJXI2T;[EB47I*-EAM027^`A6R!=YAO#]ZQ5DLD1`
M1HB-CB*RG4^)>1`[.!S7`:'@%!F\'EH8YB7VN8039:(JJ^O-QADM)@WJC\T`
MW::T-EV:K$_?/XW]\51]^6O;[0ZOZ8^'>GANBA`'B@@%'><[G)K#TST8G3P-
MSOE>'WZ[;[O[UPXY[LLW53_0WFVW;]_:/4)>+HJ?AK&E\$K:^./'L:D>OJ^?
MVRZU7?7P^7/_>_6SI\;>"&F#3[M;N&-$4U?]\O!I'.O="W;]^>%S/X([JU_.
MROKPS\<*:BNJ/ZS=&I$`H267[NS#ZR)HPD,/HTUX>WVK].-_`@P`2=#*>0T*
M96YD%LP(#`@
M-C$R(#%LP(#`@-C$R(#'1'4W1A=&4\/"]'4S`@,SDS,#(@,"!2/CXO4')O<&5R=&EE
MM7S&V3*FHXGYB9JE2J]%6V:F,[&S'90YP#!((B
MU@C`!4#+RJ_/&P"B@@:LY&"+E+I[>GJZWWN]OFBZ8I=F'?ONN_7FZ9"S]8_I
M0U&E75%7;'UY67]AOSK%G)%<6NL]TT9QH1-EF;,.OY/!L]_6%UV79OM\RWY=
M;^H#^^W[[R^OK]C9^L,56[^[$JS_)MC#F60%?OWF#I_;L\O-V7JS$4RRS>[L
M7'`AA`MLD['3QT?F>%>A^#8YO>S;]Y_^&ES
M\V_V]L,/U[?OW]RMV.W[*\XNWE^SNY\O[VZO;R]^NKVY8]]N_G=VLSF[>8>L
M^O_6ISIC/`D&C."=75_
M-9P^/->+EY:*^Q!"0KT2$=VJEM4[EM5UB?-9EA[2K.B>.-OL!OQB7$JOF4
M=RTK\"^CE9/6<&&U??UTF6C4-P[7U"RG9IXGVJO9^5F1ENS0U-MCAB2.U1:=
MUZ&,;YXK221<&WQ2B1F_3EOJK1H/BJ;K-B[E&2L?>#.>_$W9<58
M`BN`%C3ZU,P(VYL1JVX_G+[)25B#JAHM#4VZHV:.NZ"]H?6JRR'P+WE%VTQZ
M;C6&F3;"6(BAH-*;I09#$SEXA-X#L;OQH'ZV_DL;(XFH%0^:N,V>7.$TF23$
M[#ZK/RHXWS`B:]&5Q9UEU83JY8S=E&V-3ND31>'M%L<2>T=
MUUH;2P^INE7OM\6V2)NGV>QK
M*>S\91+'@QTF($=6RIB7%1E@6MKC085P<,(K8M-<,?K=2.
