UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)

[X]

  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

[ ]

  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number 0-13810

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

California	95-3290316
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	(Identification No.)

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

(864) 239-1000

(Issuer's telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X   No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __ No   X_   

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

MARCH 31, 2007

Assets
Investments in and advances to Local Limited
Partnerships (Note 3)		$    --
Cash and cash equivalents		1,980
Total assets		$ 1,980
Liabilities and Partners’ Deficit
Liabilities:
Notes payable, in default (Notes 1 and 4)		$ 6,840
Accrued interest payable, in default (Notes 1 and 4)		14,188
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		30
		21,058
Contingencies (Note 6)
Partners' deficit:
General partners	$   (515)
Limited partners	(18,563)	(19,078)
Total liabilities and partners' deficit		$ 1,980

See Accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per interest data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007	2006
Revenues:
Interest income	$    25	$    24
Operating expenses:
Interest (Note 4)	158	158
Management fees - partners (Note 5)	59	59
General and administrative	6	6
Legal and accounting	18	17
Total operating expenses	241	240
Loss from Partnership operations	(216)	(216)
Distributions in excess of investment in Local
Limited Partnerships (Note 3)	7	--
Net loss	$  (209)	$  (216)
Net loss allocated to general partners (1%)	$    (2)	$    (2)
Net loss allocated to limited partners (99%)	(207)	(214)
	$  (209)	$  (216)
Net loss per limited partnership interest (Note 2)	$(13.43)	$(13.85)

See Accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT

 (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except interest data)

	General	Limited
	Partners	Partners	Total
Partnership interests (Note 2)		15,411
Partners' deficit,
December 31, 2006	$ (513)	$(18,356)	$(18,869)
Net loss for the three months
ended March 31, 2007	(2)	(207)	(209)
Partners' deficit,
March 31, 2007	$ (515)	$(18,563)	$(19,078)

See Accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 (Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007	2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$   (209)	$   (216)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Changes in accounts:
Accrued interest payable	158	158
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(14)	(46)
Accrued fees due to affiliates	--	(13)
Net cash used in operating activities	(65)	(117)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(65)	(117)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	2,045	2,291
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$  1,980	$  2,174

See Accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming Real Estate Associates Limited VII (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") will continue as a going concern. The Partnership continues to generate recurring operating losses. In addition, the Partnership is in default on notes payable and related accrued interest payable that matured between December 1999 and December 2004.

Ten of the Partnership's twenty-three investments involved purchases of partnership interests from partners who subsequently withdrew from the operating partnership. The Partnership is obligated for non-recourse notes payable of approximately $6,840,000 to the sellers of the partnership interests, bearing interest at 9.5 to 10 percent. Total outstanding accrued interest at March 31, 2007 is approximately $14,188,000. These obligations and the related interest are collaterized by the Partnership's investment in the local limited partnerships (the “Local Limited Partnerships”) and are payable only out of cash distributions from the Local Limited Partnerships, as defined in the notes. Unpaid interest was due at maturity of the notes.  All notes payable have matured and remain unpaid at March 31, 2007.

The Partnership has not made any payments during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and is in default under the terms of the notes. As discussed in “Note 4 – Notes Payable”, the Partnership entered into an agreement with the non-recourse note holder for certain of the Local Limited Partnerships with notes payable totaling approximately $3,099,000 and accrued interest of approximately $6,473,000, in which the note holder agreed to forebear taking any action under these notes pending the purchase by the note holder of a series of projects including the properties owned by fourteen of the Local Limited Partnerships. Management is attempting to negotiate extensions of the maturity dates on the three notes payable that are not subject to the forebearance agreement. If the negotiations are unsuccessful, the Partnership could lose its investment in the Local Limited Partnerships to foreclosure. In addition, the Partnership may seek opera ting advances from the general partner of the Partnership. However, the general partner of the Partnership is not obligated to fund such advances.

