XML 19 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  
Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the accompanying financial statements.

Revision of Previously Reported Consolidated Income Statements

Revision of Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Information

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company identified adjustments necessary to correct prior periods for the overstatement of the value of work-in-process inventory at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The Company assessed the materiality of the errors on previously reported periods and concluded the impact was not material to any prior annual consolidated financial statements. Management, however, deemed the impact of this error on the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 to be material and will restate the first quarter 2012 and 2011 financial results. These errors had no impact on operating cash flows for any of the periods. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the only interim periods impacted by this error were the first and fourth quarters. Accordingly, the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 have been revised. The impact of the error on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is shown in the table below (in 000's). The impact of the errors are included in the results of the Patient Care segment in Note O.

 
  2011   2010  
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
  As Previously
Reported
  As
Revised
  As Previously
Reported
  As
Revised
 

Inventory

  $ 114,086   $ 112,305   $ 98,290   $ 97,381  

Accrued expenses (taxes)

    18,247     17,547     20,796     20,426  

Material costs

  $ 267,677   $ 270,210   $ 247,565   $ 248,667  

Personnel Costs

  $ 322,765   $ 321,529   $ 284,095   $ 282,417  

Other Operating expenses

  $ 178,335   $ 177,910   $ 163,673   $ 165,158  

Income from operations

  $ 116,827   $ 115,955   $ 81,379   $ 80,470  

Income before taxes

  $ 85,006   $ 84,134   $ 35,444   $ 34,535  

Provision for income taxes

  $ 29,987   $ 29,657   $ 14,009   $ 13,639  

Net income

  $ 55,019   $ 54,477   $ 21,435   $ 20,896  

Basic Per Common Share Net Income

  $ 1.64   $ 1.62   $ 0.66   $ 0.65  

Diluted Per Common Share Net Income

  $ 1.61   $ 1.59   $ 0.65   $ 0.64  
Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. At various times throughout the year, the Company maintains cash balances in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits.

Restricted Cash

Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash has statutory or contractual restrictions that prevent it from being used in the Company's operations. The Company agreed to restrict $3.1 million of cash to eliminate letters of credit obligations used as collateral under the revolving credit facility.

Credit Risk

Credit Risk

        The Company primarily provides O&P devices and services and products throughout the United States of America and is reimbursed by the patients' third-party insurers, governmentally funded health insurance programs, and in the case of its Distribution segment from independent O&P providers. The Company also provides advanced rehabilitation technology and clinical programs to skilled nursing facilities in the United States primarily through operating leases. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers. Accounts receivable are not collateralized. The ability of the Company's debtors to meet their obligations is dependent upon their financial stability which could be affected by future legislation and regulatory actions. Additionally, the Company maintains reserves for potential losses from these receivables that historically have been within management's expectations.

Inventories

Inventories

        Inventories in the Patient Care segment consisting principally of raw materials and work-in-process, which amounted to $99.2 million and $82.8 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are valued based on the gross profit method which approximates lower of cost or market using the first-in first-out method. The Company applies the gross profit method on a patient care clinic basis in this segment's inventory to determine ending inventory at the end of each interim period except on October 31st, which is the date of our physical inventory. The annual physical inventory for this segment values the inventory at lower of cost or market using the first-in first-out method and includes work-in-process consisting of materials, labor and overhead which is valued based on established standards for the stage of completion of each custom order. Adjustments to reconcile the physical inventory to our books are treated as changes in accounting estimates and are recorded in the fourth quarter. The Company recorded fourth quarter adjustments of a decrease of $0.5 million, an increase of $2.3 million and a decrease of $1.0 million to inventory as of October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The October 31st inventory is subsequently adjusted during interim periods to apply the gross profit method described above.

        Inventories in the Distribution and Therapeutic Solutions segments consist principally of finished goods which are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method for all reporting periods and are valued based on perpetual records.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

        The Company follows the authoritative guidance for financial assets and liabilities, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. The authoritative guidance requires disclosure about how fair value is determined for assets and liabilities and establishes a hierarchy by which these assets and liabilities must be categorized, based on significant levels of inputs as follows:

Level 1   unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company

Level 2

 

inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those inputs classified as Level 1

Level 3

 

inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation

        The determination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments

        Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, are $11.0 million and $0, respectively, and are comprised of cash equivalent money market investments. The money market investments are based on Level 1 observable market prices and are equivalent to one dollar.

        The carrying value of the Company's short-term financial instruments, such as receivables and payables, approximate their fair values based on the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company's Term Loan as of December 31 2012 and 2011, $293.3 million and $297.0, respectively, approximates fair value for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities based on rates currently available to the Company and are considered Level 2 measurements. The fair value of the Senior Notes is based on a Level 1 quoted market price, and was $211.5 million and $203.0 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, compared to the carrying value of $200.0 million and $200.0 million as of those dates. Seller Notes recorded as a part of 2012 acquisitions, $21.9 million, were recorded at contractual carrying values, which are not based on observable rates and therefore represent Level 3 measurements. The Company believes the carrying value of the Seller Notes approximate fair value for similar debt in all material respects.