MF+$W37T\L!\*^FC`2Q&4,32%#K3Z\1M<72^FKC"+5GDE_T'J6CINA;?4MCTA
MA1OK*((F2*'0BF`XZHJ\S,=O5XR>9`4W%I!%S%-J9C&CA@:MCI&+CTW>]L-#
M^\A8,(L.M+(I[2.@NDXT?:B"8/3LCGT2+R4:)8K4PLQ[#=@D
M`8P#/;4=/--FRP"E8(=J6T1=%0DO1MP?9W.KN42+>Q(&S;XKLD&3C1"D@IJ>
MC6GG4@8\V]0W__^Q.-#'T9H+AP&FMF#3;H_V?-C7QXYBEE&">R=B\TR]J%D"
M-:`\3:3M0"GLYMC44)DO)'4JJWT16`LC;-"3OE=>$5RC6A@0^>IX7W3#Q_\<
MT[+H3J1UL\TC@^6C75W2(@CH+F7`C=/@:=5#:WR@=Y%2\_(UJ#4`4R_6SGD4K.CP
M=+0J.`#`?Y]WCWE>L1.0*U#S4R=DR=G=SSD@B=D?X4;SI'5&T67B80+;%*>
M!)G1C@;M>`P:L:.T@V)Y99)`S$Z\@SIWV(_*^C&/;=EV?=V!5TV.1GU!+:E'
MOE1J01):]"4:?GB(>C?;.8*SEEA1HUAU"UDR,2)]'(HHE/$^'
M%B^?Q@L55=$-.T.1@6*[_8S^9:!+KL;P"AW7U,DI>,"E;@3MR6\VI6"1"S:OO9$3:9`#%]G@XE$7>]&MG^VK#
M2J0A3Y4U?R7WZ^;EQ+>5B+=#R/E9S&B%V5-H\X`7:?8HN&K5U
M7+80!;)Q=
MR@5=#>5NJ!69/Q_IRH`-IU8]$71[]-3DM98:#"*)JR0H1T),.VR\CS&&BJ7`
M%1Y($^^94)(&^Z`2])1^QRFJK#QNHYA;7I`@)#E$._32S)FSMQA$//L*\)>E
MQS9?Z&E`;I@7'Q(1X.[5B"DLRQMH'L#HL2C[9(8"M*O88P=,-WBUCL#%LM.8
M2R&?SYAMLI'MM`TAD*/2!LB8-T7;%5G[E04/\,"EBRO,U))`+,+/T-ECP
M4`X\^^<>E("U+$X))3I0:V*=GGE3,RAX2`=)S*JGA5*;(!=*K4*DAG'YC/TX
M2/"VURJ/^R+;+[>F!*4H%TB$U[%/HR9H%NC(B5/$G%.ZIVP-Q6:EN8':("<6
M+1`39T4F0,;X2CL42(=NL.30FEJ%)2N\3$^,^6Z79UWQ><"QJ:9_+K"2E-!C
M?<'I`'FL<3%<6>Q.@/C4&-BF%K^ZHJE@:S;B*X3>Q?5!T[7;JK:>,I#V>9
M)-0[I2]KN+$>EYB:=9B\68]!UR^(1H"WH*?$GLB_`,Y8BSTR7R%A_"RZIU[D
M'?(&\SVKOQ]Q\]6$+091&PT1/C6KLGS&K4"(.;<:[\$44JIQQ/KII967@`IO
M`153:[KM*,$3%7M\:E9U[?.<+:,7,,%::`,2O>%LLSA,RF,_@OZ<>:J,4
M$&!J2%H+J,(3:1(:[TM!XP4%#)(@\*EA0O6%S\ZB;>I`3+1U%7]V?,R`:XJC'6
MTZ!TOQ22`XY`!%.SJLHI#`AKYJN6Q_(4^7[JW?1B&`*D:XY9S'I82FD#&!,)
M5X(/I^[Q4@A0P!_;1B]EXO8&,ZS^
MI+S:>ANWL?#[_`H][@*)(HIWH"@PEP);8`?M8K,+%&T?%(=)A/%:AB0GXW_?
M[Y"R$Q[*T^U#BXQQ>$2>RW?Q/(K#%;8+HE#PC[YQ)ZOD#_YT3I?9%QX".H0=
MFON,R5HUJA)K94WKV/E7RAZ[J)Z3+3GID.DXS1R7-7#9H1R:I9JB>TUE%NAV
M667<`5Q!JN[;5<[BF*CV!(\T<%E01]KOI9^?JJF?PS7-_ARG)HW[L4J_,/.W
M;),`B15*4YU&,_O.6CVD=K0J#7_@=$F5*:"":I16[$!))$I"-7DRIRSU:F.4
M-;6WJG%%-`'+J1)<9K>M7X$2:&&PD'*INM-4D#.&O;76\-"[4;@G5E
MAP!!$QFD.4SQ]'[LJ4)#-3T5@(:AQK!Z*UB.P,,\M"WT!0O;S1%M.O#8=-C"