As a result of the above, there is substantial doubt about the Partnership's ability to continue as a going concern. The unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

NOTE 2 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

The information contained in the following notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements is condensed from that which would appear in the annual consolidated financial statements; accordingly, the consolidated financial statements included herein should be reviewed in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 prepared by the Partnership.  Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year end.  The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire year.

In the opinion of the Partnership’s management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Partnership at March 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of operations and changes in cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The general partners collectively share a one percent interest in profits and losses of the Partnership.  The limited partners share the remaining 99 percent interest which is allocated in proportion to their respective individual investments. The general partners of the Partnership are National Partnership Investments Corp. ("NAPICO" or the "Corporate General Partner") and National Partnership Investments Associates II ("NAPIA II").  The Corporate General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company (“AIMCO”), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Principles of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Real Estate Associates Limited VII and Real Estate Associates IV (“REA IV”), a California general partnership in which the Partnership holds 99 percent of the general partner interest.  Losses in excess of the minority investment that would otherwise be attributed to the minority interest are being allocated to the Partnership.

Method of Accounting for Investments in Limited Partnerships

The investments in limited partnerships are accounted for using the equity method.  

Net Loss Per Limited Partnership Interest

Net loss per limited partnership interest was computed by dividing the limited partners’ share of net loss by the number of limited partnership interests outstanding at the beginning of the year. The number of limited partnership interests used was 15,411 and 15,449 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

FASB Interpretation No. 46

As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (or “FIN 46”) and applied its requirements to all Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership held a variable interest.  FIN 46 addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities.  Generally, a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equit y investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.  FIN 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated in the financial statements of the entity that is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

At March 31, 2007, the Partnership holds variable interests in twenty-three VIEs for which the Partnership is not the primary beneficiary. Those twenty-three VIEs consist of Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership acquired an interest prior to the adoption of FIN 46 that are directly engaged in the ownership and management of twenty-three apartment properties with a total of 1,667 units. The Partnership is involved, either directly or indirectly through its consolidated subsidiary, with those VIEs as a non-controlling limited partner equity holder. The Partnership’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the unconsolidated VIEs is limited to the Partnership’s recorded investments in and receivables from these VIEs, which was zero at March 31, 2007. The Partnership may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that the Partnership voluntarily provides in the future.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entity’s own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership< B> does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership has not yet determined whether it will elect the fair value option for any of its financ ial instruments.

NOTE 3 - INVESTMENTS IN LOCAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

As of March 31, 2007, the Partnership holds limited partnership interests in twelve Local Limited Partnerships. In addition, the Partnership holds a general partner interest in REA IV, which in turn, holds limited partner interests in eleven additional Local Limited Partnerships.  NAPICO is also a general partner in REA IV.  In total, the Partnership holds interests, either directly or indirectly through REA IV, in twenty-three Local Limited Partnerships which own residential low income rental projects consisting of 1,667 apartment units.  The mortgage loans of these projects are payable to or insured by various governmental agencies.

The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Limited Partnerships or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions, of the Local Limited Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Local Limited Partnerships using the equity method. The Partnership is allocated profits and losses of the Local Limited Partnerships based upon its respective ownership percentage (between 98% and 99.99%). The Partnership is also entitled to 99% of the profits and losses of REA IV.  REA IV is entitled to a 99% interest in each of the Local Limited Partnerships in which it has invested.  Distributions of surplus cash from operations from most of the Local Limited Partnerships are restricted by the Local Limited Partnerships’ Regulatory Agreements with the United States Departmen t of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). These restrictions limit the distribution to a portion, generally less than 10%, of the initial invested capital. The excess surplus cash is deposited into a residual receipts reserve, of which the ultimate realization by the Partnership is uncertain as HUD frequently retains it upon sale or dissolution of the Local Limited Partnership. The Partnership is allocated profits and losses and receives distributions from

refinancings and sales in accordance with the Local Limited Partnerships’ partnership agreements. These agreements usually limit the Partnership’s distributions to an amount substantially less than its ownership percentage in the Local Limited Partnership.  

The individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnership’s share of the Local Limited Partnership’s profits less the Partnership’s share of the Local Limited Partnership’s losses, distributions and impairment charges. The Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Limited Partnerships and is not otherwise committed to provide additional support to them. Therefore, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Limited Partnerships reaches zero.  Distributions from the Local Limited Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  

For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnership’s policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Limited Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Limited Partnerships.  Therefore, the Partnership limits its recognition of equity earnings to the amount it expects to ultimately realize.

The Partnership has no carrying value in investments in Local Limited Partnerships as of March 31, 2007.

The following are unaudited condensed combined estimated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 for the Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership has investments (amounts  exclude Warren Heights Apartments, the assets and liabilities of which are classified as held for sale at March 31, 2007) (in thousands):

Three Months Ended

	March 31,
	2007	2006
Revenues		(Restated)
Rental and other	$ 2,412	$ 2,382
Expenses
Depreciation	357	351
Interest	238	245
Operating	1,940	1,895
	2,535	2,491
Loss from continuing operations	$  (123)	$  (109)

In September 2005 (amended in February 2007), Warren Heights Apartments entered into a contract with a third party to sell its property for approximately $1,170,000. The Partnership is obligated under a non-recourse note payable in the principal amount of approximately $520,000 and related accrued interest of approximately $1,093,000 at March 31, 2007. The Partnership expects to receive approximately $127,000 from this transaction and complete satisfaction of the non-recourse note payable and related accrued interest. The closing is expected to occur on or before the May 31, 2007 termination date. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the Local Limited Partnership has classified its assets and liabilities as held for sale. The Partnership has no remaining investment balance in this Local Limited Partnership.

In 2005, the Partnership entered into an agreement with the non-recourse note holder for certain of the Local Limited Partnerships with notes payable totaling approximately $3,099,000 and accrued interest of approximately $6,473,000, in which the note holder agreed to forebear taking any action under these notes pending the purchase by the note holder of a series of projects including the properties owned by fourteen of the Local Limited Partnerships. The Partnership has no remaining investment balance in these Local Limited Partnerships.

The Local Operating General Partner of Jasper County Properties, Newton Apartments, Pachuta Apartments, and Shubuta Properties is actively marketing the properties for sale. No offers have been accepted to date. The Partnership has no investment balance in these Local Limited Partnerships at March 31, 2007.

The current policy of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) is to not renew the Housing Assistance Payment (“HAP”) Contracts on a long term basis on the existing terms.  In connection with renewals of the HAP Contracts under current law and policy, the amount of rental assistance payments under renewed HAP Contracts will be based on market rentals instead of above market rentals, which may be the case under existing HAP Contracts. The payments under the renewed HAP Contracts may not be in an amount that would provide sufficient cash flow to permit owners of properties subject to HAP Contracts to meet the debt service requirements of existing loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration of HUD (“FHA”) unless such mortgage loans are restructured.  In order to address the reduction in payments under HAP Contracts as a result of this new policy, the Multi-family Assisted Hou sing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 (“MAHRAA”) provides for the restructuring of mortgage loans insured by the FHA with respect to properties subject to the Section 8 program. Under MAHRAA, an FHA-insured mortgage loan can be restructured into a first mortgage loan which will be amortized on a current basis and a low interest second mortgage loan payable to FHA which will only be payable on maturity of the first mortgage loan. This restructuring results in a reduction in annual debt service payable by the owner of the FHA-insured mortgage loan and is expected to result in an insurance payment from FHA to the holder of the FHA-insured loan due to the reduction in the principal amount. MAHRAA also phases out project-based subsidies on selected properties serving families not located in rental markets with limited supply, converting such subsidies to a tenant-based subsidy.