        Contingent consideration recorded as a part of 2012 acquisitions was $2.7 million. Contingent consideration is recorded at fair value as of the date of the acquisition using Level 3 measurements.

Investments

Investments

        Prior to December 2010, the Company's investments consisted of two auction rate securities ("ARS") totaling $7.5 million of par value; $5.0 million was collateralized by Indiana Secondary Market Municipal Bond—1998 ("Indiana ARS"), and $2.5 million was collateralized by Primus Financial Products Subordinated Deferrable Interest Notes ("Primus ARS"). ARS are securities that are structured with short-term interest rate reset dates which generally occur every 28 days and are linked to LIBOR. At the reset date, investors can attempt to sell via auction or continue to hold the securities at par. These securities were accounted for in accordance with authoritative guidance for investments in debt and equity securities and were reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.

        In May 2010, the Company sold its investment in the Primus ARS for $1.5 million. On July 1, 2010, the Company exercised its right to put the Indiana ARS back to UBS at par value of $5.0 million, resulting in a realized loss of $0.2 million. The $5.0 million proceeds were received on July 1, 2010. As part of the settlement, the Company closed out a $3.6 million line of credit with UBS that the Company obtained as part of the buyback agreement originally executed in November 2008, with net cash proceeds of approximately $1.4 million.

Interest Rate Swaps

Interest Rate Swaps

        Prior to December 2010, the Company utilized interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to interest rate risk associated with our variable rate borrowings. On December 1, 2010, the Company was required to terminate the interest rate swaps due to refinancing of the credit facilities. The Company incurred a loss of $1.6 million, which is recorded in loss/(gain) from interest rate swap on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

        Revenues in the Company's patient care clinics are derived from the sale of O&P devices and the maintenance and repair of existing devices and are recorded net of known contractual adjustments and discounts. The sale of O&P devices includes the design, fabrication, assembly, fitting and delivery of a wide range of braces, limbs and other devices. Revenues from the sale of these devices are recorded when (i) acceptance by and delivery to the patient has occurred; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and there are no further obligations to the patient; (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues from maintenance and repairs are recognized when the service is provided. Revenues on the sale of O&P devices to customers by the Distribution segment are recorded upon the shipment of products, in accordance with the terms of the invoice, net of merchandise returns. Discounted sales are recorded at net realizable value. Revenues in the Therapeutic Solutions segment are primarily derived from leasing rehabilitation technology combined with clinical therapy programs and education and training. The revenue is recorded on a monthly basis according to terms of the contracts with our customers.

        Certain accounts receivable may be uncollectible, even if properly pre-authorized and billed. Regardless of the balance, accounts receivable amounts are periodically evaluated to assess collectability. In addition to the actual bad debt expense recognized during collection activities, the Company estimates the amount of potential bad debt expense that may occur in the future. This estimate is based upon historical experience as well as a review of the receivable balances.

        On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates cash collections, accounts receivable balances and write-off activity to assess the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Additionally, a company-wide evaluation of collectability of receivable balances older than 180 days is performed at least semi-annually, the results of which are used in the next allowance analysis. In these detailed reviews, the account's net realizable value is estimated after considering the customer's payment history, past efforts to collect on the balance and the outstanding balance, and a specific reserve is recorded if needed. From time to time, the Company may outsource the collection of such accounts to outsourced agencies after internal collection efforts are exhausted. In the cases when valid accounts receivable cannot be collected, the uncollectible account is written off to bad debt expense.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, Plant and Equipment

        Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, with the exception of assets acquired through acquisitions, which are initially recorded at fair value. Equipment acquired under capital leases is recorded at the lower of fair market value or the present value of the future minimum lease payments. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold, retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the respective accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Depreciation is computed for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Asset class
  Estimated life
(in years)

Furniture and fixtures

  5

Machinery and equipment

  5

Computers and software

  5

Buildings

  10 - 40

Assets under capital leases

  Shorter of 10 or lease term

Leasehold improvements

  Shorter of 10 or lease term

Equipment leased to third parties under operating leases

  Up to 10

        The following table outlines the investment in equipment leased to third parties under operating leases:

(In thousands)
   
 

Program equipment

  $ 34,827  

Less: Accumulated depreciation

    (10,315 )
       

Net book value at December 31, 2012

  $ 24,512  
       

        Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment was approximately $29.2 million, $26.2 million, and $17.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Repairs and Maintenance

Repairs and Maintenance

        Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company incurred $1.5 million, $1.6 million, and $1.5 million, respectively, in repair and maintenance costs.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

        The authoritative guidance for Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets requires that purchased goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles not be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually or wherever facts or circumstances indicate potential impairment (the Company has selected October 1st as its annual test date). The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step impairment test for goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. If the Company determines that a two-step impairment test is necessary or more efficient than a qualitative approach, it measures the fair value of the Company's reporting units using any one of, or a combination of, income, market and cost approaches. The Company evaluated its intangible assets, other than goodwill and the ACP trade name, and determined that all such assets have determinable lives.