M`"VXTW)QC']++X@>L$4G55SNI``7Z18NA467.PG"P8V,L"QR*DV/,!K>04)'
MY*$\#-H`_JN1_-L\S,/_.<4?E)AC#1!:Z6H/]^'+JR;KY?F(M`OY".&K2LR0AF9#V.698;N=JGY>FS6,I=9:
M2G:DL+/0H9[<4A[&9TWC0JK!VN5A:=;0XGL48J(%YR.GL*7*"7[S;NRWQPCT
M\"UCTJ!7J4%3K&9L$15Z2NJ/5Q+ZI_%&_,GS-%R=Q"[QSP<>YFH#-;#2%M&G0N8A:P^NS<-@^K:O9;^T[:W"F08,S+Z!;9]"^#+1
M^'/MV`I8$O`@.]-QS!2&.)J!LP&X4$1^ML=M>]+PXX`.)9\'[`(%3]4N_OU"
MQC*JY?-GS/(9#ZPJZ@NJ!_;[Y%V38:C"[K'?A7!QBZ_R!IZ>X5W!,0T8/BJG
M_#L$X)2(]-W+TQ`U+-<0J(!OA>97'+B*;E?#IKG:]E]"PJ7G;GL(D37RH;L^
M_B7^WAFBE5QA)=MKP:@=19%0OY
MP^V['SY_K-[=_%Q]]]W-YX\_?JID]?WW'S[AMP^W[VYN;T4%E'UXU\0!*[MDT^B;;Z8\&K)`P;!2;,@YDM%3",%"98
M6+<[5J2&"Z"&[-9>2QX.Z4S*">;U;CC,4.[A.CF,RR.A/>&BX:]9&0D+XM':
MLL`5,1&UMD7M66AA9#702[<\(]?P4)%26\U+N`C7;HLW`[#:!F/]`A'WJHUD
MZITD4"UZA^&SR.67PLUC?W>8N[MMH'4>PW[;;4HO):'R/51^?IH@FC87##0.
MV&-XT[E_[N=",K;>K\!78PA`\Y3'*Z!6OWFJYN,>/G4+E.FG:DO*>'/<;.FG
M))%WX:6`22EE*3U:#NH?R=+R287ETXHTW#?S0MS70"+-PT80SD7N
M59I$E:'AS@Y19TER]KM#B`2\E%KP/E*!54,@IA:/DZCL)'9C:0M$E]!1"N(Q
M/UK(+5Q^&ECPIA;55(<%LI-7_;:57R';T^_^7>@
M,(V7V*\\%#M8`+&MC?30HGDD+W:B>*/XMU'L^A)_Z+]$2:(E$-/NFY1D+E+2
MV?$UJPZ#-#=@Q.@S)Y73+B`;G=5@Q3RZQ'PA45\+7\LBUQPD\,LI"XV'$&J7YMTN/`>'E^169@UQ1=2UTDK,TQ/E)#C_.0'QHR\.HT>&>"]O&\B41
M.!Z577X!4"ZMX#G93!9AP&IC$PF"W
MHI&"R&5=TXKVF@0]NQPGBE9ZL3)"3A$$V@5FPAY^"L_`]C\OQJK;HP-?N2J!
MED-&8W@&7GG2.I9$:!XVDY2&E$^47IA3*0#,,E:\S/ZV5ZW4BC<+%],>>H0]
M;4'0:$,70[(@Z@.8-GI2/#@*ZO0508JXJ)<5A'!IH3^%4C9`#GG,O<@C[T!Q
M4EQ%X9)XZHJ&IUA?&-6
M3A,AFC50T9:PT"5]GH0)Y`AI^QZ^H\-]P0I\'!HLHL.BL.-\'!IL4JN58V&G
MYJS+UA923`JZ=GYJ1;8*U*UI',^_`F$2>^.\E9J%%I(9&:4W/&/@8;I6T2VR
MA^40=A'%-LS/6Y,[P=2M9&M4"$R'6[.>PF#$FUZP@.*LZ1P@C"
M4NCL_\7B%Q12V-I:9EL9PFO:EMXQ5/24VKIK);%&254BP\I,%9E.X%?R(@
MD`5@JCQ:-M#Y6BI)T)(%,[':2Z\)H"@
MA1+B#[U.BQ1>I>:9R[5294F;ML:4PMHE=\2^XDFS*2-97`'TT%6MP0WR,*YM
M&EL+J%;!PA(P1*P^H\,BMO^SZZ%*JG^##4(T,6?]?%:#6FA.#5CEEN"M''.\]@23L&@X'BG6.14/0R'\=RWHH+*MM@T9_EM]CS,Q;#B(G,/OCK7
MH^`MJ90H@9*SX"5BK0%S`*Y
M,:UY4L)8XO>/W3AB-;#\XWX87W60/96DD:4.,B`DF2>,KNZWOW58MKNIO^^[
M\4C;MLS<;=@\[8;M\-@#"HJZ-Y)O-LIN%7HH14*_Y7;TD=_^?E7],HQ?JA]!