When the HAP Contracts are subject to renewal, there can be no assurance that the Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership has an investment will be permitted to restructure its mortgage indebtedness under MAHRAA.  In addition, the economic impact on the Partnership of the combination of the reduced payments under the HAP Contracts and the restructuring of the existing FHA-insured mortgage loans under MAHRAA is uncertain.

NOTE 4 - NOTES PAYABLE

Certain of the Partnership's investments involved purchases of partnership interests from partners who subsequently withdrew from the operating partnership. As of March 31, 2007, the Partnership is obligated on non-recourse notes payable of approximately $6,840,000 bearing interest at 9.5 to 10 percent, to the sellers of the partnership interests.  The Partnership has recognized interest expense of approximately $158,000 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Accrued interest is approximately $14,188,000 as of March 31, 2007. The notes matured between December 1999 and December 2004. These obligations and related interest are collateralized by the Partnership's investments in the Local Limited Partnerships and are payable only out of cash distributions from the investee partnerships, as defined in the notes.  Unpaid interest was due at maturity of the notes.  All notes payable have matured and remain unpaid at Ma rch 31, 2007.

In September 2005 (amended in February 2007), Warren Heights Apartments entered into a contract with a third party to sell its property for approximately $1,170,000. The Partnership is obligated under a non-recourse note payable in the principal amount of approximately $520,000 and related accrued interest of approximately $1,093,000 at March 31, 2007. The Partnership expects to receive approximately $127,000 from this transaction and complete satisfaction of the non-recourse note payable and related accrued interest. The closing is expected to occur on or before the May 31, 2007 termination date. The Partnership has no remaining investment balance in this Local Limited Partnership.

In 2005, the Partnership entered into an agreement with the non-recourse note holder for certain of the Local Limited Partnerships with notes payable totaling approximately $3,099,000 and accrued interest of approximately $6,473,000, in which the note holder agreed to forebear taking any action under these notes pending the purchase by the note holder of a series of projects including the properties owned by fourteen of the Local Limited Partnerships. The Partnership has no remaining investment balance in these Local Limited Partnerships.

There were no principal or interest payments made on these notes during the three months ended March 31, 2007 or 2006. Management is attempting to negotiate extensions of the maturity dates on the three notes payable not subject to the forebearance agreement. If the negotiations are unsuccessful, the Partnership could lose its investments in the Local Limited Partnerships to foreclosure.

NOTE 5 – TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATED PARTIES

Under the terms of the Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership, the Partnership is obligated to NAPICO for an annual management fee equal to 0.5 percent of the original remaining invested assets of the remaining partnerships and is calculated at the beginning of each year. Invested assets are defined as the costs of acquiring project interests, including the proportionate amount of the mortgage loans related to the Partnership's interest in the capital accounts of the respective partnerships. The fee was approximately $59,000 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

An affiliate of the Corporate General Partner is the general partner in eighteen of the Partnership’s twenty-three Local Limited Partnerships.

NOTE 6 - CONTINGENCIES

The Corporate General Partner is involved in various lawsuits arising from transactions in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management and the Corporate General Partner, the claims will not result in any material liability to the Partnership.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Registrant operates; financing risks, including the risk that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and defending cla ims and any adverse outcomes, and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Corporate General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance.  For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these changes, the Partnership expects that it will incur higher expenses related to compliance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Partnership's primary sources of funds include interest income earned from investing available cash and distributions from Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership has invested.  It is not expected that any of the Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership has invested will generate cash flow sufficient to provide for distributions to limited partners in any material amount. An infrequent source of funds is from the sale of a Local Limited Partnership property or the sale of the Partnership’s interest in a Local Limited Partnership. The Corporate General Partner has determined that its cash and cash equivalents are to be reserved to fund Partnership reserves and operating expenses.

Cash and cash equivalents are on deposit with a financial institution earning interest at market rates. Cash equivalents can be converted to cash to meet obligations of the Partnership as they arise. The Partnership intends to continue investing available funds in this manner.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Partnership will continue as a going concern. The Partnership continues to generate recurring operating losses. In addition, the Partnership is in default on notes payable and related accrued interest payable that matured between December 1999 and December 2004.

