XML 34 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Equity Method Investments
12 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2017
Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]  
Equity Method Investments
Equity Method Investments

As of
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
Investment Balance
 
Ownership Percentage
 
Investment Balance
 
Ownership Percentage
Inotera
 
$

 
%
 
$
1,314

 
33
%
Tera Probe
 

 
%
 
36

 
40
%
Other
 
16

 
Various

 
14

 
Various

 
 
$
16

 
 

 
$
1,364

 
 



Equity in net income (loss) of equity method investees, net of tax, included the following:
For the year ended
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Inotera
 
$
9

 
$
32

 
$
445

Tera Probe
 
(3
)
 
(11
)
 
1

Other
 
2

 
4

 
1

 
 
$
8

 
$
25

 
$
447


The summarized financial information in the tables below reflects aggregate amounts for our equity method investees. Financial information is presented for equity method investments as of the respective dates and for the periods through which we recorded our proportionate share of each investee's results of operations. Summarized results of operations are presented only for the periods subsequent to the acquisition, or through the disposition of, our ownership interests.
As of
 
2017
 
2016
Current assets
 
$
107

 
$
1,222

Noncurrent assets
 
256

 
4,294

Current liabilities
 
19

 
604

Noncurrent liabilities
 
66

 
411

For the year ended
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net sales
 
$
557

 
$
1,671

 
$
2,647

Gross margin
 
82

 
155

 
1,253

Operating income
 
126

 
199

 
1,191

Net income
 
76

 
184

 
1,361


Inotera

We held a 33% interest in Inotera, a Taiwan DRAM memory company, through December 6, 2016, at which time we acquired the remaining 67% interest in Inotera. Historically, we accounted for our interest in Inotera on a two-month lag under the equity method. As a result of the Inotera Acquisition, we account for Inotera without a lag, consistent with our other wholly-owned subsidiaries.

From January 2013 through December 2015, we purchased all of Inotera's DRAM output under supply agreements at prices reflecting discounts from market prices for our comparable components. After December 2015 and until our acquisition of the remaining interest in Inotera, the price for DRAM products purchased by us was based on a formula that equally shared margin between Inotera and us. Under these agreements, we purchased $504 million, $1.43 billion and $2.37 billion of DRAM products in 2017 through the date of our acquisition, 2016, and 2015 respectively. In 2016, we manufactured and sold specialized equipment to Inotera and recognized net sales of $55 million and margin of $16 million.

Tera Probe

In 2017, we sold our 40% interest in Tera Probe, which provided semiconductor wafer testing and probe services to us, in a transaction that included the sale of our assembly and test facility located in Akita, Japan. (See "Restructure and Asset Impairments" note.) In 2017, 2016, and 2015, we recorded impairment charges of $16 million, $25 million, and $10 million, respectively, within equity in net income (loss) of equity method investees to write down the carrying value of our investment in Tera Probe to its fair value based on its trading price (Level 1). We incurred manufacturing costs for services performed by Tera Probe of $47 million, $70 million, and $90 million in 2017 through the date of sale, 2016, and 2015, respectively.