M6>,N_M9MKZK/FW\=NN/R:[&N`'3/W]'4'I.M\B\M^5:>\M,O_ZS8/4XF](S+
M[\>Y)U5$\'Q[W(?JYN<.@BEYWIL/'X:OU:^6^`C26H/*);`+0L`IA9O^?O-^
MGKO-$^KUZ\V'809,5;\OZ'[ST\<*@-]4_S=[P'19$W78&_;(#KZI!9I,)LV3
MO*5X\_95\7]_"#``E)K7`0T*96YD7!E+U!A9V4O4&%R96YT(#DY,2`P(%(O4F]T
M871E(#`O365D:6%";WA;,"`P(#8Q,B`W.3)=+T-R;W!";WA;,"`P(#8Q,B`W
M.3)=+U)E(+,L9.G$&LQ3Y,YH&6*(D3AN20E!WOU^]I4G3,
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M^"V4Y5[36D#RGM71.O7(N'C,4S?G$?*1CO_5KN4N0O*5)V57X-#WV7%=I%
MP@KD?*Q2$3&C@Y@C4DGQS#Z_25BS?VBR=9;4SZSDHSH6`4I;JG)-FU856?$J!'(L_124__K+']F0P*X
MZ1,@,01^4E3K3612-,]-FTZZU,-=IQ31@@--BSG/
MVUVYW^ZZA$Q:7**>UCBEB7)%NU1U8I:(A1Y_2/,L?4R_QS6@E5`4%)1TD9
M4];N7@HF#JW!K9II/^31.RYL9Z9.FRH%;K8E6Z5UFZ`QR@VIFO61]E9XHAJ2
MT*2,2$MNHEA+R(RE`4[:MTZ3%\B)IT8Y'#GLV)KH9%=.1M$I1IXND6&7`
MA(`.D_F1SL73/@N[QG'9`R0)&*TLM514*B%2*+K3H90CJ?H+`@8\HG?+?;U*
MNYDLCLRDA"K@'3MC;"3,9`@F+?XLGU^2]E"'WY*GI$Z+M&FPB7XIGP`9]:(S
M_Q+Y`!Q>FVG@FD?*=30#[TQP#(@L+?)*Y.BFYJ(3H^9>P=A)*)(*82N)^1_K
M3]M4FM#\=B+9L.2P+(`-55VN]ZN4I7_MLXHVKXLC'8-.3I_J/:3`IS!!V@M#
MY=.VZ:*ITGI3UC.;EUN06)H0(B95!!CV5*Q8I1-X%,[-P*,,3<=5S^=6NZ0&
M6@
M4MT6AK7'#"N:96V/[(LY@GSO-G,B7`*.(V.&PF'.=@E:[`?.@D"DZ.\`L2.