Ten of the Partnership's twenty-three investments involved purchases of partnership interests from partners who subsequently withdrew from the operating partnership. The Partnership is obligated for non-recourse notes payable of approximately $6,840,000 to the sellers of the partnership interests, bearing interest at 9.5 to 10 percent. Total outstanding accrued interest at March 31, 2007 is approximately $14,188,000. These obligations and the related interest are collaterized by the Partnership's investment in the Local Limited Partnerships and are payable only out of cash distributions from the Local Limited Partnerships, as defined in the notes. Unpaid interest was due at maturity of the notes. The Partnership has not repaid the notes payable and is in default under the terms of the notes. As discussed below, the Partnership entered into an agreement with the non-recourse note holder for certain of the Local Limited Partnerships with notes payabl e totaling approximately $3,099,000 and accrued interest of approximately $6,473,000, in which the note holder agreed to forebear taking any action under these notes pending the purchase by the note holder of a series of projects including the properties owned by fourteen of the Local Limited Partnerships.

Management is attempting to negotiate extensions of the maturity dates on the three notes payable not subject to the forebearance agreement. If the negotiations are unsuccessful, the Partnership could lose its investment in the Local Limited Partnerships to foreclosure.

As a result of the above, there is substantial doubt about the Partnership's ability to continue as a going concern. The unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

In September 2005 (amended in February 2007), Warren Heights Apartments entered into a contract with a third party to sell its property for approximately $1,170,000. The Partnership is obligated under a non-recourse note payable in the principal amount of approximately $520,000 and related accrued interest of approximately $1,093,000 at March 31, 2007. The Partnership expects to receive approximately $127,000 from this transaction and complete satisfaction of the non-recourse note payable and related accrued interest. The closing is expected to occur on or before the May 31, 2007 termination date. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Local Limited Partnership has classified its assets and liabilities as held for sale. The Partnership has no remaining investment balance in this Local Limited Partnership.

In 2005, the Partnership entered into an agreement with the non-recourse note holder for certain of the Local Limited Partnerships with notes payable totaling approximately $3,099,000 and accrued interest of approximately $6,473,000, in which the note holder agreed to forebear taking any action under these notes pending the purchase by the note holder of a series of projects including the properties owned by fourteen of the Local Limited Partnerships. The Partnership has no remaining investment balance in these Local Limited Partnerships.

The Local Operating General Partner of Jasper County Properties, Newton Apartments, Pachuta Apartments, and Shubuta Properties is actively marketing the properties for sale. No offers have been accepted to date. The Partnership has no investment balance in these Local Limited Partnerships at March 31, 2007.

Results of Operations

At March 31, 2007, the Partnership had investments in twelve Local Limited Partnerships, and a general partner interest in REA IV which, in turn, holds limited partner interests in eleven additional Local Limited Partnerships, all of which own housing projects, most of which were substantially rented.  The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Limited Partnership or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions of the Local Limited Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investment in the Local Limited Partnerships using the equity method.  Thus the individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnership’s share of the Local Limited Partnership’s profits less the Partnership’s share of the Local Limited Partnership’s losses, distributions and im pairment charges.  However, since the Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Limited Partnerships, or is not otherwise committed to provide additional support to them, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Limited Partnerships reaches zero.  Distributions from the Local Limited Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero.  Subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnership’s policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Limited Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received, and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Limited Partnerships.

There was no recognition of equity in losses from the Local Limited Partnerships for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, as the Partnership's investment in all Local Limited Partnerships had been reduced to zero prior to January 1, 2006.

During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Partnership received approximately $7,000 in distributions from Local Limited Partnerships that was recognized as income in the statements of operations since the Partnership’s investment in the Local Limited Partnerships had been reduced to zero. There were no distributions received from Local Limited Partnerships during the three months ended March 31, 2006.

