0001019687-13-001495.txt : 20130528 0001019687-13-001495.hdr.sgml : 20130527 20130425144056 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001019687-13-001495 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: CORRESP PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 FILED AS OF DATE: 20130425 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000722572 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH APPARATUS [3661] IRS NUMBER: 953733534 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NV FISCAL YEAR END: 0630 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: CORRESP BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6205 LUSK BLVD. CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121 BUSINESS PHONE: 858-623-0000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6205 LUSK BLVD. CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: FRANKLIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19920703 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: ABM COMPUTER SYSTEMS DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19870317 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: AUTOMATED BUSINESS MACHINES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19830802 CORRESP 1 filename1.htm

Haddan & Zepfel LLP

Corporate and Securities Lawyers

500 Newport Center Drive, Suite 580

Newport Beach, CA 92660

(949) 706-6000

(949) 706-6060 (facsimile)

www.haddanzepfel.com

e-mail:rjz@haddanzepfel.com

 

April 25, 2013

 

 

Division of Corporation Finance

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Attn: Paul Fischer, Staff Attorney

 

Re:Franklin Wireless Corp.
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Filed October 15, 2012
Form 10-Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended December 31, 2012
Filed February 14, 2013
No. 001-14891

 

Dear Sirs,

 

This is in response to your letter of April 19, 2013 concerning the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 and the Form 10-Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended December 31, 2012 of Franklin Wireless Corp. (the “Company”). Your letter included comments about two items which are shown below, followed by our responses.

 

Form 10-K for the Year Ended June 30, 2012

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 24

Incentive Compensation, page 24

 

1.We note from your description of your bonus plan that your executive officers may earn cash bonuses based on the achievement of performance targets. We also note that the bonus amounts are not determined by any formula and are purely discretionary. Please advise whether the decision to award cash bonuses is purely discretionary or is triggered by the achievement of performance targets, such as revenue and operating income.

 

In general, the Company’s executive officers are eligible to earn bonuses based upon the achievement of certain performance targets - primarily revenue and operating income, which are established from time to time by the Board of Directors. The amount of the bonuses, however, is in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors and is not based upon any specific formula.

 

Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2012

 

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments, page 21

Contingency, page 21

 

2.We note your disclosure regarding C-Motech’s obligation to sell 1,566,672 shares back to the Company. In your latest beneficial ownership table contained in your latest Form 10-K, however, you indicated that these shares are the subject of a legal dispute between C-Motech and “third parties.” See footnote (4) to the table. Please advise.

 

C-Motech is the registered owner of certificates representing 1,566,672 shares, which were issued by the Company in C-Motech’s name. The Company has been advised that there are two individuals who claim to have purchased the shares from C-Motech through its former CEO; however, the authority of the former CEO to agree to the sale of the shares is being disputed by C-Motech. It is the Company’s understanding that this matter is currently being adjudicated in U.S. and Korean courts.

 

The Company has advised us that it intends to comply with your comments in future filings by incorporating the responses in this letter to the extent appropriate.

 

 
 

Securities & Exchange Commission

Page 2

April 25, 2013

 

 

 

On behalf of the Company, we understand that the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in our filings with the SEC, and that staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing. Further, we understand that the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

 

We appreciate the staff's comments and request that the staff contact the undersigned with any questions regarding this letter.

 

  Very truly yours,
   
  /s/ Robert J. Zepfel