        Non-compete agreements are recorded based on agreements entered into by the Company and are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated term ranging from five to seven years. Other definite-lived intangible assets are recorded at cost and are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful lives of up to 20 years. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of intangible assets and takes into account events or circumstances that may warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that indicate that impairment had occurred. Refer to Note D for further discussion.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt Issuance Costs

        Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the Company's long-term debt are amortized, on a straight-line basis, which is not materially different from the effective interest method, through the maturity of the related debt instrument. Amortization of these costs is included in Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

        The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset group is not recoverable and is considered impaired if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The Company measures impairment as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value. Fair market value is determined primarily using the projected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost to dispose. There were no long-lived asset impairments or indicators of impairment for the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

        Expense and liability balances associated with the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan are calculated based on certain assumptions including benefits earned, discount rates, interest costs, mortality rates and other factors. Refer to Note K for further discussion.

Marketing

Marketing

        Marketing costs, including advertising, are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $4.2 million, $3.9 million, and $4.3 million in marketing costs during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

        The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company recognizes a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized in future years. Significant accounting judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes and related accruals, deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company believes that its tax positions are consistent with applicable tax law, but certain positions may be challenged by taxing authorities. In the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. In addition, the Company is subject to periodic audits and examinations by the Internal Revenue Service and other state and local taxing authorities. Although the Company believes that its estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

        The Company issues restricted stock units of common stock under one active stock-based compensation plan. At December 31, 2012, 1.5 million shares of common stock were available for issuance under the Company's stock-based compensation plan. Shares of common stock issued under the stock-based compensation plan are issued from the Company's authorized and unissued shares. Restricted stock units are granted at the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the grant date. Restricted stock units vest over a period of time determined by the compensation plan, ranging from one to four years.

        The Company applies the fair value recognition provisions of the authoritative guidance for stock compensation, which require companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payments at fair value.

        Stock compensation expense relates to restricted stock units, as all stock options are fully vested and all associated compensation expense has been recognized in prior years. The total value of the restricted stock units is expensed ratably over the requisite service period of the employees receiving the awards.

Segment Information

Segment Information

        The Company applies a "management" approach to disclosure of segment information. The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the basis of the Company's reportable segments. The description of the Company's reportable segments and the disclosure of segment information are presented in Note O.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

        In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs," which amends ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurement." The amended guidance changes the wording used to describe many requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. Additionally, the amendments clarify the FASB's intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. The guidance provided in ASU No. 2011-04 was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied prospectively. The Company adopted the amendments of this ASU effective January 1, 2012, and the initial adoption of the amendments in this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)," which changes the presentation of comprehensive income. The amended guidance gives companies the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance provided in ASU No. 2011-05 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied prospectively. The Company adopted the amendments of this ASU effective January 1, 2012, and the initial adoption of the amendments in this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In July 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-07 "Presentation and Disclosures of Patient Service Revenue, Provision for Bad Debts and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for Certain Health Care Entities." The objective of this update is to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about a health care entity's net patient service revenue and the related allowance for doubtful accounts. This update provides information to assist financial statement users in assessing an entity's sources of net patient service revenue and related changes in its allowance for doubtful accounts. The amendments require health care entities that recognize significant amounts of patient service revenue at the time the services are rendered even though they do not assess the patient's ability to pay to present the provision for bad debts related to patient service revenue as a deduction from patient service revenue (net of contractual allowances and discounts) on their statement of operations. The amendments in this update require certain health care entities to change the presentation of their statement of operations by reclassifying the provision for bad debts associated with patient service revenue from an operating expense to a deduction from patient service revenue (net of contractual allowances and discounts). Additionally, those health care entities are required to provide enhanced disclosure about their policies for recognizing revenue and assessing bad debts. The amendments also require disclosures of patient service revenue (net of contractual allowances and discounts) as well as qualitative and quantitative information about changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts. The guidance provided in ASU No. 2011-07 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied prospectively. The provisions are effective for the Company's year ended December 31, 2012. The Company has determined that ASU No. 2011-07 has no impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In September 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-08, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment," which provides entities the option to perform a qualitative assessment in order to determine whether additional quantitative impairment testing is necessary. This amendment was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This amendment does not impact the quantitative testing methodology. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2012 and the initial adoption of the amendment in this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.