The Partnership’s revenues consist primarily of interest income earned on temporary investment of funds not required for investment in Local Limited Partnerships. Interest income was approximately $25,000 and $24,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

A recurring partnership expense is the annual management fee.  The fee is payable to the Corporate General Partner of the Partnership and is calculated at 0.5 percent of the Partnership's original remaining invested assets and is calculated at the beginning of each year. The management fee is paid to the Corporate General Partner for its continuing management of Partnership affairs. The fee is payable beginning with the month following the Partnership's initial investment in a Local Limited Partnership.  Management fees were approximately $59,000 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

Operating expenses, other than interest expense and management fees, consist of legal and accounting fees for services rendered to the Partnership and general and administrative expenses. Legal and accounting fees were approximately $18,000 and $17,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. General and administrative expenses were approximately $6,000 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.  

The Partnership, as a limited partner in the Local Limited Partnerships in which it has invested, is subject to the risks incident to the management and ownership of improved real estate.  The Partnership investments are also subject to adverse general economic conditions and, accordingly, the status of the national economy, including substantial unemployment, concurrent inflation and changing legislation, could increase vacancy levels, rental payment defaults and operating expenses, which in turn, could substantially increase the risk of operating losses for the projects.

The current policy of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) is to not renew the Housing Assistance Payment (“HAP”) Contracts on a long term basis on the existing terms.  In connection with renewals of the HAP Contracts under current law and policy, the amount of rental assistance payments under renewed HAP Contracts will be based on market rentals instead of above market rentals, which may be the case under existing HAP Contracts. The payments under the renewed HAP Contracts may not be in an amount that would provide sufficient cash flow to permit owners of properties subject to HAP Contracts to meet the debt service requirements of existing loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration of HUD (“FHA”) unless such mortgage loans are restructured.  In order to address the reduction in payments under HAP Contracts as a result of this new policy, the Multi-family Assisted Hou sing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 (“MAHRAA”) provides for the restructuring of mortgage loans insured by the FHA with respect to properties subject to the Section 8 program. Under MAHRAA, an FHA-insured mortgage loan can be restructured into a first mortgage loan which will be amortized on a current basis and a low interest second mortgage loan payable to FHA which will only be payable on maturity of the first mortgage loan. This restructuring results in a reduction in annual debt service payable by the owner of the FHA-insured mortgage loan and is expected to result in an insurance payment from FHA to the holder of the FHA-insured loan due to the reduction in the principal amount. MAHRAA also phases out project-based subsidies on selected properties serving families not located in rental markets with limited supply, converting such subsidies to a tenant-based subsidy.

When the HAP Contracts are subject to renewal, there can be no assurance that the Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership has an investment will be permitted to restructure its mortgage indebtedness under MAHRAA.  In addition, the economic impact on the Partnership of the combination of the reduced payments under the HAP Contracts and the restructuring of the existing FHA-insured mortgage loans under MAHRAA is uncertain.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Partnership owns limited partnership interests in unconsolidated Local Limited Partnerships, in which the Partnership’s ownership percentage ranges from 98% to 99.99%.  However, based on the provisions of the relevant partnership agreements, the Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have control or a contractual relationship with the Local Limited Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (see “Note 2 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the financial statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements”).  There are no lines of credit, side agreements or any other derivative financial instruments between the Local Limited Partnerships and the Partnership.  Accordingly the Partnership’s maximum risk of loss related to these unconsolidated Local Limited Partnerships is limited to the rec orded investments in and receivables from the Local Limited Partnerships.  See “Note 3 – Investments In Local Limited Partnerships” of the financial statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements” for additional information about the Partnership’s investments in unconsolidated Local Limited Partnerships.