M%$A+"X^$@?;ZL52Q#P?/OB.*58[>P,!.F8W3DNXZX+4(!]?8&I!PLNFP,3#<
MQ+LJ[UH(S5J7WR@_#@S(:!>;DQ%I[K"+!"<^M"F(C%I(<)W-/L_/VXEUU-<"
M`Q1),!"CK/)7\#S44>D9`F1B$8#!'H:N8]W=R4?2KI#VV(/VC!5>'X8+C(L(
M^D^[*5T%SFMNZ'L,JP53A)72SV&"+R#,X-Z/X0JHMQC*4-($*XFZI-$)%GX9
M8C-TV-,N6^VF"TJ'PY0FP,0!=5"D_BBH@&A-.`D0DCD<7U/Z';BM-J%O1NIT
MSG$6S8G]OWM+!=2VAE/]&7J%_Q?@8M/Q]XTLV\>0V2.56>Y
M/XW(=MYDR+R9)$8[%VG;;_6;KX=R!0E+/9%*#L&!;TU&O=8\[$LP4:NQ!K
ME%WPTX;<\3T3'Z@!%VY:'&TY*B]X/]LWWU;Y?AT080)0.B"Y1=^.-88.!BRM
MLV95%B#+>X!-"5Z%#GUI:C-P6&_HBM"'+]9V
M8I:(!7"83";D]:OL$51M;Q9+!](C3T"9^3-.$GEOOR@<6)J0=.8TM
MAQV+QL$Q\Y"R38:=NV;KGC[1D1!:$0((#(MP4BQ^:[*7D"AYCO1V4<3AUC
M-%%+Z%QH,#5'A+IN_(=0;H%7%O#N2(L9KB-O%75MZ+&7X/1`"HA*L<]O\+98^)-O2]E-$GIG;.%5@\O/;R,VE"&;O5[F>*JR/HH[GCJV7*?;
MI%X'!$#269-MBVR#HPD,J-^\#*?C8-]K,=,?2#8F1??@?0#%,,!/.W`R5L)X
MW:__;5K@/W-4(=A$?6EUTB0`T_\/JOUI.OBB`MKJ9%^.U5ETV0/69ZUSX?K
MMF-!7`S.&(H:2L11;,(>'-MCZ*M5FA_8)+W>%*X14%6AB-;DV`%'Y#%8QUCL
M2^#<+5;T!OV[S]L0;=(T:=-T48QOF?/A(TVBL@%+33_RTTSA8#!>@.2.!8OP
M"OC!T!`=1UZE=8OCHSW.7<4)\CI=24K*`$?V!ROI!(<-M\L0NYS:QZG!<0WV
MZ?R4-FE2XP1*<,I>HWWRLOH:#J-C[YJ_$XOT)K2X^<'.LB97!\R28_;
M.')>8ZK'RB'?23AEIU,'G"`SAXT:`P&)B:S-#M=7A=W\/\JK;;=Q&XA^0?]!
M?=@WKV)1XD6/29"VBUZ2(D%:8+,/M,V-A6@E5Z*2YN][AI(<:^08W1=#!H8<
ML=)/RSPFWT(U0X?;YBUIX\\8:.?
MII"308],-WU'GAN(0X$7F`9S=6[R8U%HG0<02AO!2;1U66P"=U3.1ZTM"<,J
M)C$^CI^\P#(E/##)7F/T^B#<'!]@`)2;9!H(L#R!0OI['*B`2P)*:'UZ6K?S?I=$E\D@OK:R),W$2RR1/$EKJF[
M%O-.*B^4%%.X)NJ:PXO,Z',R(B*/)=IJ=MSAB?P6DA8$3&U=!,TW-I5#+'%[0(M7_>4T@+WP%%UA^&1`\OB8*,RR5?
MQJ$%DZH@#!4+\ZXI;$F*@O"@?@XREFX:`/0`8/:L)',NE8F^%39,V=ZH&21:
MAPO@)>+H4SC]4=C)8)ID#JAB.^QXF*(P`"2[ZXRS,J,@N'5J>#&A^LS)0K:CJ,!!DX16T_S
M+*)[5W&Y0=@E#<'Y)-8V?<*?.]ML"EM%-R$KQN>\:*+;U];/K&@JXC3+9EEQ
M+3Z&J19'QAP<8/#$O>MYMM7557^$"]?ZX3"$CI4MAK/];GF/20/+:%#ZZ69'
M%#'\7<9SUBQ,IQ1&D#@)\]L^_1VO`-4=$RT,7[`GG8%S4F5F3Z9C6-V<+VWJ
MG"OV,1N8&DC#F>(0@+)JAE>;8F,\]:Y(0B@.7
M>ZD!;3UVYJE-?"