Other

AIMCO and its affiliates owned 1,167.58 limited partnership interests in the Partnership representing 7.58% of the outstanding interests at March 31, 2007.  It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional limited partnership interests in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the limited partnership interests are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockhol der. As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

FASB Interpretation No. 46

As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (or “FIN 46”) and applied its requirements to all Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership held a variable interest.  FIN 46 addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities.  Generally, a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equit y investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.  FIN 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated in the financial statements of the entity that is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

At March 31, 2007, the Partnership holds variable interests in twenty-three VIEs for which the Partnership is not the primary beneficiary. Those twenty-three VIEs consist of Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership acquired an interest prior to the adoption of FIN 46 that are directly engaged in the ownership and management of twenty-three apartment properties with a total of 1,667 units. The Partnership is involved, either directly or indirectly through its consolidated subsidiary, with those VIEs as a non-controlling limited partner equity holder. The Partnership’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the unconsolidated VIEs is limited to the Partnership’s recorded investments in and receivables from these VIEs, which was zero at March 31, 2007. The Partnership may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that the Partnership voluntarily provides in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the Partnership’s accounting policies in many areas. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Method of Accounting for Investments in Limited Partnerships

The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Limited Partnerships or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions, of the Local Limited Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Local Limited Partnerships using the equity method. The Partnership is allocated profits and losses of the Local Limited Partnerships based upon its respective ownership percentage (between 98% and 99.99%). The Partnership is also entitled to 99% of the profits and losses of REA IV.  REA IV is entitled to a 99% interest in each of the Local Limited Partnerships in which it has invested.  Distributions of surplus cash from operations from most of the Local Limited Partnerships are restricted by the Local Limited Partnerships’ Regulatory Agreements with the United States Departmen t of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). These restrictions limit the distribution to a portion, generally less than 10%, of the initial invested capital. The excess surplus cash is deposited into a residual receipts reserve, of which the ultimate realization by the Partnership is uncertain as HUD frequently retains it upon sale or dissolution of the Local Limited Partnership. The Partnership is allocated profits and losses and receives distributions from refinancings and sales in accordance with the Local Limited Partnerships’ partnership agreements. These agreements usually limit the Partnership’s distributions to an amount substantially less than its ownership percentage in the Local Limited Partnership.  

The individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnership’s share of the Local Limited Partnership’s profits less the Partnership’s share of the Local Limited Partnership’s losses, distributions and impairment charges. The Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Limited Partnerships and is not otherwise committed to provide additional support to them. Therefore, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Limited Partnerships reaches zero.  Distributions from the Local Limited Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  

For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnership’s policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Limited Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Limited Partnerships.  Therefore, the Partnership limits its recognition of equity earnings to the amount it expects to ultimately realize.

ITEM 3.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure con trols and procedures are effective.

(b)

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII
	By: National Partnership Investments Corp.
	Corporate General Partner
Date: May 9, 2007	By:   /s/David R. Robertson
	David R. Robertson
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 9, 2007	By:   /s/Kathleen Danilchick
	Kathleen Danilchick
	Senior Vice President and Chief       Financial Officer

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

Description of Exhibit

3

Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership dated May

24, 1983 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission Form S-11

No. 2-84816, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

10.2

Agreement of Sale and Purchase, by and between Warren Heights Apartments, Ltd., an Ohio limited partnership, and Renewal Housing Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, incorporated by reference to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 26, 2005.

31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David R. Robertson, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Real Estate Associates Limited VII;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 9, 2007

/s/David R. Robertson

David R. Robertson

President and Chief Executive Officer of National Partnership Investments Corp., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen Danilchick, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Real Estate Associates Limited VII;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 9, 2007

/s/Kathleen Danilchick

Kathleen Danilchick

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of National Partnership Investments Corp., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Real Estate Associates Limited VII (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David R. Robertson, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Kathleen Danilchick, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

      /s/David R. Robertson

Name: David R. Robertson

Date: May 9, 2007

      /s/Kathleen Danilchick

Name: Kathleen Danilchick

Date: May 9, 2007

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.