M\3"X+&TT3[NB&J7)6([FU5>7*Z.;AAP$G%M'USE71+V]W_QN*R*VW[('&[H2MR&=G
M!'IG.*()1[PJQRZX+^R/_=?MSMDGUUPV]FLX9
M4!?35,<A@>ELXR*L^*>SP5,.$L9MF(,Z;WSQ%0J&
MK,+=Z\Y%9S?VD4:L@#`YN[BH_XT^:[IDO$RDT1B.'"V(F<]`R5_.SKVWZRVL
MW^>SB]K[^EOT93`:9]>7$7!E+U!A9V4O4&%R96YT(#DY,2`P(%(O4F]T871E(#`O
M365D:6%";WA;,"`P(#8Q,B`W.3)=+T-R;W!";WA;,"`P(#8Q,B`W.3)=+U)E
M9.=!22^:"0PHD9
M2S'\)L7V0HD2?_[I&[YW%U?+B\5R*842R\W%&YE)*?,HEBMQ^OHHI!#+3BA)
MGW_@MV4KE,:GI(\A,IL%$V,NEK]?_/73YZ_+#_\4__C\\\WMIY^^78K;3]>9
M>/_I1GS[U]6WVYO;]U]O/WP3?UO^Y^+#\N+#1T0U_%B<\G!%OTX"&X(QBN)Z
M<_K^R*(P*I-62CM$<9-6Z?>[U`JC+H7&@>%".;QL?E2K+.81::2CD]`67Z@L
M'Z]O;V!]2.D\9U$_AS;F;.I?QDQ[*=7@_VOQ2#<\6T2;19SSS$Y\+/K4ED75
MO121FD:D#LDZ_T@?7>:"E/K51^KS+NEA_@`+E'ON/*@LA_,X.%_>)W'=_#Y]
MI5)Y%JS&XZ;&.V:F#.6T,/\>LC,Z"
M=YZ[/V:ZJ-/T$/BE)DFSBB;.>#.LR,KGCMC
M7*:\,8'GKJE3W7=BWZ'ORUJ4^/Y0M&6S[_@K;`YL*9O;U_-C`T(:6&9J5N^I
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M$%53/0&7NZE2/#;-^O+4/5.,OSE^Y9FU=,V@1M2V]XE%&U$NI(X;EBL`
M%`$4)34O%62'D/IRA?9XB9C-_\7UVA/7F]<%S;[,]<938ZHL&)/6-BA>8D,V95K<=*@DW.+OLYN-!+M"=!P[TY]ZH!*`8I1F34:;'8]=S*%KYIKD7$Z2E[OAS+\92QDB6@!^:G7/K")9
M.<^LT+`/"'S7HJ5)N2_/CX08KC,L+X3PR7$V$FHMR4P;9D8C8>IZ='B)<7`V
MOA,,@HI*L6-[9H9*P8RGH^K+W9$6;4+:(7]'<3M0TX^+BD*"`B1X>NP!/2/R,4DD$LG?Q%J>Z(LC95^EX>J&J83-NF
M)T8KMIA6L*&W&C730TIN:VA_E*]U$ND%M%C
MK9QXF+52)*M@IU;4211JV>][:'MQ9GLS$'>?:_^J>V,56:E\[OZQ7,]F7BLQ
M,$45(S/G5C[SQAKVL@/STJR`(G#/04,"`HU)/YX!I+"]M5B2MJ=ZH&_F15">
M1`[;U5"%U)7;&GDA`4GK_2I-VY$`1$UY5EWP1*R@1$(3GUQ=)'8T&6DHF)CU
MZ1@EAPI8$XXE]_L\WCV/PK/&L49GT:E94(>F`]9H0>&)RU;H!;S'*/35NMWZQH?WRA5AHS/?8/S;U1L0X*0;X*,N.
M`5PHE+Z-%<\PV(<
MAH"&YP+,>"M`/@SS4IPTVQPD6QK/YTT+P83P*![!R,HHW/MN')-P?W]?#BG?
MM@5/6P3I@C"8EQ>8!6L0UAH'UIJ:[[A9&,P\?Q>:'VD`OSQ`K,?-@:^&V&KG
M4Z+-+;A6J;%U#V@L5R^@2'F,0ECL'#LWM'RSZ1^+-AV`/>=.+&X>[6#864Z>
M0!N9\2N&.>0@'ABX%&]4F_FQ9I-3WW?0"`C=&?V7.C!N>!$%Z/R&"%(C,>
M494&*`\@2!A.'U+5[/@@@+E'2JUXHBEA.#B?(*.)\QG28BR.0>G#/D"0.V9[
M7#*?4'->*K1C"('P-SG=022J2C0KE)=0DHJV>CI!Q9_"X/*L!W\$IJD_DDN7
MG2^YR3$&&>GY"WB"@0R88<"=FE')[U)%I&JN\:FKHPW[89N>3DG6PPO;LJ,/S%>__@5V&46P6"Y1.+'<7,@!*],`K(8(
M@0H,BV,(_L/RXL/':W&Q^"+>OEU\O+Z]$4Z\>W=U@[]=+V`.2I_M_R9%@UTC*NIW;5%A)/MS&IJ4A<\.2<+V6IRI3DH?UW^N1
MGNS["G<`7.+I+KP`"),\N7$/-34L9D:\2Z.2*QG]JQJODH>]P5*3&!3DV)5B*BH=A%*6,+M(_N)9X
M;6JVD`V;QK7/1NOK0]>/5W,=*HNT`3C)2O(4+!E&LNOQ:45&:U_W
MM?,:HZ]W^$URB1AX-_58T)Z[L/AZ4#%`U7+V!=OS"Z0OD6"Q3H*4/4R,S16H
MOWB54FV8+9NS>=U1R@L-$N,XP9HT,IN;\D_7?R?ZN*T.;L2KOW!<^7+Q<6O(
M,6K<0+UZ`Y&]J`J>J3&+#8(T($&AH-6LX(Q4-.%%F&\&\DL
M=:-^PQR;-FC&0%P#^+MU)JV"1DM`N9_9@<
M$)4TT#`"KFCQGY:1V,PCD29?SO]<5D[8R`T!H3)#70H/B+*1X`(#=\ERM&^7
M?T&^<6`(/\G\`GE&ZR'UZH*1N[9JKD#4/03)U%1]V=UP^26D+OB"`;L!KP4[!K7>
M@DJW5?)$$$Z@WO`GST%SQDI:MN!;0`.D7^7Q?3OU-)94WF(RY1I8"DE0EB_R
MNX6`Y)I#P%'FTJ`_07#7COLAF8:)1%_B?2EA$HYKZL>Z6252X:DJT*#6GKIP
MF?Q^]OSZ"EK22%T:5A&A!WVS&=VC&_VSWW=P%%34G@^W5GEJM-!Y
MF*2.UU3I>#1$:0FX\IG$'+<+.1(::(\P#$/^&&VOA*(K-;H;QM8\#(H.(E:P
M,#PXM:BMGR#KVF'LL40D:?@F:XV!*0O#/N>NPHC4>[LPBKP=P<]MW8^QNU-Y
M!)7\%#S$LBG`8K>M9QQ>=CZYGP8(T8&D]+*HYR?0\QE8'A,_`;H,(-;SN_WV
M]\TM=.@#;Z^"H2B*TK)PVI1]]5B?3CP0*MS7==PY#"A\!LQEF*#C9)O[,'X.
M%GB(U@#_Y)(./J7P(\?*G.&,JFRK<2)OMJ_:EQP6=)7(02EA#FZQP`,4)E@8
MH34`;4T;0L*OH*,HR(N`(Y:-/3TB2?;SVVZ`B`]>KF!^;B[]S;C&94I!="I@
M/LM>\3";2IL!`,*PA*VKO)B#^3V`+])^+SCQ`Y;:56NV.<]#RM22%;-
M3XE(/Y-IKFUF65S2X/#3NNPXO)0IKIWQW([#B_(E"%XI=N_'!,+&Y29@0Y/4
ME[3-#B/UF,O5+O2=_\[B#"ML0%,138.I4()P86(7R:X&78,N3W/+C>`H./@O-QY[]JJW1!\WW8M.GN*^0E+
M0?V5-"BRF`7_9P\%/NU'.(J*D@U7R=T8=3;+TTQ;\'"8`)X3WW["BR=W=_.:
MH\J^)D]T1'1=+T5X=$=3=&%T93P\+T=3,"`S.3,P,B`P
M(%(^/B]0UVW8N**%-V_2_''G(?W@;D/IVE"5
MD$ZGU4_XDG'()"-,*6-`2$ZHT%Q!IC+\CUD#7]/SMG7%UM_`ES2O=O#U[=OI
M?`9)>CF#]&)&H;]1N$T8!/S[W1J_FV2:)VF>4V"0;Y(S2BBEF86\@,/G'BA`
MW@"CW?D+;WD-C.-)NZ-G)HD1UF:0WR>O5I\\7?\-?E^_ER]6X]@>5J1N!\
M-8?UI^EZ.5^>?UPNUO`Z_Y8L\F1Q@:SZG_2@P[2[CHCU9`3K>)T=OO<1"\$(
ME93*GL7<%_[^VM<@V`0X/N@=TCZRXZ><$9M9E+%[.J*6?NC2A]2\9YJ<-']LTC&CU
M.V$O61,GXQWJ8J@0IIDX$E/K[)F8^=;#K+KO7#RA/$6*YT!-Y%,"Y[F(U@
MKGR\XIPWL/-UJ&Y"`:Z\@>*AKGW90NUW5=TG^R`H,E4VJAAN-#&H06R\;<#5
M'MP/%^[<]9T';,)55;?^^^!S/Z1@,E9MO7/E03AY4KBAAW8[@:J&`V']-.%TU%@X
MH6S7L5I2(@SM&@^-;L:^,T4LE@*/4`]C%'8_HHR*4'49FFY_M!6TV+5KCQT5
MVN";OKT6/U']\O9$-W,K2::Z43"V%\$$%1B"D7$((89E1&AJ6`1KFFX=7KW"
M+A3KQ0P/>?6:C+OP?VY2H0AEF"+T94%18J1$N4<;=%JU;77_PA(=%_3IE8*]
MD?5-\GS"OK`X4)D.KS&_0ZG8H^7XCP`#`(H8YD@-"F5N9'-T'1=+T5X=$=3
M=&%T93P\+T=3,"`S.3,P,B`P(%(^/B]02>3*DG%<7_]S2YE
M61R1(H,+DEBV9V=FYYEYYMGQ<5&E]_&\(C_^.)Z]K!(ROHX?TBRNTCPCXY.3
M_!OYPW!B)(N84M82(7E$A>:*&&7@9\Q9\N?XN*KB^6.R('^,9_F*_/G33R>G
M$W(TOIJ0\<6$DO`=)0]'C*3PXY^G\+D\.ID=C64D(L>7IV3ZY61Z?GI^?'-^-B7O9_\Y.IL=G5U`5N&_\;8.)_[;1F(A
M&<%\7A^VGY]1%H)%5%(J0Q:GR3QYNDL*(MB(<#@0`M)PL_VCG$7.."BC/]I(
M;7SM8;F8G)^"]::D>S5C5&]+IO>]4Q=Q32D+WL]G9Q>$1X12EB0F=T6:W)-%4LZ+=!6:-[\GU6,23T$<;8@#TF6%/&2S!_C`IH$D-UX7Q5I-D]7\*N`,#CBSNWGKTWD+&4Z>(X7
M3][XS<+QB`LID%F*C%0D#5@@JRPMJP(2_9J$1)%G9F`X+)=[*2`S"YE3:2QV
MOKY'AI"%X18G`2590R$>"#*'P)$U&M\LGJ?+M$J3,J2<0QTWQ5/6H=$27&_`
M:7@H\$6A?)'3%@;@X$6%=!&SCN-Z`*(I8%@D\-^JR%=)$=++T7VDA@YQS.)T
M0BM,E;*76\YYN=/!XUHJ^PI)&P@?U]0=[:)"X2DC]GR6)$DF_S9!7H"/4&H-[G)I(<$_1S0AW+S`?)"Y]?]*ZB"HO8IK^CE%+.Q/H5R`SS"A41I(JZ7K,X!+4#.PA9!9@LV,WY:"'P1_NH+A?<7?M/?L7H^"@O1UMGQ'TG[>
M")%=[SNFGC&`ZR*A"4AT"<1V=(^BV^Z),7YB]OO:H1Q.WW35;AJ[YB$/Y39Y
M=:7BNE,YI+"E5S_,:^1F7M._UIZ;/B9)M9O7KGG("_8VB(-F7CM2MUU<E`$UV#3;><)T5A0C,*^YQRS=&!7)Z:"NV'67=X_Z$%ZD/'+&
MV